Version 01 Codebook
-------------------
CODEBOOK INTRODUCTION FILE
1960 PRE-POST STUDY
(1960.T)









                   AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES

                      1960 PRE-POST ELECTION STUDY




                         PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS


                        THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER (440)


                             ANGUS CAMPBELL
                             PHILIP CONVERSE
                             WARREN MILLER
                             DONALD STOKES

                        THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN




                        SEPTEMBER - DECEMBER 1960

















                        ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER 7214

                        ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ASSISTANCE


          ALL MANUSCRIPTS UTILIZING DATA MADE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE

       CONSORTIUM SHOULD ACKNOWLEDGE THAT FACT AS WELL AS IDENTIFY

       THE ORIGINAL COLLECTOR OF THE DATA.  THE ICPSR COUNCIL URGES

       ALL USERS OF THE ICPSR DATA FACILITIES TO FOLLOW SOME ADAPTA-

       TION OF THIS STATEMENT WITH THE PARENTHESES INDICATING ITEMS

       TO BE FILLED IN APPROPRIATELY OR DELETED BY THE INDIVIDUAL

       USER.


             THE DATA (AND TABULATIONS) UTILIZED IN THIS
             (PUBLICATION) WERE MADE AVAILABLE (IN PART) BY
             THE INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL
             RESEARCH.  THE DATA FOR THE SURVEY RESEARCH
             CENTER 1960 AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY
             WERE ORIGINALLY COLLECTED BY ANGUS CAMPBELL,
             PHILIP CONVERSE, WARREN MILLER, AND DONALD
             STOKES.  NEITHER THE ORIGINAL COLLECTORS OF
             THE DATA NOR THE CONSORTIUM BEAR ANY RESPON-
             SIBILITY FOR THE ANALYSES OR INTERPRETATIONS
             PRESENTED HERE.


          IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FUNDING AGENCIES WITH ESSENTIAL

       INFORMATION ABOUT THE USE OF ARCHIVAL RESOURCES, AND TO

       FACILITATE THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION ABOUT ICPSR PARTICI-

       PANTS' RESEARCH ACTIVITIES, EACH USER OF THE ICPSR FACILITIES

       IS EXPECTED TO SEND TWO COPIES OF EACH COMPLETED MANUSCRIPT

       OR THESIS ABSTRACT TO THE CONSORTIUM.  PLEASE INDICATE IN

       THE COVER LETTER WHICH DATA WERE USED.









                      CONTENTS


           Note: >>sections in the codebook introduction and
           codebook appendix can be navigated in the
           machine-readable files by searching ">>".


INTRODUCTORY MATERIAL  (file int1960.cbk)
---------------------
>> 1960 STUDY DESCRIPTION
>> 1960 SAMPLING INFORMATION
>> 1960 FILE STRUCTURE
>> 1960 CODEBOOK INFORMATION
>> 1960 PROCESSING INFORMATION
>> 1960 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST


CODEBOOK
--------
1960 variables


APPENDICES  (file app1960.cbk)
----------
>> 1960 PARTY MASTER CODE
>> 1960 CANDIDATE MASTER CODE
>> 1960 PSU  CODE
>> 1960 PSU PLACE CODE
>> 1960 STATE AND COUNTY CODE - POPULATION SIZE
>> 1960 STATE AND COUNTY CODE - TYPE OF PLACE
>> 1960 COUNTY  CODE
>> 1960 INTERVIEWER
>> 1960 STATE AND COUNTRY CODE
>> 1960 MAJOR PROBLEMS CODE
>> REF.NO.128 NOTE, 1960
>> 1960 OCCUPATION CODE
>> 1960 INDUSTRY  CODE
>> FARMING NOTE, 1960
>> 1960 UNION  CODE
>> 1960 NEWSPAPER CODE
>> 1960 EFFECT OF TELEVISION DEBATES
>> 1960 PARTY DIFFERENCES
>> 1960 RELIGION  CODE
>> REF. NOS. 107, 108, 111 AND 114 NOTE, 1960
>> REF. NOS. 19 AND 98 NOTE, 1960









>> 1960 STUDY DESCRIPTION

           THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER 1960 AMERICAN NATIONAL ELEC-
       TION STUDY WAS DIRECTED BY ANGUS CAMPBELL, PHILIP CONVERSE,
       WARREN MILLER, AND DONALD STOKES.  CONDUCTED IN SEPTEMBER
       THROUGH DECEMBER OF 1960, THE STUDY WAS DESIGNED TO PROVIDE
       INFORMATION ABOUT THE POLITICAL ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOR OF A
       REPRESENTATIVE CROSS-SECTION OF UNITED STATES VOTERS.  THE
       STUDY IS THE LAST WAVE OF A PANEL STUDY OF WHICH THE FIRST
       TWO COMPONENTS ARE THE 1956 AND 1958 AMERICAN NATIONAL ELEC-
       TION STUDIES.

           THE 1960 AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY IS ITSELF A
       PANEL STUDY IN WHICH RESPONDENTS WERE INTERVIEWED BOTH BE-
       FORE AND AFTER THE 1960 ELECTION.  IN THE PRE-ELECTION
       INTERVIEW THE INVESTIGATORS WERE CONCERNED WITH OBTAINING
       INFORMATION ABOUT THE LONG-TERM INFLUENCES UPON ELECTORAL
       CHOICE AND ABOUT THE ELECTION-SPECIFIC SHORT-TERM FORCES
       THAT WERE IN OPERATION IN 1960.  IN THE POST-ELECTION
       INTERVIEW THE EMPHASIS WAS PLACED UPON ASCERTAINING
       BEHAVIOR WITH RESPECT TO THE ELECTION AND THE REASONS FOR
       THAT BEHAVIOR.

