Version 01 Codebook
-------------------
CODEBOOK INTRODUCTION FILE
1952 PRE-POST STUDY
(1952.T)










                    AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES

                       1952 PRE-POST ELECTION STUDY





                         PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS


                              ANGUS CAMPBELL
                               GERALD GURIN
                              WARREN MILLER







              SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN (S400)




               PRE-ELECTION STUDY:  SEPTEMBER 15 - NOVEMBER 2, 1952
              POST-ELECTION STUDY:  NOVEMBER - DECEMBER, 1952












                        ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER 7213





                        ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ASSISTANCE


          ALL MANUSCRIPTS UTILIZING DATA MADE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE
       CONSORTIUM SHOULD ACKNOWLEDGE THAT FACT AS WELL AS IDENTIFY
       THE ORIGINAL COLLECTOR OF THE DATA.  THE ICPSR COUNCIL URGES
       ALL USERS OF ICPSR DATA FACILITIES TO FOLLOW SOME ADAPTATION
       OF THIS STATEMENT WITH THE PARENTHESES INDICATING ITEMS TO
       BE FILLED IN APPROPRIATELY OR DELETED BY THE INDIVIDUAL USER.

             THE DATA (AND TABULATIONS) UTILIZED IN THIS
             (PUBLICATION) WERE MADE AVAILABLE (IN PART) BY
             THE INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL
             RESEARCH.  THE DATA WERE ORIGINALLY COLLECTED BY
             ANGUS CAMPBELL, GERALD GURIN, AND WARREN
             MILLER.  NEITHER THE ORIGINAL COLLECTORS
             OF THE DATA NOR THE CONSORTIUM BEAR ANY RESPON-
             SIBILITY FOR THE ANALYSES OR INTERPRETATIONS
             PRESENTED HERE.

          IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FUNDING AGENCIES WITH ESSENTIAL INFOR-
       MATION ABOUT THE USE OF ARCHIVAL RESOURCES, AND TO FACILITATE
       THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION ABOUT ICPSR PARTICIPANTS' RESEARCH
       ACTIVITIES, EACH USER OF THE ICPSR DATA FACILITIES IS EXPECTED
       TO SEND TWO COPIES OF EACH COMPLETED MANUSCRIPT TO THE
       CONSORTIUM.  PLEASE INDICATE IN THE COVER LETTER WHICH DATA
       WERE USED.
                             TABLE OF CONTENTS

           Note: >>sections in the codebook introduction and
           codebook appendix can be navigated in the
           machine-readable files by searching ">>".



INTRODUCTORY MATERIAL  (file int1952.cbk)
---------------------
>> 1952 STUDY DESCRIPTION
>> 1952 SAMPLING INFORMATION
>> 1952 PROCESSING INFORMATION
>> 1952 CODEBOOK INFORMATION
>> 1952 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST


CODEBOOK
--------
1952 variables


APPENDICES  (file app1952.cbk)
----------
>> 1952 PARTY MASTER CODE
>> 1952 CANDIDATE MASTER CODE
>> PSU AND POPULATION SIZE NOTE
>> ELIGIBLE VOTERS, 1952
>> PARTY DIFFERENCES CODE NOTE, 1952
>> PARTY-CANDIDATE CODE NOTE, 1952
>> REF. 32 NOTE, 1952
>> REF. 42/43 NOTE, 1952
>> VAR 520072 NOTE
>> VAR 520074 NOTE
>> VAR 520083 NOTE
>> VAR 520084 NOTE
>> VAR 520090 NOTE
>> HOW FRIENDS VOTE NOTE, 1952
>> EMPLOYMENT NOTE, 1952
>> REF. NO. 132 NOTE, 1952
>> REF. NO. 133 NOTE, 1952
>> FATHER OCCUPATION NOTE, 1952
>> UNITED STATES NOTE, 1952
>> REF. NO. 37-40 NOTE, 1952
>> R PLACE OF BIRTH NOTE, 1952
>> R MOTHER'S PLACE OF BIRTH NOTE, 1952
>> REF. NO. 166 NOTE, 1952
>> REF. NO. 165 NOTE, 1952
>> REF. NO. 130 NOTE, 1952
>> VAR 520182 NOTE
>> VAR 520183 NOTE
>> VARS 520182, 520183, 520191, 520193, 520195, 520197, 520199 NOTE
>> FRIENDS PARTY VOTE, 1952
>> REF. NO. 56 NOTE, 1952
>> CO-WORKERS VOTE NOTE, 1952
>> REF. NO. 106 NOTE, 1952
>> VARS 520196, 520198 NOTE
>> REF. NO. 173-176 NOTE, 1952
>> CAMPAIGN LITERATURE NOTE, 1952
>> VARS 520203-7 NOTE
>> REF. NO. 200-202 NOTE, 1952
>> REF. NO. 237 NOTE, 1952
>> REF. NO. 208 NOTE, 1952
>> REF. NO. 229 NOTE, 1952

