Version 2005-Oct-06 Codebook ---------------------------- VARIABLE DESCRIPTION FILE 2000 PRE-POST STUDY (2000.T) ============================== VERSION Process.1. ANES VERSION NUMBER OF DATA Numeric Process1. VERSION NUMBER --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the 2-digit number corresponding to version of the data file. (The initial release of the raw data file is data version 01.) See the introductory section of this codebook for note on "version" and "dataset". ============================== DSETID Process.2. ANES DATASET NUMBER Character Process2. ANES DATASET NUMBER --------------------------------------------------------------------- Dataset number 2000.T. See the introductory section of this codebook for note on "version" and "dataset" numbers. ============================== ICPSRNO Process.2a. ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER 3131 Numeric Process2a. ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER 3131 --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the study number within the ICPSR archive. ============================== V000001 Process.4. Case ID Numeric Process.4. ANES 2000 CASE ID --------------------------------------------------------------------- ANES 2000 Case ID corresponds to the Pre-election ID. There are gaps in the numbering (0001-1812) ============================== V000001a Process.4a. Post ID Numeric Process.4a. POST ID --------------------------------------------------------------------- There are gaps in the numbering. 0001-1557 Pos Interviews 2001-2254 Post non-interviews ============================== V000002 Process.5. Sample weight Numeric DEC 4 Process.5. Sample weight --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a 6-digit variable with a coded decimal point and 4 actual decimal places. A poststratification adjustment using the 2000 CPS March Supplement estimates as the standard was done for the combined RDD and area samples. The cells were formed by crossing 6 age groups by 4 levels of education. The age groups were: 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70+. The education levels were: < high school graduation, high school graduate, some college, and 4 years of college or more. ============================== V000002a Process.5a. Post weight MD: EQ 0 Numeric Process.5a. Sample weight for Post variables --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a 6-digit variable with a coded decimal point and 4 actual decimal places. 0. No Post IW ============================== V000003 Process.6. Pre only or Pre-and-Post Numeric Process.6. Pre only or Pre-and-Post --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. Pre-Election and Post-Election interviews 1. Pre-Election Interview only 0 1 ----- ----- Count 1555 252 ============================== V000004 Pre.Admin.1. Mode of Pre IW Numeric Pre-Admin.1. PRE: Mode of Pre IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Personal (FTF) 5. Telephone 1 5 ----- ----- Count 1006 801 ============================== V000005a Pre.Admin.2a. Form - E section Numeric Pre-Admin.2a. PRE: Form - E section administered in Pre --------------------------------------------------------------------- Section E questions about R's personal financial situation were randomly selected to be administered either in Pre section E or Post section H. 0. Section E not administered in Pre [Post section H V001410-V001417] 1. Section E administered in Pre [V000398-V000406] 0 1 ----- ----- Count 880 927 ============================== V000005b Pre.Admin.2b. Form - F6-F9 half sample Numeric Pre-Admin.2b. PRE: Form - F6-F9 half sample --------------------------------------------------------------------- The series of questions F6-F9 concerning "most important problem" was administered to a randomly selected half sample in the Pre 0. R not selected for F6-F9 Pre administration 1. R selected for F6-F9 Pre administration [V000431-V000438] 0 1 ----- ----- Count 902 905 ============================== V000005c Pre.Admin.2c. Form - Q1-Q11 or Q14-15 Numeric Pre-Admin.2c. PRE: Form - Clinton retrospective Q1-Q11 series or Clinton affects/traits Q14-Q15 series --------------------------------------------------------------------- Rs were randomly selected to be administered either the Clinton retrospective (Q1-Q11) or the Clinton traits and affects questions (Q14-Q15 sections) in the Pre. The questions for which R was not selected for Pre administration were administered in the Post (S1-S11 and the S14-S15 sections). 1. Q1-Q11 asked in Pre [Clinton retrospective V000807-V000846] 2. Q14-Q15 sections asked in Pre [Clinton affects and traits [V000847-V000861] 1 2 ----- ----- Count 891 916 ============================== V000005d Pre.Admin.2d. Form - G section lib-con Numeric Pre-Admin.2d. PRE: Form - G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T or G6.E-G10.E Lib/Con format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard 7-point scale format for Liberal/Conservative placements, or to an experimental branching format. The standard format items are G1-G5 (FTF) and G1.T-G5.T (phone); the experimental format items are G6.E-G10.E (FTF and phone). SELF PLACEMENT G1a Standard format FTF = V000439 G1a.T Standard format Ph = V000439a G6.E-G6c.E Experimental FTF+Ph = V000442-445 CLINTON PLACEMENT G2 Standard format FTF = V000448 G2.T Standard format Ph = V000448a G7.E-G7b.E Experimental FTF+Ph = V000450-452 GORE PLACEMENT G3 Standard format FTF = V000455 G3.T Standard format Ph = V000455a G8.E-G8b.E Experimental FTF+Ph = V000459-461 GW BUSH PLACEMENT G4 Standard format FTF = V000465 G4.T Standard format Ph = V000465a G9.E-G9b.E Experimental FTF+Ph = V000469-471 BUCHANAN PLACEMENT G5 Standard format FTF = V000475 G5.T Standard format Ph = V000475a G10.E-G10b.E Experimental FTF+Ph = V000479-481 1. Standard format G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T (FTF/phone) 2. Experimental format G6.E-G10.E (FTF and phone) 1 2 ----- ----- Count 868 939 ============================== V000005e Pre.Admin.2e. Form - H1 or H1.E Numeric Pre-Admin.2e. PRE: Form - H1 or H1.E economy retrospective format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard (H1) or experimental (H1.E) format. 1. Standard format H1 [V000488a] 2. Experimental format H1.E [V000488b] 1 2 ----- ----- Count 908 899 ============================== V000005f Pre.Admin.2f. Form - H2 or H2.E Numeric Pre-Admin.2f. PRE: Form - H2 or H2.E employment retrospective format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard (H2) or experimental (H2.E) format. 1. Standard format H1 [V000492a] 2. Experimental format H1.E [V000492b] 1 2 ----- ----- Count 901 906 ============================== V000005g Pre.Admin.2g. Form - H4 or H4.E Numeric Pre-Admin.2g. PRE: Form - H4 or H4.E economy prospective format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard (H4) or experimental (H4.E) format. 1. Standard format H4 [V000496a] 2. Experimental format H4.E [V000496b] 1 2 ----- ----- Count 911 896 ============================== V000005h Pre.Admin.2h. Form - H11 or H11.E Numeric Pre-Admin.2h. PRE: Form - H11 or H11.E imports format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard (H11) or experimental (H11.E) format. 1. Standard format H11 [V000511a] 2. Experimental format H11.E [V000511b] 1 2 ----- ----- Count 910 897 ============================== V000005j Pre.Admin.2j. Form - H12 or H12.E Numeric Pre-Admin.2j. PRE: Form - H12 or H12.E isolationism format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard (H12) or experimental (H12.E) format. 1. Standard format H12 [V000513a] 2. Experimental format H12.E [V000513b] 1 2 ----- ----- Count 891 916 ============================== V000005k Pre.Admin.2k. Form - L3 medical insur. Numeric Pre-Admin.2k. PRE: Form - L3/L3.T or L3.E/L3.TE medical insurance format --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF (7-point scale): Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard format for Govt/Private Health Insurance self-placement, or to an experimental format. The standard format is L3a; the experimental format (with reversed scale) is L3a.E. PHONE (branching): Respondents were randomly assigned to either version 1 or version 2. The version 1 format is L3a; the version 2 format (with reversed coding) is L3a.E. 1. FTF Standard L3a/ Phone Version 1 L3a.T [V000608a/V000610a] 2. FTF Experimental L3a.E/ Phone Version 2 L3a.TE [V000608b/V000610b] 1 2 ----- ----- Count 891 916 ============================== V000005m Pre.Admin.2m. Form - L6 or L6.E Numeric Pre-Admin.2m. PRE: Form - L6 or L6.E affirmative action format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard (L6) or experimental (L6.E) format. 1. Standard format L6 [V000671a] 2. Experimental format L6.E [V000671b] 1 2 ----- ----- Count 880 927 ============================== V000005n Pre.Admin.2n. Form - M4 env vs. jobs Numeric Pre-Admin.2n. PRE: Form - M4a/M4a.T or M4a.E/M4a.TE environment vs. jobs format --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF (7-point scale): Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard format for Environment Versus Jobs self-placement, or to an experimental format. The standard format is M4a; the experimental format (without "haven't thought much" option) is M4a.E. PHONE (branching): Respondents were randomly assigned to either version 1 or version 2 . The version 1 format is M4a; the version 2 (without "haven't thought much" option) format is M4a.E. 1. FTF Standard M4a/ Phone Version 1 M4a.T [V000707a/V000709a] 2. FTF Experimental M4a.E/ Phone Version 2 M4a.TE [V000707b/V000709b] 1 2 ----- ----- Count 875 932 ============================== V000005p Pre.Admin.2p. Form - N1 or N1.E Numeric Pre-Admin.2p. PRE: Form - N1 or N1.E school voucher format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard (N1) or experimental (N1.E) format. 1. Standard format N1 [V000741a] 2. Experimental format N1.E [V000741b] 1 2 ----- ----- Count 882 925 ============================== V000005q Pre.Admin.2q. Form - P1 women's role Numeric Pre-Admin.2q. PRE: Form - P1/P1.T or P1.E/P1.TE women equal role format --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF (7-point scale): Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard format for Women's Equal Role self-placement, or to an experimental format. The standard format is P1a; the experimental format (without "haven't thought much" option) is P1a.E. PHONE (branching): Respondents were randomly assigned to either version 1 or version 2 . The version 1 format is P1a.T; the version 2 format (without "haven't thought much" option) is P1a.TE. 1. FTF Standard P1a / Phone Version 1 P1a.T [V000754a/V000756a] 2. FTF Experimental P1a.E/Phone Version 2 P1a.TE [V000754b/V000756b] 1 2 ----- ----- Count 902 905 ============================== V000006 Pre.Admin.3. Month of IW Numeric Pre-Admin.3. PRE: Month of Interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- 09. September 10. October 11. November 9 10 11 ----- ----- ----- Count 831 714 262 ============================== V000007 Pre.Admin.4. Day of IW Numeric Pre-Admin.4. PRE: Day of Interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- Coded 1-31 ============================== V000008 Pre.Admin.5. Month and day (MMDD) Character Pre-Admin.5. PRE: Month and day (MMDD) of Interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the day and month of interview in MMDD format. ============================== V000009 Pre.Admin.6. No. days after election Numeric Pre-Admin.6. PRE: Number of days before election --------------------------------------------------------------------- Election day was November 7, 2000. 1-63 days ============================== V000010 Pre.Admin.7. IW length MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Admin.7. PRE: Interview length --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: interview length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the interview as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Average Pre interview length is 68.35 minutes. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA; INAP, partial IW (5 in Pre-Admin.26) ============================== V000011 Pre.Admin.8. IW number Numeric Pre-Admin.8. PRE: Interview number --------------------------------------------------------------------- 01-53 ============================== V000012 Pre.Admin.9. Date of beginning VQ file Numeric Pre-Admin.9. PRE: Date of beginning VQ file --------------------------------------------------------------------- This refers to the VQ file loaded when the interview began. Changes were made to the VQ (application) while in the field. The next variable documents the VQ version in use at the end of the interview; note that if an interview was temporarily halted and a new VQ was installed prior to the resumption of interviewing, the VQ in effect for some questions would not be the VQ coded here. 0. VQ dated 8/15 1. VQ dated 8/30 2. VQ dated 9/5 3. VQ dated 9/6 4. VQ dated 9/8 5. VQ dated 9/25 6. VQ dated 9/28 7. VQ dated 9/29 8. VQ dated 10/5 9. VQ dated 10/19 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 6 45 41 183 430 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 103 26 191 338 444 ============================== V000013 Pre.Admin.10. Date of ending VQ file MD: EQ 99 Numeric Pre-Admin.10. PRE: Date of ending VQ file --------------------------------------------------------------------- This refers to the VQ file in use when the interview concluded. Changes were made to the VQ (application) while in the field. Note that if an interview was temporarily halted and a new VQ was installed prior to the resumption of interviewing, the VQ in effect for some questions would not be the beginning VQ (previous var). 0. VQ dated 8/15 1. VQ dated 8/30 2. VQ dated 9/5 3. VQ dated 9/6 4. VQ dated 9/8 5. VQ dated 9/25 6. VQ dated 9/28 7. VQ dated 9/29 8. VQ dated 10/5 9. VQ dated 10/19 99. INAP, partial IW (5 in Pre-Admin.26) 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 31 34 171 426 101 6 7 8 9 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 24 196 342 471 6 ============================== V000014 Pre.Admin.11. Flag- change in VQ MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Admin.11. PRE: Flag- change in VQ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Several changes to the application were made during the field period. This variable flags whether a suspended interview was resumed with a different version of the application. 0. No change 1. Change in VQ 9. NA, partial IW (5 in Pre-Admin.26) 0 1 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1694 107 6 ============================== V000015 Pre.Admin.12. Advance letter sent? MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Admin.12. PRE: Advance letter sent? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. No advance letter sent 1. Advance letter sent 9. NA 0 1 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 335 1467 5 ============================== V000016 Pre.Admin.13. Payment amount MD: EQ 99 Numeric Pre-Admin.13. PRE: Payment amount --------------------------------------------------------------------- 00. R requested no payment 20. Twenty dollars 40. Forty dollars 99. NA 0 20 40 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 8 1396 389 14 ============================== V000017 Pre.Admin.14. Payment mode MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Admin.14. PRE: Payment mode --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. R requested no payment 1. Check 2. Cash 9. NA 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 8 1615 169 15 ============================== V000018 Pre.Admin.15. Payment date MD: EQ 9999 Character Pre-Admin.15. PRE: Payment date (MMDD) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 9999. NA; R requested no payment ============================== V000019 Pre.Admin.16. Tape recorded? Numeric Pre-Admin.16. PRE: Tape recorded? --------------------------------------------------------------------- New interviewers had to tape record 2 of their first 5 production interviews; experienced interviewers were required to tape record 1 of their first 3 production interviews (FTF or phone). Tape recording was conducted with the respondent's permission. The IWR made a self-evaluation and sent the tapes to their field supervisor. 1. Yes 5. No 1 5 ----- ----- Count 161 1646 ============================== V000020 Pre.Admin.17. Verification Numeric Pre-Admin.17. PRE: Verification --------------------------------------------------------------------- Approximately 15 percent of interviews (completed or partially completed) were randomly selected and verified by field supervisors for new interviewers, and 6 percent were randomly selected and verified for SRC-experienced interviewers. Verification was attempted by phone (phone interviews) or by letter (FTF interviews) within 3 days of interview date. If no contact/ response with the respondent was made after 3 attempts, a replacement line was selected. The respondent was asked whether they were interviewed by the interviewer of record, the approximate length of the interview and whether or not the interview was interesting; in addition , 3 questions were asked about content of the interview. NOTE: for verification codes, a "don't remember" response is considered a non-match. 0. Counted for Ann Arbor office, not selected for verification 1. Flagged for verification (interview number selected) 2. Verified OK (all verification data match original data exactly) 3. Verified with discrepancy (only one piece of verification data does not match; everything else matches exactly) 4. Not verified (more than 1 piece of information reported by the respondent at the time of verification is different from that collected at the time of the original interview or finalizing the case; further probing results in assignment of either code 3 or code 4 as a final code) 5. Unable to verify (R is contacted but is unwilling to participate in verification exercise or the respondent cannot be reached; this includes: reaching the household by telephone but not reaching the respondent, and includes sending the verification latter to a household but no letter returned after 3 attempts) 6. Verification limit met (used when the verifier has already completed the needed verification level). 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1509 15 246 22 4 5 6 ----- ----- ----- Count 3 10 2 ============================== V000021 Pre.Admin.18. Evaluation Numeric Pre-Admin.18. PRE: Evaluation --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. Not evaluated 1. Flagged 2. Evaluated 3. Evaluation received in Ann Arbor office 4. Cannot evaluate 0 1 2 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1694 1 102 10 ============================== V000022 Pre.Admin.19. Conversion indicator Numeric Pre-Admin.19. PRE: Refusal conversion indicator --------------------------------------------------------------------- This refers to interviews initially refused by someone when an interviewer was first attempting contact. The source of this refusal may or may not have been the Respondent; result code 43 [contact, resistance by R] or 46 [resistance not by R] for any call (not the final result code) turns this indicator on. Conversion may be made by the initial interviewer or another interviewer. If the conversion is not made by the initial interviewer, the interviewer of record is the interviewer obtaining the conversion. 0. Not a refusal conversion situation 1. Refusal conversion situation indicated 0 1 ----- ----- Count 1534 273 ============================== V000023 Pre.Admin.20. Persuasion letter MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Admin.20. PRE: Persuasion letter - flag --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. No persuasion letter sent 1. Persuasion letter sent 9. NA 0 1 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1716 90 1 ============================== V000024 Pre.Admin.21. Date per letter requested MD: EQ 9999 Character Pre-Admin.21. PRE: Date persuasion letter requested (MMDD) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 9999. No persuasion letter requested ============================== V000025 Pre.Admin.22. Date persuasion sent MD: EQ 9999 Character Pre-Admin.22. PRE: Date persuasion letter sent (MMDD) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 9999. NA; INAP, no persuasion letter requested (9999 in Pre-Admin.21) ============================== V000026 Pre.Admin.23. Type of persuasion letter MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Admin.23. PRE: Type of persuasion letter --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A. Too busy 2. B. Too personal 3. C. Not interested 4. D. Too old 5. E. Evasive 6. F. Gatekeeper 7. G. Not at home 9. NA 0. INAP, no persuasion letter sent (0,9 in Pre-Admin.20) 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1717 33 4 23 4 6 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 4 3 23 ============================== V000027 Pre.Admin.24. Telephone calls Numeric Pre-Admin.24. PRE: Number of telephone calls --------------------------------------------------------------------- 00-42 ============================== V000028 Pre.Admin.25. FTF calls Numeric Pre-Admin.25. PRE: Number of face-to-face (FTF) calls --------------------------------------------------------------------- 00-22 ============================== V000029 Pre.Admin.26. Final result Numeric Pre-Admin.26. PRE: Final result --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Interview, complete 5. Interview, partial 1 5 ----- ----- Count 1801 6 ============================== V000030 Pre.Admin.27. Sample release (all 1) Numeric Pre-Admin.27. Sample release (all 1) --------------------------------------------------------------------- All cases coded 1. There was a single release of the entire sample. 1. Released at start of the field period 1 ----- Count 1807 ============================== V000031 Pre.Admin.28. Lang of IW (all English) Numeric Pre-Admin.28. PRE: Language of IW (all English) --------------------------------------------------------------------- All interviews conducted entirely in English (code 1) 1. English 1 ----- Count 1807 ============================== V000032 Pre.CSheet.1. Flag- missing CS Numeric Pre-CSheet.1. PRE - COVERSHEET: Flag- missing Coversheet --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. Coversheet not missing 1. Missing coversheet 0 1 ----- ----- Count 1783 24 ============================== V000033 Pre.CSheet.2. Color of coversheet MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.2. PRE - COVERSHEET: Color of coversheet --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF coversheets were blue or green. Telephone coversheets were yellow. GREEN COVERSHEETS: used by FTF interviewers when updating the area probability sample. Type II updates involved addition of unlisted (hidden) HUs at the selected listed address: for example, once the IWR was inside the HU, he or she may have noticed that the house was divided into separate and complete apartment units that were not apparent from outside. Each interviewer received a set of unlabeled coversheets that had a provision for adding up to three unlisted HUs discovered at the listed address. 1. Blue 2. Yellow 4. Green - FTF type II updating 9. Missing coversheet (1 in Pre-Csheet.1) 1 2 4 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 984 794 5 24 ============================== V000034 Pre.CSheet.3. PH- type phone # MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.3. IF TELEPHONE RDD: PRE - COVERSHEET Item 3: Since the phone number I dialed is produced by a computer, I do not know whether I'm calling a business, a home, a dormitory, or some other type of residence. (Which is it?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Business 2. Home 3. Both 4. Group headquarters 5. Cell phone 9. NA; Phone mode and coversheet missing (1 in Pre-Csheet.1) 0. Inap, assigned FTF mode 0 1 2 3 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 2 735 4 44 16 ============================== V000035 Pre.CSheet.4. PH- business with residence MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.4. IF TELEHONE RDD: IF BUSINESS PHONE NUMBER: PRE - COVERSHEET Item 3a: Does anyone live there on the premises? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No. 9. NA 0. Inap, 2,3,4,5,9 in Pre-Csheet.3; assigned FTF mode 0 1 ----- ----- Count 1805 2 ============================== V000036 Pre.CSheet.5. PH- bus res has personal# MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.5. IF TELEHONE RDD: IF BUSINESS PHONE NUMBER: IF SOMEONE LIVES ON THE PREMISES: PRE - COVERSHEET Item 3b: Do (they/you) have a different phone number inside (their/your) residence that is for personal use? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Have other 2. Use this 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.4; 2,3,4,5,9 in Pre-Csheet.3; assigned FTF mode 0 2 ----- ----- Count 1805 2 ============================== V000037 Pre.CSheet.6. FTF- HH listing from MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.6. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: PRE - COVERSHEET Item 6: Household listing obtained from: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. HU member 2. Neighbor 3. Apt. manager 4. Landlord 5. Observation 7. Other (specify) 9. NA; FTF and coversheet missing (1 in Pre-Csheet.1) 0. Inap, assigned phone mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 980 3 1 4 7 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1 4 17 ============================== V000038 Pre.CSheet.7. Selection table MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.7. PRE - COVERSHEET HOUSEHOLD LISTING: Selection table --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Selection Table is used to select a respondent from all household members who are eligible adults.(An eligible adult is a U.S. citizen who is 18 years of age or older by Election Day.) The Selection Table appears on the Coversheet below the Household Listing. After a complete listing of the HH is taken, each eligible adult is assigned a "Number" based on the criteria of gender and age [beginning with the oldest male as number 1, males are numbered by increments of 1 according to descending age; females are numbered by descending age starting with the number one higher than that assigned to the youngest male]. The interviewer then uses the Selection Table to determine the "Number" of the eligible adult to be interviewed. The Selection Table itself consists of 2 parallel columns. In the first column the interviewer circles the total number of eligible adults in the household; in the second column (same row) is identified the Number" of the person who will be the respondent. There are 8 different Selection Tables used and they are randomly assigned. A summary describing all 8 Selection Tables appears below. PERSONS PERSON SELECTED (person "Number") --------------------------------- A B1 B2 C D E1 E2 F 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 4 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 1 2 2 2 4 3 5 5 6 or more 1 2 2 2 4 5 5 6 1. Selection table A 2. Selection table B1 3. Selection table B2 4. Selection table C 5. Selection table D 6. Selection table E1 7. Selection table E2 8. Selection table F 9. Missing coversheet (1 in Pre-Csheet.1) 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 274 152 135 304 299 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 161 149 309 24 ============================== V000039 Pre.CSheet.8. Number of elig adults MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.8. PRE - COVERSHEET HOUSEHOLD LISTING: Number of eligible adults --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: In addition to completing the HH listing on the coversheet, the IWR entered a value for number of eligible respondents in CSMS. For this reason, cases with missing coversheets may be coded in this variable. 1-7 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 607 989 161 44 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 3 2 1 ============================== V000040 Pre.CSheet.9. Number inelig adults MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.9. PRE - COVERSHEET HOUSEHOLD LISTING: Number ineligible adults --------------------------------------------------------------------- These are usually adults (over 18) in the HU who are noncitizens. Note: cases with missing coversheets may be coded in this variable from information in call records/thumbnails. 0-6 9. NA 0 1 2 3 4 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1743 51 1 1 2 9 ============================== V000041 Pre.CSheet.10. Household composition MD: EQ 99 Numeric Pre-CSheet.10. PRE - COVERSHEET HOUSEHOLD LISTING: Household composition --------------------------------------------------------------------- The HH composition code is derived from information provided in the household listing. "Adults" are 18 years of age (by election day) or older; all individuals included in the HH composition codes below refer to adults. A designation of a HH member as "the householder" (HHR) describes HU member who owns or rents the home (in whose name the lease is held). Cohabiting couples are coded as married (30,40, 50-52). Roommates of opposite sex are coded 11,12,21,22; in all cases of unrelated roommates the respondent is HHR. If R identifies self as married/partnered but spouse/partner is residing elsewhere (nursing home, job requirement or other reason), R is coded as adult male HHR/adult female HHR (codes 10-22 and 60-95) and is identified as married/partnered in marital status question. In cases 8,49,77,157,377,535,580,814,1087,1117,1202,1212,1381, 1639,1731 the partner/spouse identified in V000909 (marital status) was not a resident of the HU or was residing elsewhere on temporary basis. In cases 1281,1516,46,312,133,23,222 there is no information about spouse/partner in HH listing or elsewhere other than marital status question. Note: cases with missing coversheets may be coded in this variable from information in call records/thumbnails. 10. 1 adult male HHR 11. 1 adult male HHR plus 1 other non-relative 12. 1 adult male HHR plus 2 or more non-relatives 20. 1 adult female HHR 21. 1 adult female HHR plus 1 other non-relative 22. 1 adult female HHR plus 2 or more non-relatives 30. 1 married couple: no children or all children living at home are under 18 40. 1 married couple plus 1 other relative 50. 1 married couple plus 2 or more other relatives 51. 1 married couple plus 1 other non-relative 52. 1 married couple plus 2 or more non-relatives 55. 1 married couple plus relatives and non-relatives 60. 1 male HHR plus 1 other relative 65. 1 male HHR plus relatives and nonrelatives 70. 1 male HHR plus 2 or more other relatives 80. 1 female HHR plus 1 other relative 85. 1 female HHR plus relatives and non-relatives 90. 1 female HHR plus 2 or more other relatives 95. Relatives of opposite sex, unclear who is HHR 99. NA 10 11 12 20 21 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 216 25 7 347 15 22 30 40 50 51 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 879 135 44 6 55 60 65 70 80 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 32 1 7 50 85 90 95 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 19 6 12 ============================== V000042 Pre.CSheet.11. R person number MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.11. PRE - COVERSHEET HOUSEHOLD LISTING: R person number --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: cases with missing coversheets may be coded in this variable from information in call records/thumbnails. Coded 1-5 9. NA 1 2 3 4 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1107 617 64 12 1 6 ============================== V000043 Pre.CSheet.12. FTF- type structure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.12. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD1: Describe the type of structure in which the respondent live (sample address) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Mobile home 2. Detached single family 3. Multi-family 4. Apartment house 5. Condo complex 7. Other (specify) 9. NA; missing coversheet (1 in Pre-Csheet.1) 0. Inap, assigned phone mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 38 658 47 4 5 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 166 35 32 30 ============================== V000044 Pre.CSheet.13. FTF- gatekeeper MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.13. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD2: Is there a building manager, security guard or other gatekeeper whose cooperation you need in order to gain access to the R's housing unit? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 2. No, but building is locked/ subdivision is gated and locked 5. No 9. NA; missing coversheet (1 in Pre-Csheet.1) 0. Inap, assigned phone mode 0 1 2 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 36 33 876 61 ============================== V000045 Pre.CSheet.14. FTF- type gatekeeper MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.14. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: IF GATEKEEPER/GUARD/MANAGER/LOCKED ACCESS: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD2a: Check the box below which best describes the situation --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Building manager or other Gatekeeper must let you in the buiding (on the grounds, into the mobile home park) but then you are free to attempt contact with R's HU 2. Building manager/other Gatekeeper must get permission from someone in R's HU before you are allowed to make contact with the household 7. Other (specify) 9. NA 0. Inap, 5, 9 in Pre-Csheet.13; assigned phone mode 0 1 2 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1738 15 2 47 5 ============================== V000046 Pre.CSheet.15. Resistance from contact? MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.15. PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3a: Was there resistance from any contact person? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 458 1322 27 ============================== V000047 Pre.CSheet.16. Contact resist-waste time MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.16. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(1): Resistance from contact person - SURVEYS WASTE OF TIME; PREVIOUS BAD EXPERIENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1349 10 342 106 ============================== V000048 Pre.CSheet.17. Contact resist-too personal MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.17. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(2): Resistance from contact person - CONTENT TOO PERSONAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1349 20 332 106 ============================== V000049 Pre.CSheet.18. Contact resist-confidentiality MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.18. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(3): Resistance from contact person - CONFIDENTIALITY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1349 40 312 106 ============================== V000050 Pre.CSheet.19. Contact resist-not interested politics MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.19. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(4): Resistance from contact person - NOT INTERESTED IN POLITICS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1349 81 271 106 ============================== V000051 Pre.CSheet.20. Contact resist-too busy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.20. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(5): Resistance from contact person - TOO BUSY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1349 125 227 106 ============================== V000052 Pre.CSheet.21. Contact resist-health MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.21. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(6): Resistance from contact person - POOR HEALTH --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1349 15 337 106 ============================== V000053 Pre.CSheet.22. Contact resist-other MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.22. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(7): Resistance from contact person - OTHER (SPECIFY) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1349 163 189 106 ============================== V000054 Pre.CSheet.23. R refuse initially? MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.23. PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3e: Did R refuse initially? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 222 1530 55 ============================== V000055 Pre.CSheet.24. R break appointments MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.24. PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3f: Did respondent break any appointments --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. None 1. One 2. Two or more 9. NA 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1522 200 67 18 ============================== V000056 Pre.CSheet.25. Was R contact resister? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.25. PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3g: If contact persons resisted [if CD3a was "YES"], was the respondent the contact person who gave resistance? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1349 281 97 80 ============================== V000057 Pre.CSheet.26. SUMMARY: did R resist MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.26. SUMMARY: resistance (built) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This counts any resistance identified according to Pre-CSheet.25 or in Pre-CSheet.27-Pre-CSheet.33; however, cases "not marked" throughout variables Pre-CSheet.27-Pre-CSheet.33 may have been unmarked due to complete omission rather than due to the inapplicability of any of the resistance categories to R. 1. Yes, some resistance identified 5. No resistance identified 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 330 1450 27 ============================== V000058 Pre.CSheet.27. R resist-waste time MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-CSheet.27. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(1): Resistance from R - SURVEYS WASTE OF TIME; PREVIOUS BAD EXPERIENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1630 1 176 ============================== V000059 Pre.CSheet.28. R resist-too personal MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-CSheet.28. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(2): Resistance from R - CONTENT TOO PERSONAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1630 7 170 ============================== V000060 Pre.CSheet.29. R resist-confidentiality MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-CSheet.29. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(3): Resistance from R - CONFIDENTIALITY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1630 9 168 ============================== V000061 Pre.CSheet.30. R resist-not interested in politics MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-CSheet.30. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(4): Resistance from R - NOT INTERESTED IN POLITICS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1630 12 165 ============================== V000062 Pre.CSheet.31. R resist-too busy MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-CSheet.31. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(5): Resistance from R - TOO BUSY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1630 21 156 ============================== V000063 Pre.CSheet.32. R resist-health MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-CSheet.32. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(6): Resistance from R - POOR HEALTH --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1630 3 174 ============================== V000064 Pre.CSheet.33. R resist-other MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-CSheet.33. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED: PRE - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(7): Resistance from R - OTHER (SPECIFY) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1630 15 162 ============================== V000065 Pre.CSheet.34. IWR est income (CSMS) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Pre-CSheet.34. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: PRE - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 1): What is the estimated income of R's household? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Under $10,000 2. $10,000-25,000 3. $25,000-50,000 4. $50,000-105,000 5. $105,000 and above 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 98 202 264 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 249 72 49 72 ============================== V000066 Pre.CSheet.35. IWR est race (CSMS) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Pre-CSheet.35. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: PRE - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 2): What is the race of R's household? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See also survey variables Y30(1)-Y30(3) for self-description by the respondent, item ZZ.2 describing IWR's observation of R's race, and the Post equivalent of this variable in Post-CSheet.31. 1. White 2. Black 3. American Indian 4. Asian 7. Other 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 764 131 4 4 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 17 36 2 52 ============================== V000067 Pre.CSheet.36. Certainty of race (CSMS) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.36. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: IF INTERVIEWER HAS IDENTIFIED RACE OF HOUSEHOLD: PRE - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 2a): Is this definite or probable? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Definite 5. Probable 9. NA 0. INAP, 0,8,9 in Pre-Csheet.35 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 855 915 31 6 ============================== V000068 Pre.CSheet.37. Hispanic HH? (CSMS) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Pre-CSheet.37. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: PRE - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 3): Is R or R's household of hispanic origin? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See also V000184d, V000184e (Post version of these variables) and Pre survey items Y30x/Y31 and Y31a/Y31a.T. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP, Phone mode 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 84 863 7 52 ============================== V000069 Pre.CSheet.38. Certainty if Hisp (CSMS) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-CSheet.38. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: IF INTERVIEWER HAS IDENTIFIED HISPANIC STATUS OF R/R'S HOUSEHOLD: PRE - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 3a): Is this definite or probable? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Definite 5. Probable 9. NA 0. INAP, 0,8,9 in Pre-Csheet.37 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 860 911 33 3 ============================== V000070 Pre.IWR.1. Interviewer of record Numeric Pre-IWR.1. PRE: Interviewer of record ID --------------------------------------------------------------------- 4-digit ID ============================== V000071 Pre.IWR.2. Supervisor Numeric Pre-IWR.2. PRE: Supervisor ID --------------------------------------------------------------------- 4-digit ID ============================== V000072 Pre.IWR.3. Interviewer gender MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-IWR.3. PRE: Interviewer gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 9. NA 1 2 ----- ----- Count 226 1581 ============================== V000073 Pre.IWR.4. Interviewer education MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-IWR.4. PRE: Interviewer education --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. 1-8 grades 2. Some high school 3. High school graduate 4. Some college 5. College degree 6. Master's degree 7. Ph.D. 9. NA 3 4 5 6 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 333 574 572 294 34 ============================== V000074 Pre.IWR.5. Interviewer race MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-IWR.5. PRE: Interviewer race --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. White 2. Black 3. Native American 4. Asian 7. Other 9. NA 1 2 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 1684 100 23 ============================== V000075 Pre.IWR.6. Interviewer ethnicity MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-IWR.6. PRE: Interviewer ethnicity --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. No ethnic identity coded 1. Hispanic 7. Other 9. NA 0 1 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 1561 61 185 ============================== V000076 Pre.IWR.7. Interviewer languages MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-IWR.7. PRE: Interviewer languages --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is not available in 2000. 0. NA 0 ----- Count 1807 ============================== V000077 Pre.IWR.8. Yrs Interviewer experience MD: EQ 99 Numeric Pre-IWR.8. PRE: Years Interviewer experience --------------------------------------------------------------------- Interviewer's years of experience and: 99. NA 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 449 385 148 214 22 133 6 7 8 9 10 11 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 60 64 78 82 38 15 12 13 14 15 16 17 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 38 13 4 29 12 23 ============================== V000078 Pre.IWR.9. Interviewer age (bracketed) MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-IWR.9. PRE: Interviewer age (bracketted) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. 18-34 years 2. 35-40 years 3. 41-45 years 4. 46-50 years 5. 51-55 years 6. 56-60 years 7. 51-64 years 8. 65-79 years 9. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 113 179 273 314 5 6 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 255 287 133 253 ============================== V000079 Pre.Sample.1. ICPSR state code MD: EQ 99 Numeric Pre-Sample.1. ICPSR state code - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: 3 cases were misidentified in the Preload as PA but should have been NJ. These cases are coded 96. See Post- Summary.24 (V000260). NEW ENGLAND 43. Florida 01. Connecticut 44. Georgia 02. Maine 45. Louisiana 03. Massachusetts 46. Mississippi 04. New Hampshire 47. North Carolina 05. Rhode Island 48. South Carolina 06. Vermont 49. Texas MIDDLE ATLANTIC BORDER STATES 11. Delaware 51. Kentucky 12. New Jersey 52. Maryland 13. New York 53. Oklahoma 14. Pennsylvania 54. Tennessee EAST NORTH CENTRAL 55. Washington DC 21. Illinois 56. West Virginia 22. Indiana MOUNTAIN STATES 23. Michigan 61. Arizona 24. Ohio 62. Colorado 25. Wisconsin 63. Idaho WEST NORTH CENTRAL 64. Montana 31. Iowa 65. Nevada 32. Kansas 66. New Mexico 33. Minnesota 67. Utah 34. Missouri 68. Wyoming 35. Nebraska PACIFIC STATES 36. North Dakota 71. California 37. South Dakota 72. Oregon SOLID SOUTH 73. Washington 40. Virginia EXTERNAL STATES 41. Alabama 81. Alaska 42. Arkansas 82. Hawaii 96. Misidentified location 99. NA ============================== V000080 Pre.Sample.2. FIPS state code MD: EQ 99 Numeric Pre-Sample.2. FIPS state code - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: 3 cases were misidentified in the Preload as PA but should have been NJ. These cases are coded 96. See Post- Summary.24 (V000260). 01. Alabama 30. Montana 02. Alaska 31. Nebraska 04. Arizona 32. Nevada 05. Arkansas 33. New Hampshire 06. California 34. New Jersey 08. Colorado 35. New Mexico 09. Connecticut 36. New York 10. Delaware 37. North Carolina 11. Washington DC 38. North Dakota 12. Florida 39. Ohio 13. Georgia 40. Oklahoma 15. Hawaii 41. Oregon 16. Idaho 42. Pennsylvania 17. Illinois 44. Rhode Island 18. Indiana 45. South Carolina 19. Iowa 46. South Dakota 20. Kansas 47. Tennessee 21. Kentucky 48. Texas 22. Louisiana 49. Utah 23. Maine 50. Vermont 24. Maryland 51. Virginia 25. Massachusetts 53. Washington 26. Michigan 54. West Virginia 27. Minnesota 55. Wisconsin 28. Mississippi 56. Wyoming 29. Missouri 96. Misidentified location 99. NA ============================== V000081 Pre.Sample.3. 2000 state abbr and CD Character Pre-Sample.3. 2000 state abbreviation and Congressional district number - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable provides the state (2-character Postal abbreviation) and congressional district number of the location of R's residence at the time of the 2000 Pre- election interview. Washington D.C. is blank in this variable. Note: 3 cases were misidentified PA in the Preload but should have been NJ. These cases are coded "9996". See Post-Summary.24 (V000260). ============================== V000082 Pre.Sample.4. 2000 FIPS state and CD MD1: EQ 9999, MD2: GE 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.4. 2000 FIPS state code and congresional district number - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- FIPS state code resides in first 2 digits, CD number in last 2 digits. Note: 3 cases were misidentified PA in the Preload but should have been NJ. These cases are coded 9996. See Post-Summary.24 (V000260). 9996. Misidentified location 9999. NA 0000. Washington D.C. ============================== V000083 Pre.Sample.5. Congressional district no. MD1: EQ 99, MD2: GE 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.5. Congressional district number - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-52. Note: 3 cases were misidentified PA in the Preload but should have been NJ. These cases are coded 96. See Post-Summary.24 (V000260). 96. Misidentified location 99. NA 00. Washington D.C. ============================== V000084 Pre.Sample.6. ICPSR state and CD MD1: EQ 9999, MD2: GE 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.6. ICPSR state code and congressional district - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- ICPSR state code resides in first 2 digits, CD number in last 2 digits. Note: 3 cases were misidentified PA in the Preload but should have been NJ. These cases are coded 9996. See Post-Summary.24 (V000260). 9996. Misidentified location 9999. NA 0000. Washington D.C. ============================== V000085 Pre.Sample.7. Did R vote outside IW CD? MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Sample.7. Did R vote in state and CD of interview? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. R voted in state and CD of interview 1. R did not vote in state and CD of interview 8. NA if vote was in state/CD of interview (4 in Post C1 and 8,9,0 in Post C3) 9. INAP, R did not vote or NA/DK if voted; no Post interview; IW location misidentified in the Preload (1 in Post-Summary.24) 0 1 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1131 22 28 626 ============================== V000086 Pre.Sample.8. State/CD -vote outside CD MD1: EQ 9999, MD2: GE 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.8. State and CD of vote cast outside CD of interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- The first 2 digits represent the state FIPS code, and the second 2 digits are CD number. Where the state differs but the CD number is unknown, the state will be coded in the first 2 digits but the last 2 digits will be 99. 9999. NA if voted outside CD of interview (8 in Pre-Sample.7) 0000. INAP, 0,9 in Pre-Sample.7 ============================== V000087 Pre.Sample.9. FIPS state and county MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.9. FIPS state and county - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to preserve respondent confidentiality. The FIPS State code is represented in digits 1 and 2 of this variable, the FIPS County code in the last 3 digits. ============================== V000087a Pre.Sample.9a. County (alpha) Character Pre-Sample.9a. Name of County - Interview location (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. NOTE: This variable was constructed for use as preload in Post-Election C3 (variable V001243), which attempts to ascertain specific registration location of the respondent. It should be noted that, although county identification in this variable for face-to-face interviews meets normal standards for accuracy, the V000087a Post preload data for RDD cases were created by imputing area code, central office codes and similar listed numbers. ============================== V000088 Pre.Sample.10. Primary area name Character Pre-Sample.10. Primary area name - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. This is a character variable for the Primary Selection Unit (PSU) name. See appendix "Notes on Sampling variables". NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. ============================== V000089 Pre.Sample.11. Primary area code MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.11. Primary area code - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been recoded to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. The 44 PSU codes listed below (110 through 482) have been recoded to values 1-44 in random order. See appendix "Notes on Sampling variables". NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. 110. Boston, MA 230. Milwaukee, WI 120. New York, NY 239. Wheelng-Steubenvl OH 121. Philadelphia, PA-NJ 240. Des Moines, IA 122. Nassau-Suffolk, NY 250. Richmond-Ptrsbrg, VA 130. Chicago, IL 255. Columbus, GA-AL 131. Detroit, MI 257. Jacksonville, FL 132. Cleveland, OH 258. Lakeld-Wntr Haven FL 141. St Louis, MO-IL 260. Knoxville, TN 150. Washington, DC-MD-VA 262. Birmingham, AL 152. Baltimore, MD 273. Waco, TX 154. Miami-Hialeh, FL 274. McAllen, TX 170. Houston, TX 280. Salt Lake C-Ogden UT 171. Dallas-Ft Worth, TX 292. Fresno, CA 181. Denver, CO 293. Eugene-Springfld, OR 190. Los Angeles, CA 434. Saginaw, MI 191. Seattle-Tacoma, WA 464. Gardner, MA 194. Anaheim, CA 466. Decatur Co., IN 196. San Francisco, CA 470. Mower Co., MN 211. New Haven, CT 474. DeSoto Parish, LA 213. Manchester-Nashua NH 477. Chicot Co., AR 220. Buffalo, NY 480. Montgomery Co., VA 226. Atlantic City, NJ 482. El Dorado Co., CA 000. Telephone sample (RDD) ============================== V000090 Pre.Sample.12. Segment number (blanked) MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.12. Segment number (blanked) - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. 3-digit code and: 000. Telephone sample (RDD) ============================== V000090a Pre.Sample.13. Segment name (blanked) Character Pre-Sample.13. Segment name (blanked) - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- See appendix "Notes on Sampling variables". NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. ============================== V000091 Pre.Sample.14. Number of HH units MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Pre-Sample.14. Number of household unit --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-5 and: 9. NA 0. Phone IW 0 1 2 3 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 983 2 3 1 17 ============================== V000092 Pre.Sample.15. Census region Numeric Pre-Sample.15. Census region - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Northeast (CT, ME, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT) 2. North Central (IL, IN, IA, KS, MI, MN, MO, NE, ND, OH, SD, WI) 3. South (AL, AR, DE, DC, FL, GA, KY, LA, MD, MS, NC, OK, SC, TN, TX, VA, WV) 4. West (AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NM, NV, OR, UT, WA, WY) 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 316 450 657 384 ============================== V000093 Pre.Sample.16. Belt code MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.16. Belt code - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- See appendix "Notes on Sampling variables" and the appendix CENSUS DEFINITIONS. Coded according to the 1990 Census and 1990 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) definitions, 1990 Census Population reports (as reported in the 1992 Annual Metro, City and County Data book) and 1990 Census "urbanized area" (as shown in the 1994 Rand McNally Road Atlas - 70th edition. NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. 1. Central Cities of the six largest (population over 4,500,000) Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas (CMSAs), plus the 15 next largest CMSA/MSAs (population over 2,000,000) 2. Central Cities of CMSAs and MSAs with fewer than 2,000,000 population (exclusive of those in the 21 largest CMSA/MSAs -- code 1) 3. Suburbs of the six largest CMSA/MSAs and 15 next largest CMSAs/MSAs 4. Suburb of all other CMSA/MSAs 5. Adjacent Areas: includes all territory beyond the outer boundary of the suburban belt, but within 50 miles of the central business district of a central city 6. Outlying Area: includes all territory more than 50 miles from the central business district of a central city 0. Telephone sample (RDD) 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 99 185 168 4 5 6 ----- ----- ----- Count 241 264 49 ============================== V000094 Pre.Sample.17. Population in 1000s MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9996 Numeric Pre-Sample.17. Population in 1000s - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- The actual 1990 Census Place population is coded in thousands, rounding to the nearest whole thousand (from the 1990 Population total for the city/place as reported in the 1992 Annual Metro City and County Data Book). NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. Actual population in 1000s and: 9996. Telephone sample (RDD) 9999. 9,998,500 persons or over 0000. Rural place, no defined Census Place, or Census Place with fewer than 500 persons ============================== V000095 Pre.Sample.18. Census size of place MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.18. Census size of place - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the appendix on CENSUS DEFINITIONS. Coded according to the 1990 Census. The major objective of the Census Bureau in delineating urbanized areas is to provide a better separation of urban and rural population in the vicinity of large cities. An urbanized area consists of a central city or cities, and surrounding closely settled territory ("urban fringe"). Size of Place codes 21 and 41 include areas that are in the "urban fringe" but are not Census Places. Note for Codes 50-53: in a few cases, Non-MSA PSUs (based on the 1980 OMB SMSA definitions) contain areas which are now part of a 1990 PMSA or MSA (based on the June 1990 OMB definition). In these cases, the Size of Place Code for any SSUs (segments) within such areas are coded in the "40s" rather than in the "50s" as shown. This occurred in El Dorado county CA (the major part of the El Dorado/Alpine Co, CA PSU #82) which is now a part of the Sacramento CA MSA, and also for one SSU (segment) in the Gardner MA PSU (#64), which is now a part of the Worchester MA MSA. NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. THE SIX LARGEST CMSAs PLUS THE 15 NEXT LARGEST CMSAs/ MSAs (I.e. those coded 1 or 3 [possibly 5, rarely 6] 11. Central Cities (these would have been coded 1 on the Belt Code SUBURBS OF THE 6 LARGEST CMSAs AND THE 15 NEXT LARGEST 20. Rural (including rural places with less than 2,500 population 21. 2,500-9,999 plus other urbanized areas ("urban fringe" not in Census places) 22. 10,000-29,999 23. 30,000-49,999 24. 50,000-99,999 25. 100,000-149,999 26. 150,000-349,999 27. 350,000 and over, exclusive of cities coded 11 CMSAs/MSAs W/LESS THAN 2,000,000 POPULATION CENTRAL CITIES IN CMSAs/MSAs WITH LESS THAN 2,000,000 POPULATION (2 on Belt Code): 30. Under 50,000 (identified by OMB, June 1990, as Central Cities 31. 50-000-99,999 32. 100,000-149,999 33. 150,000-349,999 34. 350,000 and over SUBURBS IN CMSAs/MSAs WITH LESS THAN 2,000,000 40. Rural (including rural places with less than 2,500 population) 41. 2,500-9,999 42. 10,000-29,999 43. 30,000-49,999 44. 50,000-99,999 45. 100,000-149,999 46. 150,000 and over "NON-CMSA/PMSA/MASs" 50. Rural (including rural places with less than 2,000,000 population) 51. 2,500-9,999 52. 10,000-29,999 53. 30,000-49,999 00. Telephone sample (RDD) ============================== V000096 Pre.Sample.19. Census tract/ed indicator MD: EQ 9 Numeric Pre-Sample.19. Census tract/ed indicator - interview location (blanked) --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. 0. Enumeration district 1. Tracted 9. Telephone sample (RDD) ============================== V000097 Pre.Sample.20. 2000 Sampling Error code Numeric Pre-Sample.20. 2000 Sampling Error code --------------------------------------------------------------------- See Sampling documentation in this codebook. The first 2 digits contain the 200 Sampling Error Stratum code and the last digit represents the 2000 SECU or Sampling Error Computation Unit code. ============================== V000098 Pre.Sample.21. 2000 Census NECMA/SMSA Numeric Pre-Sample.21. 2000 Census NECMA/SMSA - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- See appendix "Notes on Sampling variables" and the appendix CENSUS DEFINITIONS. NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. 360. Anaheim-Santa Ana-Garden Grove, CA 520. Atlanta, GA 560. Atlantic City, NJ 720. Baltimore, MD 875. Bergen-Passiac, NJ PMSA (Former code and title: 6040 Paterson-Clifton-Passaic, NJ) 1000. Birmingham, AL 1123. Boston-Lawrence-Salem-Lowell-Brockton, MA NECMA 1125. Boulder-Longmont, CO PMSA 1145. Brazoria, TX PMSA 1280. Buffalo, NY 1600. Chicago, IL 1680. Cleveland OH 1800. Columbus, GA-AL 1920. Dallas-Ft Worth, TX 2000. Dayton, OH 2080. Denver-Boulder, CO 2120. Des Moines, IA 2160. Detroit, MI 2400. Eugene-Springfield, OR 2760. Fort Wayne, IN 2800. Fort Worth-Arlington TX, PMSA 2840. Fresno, CA 3000. Grand Rapids, MI 3360. Houston, TX 3600. Jacksonville, FL 3760. Kansas City, MO-KS 3840. Knoxville, TN 3965. Lake County, IL PMSA 3980. Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL 4480. Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA 4720. Madison WI 4763. Manchester-Nashua, NH NECMA 4880. McAllen-Pharr-Edinburgh, TX 5000. Miami, FL 5015. Middlesex-Somerset-Hunterdon, NJ PMSA (former code and title: 5460 New Brunswick-Perth Amboy-Sayreville NJ) 5080. Milwaukee, WI 5120. Minneapolis-St Paul, MN-WI 5350. Nashua, NH PMSA 5380. Nassau-Suffolk, NY 5480. New Haven-West Haven, CT 5483. New Haven-Waterbury-Meriden, CT NECMA 5600. New York, NY-NJ 5640. Newark, NJ 5700. Niagara Falls, NY PMSA 5775. Oakland, CA PMSA 6160. Philadelphia, PA-NJ 6200. Phoenix, AZ 6280. Pittsburgh, PA 6453. Portsmouth-Dover-Rochester, NH NECMA 6760. Richmond, VA 6780. Riverside-San Bernardino, Ontario, CA 6920. Sacramento, CA (1990 MSA definition) 6960. Saginaw, MI 7040. St. Louis, MO-IL 7160. Salt Lake City-Ogden, UT MSA 7360. San Francisco-Oakland,CA 7600. Seattle-Everett, WA 8003. Springfield, MA NECMA 8080. Steubenville-Wierton, OH-WV 8200. Tacoma, WA 8800. Waco, TX 8840. Washington, DC-MD-VA 9000. Wheeling, WV-OH 9243. Worcester-Fitchburn-Leominster, MA NECMA 0000. INAP; location not in SMSA (MSA)/ NECMA 9996. Telephone sample (RDD) ============================== V000099 Pre.Sample.22. 2000 CMSA MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Pre-Sample.22. 2000 CMSA - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- See appendix "Notes on Sampling variables" and the appendix CENSUS DEFINITIONS. The six largest CMSA's are marked with **. NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file. Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment identification, it could not be provided with this variable. 07. Boston-Lawrence-Salem MA-NH 10. Buffalo-Niagara Falls NY 14. Chicago-Gary-Lake County IL-IN-WI** 28. Cleveland-Akron-Lorain OH 31. Dallas-Ft Worth TX (Since Dallas and Ft Worth were made separate PMSAs in 1990, this new CMSA was added 34. Denver-Boulder CO (Since Denver and Boulder were made separate PMSAs in 1990, this new CMSA was added in 35. Detroit-Ann Arbor MI** 42. Houston-Galveston-Brazoria TX 49. Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside CA** 56. Miami-Fort Lauderdale FL 63. Milwaukee-Racine WI 70. New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island NY-NJ-CT** 77. Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton PA-NJ-DE-MD** 78. Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley PA 84. San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose CA** 91. Seattle-Tacoma WA 96. Telephone sample (RDD) 00. INAP, Location not in CMSA. This includes old code 32 (Dayton Springfield, OH) which is no longer consolidated in 1990 since Dayton and Springfield are combined in a single MSA in 1990) ============================== V000099x Pre.Sample.22x. 2000 MSA MD1: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.22x. 2000 MSA - interview location --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the 2000 MSA for the full sample, including the the RDD telephone component. This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. Metropolitan Statistical Area code and: 00. INAP, Location not in MSA. ============================== V000100 Pre.Sample.23. 2000 Census Tract 1 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 996 Numeric Pre-Sample.23. 2000 Census Tract 1 - interview location (blanked) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. ============================== V000101 Pre.Sample.24. 2000 Census Tract 2 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 996 Numeric Pre-Sample.24. 2000 Census Tract 2 - interview location (blanked) --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: No 2000 cases corresponded to more than one Census tract. ============================== V000102 Pre.Sample.25. 2000 Block 1 MD1: EQ 99, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Pre-Sample.25. 2000 Block 1 - interview location (blanked) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. ============================== V000103 Pre.Sample.26. 2000 Block 2 MD1: EQ 99, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Pre-Sample.26. 2000 Block 2 - interview location (blanked) --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: No 2000 cases corresponded to more than one Census block. ============================== V000104 Pre.Sample.27. 2000 MCD MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.27. 2000 MCD - interview location (blanked) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. ============================== V000105 Pre.Sample.28. 2000 CDP MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9999 Numeric Pre-Sample.28. 2000 CDP - interview location (blanked) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. ============================== V000106 Pre.Sample.29. 2000 FIPS place code MD: EQ 0 Numeric Pre-Sample.29. 2000 FIPS place code - interview location (blanked) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the Respondent. ============================== V000107 Pre.Summary.1. Pre timing - section A MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.1. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION A --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000108 Pre.Summary.2. Pre timing - section B MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.2. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION B --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000109 Pre.Summary.3. Pre timing - section C MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.3. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION C --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000110 Pre.Summary.4. Pre timing - section D MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.4. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION D --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000111 Pre.Summary.5. Pre timing - section E MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.5. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION E --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 Section E selected for Post administration ============================== V000112 Pre.Summary.6. Pre timing - section F MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.6. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION F --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000113 Pre.Summary.7. Pre timing - section G MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.7. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION G --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000114 Pre.Summary.8. Pre timing - section H MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.8. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION H --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000115 Pre.Summary.9. Pre timing - section K MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.9. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION K --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000116 Pre.Summary.10. Pre timing - section L MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.10. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION L --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000117 Pre.Summary.11. Pre timing - section M MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.11. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION M --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000118 Pre.Summary.12. Pre timing - section N MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.12. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION N --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000119 Pre.Summary.13. Pre timing - section P MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.13. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION P --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000120 Pre.Summary.14. Pre timing - section Q MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.14. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION Q --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000121 Pre.Summary.15. Pre timing - section R MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.15. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION R --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000122 Pre.Summary.16. Pre timing - section S MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.16. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION S --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000123 Pre.Summary.17. Pre timing - section X MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.17. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION X --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000124 Pre.Summary.18. Pre timing - section Y MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.18. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION Y --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000125 Pre.Summary.19. Pre timing - section Z MD: EQ 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Pre-Summary.19. PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION Z --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA ============================== V000126 Post.Admin.1. Mode of Interview MD: EQ 0 Numeric Post-Admin.1. POST: Mode of Interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- See Post-Admin.1a. 5 cases re-assigned to phone mode in the Post were administered FTF in error; note that several of these cases, although administered FTF, used telephone logic in the interview. 