FILE anes_2006pilot_int.txt
--------------------------
ANES 2006 Pilot
Codebook Introduction File
VERSION 20070426 (Apr 26, 2007)




















                 AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES:

                         2006 PILOT STUDY













                               CODEBOOK











                     Center for Political Studies
                     Institute for Social Research
                      The University of Michigan
                               --------
             Institute for Research in the Social Sciences
                         Stanford University



CITATION

The American National Election Studies (ANES; www.electionstudies.org).
THE 2006 ANES PILOT STUDY FULL RELEASE [dataset]. Stanford University and
the University of Michigan [producers and distributors].

These materials are based on work supported by the National Science Foundation
under grants SES-0535332 and SES-0535334, Stanford University, and the
University of Michigan.

Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in these
materials are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views
of the funding organizations.


                           TABLE OF CONTENTS

        Note: >> sections in the codebook introduction can
                 be navigated in the machine-readable files
                 by searching ">>".




INTRODUCTORY MATERIALS  (file anes_2006pilot_int.txt)
----------------------
>> 2006 PILOT STUDY overview
>> 2006 PILOT STUDY acknowledgments
>> 2006 PILOT STUDY questionnaire development
>> 2006 PILOT STUDY data collection procedures
>> 2006 PILOT STUDY weights
>> 2006 PILOT STUDY data reading
>> 2006 PILOT STUDY randomization and experiments
>> 2006 PILOT STUDY data merging (with 2004 data)
>> 2006 PILOT STUDY data anomalies
>> 2006 PILOT STUDY response option note
>> 2006 PILOT STUDY note on Confidential Materials
>> 2006 PILOT STUDY file Structure and Processing information
>> 2006 PILOT STUDY codebook Information (how to read)
>> 2006 PILOT STUDY questions?
>> 2006 PILOT STUDY Variable Description List




VARIABLE DOCUMENTATION (file anes_2006pilot_var.txt)
----------------------
>> Variables:   Version - V06P822b





APPENDICES
----------
>> 2006 PILOT STUDY call disposition codes
>> 2006 PILOT STUDY master code- federal government Likes-Dislikes



>> 2006 PILOT STUDY OVERVIEW

In the fall of 2006 the American National Election Studies (ANES) carried
out a pilot study after the 2006 mid-term elections in the United States.

Over the years, the ANES has used pilot studies to test new questions that
can  be included in later national surveys. Data from these studies have
been very informative. Some have been used to convey substantive and
methodological insights in widely-read publications, while others have served
as the basis for technical reports that have directly improved subsequent ANES
data collections.

The 2006 ANES Pilot Study was conducted for the purpose of testing new
questions and conducting methodological research to inform the design of
future ANES studies.  As such, it is not considered part of the ANES time
series that has been conducted since 1948, and the pilot study only includes
time series questions necessary to evaluate the new content.

This Full Release dataset contains all 675 interviews, with the survey portion
of the interview lasting just over 37 minutes on average.  The study had a
re-interview rate of 56.25% [675 completions / (1211 in sample 11 deceased
respondents)].

Accompanying the dataset is a codebook containing detailed variable
descriptions, as well as data descriptor statement files that can be used
to read the raw data file into common data analysis software packages
such as SAS, SPSS, and STATA.



>> 2006 PILOT STUDY acknowledgments

ANES is funded and supported by the American National Science Foundation,
Stanford University, and the University of Michigan.  The study's Principal
Investigators are Jon A. Krosnick and Arthur Lupia.

The Principal Investigators wish to thank the several hundred American
citizens who took the time to respond to the survey and the many researchers
who submitted proposals for questionnaire content.  The Principal
Investigators were supported in the design and implementation of the study by
ANES staff at Stanford University and the University of Michigan, by the ANES
Board of Overseers, and by staff at Schulman, Ronca & Bucuvalas, Inc. (SRBI),
who conducted the data collection.

Researchers who submitted winning proposals for questionnaire content were
Dolores Albarracin, Scott Althaus, David Barker, Adam Berinsky, Stephen C.
Craig, Sara Ann Crump, Kathleen Dolan, Ruben Durante, Michael K. Earl, Patrick
Egan, Christopher Michael Federico, Jason Gainous, Joe Gershtenson, John
Hagan, David Hamilton, Steven Hitlin, John T. Jost, Charles Judd, Lauren J.
Krivo, Arie W. Kruglanski, Howard Lavine, David Leege, Vivian Martin, Michael
D. Martinez, Ross L. Matsueda, Marc Meredith, Stephen T. Mockabee, Daniel
Molden, Charles Nichols, Wayne D. Parker, Ruth D. Peterson, Antonio Pierro,
Dennis Plane, Katherine Porter, Louis Putterman, Heather Marie Rice, Belinda
Robnett-Olsen, Kira Sanbonmatsu, Daniel Schneider, Shalom Schwartz, Randall
Sell, Danielle Shani, Kennon M. Sheldon, David Sherman, Kenneth Sherrill,
Betsy Sinclair, Fred Slocum, Erik Snowberg, James M. Snyder, Jr., Marco
Steenbergen, Teresa A. Sullivan, David Tewksbury, Deborah Thorne, Eric M.
Uslaner, Leaf Van Boven, Kenneth D. Wald, Elizabeth Warren, and James
Zigerell, Jr.

The members of the ANES Board of Overseers were John Mark Hansen (chair), John
Aldrich, Stephen Ansolabehere, Henry Brady, Brandice Canes-Wrone, Karen Cook,
Catherine Eckel, Kenneth Goldstein, Donald Green, Vincent Hutchings, Paula
McClain, Kathleen McGraw, Walter Mebane, Randy Olsen, Richard Petty, Vincent
Price, Gary Segura, Daron Shaw, V. Kerry Smith, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and Paul
Sniderman.

ANES staff were Matthew DeBell, David Howell, Pat Luevano, Kelly Ogden-
Schuette, Angela Pok, Laurie Pierson, and Laurie Winslow. SRBI staff included
Chintan Turakhia, Dean Williams, Maria Evans, David Ciemnecki, Marylou Ronca,
Sheila Bassman, and Boris Yegutkin.

Additional information concerning the 2006 ANES Pilot Study, including
notification of select errors discovered and made known to ANES Staff after
the
data release date, can be found on the ANES Website
(http://www.electionstudies.org). Any questions not answered on the website or
by this codebook can be directed to the ANES Staff by e-mail to
"anes@electionstudies.org" or by regular postal service to the address below.
    American National Election Studies (ANES) Staff
    Center for Political Studies
    Institute for Social Research, 4100 Bay
    University of Michigan
    426 Thompson Street
    Ann Arbor, MI 48104-2321
    E-Mail: anes@electionstudies.org   Website: http://www.electionstudies.org



>> 2006 PILOT STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE DEVELOPMENT

The first ever ANES Online Commons allowed interested persons to propose
questions for the 2006 ANES Pilot Study.  The Online Commons is designed to
increase participation in, and the transparency of, the survey development
process.  The response to this new opportunity was tremendous.  Over 300
scholars from a range of scientific disciplines registered for the Online
Commons.  Collectively, they proposed over 1100 questions - with many coming
from younger faculty and graduate students.  At the close of the proposal
period, an evaluation process commenced, with the knowledge that only about
120 of the 1100 questions could be included on the Pilot Study due to survey
length constraints.

Content of the 2006 Pilot Study is organized primarily by topics related to
contributing proposals, in 29 modules.
  MODULE  1:  Character judgements         MODULE 16:  Efficacy
  MODULE  2:  Defensive confidence         MODULE 17:  Trust in government
  MODULE  3:  Need for closure             MODULE 18:  Media
  MODULE  4:  Belief in a just world       MODULE 19:  Party identification
  MODULE  5:  Self-monitoring              MODULE 20:  Abortion
  MODULE  6:  Trust                        MODULE 21:  Tolerance
  MODULE  7:  Values                       MODULE 22:  Justice
  MODULE  8:  Borrowing                    MODULE 23:  Gender
  MODULE  9:  Sociotropic voting           MODULE 24:  Tax
  MODULE 10:  Religion                     MODULE 25:  Partisan differences
  MODULE 11:  Christianity                 MODULE 26:  Vote
  MODULE 12:  Optimism/pessimism           MODULE 27:  Branching experiments-
  MODULE 13:  Social networks                          presidential approval
  MODULE 14:  Attention to politics        MODULE 28:  Economy
  MODULE 15:  Ambivalence                  MODULE 29:  Death

ANES Online Commons proposals that resulted in questions appearing on the
2006 ANES Pilot Study are as follows.  We are very grateful to the authors
for their contributions (The modules do not necessarily reflect the questions
as proposed by the proposal authors. In many cases, questions were revised
before inclusion in the Pilot Study.)