>> 1952 STUDY DESCRIPTION


           THE 1952 NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY (SRC 400) IS THE SECOND
       IN A SERIES OF STUDIES OF NATIONAL ELECTIONS CONDUCTED BY
       THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER POLITICAL BEHAVIOR PROGRAM SINCE
       1948.  THIS STUDY WAS DIRECTED BY ANGUS CAMPBELL,
       GERALD GURIN AND WARREN MILLER, AND IS THE FIRST OF THE
       SRC MAJOR ELECTION STUDIES.  THE STUDY EMPHASIZES POLITICAL
       ATTITUDES IN GENERAL, AND ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOR PERTAINENT
       TO THE 1952 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.  THE INTERVIEW SCHEDULE
       CONTAINED BOTH CLOSED AND OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONS ASCERTAINING
       A WIDE RANGE OF INFORMATION.

           MOST RESPONDENTS WERE INTERVIEWED BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER
       THE DATE OF THE ELECTION.  THE PRE-ELECTION SURVEY TAPPED
       ATTITUDES TOWARD POLITICAL PARTIES, CANDIDATES, AND SPECIFIC
       ISSUES, AS WELL AS PERSONAL AND POLITICAL BACKGROUND.  THE
       POST-ELECTION INTERVIEW CONCENTRATED ON THE ACTUAL VOTE AND
       VOTING-RELATED BEHAVIOR.  ADDITIONALLY, A SUBSAMPLE OF 585
       RESPONDENTS WAS GIVEN A FORM B REINTERVIEW, OBTAINING FURTHER
       INFORMATION ABOUT ORGANIZATIONAL AFFILIATIONS, PERSONAL DATA
       AND NON-POLITICAL ATTITUDINAL QUESTIONS.  THIS INFORMATION
       IS CONTAINED IN REF.NO. 209-236.  THIS STUDY PARTICULARLY
       EMPHASIZED THE PERCEPTION OF GROUP BEHAVIOR, ESPECIALLY THE
       PERCEIVED POLITICAL PREFERENCES OF FAMILY, FRIENDS AND
       ASSOCIATES.

           RESULTS FROM THE 1952 STUDY WERE FIRST REPORTED IN
       CAMPBELL, ET AL., THE VOTER DECIDES, EVANSTON, ILLINOIS,
       ROW, PETERSON AND CO., 1954, AND LATER USED IN CAMPBELL,
       ET AL., THE AMERICAN VOTER, NEW YORK, JOHN WILEY & SONS,
       1960.






>> 1952 SAMPLING INFORMATION


           THE INDIVIDUALS INTERVIEWED WERE A REPRESENTATIVE CROSS-
       SECTION OF PERSONS OF VOTING AGE LIVING IN PRIVATE HOUSE-
       HOLDS IN THE CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES.  THE SAMPLE WAS
       DRAWN AS FOLLOWS:  THE 12 LARGEST METROPOLITAN AREAS OF THE
       UNITED STATES WERE DRAWN WITH CERTAINTY TO REPRESENT
       THEMSELVES.  THE REST OF THE COUNTRY WAS FORMED INTO 54
       STRATA, AND FROM EACH OF THESE ONE PRIMARY SAMPLING AREA WAS
       CHOSEN TO REPRESENT THE STRATUM.  THE 26 AREAS NOT
       REPRESENTING "OPEN COUNTRY" WERE FURTHER SUBSTRATIFIED
       ACCORDING TO RENTAL VALUE AND DWELLING UNITS PER BLOCK, AND
       PROBABILITY SELECTIONS OF BLOCKS WERE THEN MADE FROM THESE
       SUBSTRATA.  FROM EACH BLOCK AND EACH SUB-AREA CHOSEN AT
       RANDOM FROM THE "OPEN COUNTRY" AREAS, AN AVERAGE OF TWO
       DWELLING UNITS WAS SELECTED AT RANDOM.  WITHIN EACH SAMPLE
       DWELLING UNIT ONLY ONE RESPONDENT WAS INTERVIEWED, AS
       DESIGNATED BY AN OBJECTIVE PROCEDURE OF SELECTION WITH NO
       SUBSTITUTIONS ALLOWED.