1. Personal 5. Telephone 7. ADMINISTERED USING WRONG MODE: FTF re-assigned to telephone but administered as Personal interview 0. No post IW 0 1 5 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 693 857 5 ============================== V000126a Post.Admin.1a. Mode switch flag Numeric Post-Admin.1a. POST - MODE SWITCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- 200 FTF Pre cases were selected for reassignment to Phone administration in the Post. Of these, 168 were completed interviews. Assignment of all Post cases (interview and non-interview) are described here. 1. Assigned FTF, not switched to Phone mode 2. Assigned Phone 3. Assigned FTF, switched to Phone mode 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- Count 805 802 200 ============================== V000127a Post.Admin.2a. Form desc 1 - H in Post MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.2a. POST: Form - section H administered in Post --------------------------------------------------------------------- Section E questions about R's personal financial situation were randomly selected to be administered either in Pre section E or Post section H. Because assignment was set during Pre administration, this randomization was unaffected by the randomization failure which took place during a portion of the Post field period. 0. Section H not administered in Post [Pre section E V000398-V000406] 1. Section H administered in Post [V000410-V000417] 9. No Post IW 0 1 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 790 765 252 ============================== V000127b Post.Admin.2b. Form desc 2 - K format MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.2b. POST: Form - K2 format --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to have the K2a-K2d office recognition battery administered with or without the use of probes [V001446a-V001454]. NOTE: see item Post-Summary.124 (V000262) for description of the randomization failure which took place during a portion of the Post field period. 0. K2a-K2d administered without probes 1. K2a-K2d administered with probes 9. No post IW 0 1 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1025 530 252 ============================== V000128 Post.Admin.3. Mo. IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric Post-Admin.3. POST: Month of interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- 11. November 12. December 00. No Post IW 0 11 12 ----- ----- ----- Count 252 1147 408 ============================== V000129 Post.Admin.4. Day IW MD: EQ 0 Numeric Post-Admin.4. POST: Day of interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- Coded 1-31 and: 0. No Post IW ============================== V000130 Post.Admin.5. Month and day (MMDD) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9999 Character Post-Admin.5. POST: Month and day (MMDD) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the day and month of interview in MMDD format. '0000' is used for cases with no Post IW; '9999' indicates NA ============================== V000131 Post.Admin.6. No. days after election MD1: EQ 96, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Admin.6. POST: Number of days after election --------------------------------------------------------------------- 96. INAP, no Post IW 99. NA ============================== V000132 Post.Admin.7. IW bef/aft Gore concession MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.7. POST: Interview taken before or after Gore concession --------------------------------------------------------------------- Gore concession: December 13, 2000 0. Before 1. Day of concession (Dec. 13) 2. After 9. NA; INAP, no Post IW 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1462 16 77 252 ============================== V000133 Post.Admin.8. IW length MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric DEC 2 Post-Admin.8. POST: Interview length --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: interview length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the interview as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. The average Post interview length is 63.76 minutes. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA; partial IW 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000134 Post.Admin.9. IW no. MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Admin.9. POST: Interview number --------------------------------------------------------------------- Codes 1-44 and: 99. NA 00. INAP, no Post Interview ============================== V000135 Post.Admin.10. Date of beg VQ file MD: EQ 0 Numeric Post-Admin.10. POST: Date of beginning VQ file --------------------------------------------------------------------- This refers to the VQ file loaded when the interview began. Changes were made to the VQ (application) while in the field. The next variable documents the VQ version in use at the end of the interview; note that if an interview was temporarily halted and a new VQ was installed prior to the resumption of interviewing, the VQ in effect for some questions would not be the VQ coded here. 1. 11/7 2. 11/10 3. 11/16 (1) 4. 11/16 (2) 5. 11/18 6. 11/27 0. No Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 140 351 13 4 5 6 ----- ----- ----- Count 201 282 568 ============================== V000136 Post.Admin.11. Date of end VQ file MD: EQ 0 Numeric Post-Admin.11. POST: Date of ending VQ file --------------------------------------------------------------------- This refers to the VQ file in use when the interview concluded. Changes were made to the VQ (application) while in the field. Note that if an interview was temporarily halted and a new VQ was installed prior to the resumption of interviewing, the VQ in effect for some questions would not be the beginning VQ (previous var). 1. 11/7 2. 11/10 3. 11/16 (1) 4. 11/16 (2) 5. 11/18 6. 11/27 0. INAP, partial IW; no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 256 105 352 13 4 5 6 ----- ----- ----- Count 158 318 605 ============================== V000137 Post.Admin.12. Flag- change in VQ MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.12. POST: Flag- change in VQ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Several changes to the application were made during the field period. This variable flags whether a suspended interview was resumed with a different version of the application. 0. No change 1. Change in VQ 9. INAP, partial IW; no post IW 0 1 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1429 122 256 ============================== V000138 Post.Admin.13. Release MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Admin.1a. POST: Release --------------------------------------------------------------------- Because of the turnaround time needed to prepare it after the Pre interviewing was concluded, the Post sample was released in 3 releases. 1. Release 1 - November 7 2. Release 2 - November 15 3. Release 3 - November 21. 9. NA 0. INAP, no Post IW 1 2 3 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1147 319 340 1 ============================== V000139 Post.Admin.14. Payment amt MD1: EQ 96, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Post-Admin.14. POST: Payment to R - amount --------------------------------------------------------------------- 00. R requested no payment 20. Twenty dollars 40. Forty dollars 96. INAP, no Post IW 99. NA 0 20 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 1525 252 26 ============================== V000139a Post.Admin.14a. Interviewer incentive MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.14a. INTERVIEWER INCENTIVE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Beginning October 26, 2000, interviewers were paid $10 for each completed interview. 0. Post interview date not in incentive period 1. Post interview date in incentive period. 9. INAP, no Post IW 0 1 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1236 319 252 ============================== V000140 Post.Admin.15. Payment mode MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.15. POST: Payment to R - mode --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. R requested no payment 1. Check 2. Cash 9. NA; INAP, no Post IW 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 1511 14 278 ============================== V000141 Post.Admin.16. Payment date MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9999 Character Post-Admin.16. POST: Payment to R - date (MMDD) --------------------------------------------------------------------- '0000' is used for cases with no Post IW or 0 in Post-Admin.14/ Post-Admin.15; '9999' indicates NA. ============================== V000142 Post.Admin.17. Tape recorded MD: EQ 0 Numeric Post-Admin.17. POST: Tape recorded? --------------------------------------------------------------------- New interviewers had to tape record 2 of their first 5 production interviews; experienced interviewers were required to tape record 1 of their first 3 production interviews (FTF or phone). Tape recording was conducted with the respondent's permission. The IWR made a self-evaluation and sent the tapes to their field supervisor. 1. Yes 5. No 0. INAP, no Post IW 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 252 78 1477 ============================== V000143 Post.Admin.18. Verification MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.18. POST: Verification --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes in Pre-Admin.17 (V000020). 0. Counted for Ann Arbor office, not selected for verification 1. Flagged for verification (interview number selected) 2. Verified OK (all verification data match original data exactly) 3. Verified with discrepancy (only one piece of verification data does not match; everything else matches exactly) 4. Not verified (more than 1 piece of information reported by the respondent at the time of verification is different from that collected at the time of the original interview or finalizing the case; further probing results in assignment of either code 3 or code 4 as a final code) 5. Unable to verify (R is contacted but is unwilling to participate in verification exercise or the respondent cannot be reached; this includes: reaching the household by telephone but not reaching the respondent, and includes sending the verification latter to a household but no letter returned after 3 attempts) 6. Verification limit met (used when the verifier has already completed the needed verification level). 9. NA; INAP, no Post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1332 55 142 18 5 6 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 4 2 254 ============================== V000144 Post.Admin.19. Evaluation MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.19. POST: Evaluation --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. Not evaluated 1. Flagged 2. Evaluated 3. Evaluation received in Ann Arbor office 4. Cannot evaluate 9. INAP, no Post IW 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1477 1 77 252 ============================== V000145 Post.Admin.20. Conversion ind. MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.20. POST: Refusal conversion indicator --------------------------------------------------------------------- This refers to interviews initially refused by someone when an interviewer was first attempting contact. The source of this refusal may or may not have been the Respondent; result code 43 [contact, resistance by R] or 46 [resistance not by R] for any call (not the final result code) turns this indicator on. Conversion may be made by the initial interviewer or another interviewer. If the conversion is not made by the initial interviewer, the interviewer of record is the interviewer obtaining the conversion. 0. Not a refusal convesion situation 1. Refusal conversion situation indicated 9. NA; INAP, no Post IW 0 1 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1529 26 252 ============================== V000146 Post.Admin.21. Persuasion letter MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Admin.21. POST: Persuasion letter - flag --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. No persuasion letter sent 1. Persuasion letter sent 9. NA; INAP, no Post IW 0 1 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1517 95 195 ============================== V000147 Post.Admin.22. Date requested MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9999 Character Post-Admin.22. POST: Date persuasion letter requested (MMDD) --------------------------------------------------------------------- '0000' is used for cases with no Post IW or no letter requested; '9999' indicates NA. ============================== V000148 Post.Admin.23. Date sent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9999 Character Post-Admin.23. POST: Date persuasion letter sent --------------------------------------------------------------------- '0000' is used for cases with no Post IW or no letter requested; '9999' indicates NA. ============================== V000149 Post.Admin.24. Type letter MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Admin.24. POST: Type of persuasion letter --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A. Too busy 2. B. Too personal 3. C. Not interested 4. D. Too old 5. E. Evasive 6. F. Gatekeeper 7. G. Not at home 9. NA 0. INAP, no Post IW 0 1 3 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1712 9 28 51 7 ============================== V000150 Post.Admin.25. Tel calls MD: EQ 99 Numeric Post-Admin.25. POST: Number of telephone calls --------------------------------------------------------------------- 99. NA; INAP, no Post IW ============================== V000151 Post.Admin.26. FTF calls MD: EQ 99 Numeric Post-Admin.26. POST: Number of Face-to-Face calls --------------------------------------------------------------------- 99. NA; INAP, no Post IW ============================== V000152 Post.Admin.27. Final result Numeric Post-Admin.27. POST: Final result code --------------------------------------------------------------------- 01 IW complete 05 IW partial 51 Refusal by R 52 Refusal by person other than R 54 Initial refusal, not reached for conversion 61 No contact 63 Noninterview, permanent reason 66 Interview begun then terminated, insufficiently complete 67 Noninterview, other reason 68 Could not Locate R 1 5 51 52 54 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1551 4 99 5 20 61 63 66 67 68 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 23 5 1 79 20 ============================== V000153 Post.Admin.28. Result date (NI) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9999 Character Post-Admin.28. POST: Result date (Post noninterviews) --------------------------------------------------------------------- '0000' is used for cases with Post IW; '9999' indicates NA. ============================== V000154 Post.Admin. 29. Flag - mode switch MD: EQ 0 Numeric Post-Admin.29. POST: Flag - pre/post mode switch --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from V000004 and V000126. Some interviews conducted FTF in the pre were administered by phone in the Post. 1. Pre FTF and Post FTF 2. Pre phone and Post phone 3. Pre FTF and Post phone 0. INAP, no post IW 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 252 698 693 164 ============================== V000155 Post.Admin.30. Lang of IW (all English) Numeric Post-Admin.30. POST: Language of interview (all English) --------------------------------------------------------------------- All interviews were conducted entirely in English 1. English 1 ----- Count 1807 ============================== V000156 Post.CSheet.1. Flag- missing CS Numeric Post-CSheet.1. POST - COVERSHEET: Flag- missing CS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. Coversheet not missing 1. Coversheet missing 0 1 ----- ----- Count 1780 27 ============================== V000157 Post.CSheet.2. Color of coversheet MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.2. POST - COVERSHEET: Color of coversheet --------------------------------------------------------------------- Pink coversheets were copies of coversheets that were in transfer. NOTE: for an unknown reason, some cases assigned to FTF mode were administered using yellow (phone) coversheets. 1. Blue 2. Yellow 3. Pink 9. NA 0. INAP, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 27 936 831 13 ============================== V000158 Post.CSheet.3. Item 1. R at samp addr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.3. POST - COVERSHEET Item 1: Does (NAME) still live here? R STILL LIVE AT SAMPLE ADDRESS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Interviewers omitted filling out this box (code 9) on 227 coversheets. 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA 0. INAP, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 27 1512 41 227 ============================== V000159 Post.CSheet.4. Item 2b. PHONE: New phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.4. IF PHONE MODE: IF R DOES NOT STILL LIVE AT SAMPLE ADDRESS: POST - PHONE COVERSHEET Item 2b: New phone number available --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Available 2. Not available 9. NA 0. INAP, 1,9 in Post-Csheet.3; coversheet missing (1 in Post- CSheet.1); FTF mode 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1793 8 2 4 ============================== V000160 Post.CSheet.5. Item 2b. FTF: Addr status MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.5. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: IF R DOES NOT STILL LIVE AT SAMPLE ADDRESS: POST - FTF COVERSHEET Item 2b: Address is: STATUS OF NEW ADDRESS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: in cases where the Post interview mode was switched from FTF to telephone, the blue FTF coversheet have already been assigned and some personal contact attempted; for some telephone cases data are found in this variable because the FTF coversheet was retained. 1. Out of range 3. Within range 5. Can't find 9. NA 0. INAP, 1,9 in Post-Csheet.3; coversheet missing (1 in Post- CSheet.1); Phone mode 0 1 3 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1780 1 17 7 2 ============================== V000161 Post.CSheet.6. FTF type structure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.6. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD1: Describe the type of structure in which the respondent live (sample address) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: in cases where the Post interview mode was switched from FTF to telephone, the blue FTF coversheet have already been assigned and some personal contact attempted; for some telephone cases data are found in this variable because the FTF coversheet was retained. 1. Mobile home 2. Detached single family 3. Multi-family 4. Apartment house 5. Condo complex 7. Other (specify) 9. NA 0. Inap, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1); assigned phone mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 926 26 501 31 4 5 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 106 35 24 158 ============================== V000162 Post.CSheet.7. FTF gatekeeper MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.7. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD2: Is there a building manager, security guard or other gatekeeper whose cooperation you need in order to gain access to the R's housing unit? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: in cases where the Post interview mode was switched from FTF to telephone, the blue FTF coversheet have already been assigned and some personal contact attempted; for some telephone cases data are found in this variable because the FTF coversheet was retained. 1. Yes 2. No, but building is locked/ subdivision is gated and locked 5. No 9. NA 0. Inap, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1); assigned phone mode 0 1 2 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 898 58 21 637 193 ============================== V000163 Post.CSheet.8. FTF type gatekeeper MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.8. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: IF GATEKEEPER/GUARD/MANAGER/LOCKED ACCESS: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD2a: Check the box below which best describes the situation --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: in cases where the Post interview mode was switched from FTF to telephone, the blue FTF coversheet have already been assigned and some personal contact attempted; for some telephone cases data are found in this variable because the FTF coversheet was retained. 1. Building manager or other Gatekeeper must let you in the buiding (on the grounds, into the mobile home park) but then you are free to attempt contact with R's HU 2. Building manager/other Gatekeeper must get permission from someone in R's HU before you are allowed to make contact with the household 7. Other (specify) 9. NA 0. Inap, 5, 9 in Pre-Csheet.13; coversheet missing; assigned phone mode 0 1 2 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1728 10 2 35 32 ============================== V000164 Post.CSheet.9. Resist from contact MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.9. POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3a: Was there resistance from any contact person? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA 0. INAP, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 27 222 1454 104 ============================== V000165 Post.CSheet.10. Contct resist-waste time MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.10. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(1): Resistance from contact person - SURVEYS WASTE OF TIME; PREVIOUS BAD EXPERIENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1585 10 202 10 ============================== V000166 Post.CSheet.11. Contct resist-too personal MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.11. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(2): Resistance from contact person - CONTENT TOO PERSONAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1585 2 210 10 ============================== V000167 Post.CSheet.12. Contct resist-confidentiality MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.12. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(3): Resistance from contact person - CONFIDENTIALITY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1585 1 211 10 ============================== V000168 Post.CSheet.13. Contct resist-not interested politics MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.13. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(4): Resistance from contact person - NOT INTERESTED IN POLITICS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1585 20 192 10 ============================== V000169 Post.CSheet.14. Contct resist-too busy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.14. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(5): Resistance from contact person - TOO BUSY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1585 91 122 9 ============================== V000170 Post.CSheet.15. Contct resist-health MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.15. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(6): Resistance from contact person - POOR HEALTH --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1585 16 196 10 ============================== V000171 Post.CSheet.16. Contct resist-other MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.16. IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON: POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(7): Resistance from contact person - OTHER (SPECIFY) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1585 111 107 4 ============================== V000172 Post.CSheet.17. R refuse initially MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.17. POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3e: Did R refuse initially? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA 0. INAP, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 27 98 1573 109 ============================== V000173 Post.CSheet.18. R break appts MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.18. POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3f: Did respondent break any appointments --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. None 1. One 2. Two or more 8. NA 9. INAP, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 2 ----- ----- ----- Count 1444 273 90 ============================== V000174 Post.CSheet.19. Was R contact resister? MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.19. POST - COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3g: If contact persons resisted [if CD3a was "YES"], was the respondent the contact person who gave resistance? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1585 152 15 55 ============================== V000175 Post.CSheet.20. SUMMARY: did R resist MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.20. SUMMARY: did R resist (built) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This counts any resistance identified according to Pre-CSheet.25 or in Pre-CSheet.27-Pre-CSheet.33; however, cases "not marked" throughout variables Pre-CSheet.27-Pre-CSheet.33 may have been unmarked due to complete omission rather than due to the inapplicability of any of the resistance categories to R. 1. Yes, some resistance identified 5. No resistance identified 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 131 152 1454 70 ============================== V000176 Post.CSheet.21. R resist- waste time MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.21. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a: POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(1): Resistance from R - SURVEYS WASTE OF TIME; PREVIOUS BAD EXPERIENCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 9 ----- ----- Count 1792 15 ============================== V000177 Post.CSheet.22. R resist- too personal MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.22. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a: POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(2): Resistance from R - TOO PERSONAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 9 ----- ----- Count 1792 15 ============================== V000178 Post.CSheet.23. R resist- confidentiality MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.23. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a: POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(3): Resistance from R - CONFIDENTIALITY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 9 ----- ----- Count 1792 15 ============================== V000179 Post.CSheet.24. R resist- not interested in politics MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.24. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a: POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(4): Resistance from R - NOT INTERESTED IN POLITICS --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 9 ----- ----- Count 1792 15 ============================== V000180 Post.CSheet.25. R resist- too busy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.25. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a: POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(5): Resistance from R - TOO BUSY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 9 ----- ----- Count 1792 15 ============================== V000181 Post.CSheet.26. R resist- health MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.26. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a: POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(6): Resistance from R - POOR HEALTH --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 9 ----- ----- Count 1792 15 ============================== V000182 Post.CSheet.27. R resist- other MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.27. IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a: POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(7): Resistance from R - OTHER (SPECIFY) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Marked 5. Not marked 9. NA 0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 9 ----- ----- Count 1792 15 ============================== V000183 Post.CSheet.28. Ever make contact (noninterview) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.28. POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3: Were you ever able to make contact with someone at this housing unit? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA 0. INAP, noninterview and coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 12 1760 35 ============================== V000183a Post.CSheet.28a. Ever contact R (noninterview) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.28a. POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3d: Did you ever have any contact with the respondent? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 9. NA 0. INAP, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.28; noninterview and coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1) 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 12 1722 70 3 ============================== V000184 Post.CSheet.29. Reason no contact (NI) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.29. IF NO CONTACT WITH HOUSEHOLD FOR POST INTERVIEW: POST- COVERSHEET CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD4: What was the reason for no contact? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Nobody home at any call; no info about household could be obtained 2. All occupants away during entire study period (i.e. long vacation, illness); info obtained from neighbor, manager etc. 3. Nobody answered door but think somone in HU [FTF: when visits made] 4. Could not obtain access to HU 7. Other (specify) 9. NA 0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.28; coversheet missing (1 in Post- CSheet.1) 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1770 14 1 1 4 7 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1 15 5 ============================== V000184a Post-CSheet.30. CSMS estimated income MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-CSheet.30. IF FTF MODE: POST- COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 1): What is the estimated income of R's household? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Under $10,000 2. $10,000-25,000 3. $25,000-50,000 4. $50,000-105,000 5. $105,000 and above 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 98 201 263 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 247 72 49 76 ============================== V000184b Post-CSheet.31. CSMS estimated HH race MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-CSheet.31. IF FTF MODE: POST - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 2): What is the race of R's household? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See also survey variables Y30(1)-Y30(3) for self-description by the respondent, item ZZ.2 describing IWR's observation of R's race, and the Pre equivalent of this variable in Pre-CSheet.35. 1. White 2. Black 3. American Indian 4. Asian 7. Other 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 759 133 4 4 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 17 36 2 55 ============================== V000184c Post-CSheet.32. CSMS est HH race certain MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.32. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: IF INTERVIEWER HAS IDENTIFIED RACE OF HOUSEHOLD: POST - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 2a): Is this definite or probable? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Definite 5. Probable 9. NA 0. INAP, 0,8,9 in Post-Csheet.31 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 858 912 31 6 ============================== V000184d Post-CSheet.33. CSMS estimated Hispanic MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-CSheet.33. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: POST - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 3): Is R or R's household of hispanic origin? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See also V000068, V000069 (Pre version of these variables) ans Pre survey items Y30x/Y31 and Y31a/Y31a.T. 1. Yes 5. No 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP, Phone mode 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 85 860 6 55 ============================== V000184e Post-CSheet.34. CSMS est Hispanic certain MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-CSheet.34. IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE: IF INTERVIEWER HAS IDENTIFIED HISPANIC STATUS OF R/R'S HOUSEHOLD: POST - COVERSHEET CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 3a): Is this definite or probable? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Definite 5. Probable 9. NA 0. INAP, 0,8,9 in Pre-Csheet.37 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 862 908 33 4 ============================== V000185 Post.IWR.1. Interviewer of record MD: EQ 9999 Numeric Post-IWR.1. POST: Interviewer of record ID --------------------------------------------------------------------- 4-digit ID 9999. NA ============================== V000186 Post.IWR.2. Supervisor MD: EQ 9999 Numeric Post-IWR.2. POST: Supervisor ID --------------------------------------------------------------------- 4-digit ID 9999. NA ============================== V000187 Post.IWR.3. Interviewer gender MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-IWR.3. POST: Interviewer gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 9. NA 0. INAP, no Post IW 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 200 1606 1 ============================== V000188 Post.IWR.4. Interviewer education MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-IWR.4. POST: Interviewer education --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. 1-8 grades 2. Some high school 3. High school graduate 4. Some college 5. College degree 6. Master's degree 7. Ph.D. 9. NA 0. INAP, no Post IW 3 4 5 6 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 385 596 533 254 39 ============================== V000189 Post.IWR.5. Interviewer race MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-IWR.5. POST: Interviewer race --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. White 2. Black 3. Native American 4. Asian 7. Other 9. NA 0. INAP, no Post IW 1 2 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 1733 46 28 ============================== V000190 Post.IWR.6. Interviewer ethnicity MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-IWR.6. POST: Interviewer ethnicity --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. No ethnic identity coded 1. Hispanic 7. Other 9. NA; INAP, no Post IW 0 1 7 ----- ----- ----- Count 1577 67 163 ============================== V000191 Post.IWR.7. Interviewer languages Numeric Post-IWR.7. POST: Interviewer languages --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is not available in 2000. 0 ----- Count 1807 ============================== V000192 Post.IWR.8. Yrs Interviewer experience MD: EQ 99 Numeric Post-IWR.8. POST: Years Interviewer experience --------------------------------------------------------------------- Interviewer's years of experience and: 99. NA; INAP, no Post IW 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 445 391 161 205 20 176 6 7 8 9 10 11 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 66 68 36 68 37 28 12 13 14 15 17 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 42 19 3 29 12 1 ============================== V000193 Post.IWR.9. Interviewer age (bracketed) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-IWR.9. POST: Interviewer age (bracketted) --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. 18-34 years 2. 35-40 years 3. 41-45 years 4. 46-50 years 5. 51-55 years 6. 56-60 years 7. 51-64 years 8. 65-79 years 9. NA 0. INAP, no Post IW 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 114 187 260 297 255 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 311 142 240 1 ============================== V000194 Post.Cand.1. House race type MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.1. House race type --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT RUNNING 12 Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER 13 Dem incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER 14 Dem incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 19 Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS REPUBLICAN INCUMBENT RUNNING 21 Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER 23 Rep incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER 24 Rep incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 29 Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS OTHER INCUMBENT RUNNING 31 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER 32 Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER 34 Other incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 35 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CHALLENGERS 36 Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS 37 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS 39 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CHALLS NO INCUMBENT RUNNING 51 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 52 Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 53 Dem incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 55 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS 56 Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS 57 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS 59 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS 61 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 62 Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 63 Rep incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 65 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS 66 Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS 67 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS 69 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99 NA 00 Washington DC 0 12 13 14 19 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 632 3 111 12 21 23 24 29 31 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 717 9 126 8 3 32 55 65 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 25 152 3 1 ============================== V000194a Post.Cand.1a. Retiring House Repr name Character Post-Cand.1a. Retiring House Representative name --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== V000194b Post.Cand.1b. Retiring House Repr code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.1b. Retiring House Representative code --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 41. Democratic Representative--retiring (district with open race) 42. Republican Representative--retiring (district with open race) 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99. NA 00. No retiring House representative; Washington DC 0 41 42 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1626 25 152 3 1 ============================== V000194c Post.Cand.1c. Retiring House Repr gender MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.1c. Retiring House Representative gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 1. Male 2. Female 8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 9. NA 0. No retiring House representative; Washington DC 0 1 2 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1626 141 36 3 1 ============================== V000194d Post.Cand.1d. Winner of 2000 House election MD: EQ 99 Numeric Post-Cand.1d. Winner of 2000 House election in R's district of interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- 30. Independent/3rd party incumbent candidate 31. Democratic candidate in open race 32. Republican candidate in open race 33. Democratic incumbent 34. Republican incumbent 35. Democratic challenger 36. Republican challenger 39. Independent/3rd party nonincumbent candidate 99. NA (R's correct district not determined, 96 or 99 in Pre-Sample.1) 00. Washington DC 0 31 32 33 34 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 42 135 753 823 35 36 39 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 37 5 4 4 ============================== V000194e Post.Cand.1e. Winner of 2000 Senate election Numeric Post-Cand.1e. Winner of 2000 Senate election in R's state of interview --------------------------------------------------------------------- 09 Third party or independent Senate candidate --incumbent 10 Third party or independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent 08 Third party or independent Senate candidate --2nd nonincumbent 11 Democratic candidate in open Senate race 12 Republican candidate in open Senate race 13 Democratic Senate incumbent 14 Republican Senate incumbent 15 Democratic Senate challenger 16 Republican Senate challenger 99. NA (R's correct district not determined, 96 or 99 in Pre-Sample.1) 00. No race in state; Washington CD 0 11 12 13 14 15 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 417 251 5 420 411 159 16 31 33 35 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 91 2 36 11 4 ============================== V000194f Post.Cand.1f. Competitiveness of respondent CD MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Cand.1f. Competitiveness of House race in 1998 in respondent's district --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1998 districts were stratified for competitiveness by the winning margin of the elected candidate. 1. Least competitive 2. 3. 4. 5. Most competitive 9. NA (R's correct district not determined, 96 or 99 in Pre-Sample.1); Washington D.C. 1 2 3 4 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 375 300 361 362 401 8 ============================== V000194g Post.Cand.1g. Open seat in 2000 in respondent district? MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Cand.1g. Open seat in R's district in 2000? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. NO 1. YES 9. NA (R's correct district not determined, 96 or 99 in Pre-Sample.1) Washington D.C. 0 1 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1697 102 8 ============================== V000195 Post.Cand.2. House Democratic cand name Character Post-Cand.2. House Democratic candidate name --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== V000196 Post.Cand.3. House Democratic cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.3. House Democratic candidate code --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99. NA 00. No Democratic candidate; Washington DC 0 31 33 35 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 140 180 758 725 3 1 ============================== V000197 Post.Cand.4. House Democratic cand gendr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.4. House Democratic candidate gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 1. Male 2. Female 8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 9. NA 0. No Democratic House candidate; Washington DC 0 1 2 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 140 1367 296 3 1 ============================== V000198 Post.Cand.5. House Republican cand name Character Post-Cand.5. House Republican candidate name --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== V000199 Post.Cand.6. House Republican cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.6. House Republican candidate code --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 32. Republican candidate in open House race 34. Republican House incumbent 36. Republican House challenger 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99. NA 00. No Republican House candidate; Washington DC 0 32 34 36 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 121 178 860 644 3 1 ============================== V000200 Post.Cand.7. House Republican cand gendr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.7. House Republican candidate gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 1. Male 2. Female 8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 9. NA 0. No Republican House candidate; Washington DC 0 1 2 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 121 1574 108 3 1 ============================== V000201 Post.Cand.8. House Ind cand name Character Post-Cand.8. House Independent/third party candidate name --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== V000202 Post.Cand.9. House Ind cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.9. House Independent/third party candidate code --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** THIS CODE IS USED ONLY IF NAME APPEARS ON CANDIDATE LIST For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99. NA 00. No Independent/third party House candidate; Washington DC 0 30 39 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1767 32 4 3 1 ============================== V000202a Post.Cand.9a. House Ind cand party Character Post-Cand.9a. House Independent/third party candidate party --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is an alpha variable ============================== V000203 Post.Cand.10. House Ind cand gender MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.10. House Independent/third party candidate gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 1. Male 2. Female 8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 9. NA 0. No Independent/third party House candidate; Washington DC 0 1 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1767 36 3 1 ============================== V000204 Post.Cand.11. Senate race type MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.11. Senate race type: STATES WITH SENATE RACE STATES WITHOUT SENATE RACE Arizona Alabama California Arkansas Connecticut Colorado Delaware Idaho Florida Illinois Georgia Iowa Indiana Kansas Maine Kentucky Maryland Louisiana Massachusetts New Hampshire Michigan North Carolina Minnesota Oklahoma Mississippi Oregon Missouri South Carolina Montana South Dakota Nebraska Nevada New Jersey New Mexico New York North Dakota Ohio Pennsylvania Rhode Island Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT RUNNING 12 Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER 13 Dem incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER 14 Dem incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 19 Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS REPUBLICAN INCUMBENT RUNNING 21 Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER 23 Rep incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER 24 Rep incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 29 Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS OTHER INCUMBENT RUNNING 31 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER 32 Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER 34 Other incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 35 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CHALLENGERS 36 Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS 37 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS 39 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CHALLS NO INCUMBENT RUNNING 51 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 52 Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 53 Dem incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 55 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS 56 Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS 57 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS 59 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS 61 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 62 Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 63 Rep incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 65 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS 66 Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS 67 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS 69 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS NO RACE IN STATE 81 DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENTS, no race in state 82 REPUBLICAN INCUMBENTS, no race in state 85 DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN INCUMBENTS, no race in state 96 Code 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99 NA 00 Washington DC 0 12 19 21 23 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 256 255 584 13 24 55 69 81 82 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 22 164 92 58 165 85 96 99 ----- ----- ----- Count 190 3 1 ============================== V000205 Post.Cand.12. Senate Democr cand name Character Post-Cand.12. Senate Democratic candidate name --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== V000206 Post.Cand.13. Senate Democr cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.13. Senate Democratic candidate code --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 11. Democratic candidate in open Senate race 13. Democratic Senate incumbent 15. Democratic Senate challenger 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99. NA 00. No race in state; no Democratic Senate candidate; Washington DC 0 11 13 15 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 452 256 511 584 3 1 ============================== V000207 Post.Cand.14. Senate Democr cand gender MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.14. Senate Democratic candidate gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 1. Male 2. Female 8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 9. NA 0. No race in state; no Democratic Senate candidate; Washington DC 0 1 2 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 452 924 427 3 1 ============================== V000208 Post.Cand.15. Senate Repub cand name Character Post-Cand.15. Senate Republican candidate name --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== V000209 Post.Cand.16. Senate Repub cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.16. Senate Republican candidate code --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 12. Republican candidate in open Senate race 14. Republican Senate incumbent 16. Republican Senate challenger 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99. NA 00. No race in state; no Republican Senate candidate; Washington DC 0 12 14 16 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 417 256 619 511 3 1 ============================== V000210 Post.Cand.17. Senate Repub cand gender MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.17. Senate Republican candidate gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 1. Male 2. Female 8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 9. NA 0. No race in state; no Republican Senate candidate; Washington DC 0 1 2 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 417 1245 141 3 1 ============================== V000211 Post.Cand.18. Senate Ind 1 cand name Character Post-Cand.18. Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate name --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== V000212 Post.Cand.19. Senate Ind 1 cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.19. Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate code --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** THIS CODE IS USED ONLY IF NAME APPEARS ON CANDIDATE LIST For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 09 Third party or independent Senate candidate --incumbent ** 10 Third party or independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent ** 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99. NA 00. No race in state; no independent/third party Senate candidate; Washington DC 0 10 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1443 360 3 1 ============================== V000212a Post.Cand.19a. Senate Ind 1 cand party Character Post-Cand.19a. Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate party --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== V000213 Post.Cand.20. Senate Ind 1 cand gender MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.20. Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 1. Male 2. Female 8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 9. NA 0. No race in state; no Independent/third party Senate candidate; Washington DC 0 1 2 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1443 109 251 3 1 ============================== V000214 Post.Cand.21. Senate Ind 2 cand name Character Post-Cand.21. Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate name --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== V000215 Post.Cand.22. Senate Ind 2 cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.22. Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate code --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** THIS CODE IS USED ONLY IF NAME APPEARS ON CANDIDATE LIST For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 08 Third party or independent Senate candidate --2nd nonincumbent** 96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 99. NA 00. No race in state; no independent/third party Senate candidate; no 2nd independent/third party Senate candidate; Washington DC 0 8 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1612 191 3 1 ============================== V000215a Post.Cand.22a. Senate Ind 2 cand party Character Post-Cand.22a. Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate party --------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification) are blank in this variable. ============================== V000216 Post.Cand.23. Senate Ind 2 cand gender MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.23. Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate gender --------------------------------------------------------------------- For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined; this is a Pre-only case. 1. Male 2. Female 8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 9. NA 0. No race in state; no Independent/third party Senate candidate; no 2nd independent/third party Senate candidate; Washington DC 0 2 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1612 191 3 1 ============================== V000217 Post.Cand.24. Outside Hse Dem cand name Character Post-Cand.24. House Democratic candidate name - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is blank if Pre-Sample.8 (V000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified. ============================== V000218 Post.Cand.25. Outside Hse Dem cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.25. House Democratic candidate code - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 96. No democratic candidate in 'outside' CD 99. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (V000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (V000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state) 00. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7 0 31 33 35 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1785 3 9 2 8 ============================== V000219 Post.Cand.26. Outside Hse Dem cand gendr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.26. House Democratic candidate gender - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 8. No democratic candidate in 'outside' CD 9. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (V000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (V000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state). 0. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1785 11 3 8 ============================== V000220 Post.Cand.27. Outside Hse Rep cand name Character Post-Cand.27. House Republican candidate name - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is blank if Pre-Sample.8 (V000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified. ============================== V000221 Post.Cand.28. Outside Hse Rep cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.28. House Republican candidate code - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 32. Republican candidate in open House race 34. Republican House incumbent 36. Republican House challenger 96. No Republican candidate in 'outside' CD 99. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (V000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (V000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state). 00. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7 0 32 34 36 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1785 3 2 9 8 ============================== V000222 Post.Cand.29. Outside Hse Rep cand gendr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.29. House Republican candidate gender - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 8. No Republican candidate in 'outside' CD 9. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (V000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (V000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state). 0. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1785 11 3 8 ============================== V000223 Post.Cand.30. Outside Hse Ind cand name Character Post-Cand.30. House Independent/third party candidate name - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is blank if Pre-Sample.8 (V000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified. ============================== V000224 Post.Cand.31. Outside Hse Ind cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.31. House Independent/third party candidate code - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent 96. No independent/3rd party candidate in 'outside' CD 99. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (V000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (V000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state). 00. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7 0 96 99 ----- ----- ----- Count 1785 14 8 ============================== V000225 Post.Cand.32. Outside Hse Ind cand gendr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Post-Cand.32. House Independent/third party candidate gender - Vote outside CD of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 8. No independent/3rd party candidate in 'outside' CD 9. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (V000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (V000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state). 0. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7 0 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1785 14 8 ============================== V000226 Post.Cand.33. Outside Hse race type MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.33. House race type - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT RUNNING 12 Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER 13 Dem incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER 14 Dem incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 19 Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS REPUBLICAN INCUMBENT RUNNING 21 Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER 23 Rep incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER 24 Rep incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 29 Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS OTHER INCUMBENT RUNNING 31 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER 32 Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER 34 Other incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 35 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CHALLENGERS 36 Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS 37 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS 39 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CHALLS NO INCUMBENT RUNNING 51 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 52 Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 53 Dem incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 55 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS 56 Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS 57 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS 59 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS 61 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 62 Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 63 Rep incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 65 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS 66 Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS 67 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS 69 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS 96. Washington DC 99. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (V000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (V000086) does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state). 00. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7 0 12 21 55 65 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1785 9 2 1 2 8 ============================== V000226a Post.Cand.33a. Outside Sen race type MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.33a. Senate race type - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT RUNNING 12 Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER 13 Dem incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER 14 Dem incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 19 Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS REPUBLICAN INCUMBENT RUNNING 21 Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER 23 Rep incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER 24 Rep incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 29 Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS OTHER INCUMBENT RUNNING 31 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER 32 Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER 34 Other incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED 35 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CHALLENGERS 36 Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS 37 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS 39 Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CHALLS NO INCUMBENT RUNNING 51 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 52 Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 53 Dem incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 55 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS 56 Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS 57 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS 59 Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS 61 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 62 Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 63 Rep incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED 65 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS 66 Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS 67 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS 69 Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS NO RACE IN STATE 81 DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENTS, no race in state 82 REPUBLICAN INCUMBENTS, no race in state 85 DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN INCUMBENTS, no race in state 96. Washington DC 99. R vote in another district but not another state 00. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7 0 12 19 21 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1785 2 1 3 69 85 99 ----- ----- ----- Count 1 3 12 ============================== V000227 Post.Cand.34. Outside Sen Dem cand name Character Post-Cand.34. Senate Democratic candidate name - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is blank if R did not vote outside state of IW. ============================== V000228 Post.Cand.35. Outside Sen Dem cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.35. Senate Democratic candidate code - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 11. Democratic candidate in open Senate race 13. Democratic Senate incumbent 15. Democratic Senate challenger 96. No race in state; no Democratic candidate 99. R voted in another district but not another state 00. R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC 0 11 13 15 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1785 1 3 3 3 12 ============================== V000229 Post.Cand.36. Outside Sen Dem cand gendr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Cand.36. Senate Democratic candidate gender - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 9. No race in state; no Democratic candidate 0. R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district but not another state; Washington DC 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1797 4 3 3 ============================== V000230 Post.Cand.37. Outside Sen Rep cand name Character Post-Cand.37. Senate Republican candidate name - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is blank if R did not vote outside state of IW. ============================== V000231 Post.Cand.38. Outside Sen Rep cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.38. Senate Republican candidate code - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 12. Republican candidate in open Senate race 14. Republican Senate incumbent 16. Republican Senate challenger 96. No race in state; no Republican candidate 99. R voted in another district but not another state 00. R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC 0 12 14 16 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1785 1 3 3 3 12 ============================== V000232 Post.Cand.39. Outside Sen Rep cand gendr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Cand.39. Senate Republican candidate gender - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 9. No race in state; no Democratic candidate 0. R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district but not another state; Washington DC 0 1 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1797 7 3 ============================== V000233 Post.Cand.40. Outside Sen Ind1 cand name Character Post-Cand.40. Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate name - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is blank if R did not vote outside state of IW or if there was no independent/third party candidate in 'outside' state. ============================== V000234 Post.Cand.41. Outside Sen Ind1 cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.41. Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate code - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 09 Third party or independent Senate candidate --incumbent 10 Third party or independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent 96. No race in state; no independent/3rd party candidate 99. R voted in another district but not another state 00. R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC 0 10 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1785 2 8 12 ============================== V000235 Post.Cand.42. Outside Sen Ind1 cand gend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Cand.42. Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate gender - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 9. No race in state; no independent/3rd party candidate 0. R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district but not another state; Washington DC 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1797 1 1 8 ============================== V000236 Post.Cand.43. Outside Sen Ind2 cand name Character Post-Cand.43. Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate name - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is blank if R did not vote outside state of IW or if there was no (2nd) independent/third party candidate in 'outside' state. ============================== V000237 Post.Cand.44. Outside Sen Ind2 cand code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Post-Cand.44. Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate code - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 08. Third party or independent Senate candidate --2nd nonincumbent 96. No race in state; no independent/3rd party candidate; no second independent/3rd party candidate 99. R voted in another district but not another state 00. R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC 0 8 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1785 1 9 12 ============================== V000238 Post.Cand.45. Outside Sen Ind2 cand gend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Post-Cand.45. Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate gender - Vote outside state of IW --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Male 2. Female 9. No race in state; no independent/3rd party candidate; no second independent/3rd party candidate 0. R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district but not another state; Washington DC 0 2 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1797 1 9 ============================== V000239 Post.Summary.1. Post timing - section A MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.1. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION A --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000240 Post.Summary.2. Post timing - section B MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.2. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION B --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000241 Post.Summary.3. Post timing - section C MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.3. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION C --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000242 Post.Summary.4. Post timing - section D MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.4. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION D --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000243 Post.Summary.5. Post timing - section E MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.5. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION E --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000244 Post.Summary.6. Post timing - section F MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.6. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION F --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000245 Post.Summary.7. Post timing - section G MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.7. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION G --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000246 Post.Summary.8. Post timing - section H MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.8. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION H --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 Section H administered in Pre; No Post IW ============================== V000247 Post.Summary.9. Post timing - section J MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.9. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION J --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000248 Post.Summary.10. Post timing - section K MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.10. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION K --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000249 Post.Summary.11. Post timing - section L MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.11. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION L --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000250 Post.Summary.12. Post timing - section M MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.12. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION M --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000251 Post.Summary.13. Post timing - section N MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.13. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION N --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000252 Post.Summary.14. Post timing - section P MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.14. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION P --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000253 Post.Summary.15. Post timing - section Q MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.15. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION Q --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000254 Post.Summary.16. Post timing - section R MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.16. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION R --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000255 Post.Summary.17. Post timing - section S MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.17. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION S --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000256 Post.Summary.18. Post timing - section T MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.18. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION T --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000257 Post.Summary.19. Post timing - section V MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.19. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION V --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000258 Post.Summary.20. Post timing - section Y MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.20. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION Y --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000259 Post.Summary.21. Post timing - section Z MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 999.99 Numeric Post-Summary.21. POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION Z --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time between the beginning and ending of the section as recorded by the instrument application, and may be affected by suspension of interview, power failure, application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA 000.00 No Post IW ============================== V000260 Post.Summary.22. Wrong CD admin(preload) MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Summary.22. POST: Wrong CD administered (preloaded)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: 3 cases (case IDs 900,1016,1114) were misidentified in the preload as PA cases but were actually conducted in New Jersey; the actual CD for the NJ location is not determined. Variables for survey questions which were administered according to Preload information are unchanged (affected cases not set to missing data). State and CD variables (e.g. V000079, V000080 etc.) are set to missing data but sampling variables associated with segment are correct for the actual segment location (if FTF mode). 0. No misidentification of CD 1. Wrong CD identified (administered) 9. No Post IW 0 1 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1553 3 251 ============================== V000261 Post.Summary.23. Type error in preload MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Summary.23. POST: Type of error in preload --------------------------------------------------------------------- Code 1 corresponds to 3 cases in WV where Senate type race was misidentified as type race 12 instead of type race 19 (note: 1 additional case in WV had correct Senate type race preloaded). For the 3 cases coded 1, the preload information for the Senate Independent/3rd party candidate was not preloaded. 0. No error in Preload 1. Wrong Senate type race preloaded (WV, 3 cases) 2. Wrong CD (1 in Post-Summary.22) 9. No Post IW 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1550 3 3 251 ============================== V000262 Post.Summary.24. Flag-Post rand failure MD: EQ 9 Numeric Post-Summary.24. POST: Flag - randomization failure in Post admin --------------------------------------------------------------------- On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument program had an error in setting randomization. Interviews --or, for some interviews administered over several days, portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00) were not administered with correctly functioning randomization. All cases administered prior to the correction of this error were administered as if only one choice in the randomization were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice). The randomization variables documented in V001752-V001810 describe the types of randomizations affected. 0. No randomization failure 1. Post randomization failure in at least a portion of the interview 9. No Post IW 0 1 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 1051 504 252 ============================== V000301 A1. Attention R paid to campaigns MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A1. Some people don't pay much attention to political campaigns. How about you? Would you say that you have been very much interested, somewhat interested or not much interested in the political campaigns so far this year? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY MUCH INTERESTED 3. SOMEWHAT INTERESTED 5. NOT MUCH INTERESTED 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 525 886 396 ============================== V000302 A2. Does R care about Pres election MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A2. Generally speaking, would you say that you personally care a good deal who wins the presidential election this fall, or that you don't care very much who wins? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CARE A GOOD DEAL 3. DON'T CARE VERY MUCH 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 1402 397 8 ============================== V000303 A3. Did R vote in 1996 election MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A3. In 1996 Bill Clinton ran on the Democratic ticket against Bob Dole for the Republicans, and Ross Perot as an independent candidate. Do you remember for sure whether or not you voted in that election? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK' RESPONSE] 1. YES, VOTED 5. NO, DIDN'T VOTE --> SKIP TO A4/A5 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP A4/A5 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1264 530 12 1 ============================== V000304 A3a. Who did R vote for in 1996 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A3a. IF R VOTED FOR PRESIDENT IN 1996: Which one did you vote for? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK' RESPONSE] 1. BILL CLINTON 3. BOB DOLE 5. ROSS PEROT 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in A3 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 543 665 408 138 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 27 9 17 ............................................................................ A4. (Now I'd like to ask you about the good and bad points of the major candidates for President.) ============================== V000305 A4a. Does R like anything about Gore MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A4a. Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al Gore that might make you want to vote for him? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of the A4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about Gore) and the A5 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about GW Bush) was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO A4c 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO A4c 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 912 878 13 4 ============================== V000306 A4b(1). #1 detail about Gore R likes MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9995 Numeric A4b(1). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR GORE: Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al Gore that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 1 - GORE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4a ============================== V000307 A4b(2). #2 detail about Gore R likes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4b(2). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR GORE: Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al Gore that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 2 - GORE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4b(1); no further mentions ============================== V000308 A4b(3). #3 detail about Gore R likes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4b(3). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR GORE: Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al Gore that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 3 - GORE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4b(1); no further mentions ============================== V000309 A4b(4). #4 detail about Gore R likes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4b(4). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR GORE: Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al Gore that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 4 - GORE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4b(1); no further mentions ============================== V000310 A4b(5). #5 detail about Gore R likes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4b(5). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR GORE: Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al Gore that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 5 - GORE 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4b(1); no further mentions ============================== V000311 A4c. Does R dislike anything about Gore MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A4c. Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might make you want to vote against him? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of the A4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about Gore) and the A5 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about GW Bush) was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. Yes 5. No --> A5a Or A6 8. Don't Know --> A5a Or A6 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 860 934 10 3 ============================== V000312 A4d(1). #1 detail about Gore R dislikes MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric A4d(1). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST GORE: Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 1 - GORE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4c ============================== V000313 A4d(2). #2 detail about Gore R dislikes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4d(2). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST GORE: Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 2 - GORE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4d(1); no further mentions ============================== V000314 A4d(3). #3 detail about Gore R dislikes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4d(3). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST GORE: Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 3 - GORE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4d(1); no further mentions ============================== V000315 A4d(4). #4 detail about Gore R dislikes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4d(4). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST GORE: Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 4 - GORE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4d(1); no further mentions ============================== V000316 A4d(5). #5 detail about Gore R dislikes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A4d(5). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST GORE: Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 5 - GORE 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4d(1); no further mentions ============================== V000317 A5a. Does R like anything about Bush MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A5a. Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of the A4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about Gore) and the A5 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about GW Bush) was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO A5c 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO A5c 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 822 970 13 2 ============================== V000318 A5b(1). #1 detail about Bush R likes MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric A5b(1). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR BUSH: Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 1 - GW BUSH 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5a ============================== V000319 A5b(2). #2 detail about Bush R likes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A5b(2). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR BUSH: Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 2 - GW BUSH 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5b(1); no further mentions ============================== V000320 A5b(3). #3 detail about Bush R likes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A5b(3). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR BUSH: Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 3 - GW BUSH 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5b(1); no further mentions ============================== V000321 A5b(4). #4 detail about Bush R likes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A5b(4). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR BUSH: Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 4 - GW BUSH 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5b(1); no further mentions ============================== V000322 A5b(5). #5 detail about Bush R likes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A5b(5). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR BUSH: Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him? (What is that?) MENTION 5 - GW BUSH 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5b(1); no further mentions ============================== V000323 A5c. Does R dislike anything about Bush MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A5c. Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush that might make you want to vote against him? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of the A4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about Gore) and the A5 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about GW Bush) was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO A4a or A6 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO A4a or A6 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 885 899 20 3 ============================== V000324 A5d(1). #1 detail about Bush R dislikes MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric A5d(1). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST BUSH: Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 1 - GW BUSH 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5c ============================== V000325 A5d(2). #2 detail about Bush R dislikes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A5d(2). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST BUSH: Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 2 - GW BUSH 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5d(1); no further mentions ============================== V000326 A5d(3). #3 detail about Bush R dislikes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A5d(3). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST BUSH: Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 3 - GW BUSH 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5d(1); no further mentions ============================== V000327 A5d(4). #4 detail about Bush R dislikes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A5d(4). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST BUSH: Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 4 - GW BUSH 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5d(1); no further mentions ============================== V000328 A5d(5). #5 detail about Bush R dislikes MD: EQ 0 Numeric A5d(5). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST BUSH: Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush that might make you want to vote against him? (What is that?) MENTION 5 - GW BUSH 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5d(1); no further mentions ============================== V000329 A6. Number of days R watched nat'l news MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric A6. How many days in the past week did you watch the national network news on TV? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. NONE --> SKIP TO A7 1. ONE DAY 2. TWO DAYS 3. THREE DAYS 4. FOUR DAYS 5. FIVE DAYS 6. SIX DAYS 7. EVERY DAY 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF; NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 483 165 201 179 99 5 6 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 135 27 515 3 ============================== V000330 A6a/A6a.T. Attention to national news MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A6a/A6a.T. IF R WATCHED NATIONAL NETWORK TV NEWS IN PAST WEEK: FTF: Please look at page 1 of the booklet. How much attention do you pay to news on national news shows about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? TELEPHONE: How much attention do you pay to news on national news shows about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL 2. QUITE A BIT 3. SOME 4. VERY LITTLE 5. NONE 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,8,9 in A6 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 486 235 364 513 190 19 ============================== V000331 A7. Days R watched early local news MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric A7. How many days in the past week did you watch the local TV news shows such as "Eyewitness News" or "Action News" in the late afternoon or early-evening? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. NONE 1. ONE DAY 2. TWO DAYS 3. THREE DAYS 4. FOUR DAYS 5. FIVE DAYS 6. SIX DAYS 7. EVERY DAY 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF; NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 562 110 176 140 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 115 163 22 519 ============================== V000332 A8. Days R watched late local news MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric A8. How many days in the past week did you watch the local TV news shows in the late evening? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. NONE 1. ONE DAY 2. TWO DAYS 3. THREE DAYS 4. FOUR DAYS 5. FIVE DAYS 6. SIX DAYS 7. EVERY DAY 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF; NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 727 130 182 157 106 5 6 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 127 39 338 1 ============================== V000333 A8a/A8a.T. Attention to local news MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A8a/A8a.T. IF NUMBER OF DAYS WATCHED IS NOT 0 FOR BOTH EARLY AND LATE LOCAL NEWS: FTF: Please look at page 1 of the booklet. How much attention do you pay to news on local news shows about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? TELEPHONE: How much attention do you pay to news on local news shows about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL 2. QUITE A BIT 3. SOME 4. VERY LITTLE 5. NONE 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,8,9 in A7 and A8 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 327 192 316 558 347 67 ============================== V000334 A9. Does R have cable or satellite tv MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A9. Do you have either cable or satellite television? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 ----- ----- Count 1418 389 ============================== V000335 A10. Days R read a daily newspaper MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric A10. How many days in the past week did you read a daily newspaper? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 0. NONE --> SKIP TO A11 1. ONE DAY 2. TWO DAYS 3. THREE DAYS 4. FOUR DAYS 5. FIVE DAYS 6. SIX DAYS 7. EVERY DAY 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF; NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 468 216 181 130 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 74 92 36 610 ============================== V000336 A10a. Did R read about campaign in paper MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A10a. IF R READ/DK IF READ NEWSPAPER ANY DAYS IN PAST WEEK: Did you read about the campaign in any newspaper? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO A11 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO A11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,8,9 in A10 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 468 790 548 1 ============================== V000337 A10b/A10b.T. Attention to newspaper articles MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A10b/A10b.T. IF R READ/DK IF READ NEWSPAPER ANY DAYS IN PAST WEEK: IF R READ ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN: FTF: (Please look at page 1 of the booklet.) How much attention do you pay to newspaper articles about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? TELEPHONE: How much attention do you pay to newspaper articles about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL 2. QUITE A BIT 3. SOME 4. VERY LITTLE 5. NONE 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in A10a 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1017 121 202 352 107 8 ============================== V000338 A11. Did R see ads for candidates on tv MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A11. Do you recall seeing any ads for political candidates on television this fall? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Yes 5. No 8. Don't Know 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 1377 427 3 ============================== V000339 A12. Approve/disappr Clinton job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A12. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling his job as president? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. APPROVE 5. DISAPPROVE 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO B1 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1177 565 55 10 ============================== V000340 A12a. Strength of approval/disapproval of Clinton MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A12a. IF R APPROVES CLINTON HANDLING JOB AS PRESIDENT/ IF R DISAPPROVES CLINTON HANDLING JOB AS PRESIDENT: Strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in A12 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 65 1145 587 8 2 ============================== V000341 A12x. Summary app/disapp Clinton job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric A12x. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling his job as president? Strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: APPROVAL/ DISAPPROVAL OF CLINTON JOB AS PRESIDENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from A12 and A12a. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 8. DK (in A12 or A12a) 9. RF (in A12 or A12b) 0. NA 1 2 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 745 425 162 400 63 12 ============================== V000342 B1. Did R care about House election MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B1. As you know, representatives to Congress in Washington are being chosen in this election from congressional districts all around the country. How much would you say that you personally care about the way the election to the U.S. House of Representatives comes out: do you care very much, pretty much, not very much or not at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY MUCH 2. PRETTY MUCH 3. NOT VERY MUCH 4. NOT AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 501 669 475 155 7 ============================== V000343 B2. Does R remember names of House cands MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B2. Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO B3 8. DK --> SKIP TO B3 9. RF 0. NA; Washington D.C. 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 526 1277 4 ============================== V000344 B2a. #1 recalled name, House cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric B2a. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? 1ST RECALLED NAME - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHERS?] ** codes 30,38,39 used only if name appears on candidate list (if name not on candidate list, code 97 is used) 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 32. Republican candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 34. Republican House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 36. Republican House challenger 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent 97. Name not on candidate list for this race 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C. 0 31 32 33 34 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1281 6 15 104 133 35 36 97 98 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 8 11 234 15 ============================== V000345 B2a1. #1 recall party, House cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B2a1. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? What is [NAME'S] party? 1ST RECALLED NAME - RECALLED PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democrat 2. Republican 7. Other Party (specify) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C. 0 1 2 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1281 245 238 20 23 ============================== V000346 B2ax1. #1 House cand recall-actual party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B2ax1. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? 1ST RECALLED NAME - ACTUAL PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democratic candidate (31,33,35) 2. Republican candidate (32,34,36) 3. Other (30,39) 7. Name given not on candidate list (97) 8. DK name but know party 9. DK name and DK/NA party; NA; RF 0. INAP, 5,8,9,0 in B2 0 1 2 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1281 118 159 234 15 ============================== V000347 B2ax2. #1 House cand recall- accuracy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric B2ax2. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? What is [NAME'S] party? 1ST RECALLED NAME - ACCURACY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name 3. Valid candidate name given, DK or NA for party associated with name 4. Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name 5. Invalid candidate name given with DK or NA for party associated with name 6. No candidate name given (DK or NA) -- any party mention 7. No candidate name given (DK) -- DK or NA for party 9. NA for candidate name and NA for party mention 0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in B2 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1281 241 25 11 4 5 6 ----- ----- ----- Count 222 12 15 ============================== V000348 B2b. #2 recalled name, House cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric B2b. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? 2ND RECALLED NAME - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHERS?] ** codes 30,38,39 used only if name appears on candidate list (if name not on candidate list, code 97 is used) 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 32. Republican candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 34. Republican House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 36. Republican House challenger 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent 97. Name not on candidate list or this race 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.; no further mention 0 31 32 33 34 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1520 6 4 16 14 35 36 97 98 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 23 16 141 67 ============================== V000349 B2b1. #2 recall party, House cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B2b1. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? What is [NAME'S] party? 2ND RECALLED NAME - RECALLED PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democrat 2. Republican 7. Other Party (specify) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.; no further mention 0 1 2 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1521 121 120 35 10 ============================== V000350 B2bx1. #2 House cand recall-actual party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B2bx1. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? 2ND RECALLED NAME - ACTUAL PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democratic candidate (31,33,35) 2. Republican candidate (32,34,36) 3. Other (30,39) 7. Name given not on candidate list (97) 8. DK name but know party 9. DK name and DK/NA party; NA; RF 0. INAP, 5,8,9,0 in B2; no further mention 0 1 2 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1520 45 34 141 67 ============================== V000351 B2bx2. #2 House cand recall- accuracy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric B2bx2. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? What is [NAME'S] party? 2ND RECALLED NAME - ACCCURACY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name 3. Valid candidate name given, DK or NA for party associated with name 4. Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name 5. Invalid candidate name given with DK or NA for party associated with name 6. No candidate name given (DK or NA) -- any party mention 7. No candidate name given (DK) -- DK or NA for party 9. NA for candidate name and NA for party mention 0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in B2; no further mention 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1520 68 9 2 4 5 6 ----- ----- ----- Count 132 9 67 ============================== V000352 B2c. #3 recalled name, House cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric B2c. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? 3RD RECALLED NAME - CANDIDATE CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHERS?] ** codes 30,38,39 used only if name appears on candidate list (if name not on candidate list, code 97 is used) 30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent ** 31. Democratic candidate in open House race 32. Republican candidate in open House race 33. Democratic House incumbent 34. Republican House incumbent 35. Democratic House challenger 36. Republican House challenger 38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent ** 39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent 97. Name not on candidate list for this race 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.; no further mention 0 32 33 34 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1728 1 1 5 35 97 98 ----- ----- ----- Count 1 38 33 ============================== V000353 B2c1. #3 recall party, House cand MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B2c1. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? What is [NAME'S] party? 3RD RECALLED NAME - RECALLED PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democrat 2. Republican 7. Other Party (specify) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.; no further mention 0 1 2 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1732 28 14 31 2 ============================== V000354 B2cx1. #3 House cand recall-actual party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B2cx1. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? 3RD RECALLED NAME - ACTUAL PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Democratic candidate (31,33,35) 2. Republican candidate (32,34,36) 3. Other (30,39) 7. Name given not on candidate list (97) 8. DK name but know party 9. DK name and DK/NA party; NA; RF 0. INAP, 5,8,9,0 in B2; no further mention 0 1 2 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1728 2 6 38 33 ============================== V000355 B2cx2. #3 House cand recall-accuracy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric B2cx2. IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES: Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? Who are they? What is [NAME'S] party? 3RD RECALLED NAME - ACCURACY --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name 3. Valid candidate name given, DK or NA for party associated with name 4. Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name 5. Invalid candidate name given with DK or NA for party associated with name 6. No candidate name given (DK or NA) -- any party mention 7. No candidate name given (DK) -- DK or NA for party 9. NA for candidate name and NA for party mention 0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in B2; no further mention 0 1 2 4 5 6 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1728 7 1 32 6 33 ============================== V000356 B3. Congress job approve/dissapr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B3. Do you approve or disapprove of the way the U.S. Congress has been handling its job? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. APPROVE 5. DISAPPROVE 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO C1 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 933 617 246 11 ============================== V000357 B3a. Strength of approval/disapproval of Cong MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B3a. IF R APPROVES U.S. CONGRESS HANDLING ITS JOB/ IF R DISAPPROVES U.S. CONGRESS HANDLING ITS JOB: (Do you approve or disapprove of the way the U.S. Congress has been handling its job?) Strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in B3 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 257 603 947 ============================== V000358 B3x. Summary R approval of US Congress MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric B3x. Do you approve or disapprove of the way the U.S. Congress has been handling its job? Strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: R APPROVAL OF U.S. CONGRESS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from B3 and B3a. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove not strongly 8. DK (in B3 or B3a) 9. RF (in B3 or B3a) 0. NA 1 2 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 285 648 299 318 246 11 ............................................................................ C1/C1.T. FTF: Please look at page 2 of the booklet. I'd like to get your feelings toward some of our political leaders and other people who are in the news these days. I'll read the name of a person and I'd like you to rate that person using something we call the feeling thermometer. Ratings between 50 degrees and 100 degrees mean that you feel favorable and warm toward the person. Ratings between 0 degrees and 50 degrees mean that you don't feel favorable toward the person and that you don't care too much for that person. You would rate the person at the 50 degree mark if you don't feel particularly warm or cold toward the person. If we come to a person whose name you don't recognize, you don't need to rate that person. Just tell me and we'll move on to the next one. TELEPHONE: I'd like to get your feelings toward some of our political leaders and other people who are in the news these days. I'll read the name of a person and I'd like you to rate that person using something we call the feeling thermometer. The feeling thermometer can rate people from 0 to 100 degrees. Ratings between 50 degrees and 100 degrees mean that you feel favorable and warm toward the person. Ratings between 0 degrees and 50 degrees mean that you don't feel favorable toward the person. Rating the person at the midpoint, the 50 degree mark, means you don't feel particularly warm or cold toward the person. If we come to a person whose name you don't recognize, you don't need to rate that person. Just tell me and we'll move on to the next one. ============================== V000359 C1a/C1a.T. Thermometer Bill Clinton MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1a/C1a.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) Bill Clinton TELEPHONE: The first person is: Bill Clinton Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate Bill Clinton? THERMOMETER - BILL CLINTON --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V000360 C1b/C1b.T. Thermometer Gore MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1b/C1b.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) Al Gore TELEPHONE: The next person is: Al Gore (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him?) THERMOMETER - AL GORE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V000361 C1c/C1c.T. Thermometer George W Bush MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1c/C1c.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) George W. Bush TELEPHONE: The next person is: George W. Bush (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him?) THERMOMETER - GEORGE W. BUSH --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V000362 C1d/C1d.T. Thermometer Buchanan MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1d/C1d.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) Pat Buchanan TELEPHONE: The next person is: Pat Buchanan (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him THERMOMETER - PAT BUCHANAN --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V000363 C1e/C1e.T. Thermometer Nader MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1e/C1e.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) Ralph Nader TELEPHONE: The next person is: Ralph Nader (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him?) THERMOMETER - RALPH NADER --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V000364 C1f/C1f.T. Thermometer Mccain MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1f/C1f.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) John McCain TELEPHONE: The next person is: John McCain (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him? THERMOMETER - JOHN MCCAIN --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V000365 C1g/C1g.T. Thermometer Bradley MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1g/C1g.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) Bill Bradley TELEPHONE: The next person is: Bill Bradley (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him?) THERMOMETER - BILL BRADLEY --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V000366 C1h/C1h.T. Thermometer Lieberman MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1h/C1h.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) Joseph Lieberman TELEPHONE: The next person is:: Joseph Lieberman (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him?) THERMOMETER - JOSEPH LIEBERMAN --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V000367 C1j/C1j.T. Thermometer Cheney MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1j/C1j.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) Dick Cheney TELEPHONE: The next person is:: Dick Cheney (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him?) THERMOMETER - DICK CHENEY --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V000368 C1k/C1k.T. Thermometer Hillary Clinton MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C1k/C1k.T. FTF: (Looking at page 2 of the booklet) (How would you rate:) Hillary Clinton TELEPHONE: The next person is:: Hillary Clinton (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate her?) THERMOMETER - HILLARY CLINTON --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?] After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names; C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names. C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ............................................................................ C2. Still using the thermometer: ============================== V000369 C2a. Thermometer Dem Party MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C2a. (How would you rate:) the Democratic Party THERMOMETER - DEMOCRATIC PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- C2a, C2b, C2c were administered in random order; C2d was administered last. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V000370 C2b. Thermometer Rep Party MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C2b. (How would you rate:) the Republican Party THERMOMETER - REPUBLICAN PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- C2a, C2b, C2c were administered in random order; C2d was administered last. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V000371 C2c. Thermometer Reform Party MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C2c. (How would you rate:) Reform Party THERMOMETER - REFORM PARTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- C2a, C2b, C2c were administered in random order; C2d was administered last. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ============================== V000372 C2d. Thermometer parties in general MD1: EQ 995, MD2: GE 997 Numeric C2d. (How would you rate:) Political parties in general THERMOMETER - POLITICAL PARTIES IN GENERAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- C2a, C2b, C2c were administered in random order; C2d was administered last. 0-100 995. NA 997. DON'T RECOGNIZE 998. DK WHERE TO RATE 999. RF ............................................................................ D0. I'd like to ask you what you think are the good and bad points about the two national parties. ============================== V000373 D1. Like anything- Dem Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric D1. Is there anything in particular that you like about the Democratic party? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of the D1/D2 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about Democratic Party) and the D3/D4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about the Republican party) was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO D2 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO D2 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1018 766 20 3 ============================== V000374 D1a(1). #1 like Dem Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric D1a(1). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 1 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D1 ============================== V000375 D1a(2). #2 like Dem Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D1a(2). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 2 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D1; no further mentions ============================== V000376 D1a(3). #3 like Dem Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D1a(3). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 3 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D1; no further mentions ============================== V000377 D1a(4). #4 like Dem Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D1a(4). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 4 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D1; no further mentions ============================== V000378 D1a(5). #5 like Dem Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D1a(5). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 5 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D1; no further mentions ============================== V000379 D2. Dislike anything- Dem Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric D2. Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Democratic party? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of the D1/D2 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about Democratic Party) and the D3/D4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about the Republican party) was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO D3 or D5 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO D3 or D5 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 782 996 25 4 ============================== V000380 D2a(1). #1 dislike Dem Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric D2a(1). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 1 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D2 ============================== V000381 D2a(2). #2 dislike Dem Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D2a(2). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 2 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D2; no further mentions ============================== V000382 D2a(3). #3 dislike Dem Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D2a(3). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 3 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D2; no further mentions ============================== V000383 D2a(4). #4 dislike Dem Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D2a(4). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 4 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D2; no further mentions ============================== V000384 D2a(5). #5 dislike Dem Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D2a(5). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Democratic party? (What is that?) MENTION 5 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D2; no further mentions ============================== V000385 D3. Like anything- Rep Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric D3. Is there anything in particular that you like about the Republican party? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of the D1/D2 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about Democratic Party) and the D3/D4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about the Republican party) was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO D4 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO D4 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 808 975 20 4 ============================== V000386 D3a(1). #1 like Rep Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric D3a(1). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 1 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D3 ============================== V000387 D3a(2). #2 like Rep Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D3a(2). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 2 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D3; no further mentions ============================== V000388 D3a(3). #3 like Rep Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D3a(3). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 3 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D3; no further mentions ============================== V000389 D3a(4). #4 like Rep Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D3a(4). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 4 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D3; no further mentions ============================== V000390 D3a(5). #5 like Rep Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D3a(5). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 5 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'LIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D3; no further mentions ============================== V000391 D4. Dislike anything- Rep Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric D4. Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Republican party? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of the D1/D2 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about Democratic Party) and the D3/D4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about the Republican party) was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO D1 or D5 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO D1 or D5 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 915 867 21 4 ============================== V000392 D4a(1). #1 dislike Rep Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9001 Numeric D4a(1). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 1 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 9001. R has been influenced by spouse 9002. R has been influenced by someone else 9995. NA 9998. DK 9999. Refused to say 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D4 ============================== V000393 D4a(2). #2 dislike Rep Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D4a(2). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 2 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D4; no further mentions ============================== V000394 D4a(3). #3 dislike Rep Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D4a(3). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 3 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D4; no further mentions ============================== V000395 D4a(4). #4 dislike Rep Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D4a(4). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 4 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D4; no further mentions ============================== V000396 D4a(5). #5 dislike Rep Party MD: EQ 0 Numeric D4a(5). IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY: Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Republican party? (What is that?) MENTION 5 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'DISLIKES' --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANYTING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY? UNTIL R SAYS NO.] See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE. Codes 1-1304 and: 8999. Other miscellaneous 0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D4; no further mentions ============================== V000397 D5. Preference for divided government MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric D5. Do you think it is better when one party controls both the presidency and Congress, better when control is split between the Democrats and Republicans, or doesn't it matter? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. BETTER WHEN ONE PARTY CONTROLS BOTH 3. BETTER WHEN CONTROL IS SPLIT 5. IT DOESN'T MATTER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 420 926 420 38 3 ============================== V000398 E1/E1.T. Better/worse off in last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E1/E1.T. FTF: We are interested in how people are getting along financially these days. Would you say that you (and your family living here) are better off, worse off, or just about the same financially as you were a year ago? TELEPHONE: We are interested in how people are getting along financially these days. Would you say that you (and your family) are better off, worse off, or just about the same financially as you were a year ago? --------------------------------------------------------------------- A half-sample of respondents was randomly selected for administration of the E section. Summary variables for all respondents administered questions related to personal financial situation either pre or post are found following corresponding post-administration variables (V001410-V001417) 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> Skip to E1b 5. THE SAME --> Skip to E2 8. DK --> Skip to E2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R not selected for half-sample 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 880 312 130 482 3 ============================== V000399 E1a. How much better off- last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E1a. IF R'S FAMILY HAS BEEN BETTER OFF IN LAST YEAR: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Much Better --> E2 5. Somewhat Better --> E2 8. DK --> E2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in E1/E1.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1495 117 194 1 ============================== V000400 E1b. How much worse off- last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E1b. IF R'S FAMILY HAS BEEN WORSE OFF IN LAST YEAR: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Much Worse 5. Somewhat Worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in E1/E1.T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1677 41 89 ============================== V000401 E1x. Summary R econ situation last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E1x. Would you say that you (and your family [FTF: living here]) are better off, worse off, or just about the same financially as you were a year ago? Much better/worse or somewhat better/worse? SUMMARY - R FINANCIAL SITUATION IN PAST YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from E1/E1.T and E1a/E1b. Summary variables for all respondents administered questions related to personal financial situation either pre or post are found following corresponding post-administration variables (V001410-V001417) 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK (in E1 or E1a/E1b) 9. RF (in E1 or E1a/E1b) 0. NA; INAP, R not selected for half-sample 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 880 117 194 482 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 89 41 4 ============================== V000402 E2/E2.T. Did R delay med/dent treatment MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E2/E2.T. FTF: In the past year did you (or anyone in your family living here) put off medical or dental treatment because you didn't have the money? TELEPHONE: In the past year did you (or anyone in your family) put off medical or dental treatment because you didn't have the money? --------------------------------------------------------------------- A half-sample of respondents was randomly selected for administration of the E section. Summary variables for all respondents administered questions related to personal financial situation either pre or post are found following corresponding post-administration variables (V001410-V001417) 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R not selected for half-sample 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 880 278 649 ============================== V000403 E3/E3.T. Expect better/worse in next year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E3/E3.T. FTF: Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you (and your family living here) will be better off financially, worse off, or just about the same as now? TELEPHONE: Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you (and your family) will be better off financially, worse off, or just about the same as now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- A half-sample of respondents was randomly selected for administration of the E section. Summary variables for all respondents administered questions related to personal financial situation either pre or post are found following corresponding post-administration variables (V001410-V001417) 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> Skip to E3B 5. THE SAME --> Skip to F1 8. DK --> Skip to F1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R not selected for half-sample 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 880 369 53 479 26 ============================== V000404 E3a. How much better off- next year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E3a. IF R THINKS FAMILY WILL BE BETTER OFF A YEAR FROM NOW: Much better off or somewhat better off? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP to F1 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP to F1 8. DK --> SKIP to F1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in E3/E3.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1438 117 251 1 ============================== V000405 E3b. How much worse off- next year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E3b. IF R THINKS FAMILY WILL BE WORSE OFF A YEAR FROM NOW: Much worse off or somewhat worse off? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in E3/E3.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1754 18 33 2 ============================== V000406 E3x. Summary R econ situation next year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric E3x. Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you (and your family [FTF: living here]) will be better off financially, worse off, or just about the same as now? Much better/worse off or somewhat better/worse off? SUMMARY: R FINANCIAL SITUATION IN NEXT YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from E3 and E3a/b. Summary variables for all respondents administered questions related to personal financial situation either pre or post are found following corresponding post-administration variables (V001410-V001417) 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Just about the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK (in E3 or E3a/E3b) 9. RF (in E 3 or E3a/E3b) 0. NA; INAP, R not selected for half sample 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 906 117 251 479 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 33 18 3 ............................................................................ F0. Now we would like to know something about the feelings you have toward the candidates for President. I am going to name a candidate, and I want you to tell me whether something about that person, or something he has done, has made you have certain feelings like anger or pride. ============================== V000407 F1a. Angry- Gore affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1a. (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: ANGRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series , and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next F1 in randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F1 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 524 1272 9 2 ============================== V000408 F1aa. Angry- how often Gore affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1aa. IF R SAYS GORE HAS MADE R FEEL ANGRY: How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F1a 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1283 94 102 221 107 ============================== V000409 F1b. Hopeful- Gore affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1b. (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: HOPEFUL --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next F1 in randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F1 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 853 934 18 2 ============================== V000410 F1bb. Hopeful- how often Gore affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1bb. IF R SAYS GORE HAS MADE R FEEL HOPEFUL: How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F1b 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 954 141 254 379 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 77 1 1 ============================== V000411 F1c. Afraid- Gore affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1c. (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: AFRAID --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. Yes 5. No --> Next F1 In Randomization 8. DK --> Next F1 In Randomization 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 333 1462 10 2 ============================== V000412 F1cc. Afraid- how often Gore affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1cc. IF R SAYS GORE HAS MADE R FEEL AFRAID: How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very Often 2. Fairly Often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F1c 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1474 73 74 134 52 ============================== V000413 F1d. Proud- Gore affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1d. (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: PROUD --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next F1 in randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F1 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 608 1174 23 2 ============================== V000414 F1dd. Proud- how often Gore affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F1dd. IF R SAYS GORE HAS MADE R FEEL PROUD: How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very Often 2. Fairly Often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F1d 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1199 111 198 250 48 1 ============================== V000415 F2a. Angry- Bush affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F2a. (Think about George W. Bush.) Has George W. Bush (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done --) ever made you feel: ANGRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 487 1303 14 3 ============================== V000416 F2aa. Angry- how often Bush affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F2aa. IF R SAYS GEORGE W. BUSH HAS MADE R ANGRY: How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F2a 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1320 79 97 209 101 1 ============================== V000417 F2b. Hopeful- Bush affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F2b. (Think about George W. Bush.) Has George W. Bush (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done --) ever made you feel: HOPEFUL --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 774 1014 17 2 ============================== V000418 F2bb. Hopeful- how often Bush affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F2bb. IF R SAYS GEORGE W. BUSH HAS MADE R HOPEFUL: How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F26 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1033 124 227 348 74 1 ============================== V000419 F2c. Afraid- Bush affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F2c. (Think about George W. Bush.) Has George W. Bush (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done --) ever made you feel: AFRAID --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 418 1374 13 2 ============================== V000420 F2cc. Afraid- how often Bush affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F2cc. IF R SAYS GEORGE W. BUSH HAS MADE R AFRAID: How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F2c 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1389 73 93 176 75 1 ============================== V000421 F2d. Proud- Bush affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F2d. (Think about George W. Bush.) Has George W. Bush (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done --) ever made you feel: PROUD --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 542 1239 24 2 ============================== V000422 F2dd. Proud- how often Bush affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F2dd. IF R SAYS GEORGE W. BUSH HAS MADE R PROUD: How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F2d 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1265 96 148 250 46 2 ============================== V000423 F3a. Angry- Buchanan affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3a. (Think about Pat Buchanan.) Has Pat Buchanan (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done --) ever made you feel: ANGRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Buchanan affects were dropped during the field period (09/28/00). Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. Yes 5. No --> Next F3 In Randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F3 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, question dropped 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1037 197 505 67 1 ============================== V000424 F3aa. Angry- how often Buchanan affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3aa. IF R SAYS BUCHANAN HAS MADE R ANGRY: How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F3a 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1610 53 40 82 22 ============================== V000425 F3b. Hopeful- Buchanan affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3b. (Think about Pat Buchanan.) Has Pat Buchanan (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done --) ever made you feel: HOPEFUL --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Buchanan affects were dropped during the field period (09/28/00). Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. Yes 5. No --> Next F3 In Randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F3 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, question dropped 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1037 114 588 67 1 ============================== V000426 F3bb. Hopeful- how often Buchanan affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3bb. IF R SAYS BUCHANAN HAS MADE R HOPEFUL: How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F3b 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1693 10 17 61 26 ============================== V000427 F3c. Afraid- Buchanan affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3c. (Think about Pat Buchanan.) Has Pat Buchanan (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done --) ever made you feel: AFRAID --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Buchanan affects were dropped during the field period (09/28/00). Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. Yes 5. No --> Next F3 In Randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F3 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, question dropped 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1037 153 551 65 1 ============================== V000428 F3cc. Afraid- how often Buchanan affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3cc. IF R SAYS BUCHANAN HAS MADE R AFRAID: How often would you say you've felt afraid-- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F3c 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1654 46 34 51 22 ============================== V000429 F3d. Proud- Buchanan affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3d. (Think about Pat Buchanan.) Has Pat Buchanan (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done --) ever made you feel: PROUD --------------------------------------------------------------------- The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects is also randomized. Buchanan affects were dropped during the field period (09/28/00). Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. Yes 5. No --> Next F3 In Randomization 8. DK --> SKIP to next F3 in randomization 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, question dropped 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1037 78 623 68 1 ============================== V000430 F3dd. Proud- how often Buchanan affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F3dd. IF R SAYS BUCHANAN HAS MADE R PROUD: How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Very often 2. Fairly often 3. Occasionally 4. Rarely 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F3d 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1729 8 23 33 14 ============================== V000431 F6(1). #1 most important problem MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 991 Numeric F6(1). What do you think are the most important problems facing this country? MENTION 1 - MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT PROBLEMS FACING THE COUNTRY? UNTIL R SAYS NONE] A half sample of Rs were randomly selected for administration of the 'most important problem' questions F6-F7. See MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM master code. Codes 001-899 and: 990. Other specific mention not codeable elsewhere 991. "There were no issues"; "no issues, just party politics" 992. "There was no campaign in my district" 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. Inap, R not selected for half-sample administration (see Pre-Admin.2b, V000005b=0) ============================== V000432 F6(2). #2 most important problem MD: EQ 0 Numeric F6(2). What do you think are the most important problems facing this country? MENTION 2 - MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT PROBLEMS FACING THE COUNTRY? UNTIL R SAYS NONE] See MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM master code. Codes 001-899 and: 990. Other specific mention not codeable elsewhere 000. INAP, 000, 991-999 in F6(1); no further mention ============================== V000433 F6(3). #3 most important problem MD: EQ 0 Numeric F6(3). What do you think are the most important problems facing this country? MENTION 3 - MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT PROBLEMS FACING THE COUNTRY? UNTIL R SAYS NONE] See MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM master code. Codes 001-899 and: 990. Other specific mention not codeable elsewhere 000. INAP, 000, 991-999 in F6(1); no further mention ============================== V000434 F6(4). #4 most important problem MD: EQ 0 Numeric F6(4). What do you think are the most important problems facing this country? MENTION 4 - MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT PROBLEMS FACING THE COUNTRY? UNTIL R SAYS NONE] See MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM master code. Codes 001-899 and: 990. Other specific mention not codeable elsewhere 000. INAP, 000, 991-999 in F6(1); no further mention ============================== V000435 F6x. Checkpoint for # of mentions MD: EQ 9 Numeric F6x. CHECKPOINT: NUMBER OF IMPORTANT PROBLEMS MENTIONED BY R --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF UNSURE WHETHER ONE PROBLEM OR MORE THAN ONE PROBLEM, CODE MORE THAN 1.] A half sample of Rs were randomly selected for administration of the 'most important problem' questions F6-F7. 0. No problem mentioned (000, 991-999 in F6(1)) 1. One problem mentioned 2. Two or more problems mentioned 9. R not selected for administration of F6-F7 0 1 2 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 31 167 707 902 ============================== V000436 F7. Choice - most important problem MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 998 Numeric F7. IF R HAS MADE 2 OR MORE MENTIONS OF 'MOST IMPORTANT' PROBLEM: Of those you've mentioned, what would you say is the single most important problem the country faces? --------------------------------------------------------------------- A half sample of Rs were randomly selected for administration of the 'most important problem' questions F6-F7. See MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM master code. If R mentioned only 1 problem, that mention is duplicated here. Codes 001-899 and: 990. Other specific mention not codeable elsewhere 998. DK 999. RF; NA 000. Inap, R not selected for administration of F6-F7 (0 in F6x) ============================== V000437 F8. Gov't performance on most imp problem MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F8. IF R HAS MADE ANY MENTION OF 'MOST IMPORTANT' PROBLEM: How good a job is the government in Washington doing in dealing with this problem -- a good job, only fair, or a poor job? --------------------------------------------------------------------- A half-sample of respondents was randomly selected for administration of section F. 1. A GOOD JOB 3. ONLY FAIR 5. A POOR JOB 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R not selected for section F administration; 0,9 in F6x 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 944 84 358 411 9 1 ============================== V000438 F9. Party performance on most imp problem MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric F9. IF R HAS MADE ANY MENTION OF 'MOST IMPORTANT' PROBLEM: Which political party do you think would be most likely to get the government to do a better job in dealing with this problem -- the Republicans, the Democrats, or wouldn't there be much difference between them? --------------------------------------------------------------------- A half-sample of respondents was randomly selected for administration of section F. 1. REPUBLICANS 3. DEMOCRATS 5. THERE WOULDN'T BE MUCH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM 7. NEITHER PARTY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R not selected for section F administration; 0,9 in F6x 0 1 3 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 944 201 237 382 26 17 ............................................................................ G1/G1.T. FTF: Please look at page 3 of the booklet. We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and conservatives. Here is a seven-point scale on which the political views that people might hold are arranged from extremely liberal to extremely conservative. TELEPHONE: We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and conservatives. ============================== V000439 G1a. Self placement lib-con scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G1a. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the telephone version of the 7-point scale, see G1a.T; for FTF (and telephone) branching format, see G6.E (V000442). 