Version 01 Codebook
-------------------
CODEBOOK INTRODUCTION FILE
1966 POST-ELECTION STUDY
(1966.T)










                    AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES 
                         1966 POST ELECTION STUDY


                   CONDUCTED BY THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER (504)






                          PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS


               POLITICAL BEHAVIOR PROGRAM, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN

                      WALTER MURPHY, PRINCETON UNIVERSITY

                      JOSEPH TANENHAUS, UNIVERSITY OF IOWA




                        NOV. 9, 1966 - JAN. 31, 1967

















                        ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER 7259





                        ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ASSISTANCE


          ALL MANUSCRIPTS UTILIZING DATA MADE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE

       CONSORTIUM SHOULD ACKNOWLEDGE THAT FACT AS WELL AS IDENTIFY

       THE ORIGINAL COLLECTOR OF THE DATA.  THE ICPSR COUNCIL URGES

       ALL USERS OF ICPSR DATA FACILITIES TO FOLLOW SOME ADAPTATION

       OF THIS STATEMENT WITH THE PARENTHESES INDICATING ITEMS TO

       BE FILLED IN APPROPRIATELY OR DELETED BY THE INDIVIDUAL USER.

             THE DATA (AND TABULATIONS) UTILIZED IN THIS
             (PUBLICATION) WERE MADE AVAILABLE (IN PART) BY
             THE INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL
             RESEARCH.  THE DATA WERE ORIGINALLY COLLECTED BY
             THE POLITICAL BEHAVIOR PROGRAM (UNIVERSITY OF
             MICHIGAN), WALTER MURPHY (PRINCETON UNIVERSITY),
             AND JOSEPH TANENHAUS (UNIVERSITY OF IOWA).
             NEITHER THE ORIGINAL COLLECTORS OF THE DATA
             NOR THE CONSORTIUM BEAR ANY RESPONSIBILITY
             FOR THE ANALYSES OR INTERPRETATIONS PRESENTED HERE.

          IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FUNDING AGENCIES WITH ESSENTIAL INFOR-

       MATION ABOUT THE USE OF ARCHIVAL RESOURCES, AND TO FACILITATE

       THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION ABOUT ICPSR PARTICIPANTS' RESEARCH

       ACTIVITIES, EACH USER OF THE ICPSR DATA FACILITIES IS EXPECTED

       TO SEND TWO COPIES OF EACH COMPLETED MANUSCRIPT TO THE

       CONSORTIUM.  PLEASE INDICATE IN THE COVER LETTER WHICH DATA

       WERE USED.

















                           CONTENTS


           Note: >>sections in the codebook introduction and
           codebook appendix can be navigated in the
           machine-readable files by searching ">>".


INTRODUCTORY MATERIAL  (file int1966.cbk)
---------------------
>> 1966 STUDY DESCRIPTION
>> 1966 SAMPLING, INTERVIEW, AND CODING INFORMATION
>> 1966 PROCESSING INFORMATION
>> 1966 CODEBOOK INFORMATION
>> 1966 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST 


CODEBOOK
--------
1966 variables


APPENDICES  (file app1966.cbk)
----------
>> 1966 STANDARD PSU CODE
>> 1966 SAMPLING COUNTY CODE
>> 1966 ICPSR COUNTY CODE
>> 1966 ICPSR STATE AND COUNTRY CODE
>> REF. NO. 19 NOTE, 1966
>> THREE MENTIONS NOTE, 1966
>> PRIORITY CODE NOTE, 1966
>> 1966 CANDIDATE LISTS
>> GROUP THERMOMETER NOTE, 1966
>> REF. NOS. 140-143 NOTE, 1966
>> VAR 660140, 660141, 660142 NOTE
>> STRENGTH OF FEELING NOTE, 1966
>> VAR 66144 NOTE
>> VAR 66172 NOTE
>> VAR 660174 NOTE
>> LEVEL OF EDUCATION NOTE, 1966
>> 1966 COLLEGE LIST
>> 1966 POLITICAL BEHAVIOR CODE
>> OCCUPATION OF HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD NOTE, 1966 
>> 1966 CENSUS INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION
>> CENSUS BUREAU OCCUPATION CODES, 1966
>> REF. NOS. 205-214 NOTE, 1966
>> UNION CODE NOTE, 1966
>> 1966 UNION CODE
>> MAJOR PROBLEMS CODE, 1966