           THE ACCOUNT OF THE EXACT PROCEDURE WHICH THEN FOLLOWED
       IS RATHER COMPLICATED.  FIRST, 1799 INTERVIEWS WERE TAKEN
       ON THE PRE-ELECTION STUDY.  IN THE POST-ELECTION WAVE 185
       RESPONDENTS COULD NOT BE RE-INTERVIEWED, BUT WERE KEPT IN
       THE STUDY.  (THESE PEOPLE WERE CODED 9 IN REF.NO.3.)  IN
       ADDITION, 100 RESPONDENTS WHO HAD BEEN PREVIOUSLY
       UNAVAILABLE WERE INTERVIEWED FOR THE FIRST TIME IN THE POST-
       ELECTION STUDY.  (THEY WERE CODED 3 OR 4 IN REF.NO.3.)  THUS
       THE TOTAL N FOR THE STUDY IS 1899, INCLUDING 185 WITH ONLY
       PRE-ELECTION DATA AND 100 WITH ONLY POST-ELECTION DATA.  THE
       585 RESPONDENTS IN THE FORM B SUBSAMPLE WERE CHOSEN AT RANDOM
       FROM THE ENTIRE SAMPLE.  (THEY WERE CODED 2 OR 4 IN
       REF.NO.3.)






>> 1952 PROCESSING INFORMATION


           THE STUDY WAS PROCESSED ACCORDING TO ICPSR STANDARD
       PROCESSING PROCEDURES. THE CODE CATEGORIES WERE RECODED TO
       ELIMINATE AMPS AND DASHES AND TO CONFORM TO ICPSR STANDARD-
       IZED CODES WHERE APPLICABLE.  THE DATA WERE CHECKED FOR
       INCONSISTENT AND ILLEGAL CODES AND, WHENEVER FOUND, THE
       LATTER MISTAKES WERE CORRECTED BY REFERRING TO THE
       ORIGINAL INTERVIEW SCHEDULES.

           IN USING THIS CODEBOOK SEVERAL FEATURES SHOULD BE NOTED.
       THE FIRST IS THAT THE HUNDREDS AND TENS DIGITS OF MOST TWO
       AND THREE DIGIT CODES CAN BE MEANINGFULLY USED ALONE.  (THE
       GAPS THAT APPEAR IN SOME OF THE TWO AND THREE DIGIT
       STANDARDIZED CODES REPRESENT VALUES NOT USED IN THIS STUDY.)
       ANOTHER IS THAT IN MANY CASES, BOTH IN THE BODY OF THE
       CODEBOOK AND IN THE FOOTNOTES, TEXT IS BRACKETED IN
       "<" AND ">" SIGNS.  ALL TEXT SO BRACKETED WAS NOT CONTAINED
       IN THE ORIGINAL CODEBOOK BUT WAS ADDED BY THE PROCESSOR,
       EITHER FOR EXPLANATORY PURPOSES OR IN ORDER TO MAKE VARIABLES
       INDEPENDENT OF ONE ANOTHER BY MAKING IT UNNECESSARY TO REFER
       TO ONE IN ORDER TO UNDERSTAND THE TEXT OF ANOTHER.  VARIABLE
       NAMES IN THE TABLE OF CONTENTS FOLLOWED BY AN ASTERISK HAVE
       SPECIAL ICPSR STANDARDIZED CODES.  THOSE PRECEDED BY AN X
       DESIGNATE A VARIABLE DEPENDENT ON SOME OTHER VARIABLE DUE
       TO THE STRUCTURE OF THE INTERVIEW SCHEDULE.








>> 1952 CODEBOOK INFORMATION

The following example from the 1948 NES study provides the standard 
format for codebook variable documentation. 

Note that NES studies which are not part of the Time-Series usually
omit marginals and the descriptive content in lines 2-5 (except for
variable name).