           THE LONG-TERM INFLUENCES ON THE RESPONDENT'S ELECTORAL
       BEHAVIOR WHICH WERE EXPLORED IN THE PRE-ELECTION INTERVIEW
       INCLUDED A NUMBER OF FACTORS IMPORTANT IN POLITICAL
       SOCIALIZATION, SUCH AS THE RESPONDENT'S EDUCATION,
       OCCUPATION,
       FINANCIAL SITUATION, LIFE CYCLE STATUS, GEOGRAPHIC AND SOCIAL
       MOBILITY, AND MILITARY SERVICE.  THE DIRECTION AND INTENSITY
       OF THE RESPONDENT'S PARTY IDENTIFICATION AND THE REASONS
       FOR ANY PAST CHANGES IN THIS IDENTIFICATION WERE ALSO THE
       SUBJECT OF QUESTIONS DESIGNED TO TAP THESE LONG-TERM INFLU-
       ENCES ON BEHAVIOR.

           IN ORDER TO DETERMINE THE NATURE OF THE SHORT-TERM FORCES
       WHICH MIGHT INFLUENCE VOTING BEHAVIOR, RESPONDENTS IN THE
       PRE-
       ELECTION INTERVIEW WERE ASKED THEIR OPINIONS ON POLITICAL
       ISSUES WHICH WERE IMPORTANT IN 1960, SUCH AS CIVIL RIGHTS,
       DOMESTIC SPENDING FOR SOCIAL SERVICES, AND FOREIGN AID.
       QUESTIONS ABOUT AGRICULTURAL MATTERS AND LABOR CONCERNS WERE
       ASKED OF FARMERS AND LABOR UNION MEMBERS, RESPECTIVELY. THE
       RESPONDENT'S PERCEPTIONS AND EVALUATIONS OF THE PRESIDENTIAL
       AND VICE-PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES AND THE TWO MAJOR PARTIES
       WERE OBTAINED.  IN ADDITION, QUESTIONS DESIGNED TO REVEAL
       CHANGES IN THE RESPONDENT'S ATTITUDES TOWARD THE CANDIDATES
       AND PARTIES WERE INCLUDED.

           THE SURVEY INSTRUMENT CONTAINED A SERIES OF QUESTIONS
       USED TO MEASURE THE RESPONDENT'S SENSE OF POLITICAL EFFICACY
       AND CITIZEN DUTY.  ALSO INCLUDED WAS A SERIES OF ITEMS
       DESIGNED TO MEASURE THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE RESPONDENT WOULD
       TRUST CERTAIN GROUPS TO ENDORSE AN ACCEPTABLE CANDIDATE FOR
       OFFICE.  FINALLY, THE PRE-ELECTION INTERVIEW ASKED THE
       RESPONDENT TO PREDICT THE 1960 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OUT-
       COME, TO PREDICT HIS LIKELIHOOD OF VOTING, TO IDENTIFY THE
       CANDIDATE FOR WHOM HE WOULD VOTE, AND TO GIVE THE REASON FOR
       THAT ELECTORAL PREFERENCE.

           THE POST-ELECTION INTERVIEW WAS PRIMARILY CONCERNED WITH
       THE RESPONDENT'S VOTE AND THE PARTY-, CANDIDATE-, AND ISSUE-
       ORIENTED REASONS FOR THAT VOTE.  THE RESPONDENT'S INTEREST
       IN THE ELECTION AND HIS EXPOSURE TO MEDIA WERE EXPLORED.
       IN PARTICULAR, RESPONDENTS WERE ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THEIR
       PARTICIPATION IN POLITICAL ACTIVITIES, AND ABOUT THEIR REAC-
       TIONS TO THE TELEVISED KENNEDY-NIXON DEBATES.  IN ORDER TO
       ASSESS THE EFFECT OF KENNEDY'S RELIGION ON ELECTORAL CHOICE,
       A SERIES OF QUESTIONS ABOUT THE RESPONDENT'S RELIGIOUS
       PREFERENCES AND BACKGROUND WERE INCLUDED, IN ADDITION TO
       QUESTIONS WHICH DIRECTLY ASKED THE RESPONDENT ABOUT RELIGION
       AS A FACTOR IN THE 1960 ELECTION.  FINALLY, THE POST-ELEC-
       TION QUESTIONNAIRE INCLUDED A SERIES OF QUESTIONS DESIGNED
       TO MEASURE THE RESPONDENT'S SENSE OF PERSONAL COMPETENCE.

           THE PRIMARY REPORT ON THE FINDINGS OF THE SURVEY
       RESEARCH CENTER 1960 AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY IS BY
       ANGUS CAMPBELL, PHILIP CONVERSE, WARREN MILLER, AND
       DONALD STOKES, "STABILITY AND CHANGE IN 1960:  A REINSTATING
       ELECTION," AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, JUNE 1961.
       FURTHER ARTICLES USING THE 1960 DATA ARE FOUND IN ANGUS
       CAMPBELL, ET AL., ELECTIONS AND THE POLITICAL ORDER (NEW
       YORK:  JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC., 1966).







