ANES 2000-2004 Merged File
Codebook variable documentation file



=============================================================================
        DESCRIPTION OF CODEBOOK DOCUMENTATION
=============================================================================

DSETID   - WT04     Vars specific to ANES 2000-2004 Merged file (this file)
M000003  - M001810  Vars from the ANES 2000 Time Series Study
M021001  - M025201  Vars from the ANES 2002 Time Series Study ('panel' cases only)
M041201  - M045209  Vars from the ANES 2004 Panel Study

Except for prefix "M" at the beginning of variable names, variable descriptions
are the same as in documentation for the stand-along studies.

=============================================================================
VERSION     Dataset Version
=============================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

Version of ANES dataset

NOTES:
------
This is the version of the ANES 2000-2004 Merged File
release in format:

2004ANESVERSION:yyyymmmdd

TYPE:
-----
Character

=============================================================================
DSETID      Dataset ID
=============================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

ANES dataset ID

NOTES:
------
This is the ANES dataset ID of the ANES 2000-2004 Merged File:
2004.M2000

TYPE:
-----
Character

=============================================================================
ID    Case ID
=============================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

Case ID

VALID CODES:
------------
001-1811

NOTES:
------
This is the ANES 2000 Time Series Study (pre-election) case ID.
There are gaps in the numbering.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

=============================================================================
2002ID     2002 Case ID
=============================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

2002 Pre Election Case ID

VALID CODES:
------------
0001-1513

NOTES:
------
This is the ANES 2002 Time Series Study (pre-election) case ID.
There are four gaps in the numbering.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

=============================================================================
2004ID     2004 Case ID
=============================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

2004 post election case ID

VALID CODES:
------------
001-897

NOTES:
------
This is the ANES 2004 Panel Study 4-digit case ID.
There are gaps in the numbering.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

=============================================================================
Years      Years. Year Participation
=============================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

Year Participation 2000-2002-2004

VALID CODES:
------------
1. 2000 only
2. 2000 and 2002
3. 2000 - 2002 - 2004

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

=============================================================================
Waves      Waves. Wave Participation
=============================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

Wave Participation 2000-2002-2004

VALID CODES:
------------
2000 ONLY:
01. 2000 Pre
02. 2000 Pre - 2000 Post

2000 AND 2002:
03. 2000 Pre -           - 2002 Pre
04. 2000 Pre -           - 2002 Pre - 2002 Post
05. 2000 Pre - 2000 Post - 2002 Pre
06. 2000 Pre - 2000 Post - 2002 Pre - 2002 Post

2000,2002,2004:
07. 2000 Pre - --------- - 2002 Pre - --------- - 2004 Post
08. 2000 Pre - --------- - 2002 Pre - 2002 Post - 2004 Post
09. 2000 Pre - 2000 Post - 2002 Pre - --------- - 2004 Post
10. 2000 Pre - 2000 Post - 2002 Pre - 2002 Post - 2004 Post

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

=============================================================================
WT00PRE     2000 Pre-Election Sample Weight
=============================================================================

       Sample weight for Pre variables
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This is a 6-digit variable with a coded decimal point and
       4 actual decimal places.
       A poststratification adjustment using the 2000 CPS March
       Supplement estimates as the standard was done for the combined
       RDD and area samples. The cells were formed by crossing 6 age
       groups by 4 levels of education. The age groups were: 18-29,
       30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70+. The education levels were:
       < high school graduation, high school graduate, some college,
       and 4 years of college or more.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 4

=============================================================================
WT00PO      2000 Post-Election Sample Weight
=============================================================================

       Sample weight for Post variables
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This is a 6-digit variable with a coded decimal point and
       4 actual decimal places.

       0. No Post IW

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 4

=============================================================================
WT02PRE     2002 Pre-Election 'Panel' Weight (2000-2002)
=============================================================================

       Pre-election Post-stratified weight
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

         This is a 6-digit variable with a coded decimal point and
         4 decimal places.
         This weight compensates for the unequal probabilities of
         selection for respondents in different size households and
         for different non-response across geographic sample design
         categories.
         A post stratification adjustment used the 2000 CPS March
         Supplement estimates as the standard. The cells were formed by
         crossing 6 age groups by 4 levels of education. The age groups
         were: 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70+. The education
         levels were: < high school graduation, high school graduate,
         some college, and 4 years of college or more.

TYPE:
-----
Num  Dec 0

=============================================================================
WT02PO      2002 Post-Election 'Panel' Weight (2000-2002)
=============================================================================

       Post-election Post-stratified weight
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

         This is a 6-digit variable with a coded decimal point and
         4 decimal places.
         See note WEIGHT.1; WEIGHT.2 values are constructed for the
         cases reinterviewed in the Post.

         0. No Post interview

TYPE:
-----
Num  Dec 0

=============================================================================
WT04        2004 Panel Study Weight (2000-2002-2004)
=============================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

2004 Panel Weight

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 4

==============================
M000003    Process.6. Pre only or Pre-and-Post
           Numeric

   Process.6.

       Pre only or Pre-and-Post
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0. Pre-Election and Post-Election interviews
       1. Pre-Election Interview only

==============================
M000004    Pre.Admin.1. Mode of Pre IW
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.1.

       PRE: Mode of Pre IW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Personal (FTF)
       5. Telephone

==============================
M000005a   Pre.Admin.2a. Form - E section
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.2a.

       PRE: Form - E section administered in Pre
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Section E questions about R's personal financial situation
       were randomly selected to be administered either in Pre
       section E or Post section H.

       0. Section E not administered in Pre [Post section H P001410-P001417]
       1. Section E administered in Pre [P000398-P000406]

==============================
M000005b   Pre.Admin.2b. Form - F6-F9 half sample
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.2b.

       PRE: Form - F6-F9 half sample
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The series of questions F6-F9 concerning "most important
       problem" was administered to a randomly selected half
       sample in the Pre

       0. R not selected for F6-F9 Pre administration
       1. R selected for F6-F9 Pre administration [P000431-P000438]


==============================
M000005c   Pre.Admin.2c. Form - Q1-Q11 or Q14-15
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.2c.

       PRE: Form - Clinton retrospective Q1-Q11 series or
       Clinton affects/traits Q14-Q15 series
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Rs were randomly selected to be administered either the
       Clinton retrospective (Q1-Q11) or the Clinton traits and
       affects questions (Q14-Q15 sections) in the Pre.  The
       questions for which R was not selected for Pre
       administration were administered in the Post (S1-S11 and
       the S14-S15 sections).

       1. Q1-Q11 asked in Pre [Clinton retrospective P000807-P000846]
       2. Q14-Q15 sections asked in Pre [Clinton affects and traits
          [P000847-P000861]

==============================
M000005d   Pre.Admin.2d. Form - G section lib-con
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.2d.

       PRE: Form - G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T or G6.E-G10.E Lib/Con format
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard
       7-point scale format for Liberal/Conservative placements, or
       to an experimental branching format.  The standard format
       items are G1-G5 (FTF) and G1.T-G5.T (phone); the experimental
       format items are G6.E-G10.E (FTF and phone).
       SELF PLACEMENT
         G1a          Standard format FTF = P000439
         G1a.T        Standard format Ph  = P000439a
         G6.E-G6c.E   Experimental FTF+Ph = P000442-445
       CLINTON PLACEMENT
         G2           Standard format FTF = P000448
         G2.T         Standard format Ph  = P000448a
         G7.E-G7b.E   Experimental FTF+Ph = P000450-452
       GORE PLACEMENT
         G3           Standard format FTF = P000455
         G3.T         Standard format Ph  = P000455a
         G8.E-G8b.E   Experimental FTF+Ph = P000459-461
       GW BUSH PLACEMENT
         G4           Standard format FTF = P000465
         G4.T         Standard format Ph  = P000465a
         G9.E-G9b.E   Experimental FTF+Ph = P000469-471
       BUCHANAN PLACEMENT
         G5           Standard format FTF = P000475
         G5.T         Standard format Ph  = P000475a
         G10.E-G10b.E Experimental FTF+Ph = P000479-481

       1. Standard format G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T (FTF/phone)
       2. Experimental format G6.E-G10.E  (FTF and phone)


==============================
M000005e   Pre.Admin.2e. Form - H1 or H1.E
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.2e.

       PRE: Form - H1 or H1.E economy retrospective format
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard
       (H1) or experimental (H1.E) format.

       1. Standard format H1 [P000488a]
       2. Experimental format H1.E [P000488b]

==============================
M000005f   Pre.Admin.2f. Form - H2 or H2.E
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.2f.

       PRE: Form - H2 or H2.E employment retrospective format
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard
       (H2) or experimental (H2.E) format.

       1. Standard format H1 [P000492a]
       2. Experimental format H1.E [P000492b]

==============================
M000005g   Pre.Admin.2g. Form - H4 or H4.E
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.2g.

       PRE: Form - H4 or H4.E economy prospective format
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard
       (H4) or experimental (H4.E) format.

       1. Standard format H4 [P000496a]
       2. Experimental format H4.E [P000496b]

==============================
M000005h   Pre.Admin.2h. Form - H11 or H11.E
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.2h.

       PRE: Form - H11 or H11.E imports format
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard
       (H11) or experimental (H11.E) format.

       1. Standard format H11 [P000511a]
       2. Experimental format H11.E [P000511b]

==============================
M000005j   Pre.Admin.2j. Form - H12 or H12.E
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.2j.

       PRE: Form - H12 or H12.E isolationism format
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard
       (H12) or experimental (H12.E) format.

       1. Standard format H12 [P000513a]
       2. Experimental format H12.E [P000513b]

==============================
M000005k   Pre.Admin.2k. Form - L3 medical insur.
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.2k.

       PRE: Form - L3/L3.T or L3.E/L3.TE medical insurance
       format
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       FTF (7-point scale):  Respondents were randomly assigned
       to either the standard format for Govt/Private Health
       Insurance self-placement, or to an experimental format.
       The standard format is L3a; the experimental format (with
       reversed scale) is L3a.E.
       PHONE (branching): Respondents were randomly assigned to
       either version 1 or version 2. The version 1 format is L3a;
       the version 2 format (with reversed coding) is L3a.E.

       1. FTF Standard L3a/ Phone Version 1 L3a.T [P000608a/P000610a]
       2. FTF Experimental L3a.E/ Phone Version 2 L3a.TE [P000608b/P000610b]

==============================
M000005m   Pre.Admin.2m. Form - L6 or L6.E
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.2m.

       PRE: Form - L6 or L6.E affirmative action format
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard
       (L6) or experimental (L6.E) format.

       1. Standard format L6 [P000671a]
       2. Experimental format L6.E [P000671b]

==============================
M000005n   Pre.Admin.2n. Form - M4 env vs. jobs
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.2n.

       PRE: Form - M4a/M4a.T or M4a.E/M4a.TE environment vs.
       jobs format
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       FTF (7-point scale):  Respondents were randomly assigned
       to either the standard format for Environment Versus Jobs
       self-placement, or to an experimental format.  The standard
       format is M4a; the experimental format (without "haven't
       thought much" option) is M4a.E.
       PHONE (branching): Respondents were randomly assigned to
       either version 1 or version 2 .  The version 1 format is
       M4a; the version 2 (without "haven't thought much" option)
       format is M4a.E.

       1. FTF Standard M4a/ Phone Version 1 M4a.T [P000707a/P000709a]
       2. FTF Experimental M4a.E/ Phone Version 2 M4a.TE [P000707b/P000709b]

==============================
M000005p   Pre.Admin.2p. Form - N1 or N1.E
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.2p.

       PRE: Form - N1 or N1.E school voucher format
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard
       (N1) or experimental (N1.E) format.

       1. Standard format N1 [P000741a]
       2. Experimental format N1.E [P000741b]

==============================
M000005q   Pre.Admin.2q. Form - P1 women's role
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.2q.

       PRE: Form - P1/P1.T or P1.E/P1.TE women equal role format
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       FTF (7-point scale):  Respondents were randomly assigned
       to either the standard format for Women's Equal Role
       self-placement, or to an experimental format.  The standard
       format is P1a; the experimental format (without "haven't
       thought much" option) is P1a.E.
       PHONE (branching): Respondents were randomly assigned to
       either version 1 or version 2 . The version 1 format is
       P1a.T; the version 2 format (without "haven't thought
       much" option) is P1a.TE.

       1. FTF Standard P1a / Phone Version 1 P1a.T [P000754a/P000756a]
       2. FTF Experimental P1a.E/Phone Version 2 P1a.TE [P000754b/P000756b]

==============================
M000006    Pre.Admin.3. Month of IW
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.3.

       PRE: Month of Interview
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       09. September
       10. October
       11. November

==============================
M000007    Pre.Admin.4. Day of IW
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.4.

       PRE: Day of Interview
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Coded 1-31

==============================
M000008    Pre.Admin.5. Month and day (MMDD)
           Character

   Pre-Admin.5.

       PRE: Month and day (MMDD) of Interview
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This is the day and month of interview in MMDD format.

==============================
M000009    Pre.Admin.6. No. days after election
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.6.

       PRE: Number of days before election
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Election day was November 7, 2000.
       1-63 days

==============================
M000010    Pre.Admin.7. IW length
           MD:  EQ 999.99
              Numeric  DEC 2

   Pre-Admin.7.

       PRE: Interview length
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: interview length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the interview as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Average Pre interview length is 68.35 minutes.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA; INAP, partial IW (5 in Pre-Admin.26)

==============================
M000011    Pre.Admin.8. IW number
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.8.

       PRE: Interview number
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       01-53

==============================
M000012    Pre.Admin.9. Date of beginning VQ file
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.9.

       PRE: Date of beginning VQ file
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This refers to the VQ file loaded when the interview began.
       Changes were made to the VQ (application) while in
       the field. The next variable documents the VQ version in
       use at the end of the interview; note that if an interview
       was temporarily halted and a new VQ was installed prior to
       the resumption of interviewing, the VQ in effect for some
       questions would not be the VQ coded here.

       0. VQ dated 8/15
       1. VQ dated 8/30
       2. VQ dated 9/5
       3. VQ dated 9/6
       4. VQ dated 9/8
       5. VQ dated 9/25
       6. VQ dated 9/28
       7. VQ dated 9/29
       8. VQ dated 10/5
       9. VQ dated 10/19

==============================
M000013    Pre.Admin.10. Date of ending VQ file
           MD:  EQ 99
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.10.

       PRE: Date of ending VQ file
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This refers to the VQ file in use when the interview
       concluded. Changes were made to the VQ (application)
       while in the field.  Note that if an interview was
       temporarily halted and a new VQ was installed prior to
       the  resumption of interviewing, the VQ in effect for
       some questions would not be the beginning VQ (previous
       var).

       0. VQ dated 8/15
       1. VQ dated 8/30
       2. VQ dated 9/5
       3. VQ dated 9/6
       4. VQ dated 9/8
       5. VQ dated 9/25
       6. VQ dated 9/28
       7. VQ dated 9/29
       8. VQ dated 10/5
       9. VQ dated 10/19

       99. INAP, partial IW (5 in Pre-Admin.26)

==============================
M000014    Pre.Admin.11. Flag- change in VQ
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.11.

       PRE: Flag- change in VQ
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Several changes to the application were made during
       the field period. This variable flags whether a suspended
       interview was resumed with a different version of the
       application.

       0. No change
       1. Change in VQ

       9. NA, partial IW (5 in Pre-Admin.26)

==============================
M000015    Pre.Admin.12. Advance letter sent?
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.12.

       PRE: Advance letter sent?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0. No advance letter sent
       1. Advance letter sent

       9. NA

==============================
M000016    Pre.Admin.13. Payment amount
           MD:  EQ 99
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.13.

       PRE: Payment amount
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       00. R requested no payment
       20. Twenty dollars
       40. Forty dollars

       99. NA

==============================
M000017    Pre.Admin.14. Payment mode
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.14.

       PRE: Payment mode
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0. R requested no payment
       1. Check
       2. Cash

       9. NA

==============================
M000018    Pre.Admin.15. Payment date
           MD:  EQ 9999
           Character

   Pre-Admin.15.

       PRE: Payment date (MMDD)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       9999. NA; R requested no payment

==============================
M000019    Pre.Admin.16. Tape recorded?
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.16.

       PRE: Tape recorded?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       New interviewers had to tape record 2 of their first 5
       production interviews; experienced interviewers were required to
       tape record 1 of their first 3 production interviews (FTF or
       phone). Tape recording was conducted with the respondent's
       permission. The IWR made a self-evaluation and sent the tapes to
       their field supervisor.

       1. Yes
       5. No

==============================
M000020    Pre.Admin.17. Verification
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.17.

       PRE: Verification
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Approximately 15 percent of interviews (completed or partially
       completed) were randomly selected and verified by field supervisors
       for new interviewers, and 6 percent were randomly selected and verified
       for SRC-experienced interviewers.

       Verification was attempted by phone (phone interviews) or by letter
       (FTF interviews) within 3 days of interview date.  If no contact/
       response with the respondent was made after 3 attempts, a replacement
       line was selected.  The respondent was asked whether they were
       interviewed by  the interviewer of record, the approximate length of
       the interview, and whether or not the interview was interesting; in
       addition , 3 questions were asked about content of the interview.
       NOTE: for verification codes,  a "don't remember" response is
       considered a non-match.

       0. Counted for Ann Arbor office, not selected for verification
       1. Flagged for verification (interview number selected)
       2. Verified OK (all verification data match original data exactly)
       3. Verified with discrepancy (only one piece of verification data
          does not match; everything else matches exactly)
       4. Not verified (more than 1 piece of information reported by the
          respondent at the time of verification is different from that
          collected at the time of the original interview or finalizing
          the case; further probing results in assignment of either code 3
          or code 4 as a final code)
       5. Unable to verify (R is contacted but is unwilling to participate
          in verification exercise or the respondent cannot be reached;
          this includes: reaching the household by telephone but not reaching
          the respondent, and includes sending the verification latter to a
          household but no letter returned after 3 attempts)
       6. Verification limit met (used when the verifier has already completed
          the needed verification level).