Line

1  ==============================                                              
2  VAR 480026    NAME-R NOT VT-WAS R REG TO VT                                 
3                COLUMNS 61   - 61                                             
4                NUMERIC                                                       
5                MD=0 OR GE 8                                                  
6                                                                              
7                  Q. 17.  (IF R DID NOT VOTE)  WERE YOU REGISTERED (ELIGIBLE)
8                  TO VOTE.                                                   
9                  ...........................................................
10                                                                            
11            82       1.  YES                                                
12           149       2.  NO                                                 
13                                                                             
14             0       8.  DK                                                 
15             9       9.  NA                                                 
16           422       0.  INAP., R VOTED                                     
                                                                            


Line 2 - VARIABLE NAME.  Note that in the codebook the variable name
         (usually a 'number') does not include the "V" prefix which is 
         used in the release SAS and SPSS data definition files
         (.sas and .sps files) for all variables including those
         which do not have 'number' names.  For example the variable
         "VERSION" in the codebook is "VVERSION" in the data definition
         files.

Line 2 - "NAME".  This is the variable label used in the SAS and SPSS
         data definition files (.sas and .sps files).  Some codebooks 
         exclude this.

Line 3 - COLUMNS.  Columns in the ASCII data file (.dat file).

Line 4 - CHARACTER OR NUMERIC.  If numeric and the variable is a decimal
         rather than integer variable, the numer of decimal places is 
         also indicated (e.g. "NUMERIC  DEC 4")

Line 5 - Values which are assigned to missing by default in the Study's
         SAS and and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files).

Line 7 - Actual question text for survey variables or a description of 
         non-survey variables (for example, congressional district).
         Survey items usually include the question number (for example
         "B1a.") from the Study questionnaire; beginning in 1996 
         non-survey items also have unique item numbers (for example
         "CSheet.1").

Line 9 - A dashed or dotted line usually separates question text from
         any other documentation which follows.

Line 10- When present, annotation provided by Study staff is presented
         below the question text/description and preceding code values.

Lines 11-16
         Code values are listed with descriptive labels.  Valid codes
         (those not having 'missing' status in line 5) are presented
         first, followed by the values described in line 5.  For
         continuous variables, one line may appear providing the range
         of possible values.  A blank line usually separates the 'valid'
         and 'missing' values.

Lines 11-16
         Marginals are usually provided for discrete variables.  The
         counts may be unweighted or weighted; check the Study codebook
         introductory text to determine weight usage.
>> 1952 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST


     VARIABLE    VARIABLE LABEL
     --------    --------------

      VERSION    NES VERSION NUMBER
      DSETNO     NES DATASET NUMBER
      520001     ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER
      520002     INTERVIEW NUMBER

                   STUDY PROCEDURE AND SAMPLING

      520003     FORM OF REINTERVIEW
      520004     NATURE OF (RE)INTERVIEW
      520005     REGION OF INTERVIEW
      520006     REGION, PRIMARY SAMPLING UNIT AND
                 POPULATION SIZE
      520007     POPULATION SIZE
      520008     NUMBER OF ADULTS IN HOUSEHOLD
      520009     RELATIONSHIP OF RESPONDENT TO HEAD OF
                 HOUSEHOLD
      520010     DATE INTERVIEW WAS TAKEN
      520011     NAME OF INTERVIEWER
      520012     CODERS

                   ELECTION PREDICTIONS BY R

      520013     WHO WILL BE ELECTED PRESIDENT
      520014     XWILL THE PRESIDENTIAL RACE BE CLOSE OR NOT
      520015     XWILL THE VOTE BE CLOSE IN YOUR STATE
      520016     XR'S PRESIDENTIAL PREDICTION IN STATE

