Version 01 Codebook
-------------------
CODEBOOK INTRODUCTION FILE
1974 POST-ELECTION STUDY
(1974.T)













                    AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES

                         1974 POST-ELECTION STUDY









                         PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS

                            WARREN E. MILLER
                            ARTHUR H. MILLER
                            F. GERALD KLINE


                     THE CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES
                        THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN




                       NOV.-DEC., 1974; JAN., 1975














                       ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER 7355







                        ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ASSISTANCE


           ALL MANUSCRIPTS UTILIZING DATA MADE AVAILABLE THROUGH

       THE CONSORTIUM SHOULD ACKNOWLEDGE THAT FACT AS WELL AS

       IDENTIFY THE ORIGINAL COLLECTOR OF THE DATA.  THE ICPSR

       COUNCIL URGES ALL USERS OF ICPSR DATA FACILITIES TO FOLLOW

       SOME ADAPTATION OF THIS STATEMENT WITH THE PARENTHESES IN-

       DICATING ITEMS TO BE FILLED IN APPROPRIATELY OR DELETED BY

       THE INDIVIDUAL USER.

             THE DATA (AND TABULATIONS) UTILIZED IN THIS
             (PUBLICATION) WERE MADE AVAILABLE (IN PART) BY
             THE INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL
             RESEARCH.  THE DATA FOR THE CPS 1974 AMERICAN
             NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY WERE ORIGINALLY COLLECTED
             BY THE CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES OF THE INSTITUTE
             FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH, THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
             UNDER GRANTS FROM THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION,
             THE JOHN AND MARY R. MARKLE FOUNDATION AND THE
             CARNEGIE CORPORATION.  NEITHER THE ORIGINAL
             COLLECTORS OF THE DATA NOR THE CONSORTIUM
             BEAR ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ANALYSES OR
             INTERPRETATIONS PRESENTED HERE.

           IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FUNDING AGENCIES WITH ESSENTIAL

       INFORMATION ABOUT THE USE OF ARCHIVAL RESOURCES, AND TO

       FACILITATE THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION ABOUT ICPSR PAR-

       TICIPANTS' RESEARCH ACTIVITIES, EACH USER OF THE ICPSR DATA

       FACILITIES IS EXPECTED TO SEND TWO COPIES OF EACH COMPLETED

       MANUSCRIPT OR THESIS ABSTRACT TO THE CONSORTIUM.  PLEASE

       INDICATE IN THE COVER LETTER WHICH DATA WERE USED.










                           TABLE OF CONTENTS



           Note: >>sections in the codebook introduction and
           codebook appendix can be navigated in the
           machine-readable files by searching ">>".

                                                        

INTRODUCTORY MATERIAL   (file int1974.cbk)
---------------------
>> 1974 STUDY DESCRIPTION
>> 1974 PUBLICATIONS, 1974 
>> 1974 SAMPLING INFORMATION 
>> 1974 WEIGHTING INFORMATION 
>> 1974 FILE STRUCTURE
>> 1974 CODEBOOK INFORMATION  
>> 1974 PROCESSING INFORMATION 
>> 1974 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST   



CODEBOOK
--------
     1974 variables



APPENDICES   (file app1974.cbk)
----------
>> 1974 STANDARD PRIMARY SAMPLING UNIT CODE
>> 1974 COUNTY CODES 
>> 1974 STATION CALL LETTER CODE
>> 1974 NEWSPAPER CODE
>> 1974 PERSONAL PROBLEMS CODE
>> 1974 NATIONAL PROBLEMS CODE
>> 1974 PERSON/ACTOR CODE
>> 1974 CANDIDATES FOR REPRESENTATIVE TO CONGRESS
>> 1974 CANDIDATES FOR U.S. SENATOR
>> 1974 CANDIDATES FOR GOVERNOR
>> 1974 PARTY/CANDIDATE MASTER CODE
>> 1974 FEELING THERMOMETER NOTE
>> 1974 ICPSR COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY CODE
>> 1974 CENSUS INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION
>> 1974 UNION CODE
>> 1974 THE STATE AND COUNTRY CODE
>> 1974 CENSUS COUNTY CODES













>> 1974 STUDY DESCRIPTION


           THE CPS 1974 AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY (CPS #
       495441) WAS CONDUCTED BY THE CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES OF
       THE INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH, THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHI-
       GAN UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WARREN MILLER, ARTHUR MILLER AND
       GERALD KLINE.  IT WAS THE THIRTEENTH IN A SERIES OF STUDIES
       OF NATIONAL ELECTIONS PRODUCED BY THE POLITICAL BEHAVIOR
       PROGRAM OF THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER AND THE CENTER FOR
       POLITICAL STUDIES.  THE STUDY WAS SUPPORTED BY GRANTS FROM
       THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION (SOC 75-02704), THE JOHN AND
       MARY R. MARKLE FOUNDATION AND THE CARNEGIE CORPORATION.

           THE BASIC DESIGN OF THE 1974 STUDY INCLUDES A SUBSET OF
       THE RESPONDENTS WHO HAD PREVIOUSLY BEEN INTERVIEWED IN THE
       1972 POST-ELECTION SURVEY.  THIS SET OF PANEL RESPONDENTS
       WAS THEN AUGMENTED WITH A SET OF NEW INTERVIEWS SELECTED SO
       AS TO PROVIDE A REPRESENTATIVE CROSS-SECTION OF U.S. CIT-
       IZENS WHEN COMBINED WITH THE NON-MOVING PANEL RESPONDENTS.
       NEW RESPONDENTS WERE NOT, HOWEVER, SELECTED AT THE SAME
       SAMPLING RATE AS 1972 RESPONDENTS; THUS WEIGHTING IS NECES-
       SARY TO FORM A REPRESENTATIVE CROSS-SECTION FROM THE TWO
       TYPES OF RESPONDENT.  THE 1974 AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION
       STUDY INCLUDES ONLY THE CROSS-SECTION SAMPLES, THAT IS,
       NON-MOVING PANEL RESPONDENTS AND THE RESPONDENTS WHO WERE
       ADDED IN 1974.  THE STUDY INCLUDES 1575 RESPONDENTS. RESPONDENTS
       WERE INTERVIEWED FROM NOVEMBER 5, 1974 THROUGH JANUARY 31,
       1975, FOLLOWING THE CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS.

           THE CPS AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY EXPLORED POLIT-
       ICAL ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOR IN THE CONTEXT OF THE WATERGATE
       EVENTS AND THE 1974 CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS.  THE PARTY
       IDENTIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENTS, THEIR VOTING HISTORY, AND
       INFORMATION ABOUT FACETS OF EARLY POLITICAL SOCIALIZATION
       WERE OBTAINED.  THE RESPONDENTS' SENSE OF POLITICAL EFFICACY
       AND CIVIC DUTY, THE DEGREE OF THEIR TRUST IN GOVERNMENT, AND
       THEIR EVALUATIONS OF GOVERNMENTAL RESPONSIVENESS WERE THE
       SUBJECTS OF QUESTIONS DESIGNED TO MEASURE DIMENSIONS OF THE
       RESPONDENTS' PERCEPTIONS OF THE RELAIONSHIP OF THE GOVERN-
       MENT TO ITS CITIZENS.

           CONSIDERABLE ATTENTION WAS ALSO FOCUSED ON WATERGATE
       EVENTS.  FEELING THERMOMETERS WERE USED TO TAP REACTIONS TO
       THE PRINCIPAL FIGURES IN THESE EVENTS.  ANOTHER SERIES OF
       QUESTIONS TAPPED ATTITUDES TOWARDS THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE'S
       IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS AND THE DECISION TO IMPEACH, NIXON'S
       RESIGNATION, AND FORD'S PARDON OF NIXON.  RESPONDENTS WERE
       ALSO ASKED TO EVALUATE MEDIA OBJECTIVITY IN COVERAGE OF THE
       INVOLVEMENT OF THE NIXON ADMINISTRATION IN THE WATERGATE
       AFFAIR.

           THE STUDY CONTAINED EXTENSIVE INQUIRIES INTO THE RESPON-
       DENTS' MEDIA-RELATED ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOR.  AN INITIAL
       SERIES OF QUESTIONS DEALT WITH THE GENERAL EXTENT OF MASS
       MEDIA USAGE, AND ALSO MEDIA USAGE SPECIFICALLY AS A NEWS
       SOURCE.  FURTHER QUESTIONS PROBED MORE DEEPLY INTO TELE-
       VISION AND NEWSPAPERS AS A SOURCE OF CAMPAIGN INFORMATION.
       ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS CONCERNED THE RESPONDENT'S MOTIVATIONS
       FOR FOLLOWING THE CAMPAIGN IN THE MASS MEDIA.

           OTHER ITEMS DEALT MORE SPECIFICALLY WITH THE 1974
       CAMPAIGN AND ELECTION.  THE RESPONDENTS' INTEREST IN THE
       CAMPAIGN AND CONCERN FOR THE OUTCOME OF THE ELECTION WERE
       ASCERTAINED, AND THEIR REPORTS OF THEIR 1974 VOTING BEHAVIOR
       WERE RECORDED.  IN ADDITION, RESPONDENTS WERE ASKED TO
       REPORT THEIR FEELINGS ABOUT POTENTIAL PRESIDENTIAL CANDI-
       DATES ON A FEELING THERMOMETER, AND TO GIVE THEIR SPECIFIC
       LIKES AND DISLIKES ABOUT THE SENATORIAL CANDIDATES.