==============================
M000021    Pre.Admin.18. Evaluation
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.18.

       PRE: Evaluation
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0. Not evaluated
       1. Flagged
       2. Evaluated
       3. Evaluation received in Ann Arbor office
       4. Cannot evaluate


==============================
M000022    Pre.Admin.19. Conversion indicator
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.19.

       PRE: Refusal conversion indicator
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This refers to interviews initially refused by someone
       when an interviewer was first attempting contact.
       The source of this refusal may or may not have been the
       Respondent; result code 43 [contact, resistance by R] or
       46 [resistance not by R] for any call (not the final
       result code) turns this indicator on.
       Conversion may be made by the initial interviewer or
       another interviewer.  If the conversion is not made by the
       initial interviewer, the interviewer of record is the
       interviewer obtaining the conversion.

       0. Not a refusal conversion situation
       1. Refusal conversion situation indicated

==============================
M000023    Pre.Admin.20. Persuasion letter
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.20.

       PRE: Persuasion letter - flag
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0. No persuasion letter sent
       1. Persuasion letter sent

       9. NA

==============================
M000024    Pre.Admin.21. Date per letter requested
           MD:  EQ 9999
         Character

   Pre-Admin.21.

       PRE: Date persuasion letter requested (MMDD)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       9999. No persuasion letter requested

==============================
M000025    Pre.Admin.22. Date persuasion sent
           MD:  EQ 9999
         Character

   Pre-Admin.22.

       PRE: Date persuasion letter sent (MMDD)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       9999. NA; INAP, no persuasion letter requested (9999 in Pre-Admin.21)

==============================
M000026    Pre.Admin.23. Type of persuasion letter
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.23.

       PRE: Type of persuasion letter
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A. Too busy
       2. B. Too personal
       3. C. Not interested
       4. D. Too old
       5. E. Evasive
       6. F. Gatekeeper
       7. G. Not at home

       9. NA
       0. INAP, no persuasion letter sent (0,9 in Pre-Admin.20)

==============================
M000027    Pre.Admin.24. Telephone calls
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.24.

       PRE: Number of telephone calls
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       00-42

==============================
M000028    Pre.Admin.25. FTF calls
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.25.

       PRE: Number of face-to-face (FTF) calls
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       00-22

==============================
M000029    Pre.Admin.26. Final result
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.26.

       PRE: Final result
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Interview, complete
       5. Interview, partial

==============================
M000030    Pre.Admin.27. Sample release (all 1)
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.27.

       Sample release (all 1)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       All cases coded 1.
       There was a single release of the entire sample.

       1. Released at start of the field period

==============================
M000031    Pre.Admin.28. Lang of IW (all English)
           Numeric

   Pre-Admin.28.

       PRE: Language of IW (all English)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       All interviews conducted entirely in English (code 1)

       1. English

==============================
M000032    Pre.CSheet.1. Flag- missing CS
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.1.

       PRE - COVERSHEET:
       Flag- missing Coversheet
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0. Coversheet not missing
       1. Missing coversheet

==============================
M000033    Pre.CSheet.2. Color of coversheet
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.2.

       PRE - COVERSHEET:
       Color of coversheet
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       FTF coversheets were blue or green.
       Telephone coversheets were yellow.
       GREEN COVERSHEETS: used by FTF interviewers when updating
       the area probability sample.  Type II updates involved addition
       of unlisted (hidden) HUs at the selected listed address: for
       example, once the IWR was inside the HU, he or she may have
       noticed that the house was divided into separate and complete
       apartment units that were not apparent from outside.  Each
       interviewer received a set of unlabeled coversheets that had a
       provision for adding up to three unlisted HUs discovered at the
       listed address.

       1. Blue
       2. Yellow
       4. Green - FTF type II updating

       9. Missing coversheet (1 in Pre-Csheet.1)

==============================
M000034    Pre.CSheet.3. PH- type phone #
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.3.

   IF TELEPHONE RDD:

       PRE - COVERSHEET Item 3:
       Since the phone number I dialed is produced by a
       computer, I do not know whether I'm calling a business,
       a home, a dormitory, or some other type of residence.
       (Which is it?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Business
       2. Home
       3. Both
       4. Group headquarters
       5. Cell phone

       9. NA; Phone mode and coversheet missing (1 in Pre-Csheet.1)
       0. Inap, assigned FTF mode

==============================
M000035    Pre.CSheet.4. PH- business with residence
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.4.

   IF TELEHONE RDD:
   IF BUSINESS PHONE NUMBER:

       PRE - COVERSHEET Item 3a:
       Does anyone live there on the premises?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Yes
       5. No.

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 2,3,4,5,9 in Pre-Csheet.3; assigned FTF mode


==============================
M000036    Pre.CSheet.5. PH- bus res has personal#
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.5.

   IF TELEHONE RDD:
   IF BUSINESS PHONE NUMBER:
   IF SOMEONE LIVES ON THE PREMISES:

       PRE - COVERSHEET Item 3b:
       Do (they/you) have a different phone number inside
       (their/your) residence that is for personal use?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Have other
       2. Use this

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.4; 2,3,4,5,9 in Pre-Csheet.3;
          assigned FTF mode

==============================
M000037    Pre.CSheet.6. FTF- HH listing from
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.6.

   IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE:

       PRE - COVERSHEET Item 6:
       Household listing obtained from:
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. HU member
       2. Neighbor
       3. Apt. manager
       4. Landlord
       5. Observation
       7. Other (specify)

       9. NA; FTF and coversheet missing (1 in Pre-Csheet.1)
       0. Inap, assigned phone mode

==============================
M000038    Pre.CSheet.7. Selection table
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.7.

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       HOUSEHOLD LISTING:
       Selection table
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The Selection Table is used to select a respondent from
       all household members who are eligible adults.(An
       eligible adult is a U.S. citizen who is 18 years of age or
       older by Election Day.)  The Selection Table appears on
       the Coversheet below the Household Listing.

       After a complete listing of the HH is taken, each eligible
       adult is assigned a "Number" based on the criteria of
       gender and age [beginning with the oldest male as number
       1, males are numbered by increments of 1 according to
       descending age; females are numbered by descending age
       starting with the number one higher than that assigned
       to the youngest male].  The interviewer then uses the
       Selection Table to determine the "Number" of the eligible
       adult to be interviewed.

       The Selection Table itself consists of 2 parallel
       columns.  In the first column the interviewer circles the
       total number of eligible adults in the household; in the
       second column (same row) is identified the Number" of the
       person who will be the respondent.

       There are 8 different Selection Tables used and they are
       randomly assigned. [Note that although only 8 tables are
       used, there are 12 codes in this variable because the 8
       tables are used in cycles of 12; this procedure is used to
       equalize the probability of selection for each eligible
       adult].  A summary describing all 8 Selection Tables
       appears below.

          PERSONS   PERSON SELECTED (person "Number")
                    ---------------------------------
                    A  B1   B2  C   D   E1 E2   F

         1          1   1   1   1   1   1   1   1
         2          1   1   1   1   2   2   2   2
         3          1   1   1   2   2   3   3   3
         4          1   1   2   2   3   3   4   4
         5          1   2   2   2   4   3   5   5
         6 or more  1   2   2   2   4   5   5   6

       1. Selection table A
       2. Selection table B1
       3. Selection table B2
       4. Selection table C
       5. Selection table D
       6. Selection table E1
       7. Selection table E2
       8. Selection table F

       9. Missing coversheet (1 in Pre-Csheet.1)

==============================
M000039    Pre.CSheet.8. Number of elig adults
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.8.

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       HOUSEHOLD LISTING:
       Number of eligible adults
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note:  In addition to completing the HH listing on the
       coversheet, the IWR entered a value for number of eligible
       respondents in CSMS.  For this reason, cases with missing
       coversheets may be coded in this variable.

       1-7

       9. NA

==============================
M000040    Pre.CSheet.9. Number inelig adults
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.9.

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       HOUSEHOLD LISTING:
       Number ineligible adults
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       These are usually adults (over 18) in the HU who are noncitizens.
       Note: cases with missing coversheets may be coded in this
       variable from information in call records/thumbnails.

       0-6

       9. NA

==============================
M000041    Pre.CSheet.10. Household composition
           MD:  EQ 99
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.10.

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       HOUSEHOLD LISTING:
       Household composition
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The HH composition code is derived from information provided in
       the household listing.  "Adults" are 18 years of age (by
       election day) or older; all individuals included in the HH
       composition codes below refer to adults.

       A designation of a HH member as "the householder" (HHR)
       describes HU member who owns or rents the home (in whose
       name the lease is held).  Cohabiting couples are coded as
       married (30,40, 50-52).  Roommates of opposite sex are
       coded 11,12,21,22; in all cases of unrelated roommates the
       respondent is HHR.

       If R identifies self as married/partnered but spouse/partner
       is residing elsewhere (nursing home, job requirement or other
       reason), R is coded as adult male HHR/adult female HHR (codes
       10-22 and 60-95) and is identified as married/partnered in
       marital status question.
       In cases 8,49,77,157,377,535,580,814,1087,1117,1202,1212,1381,
       1639,1731 the partner/spouse identified in P000909 (marital
       status) was not a resident of the HU or was residing elsewhere
       on temporary basis. In cases 1281,1516,46,312,133,23,222 there
       is no information about spouse/partner in HH listing or
       elsewhere other than marital status question.
       Note: cases with missing coversheets may be coded in this
       variable from information in call records/thumbnails.

       10. 1 adult male HHR
       11. 1 adult male HHR plus 1 other non-relative
       12. 1 adult male HHR plus 2 or more non-relatives
       20. 1 adult female HHR
       21. 1 adult female HHR plus 1 other non-relative
       22. 1 adult female HHR plus 2 or more non-relatives
       30. 1 married couple: no children or all children living
           at home are under 18
       40. 1 married couple plus 1 other relative
       50. 1 married couple plus 2 or more other relatives
       51. 1 married couple plus 1 other non-relative
       52. 1 married couple plus 2 or more non-relatives
       55. 1 married couple plus relatives and non-relatives
       60. 1 male HHR plus 1 other relative
       65. 1 male HHR plus relatives and nonrelatives
       70. 1 male HHR plus 2 or more other relatives
       80. 1 female HHR plus 1 other relative
       85. 1 female HHR plus relatives and non-relatives
       90. 1 female HHR plus 2 or more other relatives
       95. Relatives of opposite sex, unclear who is HHR

       99. NA

==============================
M000042    Pre.CSheet.11. R person number
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.11.

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       HOUSEHOLD LISTING:
       R person number
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases with missing coversheets may be coded in this
       variable from information in call records/thumbnails.

       Coded 1-5

       9. NA

==============================
M000043    Pre.CSheet.12. FTF- type structure
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.12.

   IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE:

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD1:
       Describe the type of structure in which the respondent
       live (sample address)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Mobile home
       2. Detached single family
       3. Multi-family
       4. Apartment house
       5. Condo complex
       7. Other (specify)

       9. NA; missing coversheet (1 in Pre-Csheet.1)
       0. Inap, assigned phone mode

==============================
M000044    Pre.CSheet.13. FTF- gatekeeper
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.13.

   IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE:

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD2:
       Is there a building manager, security guard or other
       gatekeeper whose cooperation you need in order to gain
       access to the R's housing unit?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Yes
       2. No, but building is locked/ subdivision is gated and locked
       5. No

       9. NA; missing coversheet (1 in Pre-Csheet.1)
       0. Inap, assigned phone mode

==============================
M000045    Pre.CSheet.14. FTF- type gatekeeper
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.14.

   IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE:
   IF GATEKEEPER/GUARD/MANAGER/LOCKED ACCESS:

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD2a:
       Check the box below which best describes the situation
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Building manager or other Gatekeeper must let you in the
          buiding (on the grounds, into the mobile home park) but then
          you are free to attempt contact with R's HU
       2. Building manager/other Gatekeeper must get permission from
          someone in R's HU before you are allowed to make contact
          with the household
       7. Other (specify)

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 5, 9 in Pre-Csheet.13; assigned phone mode

==============================
M000046    Pre.CSheet.15. Resistance from contact?
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.15.

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3a:
       Was there resistance from any contact person?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Yes
       5. No

       9. NA

==============================
M000047    Pre.CSheet.16. Contact resist-waste time
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.16.

   IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON:

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(1):
       Resistance from contact person - SURVEYS WASTE OF TIME;
       PREVIOUS BAD EXPERIENCE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15

==============================
M000048    Pre.CSheet.17. Contact resist-too personal
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.17.

   IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON:

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(2):
       Resistance from contact person - CONTENT TOO PERSONAL
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15

==============================
M000049    Pre.CSheet.18. Contact resist-confidentiality
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.18.

   IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON:

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(3):
       Resistance from contact person - CONFIDENTIALITY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15

==============================
M000050    Pre.CSheet.19. Contact resist-not interested politics
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.19.

   IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON:

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(4):
       Resistance from contact person - NOT INTERESTED IN
       POLITICS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15

==============================
M000051    Pre.CSheet.20. Contact resist-too busy
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.20.

   IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON:

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(5):
       Resistance from contact person - TOO BUSY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15

==============================
M000052    Pre.CSheet.21. Contact resist-health
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.21.

   IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON:

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(6):
       Resistance from contact person - POOR HEALTH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15

==============================
M000053    Pre.CSheet.22. Contact resist-other
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.22.

   IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON:

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(7):
       Resistance from contact person - OTHER (SPECIFY)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15

==============================
M000054    Pre.CSheet.23. R refuse initially?
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.23.

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3e:
       Did R refuse initially?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Yes
       5. No

       9. NA

==============================
M000055    Pre.CSheet.24. R break appointments
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.24.

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3f:
       Did respondent break any appointments
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0. None
       1. One
       2. Two or more

       9. NA

==============================
M000056    Pre.CSheet.25. Was R contact resister?
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.25.

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3g:
       If contact persons resisted [if CD3a was "YES"], was the
       respondent the contact person who gave resistance?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Yes
       5. No

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15

==============================
M000057    Pre.CSheet.26. SUMMARY: did R resist
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.26.

       SUMMARY: resistance (built)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This counts any resistance identified according to Pre-CSheet.25
       or in Pre-CSheet.27-Pre-CSheet.33; however, cases "not marked"
       throughout variables Pre-CSheet.27-Pre-CSheet.33 may have
       been unmarked due to complete omission rather than due to the
       inapplicability of any of the resistance categories to R.

       1. Yes, some resistance identified
       5. No resistance identified

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15

==============================
M000058    Pre.CSheet.27. R resist-waste time
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.27.

   IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED:

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(1):
       Resistance from R - SURVEYS WASTE OF TIME; PREVIOUS BAD
       EXPERIENCE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15

==============================
M000059    Pre.CSheet.28. R resist-too personal
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.28.

   IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED:

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(2):
       Resistance from R - CONTENT TOO PERSONAL
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15

==============================
M000060    Pre.CSheet.29. R resist-confidentiality
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.29.

   IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED:

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(3):
       Resistance from R - CONFIDENTIALITY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15

==============================
M000061    Pre.CSheet.30. R resist-not interested in politics
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.30.

   IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED:

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(4):
       Resistance from R - NOT INTERESTED IN POLITICS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15

==============================
M000062    Pre.CSheet.31. R resist-too busy
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.31.

   IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED:

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(5):
       Resistance from R - TOO BUSY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15

==============================
M000063    Pre.CSheet.32. R resist-health
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.32.

   IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED:

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(6):
       Resistance from R - POOR HEALTH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15

==============================
M000064    Pre.CSheet.33. R resist-other
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.33.

   IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON WHO RESISTED:

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(7):
       Resistance from R - OTHER (SPECIFY)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       0. Inap, 1 in Pre-CSheet.25; 5,9 in Pre-Csheet.15

==============================
M000065    Pre.CSheet.34. IWR est income (CSMS)
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.34.

   IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE:

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION
       (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 1):
       What is the estimated income of R's household?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Under $10,000
       2. $10,000-25,000
       3. $25,000-50,000
       4. $50,000-105,000
       5. $105,000 and above

       8. DK
       9. NA
       0. INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000066    Pre.CSheet.35. IWR est race (CSMS)
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.35.

   IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE:

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION
       (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 2):
       What is the race of R's household?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See also survey variables Y30(1)-Y30(3) for self-description by
       the respondent, item ZZ.2 describing IWR's observation of R's
       race, and the Post equivalent of this variable in Post-CSheet.31.

       1. White
       2. Black
       3. American Indian
       4. Asian
       7. Other

       8. DK
       9. NA
       0. INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000067    Pre.CSheet.36. Certainty of race (CSMS)
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.36.

   IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE:
   IF INTERVIEWER HAS IDENTIFIED RACE OF HOUSEHOLD:

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION
       (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 2a):
       Is this definite or probable?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Definite
       5. Probable

       9. NA
       0. INAP, 0,8,9 in Pre-Csheet.35

==============================
M000068    Pre.CSheet.37. Hispanic HH? (CSMS)
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.37.

   IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE:

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION
       (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 3):
       Is R or R's household of hispanic origin?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See also P000184d, P000184e (Post version of these variables)
       and Pre survey items Y30x/Y31 and Y31a/Y31a.T.

       1. Yes
       5. No

       8. DK
       9. NA
       0. INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000069    Pre.CSheet.38. Certainty if Hisp (CSMS)
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-CSheet.38.

   IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE:
   IF INTERVIEWER HAS IDENTIFIED HISPANIC STATUS OF R/R'S HOUSEHOLD:

       PRE - COVERSHEET
       CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION
       (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 3a):
       Is this definite or probable?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Definite
       5. Probable

       9. NA
       0. INAP, 0,8,9 in Pre-Csheet.37

==============================
M000070    Pre.IWR.1. Interviewer of record
           Numeric

   Pre-IWR.1.

       PRE: Interviewer of record ID
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       4-digit ID

==============================
M000071    Pre.IWR.2. Supervisor
           Numeric

   Pre-IWR.2.

       PRE: Supervisor ID
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       4-digit ID

==============================
M000072    Pre.IWR.3. Interviewer gender
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-IWR.3.

       PRE: Interviewer gender
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Male
       2. Female

==============================
M000073    Pre.IWR.4. Interviewer education
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-IWR.4.

       PRE: Interviewer education
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. 1-8 grades
       2. Some high school
       3. High school graduate
       4. Some college
       5. College degree
       6. Master's degree
       7. Ph.D.

       9. NA

==============================
M000074    Pre.IWR.5. Interviewer race
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-IWR.5.

       PRE: Interviewer race
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. White
       2. Black
       3. Native American
       4. Asian
       7. Other

       9. NA

==============================
M000075    Pre.IWR.6. Interviewer ethnicity
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-IWR.6.

       PRE: Interviewer ethnicity
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0. No ethnic identity coded
       1. Hispanic
       7. Other

       9. NA

==============================
M000076    Pre.IWR.7. Interviewer languages
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-IWR.7.

       PRE: Interviewer languages
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This variable is not available in 2000.

       0. NA

==============================
M000077    Pre.IWR.8. Yrs Interviewer experience
           MD:  EQ 99
           Numeric

   Pre-IWR.8.

       PRE: Years Interviewer experience
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Interviewer's years of experience and:

       99. NA

==============================
M000078    Pre.IWR.9. Interviewer age (bracketed)
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-IWR.9.

       PRE: Interviewer age (bracketted)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. 18-34 years
       2. 35-40 years
       3. 41-45 years
       4. 46-50 years
       5. 51-55 years
       6. 56-60 years
       7. 51-64 years
       8. 65-79 years

       9. NA

==============================
M000079    Pre.Sample.1. ICPSR state code
           MD:  EQ 99
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.1.

       ICPSR state code - interview location
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note:  3 cases were misidentified in the Preload as PA but
       should have been NJ. These cases are coded 96.  See Post-
       Summary.24 (P000260).

           NEW ENGLAND           43. Florida
       01. Connecticut           44. Georgia
       02. Maine                 45. Louisiana
       03. Massachusetts         46. Mississippi
       04. New Hampshire         47. North Carolina
       05. Rhode Island          48. South Carolina
       06. Vermont               49. Texas
           MIDDLE ATLANTIC          BORDER STATES
       11. Delaware              51. Kentucky
       12. New Jersey            52. Maryland
       13. New York              53. Oklahoma
       14. Pennsylvania          54. Tennessee
           EAST NORTH CENTRAL    55. Washington DC
       21. Illinois              56. West Virginia
       22. Indiana                   MOUNTAIN STATES
       23. Michigan              61. Arizona
       24. Ohio                  62. Colorado
       25. Wisconsin             63. Idaho
           WEST NORTH CENTRAL    64. Montana
       31. Iowa                  65. Nevada
       32. Kansas                66. New Mexico
       33. Minnesota             67. Utah
       34. Missouri              68. Wyoming
       35. Nebraska                  PACIFIC STATES
       36. North Dakota          71. California
       37. South Dakota          72. Oregon
           SOLID SOUTH           73. Washington
       40. Virginia                  EXTERNAL STATES
       41. Alabama               81. Alaska
       42. Arkansas              82. Hawaii

       96. Misidentified location
       99. NA

==============================
M000080    Pre.Sample.2. FIPS state code
           MD:  EQ 99
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.2.

       FIPS state code - interview location
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note:  3 cases were misidentified in the Preload as PA but
       should have been NJ. These cases are coded 96.  See Post-
       Summary.24 (P000260).

       01. Alabama             30. Montana
       02. Alaska              31. Nebraska
       04. Arizona             32. Nevada
       05. Arkansas            33. New Hampshire
       06. California          34. New Jersey
       08. Colorado            35. New Mexico
       09. Connecticut         36. New York
       10. Delaware            37. North Carolina
       11. Washington DC       38. North Dakota
       12. Florida             39. Ohio
       13. Georgia             40. Oklahoma
       15. Hawaii              41. Oregon
       16. Idaho               42. Pennsylvania
       17. Illinois            44. Rhode Island
       18. Indiana             45. South Carolina
       19. Iowa                46. South Dakota
       20. Kansas              47. Tennessee
       21. Kentucky            48. Texas
       22. Louisiana           49. Utah
       23. Maine               50. Vermont
       24. Maryland            51. Virginia
       25. Massachusetts       53. Washington
       26. Michigan            54. West Virginia
       27. Minnesota           55. Wisconsin
       28. Mississippi         56. Wyoming
       29. Missouri

       96. Misidentified location
       99. NA

==============================
M000081    Pre.Sample.3. 2000 state abbr and CD
           Character

   Pre-Sample.3.

       2000 state abbreviation and Congressional district
       number - interview location
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This variable provides the state (2-character Postal
       abbreviation) and congressional district number of the
       location of R's residence at the time of the 2000 Pre-
       election interview.  Washington D.C. is blank in this
       variable.
       Note:  3 cases were misidentified PA in the Preload but should
       have been NJ. These cases are coded "9996".  See Post-Summary.24
       (P000260).

==============================
M000082    Pre.Sample.4. 2000 FIPS state and CD
           MD1: EQ 9999,  MD2: GE 0
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.4.

       2000 FIPS state code and congresional district number -
       interview location
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       FIPS state code resides in first 2 digits, CD number in
       last 2 digits.
       Note:  3 cases were misidentified PA in the Preload but should
       have been NJ. These cases are coded 9996.  See Post-Summary.24
       (P000260).

       9996. Misidentified location
       9999. NA
       0000. Washington D.C.

==============================
M000083    Pre.Sample.5. Congressional district no.
           MD1: EQ 99,  MD2: GE 0
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.5.

       Congressional district number - interview location
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-52.
       Note:  3 cases were misidentified PA in the Preload but should
       have been NJ. These cases are coded 96.  See Post-Summary.24
       (P000260).

       96. Misidentified location
       99. NA
       00. Washington D.C.

==============================
M000084    Pre.Sample.6. ICPSR state and CD
           MD1: EQ 9999,  MD2: GE 0
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.6.

       ICPSR state code and congressional district - interview
       location
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       ICPSR state code resides in first 2 digits, CD number in
       last 2 digits.
       Note:  3 cases were misidentified PA in the Preload but should
       have been NJ. These cases are coded 9996.  See Post-Summary.24
       (P000260).

       9996. Misidentified location
       9999. NA
       0000. Washington D.C.

==============================
M000085    Pre.Sample.7. Did R vote outside IW CD?
           MD1: EQ 8,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.7.

       Did R vote in state and CD of interview?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0. R voted in state and CD of interview
       1. R did not vote in state and CD of interview

       8. NA if vote was in state/CD of interview (4 in Post C1 and 8,9,0
          in Post C3)
       9. INAP, R did not vote or NA/DK if voted; no Post interview; IW
          location misidentified in the Preload (1 in Post-Summary.24)

==============================
M000086    Pre.Sample.8. State/CD -vote outside CD
           MD1: EQ 9999,  MD2: GE 0
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.8.

       State and CD of vote cast outside CD of interview
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The first 2 digits represent the state FIPS code, and the
       second 2 digits are CD number.  Where the state differs but
       the CD number is unknown, the state will be coded in the
       first 2 digits but the last 2 digits will be 99.

       9999. NA if voted outside CD of interview (8 in Pre-Sample.7)
       0000. INAP, 0,9 in Pre-Sample.7

==============================
M000087    Pre.Sample.9. FIPS state and county
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.9.

       FIPS state and county - interview location
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This variable has been blanked to preserve respondent confidentiality.
       The FIPS State code is represented in digits 1 and 2 of this
       variable, the FIPS County code in the last 3 digits.

==============================
M000087a   Pre.Sample.9a. County (alpha)
         Character

   Pre-Sample.9a.

       Name of County - Interview location (BLANKED)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This variable has been blanked to protect the confidentiality of the
       Respondent.
       NOTE: This variable was constructed for use as preload in Post-Election
       C3 (variable P001243), which attempts to ascertain specific
       registration location of the respondent.
       It should be noted that, although county identification in this
       variable for face-to-face interviews meets normal standards for
       accuracy, the P000087a Post preload data for RDD cases were created by
       imputing area code, central office codes and similar listed numbers.

==============================
M000088    Pre.Sample.10. Primary area name
           Character

   Pre-Sample.10.

       Primary area name - interview location
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This variable has been blanked to protect the
       confidentiality of the Respondent.
       This is a character variable for the Primary Selection Unit
       (PSU) name.
       See appendix "Notes on Sampling variables".
       NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file.
       Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment
       identification, it could not be provided with this variable.

==============================
M000089    Pre.Sample.11. Primary area code
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.11.

       Primary area code - interview location
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This variable has been recoded to protect the confidentiality of
       the Respondent.  The 44 PSU codes listed below (110 through 482) have
       been recoded to values 1-44 in random order.
       See appendix "Notes on Sampling variables".
       NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file.
       Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment
       identification, it could not be provided with this variable.

       110. Boston, MA             230. Milwaukee, WI
       120. New York, NY           239. Wheelng-Steubenvl OH
       121. Philadelphia, PA-NJ    240. Des Moines, IA
       122. Nassau-Suffolk, NY     250. Richmond-Ptrsbrg, VA
       130. Chicago, IL            255. Columbus, GA-AL
       131. Detroit, MI            257. Jacksonville, FL
       132. Cleveland, OH          258. Lakeld-Wntr Haven FL
       141. St Louis, MO-IL        260. Knoxville, TN
       150. Washington, DC-MD-VA   262. Birmingham, AL
       152. Baltimore, MD          273. Waco, TX
       154. Miami-Hialeh, FL       274. McAllen, TX
       170. Houston, TX            280. Salt Lake C-Ogden UT
       171. Dallas-Ft Worth, TX    292. Fresno, CA
       181. Denver, CO             293. Eugene-Springfld, OR
       190. Los Angeles, CA        434. Saginaw, MI
       191. Seattle-Tacoma, WA     464. Gardner, MA
       194. Anaheim, CA            466. Decatur Co., IN
       196. San Francisco, CA      470. Mower Co., MN
       211. New Haven, CT          474. DeSoto Parish, LA
       213. Manchester-Nashua NH   477. Chicot Co., AR
       220. Buffalo, NY            480. Montgomery Co., VA
       226. Atlantic City, NJ      482. El Dorado Co., CA

       000. Telephone sample (RDD)

==============================
M000090    Pre.Sample.12. Segment number (blanked)
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.12.

       Segment number (blanked) - interview location
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file.
       Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment
       identification, it could not be provided with this variable.
       This variable has been blanked to protect the
       confidentiality of the Respondent.

       3-digit code and:

       000. Telephone sample (RDD)

==============================
M000090a   Pre.Sample.13. Segment name (blanked)
           Character

   Pre-Sample.13.

       Segment name (blanked) - interview location
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See appendix "Notes on Sampling variables".
       NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file.
       Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment
       identification, it could not be provided with this variable.
       This variable has been blanked to protect the
       confidentiality of the Respondent.

==============================
M000091    Pre.Sample.14. Number of HH units
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.14.

       Number of household unit
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-5 and:

       9. NA
       0. Phone IW

==============================
M000092    Pre.Sample.15. Census region
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.15.

       Census region - interview location
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Northeast (CT, ME, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT)
       2. North Central (IL, IN, IA, KS, MI, MN, MO, NE, ND,
          OH, SD, WI)
       3. South (AL, AR, DE, DC, FL, GA, KY, LA, MD, MS, NC,
          OK, SC, TN, TX, VA, WV)
       4. West (AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NM, NV, OR, UT, WA,
          WY)

==============================
M000093    Pre.Sample.16. Belt code
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.16.

       Belt code - interview location
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See appendix "Notes on Sampling variables" and the appendix
       CENSUS DEFINITIONS.
       Coded according to the 1990 Census and 1990 Office of
       Management and Budget (OMB) definitions, 1990 Census
       Population reports (as reported in the 1992 Annual Metro,
       City and County Data book) and 1990 Census "urbanized
       area" (as shown in the 1994 Rand McNally Road Atlas - 70th
       edition.

       NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file.
       Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment
       identification, it could not be provided with this variable.

       1. Central Cities of the six largest (population over
          4,500,000) Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas
          (CMSAs), plus the 15 next largest CMSA/MSAs
          (population over 2,000,000)
       2. Central Cities of CMSAs and MSAs with fewer than
          2,000,000 population (exclusive of those in the 21
          largest CMSA/MSAs -- code 1)
       3. Suburbs of the six largest CMSA/MSAs and 15 next
          largest CMSAs/MSAs
       4. Suburb of all other CMSA/MSAs
       5. Adjacent Areas: includes all territory beyond the
          outer boundary of the suburban belt, but within 50
          miles of the central business district of a central city
       6. Outlying Area: includes all territory more than 50
          miles from the central business district of a
          central city

       0. Telephone sample (RDD)

==============================
M000094    Pre.Sample.17. Population in 1000s
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9996
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.17.

       Population in 1000s - interview location
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The actual 1990 Census Place population is coded in
       thousands, rounding to the nearest whole thousand (from
       the 1990 Population total for the city/place as reported
       in the 1992 Annual Metro City and County Data Book).
       NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file.
       Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment
       identification, it could not be provided with this variable.

       Actual population in 1000s and:

       9996. Telephone sample (RDD)
       9999. 9,998,500 persons or over
       0000. Rural place, no defined Census Place, or Census Place
             with fewer than 500 persons

==============================
M000095    Pre.Sample.18. Census size of place
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.18.

       Census size of place - interview location
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See the appendix on CENSUS DEFINITIONS.
       Coded according to the 1990 Census.  The major objective
       of the Census Bureau in delineating urbanized areas is to
       provide a better separation of urban and rural population
       in the vicinity of large cities.  An urbanized area
       consists of a central city or cities, and surrounding
       closely settled territory ("urban fringe").  Size of Place
       codes 21 and 41 include areas that are in the "urban
       fringe" but are not Census Places.
       Note for Codes 50-53:  in a few cases, Non-MSA PSUs (based
       on the 1980 OMB SMSA definitions) contain areas which are
       now part of a 1990 PMSA or MSA (based on the June 1990 OMB
       definition).  In these cases, the Size of Place Code for
       any SSUs (segments) within such areas are coded in the
       "40s" rather than in the "50s" as shown.  This occurred in
       El Dorado county CA (the major part of the El
       Dorado/Alpine Co, CA PSU #82) which is now a part of the
       Sacramento CA MSA, and also for one SSU (segment) in the
       Gardner MA PSU (#64), which is now a part of the
       Worchester MA MSA.
       NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file.
       Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment
       identification, it could not be provided with this variable.

           THE SIX LARGEST CMSAs PLUS THE 15 NEXT LARGEST CMSAs/
           MSAs (I.e. those coded 1 or 3 [possibly 5, rarely 6]
       11. Central Cities (these would have been coded 1 on the Belt Code
           SUBURBS OF THE 6 LARGEST CMSAs AND THE 15 NEXT LARGEST
       20. Rural (including rural places with less than 2,500 population
       21. 2,500-9,999 plus other urbanized areas ("urban fringe"  not in
           Census places)
       22. 10,000-29,999
       23. 30,000-49,999
       24. 50,000-99,999
       25. 100,000-149,999
       26. 150,000-349,999
       27. 350,000 and over, exclusive of cities coded 11
           CMSAs/MSAs W/LESS THAN 2,000,000 POPULATION CENTRAL CITIES IN
           CMSAs/MSAs WITH LESS THAN 2,000,000 POPULATION (2 on Belt Code):
       30. Under 50,000 (identified by OMB, June 1990, as Central Cities
       31. 50-000-99,999
       32. 100,000-149,999
       33. 150,000-349,999
       34. 350,000 and over
           SUBURBS IN CMSAs/MSAs WITH LESS THAN 2,000,000
       40. Rural (including rural places with less than 2,500 population)
       41. 2,500-9,999
       42. 10,000-29,999
       43. 30,000-49,999
       44. 50,000-99,999
       45. 100,000-149,999
       46. 150,000 and over
           "NON-CMSA/PMSA/MASs"
       50. Rural (including rural places with less than 2,000,000 population)
       51. 2,500-9,999
       52. 10,000-29,999
       53. 30,000-49,999

       00. Telephone sample (RDD)

==============================
M000096    Pre.Sample.19. Census tract/ed indicator
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.19.

       Census tract/ed indicator - interview location (blanked)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------
       NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file.
       Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment
       identification, it could not be provided with this variable.
       This variable has been blanked to protect the
       confidentiality of the Respondent

       0. Enumeration district
       1. Tracted

       9. Telephone sample (RDD)

==============================
M000097    Pre.Sample.20. 2000 Sampling Error code
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.20.

       2000 Sampling Error code
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See Sampling documentation in this codebook.
       The first 2 digits contain the 200 Sampling Error Stratum
       code and the last digit represents the 2000 SECU or
       Sampling Error Computation Unit code.

==============================
M000098    Pre.Sample.21. 2000 Census NECMA/SMSA
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.21.

       2000 Census NECMA/SMSA - interview location
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See appendix "Notes on Sampling variables" and the appendix
       CENSUS DEFINITIONS.
       NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file.
       Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment
       identification, it could not be provided with this variable.