                   THE PARTIES AND THE CANDIDATES

      520017     IS THERE ANY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE PARTIES
      520018     WHAT IS GOOD ABOUT THE DEMOCRATS *
      520019     WHAT IS BAD ABOUT THE DEMOCRATS *
      520020     WHAT IS GOOD ABOUT THE REPUBLICANS *
      520021     WHAT IS BAD ABOUT THE REPUBLICANS *
      520022     DOES IT MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE WHICH PARTY
                 WINS THE ELECTION
      520023     XCONTENT OF THE DIFFERENCE IN WHO WINS THE
                 ELECTION
      520024     XWHY IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE WHO WINS THE
                 ELECTION
      520025     WHAT IS THE FINANCIAL EFFECT OF THE ELECTION
      520026     XFRAME OF REFERENCE FOR THE FINANCIAL EFFECT
      520027     WHY VOTE FOR STEVENSON *
      520028     WHY NOT VOTE FOR STEVENSON *
      520029     WHY VOTE FOR EISENHOWER *
      520030     WHY NOT VOTE FOR EISENHOWER *
      520031     WHICH CANDIDATE WOULD MAKE THE
                 BEST PRESIDENT
      520032     IS EISENHOWER A REAL REPUBLICAN
      520033     XWHY EISENHOWER IS OR IS NOT A REAL
                 REPUBLICAN
      520034     DOES R HAVE ANY OPINIONS ABOUT EITHER VICE-
                 PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE
      520035     XRESPONDENT'S REACTION TO SPARKMAN
      520036     XRESPONDENT'S REACTION TO NIXON
      520037     XOPINION ON VICE-PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE --
                 PRO-SPARKMAN *
      520038     XOPINION ON VICE-PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE --
                 ANTI-SPARKMAN *
      520039     XOPINION ON VICE-PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE --
                 PRO-NIXON *
      520040     XOPINION ON VICE-PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE --
                 ANTI-NIXON *

                   POLITICAL INVOLVEMENT

      520041     DOES R CARE MUCH WHICH PARTY WINS
      520042     XCARE WHO WINS STATE ELECTION
      520043     XCARE WHO WINS LOCAL ELECTION
      520044     INTEREST IN POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS

                   DOMESTIC ISSUES AND FOREIGN POLICY

      520045     INVOLVEMENT OF GOVERNMENT IN SOCIAL WELFARE
      520046     PARTY DIFFERENCES ON SOCIAL WELFARE
      520047     GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT IN NEGRO EMPLOYMENT
      520048     XOTHER SOLUTIONS -- JOBS FOR NEGROES
      520049     HEARD ABOUT THE TAFT-HARTLEY LAW
      520050     XHOW DOES R FEEL ABOUT THE TAFT-HARTLEY LAW
      520051     IS THE UNITED STATES TOO INVOLVED WITH WORLD
                 PROBLEMS
      520052     PARTY DIFFERENCES ON WORLD PROBLEMS
      520053     IS THE GOVERNMENT GUILTY BECAUSE CHINA
                 WENT COMMUNIST
      520054     IS THE UNITED STATES RIGHT TO FIGHT IN KOREA
      520055     WHAT SHOULD BE OUR POLICIES NOW IN KOREA

                 SPECIAL QUESTIONS ABOUT EISENHOWER

      520056     ARE EISENHOWER'S IDEAS THE SAME AS
                 REPUBLICANS'
      520057     XREASONS EISENHOWER IS OR IS NOT A REAL
                 REPUBLICAN

                   PARTY IDENTIFICATION

      520058     ARE YOU A DEMOCRAT, REPUBLICAN OR WHAT
      520059     XSTRONG OR WEAK DEMOCRAT OR REPUBLICAN
      520060     XHAS RESPONDENT'S POLITICAL ALLEGIANCE CHANGED
      520061     XWHEN DID RESPONDENT'S POLITICAL ALLEGIANCE
                 CHANGE *
      520062     XSOCIAL REASON FOR POLITICAL ALLEGIANCE
                 CHANGE
      520063     XSUPPOSE YOU DISAGREE WITH THE PARTY
                 NOMINATION...
      520064     XIF R IS AN INDEPENDENT, IS HE CLOSER TO THE
                 DEMOCRATIC OR THE REPUBLICAN PARTY
      520065     XIF R IS AN INDEPENDENT, WAS HE EVER A
                 DEMOCRAT OR A REPUBLICAN
      520066     XWHEN R BECAME AN INDEPENDENT *
      520067     XSOCIAL REASON FOR R BECOMING AN INDEPENDENT
      520068     FATHER'S POLITICAL PARTY WHEN R WAS YOUNG
      520069     MOTHER'S POLITICAL PARTY WHEN R WAS YOUNG
      520070     PARENTS' POLITICAL PARTY WHEN R WAS YOUNG
                   VOTING BEHAVIOR