MODULE
------
Module  1    "Character Judgments and Voting Behavior"
                - Daniel Molden, Northwestern University
Module  2    "Defensive Confidence and Exposure to Political Information"      
                - Dolores Albarracin,  University of Florida
Module  3    "The Need for Closure and Political Attitudes"
                - Christopher Michael Federico, University of Minnesota
                - John T. Jost, New York University
                - Antonio Pierro, Universita delgi Studi di Roma
                - Arie W. Kruglanski, University of Maryland
Module  5    "Self-Monitoring and Political Attitudes"
                - Adam Berinsky, MIT
                - Howard Lavine, Stony Brook University
Module  6    "Generalized Trust Questions"
                - Eric M. Uslaner, University of Maryland
Module  7    "Basic Values"
                - Shalom Schwartz, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
             "Figuring Out Voters' Values"
                - Steven Hitlin, University of Iowa
             "Values Assessment Proposal"
                - Kennon M Sheldon, University of Missouri-Columbia
                - Charles Nichols, University of Missouri-Columbia
Module  8    "Financial Resources and Security"
                - Katherine Porter, University of Iowa College of Law
                - Teresa A. Sullivan, University of Michigan
                - Deborah Thorne, Ohio University
                - Elizabeth Warren, Harvard Law School
Module  9    "Sociotropic Voting and the Media"
                - Stephen Ansolabehere
                - Marc Meredith, Stanford GSB
                - Erik Snowberg, Stanford University
                - James M. Snyder, Jr., MIT
Module 10    "Religion and Electoral Behavior"
                - David C. Leege, University of Notre Dame
                - Stephen T. Mockabee, University of Cincinnati
                - Kenneth D. Wald, University of Florida
Module 11    "Born Again Identity"
                - David Barker, University of Pittsburgh
                - Lawrence James Zigerell Jr., University of Pittsburgh
                - Heather Marie Rice, University of Pittsburgh
Module 12    "Questions about Social Mood"
                - Wayne D. Parker, Socionomics Foundation
Module 13    "Political Networks"
                - Betsy Sinclair, Caltech
             "Everyday Political Talk"
                -  Vivian Martin, Central Connecticut State University
Module 14    "Measuring Political Interest"
                - Danielle Shani, Princeton University
Module 15    "Alternative Measures of Partisan Ambivalence"
                - Marco Steenbergen, UNC Chapel Hill
                - Howard Lavine, Stony Brook University
             "Measuring Ambivalence about Government"
                - Stephen C. Craig, University of Florida
                - Jason Gainous, University of Louisville
                - Michael D. Martinez, University of Florida
Module 16    "Extending Political Efficacy"
                - Daniel Schneider, Stanford University
Module 17    "Federalism and Trust in Government"
                - Joe Gershtenson, Eastern Kentucky University
             "Political Trust: Reconciling Theory and Practice"
                - Dennis L. Plane, Juniata College
Module 18    "Testing a New Generation of Media Use Measures for the ANES"
                - Scott Althaus, University of Illinois
                - David Tewksbury, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Module 19    "New Abortion Items"
                - David Barker, University of Pittsburgh
                - Lawrence James Zigerell Jr, University of Pittsburgh
                - Heather Marie Rice, University of Pittsburgh
Module 22    "Crime, Perceived Criminal Injustice, and Electoral Politics"
                - John Hagan, Northwestern University
                - Ross L. Matsueda, University of Washington
                - Ruth D. Peterson, Ohio State University
                - Lauren J. Krivo, Ohio State University
Module 23    "Candidate Gender and American Political Behavior"
                - Kira Sanbonmatsu, Ohio State University
                - Kathleen Dolan, University of Wisconsin Milwaukee
Module 24    "People's Attitudes toward Equality, Redistribution and a
              Progressive Tax System"
                - Ruben Durante, Brown University
                - Louis Putterman, Brown University
Module 25    "Perceptions of Entitativity and Similarity of Political Groups"
                - Sara Ann Crump, UC Santa Barbara
                - David Hamilton, UC Santa Barbara
             "Polarization and Perceived Polarization on Policy Issues""
                - Charles Judd, University of Colorado
                - Leaf Van Boven, University of Colorado
                - David Sherman, University of California, Santa Barbara
Module 29    "End Times Beliefs"
                - Michael K. Earl, Trinity University



>> 2006 PILOT STUDY DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES

Data collection for the 2006 ANES Pilot Study began on November 13, 2006, just
after the November election, and the last interview was collected on
January 5, 2007.  The sample consisted of 1,211 individuals who completed a
valid interview in the 2004 ANES time series study (not to be confused with
the 2004 ANES Panel Study).

Note: One of the 1,212 respondents in the 2004 ANES time series study will
eventually be dropped from that dataset due to a recently identified problem
with the integrity of 1 case (case 0357).  Thus, when referring to the number
of 2004 respondents, you may see either the number 1,211 or 1,212 used,
depending on the context.

This Full Release dataset contains all 675 interviews, with the survey portion
of the interview lasting just over 37 minutes on average.  The study had a
re-interview rate of 56.25% (675 completions / (1211 in sample  11 deceased
respondents)).

Shortly before the 2006 Pilot Study field period began on November 13, advance
letters were sent to the respondents by USPS Priority Mail, stating the
purpose of the study and noting that a monetary incentive would be paid for
participation.  Most respondents had been paid $20 for participation in 2004,
while others were paid $50 if they declined the $20 offer.  Respondents in
2006 were initially offered the largest amount they had been offered in 2004.

Respondents who were not reached by phone in November were sent a second
advance letter on or about December 1, and those who refused to be interviewed
in November were sent a persuasion letter with an incentive offer of $50 on or
about December 1.  Those who had not completed an interview by mid-December
were sent a persuasion letter by Federal Express, featuring a $100 incentive
offer, on December 15.

Data collection was conducted entirely on the telephone by Schulman, Ronca &
Bucuvalas, Inc. (SRBI; http://www.srbi.com/) using CATI instrumentation and
interviewers stationed in Fort Myers, Florida.

The data collection was overseen by Stanford University with assistance from
the University of Michigan.



>> 2006 PILOT STUDY WEIGHTS

The 2006 ANES Pilot Study data set includes a person-level analysis weight,
which incorporates sampling, nonresponse, and post-stratification factors.
Analysts should use the 2006 final weight (V06P002) for all analyses unless
they have a specific reason to choose an alternative weighting approach of
their own devising.

The 2006 weight was created by applying an adjustment factor to the 2004 pre-
election analysis weight (V040101).  This adjustment factor accounts for
nonresponse in 2006 insofar as 2006 nonresponse is a function of sample
members' age and educational attainment.  In 2006, response rates by age
ranged from a low of 41.8 percent for persons age 18-29 as of November 2004 to
a high of 65.7 percent for those age 60-69 as of November 2004.  Response
rates by educational attainment ranged from a low of 31.5 percent for those
with less than a high school diploma in 2004 to a high of 68.2 percent for
college graduates.  (All response rates are unweighted.)

The 2006 weight adjustments were made in three steps.  First, each of the
1,212 sample members who completed the 2004 ANES pre-election interview were
assigned to one of the 24 cells that result from cross-tabulating age by
educational level using the categories shown in Table C in the 2004 ANES
codebook.  (The age categories are 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and 70-
90.  The educational attainment categories are less than a high school
diploma, high school diploma, some college, and college graduate.)  One of
these cells (age 30-39 with less than a high school diploma) contains no
2006 respondents, so this cell was merged with an adjacent cell (age 40-49
with less than a high school diploma) for purposes of the weight calculation,
resulting in a total of 23 cells.  Second, for each cell, a weight adjustment
factor was computed by dividing the sum of the 2004 weights for all sample
members in the cell by the sum of the weights for the
2006 respondents in the same cell.  Last, the 2006 analysis weight was
computed by multiplying the 2004 analysis weight by the adjustment factor
described in the step above, and then scaling the weight to sum to the sample
size of 675.

This 2006 weight adjustment reflects a minimalist weighting approach,
consistent with the prior approach taken by ANES.  Please see the 2004 ANES
codebook for more information about the construction of the 2004 analysis
weight that was adjusted to create the 2006 weight.



>> 2006 PILOT STUDY DATA READING

The raw data have been provided in a single text file.

The raw data may be read into SAS, SPSS, or STATA using the syntax files that
have been packaged with the raw data file - for detailed instructions, please
see the header of the run files for the statistical package of interest.

The raw data file may also be read directly into these or other software
packages.  Within the raw data file the data points are delimited, there is
one interview per line, and a header line with variable names is present for
your convenience.



>> 2006 PILOT STUDY RANDOMIZATION AND EXPERIMENTS

Experiments and randomization were used in many locations throughout the 2006
ANES Pilot Study.  Different experimental conditions applied to either
different question sets or within a single question.

Randomizations employed in survey administration are documented within
V06P401-V06P435n, which are special variables providing case-level
randomization values.

One randomization was carried throughout the 2006 Pilot interview, in which
respondents were randomly assigned to either forward or reverse order of
response categories for a pre-selected subset of questions; this ordering
assignment determined:  1) the order in which response options were read
(without number) to the respondent as part of the question text, and 2) the
order in which the numbered response categories appeared onscreen in the CATI
instrument for interviewer coding.  Respondents who are coded in item Rand.1
(randomization variable V06P401) for reverse ordering of response categories
had reverse ordering apply for the following 2006 Pilot items:
   Mod1_1     Mod2_1     Mod3_1     Mod3_3     Mod3_4     Mod3_6
   Mod3_7     Mod3_8     Mod4_1     Mod5_A1    Mod5_A2    Mod5_A3
   Mod6_A1    Mod7_B1    Mod7_B2    Mod7_B3    Mod7_B4    Mod7_B5
   Mod7_B6    Mod7_B7    Mod7_B8    Mod7_B9    Mod7_B10   Mod7_B11
   Mod7_B12   Mod11_2    Mod11_4    Mod13_3_1  Mod13_3_2  Mod13_3_3
   Mod13_7_1  Mod13_7_2  Mod13_7_3  Mod13_12_1 Mod13_12_2 Mod13_12_3
   Mod14_A1   Mod14_A2   Mod14_A3   Mod14_B2   Mod15_2    Mod15_4
   Mod15_5    Mod16_A1   Mod16_A2   Mod16_B1   Mod16_B2   Mod16_3
   Mod16_4    Mod17_B1   Mod17_B2   Mod17_B3   Mod17_B4   Mod20_A5
   Mod20_A10  Mod20_A15  Mod20_A20  Mod20_A25  Mod20_A30  Mod20_A35
   Mod25_1    Mod25_2    Mod25_3    Mod25_4    Mod29_1    Mod29_2

A summary of additional randomizations is provided below.