>> 1966 STUDY DESCRIPTION


           THE 1966 NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY (SRC 504) IS THE NINTH
       IN A SERIES OF STUDIES OF NATIONAL ELECTIONS CONDUCTED BY THE
       SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER POLITICAL BEHAVIOR PROGRAM SINCE
       1948.  IT CONSISTS OF 1291 POST-ELECTION INTERVIEWS OBTAINED
       BETWEEN NOV. 9, 1966, AND JAN. 31, 1967, FROM A RANDOM
       PROBABILITY SAMPLE OF CITIZENS OF VOTING AGE IN THE CONTI-
       NENTAL UNITED STATES (EXCLUDING ALASKA AND THE INHABITANTS
       OF INSTITUTIONS, HOTELS, ROOMING HOUSES, ETC.).  THE STUDY
       WAS CONDUCTED IN COOPERATION WITH THE SRC ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR
       PROGRAM WHICH WAS GATHERING DATA FOR ITS REGULAR QUARTERLY
       SURVEY ON THE CONSUMER OUTLOOK.

           THE QUESTIONNAIRE WAS DIVIDED INTO FOUR PARTS:  SECTION
       A (QUESTIONS OF A POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC NATURE ANSWERED
       BY ALL OF THE RESPONDENTS), SECTION B (ECONOMIC QUESTIONS),
       SECTION C (POLITICAL QUESTIONS), AND SECTION D (PERSONAL
       DATA QUESTIONS).  THIS CODEBOOK IS A SUB-SET OF THE ORIGINAL
       QUESTIONNAIRE.  SECTION B QUESTIONS, SPONSORED BY THE
       SRC ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR PROGRAM, HAVE BEEN OMITTED FROM
       THE CODEBOOK.  INCLUDED, HOWEVER, ARE ALL THE QUESTIONS
       IN SECTIONS A, C, AND D WHICH WERE DESIGNED TO INVESTIGATE
       POLITICAL ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIORS, ESPECIALLY THOSE RELATING
       TO THE 1966 CONGRESSIONAL ELECTION.

            THE INTERVIEW SCHEDULE FOR SECTIONS A, C, AND D COM-
       PRISED BOTH CLOSED AND OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONS.  THE STUDY IN-
       CLUDES OPINIONS ON THE VIETNAM WAR, THE SCHOOL PRAYER ISSUE,
       THE CHANGE IN THE NEGROES' POSITION, THE POWER OF THE FEDERAL
       GOVERNMENT, AND THE GOVERNMENT'S ROLE IN SCHOOL INTEGRATION.
       IN ADDITION TO EVALUATING THE FINANCIAL SITUATION OF HIS
       FAMILY UNIT, THE RESPONDENT WAS ASKED HIS THOUGHTS ON SUCH
       NATIONAL ECONOMIC FACTORS AS FUTURE PRICE CHANGES, BUSINESS
       CONDITIONS AND UNEMPLOYMENT.  QUESTIONS MEASURING THE RESPON-
       DENT'S POLITICAL EFFICACY, TRUST IN GOVERNMENT, AND LOCAL AND
       NATIONAL COMPETENCE ARE INCLUDED AS WELL AS "FEELING THER-
       MOMETER" VARIABLES ABOUT RELIGIOUS, ECONOMIC AND RACIAL
       GROUPS IN THE SOCIETY.

            THE RESPONDENT'S POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE WAS TAPPED BY VARI-
       ABLES SUCH AS KNOWLEDGE OF NAME, PARTY, INCUMBENCY STATUS OF
       THE CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES AND KNOWLEDGE OF THE 1966 PARTY
       CANDIDACY PATTERN FOR THE CONGRESSIONAL, SENATORIAL AND
       GUBERNATORIAL ELECTORAL CONTESTS.  THE RESPONDENT'S GENERAL
       INVOLVEMENT IN THE ELECTION WAS EXPLORED BY ASKING HIM
       WHETHER HE CONTRIBUTED TO A CAMPAIGN, WHETHER HE WAS
       CONTACTED BY THE POLITICAL PARTIES, WHETHER HE VOTED AND IF
       HE VOTED, WHEN,
       WHERE AND HOW HE VOTED (STRAIGHT OR SPLIT TICKET; AND
       MACHINE, PAPER BALLOT OR ABSENTEE).  THE STUDY ALSO INCLUDED
       VARIABLES DEALING WITH INDICATORS OF PERSONAL POLITICAL
       COMPETENCE AND
       ATTITUDES TOWARD THE SUPREME COURT.  THEY WERE SPONSORED BY
       PROFESSORS WALTER MURPHY OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY AND JOSEPH
       TANENHAUS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA UNDER A GRANT FROM THE
       NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION.  IN ADDITION TO THE QUESTIONS
       WHICH WERE FORMULATED TO TAP THE RESPONDENT'S KNOWLEDGE ABOUT
       THE SUPREME COURT, THERE ARE THOSE WHICH SOUGHT TO EXPLORE 
       THE RESPONDENT'S ATTITUDE TOWARD THE COURT, ITS ROLE IN
       GOVERNMENT AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO VARIOUS GROUPS AND ISSUES.
       THE
       PERSONAL DATA SECTION OBTAINED INFORMATION ON THE RELIGION,
       CHURCH ATTENDANCE, SOCIAL CLASS, INCOME, EDUCATION, AND
       MATRILINEAL AND PATRILINEAL ORIGINS OF THE RESPONDENT.  THIS
       SECTION ALSO INQUIRED ABOUT THE EMPLOYMENT STATUS AND OCCU-
       PATION OF THE HEAD OF THE HOUSEHOLD AS WELL AS UNION AFFIL-
       IATION AND LENGTH OF UNION MEMBERSHIP OF HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS.