>> 1960 SAMPLING INFORMATION

           THE INDIVIDUALS INTERVIEWED IN 1960 WERE A REPRESENTATIVE
       CROSS-SECTION OF PERSONS OF VOTING AGE LIVING IN PRIVATE
       HOUSEHOLDS IN THE UNITED STATES.  COMPLICATIONS IN THE
       SAMPLING PROCEDURE WERE INTRODUCED BY THE FACT THAT THE
       1960 STUDY WAS THE THIRD WAVE OF A PANEL STUDY.  IN 1958
       MANY OF THE 1956 RESPONDENTS HAD MOVED AND COULD NOT BE
       RE-INTERVIEWED AT THEIR ORIGINAL ADDRESSES.  A NUMBER OF
       THESE RESPONDENTS WERE INTERVIEWED AT THE NEW ADDRESSES,
       BUT WERE INCLUDED ONLY IN THE PANEL STUDY, NOT IN THE CROSS-
       SECTION.  (THIS IS BECAUSE A CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE IS A
       SAMPLE OF SELECTED INDIVIDUALS WITHIN SPECIFIC HOUSEHOLDS,
       NOT A SAMPLE OF INDIVIDUAL PERSONS ONLY.)  TO COMPENSATE
       FOR THE LOSS OF THIS GROUP OF RESPONDENTS IN THE 1958 STUDY
       A NEW GROUP WAS SELECTED FROM THE CURRENT OCCUPANTS OF
       DWELLINGS FROM WHICH FORMER RESPONDENTS HAD MOVED.  TO
       REDUCE FIELD COSTS, ONLY HALF AS MANY SUCH ADDITIONAL
       RESPONDENTS WERE ADDED AS WOULD HAVE BEEN SELECTED IF THEIR
       PROBABILITY OF SELECTION HAD BEEN IDENTICAL TO THAT OF THE
       RE-INTERVIEWED RESPONDENTS.  TO ADJUST FOR THIS DIFFERENCE
       IN SAMPLING FRACTIONS, THE ADDITIONAL RESPONDENTS WERE GIVEN
       DOUBLE WEIGHT.

           THE BASIC RATE OF SELECTION OF THOSE INTERVIEWED AT THEIR
       1956 ADDRESSES IN BOTH 1956 AND 1958 WAS 1 IN 20,571.  THE
       RATE OF SELECTION OF THOSE RESPONDENTS FIRST INTERVIEWED
       IN 1958 WAS HALF OF THAT.  ACCORDINGLY THESE GROUPS ARE
       WEIGHTED "ONE" AND "TWO", RESPECTIVELY.  IN 1960 A TOTAL OF
       166 NEW RESPONDENTS WERE SELECTED FROM NEWLY CONSTRUCTED
       DWELLING UNITS AND FROM AN ASSORTMENT OF 1956 ADDRESSES.
       THESE GROUPS WERE SELECTED AT A RATE OF ONE-FOURTH THE BASIC
       RATE, AND THEREFORE ARE WEIGHTED "FOUR".  FINALLY, TO
       MAINTAIN REPRESENTATIVENESS OF THE 1960 SAMPLE, ONE HUNDRED
       1956 RESPONDENTS (INTERVIEWED BOTH IN 1958 AND 1960) WERE
       SELECTED TO REPRESENT 1956 RESPONDENTS LOST THROUGH PANEL
       ATTRITION.  NINETY-FOUR OF THESE RESPONDENTS WERE WEIGHTED
       BY A FACTOR OF TWO AND THE REMAINING SIX WERE WEIGHTED BY A
       FACTOR OF THREE.  THE UNWEIGHTED N OF THE 1960 STUDY IS 1181
       AND THE WEIGHTED N IS 1954.

           IN OTHER RESPECTS, HOWEVER, THE 1960 STUDY SHARES THE
       SAME SAMPLE DESIGN AS THAT OF THE 1956 AND 1958 STUDIES.
       THE SAMPLE WAS DRAWN AS FOLLOWS:  THE TWELVE LARGEST
       METROPOLITAN AREAS OF THE UNITED STATES WERE DRAWN WITH
       CERTAINTY TO REPRESENT THEMSELVES.  THE REST OF THE COUNTRY
       WAS FORMED INTO FIFTY-FOUR STRATA, FROM EACH OF WHICH A
       PRIMARY SAMPLING UNIT (CONSISTING OF A COUNTY OR GROUP OF
       COUNTIES) WAS DRAWN WITH PROBABILITY PROPORTIONAL TO SIZE.
       THE SELECTION PROCEDURE WITHIN THESE SIXTY-SIX PRIMARY
       SAMPLING UNITS ULTIMATELY YIELDED A SAMPLE OF PRIVATE
       HOUSEHOLDS.  RESPONDENTS WERE SELECTED FROM THESE HOUSE-
       HOLDS BY AN OBJECTIVE PROCEDURE OF SELECTION WHICH
       ALLOWED NO SUBSTITUTIONS.