1. QUESTION SELECTION
   ======   ==================     =====================     ================
   MODULE   QUESTIONS              OR:                       TOPIC:
   ======   ==================     =====================     ================
   Mod5     _A1-A3  (version 1)    _B1-B3  (version 2)       SELF-MONITORING
   Mod6     _A1-A3  (new)          _B1     (std)             TRUST
   Mod7     _A1-A10 (version 1)    _B1-B12 (version 2)       VALUES
   Mod12    _A1-A8  (version 1)    _B1-B8  (version 2)       OPTIMISM
   Mod14    _A1-A3  (new)          _B1-B2  (std)             ATTN TO POLITICS
   Mod16    _A1-A2  (version 1)    _B1-B2  (version 2)       EFFICACY
   Mod16    _A5-A6  (std)          _B5-B6  (new)             EFFICACY
   Mod17    _A1-A2  (std 1/3)      _B1-B4,C1-C4 (1/3 ea)     TRUST IN GOVT
   Mod18    _A1-A8  (version 1)    _B1-B8  (version 2)       MEDIA
   Mod19    _A1-A4  (std)          _B1-B4  (new)             PARTY ID
   Mod20    _A1-A35 (new 2/3)      _B1     (std 1/3)         ABORTION
   Mod21    _A1     (version 1)    _B1     (version 2)       TOLERANCE
   Mod23    _A1-A2  (version 1)    _B1-B2  (version 2)       GENDER
   Mod24    _A3-A4  (new)          _B3     (std)             TAX
   Mod26    _A2-A3  (std)          _B2-B6  (new)             VOTE
   Mod27    std branch items       exp branch items          PRES APPROVAL
..............................................................................
2. CASE SELECTION  [1/2 SELECTION; EACH INDEPENDENT]
   ======  =========  =============================================  =========
   MODULE  QUESTIONS  DESCRIPTION                                    TOPIC
   ======  =========  =============================================  =========
   Mod20   _A1-A5     select 1/2 of Rs chosen for _A1-_A35 (see 1.)  ABORTION
   Mod20   _A6-A10    select 1/2 of Rs chosen for _A1-_A35 (see 1.)  ABORTION
   Mod20   _A11-A15   select 1/2 of Rs chosen for _A1-_A35 (see 1.)  ABORTION
   Mod20   _A16-A20   select 1/2 of Rs chosen for _A1-_A35 (see 1.)  ABORTION
   Mod20   _A21-A25   select 1/2 of Rs chosen for _A1-_A35 (see 1.)  ABORTION
   Mod20   _A26-A30   select 1/2 of Rs chosen for _A1-_A35 (see 1.)  ABORTION
   Mod20   _A31-A35   select 1/2 of Rs chosen for _A1-_A35 (see 1.)  ABORTION
..............................................................................
3. QUESTION ORDER
   ======  ============================   ===================   ==============
   MODULE  QUESTIONS                      TYPE                  TOPIC
   ======  ============================   ===================   ==============
   Mod20   _A1-A35 selected quest. sets   randomized order      ABORTION
   Mod22   all questions                  reverse/forward       JUSTICE
   Mod23   _6-_17  party questions        dem or rep first      GENDER
   Mod23   _6-_17  issue questions        crime or educ first   GENDER
   Mod25   all questions (on parties)     dem or rep first      PARTY DIFF
   IWRobs  all questions                  randomized order      IWR OBS
..............................................................................
4. QUESTION ORDER AND SELECTION
   ======  ======================================================  ===========
   MODULE  DESCRIPTION                                             TOPIC
   ======  ======================================================  ===========
   Mod15   select _1-_4 or _6-_9; _5 before or after selection     AMBIVALENCE
..............................................................................
5. WORDING CHOICE  [QUESTION TEXT]
   =======   ====================================================  ==========
   QUESTION  DESCRIPTION                                           TOPIC
   =======   ====================================================  ==========
   Mod13_1   "things important to you"/"government and elections"  SOC NETWORK
..............................................................................
6. WORDING ORDER  [QUESTION TEXT]
   =====   ========   ==========================================   =========
   MODULE  QUESTIONS  DESCRIPTIONS                                 TOPIC
   =====   ========   ==========================================   =========
   Mod13   _8         "a Democrat, a Republican" /reverse          SOC NETWORK
   Mod19   _A1,_B1    "a Democrat, a Republican" /reverse          PARTY ID
   Mod26   _1         "George W. Bush and Bill Clinton" /reverse   VOTE



>> 2006 PILOT STUDY DATA MERGING (with 2004 data)

One of the advantageous features of the 2006 Pilot Study design is the fact
that all of the respondents in the 2006 study were interviewed previously in
the 2004 ANES time series study (not to be confused with the 2004 ANES Panel
Study).  Thus, a great deal of additional data is available about the 2006
respondents.  Users may be interested in comparing answers from the current
study to answers given in the 2004 ANES.  Furthermore, some answers that are
unlikely to change (such as select demographics) were not asked about again in
the 2006 ANES Pilot Study, in order to reduce the survey length.  With this in
mind, users may wish to merge variables from the 2004 ANES time series study
(again, not to be confused with the 2004 ANES Panel Study) into the dataset
for the 2006 ANES Pilot Study.  While we are unable to support the various
software packages you might use to accomplish this, the general process is as
follows:

1. Download the 2004 ANES time series study (not the 2004 ANES Panel Study)
   and read it into your software package of choice.  There should be 1,212
   records in the file, because 1,212 interviews appear in the 2004 ANES
   time series study.  If you do not wish to carry forward all of the
   variables, you may delete the variables you do not need.

2. Download the 2006 ANES Pilot Study release and read it into your software
   package of choice.  There should be 675 records in the file, because
   there were 675 interviews.

3. Merge the two files together, matching on the respondent identifier.
   In the 2004 ANES time series study this is variable "V040001".  In the 2006
   ANES Pilot Study this is variable "V06P001."  The resulting file should
   have 1,212 records.  Variables for the respondents who did not provide an
   interview in 2006 will show as missing for survey variables from the 2006
   study.



>> 2006 PILOT STUDY DATA ANOMALIES

Known data anomalies are noted at the appropriate variable in the codebook.
If you notice possible undocumented errors in the dataset, we would appreciate
an email to "anes@electionstudies.org" describing the problem so that we can
research and address it.



>> 2006 PILOT STUDY RESPONSE OPTION NOTE

Except in the uncommon event that "Don't know" is included in question text
with other response options read to the respondent, "Don't know" and "Refused"
have traditionally been considered by ANES to be 'volunteered' responses only,
although they are not documented as such in code labels within the codebook or
elsewhere, even when a CAI application had consistently tagged Don't know and
Refused "VOLUNTEERED"/"VOL" etc. for the benefit of interviewers.

In the 2006 Pilot Study, interviewers followed a new protocol whenever a
respondent gave an initial "don't know" response.  The interviewer waited
silently for approximately four seconds and then probed as follows:  "I'll
make a note of that.  It would be a big help to us if you'd be willing to give
me your best guess."  The interviewer then repeated the question and coded the
respondent's answer.



>> 2006 PILOT STUDY NOTE ON CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS

The American National Election Studies have not included information for
census tracts or minor civil divisions since 1978, and since 2000 county
and PSU identification have no longer been made available.

In addition, ANES has traditionally restricted open-ended textual responses,
coding them according to master code schemes; other scholars have developed
alternative or supplemental coding schemes for such questions.  ANES wishes 
to encourage these efforts but in ways which respect the ANES obligation to
protect the privacy and anonymity of respondents. Circumstances under which
individuals may have access to transcribed versions of these questions have
been worked out and those interested should contact the ANES project staff for
further details.

In the 2006 Pilot, there are two open-ended response questions, Mod15_7 and
Mod15_9, which ask what the respondent likes and dislikes about the federal
government; in the absence of any other ready coding scheme for the responses
to these questions, they were coded according to an existing 'Likes-Dislikes'
master code already established for candidates and parties in the ANES time-
series.  Specific application of pre-existing 'Likes-Dislikes' codes, as well
as new codes added to the set of master codes specifically for the 2006
Pilot, are fully documented in the appendix "2006 PILOT STUDY master code-
federal government Likes-Dislikes."

Permission to use detailed geographic information, open-end response texts, or
other restricted data for scholarly research may be obtained from the ANES
Board of Overseers.  If there is an established research need, users may apply
for access to restricted data by following the procedure on this page of the
ANES website:
http://www.electionstudies.org/studyres/spar/sparweb.htm



>> 2006 PILOT STUDY FILE STRUCTURE AND PROCESSING INFORMATION

The public release data file for the 2006 ANES Pilot Study is constructed with
a single logical record for each respondent. Records are in ASCII files that
are both comma-delimited AND fixed-column, with variable names comprising the
first data line.

The data collection was processed according to standard processing
procedures.  The data were checked for inconsistent code values which, when
found, were corrected or recoded to missing data values. Consistency checks
were performed.  Annotation was added by the processors for explanatory
purposes.