>> 1966 SAMPLING, INTERVIEW, AND CODING INFORMATION


           THE SAMPLE FOR THE STUDY WAS SO DRAWN THAT REPRESENTA-
       TIVE SUBSAMPLES WERE OBTAINED FROM EACH OF THE FOUR MAJOR
       REGIONS OF THE UNITED STATES.  THE SAMPLE MAY ALSO BE
       CONSIDERED REPRESENTATIVE OF CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS IN THE
       UNITED STATES.  THE SAMPLING PROCEDURE INVOLVED A CONTROLLED
       PROBABILITY SELECTION OF HOUSEHOLDS (DEFINED AS RELATED
       MEMBERS LIVING TOGETHER) IN 74 PRIMARY SAMPLING AREAS AND
       THEN, AFTER THE INTERVIEWER OBTAINED A LISTING OF THE
       CITIZENS OF VOTING AGE IN THE HOUSEHOLD, A FURTHER CONTROLLED
       PROBABILITY SELECTION OF ONE AS THE ELECTION STUDY
       RESPONDENT TOOK PLACE.  OBJECTIONS TO THIS PROCEDURE OF
       OBTAINING ONE INTERVIEW PER HOUSEHOLD COULD BE RAISED ON THE
       GROUNDS THAT IT OVER-REPRESENTS SINGLE PERSONS.  HOWEVER,
       WHEN THE UNWEIGHTED FREQUENCIES FOR CERTAIN VARIABLES (SEX,
       RACE, AGE, ETC.) ARE COMPARED WITH THE SAME FREQUENCIES
       WEIGHTED BY HOUSEHOLD SIZE AND WITH THE NATIONAL STATISTI-
       CAL PARAMETERS FOR THESE VARIABLES, NO EVIDENCE OF ANY
       SIGNIFICANT BIAS APPEARS IN THE SAMPLE.  THUS, THE COLLEC-|
       TION OF INTERVIEWS CAN BE LEGITIMATELY ANALYZED AS THOUGH
       EACH RESPONDENT HAD AN EQUAL CHANCE OF SELECTION (NO WEIGHTS
       NECESSARY).  NOTES ON THE ESTIMATION OF SAMPLING ERROR FOR A
       SAMPLE OF THIS SIZE MAY BE FOUND AT THE BEGINNING OF THE
       ICPSR ANALYSIS BOOK FOR THE 1952-1960 STUDIES.

           INTERVIEWS WERE OBTAINED FROM 77% OF THE ELIGIBLE
        ELECTION STUDY RESPONDENTS, A SLIGHTLY LOWER RATE THAN IS
        USUAL FOR SRC SURVEYS.  INCLUDED IN THE NON-RESPONSE
        CATEGORY ARE NOT ONLY REFUSALS (14%), BUT ALSO NO ONE 
       AT HOME AFTER REPEATED CALLS (4.3%), AND MISCELLANEOUS
       REASONS FOR NO INTERVIEW (4.7%), SUCH AS ILLNESS, SENILITY,
       LANGUAGE DIFFICULTY, ETC.  THREE PERCENT OF THE ELECTION
       STUDY RESPONDENTS WERE NOT ASKED THE  ECONOMIC SECTION SINCE
       THE ECONOMIC INTERVIEWS WERE ONLY ADMINISTERED TO THE HEAD OF
       THE HOUSEHOLD OR HIS WIFE.  THE AVERAGE LENGTH OF THE
       COMBINED POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC INTERVIEWS WAS 93 MINUTES.

           THE INTERVIEWS WERE CODED BY THE SRC CODING SECTION
       UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF POLITICAL BEHAVIOR PROGRAM STAFF
       MEMBERS, AND THE USUAL PRACTICE OF CHECK-CODING ONE OUT OF
       EVERY TEN INTERVIEWS WAS FOLLOWED.  THIS RESULTED IN THE
       CALCULATION OF AN AVERAGE CODING ERROR OF 3.5 ERRORS PER
       INTERVIEW, MOSTLY IN THE MORE DIFFICULT CODES SUCH AS MAJOR
       PROBLEMS AND PARTY DIFFERENCES QUESTIONS.








