ANES

2012 DIRECT DEMOCRACY STUDY

 
DATA
Return to Data Center
QUESTIONNAIRES
Pre-election pdf
Post-election pdf
DOCUMENTATION
Preliminary Documentationpdf
  ABOUT THE DATASET:
arrowType of study: two-wave panel study
arrowSample universe: U.S. voting-age citizens (18 or older)
arrowSample composition: internet panel cases
arrowNumber of waves: 2 (one pre-election, one post-election)
arrowModes used: internet
arrowNumber of completions: 5,421
arrowWeights: weight_pre and weight_post
arrowAdditional files: none
arrowAssociated studies or derivative files: ANES 2012 Time Series Study

STUDY DESIGN & CONTENT HIGHLIGHTS:
The ANES 2012 Direct Democracy Study collected public opinion data concerning ballot measures in 13 states: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, South Dakota, and Washington.

Data were collected concurrently with the ANES 2012 Time Series study by asking Direct Democracy questions to Time Series respondents during (at the end of) the Time Series pre- and post-election interviews and by administering a separate Direct Democracy questionnaire to a supplemental sample of respondents. These supplemental respondents completed a subset of the Time Series questions. All respondents answered questions about ballot measures in their state, including voting on ballot measures, ease of understanding them, groups ballot measures would affect, groups campaigning for or against ballot measures, and evaluation of the use of ballot measures.

The estimated overall response rate (AAPOR RR3) is expected to be 1 or 2 percent.

WEIGHTS SUMMARY:
Use the variables weight_pre and weight_post.

PRE-PROCESSING PRELIMINARY RELEASE:
The current dataset, released December 2013, is a rough draft and contains errors. Variables have inconsistent missing data codes, such as improper or unlabeled distinctions among the categories for item nonresponse due to item refusal, technical error, an appropriate skip pattern, or an undifferentiated missing data category. ANES staff will work to correct all errors and to make the data easier to use. Please tell ANES staff about any problems with the data by sending email to anes@electionstudies.org. Any future re-release of the dataset will contain error corrections or other changes to improve accuracy and usability.

MERGING THE DATA WITH THE ANES 2012 TIME SERIES STUDY:
Many of the respondents who completed the Direct Democracy surveys also completed the ANES 2012 Time Series Survey. The case identification variables on the two files do not correspond to the same individuals. Details on how to merge the Direct Democracy data with the 2012 Time Series data will be made available in January, 2014.