>> 2006 PILOT STUDY CODEBOOK INFORMATION (how to read)
__________________________________________


              EXAMPLE OF CODEBOOK VARIABLE DOCUMENTATION

01  ========================================================================
02  V035246     Q9a. Party of Pres vote -party performance past 4 yrs
03  ========================================================================
04
05  PRE-ELECTION SURVEY:
06  IF R VOTED FOR PRESIDENT:
07  IF PRESIDENTIAL VOTE WAS FOR MAJOR PARTY CANDIDATE/
08  IF PRESIDENTIAL VOTE WAS FOR OTHER PARTY CANDIDATE:
09
10  QUESTION:
11  ---------
12  You've indicated that you voted for the [>NAME OF MAJOR PARTY<
13  Presidential candidate/Presidential candidate from the >NAME
14  OF OTHER PARTY< party] in 2004.
15  How well has [the >NAME OF MAJOR PARTY< party/ that party] performed
16  over the past four years? Has it done a VERY GOOD job? a GOOD job?
17  A BAD job? A VERY BAD job? (in general)
18
19  INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
20  ------------------------
21  {INTERVIEWER: DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}
22
23  VALID CODES:
24  ------------
25  1. Very good job
26  2. Good job
27  3. Bad job
28  4. Very bad job
29
30  MISSING CODES:
31  --------------
32  8. Don't know
33  9. Refused
34  INAP. 5,8,9 in C1a or 1-3,8,9 in C1b; 5,8,9 in C6; 7,8,9 in
35  Q9x; no post IW
36
37  NOTES:
38  ------
39  Text corresponding to C6a party of vote for President was
40  included in the question text.
41
42  TYPE:
43  -----
44  Numeric  Dec 0
45

..........................................................................
NOTE: THIS EXAMPLE DOES NOT REPRESENT AN ACTUAL ANES VARIABLE

LINE 02
Contains identifiers, including (left to right) the variable name, the
question "tag" or item number (Q9a), and the variable label.  Since the
variable label begins with the question tag, the question tag only appears
once, as part of the variable label.

LINE 05
This describes the section of the codebook; sections define survey content by
wave, administrative variables, geocodes, interviewer characteristics
variables, etc.

LINES 06-08
This describes who is being asked the question, inverse to the INAP
conditions (lines 34-35).  Each line ending with ":" describes one condition
that has been met to reach this question.
"/" at the end of a line is equivalent to an "OR" between the condition
preceding and the condition following the "/".  In this example, respondents
who were asked this question were respondents who 1) said they voted, and
who 2) said they voted specifically for President, and who 3) voted for a
major party Presidential candidate OR for another party's candidate.  Note
that a corresponding "/" sometimes appears in the question text when
question wording varies according to which of the OR conditions applies. See
lines 12-17.

LINES 12-17
Several conventions are observed in codebook presentation of question text.
1) Text bracketed between ">" and "<" (line 12, line 15) indicates that
   case-specific text was loaded onto the instrument by the survey
   application.
   In this example, ">NAME OF MAJOR PARTY<" indicates that either
   "Democratic" or "Republican" was loaded into the question text,
   depending up which major party candidate R indicated he had voted for
   earlier in the questionnaire
2) Text bracketed between "[" and "]" (lines 12-14; line 15) displays
   text options, separated by "/".  In this example, the first option is for
   Rs who had voted for a major party candidate; the first 2 sentences read
   to these respondent are:
  "You've indicated that you voted for the >NAME OF MAJOR PARTY<
   Presidential candidate in 2004. How well has the >NAME OF MAJOR PARTY<
   party performed over the past four years?"
   On the other hand, in this example, if R voted for another party's
   candidate, the first 2 sentences are:
  "You've indicated that you voted for the >NAME OF OTHER PARTY< party in
   2004. How well has that party performed over the past four years?"
3) Text in parentheses (line 17) is read at the interviewer's discretion.
4) Text in CAPS, other than text bracketed with ">" "<" per 1), indicates
   words or phrases that appeared underlined in the instrument for emphasis.
   In this example (lines 16-17), the words "very good", "good", "bad", and
   "very bad" had appeared underlined for interviewer emphasis..

LINE 21
With few exceptions, interviewer instructions appear in the instrument
immediately following the question text.

LINES 34-35
INAP describes the specific paths of all respondents whom the instrument
skips over the question.  Each condition which results in a skip is listed,
separated by ";".



>> 2006 PILOT STUDY QUESTIONS?

If you have questions or find errors, please let us know by email to:
anes@electionstudies.org

>> 2006 PILOT STUDY Variable Description List

In large part, ANES 2006 Pilot survey content corresponds, by module, with
proposals accepted from the user community on specific topics.  
For a comprehensive list of proposals by module see 2006 PILOT STUDY
QUESTIONNAIRE DEVELOPMENT in this codebook introduction file.



========   ======================================================
Variable   Variable label
========   ======================================================