>> 1960 FILE STRUCTURE

           THE DATA ARE AVAILABLE FROM ICPSR IN TWO FORMATS:  A CARD
       IMAGE FILE AND AN OSIRIS DATASET.  THE CARD IMAGE FILE CON-
       TAINS 10 DECKS PER RESPONDENT IN A FORMAT BASED ON 80 COLUMN
       PUNCHED CARDS.  THE DATA ARE SORTED BY INTERVIEW NUMBER WITH
       ALL DECKS FOR EACH CASE TOGETHER IN ASCENDING ORDER.  THERE
       ARE TWO COMPONENTS TO THE OSIRIS DATASET.  THE OSIRIS
       DICTIONARY GIVES THE FORMAT AND OTHER INFORMATION FOR EACH
       VARIABLE IN THE OSIRIS DATA FILE.  THE DICTIONARY OR DIC-
       TIONARY-CODEBOOK FILE IS USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE
       OSIRIS SOFTWARE PACKAGE.  THE OSIRIS DATA FILE IS CONSTRUC-
       TED WITH A SINGLE LOGICAL RECORD OF 629 BYTES FOR EACH
       RESPONDENT.

           IN THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER 1960 AMERICAN NATIONAL
       ELECTION STUDY, ONE PRE-ELECTION INTERVIEW AND ONE POST-
       ELECTION INTERVIEW WERE CONDUCTED WITH EACH RESPONDENT, WITH
       THE EXCEPTION OF 125 RESPONDENTS WHO WERE GIVEN ONLY THE
       PRE-ELECTION INTERVIEW, AND 22 RESPONDENTS WHO WERE GIVEN
       ONLY THE POST-ELECTION INTERVIEW.  RESPONDENTS WHO WERE
       GIVEN ONLY ONE INTERVIEW HAVE BEEN CODED "NA" OR "INAP" IN
       THOSE VARIABLES FOR WHICH NO DATA WERE AVAILABLE.  THE
       DATA ARE FORMATTED SUCH THAT INFORMATION FOR THE TWO WAVES
       IS CONTIGUOUS:  THAT IS, FOR OSIRIS FORMATTED DATA, THE DATA
       FOR EACH RESPONDENT FOR BOTH WAVES ARE CONTAINED IN ONE
       LOGICAL RECORD;  AND FOR CARD-IMAGE FORMATTED DATA, DECKS 1
       THROUGH 10 CONTAIN THE DATA FOR EACH RESPONDENT FOR BOTH
       WAVES.

           THE DATA ARE WEIGHTED;  VARIABLE 600003 IS THE WEIGHT
       VARIABLE.  THE UNWEIGHTED STUDY N IS 1181 AND THE
       WEIGHTED N IS 1954.  SEE THE "SAMPLING INFORMATION"
       SECTION OF THIS INTRODUCTION FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ABOUT
       THE WEIGHTING PROCEDURES.


                       WEIGHTING AND FREQUENCIES

           THE FREQUENCIES PROVIDED IN THIS CODEBOOK ARE WEIGHTED
       BY AN INTEGER WEIGHT VARIABLE (VARIABLE 600003), WHICH SHOULD
       ALWAYS BE USED IN DATA ANALYSIS PROCEDURES TO OBTAIN A
       REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE.  IF THE DATA ARE IN CARD-IMAGE
       FORMAT, THE WEIGHT VARIABLE IS LOCATED IN COLUMN 80 OF EACH
       DECK.  SEE THE "SAMPLING INFORMATION" SECTION OF THIS
       INTRODUCTION FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THE ASSIGNMENT OF WEIGHTS
       TO THE VARIOUS CATEGORIES OF RESPONDENTS.





>> 1960 CODEBOOK INFORMATION

The following example from the 1948 NES study provides the standard 
format for codebook variable documentation. 

Note that NES studies which are not part of the Time-Series usually
omit marginals and the descriptive content in lines 2-5 (except for
variable name).


Line

1  ==============================                                              
2  VAR 480026    NAME-R NOT VT-WAS R REG TO VT                                 
3                COLUMNS 61   - 61                                             
4                NUMERIC                                                       
5                MD=0 OR GE 8                                                  
6                                                                              
7                  Q. 17.  (IF R DID NOT VOTE)  WERE YOU REGISTERED (ELIGIBLE)
8                  TO VOTE.                                                   
9                  ...........................................................
10                                                                            
11            82       1.  YES                                                
12           149       2.  NO                                                 
13                                                                             
14             0       8.  DK                                                 
15             9       9.  NA                                                 
16           422       0.  INAP., R VOTED                                     
                                                                            


Line 2 - VARIABLE NAME.  Note that in the codebook the variable name
         (usually a 'number') does not include the "V" prefix which is 
         used in the release SAS and SPSS data definition files
         (.sas and .sps files) for all variables including those
         which do not have 'number' names.  For example the variable
         "VERSION" in the codebook is "VVERSION" in the data definition
         files.

Line 2 - "NAME".  This is the variable label used in the SAS and SPSS
         data definition files (.sas and .sps files).  Some codebooks 
         exclude this.

Line 3 - COLUMNS.  Columns in the ASCII data file (.dat file).

Line 4 - CHARACTER OR NUMERIC.  If numeric and the variable is a decimal
         rather than integer variable, the numer of decimal places is 
         also indicated (e.g. "NUMERIC  DEC 4")

Line 5 - Values which are assigned to missing by default in the Study's
         SAS and and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files).