      520071     DOES R ALWAYS VOTE IN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS
      520072     XDOES R ALWAYS VOTE FOR THE SAME PARTY
      520073     XDOES R REMEMBER THE FIRST PRESIDENT HE
                 VOTED FOR
      520074     XWHO WAS THE FIRST PRESIDENT R VOTED FOR
      520075     XYEAR RESPONDENT FIRST VOTED FOR PRESIDENT
      520076     XHOW DID R VOTE IN THE 1948 PRESIDENTIAL
                 ELECTION
      520077     IS RESPONDENT REGISTERED FOR NOVEMBER
                 ELECTION
      520078     DOES RESPONDENT MEET LEGAL RESIDENCE
                 REQUIREMENT
      520079     ARE YOU GOING TO VOTE IN NOVEMBER
      520080     XHOW DOES R PLAN TO VOTE IN THIS
                 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
      520081     XLIKELIHOOD OF R'S VOTING DEMOCRATIC OR
                 REPUBLICAN
      520082     XWHY WILL R VOTE FOR HIS CHOSEN PRESIDENTIAL
                 CANDIDATE *
      520083     XHOW WILL R VOTE FOR UNITED STATES SENATOR
      520084     XHOW WILL R VOTE FOR CONGRESSMAN
      520085     XHOW WILL R VOTE FOR GOVERNOR
      520086     XIF R WERE TO VOTE FOR PRESIDENT, HOW
                 WOULD HE VOTE
      520087     XWHY WOULD R VOTE FOR HIS CHOSEN
                 PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE *
      520088     R'S OPINION ON STRAIGHT TICKET VOTING
      520089     XWHY R APPROVES OR DISAPPROVES OF STRAIGHT
                 TICKET VOTING

                   PARTY CONVENTION

      520090     R PREFERRED SOME OTHER CANDIDATE AT THE
                 CONVENTION
      520091     XWHY PREFER SOME OTHER NOMINATION (DEM) *
      520092     XWHY PREFER SOME OTHER NOMINATION (REP) *
      520093     IS THE TRADITIONAL PARTY CONVENTION GOOD
                 OR BAD
      520094     XREASON FOR APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE
                 TRADITIONAL PARTY CONVENTION
      520095     XSUGGESTED REFORMS FOR CONVENTIONS

                   COGNITIONS ABOUT VOTING BEHAVIOR OF VARIOUS
                   GROUPS

      520096     PERCEIVED FARMER VOTE
      520097     PERCEIVED WORKING CLASS VOTE
      520098     PERCEIVED NEGRO VOTE
      520099     PERCEIVED MIDDLE CLASS VOTE
      520100     PERCEIVED BIG BUSINESS VOTE
      520101     PERCEIVED LABOR UNION VOTE
      520102     PERCEIVED PROTESTANT VOTE
      520103     PERCEIVED CATHOLIC VOTE
      520104     PERCEIVED JEWISH VOTE
      520105     XREASONS FOR FARMER VOTE
      520106     XREASONS FOR WORKING CLASS VOTE
      520107     XREASONS FOR NEGRO VOTE
      520108     XREASONS FOR MIDDLE CLASS VOTE
      520109     XREASONS FOR BIG BUSINESS VOTE
      520110     XREASONS FOR LABOR UNION VOTE
      520111     XREASONS FOR PROTESTANT VOTE
      520112     XREASONS FOR CATHOLIC VOTE
      520113     XREASONS FOR JEWISH VOTE