           AS IN THE PAST, THE QUESTIONNAIRE INCLUDED AN INQUIRY
       INTO THE MAJOR PROBLEMS FACING THE COUNTRY.  A FEELING
       THERMOMETER SERIES WAS USED TO MEASURE RESPONDENT PERCEP-
       TIONS OF GROUP INFLUENCES IN AMERICAN LIFE AND POLITICS.
       ANOTHER SERIES OF SCALES MEASURED THE RESPONDENTS' POSITION
       AND THE POSITION OF THE POLITICAL PARTIES AND CERTAIN POLIT-
       ICAL LEADERS WITH REGARD TO POLITICAL ISSUES SUCH AS BUSING,
       WOMEN'S LIBERATION, URBAN UNREST, RIGHTS OF ACCUSED PERSONS,
       AID TO MINORITIES AND THE IMPORTANCE OF GOVERNMENT GUARAN-
       TEES OF LIVING STANDARDS.  FURTHER, RESPONDENTS WERE ASKED
       TO EVALUATE THEMSELVES AND POLITICAL LEADERS AND PARTIES
       ON A LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE SCALE.

           SEVERAL SERIES OF QUESTIONS DEALT WITH NON-POLITICAL
       ISSUES.  RESPONDENTS WERE QUESTIONED ABOUT THEIR PERCEPTION
       OF THEIR FINANCIAL CONDITION, AND ABOUT BUSINESS AND ECONOM-
       IC CONDITIONS IN THE NATION AS A WHOLE.  RESPONDENTS WERE
       ASKED TO EVALUATE THE QUALITY OF THEIR OWN LIFE IN A SERIES
       OF QUESTIONS DESIGNED TO MEASURE PERSONAL ESTEEM, TRUST AND
       QUALITY OF LIFE.

           THE PERSONAL DATA SECTION CONTAINED A WIDE VARIETY OF
       INFORMATION ABOUT THE RESPONDENTS AND THEIR FAMILIES.
       INFORMATION WAS SOUGHT ON EDUCATION, OCCUPATION, UNION
       MEMBERSHIP(S), AGE, SEX, MARITAL STATUS AND FAMILY COMPOSI-
       TION, SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS, ETHNIC BACKGROUND, INCOME LEVEL
       AND RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION.









>> 1974 PUBLICATIONS

       MILLER, ARTHUR H., JEFFREY BRUDNEY AND PETER JOFTIS,
         "PRESIDENTIAL CRISES AND POLITICAL SUPPORT:  THE IMPACT
         OF WATERGATE ON ATTITUDES TOWARD INSTITUTIONS," PAPER
         PRESENTED AT THE MIDWEST POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION
         CONVENTION, CHICAGO, MAY 1-3, 1975.











>> 1974 SAMPLING INFORMATION


          THE SAMPLE FOR THE 1974 CPS AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION
       STUDY WAS A COMBINATION OF TWO SAMPLES, EACH DERIVED FROM
       THE 1972 CPS AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY SAMPLE.  THE
       1972 SAMPLE WAS SUPPLEMENTED TO INCLUDE REPRESENTATIONS
       OF HOUSING UNITS AND CITIZENS ADDED TO THE STUDY UNIVERSE
       AFTER THE FALL OF 1972.  THE SAMPLING OF HOUSING UNITS
       UTILIZED THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER'S MASTER FRAME OF
       COTERMINOUS UNITED STATES HOUSING UNITS EXCLUSIVE OF
       THOSE ON MILITARY BASES.  <SEE KISH, LESLIE AND HESS,
       IRENE, "THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER'S NATIONAL SAMPLE OF
       DWELLINGS,"  ISR NUMBER 2315, ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN:
       INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH, THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN>

          THE 1972 SAMPLE OF HOUSING UNITS, SELECTED AT THE OVERALL
       RATE OF ABOUT 1/17,000, WAS DESIGNED TO YIELD APPROXIMATELY
       2,600 INTERVIEWS, ONE PER HOUSING UNIT, WITH UNITED STATES
       CITIZENS 18 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER ON OR BEFORE NOVEMBER 7,
       1972.  ALTHOUGH HOUSING UNITS HAD EQUAL SELECTION PROBABIL-
       ITIES, RESPONDENTS HAD DISPROPORTIONATE SELECTION RATES
       BECAUSE THE NUMBER OF ELIGIBLE PERSONS VARIES AMONG HOUSING
       UNITS.  THOSE PERSONS INTERVIEWED PRIOR TO THE 1972 ELECTION
       WERE CONTACTED AFTER NOVEMBER 7 FOR A POST-ELECTION INTER-
       VIEW.  THOSE PERSONS GRANTING TWO INTERVIEWS IN 1972 (PRE-
       AND POST-ELECTION) COMPRISE THE PANEL FOR THE 1974 STUDY.

                  THE 1974 PANEL STUDY

          THE PANEL STUDY IS SIMPLE IN CONCEPT.  AFTER THE 1974
       ELECTION, ATTEMPTS TO CONTACT THE 2191 RESPONDENTS WHO
       GRANTED BOTH A PRE- AND POST-ELECTION INTERVIEW IN 1972 WERE
       MADE.  IF A PANEL MAMBER HAD MOVED FROM HIS OR HER 1972
       RESIDENCE, EVERY REASONABLE EFFORT WAS MADE TO LOCATE THAT
       PERSON AND INTERVIEW HER OR HIM AT THE 1974 RESIDENCE.
       THUS, APPROXIMATELY 1625 INTERVIEWS WERE OBTAINED WITH
       PANEL MEMBERS.

                  THE 1974 CROSS-SECTION STUDY

       THE SAMPLE OF HOUSING UNITS

          INSTEAD OF SELECTING A NEW SAMPLE OF HOUSING UNITS
       (HU'S), A CURRENT CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE OF HU'S WAS CON-
       STRUCTED AT THE OVER-ALL RATE OF APPROXIMATELY 1/51,000
       BY SUB-SAMPLING THE 1972 SAMPLE HU'S AT THE RATE OF 1/3
       AND THEN ADDING TO THE 1972 SAMPLE A 1/51,000 SAMPLE OF
       HU'S THAT HAD ZERO CHANCE OF SELECTION IN 1972 FOR ONE OF
       THREE REASONS:  (1) THEY WERE OVERLOOKED IN 1972 WHEN THE
       LISTS WERE PREPARED; (2) THEY RESULTED FROM CONVERSIONS
       AFTER 1972; (3) THEY WERE NEWLY CONSTRUCTED AFTER 1972.


          THE SUBSAMPLING OF 1972 SAMPLE HU'S WAS ACCOMPLISHED
       IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER:

          1.  ONE-THIRD OF THE PANEL HU'S WERE DESIGNATED
              FOR THE CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE, THE SAMPLE
              SELECTION CUTTING ACROSS ALL REGIONS, ALL
              PRIMARY AREAS, ALL PLACES AND ALL SEGMENTS
              THAT HAD ONE OR MORE PANEL HU'S.  IF MORE
              THAN ONE HU WAS FOUND TO EXIST AT A DESIG-
              NATED PANEL ADDRESS, THOSE ADDITIONAL HU'S
              WERE ADDED TO THE 1974 SAMPLE.

          2.  ONE-THIRD OF THE 1972 VACANT HU'S, NON-RE-
              SPONSES AND PRE-ELECTION ONLY RESPONSES WERE
              CHOSEN FOR THE CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE IN A
              MANNER SIMILAR TO THE SUBSAMPLING OF PANEL
              HU'S.  IF MORE THAN ONE HU WAS FOUND AT A
              1972 ADDRESS, THOSE ADDITIONAL HU'S WERE
              ADDED TO THE 1974 SAMPLE.

          3.  INTERVIEWERS WERE INSTRUCTED TO UPDATE THE
              HU LISTINGS FOR EACH SAMPLE SEGMENT; THEN
              INSTRUCTIONS IN THE FORM OF LISTING SHEET
              LINE NUMBERS WERE PROVIDED, SO ONE-THIRD OF
              THE HU'S IN PREVIOUSLY UNLISTED RESIDENTIAL
              BUILDINGS WERE ADDED TO THE SAMPLE.


       THE SAMPLE OF ELIGIBLE PERSONS

          FOR THE 1974 CPS AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY,
       HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS WHO WERE UNITED STATES CITIZENS 16 YEARS
       OF AGE OR OVER WERE ELIGIBLE TO BE CHOSEN AS RESPONDENTS.
       SINCE ANY ELIGIBLE PERSON WHO WAS UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE ON
       NOVEMBER 7, 1972 HAD ZERO CHANCE OF SELECTION IN 1972, A
       PROCEDURE TO GIVE SUCH PERSONS A NON-ZERO CHANCE OF SELEC-
       TION IN 1974 WAS DEVISED.  THE SELECTION OF RESPONDENTS PRO-
       CEEDED AS FOLLOWS:

          1.  ONE-THIRD SELECTION OF 1972 NONPANEL HU'S:
              THESE ARE THE 1972 HU'S THAT WERE VACANT,
              PRODUCED NONRESPONSES OR ONLY A PRE-ELEC-
              TION RESPONSE.  AT EACH OF THESE HU'S,
              HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS 16 YEARS OF AGE AND
              OVER WERE LISTED AND AN INTERVIEW
              ATTEMPTED WITH AN OBJECTIVELY SELECTED
              RESPONDENT.  <SEE KISH, LESLIE, "A PRO-
              CEDURE FOR OBJECTIVE RESPONDENT SELEC-
              TION WITHIN THE HOUSEHOLD," JOURNAL OF
              THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION,
              44 (SEPTEMBER, 1949), PP. 380-387.>

          2.  1974 SAMPLE HU'S NON-EXISTENT IN 1972:
              AT EACH OF THESE HU'S HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS
              16 YEARS OF AGE AND OVER WERE LISTED AND
              AN INTERVIEW ATTEMPTED WITH AN OBJECTIVE-
              LY SELECTED RESPONDENT.