Line 7 - Actual question text for survey variables or a description of 
         non-survey variables (for example, congressional district).
         Survey items usually include the question number (for example
         "B1a.") from the Study questionnaire; beginning in 1996 
         non-survey items also have unique item numbers (for example
         "CSheet.1").

Line 9 - A dashed or dotted line usually separates question text from
         any other documentation which follows.

Line 10- When present, annotation provided by Study staff is presented
         below the question text/description and preceding code values.

Lines 11-16
         Code values are listed with descriptive labels.  Valid codes
         (those not having 'missing' status in line 5) are presented
         first, followed by the values described in line 5.  For
         continuous variables, one line may appear providing the range
         of possible values.  A blank line usually separates the 'valid'
         and 'missing' values.

Lines 11-16
         Marginals are usually provided for discrete variables.  The
         counts may be unweighted or weighted; check the Study codebook
         introductory text to determine weight usage.
>> 1960 PROCESSING INFORMATION

           THE CODEBOOK WAS PROCESSED ACCORDING TO STANDARD ICPSR
       PROCESSING PROCEDURES.  THE DATASET WAS CHECKED FOR INCON-
       SISTENT AND ILLEGAL CODES.  WHEN ANY SUCH CODES WERE FOUND,
       THE INTERVIEW PROTOCOLS WERE CONSULTED TO OBTAIN THE CORRECT
       CODE VALUES.  THE SYMBOLS < AND > ARE USED TO ENCLOSE COM-
       MENTS OR EXPLANATIONS ADDED BY THE PROCESSOR TO PROVIDE
       FURTHER CLARIFICATION OF INFORMATION IN THE ORIGINAL CODE-
       BOOK.  IN THE TABLE OF CONTENTS, AN ASTERISK APPEARS AFTER
       EACH VARIABLE HAVING A SPECIAL ICPSR STANDARDIZED CODE.

>> 1960 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST



     VARIABLE  VARIABLE LABEL
     --------  --------------

      VERSION    NES VERSION NUMBER
      DSETNO     NES DATASET NUMBER
      600001     ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER
      600002     INTERVIEW NUMBER

                   STUDY PROCEDURE AND SAMPLING

      600003     WEIGHT
      600004     PRIMARY SAMPLING UNIT CODE
      600005     PRIMARY SAMPLING UNIT PLACE CODE
      600006     POPULATION SIZE
      600007     TYPE OF PLACE
      600008     SAMPLE RATE CODE
      600009     COUNTY CODE
      600010     STATE CODE*
      600011     1960 CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT
      600012     DATE OF INTERVIEW--PRE-ELECTION
      600013     INTERVIEWER--PRE-ELECTION
      600014     CODER--PRE-ELECTION
      600015     INTERVIEW TYPE
      600016     NATURE OF INTERVIEW

                   ELECTION PREDICTIONS BY RESPONDENT

      600017     PREDICTION RESULT PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
      600018     XWILL ELECTION BE CLOSE RACE
      600019     IMPORTANCE OF ELECTION RESULT TO RESPONDENT

                   THE PARTIES AND THE CANDIDATES

      600020     WHAT GOOD ABOUT DEMOCRATS*
      600021     WHAT BAD ABOUT DEMOCRATS*
      600022     WHAT GOOD ABOUT REPUBLICANS*
      600023     WHAT BAD ABOUT REPUBLICANS*
      600024     WHY VOTE FOR KENNEDY*
      600025     WHY NOT VOTE FOR KENNEDY*
      600026     WHY VOTE FOR NIXON*
      600027     WHY NOT VOTE FOR NIXON*
      600028     XCHANGE OF FEELING TOWARD NIXON
      600029     XHOW FEELING TOWARD NIXON CHANGED
      600030     XWHAT CHANGED MIND ABOUT NIXON
      600031     XWHEN CHANGED MIND ABOUT NIXON
      600032     XCHANGE OF FEELING TOWARD KENNEDY
      600033     XHOW FEELING TOWARD KENNEDY CHANGED
      600034     XWHAT CHANGED MIND ABOUT KENNEDY
      600035     XWHEN CHANGED MIND ABOUT KENNEDY
      600036     HAS RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT JOHNSON
      600037     HAS RESPONDENT OPINION ABOUT LODGE
      600038     OPINION PRO-JOHNSON*
      600039     OPINION ANTI-JOHNSON*
      600040     OPINION PRO-LODGE*
      600041     OPINION ANTI-LODGE*

                   KNOWLEDGE OF THE CANDIDATES

      600042     WHERE IS NIXON FROM*
      600043     HOW OLD IS NIXON
      600044     NIXON'S SOCIAL CLASS
      600045     WHAT IS NIXON'S RELIGION
      600046     WHERE IS KENNEDY FROM*
      600047     HOW OLD IS KENNEDY
      600048     KENNEDY'S SOCIAL CLASS
      600049     WHAT IS KENNEDY'S RELIGION