--------------------------
IDENTIFICATION AND PRELOAD
--------------------------
Version    Version of ANES 2006 Pilot data
V06P001    Study.1. Case ID (2004)
V06P002    Study.2. 2006 Pilot study type
V06P003    Study.3. 2006 Pilot weight
V06P004    Study.4. 2004-2006 participation
V06P005    Study.5. 2004 R gender
V06P006    Study.6. Updated age of R from 2004
V06P007a   Study.7a. 2004 Sampling error code: Stratum
V06P007b   Study.7b. 2004 Sampling error code: SECU
--------
GEOCODES
--------
V06P101    Geocode.1. R moved since 2004
V06P101x   Geocode.1x. R moved within or out of 2004 community
V06P102    Geocode.2. FIPS state 2006
V06P102a   Geocode.2a. Postal abbreviation state 2006
V06P103    Geocode.3. Senate race in 2006 state
V06P104    Geocode.4. Region 2006
V06P105    Geocode.5. Congressional District (110th Congress)
V06P105a   Geocode.5a. FIPS state and Congressional District (110th)
V06P105b   Geocode.5b. Postal abbreviation and Congressional District (110th)
V06P106    Geocode.6. SUMMARY: same or different district 2004-2006
V06P106a   Geocode.6a. FIPS state and congressional district from 2004 ANES
V06P107    Geocode.7. 2006 Pilot FIPS state and county
V06P108    Geocode.8. 2006 Pilot Census tract
V06P109a   Geocode.9a. 2006 Pilot Census block
V06P109b   Geocode.9b. 2006 Pilot full Census block number (character)
V06P110    Geocode.10. 2006 Pilot Census place code
V06P111    Geocode.11. 2006 Pilot Minor Civil Division (MCD)
V06P112    Geocode.12. 2006 Pilot Metropolitan Statistical Area
V06P113    Geocode.13. 2006 Pilot Census Urban/Rural designation
V06P114a   Geocode.14a. 2006 Pilot CSA
V06P114b   Geocode.14b. 2006 Pilot CBSA
--------------
ADMINISTRATION
--------------
V06P201a   Admin.1a. Month of IW - session 1
V06P201b   Admin.1b. Day of IW - session 1
V06P201c   Admin.1c. Date of IW (MMDD) - session 1
V06P202a   Admin.2a. Month of IW - session 2
V06P202b   Admin.2b. Day of IW - session 2
V06P202c   Admin.2c. Date of IW (MMDD) - session 2
V06P203a   Admin.3a. Number of days between sessions
V06P203b   Admin.3b. Session breakoff
V06P204a   Admin.4a. Number of days after election - session 1
V06P204b   Admin.4b. Number of days after election - session 2
V06P205    Admin.5. Release
V06P206    Admin.6. Mode of IW
V06P207    Admin.7. R time zone
V06P208    Admin.8. Version of CATI instrument
V06P208a   Admin.8a. Cell or land line
V06P209    Admin.9. Length of IW
V06P210a   Admin.10a. Beginning time of call - 1st interview session
V06P210b   Admin.10b. Beginning time of call - 2nd interview session
V06P211    Admin.11. Tape-recorded
V06P212    Admin.12. Interviewer IW number
V06P213    Admin.13. Language of IW
V06P214    Admin.14. Verification of IW
V06P215    Admin.15. Evaluation of IW
V06P216    Admin.16. Respondent incentive
V06P217    Admin.17. Respondent payment
V06P218    Admin.18. Refusal conversion - type persuasion letter
V06P219    Admin.19. Final letter - type persuasion letter
V06P220    Admin.20. Total number of interviewers
V06P221    Admin.21. Total number of appointments set
V06P221a   Admin.21a. Number of appts. broken or missed
V06P222    Admin.22. Total number of calls
V06P223    Admin.23. Call summary 1 - no contact
V06P224    Admin.24. Call summary 2 - hang up
V06P225    Admin.25. Call summary 3 - refusal
V06P226    Admin.26. Call summary 4 - contact callback
V06P227    Admin.27. Call summary 5 - health/hearing
V06P228    Admin.28. Call summary 6 - away for duration
V06P229    Admin.29. Call summary 7 - temporary call problem
V06P230    Admin.30. Call summary 8 - permanent call problem
V06P231    Err.1. Error flag
--------------------------
INTERVIEWER CHARACERISTICS
--------------------------
V06P301    IWR.1. Interviewer ID
V06P302    IWR.2. Interviewer gender
V06P303    IWR.3. Interviewer age group
V06P304    IWR.4. Interviewer Hispanic
V06P305    IWR.5. Interviewer race
V06P306    IWR.6. Interviewer education
V06P307    IWR.7. Interviewer experience
V06P308    IWR.8. Interviewer party ID
V06P309    IWR.9. Interviewer interest in politics
-------------
RANDOMIZATION
-------------
V06P401    Rand.1. Random assignment to code reversal of select questions
V06P402    Rand.2. Random selection Mod5_A1-A3 / Mod5_B1-B3 (self-monitoring)
V06P403    Rand.3. Random selection Mod6_A1-A3 / Mod6_B1 (trust)
V06P404    Rand.4. Random selection Mod7_A1-A10 / Mod7_B1-B12 (values)
V06P405    Rand.5. Random selection Mod12_A1-A8 / Mod12_B1-B8 (optimism)
V06P406    Rand.6. Random wording assignment Mod13_1 (discussion in network)
V06P407    Rand.7. Random wording order Mod13_8 (network Dem/Rep)
V06P408    Rand.8. Random selection Mod14_A1-A3/Mod14_B1-B2 (attn to politics)
V06P409    Rand.9. Random selection and order Mod15 questions (ambivalence)
V06P410    Rand.10. Random selection Mod16_A1-A2 / Mod16_B1-B2 (efficacy)
V06P411    Rand.11. Random selection Mod16_A5-A6 / Mod16_B5-B6 (efficacy)
V06P412    Rand.12. Random selection Mod17_A1-A2/B1-B4/C1-C4 (trust in govt)
V06P413    Rand.13. Random selection Mod18_A1-A8 / Mod18_B1-B8 (media)
V06P414    Rand.14. Random selection Mod19_A1-A4 / Mod19_B1-B4 (party ID)
V06P415    Rand.15. Random wording order Mod19 (party ID Democrat/Republican)
V06P416    Rand.16. Random selection Mod20_A1-A35 / Mod20_B1 (abortion)
V06P417    Rand.17. Random selection 1st abortion scenario (Mod20_A1-A5)
V06P418    Rand.18. Random selection 2nd abortion scenario (Mod20_A6-A10)
V06P419    Rand.19. Random selection 3rd abortion scenario (Mod20_A11-A15)
V06P420    Rand.20. Random selection 4th abortion scenario (Mod20_A16-A20)
V06P421    Rand.21. Random selection 5th abortion scenario (Mod20_A21-A25)
V06P422    Rand.22. Random selection 6th abortion scenario (Mod20_A26-A30)
V06P423    Rand.23. Random selection 7th abortion scenario (Mod20_A31-A35)
V06P424a   Rand.24a. Random order 1st Mod20 abortion scenario
V06P424b   Rand.24b. Random order 2nd Mod20 abortion scenario
V06P424c   Rand.24c. Random order 3rd Mod20 abortion scenario
V06P424d   Rand.24d. Random order 4th Mod20 abortion scenario
V06P424e   Rand.24e. Random order 5th Mod20 abortion scenario
V06P424f   Rand.24f. Random order 6th Mod20 abortion scenario
V06P424g   Rand.24g. Random order 7th Mod20 abortion scenario
V06P425    Rand.25. Random selection Mod21_A1 / Mod21_B1 (tolerance)
V06P426    Rand.26. Forward/reverse order Mod22 (justice)
V06P427    Rand.27. Random selection Mod23_A1-A2 / Mod23_B1-B2 (gender)
V06P428    Rand.28. Random order by party Mod23 (gender)
V06P429    Rand.29. Random order by crime/education Mod23 (gender)
V06P430    Rand.30. Random selection Mod24_A3-A4 / Mod24_B3 (tax)
V06P431    Rand.31. Random order by party Mod25 (party differences)
V06P432    Rand.32. Random wording order Mod26_1 (vote)
V06P433    Rand.33. Random selection Mod26_A2-A3 / Mod26_B2-B6 (vote)
V06P434    Rand.34. Random selection experiment Module 27 branching
V06P435a   Rand.35a. Random order 1st IWR observation item
V06P435b   Rand.35b. Random order 2nd IWR observation item
V06P435c   Rand.35c. Random order 3rd IWR observation item
V06P435d   Rand.35d. Random order 4th IWR observation item
V06P435e   Rand.35e. Random order 5th IWR observation item
V06P435f   Rand.35f. Random order 6th IWR observation item
V06P435g   Rand.35g. Random order 7th IWR observation item
V06P435h   Rand.35h. Random order 8th IWR observation item
V06P435j   Rand.35j. Random order 9th IWR observation item
V06P435k   Rand.35k. Random order 10th IWR observation item
V06P435m   Rand.35m. Random order 11th IWR observation item
V06P435n   Rand.35n. Random order 12th IWR observation item
-------------------------------
MODULE 1 (CHARACTER JUDGEMENTS)
-------------------------------
V06P501    Mod1_1. How much can people change
-------------------------------
MODULE 2 (DEFENSIVE CONFIDENCE)
-------------------------------
V06P502    Mod2_1. How well could R defend an opinion
---------------------------
MODULE 3 (NEED FOR CLOSURE)
---------------------------
V06P503    Mod3_1. How disorganized is R
V06P504x   Mod3_2-5x. SUMMARY: R likes or dislikes unpredictable situations
V06P505    Mod3_2. Does R like or dislike unpredictable situations
V06P506    Mod3_3. How much does R like unpredictable situations
V06P507    Mod3_4. How much does R dislike unpredictable situations
V06P508    Mod3_5. R lean toward liking or disliking unpredictable situations
V06P509    Mod3_6. How many important decisions R makes quickly, confidently
V06P510    Mod3_7. How uncomfortable to not understand reason things happen
V06P511    Mod3_8. How often can R see both sides of a disagreement
---------------------------------
MODULE 4 (BELIEF IN A JUST WORLD)
---------------------------------
V06P512    Mod4_1. How often do people get what they deserve
--------------------------
MODULE 5 (SELF-MONITORING)
--------------------------
V06P513    Mod5_A1. How often does R put on a show to impress
V06P514    Mod5_A2. How good an actor would R be
V06P515    Mod5_A3. How often is R the center of attention
V06P516    Mod5_B1. True/False that R puts on a show to impress
V06P517    Mod5_B2. True/False that R would make a good actor
V06P518    Mod5_B3. True/False that R is rarely the center of attention
----------------
MODULE 6 (TRUST)
----------------
V06P519    Mod6_A1. How often can R trust other people
V06P520    Mod6_A2. What percent of people can R trust all the time
V06P521    Mod6_A3. What percent of people can R never trust
V06P522    Mod6_B1. Can most people be trusted or can you not be too careful
-----------------
MODULE 7 (VALUES)
-----------------
V06P523    Mod7_A1. How like R is one who believes should treat everyone equal
V06P524    Mod7_A2. How much like R is one who wants secure surroundings
V06P525    Mod7_A3. How much like R is person who seeks adventure and risks