      520114     IF R IS MARRIED, MATE'S VOTE
      520115     VOTE OF FIVE BEST FRIENDS

                   POLITICAL EFFICACY AND CITIZEN DUTY

      520116     ORDER OF EFFICACY QUESTIONS
      520117     SHOULD ONE VOTE IF HIS PARTY CAN'T WIN
      520118     THE PEOPLE'S OPINION IS UNIMPORTANT TO THE
                 GOVERNMENT
      520119     PEOPLE'S VOTE IS THE MAIN DETERMINATOR OF
                 POLICY
      520120     VOTING IS THE ONLY WAY TO INFLUENCE THE
                 GOVERNMENT
      520121     LOCAL ELECTIONS ARE UNIMPORTANT
      520122     ONE VOTE IS UNIMPORTANT IN THE TOTAL VOTE
      520123     PEOPLE HAVE NO SAY IN GOVERNMENT
      520124     IF ONE DOES NOT CARE, ONE NEED NOT VOTE IN
                 ELECTIONS
      520125     POLITICS TOO COMPLICATED TO UNDERSTAND
      520126     WHAT SOCIAL CLASS ARE YOU
      520127     IS THERE MUCH OPPORTUNITY IN TODAY'S SOCIETY
      520128     SEX OF RESOPNDENT
      520129     RACE OF RESPONDENT
      520130     WHAT YEAR WERE YOU BORN
      520131     EDUCATION
      520132     WHAT IS YOUR OCCUPATION
      520133     XIS R SELF-EMPLOYED OR NOT
      520134     XOCCUPATION IF R IS UNEMPLOYED OR RETIRED
      520135     WHAT WORK DOES HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD DO
      520136     XIS HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD SELF-EMPLOYED
      520137     XHEAD OF HOUSEHOLD'S OCCUPATION IF
                 UNEMPLOYED OR RETIRED
      520138     CATEGORIZED AGE OF HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD
      520139     IS R OR HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD A UNION MEMBER
      520140     WHO WAS HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD WHEN RESPONDENT
                 WAS YOUNG
      520141     XOCCUAPTION OF HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD WHEN
                 RESPONDENT WAS YOUNG
      520142     ACTUAL AGE OF R
      520143     WHERE WERE YOU BORN *
      520144     XWHERE DID YOU GROW UP *
      520145     WHERE WAS R RAISED (FARM OR CITY)
      520146     WERE PARENTS BORN IN UNITED STATES
      520147     XFATHER'S FATHER'S COUNTRY *
      520148     XFATHER'S MOTHER'S COUNTRY *
      520149     XMOTHER'S FATHER'S COUNTRY *
      520150     XMOTHER'S MOTHER'S COUNTRY *
      520151     XFATHER'S NATIVE COUNTRY *
      520152     XMOTHER'S NATIVE COUNTRY *
      520153     HOW LONG HAS R LIVED IN THE UNITED STATES
      520154     HOW LONG HAS R LIVED IN HIS PRESENT STATE
      520155     DOES R PLAN TO STAY HERE IN ----
      520156     DO YOU OWN, RENT OR WHAT
      520157     HAVE YOU ANY CHILDREN IN LOCAL SCHOOL
      520158     RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE
      520159     HOW OFTEN DOES R ATTEND CHURCH
      520160     TOTAL FAMILY INCOME
      520161     INTERVIEWER'S RATING OF SAMPLE ADDRESS ON
                 SOCIAL CLASS
      520162     ARE R, HIS PARENTS, HIS GRANDPARENTS NATIVE
                 OR FOREIGN BORN
      520163     XR'S OR PATERNAL ANCESTORS' NATIVITY
      520164     XR'S MATERNAL ANCESTORS' NATIVITY
      520165     XPLACE OF BIRTH OF GRANDFATHER *
      520166     XPLACE OF BIRTH OF GRANDMOTHER *
      520167     CATEGORIZED AGE OF RESPONDENT

                               POST-ELECTION

                   STUDY PROCEDURE

      520168     REGION OF POST-ELECTION INTERVIEW
      520169     DATE POST-ELECTION INTERVIEW WAS TAKEN
      520170     POST-ELECTION INTERVIEWER'S NAME

                   EISENHOWER'S ELECTION

      520171     DOES IT MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE THAT EISENHOWER
                 WON
      520172     XREASONS FOR DIFFERENCE BECAUSE EISENHOWER
                 WON *

                   MASS MEDIA USEAGE

      520173     DID R READ ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN IN THE PAPER
      520174     DID R HEAR ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN ON THE RADIO
      520175     DID R SEE MUCH OF THE CAMPAIGN ON TELEVISION
      520176     DID R READ ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN IN MAGAZINES
      520177     WHICH MEDIA WERE MOST INFORMATIVE

                   VOTING BEHAVIOR

      520178     1952 PRESIDENTIAL VOTE OR NONVOTER PREFERENCE
      520179     R'S 1948 PRESIDENTIAL VOTE
      520180     XWHY DIDN'T YOU VOTE
      520181     XWERE YOU REGISTERED TO VOTE
      520182     XWHY DID R VOTE FOR EISENHOWER OR STEVENSON *
      520183     XWHEN DID R DECIDE ON HIS VOTING PREFERENCE
      520184     XDID R CONSIDER VOTING FOR THE OPPOSITION
      520185     XWHY DIDN'T HE VOTE FOR THE OPPOSITE
                 CANDIDATE *
      520186     XHOW DID R VOTE FOR SENATOR
      520187     XHOW DID R VOTE FOR CONGRESSMAN
      520188     XHOW DID R VOTE FOR GOVERNOR
      520189     XDID R VOTE A STRAIGHT PARTY TICKET