          3.  ONE-THIRD SAMPLE OF 1972 PANEL HU'S:
              THERE WERE THREE SITUATIONS:

              A)  THE PANEL MEMBER NO LONGER LIVED AT
                  THE HU.  IN THIS CASE, ALL HOUSEHOLD
                  MEMBERS 16 YEARS AND OVER WERE LISTED
                  AND AN INTERVIEW ATTEMPTED WITH ONE
                  OBJECTIVELY SELECTED RESPONDENT.

              B)  THE PANEL MEMBER STILL LIVED AT THE
                  1972 HU AND NO NEW MEMBERS HAD BEEN
                  ADDED TO THE HOUSEHOLD.  BY "NEW"
                  MEMBERS WE MEAN ANYONE WHO HAD ZERO
                  CHANCE OF SELECTION FOR THE 1972
                  STUDY.  WHEN THE PANEL MEMBER WAS
                  PRESENT AND THERE WERE NO NEW MEM-
                  BERS, THE PANEL MEMBER WAS ALSO THE
                  CROSS-SECTION RESPONDENT.

              C)  THE PANEL MEMBER WAS STILL LIVING
                  AT THE SAMPLE HU, BUT ONE OR MORE NEW
                  MEMBERS WERE PRESENT IN THE HOUSE-
                  HOLD.  INTERVIEWERS WERE INSTRUCTED
                  TO LIST ALL ELIGIBLE HOUSEHOLD MEM-
                  BERS AND TO CHOOSE ONE OBJECTIVELY.
                  <SEE KISH, OP. CIT.>  IF THE CHOSEN
                  PERSON WAS AN ELIGIBLE HOUSEHOLD
                  MEMBER IN 1972, THE PANEL MEMBER WAS
                  THE DESIGNATED RESPONDENT FOR THE
                  CROSS-SECTION STUDY AS WELL AS FOR
                  THE PANEL.  IF THE CHOSEN PERSON WAS
                  NOT AN ELIGIBLE HOUSEHOLD MEMBER IN
                  1972, A CROSS-SECTION INTERVIEW WAS
                  ATTEMPTED WITH THE OBJECTIVELY
                  CHOSEN PERSON.







>> 1974 WEIGHTING INFORMATION


           THE CPS 1974 AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY SAMPLE
       CONSISTED OF PANEL AND CROSS-SECTION COMPONENTS.  THE RE-
       CONTACTED RESPONDENTS FORMING THE PANEL WERE FIRST INTER-
       VIEWED IN THE PRE- AND POST-ELECTION PHASES OF THE 1972 CPS
       AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY.  OF THESE PANEL RESPON-
       DENTS 1101 WERE FOUND TO REMAIN AT THEIR 1972 ADDRESSES AND
       WERE INCORPORATED INTO THE 1974 CROSS SECTION SAMPLE.
       THESE RESPONDENTS WERE GIVEN A WEIGHT OF 1.  TO FORM A
       REPRESENTATIVE CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE OF ADULTS 16 YEARS AND
       OVER, 474 NON-PANEL RESPONDENTS WERE SELECTED BY SUB-
       SAMPLING THE 1972 SAMPLE OF HOUSING UNITS.  SINCE THE CROSS-
       SECTION (NON-PANEL) RESPONDENTS WERE SELECTED WITH A ONE-
       THIRD FRACTION OUT OF THE AVAILABLE ADDRESSES, THEY WERE
       GIVEN A WEIGHT OF 3.

            NOTE:  FOR PURPOSES OF THIS DATASET, PERSONS UNDER
       THE AGE OF 18 ON NOVEMBER 5, 1974 WERE DROPPED FROM THE
       SAMPLE.

           V742003, WEIGHTING VARIABLE, SHOULD BE USED IN CONJUNCTION
       WITH ANY ANALYSIS OF THIS DATA.  THE WEIGHTED N IS 2523.








>> 1974 FILE STRUCTURE


           THERE IS ONE WEIGHT VARIABLE IN THE CPS 1974 AMERICAN
       NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY.  (SEE V742003; THIS SHOULD BE USED
       IN CONJUNCTION WITH DATA ANALYSIS PROGRAMS.)








>> 1974 CODEBOOK INFORMATION

The following example from the 1948 NES study provides the standard 
format for codebook variable documentation. 

Note that NES studies which are not part of the Time-Series usually
omit marginals and the descriptive content in lines 2-5 (except for
variable name).


Line

1  ==============================                                              
2  VAR 480026    NAME-R NOT VT-WAS R REG TO VT                                 
3                COLUMNS 61   - 61                                             
4                NUMERIC                                                       
5                MD=0 OR GE 8                                                  
6                                                                              
7                  Q. 17.  (IF R DID NOT VOTE)  WERE YOU REGISTERED (ELIGIBLE)
8                  TO VOTE.                                                   
9                  ...........................................................
10                                                                            
11            82       1.  YES                                                
12           149       2.  NO                                                 
13                                                                             
14             0       8.  DK                                                 
15             9       9.  NA                                                 
16           422       0.  INAP., R VOTED                                     
                                                                            


Line 2 - VARIABLE NAME.  Note that in the codebook the variable name
         (usually a 'number') does not include the "V" prefix which is 
         used in the release SAS and SPSS data definition files
         (.sas and .sps files) for all variables including those
         which do not have 'number' names.  For example the variable
         "VERSION" in the codebook is "VVERSION" in the data definition
         files.

Line 2 - "NAME".  This is the variable label used in the SAS and SPSS
         data definition files (.sas and .sps files).  Some codebooks 
         exclude this.

Line 3 - COLUMNS.  Columns in the ASCII data file (.dat file).

Line 4 - CHARACTER OR NUMERIC.  If numeric and the variable is a decimal
         rather than integer variable, the numer of decimal places is 
         also indicated (e.g. "NUMERIC  DEC 4")

Line 5 - Values which are assigned to missing by default in the Study's
         SAS and and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files).

Line 7 - Actual question text for survey variables or a description of 
         non-survey variables (for example, congressional district).
         Survey items usually include the question number (for example
         "B1a.") from the Study questionnaire; beginning in 1996 
         non-survey items also have unique item numbers (for example
         "CSheet.1").

Line 9 - A dashed or dotted line usually separates question text from
         any other documentation which follows.

Line 10- When present, annotation provided by Study staff is presented
         below the question text/description and preceding code values.

Lines 11-16
         Code values are listed with descriptive labels.  Valid codes
         (those not having 'missing' status in line 5) are presented
         first, followed by the values described in line 5.  For
         continuous variables, one line may appear providing the range
         of possible values.  A blank line usually separates the 'valid'
         and 'missing' values.

Lines 11-16
         Marginals are usually provided for discrete variables.  The
         counts may be unweighted or weighted; check the Study codebook
         introductory text to determine weight usage.



>> 1974 PROCESSING INFORMATION


           THIS STUDY WAS PROCESSED ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD ICPSR
       PROCEDURES.  THE DATA WERE CHECKED FOR INCONSISTENT CODES,
       ILLEGAL CODES, AND BLANKS WHICH, WHENEVER FOUND, WERE
       CORRECTED BY REFERRING TO THE ORIGINAL INTERVIEW SCHEDULES.
       STATEMENTS BRACKETED IN "<" AND ">" SIGNS IN THE BODY OF
       THE CODEBOOK AND THE FOOTNOTES WERE ADDED BY THE PROCESSORS
       FOR EXPLANATORY PURPOSES.  THE PROCESSING OF THE STUDY WAS
       PLANNED AND EXECUTED PRIMARILY BY MICHAEL NOLTE WITH THE
       COLLABORATION OF PETER JOFTIS AND MITCHELL COHEN.








>> 1974 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST


       VAR.
       NO.

    VERSION NES VERSION NUMBER
     DSETNO NES DATASET NUMBER
     742001 ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER - 7355
     742002 INTERVIEW NUMBER
     742003 WEIGHT VARIABLE
     742004 FUTURE PANEL R IDENTIFICATION NUMBER


                  STUDY PROCEDURE AND SAMPLING INFORMATION

     742005 STATE OF INTERVIEW
     742006 REGION OF INTERVIEW
     742007 STATE AND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT OF INTERVIEW
     742008 ICPSR COUNTY CODE
     742009 SAMPLING COUNTY CODE
     742010 PRIMARY SAMPLING UNIT (PSU) OF INTERVIEW
     742011 PRIMARY SAMPLING UNIT AND PLACE IDENTIFICATION
     742012 ACTUAL POPULATION OF INTERVIEW PLACE
     742013 DISTANCE FROM PLACE OF INTERVIEW TO CENTER OF CENTRAL
             CITY OF NEAREST SMSA
     742014 DISTANCE FROM PLACE OF INTERVIEW TO CENTER OF CENTRAL
             CITY OF NEAREST SMSA OVER 349,999 PEOPLE
     742015 1970 CENSUS TRACT NUMBER FOR PLACE OF INTERVIEW
     742016 SIZE OF INTERVIEW PLACE-MASTER CODE
     742017 BELT CODE
     742018 NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS IN HOUSEHOLD
     742019 ADULT COMPOSITION OF PRIMARY FAMILY UNIT
     742020 NUMBER OF POLITICALLY ELIGIBLE ADULTS IN DWELLING UNIT
     742021 SEGMENT CODE
     742022 INTERVIEWER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
     742023 DATE OF INTERVIEW
     742024 LENGTH OF INTERVIEW
     742025 CODER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER


                  CONCERN ABOUT ELECTION

     742026 DOES R CARE HOW CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS COME OUT
     742027 DOES R FOLLOW POLITICS


                  TELEVISION AS A NEWS SOURCE

     742028 HOW OFTEN DOES R WATCH MORNING NATIONAL NEWS
     742029 HOW OFTEN DOES R WATCH DAYTIME TV ENTERTAINMENT
     742030 HOW OFTEN DOES R WATCH EARLY EVENING LOCAL NEWS
     742031 HOW OFTEN DOES R WATCH NATIONAL NEWS
     742032 HOW OFTEN DOES R WATCH EVENING TV ENTERTAINMENT
     742033 HOW OFTEN DOES R WATCH LATE EVENING LOCAL NEWS
     742034 WHICH NATIONAL EVENING NEWS DOES R WATCH MOST
     742035 WHICH STATION DOES R WATCH MOST FOR LOCAL NEWS

                  TELEVISION AS A SOURCE OF POLITICAL INFORMATION

     742036 DID R WATCH ANY PROGRAMS ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN
     742037 HOW MANY CAMPAIGN PROGRAMS DID R WATCH
     742038 DOES R WATCH TV TO LEARN THE CANDIDATES' STANDS
     742039 DOES R WATCH TV TO DECIDE HOW TO VOTE
     742040 DOES R WATCH TV TO ENJOY EXCITEMENT OF ELECTION
     742041 DOES R WATCH TV TO JUDGE THE CANDIDATES
     742042 DOES R WATCH TV TO REENFORCE CANDIDATE PREFERENCE
     742043 DOES R WATCH TV TO OBTAIN INFORMATION
     742044 DID R SEE ANY SENATE RACE ADVERTISEMENTS ON TV
     742045 DID R PAY ATTENTION TO SENATE RACE ADVERTISEMENTS


                  NEWSPAPERS AS AN INFORMATION SOURCE

     742046 DOES R READ A DAILY NEWSPAPER
     742047 WHICH NEWSPAPERS DOES R READ
     742048 WHAT LOCAL PAPER DOES R READ MOST FOR CURRENT EVENTS
     742049 HOW OFTEN DOES R READ PERSONAL INTEREST STORIES
     742050 HOW OFTEN DOES R READ NATIONAL POLITICAL NEWS
     742051 HOW OFTEN DOES R READ STATE AND LOCAL POLITICAL NEWS
     742052 HOW OFTEN DOES R READ COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
     742053 HOW OFTEN DOES R READ INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS
     742054 HOW OFTEN DOES R READ HOME AND GARDENING STORIES
     742055 HOW OFTEN DOES R READ STORIES ABOUT CRIME
     742056 HOW OFTEN DOES R READ EDITORIALS AND OPINION COLUMNS


                  NEWSPAPERS AS A SOURCE OF POLITICAL INFORMATION

     742057 DOES R READ PAPERS TO LEARN THE CANDIDATES' STANDS
     742058 DOES R READ PAPERS TO DECIDE HOW TO VOTE
     742059 DOES R READ PAPERS TO ENJOY EXCITEMENT OF ELECTION
     742060 DOES R READ PAPERS TO JUDGE THE CANDIDATES
     742061 DOES R READ PAPERS TO REENFORCE CANDIDATE PREFERENCE
     742062 DOES R READ PAPERS TO OBTAIN INFORMATION
     742063 DID R READ ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN IN ANY NEWSPAPER
     742064 HOW OFTEN DID R READ ABOUT U.S. SENATE CAMPAIGN
     742065 HOW OFTEN DID R READ ABOUT U.S. HOUSE CAMPAIGN

     742066 R RELY ON TV/NEWSPAPERS FOR POLITICAL INFORMATION

                  R'S PERSONAL PROBLEMS

     742067 WHAT PERSONAL PROBLEMS DOES R FACE - FIRST MENTION
     742068 WHAT PERSONAL PROBLEMS DOES R FACE - SECOND MENTION
     742069 WHAT PERSONAL PROBLEMS DOES R FACE - THIRD MENTION
     742070 DOES R MENTION ANY PERSONAL PROBLEM
     742071 WHAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT PERSONAL PROBLEM R FACES
     742072 DOES R WORK OUT PERSONAL PROBLEM ALONE
     742073 WHO SHOULD HELP R WITH PERSONAL PROBLEMS
     742074 HOW HELPFUL IS GOVERNMENT WITH R'S PROBLEMS


                  MOST IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEMS

     742075 IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM - FIRST MENTION
     742076 IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM - SECOND MENTION
     742077 IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM - THIRD MENTION

     742078 DOES R MENTION ANY IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM
     742079 WHAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM


                  NEWSPAPER COVERAGE -- NATIONAL PROBLEMS

     742080 DID R READ ABOUT IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEMS IN PAPER
     742081 FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM R READ ABOUT
     742082 LEVEL OF FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM
     742083 PERSON/ACTOR DIMENSION 1 - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM
     742084 PERSON/ACTOR DIMENSION 2 - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM
     742085 CRITICISM/PRAISE DIMENSION 1 - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM
     742086 OBJECT OF CRITICISM/PRAISE 1 - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM
     742087 CRITICISM/PRAISE DIMENSION 2 - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM
     742088 OBJECT OF CRITICISM/PRAISE 2 - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM
     742089 PROPOSAL FOR ACTION DIMENSION - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM
     742090 KEYWORD DIMENSION (MENTION 1) - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM
     742091 KEYWORD DIMENSION (MENTION 2) - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM

     742092 SECOND NATIONAL PROBLEM R READ ABOUT
     742093 LEVEL OF SECOND NATIONAL PROBLEM

                  TELEVISION COVERAGE - NATIONAL PROBLEMS

     742094 DID R SEE ANYTHING ABOUT IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEMS
             ON TELEVISION
     742095 FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM R SAW ON TELEVISION
     742096 LEVEL OF FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM
     742097 PERSON/ACTOR DIMENSION 1 - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM
     742098 PERSON/ACTOR DIMENSION 2 - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM
     742099 CRITICISM/PRAISE DIMENSION 1 - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM
     742100 OBJECT OF CRITICISM/PRAISE 1 - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM
     742101 CRITICISM/PRAISE DIMENSION 2 - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM
     742102 OBJECT OF CRITICISM/PRAISE 2 - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM
     742103 PROPOSAL FOR ACTION DIMENSION - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM
     742104 KEYWORD DIMENSION (MENTION 1) - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM
     742105 KEYWORD DIMENSION (MENTION 2) - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM

     742106 SECOND NATIONAL PROBLEM R SAW ON TELEVISION
     742107 LEVEL OF SECOND NATIONAL PROBLEM

     742108 HOW HELPFUL IS GOVERNMENT ON MOST IMPORTANT
             NATIONAL PROBLEM


                  IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEMS - ELECTION CAMPAIGN

     742109 WHAT WAS THE FIRST IMPORTANT THING THAT R READ
             ABOUT DURING THE CAMPAIGN
     742110 LEVEL OF PROBLEM - FIRST CAMPAIGN EVENT
     742111 PERSON/ACTOR DIMENSION 1 - FIRST CAMPAIGN EVENT
     742112 PERSON/ACTOR DIMENSION 2 - FIRST CAMPAIGN EVENT
     742113 CRITICISM/PRAISE DIMENSION 1 - FIRST CAMPAIGN EVENT
     742114 OBJECT OF CRITICISM/PRAISE 1 - FIRST CAMPAIGN EVENT
     742115 CRITICISM/PRAISE DIMENSION 2 - FIRST CAMPAIGN EVENT
     742116 OBJECT OF CRITICISM/PRAISE 2 - FIRST CAMPAIGN EVENT
     742117 PROPOSAL FOR ACTION DIMENSION - FIRST CAMPAIGN EVENT
     742118 KEYWORD DIMENSION (MENTION 1) - FIRST CAMPAIGN EVENT
     742119 KEYWORD DIMENSION (MENTION 2) - FIRST CAMPAIGN EVENT

     742120 WHAT WAS THE SECOND IMPORTANT THING THAT R READ
             ABOUT DURING THE CAMPAIGN
     742121 LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT - SECOND CAMPAIGN EVENT


                  NEWSPAPER COVERAGE OF IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM

     742122 HOW MUCH DID R READ ABOUT NATIONAL PROBLEM IN PAPERS
     742123 WAS NEWSPAPER COVERAGE OF NATIONAL PROBLEM FAIR

                  DISCUSSION OF MOST IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM

     742124 DID R DISCUSS NATIONAL PROBLEM WITH ANYONE
     742125 WHOM DID R DISCUSS NATIONAL PROBLEM WITH - MENTION 1
     742126 WHOM DID R DISCUSS NATIONAL PROBLEM WITH - MENTION 2


                  SALIENT ISSUES IN SENATE CAMPAIGN

     742127 R MENTIONS HONESTY IN GOVERNMENT--SENATE CAMPAIGN ISSUE
     742128 R MENTIONS TAXES AS SENATE CAMPAIGN ISSUE
     742129 R MENTIONS INFLATION AS SENATE CAMPAIGN ISSUE
     742130 R MENTIONS ENERGY SHORTAGES AS SENATE CAMPAIGN ISSUE
     742131 R MENTIONS UNEMPLOYMENT AS SENATE CAMPAIGN ISSUE
     742132 R MENTIONS FOREIGN RELATIONS AS SENATE CAMPAIGN ISSUE
     742133 R MENTIONS RACIAL TOPICS AS SENATE CAMPAIGN ISSUE
     742134 R MENTIONS CRIME/DRUGS AS SENATE CAMPAIGN ISSUE
     742135 R MENTIONS CONSUMER PROTECTION AS SENATE CAMPAIGN ISSUE
     742136 R MENTIONS POLLUTION AS SENATE CAMPAIGN ISSUE