                   DOMESTIC ISSUES AND FOREIGN POLICY

      600050     IMPORTANT PROBLEMS FACING GOVERNMENT*
      600051     XWHICH PARTY WILL SOLVE PROBLEMS
      600052     GOVERNMENT ROLE IN HOUSING AND POWER
      600053     WHICH PARTY INTERFERE LESS IN HOUSING AND POWER
      600054     SHOULD GOVERNMENT GUARANTEE EMPLOYMENT
      600055     XWHICH PARTY GUARANTEE WORK FOR ALL
      600056     ISOLATIONIST POLICY BEST FOR UNITED STATES
      600057     XWHICH PARTY FOR ISOLATIONISM
      600058     SHOULD GOVERNMENT AID EDUCATION
      600059     XWHICH PARTY FOR AID TO SCHOOLS
      600060     SHOULD UNITED STATES HELP UNDERDEVELOPED
                 NATIONS
      600061     XWHICH PARTY FOR FOREIGN AID
      600062     EQUALITY FOR NEGROES IN HOUSING AND WORK
      600063     XWHICH PARTY FOR NEGRO EQUALITY
      600064     SHOULD UNITED STATES FIGHT COMMUNISM OVERSEAS
      600065     XWHICH PARTY FOR ANTI-COMMUNIST MILITARY AID
      600066     SHOULD GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIZE MEDICAL CARE
      600067     XWHY FOR OR AGAINST GOVERNMENT MEDICAL CARE*
      600068     XWHICH PARTY FAVORS MEDICAL SUBSIDIZATION
      600069     XWHY THINK REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT FOR MEDICAL
                 SUBSIDIZATION
      600070     SHOULD GOVERNMENT INTEGRATE SCHOOLS
      600071     XWHY GOVERNMENT SCHOOL INTEGRATION GOOD OR BAD
      600072     XOPINION CHANGE ON SCHOOL INTEGRATION
      600073     XWHICH PARTY WON'T INTEGRATE SCHOOLS

                   FINANCIAL SITUATION OF FAMILY UNIT

      600074     RESPONDENT'S ESTIMATE OF OWN FINANCIAL SITUATION
      600075     HAS RESPONDENT'S FINANCIAL SITUATION CHANGED
      600076     FACTORS AFFECTING RESPONDENT'S FINANCIAL
                 SITUATION
      600077     RESPONDENT'S FUTURE FINANCIAL PROSPECTS
      600078     HOW WILL FINANCIAL SITUATION CHANGE IN FUTURE*
      600079     ELECTION AFFECT RESPONDENT'S FINANCIAL
                 SITUATION
      600080     XHOW ELECTION AFFECT RESPONDENT FINANCIALLY*
      600081     ASSESSMENT UNITED STATES FOREIGN RELATIONS
      600082     REASONS FOR ASSESSMENT FOREIGN RELATIONS
      600083     PAST YEAR UNITED STATES' INFLUENCE STRONGER
      600084     HOW UNITED STATES' INFLUENCE STRONGER
      600085     FEAR OF ANOTHER WAR
      600086     HAS PROBLEM OF WAR LESSENED
      600087     WHICH PARTY BEST AVOIDS WAR
      600088     XWHY REPUBLICANS OR DEMOCRATS BETTER AT
                 AVOIDING WAR
      600089     ASSESSMENT OF PROGRESS DOMESTIC AFFAIRS
      600090     XREASONS ASSESSMENT OF DOMESTIC PROGRESS

                   PARTY IDENTIFICATION

      600091     RESPONDENT'S PARTY ALLEGIANCE
      600092     XHAS RESPONDENT CHANGED PARTY ALLEGIANCE
      600093     XWHEN RESPONDENT CHANGED PARTY ALLEGIANCE
      600094     XWHY RESPONDENT CHANGED PARTY ALLEGIANCE*

                   VOTING BEHAVIOR

      600095     ALWAYS VOTE IN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
      600096     XALWAYS VOTE FOR SAME PARTY
      600097     XHOW VOTE 1956 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
      600098     RESPONDENT'S INTEREST IN POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS
      600099     IS RESPONDENT REGISTERED TO VOTE THIS YEAR
      600100     DOES RESPONDENT INTEND TO VOTE THIS YEAR
      600101     XWHOM WILL RESPONDENT VOTE FOR PRESIDENT
      600102     XWHY RESPONDENT CHOSE CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT*
      600103     XVOTE FOR CANDIDATE OR AGAINST OPPONENT
      600104     XIF VOTING FOR WHOM WOULD VOTE
      600105     XWHY WOULD CHOOSE CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT*
      600106     XVOTE FOR CANDIDATE OR AGAINST OPPONENT

                   POLITICAL EFFICACY AND CITIZEN DUTY

      600107     PEOPLE HAVE NO SAY IN GOVERNMENT
      600108     VOTING ONLY WAY TO INFLUENCE GOVERNMENT
      600109     IF PARTY CAN'T WIN NEED NOT VOTE
      600110     ONE VOTE UNIMPORTANT IN TOTAL VOTE
      600111     POLITICS TOO DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND
      600112     IF NO INTEREST NEED NOT VOTE
      600113     LOCAL ELECTIONS UNIMPORTANT
      600114     PEOPLE'S OPINION UNIMPORTANT TO GOVERNMENT
      600115     DEGREE OF INTEREST IN POLITICS
      600116     XMAIN REASON WHY CHOSE CANDIDATE
      600117     RESPONDENT'S TREATMENT OF CATHOLIC QUESTION