>> 1966 PROCESSING INFORMATION


           THE STUDY WAS PROCESSED ACCORDING TO ICPSR STANDARD PRO-
       CESSING PROCEDURES.  WHERE APPLICABLE, THE CODE CATEGORIES
       WERE RECODED TO CONFORM TO ICPSR STANDARDIZED CODES.  THE
       DATA WERE CHECKED FOR INCONSISTENT AND ILLEGAL CODES, AND,
       WHENEVER FOUND, THE LATTER MISTAKES WERE CORRECTED BY REFER-
       RING TO THE ORIGINAL INTERVIEW SCHEDULES.

          IN THE CONTENTS SECTION, AN ASTERISK APPEARS AFTER EACH
       VARIABLE HAVING A SPECIAL ICPSR STANDARDIZED CODE.  THOSE
       VARIABLE NAMES PRECEDED BY AN X DESIGNATE A VARIABLE DEPEN-
       DENT ON SOME OTHER VARIABLE DUE TO THE STRUCTURE OF THE
       INTERVIEW SCHEDULE.

           FREQUENCIES FOR MULTIPLE RESPONSE VARIABLES ARE CUMU-
       LATIVE.

           INFORMATION SET IN SLASHES (//) WILL BE FOUND THROUGHOUT
       THE CODEBOOK.  FOR EXAMPLE:  /SCHOOL INTEGRATION.  SEE REF.
       NO. 25 FOR COMPLETE TEXT./  THIS REPRESENTS AT ALL TIMES
       INFORMATION ADDED BY THE STUDY PROCESSOR IN THE COURSE OF
       PREPARING THE CODEBOOK.





>> 1966 CODEBOOK INFORMATION

The following example from the 1948 NES study provides the standard 
format for codebook variable documentation. 

Note that NES studies which are not part of the Time-Series usually
omit marginals and the descriptive content in lines 2-5 (except for
variable name).


Line

1  ==============================                                              
2  VAR 480026    NAME-R NOT VT-WAS R REG TO VT                                 
3                COLUMNS 61   - 61                                             
4                NUMERIC                                                       
5                MD=0 OR GE 8                                                  
6                                                                              
7                  Q. 17.  (IF R DID NOT VOTE)  WERE YOU REGISTERED (ELIGIBLE)
8                  TO VOTE.                                                   
9                  ...........................................................
10                                                                            
11            82       1.  YES                                                
12           149       2.  NO                                                 
13                                                                             
14             0       8.  DK                                                 
15             9       9.  NA                                                 
16           422       0.  INAP., R VOTED                                     
                                                                            


Line 2 - VARIABLE NAME.  Note that in the codebook the variable name
         (usually a 'number') does not include the "V" prefix which is 
         used in the release SAS and SPSS data definition files
         (.sas and .sps files) for all variables including those
         which do not have 'number' names.  For example the variable
         "VERSION" in the codebook is "VVERSION" in the data definition
         files.

Line 2 - "NAME".  This is the variable label used in the SAS and SPSS
         data definition files (.sas and .sps files).  Some codebooks 
         exclude this.

Line 3 - COLUMNS.  Columns in the ASCII data file (.dat file).

Line 4 - CHARACTER OR NUMERIC.  If numeric and the variable is a decimal
         rather than integer variable, the numer of decimal places is 
         also indicated (e.g. "NUMERIC  DEC 4")

Line 5 - Values which are assigned to missing by default in the Study's
         SAS and and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files).

Line 7 - Actual question text for survey variables or a description of 
         non-survey variables (for example, congressional district).
         Survey items usually include the question number (for example
         "B1a.") from the Study questionnaire; beginning in 1996 
         non-survey items also have unique item numbers (for example
         "CSheet.1").

Line 9 - A dashed or dotted line usually separates question text from
         any other documentation which follows.

Line 10- When present, annotation provided by Study staff is presented
         below the question text/description and preceding code values.

Lines 11-16
         Code values are listed with descriptive labels.  Valid codes
         (those not having 'missing' status in line 5) are presented
         first, followed by the values described in line 5.  For
         continuous variables, one line may appear providing the range
         of possible values.  A blank line usually separates the 'valid'
         and 'missing' values.