                   INFLUENCE OF FACE TO FACE CONTACTS

      520190     DID ANY PARTY PERSON TALK TO YOU
      520191     XDID THE CONVERSATION INFLUENCE YOU
      520192     HOW DID R'S FRIENDS VOTE
      520193     XDID FRIENDS' OPINIONS INFLUENCE YOU
      520194     XHOW DID R'S COWORKERS VOTE
      520195     XDID COWORKERS' OPINIONS INFLUENCE YOU
      520196     XHOW DID R'S MATE VOTE
      520197     XDID MATE'S OPINION INFLUENCE YOU
      520198     XHOW DID YOUR FAMILY VOTE
      520199     XDID YOUR FAMILY'S OPINIONS INFLUENCE YOU

                   INFLUENCE OF CAMPAIGN

      520200     XWAS VOTE INFLUENCED BY THE CAMPAIGN
      520201     XPARTY DIRECTION OF THE CAMPAIGN INFLUENCE
      520202     XCAMPAIGN EVENTS MENTIONED BY R

                   POLITICAL ACTIVITY

      520203     DID R TRY TO INFLUENCE ANOTHER'S POLITICAL
                 OPINION
      520204     DID R GIVE MONEY TO A PARTY OR CANDIDATE
      520205     DID R EVER GO TO A POLITICAL MEETING
      520206     DID R WORK FOR A PARTY OR A CANDIDATE
      520207     DOES R BELONG TO A POLITICAL CLUB OR
                 ORGANIZATION


       QUESTIONS ASKED ONLY OF FORM B RESPONDENTS

                   MEMBERSHIP IN ORGANIZATIONS

      520208     NUMBER OF FORMAL ORGANIZATIONS RESPONDENT IS
                 A MEMBER OF
      520209     NUMBER OF INFORMAL ORGANIZATIONS RESPONDENT
                 IS A MEMBER OF
      520210     TOTAL ORGANIZATIONS RESPONDENT IS A MEMBER OF
      520211     NUMBER OF FORMAL ORGANIZATIONS RESPONDENT IS
                 ACTIVE IN
      520212     NUMBER INFORMAL ORGANIZATIONS RESPONDENT IS
                 ACTIVE IN
      520213     TOTAL ORGANIZATIONS RESPONDENT IS ACTIVE IN
      520214     ECONOMIC OR PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
      520215     RELIGIOUS, CHARITABLE OR WELFARE
                 ORGANIZATIONS
      520216     FORMAL SOCIAL AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATIONS
      520217     MISCELLANEOUS FORMAL ORGANIZATIONS
      520218     INFORMAL ORGANIZATIONS -- SPORTS

                   AUTHORITARIANISM

      520219     WAR AND CONFLICT ARE ALWAYS PRESENT
      520220     KIDS NEED STRICT DISCIPLINE
      520221     LEADERS ARE BETTER THAN LAWS
      520222     FAILURES LACK WILL POWER
      520223     IT IS BAD THAT WOMEN ARE IN POLITICS
      520224     ONE SHOULD NOT FORGET AN INSULT
      520225     PEOPLE CAN BE TRUSTED
      520226     TODAY THERE IS MUCH TALK AND LITTLE WORK
      520227     SEX CRIMINALS NEED WHIPPING
      520228     WOMEN SHOULD HAVE LESS FREEDOM THAN MEN

                   PERSONAL DATA (EXTENDED)

      520229     RESPONDENT'S OCCUPATION IN 1948
      520230     XWAS R SELF EMPLOYED IN 1948
      520231     OCCUPATION OF HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD IN 1948
      520232     XWAS HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD SELF EMPLOYED IN 1948
      520233     NATURE OF R'S SECONDARY SCHOOL
      520234     WERE YOU OR HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD EVER IN THE
                 MILITARY
      520235     XRESPONDENT'S YEARS OF MILITARY SERVICE
      520236     XHEAD OF HOUSEHOLD'S YEARS OF MILITARY SERVICE
      520237     PARTY IDENTIFICATION AND STRENGTH INDEX
                 (FOR ALL RESPONDENTS)