       360.     Anaheim-Santa Ana-Garden Grove, CA
       520.     Atlanta, GA
       560.     Atlantic City, NJ
       720.     Baltimore, MD
       875.     Bergen-Passiac, NJ PMSA (Former code and title: 6040
                Paterson-Clifton-Passaic, NJ)
       1000.    Birmingham, AL
       1123.    Boston-Lawrence-Salem-Lowell-Brockton, MA NECMA
       1125.    Boulder-Longmont, CO PMSA
       1145.    Brazoria, TX PMSA
       1280.    Buffalo, NY
       1600.    Chicago, IL
       1680.    Cleveland OH
       1800.    Columbus, GA-AL
       1920.    Dallas-Ft Worth, TX
       2000.    Dayton, OH
       2080.    Denver-Boulder, CO
       2120.    Des Moines, IA
       2160.    Detroit, MI
       2400.    Eugene-Springfield, OR
       2760.    Fort Wayne, IN
       2800.    Fort Worth-Arlington TX, PMSA
       2840.    Fresno, CA
       3000.    Grand Rapids, MI
       3360.    Houston, TX
       3600.    Jacksonville, FL
       3760.    Kansas City, MO-KS
       3840.    Knoxville, TN
       3965.    Lake County, IL PMSA
       3980.    Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL
       4480.    Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA
       4720.    Madison WI
       4763.    Manchester-Nashua, NH NECMA
       4880.    McAllen-Pharr-Edinburgh, TX
       5000.    Miami, FL
       5015.    Middlesex-Somerset-Hunterdon, NJ PMSA (former code and
                title: 5460 New Brunswick-Perth Amboy-Sayreville NJ)
       5080.    Milwaukee, WI
       5120.    Minneapolis-St Paul, MN-WI
       5350.    Nashua, NH PMSA
       5380.    Nassau-Suffolk, NY
       5480.    New Haven-West Haven, CT
       5483.    New Haven-Waterbury-Meriden, CT NECMA
       5600.    New York, NY-NJ
       5640.    Newark, NJ
       5700.    Niagara Falls, NY PMSA
       5775.    Oakland, CA  PMSA
       6160.    Philadelphia, PA-NJ
       6200.    Phoenix, AZ
       6280.    Pittsburgh, PA
       6453.    Portsmouth-Dover-Rochester, NH NECMA
       6760.    Richmond, VA
       6780.    Riverside-San Bernardino, Ontario, CA
       6920.    Sacramento, CA (1990 MSA definition)
       6960.    Saginaw, MI
       7040.    St. Louis, MO-IL
       7160.    Salt Lake City-Ogden, UT MSA
       7360.    San Francisco-Oakland,CA
       7600.    Seattle-Everett, WA
       8003.    Springfield, MA NECMA
       8080.    Steubenville-Wierton, OH-WV
       8200.    Tacoma, WA
       8800.    Waco, TX
       8840.    Washington, DC-MD-VA
       9000.    Wheeling,  WV-OH
       9243.    Worcester-Fitchburn-Leominster, MA NECMA

       0000.    INAP; location not in SMSA (MSA)/ NECMA
       9996.    Telephone sample (RDD)

==============================
M000099    Pre.Sample.22. 2000 CMSA
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.22.

       2000 CMSA - interview location
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See appendix "Notes on Sampling variables" and the appendix
       CENSUS DEFINITIONS.
       The six largest CMSA's are marked with **.
       NOTE: This variable was created from the segment file.
       Because the RDD telephone sample did not have PSU and segment
       identification, it could not be provided with this variable.

       07. Boston-Lawrence-Salem MA-NH
       10. Buffalo-Niagara Falls NY
       14. Chicago-Gary-Lake County IL-IN-WI**
       28. Cleveland-Akron-Lorain OH
       31. Dallas-Ft Worth TX (Since Dallas and Ft Worth were
           made separate PMSAs in 1990, this new CMSA was added
       34. Denver-Boulder CO (Since Denver and Boulder were made
           separate PMSAs in 1990, this new CMSA was added in
       35. Detroit-Ann Arbor MI**
       42. Houston-Galveston-Brazoria TX
       49. Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside CA**
       56. Miami-Fort Lauderdale FL
       63. Milwaukee-Racine WI
       70. New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island NY-NJ-CT**
       77. Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton PA-NJ-DE-MD**
       78. Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley PA
       84. San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose CA**
       91. Seattle-Tacoma WA

       96. Telephone sample (RDD)
       00. INAP, Location not in CMSA. This includes old code 32
           (Dayton Springfield, OH) which is no longer
           consolidated in 1990 since Dayton and Springfield are
           combined in a single MSA in 1990)

==============================
VAR 000099x   Pre.Sample.22x. 2000 MSA
           MD1: EQ 0
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.22x.

       2000 MSA - interview location
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This is the 2000 MSA for the full sample, including the
       the RDD telephone component.
       This variable has been blanked to protect the
       confidentiality of the Respondent.

       Metropolitan Statistical Area code and:

       00. INAP, Location not in MSA.

==============================
M000100    Pre.Sample.23. 2000 Census Tract 1
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.23.

       2000 Census Tract 1 - interview location (blanked)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This variable has been blanked to protect the
       confidentiality of the Respondent.

==============================
M000101    Pre.Sample.24. 2000 Census Tract 2
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.24.

       2000 Census Tract 2 - interview location (blanked)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       NOTE: No 2000 case corresponded to more than one Census tract.

==============================
M000102    Pre.Sample.25. 2000 Block 1
           MD1: EQ 99,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.25.

       2000 Block 1 - interview location (blanked)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This variable has been blanked to protect the
       confidentiality of the Respondent.

==============================
M000103    Pre.Sample.26. 2000 Block 2
           MD1: EQ 99,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.26.

       2000 Block 2 - interview location (blanked)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       NOTE: No 2000 case corresponded to more than one Census block.

==============================
M000104    Pre.Sample.27. 2000 MCD
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.27.

       2000 MCD - interview location (blanked)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This variable has been blanked to protect the
       confidentiality of the Respondent.

==============================
M000105    Pre.Sample.28. 2000 CDP
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9999
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.28.

       2000 CDP - interview location (blanked)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This variable has been blanked to protect the
       confidentiality of the Respondent.

==============================
M000106    Pre.Sample.29. 2000 FIPS place code
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Pre-Sample.29.

       2000 FIPS place code - interview location (blanked)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This variable has been blanked to protect the
       confidentiality of the Respondent.

==============================
M000107    Pre.Summary.1. Pre timing - section A
           MD:  EQ 999.99
              Numeric  DEC 2

   Pre-Summary.1.

       PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION A
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA

==============================
M000108    Pre.Summary.2. Pre timing - section B
           MD:  EQ 999.99
              Numeric  DEC 2

   Pre-Summary.2.

       PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION B
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA

==============================
M000109    Pre.Summary.3. Pre timing - section C
           MD:  EQ 999.99
              Numeric  DEC 2

   Pre-Summary.3.

       PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION C
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA

==============================
M000110    Pre.Summary.4. Pre timing - section D
           MD:  EQ 999.99
              Numeric  DEC 2

   Pre-Summary.4.

       PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION D
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA

==============================
M000111    Pre.Summary.5. Pre timing - section E
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 999.99
              Numeric  DEC 2

   Pre-Summary.5.

       PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION E
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA
       000.00 Section E selected for Post administration

==============================
M000112    Pre.Summary.6. Pre timing - section F
           MD:  EQ 999.99
              Numeric  DEC 2

   Pre-Summary.6.

       PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION F
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA

==============================
M000113    Pre.Summary.7. Pre timing - section G
           MD:  EQ 999.99
              Numeric  DEC 2

   Pre-Summary.7.

       PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION G
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA

==============================
M000114    Pre.Summary.8. Pre timing - section H
           MD:  EQ 999.99
              Numeric  DEC 2

   Pre-Summary.8.

       PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION H
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA

==============================
M000115    Pre.Summary.9. Pre timing - section K
           MD:  EQ 999.99
              Numeric  DEC 2

   Pre-Summary.9.

       PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION K
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA

==============================
M000116    Pre.Summary.10. Pre timing - section L
           MD:  EQ 999.99
              Numeric  DEC 2

   Pre-Summary.10.

       PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION L
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA

==============================
M000117    Pre.Summary.11. Pre timing - section M
           MD:  EQ 999.99
              Numeric  DEC 2

   Pre-Summary.11.

       PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION M
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA

==============================
M000118    Pre.Summary.12. Pre timing - section N
           MD:  EQ 999.99
              Numeric  DEC 2

   Pre-Summary.12.

       PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION N
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA

==============================
M000119    Pre.Summary.13. Pre timing - section P
           MD:  EQ 999.99
              Numeric  DEC 2

   Pre-Summary.13.

       PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION P
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA

==============================
M000120    Pre.Summary.14. Pre timing - section Q
           MD:  EQ 999.99
              Numeric  DEC 2

   Pre-Summary.14.

       PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION Q
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA

==============================
M000121    Pre.Summary.15. Pre timing - section R
           MD:  EQ 999.99
              Numeric  DEC 2

   Pre-Summary.15.

       PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION R
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA

==============================
M000122    Pre.Summary.16. Pre timing - section S
           MD:  EQ 999.99
              Numeric  DEC 2

   Pre-Summary.16.

       PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION S
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA

==============================
M000123    Pre.Summary.17. Pre timing - section X
           MD:  EQ 999.99
              Numeric  DEC 2

   Pre-Summary.17.

       PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION X
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA

==============================
M000124    Pre.Summary.18. Pre timing - section Y
           MD:  EQ 999.99
              Numeric  DEC 2

   Pre-Summary.18.

       PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION Y
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA

==============================
M000125    Pre.Summary.19. Pre timing - section Z
           MD:  EQ 999.99
              Numeric  DEC 2

   Pre-Summary.19.

       PRE SECTION TIMING - SECTION Z
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA

==============================
M000126    Post.Admin.1. Mode of Interview
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.1.

       POST: Mode of Interview
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See Post-Admin.1a.
       5 cases re-assigned to phone mode in the Post were administered FTF
       in error; note that several of these cases, although administered FTF,
       used telephone logic in the interview.

       1. Personal
       5. Telephone
       7. ADMINISTERED USING WRONG MODE: FTF re-assigned to telephone
          but administered as Personal interview

       0. No post IW

==============================
M000126a   Post.Admin.1a. Mode switch flag
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.1a.

       POST - MODE SWITCH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       200 FTF Pre cases were selected for reassignment to Phone
       administration  in the Post. Of these, 168 were completed interviews.
       Assignment of all Post cases (interview and non-interview) are
       described here.

       1. Assigned FTF,  not switched to Phone mode
       2. Assigned Phone
       3. Assigned FTF, switched to Phone mode

==============================
M000127a   Post.Admin.2a. Form desc 1 - H in Post
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.2a.

       POST: Form - section H administered in Post
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Section E questions about R's personal financial situation
       were randomly selected to be administered either in Pre
       section E or Post section H.
       Because assignment was set during Pre administration,
       this randomization was unaffected by the randomization
       failure which took place during a portion of the Post
       field period.

       0. Section H not administered in Post [Pre section E P000398-P000406]
       1. Section H administered in Post [P000410-P000417]

       9. No Post IW

==============================
M000127b   Post.Admin.2b. Form desc 2 - K format
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.2b.

       POST: Form  - K2 format
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly selected to have the K2a-K2d
       office recognition battery administered with or without
       the use of probes [P001446a-P001454].
       NOTE: see item Post-Summary.124 (P000262) for description
       of the randomization failure which took place during a
       portion of the Post field period.

       0. K2a-K2d administered without probes
       1. K2a-K2d administered with probes

       9. No post IW

==============================
M000128    Post.Admin.3. Mo. IW
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.3.

       POST: Month of interview
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       11. November
       12. December

       00. No Post IW

==============================
M000129    Post.Admin.4. Day IW
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.4.

       POST: Day of interview
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Coded 1-31 and:

       0. No Post IW

==============================
M000130    Post.Admin.5. Month and day (MMDD)
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9999
           Character

   Post-Admin.5.

       POST: Month and day (MMDD)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This is the day and month of interview in MMDD format.
       '0000' is used for cases with no Post IW; '9999' indicates NA

==============================
M000131    Post.Admin.6. No. days after election
           MD1: EQ 96,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.6.

       POST: Number of days after election
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       96. INAP, no Post IW
       99. NA

==============================
M000132    Post.Admin.7. IW bef/aft Gore concession
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.7.

       POST: Interview taken before or after Gore concession
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Gore concession:  December 13, 2000

       0. Before
       1. Day of concession (Dec. 13)
       2. After

       9. NA; INAP, no Post IW

==============================
M000133    Post.Admin.8. IW length
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 999.99
              Numeric  DEC 2

   Post-Admin.8.

       POST: Interview length
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: interview length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the interview as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       The average Post interview length is 63.76 minutes.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA; partial IW
       000.00 No Post IW

==============================
M000134    Post.Admin.9. IW no.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.9.

       POST: Interview number
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-44 and:

       99. NA
       00. INAP, no Post Interview

==============================
M000135    Post.Admin.10. Date of beg VQ file
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.10.

       POST: Date of beginning VQ file
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This refers to the VQ file loaded when the interview began.
       Changes were made to the VQ (application) while in
       the field. The next variable documents the VQ version in
       use at the end of the interview; note that if an interview
       was temporarily halted and a new VQ was installed prior to
       the resumption of interviewing, the VQ in effect for some
       questions would not be the VQ coded here.

       1. 11/7
       2. 11/10
       3. 11/16 (1)
       4. 11/16 (2)
       5. 11/18
       6. 11/27

       0. No Post IW

==============================
M000136    Post.Admin.11. Date of end VQ file
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.11.

       POST: Date of ending VQ file
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This refers to the VQ file in use when the interview
       concluded. Changes were made to the VQ (application)
       while in the field.  Note that if an interview was
       temporarily halted and a new VQ was installed prior to
       the  resumption of interviewing, the VQ in effect for
       some questions would not be the beginning VQ (previous
       var).

       1. 11/7
       2. 11/10
       3. 11/16 (1)
       4. 11/16 (2)
       5. 11/18
       6. 11/27

==============================
M000137    Post.Admin.12. Flag- change in VQ
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.12.

       POST: Flag- change in VQ
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Several changes to the application were made during
       the field period. This variable flags whether a suspended
       interview was resumed with a different version of the
       application.

       0. No change
       1. Change in VQ

       9. INAP, partial IW; no post IW

==============================
M000138    Post.Admin.13. Release
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.1a.

       POST: Release
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Because of the turnaround time needed to prepare it after the
       Pre interviewing was concluded, the Post sample was released
       in 3 releases.

       1. Release 1 - November 7
       2. Release 2 - November 15
       3. Release 3 - November 21.

       9. NA
       0. INAP, no Post IW

==============================
M000139    Post.Admin.14. Payment amt
           MD1: EQ 96,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.14.

       POST: Payment to R - amount
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       00. R requested no payment
       20. Twenty dollars
       40. Forty dollars

       96. INAP, no Post IW
       99. NA

==============================
M000139a   Post.Admin.14a. Interviewer incentive
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.14a.

       INTERVIEWER INCENTIVE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Beginning October 26, 2000, interviewers were paid $10 for each
       completed interview.

       0. Post interview date not in incentive period
       1. Post interview date in incentive period.

       9. INAP, no Post IW

==============================
M000140    Post.Admin.15. Payment mode
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.15.

       POST: Payment to R - mode
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0. R requested no payment
       1. Check
       2. Cash

       9. NA; INAP, no Post IW

==============================
M000141    Post.Admin.16. Payment date
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9999
           Character

   Post-Admin.16.

       POST: Payment to R - date (MMDD)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       '0000' is used for cases with no Post IW or 0 in Post-Admin.14/
       Post-Admin.15; '9999' indicates NA.

==============================
M000142    Post.Admin.17. Tape recorded
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.17.

       POST: Tape recorded?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       New interviewers had to tape record 2 of their first 5
       production interviews; experienced interviewers were required to
       tape record 1 of their first 3 production interviews (FTF or
       phone). Tape recording was conducted with the respondent's
       permission. The IWR made a self-evaluation and sent the tapes to
       their field supervisor.

       1. Yes
       5. No

       0. INAP, no Post IW

==============================
M000143    Post.Admin.18. Verification
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.18.

       POST: Verification
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See notes in Pre-Admin.17 (P000020).

       0. Counted for Ann Arbor office, not selected for verification
       1. Flagged for verification (interview number selected)
       2. Verified OK (all verification data match original data exactly)
       3. Verified with discrepancy (only one piece of verification data
          does not match; everything else matches exactly)
       4. Not verified (more than 1 piece of information reported by the
          respondent at the time of verification is different from that
          collected at the time of the original interview or finalizing
          the case; further probing results in assignment of either code 3
          or code 4 as a final code)
       5. Unable to verify (R is contacted but is unwilling to participate
          in verification exercise or the respondent cannot be reached;
          this includes: reaching the household by telephone but not reaching
          the respondent, and includes sending the verification latter to a
          household but no letter returned after 3 attempts)
       6. Verification limit met (used when the verifier has already completed
          the needed verification level).

       9. NA; INAP, no Post IW

==============================
M000144    Post.Admin.19. Evaluation
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.19.

       POST: Evaluation
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0. Not evaluated
       1. Flagged
       2. Evaluated
       3. Evaluation received in Ann Arbor office
       4. Cannot evaluate

       9. INAP, no Post IW

==============================
M000145    Post.Admin.20. Conversion ind.
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.20.