Lines 11-16
         Marginals are usually provided for discrete variables.  The
         counts may be unweighted or weighted; check the Study codebook
         introductory text to determine weight usage.
>> 1966 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST 


     VARIABLE  VARIABLE LABEL
     --------  --------------

     VERSION    NES VERSION NUMBER
     DSETNO     NES DATASET NUMBER
     660001     ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER
     660002     INTERVIEW NUMBER

                  STUDY PROCEDURE AND SAMPLING

     660003     PRIMARY SAMPLING UNIT AND PLACE IDENTIFICATION
     660004     SAMPLING COUNTY CODE
     660005     ICPSR COUNTY CODE *
     660006     BELT CODE
     660007     SIZE CODE FOR SURVEY OF CONSUMER FINANCES
     660008     SIZE CODE FOR INTERIM SURVEYS
     660009     DISTANCE TO CENTRAL CITY OF NEAREST SMSA
     660010     STATE OF INTERVIEW *
     660011     CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT OF INTERVIEW
     660012     DWELLING UNIT NUMBER
     660013     INTERVIEWER NUMBER
     660014     ADULT COMPOSITION OF PRIMARY FAMILY UNIT (PFU)
     660015     ADULT COMPOSITION OF SECONDARY FAMILY UNIT (SFU) 
     660016     POLITICALLY ELIGIBLE ADULTS IN PFU
     660017     DATE OF INTERVIEW
     660018     CODER

                  MAJOR PROBLEMS

     660019     R'S LIST OF MAJOR PROBLEMS *
     660020     TYPE OF GOVERNMENT ACTION R WANTS

                  POWER OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

     660021     R'S OPINION ON POWER OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
     660022     R CERTAIN GOVERNMENT IS (NOT) TOO POWERFUL
     660023     R'S POSITION ON POWER OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
     660024     FEDERAL POWER-REP OR DEM WOULD HANDLE BEST

                  SCHOOL INTEGRATION

     660025     SCHOOL INTEGRATION IS GOVERNMENT'S BUSINESS?  
     660026     SCHOOL INTEGRATION-R'S COMMENTS
     660027     R CERTAIN SCHOOL INTEGRATION IS (NOT) GOVERN-
                MENT'S BUSINESS                                 
     660028     R'S POSITION ON ISSUE OF SCHOOL INTEGRATION
     660029     SCHOOL INTEGRATION-REP OR DEM WOULD HANDLE BEST 
                  SCHOOL PRAYER

     660030     R'S OPINION ON SCHOOL PRAYER ISSUE
     660031     SCHOOL PRAYER-R'S COMMENTS                      
     660032     R CERTAIN SCHOOL PRAYER SHOULD (NOT) BE ALLOWED 
     660033     R'S POSITION ON SCHOOL PRAYER ISSUE            
     660034     SCHOOL PRAYER-REP OR DEM WOULD HANDLE BEST

                  VIETNAM

     660035     VIETNAM INTERVENTION-RIGHT OR WRONG           
     660036     VIETNAM-WHAT SHOULD U.S. DO?
     660037     VIETNAM-R'S COMMENTS            
     660038     VIETNAM-REP OR DEM WOULD HANDLE BEST         

                  BIGGER WAR

     660039     BIGGER WAR-PRESENT CHANCES
     660040     BIGGER WAR-REP OR DEM WOULD HANDLE BEST    
     660041     BIGGER WAR-WHY REP OR DEM WOULD HANDLE BEST    

                  RACE RELATIONS

     660042     R'S ESTIMATE OF CHANGE IN THE NEGROES' POSITION 
     660043     R'S VIEW OF THE PUSH OF CIVIL RIGHTS LEADERS

                  FINANCIAL SITUATION OF FAMILY UNIT

     660044     BETTER OR WORSE FINANCIALLY THAN THE YEAR BEFORE
     660045     MORE OR LESS MONEY THAN THE YEAR BEFORE
     660046     WHY IS FAMILY UNIT'S FINANCIAL STATUS DIFFERENT 
     660047     BETTER OR WORSE FINANCIALLY NEXT YEAR           

                  NATIONAL ECONOMIC SITUATION

     660048     WILL PRICES GO UP OR DOWN?                     
     660049     FUTURE PRICE CHANGES-GOOD OR BAD
     660050     GOOD OR BAD NATIONAL FINANCIAL FUTURE      
     660051     WHY GOOD OR BAD NATIONAL FINANCIAL FUTURE
     660052     PRESENT BUSINESS CONDITIONS BETTER OR WORSE    
     660053     READ OR HEARD ABOUT RECENT CHANGES IN BUSINESS
                CONDITIONS                                      
     660054     FUTURE BUSINESS CONDITIONS BETTER OR WORSE
     660055     MORE OR LESS UNEMPLOYMENT NEXT YEAR
     660056     WHY MORE OR LESS UNEMPLOYMENT IN THE FUTURE
     660057     GOOD OR BAD ECONOMIC TIMES DURING NEXT 5 YEARS
     660058     WILL RECESSION HAPPEN AGAIN
     660059     WHY RECESSION AGAIN
     660060     WHEN WILL RECESSION HAPPEN AGAIN
     660061     IS WORLD SITUATION AFFECTING BUSINESS CONDITIONS
                AT HOME
     660062     WHY IS WORLD SITUATION AFFECTING BUSINESS
                CONDITIONS AT HOME