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL --> Skip to G2 2. LIBERAL --> Skip to G2 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL --> Skip to G2 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD --> G1b 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE --> Skip to G2 6. CONSERVATIVE --> Skip to G2 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE --> Skip to G2 8. DK --> G1b 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode; R selected for branching version 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH [DO NOT PROBE] --> G1b 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 107 9 29 48 125 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 65 68 11 4 1341 ============================== V000439a G1a.T. Self placement lib-con scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G1a.T. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: TELEPHONE: When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal; moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, extremely conservative, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the FTF version of the 7-point scale, see G1a; for telephone (and FTF) branching format, see G6.E (V000442) 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL --> Skip to G2 2. LIBERAL --> Skip to G2 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL --> Skip to G2 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD --> G1b 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE --> Skip to G2 6. CONSERVATIVE --> Skip to G2 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE --> Skip to G2 8. DK --> G1b 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode; R selected for branching version 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH [DO NOT PROBE] --> G1b 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 77 8 48 37 90 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 48 72 15 5 1407 ============================== V000440 G1ax. Summary: combined FTF/ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G1ax. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE: When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal; moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, extremely conservative, or haven't you thought much about this? COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT-SCALE LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE SELF-PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G1a and G1a.T. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, R selected for branching version 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH [DO NOT PROBE] 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 184 17 77 85 215 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 113 140 26 9 941 ============================== V000441 G1b. Had to choose lib-con self-placemt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G1b. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF SELF-PLACEMENT IS MODERATE, DK OR HAVEN'T THOUGHT: If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. LIBERAL 3. CONSERVATIVE 5. MODERATE 7. R REFUSES TO CHOOSE 8. DK 0. NA; INAP, 1-3, 5-7 or RF/NA in G1a or G1a.T; R selected for branching version 0 1 3 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1399 123 174 51 52 8 ============================== V000441a G1bx. Summary: comb FTF/phone-lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G1bx. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? TELEPHONE: When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal; moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, extremely conservative, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? SUMMARY: 3-CATEGORY LIB-CON SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT-SCALE SERIES: --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G1ax and G1b. This is the traditional summary used in 7-pt scale FTF administration in previous years. Recode values used for each category appear in the order: G1a,G1b. 1. Liberal (1/2/3,0; 0/4/8,1) 3. Moderate (0/4/8,5; 4,7/8/9/NA) 5. Conservative (5/6/7,0; 0/4/8,3) 7. Refused to choose (0/8,7) 8. DK (0/8,8) 9. NA/RF to entire question series (RF/NA,0) 0. NA to follow up question G4aa (0/8,9/NA) 1 3 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 302 51 453 52 8 941 ============================== V000442 G6.E. Self placement lib-con branching MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and conservatives. When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as a liberal, a conservative, a moderate, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. See also: G1a and G1a.T (V000439 and V000439a). Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E) 1. A LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G6b.E 3. A CONSERVATIVE --> SKIP TO G6a.E 5. A MODERATE --> SKIP TO G6a.E 7. NEITHER [VOL] --> SKIP TO G6a.E 8. DK --> SKIP TO G6a.E 9. RF; NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH [DO NOT PROBE] --> SKIP TO G6a.E 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 314 146 229 216 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 29 4 869 ============================== V000443 G6a.E. Had to choose lib-con branching MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6a.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF SELF-PLACEMENT IS DK/NEITHER/MODERATE/NO THOUGHT: If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G7.E 3. CONSERVATIVE --> SKIP TO G7.E 5. MODERATE[VOL] --> SKIP TO G7.E 7. R REFUSES TO CHOOSE [VOL] --> SKIP TO G7.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO G7.E 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,9 in G6.E 0 1 3 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1244 143 241 58 111 10 ============================== V000444 G6b.E. R strong liberal or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6b.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF SELF-PLACEMENT IS LIBERAL: Would you call yourself a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G7.E 5. NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G7.E 8. DK --> SKIP TO G7.E 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,7,8,9,0 in G6.E 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1661 65 79 2 ============================== V000445 G6c.E. R strong conservative or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6c.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF SELF-PLACEMENT IS CONSERVATIVE: Would you call yourself a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG CONSERVATIVE 5. NOT VERY STRONG CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,7,8,9,0 in G6.E 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1578 119 105 5 ============================== V000446 G6x1. Summary self plcmnt lib-con scale/brnch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6x1. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: 7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? 7-POINT SCALE PHONE: When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal; moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, extremely conservative, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? BRANCHING (FTF AND PHONE): When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as a liberal, a conservative, a moderate, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? Would you call yourself a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? Would you call yourself a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? COMBINED 7-POINT LIB-CON SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE /BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from: - branching data in G6.E, G6a.E, G6b.E, G6c.E. - 7-pt scale data in G1ax, G1b. NOTE: To make 7pt scale data comparable with the construction of a 7-pt summary of branching data, both the 7pt-scale data in G1ax and the "had to choose" data in G1b were used for constructing this summary. For both 7pt-scale and branching cases, Rs who answered moderate (4 in 7pt-scale) or DK or 'haven't thought much' (branching: or 'neither') were asked for the "had to choose" selection of liberal or conservative. Branching: If R selected liberal or conservative but strength followup was missing data (typically: DK) then 'not strong' has been coded in G6x1. Note: when using combined-mode summaries (combining face-to- face 7-point scales with telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: strong liberal 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: not strong liberal 3. SCALE: 3; had to choose liberal / BRANCHING: had to choose liberal 4. SCALE: 4; had to choose moderate/ BRANCHING: had to choose moderate 5. SCALE: 5; had to choose conserv/ BRANCHING: had to choose conserv 6. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: not strong conservative 7. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: strong conservative 8. DK 9. R refuses to choose 0. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 82 158 351 109 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 528 250 145 18 165 ============================== V000446a G6x1a. 7pt lib-con summary - FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6x1a. IF FTF MODE: BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: 7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? BRANCHING (FTF): When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as a liberal, a conservative, a moderate, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? Would you call yourself a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? Would you call yourself a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the the equivalent of G6x1 for FTF cases only, summarizing FTF data from both 7-pt scale and branching formats. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: strong liberal 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: not strong liberal 3. SCALE: 3; had to choose liberal / BRANCHING: had to choose liberal 4. SCALE: 4; had to choose moderate/ BRANCHING: had to choose moderate 5. SCALE: 5; had to choose conserv/ BRANCHING: had to choose conserv 6. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: not strong conservative 7. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: strong conservative 8. DK 9. R refuses to choose 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 51 77 212 57 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 314 129 77 9 80 ============================== V000446b G6x1b. 7pt lib-con summary - PHONE MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6x1b. IF PHONE MODE: BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: 7-POINT SCALE PHONE: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? BRANCHING (PHONE): When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as a liberal, a conservative, a moderate, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? Would you call yourself a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? Would you call yourself a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the the equivalent of G6x1 for phone cases only, summarizing telephone data from both 7-pt scale and branching formats. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: strong liberal 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: not strong liberal 3. SCALE: 3; had to choose liberal / BRANCHING: had to choose liberal 4. SCALE: 4; had to choose moderate/ BRANCHING: had to choose moderate 5. SCALE: 5; had to choose conserv/ BRANCHING: had to choose conserv 6. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: not strong conservative 7. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: strong conservative 8. DK 9. R refuses to choose 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1007 31 81 139 52 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 214 121 68 9 85 ============================== V000447 G6x2. Comb.7pt & branching summ MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G6x2. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: 7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? 7-POINT SCALE PHONE: When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal; moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, extremely conservative, or haven't you thought much about this? 7PT FTF AND PHONE: If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? BRANCHING (FTF AND PHONE): When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as a liberal, a conservative, a moderate, or haven't you thought much about this? If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? Would you call yourself a strong liberal/conservative or a not very strong liberal/ conservative? SUMMARY: 3-CATEGORY LIB-CON SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Collapsed from G6x1. 1. Liberal (1-3 in G6x1) 3. Moderate (4 in G6x1) 5. Conservative (5-7 in G6x1) 7. Refused to choose (9 in G6x1) 8. DK (8 in G6x1) 0. NA (0 in G6x1) 0 1 3 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 591 109 923 165 18 ============================== V000448 G2. Clinton placement lib-con scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G2. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place Bill Clinton on this scale? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the telephone version of the 7-point scale, see G2.T.; for branching format, see G7.E (V000450). 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; R selected for branching version 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1339 78 120 91 85 5 6 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 30 31 4 29 ============================== V000448a G2.T. Clinton plcmnt lib-con scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G2.T. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: TELEPHONE: What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the telephone version of the 7-point scale, see G2.T.; for branching format, see G7.E (V000450). Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the FTF version of the 7-point scale, see G2; for branching format, see G7.E (V000450). 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; R selected for branching version 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1407 76 106 55 85 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 10 24 4 38 2 ============================== V000449 G2x. Combined FTF/ph Clinton lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G2x. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place Bill Clinton on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative? COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT-SCALE LIB-CON CLINTON PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G2/G2.T. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for branching version 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 939 154 226 146 170 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 40 55 8 67 2 ============================== V000450 G7.E. Clinton placement lib-con branch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G7.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: What about Bill Clinton? Is Bill Clinton a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E) 1. LIBERAL --> G7a.E 2. CONSERVATIVE --> SKIP TO G7b.E 3. MODERATE --> SKIP TO RANDOMIZED G8.E, G9.E, OR G10.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO RANDOMIZED G8.E, G9.E, OR G10.E 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version 0 1 2 3 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 868 434 78 285 139 3 ============================== V000451 G7a.E. Clinton strong liberal or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G7a.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF CLINTON PLACEMENT IS LIBERAL: Would you call Bill Clinton a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G8.E, G9.E, OR G10.E 5. NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G8.E, G9.E, OR G10.E 8. DK --> SKIP TO G8.E, G9.E OR G10.E 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2,3,8,9,0 in G7.E 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1373 280 150 4 ============================== V000452 G7b.E. Clinton strong conservtive or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G7b.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF CLINTON PLACEMENT IS CONSEVATIVE: Would you call Bill Clinton a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG CONSERVATIVE 5. NOT VERY STRONG CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9,0 in G7.E 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1729 45 32 1 ============================== V000453 G7x1.E. 5-pt br summary Clinton lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G7x1.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: What about Bill Clinton? Is Bill Clinton a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate? Would you call Bill Clinton a strong liberal/ conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? SUMMARY: 5PT LIB-CON CLINTON PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G7.E/G7a.E/G7b.E. 1. Strong liberal 2. Not very strong liberal 3. Moderate 4. Not very strong conservative 5. Strong conservative 8. DK in G7.E 9. RF in G7.E 0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 868 280 154 285 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 33 45 139 3 ============================== V000454 G7x2. Comb.7pt/br summ Clinton lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G7x2. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: 7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place Bill Clinton on this scale? 7-POINT SCALE PHONE: What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative? BRANCHING (FTF AND PHONE): What about Bill Clinton? Is Bill Clinton a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate? Would you call Bill Clinton a strong liberal/ conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? COMBINED 5-PT LIB-CON CLINTON PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE /BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G2x and G7x1.E Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 ; BRANCHING: Strong liberal 2. SCALE: 2 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong liberal 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Moderate 4. SCALE: 6 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong conservative 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Strong conservative 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 434 380 641 88 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 53 206 5 ============================== V000455 G3. Gore placement lib-con scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G3. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this scale? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the telephone version of the 7-point scale, see G3.T; for branching version, see G8.E (V000459). The order in which G3, G4, and G5 were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> SKIP TO NEXT PRES. CAND OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; R selected for branching version 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1339 40 131 98 94 5 6 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 40 25 8 32 ============================== V000455a G3.T. Gore placement lib-con scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G3.T. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the FTF version of the 7-point scale, see G3; for branching version, see G8.E (V000459). The order in which G3.T, G4.T, and G5.T were administered was randomized. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> SKIP TO NEXT PRES. CAND OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; R selected for branching version 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1407 35 98 68 86 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 19 32 5 54 3 ============================== V000456 G3x. Combined FTF/ph Gore lib-con scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G3x. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) SUMMARY: COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT-SCALE LIB-CON GORE PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G3/G3.T 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for branching version 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 939 75 229 166 180 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 59 57 13 86 3 ============================== V000457 G3a. Gore-certain lib-con placement FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G3a. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GORE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; 8,9,0 in G3 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1371 92 210 134 ============================== V000458 G3a.T. Gore-certain lib-con plcmnt phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G3a.T. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GORE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: TELEPHONE: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 8,9,0 in G3.T 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1464 90 190 63 ============================== V000458a G3ax.T. Combined - certain Gore lib-con placement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G3ax. IF GORE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? TELEPHONE: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT SCALE CERTAINTY - GORE PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- This combines data from G3a and G3a.T. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9, NA in G3/G3.T; R selected for branching format 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1028 182 400 197 ============================== V000459 G8.E. Gore placement lib-con branch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G8.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: What about Al Gore? (Is Al Gore a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. See also G3 and G3.T (V000455 and V000455a). Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E) The order in which G8.E, G9.E, and G10.E were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. LIBERAL --> G8a.E 2. CONSERVATIVE --> SKIP TO G8b.E 3. MODERATE --> SKIP TO G8c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version 0 1 2 3 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 868 386 150 254 149 ============================== V000460 G8a.E. Gore strong liberal or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G8a.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GORE PLACEMENT IS LIBERAL: Would you call Al Gore a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G8c.E 5. NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G8c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2,3,8,9,0 in G8.E 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1421 250 130 5 1 ============================== V000461 G8b.E. Gore strong conservative or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G8b.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GORE PLACEMENT IS CONSERVATIVE: Would you call Al Gore a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG CONSERVATIVE --> G8c.E 5. NOT VERY STRONG CONSERVATIVE --> G8c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9,0 in G8.E 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1657 89 58 3 ============================== V000462 G8x1.E. 5-pt br summary Gore lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G8x1.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: What about Al Gore? (Is Al Gore a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) Would you call Al Gore a strong liberal/conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? SUMMARY: 5PT LIB-CON GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G8.E/G8a.E/G8b.E 1. Strong liberal 2. Not very strong liberal 3. Moderate 4. Not very strong conservative 5. Strong conservative 8. DK in G8.E 9. RF in G8.E 0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 868 250 136 254 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 61 89 149 ============================== V000463 G8x2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G8x2. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: 7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this scale? 7-POINT SCALE PHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) BRANCHING (FTF AND PHONE:) What about Al Gore? (Is Al Gore a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) Would you call Al Gore a strong liberal/conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? COMBINED 5-POINT LIB-CON GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G3x and G8x1.E Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 ; BRANCHING: Strong liberal 2. SCALE: 2 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong liberal 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Moderate 4. SCALE: 6 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong conservative 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Strong conservative 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 325 365 659 118 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 102 235 3 ============================== V000464 G8c.E. Gore-certain lib-con placement br MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G8c.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GORE PLACEMENT IS MODERATE/ IF STRENGTH OF LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in G8.E; 8,9,or NA in G8a.E/G8b.E 0 1 3 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1026 224 373 183 1 ============================== V000464a G8cx 7pt/branching summary Gore crtn l-c MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G8cx. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? COMBINED LIB-CON CERTAINTY - GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G3ax.T and G8c.E. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in G3/G3.T/G8.E; 8,9,or NA in G8a.E/G8b.E 0 1 3 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 247 406 773 380 1 ============================== V000465 G4. Bush placement lib-con scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G4. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush on this scale? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the telephone version of the 7-point scale, see G4.T; for branching format see G9.E (V000469). The order in which G3, G4, and G5 were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> SKIP TO NEXT PRES CAND OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; R selected for branching version 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1339 8 23 37 58 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 105 164 36 35 2 ============================== V000465a G4.T. Bush placement lib-con scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G4.T. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the FTF version of the 7-point scale, see G4; for branching format see G9.E (V000469). The order in which G3.T, G4.T, and G5.T were administered was randomized. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> SKIP TO NEXT PRES CAND OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; R selected for branching version 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1407 6 32 18 49 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 61 146 35 51 2 ============================== V000466 G4x. Combined FTF/ph Bush lib-con scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G4x. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) SUMMARY: COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT-SCALE LIB-CON GW BUSH PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G4/G4.T 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for branching version 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 939 14 55 55 107 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 166 310 71 86 4 ============================== V000467 G4a. Bush-certain lib-con placement FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G4a. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; 8,9,0 in G4 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1376 93 208 129 1 ============================== V000468 G4a.T. Bush-certain plcmnt lib-con phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G4a.T. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: TELEPHONE: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 8,9,0 in G4.T 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1460 101 175 71 ============================== V000468a G4ax.T. Combined - certain GW Bush lib-con placement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G4ax. IF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? TELEPHONE: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT SCALE CERTAINTY - GW BUSH PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- This combines data from G4a and G4a.T. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in G4/G4.T; R selected for branching format 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1029 194 383 200 1 ============================== V000469 G9.E. Bush placement lib-con branch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G9.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: What about George W. Bush? (Is George W. Bush a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. See also G4 and G4.T (V000465 and V000465a). Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E) The order in which G8.E, G9.E, and G10.E were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. LIBERAL --> G9a.E 2. CONSERVATIVE --> SKIP TO G9b.E 3. MODERATE --> SKIP TO G9c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version 0 1 2 3 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 868 113 464 209 151 2 ============================== V000470 G9a.E. Bush strong liberal or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G9a.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS LIBERAL: Would you call George W. Bush a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G9c.E 5. NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G9c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2,3,8,9,0 in G9.E 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1694 70 43 ============================== V000471 G9b.E. Bush strong conservative or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G9b.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS CONSERVATIVE: Would you call George W. Bush a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG CONSERVATIVE --> SKIP TO G9c.E 5. NOT VERY STRONG CONSERVATIVE --> SKIP TO G9c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9,0 in G9.E 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1343 287 162 14 1 ============================== V000472 G9x1.E. 5-pt br summary Bush lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G9x1.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: What about George W. Bush? (Is George W. Bush a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) Would you call George W. Bush a strong liberal/ conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? SUMMARY: 5PT LIB-CON GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G9.E/G9a.E/G9b.E 1. Strong liberal 2. Not very strong liberal 3. Moderate 4. Not very strong cosnervative 5. Strong conservative 8. DK in G9.E 9. RF in G9.E 0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 868 70 43 209 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 177 287 151 2 ============================== V000473 G9x2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G9x2. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: 7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush on this scale? 7-POINT SCALE PHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) BRANCHING (FTF AND PHONE:) What about George W. Bush? (Is George W. Bush a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) Would you call George W. Bush a strong liberal/ conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? COMBINED 5-POINT LIB-CON GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE /BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G4x and G9x1.E Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 ; BRANCHING: Strong liberal 2. SCALE: 2 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong liberal 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Moderate 4. SCALE: 6 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong conservative 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Strong conservative 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 84 98 537 487 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 358 237 6 ============================== V000474 G9c.E. Bush-certain lib-con placement br MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G9c.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS MODERATE/ IF STRENGTH OF LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in G9.E; 8,9 or NA in G9a.E/G9b.E 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1036 198 376 196 1 ============================== V000474a G9cx 7pt/branching summary Bush crtn l-c MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G9cx. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? COMBINED LIB-CON CERTAINTY - GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G4ax.T and G9c.E. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in G4/G4.T/G9.E; 8,9,or NA in G9a.E/G9b.E 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 258 392 759 396 2 ============================== V000475 G5. Buchanan placement lib-con scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G5. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place Pat Buchanan on this scale? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E). For the telephone version of the 7-point scale version see G5.T; for branching format see G10.E (V000479). The order in which G3, G4, and G5 were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> SKIP TO NEXT PRES CAND OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; R selected for branching version 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1339 14 15 26 57 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 38 55 115 145 3 ============================== V000475a G5.T. Buchan plcmnt lib-con scale phon MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G5.T. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: TELEPHONE: What about Pat Buchanan? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E) For the FTF version of the 7-point scale version see G5; for branching format see G10.E (V000479). The order in which G3.T, G4.T, and G5.T were administered was randomized. 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK --> SKIP TO NEXT PRES CAND OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; R selected for branching version 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1407 3 17 8 35 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 10 61 108 154 4 ============================== V000476 G5x. Combined FTF/ph Buchan lib-con scl MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G5x. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: FTF: Where would you place Pat Buchanan on this scale? TELEPHONE: What about Pat Buchanan? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) SUMMARY: COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT-SCALE LIB-CON BUCHANAN PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G5/G5.T 1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL 2. LIBERAL 3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD 5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE 6. CONSERVATIVE 7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for branching version 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 939 17 32 34 92 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 48 116 223 299 7 ============================== V000477 G5a. Buchan-crtn lib-con plcemnt FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G5a. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF BUCHANAN PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; 8,9,0 in G5 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1487 100 113 107 ============================== V000478 G5a.T. Buchan-crtn lib-con plcemnt phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G5a.T. IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF BUCHANAN PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: TELEPHONE: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 8,9,0 in G5.T 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1565 93 89 60 ============================== V000478a G5ax.T. Combined - certain Buchanan lib-con placement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G5ax. FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? TELEPHONE: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT SCALE CERTAINTY - BUCHANAN PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- This combines data from G5a and G5a.T. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in G5/G4.T; R selected for branching format 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1245 193 202 167 ============================== V000479 G10.E. Buchanan placement lib-con branch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G10.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: What about Pat Buchanan? (Is Pat Buchanan a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE 'DK'] See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (V000005e) for a general description of the administration of liberal- conservative placements. See also G5 and G5.T (V000475 and V000475a). Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the 7-point scale (G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E) The order in which G8.E, G9.E, and G10.E were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. LIBERAL --> G10a.E 2. CONSERVATIVE --> SKIP TO G10b.E 3. MODERATE --> SKIP TO G10c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version 0 1 2 3 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 868 65 389 107 372 6 ============================== V000480 G10a.E. Buchanan strong liberal or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G10a.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF BUCHANAN PLACEMENT IS LIBERAL: Would you call Pat Buchanan a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G10c.E 5. NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G10c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2,3,8,9,0 in G10.E 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1742 38 24 3 ============================== V000481 G10b.E. Buchan strong conserv or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G10b.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF BUCHANAN PLACEMENT IS CONSERVATIVE: Would you call Pat Buchanan a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG CONSERVATIVE --> G10c.E 5. NOT VERY STRONG CONSERVATIVE --> G10c.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9,0 in G10.E 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1418 325 61 2 1 ============================== V000482 G10x1.E. 5-pt br summary Buchan lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G10x1.E. IF R SELECTED BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: What about Pat Buchanan? (Is Pat Buchanan a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) Would you call Pat Buchanan a strong liberal/ conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? SUMMARY: 5PT LIB-CON BUCHANAN PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G10.E/G10a.E/G10b.E 1. Strong liberal 2. Not very strong liberal 3. Moderate 4. Not very strong conservative 5. Strong conservative 8. DK in G10.E 9. RF in G10.E 0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 868 38 27 107 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 64 325 372 6 ============================== V000483 G10x2. Comb.7pt/br summ Buchan lib-con MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G10x2. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: 7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place Pat Buchanan on this scale? 7-POINT SCALE PHONE: What about Pat Buchanan? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) BRANCHING (FTF AND PHONE) What about Pat Buchanan? (Is Pat Buchanan a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) Would you call Pat Buchanan a strong liberal/ conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? COMBINED 5PT LIB-CON GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE /BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G5x and G10x1.E Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 ; BRANCHING: Strong liberal 2. SCALE: 2 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong liberal 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Moderate 4. SCALE: 6 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong conservative 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Strong conservative 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 55 59 281 180 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 548 671 13 ============================== V000484 G10c.E. Certain-Buchan plcmnt lib-con br MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G10c.E. IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES: IF BUCHANAN PLACEMENT IS MODERATE/ IF STRENGTH OF LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 3. PRETTY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in G5/G5.T/G10.E; 8,9,or NA in G10a.E/G10b.E 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1252 225 181 149 ============================== V000484a G10cx. 7pt/branching summ Buchan l-c crt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G10cx. BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? COMBINED LIB-CON CERTAINTY - GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from G5ax.T and G10c.E. 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 690 418 383 316 ============================== V000485 G11. Who does R think will be elected MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11. Who do you think will be elected President in November? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. AL GORE 2. GEORGE W. BUSH 3. PAT BUCHANAN 4. RALPH NADER 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] 8. DK --> SKIP to G11b 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 848 783 5 3 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 39 126 3 ============================== V000486 G11a. Race close or not- cand named MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11a. IF R NAMES PRES. CANDIDATE WHO R THINKS WILL WIN ELECTION: Do you think the Presidential race will be close or will [NAME GIVEN IN G11] win by quite a bit? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WILL BE CLOSE --> SKIP to H1 or H1.E 5. WIN BY QUITE A BIT --> SKIP to H1 or H1.E 8. DK --> SKIP to H1 or H1.E 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in G11 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 129 1449 213 16 ============================== V000487 G11b. Race close or not- cand not named MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric G11b. IF R SAYS HE/SHE DOESN'T KNOW WHO WILL WIN THE PRES. ELECTION: Do you think the Presidential race will be close or will one candidate win by quite a bit? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WILL BE CLOSE 5. WIN BY QUITE A BIT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1-7 in G11 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1678 108 8 13 ============================== V000488a H1. US econ bttr/worse in last year stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H1. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: Now thinking about the economy in the country as a whole, would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR the nation's economy has gotten better, stayed about the same, or gotten worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H1 or H1.E 1. GOTTEN BETTER --> SKIP TO H1a 3. STAYED ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO H2 5. GOTTEN WORSE --> SKIP TO H1b 8. DK --> SKIP TO H2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H1.E 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 899 369 380 147 11 1 ============================== V000488b H1.E. US econ bttr/worse in last year ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H1.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Now thinking about the economy in the country as a whole, would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR the nation's economy has gotten worse, stayed about the same, or gotten better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H1 or H1.E 1. GOTTEN WORSE. --> SKIP TO H1b 3. STAYED ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO H2 5. GOTTEN BETTER --> SKIP TO H1a 8. DK --> SKIP TO H2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H1. 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 908 155 405 331 8 ============================== V000489 H1a. How much better US econ past year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H1a. IF R THINKS ECONOMY BETTER IN THE LAST YEAR: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO H2 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO H2 8. DK --> SKIP TO H2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9 or NA in H1; 1,3,8,9 or NA in H1.E 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1107 251 448 1 ============================== V000490 H1b. How much worse US econ last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H1b. IF R THINKS ECONOMY WORSE IN THE LAST YEAR: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SOMEWHAT WORSE 5. MUCH WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9 or NA in H1; 3,5,8,9 or NA in H1.E 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1505 232 70 ============================== V000491 H1x. Summary US econ btr/worse last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H1x. STANDARD VERSION: Now thinking about the economy in the country as a whole, would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR the nation's economy has gotten worse, stayed about the same, or gotten better? EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Now thinking about the economy in the country as a whole, would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR the nation's economy has gotten worse, stayed about the same, or gotten better? BOTH VERSIONS: Much better/worse or somewhat better/worse? COMBINED VERSION SUMMARY: ECONOMY IN LAST YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from H1/H1.E and H1a,H1b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Stayed about the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK in H1/H1.E or H1a/b 9. RF in H1/H1.E or H1a/b 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 251 448 785 70 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 232 20 1 ============================== V000492a H2. Esr/hrdr to find work last year stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H2. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: Would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR, it has gotten harder for people across the country to find enough work, stayed about the same, or gotten easier for people to find enough work? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H2 or H2.E 1. GOTTEN HARDER --> SKIP TO H2a 3. STAYED THE SAME --> SKIP TO H4 5. GOTTEN EASIER --> SKIP TO H2b 8. DK --> SKIP TO H4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H2.E 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 906 125 313 447 16 ============================== V000492b H2.E. Esr/hrdr to find work last year ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H2.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR, it has gotten easier for people across the country to find enough work, stayed about the same, or gotten harder for people to find enough work? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H2 or H2.E 1. GOTTEN EASIER --> SKIP TO H2b 3. ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO H4 5. GOTTEN HARDER 8. DK --> SKIP TO H4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H2 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 901 454 300 129 23 ============================== V000493 H2a. How much harder to find work lst yr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H2a. IF R SAYS IT HAS GOTTEN HARDER TO FIND WORK IN THE LAST YEAR: Much harder or a little harder? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH HARDER --> H4 5. A LITTLE HARDER --> H4 8. DK --> H4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9 or NA in H2; 1,3,8,9 or NA in H2.E 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1553 123 131 ============================== V000494 H2b. How much easier to find work lst yr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H2b. IF R SAYS IT HAS GOTTEN EASIER TO FIND WORK IN THE LAST YEAR: Much easier or a little easier? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH EASIER 5. A LITTLE EASIER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9 or NA in H2; 3,5,8,9 or NA in H2.E 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 906 493 404 3 1 ============================== V000495 H2x. Summary employ opps in last year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H2x. STANDARD VERSION: Would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR, it has gotten harder for people across the country to find enough work, stayed about the same, or gotten easier for people to find enough work? EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR, it has gotten easier for people across the country to find enough work, stayed about the same, or gotten harder for people to find enough work? BOTH VERSIONS: Much harder/easier or a little harder/easier? COMBINED VERSION SUMMARY: EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN LAST YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from H2/H2.E and H2a,H2b. 1. Much harder 2. Somewhat harder 3. Stayed about the same 4. Somewhat easier 5. Much easier 8. DK in H2/H2.E or H2a/b 9. RF in H2/H2.E or H2a/b 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 123 131 613 404 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 493 42 1 ============================== V000496a H4. US econ bttr/worse in next year stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H4. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: What about THE NEXT 12 MONTHS? Do you expect the economy, in the country as a whole, to get better, stay about the same, or get worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H4 or H4.E 1. GET BETTER --> SKIP TO H4a 3. STAY ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO H5 5. GET WORSE --> SKIP TO H4b 8. DK --> SKIP TO H5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H4.E 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 896 181 535 163 29 3 ============================== V000496b H4.E. US econ bttr/worse in next year ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H4.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: What about THE NEXT 12 MONTHS? Do you expect the economy, in the country as a whole, to get worse, stay about the same, or get better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H4 or H4.E 1. GET WORSE --> SKIP TO H4b 3. STAY ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO H5 5. GET BETTER 8. DK --> SKIP TO H5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H4 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 911 166 499 196 34 1 ============================== V000497 H4a. How much better US econ in nxt year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H4a. IF R EXPECTS ECONOMY TO GET BETTER IN THE NEXT 12 MONTHS: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO H5 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO H5 8. DK --> SKIP TO H5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9 or NA in H4; 1,3,8,9 or NA in H4.E 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1430 113 264 ============================== V000498 H4b. How much worse US econ in nxt year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H4b. IF R EXPECTS ECONOMY TO GET WORSE IN THE NEXT 12 MONTHS: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9 or NA in H4; 3,5,8,9 or NA in H4.E 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1478 69 260 ============================== V000499 H4x. Summary US econ in next year MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H4x. STANDARD VERSION: What about THE NEXT 12 MONTHS? Do you expect the economy, in the country as a whole, to get better, stay about the same, or get worse? EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: What about THE NEXT 12 MONTHS? Do you expect the economy, in the country as a whole, to get worse, stay about the same, or get better? Much worse or somewhat worse? SUMMARY: ECONOMY IN NEXT 12 MONTHS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from H4/H4.E and H4a,H4b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Stayed about the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK in H4/H4.E or Ha/b 9. RF in H4/H4.E or Ha/b 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 113 264 1034 260 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 69 63 4 ============================== V000500 H5. Approve/dissap Clinton w/economy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H5. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling the economy? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. APPROVE 5. DISAPPROVE --> SKIP to H5b 8. DK --> SKIP to H6 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1304 387 106 10 ============================== V000501 H5a. How much approve Clinton w/economy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H5a. IF R APPROVES OF CLINTON'S HANDLING JOB AS PRESIDENT: Do you approve strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> SKIP to H7 5. NOT STRONGLY --> SKIP to H7 8. DK --> SKIP to H7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in H5 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 503 783 516 4 1 ============================== V000502 H5b. How much dissprv Clinton w/economy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H5b. IF R DISAPPROVES OF CLINTON'S HANDLING JOB AS PRESIDENT: Do you disapprove strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,8,9,0 in H5 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1420 237 150 ============================== V000503 H5x. Summary Clinton w/economy MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H5x. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling the economy? Do you approve/disapprove strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: APPROVAL OF CLINTON JOB AS PRESIDENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from H5 and H5a/H5b. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 8. DK in H5 or H5a/b 9. RF in H5 or H5a/b 0. NA 1 2 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 783 516 150 237 110 11 ============================== V000504 H6. Is R invested in stock market MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H6. Do you personally, or jointly with a spouse, have any money invested in the stock market right now -- either in an individual stock or in a mutual fund? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1004 780 6 17 ============================== V000505 H7. Which party R thinks best to handle econ MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H7. Which party do you think would do a better job of handling the nation's economy..., the Democrats, the Republicans, or wouldn't there be much difference between them? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF 'DK' OR 'NEITHER PARTY' IS VOLUNTEERED, DO NOT PROBE] 1. DEMOCRATS 3. REPUBLICANS 5. WOULDN'T BE MUCH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM/NO DIFFERENCE 7. NEITHER PARTY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 527 406 794 28 50 2 ============================== V000506 H8. Which party R thinks would avoid war MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H8. Looking ahead, do you think the problem of keeping out of war would be handled better IN THE NEXT FOUR YEARS by the Democrats, the Republicans, or about the same by both? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [IF 'DK' OR 'NEITHER PARTY' IS VOLUNTEERED, DO NOT PROBE] 1. DEMOCRATS 3. REPUBLICANS 5. ABOUT THE SAME BY BOTH 7. NEITHER PARTY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 373 324 1043 24 42 1 ============================== V000507 H9. Us position in world weaker/stronger MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H9. Turning to some other types of issues facing the country. During the past year, would you say that the United States' position in the world has grown weaker, stayed about the same, or has it grown stronger? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WEAKER 3. STAYED ABOUT THE SAME 5. STRONGER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 500 874 403 28 2 ============================== V000508 H10. Increase/decrease immigratration MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H10. Do you think the number of immigrants from foreign countries who are permitted to come to the United States to live should be increased, decreased, or left the same as it is now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. LEFT THE SAME AS IT IS NOW --> SKIP TO H11 OR H11.E 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO H11 OR H11.E 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 172 785 785 60 5 ============================== V000509 H10a. Inc/dec immigratn little or a lot MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H10a. IF R THINKS NUMBER OF IMMIGRANTS SHOULD BE INCREASED/ IF R THINKS NUMBER OF IMMIGRANTS SHOULD BE DECREASED: A little or a lot? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LITTLE 5. A LOT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in H10 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 850 360 588 9 ============================== V000510 H10x. Summary immigration level MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H10x. Do you think the number of immigrants from foreign countries who are permitted to come to the United States to live should be increased, decreased, or left the same as it is now? A little or a lot? SUMMARY: IMMIGRATION LEVEL --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from H10 and H10a. 1. Increased a lot 2. Increased a little 3. Left the same 4. Decreased a little 5. Decreased a lot 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in H10 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 68 100 785 260 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 520 69 5 ============================== V000511a H11. Favor/oppose import limits stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H11. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: Some people have suggested placing new limits on foreign imports in order to protect American jobs. Others say that such limits would raise consumer prices and hurt American exports. Do you favor or oppose placing new limits on imports, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H11 or H11.E 1. FAVOR --> SKIP TO H12 5. OPPOSE --> SKIP TO H12 7. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> SKIP TO H12 8. DK --> SKIP TO H12 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H11.E 0 1 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 897 245 263 385 17 ============================== V000511b H11.E. Favor/opp import limits ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H11.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Some people have suggested placing new limits on foreign imports in order to protect American jobs. Others say that such limits would raise consumer prices and hurt American exports. Do you favor or oppose placing new limits on imports? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H11 or H11.E 1. FAVOR 5. OPPOSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H11 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 910 390 408 95 4 ============================== V000512 H11x. Combined versions import limits MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 7 Numeric H11x. STANDARD VERSION: Some people have suggested placing new limits on foreign imports in order to protect American jobs. Others say that such limits would raise consumer prices and hurt American exports. Do you favor or oppose placing new limits on imports, or haven't you thought much about this? EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Some people have suggested placing new limits on foreign imports in order to protect American jobs. Others say that such limits would raise consumer prices and hurt American exports. Do you favor or oppose placing new limits on imports? COMBINED VERSION SUMMARY: IMPORT LIMITS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from H11 and H11.E 1. Favor 5. Oppose 7. Haven't thought much (H11 only) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 635 671 385 112 4 ============================== V000513a H12. US better off to stay at home stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H12. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: Do you agree or disagree with this statement: This country would be better off if we just stayed home and did not concern ourselves with problems in other parts of the world. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H12 or H12.E 1. AGREE --> SKIP to H13 5. DISAGREE --> SKIP to H13 8. DK --> SKIP to H13 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H12.E 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 916 235 640 15 1 ============================== V000513b H12.E. US better off to stay at home ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H12.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Do you think this country would be better off if we just stayed home and did not concern ourselves with problems in other parts of the world, or do you think that this country would be better off trying to solve some problems in other parts of the world? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H12 or H12.E 1. BETTER OFF IF WE JUST STAYED HOME 5. BETTER OFF TRYING TO SOLVE SOME PROBLEMS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for H12 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 267 601 44 4 ============================== V000514 H12x. Combined versions isolationism MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H12x. STANDARD VERSION: Do you agree or disagree with this statement: This country would be better off if we just stayed home and did not concern ourselves with problems in other parts of the world. EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Do you think this country would be better off if we just stayed home and did not concern ourselves with problems in other parts of the world, or do you think that this country would be better off trying to solve some problems in other parts of the world? COMBINED VERSION SUMMARY: ISOLATIONISM --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from H12 and H12.E 1. Agree/ Better off to stay home 5. Disagree/ Better off trying to solve problems 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 502 1241 59 5 ============================== V000515 H13. Clinton foreign rel approve/disappr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H13. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling our relations with foreign countries? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. APPROVE 5. DISAPPROVE --> SKIP to H13b 8. DK --> SKIP to K1 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1161 534 102 10 ============================== V000516 H13a. Strength appove Clinton frgn rel MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H13a. IF R APPROVES CLINTON'S HANDLING OF FOREIGN RELATIONS: Do you approve strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> SKIP TO K1 5. NOT STRONGLY --> SKIP TO K1 8. DK --> SKIP TO K1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in H13 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 646 605 553 3 ============================== V000517 H13b. Strength dissapr Clinton frgn rel MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H13b. IF R DISAPPROVES CLINTON'S HANDLING OF FOREIGN RELATIONS: Do you disapprove strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,8,9,0 in H13 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1273 328 202 3 1 ============================== V000518 H13x. Summary Clinton foreign relations MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric H13x. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling our relations with foreign countries? Do you approve/disapprove strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: CLINTON HANDLING OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from H13 and H13a/b. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in H13 1 2 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 605 553 202 328 108 11 ============================== V000519 K1. Does R consider self Rep Dem or Ind MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1. Generally speaking, do you think of yourself as a Republican, a Democrat, an Independent, or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DEMOCRAT 2. REPUBLICAN --> SKIP TO K1b 3. INDEPENDENT --> SKIP TO K1c 4. OTHER PARTY [SPECIFY] --> SKIP TO K1c 5. NO PREFERENCE --> SKIP TO K1c 8. DK --> SKIP TO K1c 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 620 451 496 27 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 204 5 4 ============================== V000520 K1a. Is R a strong Democrat or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1a. IF R CONSIDERS SELF A DEMOCRAT: Would you call yourself a strong Democrat or a not very strong Democrat? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG --> SKIP TO K2, K3, OR K4 5. NOT VERY STRONG --> SKIP TO K2, K3, OR K4 8. DK --> SKIP TO K2, K3, OR K4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 2-5, 8,9,0 in K1 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1187 346 273 1 ============================== V000521 K1b. Is R a strong Republican or not MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1b. IF R CONSIDERS SELF A REPUBLICAN: Would you call yourself a strong Republican or a not very strong Republican? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG --> SKIP TO K2, K3, OR K4 5. NOT VERY STRONG --> SKIP TO K2, K3, OR K4 8. DK --> SKIP TO K2, K3, OR K4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,4,5,8,9,0 in K1 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1356 236 214 1 ============================== V000522 K1c. Is R closer to Rep or Dem Party MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K1c. IF R'S PARTY PREFERENCE IS INDEPENDENT, NO PREFERENCE, OTHER, DK: Do you think of yourself as closer to the Republican Party or to the Democratic party? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CLOSER TO REPUBLICAN 3. NEITHER [VOL] 5. CLOSER TO DEMOCRATIC 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,9,0 in K1 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1075 230 224 269 9 ============================== V000523 K1x. Party ID summary MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric K1x. Generally speaking, do you think of yourself as a Republican, a Democrat, an Independent, or what? Would you call yourself a strong Democrat/Republican or a not very strong Democrat/ Republican? Do you think of yourself as closer to the Republican Party or to the Democratic party? SUMMARY: PARTY ID --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from K1, K1a/b, K1c. Code 8 (apolitical) was used only if the respondent had a code of 5 (no preference) in K1 and a code of 3,8 or 9 in K1c AND also showed little or no interest in politics in response to the following survey questions: PRE question A1.(interest in campaigns), PRE question B1 (care about Congressional race outcome), POST question C1 (voted), POST question F5 (follow public affairs); respondents who showed an interest in politics were coded 3. 0. Strong Democrat (1,1,0 in K1, K1a/b, K1c) 1. Weak Democrat (1,5/8/9,0 in K1, K1a/b, K1c) 2. Independent-Democrat (3/4/5/8,0,5 in K1, K1a/b, K1c 3. Independent-Independent (3,0,3/8/9 in K1, K1a/b, K1c; 8,0,3 and 5,0,3/8/9 if not apolitical) 4. Independent-Republican (3/4/5/8,0,1 in K1, K1a/b, K1c) 5. Weak Republican (2,5/8/9,0 in K1, K1a/b, K1c) 6. Strong Republican (2,1,0 in K1, K1a/b, K1c) 7. Other; minor party; refuses to say (4,0,3/8/9 in K1, K1a/b, K1c) 8. Apolitical (8,0,3 or 5,0,3/8/9 in E6, E6a/b, E6c and no interest in politics 9. NA (8/9,0,0 in E6, E6a/b, E6c) 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 346 274 269 206 230 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 215 236 9 17 5 ............................................................................ K1z/K1z.T. FTF: Please look at page 4 of the booklet. I am going to read a list of words and phrases people may use to describe political figures. For each, tell me whether the word or phrase describes the candidate I name. TELEPHONE: I am going to read a list of words and phrases people may use to describe political figures. For each, please tell me whether the word or phrase describes the candidate I name. ============================== V000524 K2a. Gore trait - moral MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2a. Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) GORE TRAIT - MORAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 423 820 287 133 143 1 ============================== V000525 K2b. Gore trait - really cares MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2b. Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) GORE TRAIT - REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 277 713 464 232 119 2 ============================== V000526 K2c. Gore trait - knowledgeable MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2c. Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) GORE TRAIT - KNOWLEDGEABLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 461 997 212 59 77 1 ============================== V000527 K2d. Gore trait - strong leader MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2d. Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) GORE TRAIT - PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 258 728 522 185 113 1 ============================== V000528 K2e. Gore trait - dishonest MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2e. Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) GORE TRAIT - DISHONEST --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 133 312 629 557 173 3 ============================== V000529 K2f. Gore trait - intelligent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2f. Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) GORE TRAIT - INTELLIGENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 494 995 182 65 69 2 ============================== V000530 K2g. Gore trait - out of touch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K2g. Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) GORE TRAIT - OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 136 495 641 419 113 3 ============================== V000531 K3a. Bush trait - moral MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K3a. Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUSH TRAIT - MORAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 340 841 330 98 196 2 ============================== V000532 K3b. Bush trait - really cares MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K3b. Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUSH TRAIT - REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 155 625 562 342 122 1 ============================== V000533 K3c. Bush trait - knowledgeable MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K3c. Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUSH TRAIT - KNOWLEDGEABLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 274 933 379 133 87 1 ============================== V000534 K3d. Bush trait - strong leader MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K3d. Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUSH TRAIT - PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 266 842 407 166 125 1 ============================== V000535 K3e. Bush trait - dishonest MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K3e. Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUSH TRAIT - DISHONEST --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 70 288 653 574 220 2 ============================== V000536 K3f. Bush trait - intelligent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K3f. Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUSH TRAIT - INTELLIGENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 329 967 306 110 94 1 ============================== V000537 K3g. Bush trait - out of touch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K3g. Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUSH TRAIT - OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 207 495 638 348 118 1 ============================== V000538 K4a. Buchanan trait - moral MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K4a. Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUCHANAN TRAIT - MORAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00) Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; question dropped 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1037 94 240 120 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 47 268 1 ============================== V000539 K4b. Buchanan trait - really cares MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K4b. Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUCHANAN TRAIT - REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00) Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; question dropped 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1037 31 137 197 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 150 254 1 ============================== V000540 K4c. Buchanan trait- knowledgeable MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K4c. Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUCHANAN TRAIT - KNOWLEDGEABLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00) Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; question dropped 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1037 50 304 139 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 41 235 1 ============================== V000541 K4d. Buchanan trait - strong leader MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K4d. Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUCHANAN TRAIT - PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00) Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; question dropped 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1037 23 136 227 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 138 245 1 ============================== V000542 K4e. Buchanan trait - dishonest MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K4e. Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUCHANAN TRAIT - DISHONEST --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00) Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; question dropped 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1037 17 65 224 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 175 287 2 ============================== V000543 K4f. Buchanan trait - intelligent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K4f. Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUCHANAN TRAIT - INTELLIGENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00) Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; question dropped 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1037 82 323 98 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 37 229 1 ============================== V000544 K4g. Buchanan trait - out of touch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric K4g. Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) BUCHANAN TRAIT - OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were administered was randomized. Within each series, the order of the traits about that candidate was also randomized. Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period (09/28/00) Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. EXTREMELY WELL 2. QUITE WELL 3. NOT TOO WELL 4. NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; question dropped 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1037 85 183 177 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 79 244 2 ............................................................................ L1/L1.T. FTF: Please look at page 5 of the booklet. Some people think the government should provide fewer services even in areas such as health and education in order to reduce spending. Suppose these people are at one end of a scale, at point 1. Other people feel it is important for the government to provide many more services even if it means an increase in spending. Suppose these people are at the other end, at point 7. And, of course, some other people have opinions somewhere in between, at points 2,3,4,5 or 6. TELEPHONE: Some people think the government should provide fewer services even in areas such as health and education in order to reduce spending. Other people feel it is important for the government to provide many more services even if it means an increase in spending. ============================== V000545 L1a. Self plcmnt-services/spend scl FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1a. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- For telephone (branching) version of this question see L1a.T. 1. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY FEWER SERVICES --> L1b 2. --> L1b 3. --> L1b 4. --> L1b 5. --> L1b 6. --> L1b 7. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY MORE SERVICES --> L1b 8. DK --> L1b 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L1b 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 142 46 60 102 251 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 184 115 98 7 802 ============================== V000546 L1a.T. Self plcmnt-services/spend scl phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1a.T. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- For FTF (7-point scale) version of this question see L1a. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> L1a1.T 5. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> L2.T 7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL] --> L1b.T 8. DK --> L1b.T 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L1b.T 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 141 179 378 93 7 1009 ============================== V000547 L1a1.T. How much reduce serv/spend phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1a1.T. IF R THINKS THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD REDUCE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Should the government reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> L1b.T 5. ONLY SOME --> L1b.T 8. DK --> L1b.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L1a.T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1628 74 105 ============================== V000548 L1a2.T. How much incr serv/spend phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1a2.T. IF R THINKS THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD INCREASE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Should the government increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> L1b.T 5. ONLY SOME --> L1b.T 8. DK --> L1b.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L1a.T 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1429 141 233 3 1 ============================== V000549 L1ax1. 5-pt br summary of self on serv/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 7 Numeric L1ax1.T. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? Should the government reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: SPT SERV/SPEND SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1a.T and L1a1.T/L1a2.T 1. Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. Reduce spending and services only some 3. Stay same as now (3 in L1a.T) 4. Increase spending and services only some 5. Increase spending and services a great deal 7. Haven't thought much 8. DK in L1a.T or L1a1.T/L1a2.T 9. RF in L1a.T or L1a1.T/L1a2.T 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1a.T; FTF mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 74 105 93 233 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 141 141 10 4 ============================== V000550 L1ax2. Comb.7pt/br summ of self on serv/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1ax2. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? Should the government reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? COMBINED 5PT SERV/SPEND SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE /BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1a and L1ax1 Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. SCALE 2; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services only some 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Stay same as now (3 in L1a.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services only some 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1a or L1a.T 0. Haven't thought much 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 283 120 165 630 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 348 239 17 5 ============================== V000551 L1b. Clinton- serv/spend scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1b. FTF: Where would you place Bill Clinton on this issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L1b was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question see L1b.T 1. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY FEWER SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 2. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 3. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 4. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 5. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 6. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 7. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY MORE SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 20 23 73 149 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 255 240 152 92 2 ============================== V000552 L1b.T. Clinton- serve/spend scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1b.T. TELEPHONE: What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L1b.T was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the FTF version of this question, see L1b. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> L1b1.T 5. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> L1b2.T 7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL] --> NEXT NAME 8. DK --> NEXT NAME 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 108 522 59 109 3 ============================== V000553 L1b1.T. Clinton- how much red srv/spd ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1b1.T. IF R THINKS CLINTON WOULD LIKE TO REDUCE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT NAME 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME 8. DK --> NEXT NAME 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L1b.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1699 33 74 1 ============================== V000554 L1b2.T. Clinton- how much inc srv/spd ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1b2.T. IF R THINKS CLINTON WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT NAME 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME 8. DK --> NEXT NAME 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L1b.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1285 246 275 1 ============================== V000555 L1bx1. 5-pt br summary Clinton srv/spnd MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1bx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending? (Do you think he would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND CLINTON PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1b.T and L1b1.T/L1b2.T 1. Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. Reduce spending and services only some 3. Stay same as now (3 in L1b.T) 4. Increase spending and services only some 5. Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK in L1b.T or L1b1.T/L1b2.T 9. RF in L1b.T or L1b1.T/L1b2.T 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1b.T; FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 33 74 59 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 275 246 111 3 ============================== V000556 L1bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Clinton srv/spnd MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1bx2. FTF: Where would you place Bill Clinton on this issue? TELEPHONE: What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending? (Do you think he would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND CLINTON PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1b and L1bx1 Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. SCALE 2; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services only some 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Stay same as now (3 in L1b.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services only some 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1b or L1b.T 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 53 97 536 515 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 398 203 5 ============================== V000557 L1c. Gore- serv/spend scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1c. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L1b was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L1c.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY FEWER SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 2. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 3. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 4. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 5. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 6. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 7. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY MORE SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 9 27 62 154 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 262 251 129 111 1 ============================== V000558 L1c.T. Gore- serv/spend scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1c.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L1b.T was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the FTF version of this question, see L1c. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> L1c1.T 5. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> L1c2.T 7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL]-->NEXT NAME/PARTY OR-->L2.T 8. DK -->NEXT NAME/PARTY OR-->L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 91 553 41 114 2 ============================== V000559 L1c1.T. Gore- how much red serv/spend ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1c1.T. IF R THINKS GORE WOULD LIKE TO REDUCE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L1c.T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1716 35 56 ============================== V000560 L1c2.T. Gore- how much inc serv/spend ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1c2.T. IF R THINKS GORE WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L1c.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1254 264 286 3 ============================== V000561 L1cx1. 5-pt br summary Gore serv/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1cx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) (Do you think he would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1c.T and L1c1.T/L1c2.T 1. Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. Reduce spending and services only some 3. Stay same as now (3 in L1c.T) 4. Increase spending and services only some 5. Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK in L1c.T or L1c1.T/L1c2.T 9. RF in L1c.T or L1c1.T/L1c2.T 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1c.T; FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 35 56 41 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 286 264 117 2 ============================== V000562 L1cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore serv/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1cx2. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) (Do you think he would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1c and L1cx1 Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. SCALE 2; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services only some 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Stay same as now (3 in L1c.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services only some 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1c or L1c.T 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 44 83 519 537 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 393 228 3 ============================== V000563 L1d. Bush- serv/spend scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1d. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L1b was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L1d.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY FEWER SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 2. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 3. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 4. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 5. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 6. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 7. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY MORE SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 58 145 253 213 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 115 73 23 124 2 ============================== V000564 L1d.T. Bush- serv/spend scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1d.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L1b.T was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L1d. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING -->L1d1.T 5. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING -->L1d2.T 7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL]-->NEXT NAME/PARTY OR-->L2.T 8. DK -->NEXT NAME/PARTY OR-->L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 410 223 38 128 2 ============================== V000565 L1d1.T. Bush- how much reduce serv/spend ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1d1.T. IF R THINKS GW BUSH WOULD LIKE TO REDUCE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L1d.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1397 208 200 2 ============================== V000566 L1d2.T. Bush- how much increase serv/spend ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1d2.T. IF R THINKS GW BUSH WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE SERVICES AND SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L1d.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1584 69 153 1 ============================== V000567 L1dx1. 5-pt br summary Bush serv/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1dx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) (Do you think he would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1d.T and L1d1.T/L1d2.T 1. Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. Reduce spending and services only some 3. Stay same as now (3 in L1d.T) 4. Increase spending and services only some 5. Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK in L1d.T or L1d1.T/L1d2.T 9. RF in L1d.T or L1d1.T/L1d2.T 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1d.T; FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 208 200 38 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 153 69 131 2 ============================== V000568 L1dx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush serv/spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1dx2. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) (Do you think he would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE /BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1d and L1dx1 Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. SCALE 2; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services only some 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Stay same as now (3 in L1d.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services only some 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1d or L1d.T 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 266 345 619 226 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 92 255 4 ============================== V000569 L1e. Dem Party- serv/spend scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1e. FTF: Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L1b was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L1e.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY FEWER SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 2. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 3. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 4. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 5. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 6. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 7. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY MORE SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 15 14 51 143 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 267 266 142 106 2 ============================== V000570 L1e.T. Dem Party- serv/spend scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1e.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L1b.T was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L1e. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> L1e1.T 5. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> L1e2.T 7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL] --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 84 556 46 115 ============================== V000571 L1e1.T. Dem Party-how much red srv/sp ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1e1.T. IF R THINKS DEMOCRATIC PARTY WANTS TO REDUCE SERVICES/SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think they would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L1e.T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1723 31 53 ============================== V000572 L1e2.T. Dem Party-how much inc srv/sp ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1e2.T. IF R THINKS DEMOCRATIC PARTY WANTS TO INCREASE SERVICES/SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think they would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A Great Deal --> Next Party or L2 5. Only Some --> Next Party or L2 8. DK --> Next Party Or L2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L1e.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1251 291 264 1 ============================== V000573 L1ex1. 5-pt br summary Dem Party srv/spd MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1ex1.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) (Do you think they would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1e.T and L1e1.T/L1e2.T 1. Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. Reduce spending and services only some 3. Stay same as now (3 in L1e.T) 4. Increase spending and services only some 5. Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK in L1e.T or L1e1.T/L1e2.T 9. RF in L1e.T or L1e1.T/L1e2.T 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1e.T; FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 31 53 46 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 264 291 116 ============================== V000574 L1ex2. Comb.7pt/br summ Dem Party srv/sp MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1ex2. FTF: Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) (Do you think they would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1e and L1ex1 Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. SCALE 2; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services only some 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Stay same as now (3 in L1e.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services only some 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1e or L1e.T 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 46 67 507 530 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 433 222 2 ============================== V000575 L1f. Rep Party- serv/spend scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1f. FTF: Where would you place the Republican Party (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L1b was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L1f.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY FEWER SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 2. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 3. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 4. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 5. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 6. --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 7. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY MORE SERVICES --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 8. DK --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 86 182 226 208 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 110 52 20 121 1 ============================== V000576 L1f.T. Rep Party- serv/spend scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1f.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L1b.T was administered first, then L1c and L1d were randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f were administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L1f. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING --> L1f1.T 5. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING --> L1f2.T 7. SHOULD STAY SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL] --> Next Party or L2 8. DK --> Next Party Or L2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 451 185 37 128 ============================== V000577 L1f1.T. Rep Party-how much red srv/sp ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1f1.T. IF R THINKS REPUBLICAN PARTY WANTS TO REDUCE SERVICES/SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think they would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L1f.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1356 229 221 1 ============================== V000578 L1f2.T. Rep Party-how much inc srv/sp ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1f2.T. IF R THINKS DEMOCRATIC PARTY WANTS TO INCREASE SERVICES/SPENDING: TELEPHONE: (Do you think they would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A GREAT DEAL --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L1f.T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1622 54 131 ============================== V000579 L1fx1. 5-pt br summary Rep Party srv/spd MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1fx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) (Do you think they would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND REP PTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1f.T and L1f1.T/L1f2.T 1. Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. Reduce spending and services only some 3. Stay same as now (3 in L1f.T) 4. Increase spending and services only some 5. Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK in L1f.T or L1f1.T/L1f2.T 9. RF in L1f.T or L1f1.T/L1f2.T 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1f.T; FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 229 221 37 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 131 54 129 ============================== V000580 L1fx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Rep Party srv/sp MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L1fx2. FTF: Where would you place the Republican Party (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending?) (Do you think they would like to) reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND REP PTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L1f and L1fx1 Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services a great deal 2. SCALE 2; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services only some 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Stay same as now (3 in L1f.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services only some 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services a great deal 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1f or L1f.T 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 315 403 581 183 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 74 250 1 ............................................................................ L2/L2.T. FTF: Please look at page 6 of the booklet. Some people believe that we should spend much less money for defense. Suppose these people are at one end of a scale, at point 1. Others feel that defense spending should be greatly increased. Suppose these people are at the other end, at point 7. And, of course, some other people have opinions somewhere in between, at points 2,3,4,5 or 6. TELEPHONE: Some people believe that we should spend much less money for defense. Others feel that defense spending should be greatly increased. ============================== V000581 L2a. Self plcemnt-def spending scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2a. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- For the telephone version of this question, see L2a.T 1. GOVT SHOULD DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2b 2. --> L2b 3. --> L2b 4. --> L2b 5. --> L2b 6. --> L2b 7. GOVT SHOULD INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2b 8. DK --> L2b 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L2b 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 161 35 33 72 238 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 229 144 85 8 802 ============================== V000582 L2a.T. Self plcemnt-def spending scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2a.T. TELEPHONE: Do you have an opinion on this issue or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- For the FTF version of this question, see L2a. 1. YES, HAVE AN OPINION 5. NO, NO OPINION (HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH) --> L2b.T 8. DK --> L2b.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 589 207 4 1 ============================== V000583 L2a1.T. Govt inc/dec def spending phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2a1.T. IF R DOES NOT SAY HE/SHE HAS NO OPINION ABOUT DEFENSE SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Do you feel the government should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or is the government spending on defense about the right amount now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2a1a.T 3. INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2a1b.T 5. ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT --> L2b.T/L2c.T 8. DK --> L2b.T/L2c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,0 in L2a.T 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1213 110 331 146 5 2 ============================== V000584 L2a1a.T. How much reduce def spending ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2a1a.T. IF R SAYS DOES NOT SAY HE/SHE HAS NO OPINION ABOUT DEFENSE SPENDING: IF R SAYS THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD REDUCE DEFENSE SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Should the government reduce defense spending a lot or a little? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> L2bT/L2c.T 5. A LITTLE --> L2b.T/L2c.T 8. DK --> L2b.T/L2c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 3,5,8,9,0 in L2a1.T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1697 54 56 ============================== V000585 L2a1b.T. How much incres def spending ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2a1b.T. IF R SAYS DOES NOT SAY HE/SHE HAS NO OPINION ABOUT DEFENSE SPENDING: IF R SAYS THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING: TELEPHONE: Should the government increase defense spending a lot or a little? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> L2b.T/L2c.T 5. A LITTLE --> L2b.T/L2c.T 8. DK --> L2b.T/L2c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,5,8,9,0 in L2a1.T 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1476 188 141 1 1 ============================== V000586 L2ax1. 5-pt br summary defense spending MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 7 Numeric L2ax1.T. TELEPHONE: Do you have an opinion on this issue or haven't you thought much about this? Do you feel the government should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or is the government spending on defense about the right amount now? Should the government decrease/increase defense spending a lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2a.T, L2a1.T and L2a1a.T/L2a1b.T 1. Decrease defense spending a lot 2. Decrease defense spending a little 3. About the right amount (5 in L2a1.T) 4. Increase defense spending a little 5. Increase defense spending a lot 7. Haven't thought much (5 in L2a.T) 8. DK in L2a1.T or L2a1a.T/L2a1b.T 9. RF in L2a1.T or L2a1a.T/L2a1b.T 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2a.T or L2a1.T; FTF mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 54 56 146 141 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 188 207 6 3 ============================== V000587 L2ax2. Comb.7pt/br summ defense spending MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2ax2. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE: Do you have an opinion on this issue or haven't you thought much about this? Do you feel the government should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or is the government spending on defense about the right amount now? Should the government decrease/increase defense spending a lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEFENSE SPENDING SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2a and from L2a.T/L2a1.T/L2a1a.T/L2a1b.T. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a lot 2. SCALE: 2; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a little 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: About the right amount (5 in L2a1.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a little 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2a; 8,9,NA in L2a.T or L2a1.T; FTF mode 0. Haven't thought much 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 368 89 89 685 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 285 273 14 4 ============================== V000588 L2b. Gore- defense spending scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2b. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L2b and L2c were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names. L2e and L2f were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L2b.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 7. GOVT SHOULD INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 29 72 169 239 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 186 83 32 195 1 ============================== V000589 L2b.T. Gore- defense spending scale ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2b.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L2b.T and L2c.T were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names. L2e.T and L2f.T were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L2b. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2b1.T 3. INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2b1.T 5. ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 157 167 273 203 1 ============================== V000590 L2b1.T. Gore-how much red/inc def spn ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2b1.T. IF R SAYS GORE WANTS TO REDUCE DEFENSE SPENDING/ IF R SAYS GORE WANTS TO INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING: TELEPHONE: A lot or a little? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3.T 5. A LITTLE --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME.PARTY OR --> L3.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,8,9,0 in L2b.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1483 137 183 4 ============================== V000591 L2bx1. 5-pt br summary Gore def spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2bx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? A lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2b.T and L2b1.T/L2b2.T 1. Decrease defense spending a lot 2. Decrease defense spending a little 3. About the right amount (5 in L2b.T) 4. Increase defense spending a little 5. Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK in L2b.T or L2b1.T/L2b2.T 9. RF in L2b.T or L2b1.T/L2b2.T 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2b.T; FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 78 76 273 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 107 59 207 1 ============================== V000592 L2bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore def spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2bx2. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? A lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2b and L2bx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a lot 2. SCALE: 2; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a little 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: About the right amount (5 in L2b.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a little 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2b or L2b.T; FTF mode 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 107 148 867 190 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 91 402 2 ============================== V000593 L2c. Bush- defense spending scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2c. FTF: (Still looking at Page 6). Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L2b and L2c were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names. L2e and L2f were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L2c.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 7. GOVT SHOULD INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 12 26 60 164 5 6 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 247 221 97 179 ============================== V000594 L2c.T. Bush- defense spending scale ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2c.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L2b.T and L2c.T were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names. L2e.T and L2f.T were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L2c. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2c1.T 3. INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2c1.T 5. ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 48 452 111 189 1 ============================== V000595 L2c1.T. Bush-how much red/inc def spd ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2c1.T. IF R SAYS GW BUSH WANTS TO REDUCE DEFENSE SPENDING/ IF R SAYS GW BUSH WANTS TO INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING: TELEPHONE: A lot or a little? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3.T 5. A LITTLE --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,8,9,0 in L2c.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1307 304 186 10 ============================== V000596 L2cx1. 5-pt br summary Bush def spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2cx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now?) A lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCH SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2c.T and L2c1.T/L2c2.T 1. Decrease defense spending a lot 2. Decrease defense spending a little 3. About the right amount (5 in L2c.T) 4. Increase defense spending a little 5. Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK in L2c.T or L2c1.T/L2c2.T 9. RF in L2c.T or L2c1.T/L2c2.T 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2c.T; FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 29 18 111 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 168 275 199 1 ============================== V000597 L2cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush def spend MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2cx2. FTF: (Still looking at Page 6). Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now?) A lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2c and L2cx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a lot 2. SCALE: 2; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a little 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: About the right amount (5 in L2c.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a little 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2c or L2c.T; FTF mode 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 41 44 582 389 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 372 378 1 ============================== V000598 L2d. Dem Party-def spending scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2d. FTF: (Still looking at Page 6). Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L2b and L2c were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names. L2e and L2f were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L2d.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 7. GOVT SHOULD INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 26 107 180 240 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 168 85 39 160 1 ============================== V000599 L2d.T. Dem Party-def spend scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2d.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they believe we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L2b.T and L2c.T were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names. L2e.T and L2f.T were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L2d. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2d1.T 3. INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2d1.T 5. ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 197 171 248 185 ============================== V000600 L2d1.T. Dem Party-how much red/inc ds ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2d1.T. IF R SAYS DEMOCRATIC PARTY WANTS TO REDUCE DEFENSE SPENDING/ IF R SAYS DEMOCRATIC PARTY WANTS TO INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING: TELEPHONE: A lot or a little? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T 5. A LITTLE --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,8,9,0 in L2d.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1439 151 212 5 ============================== V000601 L2dx1. 5-pt br summary Dem Party def sp MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2dx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they believe we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? A lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCH SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2d.T and L2d1.T/L2d2.T 1. Decrease defense spending a lot 2. Decrease defense spending a little 3. About the right amount (5 in L2d.T) 4. Increase defense spending a little 5. Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK in L2d.T or L2d1.T/L2d2.T 9. RF in L2d.T or L2d1.T/L2d2.T 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2d.T; FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 90 103 248 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 109 61 190 ============================== V000602 L2dx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Dem Party def sp MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2dx2. FTF: (Still looking at Page 6). Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they believe we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? A lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING DEM PTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2d and L2dx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a lot 2. SCALE: 2; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a little 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: About the right amount (5 in L2d.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a little 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2d or L2d.T; FTF mode 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 116 210 836 194 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 100 350 1 ============================== V000603 L2e. Rep Party-def spending scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2e. FTF: (Still looking at Page 6). Where would you place the Republican Party (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L2b and L2c were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names. L2e and L2f were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L2e.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 7. GOVT SHOULD INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 12 25 77 169 5 6 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 238 234 86 165 ============================== V000604 L2e.T. Rep Party-def spend scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2e.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L2b.T and L2c.T were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names. L2e.T and L2f.T were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question, see L2e. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2e1.T 3. INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING --> L2e1.T 5. ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 68 441 106 186 ============================== V000605 L2e1.T. Rep Party-how much inc/red ds ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2e1.T. IF R SAYS REPUBLICAN PARTY WANTS TO REDUCE DEFENSE SPENDING/ IF R SAYS REPUBLICAN PARTY WANTS TO INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING: TELEPHONE: A lot or a little? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> NEXT PARTY OR L3.T 5. A LITTLE --> NEXT PARTY OR L3.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR L3.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,8,9,0 in L2e.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1298 288 217 4 ============================== V000606 L2ex1. 5-pt br summary Rep Party def sp MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2ex1.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now?) A lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING REP PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCH SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2e.T and L2e1.T/L2e2.T 1. Decrease defense spending a lot 2. Decrease defense spending a little 3. About the right amount (5 in L2e.T) 4. Increase defense spending a little 5. Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK in L2e.T or L2e1.T/L2e2.T 9. RF in L2e.T or L2e1.T/L2e2.T 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2e.T; FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 36 32 106 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 185 252 190 ============================== V000607 L2ex2. Comb.7pt/br summ Rep Party def sp MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L2ex2. FTF: (Still looking at Page 6). Where would you place the Republican Party (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now?) A lot or a little? SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING REP PTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L2e and L2ex1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a lot 2. SCALE: 2; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a little 3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: About the right amount (5 in L2e.T) 4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a little 5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a lot 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2e or L2e.T; FTF mode 1 2 3 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 48 57 590 419 338 355 ............................................................................ L3/L3.E/L3.T/L3.TE. L3. FTF STANDARD VERSION: Please look at page 7 of the booklet. There is much concern about the rapid rise in medical and hospital costs. Some people feel there should be a government insurance plan which would cover all medical and hospital expenses for everyone. Suppose these people are at one end of a scale, at point 1. Others feel that all medical expenses should be paid by individuals through private insurance plans like Blue Cross or other company paid plans. Suppose these people are at the other end, at point 7. And, of course, some other people have opinions somewhere in between, at points 2,3,4,5, or 6. L3.E. FTF EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Please look at page 8 of the booklet. There is much concern about the rapid rise in medical and hospital costs. Some people feel that all medical expenses should be paid by individuals through private insurance plans like Blue Cross or other company paid plans. Suppose these people are at one end of a scale, at point 1. Others feel there should be a government insurance plan which would cover all medical and hospital expenses for everyone. Suppose these people are at the other end, at point 7. And, of course, some other people have opinions somewhere in between, at points 2,3,4,5, or 6. L3.T TELEPHONE VERSION 1: There is much concern about the rapid rise in medical and hospital costs. Some people feel there should be a government insurance plan which would cover all medical and hospital expenses for everyone. Others feel that all medical expenses should be paid by individuals through private insurance plans like Blue Cross or other company paid plans. L3.TE. TELEPHONE VERSION 2: here is much concern about the rapid rise in medical and hospital costs. Some people feel that all medical expenses should be paid by individuals through private insurance plans like Blue Cross or other company paid plans. Others feel there should be a government insurance plan which would cover all medical and hospital expenses for everyone. ============================== V000608 L3(1). Ckpt: FTF/ph, reg/exp. Numeric L3(1). CHECKPOINT: MODE AND VERSION FOR GOVT/PRIVATE MEDICAL INSURANCE SELF-PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF: Rs were randomly assigned to the standard 7-point scale or to an experimental version of the 7-point scale (with endpoints reversed). Phone: Rs were randomly assigned to 2 versions of the branching format; in the 2nd version, the initial placement question is coded in reverse. 1. FTF standard version 2. FTF experimental version 3. PHONE version 1 4. PHONE version 2 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 515 491 376 425 ============================== V000608a L3a. Self placement-private or govt insur MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3a. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L3 for complete text. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered either L3a (standard) or L3a.E (experimental). The endpoints are reversed in the experimental version of this question. For telephone versions of this question, see L3a.T and L3a.TE. 1. GOVT INSURANCE PLAN --> SKIP TO L4 2. --> SKIP TO L4 3. --> SKIP TO L4 4. --> SKIP TO L4 5. --> SKIP TO L4 6. --> SKIP TO L4 7. PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN --> SKIP TO L4 8. DK --> SKIP TO L4 9. RF; NA; INAP, 2, 3, 4 in L3(1) 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH --> SKIP TO L4 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 25 74 42 83 105 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 72 46 59 9 1292 ============================== V000608b L3a.E. Self placement-insur scale FTF ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3a.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L3.E for complete text. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered either L3a (standard) or L3a.E (experimental). The endpoints are reversed in the experimental version of this question. For telephone versions of this question, see L3a.T and L3a.TE. 1. PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN --> L4 2. --> L4 3. --> L4 4. --> L4 5. --> L4 6. --> L4 7. GOVT INSURANCE PLAN --> L4 8. DK --> L4 9. RF; NA; INAP, 1, 3, 4 in L3(1) 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L4 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 35 41 48 62 89 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 74 57 83 2 1316 ============================== V000609 L3ax. Comb. FTF versions R insurnc scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3ax. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? COMBINED FTF: STANDARD/EXPERIMENTAL 7 PT MEDICAL INSURANCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L3a/L3a.E. 1. GOVT INSURANCE PLAN 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, phone mode [3, 4 in L3(1)] 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 60 157 99 157 194 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 134 94 100 11 801 ============================== V000610a L3a.T. Self placement-insur scale phone stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3a.T. IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 1: TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L3.T for complete text. Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered either L3a.T (version 1) or L3a.TE (version 2). The coding is reversed in version 2 of this question. For FTF versions of this question, see L3a and L3a.E. 1. SHOULD BE A GOVT INSURANCE PLAN --> SKIP TO L3a1.T 5. INDIVIDUALS SHOULD PAY MEDICAL EXPENSES THROUGH PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN --> SKIP TO L3a2.T 7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL] --> SKIP TO L4 8. DK --> SKIP TO L4.T 9. RF; NA; INAP, 1, 2, 4 in L3(1) 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> SKIP TO L4.T 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 44 149 155 20 8 1431 ============================== V000610b L3a.TE. Self placement-insur scale phone ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3a.TE. IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 2: TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L3.TE for complete text. Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered either L3a.T (version 1) or L3a.TE (version 2). The coding is reversed in version 2 of this question. For FTF versions of this question, see L3a and L3a.E. 1. INDIVIDUALS SHOULD PAY MEDICAL EXPENSES THROUGH PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN --> L3a2.T 5. SHOULD BE A GOVT INSURANCE PLAN --> L3a1.T 7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW --> L4.T 8. DK --> L4.T 9. RF; NA; INAP, 1, 2, 3 in L3(1) 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L4.T 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 47 146 188 30 14 1382 ============================== V000611 L3ax.TE. Comb. Ph versions R insur scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3ax.T. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? COMBINED PHONE VERSION 1/VERSION 2 - MEDICAL INSURANCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L3a.T and L3a.TE 1. SHOULD BE A GOVT INSURANCE PLAN 5. INDIVIDUALS SHOULD PAY MEDICAL EXPENSES THROUGH PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN 7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode [1,2 in L3(1)] 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 91 337 301 50 22 1006 ============================== V000612 L3a1/a2.T. Strength of insurance plan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3a1/a2.T. BOTH TELEPHONE VERSIONS: IF R FEELS THERE SHOULD BE GOVERNMENT INSURANCE PLAN/ IF R FEELS INDIVIDUALS SHOULD PAY THROUGH PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN: TELEPHONE: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that there should be a government insurance plan?/ Do you feel strongly or not strongly that individuals should pay through private insurance plan? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> L4.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> L4.T 8. DK --> L4.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,0 or RF/NA in L3a.T or L3a.TE 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1169 507 127 3 1 ============================== V000613 L3x1. 5-pt br summary R on pri/govt insurance MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3x1.T. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? Do you feel strongly or not strongly that there should be a a government insurance plan?/ Do you feel strongly or not strongly that individuals should pay through private insurance plan? SUMMARY: 5PT MED INSURANCE SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built L3ax.T and L3a1.T/L3a2.T 1. Strongly - government insurance plan 2. Not strongly - government insurance plan 3. Stay the same as it is now 4. Not strongly - individual insurance 5. Strongly - individual insurance 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode [1,2 in L3(1)] 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 91 282 54 50 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 73 225 25 1007 ============================== V000614 L3x2. Comb.7pt/br summ of R on pri/govt insurance MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L3x2. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? Do you feel strongly or not strongly that there should be a a government insurance plan?/ Do you feel strongly or not strongly that individuals should pay through private insurance plan? SUMMARY: 5PT MED INSURANCE SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L3ax and L3ax.T Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt insurance plan 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt insurance plan 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 ; BRANCHING: Stay the same as it is now 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - individual insurance 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Strongly - individual insurance 8. DK 9. RF; NA 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 151 439 153 535 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 167 325 36 1 ............................................................................ L4/L4.T. FTF: Please look at page 9 of the booklet. Some people feel the government in Washington should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living. Suppose these people are at one end of a scale, at point 1. Others think the government should just let each person get ahead on their own. Suppose these people are at the other end, at point 7. And, of course, some other people have opinions somewhere in between, at points 2,3,4,5, or 6. TELEPHONE: Please look at page 9 of the booklet. Some people feel the government in Washington should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living. Suppose these people are at one end of a scale, at point 1. Others think the government should just let each person get ahead on their own. Suppose these people are at the other end, at point 7. And, of course, some other people have opinions somewhere in between, at points 2,3,4,5, or 6. ============================== V000615 L4a. R plcmnt-guar job/std liv scl FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4a. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- For the telephone version of this question see L4a.T. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING --> L4b. 2. --> L4b. 3. --> L4b. 4. --> L4b. 5. --> L4b. 6. --> L4b. 7. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN --> L4b. 8. DK --> L4b. 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L4b. 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 93 74 48 93 173 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 189 195 137 4 801 ============================== V000616 L4a.T. R plcmnt-guar job/std liv scl ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4a.T. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- For the FTF version of this question see L4a. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING --> L4a1.T 5. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN --> L4a2.T 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> L4b.T/L4c.T 8. DK --> L4b.T/L4c.T 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L4b.T/L4c.T 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 108 193 439 55 3 1009 ============================== V000617 L4a1.T. How much should gov guar jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4a1.T. IF R THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING: TELEPHONE: Do you feel strongly that the government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or not so strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> L4b.T/L4c.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> L4b.T/L4c.T 8. DK --> L4b.T/L4c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L4a.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1614 152 40 1 ============================== V000618 L4a2t. How much should ppl get by on own MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4a2.T. IF R THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD LET EACH GET AHEAD ON THEIR OWN: TELEPHONE: Do you feel strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own, or not so strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> L4b.T/L4c.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> L4b.T/L4c.T 8. DK --> L4b.T/L4c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L4a.T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1368 346 93 ============================== V000619 L4x1. 5-pt br summary guaranteed jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4x1.T. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? Do you feel strongly that the government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or not so strongly? Do you feel strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own, or not so strongly? SUMMARY: 5PT GUARANTEED JOBS SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4a; built from L4a.T and L4a1.T/L4a2.T 1. Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 108 152 40 55 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 93 346 4 1009 ============================== V000620 L4x2. Comb.7pt/br summ guaranteed jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4x2. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? Do you feel strongly that the government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or not so strongly? Do you feel strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own, or not so strongly? SUMMARY: 5PT GUARANTEED JOBS SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4a and L4x1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF; NA 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 201 226 88 510 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 288 483 8 3 ============================== V000621 L4b. Gore-guar job/std liv scl FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4b. FTF: (Still looking at Page 9) Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L4b and L4c were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names; L4e and L4f were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question see L4b.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5. 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5 7. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 74 128 206 208 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 110 58 38 182 2 ============================== V000622 L4b.T. Gore-guar job/std liv scl phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4b.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L4b.T and L4c.T were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names; L4e.T and L4f.T were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the FTF version of this question see L4b. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING --> L4b1.T 5. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN --> L4b2T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR -->L5.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 434 180 20 165 2 ============================== V000623 L4b1/b2.T. Gore-strength of guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4b1/b2.T. IF R SAYS GORE THINKS GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD LIVING/ IF R SAYS GORE THINKS GOVT SHOULD LET EACH ON OWN: TELEPHONE: Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME.PARTY OR --> L5.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L4b.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1193 444 162 8 ============================== V000624 L4bx1. 5-pt br summary Gore guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4bx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own? SUMMARY: 5PT GUARANTEED JOBS GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4b.T and L4b1.T/L4b2. 1. Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 338 94 20 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 68 106 173 2 ============================== V000625 L4bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4bx2. FTF: (Still looking at Page 9) Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own? SUMMARY: 5PT GUARANTEED JOBS GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4b and L4bx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 412 222 544 126 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 144 355 4 ============================== V000626 L4c. Bush-guar job/std liv scl FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4c. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L4b and L4c were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names; L4e and L4f were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question see L4c.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 23 22 80 169 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 205 220 98 187 2 ============================== V000627 L4c.T. Bush-guar job/std liv scl phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4c.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he feels government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L4b.T and L4c.T were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names; L4e.T and L4f.T were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the FTF version of this question see L4c. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING --> L4c1.T 5. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN --> L4c1.T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 122 494 15 168 2 ============================== V000628 L4c1/c2.T. Bush-strength guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4c1/c2.T. IF R SAYS GW BUSH THINKS GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD LIVING/ IF R SAYS GW BUSH THINKS GOVT SHOULD LET EACH ON OWN: TELEPHONE: Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own ? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.T 8. DK --> NEXT NAME.PARTY OR --> L5.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L4c.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1191 463 143 10 ============================== V000629 L4cx1. 5-pt br summary Bush guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4cx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he feels government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own ? SUMMARY: 5PT GUARANTEED JOBS BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4c.T and L4c1.T/L4c2.T 1. Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 80 40 15 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 103 383 178 2 ============================== V000630 L4cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4cx2. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he feels government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own ? SUMMARY: 5PT GUARANTEED JOBS BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4c and L4cx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 103 62 469 323 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 481 365 4 ============================== V000631 L4d. Dem Party-guar job/std liv scl FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4d. FTF: Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L4b and L4c were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names; L4e and L4f were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question see L4d.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 82 163 217 180 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 108 51 43 161 1 ============================== V000632 L4d.T. Dem Party-guar job/std liv scl ph MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4d.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they feel government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L4b.T and L4c.T were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names; L4e.T and L4f.T were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the FTF version of this question see L4d. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING --> L4d1.T 5. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN --> L4d1.T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L5.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L5.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 450 161 22 167 1 ============================== V000633 L4d1/d2.T. Dem Party-strength guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4d1/d2.T. IF R SAYS DEM PARTY THINKS GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STD OF LIVING/ IF R SAYS DEM PARTY THINKS GOVT SHOULD LET EACH ON OWN: TELEPHONE: Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own ? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L5.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L5.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L5.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L4d.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1196 436 173 2 ============================== V000634 L4dx1. 5-pt br summary Dem Party guar jb MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4dx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they feel government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own ? SUMMARY: 5PT GUAR JOBS DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4d.T and L4d1.T/L4d2.T 1. Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 347 101 22 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 72 89 169 1 ============================== V000635 L4dx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Dem Party gua jb MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4dx2. FTF: Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they feel government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own ? SUMMARY: 5PT GUAR JOBS DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4d and L4dx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 429 264 527 123 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 132 330 2 ============================== V000636 L4e. Rep Party-guar job/std liv FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4e. FTF: Where would you place the Republican Party (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] FTF: L4b and L4c were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names; L4e and L4f were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the telephone version of this question see L4e.