                   PERSONAL DATA

      600118     SEX OF RESPONDENT
      600119     RACE OF RESPONDENT
      600120     NUMBER OF ADULTS IN HOUSEHOLD
      600121     RESPONDENT'S RELATIONSHIP TO HEAD
      600122     AGE OF RESPONDENT
      600123     AGE OF HEAD
      600124     RESPONDENT'S MARITAL STATUS
      600125     NUMBER OF CHILDREN UNDER 18 IN FAMILY UNIT
      600126     XAGE OF YOUNGEST CHILD
      600127     LIFE CYCLE STATUS
      600128     EDUCATION OF RESPONDENT*
      600129     RESPONDENT'S OCCUPATION*
      600130     INDUSTRY RESPONDENT IS EMPLOYED IN*
      600131     RESPONDENT SELF-EMPLOYED OR NOT
      600132     XRESPONDENT'S OCCUPATION IF UNEMPLOYED OR
                 RETIRED
      600133     XINDUSTRY IF RESPONDENT UNEMPLOYED OR RETIRED
      600134     XRECENCY OF RESPONDENT'S UNEMPLOYMENT
      600135     XLENGTH OF RESPONDENT'S UNEMPLOYMENT
      600136     HEAD'S OCCUPATION*
      600137     XINDUSTRY IN WHICH HEAD EMPLOYED
      600138     XHEAD SELF-EMPLOYED OR NOT
      600139     XHEAD'S OCCUPATION IF UNEMPLOYED OR RETIRED*
      600140     XINDUSTRY IF HEAD UNEMPLOYED OR RETIRED
      600141     XRECENCY OF HEAD'S UNEMPLOYMENT
      600142     XLENGTH OF HEAD'S UNEMPLOYMENT

                   QUESTIONS FOR FARMERS

      600143     XRESPONDENT FULL-TIME FARMER OR NOT
      600144     XFARM OWNED OR RENTED OR OTHER
      600145     XHOW MUCH LAND RESPONDENT FARMS
      600146     XWHAT KIND OF FARMING*
      600147     XCHANGING PRICES OF FARM PRODUCTS
      600148     XEFFECT OF FARM POLICY ON PRICES
      600149     XGOVERNMENT SUBSIDIZE FARM PRODUCTS

                   UNION MEMBERSHIP

      600150     ANYONE BELONG TO LABOR UNION
      600151     XMEMBER OF WHAT UNION*
      600152     XHOW LONG A UNION MEMBER
      600153     XFEEL CLOSE TO UNION MEMBERS
      600154     XINTEREST IN UNION MEMBERS

                   SOCIAL CLASS

      600155     WHAT SOCIAL CLASS IS RESPONDENT
      600156     XAFFINITY WITH MEMBERS OF SAME CLASS
      600157     XINTEREST IN WELFARE OF OWN CLASS
      600158     SOCIAL CLASS OF FAMILY WHEN RESPONDENT WAS YOUNG
      600159     XAFFINITY WITH OTHER NEGROES
      600160     XINTEREST IN OTHER NEGROES' WELFARE

                   POLITICAL TRUST IN VARIOUS GROUPS

      600161     TRUST VETERANS GROUPS
      600162     TRUST PROTESTANT GROUPS
      600163     TRUST FARM GROUPS
      600164     TRUST NEGRO GROUPS
      600165     TRUST BUSINESS GROUPS
      600166     TRUST JEWISH GROUPS
      600167     TRUST COLLEGE GROUPS
      600168     TRUST LABOR UNIONS
      600169     TRUST CATHOLIC GROUPS
      600170     TOTAL GROUPS TRUSTED
      600171     TOTAL GROUPS DISTRUSTED

                   PERSONAL DATA (CONT.)

      600172     WAS RESPONDENT OR HEAD IN MILITARY
      600173     XRESPONDENT'S YEARS IN MILITARY
      600174     XHEAD'S YEARS IN MILITARY
      600175     RESPONDENT'S PLACE OF BIRTH*
      600176     XWERE PARENTS BORN IN UNITED STATES
      600177     XPLACE OF BIRTH OF FATHER*
      600178     XPLACE OF BIRTH OF MOTHER*
      600179     XPLACE OF BIRTH OF FATHER'S ANCESTORS*
      600180     FATHER'S OCCUPATION WHILE RESPONDENT WAS YOUNG*
      600181     XFINANCIAL SITUATION OF FAMILY WHEN RESPONDENT
                 WAS GROWING UP ON FARM
      600182     PART OF UNITED STATES RESPONDENT GREW UP IN*
      600183     XRESPONDENT'S AGE ON ARRIVAL IN THIS STATE
      600184     RAISED IN CITY OR FARM
      600185     HOW LONG IN THIS HOUSE
      600186     XNEIGHBORHOOD'S AGE RELATIVE TO LAST
      600187     XNEIGHBORHOOD MORE OR LESS EXPENSIVE
      600188     XNEIGHBORHOOD CLOSER TO CITY CENTER
      600189     TOTAL FAMILY INCOME