                  PUBLIC INTEREST

     660063     CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS-R'S CONCERN
     660064     PUBLIC AFFAIRS-R'S INTEREST
     660065     PUBLIC AFFAIRS-WHICH MOST FOLLOWED BY R        
     660066     PUBLIC AFFAIRS-WHICH SECOND MOST FOLLOWED BY R
     660067     PUBLIC AFFAIRS-WHICH LEAST FOLLOWED BY R

                  ELECTIONS - PARTY ACTIVITY, R'S VOTING
                  BEHAVIOR, AND OTHER

     660068     ELECTIONS-R'S MEDIA OF INFORMATION *
     660069     ELECTIONS-WHO ASKED FOR R'S VIEWS
     660070     ELECTIONS-WHOM R TRIED TO INFLUENCE
     660071     WAS R CONTACTED BY POLITICAL PARTIES  
     660072     HOW MANY TIMES WAS R CONTACTED BY PARTIES
     660073     TIMES CONTACTED BY REPUBLICANS            
     660074     TIMES CONTACTED BY DEMOCRATS
     660075     CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION-WAS R ASKED
     660076     CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION-WHICH PARTY ASKED
     660077     CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION-DID R GIVE
     660078     CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION-TO WHICH PARTY DID R GIVE 
     660079     CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION-WOULD R HAVE GIVEN IF
                CONTACTED
     660080     PARTY DIFFERENCES-WHICH PARTY MENTIONED BY R 
     660081     PARTY DIFFERENCES-CONTENT OF R'S RESPONSE
     660082     R'S PARTY IDENTIFICATION *
     660083     R IS REGULAR VOTER IN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS    
     660084     R ALWAYS VOTES FOR SAME PARTY
     660085     R'S VOTE IN 1964 ELECTION
     660086     DID R VOTE IN PRIMARY
     660087     R'S INTEREST IN THE CAMPAIGNS

                  CONGRESSIONAL, SENATORIAL AND GUBERNATORIAL
                  RACES

     660088     KNOWLEDGE OF DEM CANDIDATE FOR CONGRESS
     660089     KNOWLEDGE OF REP CANDIDATE FOR CONGRESS
     660090     KNOWLEDGE OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES-NUMBER OF
                CORRECT NAMES AND PARTIES
     660091     DEM AND/OR REP CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES IN
                DISTRICT
     660092     R'S KNOWLEDGE OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDACY
                PATTERNS IN DISTRICT
     660093     WHICH CANDIDATE INCUMBENT CONGRESSMAN
     660094     R'S KNOWLEDGE OF INCUMBENT CONGRESSIONAL
                CANDIDATE
     660095     INCUMBENCY STATUS OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE
     660096     REPUBLICAN % OF CONGRESSIONAL VOTE
     660097     CONGRESSIONAL 1966 PARTY CANDIDACY PATTERN
     660098     GUBERNATORIAL 1966 PARTY CANDIDACY PATTERN
     660099     SENATORIAL 1966 PARTY CANDIDACY PATTERN
     660100     WHICH PARTY HAD MORE CONGRESSMEN BEFORE ELECTION
     660101     WHICH PARTY HAD MORE CONGRESSMEN AFTER ELECTION 

                  VOTING:  WHERE, HOW, FOR WHOM

     660102     DID R VOTE IN 1966 ELECTION
     660103     R VOTED IN WHICH DISTRICT         
     660104     STATE OF ABSENTEE VOTE *
     660105     CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT OF ABSENTEE VOTE     
     660106     VOTE BY VOTING MACHINE OR BY PAPER(BALLOT)
     660107     DID R VOTE FOR IN THE ELECTION FOR GOVERNOR    
     660108     WHICH GUBERNATORIAL CANDIDATE DID R VOTE FOR
     660109     DID R VOTE IN THE ELECTION FOR U.S. SENATOR  
     660110     WHICH SENATORIAL CANDIDATE DID R VOTE FOR  
     660111     DID R VOTE IN THE ELECTION FOR U.S. CONGRESSMAN
     660112     WHICH CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE DID R VOTE FOR  
     660113     DID R VOTE STRAIGHT OR SPLIT TICKET FOR OTHER
                STATE AND LOCAL OFFICES              
     660114     SPLIT TICKET PATTERNS