                  ISSUES WHICH ARE IMPORTANT TO R

     742137 R MENTIONS HONESTY IN GOVERNMENT AS IMPORTANT ISSUE
     742138 R MENTIONS TAXES AS IMPORTANT ISSUE
     742139 R MENTIONS INFLATION AS IMPORTANT ISSUE
     742140 R MENTIONS ENERGY SHORTAGES AS IMPORTANT ISSUE
     742141 R MENTIONS UNEMPLOYMENT AS IMPORTANT ISSUE
     742142 R MENTIONS FOREIGN RELATIONS AS IMPORTANT ISSUE
     742143 R MENTIONS RACIAL TOPICS AS IMPORTANT ISSUE
     742144 R MENTIONS CRIME/DRUGS AS IMPORTANT ISSUE
     742145 R MENTIONS CONSUMER PROTECTION AS IMPORTANT ISSUE
     742146 R MENTIONS POLLUTION AS IMPORTANT ISSUE


                  R'S RANKING OF IMPORTANT ISSUES

     742147 ISSUE RANKED BY R:  HONESTY IN GOVERNMENT
     742148 ISSUE RANKED BY R:  TAXES
     742149 ISSUE RANKED BY R:  INFLATION
     742150 ISSUE RANKED BY R:  ENERGY SHORTAGES
     742151 ISSUE RANKED BY R:  UNEMPLOYMENT
     742152 ISSUE RANKED BY R:  FOREIGN RELATIONS
     742153 ISSUE RANKED BY R:  RACIAL ISSUES
     742154 ISSUE RANKED BY R:  CRIME/DRUGS
     742155 ISSUE RANKED BY R:  CONSUMER PROTECTION
     742156 ISSUE RANKED BY R:  POLLUTION

     742157 DOES R APPROVE OF THE WAY FORD IS HANDLING HIS JOB

                  NIXON'S RESIGNATION

     742158 WAS R (DIS)PLEASED BY NIXON'S RESIGNATION
     742159 WHY WAS R (DIS)PLEASED BY NIXON RESIGNATION - MENTION 1
     742160 WHY WAS R (DIS)PLEASED BY NIXON RESIGNATION - MENTION 2
     742161 WERE THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE HEARINGS FAIR
     742162 DID R (DIS)APPROVE OF THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE'S
             IMPEACHMENT DECISION
     742163 WHY DID R (DIS)APPROVE OF THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE'S
             IMPEACHMENT DECISION - FIRST MENTION
     742164 WHY DID R (DIS)APPROVE OF THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE'S
             IMPEACHMENT DECISION - SECOND MENTION
     742165 HOW FAIR WAS MEDIA COVERAGE OF THE WATERGATE AFFAIR


                  FORD'S PARDON OF NIXON

     742166 SHOULD FORD HAVE PARDONED NIXON
     742167 SHOULD FORD HAVE PARDONED NIXON AFTER TRIAL/NOT AT ALL
     742168 WHY SHOULD FORD (NOT) HAVE PARDONED NIXON - MENTION 1
     742169 WHY SHOULD FORD (NOT) HAVE PARDONED NIXON - MENTION 2
     742170 SHOULD FORD HAVE WAITED UNTIL AFTER TRIAL BEFORE PARDON


                  R'S EVALUATION OF NIXON'S RESIGNATION

     742171 WAS NIXON'S RESIGNATION GOOD/BAD FOR COUNTRY
     742172 WHY NIXON'S RESIGNATION GOOD/BAD FOR COUNTRY--MENTION 1
     742173 WHY NIXON'S RESIGNATION GOOD/BAD FOR COUNTRY--MENTION 2


                  SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN

     742174 DOES R REMEMBER THE SENATORIAL CANDIDATES
     742175 WHO WERE THE SENATORIAL CANDIDATES - MENTION 1
     742176 WHO WERE THE SENATORIAL CANDIDATES - MENTION 2
     742177 WAS THERE ANYTHING R LIKED ABOUT THE DEMOCRAT
     742178 WHAT DID R LIKE ABOUT DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE - MENTION 1
     742179 WHAT DID R LIKE ABOUT DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE - MENTION 2
     742180 WHAT DID R LIKE ABOUT DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE - MENTION 3
     742181 WAS THERE ANYTHING R DISLIKED ABOUT THE DEMOCRAT
     742182 WHAT R DISLIKED ABOUT DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE - MENTION 1
     742183 WHAT R DISLIKED ABOUT DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE - MENTION 2
     742184 WHAT R DISLIKED ABOUT DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE - MENTION 3
     742185 WAS THERE ANYTHING R LIKED ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN
     742186 WHAT DID R LIKE ABOUT REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE - MENTION 1
     742187 WHAT DID R LIKE ABOUT REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE - MENTION 2
     742188 WHAT DID R LIKE ABOUT REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE - MENTION 3
     742189 WAS THERE ANYTHING R DISLIKED ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN
     742190 WHAT R DISLIKED ABOUT REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE - MENTION 1
     742191 WHAT R DISLIKED ABOUT REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE - MENTION 2
     742192 WHAT R DISLIKED ABOUT REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE - MENTION 3


                  PARTY CONTACTS WITH R DURING CAMPAIGN

     742193 DID A POLITICAL PARTY WORKER CONTACT R DURING CAMPAIGN
     742194 WHICH PARTY(S) CONTACTED R DURING CAMPAIGN


                  R'S POLITICAL ACTIVITY

     742195 DID R TRY TO INFLUENCE OTHERS' VOTE CHOICES
     742196 DID R ATTEND ANY POLITICAL MEETINGS OR RALLIES
     742197 DID R WORK FOR A PARTY OR CANDIDATE
     742198 DID R WEAR A BUTTON OR PUT A STICKER ON THE CAR
     742199 DID R GIVE ANY MONEY TO A POLITICAL PARTY
     742200 WHICH PARTY DID R GIVE MONEY TO


                  PARTY IDENTIFICATION

     742201 DOES R CONSIDER SELF AS REPUBLICAN/DEMOCRAT/OTHER
     742202 STRENGTH OF DEMOCRAT/REPUBLICAN IDENTIFICATION
     742203 R THINK OF SELF AS CLOSER REPUBLICAN/DEMOCRATIC PARTY
     742204 R'S PARTY IDENTIFICATION
     742205 DID R EVER HAVE A DIFFERENT PARTY IDENTIFICATION
     742206 WHAT WAS R'S PREVIOUS PARTY IDENTIFICATION
     742207 (IF REPUBLICAN/DEMOCRAT) WHEN DID R CHANGE PARTY
             IDENTIFICATION


                  NON-IDENTIFIERS -- INDEPENDENTS

     742208 (IF CLOSER TO ONE PARTY) DID R EVER CONSIDER SELF AS
             CLOSER TO OTHER PARTY
     742209 (IF CLOSE TO NEITHER PARTY) DID R EVER CONSIDER SELF AS
             CLOSER TO REPUBLICAN/DEMOCRATIC PARTY
     742210 (IF INDEPENDENT/OTHER) WHEN DID R CHANGE PARTY
             IDENTIFICATION

                  PAST PRESIDENTIAL VOTING BEHAVIOR

     742211 HAS R VOTED IN ALL POSSIBLE PAST PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS
     742212 HAS R ALWAYS VOTED FOR THE SAME PARTY FOR PRESIDENT
     742213 PARTY R SUPPORTED IN PAST-PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS


                  CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN

     742214 DOES R REMEMBER THE CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES
     742215 WHO WERE THE CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES - FIRST MENTION
     742216 WHO WERE THE CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES - SECOND MENTION
     742217 WHO WERE THE CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES - THIRD MENTION
     742218 FROM WHICH PARTY WERE THE CANDIDATES - 1ST CANDIDATE
     742219 FROM WHICH PARTY WERE THE CANDIDATES - 2ND CANDIDATE
     742220 FROM WHICH PARTY WERE THE CANDIDATES - 3RD CANDIDATE
     742221 DID BOTH MAJOR PARTIES RUN CANDIDATES IN R'S DISTRICT


                  POLITICAL EFFICACY

     742222 DO PEOPLE LIKE R HAVE ANY SAY IN WHAT GOVERNMENT DOES
     742223 IS VOTING THE ONLY WAY PEOPLE LIKE R HAVE A SAY
     742224 IS POLITICS TOO COMPLICATED FOR R TO UNDERSTAND
     742225 DO OFFICIALS CARE WHAT PEOPLE LIKE R THINK
     742226 DO CONGRESSMEN LOSE TOUCH WITH PEOPLE QUICKLY
     742227 ARE PARTIES INTERESTED IN PEOPLE'S VOTES, NOT OPINION
     742228 IS EVERYONE TREATED EQUALLY BY LAWS


                  CYNICISM AND TRUST IN GOVERNMENT

     742229 DO PEOPLE IN GOVERNMENT WASTE A LOT OF TAX MONEY
     742230 HOW MUCH CAN R TRUST FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO DO RIGHT
     742231 IS GOVERNMENT RUN FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL OR A FEW
     742232 DO GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS USUALLY KNOW WHAT THEY'RE DOING
     742233 ARE MANY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS A LITTLE CROOKED