V06P526    Mod7_A4. How much like R is person who follows traditions
V06P527    Mod7_A5. How much like R is person who seeks out fun
V06P528    Mod7_A6. How like R is one who believes people should do as told
V06P529    Mod7_A7. How much like R is one who feels importnt to be successful
V06P530    Mod7_A8. How much like R is one who feels important to help others
V06P531    Mod7_A9. How much like R is one who feels important to be in charge
V06P532    Mod7_A10. How much like R is one who wants to make own decisions
V06P533    Mod7_B1. How important to R that everyone has equal opportunities
V06P534    Mod7_B2. How important is it to R to feel safe from harm
V06P535    Mod7_B3. How important is it to R to have an exciting life
V06P536    Mod7_B4. How important is it to R to follow traditions
V06P537    Mod7_B5. How important is it to R to have fun whenever possible
V06P538    Mod7_B6. How important is it to R that people always follow rules
V06P539    Mod7_B7. How important is it to R to be very successful
V06P540    Mod7_B8. How important is it to R to help others
V06P541    Mod7_B9. How important is it to R to be in charge of others
V06P542    Mod7_B10. How important is it to R to choose what R does in life
V06P543    Mod7_B11. How important is it to R to be financially successful
V06P544    Mod7_B12. How important to succeed in getting respect from others
--------------------
MODULE 8 (BORROWING)
--------------------
V06P545    Mod8_1. Could R borrow money from family or friends
V06P546    Mod8_2. Response indicator - amount R could borrow
V06P547    Mod8_3. Amount R could borrow from family or friends
-----------------------------
MODULE 9 (SOCIOTROPIC VOTING)
-----------------------------
V06P548    Mod9_1. What would R guess is average price of gas in R's state
V06P549    Mod9_2. How many days in a week does R drive an automobile
V06P550    Mod9_3. How many times in week does R notice price of gas
V06P551    Mod9_4. What is R's estimate of unemployment in R's state
V06P551a   Mod9_4a. Estimate of unemployment raw data
V06P551b   Mod9_4month. Month of Mod9_4 unemployment estimate
--------------------
MODULE 10 (RELIGION)
--------------------
V06P552    Mod10_1. Does R consider religion important
V06P553    Mod10_2. How much guidance does religion provide to R
V06P554x   Mod10_3-5x. SUMMARY: R religious service attendance
V06P555    Mod10_3. Does R attend religious services
V06P556    Mod10_4. How often does R attend religious services
V06P557    Mod10_5. R attend religious services more often than once a week
------------------------
MODULE 11 (CHRISTIANITY)
------------------------
V06P558    Mod11_0. 2004 ANES major religious group category
V06P559    Mod11_1. Does Christian R believe Jesus is the son of God
V06P560    Mod11_2. How important to Christian R is belief Jesus is son of God
V06P561    Mod11_3. Christian R believe in transubstantiation of the Eucharist
V06P562    Mod11_4. How important to Christian R is transubstantiation belief
V06P563    Mod11_5. Christian R had times when R tried to be a good Christian
V06P564    Mod11_6. R try to be good Christian by avoiding sin or helping oth
V06P565    Mod11_7. R good Christian helping others one or many at a time
V06P566    Mod11_8. Christian R believe God gave responsibility save environmt
------------------------------
MODULE 12 (OPTIMISM/PESSIMISM)
------------------------------
V06P567x   Mod12_A1-A3. SUMMARY: R optimism/pessimism own future (VERSION 1)
V06P568    Mod12_A1. R optimistic or pessimistic about own future (VERSION 1)
V06P569    Mod12_A2. R extreme, moderate, slight optim (VERSION 1) own future
V06P570    Mod12_A3. R extreme, moderate, slight pessim (VERSION 1) own futur
V06P571    Mod12_A4. Lean optimistic or pessimistic (VERSION 1) own future
V06P572x   Mod12_A5-A7. SUMMARY: R optimism/pessimism U.S. future (VERSION 1)
V06P573    Mod12_A5. R optimistic or pessimistic about U.S. future (VERSION 1)
V06P574    Mod12_A6. R extreme, moderate, slight optim (VERSION 1) U.S. futur
V06P575    Mod12_A7. R extreme, moderate, slight pessim (VERSION 1) US future
V06P576    Mod12_A8. Lean optimistic or pessimistic (VERSION 1) U.S. future
V06P577x   Mod12_B1-B3. SUMMARY: R optimism/pessimism own future (VERSION 2)
V06P578    Mod12_B1. R optimistic or pessimistic about own future (VERSION 2)
V06P579    Mod12_B2. R extreme, moderate, slight optim (VERSION 2) own future
V06P580    Mod12_B3. Extreme, moderate, slight pessim (VERSION 2) own future
V06P581    Mod12_B4. Lean optimistic or pessimistic (VERSION 2) own future
V06P582x   Mod12_B5-B7. SUMMARY: R optimism/pessimism U.S. future (VERSION 2)
V06P583    Mod12_B5. R optimistic or pessimistic about U.S. future (VERSION 2)
V06P584    Mod12_B6. R very or somewhat optimistic (VERSION 2) about US future
V06P585    Mod12_B7. R very or somewhat pessimistic (VERSION 2) about US futur
V06P586    Mod12_B8. Lean optimistic or pessimistic (VERSION 2) U.S. future
---------------------------
MODULE 13 (SOCIAL NETWORKS)
---------------------------
V06P587    Mod13_1. Talk with anyone about important things/govt and election
V06P588    Mod13_2. Network mentions - total number of persons
V06P588a   Mod13_2females. Network mentions - total number of females
V06P588b   Mod13_2males. Network mentions - total number of males
V06P589a   Mod13_2_1gender. Gender of Network person #1
V06P589b   Mod13_2_2gender. Gender of Network person #2
V06P589c   Mod13_2_3gender. Gender of Network person #3
V06P590    Mod13_3_1. How close does R feel to Network person #1
V06P591    Mod13_4_1. How many days did R talk with Network person #1
V06P591x   Mod13_4_1x. SUMMARY: Total frequency R talked with Network person#1
V06P592    Mod13_3_2. How close does R feel to Network person #2
V06P593    Mod13_4_2. How many days did R talk with Network person #2
V06P593x   Mod13_4_2x. SUMMARY: Total frequency R talked with Network person#2
V06P594    Mod13_3_3. How close does R feel to Network person #3
V06P595    Mod13_4_3. How many days did R talk with Network person #3
V06P595x   Mod13_4_3x. SUMMARY: Total frequency R talked with Network person#3
V06P596    Mod13_5. Days persons talked for 2 total Network mentions
V06P596x   Mod13_5x. SUMMARY: Total freq talked - 2 total network mentions
V06P597    Mod13_6_pair1. Days network persons #1,#2 talked (3/more mentions)
V06P597x   Mod13_6_pair1x. SUMMARY: Total freq network #1,#2 talked (3/more)
V06P598    Mod13_6_pair2. Days network persons #1,#3 talked (3/more)
V06P598x   Mod13_6_pair2x. SUMMARY: Total freq network #1,#3 talked (3/more)
V06P599    Mod13_6_pair3. Days network persons #2,#3 talked (3/more)
V06P599x   Mod13_6_pair3x. SUMMARY: Total freq network #2,#3 talked (3/more)
V06P600    Mod13_7_1. How different Network person #1 polit opinions from R
V06P601    Mod13_7_2. How different Network person #2 polit opinions from R
V06P602    Mod13_7_3. How different Network person #3 polit opinions from R
V06P603x   Mod13_8_1x. SUMMARY: Party ID network mention #1
V06P604    Mod13_8_1. Network person #1 think of self Democrat or Republican
V06P605    Mod13_9_1. Is Network person #1 a strong or not strong Democrat
V06P606    Mod13_10_1. Is Network person #1 a strong or not strong Republican
V06P607    Mod13_11_1. Is Network person #1 closer to Democrats or Republicans
V06P608x   Mod13_8_2x. SUMMARY: Party ID network mention #2
V06P609    Mod13_8_2. Network person #2 think self as Democrat Republican
V06P610    Mod13_9_2. Is Network person #2 a strong or not strong Democrat
V06P611    Mod13_10_2. Is Network person #2 a strong or not strong Republican
V06P612    Mod13_11_2. Is Network person #2 closer to Democrats or Republicans
V06P613x   Mod13_8_3x. SUMMARY: Party ID network mention #3
V06P614    Mod13_8_3. Network person #3 think self as Democrat Republican
V06P615    Mod13_9_3. Is Network person #3 a strong or not strong Democrat
V06P616    Mod13_10_3. Is Network person #3 a strong or not strong Republican
V06P617    Mod13_11_3. Is Network person #3 closer to Democrats or Republicans
V06P618    Mod13_12_1. How interested Network person #1 in govt and politics
V06P619    Mod13_12_2. How interested Network person #2 in govt and politics
V06P620    Mod13_12_3. How interested Network person #3 in govt and politics
V06P621    Mod13_13_1. How much time to drive to home of Network person #1
V06P622a   Mod13_13_1min. No. minute units-drive time to Network person #1 hom
V06P622b   Mod13_13_1hr. No. hour units-time to drive to Network person #1 hom
V06P622c   Mod13_13_1day. No. day units-time to drive to Network person #1 hom
V06P623    Mod13_14_1. Guess for nondriving distance -home of Network person #
V06P624    Mod13_13_2. How much time to drive to home of Network person #2
V06P625a   Mod13_13_2min. No. minute units-drive time to Network person #2 hom
V06P625b   Mod13_13_2hr. No. hour units-time to drive to Network person #2 hom
V06P625c   Mod13_13_2day. No. day units-time to drive to Network person #2 hom
V06P626    Mod13_14_2. Guess for nondriving distance -home of Network person #
V06P627    Mod13_13_3. How much time to drive to home of Network person #3
V06P628a   Mod13_13_3min. No. minute units-drive time to Network person #3 hom
V06P628b   Mod13_13_3hr. No. hour units-time to drive to Network person #3 hom
V06P628c   Mod13_13_3day. No. day units-time to drive to Network person #3 hom
V06P629    Mod13_14_3. Guess for nondriving distance -home of Network person #
---------------------------------
MODULE 14 (ATTENTION TO POLITICS)
---------------------------------
V06P630    Mod14_A1. How interested is R in government and politics
V06P631    Mod14_A2. How closely R pays attention to government and politics