                  POLITICAL EFFICACY

     660115     PEOPLE LIKE ME HAVE NO POLITICAL POWER  
     660116     VOTING EFFECTIVE POLITICAL WEAPON     
     660117     POLITICS COMPLICATED FOR PEOPLE
     660118     PUBLIC OFFICIALS DON'T CARE

                  FEELINGS TOWARDS GROUPS - 'FEELING THERMOMETER'

     660119     R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS BIG BUSINESS
     660120     R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS LIBERALS
     660121     R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS CATHOLICS
     660122     R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS LAWYERS                  
     660123     R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS PROTESTANTS
     660124     R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS DEMOCRATS
     660125     R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS POLICEMEN
     660126     R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS JEWS
     660127     R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS LABOR UNIONS
     660128     R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS WHITES
     660129     R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS REPUBLICANS
     660130     R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS NEGROES                    
     660131     R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS CONSERVATIVES

     660132     POLICEMEN-ARE ANY R'S FRIENDS OR RELATIVES
     660133     LAWYERS-ARE ANY R'S FRIENDS OR RELATIVES
     660134     R EVER TAKEN PART IN TRIAL
     660135     WHICH OCCUPATIONS R ADMIRES MOST

                  TRUST IN PEOPLE (ROSENBERG)

     660136     PEOPLE CAN (NOT) BE TRUSTED-R'S OPINION
     660137     PEOPLE SELFISH OR HELPFUL-R'S OPINION

     660138     R'S ESTIMATE OF POLITICAL POWER OF PEOPLE LIKE
                HIMSELF

                  SUPREME COURT QUESTIONS

     660139     COVER SHEET
     660140     SUPREME COURT-ANYTHING R DISLIKES
     660141     SUPREME COURT-STRENGTH OF R'S DISLIKES
     660142     SUPREME COURT-ANYTHING R LIKES
     660143     SUPREME COURT-STRENGTH OF R'S LIKES
     660144     SUPREME COURT-ROLE IN THE GOVERNMENT
     660145     SUPREME COURT-HOW GOOD DOES ITS JOB
     660146     SUPREME COURT-TOO MIXED UP IN POLITICS
     660147     SUPREME COURT-R (NOT) SURE IT'S TOO MIXED UP
                IN POLITICS
     660148     WHICH R TRUSTS MORE:  SUPREME COURT OR CONGRESS
     660149     TRUST MORE SUPREME COURT OR CONGRESS-R IS HOW
                SURE
     660150     SUPREME COURT FAVORS SOME GROUPS               
     660151     SUPREME COURT FAVORS WHICH GROUPS
     660152     OPEN HOUSING-R AGREES OR DISAGREES      
     660153     OPEN HOUSING-STRENGTH OF R'S OPINION
     660154     OPEN HOUSING-DEPENDS ON WHAT               
     660155     SUPREME COURT AGAINST OPEN HOUSING-R'S FEELINGS
     660156     SUPREME COURT AGAINST OPEN HOUSING-R'S VIEW OF
                COURT
     660157     SUPREME COURT FAVORS OPEN HOUSING-R'S FEELINGS 
     660158     SUPREME COURT FAVORS OPEN HOUSING-R'S VIEW OF
                COURT
     660159     FREEDOM TO SELL INDECENT MAGAZINES-R'S OPINION
     660160     FREEDOM TO SELL INDECENT MAGAZINES-STRENGTH OF
                R'S OPINION
     660161     INDECENT MAGAZINES-SALE DEPENDS ON WHAT
     660162     SUPREME COURT AGAINST INDECENT MAGAZINES-R'S
                FEELINGS
     660163     SUPREME COURT AGAINST INDECENT MAGAZINES-R'S
                VIEW OF COURT
     660164     SUPREME COURT FAVORS INDECENT MAGAZINES-R'S
                FEELINGS
     660165     SUPREME COURT FAVORS INDECENT MAGAZINES-R'S
                VIEW OF COURT
     660166     NAMES OF SUPREME COURT JUSTICES
     660167     CORRECT NAMES (GIVEN) OF SUPREME COURT JUSTICES
     660168     HAS R HEARD OR READ ABOUT SUPREME COURT JUSTICES
     660169     FAVORABLE MENTIONS ABOUT JUSTICES
     660170     UNFAVORABLE MENTIONS ABOUT JUSTICES            
     660171     R HAS READ OR HEARD ABOUT CHANGES IN SUPREME
                COURT MEMBERSHIP
     660172     R AGREES OR DISAGREES WITH CHANGES IN SUPREME
                COURT MEMBERSHIP
     660173     CAN WE TRUST FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
     660174     IMPACT OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ON PEOPLE
     660175     POLITICAL POWER OF PEOPLE LIKE R
     660176     GOVERNMENT RUN BY BIG INTERESTS
     660177     ELECTIONS MAKE GOVERNMENT CARE
     660178     (NOT) PUNISH PERSON WHO BREAKS LAW AGAINST
                HIS RELIGION
     660179     BREAKING LAW AGAINST RELIGION-R'S COMMENTS
     660180     POLICE TREATMENT
     660181     POLICE TREATMENT IF R WENT TO ELECTED OFFICIAL 
     660182     BUREAUCRATIC TREATMENT
     660183     BUREAUCRATIC TREATMENT IF R WENT TO ELECTED
                OFFICIAL