                   POST ELECTION INTERVIEW

      600190     READ ABOUT CAMPAIGN IN NEWSPAPER
      600191     XWHICH PAPER READ MOST ON CAMPAIGN*
      600192     HEAR ABOUT CAMPAIGN ON RADIO
      600193     SEE MUCH OF CAMPAIGN ON TELEVISION
      600194     READ MUCH ABOUT CAMPAIGN IN MAGAZINES
      600195     XWHICH MEDIUM INFLUENCED MOST
      600196     XSEE KENNEDY-NIXON DEBATES
      600197     XDEBATE CHANGE OPINION OF KENNEDY*
      600198     XDEBATE CHANGE OPINION OF NIXON*
      600199     XDEBATE CHANGE OPINION OF KENNEDY OR NIXON*
      600200     MEDIA OR PEOPLE INFLUENCED RESPONDENT MOST
      600201     WHOM RESPONDENT VOTED FOR PRESIDENT
      600202     XWHY RESPONDENT VOTED FOR PRESIDENTIAL
                 CANDIDATE*
      600203     XMAIN REASON DID NOT VOTE*
      600204     XWHEN DECIDED VOTING PREFERENCE
      600205     XVOTED FOR CANDIDATE OR AGAINST OPPOSING
                 CANDIDATE
      600206     XEVER CONSIDER VOTING FOR OPPONENT
      600207     XWHY DIDN'T VOTE FOR OPPONENT
      600208     XBETTER VOTE AS DID OR NO DIFFERENCE
      600209     XCARE ABOUT VOTING OR NOT
      600210     XVOTE FOR UNITED STATES SENATOR
      600211     XVOTE FOR UNITED STATES CONGRESSMAN
      600212     XREASON VOTE FOR CONGRESSMAN*
      600213     XSPLIT OR STRAIGHT TICKET
      600214     XREASONS NOT WATCH TELEVISION DEBATE
      600215     EVER TRY INFLUENCING OTHERS' VOTE

                   POLITICAL PARTICIPATION AND INFORMATION

      600216     FINANCIAL AID TO PARTY
      600217     EVER GO TO POLITICAL MEETINGS
      600218     DO OTHER WORK FOR PARTIES
      600219     BELONG TO POLITICAL ORGANIZATION
      600220     CAMPAIGN BUTTON OR STICKER
      600221     PARTY REPRESENTATIVE TALK TO RESPONDENT
      600222     XVOTING ADVICE OF REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE
      600223     XVOTING ADVICE OF DEMOCRATIC REPRESENTATIVE
      600224     INTERESTED IN CAMPAIGN
      600225     FOLLOW POLITICAL EVENTS CLOSELY
      600226     WHICH PARTY HAD MAJORITY IN CONGRESS
      600227     WHICH PARTY HAS MAJORITY IN CONGRESS
      600228     MOST IMPORTANT GOVERNMENT PROBLEM*
      600229     ANY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN REPUBLICANS AND
                 DEMOCRATS
      600230     XWHAT DIFFERENT ABOUT DEMOCRATS*
      600231     XWHAT DIFFERENT ABOUT REPUBLICANS*
      600232     WHICH PARTY MORE CONSERVATIVE
      600233     XREASONS WHY DEMOCRATS MORE CONSERVATIVE*
      600234     XREASONS WHY REPUBLICANS MORE CONSERVATIVE*

                   DOMESTIC ISSUES AND FOREIGN POLICY

      600235     GOVERNMENT OUGHT TO GUARANTEE JOBS
      600236     FOREIGN AID TO POOR COUNTRIES
      600237     LABOR UNION INFLUENCE IN GOVERNMENT BAD

                   PERSONAL COMPETENCE

      600238     DOES RESPONDENT'S LIFE GO AS PLANNED
      600239     USUALLY HAVE GOOD LUCK
      600240     RESPONDENT'S PLANS REALIZED OR NOT

                   STRONG MINDEDNESS

      600241     USUALLY WIN ARGUMENTS
      600242     HAVE STRONG OPINIONS OR NOT
      600243     HARD TO CHANGE RESPONDENT'S MIND

                   OTHER PERSONALITY ITEMS

      600244     USUALLY PLAN AHEAD
      600245     GET PUSHED AROUND
      600246     FINISH WHAT IS STARTED
      600247     PREFER GIVING OR RECEIVING ORDERS

                   PERSONAL DATA (CONT.)

      600248     SEX OF RESPONDENT
      600249     RACE OF RESPONDENT
      600250     MARITAL STATUS
      600251     XDID SPOUSE VOTE
      600252     RESPONDENT'S CHURCH PREFERENCE*
      600253     XHOW OFTEN ATTEND CHURCH

                   RELIGION AND POLITICS

      600254     CANDIDATES DISCUSSED IN CHURCH
      600255     XRELIGION OF SPOUSE SAME
      600256     XSPOUSE'S CHURCH PREFERENCE*
      600257     XSPOUSE ATTEND CHURCH REGULARLY
      600258     XRESPONDENT STRONGLY RELIGIOUS
      600259     XCLOSE TO MEMBERS OF RELIGION
      600260     XINTEREST IN MEMBERS OF RELIGION
      600261     X(RESPONDENT JEWISH) CLOSE TO JEWISH PEOPLE
      600262     X(RESPONDENT JEWISH) INTEREST IN JEWS
      600263     MOTHER'S CHURCH PREFERENCE*
      600264     XMOTHER'S INTEREST IN RELIGION
      600265     FATHER'S CHURCH PREFERENCE*
      600266     XFATHER'S INTEREST IN RELIGION
      600267     OPINION OF CATHOLIC INFLUENCE IN GOVERNMENT
      600268     OPINION OF CATHOLICS AIDING CANDIDATES
      600269     POLITICAL ALLEGIANCE

      600270     INTERVIEWER POST ELECTION
      600271     DATE OF INTERVIEW - POST ELECTION
      600272     CODER POST ELECTION

      600273     POLITICAL EFFICACY INDEX
      600274     INVOLVEMENT INDEX