                  GOVERNMENT ATTENTION TO PEOPLE

     742234 HOW MUCH DOES GOVERNMENT LISTEN TO PEOPLE
     742235 HOW MUCH DO PARTIES MAKE GOVERNMENT LISTEN
     742236 HOW MUCH DO ELECTIONS MAKE GOVERNMENT LISTEN
     742237 ARE CONGRESSMEN ATTENTIVE TO THEIR CONSTITUENCIES

                  R'S ATTITUDE:  PROTEST, CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE

     742238 WOULD R APPROVE OF TAKING PART IN LEGAL PROTESTS
     742239 WOULD R APPROVE OF DISOBEYING UNJUST LAW
     742240 WOULD R APPROVE OF EFFORTS TO STOP GOVERNMENT OPERATION


                  EVALUATION OF GOVERNMENTAL INSTITUTIONS

     742241 WHICH PART OF GOVERNMENT CAN BE MOST OFTEN TRUSTED
     742242 WHICH PART OF GOVERNMENT CAN BE NEXT MOST OFTEN TRUSTED
     742243 WHICH PART OF GOVERNMENT CAN BE LEAST OFTEN TRUSTED


                  CONFIDENCE IN NATIONAL/STATE/LOCAL GOVERNMENT

     742244 LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT R HAS MOST CONFIDENCE IN
     742245 WHY R HAS CONFIDENCE IN LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT - MENTION 1
     742246 WHY R HAS CONFIDENCE IN LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT - MENTION 2
     742247 LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT R HAS LEAST CONFIDENCE IN
     742248 WHY R LACKS CONFIDENCE IN LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT-MENTION 1
     742249 WHY R LACKS CONFIDENCE IN LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT-MENTION 2


                  INSTITUTIONAL PERFORMANCE

     742250 HOW GOOD A JOB IS DONE BY NATIONAL TELEVISION NEWS
     742251 HOW GOOD A JOB IS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DOING
     742252 HOW GOOD A JOB ARE STATE GOVERNMENTS DOING
     742253 HOW GOOD A JOB ARE LOCAL GOVERNMENTS DOING
     742254 HOW GOOD A JOB IS THE PRESIDENCY DOING
     742255 HOW GOOD A JOB IS THE CONGRESS DOING
     742256 HOW GOOD A JOB IS THE SUPREME COURT DOING


                  INSTITUTIONAL INFLUENCE

     742257 HOW MUCH INFLUENCE SHOULD NATIONAL TELEVISION NEWS HAVE
     742258 HOW MUCH INFLUENCE SHOULD THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAVE
     742259 HOW MUCH INFLUENCE SHOULD STATE GOVERNMENTS HAVE
     742260 HOW MUCH INFLUENCE SHOULD LOCAL GOVERNMENTS HAVE
     742261 HOW MUCH INFLUENCE SHOULD THE PRESIDENCY HAVE
     742262 HOW MUCH INFLUENCE SHOULD CONGRESS HAVE
     742263 HOW MUCH INFLUENCE SHOULD THE SUPREME COURT HAVE

     742264 ARE CIVIL RIGHTS PEOPLE PUSHING TOO FAST

                  GOVERNMENT GUARANTEED JOB & LIVING STANDARD SCALE

     742265 R'S POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD
             SCALE
     742266 FORD'S POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD
             SCALE
     742267 WALLACE'S POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING
             STANDARD SCALE
     742268 NIXON'S POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD
             SCALE
     742269 DEMOCRATS' POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING
             STANDARD SCALE
     742270 REPUBLICANS' POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING
             STANDARD SCALE
     742271 DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE'S POSITION ON GUARANTEED
             JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE
     742272 REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE'S POSITION ON GUARANTEED
             JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE


                  HANDLING URBAN UNREST SCALE

     742273 R'S POSITION ON HANDLING URBAN UNREST SCALE
     742274 FORD'S POSITION ON HANDLING URBAN UNREST SCALE
     742275 WALLACE'S POSITION ON HANDLING URBAN UNREST SCALE
     742276 NIXON'S POSITION ON HANDLING URBAN UNREST SCALE
     742277 DEMOCRATS' POSITION ON HANDLING URBAN UNREST SCALE
     742278 REPUBLICANS' POSITION ON HANDLING URBAN UNREST SCALE
     742279 DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE'S POSITION ON HANDLING
             URBAN UNREST SCALE
     742280 REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE'S POSITION ON HANDLING
             URBAN UNREST SCALE


                  RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED SCALE

     742281 R'S POSITION ON RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED SCALE
     742282 FORD'S POSITION ON RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED SCALE
     742283 WALLACE'S POSITION ON RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED SCALE
     742284 DEMOCRATS' POSITION ON RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED SCALE
     742285 REPUBLICANS' POSITION ON RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED SCALE
     742286 DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE'S POSITION ON RIGHTS OF
             THE ACCUSED SCALE
     742287 REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE'S POSITION ON RIGHTS OF
             THE ACCUSED SCALE

                  SCHOOL BUSING TO ACHIEVE INTEGRATION SCALE

     742288 R'S POSITION ON SCHOOL BUSING SCALE
     742289 FORD'S POSITION ON SCHOOL BUSING SCALE
     742290 WALLACE'S POSITION ON SCHOOL BUSING SCALE
     742291 NIXON'S POSITION ON SCHOOL BUSING SCALE
     742292 DEMOCRATS' POSITION ON SCHOOL BUSING SCALE
     742293 REPUBLICANS' POSITION ON SCHOOL BUSING SCALE
     742294 DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE'S POSITION ON SCHOOL
             BUSING SCALE
     742295 REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE'S POSITION ON SCHOOL
             BUSING SCALE


                  GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES SCALE

     742296 R'S POSITION ON GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES SCALE
     742297 FORD'S POSITION ON GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES SCALE
     742298 WALLACE'S POSITION--GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES SCALE
     742299 NIXON'S POSITION ON GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES SCALE
     742300 DEMOCRATS' POSITION ON GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES
             SCALE
     742301 REPUBLICANS' POSITION ON GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES
             SCALE


                  EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN SCALE

     742302 R'S POSITION ON EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN SCALE
     742303 DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE'S POSITION ON EQUAL RIGHTS
             FOR WOMEN SCALE
     742304 REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE'S POSITION ON EQUAL RIGHTS
             FOR WOMEN SCALE


                  LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE

     742305 R'S POSITION ON LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE
     742306 FORD'S POSITION ON LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE
     742307 WALLACE'S POSITION ON LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE
     742308 NIXON'S POSITION ON LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE
     742309 DEMOCRATS' POSITION ON LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE
     742310 REPUBLICANS' POSITION ON LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE VIEWS
             SCALE
     742311 DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE'S POSITION ON LIBERAL/
             CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE
     742312 REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE'S POSITION ON LIBERAL/
             CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE

                  R'S PERSONAL FINANCIAL SITUATION

     742313 DOES R FEEL BETTER OFF FINANCIALLY THAN A YEAR AGO
     742314 WILL R BE BETTER OFF FINANCIALLY THAN A YEAR AGO


                  BUSINESS CONDITIONS

     742315 WILL BUSINESS CONDITIONS BE GOOD DURING NEXT YEAR
     742316 WHY DOES R THINK BUSINESS CONDITIONS WILL BE GOOD/BAD


                  GOVERNMENT ECONOMIC POLICY

     742317 IS THE GOVERNMENT DOING A GOOD JOB WITH ECONOMIC POLICY
     742318 WHICH PARTY CAN BEST HANDLE INFLATION PROBLEMS


                  R'S 1974 ELECTION VOTING BEHAVIOR

     742319 DID R VOTE IN THE 1974 ELECTION
     742320 DID R VOTE FOR CONGRESSMAN IN 1974
     742321 WHOM DID R VOTE FOR CONGRESSMAN - CANDIDATE
     742322 WHOM DID R VOTE FOR CONGRESSMAN - PARTY NAMED BY R
     742323 DID R VOTE FOR U.S. SENATOR IN 1974
     742324 WHOM DID R VOTE FOR SENATOR - CANDIDATE
     742325 WHOM DID R VOTE FOR SENATOR - PARTY NAMED BY R
     742326 DID R VOTE FOR GOVERNOR IN 1974
     742327 WHOM DID R VOTE FOR GOVERNOR - CANDIDATE
     742328 WHOM DID R VOTE FOR GOVERNOR - PARTY NAMED BY R


                  OTHER STATE AND LOCAL OFFICES

     742329 DID R VOTE A STRAIGHT TICKET FOR OTHER OFFICES IN 1974
     742330 (STRAIGHT TICKET) PARTY SUPPORTED IN STATE/LOCAL RACES
     742331 (IF SPLIT TICKET) PARTY SUPPORTED IN STATE/LOCAL RACES
     742332 RECODE: TICKET TYPE AND PARTY SUPPORTED IN STATE/
             LOCAL RACES


                  PROPOSITIONS ON BALLOT

     742333 WERE THERE ANY PROPOSITIONS ON THE 1974 BALLOT
     742334 HOW MANY PROPOSITIONS DID R VOTE ON
     742335 SHOULD MORE ISSUES BE DECIDED AT THE POLLS
     742336 ISSUES R FEELS SHOULD BE DECIDED AT POLLS - 1ST MENTION
     742337 ISSUES R FEELS SHOULD BE DECIDED AT POLLS - 2ND MENTION