       POST: Refusal conversion indicator
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This refers to interviews initially refused by someone
       when an interviewer was first attempting contact.
       The source of this refusal may or may not have been the
       Respondent; result code 43 [contact, resistance by R] or
       46 [resistance not by R] for any call (not the final
       result code) turns this indicator on.
       Conversion may be made by the initial interviewer or
       another interviewer.  If the conversion is not made by the
       initial interviewer, the interviewer of record is the
       interviewer obtaining the conversion.

       0. Not a refusal convesion situation
       1. Refusal conversion situation indicated

       9. NA; INAP, no Post IW

==============================
M000146    Post.Admin.21. Persuasion letter
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.21.

       POST: Persuasion letter - flag
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0. No persuasion letter sent
       1. Persuasion letter sent

       9. NA; INAP, no Post IW

==============================
M000147    Post.Admin.22. Date requested
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9999
           Character

   Post-Admin.22.

       POST: Date persuasion letter requested (MMDD)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       '0000' is used for cases with no Post IW or no letter requested;
       '9999' indicates NA.

==============================
M000148    Post.Admin.23. Date sent
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9999
           Character

   Post-Admin.23.

       POST: Date persuasion letter sent
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       '0000' is used for cases with no Post IW or no letter requested;
       '9999' indicates NA.

==============================
M000149    Post.Admin.24. Type letter
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.24.

       POST: Type of persuasion letter
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A. Too busy
       2. B. Too personal
       3. C. Not interested
       4. D. Too old
       5. E. Evasive
       6. F. Gatekeeper
       7. G. Not at home

       9. NA
       0. INAP, no Post IW


==============================
M000150    Post.Admin.25. Tel calls
           MD:  EQ 99
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.25.

       POST: Number of telephone calls
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       99. NA; INAP, no Post IW

==============================
M000151    Post.Admin.26. FTF calls
           MD:  EQ 99
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.26.

       POST: Number of Face-to-Face calls
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       99. NA; INAP, no Post IW

==============================
M000152    Post.Admin.27. Final result
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.27.

       POST: Final result code
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       01 IW complete
       05 IW partial

       51 Refusal by R
       52 Refusal by person other than R
       54 Initial refusal, not reached for conversion
       61 No contact
       63 Noninterview, permanent reason
       66 Interview begun then terminated, insufficiently complete
       67 Noninterview, other reason
       68 Could not Locate R

==============================
M000153    Post.Admin.28. Result date (NI)
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9999
           Character

   Post-Admin.28.

       POST: Result date (Post noninterviews)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       '0000' is used for cases with Post IW; '9999' indicates NA.

==============================
M000154    Post.Admin. 29. Flag - mode switch
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.29.

       POST: Flag - pre/post mode switch
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from P000004 and P000126.
       Some interviews conducted FTF in the pre were administered
       by phone in the Post.

       1. Pre FTF and Post FTF
       2. Pre phone and Post phone
       3. Pre FTF and Post phone

       0. INAP, no post IW

==============================
M000155    Post.Admin.30. Lang of IW (all English)
           Numeric

   Post-Admin.30.

       POST: Language of interview (all English)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       All interviews were conducted entirely in English

       1. English

==============================
M000156    Post.CSheet.1. Flag- missing CS
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.1.

       POST - COVERSHEET:
       Flag- missing CS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0. Coversheet not missing
       1. Coversheet missing

==============================
M000157    Post.CSheet.2. Color of coversheet
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.2.

       POST - COVERSHEET:
       Color of coversheet
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Pink coversheets were copies of coversheets that were in transfer.
       NOTE: for an unknown reason, some cases assigned to FTF mode were
       administered using yellow (phone) coversheets.

       1. Blue
       2. Yellow
       3. Pink

       9. NA
       0. INAP, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1)

==============================
M000158    Post.CSheet.3. Item 1. R at samp addr
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.3.

       POST - COVERSHEET Item 1:
       Does (NAME) still live here?

       R STILL LIVE AT SAMPLE ADDRESS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Interviewers omitted filling out this box (code 9) on 227 coversheets.

       1. Yes
       5. No

       9. NA
       0. INAP, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1)

==============================
M000159    Post.CSheet.4. Item 2b. PHONE: New phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.4.

   IF PHONE MODE:
   IF R DOES NOT STILL LIVE AT SAMPLE ADDRESS:

       POST - PHONE COVERSHEET Item 2b:
       New phone number available
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Available
       2. Not available

       9. NA
       0. INAP, 1,9 in Post-Csheet.3; coversheet missing (1 in Post-
          CSheet.1); FTF mode

==============================
M000160    Post.CSheet.5. Item 2b. FTF: Addr status
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.5.

   IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE:
   IF R DOES NOT STILL LIVE AT SAMPLE ADDRESS:

       POST - FTF COVERSHEET Item 2b:
       Address is:

       STATUS OF NEW ADDRESS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: in cases where the Post interview mode was switched from
       FTF to telephone, the blue FTF coversheet have already been assigned
       and some personal contact attempted; for some telephone cases
       data are found in this variable because the FTF coversheet was
       retained.

       1. Out of range
       3. Within range
       5. Can't find

       9. NA
       0. INAP, 1,9 in Post-Csheet.3; coversheet missing (1 in Post-
          CSheet.1); Phone mode

==============================
M000161    Post.CSheet.6. FTF type structure
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.6.

   IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE:

       POST - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD1:
       Describe the type of structure in which the respondent
       live (sample address)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: in cases where the Post interview mode was switched from
       FTF to telephone, the blue FTF coversheet have already been assigned
       and some personal contact attempted; for some telephone cases
       data are found in this variable because the FTF coversheet was
       retained.

       1. Mobile home
       2. Detached single family
       3. Multi-family
       4. Apartment house
       5. Condo complex
       7. Other (specify)

       9. NA
       0. Inap, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1); assigned phone mode

==============================
M000162    Post.CSheet.7. FTF gatekeeper
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.7.

   IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE:

       POST - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD2:
       Is there a building manager, security guard or other
       gatekeeper whose cooperation you need in order to gain
       access to the R's housing unit?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: in cases where the Post interview mode was switched from
       FTF to telephone, the blue FTF coversheet have already been assigned
       and some personal contact attempted; for some telephone cases
       data are found in this variable because the FTF coversheet was
       retained.

       1. Yes
       2. No, but building is locked/ subdivision is gated and locked
       5. No

       9. NA
       0. Inap, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1); assigned phone mode

==============================
M000163    Post.CSheet.8. FTF type gatekeeper
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.8.

   IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE:
   IF GATEKEEPER/GUARD/MANAGER/LOCKED ACCESS:

       POST - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD2a:
       Check the box below which best describes the situation
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: in cases where the Post interview mode was switched from
       FTF to telephone, the blue FTF coversheet have already been assigned
       and some personal contact attempted; for some telephone cases
       data are found in this variable because the FTF coversheet was
       retained.

       1. Building manager or other Gatekeeper must let you in the
          buiding (on the grounds, into the mobile home park) but then
          you are free to attempt contact with R's HU
       2. Building manager/other Gatekeeper must get permission from
          someone in R's HU before you are allowed to make contact
          with the household
       7. Other (specify)

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 5, 9 in Pre-Csheet.13; coversheet missing; assigned phone
          mode

==============================
M000164    Post.CSheet.9. Resist from contact
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.9.

       POST - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3a:
       Was there resistance from any contact person?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Yes
       5. No

       9. NA
       0. INAP, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1)

==============================
M000165    Post.CSheet.10. Contct resist-waste time
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.10.

   IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON:

       POST - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(1):
       Resistance from contact person - SURVEYS WASTE OF TIME;
       PREVIOUS BAD EXPERIENCE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1)

==============================
M000166    Post.CSheet.11. Contct resist-too personal
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.11.

   IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON:

       POST - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(2):
       Resistance from contact person - CONTENT TOO PERSONAL
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1)

==============================
M000167    Post.CSheet.12. Contct resist-confidentiality
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.12.

   IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON:

       POST - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(3):
       Resistance from contact person - CONFIDENTIALITY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1)

==============================
M000168    Post.CSheet.13. Contct resist-not interested politics
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.13.

   IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON:

       POST - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(4):
       Resistance from contact person - NOT INTERESTED IN
       POLITICS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1)

==============================
M000169    Post.CSheet.14. Contct resist-too busy
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.14.

   IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON:

       POST - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(5):
       Resistance from contact person - TOO BUSY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1)

==============================
M000170    Post.CSheet.15. Contct resist-health
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.15.

   IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON:

       POST - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(6):
       Resistance from contact person - POOR HEALTH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1)

==============================
M000171    Post.CSheet.16. Contct resist-other
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.16.

   IF RESISTANCE FROM ANY CONTACT PERSON:

       POST - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3b(7):
       Resistance from contact person - OTHER (SPECIFY)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1)

==============================
M000172    Post.CSheet.17. R refuse initially
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.17.

       POST - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3e:
       Did R refuse initially?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Yes
       5. No

       9. NA
       0. INAP, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1)

==============================
M000173    Post.CSheet.18. R break appts
           MD1: EQ 8,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.18.

       POST - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3f:
       Did respondent break any appointments
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0. None
       1. One
       2. Two or more

       8. NA
       9. INAP, coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1)

==============================
M000174    Post.CSheet.19. Was R contact resister?
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.19.

       POST - COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3g:
       If contact persons resisted [if CD3a was "YES"], was the
       respondent the contact person who gave resistance?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Yes
       5. No

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1)

==============================
M000175    Post.CSheet.20. SUMMARY: did R resist
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.20.

       SUMMARY: did R resist (built)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This counts any resistance identified according to Pre-CSheet.25
       or in Pre-CSheet.27-Pre-CSheet.33; however, cases "not marked"
       throughout variables Pre-CSheet.27-Pre-CSheet.33 may have
       been unmarked due to complete omission rather than due to the
       inapplicability of any of the resistance categories to R.

       1. Yes, some resistance identified
       5. No resistance identified

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1)

==============================
M000176    Post.CSheet.21. R resist- waste time
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.21.

   IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a:

       POST- COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(1):
       Resistance from R - SURVEYS WASTE OF TIME; PREVIOUS BAD
       EXPERIENCE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet
          missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1)

==============================
M000177    Post.CSheet.22. R resist- too personal
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.22.

   IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a:

       POST- COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(2):
       Resistance from R - TOO PERSONAL
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet
          missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1)

==============================
M000178    Post.CSheet.23. R resist- confidentiality
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.23.

   IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a:

       POST- COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(3):
       Resistance from R - CONFIDENTIALITY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet
          missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1)

==============================
M000179    Post.CSheet.24. R resist- not interested in politics
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.24.

   IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a:

       POST- COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(4):
       Resistance from R - NOT INTERESTED IN POLITICS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet
          missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1)

==============================
M000180    Post.CSheet.25. R resist- too busy
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.25.

   IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a:

       POST- COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(5):
       Resistance from R - TOO BUSY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet
          missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1)

==============================
M000181    Post.CSheet.26. R resist- health
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.26.

   IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a:

       POST- COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(6):
       Resistance from R - POOR HEALTH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet
          missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1)

==============================
M000182    Post.CSheet.27. R resist- other
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.27.

   IF R WAS NOT THE CONTACT PERSON AT CD3a:

       POST- COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3h(7):
       Resistance from R - OTHER (SPECIFY)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Marked
       5. Not marked

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 1 in Post-CSheet.20; 5,9 in Post-Csheet.9; coversheet
          missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1)

==============================
M000183    Post.CSheet.28. Ever make contact (noninterview)
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.28.

       POST- COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3:
       Were you ever able to make contact with someone at this
       housing unit?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Yes
       5. No

       9. NA
       0. INAP, noninterview and coversheet missing (1 in Post-CSheet.1)

==============================
M000183a   Post.CSheet.28a. Ever contact R (noninterview)
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.28a.

       POST- COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD3d:
       Did you ever have any contact with the respondent?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Yes
       5. No

       9. NA
       0. INAP, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.28; noninterview and coversheet missing
          (1 in Post-CSheet.1)

==============================
M000184    Post.CSheet.29. Reason no contact (NI)
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.29.

   IF NO CONTACT WITH HOUSEHOLD FOR POST INTERVIEW:

       POST- COVERSHEET
       CONTACT DESCRIPTION Item CD4:
       What was the reason for no contact?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Nobody home at any call; no info about household could be
          obtained
       2. All occupants away during entire study period (i.e. long
          vacation, illness); info obtained from neighbor, manager etc.
       3. Nobody answered door but think somone in HU [FTF: when visits made]
       4. Could not obtain access to HU
       7. Other (specify)

       9. NA
       0. Inap, 5,9 in Post-Csheet.28; coversheet missing (1 in Post-
          CSheet.1)

==============================
M000184a   Post-CSheet.30. CSMS estimated income
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.30.

   IF FTF MODE:

       POST- COVERSHEET
       CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION
       (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 1):
       What is the estimated income of R's household?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Under $10,000
       2. $10,000-25,000
       3. $25,000-50,000
       4. $50,000-105,000
       5. $105,000 and above

       8. DK
       9. NA
       0. INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000184b   Post-CSheet.31. CSMS estimated HH race
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.31.

   IF FTF MODE:

       POST - COVERSHEET
       CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION
       (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 2):
       What is the race of R's household?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See also survey variables Y30(1)-Y30(3) for self-description by
       the respondent, item ZZ.2 describing IWR's observation of R's
       race, and the Pre equivalent of this variable in Pre-CSheet.35.

       1. White
       2. Black
       3. American Indian
       4. Asian
       7. Other

       8. DK
       9. NA
       0. INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000184c   Post-CSheet.32. CSMS est HH race certain
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.32.

   IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE:
   IF INTERVIEWER HAS IDENTIFIED RACE OF HOUSEHOLD:

       POST - COVERSHEET
       CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION
       (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 2a):
       Is this definite or probable?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Definite
       5. Probable

       9. NA
       0. INAP, 0,8,9 in Post-Csheet.31


==============================
M000184d   Post-CSheet.33. CSMS estimated Hispanic
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.33.

   IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE:

       POST - COVERSHEET
       CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION
       (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 3):
       Is R or R's household of hispanic origin?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See also P000068, P000069 (Pre version of these variables)
       ans Pre survey items Y30x/Y31 and Y31a/Y31a.T.

       1. Yes
       5. No

       8. DK
       9. NA
       0. INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000184e   Post-CSheet.34. CSMS est Hispanic certain
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-CSheet.34.

   IF FACE-TO-FACE MODE:
   IF INTERVIEWER HAS IDENTIFIED HISPANIC STATUS OF R/R'S HOUSEHOLD:

       POST - COVERSHEET
       CSMS INTERVIEWER EVALUATION
       (F10 SCREEN CARD ITEM 3a):
       Is this definite or probable?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Definite
       5. Probable

       9. NA
       0. INAP, 0,8,9 in Pre-Csheet.37

==============================
M000185    Post.IWR.1. Interviewer of record
           MD:  EQ 9999
           Numeric

   Post-IWR.1.

       POST: Interviewer of record ID
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       4-digit ID

       9999. NA

==============================
M000186    Post.IWR.2. Supervisor
           MD:  EQ 9999
           Numeric

   Post-IWR.2.

       POST: Supervisor ID
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       4-digit ID

       9999. NA

==============================
M000187    Post.IWR.3. Interviewer gender
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-IWR.3.

       POST: Interviewer gender
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Male
       2. Female

       9. NA
       0. INAP, no Post IW

==============================
M000188    Post.IWR.4. Interviewer education
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-IWR.4.

       POST: Interviewer education
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. 1-8 grades
       2. Some high school
       3. High school graduate
       4. Some college
       5. College degree
       6. Master's degree
       7. Ph.D.

       9. NA
       0. INAP, no Post IW

==============================
M000189    Post.IWR.5. Interviewer race
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-IWR.5.

       POST: Interviewer race
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. White
       2. Black
       3. Native American
       4. Asian
       7. Other

       9. NA
       0. INAP, no Post IW

==============================
M000190    Post.IWR.6. Interviewer ethnicity
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Post-IWR.6.

       POST: Interviewer ethnicity
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0. No ethnic identity coded
       1. Hispanic
       7. Other

       9. NA; INAP, no Post IW

==============================
M000191    Post.IWR.7. Interviewer languages
           Numeric

   Post-IWR.7.

       POST: Interviewer languages
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This variable is not available in 2000.

==============================
M000192    Post.IWR.8. Yrs Interviewer experience
           MD:  EQ 99
           Numeric

   Post-IWR.8.

       POST: Years Interviewer experience
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Interviewer's years of experience and:

       99. NA; INAP, no Post IW

==============================
M000193    Post.IWR.9. Interviewer age (bracketed)
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-IWR.9.

       POST: Interviewer age (bracketted)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. 18-34 years
       2. 35-40 years
       3. 41-45 years
       4. 46-50 years
       5. 51-55 years
       6. 56-60 years
       7. 51-64 years
       8. 65-79 years

       9. NA
       0. INAP, no Post IW

==============================
M000194    Post.Cand.1. House race type
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.1.

       House race type
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined;
       this is a Pre-only case.

       DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT RUNNING
         12  Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER
         13  Dem incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER
         14  Dem incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED
         19  Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS
       REPUBLICAN INCUMBENT RUNNING
         21  Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER
         23  Rep incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER
         24  Rep incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED
         29  Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS
       OTHER INCUMBENT RUNNING
         31  Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER
         32  Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER
         34  Other incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED
         35  Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CHALLENGERS
         36  Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS
         37  Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS
         39  Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CHALLS
       NO INCUMBENT RUNNING
         51  Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED
         52  Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED
         53  Dem incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED
         55  Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS
         56  Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS
         57  Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS
         59  Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS
         61  Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED
         62  Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED
         63  Rep incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED
         65  Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS
         66  Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS
         67  Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS
         69  Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS

         96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases)
         99  NA
         00  Washington DC

==============================
M000194a   Post.Cand.1a. Retiring House Repr name
           Character

   Post-Cand.1a.