V06P632    Mod14_A3. How often does R pay attention to government and politics
V06P633    Mod14_B1. How interested has R been in the political campaigns
V06P634    Mod14_B2. How often does R follow government and public affairs
-----------------------
MODULE 15 (AMBIVALENCE)
-----------------------
V06P635    Mod15_1. Does R have any favorable thoughts about the federal govt
V06P636    Mod15_2. How favorable are favorable thoughts about federal govt
V06P637    Mod15_3. Does R have unfavorable thoughts about federal government
V06P638    Mod15_4. How unfavorable are unfavorable thoughts about federal gov
V06P639    Mod15_5. How conflicting thoughts and feelings about federal govt
V06P640    Mod15_6. Is there anything R likes about federal government in Wash
V06P641    Mod15_7. Number of likes about federal government
V06P641a   Mod15_6a. #1 What R likes about federal government in Wash
V06P641b   Mod15_6b. #2 What R likes about federal government in Wash
V06P641c   Mod15_6c. #3 What R likes about federal government in Wash
V06P641d   Mod15_6d. #4 What R likes about federal government in Wash
V06P641e   Mod15_6e. #5 What R likes about federal government in Wash
V06P641f   Mod15_6f. #6 What R likes about federal government in Wash
V06P642    Mod15_8. Is there anything R dislikes about federal govt in Wash.
V06P643    Mod15_9. Number of dislikes about federal government
V06P643a   Mod15_9a. #1 What R dislikes about federal government in Wash
V06P643b   Mod15_9b. #2 What R dislikes about federal government in Wash
V06P643c   Mod15_9c. #3 What R dislikes about federal government in Wash
V06P643d   Mod15_9d. #4 What R dislikes about federal government in Wash
V06P643e   Mod15_9e. #5 What R dislikes about federal government in Wash
V06P643f   Mod15_9f. #6 What R dislikes about federal government in Wash
V06P643g   Mod15_9g. #7 What R dislikes about federal government in Wash
V06P643h   Mod15_9h. #8 What R dislikes about federal government in Wash
V06P643j   Mod15_9j. #9 What R dislikes about federal government in Wash
V06P643k   Mod15_9k. #10 What R dislikes about federal government in Wash
V06P643m   Mod15_9m. #11 What R dislikes about federal government in Wash
V06P643n   Mod15_9n. #11 What R dislikes about federal government in Wash
--------------------
MODULE 16 (EFFICACY)
--------------------
V06P644    Mod16_A1. How much work and decisions of US Pres affect what happen
V06P645    Mod16_A2. How much can Congress affect what happens in U.S.
V06P646    Mod16_B1. How much can work and decisions of US Pres. affect nation
V06P647    Mod16_B2. How much can Congress affect the nation
V06P648    Mod16_3. How much can President affect how R personally lives life
V06P649    Mod16_4. How much can Congress affect how R personally lives life
V06P650    Mod16_A5. How much R agrees or disagrees public officials don't car
V06P651    Mod16_A6. How much R agrees or disagrees people like R have no say
V06P652    Mod16_B5. How much do public officials care what people like R thin
V06P653    Mod16_B6. How much can people like R affect what the government doe
-------------------------------
MODULE 17 (TRUST IN GOVERNMENT)
-------------------------------
V06P654    Mod17_A1. How much governmentt in Washington trusted to do right
V06P655    Mod17_A2. How much of the time govt in state trusted to do right
V06P656    Mod17_B1. How much of the time trust govt in Wash. on fair decision
V06P657    Mod17_B2. How much of the time trust govt in state on fair decision
V06P658    Mod17_B3. How much of the time trust govt in Wash. on best for U.S.
V06P659    Mod17_B4. How much of the time trust govt in state on best for stat
V06P660    Mod17_C1. Percent of time govt in Wash. trusted on fair decisions
V06P661    Mod17_C2. Percent of time govt in state trusted on fair decisions
V06P662    Mod17_C3. Percent of time govt in Washington trusted on best for US
V06P663    Mod17_C4. Percent of time govt in state trusted on best for state
-----------------
MODULE 18 (MEDIA)
-----------------
V06P664    Mod18_A1. Typical week (VERSION 1) no. days R reads Internet news
V06P665    Mod18_A2. Typical week (VERSION 1) amount time R reads Internet new
V06P665x   Mod18_A2x. SUMMARY: minutes reading internet news (VERSION 1)
V06P666    Mod18_A3. Typical week (VERSION 1) no. days R reads print newspaper
V06P667    Mod18_A4. Typical week (VERSION 1) amount time R reads print news
V06P667x   Mod18_A4x. SUMMARY: minutes reading print news (VERSION 1)
V06P668    Mod18_A5. Typical week (VERSION 1) no. days R watches news on TV
V06P669    Mod18_A6. Typical week (VERSION 1) amount time R watches news on TV
V06P669x   Mod18_A6x. SUMMARY: minutes watching news on TV (VERSION 1)
V06P670    Mod18_A7. Typical week (VERSION 1) no. days R listens to radio news
V06P671    Mod18_A8. Typical week (VERSION 1) amount time R hears radio news
V06P671x   Mod18_A8x. SUMMARY: minutes hearing news on radio (VERSION 1)
V06P672    Mod18_B1. Typical week past yr (VERSION 2) no. days R Internet news
V06P673    Mod18_B2. Typical week past yr (VERSION 2) amt time R Internet new
V06P673x   Mod18_B2x. SUMMARY: minutes reading internet news (VERSION 2)
V06P674    Mod18_B3. Typical wk past yr (VERSION 2) no. days R print newspaper
V06P675    Mod18_B4. Typical week past yr (VERSION 2) amt time R printed news
V06P675x   Mod18_B4x. SUMMARY: minutes reading print news (VERSION 2)
V06P676    Mod18_B5. Typical week past yr (VERSION 2) no. days R news on TV
V06P677    Mod18_B6. Typical week past yr(VERSION 2) amt time R news on TV
V06P677x   Mod18_B6x. SUMMAARY: minutes watching news on TV (VERSION 2)
V06P678    Mod18_B7. Typical week past yr (VERSION 2) no. days R news on radio
V06P679    Mod18_B8. Typical week past yr (VERSION 2) amt time R news on radio
V06P679x   Mod18_B8x. SUMMARY: minutes hearing news on radio (VERSION 2)
--------------------------------
MODULE 19 (PARTY IDENTIFICATION)
--------------------------------
V06P680    Mod19_0. R Party ID summary - VERSION 1 and VERSION 2
V06P680a   Mod19_0_1. R Party ID summary - VERSION 1 (Generally speaking)
V06P680b   Mod19_0_2. R Party ID summary - VERSION 2 (As of today)
V06P681    Mod19_A1. Generally speaking (VERSION 1) R think self Repub, Democr
V06P682    Mod19_A2. R call self strong or not strong Republican (VERSION 1)
V06P683    Mod19_A3. R call self a strong or not strong Democrat (VERSION 1)
V06P684    Mod19_A4. Is R closer to Republican or Democratic Party (VERSION 1)
V06P685    Mod19_B1. As of today (VERSION 2) R think of self Republ, Democrat
V06P686    Mod19_B2. R call self strong or not strong Republican (VERSION 2)
V06P687    Mod19_B3. R call self a strong or not strong Democrat (VERSION 2)
V06P688    Mod19_B4. Is R closer to Republican or Democratic Party (VERSION 2)
--------------------
MODULE 20 (ABORTION)
--------------------
V06P689x   Mod20_A1-A4. SUMMARY: abortion if pregn nonfatally injures woman
V06P690    Mod20_A1. R favor or oppose abortion if pregnancy injures woman
V06P691    Mod20_A2. Strongly or not favor abortion if pregnancy injures woman
V06P692    Mod20_A3. Strongly or not oppose abortion if pregnancy injures woma
V06P693    Mod20_A4. Lean favor or oppose abortion if pregnancy injures woman
V06P694    Mod20_A5. When is abortion legal if pregn nonfatally injure woman
V06P695x   Mod20_A6-A9x. SUMMARY: abortion if pregnancy fatally injure woman
V06P696    Mod20_A6. R favor or oppose abortion if pregn fatally injures woman
V06P697    Mod20_A7. Strongly or not favor abort if pregn fatally injure woman
V06P698    Mod20_A8. Strongly or not oppose abort if pregn fatally injure woma
V06P699    Mod20_A9. Lean favor or oppose abort if pregn fatally injure woman
V06P700    Mod20_A10. When is abortion legal if pregnancy fatally injures woma
V06P701x   Mod20_A11-A14x. SUMMARY: abortion if pregnancy due to incest
V06P702    Mod20_A11. Does R favor or oppose abortion if pregn due to incest
V06P703    Mod20_A12. Strongly or not favor abortion if incest pregnancy
V06P704    Mod20_A13. Strongly or not oppose abortion if incest pregnancy
V06P705    Mod20_A14. Lean to favor or oppose abort if pregnancy due to incest
V06P706    Mod20_A15. When should abortion be legal if pregnancy due to incest
V06P707x   Mod20_A16-A19x. SUMMARY: abortion if pregnancy due to rape
V06P708    Mod20_A16. Does R favor or oppose abortion if pregnancy due to rape
V06P709    Mod20_A17. Strongly or not favor abortion if pregnancy due to rape
V06P710    Mod20_A18. Strongly or not oppose abortion if pregnancy due to rape
V06P711    Mod20_A19. Lean to favor or oppose abort if pregnancy due to rape
V06P712    Mod20_A20. When should abortion be legal if pregnancy is due to rap
V06P713x   Mod20_A21-A24x. SUMMARY: abortion if pregn has serious birth defect
V06P714    Mod20_A21. Does R favor or oppose abortion if serious birth defect
V06P715    Mod20_A22. Strongly or not favor abort if pregn serious birth defec
V06P716    Mod20_A23. Strongly or not oppose abort if pregn serious brth defec
V06P717    Mod20_A24. Lean favor or oppose abort if pregn serious birth defect
V06P718    Mod20_A25. When abortion legal where pregnancy serious birth defect
V06P719x   Mod20_A26-A29x. SUMMARY: abortion if child is not the desired sex
V06P720    Mod20_A26. R favor or oppose abortion if child not the desired sex
V06P721    Mod20_A27. Strongly or not favor abortion if child not desired sex
V06P722    Mod20_A28. Strongly or not oppose abortion if child not desired sex
V06P723    Mod20_A29. Lean to favor or oppose abortion if child not desired se
V06P724    Mod20_A30. When abortion legal where child not the desired sex
V06P725x   Mod20_A31-A34x. SUMMARY: abortion if child would be finan hardship
V06P726    Mod20_A31. R favor or oppose abortion if child a financial hardship