                  "FEELING THERMOMETER" - POLITICAL/MEDIA FIGURES

     742338 FEELING THERMOMETER - GEORGE WALLACE
     742339 FEELING THERMOMETER - GERALD FORD
     742340 FEELING THERMOMETER - LEON JAWORSKI
     742341 FEELING THERMOMETER - JOHN MITCHELL
     742342 FEELING THERMOMETER - NELSON ROCKEFELLER
     742343 FEELING THERMOMETER - JOHN ERLICHMAN
     742344 FEELING THERMOMETER - WALTER CRONKITE
     742345 FEELING THERMOMETER - JOHN CHANCELLOR
     742346 FEELING THERMOMETER - PETER RODINO
     742347 FEELING THERMOMETER - EDWARD "TED" KENNEDY
     742348 FEELING THERMOMETER - HENRY "SCOOP" JACKSON
     742349 FEELING THERMOMETER - JUDGE JOHN SIRICA
     742350 FEELING THERMOMETER - HOWARD K. SMITH
     742351 FEELING THERMOMETER - JOHN DEAN
     742352 FEELING THERMOMETER - HUBERT HUMPHREY
     742353 FEELING THERMOMETER - WALTER MONDALE
     742354 FEELING THERMOMETER - RICHARD NIXON
     742355 FEELING THERMOMETER - LLOYD BENTSEN


                  "FEELING THERMOMETER" - GROUPS IN SOCIETY

     742356 FEELING THERMOMETER - BIG BUSINESS
     742357 FEELING THERMOMETER - POOR PEOPLE
     742358 FEELING THERMOMETER - LIBERALS
     742359 FEELING THERMOMETER - RADICAL STUDENTS
     742360 FEELING THERMOMETER - POLICEMEN
     742361 FEELING THERMOMETER - OLDER PEOPLE
     742362 FEELING THERMOMETER - THE MILITARY
     742563 FEELING THERMOMETER - WHITES
     742364 FEELING THERMOMETER - DEMOCRATS
     742365 FEELING THERMOMETER - BLACKS
     742366 FEELING THERMOMETER - REPUBLICANS
     742367 FEELING THERMOMETER - LABOR UNIONS
     742368 FEELING THERMOMETER - YOUNG PEOPLE
     742369 FEELING THERMOMETER - CONSERVATIVES
     742370 FEELING THERMOMETER - WOMEN'S LIBERATION MOVEMENT
     742371 FEELING THERMOMETER - MARIJUANA USERS
     742372 FEELING THERMOMETER - BLACK MILITANTS
     742373 FEELING THERMOMETER - CIVIL RIGHTS LEADERS
     742374 FEELING THERMOMETER - POLITICIANS
     742375 FEELING THERMOMETER - FARMERS
     742376 FEELING THERMOMETER - MIDDLE-CLASS PEOPLE
     742377 FEELING THERMOMETER - TV COMMENTATORS
     742378 FEELING THERMOMETER - NEWSPAPER EDITORS

                  INFLUENCE OF SOCIAL GROUPS SCALE

     742379 R'S OPINION OF LABOR UNIONS' INFLUENCE
     742380 R'S OPINION OF POOR PEOPLE'S INFLUENCE
     742381 R'S OPINION OF POLICEMEN'S INFLUENCE
     742382 R'S OPINION OF POLITICIANS' INFLUENCE
     742383 R'S OPINION OF BIG BUSINESS' INFLUENCE
     742384 R'S OPINION OF BLACKS' INFLUENCE
     742385 R'S OPINION OF LIBERALS' INFLUENCE
     742386 R'S OPINION OF THE MILITARY'S INFLUENCE
     742387 R'S OPINION OF NEWSPAPER EDITORS' INFLUENCE
     742388 R'S OPINION OF YOUNG PEOPLE'S INFLUENCE
     742389 R'S OPINION OF WOMEN'S INFLUENCE
     742390 R'S OPINION OF REPUBLICANS' INFLUENCE
     742391 R'S OPINION OF INFLUENCE OF PEOPLE ON WELFARE
     742392 R'S OPINION OF FARMERS' INFLUENCE
     742393 R'S OPINION OF OLD PEOPLE'S INFLUENCE
     742394 R'S OPINION OF DEMOCRATS' INFLUENCE
     742395 R'S OPINION OF AVERAGE CITIZEN'S INFLUENCE


                  CONTROL AND DIRECTION OF OWN LIFE

     742396 IS IT BETTER TO PLAN ONE'S LIFE A GOOD WAY AHEAD
     742397 WHEN R PLANS AHEAD, DO R'S PLANS WORK AS EXPECTED
     742398 HAS R FELT LIFE WOULD WORK OUT AS DESIRED
     742399 DOES R FEEL R CAN RUN LIFE AS WANTED


                  PERSONAL TRUST

     742400 GENERALLY SPEAKING, CAN MOST PEOPLE BE TRUSTED
     742401 DO PEOPLE TRY TO BE HELPFUL MOST OF THE TIME
     742402 IF GIVEN THE CHANCE, WOULD PEOPLE TAKE ADVANTAGE OF R


                  SATISFACTION WITH STANDARD OF LIVING

     742403 HOW SATISFIED IS R WITH R'S INCOME
     742404 HOW SATISFIED IS R WITH R'S STANDARD OF LIVING


                           ** PERSONAL DATA **

                  AGE AND MARITAL STATUS

     742405 R'S DATE OF BIRTH
     742406 RECODE: R'S AGE AT TIME OF INTERVIEW
     742407 R'S MARITAL STATUS

                  CHILDREN IN HOUSEHOLD

     742408 DOES R HAVE ANY CHILDREN
     742409 HOW MANY CHILDREN DOES R HAVE
     742410 WHAT ARE CHILDREN'S AGES - FIRST CHILD
     742411 WHAT ARE CHILDREN'S AGES - SECOND CHILD
     742412 WHAT ARE CHILDREN'S AGES - THIRD CHILD
     742413 WHAT ARE CHILDREN'S AGES - FOURTH CHILD
     742414 WHAT ARE CHILDREN'S AGES - FIFTH CHILD
     742415 WHAT ARE CHILDREN'S AGES - SIXTH CHILD
     742416 WHAT ARE CHILDREN'S AGES - SEVENTH CHILD
     742417 WHAT ARE CHILDREN'S AGES - EIGHTH CHILD


                  R'S EDUCATION

     742418 WHAT IS THE HIGHEST GRADE COMPLETED BY R
     742419 DOES R HAVE A HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA
     742420 HAS R HAD ANY OTHER SCHOOLING
     742421 DOES R HAVE A COLLEGE DEGREE
     742422 WHAT COLLEGE DEGREE DOES R HAVE
     742423 RECODE: EDUCATION OF RESPONDENT
     742424 FIRST COLLEGE ATTENDED BY R
     742425 LAST COLLEGE ATTENDED BY R

     742426 FAMILY STATUS OF RESPONDENT


                  EDUCATION OF FAMILY HEAD

     742427 WHAT IS THE HIGHEST GRADE COMPLETED BY FAMILY HEAD
     742428 DOES FAMILY HEAD HAVE A HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA
     742429 DOES FAMILY HEAD HAVE ANY OTHER SCHOOLING
     742430 DOES FAMILY HEAD HAVE A COLLEGE DEGREE
     742431 WHAT COLLEGE DEGREE DOES FAMILY HEAD HAVE
     742432 RECODE: EDUCATION OF FAMILY HEAD
     742433 FIRST COLLEGE ATTENDED BY FAMILY HEAD
     742434 LAST COLLEGE ATTENDED BY FAMILY HEAD


                  EDUCATION OF WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD

     742435 WHAT IS HIGHEST GRADE COMPLETED BY WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD
     742436 DOES WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD HAVE A HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA
     742437 DOES WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD HAVE ANY OTHER SCHOOLING
     742438 DOES WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD HAVE A COLLEGE DEGREE
     742439 WHAT COLLEGE DEGREE DOES WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD HAVE
     742440 RECODE: EDUCATION OF WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD
     742441 FIRST COLLEGE ATTENDED BY WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD
     742442 LAST COLLEGE ATTENDED BY WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD


                  R'S OCCUPATION SECTION

     742443 R'S PRESENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS
     742444 (IF RETIRED) WHEN DID R RETIRE
     742445 (IF UNEMPLOYED) HAS R EVER WORKED FOR PAY
     742446 KIND OF WORK R DOES/DID (PB OCCUPATION CODE)
     742447 R'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION - DUNCAN SES
     742448 R'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION - DUNCAN DECILE
     742449 R'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION - CENSUS SES
     742450 R'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY
     742451 IS/WAS R SELF-EMPLOYED
     742452 (IF UNEMPLOYED) DID R WORK FOR PAY DURING THE PAST YEAR
     742453 (IF RETIRED OR DISABLED) IS R PRESENTLY WORKING
     742454 HOW MANY HOURS A WEEK DOES/DID R WORK
     742455 (IF EMPLOYED) WAS R UNEMPLOYED DURING THE PAST YEAR

                       (IF HOUSEWIFE OR STUDENT)

     742456 DID R WORK FOR PAY DURING THE PAST YEAR
     742457 IS R PRESENTLY EMPLOYED
     742458 WHAT KIND OF WORK DID R DO (PB OCCUPATION CODE)
     742459 R'S FORMER OCCUPATION - DUNCAN SES
     742460 R'S FORMER OCCUPATION - DUNCAN DECILE
     742461 R'S FORMER OCCUPATION - CENSUS SES
     742462 R'S FORMER OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY
     742463 WAS R SELF-EMPLOYED
     742464 HOW MANY HOURS A WEEK DID R WORK