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 13 24 65 167 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 204 228 130 174 1 ============================== V000637 L4e.T. Rep Party-guar job/std liv phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4e.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they feel government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] PHONE: L4b.T and L4c.T were randomly administered as the 1st or 2nd names; L4e.T and L4f.T were then randomly administered as the 3rd or 4th names. For the FTF version of this question see L4e. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING --> L4e1.T 5. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN-->NEXT PARTY OR-->L5.T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> L4e1.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L5.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 96 502 21 181 1 ============================== V000638 L4e1/e2.T. Rep Party-strength guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4e1/e2.T. IF R SAYS REP PARTY THINKS GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STD OF LIVING/ IF R SAYS REP PARTY THINKS GOVT SHOULD LET EACH ON OWN: TELEPHONE: Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> NEXT PARTY OR L5.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> NEXT PARTY OR L5.T 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR L5.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L4e.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1209 427 167 4 ============================== V000639 L4ex1. 5-pt br summ Rep Party guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4ex1.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they feel government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own? SUMMARY: 5PT GUAR JOBS REP PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4e.T and L4e1.T/L4e2.T 1. Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 66 30 21 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 137 361 185 1 ============================== V000640 L4ex2. Comb.7pt/br summ Rep Party guar job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L4ex2. FTF: Where would you place the Republican Party (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they feel government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own?) Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should see to jobs and a good standard of living? Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own? SUMMARY: 5PT GUAR JOBS REP PARTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L4e and L4ex1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt leave people on own 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt leave people on own 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 79 54 457 365 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 491 359 2 ............................................................................ L5/L5.T. FTF: Please look at page 10 of the booklet. Some people feel that the government in Washington should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks. (Suppose these people are at one end of a scale, at point 1.) Others feel that the government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves. (Suppose these people are at the other end, at point 7.) And, of course, some other people have opinions somewhere in between, at points 2,3,4,5, or 6. TELEPHONE: Some people feel that the government in Washington should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks. Others feel that the government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves. ============================== V000641 L5a. R plcmnt-aid to blacks scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5a. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L5 for complete text. For the telephone version of this question see L5a.T. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> L5b. 2. --> L5b. 3. --> L5b. 4. --> L5b. 5. --> L5b. 6. --> L5b. 7. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> L5b. 8. DK --> L5b. 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L5b. 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 69 52 40 79 250 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 150 160 193 4 810 ============================== V000642 L5a.T. R plcmnt-aid to blacks scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5a.T. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L5.T for complete text. For the FTF version of this question see L5a. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> L5a1.T 5. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> L5a1.T 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> L5b.T 8. DK --> L5b.T 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L5b.T 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 151 196 339 104 2 1015 ============================== V000643 L5a1/a2.T. R-strength aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5a1/a2.T. IF R THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD HELP BLACKS/ IF R THINKS BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES: TELEPHONE: Should the government help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? Should blacks have to help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GREAT EXTENT --> L5b.T 5. ONLY SOME --> L5b.T 8. DK --> L5b.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L5a.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1272 342 191 2 ============================== V000644 L5ax1. 5-pt br summary R aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5ax1.T. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? Should the government help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? Should blacks have to help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5a.T and L5a1.T/L5a2.T. 1. Govt help blacks to great extent 2. Govt help blacks to some extent 3. Other/neither/depends 4. Should help themselves to some extent 5. Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. Haven't thought much about it 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 151 86 110 104 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 81 256 4 1015 ============================== V000645 L5ax2. Comb.7pt/br summ R aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5ax2. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? Should the government help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? Should blacks have to help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5a and L5ax1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to great extent 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to some extent 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/neither/depends 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to some extent 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. Haven't thought much about it 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 220 138 150 583 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 241 449 8 18 ============================== V000646 L5b. Clinton plcmnt-aid to blacks scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5b. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place Bill Clinton on this issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5 for complete text. FTF: L5b is administered first, then L5c and L5d are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e and L5f are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question see L5b.T. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 7. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 108 153 205 202 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 88 46 31 168 5 ============================== V000647 L5b.T. Clinton-aid to blacks scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5b.T. TELEPHONE: What about Bill Clinton? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5.T for complete text. TELEPHONE: L5b.T is administered first, then L5c.T and L5d.T are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e.T and L5f.T are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the FTF version of this question see L5b. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> L5b1.T 5. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> L5b1.T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> NEXT NAME 8. DK --> NEXT NAME 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 446 111 46 192 6 ============================== V000648 L5b1/b2.T. Clinton-strength aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5b1/b2.T. IF R SAYS CLINTON THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD HELP BLACKS/ IF R SAYS CLINTON THINKS BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GREAT EXTENT --> NEXT NAME 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME 8. DK --> NEXT NAME 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L5b.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1250 317 237 3 ============================== V000649 L5bx1. 5-pt br summary Clinton aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5bx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about Bill Clinton? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS CLINTON PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5b.T and L5b1.T/L5b2.T. 1. Govt help blacks to great extent 2. Govt help blacks to some extent 3. Other/neither/depends 4. Should help themselves to some extent 5. Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 267 176 46 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 61 50 195 6 ============================== V000650 L5bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Clinton aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5bx2. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place Bill Clinton on this issue? TELEPHONE: What about Bill Clinton? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS CLINTON PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5b and L5bx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to great extent 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to some extent 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/neither/depends 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to some extent 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 375 329 541 107 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 81 363 11 ============================== V000651 L5c. Gore plcmnt-aid to blacks scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5c. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5 for complete text. FTF: L5b is administered first, then L5c and L5d are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e and L5f are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question see L5c.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 7. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 96 135 189 224 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 68 58 27 204 5 ============================== V000652 L5c.T. Gore-aid to blacks scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5c.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5.T for complete text. TELEPHONE: L5b.T is administered first, then L5c.T and L5d.T are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e.T and L5f.T are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the FTF version of this question see L5c. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> L5c1.T 5. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> L5c1.T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 420 110 33 232 6 ============================== V000653 L5c1/c2.T. Gore-strength aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5c1/c2.T. IF R SAYS GORE THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD HELP BLACKS/ IF R SAYS GORE THINKS BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GREAT EXTENT --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L5c.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1277 284 245 1 ============================== V000654 L5cx1. 5-pt br summary Gore aid to blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5cx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5c.T and L5c1.T/L5c2.T. 1. Govt help blacks to great extent 2. Govt help blacks to some extent 3. Other/neither/depends 4. Should help themselves to some extent 5. Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 234 185 33 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 60 50 233 6 ============================== V000655 L5cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore aid to blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5cx2. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5c and L5cx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to great extent 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to some extent 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/neither/depends 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to some extent 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 330 320 514 118 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 77 437 11 ============================== V000656 L5d. Bush plcmnt-aid to blacks scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5d. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5 for complete text. FTF: L5b is administered first, then L5c and L5d are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e and L5f are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question see L5d.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 7. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 19 22 69 209 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 226 143 102 212 4 ============================== V000657 L5d.T. Bush-aid to blacks scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5d.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5.T for complete text. TELEPHONE: L5b.T is administered first, then L5c.T and L5d.T are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e.T and L5f.T are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the FTF version of this question see L5d. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> L5d1.T 5. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> L5d1.T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 151 351 44 247 8 ============================== V000658 L5d1/d2.T. Bush-strength aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5d1/d2.T. IF R SAYS GW BUSH THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD HELP BLACKS/ IF R SAYS GW BUSH THINKS BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES: TELEPHONE: (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GREAT EXTENT --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L5d.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1305 255 245 2 ============================== V000659 L5dx1. 5-pt br summary Bush aid to blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5dx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5d.T and L5d1.T/L5d2.T. 1. Govt help blacks to great extent 2. Govt help blacks to some extent 3. Other/neither/depends 4. Should help themselves to some extent 5. Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 45 106 44 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 139 210 249 8 ============================== V000660 L5dx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush aid to blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5dx2. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think he feels the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5d and L5dx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to great extent 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to some extent 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/neither/depends 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to some extent 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 64 128 548 282 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 312 461 12 ============================== V000661 L5e. Dem Party plcmnt-aid to blks scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5e. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5 for complete text. FTF: L5b is administered first, then L5c and L5d are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e and L5f are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question see L5e.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 7. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES--> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 106 164 214 198 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 70 45 29 176 4 ============================== V000662 L5e.T. Dem Party-aid to blks scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5e.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they feel that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5.T for complete text. TELEPHONE: L5b.T is administered first, then L5c.T and L5d.T are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e.T and L5f.T are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the FTF version of this question see L5e. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> L5e1.T 5. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> L5e1.T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L6. 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR -->L6. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 437 112 26 220 6 ============================== V000663 L5e1/e2.T. Dem Party-strgth aid to blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5e1/e2.T. IF R SAYS DEMOCRATIC PARTY THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD HELP BLACKS/ IF R SAYS DEMOCRATIC PARTY THINKS BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES: TELEPHONE: (Do you think they feel the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think they feel blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GREAT EXTENT --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L6. 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L6. 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L6. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L5e.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1258 301 247 1 ============================== V000664 L5ex1. 5-pt br summary Dem Party aid blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5ex1.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they feel that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think they feel the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think they feel blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5e.T and L5e1.T/L5e2.T. 1. Govt help blacks to great extent 2. Govt help blacks to some extent 3. Other/neither/depends 4. Should help themselves to some extent 5. Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 256 181 26 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 66 45 221 6 ============================== V000665 L5ex2. Comb.7pt/br summ Dem Party aid blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5ex2. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they feel that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think they feel the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think they feel blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5e and L5ex1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to great extent 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to some extent 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/neither/depends 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to some extent 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 362 345 508 111 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 74 397 10 ============================== V000666 L5f. Rep Party plcmnt-aid to blks scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5f. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place the Republican Party (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5 for complete text. FTF: L5b is administered first, then L5c and L5d are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e and L5f are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the telephone version of this question see L5f.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 2. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 3. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 4. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 5. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 6. --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 7. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 8. DK --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 801 15 19 66 186 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 218 196 116 186 4 ============================== V000667 L5f.T. Rep Party-aid to blks scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5f.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they feel that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See L5.T for complete text. TELEPHONE: L5b.T is administered first, then L5c.T and L5d.T are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e.T and L5f.T are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names. For the FTF version of this question see L5f. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS --> L5f1.T 5. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> L5f1.T 7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL] --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L6. 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L6. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 151 369 43 232 6 ============================== V000668 L5f1/f2.T. Rep Party-strgth aid to blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5f1/f2.T. IF R SAYS REPUBLICAN PARTY THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD HELP BLACKS/ IF R SAYS REPUBLICAN PARTY THINKS BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES: TELEPHONE: (Do you think they feel the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think they feel blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GREAT EXTENT --> NEXT PARTY OR L6. 5. ONLY SOME --> NEXT PARTY OR L6. 8. DK --> NEXT PARTY OR L6. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L5f.T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1287 271 249 ============================== V000669 L5fx1. 5-pt br summary Rep Party aid blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5fx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they feel that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think they feel the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think they feel blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS REP PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5f.T and L5f1.T/L5f2.T. 1. Govt help blacks to great extent 2. Govt help blacks to some extent 3. Other/neither/depends 4. Should help themselves to some extent 5. Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1006 44 107 43 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 142 227 232 6 ============================== V000670 L5fx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Rep Party aid blks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L5fx2. FTF: (Still looking at page 10) Where would you place the Republican Party (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they feel that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) (Do you think they feel the government should) help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent? (Do you think they feel blacks should have to) help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent? SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS REP PARTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L5f and L5fx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to great extent 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to some extent 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/neither/depends 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to some extent 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to a great extent 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 59 126 513 338 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 343 418 10 ============================== V000671a L6. Appr/disappr affirmative action stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L6. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: Some people think that if a company has a history of discriminating against blacks when making hiring decisions, then they should be required to have an affirmative action program that gives blacks preference in hiring. What do you think? Should companies that have discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative action program? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered either L6 (standard) or L6.E (experimental). 1. YES, THEY SHOULD HAVE TO HAVE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION --> GO TO L6a 5. NO, THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE TO HAVE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION --> GO TO L6b 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] --> GO TO L7 8 DK --> GO TO L7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for L6.E 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 927 431 338 59 42 10 ============================== V000671b L6.E. Appr/disappr affirmative action ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L6.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Some people think that if a company has a history of discriminating against blacks when making hiring decisions, then they should be required to have an affirmative action program that gives blacks preference in hiring. What do you think? Should companies that have discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative action program or should companies not have to have an affirmative action program? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered either L6 (standard) or L6.E (experimental). 1. YES, THEY SHOULD HAVE TO HAVE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION --> GO TO L6a 5. NO, THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE TO HAVE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION --> GO TO L6b 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] --> GO TO L7 8. DK --> GO TO L7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for L6 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 880 397 429 50 43 8 ============================== V000672 L6a. Strength for affirmative action MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L6a. IF R SAYS COMPANIES SHOULD HAVE TO HAVE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: Do you feel strongly or not strongly (that they should have to have affirmative action)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> GO TO L7 5. NOT STRONGLY --> GO TO L7 8. DK --> GO TO L7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,7,8,9 or NA in L6 or L6.E 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 979 601 221 6 ============================== V000673 L6b. Strength against affirmative action MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L6b. IF R SAYS COMPANIES SHOULD NOT HAVE TO HAVE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: Do you feel strongly or not strongly (that they should not have to have affirmative action)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,7,8,9 or NA in L6 or L6.E 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1040 560 204 2 1 ============================== V000674 L6x. Summary affirmative action MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L6x. STANDARD VERSION: Some people think that if a company has a history of discriminating against blacks when making hiring decisions, then they should be required to have an affirmative action program that gives blacks preference in hiring. What do you think? Should companies that have discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative action program? EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Some people think that if a company has a history of discriminating against blacks when making hiring decisions, then they should be required to have an affirmative action program that gives blacks preference in hiring. What do you think? Should companies that have discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative action program or should companies not have to have an affirmative action program? COMBINED AFFIRMATIVE ACTION (STANDARD/EXPERIMENTAL) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L6, L6.E. 1. Yes, they should have to have affirmative action 5. No, they should not have to have affirmative action 7. Other 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 828 767 109 85 18 ============================== V000674a L6x1. Summary - Strength of feeling MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 7 Numeric L6x1. STANDARD VERSION: Some people think that if a company has a history of discriminating against blacks when making hiring decisions, then they should be required to have an affirmative action program that gives blacks preference in hiring. What do you think? Should companies that have discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative action program? EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Some people think that if a company has a history of discriminating against blacks when making hiring decisions, then they should be required to have an affirmative action program that gives blacks preference in hiring. What do you think? Should companies that have discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative action program or should companies not have to have an affirmative action program? BOTH VERSIONS: Do you feel strongly or not strongly (that they should not have to have affirmative action)? SUMMARY - AFFIRMATIVE ACTION (STANDARD/EXPERIMENTAL) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L6, L6.E and L6a/L6b. 1. Strongly - should have to have affirmative action 2. Not strongly - should have to have affirmative action 4. Not strongly - shouldn't have to have affirmative action 5. Strongly - shouldn't have to have affirmative action 7. Other 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 601 221 204 560 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 109 93 19 ............................................................................ L7. Next I am going to read you a list of federal programs. For each one, I would like you to tell me whether you would like to see spending increased or decreased. The first program is: ============================== V000675 L7a. Inc/dec build and repair highways MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7a. BUILDING AND REPAIRING HIGHWAYS (If you had a say in making up the federal budget this year, should federal spending on BUILDING AND REPAIRING HIGHWAYS be increased decreased or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 677 135 969 6 20 ============================== V000676 L7b. Inc/dec welfare programs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7b. What about WELFARE PROGRAMS? (Should federal spending on WELFARE PROGRAMS be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 302 669 782 22 30 2 ============================== V000677 L7c. Inc/dec spending on aids research MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7c. What about SPENDING ON AIDS RESEARCH? (Should federal spending on SPENDING ON AIDS RESEARCH be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 911 151 697 11 37 ============================== V000678 L7d. Inc/dec foreign aid MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7d. What about FOREIGN AID? (Should federal spending on FOREIGN AID be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 162 787 792 22 42 2 ============================== V000679 L7e. Inc/dec food stamps MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7e. What about FOOD STAMPS? (Should federal spending on FOOD STAMPS be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 285 549 890 32 49 2 ============================== V000680 L7f. Inc/dec aid to poor people MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7f. What about AID TO POOR PEOPLE? (Should federal spending on AID TO POOR PEOPLE be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 916 154 693 9 29 6 ============================== V000681 L7g. Inc/dec Social Security MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7g. What about SOCIAL SECURITY? (Should federal spending on SOCIAL SECURITY be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1120 66 572 11 38 ============================== V000682 L7h. Inc/dec environmental protection MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7h. What about ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION? (Should federal spending on ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 913 164 694 2 33 1 ============================== V000683 L7j. Inc/dec public schools MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7j. What about PUBLIC SCHOOLS? (Should federal spending on PUBLIC SCHOOLS be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1368 87 330 13 9 ============================== V000684 L7k. Inc/dec dealing with crime MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7k. What about DEALING WITH CRIME? (Should federal spending on DEALING WITH CRIME be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1180 89 514 7 17 ============================== V000685 L7m. Inc/dec child care MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7m. What about CHILD CARE? (Should federal spending on CHILD CARE be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1108 128 515 16 39 1 ============================== V000686 L7n. Inc/dec against illegal immigrants MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7n. What about TIGHTENING BORDER SECURITY TO PREVENT ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION? (Should federal spending on TIGHTENING BORDER SECURITY TO PREVENT ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 931 173 641 11 47 4 ============================== V000687 L7p. Inc/dec aid to blacks MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L7p. What about AID TO BLACKS? (Should federal spending on AID TO BLACKS be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See L7 intro. The order of L7b-L7p was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. INCREASED 3. DECREASED 5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME 7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 3 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 293 415 971 39 75 14 ============================== V000688 L8. App/dis using surplus for tax cuts MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L8. Recently, there has been a lot of talk about how to spend the extra money the federal government is likely to have in the near future. Some people have proposed that most of the expected federal budget surplus should be used to cut taxes. Do you approve or disapprove of this proposal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. APPROVE 5. DISAPPROVE 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO L9 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1111 637 56 3 ============================== V000689 L8a/b. Strength app/dis tax cuts MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L8a/b. IF R APPROVES USING FEDERAL BUDGET SURPLUS TO CUT TAXES/ IF R DISAPPROVES USING FEDERAL BUDGET SURPLUS TO CUT TAXES: Do you approve of this proposal strongly or not strongly?/ Do you disapprove of this proposal strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in L8 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 59 1216 529 3 ============================== V000690 L8x. Summary tax cuts from surplus MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L8x. Some people have proposed that most of the expected federal budget surplus should be used to cut taxes. Do you approve or disapprove of this proposal? Do you approve of this proposal strongly or not strongly? Do you disapprove of this proposal strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: TAX CUT FROM SURPLUS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L8 and L8a/b. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 811 298 231 405 59 3 ============================== V000691 L9. App/dis surplus for Soc Sec medicare MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L9. Some people have proposed that most of the expected federal budget surplus should go to protecting social security and Medicare. Do you approve or disapprove of this proposal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. APPROVE 5. DISAPPROVE 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO M1 9. RF 0. NA 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1453 312 39 3 ============================== V000692 L9a/b. Strength app/dis Soc Sec medicare MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L9a/b. IF R APPROVES USING SURPLUS FOR SOCIAL SECURITY & MEDICARE/ IF R DISAPPROVES USING SURPLUS FOR SOCIAL SECURITY & MEDICARE: Do you approve of this proposal strongly or not strongly?/ Do you disapprove of this proposal strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in L9 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 42 1309 454 2 ============================== V000693 L9x. Summary surplus for Soc Sec medcare MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric L9x. Some people have proposed that most of the expected federal budget surplus should go to protecting social security and Medicare. Do you approve or disapprove of this proposal? Do you approve of this proposal strongly or not strongly? Do you disapprove of this proposal strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: USE SURPLUS TO PROTECT SOCIAL SECURITY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from L9 and L9a/b. 1. Approve strongly 2. Approve not strongly 4. Disapprove not strongly 5. Disapprove strongly 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 1 2 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1153 298 156 156 41 3 ============================== V000694 M1/M1.T. Abortion self-placement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M1/M1.T. FTF: Please look at page 11 of the booklet. There has been some discussion about abortion during recent years. Which one of the opinions on this page best agrees with your view? You can just tell me the number of the opinion you choose. TELEPHONE: There has been some discussion about abortion during recent years. I am going to read you a short list of opinions. Please tell me which one of the opinions best agrees with your view? You can just tell me the number of the opinion you choose. --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED. 2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE OF RAPE, INCEST, OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS IN DANGER. 3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS OTHER THAN RAPE, INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE WOMAN'S LIFE, BUT ONLY AFTER THE NEED FOR THE ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED. 4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN AN ABORTION AS A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE. 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 215 525 265 4 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 753 28 11 7 ============================== V000695 M1a. Importance of abortion to R MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M1a. ALL ABORTION RESPONDENTS: How important is this issue to you personally? Not at all important, not too important, somewhat important, very important, or extremely important? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 2. NOT TOO IMPORTANT 3. SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 4. VERY IMPORTANT 5. EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 76 193 499 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 640 389 3 4 ============================== V000696 M1b/M1b.T. Gore-abortion scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M1b/M1b.T. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on abortion? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore (on abortion)? Which opinion best agrees with his views? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] The order in which abortion items M1b/M1b.T and M1c/M1c.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED. 2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE OF RAPE, INCEST, OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS IN DANGER. 3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS OTHER THAN RAPE, INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE WOMAN'S LIFE, BUT ONLY AFTER THE NEED FOR THE ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED. 4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN AN ABORTION AS A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE. 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] 8. DK --> SKIP TO M1c OR M2 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 84 228 253 4 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 762 21 450 6 ============================== V000697 M1b1. Gore-certain abortion placement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M1b1. IF GORE'S POSITION ON ABORTION IS NOT DK/REF: How certain are you of Al Gore's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in M1b/M1b.T 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 459 426 540 380 2 ============================== V000698 M1c/M1c.T. Bush-abortion scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M1c/M1c.T. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on abortion)? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush (on abortion)? Which opinion best agrees with his views? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] The order in which abortion items M1b/M1b.T and M1c/M1c.T were administered was randomized. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED. 2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE OF RAPE, INCEST, OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS IN DANGER. 3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS OTHER THAN RAPE, INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE WOMAN'S LIFE, BUT ONLY AFTER THE NEED FOR THE ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED. 4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN AN ABORTION AS A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE. 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] 8. DK --> SKIP TO M1b OR M2 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 285 655 227 4 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 119 23 488 7 ============================== V000699 M1c1. Bush-certain abortion placement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M1c1. IF GEORGE W. BUSH'S POSITION ON ABORTION IS NOT DK/REF: How certain are you of George W. Bush's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in M1c/M1c.T 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 498 315 560 433 1 ============================== V000700 M2. App/dis abortion parental consent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M2. Would you favor or oppose a law in your state that would require a teenage girl under age 18 to receive her parent's permission before she could obtain an abortion? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. FAVOR 5. OPPOSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1395 353 44 12 ============================== V000701 M2a. Strength abortion parental consent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M2a. IF R FAVORS ABORTION LAW REQUIRING MINORS' PARENTAL PERMISSION/ IF R OPPOSES ABORTION LAW REQUIRING MINORS' PARENTAL PERMISSION: Strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in M2 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 59 1461 286 1 ============================== V000702 M2x. Summary abortion parental consent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M2x. Would you favor or oppose a law in your state that would require a teenage girl under age 18 to receive her parent's permission before she could obtain an abortion? Strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: PARENTAL CONSENT FOR ABORTIONS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M2 and M2a. 1. Favor strongly 2. Favor not strongly 4. Oppose not strongly 5. Oppose strongly 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1233 162 124 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 228 45 12 ============================== V000703 M3. Fav/oppose prtl-birth abortion ban MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M3. There has been discussion recently about a proposed law to ban certain types of late-term abortions, sometimes called partial birth abortions. Do you favor or oppose a law that would make these types of abortions illegal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. FAVOR 5. OPPOSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1236 444 108 16 ============================== V000704 M3a/b. Strength fav/opp p-b abortion ban MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M3a/b. IF R FAVORS BAN ON LATE-TERM ABORTIONS/ IF R OPPOSES BAN ON LATE-TERM ABORTIONS: Do you strongly or not strongly favor/oppose a law that would that would make these types of abortions illegal? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in M3 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 127 1386 289 5 ============================== V000705 M3x. Summary partial-birth abortion ban MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M3x. There has been discussion recently about a proposed law to ban certain types of late-term abortions, sometimes called partial birth abortions. Do you favor or oppose a law that would make these types of abortions illegal? Do you strongly or not strongly favor/oppose a law that would that would make these types of abortions illegal? SUMMARY: BAN ON LATE-TERM ABORTIONS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M3 and M3a/b. 1. Favor strongly 2. Favor not strongly 4. Oppose not strongly 5. Oppose strongly 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1097 137 152 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 289 113 16 ............................................................................ M4/M4.E/M4.T/M4.TE. FTF STANDARD AND EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Please look at page 12 of the booklet Some people think it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs or otherwise reduces our standard of living. (Suppose these people are at one end of the scale, at point number 1) Other people think that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living. (Suppose these people are at the other end of the scale, at point number 7. And of course, some other people have opinions somewhere in between, at points 2,3,4,5, or 6). TELEPHONE VERSIONS 1 AND 2: Some people think it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs or otherwise reduces our standard of living. Other people think that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living. ============================== V000706 M4. Ckpt: FTF/ph, reg/exp. Numeric M4(1). CHECKPOINT: MODE AND VERSION FOR ENVIRONMENT VERSUS JOBS SELF-PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF: Rs were randomly assigned to the standard 7-point scale or to an experimental version of the 7-point scale (without "haven't thought much about it" option). Phone: Rs were randomly assigned to 2 versions of the branching format; in the 2nd version, the initial placement question does not include the "haven't thought much about it" option. 1. FTF standard version (M4a) 2. FTF experimental version (M4a.E) 3. PHONE version 1 (M4a.T) 4. PHONE version 2 (M4a.TE) 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 502 504 373 428 ============================== V000707a M4a. R-jobs/envir scale FTF stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4a. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See M4 for complete text. Respondents were randomly selected to be administered either M4a (standard) or M4a.E (experimental). For the telephone versions of this question see M4a.T and M4a.TE. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING --> SKIP TO M4b 2. --> SKIP TO M4b 3. --> SKIP TO M4b 4. --> SKIP TO M4b 5. --> SKIP TO M4b 6. --> SKIP TO M4b 7. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT --> SKIP TO M4b 8. DK --> SKIP TO M4b 9. RF; NA; INAP, 2, 3, 4 in M4(1) 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> SKIP TO M4b 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 66 66 66 70 131 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 60 26 16 1 1305 ============================== V000707b M4a.E. R-jobs/envir scale FTF ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4a.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See M4.E for complete text. Respondents were randomly selected to be administered either M4a (standard) or M4a.E (experimental). For the telephone versions of this question see M4a.T and M4a.TE. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING --> SKIP TO M4b 2. --> SKIP TO M4b 3. --> SKIP TO M4b 4. --> SKIP TO M4b 5. --> SKIP TO M4b 6. --> SKIP TO M4b 7. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT --> SKIP TO M4b 8. DK --> SKIP TO M4b 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 4 in M4(1) 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1305 44 62 92 160 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 70 41 18 13 2 ============================== V000708 M4ax. Comb. FTF versions jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4ax. FTF STANDARD VERSION: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? FTF EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Where would you place yourself on this scale? COMBINED FTF STANDARD/EXPERIMENTAL - 7PT JOBS VS. ENVIRONMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M4a, M4a.E. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS (M4a only) 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 66 110 128 162 291 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 130 67 34 14 805 ============================== V000709a M4a.T. R-jobs/envir br phone stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4a.T. IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 1: TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See M4.T for complete text. Respondents were randomly selected to be administered either M4a.T (version 1) or M4a.TE (version 2). For the FTF versions of this question see M4a and M4a.E. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING --> M4a1.T/ 5. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT --> M4a1.T 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> SKIP TO M4b/M4c.T 8. DK --> SKIP TO M4b/M4c.T 9. RF; NA; INAP, 1, 2, 4 in M4(1) 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 110 177 52 29 5 1434 ============================== V000709b M4a.TE. R-jobs/envir phone ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4a.TE. IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 2: TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See M4.TE for complete text. Respondents were randomly selected to be administered either M4a.T (version 1) or M4a.TE (version 2). For the FTF versions of this question see M4a and M4a.E. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING --> M4a1.T/ 5. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT --> M4a1.T 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> SKIP TO M4b/M4c.T 8. DK --> SKIP TO M4b/M4c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1, 2, 3 in M4(1) 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1380 245 102 46 28 6 ============================== V000710 M4ax.T. Comb. Ph versions jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4ax.T. TELEPHONE VERSION 1: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE VERSION 2: Which is closer to the way you feel? COMBINED TELEPHONE VERSIONS - ENVIRONMENT VS. JOBS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M4a.T and M4a.TE 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING 5. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH (M4a.T only) 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 110 422 154 75 33 1013 ============================== V000711 M4a1/a2.T. Strength jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4a1/a2.T. BOTH TELEPHONE VERSIONS: IF PROTECTING ENVIRONMENT IS MORE IMPORTANT/ IF MAINTAINING JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING ARE MORE IMPORTANT: TELEPHONE: Is protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important?/ Are maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH MORE IMPORTANT --> M4b.T/M4c.T 5. ONLY SOMEWHAT MORE IMPORTANT --> M4b.T/M4c.T 8. DK --> M4b.T/M4c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 0,7,8 or RF/NA in M4a.T; 7,8,9 or NA in M4a.TE 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1231 336 240 ============================== V000712 M4a1x1. 5-pt br summary jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4a1x1.T. TELEPHONE VERSION 1: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE VERSION 2: Which is closer to the way you feel? BOTH TELEPHONE VERSIONS: Is protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important? Are maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? SUMMARY: 5PT ENV/JOBS SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M4ax.T and M4a1/a2.T 1. Environment much more important 2. Environment somewhat more important 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Jobs somewhat more important 5. Jobs much more important 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. Haven't thought much (from M4a.T only) 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 110 270 152 75 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 88 66 33 1013 ============================== V000713 M4a1x2. Comb.7pt/br summ jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4a1x2. FTF STANDARD VERSION: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? FTF EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Where would you place yourself on this scale? TELEPHONE VERSION 1: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE VERSION 2: Which is closer to the way you feel? BOTH TELEPHONE VERSIONS: Is protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important? Are maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? SUMMARY: 5PT ENV/JOBS SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M4a and M4a1x1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Environment much more important 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Environment somewhat more important 3. SCALE: 3 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 4 / BRANCHING: Jobs somewhat more important 5. SCALE: 5 / BRANCHING: Jobs much more important 8. DK 9. RF; NA 0. Haven't thought much (from M4a and M4a.T only) 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 176 380 280 658 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 155 100 47 11 ============================== V000714 M4b. Gore-jobs/envir scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4b. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See M4 for complete text. FTF: M4b and M4c were administered in random order. For the telephone version of this question see M4b.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING --> M4c. OR M5. 2. --> M4c. OR M5. 3. --> M4c. OR M5. 4. --> M4c. OR M5. 5. --> M4c. OR M5. 6. --> M4c. OR M5. 7. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT --> M4c. OR M5. 8. DK --> M4c. OR M5. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 803 132 161 171 178 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 79 45 22 213 3 ============================== V000715 M4b.T. Gore-jobs/envir scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4b.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he thinks it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See M4.T for complete text. TELEPHONE: M4b and M4c were administered in random order. For the FTF version of this question see M4b. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING --> SKIP TO M4c.T OR --> M5. 5. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT --> SKIP TO M4c.T OR --> M5. 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> SKIP TO M4c.T OR --> M5. 8. DK --> SKIP TO M4c.T OR --> M5. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1007 461 101 21 215 2 ============================== V000716 M4b1/b2.T. Gore-strength jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4b1/b2.T. IF R SAYS GORE THINKS PROTECTING ENVIRONMENT IS MORE IMPORTANT/ IF R SAYS GORE THINKS JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING ARE MORE IMPORTANT: TELEPHONE: Does he think protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important?/ Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH MORE IMPORTANT 5. SOMEWHAT MORE IMPORTANT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 or NA in M4b.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1245 324 234 4 ============================== V000717 M4bx1. 5-pt br summary jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4bx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he thinks it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living? Does he think protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important? Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? SUMMARY: 5PT ENV/JOBS GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M4b.T and M4b1.T/M4b2.T. 1. Environment much more important 2. Environment somewhat more important 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Jobs somewhat more important 5. Jobs much more important 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1007 298 161 21 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 73 26 219 2 ============================== V000718 M4bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4bx2. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he thinks it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living? Does he think protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important? Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? SUMMARY: 5PT ENV/JOBS GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Environment much more important 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Environment somewhat more important 3. SCALE: 3 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 4 / BRANCHING: Jobs somewhat more important 5. SCALE: 5 / BRANCHING: Jobs much more important 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 430 322 449 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 118 48 432 5 ============================== V000719 M4c. Bush-jobs/envir scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4c. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See M4 for complete text. FTF: M4b and M4c were administered in random order. For the telephone version of this question see M4c.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING --> M4b. OR M5. 2. --> M4b. OR M5. 3. --> M4b. OR M5. 4. --> M4b. OR M5. 5. --> M4b. OR M5. 6. --> M4b. OR M5. 7. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT --> M4b. OR M5. 8. DK --> M4b. OR M5. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 803 23 18 73 199 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 209 168 63 249 2 ============================== V000720 M4c.T. Bush-jobs/envir scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4c.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he thinks it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See M4.T for complete text. TELEPHONE: M4b and M4c were administered in random order. For the FTF version of this question see M4c. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING --> SKIP TO M4b.T OR --> M5. 5. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT --> SKIP TO M4b.T OR --> M5. 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> SKIP TO M4b.T OR --> M5. 8. DK --> SKIP TO M4b.T OR --> M5. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1007 194 327 39 237 3 ============================== V000721 M4c1/c2.T. Bush-strength jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4c1/c2.T. IF R SAYS GW BUSH THINKS PROTECTING ENVIRONMENT IS MORE IMPORTANT/ IF R SAYS GW BUSH THINKS JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING ARE MORE IMPORTANT: TELEPHONE: Does he think protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important?/ Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH MORE IMPORTANT 5. SOMEWHAT MORE IMPORTANT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 or NA in M4c.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1286 242 273 6 ============================== V000722 M4cx1. 5-pt br summary Bush jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4cx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he thinks it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living? Does he think protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important? Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? SUMMARY: 5PT ENV/JOBS BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M4c.T and M4c1.T/M4c2.T. 1. Environment much more important 2. Environment somewhat more important 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Jobs somewhat more important 5. Jobs much more important 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1007 78 114 39 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 159 164 243 3 ============================== V000723 M4cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush jobs/envir MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M4cx2. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he thinks it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living? Does he think protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important? Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? SUMMARY: 5PT ENV/JOBS BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M4c and M4cx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Environment much more important 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Environment somewhat more important 3. SCALE: 3 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 4 / BRANCHING: Jobs somewhat more important 5. SCALE: 5 / BRANCHING: Jobs much more important 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 101 132 520 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 327 227 492 5 ============================== V000724 M5. Fav/oppose homosexuals in military MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M5. Do you think homosexuals should be allowed to serve in the United States Armed Forces or don't you think so? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. HOMOSEXUALS SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO SERVE --> M5a 5. HOMOSEXUALS SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO SERVE --> M5b 8. DK --> M6a 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1285 414 86 19 ============================== V000725 M5a. Strngth fav homosexuals in military MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M5a. IF R SAYS ALLOW HOMOSEXUALS TO SERVE IN ARMED FORCES: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that homosexuals should be allowed to serve? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> M6a 5. NOT STRONGLY --> M6a 8. DK --> M6a 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in M5 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 522 871 410 4 ============================== V000726 M5b. Strngth opp homosexuals in military MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M5b. IF R SAYS DO NOT ALLOW HOMOSEXUALS TO SERVE IN ARMED FORCES: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that homosexuals should not be allowed to serve? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,8,9,0 in M5 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1393 322 89 3 ============================== V000727 M5x. Summary homosexuals in military MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M5x. Do you think homosexuals should be allowed to serve in the United States Armed Forces or don't you think so? Do you feel strongly or not strongly that homosexuals should be allowed to serve? Do you feel strongly or not strongly that homosexuals should not be allowed to serve? SUMMARY: HOMOSEXUALS IN ARMED FORCES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M5 and M5a/b. 1. Strongly - should be allowed to serve 2. Not strongly - should be allowed to serve 4. Not strongly - should not be allowed to serve 5. Strongly - should not be allowed to serve 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 871 410 89 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 322 93 19 ============================== V000728 M6a. R-gun control scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6a. Do you think the federal government should make it more difficult for people to buy a gun than it is now, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MORE DIFFICULT --> SKIP TO M6a1 3. MAKE IT EASIER --> SKIP TO M6a2 5. KEEP THESE RULES ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO M6a3 8. DK --> SKIP TO M6a3 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1060 75 659 8 2 ============================== V000729 M6a1. R-strength more gun control MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6a1. IF R SAYS GOVT SHOULD MAKE IT MORE DIFFICULT TO BUY A GUN: A lot more difficult or somewhat more difficult? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT MORE DIFFICULT --> SKIP TO M6a3 5. SOMEWHAT MORE DIFFICULT --> SKIP TO M6a3 8. DK --> SKIP TO M6a3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in M6a 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 747 861 199 ============================== V000730 M6a2. R-strength less gun control MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6a2. IF R SAYS GOVT SHOULD MAKE IT EASIER TO BUY A GUN: A lot easier or somewhat easier? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT EASIER 5. SOMEWHAT EASIER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in M6a 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1732 39 36 ============================== V000731 M6ax. Summary gun control MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6ax. Do you think the federal government should make it more difficult for people to buy a gun than it is now, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? A lot easier/more difficult or somewhat easier/more difficult? SUMMARY: R POSITION ON GUN RESTRICTIONS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M6 and M6a/b. 1. A lot more difficult 2. Somewhat more difficult 3. Keep rules about the same 4. Somewhat easier 5. A lot easier 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 861 199 659 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 36 39 8 2 ============================== V000732 M6a3. R-importance of gun control MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6a3. ALL GUN RESTRICTION RESPONDENTS: How important is this issue to you personally? Not at all important, not too important, somewhat important, very important, or extremely important? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 2. NOT TOO IMPORTANT 3. SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 4. VERY IMPORTANT 5. EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 37 139 461 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 716 448 3 ============================== V000733 M6b. Gore plcmnt-gun control scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6b. Where would you place Al Gore? Do you think he would like to make it more difficult for people to buy a gun, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE] M6c and M6c were administered in random order. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. MORE DIFFICULT 3. MAKE IT EASIER 5. KEEP THESE RULES ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO M6b3 8. DK --> SKIP TO M6c 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1139 19 350 294 2 ============================== V000734 M6b1/b2. Gore-strength more/less gun ctl MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6b1/b2. IF R THINKS GORE WOULD LIKE IT EASIER TO BUY A GUN/ IF R THINKS GORE WOULD LIKE IT MORE DIFFICULT TO BUY A GUN: A lot easier or somewhat easier?/ A lot more difficult or somewhat more difficult? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> M6b3 5. SOMEWHAT --> M6b3 8. DK --> SKIP TO M6c 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in M6b 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 649 718 437 3 ============================== V000735 M6bx. Summary Gore gun control MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6bx. Where would you place Al Gore? Do you think he would like to make it more difficult for people to buy a gun, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? A lot easier/more difficult or somewhat easier/ more difficult? SUMMARY: GORE POSITION ON GUN RESTRICTIONS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M6b and M6b1/b2. 1. A lot more difficult 2. Somewhat more difficult 3. Keep rules about the same 4. Somewhat easier 5. A lot easier 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 709 427 350 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 10 9 297 2 ============================== V000736 M6b3. Gore-certain gun control placement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6b3. IF R SAYS GORE WANTS MORE DIFFICULT/EASIER TO BUY GUN: IF STRENGTH OF GORE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK/RF: How certain are you of Al Gore's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in M6b1/M6b2 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 652 393 542 219 1 ============================== V000737 M6c. Bush plcmnt-gun control scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6c. Where would you place George W. Bush? Do you think he would like to make it more difficult for people to buy a gun, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE] M6c and M6c were administered in random order. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. MORE DIFFICULT 3. MAKE IT EASIER 5. KEEP THESE RULES ABOUT THE SAME --> M6c2 8. DK --> N1/n1.e 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 375 315 806 306 2 ============================== V000738 M6c1/c2. Bush-strength more/less gun ctl MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6c1/c2. IF R THINKS G.W. BUSH WOULD LIKE IT EASIER TO BUY A GUN/ IF R THINKS G.W. BUSH WOULD LIKE IT MORE DIFFICULT TO BUY A GUN: A lot easier or somewhat easier? A lot more difficult or somewhat more difficult? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> M6c3 5. SOMEWHAT --> M6c3 8. DK --> SKIP TO N1/N1.E 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in M6c 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1117 318 370 2 ============================== V000739 M6cx. Summary Bush gun control MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6cx. Where would you place George W. Bush? Do you think he would like to make it more difficult for people to buy a gun, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? A lot easier/more difficult or somewhat easier/ more difficult? SUMMARY: GW BUSH POSITION ON GUN RESTRICTIONS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from M6c and M6c1/c2. 1. A lot more difficult 2. Somewhat more difficult 3. Keep rules about the same 4. Somewhat easier 5. A lot easier 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 182 193 806 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 177 136 308 2 ============================== V000740 M6c3. Bush-certain gun control placement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric M6c3. IF R SAYS GW BUSH WANTS MORE DIFFICULT/EASIER TO BUY GUN: IF STRENTH OF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS NOT DK/RF: How certain are you of George W. Bush's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in M6c1/M6c2 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1119 190 318 180 ============================== V000741a N1. Fav/opp school voucher program stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N1. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that would allow parents to use tax funds to send their children to the school of their choice, even if it were a private school? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered either N1 (standard) or N1.E (experimental). 1. FAVOR SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM --> SKIP TO NIa 5. OPPOSE SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM --> SKIP TO N1a 8. DK --> SKIP TO N2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for N1.E 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 925 424 394 62 2 ============================== V000741b N1.E. Fav/opp school voucher program ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N1.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that would allow parents to use tax funds to send their children to the school of their choice, even if it were a private school, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly selected to be administered either N1 (standard) or N1.E (experimental). 1. FAVOR SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM --> N1a 5. OPPOSE SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM --> N1a 8. DK --> SKIP TO N2 9. RF; NA; INAP, R selected for N1 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> SKIP TO N2 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 317 332 259 12 887 ============================== V000742 N1x. Combined versions school vouchers MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N1x. STANDARD VERSION: Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that would allow parents to use tax funds to send their children to the school of their choice, even if it were a private school? EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that would allow parents to use tax funds to send their children to the school of their choice, even if it were a private school, or haven't you thought much about this? COMBINED VERSIONS - SCHOOL VOUCHERS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from N1 and N1.E. 1. FAVOR SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM 5. OPPOSE SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, R selected for N1 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS (N1.E only) 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 317 756 653 74 7 ============================== V000743 N1a/b. Strength fav/opp school vouchers MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N1a/b. IF R FAVORS SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM/ IF R OPPOSES SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM: Do you favor/oppose a school voucher program strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: an error in the instrument programming excluded for this question respondents from the standard version; only respondents from N1.E were asked N1a/b. 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,8,9 or NA in N1.E; R selected for N1 and excluded in error from N1a/b 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1216 439 152 ============================== V000744 N1ax. Summary school vouchers MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N1ax. STANDARD VERSION: Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that would allow parents to use tax funds to send their children to the school of their choice, even if it were a private school? EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that would allow parents to use tax funds to send their children to the school of their choice, even if it were a private school, or haven't you thought much about this? BOTH VERSIONS: Do you favor/oppose a school voucher program strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: R POSITION ON SCHOOL VOUCHERS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Build from N1x and N1a/b. 1. Favor strongly 2. Favor not strongly 4. Oppose not strongly 5. Oppose strongly 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, R selected for N1 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS (N1.E only) 0 1 2 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 317 245 87 65 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 194 12 887 ============================== V000745 N2. R fav/opp English official language MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N2. Do you favor a law making English the official language of the United States, meaning government business would be conducted in English only, or do you oppose such a law? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. FAVOR 3. NEITHER FAVOR NOR OPPOSE [VOL] 5. OPPOSE 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1202 130 446 24 2 ============================== V000746 N3. R interest in school integration MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N3. Some people say that the government in Washington should see to it that white and black children go to the same schools. Others claim that this is not the government's business. Have you been interested enough in this question to favor one side over the other? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO N4 8. DK --> SKIP TO N4 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1195 580 27 2 ============================== V000747 N3a. Fav/opp gov help school integration MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N3a. IF R HAS OPINION WHETHER GOVT SEE TO BLACK/WHITE KIDS IN SAME SCHOOLS: Do you think the government in Washington should see to it that white and black children go to the same schools or stay out of this area as it is not the government's business? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SEE TO IT THAT WHITE AND BLACK CHILDREN GO TO THE SAME SCHOOLS 5. STAY OUT OF THIS AREA AS IT IS NOT THE GOVERNMENT'S BUSINESS 7. OTHER; DEPENDS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in N3 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 612 596 531 56 10 2 ============================== V000748 N4. Fav/opp h-sexual couples adopt chldn MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N4. Do you think gay or lesbian couples, in other words, homosexual couples, should be legally permitted to adopt children? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 747 909 126 22 ============================== V000749 N5. Fav/opp death penalty MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N5. Do you favor or oppose the death penalty for persons convicted of murder? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. FAVOR --> SKIP TO N5a 5. OPPOSE --> SKIP TO N5b 8. DK --> SKIP TO P1 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1240 462 87 15 ============================== V000750 N5a. How much favor death penalty MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N5a. IF R FAVORS DEATH PENALTY FOR PERSONS CONVICTED OF MURDER: (Do you favor the death penalty for persons convicted of murder) strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> P1/P1.E 5. NOT STRONGLY --> P1/P1.E 8. DK --> P1/P1.E 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in N5 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 567 925 314 1 ============================== V000751 N5b. How much oppose death penalty MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N5b. IF R OPPOSES DEATH PENALTY FOR PERSONS CONVICTED OF MURDER: (Do you oppose the death penalty for persons convicted of murder) strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,8,9,0 in N5 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1345 283 177 1 1 ============================== V000752 N5x. Summary R position on death penalty MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric N5x. Do you favor or oppose the death penalty for persons convicted of murder? (Do you favor/oppose the death penalty for persons convicted of murder) strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: R POSITION ON DEATH PENALTY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from N5 and N5a/b. 1. Favor strongly 2. Favor not strongly 4. Oppose not strongly 5. Oppose strongly 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 925 314 177 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 283 89 16 ............................................................................ P1/P1.T. FTF STANDARD AND EXPERIMENTAL VERSIONS: Please look at page 13 of the booklet. Recently there has been a lot of talk about women's rights. Some people feel that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry, and government. (Suppose these people are at one end of a scale, at point 1.) Others feel that a woman's place is in the home. (Suppose these people are at the other end, at point 7.) And, of course, some other people have opinions somewhere in between, at points 2,3,4,5 or 6. TELEPHONE VERSIONS 1 AND 2: Recently there has been a lot of talk about women's rights. Some people feel that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry, and government. Others feel that a woman's place is in the home. ============================== V000753 P1. Ckpt: FTF/ph, reg/exp. Numeric P1(1). CHECKPOINT: MODE AND VERSION FOR WOMEN'S EQUAL ROLE SELF-PLACEMENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- FTF: Rs were randomly assigned to the standard 7-point scale or to an experimental version of the 7-point scale (without "haven't thought much about it" option). Phone: Rs were randomly assigned to 2 versions of the branching format; in the 2nd version, the initial placement question does not include the "haven't thought much about it" option. 1. FTF standard 2. FTF experimental 3. PHONE version 1 4. PHONE version 2 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 520 486 382 419 ============================== V000754a P1a. R plcmnt equal role scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1a. IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See P1 for complete text. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered either P1a (standard) or P1a.E (experimental). For the telephone versions of this question see P1a.T and P1a.TE. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 2. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 3. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 4. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 5. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 6. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 7. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 8. DK --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 9. RF; NA; INAP, 2,3,4 in P1(1) 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 18 296 80 31 44 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 20 14 16 1 1287 ============================== V000754b P1a.E. R plcmnt equal role scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1a.E. IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See P1 for complete text. FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered either P1a (standard) or P1a.E (experimental). For the telephone versions of this question see P1a.T and P1a.TE. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 2. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 3. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 4. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 5. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 6. --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 7. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 8. DK --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,4 in P1(1) 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1323 276 62 39 60 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 18 9 13 6 1 ============================== V000755 P1ax. Comb. FTF versions R equal role sc MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1ax. FTF STANDARD FORMAT: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? FTF EXPERIMENTAL FORMAT: Where would you place yourself on this scale? COMBINED FTF STANDARD/EXPERIMENTAL VERSIONS - WOMEN'S ROLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P1a and P1a.E. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS (P1a only) 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 18 572 142 70 104 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 38 23 29 7 804 ============================== V000756a P1a.T. R equal role branch stan MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1a.T. IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 1: TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See P1.T for complete text. Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered either P1a.T (version 1) or P1a.TE (version 2). For the FTF versions of this question see P1a and P1a.E. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES --> P1a1.T 5. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME --> P1a1.T 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> P1b.T/P1c.T 8. DK --> P1b.T/P1c.T 9. RF; NA; INAP, 1,2,4 in P1(1) 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 19 328 18 14 3 1425 ============================== V000756b P1a.TE. R equal role branch ex MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1a.TE. IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 2: TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See P1.T for complete text. Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered either P1a.T (version 1) or P1a.TE (version 2). For the FTF versions of this question see P1a and P1a.E. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES --> P1a1.T 5. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME --> P1a1.T 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> P1b.T/P1c.T 8. DK --> P1b.T/P1c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,3 in P1(1) 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1389 367 23 24 3 1 ============================== V000757 P1ax.T. Comb. Ph. Versions R eql role br MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1ax.T. TELEPHONE VERSION 1: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE VERSION 2: Which is closer to the way you feel? COMBINED TELEPHONE VERSIONS - WOMEN'S ROLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P1a.T and P1a.TE. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES 5. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH (P1a.T only) 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 19 695 41 38 6 1008 ============================== V000758 P1a1/a2.T. R strength equal roles MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1a1/a2.T. BOTH TELEPHONE VERSIONS: IF R SAYS MEN AND WOMEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES/ IF R SAYS A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME: TELEPHONE: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal roles?/ Do you feel strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> SKIP TO P1b.T/P1c.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> SKIP TO P1b.T/P1c.T 8. DK --> SKIP TO P1b.T/P1c.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 0,7,8 or RF/NA in P1a.T; 7,8,9 or NA in P1a.TE 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1071 680 55 1 ============================== V000759 P1a1x1. 5-pt br summary R equal role MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1a1x1.T. TELEPHONE VERSION 1: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE VERSION 2: Which is closer to the way you feel? BOTH TELEPHONE VERSIONS: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal roles? Do you feel strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? SUMMARY: 5PT WOMENS ROLE SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P1ax.T and P1a1/a2.T 1. Strongly - women equal role 2. Not strongly - equal role 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Not strongly - place is in the home 5. Strongly - place is in the home 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH (standard format only) 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 19 652 42 38 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 13 28 7 1008 ============================== V000760 P1a1x2. Comb.7pt/br summ R equal role MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1a1x2. FTF STANDARD FORMAT: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? FTF EXPERIMENTAL FORMAT: Where would you place yourself on this scale? TELEPHONE VERSION 1: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEPHONE VERSION 2: Which is closer to the way you feel? BOTH TELEPHONE VERSIONS: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal roles? Do you feel strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? SUMMARY: 5PT WOMENS ROLE SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P1ax and P1a1x1 Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - women equal role 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - equal role 3. SCALE: 3 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 4 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - place is in the home 5. SCALE: 5 / BRANCHING: Strongly - place is in the home 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH (standard format only) 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 37 1224 184 250 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 36 57 14 5 ============================== V000761 P1b. Gore-equal role scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1b. FTF: (Still looking at page 13) Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See P1 for complete text. FTF: P1b and P1c were administered in random order. For the telephone version of this question see P1b.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 2. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 3. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 4. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 5. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 6. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 7. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 8. DK --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 803 273 185 145 127 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 36 24 19 193 2 ============================== V000762 P1b.T. Gore-equal role scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1b.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry and government, OR that a woman's place is in the home? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See P1 for complete text. TELEPHONE: P1b.T and P1c.T were administered in random order. For the FTF version of this question see P1b. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES --> P1b1.T 5. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME --> P1b1.T 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] --> P1c.T OR --> P2.T 8. DK --> P1c.T OR --> P2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1007 552 40 19 187 2 ============================== V000763 P1b1/b2.T. Gore-strength equal role MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1b1/b2.T. IF R THINKS GORE FEELS MEN AND WOMEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES/ IF R THINKS GORE FEELS THAT A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME: TELEPHONE: Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal role?/ Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> P1c.T OR --> P2.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> P1c.T OR --> P2.T 8. DK --> P1c.T OR --> P2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in P1b.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1215 506 78 8 ============================== V000764 P1bx1. 5-pt br summary Gore equal role MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1bx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry and government, OR that a woman's place is in the home? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal role? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? SUMMARY: 5PT WOMENS ROLE GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P1b.T and P1b1/b2.T 1. Strongly - women equal role 2. Not strongly - equal role 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Not strongly - place is in the home 5. Strongly - place is in the home 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1007 480 64 19 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 14 26 195 2 ============================== V000765 P1bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore equal role MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1bx2. FTF: (Still looking at page 13) Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry and government, OR that a woman's place is in the home? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal role? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? SUMMARY: 5PT WOMENS ROLE GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P1b and P1bx1 Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - women equal role 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - equal role 3. SCALE: 3 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 4 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - place is in the home 5. SCALE: 5 / BRANCHING: Strongly - place is in the home 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 753 249 327 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 38 45 388 4 ============================== V000766 P1c. Bush-equal role scale FTF MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1c. FTF: (Still looking at page 13) Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See P1 for complete text. FTF: P1b and P1c were administered in random order. For the telephone version of this question see P1c.T. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 2. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 3. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 4. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 5. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 6. --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 7. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME --> SKIP TO P1c./P2 8. DK --> SKIP TO P1b./P2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 803 154 99 153 172 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 114 60 30 220 2 ============================== V000767 P1c.T. Bush-equal role scale phone MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1c.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he feels that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry and government, OR that a woman's place is in the home? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See P1 for complete text. TELEPHONE: P1b.T and P1c.T were administered in random order. For the FTF version of this question see P1c. 1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES 5. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] 8. DK --> P1b.T OR --> P2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1007 440 112 30 216 2 ============================== V000768 P1c1/c2.T. Bush-strength equal role MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1c1/c2.T. IF R THINKS GW BUSH FEELS MEN AND WOMEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES/ IF R THINKS GW BUSH FEELS THAT A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME: TELEPHONE: Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal roles?/ Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY --> P1c.T OR --> P2.T 5. NOT STRONGLY --> P1c.T OR --> P2.T 8. DK --> P1c.T OR --> P2.T 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in P1c.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1255 412 133 7 ============================== V000769 P1cx1. 5-pt br summary Bush equal role MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1cx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he feels that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry and government, OR that a woman's place is in the home? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal role? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? SUMMARY: 5PT WOMENS ROLE BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P1c.T and P1c1/c2.T 1. Strongly - women equal role 2. Not strongly - equal role 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Not strongly - place is in the home 5. Strongly - place is in the home 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1007 344 90 30 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 43 68 223 2 ============================== V000770 P1cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush equal role MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P1cx2. FTF: (Still looking at page 13) Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he feels that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry and government, OR that a woman's place is in the home? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal role? Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? SUMMARY: 5PT WOMENS ROLE BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P1c and P1cx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - women equal role 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - equal role 3. SCALE: 3 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 4 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - place is in the home 5. SCALE: 5 / BRANCHING: Strongly - place is in the home 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 498 189 469 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 103 98 443 4 ............................................................................ P2/P2.T. FTF: Please look at page 14 of the booklet. Some people think we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment. (Suppose these people are at one end of a scale, at point 1.) Others think that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business. Suppose these people are at the other end, at point 7. And, of course, some other people have opinions somewhere in between, at points 2,3,4,5, or 6.) TELEPHONE: Some people think we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment. Others think that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business. ============================== V000771 P2a. self placmnt-envir regulation scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2a. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See P2 for complete text. For the telephone version of this question see P2a.T 1. TOUGHER REGULATIONS ON BUSINESS NEEDED TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. REGULATIONS TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT ALREADY TOO MUCH A BURDEN ON BUSINESS 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 192 172 149 159 167 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 76 48 36 5 803 ============================== V000772 P2a.T. R-envir regulation branch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2a.T. TELEPHONE: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? --------------------------------------------------------------------- See P2.T for complete text. For the FTF version of this question see P2a. 1. TOUGHER REGULATIONS ON BUSINESS NEEDED TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT 5. REGULATIONS TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT ALREADY TOO MUCH A BURDEN ON BUSINESS 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 243 337 132 73 11 1011 ============================== V000773 P2a1.T. How much tougher regulation MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2a1.T. IF R THINKS TOUGHER REGULATION ON BUSINESS NEEDED: TELEPHONE: Do we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> P2a3 5. SOMEWHAT --> P2a3 8. DK --> P2a3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in P2a.T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1470 217 120 ============================== V000774 P2a2.T. How much are regulatns a burden MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2a2.T. IF R THINKS REGULATIONS ALREADY TOO MUCH BURDEN: TELEPHONE: Are regulations to protect the environment way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WAY TOO MUCH 5. SOMEWHAT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in P2a.T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1675 58 74 ============================== V000775 P2ax1. 5-pt br summary R envir regul MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2ax1.T. TELEHPONE: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? Do we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? Are regulations to protect the environment way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? SUMMARY: 5PT ENVIR REG SELF-LACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P2a.T and P2a1/a2.T 1. Toughen regulations a lot 2. Toughen regulations a little 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Regulations somewhat of a burden 5. Regulations way too much burden 8. DK 9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode 0. Haven't thought much about it 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 243 217 120 73 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 74 58 11 1011 ============================== V000776 P2ax2. Comb.7pt/br summ R envir regul MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2ax2. FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? TELEHPONE: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? Do we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? Are regulations to protect the environment way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? SUMMARY: 5PT ENVIR REG SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P2a and P2ax1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Toughen regulations a lot 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Toughen regulations a little 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Regulations somewhat of a burden 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Regulations way too much burden 8. DK 9. RF; NA 0. Haven't thought much about it 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 435 389 269 475 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 122 94 16 7 ============================== V000777 P2aa. How important is envir regulation MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2aa. ALL ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION RESPONDENTS: How important is this issue to you personally? Not at all important, not too important, somewhat important, very important, or extremely important? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 2. NOT TOO IMPORTANT 3. SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 4. VERY IMPORTANT 5. EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 129 223 648 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 563 219 21 1 ============================== V000778 P2b. Gore placmnt-envir regulation scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2b. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See P2 for complete text. P2b and P2c were administered in random order. For the telephone version of this question see P2b.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. TOUGHER REGULATIONS ON BUSINESS NEEDED TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT --> P2bb 2. --> P2bb 3. --> P2bb 4. --> P2bb 5. --> P2bb 6. --> P2bb 7. REGULATIONS TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT ALREADY TOO MUCH A BURDEN ON BUSINESS 8. DK --> SKIP TO P2c OR P3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 803 153 232 178 138 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 45 24 10 223 1 ============================== V000779 P2b.T. Gore-envir regulation branch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2b.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment, OR that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See P2.T for complete text. P2b.T and P2c.T were administered in random order. For the FTF version of this question see P2b. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. TOUGHER REGULATIONS ON BUSINESS NEEDED TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT 5. REGULATIONS TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT ALREADY TOO MUCH A BURDEN ON BUSINESS 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1007 483 71 19 225 2 ============================== V000780 P2b1.T. Gore-strength tougher regulation MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2b1.T. IF R THINKS GORE FEELS TOUGHER ENV REGULATION ON BUSINESS NEEDED: TELEPHONE: Do you think he believes that we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> P2bb 5. SOMEWHAT --> P2bb 8. DK --> P2c.T OR --> P3. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in P2b.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1324 331 151 1 ============================== V000781 P2b2.T. Gore-strength regulation burden MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2b2.T. IF R THINKS GORE FEELS ENV REGULATIONS ALREADY TOO MUCH BURDEN: TELEPHONE: Do you think he believes regulations to protect the environment are way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WAY TOO MUCH --> P2bb 5. SOMEWHAT --> P2bb 8. DK --> P2c.T OR -->P3. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in P2b.T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1736 7 64 ============================== V000782 P2bx1. 5-pt br summary Gore envir regul Numeric P2bx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment, OR that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business? Do you think he believes that we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? Do you think he believes regulations to protect the environment are way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? SUMMARY: 5PT ENVIR REG GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P2b.T and P2b1/b2.T. 1. Toughen regulations a lot 2. Toughen regulations a little 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Regulations somewhat of a burden 5. Regulations way too much burden 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1007 331 151 19 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 64 7 226 2 ============================== V000783 P2bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore envir regul MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2bx2. FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? TELEPHONE: What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment, OR that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business? Do you think he believes that we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? Do you think he believes regulations to protect the environment are way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? SUMMARY: 5PT ENVIR REG GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P2b and P2bx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Toughen regulations a lot 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Toughen regulations a little 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Regulations somewhat of a burden 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Regulations way too much burden 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 484 383 380 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 88 17 449 3 ============================== V000784 P2bb. Gore-certain envir regulation MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2bb. IF R'S PLACEMENT OF GORE IS NOT DK OR OTHER/DEPENDS/NEITHER: How certain are you of Al Gore's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in P2b; 7,8,9 or NA in P2b.T 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 473 420 548 364 1 1 ============================== V000785 P2c. Bush placemnt-envir regulation scale MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2c. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See P2 for complete text. P2b and P2c were administered in random order. For the telephone version of this question see P2c.T Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. TOUGHER REGULATIONS ON BUSINESS NEEDED TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT --> P2cc 2. --> P2cc 3. --> P2cc 4. --> P2cc 5. --> P2cc 6. --> P2cc 7. REGULATIONS TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT ALREADY TOO MUCH A BURDEN ON BUSINESS --> P2cc 8. DK --> P2b OR P3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, Phone mode 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 803 26 40 93 203 5 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 182 148 63 248 1 ============================== V000786 P2c.T. Bush-envir regulation branch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2c.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he believes we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment, OR that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE DK] See P2.T for complete text. P2b.T and P2c.T were administered in random order. For the FTF version of this question see P2c. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. TOUGHER REGULATIONS ON BUSINESS NEEDED TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT 5. REGULATIONS TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT ALREADY TOO MUCH A BURDEN ON BUSINESS 7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1007 159 355 43 241 2 ============================== V000787 P2c1.T. Bush-strength tougher regulation MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2c1.T. IF R THINKS GW BUSH FEELS TOUGHER ENV REGULATION ON BUSINESS NEEDED: TELEPHONE: Do you think he believes that we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> P2cc 5. SOMEWHAT --> P2cc 8. DK --> P2b.T OR --> P3. 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in P2c.T 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1648 68 91 ============================== V000788 P2c2.T. Bush-strength regulation burden MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2c2.T. IF R THINKS GW BUSH FEELS ENV REGULATIONS ALREADY TOO MUCH BURDEN: TELEPHONE: Do you think he believes regulations to protect the environment are way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. WAY TOO MUCH --> P2cc 5. SOMEWHAT --> P2cc 8. DK --> P2b.T OR --> P3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in P2c.T 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1452 136 216 3 ============================== V000789 P2cx1. 5-pt br summary Bush envir regul MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2cx1.T. TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he believes we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment, OR that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business? Do you think he believes that we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? Do you think he believes regulations to protect the environment are way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? SUMMARY: 5PT ENVIR REG BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P2c.T and P2c1/c2.T 1. Toughen regulations a lot 2. Toughen regulations a little 3. Other/depends/neither 4. Regulations somewhat of a burden 5. Regulations way too much burden 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, FTF mode 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1007 68 91 43 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 216 136 244 2 ============================== V000790 P2cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush envir regul MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2cx2. FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? TELEPHONE: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he believes we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment, OR that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business? Do you think he believes that we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? Do you think he believes regulations to protect the environment are way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? SUMMARY: 5PT ENVIR REG BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P2c and P2cx1. Note: when using 5-point combined-mode summaries (combining collapsed face-to-face 7-point scales with 5-point telephone branching summaries), users must be fully aware of the differences in the questions, administration, and summary construction by mode; it is up to the individual user to evaluate the importance of those differences for his individual purposes. 1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Toughen regulations a lot 2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Toughen regulations a little 3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither 4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Regulations somewhat of a burden 5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Regulations way too much burden 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 94 131 521 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 364 199 492 3 ============================== V000791 P2cc. Bush-certain envir regulation MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P2cc. IF R'S PLACEMENT OF GW BUSH IS NOT DK OR OTHER/DEPENDS/NEITHER: How certain are you of George W. Bush's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY CERTAIN 3. PRETTY CERTAIN 5. NOT VERY CERTAIN 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in P2c; 7,8,9 or NA in P2c.T 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 541 255 570 440 1 ============================== V000792 P3. R expect to vote in Nov election MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P3. So far as you know now, do you expect to vote in the national elections this coming November or not? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP TO P3c 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO P3c 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1547 230 27 ============================== V000793 P3a. Who will R vote for President MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P3a. IF R EXPECTS TO VOTE IN NOVEMBER ELECTION: Who do you think you will vote for in the election for President? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: NEEDLESS TO SAY, THE ELECTION FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS A LONG TIME AWAY IN NOVEMBER. BUT I'D LIKE TO ASK YOU FOR YOUR BEST GUESS ABOUT WHO YOU WILL VOTE FOR IN THE ELECTION FOR PRESIDENT IN NOVEMBER.] 1. AL GORE 2. GEORGE W. BUSH 3. PAT BUCHANAN 4. RALPH NADER 5. NONE (if voter, will not vote for president) [VOL] --> SKIP TO P3c 7. OTHER, (SPECIFY): 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO P4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in P3 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 260 740 604 5 41 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 70 63 21 ============================== V000794 P3b. Strength of preference for candidate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P3b. IF R EXPECTS TO VOTE IN NOVEMBER ELECTION: IF INTENDED PRESIDENTIAL VOTE IS NOT NONE OR DK/RF: Would you say that your preference for [GORE/BUSH/BUCHANAN/OTHER] is strong or not strong? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG --> SKIP TO P4 5. NOT STRONG --> SKIP TO P4 8. DK --> SKIP TO P4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9 or 0 in P3a 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 347 1114 339 7 ============================== V000795 P3c. If R voted, who would R vote for President MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P3c. IF TURNOUT INTENT IS WILL NOT/DK IF WILL VOTE IN NOVEMBER/ IF VOTE INTENT IS TO VOTE BUT NOT FOR PRESIDENT: If you were going to vote, who do you think you would vote for in the election for President? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [PROBE: NEEDLESS TO SAY, THE ELECTION FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS A LONG TIME AWAY IN NOVEMBER. BUT I'D LIKE TO ASK YOU FOR YOUR BEST GUESS ABOUT WHO YOU WOULD VOTE FOR IN THE ELECTION FOR PRESIDENT IN NOVEMBER.] 1. AL GORE 2. GEORGE W. BUSH 3. PAT BUCHANAN 4. RALPH NADER 5. NONE (if voter, will not vote for president) [VOL] --> SKIP TO P4 7. OTHER, (SPECIFY): 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO P4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0, 9 in P3; 1-4,7,8,9 or NA in P3a 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1547 89 104 2 4 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 33 6 19 3 ============================== V000796 P3d. Strength of preference for candidate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P3d. IF TURNOUT INTENT IS WILL NOT/DK IF WILL VOTE IN NOVEMBER/ IF VOTE INTENT IS TO VOTE BUT NOT FOR PRESIDENT: IF R NAMES PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE HE WOULD VOTE FOR IF VOTING: Would you say that your preference for is strong or not strong? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONG 5. NOT STRONG 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,0,8,9 in P3c 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1602 105 97 3 ============================== V000797 P4. Which party will control the House MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P4. The next couple of questions are about what you think will happen as a result of the upcoming elections. After the November election, which party do you think will have the most members in the U.S. House of Representatives -- the Republicans or the Democrats? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. REPUBLICANS 5. DEMOCRATS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 815 604 384 1 ============================== V000798 P5. Which party will control the Senate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P5. Again, after the November election, which party do you think will have the most members in the U.S. Senate, -- the Republicans or the Democrats? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. REPUBLICANS 5. DEMOCRATS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 814 557 430 3 ============================== V000799 P6. Interest in fair treatment in jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P6. Some people feel that if black people are not getting fair treatment in jobs, the government in Washington ought to see to it that they do. Others feel that this is not the federal government's business. Have you had enough interest in this question to favor one side over the other? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, HAVE INTEREST IN QUESTION --> P6a 5. NO, HAVEN'T HAD INTEREST --> P7 8. DK --> P7 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 1192 585 18 9 ============================== V000800 P6a. Govt should ensure Blacks equ trtment in jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P6a. IF R HAS HAD INTEREST IN ISSUE OF FAIR TREATMENT IN JOBS: How do you feel? Should the government in Washington see to it that black people get fair treatment in jobs OR is this not the federal government's business? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GOVERNMENT IN WASHINGTON SHOULD SEE TO IT THAT BLACK PEOPLE GET FAIR TREATMENT IN JOBS 5. THIS IS NOT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S BUSINESS 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK -->P7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in P6 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 615 625 519 46 1 1 ============================== V000801 P6a1. Strength blacks equal trtmnt jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P6a1. IF R HAS HAD INTEREST IN ISSUE OF FAIR TREATMENT IN JOBS: IF R'S POSITION IS SEE TO FAIR TREATMENT/ IF R'S POSITION IS NOT THE FEDERAL GOVT'S BUSINESS: Do you feel strongly or not strongly about that? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,7,8,9 in P6a 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 663 951 192 1 ============================== V000802 P6x. Summary blacks equal treatment jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 7 Numeric P6x. How do you feel? Should the government in Washington see to it that black people get fair treatment in jobs OR is this not the federal government's business? Do you feel strongly or not strongly about that? SUMMARY: R POSITION ON FAIR TREATMENT IN JOBS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P6,P6a,P6a1. 1. Strongly - govt should see to fair treatment 2. Not strongly - govt should see to fair treatment 4. Not strongly - not the government's business 5. Strongly - not the government's business 7. Other 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, no interest (5 in P6) 0 1 2 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 588 524 100 92 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 427 46 20 10 ============================== V000803 P7. Preferences for blacks in jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P7. Some people say that because of past discrimination, blacks should be given preference in hiring and promotion. Others say that such preference in hiring and promotion of blacks is wrong because it gives blacks advantages they haven't earned. What about your opinion -- are you for or against preferential hiring and promotion of blacks? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. FOR PREFERENTIAL HIRING AND PROMOTION OF BLACKS --> P7a 5. AGAINST PREFERENTIAL HIRING AND PROMOTION OF BLACKS --> P7b 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) --> section Q as randomly selected 8. DK --> section Q as randomly selected 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 262 1366 94 66 15 ============================== V000804 P7a. Strength for preference blks jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P7a. IF R FAVORS PREFERENCE IN HIRING AND PROMOTION OF BLACKS: Do you favor preference in hiring and promotion strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,7,8,9,0 in P7 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1545 174 87 1 ============================== V000805 P7b. Strength against preference blks jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric P7b. IF R OPPOSES PREFERENCE IN HIRING AND PROMOTION OF BLACKS: Do you oppose preference in hiring and promotion strongly or not strongly? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. STRONGLY 5. NOT STRONGLY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,7,8,9,0 in P7 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 441 1021 342 3 ============================== V000806 P7x. Summary preference for blacks jobs MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 7 Numeric P7x. What about your opinion- are you for or against preferential hiring and promotion of blacks? Do you favor/oppose preference in hiring and promotion strongly or not strongly? SUMMARY: R POSITION ON AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN JOBS --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from P7 and P7a/b. 1. Favor strongly 2. Favor not strongly 4. Oppose not strongly 5. Oppose strongly 7. Other 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 4 174 87 342 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1021 94 70 15 ............................................................................ Q0. Now I'd like to talk to you about Bill Clinton ============================== V000807 Q1. Budget deficit lg/sm since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q1. As you know, Bill Clinton was first elected President in November 1992. He will soon be leaving office after 8 years as President. The next several questions ask whether you think things have changed since Clinton came into office. First, would you say that compared to 1992, the federal budget deficit is now smaller, larger, or about the same? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. GOTTEN SMALLER 3. GOTTEN LARGER --> SKIP TO Q1b 5. STAYED ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO Q2 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 496 126 203 61 1 ============================== V000808 Q1a. Deficit much/somewhat smaller MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q1a. IF R SAYS THE BUDGET DEFICIT IS SMALLER THAN IN 1992: (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much smaller or somewhat smaller? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH SMALLER --> SKIP TO Q2 5. SOMEWHAT SMALLER --> SKIP TO Q2 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q1 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1311 240 248 8 ============================== V000809 Q1b. Deficit much/somewhat larger MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q1b. IF R SAYS THE BUDGET DEFICIT IS LARGER THAN IN 1992: (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much larger or somewhat larger? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH LARGER 5. SOMEWHAT LARGER 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q1 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1681 44 78 4 ============================== V000810 Q1x. Summary budget deficit since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q1x. First, would you say that compared to 1992, the federal budget deficit is now smaller, larger, or about the same? (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much smaller/ larger or somewhat smaller/larger? SUMMARY: BUDGET DEFICIT SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q1 and Q1a/b. 1. Much smaller 2. Somewhat smaller 3. About the same 4. Somewhat larger 5. Much larger 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 240 248 203 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 78 44 73 1 ============================== V000811 Q2. Spending on poor inc/dec since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q2. Has federal spending on assistance to the poor been increased, decreased, or has it stayed about the same as in 1992? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1 INCREASED 3 DECREASED 5 STAYED ABOUT THE SAME --> SKIP TO Q3 8 DK --> SKIP TO Q3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 339 158 275 114 1 ============================== V000812 Q2a. How much inc/dec aid to poor MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q2a. IR SAYS SPENDING ON POOR HAS DECREASED SINCE 1992/ IR SAYS SPENDING ON POOR HAS INCREASED SINCE 1992: A lot or somewhat? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT 5. SOMEWHAT 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Q2 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1310 130 362 5 ============================== V000813 Q2x. Summary assistance to poor MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q2x. Has federal spending on assistance to the poor been increased, decreased, or has it stayed about the same as in 1992? A lot or somewhat? SUMMARY: FEDERAL ASSISTANCE TO THE POOR --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q2 and Q2a. 1. Increases a lot 2. Increased somewhat 3. Stayed about the same 4. Decreased somewhat 5. Decreased a lot 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 81 256 275 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 106 49 119 1 ============================== V000814 Q3. Economy better/worse compared to 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q3. Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's economy is better, worse, or about the same? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO Q3b 5. THE SAME --> SKIP TO Q4 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 633 59 185 10 ============================== V000815 Q3a. Economy much/somewhat better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q3a. IF R SAYS NATION'S ECONOMY IS BETTER SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO Q4 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO Q4 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q4 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q3 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1174 372 261 ============================== V000816 Q3b. Economy much/somewhat worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q3b. IF R SAYS NATION'S ECONOMY IS WORSE SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q3 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1748 22 37 ============================== V000817 Q3x. Summary economy since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q3x. Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's economy is better, worse, or about the same? (Would you say) much better/worse or somewhat better/ worse? SUMMARY: ECONOMY SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q3 and Q3a/b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. About the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 372 261 185 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 37 22 10 ============================== V000818 Q4. Clinton made economy better/worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q4. Since 1992, would you say President Clinton has made the nation's economy better, made the economy worse, or had no effect on the economy one way or the other? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. MADE THE ECONOMY BETTER 3. MADE THE ECONOMY WORSE --> SKIP TO Q4b 5. NO EFFECT --> SKIP TO Q5 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 502 41 321 23 ============================== V000819 Q4a. Clinton made econ much/somewhat better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q4a. IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE ECONOMY BETTER SINCE 1992: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO Q5 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO Q5 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q4 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1305 242 260 ============================== V000820 Q4b. Clinton made econ much/somewhat worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q4b. IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE ECONOMY WORSE SINCE 1992: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q4 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1766 15 26 ============================== V000821 Q4x. Summary Clinton effect on US econ MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q4x. Since 1992, would you say President Clinton has made the nation's economy better, made the economy worse, or had no effect on the economy one way or the other? Much better/worse or somewhat better/worse? SUMMARY: CLINTON EFFECT ON ECONOMY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q4 and Q4a/b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. No effect 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 242 260 321 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 26 15 23 ============================== V000822 Q5. Clinton admin hurt/help R personally MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q5. Have you personally been helped or have you been hurt economically by the Clinton Administration, or hasn't it affected you one way or the other? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. HELPED 3. HURT 5. NOT AFFECTED 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 189 75 608 15 ============================== V000823 Q6. U.S. more/less secure since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q6. Would you say that compared to 1992, the United States is more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't this changed very much? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. MORE SECURE 3. LESS SECURE --> SKIP TO Q6b 5. NO CHANGE --> SKIP TO Q7 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 215 261 379 32 ============================== V000824 Q6a. U.S. much more secure from enemies MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q6a. IF R SAYS U.S. MORE SECURE FROM ENEMIES SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much more secure or somewhat more secure? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH MORE SECURE --> SKIP TO Q7 5. SOMEWHAT MORE SECURE --> SKIP TO Q7 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q6 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1592 71 144 ============================== V000825 Q6b. U.S much less secure from enemies MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q6b. IF R SAYS U.S. LESS SECURE FROM ENEMIES SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much less secure or somewhat less secure? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH LESS SECURE 5. SOMEWHAT LESS SECURE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q6 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1546 107 153 1 ============================== V000826 Q6x. Summary US secure from for enemies MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q6x. Would you say that compared to 1992, the United States is more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't this changed very much? (Would you say) much more/less secure or somewhat more/ less secure? SUMMARY: U.S. SECURITY FROM FOREIGN ENEMIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q6 and Q6a/b. 1. Much more secure 2. Somewhat more secure 3. Not changed very much 4. Somewhat less secure 5. Much less secure 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 71 144 379 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 153 107 33 ============================== V000827 Q7. Clinton made U.S. more/less secure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q7. Would you say that Clinton administration has made the United States more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't it made much difference either way? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. MORE SECURE 3. LESS SECURE --> SKIP TO Q7b 5. NO CHANGE --> SKIP TO Q8 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q8 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 192 218 449 28 ============================== V000828 Q7a. Clinton made U.S. much/smwhat more secure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q7a. IF R SAYS CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. MORE SECURE: Much more secure or somewhat more secure? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH MORE SECURE --> SKIP TO Q8 5. SOMEWHAT MORE SECURE --> SKIP TO Q8 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q8 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q7 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1615 73 119 ============================== V000829 Q7b. Clinton made U.S. much/smwhat less secure MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q7b. IF R SAYS CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. LESS SECURE: Much less secure or somewhat less secure? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH LESS SECURE 5. SOMEWHAT LESS SECURE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q7 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1589 99 119 ============================== V000830 Q7x. Summ- Clinton impact on U.S. security MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q7x. Would you say that Clinton administration has made the United States more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't it made much difference either way? Much more/less secure or somewhat more/less secure? SUMMARY: CLINTON ADMINISTRATION EFFECT ON U.S. SECURITY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q7 and Q7a/b. 1. Much more secure 2. Somewhat more secure 3. Hasn't made much difference 4. Somewhat less secure 5. Much less secure 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 73 119 449 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 119 99 28 ============================== V000831 Q8. U.S. crime rate better/worse since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q8. Would you say that compared to 1992 the nation's crime rate has gotten better, gotten worse, or stayed about the same? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO Q8b 5. THE SAME --> SKIP TO Q9 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q9 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 327 276 260 24 ============================== V000832 Q8a. U.S. crime rate much or smwhat better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q8a. IF R SAYS U.S. CRIME RATE HAS GOTTEN BETTER SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO Q9 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO Q9 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q9 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q8 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1480 82 244 1 ============================== V000833 Q8b. U.S. crime rate much or smwhat worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q8b. IF R SAYS U.S. CRIME RATE HAS GOTTEN WORSE SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q8 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1531 138 138 ============================== V000834 Q8x. Summary - U.S. crime rate since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q8x. Would you say that compared to 1992 the nation's crime rate has gotten better, gotten worse, or stayed about the same? (Would you say) much better/worse or somewhat better/ worse? SUMMARY: U.S. CRIME RATE SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q8 and Q8a/b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Stayed about the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 82 244 260 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 138 138 25 ============================== V000835 Q9. Clinton made crime rate better/worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q9. Would you say that Clinton administration has made the nation's crime rate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO Q9b 5. NO DIFFERENCE --> SKIP TO Q10 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q10 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 234 72 543 38 ============================== V000836 Q9a. Clinton made crime rate much/smwhat btr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q9a. IF R SAYS CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. CRIME RATE BETTER: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO Q10 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO Q10 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q10 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q9 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1573 72 161 1 ============================== V000837 Q9b. Clinton made crime rate much/smwhat wrse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q9b. IF R SAYS CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. CRIME RATE WORSE: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q9 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1735 36 36 ============================== V000838 Q9x. Summary - Clinton impact on crime rate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q9x. Would you say that Clinton administration has made the nation's crime rate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? Much better/worse or somewhat better/worse? SUMMARY: EFFECT OF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION ON CRIME RATE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q9 and Q9a/b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Hasn't made much difference 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 72 161 543 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 36 36 39 ============================== V000839 Q10. Moral climate btr/worse since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q10. Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's moral climate has gotten better, stayed about the same, or gotten worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO Q10b 5. THE SAME --> SKIP TO Q11 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 87 470 314 15 1 ============================== V000840 Q10a.Moral climate much/smwhat better MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q10a. IF R SAYS MORAL CLIMATE IS BETTER SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO Q11 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO Q11 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q11 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q10 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1720 28 59 ============================== V000841 Q10b.Moral climate much/smwhat worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q10b. IF R SAYS MORAL CLIMATE IS WORSE SINCE 1992: (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q10 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1337 260 209 1 ============================== V000842 Q10x. Summary moral climate since 1992 MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q10x. Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's moral climate has gotten better, stayed about the same, or gotten worse? (Would you say) much better/worse or somewhat better/ worse? SUMMARY: U.S. MORAL CLIMATE SINCE 1992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q10 and Q10a/b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Stayed about the same 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 28 59 314 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 209 260 15 2 ============================== V000843 Q11. Clinton made moral climate btr/worse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q11. Has the Clinton administration made the nation's moral climate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. 1. BETTER 3. WORSE --> SKIP TO Q11b 5. NO DIFFERENCE --> SKIP TO Q14 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q14 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 65 373 425 21 3 ============================== V000844 Q11a.Clinton made moral climate much/swht btr MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q11a. IF R SAYS CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE MORAL CLIMATE BETTER: Much better or somewhat better? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH BETTER --> SKIP TO Q14 5. SOMEWHAT BETTER --> SKIP TO Q14 8. DK --> SKIP TO Q14 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q11 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1742 23 42 ============================== V000845 Q11b.Clinton made moral climate much/swht wrse MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q11b. IF R SAYS CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE MORAL CLIMATE WORSE: Much worse or somewhat worse? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. MUCH WORSE 5. SOMEWHAT WORSE 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q11 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1434 214 159 ============================== V000846 Q11x. Summary - Clinton impact on moral climate MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q11x. Has the Clinton administration made the nation's moral climate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? Much better/worse or somewhat better/worse? SUMMARY: EFFECT OF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION ON MORAL CLIMATE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Q11 and Q11a/b. 1. Much better 2. Somewhat better 3. Hasn't made much difference 4. Somewhat worse 5. Much worse 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, ; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 920 23 42 425 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 159 214 21 3 ============================== V000847 Q14a. Angry- Clinton affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q14a. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) ANGRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton affects were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK --> SKIP to next affect 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 617 297 2 ============================== V000848 Q14a1. Angry- how oft Clinton affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q14a1. IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R ANGRY: How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Q14a 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1190 138 143 263 73 ============================== V000849 Q14b. Hopeful- Clinton affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q14b. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) HOPEFUL --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton affects were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK --> SKIP to next affect 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 469 444 3 ============================== V000850 Q14b1. Hopeful- how oft Clinton affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q14b1. IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R HOPEFUL: How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Q14b 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1338 90 135 203 41 ============================== V000851 Q14c. Afraid- Clinton affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q14c. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) AFRAID --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton affects were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK --> SKIP to next affect 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 232 682 2 ============================== V000852 Q14c1. Afraid- how often Clinton affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q14c1. IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R AFRAID: How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Q14c 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1575 40 55 96 41 ============================== V000853 Q14d. Proud- Clinton affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q14d. (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is or because of something he has done, ever made you feel:) PROUD --------------------------------------------------------------------- Clinton affects were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1. YES 5. NO --> SKIP to next affect 8. DK --> SKIP to next affect 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 367 544 4 1 ============================== V000854 Q14d1. Proud- how oft Clinton affect MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q14d1. IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R AFRAID: How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY OFTEN 2. FAIRLY OFTEN 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. RARELY 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Q14d 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1440 80 101 150 35 1 ============================== V000855 Q15a/Q15a.T. Clinton trait-moral MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q15a/Q15a.T. FTF: Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) TELEPHONE: In your opinion, does the phrase he (is)'' describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) MORAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Clinton traits were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1 EXTREMELY WELL 2 QUITE WELL 3 NOT TOO WELL 4 NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 34 111 293 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 456 20 2 ============================== V000856 Q15b/Q15b.T. Clinton trait-really cares MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q15b/Q15b.T. FTF: Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) TELEPHONE: In your opinion, does the phrase he (is) '' describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Clinton traits were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1 EXTREMELY WELL 2 QUITE WELL 3 NOT TOO WELL 4 NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 128 316 280 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 165 26 1 ============================== V000857 Q15c/Q15c.T. Clinton trait-knowledgeable MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q15c/Q15c.T. FTF: Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) TELEPHONE: In your opinion, does the phrase he (is) '' describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) KNOWLEDGEABLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Clinton traits were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1 EXTREMELY WELL 2 QUITE WELL 3 NOT TOO WELL 4 NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 330 462 90 18 16 ============================== V000858 Q15d/Q15d.T. Clinton trait-strong leader MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q15d/Q15d.T. FTF: Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) TELEPHONE: In your opinion, does the phrase he (is) '' describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Clinton traits were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1 EXTREMELY WELL 2 QUITE WELL 3 NOT TOO WELL 4 NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 207 374 213 106 16 ============================== V000859 Q15e/Q15e.T. Clitnon trait-dishonest MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q15e/Q15e.T. FTF: Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) TELEPHONE: In your opinion, does the phrase he (is) '' describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) DISHONEST --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Clinton traits were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1 EXTREMELY WELL 2 QUITE WELL 3 NOT TOO WELL 4 NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 284 304 223 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 76 26 3 ============================== V000860 Q15f/Q15f.T. Clinton trait-intelligent MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q15f/Q15f.T. FTF: Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) TELEPHONE: In your opinion, does the phrase he (is) '' describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) INTELLIGENT --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Clinton traits were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1 EXTREMELY WELL 2 QUITE WELL 3 NOT TOO WELL 4 NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre 0 1 2 3 4 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 376 412 88 30 10 ============================== V000861 Q15g/Q15g.T. Clinton trait-out of touch MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Q15g/Q15g.T. FTF: Please look at page 4 of the booklet. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is ?" describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) TELEPHONE: In your opinion, does the phrase he (is) '' describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? (What about ? [Does this phrase describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all?]) OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE --------------------------------------------------------------------- [DO NOT PROBE "DK"] Clinton traits were asked in random order. Respondents were randomly assigned either to the retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects and traits battery (Q14-Q15). If R did not get selected for the retrospective battery in the Pre election instrument they were assigned administration in the Post (S1-S11) and vice versa. Randomization: Randomization is documented within the collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of the Pre survey vars. The question numbers for randomization variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization variable Rand.A4/A5]. 1 EXTREMELY WELL 2 QUITE WELL 3 NOT TOO WELL 4 NOT WELL AT ALL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 891 107 245 351 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 183 29 1 ============================== V000862 R1. How opinionated is R MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1. Some people have opinions about almost everything; other people have opinions about just some things; and still other people have very few opinions. What about you? Would you say you have opinions about almost everything, about many things, about some things, or about very few things? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALMOST EVERYTHING 2. MANY THINGS 3. SOME THINGS 4. VERY FEW THINGS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 348 633 693 4 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 124 3 1 ============================== V000863 R1a. Fewer or more opinions than avg MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1a. Compared to the average person do you have fewer opinions about whether things are good or bad, about the same number of opinions, or more opinions? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. FEWER OPINIONS 3. ABOUT THE SAME NUMBER OF OPINIONS 5. MORE OPINIONS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 3 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 244 969 558 27 4 ============================== V000864 R1a1. How much more opinions than avg MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1a1. IF R SAYS HE/SHE HAS MORE OPINIONS THAN THE AVERAGE PERSON: Would you say that you have a lot more opinions or just somewhat more opinions? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT MORE OPINIONS --> SKIP TO R2 5. SOMEWHAT MORE OPINIONS --> SKIP TO R2 8. DK --> SKIP TO R2 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9,0 in R1a 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1249 255 303 ============================== V000865 R1a2. More much fewer opinions than avg MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1a2. IF R SAYS HE/SHE HAS FEWER OPINIONS THAN THE AVERAGE PERSON: Would you say that you have a lot fewer opinions or just somewhat fewer opinions? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT FEWER OPINIONS 5. SOMEWHAT FEWER OPINIONS 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in R1a 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1563 58 186 ============================== V000866 R1x. Summary degree R opinionated MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R1x. Compared to the average person do you have fewer opinions about whether things are good or bad, about the same number of opinions, or more opinions? Would you say that you have a lot more/fewer opinions or just somewhat more/fewer opinions? SUMMARY: DEGREE R OPINIONATED --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from R1a and R1a1/R1a2. 1. A lot fewer 2. Somewhat fewer 3. About the same 4. Somewhat more 5. A lot more 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 58 186 969 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 303 255 27 4 ============================== V000867 R2. Does R like respnsbty for thinking MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R2. Some people like to have responsibility for handling situations that require a lot of thinking, and other people don't like to have responsibility for situations like that. What about you? Do you like having responsibility for handling situations that require a lot of thinking, do you dislike it, or do you neither like it nor dislike it? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. LIKE 3. DISLIKE --> SKIP TO R2b 5. NEITHER LIKE OR DISLIKE --> SKIP TO R3 8. DK --> SKIP TO R3 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 1068 243 485 6 ============================== V000868 R2a. How much like respnbty for thinking MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R2a. IF R SAYS R LIKES SITUATIONS REQUIRING A LOT OF THINKING: Do you like it a lot or just somewhat? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> SKIP TO R3 5. SOMEWHAT --> SKIP TO R3 8. DK --> SKIP TO R3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in R2 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 739 707 360 1 ============================== V000869 R2b. How much dislike rsbty for thinking MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R2b. IF R SAYS R DISLIKES SITUATIONS REQUIRING A LOT OF THINKING: Do you dislike it a lot or just somewhat? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DISLIKE IT A LOT 5. DISLIKE IT SOMEWHAT 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in R2 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1564 74 169 ============================== V000870 R2x. Summary like/dislike thinking MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R2x. What about you? Do you like having responsibility for handling situations that require a lot of thinking, do you dislike it, or do you neither like it nor dislike it? Do you like/dislike it a lot or just somewhat? SUMMARY: R LIKE/DISLIKE FOR INTENSIVE THOUGHT --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from R2 and R2a/b. 1. Like it a lot 2. Like it somewhat 3. Neither like it nor dislike it 4. Dislike it somewhat 5. Dislike it a lot 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 707 360 485 4 5 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 169 74 7 ============================== V000871 R3. Like simple or complex problems MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric R3. Some people prefer to solve simple problems instead of complex ones, whereas other people prefer to solve more complex problems. Which type of problem do you prefer to solve: simple or complex? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SIMPLE 5. COMPLEX 8. DON'T KNOW 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 889 872 34 7 ============================== V000872 S1. Is religion important to R MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S1. Do you consider religion to be an important part of your life, or not? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. IMPORTANT 5. NOT IMPORTANT --> SKIP TO S3 8. DON'T KNOW --> SKIP TO S3 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 1373 426 1 2 ============================== V000873 S2. How much guidance from religion MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S2. IF R SAYS THAT RELIGION IS IMPORTANT: Would you say your religion provides some guidance in your day-to-day living, quite a bit of guidance, or a great deal of guidance in your day-to-day life? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SOME 3. QUITE A BIT 5. A GREAT DEAL 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in S1 0 1 3 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 434 292 395 685 1 ============================== V000874 S3/S3.T. How often does R pray MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S3/S3.T. FTF: Please look at page 15 of the booklet. People practice their religion in different ways. Outside of attending religious services, do you pray several times a day, once a day, a few times a week, once a week or less or never? TELEPHONE: People practice their religion in different ways. Outside of attending religious services, do you pray several times a day, once a day, a few times a week, once a week or less or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SEVERAL TIMES A DAY 2. ONCE A DAY 3. A FEW TIMES A WEEK 4. ONCE A WEEK OR LESS 5. NEVER 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 567 402 312 284 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 192 27 2 16 ============================== V000875 S4/S4.T. How often does R read the bible MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S4/S4.T. FTF: Still looking at page 15 of the booklet. Outside of attending religious services, do you read the Bible several times a day, once a day, a few times a week, once a week or less or never? TELEPHONE: Outside of attending religious services, do you read the Bible several times a day, once a day, a few times a week, once a week or less or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SEVERAL TIMES A DAY 2. ONCE A DAY 3. A FEW TIMES A WEEK 4. ONCE A WEEK OR LESS 5. NEVER 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 64 187 245 556 5 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 690 48 2 10 ============================== V000876 S5/S5.T. Bible is word of God or men MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric S5/S5.T. FTF: Please look at page 16 of the booklet. Which of these statements comes closest to describing your feelings about the Bible? You can just give me the number of your choice. TELEPHONE: I am going to read you a short list of statements. Please tell me which of these statements comes closest to describing your feelings about the Bible? You can just give me the number of the statement you choose. --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE BIBLE IS THE ACTUAL WORD OF GOD AND IS TO BE TAKEN LITERALLY, WORD FOR WORD. 2. THE BIBLE IS THE WORD OF GOD BUT NOT EVERYTHING IN IT SHOULD BE TAKEN LITERALLY, WORD FOR WORD. 3. THE BIBLE IS A BOOK WRITTEN BY MEN AND IS NOT THE WORD OF GOD. 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 600 869 247 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 44 21 21 ============================== V000877 X1. Attend religious services MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X1. Lots of things come up that keep people from attending religious services even if they want to. Thinking about your life these days, do you ever attend religious services, apart from occasional weddings, baptisms or funerals? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> SKIP TO X2 5. NO --> SKIP TO X1a 8. DK --> SKIP TO X1a 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 1249 545 8 ============================== V000878 X1a. Part of a church or denomination MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X1a. IF R DOES NOT ATTEND RELIGIOUS SERVICES: Regardless of whether you now attend any religious services do you ever think of yourself as part of a particular church or denomination? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> X3 5. NO --> GO TO Y1 8. DK --> GO TO Y1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,9,0 in X1 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1262 294 251 ============================== V000879 X2. Attend religious services how often MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X2. IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES: Do you go to religious services every week, almost every week, once or twice a month, a few times a year, or never? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EVERY WEEK --> X2a 2. ALMOST EVERY WEEK --> X3 3. ONCE OR TWICE A MONTH --> X3 4. A FEW TIMES A YEAR --> X3 5. NEVER --> X3 8. DK --> X3 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in X1 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 558 479 205 270 4 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 282 8 1 4 ============================== V000880 X2a. Attend relig serv > once/week MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X2a. IF R SAYS ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES 'EVERY WEEK': Would you say you go to religious services once a week or more often than once a week? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ONCE A WEEK 2. MORE OFTEN THAN ONCE A WEEK 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9, 0 in X1; 2-5,8,9 or NA in X2 0 1 2 ----- ----- ----- Count 1328 270 209 ============================== V000881 X3. Attend church checkpoint MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9 Numeric X3. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH: / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION: CHECKPOINT: CHURCH ATTENDANCE --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> X3a 5. NO (5 in X1) --> X3b 9. RF (9 in X1) 0. INAP, 0 in X1 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 1240 554 8 ============================== V000882 X3a. Attend protestant/Cath/Jewish/other MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X3a. IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES: Do you mostly attend a place of worship that is Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, or something else? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PROTESTANT --> X4 2. CATHOLIC --> X7 3. JEWISH --> X6a 7. OTHER --> X4 8. DK --> SKIP TO Y1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,9 in X3 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 567 543 359 28 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 303 2 5 ============================== V000883 X3b. Belong protestant/Cath/Jewish/other MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X3b. IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION: Do you consider yourself Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, or something else? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PROTESTANT --> X4 2. CATHOLIC --> SKIP TO X7 3. JEWISH --> SKIP TO X6b 7. OTHER --> X4 8. DK --> SKIP TO Y1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9 or NA in X1a; 1,0,9 in X3 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1504 123 100 15 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- Count 62 1 2 ============================== V000884 X4. Denomination/other specify MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric X4. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER'/ IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER': What church or denomination is that? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. BAPTIST --> SKIP TO X4b 2. EPISCOPALIAN/ANGLICAN/CHURCH OF ENGLAND --> SKIP TO X7 3. LUTHERAN --> SKIP TO X4c 4. METHODIST --> SKIP TO X4d 5. JUST PROTESTANT --> SKIP TO X7 6. PRESBYTERIAN --> SKIP TO X4e 7. REFORMED --> SKIP TO X4f 8. BRETHREN --> SKIP TO X4g 9. EVANGELICAL UNITED BRETHREN --> SKIP TO X7 10. CHRISTIAN OR JUST CHRISTIAN --> SKIP TO X4h 11. CHRISTIAN SCIENTIST --> SKIP TO X7 12. CHURCH (or CHURCHES) OF CHRIST --> SKIP TO X4i 13. UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST --> SKIP TO X7 14. DISCIPLES OF CHRIST --> SKIP TO X7 15. CHURCH OF GOD --> SKIP TO X4j 16. ASSEMBLY OF GOD --> SKIP TO X7 17. CONGREGATIONALIST --> SKIP TO X7 18. HOLINESS --> SKIP TO X4k 19. PENTACOSTAL --> SKIP TO X4k 20. FRIENDS, QUAKER --> SKIP TO X7 21. ORTHODOX, e.g. Greek, Russian (SPECIFY);C --> SKIP TO X7 22. NON-DENOMINATIONAL - PROTESTANT --> SKIP TO X7 23. MORMONS --> SKIP TO X7 24. JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES --> SKIP TO X7 25. LATTER DAY SAINTS --> SKIP TO X7 26. UNITARIAN/UNIVERSALIST --> SKIP TO X7 27. BUDDHIST --> SKIP TO X7 28. HINDU --> SKIP TO X7 29. MUSLIM/ISLAM --> SKIP TO X7 30. NATIVE AMERICAN --> SKIP TO X7 95. NA 98. DK --> SKIP TO X7 99. RF 00. INAP, 9,0 in X1; 5,8,9 or NA in X1a; 2,3,8,9 or NA in X3a/b 90. OTHER (SPECIFY) --> SKIP TO X4m 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 776 307 32 101 111 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 75 2 1 5 63 3 12 13 14 15 16 17 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 17 11 6 12 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 39 4 5 52 12 24 25 26 27 28 29 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 10 18 10 4 1 4 30 90 ----- ----- Count 2 85 ============================== V000885 X4(1). (blanked) denomination other Character X4(1). IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER'/ IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER': IF R DENOMINATION IS 'OTHER': What church or denomination is that? TEXT OF X4 DENOMINATION CODE 90 'OTHER' (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable has been blanked to preserve confidentiality. ============================== V000886 X4a. Baptist group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4a. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS BAPTIST IN X4: With which Baptist group is your church associated? Is it the Southern Baptist Convention, the American Baptist Churches in the U.S.A., the American Baptist Association, an independent Baptist church or some other Baptist group? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION --> X7 2. AMERICAN BAPTIST CHURCHES IN USA --> X7 3. AMERICAN BAPTIST ASSOCIATION --> X7 4. INDEPENDENT BAPTIST --> X7 7. OTHER (SPECIFY) --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,2-99 in X4 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1500 160 19 18 4 7 8 ----- ----- ----- Count 49 44 17 ============================== V000887 X4b. Independent Baptist group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4b. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS BAPTIST IN X4: IF R'S CHURCH IS INDEPENDENT BAPTIST: Are you affiliated with any larger Baptist group or is this strictly a local church? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. LARGER BAPTIST GROUP [SPECIFY] --> X7 2. LOCAL --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1-3,7,8,9,0 in X4a 0 1 2 ----- ----- ----- Count 1758 3 46 ============================== V000888 X4c. Lutheran group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4c. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS LUTHERAN IN X4: Is this church part of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in American, the Missouri Synod, or some other Lutheran group? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH --> X7 2. MISSOURI SYNOD --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1,2,4-99 in X4 0 1 2 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1706 52 27 15 7 ============================== V000889 X4d. Methodist group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4d. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS METHODIST IN X4: Is your church part of the United Methodist Church, African Methodist Episcopal, or some other Methodist group? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. UNITED METHODIST CHURCH --> X7 2. AFRICAN METHODIST EPISCOPAL --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1-3,5-99 in X4 0 1 2 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1696 96 8 5 2 ============================== V000890 X4e. Presbyterian group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4e. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS PRESBYTERIAN IN X4: Is this the Presbyterian Church in the USA or some other Presbyterian group? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH USA (FORMERLY UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH) --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1-5,7-99 in X4 0 1 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1732 63 10 2 ============================== V000891 X4f. Reformed group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4f. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS REFORMED IN X4: Is this the Christian Reformed Church, the Reformed Church in America or some Other Reformed group? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH --> X7 2. THE REFORMED CHURCH IN AMERICA --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1-6,8-99 in X4 0 1 ----- ----- Count 1805 2 ============================== V000892 X4g. Brethren group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4g. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS BRETHREN IN X4: Is this the church of the Brethren, the Plymouth Brethren, or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CHURCH OF THE BRETHREN --> X7 2. THE PLYMOUTH BRETHREN --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1-7,9-99 in X4 0 2 ----- ----- Count 1806 1 ============================== V000893 X4h. Christian group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4h. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R SAYS DENOMINATION IS 'CHRISTIAN' IN X4: When you say "Christian" does that mean the denomination called the "Christian Church Disciples of Christ," or some other Christian denomination, or do you mean to say "I am just a Christian"? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. DISCIPLES OF CHRIST --> X7 2. I AM JUST A CHRISTIAN --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1-9,11-99 in X4 0 1 2 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1744 12 37 12 2 ============================== V000894 X4i. Church of Christ group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4i. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS CHURCH OF CHRIST IN X4: Is this the Church of Christ or the United Church of Christ? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CHURCH OF CHRIST --> X7 2. UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1-11,13-99 in X4 0 1 2 ----- ----- ----- Count 1790 16 1 ============================== V000895 X4j. Church of God group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4j. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS CHURCH OF GOD IN X4: Is this the Church of God of Anderson, Indiana; the Church of God of Cleveland, Tennessee; the Church of God in Christ; or some other Church of God? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ANDERSON, INDIANA --> X7 2. CLEVELAND, TENNESSEE --> X7 3. CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1-14,16-99 in X4 0 1 2 3 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1795 4 3 1 4 ============================== V000896 X4k. (blanked) holiness/pentacostal Character X4k. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION IS HOLINIESS OR PENTACOSTAL IN X4: What kind of church is that? What is it called exactly? Is that part of a larger church or denomination? What is the church called? HOLINESS OR PENTACOSTAL TEXT (18 and 19 in X4) --------------------------------------------------------------------- [THESE QUESTIONS ARE PROBES. USE THESE AND OTHERS TO GET AS MUCH SPECIFIC INFORMATION AS POSSIBLE] This field has been blanked. The open-ended responses are hand-coded into the religion summary variable. ============================== V000897 X4a-j. (blanked) other Character X4a-j. IF R'S DENOMINATION SPECIFIES 'OTHER' IN X4a-X4k: TEXT OF OTHER (SPECIFY) IN DENOMINATIONAL FOLLOWUPS: --------------------------------------------------------------------- This field has been blanked. The open-ended responses are hand-coded into the religion summary variable. ============================== V000898 X4m. (blanked) other group/denomination Character X4m. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION 'OTHER' IN X4: What is it called exactly? Is that church part of a denomination? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [USE ANY OR ALL AS NECESSARY; GET AS MUCH DETAIL AS POSSIBLE] This field has been blanked. The open-ended responses are hand coded into the religion summary variable. ============================== V000899 X4m1. Is other group christian MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X4m1. IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a / IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF 'OTHER' IN X3b: IF R DENOMINATION 'OTHER' IN X4: Is that group Christian? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> X7 5. NO --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,1-30,95-99 in X4 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1722 77 7 1 ============================== V000900 X6a. Attend Jewish group MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X6a. IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES AND IS JEWISH IN X3a: Do you usually attend a synagogue or temple that is Orthodox, Conservative, Reform or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ORTHODOX` --> X7 2. CONSERVATIVE --> X7 3. REFORM --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,7,8,9,0 in X3a 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1779 6 11 11 ============================== V000901 X6b. Jewish denomination MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X6b. IF R DOES NOT ATTEND RELIGIOUS SERVICES BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF JEWISH IN X3b: Do you consider yourself Orthodox, Conservative, Reform, or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ORTHODOX --> X7 2. CONSERVATIVE --> X7 3. REFORM --> X7 7. OTHER [SPECIFY] --> X7 8. DK --> X7 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,7,8,9,0 in X3b 0 2 3 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1792 2 9 4 ============================== V000902 X7. Member place of worship MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X7. IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES/ IF R DOES NOT ATTEND RELIGIOUS SERVICES BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR DENOMINATION: Are you officially a member of a parish, congregation, temple or other place of worship? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> X8 or Y1 5. NO --> X8 or Y1 8. DK --> X8 or Y1 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,9 in X1; 5,8,9 or NA in X1a 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 264 1030 509 2 2 ============================== V000903 X8. Born-again christian MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric X8. IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES/ IF R DOES NOT ATTEND RELIGIOUS SERVICES BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF A CHURCH OR DENOMINATION: IF R IDENTIFIES A CHRISTIAN RELIGION IN X3a, X3b, X4 OR X4m1: Would you call yourself a born-again Christian, that is, have you personally had a conversion experience related to Jesus Christ? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,9 in X1; 5,8,9 or NA in X1a; 3,8,9 or NA in X3a/b; 5,8,9 or NA in X4m1 0 1 5 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 336 594 865 8 4 ============================== V000904 X9x. Religion summary MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric X9x. Do you mostly attend a place of worship that is Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, or something else / Do you consider yourself Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, or something else? JEWISH: Do you usually attend a synagogue or temple that is Orthodox, Conservative, Reform or what/ Do you consider yourself Orthodox, Conservative, Reform, or what? PROTESTANT OR SOMETHING ELSE: What church or denomination is that? IF BAPTIST: With which Baptist group is your church associated? Is it the Southern Baptist Convention, the American Baptist Churches in the U.S.A., the American Baptist Association, an independent Baptist church or some other Baptist group? (INDEPENDENT BAPTIST:) Are you affiliated with any larger Baptist group or is this strictly a local church? IF LUTHERAN: Is this church part of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in American, the Missouri Synod, or some other Lutheran group? IF METHODIST: Is your church part of the United Methodist Church, African Methodist Episcopal, or some other Methodist group? IF PRESBYTERIAN: Is this the Presbyterian Church in the USA or some other Presbyterian group? IF REFORMED: Is this the Christian Reformed Church, the Reformed Church in America or some Other Reformed group? IF BRETHREN: Is this the church of the Brethren, the Plymouth Brethren, or what?' IF 'CHRISTIAN': When you say "Christian" does that mean the denomination called the "Christian Church Disciples of Christ" or some other Christian denomination, or do you mean to say "I am just a Christian"? IF CHURCH OF CHRIST: Is this the Church of Christ or the United Church of Christ? IF CHURCH OF GOD: Is this the Church of God of Anderson, Indiana; the Church of God of Cleveland, Tennessee; the Church of God in Christ; or some other Church of God? IF PENTECOSTAL OR HOLINESS: What kind of church is that? What is it called exactly? Is that part of a larger church or denomination? What is that church called? IF OTHER: What is it called exactly? Is that church part of a denomination? IF OTHER: Is that group Christian? RELIGION SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable summarizes the information gathered in questions X3a/b, X4, X4a-m, X4m1, X6a/b. Information collected in the open-ended responses to the religion section component questions have been hand coded into this summary variable. NOTE: in 1 case, an R whose initial religious group was identified as Protestant was discovered, upon further probing, to be Roman Catholic. Codes 010-990 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, no religious identification or preference (and R does not attend religious services) ============================== V000905 Y1(1). Month of birth MD1: EQ 98, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Y1(1). What is the month, day and year of your birth? MONTH --------------------------------------------------------------------- 01-12 98. DK 99. RF; NA 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 164 123 159 143 143 6 7 8 9 10 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 133 174 147 156 124 11 12 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 146 163 1 31 ============================== V000906 Y1(2). Day of birth (blanked) Numeric Y1(2). What is the month, day and year of your birth? DAY (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- This variable is blanked. ============================== V000907 Y1(3). Year of birth MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9998 Numeric Y1(3). What is the month, day and year of your birth? YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------- 9998. DK 9999. RF 0000. NA ============================== V000908 Y1x. Respondent age MD: EQ 0 Numeric Y1x. What is the month, day and year of your birth? SUMMARY - RESPONDENT AGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Age was calculated by subtracting the year of birth from 2000. For cases where R refused to give year of birth or year of birth was NA in the survey variable, a check was made of Household listing information: if age of R was included in the Household listing, it was included here from the Household listing. Codes 17-96 and: 97. 97 and older 00. NA 0 18 19 20 21 22 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 9 12 16 23 23 23 23 24 25 26 27 28 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 23 26 26 28 28 29 29 30 31 32 33 34 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 22 34 30 36 33 40 35 36 37 38 39 40 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 41 45 48 40 44 46 41 42 43 44 45 46 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 42 48 37 41 34 35 47 48 49 50 51 52 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 38 36 32 39 35 26 53 54 55 56 57 58 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 31 30 26 36 40 33 59 60 61 62 63 64 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 25 21 20 17 29 16 65 66 67 68 69 70 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 24 17 14 17 18 17 71 72 73 74 75 76 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 11 16 22 17 17 14 77 78 79 80 81 82 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 9 12 13 10 9 15 83 84 85 86 87 88 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 6 9 5 1 2 6 89 90 91 92 93 95 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 2 1 1 2 1 96 97 ----- ----- Count 1 1 ============================== V000909 Y2. Marital status MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y2. Are you married now and living with your (husband/wife) -- or are you widowed, divorced, separated, or have you never married? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: in cases 8,49,77,157,377,535,580,814,1087,1117,1202,1212, 1381,1639,1731 the partner/spouse identified in V000909 (marital status) was not a resident of the HU or was residing elsewhere on temporary basis. In cases 1281,1516,46,312,133,23,222 there is no information about spouse/partner. 1. MARRIED 2. WIDOWED 3. DIVORCED 4. SEPARATED 5. NEVER MARRIED 6. PARTNERED, NOT MARRIED [VOL] 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 5 935 168 238 55 5 6 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 348 49 1 8 ============================== V000910 Y3. Highest grade completed MD1: EQ 98, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Y3. What is the highest grade of school or year of college you have completed? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 00-12 YEARS 13-16 YEARS --> SKIP TO Y3b 17. 17+ YEARS --> SKIP TO Y3b 98. DK 99. RF; NA 0 2 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 3 5 2 14 12 8 9 10 11 12 13 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 30 26 52 66 483 181 14 15 16 17 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 240 106 316 259 9 ============================== V000911 Y3a. Diploma/GED MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y3a. IF HIGHEST GRADE OF EDUCATION IS 0-12 YEARS OR DK: Did you get a high school diploma or pass a high school equivalency test? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> SKIP TO Y4 IF MARRIED/PARTNERED, IF NOT SKIP TO Y5 5. NO --> SKIP TO Y4 IF MARRIED/PARTNERED, IF NOT SKIP TO Y5 8. DK --> SKIP TO Y4 IF MARRIED/PARTNERED, IF NOT SKIP TO Y5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 13-16 or NA in Y3 0 1 5 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1107 519 180 1 ============================== V000912 Y3b. Highest degree earned MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Y3b. IF HIGHEST GREADE OF EDUCATION IS 13+ YEARS: What is the highest degree that you have earned? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 01. BACHELOR'S DEGREE 02. MASTER'S DEGREE 03. PhD, LIT, SCD, DFA, DLIT, DPH, DPHIL, JSC, SJD 04. LLB, JD 05. MD, DDS, DVM, MVSA, DSC, DO 06. JDC, STD, THD 07. ASSOCIATE DEGREE (AA) 96. NO DEGREE EARNED 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 0-12, 99 in Y3 0 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 705 373 139 27 7 5 6 7 96 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 8 2 168 377 1 ============================== V000913 Y3x. R educ summary MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Y3x. What is the highest grade of school or year of college you have completed? Did you get a high school diploma or pass a high school equivalency test? What is the highest degree that you have earned? SUMMARY: R EDUCATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Y3, Y3a, Y3b. 1. 8 grades or less and no diploma or equivalency [0-8 in Y3, 5 in Y3a] 2. 9-11 grades, no further schooling (incl. 12 years without diploma or equivalency) [9-12 in Y3, 5 in Y3a] 3. High school diploma or equivalency test [0-12 in Y3, 1 in Y3a] 4. More than 12 years of schooling, no higher degree (13-17 in Y3, 96 in Y3b) 5. Junior or community college level degrees (AA degrees) (07 in Y3b) 6. BA level degrees; 17+ years, no advanced degree (01 in Y3b) 7. Advanced degree, including LLB [13-17 in Y3, 2-6 in Y3b] 8. DK [98 in Y3, 8 in Y3a; 98 in Y3b] 9. NA [99 in Y3; 9 in Y3a; 99 or NA in Y3b] 1 2 3 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 64 116 519 377 5 6 7 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 168 373 183 7 ============================== V000914 Y4. Highest grade of partner MD1: EQ 98, MD2: GE 99 Numeric Y4. IF MARRIED OR PARTNERED: What is the highest grade of school or year of college (your husband/your wife/your partner) has completed? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 00-12 YEARS 13-16 YEARS --> SKIP TO Y4b 17. 17+ YEARS --> SKIP TO Y4b 98. DK 99. RF; NA; INAP, 2-5,8,9,0 in Y2 0 3 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 2 2 2 2 3 8 9 10 11 12 13 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 21 12 23 23 285 73 14 15 16 17 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 141 39 205 140 9 823 ============================== V000915 Y4a. Partner diploma/GED MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y4a. IF HIGHEST GRADE OF SPOUSE/PARTNER IS 0-12 YEARS OR DK: Did (he/she) get a high school diploma or pass a high school equivalency test? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> SKIP TO Y5 5. NO --> SKIP TO Y5 8. DK --> SKIP TO Y5 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 13-17, 99 in Y4 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1421 297 82 7 ============================== V000916 Y4b. Partner highest degree MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 98 Numeric Y4b. IF HIGHEST GRADE OF SPOUSE/PARTNER EDUCATION IS 13+ YEARS: What is the highest degree that(he/she) has earned? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 01. BACHELOR'S DEGREE 02. MASTER'S DEGREE 03. PhD, LIT, SCD, DFA, DLIT, DPH, DPHIL, JSC, SJD 04. LLB, JD 05. MD, DDS, DVM, MVSA, DSC, DO 06. JDC, STD, THD 07. ASSOCIATE DEGREE (AA) 96. NO DEGREE EARNED 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA; INAP, 1-12, 98, 99 in Y4 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1209 218 88 17 1 10 6 7 96 98 99 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 85 174 2 2 ============================== V000917 Y4x. Sp educ. Summary MD1: EQ 8, MD2: GE 9 Numeric Y4x. What is the highest grade of school or year of college (your husband/your wife/your partner) has completed? Did (he/she) get a high school diploma or pass a high school equivalency test? What is the highest degree that(he/she) has earned? SUMMARY: SPOUSE/PARTNER EDUCATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Y4, Y4a, Y4b. Note: 3 cases [561,1017,1719] coded 98 (DK) for number of school years in Y4 and 'no' in Y4a (no high school diploma) are coded 2 here; 3 cases [77,1057,1799] where R indicated 12 years of schooling but DK for Y4a diploma are coded 2. 1. 8 grades or less and no diploma or equivalency [0-8 in Y4, 5 in Y4a] 2. 9-11 grades, no further schooling (incl. 12 years without diploma or equivalency) [9-12 in Y4, 5 in Y4a] 3. High school diploma or equivalency test [0-12 in Y4, 1 in Y4a] 4. More than 12 years of schooling, no higher degree (13-17 in Y4, 96 in Y4b) 5. Junior or community college level degrees (AA degrees) (07 in Y4b) 6. BA level degrees; 17+ years, no advanced degree (01 in Y4b) 7. Advanced degree, including LLB [13-17 in Y4, 2-6 in Y4b] 8. DK [98 in Y4, 8 in Y4a; 98 in Y4b] 9. NA [99 in Y4; 9 in Y4a; 99 or NA in Y4b] 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 29 56 297 174 85 6 7 8 9 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 218 117 6 825 ............................................................................ Y6. Occupation/employment variables represent 5 series of questions. The question series initially assigned to R in Y6(1) is determined by R's self-identification of employment status. The series occupation data are: "UNEMPLOYED" - past occupation "RETIRED" - past occupation "DISABLED" - past occupation "HOMEMAKER" (nonworking) - past occupation "STUDENT" (nonworking) - past occupation "WORKING NOW" - current occupation "TEMPORARILY LAID OFF" - current occupation Note: The final employment status summaries Y6(2)-Y6(3) are built using both R's initial self-identification per Y6(1) and additional information provided by R during questioning. The retired who are also currently working have data in both the RETIRED and WORKING NOW series; the disabled may have data in both DISABLED and WORKING NOW series. For homemaker and student Rs, the 1st question in the HOMEMAKER/STUDENT series asks whether R is currently working; if so, R is immediately transferred out of that series to the WORKING NOW series (the HOMEMAKER/STUDENT series not completed). Since many questions are asked across multiple series, data for common questions across series are "stacked" into variables V000979-V000989; for these stacked variables the following data are included: PAST employment of all retirees [15,50,51 in Y6(1)] PAST employment of the unemployed [40 in Y6(1)] PAST employment of nonworking disabled [60 in Y6(1)] PRESENT employment of working disabled [16,61 in Y6(1)] PRESENT employment of Rs working now only [10,20 in Y6(1)] or working homemaker/student [17,18,71,81 in Y6(2)] NO data for nonworking homemakers/students [70,75,80 in Y6(1)] ============================== V000918 Y6(1). Assigned employment status MD: EQ 0 Numeric Y6(1). Please look at page 17 of the booklet. We'd like to know if you are working now, temporarily laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what? ASSIGNED EMPLOYMENT SERIES --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. This variable describes the series of employment questions to which R is initially assigned according to R's self- identification of employment status. By contrast, the Y6(2) and Y6(3) employment status summary variables are built using relevant information from R's Y6(1) self-identification and also from information obtained during questioning (especially number of hours worked). Initial series assignment from multiple mentions given by R for his or her own employment status is as follows: RET ONLY or (RET and any others) -->retired series HM/ST ONLY or (HM/ST and UN/DIS/WN/TLO) -->hmkr/st series DIS ONLY or (DIS and UN/WN/TLO) -->disabled series WN/TLO ONLY -->wrkg now series Note that Rs initially assigned per Y6(1) to the RETIRED, DISABLED or HOMEMAKER/STUDENT series are redirected from within those series to the WORKING NOW series if the R was also currently working (both series completed if retired or disabled). For this reason, the WORKING NOW series appears last in codebook variables: - V000921-000931 UNEMPLOYED [UN] - V000932-000944 RETIRED [RET] - V000945-000956 PERMANENTLY DISABLED [DIS] - V000957-000967 HOMEMAKER/STUDENT [HM/ST] - V000968-000978 WORKING NOW/TEMP. LAID OFF [WN/TLO] 1. Assigned WORKING NOW series - working now (Y7-Y7j) 2. Assigned WORKING NOW series - temporarily laid off (Y7-Y7j) 3. Assigned UNEMPLOYED series (Y9-Y10h) 4. Assigned RETIRED series (Y11-Y12j) 5. Assigned PERMANENTLY DISABLED series (Y13-Y14j) 6. Assigned HOMEMAKER series (Y15-Y16j) 7. Assigned STUDENT series (Y15-Y16j) 0. NA 0 1 2 3 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 7 1035 17 59 4 5 6 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 336 74 183 96 ============================== V000919 Y6(2). 2 digit employment status MD: EQ 0 Numeric Y6(2). Please look at page 17 of the booklet. We'd like to know if you are working now, temporarily laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what? EMPLOYMENT STATUS 2 DIGIT SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- See notes Y6. Built using Y5, Y12g, Y14g, Y15, Y7e. This is a summary which describes R's occupation status as categorized AFTER all information has been collected. Note that case 1263 has been coded 81 rather than 18 although number of hours worked (V000974) was coded as DK; for this case, information in the thumbnail indicated that R worked only a few hours a week. 10. WORKING NOW only 15. WORKING NOW and retired (R volunteers), currently working 20 or more hours per week 16. WORKING NOW and permanently disabled, currently working 20 or more hours per week 17. WORKING NOW and homemaker (R volunteers), currently working 20 or more hours per week 18. WORKING NOW and student (R volunteers), currently working 20 or more hours per week 20. TEMPORARILY LAID OFF 40. UNEMPLOYED 50. RETIRED, no other occupation 51. RETIRED and working now (R volunteers), currently working fewer than 20 hours per week 60. PERMANENTLY DISABLED, not working 61. PERMANENTLY DISABLED and working now, currently working fewer than 20 hours per week 70. HOMEMAKER, no other occupation 71. HOMEMAKER and working now (R volunteers), currently working fewer than 20 hours per week 75. HOMEMAKER and student (R volunteers), no other occupation 80. STUDENT, no other occupation 81. STUDENT and working now (R volunteers), currently working fewer than 20 hours per week 00. NA 0 10 15 16 17 18 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 7 1035 18 2 55 51 20 40 50 51 60 70 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 17 59 300 18 72 114 71 75 80 81 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 14 2 25 18 ============================== V000920 Y6(3). 1 digit employment status MD: EQ 0 Numeric Y6(3). Please look at page 17 of the booklet. We'd like to know if you are working now, temporarily laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what? EMPLOYMENT STATUS 1 DIGIT SUMMARY --------------------------------------------------------------------- Built from Y6(2) 1. R WORKING NOW (working now or working 20 hours or more per week if also retired, permanently disabled, homemaker or student 2. R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF [20 in Y6(2)] 4. R UNEMPLOYED [40 in Y6(2)] 5. R RETIRED, not working or working fewer than 20 hours per week [50,51 in Y6(2)] 6. R PERMANENTLY DISABLED, not working or working fewer than 20 hours per week [60,61 in Y6(2)] 7. R HOMEMAKER, not working or working fewer than 20 hours per week [also nonworking Rs who are both homemakers and students-- 70,71,75 in Y6(2)] 8. R STUDENT, not working or working fewer than 20 hours per week ([80,81 in Y6(2)] 0. NA 0 1 2 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 7 1161 17 59 5 6 7 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 318 72 130 43 ============================== V000921 Y9. R unemp: ever worked for pay MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y9. IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: Have you ever done any work for pay? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y10g 8. DK --> Y10g 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1748 58 1 ============================== V000922 Y10a(1). 2-digit occup MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric Y10a(1). IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R UNEMPLOYED: 2 DIGIT OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the OCCUPATION master code. The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1), at end of R employment section. The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect respondents' anonymity. Codes 1-71 and: 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 0 1 2 7 9 13 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1749 6 3 2 3 2 18 20 22 24 32 33 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 9 1 1 2 3 35 36 37 42 48 54 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 2 6 3 3 1 1 61 63 65 66 69 70 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1 4 1 1 1 1 ============================== V000922a Y10a(2). 3-digit occup (blanked) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y10a(2). IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R UNEMPLOYED: 3 DIGIT CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the OCCUPATION master code. The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1a), at end of R employment section. The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect respondents' anonymity. Contact ANES Project Staff for information about a procedure by which it is possible to gain access to the full 3-digit code values. Codes 1-905 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 ============================== V000923 Y10a(3). 1-digit occup summary MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric Y10a(3). IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? UNEMPLOYED: COLLAPSED CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Collapsed from Y10a(2). The stacked version of this question is at Y17(2), at end of R employment section. 1. Executive, Administrative and Managerial (Census categories 001-039) 2. Professional Specialty Occupations (Census categories 040-199) 3. Technicians and Related Support Occupations (Census categories 200-235) 4. Sales Occupation (Census categories 236-285) 5. Administrative Support, including clerical (Census categories 286-389) 6. Private Household (Census categories 403-407) 7. Protective Service (Census categories 408-427) 8. Service except Protective and Household (Census categories 428-469) 9. Farming, Forestry and Fishing Occupations (Census categories 470-499) 10. Precision Production, Craft and Repair Occupations (Census categories 500-699) 11. Machine Operators, Assemblers and Inspectors (Census categories 700-799) 12. Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (Census categories 800-859) 13. Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers (Census categories 860-890) 14. Member of Armed Forces (Census category 903-905) 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 0 1 2 4 5 7 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1749 9 7 10 7 2 8 9 10 11 12 13 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 9 3 2 5 2 2 ============================== V000924 Y10a(4). Prestige code (blanked) MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99.99 Numeric Y10a(4). IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R OCCUPATION: PRESTIGE SCORE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- The stacked version of this question is at Y17(3), at end of R employment section. Prestige scores are based on Occupational Prestige Ratings from the 1989 General Social Survey, by James A. Davis, Robert W. Hodge, Keiko Nakao, Tom W. Smith, and Judith Treas (ICPSR 9593), Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor MI 48106, December 1991. Prestige Score data have been coded 0 missing to preserve respondents' anonymity. Contact ANES project staff for information about a procedure by which it is possible to gain access to this data. 99.99. 995,998,999 in Y10a(2) 00.00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 ============================== V000925 Y10b. R unemp: past industry code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y10b. IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of business or industry was that? R OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The stacked version of this question is at Y17(4), at end of R employment section. See 1980 CENSUS INDUSTRY Master Code. Codes 10-932 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 ============================== V000926 Y10c. R unemp: past self employed MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y10c. IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SOMEONE ELSE 3. BOTH SELF AND SOMEONE ELSE 5. SELF-EMPLOYED --> Y10e 8. DK --> Y10e 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in Y9 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1749 48 4 6 ============================== V000927 Y10d. R unemp: past employed by govt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y10d. IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: IF WAS NOT SELF-EMPLOYED ONLY: Were you employed by a federal, state or local government? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y10c 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1755 5 47 ============================== V000928 Y10e. R unemp: work last 6 months MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y10e. IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: Have you had a job in the last six months? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y10g 8. DK --> Y10g 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in Y9 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1749 28 30 ============================== V000929 Y10f. R unemp: hrs/wk 6 months MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 996 Numeric Y10f. IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: IF HAS HAD A JOB IN THE LAST 6 MOS: About how many hours did you work on your job in the average week? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-168 996. INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y10e 998. DK 999. RF 000. NA ============================== V000930 Y10g. R unemp: looking for work now MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y10g. IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: Are you looking for work at the present time? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y25 8. DK --> Y25 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1748 36 23 ============================== V000931 Y10h. R unemp: worry about find job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y10h. IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY: IF LOOKING FOR WORK AT PRESENT: How worried are you about not being able to find a job in the near future; a lot, somewhat, or not much at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> Y25 3. SOMEWHAT --> Y25 5. NOT MUCH AT ALL --> Y25 8. DK --> Y25 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y10g 0 1 3 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1771 8 11 17 ============================== V000932 Y11(1). Retired: month of retirement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 96 Numeric Y11(1). IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): When did you retire? MONTH --------------------------------------------------------------------- MONTH: 01. JANUARY 02. FEBRUARY 03. MARCH 04. APRIL 05. MAY 06. JUNE 07. JULY 08. AUGUST 09. SEPTEMBER 10. OCTOBER 11. NOVEMBER 12. DECEMBER 96. INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) 98. DK 99. RF 00. NA 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 53 15 22 47 16 6 7 8 9 10 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 42 27 25 19 17 11 12 96 98 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 6 30 1471 17 ============================== V000933 Y11(2). Retired: year of retirement MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 9996 Numeric Y11(2). IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): When did you retire? YEAR --------------------------------------------------------------------- 9996. INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) 9998. DK 9999. RF 0000. NA ============================== V000934 Y12a(1). 2-digit occup retired MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric Y12a(1). IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R RETIRED: 2 DIGIT OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the OCCUPATION master code. The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1), at end of R employment section. The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect respondents' anonymity. 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) ============================== V000934a Y12a(2). 3-digit occup (blanked) retired MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y12a(2). IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R RETIRED: 3 DIGIT CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the OCCUPATION master code. The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1a), at end of R employment section. The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect respondents' anonymity. Contact ANES Project Staff for information about a procedure by which it is possible to gain access to the full 3-digit code values. Codes 1-905 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) ============================== V000935 Y12a(3). 1-digit occup summary retired MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 95 Numeric Y12a(3). IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R RETIRED: COLLAPSED CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- Collapsed from Y10a(2). The stacked version of this question is at Y17(2), at end of R employment section. 1. Executive, Administrative and Managerial (Census categories 001-039) 2. Professional Specialty Occupations (Census categories 040-199) 3. Technicians and Related Support Occupations (Census categories 200-235) 4. Sales Occupation (Census categories 236-285) 5. Administrative Support, including clerical (Census categories 286-389) 6. Private Household (Census categories 403-407) 7. Protective Service (Census categories 408-427) 8. Service except Protective and Household (Census categories 428-469) 9. Farming, Forestry and Fishing Occupations (Census categories 470-499) 10. Precision Production, Craft and Repair Occupations (Census categories 500-699) 11. Machine Operators, Assemblers and Inspectors (Census categories 700-799) 12. Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (Census categories 800-859) 13. Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers (Census categories 860-890) 14. Member of Armed Forces (Census category 903-905) 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 0 1 2 3 4 5 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1471 59 58 9 27 54 6 7 8 9 10 11 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 3 8 34 4 31 24 12 13 14 95 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 14 5 2 4 ============================== V000936 Y12a(4). Prestige code (blanked) retired MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 99.99 Numeric Y12a(4). IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R OCCUPATION: PRESTIGE SCORE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- The stacked version of this question is at Y17(3), at end of R employment section. Prestige scores are based on Occupational Prestige Ratings from the 1989 General Social Survey, by James A. Davis, Robert W. Hodge, Keiko Nakao, Tom W. Smith, and Judith Treas (ICPSR 9593), Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor MI 48106, December 1991. Prestige Score data have been coded 0 missing to preserve respondents' anonymity. Contact ANES project staff for information about a procedure by which it is possible to gain access to this data. 99.99. 995,998,999 in Y12a(2) 00.00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9 ============================== V000937 Y12b. R ret: industry code MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y12b. IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): What kind of business or industry was that? R OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY --------------------------------------------------------------------- The stacked version of this question is at Y17(4), at end of R employment section. See 1980 CENSUS INDUSTRY Master Code. Codes 10-932 and: 995. NA 998. DK 999. RF 000. INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) ============================== V000938 Y12c. R ret: self employed MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y12c. IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. SOMEONE ELSE 3. BOTH SELF AND SOMEONE ELSE 5. SELF-EMPLOYED --> Y12e 8. DK --> Y12e 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) 0 1 3 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1471 281 9 45 1 ============================== V000939 Y12d. R ret: employed by govt MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y12d. IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): IF WAS NOT SELF-EMPLOYED ONLY: Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or what? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y12c 0 1 5 8 ----- ----- ----- ----- Count 1517 87 202 1 ============================== V000940 Y12e. R ret: work last 6 months MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y12e. IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): Have you had a job in the last six months? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y12g 8. DK --> Y12g 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1471 46 290 ============================== V000941 Y12f. R ret: hours/wk work 6 months MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 996 Numeric Y12f. IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): IF HAS HAD A JOB IN LAST 6 MOS: About how many hours did you work on your job in the average week? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-168 996. INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y12e 998. DK 999. RF 000. NA ============================== V000942 Y12g. R ret: working for pay MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y12g. IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): Are you doing any work for pay at the present time? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES --> SKIP TO Y7 (below) 5. NO 8. DK 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1) 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1471 36 300 ============================== V000943 Y12h. R ret: looking for work now MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y12h. IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: Are you looking for work at the present time? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y25 8. DK --> Y25 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1,8,9,0 in Y12g 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1507 8 292 ============================== V000944 Y12j. R ret: worry about finding job MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y12j. IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1): IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT: IF R IS LOOKING FOR WORK: How worried are you about not being able to find a job in the near future -- a lot, somewhat, or not much at all? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT --> Y25 3. SOMEWHAT --> Y25 5. NOT MUCH AT ALL --> Y25 8. DK --> Y25 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in Y12h 0 5 ----- ----- Count 1799 8 ============================== V000945 Y13. R disabled: ever worked for pay MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 8 Numeric Y13. IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: Have you ever done any work for pay? --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 5. NO --> Y14h 8. DK --> Y14h 9. RF 0. NA; INAP, 1-4,6,7,0 in Y6(1) 0 1 5 ----- ----- ----- Count 1733 68 6 ============================== V000946 Y14a(1). 2-digit occup disabled MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y14a(1). IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R DISABLED: 2 DIGIT OCCUPATION CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the OCCUPATION master code. The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1), at end of R employment section. The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect respondents' anonymity. 95. NA 98. DK 99. RF 00. INAP, 1-4,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y13 ============================== V000946a Y14a(2). 3-digit occup (blanked) disable MD1: EQ 0, MD2: GE 995 Numeric Y14a(2). IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED: IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY: What kind of work did you do on your last regular job (What was your occupation?) What were your most important duties or activities? R DISABLED: 3 DIGIT CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE (BLANKED) --------------------------------------------------------------------- See the OCCUPATION master code. The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1a), at end of R employment section. The original 3-digit 1980 C