V06P727    Mod20_A32. Strongly or not favor abortion if child financial hardsh
V06P728    Mod20_A33. Strongly or not oppose abortion if child finan hardship
V06P729    Mod20_A34. Lean to favor or oppose abortion if child finan hardship
V06P730    Mod20_A35. When abortion legal where child a financial hardship
V06P731    Mod20_B1. When should abortion be permitted by law
---------------------
MODULE 21 (TOLERANCE)
---------------------
V06P732a   Mod21_A1. Library book if author favors Muslim terror (VERSION 1)
V06P732b   Mod21_B1. Remove library book if author favors terrorism (VERSION 2
-------------------
MODULE 22 (JUSTICE)
-------------------
V06P733    Mod22_1. Percent all suspects treated fairly by police
V06P734    Mod22_2. Percent poor suspects treated fairly by police
V06P735    Mod22_3. Percent white suspects treated fairly by police
V06P736    Mod22_4. Percent black suspects treated fairly by police
------------------
MODULE 23 (GENDER)
------------------
V06P737z   Mod23_A/B. SUMMARY: chances vote for woman Pres cand (2 VERSIONS)
V06P737x   Mod23_A1-A2x. SUMMARY: chances vote for woman Pres cand (VERSION 1)
V06P738    Mod23_A1. Woman Pres cand gender reduce or incr vote (VERSION 1)
V06P739    Mod23_A2. How much gender reduce or incr Pres vote chance(VERSION 1
V06P740x   Mod23_B1-B2x. SUMMARY: chances vote for woman Pres cand (VERSION 2)
V06P741    Mod23_B1. Woman Pres cand gender reduce or incr vote (VERSION 2)
V06P742    Mod23_B2. How much gender reduce or incr Pres vote chance(VERSION 2
V06P743    Mod23_3. What percent of elected officials should be men
V06P744x   Mod23_4-5x. SUMMARY: men/women better suited to work in govt
V06P745    Mod23_4. Are most men or women cands better suited to work in govt
V06P746    Mod23_5. By how much are most men/women cands better suited to govt
V06P747x   Mod23_6-7x. SUMMARY: man/woman Dem in Congress better on crime
V06P748    Mod23_6. Would man or woman Dem Congressman do better job on crime
V06P749    Mod23_7. How much better man/woman Dem Congressman handle crime
V06P750x   Mod23_8-9x. SUMMARY: man/woman Dem in Congress better on education
V06P751    Mod23_8. Man or woman Dem Congressperson do better job on education
V06P752    Mod23_9. How much better man/woman Dem Congressman handle education
V06P753x   Mod23_10-11x. SUMMARY: man/woman Repub in Congress better on crime
V06P754    Mod23_10. Man or woman Repub Congressperson do better job on crime
V06P755    Mod23_11. How much better man/woman Repub Congressman handle crime
V06P756x   Mod23_12-13x. SUMMARY: man/woman Repub in Congress better on educ
V06P757    Mod23_12. Man or woman Repub Congressman do better job on education
V06P758    Mod23_13. How much better man/woman Repub Congressman handle educ
V06P759x   Mod23_14-15x. SUMMARY: man/woman Dem in Congress support abort
V06P760    Mod23_14. Man or woman Dem Congressman more likely support abortion
V06P761    Mod23_15. By how much more man/woman Dem Congressman support abortn
V06P762x   Mod23_16-17x. SUMMARY: man/woman Repub in Congress support abort
V06P763    Mod23_16. Man or woman Repub Congressman more likely support abortn
V06P764    Mod23_17. How much more man/woman Repub Congressman support abortn
---------------
MODULE 24 (TAX)
---------------
V06P765    Mod24_1. Which statement best agrees with R about graduated tax
V06P766    Mod24_2. Should big companies pay larger or smaller perc of profits
V06P767    Mod24_A3. When dying leave money should fed govt require tax paid
V06P768    Mod24_A4. More tax be paid when someone dies and leaves more money
V06P769    Mod24_B3. Does R favor or oppose doing away with the estate tax
--------------------------------
MODULE 25 (PARTISAN DIFFERENCES)
--------------------------------
V06P770    Mod25_1. How similar are Democrats to each other
V06P771    Mod25_2. How much disagreement is there among Democrats
V06P772    Mod25_3. How similar are Republicans to each other
V06P773    Mod25_4. How much disagreement is there among Republicans
----------------
MODULE 26 (VOTE)
----------------
V06P774    Mod26_1. Would R vote for Clinton or Bush if they ran now
V06P775x   Mod26_2summ. SUMMARY: Did R vote election day (VERSION 1/VERSION 2)
V06P776    Mod26_A2. Did R vote in the elections in November (VERSION 1)
V06P776a   Mod26_A3. Did R vote in person on election day or by mail
V06P777    Mod26_B2. During the past 6 years, did R usually vote
V06P778    Mod26_B3. Did R ever plan to vote in months before November electio
V06P779    Mod26_B4. Did R definitely vote or did R not vote (VERSION 2)
V06P779a   Mod26_B5. Response indicator - not sure if voted or not
V06P779b   Mod26_B6. If R had to guess, did R probably vote in November, or no
V06P780    Mod26_7. Did nonvoter R prefer a candidate for the U.S. House
V06P780a   Mod26_8. U.S. House candidate preference of nonvoter R
V06P781    Mod26_9. Was US House cand nonvoter R preferred Democrat, Republica
V06P782    Mod26_10. Did nonvoter R prefer a candidate for the U.S. Senate
V06P782a   Mod26_11. US Senate candidate preference of nonvoter R
V06P783    Mod26_12. Was US Sen cand nonvoter R preferred Democrat, Republican
V06P784    Mod26_13. Did voter R vote for a candidate for the U.S. House
V06P784a   Mod26_14. For which U.S. House candidate did voter R vote
V06P785    Mod26_15. Was US Hse candidate for whom R voted Democrat, Republica
V06P786    Mod26_16. Did voter R vote for a candidate for the U.S. Senate
V06P786a   Mod26_17. For which U.S. Senate candidate did voter R vote
V06P787    Mod26_18. Was US Sen candidate for whom R voted Democrat, Republica
---------------------------------------------------------
MODULE 27 (BRANCHING EXPERIMENTS - PRESIDENTIAL APPROVAL)
---------------------------------------------------------
V06P788x   Mod27_1/A2-A4x. SUMMARY: VERSION 1 approve Bush job as President
V06P789x   Mod27_1/B2-B4x. SUMMARY: VERSION 2 approve Bush job as President
V06P790    Mod27_1. Does R approve or disapprove of Bush job as President
V06P791a   Mod27_A2. VERSION 1 strongly or not approve Bush job as Pres
V06P791b   Mod27_A3. VERSION 1 strongly or not disapprove Bush job as Pres
V06P791c   Mod27_A4. VERSION 1 lean approve or disapprove Bush job as Pres
V06P792a   Mod27_B2. VERSION 2 approve extr, moder or slightly Pres Bush
V06P792b   Mod27_B3. VERSION 2 disapprove extr, moder or slightly Pres Bush
V06P792c   Mod27_B4. VERSION 2 lean approve or disapprove Pres Bush
V06P793x   Mod27_5/A6-A8x. SUMMARY: VERSION 1 approve Bush job on economy
V06P795x   Mod27_5/B6-B8x. SUMMARY: VERSION 2 approve Bush job on economy
V06P796    Mod27_5. Does R approve or disapprove of George Bush economy
V06P796a   Mod27_A6. VERSION 1 strongly or not approve Bush on economy
V06P796b   Mod27_A7. VERSION 1 strongly or not disapprove Bush on economy
V06P796c   Mod27_A8. VERSION 1 lean approve or disapprove Bush on economy
V06P797a   Mod27_B6. VERSION 2 approve extr, moder or slightly Bush on econ
V06P797b   Mod27_B7. VERSION 2 disapprove extr, moder or slightly Bush on econ
V06P797c   Mod27_B8. VERSION 2 lean approve or disapprove Bush on economy
V06P798x   Mod27_9/A10-A12x. SUMMARY: VERSION 1 approve Bush job foreign rel
V06P799x   Mod27_9/B10-B12x. SUMMARY: VERSION 2 approve Bush job foreign rel
V06P800    Mod27_9. R approve or disapprove Bush on foreign relations
V06P801a   Mod27_A10. VERSION 1 strongly or not approve Bush foreign rel
V06P801b   Mod27_A11. VERSION 1 strongly or not disapprove Bush foreign rel
V06P801c   Mod27_A12. VERSION 1 lean approve or disapprove Bush foreign rel
V06P802a   Mod27_B10. VERSION 2 approve extr, moder or slight Bush foreign rel
V06P802b   Mod27_B11. VERSION 2 disappr extr, moder or slight Bush foreign rel
V06P802c   Mod27_B12. VERSION 2 lean approve or disapprove Bush foreign rel
V06P803x   Mod27_13/A14-A16x. SUMMARY: VERSION 1 approve Bush on terrorism
V06P804x   Mod27_13/B14-B16x. SUMMARY: VERSION 2 approve Bush on terrorism
V06P805    Mod27_13. Does R approve or disapprove of George Bush terrorism
V06P806a   Mod27_A14. VERSION 1 strongly or not approve Bush terrorism
V06P806b   Mod27_A15. VERSION 1 strongly or not disapprove Bush terrorism
V06P806c   Mod27_A16. VERSION 1 lean approve or disapprove Bush terrorism
V06P807a   Mod27_B14. VERSION 2 approve extr, moder or slightly Bush terrorism
V06P807b   Mod27_B15. VERSION 2 disappr extr, moder or slight Bush terrorism
V06P807c   Mod27_B16. VERSION 2 lean approve or disapprove Bush terrorism
-------------------
MODULE 28 (ECONOMY)
-------------------
V06P808    Mod28_1. Nation economy better, worse, or same in past year
-----------------
MODULE 29 (DEATH)
-----------------
V06P809    Mod29_1. How upsetting to R is the possibility of R's death
V06P810    Mod29_2. How likely that most on earth will die at once w/in 100yrs
-----------------------
INTERVIEWER OBSERVATION
-----------------------
V06P811    IWRobs.1. IWR obs: how hard did R work to answer questions
V06P812    IWRobs.2. IWR obs: how difficult for R to understand questions
V06P813    IWRobs.3. IWR obs: how difficult for R to come up with answers
V06P814    IWRobs.4. IWR obs: how intelligent was R
V06P815    IWRobs.5. IWR obs: how reluctant was R to begin the interview
V06P816    IWRobs.6. IWR obs: how cooperative was R
V06P817    IWRobs.7. IWR obs: how suspicious was R at first
V06P818    IWRobs.8. IWR obs: R worried reporting personl information during I
V06P819    IWRobs.9. IWR obs: R concern IWR might be someone other than IWR
V06P820    IWRobs.10. IWR obs: how interested was R in the interview
V06P821    IWRobs.11. IWR obs: how much did R enjoy the interview
V06P822a   IWRobs.12a. IWR obs: which complaints R make about the interview -1
V06P822b   IWRobs.12b. IWR obs: which complaints R make about the interview -2