     742465 FAMILY STATUS OF RESPONDENT


                  FAMILY HEAD'S OCCUPATION SECTION

     742466 FAMILY HEAD'S PRESENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS
     742467 (IF RETIRED) WHEN DID THE FAMILY HEAD RETIRE
     742468 (IF UNEMPLOYED) HAS THE FAMILY HEAD EVER WORKED FOR PAY
     742469 WHAT KIND OF WORK DOES/DID THE FAMILY HEAD DO
             (PB OCCUPATION CODE)
     742470 FAMILY HEAD'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION - DUNCAN SES
     742471 FAMILY HEAD'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION - DUNCAN DECILE
     742472 FAMILY HEAD'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION - CENSUS SES
     742473 FAMILY HEAD'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION - CENSUS
             INDUSTRY
     742474 IS/WAS THE FAMILY HEAD SELF-EMPLOYED
     742475 (IF UNEMPLOYED) DID THE FAMILY HEAD WORK FOR PAY
             DURING THE PAST YEAR
     742476 (IF RETIRED OR DISABLED) IS THE FAMILY HEAD PRESENTLY
             WORKING
     742477 HOW MANY HOURS A WEEK DOES/DID THE FAMILY HEAD WORK
     742478 (IF EMPLOYED) WAS FAMILY HEAD UNEMPLOYED IN PAST YEAR

                       (IF HOUSEWIFE OR STUDENT)

     742479 DID THE FAMILY HEAD WORK FOR PAY DURING THE PAST YEAR
     742480 IS THE FAMILY HEAD PRESENTLY EMPLOYED
     742481 WHAT KIND OF WORK DID THE FAMILY HEAD DO (PB OCCUPATION
             CODE)
     742482 FAMILY HEAD'S FORMER OCCUPATION - DUNCAN SES
     742483 FAMILY HEAD'S FORMER OCCUPATION - DUNCAN DECILE
     742484 FAMILY HEAD'S FORMER OCCUPATION - CENSUS SES
     742485 FAMILY HEAD'S FORMER OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY
     742486 WAS THE FAMILY HEAD SELF-EMPLOYED
     742487 HOW MANY HOURS A WEEK DID THE FAMILY HEAD WORK


                  WIFE OF HEAD'S OCCUPATION SECTION

     742488 WIFE OF HEAD'S PRESENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS
     742489 (IF RETIRED) WHEN DID WIFE OF HEAD RETIRE
     742490 (IF UNEMPLOYED) HAS WIFE OF HEAD EVER WORKED FOR PAY
     742491 WHAT KIND OF WORK DOES/DID WIFE OF HEAD DO
             (PB OCCUPATION CODE)
     742492 WIFE OF HEAD'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION--DUNCAN SES
     742493 WIFE OF HEAD'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION--DUNCAN DECILE
     742494 WIFE OF HEAD'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION--CENSUS SES
     742495 WIFE OF HEAD'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION--CENSUS
             INDUSTRY
     742496 IS/WAS WIFE OF HEAD SELF-EMPLOYED
     742497 (IF UNEMPLOYED) DID THE WIFE OF HEAD WORK FOR PAY
             DURING THE PAST YEAR
     742498 (IF RETIRED OR DISABLED) IS THE WIFE OF HEAD PRESENTLY
             WORKING
     742499 HOW MANY HOURS A WEEK DOES/DID THE WIFE OF HEAD WORK
     742500 (IF EMPLOYED) WAS THE WIFE OF HEAD UNEMPLOYED DURING
             THE PAST YEAR

                       (IF HOUSEWIFE OR STUDENT)

     742501 DID WIFE OF HEAD WORK FOR PAY DURING THE PAST YEAR
     742502 IS WIFE OF HEAD PRESENTLY EMPLOYED
     742503 WHAT KIND OF WORK DID WIFE OF HEAD DO (PB OCCUPATION
             CODE)
     742504 WIFE OF HEAD'S FORMER OCCUPATION - DUNCAN SES
     742505 WIFE OF HEAD'S FORMER OCCUPATION - DUNCAN DECILE
     742506 WIFE OF HEAD'S FORMER OCCUPATION - CENSUS SES
     742507 WIFE OF HEAD'S FORMER OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY
     742508 WAS WIFE OF HEAD SELF-EMPLOYED
     742509 HOW MANY HOURS A WEEK DID WIFE OF HEAD WORK


                  FARMERS' QUESTIONS

     742510 DOES THE FAMILY HEAD DO OTHER WORK BESIDES FARMING
     742511 FARMER/RANCHER'S OTHER OCCUPATION
     742512 HOW MUCH TIME DOES FAMILY HEAD PUT IN ON NON-FARMING
             JOB - HOURS/WEEK
     742513 HOW MUCH TIME DOES FAMILY HEAD PUT IN ON NON-FARMING
             JOB - WEEKS/YEAR
     742514 DOES FAMILY HEAD OWN/RENT/MANAGE FARM


                  HOUSEHOLD UNION MEMBERSHIP

     742515 IS ANYONE IN THE HOUSEHOLD A UNION MEMBER
     742516 WHO IS THE HOUSEHOLD IS A UNION MEMBER
     742517 UNION MEMBERSHIP - FIRST UNION MENTIONED
     742518 UNION MEMBERSHIP - SECOND UNION MENTIONED
     742519 UNION MEMBERSHIP - THIRD UNION MENTIONED


                  R'S INCOME LEVEL

     742520 DOES R MAKE AS MUCH AS OTHERS WITH SAME OCCUPATION
     742521 DOES R MAKE AS MUCH AS OTHERS WITH OTHER OCCUPATIONS

                  R'S CLASS IDENTIFICATION

     742522 DOES R THINK OF SELF AS BELONGING TO A SOCIAL CLASS
     742523 WHICH SOCIAL CLASS DOES R THINK OF SELF AS BELONGING TO
     742524 R'S RELATIVE PLACEMENT IN SOCIAL CLASS CHOSEN
     742525 RECODE: R'S SUBJECTIVE SOCIAL CLASS SUMMARY
     742526 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO PEOPLE IN R'S SOCIAL CLASS
     742527 WHAT SOCIAL CLASS WAS R'S FAMILY WHEN R WAS YOUNG


                  R'S ETHNIC BACKGROUND AND IDENTIFICATION

     742528 WHAT DOES R CONSIDER R'S MAIN ETHNIC GROUP
     742529 WERE BOTH OF R'S PARENTS BORN IN THIS COUNTRY
     742530 (IF ONE OR BOTH PARENTS FOREIGN-BORN) WHAT COUNTRY
             WAS R'S FATHER BORN IN
     742531 (IF ONE OR BOTH PARENTS FOREIGN-BORN) WHAT COUNTRY
             WAS R'S MOTHER BORN IN
     742532 (IF BOTH PARENTS NATIVE-BORN) WHICH COUNTRY DID R'S
             FAMILY COME FROM - FATHER'S SIDE
     742533 (IF BOTH PARENTS NATIVE-BORN) WHICH COUNTRY DID R'S
             FAMILY COME FROM - MOTHER'S SIDE


                  OCCUPATION OF R'S PARENTS

     742534 KIND OF WORK R'S FATHER DID WHEN R WAS YOUNG
     742535 WAS R'S MOTHER EMPLOYED WHEN R WAS YOUNG
     742536 KIND OF WORK R'S MOTHER DID WHEN R WAS YOUNG

                  WHERE WAS R BROUGHT UP

     742537 WHERE WAS R BORN
     742538 WHERE DID R GROW UP
     742539 R'S AGE WHEN R CAME TO STATE OF CURRENT RESIDENCE
     742540 WHAT TYPE OF COMMUNITY WAS R BROUGHT UP IN
     742541 WHICH CITY DID R LIVE IN AT AGE 14
     742542 WHICH STATE DID R LIVE IN AT AGE 14
     742543 HOW LONG HAS R LIVED IN PRESENT COMMUNITY
     742544 RESPONDENT'S CITY BEFORE MOVING TO PRESENT COMMUNITY
     742545 STATE IN WHICH R LIVED BEFORE MOVING TO PRESENT STATE

                  R'S HOUSING

     742546 HOW LONG HAS R LIVED IN PRESENT HOUSING
     742547 IS R'S PRESENT NEIGHBORHOOD NEWER THAN PRIOR ONE
     742548 IS R'S PRESENT NEIGHBORHOOD MORE EXPENSIVE THAN
             PRIOR ONE


                  PERSONAL DATA

     742549 R'S ESTIMATED FAMILY INCOME FOR 1973
     742550 DOES R OWN/RENT PRESENT HOME
     742551 R'S RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE
     742552 HOW OFTEN DOES R GO TO CHURCH
     742553 WHAT IS R'S SEX
     742554 WHAT IS R'S RACE
     742555 WHAT IS THE RELATIONSHIP OF R TO HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD


                  CONDITIONS OF THE INTERVIEW

     742556 WHO ELSE WAS PRESENT AT THE INTERVIEW
     742557 DEGREE OF R'S COOPERATION WITH INTERVIEW
     742558 R'S APPARENT LEVEL OF POLITICAL INFORMATION
     742559 RATING OF R'S APPARENT INTELLIGENCE
     742560 HOW SUSPICIOUS WAS R ABOUT THE STUDY BEFOREHAND
     742561 HOW GREAT WAS R'S INTEREST IN THE INTERVIEW
     742562 HOW SINCERE WAS R WITH ANSWERS
     742563 TYPE OF STRUCTURE IN WHICH R LIVES
     742564 NUMBER OF STORIES IN STRUCTURE IN WHICH R LIVES