       Retiring House Representative name
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification)
       are blank in this variable.

==============================
M000194b   Post.Cand.1b. Retiring House Repr code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.1b.

       Retiring House Representative code
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined;
       this is a Pre-only case.

       41. Democratic Representative--retiring (district with open race)
       42. Republican Representative--retiring (district with open race)

       96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases)
       99. NA
       00. No retiring House representative; Washington DC

==============================
M000194c   Post.Cand.1c. Retiring House Repr gender
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.1c.

       Retiring House Representative gender
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined;
       this is a Pre-only case.

       1. Male
       2. Female

       8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases)
       9. NA
       0. No retiring House representative; Washington DC

==============================
M000194d   Post.Cand.1d. Winner of 2000 House election
           MD:  EQ 99
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.1d.

       Winner of 2000 House election in R's district of
       interview
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       30. Independent/3rd party incumbent candidate
       31. Democratic candidate in open race
       32. Republican candidate in open race
       33. Democratic incumbent
       34. Republican incumbent
       35. Democratic challenger
       36. Republican challenger
       39. Independent/3rd party nonincumbent candidate

       99. NA (R's correct district not determined, 96 or 99 in Pre-Sample.1)
       00. Washington DC

==============================
M000194e   Post.Cand.1e. Winner of 2000 Senate election
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.1e.

       Winner of 2000 Senate election in R's state of
       interview
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       09    Third party or independent Senate candidate --incumbent
       10    Third party or independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent
       08    Third party or independent Senate candidate --2nd nonincumbent
       11    Democratic candidate in open Senate race
       12    Republican candidate in open Senate race
       13    Democratic Senate incumbent
       14    Republican Senate incumbent
       15    Democratic Senate challenger
       16    Republican Senate challenger

       99. NA (R's correct district not determined, 96 or 99 in Pre-Sample.1)
       00. No race in state; Washington CD

==============================
M000194f   Post.Cand.1f. Competitiveness of respondent CD
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.1f.

       Competitiveness of House race in 1998 in respondent's
       district
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1998 districts were stratified for competitiveness by the winning
       margin of the elected candidate.

       1. Least competitive
       2.
       3.
       4.
       5. Most competitive

       9. NA (R's correct district not determined, 96 or 99 in Pre-Sample.1);
          Washington D.C.

==============================
M000194g   Post.Cand.1g. Open seat in 2000 in respondent district?
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.1g.

       Open seat in R's district in 2000?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0. NO
       1. YES

       9. NA (R's correct district not determined, 96 or 99 in Pre-Sample.1)
          Washington D.C.

==============================
M000195    Post.Cand.2. House Democratic cand name
           Character

   Post-Cand.2.

       House Democratic candidate name
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification)
       are blank in this variable.

==============================
M000196    Post.Cand.3. House Democratic cand code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.3.

       House Democratic candidate code
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined;
       this is a Pre-only case.

       31. Democratic candidate in open House race
       33. Democratic House incumbent
       35. Democratic House challenger

       96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases)
       99. NA
       00. No Democratic candidate; Washington DC

==============================
M000197    Post.Cand.4. House Democratic cand gendr
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.4.

       House Democratic candidate gender
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined;
       this is a Pre-only case.

       1. Male
       2. Female

       8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases)
       9. NA
       0. No Democratic House candidate; Washington DC

==============================
M000198    Post.Cand.5. House Republican cand name
           Character

   Post-Cand.5.

       House Republican candidate name
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification)
       are blank in this variable.

==============================
M000199    Post.Cand.6. House Republican cand code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.6.

       House Republican candidate code
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined;
       this is a Pre-only case.

       32. Republican candidate in open House race
       34. Republican House incumbent
       36. Republican House challenger

       96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases)
       99. NA
       00. No Republican House candidate; Washington DC

==============================
M000200    Post.Cand.7. House Republican cand gendr
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.7.

       House Republican candidate gender
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined;
       this is a Pre-only case.

       1. Male
       2. Female

       8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases)
       9. NA
       0. No Republican House candidate; Washington DC

==============================
M000201    Post.Cand.8. House Ind cand name
           Character

   Post-Cand.8.

       House Independent/third party candidate name
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification)
       are blank in this variable.

==============================
M000202    Post.Cand.9. House Ind cand code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.9.

       House Independent/third party candidate code
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       ** THIS CODE IS USED ONLY IF NAME APPEARS ON CANDIDATE LIST
       For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined;
       this is a Pre-only case.

       30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent **
       38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent **
       39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent

       96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases)
       99. NA
       00. No Independent/third party House candidate; Washington DC

==============================
M000202a   Post.Cand.9a. House Ind cand party
           Character

   Post-Cand.9a.

       House Independent/third party candidate party
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This is an alpha variable

==============================
M000203    Post.Cand.10. House Ind cand gender
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.10.

       House Independent/third party candidate gender
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined;
       this is a Pre-only case.

       1. Male
       2. Female

       8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases)
       9. NA
       0. No Independent/third party House candidate; Washington DC

==============================
M000204    Post.Cand.11. Senate race type
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.11.

       Senate race type:

       STATES WITH SENATE RACE     STATES WITHOUT SENATE RACE
         Arizona                       Alabama
         California                    Arkansas
         Connecticut                   Colorado
         Delaware                      Idaho
         Florida                       Illinois
         Georgia                       Iowa
         Indiana                       Kansas
         Maine                         Kentucky
         Maryland                      Louisiana
         Massachusetts                 New Hampshire
         Michigan                      North Carolina
         Minnesota                     Oklahoma
         Mississippi                   Oregon
         Missouri                      South Carolina
         Montana                       South Dakota
         Nebraska
         Nevada
         New Jersey
         New Mexico
         New York
         North Dakota
         Ohio
         Pennsylvania
         Rhode Island
         Tennessee
         Texas
         Utah
         Vermont
         Virginia
         Washington
         West Virginia
         Wisconsin
         Wyoming
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined;
       this is a Pre-only case.

       DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT RUNNING
         12  Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER
         13  Dem incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER
         14  Dem incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED
         19  Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS
       REPUBLICAN INCUMBENT RUNNING
         21  Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER
         23  Rep incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER
         24  Rep incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED
         29  Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS
       OTHER INCUMBENT RUNNING
         31  Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER
         32  Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER
         34  Other incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED
         35  Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CHALLENGERS
         36  Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS
         37  Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS
         39  Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CHALLS
       NO INCUMBENT RUNNING
         51  Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED
         52  Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED
         53  Dem incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED
         55  Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS
         56  Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS
         57  Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS
         59  Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS
         61  Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED
         62  Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED
         63  Rep incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED
         65  Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS
         66  Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS
         67  Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS
         69  Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS
       NO RACE IN STATE
         81  DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENTS, no race in state
         82  REPUBLICAN INCUMBENTS, no race in state
         85  DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN INCUMBENTS, no race in state

         96  Code 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases)
         99  NA
         00  Washington DC


==============================
M000205    Post.Cand.12. Senate Democr cand name
           Character

   Post-Cand.12.

       Senate Democratic candidate name
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification)
       are blank in this variable.

==============================
M000206    Post.Cand.13. Senate Democr cand code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.13.

       Senate Democratic candidate code
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined;
       this is a Pre-only case.

       11. Democratic candidate in open Senate race
       13. Democratic Senate incumbent
       15. Democratic Senate challenger

       96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases)
       99. NA
       00. No race in state; no Democratic Senate candidate; Washington DC

==============================
M000207    Post.Cand.14. Senate Democr cand gender
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.14.

       Senate Democratic candidate gender
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined;
       this is a Pre-only case.

       1. Male
       2. Female

       8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases)
       9. NA
       0. No race in state; no Democratic Senate candidate; Washington DC

==============================
M000208    Post.Cand.15. Senate Repub cand name
           Character

   Post-Cand.15.

       Senate Republican candidate name
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification)
       are blank in this variable.

==============================
M000209    Post.Cand.16. Senate Repub cand code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.16.

       Senate Republican candidate code
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined;
       this is a Pre-only case.

       12. Republican candidate in open Senate race
       14. Republican Senate incumbent
       16. Republican Senate challenger

       96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases)
       99. NA
       00. No race in state; no Republican Senate candidate; Washington DC

==============================
M000210    Post.Cand.17. Senate Repub cand gender
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.17.

       Senate Republican candidate gender
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined;
       this is a Pre-only case.

       1. Male
       2. Female

       8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases)
       9. NA
       0. No race in state; no Republican Senate candidate; Washington DC

==============================
M000211    Post.Cand.18. Senate Ind 1 cand name
           Character

   Post-Cand.18.

       Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate name
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification)
       are blank in this variable.

==============================
M000212    Post.Cand.19. Senate Ind 1 cand code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.19.

       Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate code
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       ** THIS CODE IS USED ONLY IF NAME APPEARS ON CANDIDATE LIST
       For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined;
       this is a Pre-only case.

       09  Third party or independent Senate candidate --incumbent **
       10  Third party or independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent **

       96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases)
       99. NA
       00. No race in state; no independent/third party Senate candidate;
           Washington DC

==============================
M000212a   Post.Cand.19a. Senate Ind 1 cand party
           Character

   Post-Cand.19a.

       Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate party
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification)
       are blank in this variable.

==============================
M000213    Post.Cand.20. Senate Ind 1 cand gender
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.20.

       Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate gender
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined;
       this is a Pre-only case.

       1. Male
       2. Female

       8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases)
       9. NA
       0. No race in state; no Independent/third party Senate candidate;
          Washington DC

==============================
M000214    Post.Cand.21. Senate Ind 2 cand name
           Character

   Post-Cand.21.

       Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate name
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification)
       are blank in this variable.

==============================
M000215    Post.Cand.22. Senate Ind 2 cand code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.22.

       Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate code
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       ** THIS CODE IS USED ONLY IF NAME APPEARS ON CANDIDATE LIST
       For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined;
       this is a Pre-only case.

       08  Third party or independent Senate candidate --2nd nonincumbent**

       96. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases)
       99. NA
       00. No race in state; no independent/third party Senate candidate;
           no 2nd independent/third party Senate candidate; Washington DC

==============================
M000215a   Post.Cand.22a. Senate Ind 2 cand party
           Character

   Post-Cand.22a.

       Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate party
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       3 Cases coded 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification)
       are blank in this variable.

==============================
M000216    Post.Cand.23. Senate Ind 2 cand gender
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.23.

       Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate gender
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       For 1 case (NA), district/state race information is undetermined;
       this is a Pre-only case.

       1. Male
       2. Female

       8. 1 in Post-Summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases)
       9. NA
       0. No race in state; no Independent/third party Senate candidate;
          no 2nd independent/third party Senate candidate; Washington DC

==============================
M000217    Post.Cand.24. Outside Hse Dem cand name
           Character

   Post-Cand.24.

       House Democratic candidate name - Vote outside CD of IW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This variable is blank if Pre-Sample.8 (P000086) does not have
       the exact CD of outside vote identified.

==============================
M000218    Post.Cand.25. Outside Hse Dem cand code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.25.

       House Democratic candidate code - Vote outside CD of IW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       31. Democratic candidate in open House race
       33. Democratic House incumbent
       35. Democratic House challenger

       96. No democratic candidate in 'outside' CD
       99. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (P000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (P000086) does not
           have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state)
       00. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7

==============================
M000219    Post.Cand.26. Outside Hse Dem cand gendr
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.26.

       House Democratic candidate gender - Vote outside CD of IW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Male
       2. Female

       8. No democratic candidate in 'outside' CD
       9. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (P000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (P000086) does not
           have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state).
       0. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7

==============================
M000220    Post.Cand.27. Outside Hse Rep cand name
           Character

   Post-Cand.27.

       House Republican candidate name - Vote outside CD of IW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This variable is blank if Pre-Sample.8 (P000086) does not have
       the exact CD of outside vote identified.

==============================
M000221    Post.Cand.28. Outside Hse Rep cand code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.28.

       House Republican candidate code - Vote outside CD of IW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       32. Republican candidate in open House race
       34. Republican House incumbent
       36. Republican House challenger

       96. No Republican candidate in 'outside' CD
       99. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (P000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (P000086) does not
           have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state).
       00. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7

==============================
M000222    Post.Cand.29. Outside Hse Rep cand gendr
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.29.

       House Republican candidate gender - Vote outside CD of IW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Male
       2. Female

       8. No Republican candidate in 'outside' CD
       9. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (P000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (P000086) does not
           have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state).
       0. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7

==============================
M000223    Post.Cand.30. Outside Hse Ind cand name
           Character

   Post-Cand.30.

       House Independent/third party candidate name - Vote
       outside CD of IW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This variable is blank if Pre-Sample.8 (P000086) does not have
       the exact CD of outside vote identified.

==============================
M000224    Post.Cand.31. Outside Hse Ind cand code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.31.

       House Independent/third party candidate code - Vote
       outside CD of IW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent **
       38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent **
       39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent

       96. No independent/3rd party candidate in 'outside' CD
       99. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (P000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (P000086) does not
           have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state).
       00. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7

==============================
M000225    Post.Cand.32. Outside Hse Ind cand gendr
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.32.

       House Independent/third party candidate gender - Vote
       outside CD of IW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Male
       2. Female

       8. No independent/3rd party candidate in 'outside' CD
       9. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (P000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (P000086) does not
           have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state).
       0. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7

==============================
M000226    Post.Cand.33. Outside Hse race type
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.33.

       House race type - Vote outside state of IW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT RUNNING
         12  Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER
         13  Dem incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER
         14  Dem incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED
         19  Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS
       REPUBLICAN INCUMBENT RUNNING
         21  Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER
         23  Rep incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER
         24  Rep incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED
         29  Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS
       OTHER INCUMBENT RUNNING
         31  Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER
         32  Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER
         34  Other incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED
         35  Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CHALLENGERS
         36  Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS
         37  Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS
         39  Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CHALLS
       NO INCUMBENT RUNNING
         51  Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED
         52  Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED
         53  Dem incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED
         55  Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS
         56  Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS
         57  Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS
         59  Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS
         61  Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED
         62  Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED
         63  Rep incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED
         65  Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS
         66  Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS
         67  Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS
         69  Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS

         96. Washington DC
         99. 1 in Pre-Sample.7 (P000085) and Pre-Sample.8 (P000086) does not
             have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state).
         00. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7

==============================
M000226a   Post.Cand.33a. Outside Sen race type
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.33a.

       Senate race type - Vote outside state of IW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT RUNNING
         12  Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER
         13  Dem incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER
         14  Dem incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED
         19  Dem incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS
       REPUBLICAN INCUMBENT RUNNING
         21  Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER
         23  Rep incumbent running -- OTHER CHALLENGER
         24  Rep incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED
         29  Rep incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS
       OTHER INCUMBENT RUNNING
         31  Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER
         32  Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER
         34  Other incumbent running -- UNOPPOSED
         35  Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CHALLENGERS
         36  Other incumbent running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CHALLENGERS
         37  Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CHALLENGERS
         39  Other incumbent running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CHALLS
       NO INCUMBENT RUNNING
         51  Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED
         52  Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED
         53  Dem incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED
         55  Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS
         56  Dem incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS
         57  Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS
         59  Dem incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS
         61  Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED
         62  Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED
         63  Rep incumbent not running -- OTHER CANDIDATE UNOPPOSED
         65  Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDS
         66  Rep incumbent not running -- REPUBLICAN AND OTHER CANDS
         67  Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC AND OTHER CANDS
         69  Rep incumbent not running -- DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, OTHER CANDS
       NO RACE IN STATE
         81  DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENTS, no race in state
         82  REPUBLICAN INCUMBENTS, no race in state
         85  DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN INCUMBENTS, no race in state

         96. Washington DC
         99. R vote in another district but not another state
         00. 0,8,9 in Pre-Sample.7

==============================
M000227    Post.Cand.34. Outside Sen Dem cand name
           Character

   Post-Cand.34.

       Senate Democratic candidate name - Vote outside state of
       IW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This variable is blank if R did not vote outside state of IW.

==============================
M000228    Post.Cand.35. Outside Sen Dem cand code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.35.

       Senate Democratic candidate code - Vote outside state of
       IW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       11. Democratic candidate in open Senate race
       13. Democratic Senate incumbent
       15. Democratic Senate challenger

       96. No race in state; no Democratic candidate
       99. R voted in another district but not another state
       00. R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC

==============================
M000229    Post.Cand.36. Outside Sen Dem cand gendr
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.36.

       Senate Democratic candidate gender - Vote outside state
       of IW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Male
       2. Female

       9. No race in state; no Democratic candidate
       0. R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district
           but not another state; Washington DC

==============================
M000230    Post.Cand.37. Outside Sen Rep cand name
           Character

   Post-Cand.37.

       Senate Republican candidate name - Vote outside state of
       IW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This variable is blank if R did not vote outside state of IW.

==============================
M000231    Post.Cand.38. Outside Sen Rep cand code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.38.

       Senate Republican candidate code - Vote outside state of
       IW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       12. Republican candidate in open Senate race
       14. Republican Senate incumbent
       16. Republican Senate challenger

       96. No race in state; no Republican candidate
       99. R voted in another district but not another state
       00. R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC

==============================
M000232    Post.Cand.39. Outside Sen Rep cand gendr
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.39.

       Senate Republican candidate gender - Vote outside state
       of IW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Male
       2. Female

       9. No race in state; no Democratic candidate
       0. R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district
           but not another state; Washington DC

==============================
M000233    Post.Cand.40. Outside Sen Ind1 cand name
           Character

   Post-Cand.40.

       Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate name
       - Vote outside state of IW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This variable is blank if R did not vote outside state of IW or
       if there was no independent/third party candidate in 'outside'
       state.

==============================
M000234    Post.Cand.41. Outside Sen Ind1 cand code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.41.

       Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate code
       - Vote outside state of IW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       09  Third party or independent Senate candidate --incumbent
       10  Third party or independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent

       96. No race in state; no independent/3rd party candidate
       99. R voted in another district but not another state
       00. R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC

==============================
M000235    Post.Cand.42. Outside Sen Ind1 cand gend
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.42.

       Senate Independent/third party 1 -candidate gender
       - Vote outside state of IW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Male
       2. Female

       9. No race in state; no independent/3rd party candidate
       0. R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district
          but not another state; Washington DC

==============================
M000236    Post.Cand.43. Outside Sen Ind2 cand name
           Character

   Post-Cand.43.

       Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate name
       - Vote outside state of IW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This variable is blank if R did not vote outside state of IW or
       if there was no (2nd) independent/third party candidate in
       'outside' state.

==============================
M000237    Post.Cand.44. Outside Sen Ind2 cand code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.44.

       Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate code
       - Vote outside state of IW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       08.  Third party or independent Senate candidate --2nd nonincumbent

       96. No race in state; no independent/3rd party candidate; no second
           independent/3rd party candidate
       99. R voted in another district but not another state
       00. R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC

==============================
M000238    Post.Cand.45. Outside Sen Ind2 cand gend
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Cand.45.

       Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate gender
       - Vote outside state of IW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Male
       2. Female

       9. No race in state; no independent/3rd party candidate; no second
           independent/3rd party candidate
       0. R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district
          but not another state; Washington DC

==============================
M000239    Post.Summary.1. Post timing - section A
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 999.99
           Numeric

   Post-Summary.1.

       POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION A
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA
       000.00 No Post IW

==============================
M000240    Post.Summary.2. Post timing - section B
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 999.99
           Numeric

   Post-Summary.2.

       POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION B
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA
       000.00 No Post IW

==============================
M000241    Post.Summary.3. Post timing - section C
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 999.99
           Numeric

   Post-Summary.3.

       POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION C
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA
       000.00 No Post IW

==============================
M000242    Post.Summary.4. Post timing - section D
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 999.99
           Numeric

   Post-Summary.4.

       POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION D
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA
       000.00 No Post IW

==============================
M000243    Post.Summary.5. Post timing - section E
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 999.99
           Numeric

   Post-Summary.5.

       POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION E
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA
       000.00 No Post IW

==============================
M000244    Post.Summary.6. Post timing - section F
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 999.99
           Numeric

   Post-Summary.6.

       POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION F
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA
       000.00 No Post IW

==============================
M000245    Post.Summary.7. Post timing - section G
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 999.99
           Numeric

   Post-Summary.7.

       POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION G
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA
       000.00 No Post IW

==============================
M000246    Post.Summary.8. Post timing - section H
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 999.99
           Numeric

   Post-Summary.8.

       POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION H
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA
       000.00 Section H administered in Pre; No Post IW

==============================
M000247    Post.Summary.9. Post timing - section J
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 999.99
           Numeric

   Post-Summary.9.

       POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION J
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA
       000.00 No Post IW

==============================
M000248    Post.Summary.10. Post timing - section K
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 999.99
           Numeric

   Post-Summary.10.

       POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION K
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA
       000.00 No Post IW

==============================
M000249    Post.Summary.11. Post timing - section L
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 999.99
           Numeric

   Post-Summary.11.

       POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION L
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA
       000.00 No Post IW

==============================
M000250    Post.Summary.12. Post timing - section M
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 999.99
           Numeric

   Post-Summary.12.

       POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION M
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA
       000.00 No Post IW

==============================
M000251    Post.Summary.13. Post timing - section N
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 999.99
           Numeric

   Post-Summary.13.

       POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION N
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA
       000.00 No Post IW

==============================
M000252    Post.Summary.14. Post timing - section P
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 999.99
           Numeric

   Post-Summary.14.

       POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION P
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA
       000.00 No Post IW

==============================
M000253    Post.Summary.15. Post timing - section Q
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 999.99
           Numeric

   Post-Summary.15.

       POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION Q
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA
       000.00 No Post IW

==============================
M000254    Post.Summary.16. Post timing - section R
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 999.99
           Numeric

   Post-Summary.16.

       POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION R
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA
       000.00 No Post IW

==============================
M000255    Post.Summary.17. Post timing - section S
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 999.99
           Numeric

   Post-Summary.17.

       POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION S
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA
       000.00 No Post IW

==============================
M000256    Post.Summary.18. Post timing - section T
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 999.99
           Numeric

   Post-Summary.18.

       POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA
       000.00 No Post IW

==============================
M000257    Post.Summary.19. Post timing - section V
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 999.99
           Numeric

   Post-Summary.19.

       POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION V
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA
       000.00 No Post IW

==============================
M000258    Post.Summary.20. Post timing - section Y
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 999.99
           Numeric

   Post-Summary.20.

       POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION Y
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA
       000.00 No Post IW

==============================
M000259    Post.Summary.21. Post timing - section Z
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 999.99
           Numeric

   Post-Summary.21.

       POST SECTION TIMING - SECTION Z
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: section length is the amount of lapsed time
       between the beginning and ending of the section as
       recorded by the instrument application, and may be
       affected by suspension of interview, power failure,
       application failure, R digressions and interruptions etc.
       Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except:

       999.99 NA
       000.00 No Post IW

==============================
M000260    Post.Summary.22. Wrong CD admin(preload)
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Post-Summary.22.

       POST:  Wrong CD administered (preloaded)?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       NOTE:  3 cases (case IDs 900,1016,1114) were misidentified in
       the preload as PA cases but were actually conducted in New
       Jersey; the actual CD for the NJ location is not determined.
       Variables for survey questions which were administered according
       to Preload information are unchanged (affected cases not set to
       missing data).  State and CD variables (e.g. P000079, P000080
       etc.) are set to missing data but sampling variables associated
       with segment are correct for the actual segment location (if
       FTF mode).

       0. No misidentification of CD
       1. Wrong CD identified (administered)

       9. No Post IW

==============================
M000261    Post.Summary.23. Type error in preload
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Post-Summary.23.

       POST: Type of error in preload
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Code 1 corresponds to 3 cases in WV where Senate type race was
       misidentified as type race 12 instead of type race 19
       (note: 1 additional case in WV had correct Senate type race
       preloaded).  For the 3 cases coded 1, the preload
       information for the Senate Independent/3rd party candidate
       was not preloaded.

       0. No error in Preload
       1. Wrong Senate type race preloaded (WV, 3 cases)
       2. Wrong CD (1 in Post-Summary.22)

       9. No Post IW

==============================
M000262    Post.Summary.24. Flag-Post rand failure
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Post-Summary.24.

       POST:  Flag - randomization failure in Post admin
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       The randomization variables documented in P001752-P001810
       describe the types of randomizations affected.

       0. No randomization failure
       1. Post randomization failure in at least a portion of
          the interview

       9. No Post IW

==============================
M000301    A1. Attention R paid to campaigns
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   A1.

       Some people don't pay much attention to political
       campaigns. How about you? Would you say that you have
       been very much interested, somewhat interested or not
       much interested in the political campaigns so far this
       year?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY MUCH INTERESTED
       3. SOMEWHAT INTERESTED
       5. NOT MUCH INTERESTED

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000302    A2. Does R care about Pres election
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   A2.

       Generally speaking, would you say that you personally
       care a good deal who wins the presidential election
       this fall, or that you don't care very much who wins?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. CARE A GOOD DEAL
       3. DON'T CARE VERY MUCH

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000303    A3. Did R vote in 1996 election
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   A3.

       In 1996 Bill Clinton ran on the Democratic ticket
       against Bob Dole for the Republicans, and Ross Perot as
       an independent candidate.
       Do you remember for sure whether or not you voted in
       that election?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE 'DK' RESPONSE]

       1. YES, VOTED
       5. NO, DIDN'T VOTE  --> SKIP TO A4/A5

       8. DON'T KNOW       --> SKIP A4/A5
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000304    A3a. Who did R vote for in 1996
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   A3a.

   IF R VOTED FOR PRESIDENT IN 1996:

       Which one did you vote for?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE 'DK' RESPONSE]

       1. BILL CLINTON
       3. BOB DOLE
       5. ROSS PEROT
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY)

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in A3


==============================
M000305    A4a. Does R like anything about Gore
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   A4a.

       Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al
       Gore that might make you want to vote for him?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order of the A4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about
       Gore) and the A5 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about GW
       Bush) was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. YES
       5. NO           --> SKIP TO A4c

       8. DON'T KNOW   --> SKIP TO A4c
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000306    A4b(1). #1 detail about Gore R likes
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9995
           Numeric

   A4b(1).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR GORE:

       Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al
       Gore that might make you want to vote for him?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 1 - GORE 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       9001. R has been influenced by spouse
       9002. R has been influenced by someone else
       9995. NA
       9998. DK
       9999. Refused to say
       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4a

==============================
M000307    A4b(2). #2 detail about Gore R likes
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   A4b(2).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR GORE:

       Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al
       Gore that might make you want to vote for him?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 2 - GORE 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4b(1); no
             further mentions

==============================
M000308    A4b(3). #3 detail about Gore R likes
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   A4b(3).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR GORE:

       Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al
       Gore that might make you want to vote for him?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 3 - GORE 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4b(1); no
             further mentions

==============================
M000309    A4b(4). #4 detail about Gore R likes
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   A4b(4).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR GORE:

       Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al
       Gore that might make you want to vote for him?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 4 - GORE 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4b(1); no
             further mentions

==============================
M000310    A4b(5). #5 detail about Gore R likes
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   A4b(5).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR GORE:

       Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al
       Gore that might make you want to vote for him?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 5 - GORE 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4b(1); no
             further mentions

==============================
M000311    A4c. Does R dislike anything about Gore
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   A4c.

       Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might
       make you want to vote against him?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order of the A4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about
       Gore) and the A5 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about GW
       Bush) was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. Yes
       5. No          --> A5a Or A6

       8. Don't Know  --> A5a Or A6
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000312    A4d(1). #1 detail about Gore R dislikes
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9001
           Numeric

   A4d(1).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST GORE:

       Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might
       make you want to vote against him?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 1 - GORE 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       9001. R has been influenced by spouse
       9002. R has been influenced by someone else
       9995. NA
       9998. DK
       9999. Refused to say
       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4c

==============================
M000313    A4d(2). #2 detail about Gore R dislikes
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   A4d(2).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST GORE:

       Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might
       make you want to vote against him?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 2 - GORE 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4d(1); no
             further mentions

==============================
M000314    A4d(3). #3 detail about Gore R dislikes
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   A4d(3).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST GORE:

       Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might
       make you want to vote against him?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 3 - GORE 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4d(1); no
             further mentions

==============================
M000315    A4d(4). #4 detail about Gore R dislikes
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   A4d(4).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST GORE:

       Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might
       make you want to vote against him?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 4 - GORE 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4d(1); no
             further mentions

==============================
M000316    A4d(5). #5 detail about Gore R dislikes
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   A4d(5).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST GORE:

       Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might
       make you want to vote against him?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 5 - GORE 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A4c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A4d(1); no
             further mentions

==============================
M000317    A5a. Does R like anything about Bush
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   A5a.

       Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor
       George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order of the A4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about
       Gore) and the A5 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about GW
       Bush) was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. YES
       5. NO           --> SKIP TO A5c

       8. DON'T KNOW   --> SKIP TO A5c
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000318    A5b(1). #1 detail about Bush R likes
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9001
           Numeric

   A5b(1).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR BUSH:

       Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor
       George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 1 - GW BUSH 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       9001. R has been influenced by spouse
       9002. R has been influenced by someone else
       9995. NA
       9998. DK
       9999. Refused to say
       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5a

==============================
M000319    A5b(2). #2 detail about Bush R likes
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   A5b(2).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR BUSH:

       Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor
       George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 2 - GW BUSH 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5b(1); no
             further mentions

==============================
M000320    A5b(3). #3 detail about Bush R likes
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   A5b(3).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR BUSH:

       Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor
       George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 3 - GW BUSH 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5b(1); no
             further mentions

==============================
M000321    A5b(4). #4 detail about Bush R likes
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   A5b(4).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR BUSH:

       Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor
       George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 4 - GW BUSH 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5b(1); no
             further mentions

==============================
M000322    A5b(5). #5 detail about Bush R likes
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   A5b(5).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR BUSH:

       Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor
       George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 5 - GW BUSH 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5a; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5b(1); no
             further mentions

==============================
M000323    A5c. Does R dislike anything about Bush
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   A5c.

       Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush
       that might make you want to vote against him?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order of the A4 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about
       Gore) and the A5 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about GW
       Bush) was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. YES
       5. NO              --> SKIP TO A4a or A6

       8. DON'T KNOW      --> SKIP TO A4a or A6
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000324    A5d(1). #1 detail about Bush R dislikes
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9001
           Numeric

   A5d(1).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST BUSH:

       Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush
       that might make you want to vote against him?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 1 - GW BUSH 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       9001. R has been influenced by spouse
       9002. R has been influenced by someone else
       9995. NA
       9998. DK
       9999. Refused to say
       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5c

==============================
M000325    A5d(2). #2 detail about Bush R dislikes
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   A5d(2).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST BUSH:

       Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush
       that might make you want to vote against him?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 2 - GW BUSH 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5d(1); no
             further mentions

==============================
M000326    A5d(3). #3 detail about Bush R dislikes
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   A5d(3).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST BUSH:

       Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush
       that might make you want to vote against him?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 3 - GW BUSH 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5d(1); no
             further mentions

==============================
M000327    A5d(4). #4 detail about Bush R dislikes
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   A5d(4).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST BUSH:

       Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush
       that might make you want to vote against him?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 4 - GW BUSH 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5d(1); no
             further mentions

==============================
M000328    A5d(5). #5 detail about Bush R dislikes
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   A5d(5).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST BUSH:

       Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush
       that might make you want to vote against him?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 5 - GW BUSH 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE? UNTIL R SAYS NO]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in A5c; 9001,9002,9995,9998,9999 in A5d(1); no
             further mentions

==============================
M000329    A6. Number of days R watched nat'l news
           MD1: EQ 8,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   A6.

       How many days in the past week did you watch the
       national network news on TV?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0. NONE      --> SKIP TO A7
       1. ONE DAY
       2. TWO DAYS
       3. THREE DAYS
       4. FOUR DAYS
       5. FIVE DAYS
       6. SIX DAYS
       7. EVERY DAY

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF; NA

==============================
M000330    A6a/A6a.T. Attention to national news
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   A6a/A6a.T.

   IF R WATCHED NATIONAL NETWORK TV NEWS IN PAST WEEK:

       FTF:
       Please look at page 1 of the booklet.
       How much attention do you pay to news on national news
       shows about the campaign for President -- a great deal,
       quite a bit, some, very little, or none?

       TELEPHONE:
       How much attention do you pay to news on national news
       shows about the campaign for President -- a great deal,
       quite a bit, some, very little, or none?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL
       2. QUITE A BIT
       3. SOME
       4. VERY LITTLE
       5. NONE

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,8,9 in A6

==============================
M000331    A7. Days R watched early local news
           MD1: EQ 8,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   A7.

       How many days in the past week did you watch the local
       TV news shows such as "Eyewitness News" or "Action News"
       in the late afternoon or early-evening?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0. NONE
       1. ONE DAY
       2. TWO DAYS
       3. THREE DAYS
       4. FOUR DAYS
       5. FIVE DAYS
       6. SIX DAYS
       7. EVERY DAY

==============================
M000332    A8. Days R watched late local news
           MD1: EQ 8,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   A8.

       How many days in the past week did you watch the local
       TV news shows in the late evening?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0. NONE
       1. ONE DAY
       2. TWO DAYS
       3. THREE DAYS
       4. FOUR DAYS
       5. FIVE DAYS
       6. SIX DAYS
       7. EVERY DAY

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF; NA

==============================
M000333    A8a/A8a.T. Attention to local news
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   A8a/A8a.T.

   IF NUMBER OF DAYS WATCHED IS NOT 0 FOR BOTH EARLY AND LATE LOCAL NEWS:

       FTF:
       Please look at page 1 of the booklet.
       How much attention do you pay to news on local news
       shows about the campaign for President -- a great deal,
       quite a bit, some, very little, or none?

       TELEPHONE:
       How much attention do you pay to news on local news
       shows about the campaign for President --
       a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL
       2. QUITE A BIT
       3. SOME
       4. VERY LITTLE
       5. NONE

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,8,9 in A7 and A8

==============================
M000334    A9. Does R have cable or satellite tv
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   A9.

       Do you have either cable or satellite television?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Yes
       5. No

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000335    A10. Days R read a daily newspaper
           MD1: EQ 8,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   A10.

       How many days in the past week did you read a daily
       newspaper?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0. NONE         --> SKIP TO A11
       1. ONE DAY
       2. TWO DAYS
       3. THREE DAYS
       4. FOUR DAYS
       5. FIVE DAYS
       6. SIX DAYS
       7. EVERY DAY

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF; NA

==============================
M000336    A10a. Did R read about campaign in paper
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   A10a.

   IF R READ/DK IF READ NEWSPAPER ANY DAYS IN PAST WEEK:

       Did you read about the campaign in any newspaper?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO           --> SKIP TO A11

       8. DON'T KNOW   --> SKIP TO A11
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,8,9 in A10

==============================
M000337    A10b/A10b.T. Attention to newspaper articles
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   A10b/A10b.T.