                  LOCAL COMPETENCE

     660184     LOCAL UNJUST LAW-R'S ACTION
     660185     LOCAL UNJUST LAW-EFFECT OF R'S ACTION
     660186     LOCAL UNJUST LAW-WOULD R ACT
     660187     HOW HAS R TRIED TO INFLUENCE LOCAL DECISION

                  NATIONAL COMPETENCE

     660188     FEDERAL UNJUST LAW-R'S ACTION
     660189     FEDERAL UNJUST LAW-EFFECT OF R'S ACTION
     660190     FEDERAL UNJUST LAW-WOULD R ACT
     660191     HOW HAS R TRIED TO INFLUENCE ACT OF CONGRESS

                  PERSONAL DATA

     660192     R'S DATE OF BIRTH
     660193     R'S MARITAL STATUS
     660194     CHILDREN UNDER 18 YRS. IN FAMILY
     660195     AGE OF YOUNGEST CHILD
     660196     R'S LIFE CYCLE
     660197     R'S EDUCATION *                                
     660198     COLLEGE R ATTENDED *                           
     660199     HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD'S CURRENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS   
     660200     HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD WORKS FOR SELF OR OTHER
     660201     HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD'S OCCUPATION-POLITICAL
                BEHAVIOR OCCUPATION CODE *
     660202     HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD'S OCCUPATION-POLITICAL
                BEHAVIOR INDUSTRY CODE *
     660203     HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD'S OCCUPATION-CENSUS INDUSTRY
                CODE
     660204     HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD'S OCCUPATION-DUNCAN SOCIO-
                ECONOMIC STATUS SCALE

                  (QUESTIONS FOR FARMERS)
     660205     R'S FULL-TIME OR PART-TIME FARMER

     660206     FARMER'S PART-TIME JOB
     660207     HOURS PER WEEK SPENT ON PART-TIME JOB
     660208     WEEKS PER YEAR SPENT ON PART-TIME JOB
     660209     OWN, MANAGE OR RENT FARM
     660210     AMOUNT OF LAND FARMED
     660211     TYPE OF FARMING DONE *
     660212     FARM PRICE MOVEMENT IN PAST FOUR YEARS
     660213     EFFECT OF GOVERNMENT POLICY ON CROP PRICES
     660214     FARM SUBSIDIZATION-DOES R AGREE OR DISAGREE

                  PERSONAL DATA (CONT.)

     660215     WHO IN HOUSEHOLD A UNION MEMBER
     660216     UNION AFFILIATION OF HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS *
     660217     LENGTH OF UNION MEMBERSHIP
     660218     R'S SOCIAL CLASS IDENTIFICATION-MIDDLE CLASS
                OR WORKING CLASS
     660219     R'S SOCIAL CLASS-OWN RANKING
     660220     R'S SOCIAL CLASS-BACKGROUND
     660221     R'S CHURCH PREFERENCE *                        
     660222     CHURCH ATTENDANCE
     660223     WHERE WAS R BORN *
     660224     GENERATIONS IN UNITED STATES
     660225     PATRILINEAL ORIGIN *
     660226     MATRILINEAL ORIGIN *
     660227     NATIONALITY OF GRANDFATHER *
     660228     FATHER'S OCCUPATION WHILE R WAS GROWING UP
     660229     FARM FINANCIAL SITUATION-R IS A FARMER'S SON   
     660230     AREA WHERE R GREW UP *
     660231     R'S AGE WHEN HE MOVED HERE
     660232     SIZE OF PLACE WHERE R GREW UP
     660233     LENGTH OF CURRENT RESIDENCE
     660234     AREA OF PREVIOUS RESIDENCE
     660235     EXPECTED 1966 INCOME *
     660236     R'S SEX
     660237     R'S RACE
     660238     R'S RELATIONSHIP TO HEAD *

     660239     OTHER PERSONS PRESENT DURING INTERVIEW
     660240     R'S COOPERATION
     660241     R'S INTEREST IN POLITICS
     660242     R'S LEVEL OF POLITICAL INFORMATION