   IF R READ/DK IF READ NEWSPAPER ANY DAYS IN PAST WEEK:
   IF R READ ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN:

       FTF:
       (Please look at page 1 of the booklet.)
       How much attention do you pay to newspaper articles
       about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite
       a bit, some, very little, or none?

       TELEPHONE:
       How much attention do you pay to newspaper articles
       about the  campaign for President -- a great deal, quite
       a bit, some, very little, or none?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL
       2. QUITE A BIT
       3. SOME
       4. VERY LITTLE
       5. NONE

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in A10a

==============================
M000338    A11. Did R see ads for candidates on tv
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   A11.

       Do you recall seeing any ads for political candidates
       on television this fall?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Yes
       5. No

       8. Don't Know
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000339    A12. Approve/disappr Clinton job
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   A12.

       Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is
       handling his job as president?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. APPROVE
       5. DISAPPROVE

       8. DON'T KNOW      --> SKIP TO B1
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000340    A12a. Strength of approval/disapproval of Clinton
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   A12a.

   IF R APPROVES CLINTON HANDLING JOB AS PRESIDENT/
   IF R DISAPPROVES CLINTON HANDLING JOB AS PRESIDENT:

       Strongly or not strongly?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY
       5. NOT STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in A12

==============================
M000341    A12x. Summary app/disapp Clinton job
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   A12x.

       Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is
       handling his job as president?
       Strongly or not strongly?

       SUMMARY: APPROVAL/ DISAPPROVAL OF CLINTON JOB AS PRESIDENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from A12 and A12a.

       1. Approve strongly
       2. Approve not strongly
       4. Disapprove not strongly
       5. Disapprove strongly

       8. DK (in A12 or A12a)
       9. RF (in A12 or A12b)
       0. NA

==============================
M000342    B1. Did R care about House election
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B1.

       As you know, representatives to Congress in Washington
       are being chosen in this election from congressional
       districts all around the country.  How much would you
       say that you personally care about the way the election
       to the U.S. House of Representatives comes out: do you
       care very much, pretty much, not very much or not at all?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY MUCH
       2. PRETTY MUCH
       3. NOT VERY MUCH
       4. NOT AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000343    B2. Does R remember names of House cands
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B2.

       Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates
       for Congress -- that is, for the House of
       Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the
       November election from this district?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO   --> SKIP TO B3

       8. DK   --> SKIP TO B3
       9. RF
       0. NA; Washington D.C.

==============================
M000344    B2a. #1 recalled name, House cand
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   B2a.

   IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES:

       Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates
       for Congress -- that is, for the House of
       Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the
       November election from this district?
       Who are they?

       1ST RECALLED NAME - CANDIDATE CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANY OTHERS?]
       ** codes 30,38,39 used only if name appears on candidate
       list (if name not on candidate list, code 97 is used)

       30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent **
       31. Democratic candidate in open House race
       32. Republican candidate in open House race
       33. Democratic House incumbent
       34. Republican House incumbent
       35. Democratic House challenger
       36. Republican House challenger
       38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent **
       39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent
       97. Name not on candidate list for this race

       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.

==============================
M000345    B2a1. #1 recall party, House cand
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B2a1.

   IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES:

       Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates
       for Congress -- that is, for the House of
       Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the
       November election from this district?
       Who are they?
       What is [NAME'S] party?

       1ST RECALLED NAME - RECALLED PARTY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Democrat
       2. Republican
       7. Other Party (specify)

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.

==============================
M000346    B2ax1. #1 House cand recall-actual party
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B2ax1.

   IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES:

       Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates
       for Congress -- that is, for the House of
       Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the
       November election from this district?
       Who are they?

       1ST RECALLED NAME - ACTUAL PARTY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Democratic candidate (31,33,35)
       2. Republican candidate (32,34,36)
       3. Other (30,39)
       7. Name given not on candidate list (97)

       8. DK name but know party
       9. DK name and DK/NA party; NA; RF
       0. INAP, 5,8,9,0 in B2


==============================
M000347    B2ax2. #1 House cand recall- accuracy
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   B2ax2.

   IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES:

       Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates
       for Congress -- that is, for the House of
       Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the
       November election from this district?
       Who are they?
       What is [NAME'S] party?

       1ST RECALLED NAME - ACCURACY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1.  Valid candidate name given and correct party
           associated with name
       2.  Valid candidate name given but incorrect party
           associated with name
       3.  Valid candidate name given, DK or NA for party
           associated with name
       4.  Invalid candidate name given with any mention of
           party associated with name
       5.  Invalid candidate name given with DK or NA for party
           associated with name
       6.  No candidate name given (DK or NA) -- any party
           mention
       7.  No candidate name given (DK) -- DK or NA for party

       9.  NA for candidate name and NA for party mention
       0.  Inap, 5,8,9,0 in B2

==============================
M000348    B2b. #2 recalled name, House cand
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   B2b.

   IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES:

       Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates
       for Congress -- that is, for the House of
       Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the
       November election from this district?
       Who are they?

       2ND RECALLED NAME - CANDIDATE CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANY OTHERS?]
       ** codes 30,38,39 used only if name appears on candidate
       list (if name not on candidate list, code 97 is used)

       30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent **
       31. Democratic candidate in open House race
       32. Republican candidate in open House race
       33. Democratic House incumbent
       34. Republican House incumbent
       35. Democratic House challenger
       36. Republican House challenger
       38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent **
       39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent
       97. Name not on candidate list or this race

       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.;
           no further mention

==============================
M000349    B2b1. #2 recall party, House cand
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B2b1.

   IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES:

       Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates
       for Congress -- that is, for the House of
       Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the
       November election from this district?
       Who are they?
       What is [NAME'S] party?

       2ND RECALLED NAME - RECALLED PARTY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Democrat
       2. Republican
       7. Other Party (specify)

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.;
          no further mention

==============================
M000350    B2bx1. #2 House cand recall-actual party
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B2bx1.

   IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES:

       Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates
       for Congress -- that is, for the House of
       Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the
       November election from this district?
       Who are they?

       2ND RECALLED NAME - ACTUAL PARTY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Democratic candidate (31,33,35)
       2. Republican candidate (32,34,36)
       3. Other (30,39)
       7. Name given not on candidate list (97)

       8. DK name but know party
       9. DK name and DK/NA party; NA; RF
       0. INAP, 5,8,9,0 in B2; no further mention

==============================
M000351    B2bx2. #2 House cand recall- accuracy
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   B2bx2.

   IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES:

       Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates
       for Congress -- that is, for the House of
       Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the
       November election from this district?
       Who are they?
       What is [NAME'S] party?

       2ND RECALLED NAME - ACCCURACY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1.  Valid candidate name given and correct party
           associated with name
       2.  Valid candidate name given but incorrect party
           associated with name
       3.  Valid candidate name given, DK or NA for party
           associated with name
       4.  Invalid candidate name given with any mention of
           party associated with name
       5.  Invalid candidate name given with DK or NA for party
           associated with name
       6.  No candidate name given (DK or NA) -- any party
           mention
       7.  No candidate name given (DK) -- DK or NA for party

       9.  NA for candidate name and NA for party mention
       0.  Inap, 5,8,9,0 in B2; no further mention

==============================
M000352    B2c. #3 recalled name, House cand
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   B2c.

   IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES:

       Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates
       for Congress -- that is, for the House of
       Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the
       November election from this district?
       Who are they?

       3RD RECALLED NAME - CANDIDATE CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANY OTHERS?]
       ** codes 30,38,39 used only if name appears on candidate
       list (if name not on candidate list, code 97 is used)

       30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent **
       31. Democratic candidate in open House race
       32. Republican candidate in open House race
       33. Democratic House incumbent
       34. Republican House incumbent
       35. Democratic House challenger
       36. Republican House challenger
       38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent **
       39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent
       97. Name not on candidate list for this race

       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.;
           no further mention

==============================
M000353    B2c1. #3 recall party, House cand
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B2c1.

   IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES:

       Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates
       for Congress -- that is, for the House of
       Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the
       November election from this district?
       Who are they?
       What is [NAME'S] party?

       3RD RECALLED NAME - RECALLED PARTY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Democrat
       2. Republican
       7. Other Party (specify)

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.;
          no further mention

==============================
M000354    B2cx1. #3 House cand recall-actual party
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B2cx1.

   IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES:

       Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates
       for Congress -- that is, for the House of
       Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the
       November election from this district?
       Who are they?

       3RD RECALLED NAME - ACTUAL PARTY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Democratic candidate (31,33,35)
       2. Republican candidate (32,34,36)
       3. Other (30,39)
       7. Name given not on candidate list (97)

       8. DK name but know party
       9. DK name and DK/NA party; NA; RF
       0. INAP, 5,8,9,0 in B2; no further mention

==============================
M000355    B2cx2. #3 House cand recall-accuracy
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   B2cx2.

   IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES:

       Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates
       for Congress -- that is, for the House of
       Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the
       November election from this district?
       Who are they?
       What is [NAME'S] party?

       3RD RECALLED NAME - ACCURACY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1.  Valid candidate name given and correct party
           associated with name
       2.  Valid candidate name given but incorrect party
           associated with name
       3.  Valid candidate name given, DK or NA for party
           associated with name
       4.  Invalid candidate name given with any mention of
           party associated with name
       5.  Invalid candidate name given with DK or NA for party
           associated with name
       6.  No candidate name given (DK or NA) -- any party
           mention
       7.  No candidate name given (DK) -- DK or NA for party

       9.  NA for candidate name and NA for party mention
       0.  Inap, 5,8,9,0 in B2; no further mention

==============================
M000356    B3. Congress job approve/dissapr
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B3.

       Do you approve or disapprove of the way the U.S.
       Congress has been handling its job?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. APPROVE
       5. DISAPPROVE

       8. DON'T KNOW   --> SKIP TO C1
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000357    B3a. Strength of approval/disapproval of Cong
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B3a.

   IF R APPROVES U.S. CONGRESS HANDLING ITS JOB/
   IF R DISAPPROVES U.S. CONGRESS HANDLING ITS JOB:

       (Do you approve or disapprove of the way the U.S.
       Congress has been handling its job?)
       Strongly or not strongly?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY
       5. NOT STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in B3

==============================
M000358    B3x. Summary R approval of US Congress
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B3x.

       Do you approve or disapprove of the way the U.S.
       Congress has been handling its job?
       Strongly or not strongly?

       SUMMARY:  R APPROVAL OF U.S. CONGRESS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from B3 and B3a.

       1. Approve strongly
       2. Approve not strongly
       4. Disapprove not strongly
       5. Disapprove not strongly

       8. DK (in B3 or B3a)
       9. RF (in B3 or B3a)
       0. NA

==============================
M000359    C1a/C1a.T. Thermometer Bill Clinton
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 997
           Numeric

   C1a/C1a.T.

       FTF:
       (Looking at page 2 of the booklet)
       (How would you rate:)
       Bill Clinton

       TELEPHONE:
       The first person is:
       Bill Clinton
       Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate Bill
       Clinton?

       THERMOMETER - BILL CLINTON
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO
       YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
       SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were
       administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and
       C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names;
       C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names.
       C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name.

       0-100

       995. NA
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M000360    C1b/C1b.T. Thermometer Gore
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 997
           Numeric

   C1b/C1b.T.

       FTF:
       (Looking at page 2 of the booklet)
       (How would you rate:)
       Al Gore

       TELEPHONE:
       The next person is:
       Al Gore
       (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him?)

       THERMOMETER - AL GORE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO
       YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
       SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were
       administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and
       C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names;
       C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names.
       C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M000361    C1c/C1c.T. Thermometer George W Bush
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 997
           Numeric

   C1c/C1c.T.

       FTF:
       (Looking at page 2 of the booklet)
       (How would you rate:)
       George W. Bush

       TELEPHONE:
       The next person is:
       George W. Bush
       (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him?)

       THERMOMETER - GEORGE W. BUSH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO
       YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
       SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were
       administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and
       C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names;
       C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names.
       C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M000362    C1d/C1d.T. Thermometer Buchanan
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 997
           Numeric

   C1d/C1d.T.

       FTF:
       (Looking at page 2 of the booklet)
       (How would you rate:)
       Pat Buchanan

       TELEPHONE:
       The next person is:
       Pat Buchanan
       (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him

       THERMOMETER - PAT BUCHANAN
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO
       YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
       SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were
       administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and
       C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names;
       C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names.
       C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M000363    C1e/C1e.T. Thermometer Nader
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 997
           Numeric

   C1e/C1e.T.

       FTF:
       (Looking at page 2 of the booklet)
       (How would you rate:)
       Ralph Nader

       TELEPHONE:
       The next person is:
       Ralph Nader
       (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him?)

       THERMOMETER - RALPH NADER
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO
       YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
       SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were
       administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and
       C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names;
       C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names.
       C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M000364    C1f/C1f.T. Thermometer Mccain
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 997
           Numeric

   C1f/C1f.T.

       FTF:
       (Looking at page 2 of the booklet)
       (How would you rate:)
       John McCain

       TELEPHONE:
       The next person is:
       John McCain
       (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him?

       THERMOMETER - JOHN MCCAIN
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO
       YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
       SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were
       administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and
       C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names;
       C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names.
       C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M000365    C1g/C1g.T. Thermometer Bradley
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 997
           Numeric

   C1g/C1g.T.

       FTF:
       (Looking at page 2 of the booklet)
       (How would you rate:)
       Bill Bradley

       TELEPHONE:
       The next person is:
       Bill Bradley
       (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him?)

       THERMOMETER - BILL BRADLEY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO
       YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
       SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were
       administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and
       C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names;
       C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names.
       C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M000366    C1h/C1h.T. Thermometer Lieberman
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 997
           Numeric

   C1h/C1h.T.

       FTF:
       (Looking at page 2 of the booklet)
       (How would you rate:)
       Joseph Lieberman

       TELEPHONE:
       The next person is::
       Joseph Lieberman
       (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him?)

       THERMOMETER - JOSEPH LIEBERMAN
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO
       YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
       SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were
       administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and
       C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names;
       C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names.
       C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M000367    C1j/C1j.T. Thermometer Cheney
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 997
           Numeric

   C1j/C1j.T.

       FTF:
       (Looking at page 2 of the booklet)
       (How would you rate:)
       Dick Cheney

       TELEPHONE:
       The next person is::
       Dick Cheney
       (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate him?)

       THERMOMETER - DICK CHENEY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO
       YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
       SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were
       administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and
       C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names;
       C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names.
       C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M000368    C1k/C1k.T. Thermometer Hillary Clinton
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 997
           Numeric

   C1k/C1k.T.

       FTF:
       (Looking at page 2 of the booklet)
       (How would you rate:)
       Hillary Clinton

       TELEPHONE:
       The next person is::
       Hillary Clinton
       (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate her?)

       THERMOMETER - HILLARY CLINTON
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY DON'T KNOW DO
       YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
       SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       After C1a was administered as the first name, C1b-C1e were
       administered in random order as the 2nd-5th names; C1f and
       C1g were randomly administered as the 6th or 7th names;
       C1h-C1j were randomly adminstered as the 8th or 9th names.
       C1k was administerd as the last (10th) name.

       0-100

       995. NA
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

............................................................................

   C2.

       Still using the thermometer:

==============================
M000369    C2a. Thermometer Dem Party
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 997
           Numeric

   C2a.

       (How would you rate:)
       the Democratic Party

       THERMOMETER - DEMOCRATIC PARTY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       C2a, C2b, C2c were administered in random order; C2d was
       administered last.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M000370    C2b. Thermometer Rep Party
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 997
           Numeric

   C2b.

       (How would you rate:)
       the Republican Party

       THERMOMETER - REPUBLICAN PARTY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       C2a, C2b, C2c were administered in random order; C2d was
       administered last.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M000371    C2c. Thermometer Reform Party
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 997
           Numeric

   C2c.

       (How would you rate:)
       Reform Party

       THERMOMETER - REFORM PARTY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       C2a, C2b, C2c were administered in random order; C2d was
       administered last.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M000372    C2d. Thermometer parties in general
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 997
           Numeric

   C2d.

       (How would you rate:)
       Political parties in general

       THERMOMETER - POLITICAL PARTIES IN GENERAL
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       C2a, C2b, C2c were administered in random order; C2d was
       administered last.

       0-100

       995. NA
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

............................................................................

   D0.

       I'd like to ask you what you think are the good and bad
       points about the two national parties.

==============================
M000373    D1. Like anything- Dem Party
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   D1.

       Is there anything in particular that you like about the
       Democratic party?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order of the D1/D2 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about
       Democratic Party) and the D3/D4 series ('likes' and
       'dislikes' about the Republican party) was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. YES
       5. NO             --> SKIP TO D2

       8. DON'T KNOW     --> SKIP TO D2
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000374    D1a(1). #1 like Dem Party
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9001
           Numeric

   D1a(1).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY:

       Is there anything in particular that you like about the
       Democratic party?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 1 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY?
       UNTIL R SAYS NO.]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       9001. R has been influenced by spouse
       9002. R has been influenced by someone else
       9995. NA
       9998. DK
       9999. Refused to say
       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D1

==============================
M000375    D1a(2). #2 like Dem Party
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   D1a(2).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY:

       Is there anything in particular that you like about the
       Democratic party?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 2 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY?
       UNTIL R SAYS NO.]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D1; no further mentions

==============================
M000376    D1a(3). #3 like Dem Party
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   D1a(3).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY:

       Is there anything in particular that you like about the
       Democratic party?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 3 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY?
       UNTIL R SAYS NO.]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D1; no further mentions

==============================
M000377    D1a(4). #4 like Dem Party
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   D1a(4).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY:

       Is there anything in particular that you like about the
       Democratic party?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 4 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY?
       UNTIL R SAYS NO.]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D1; no further mentions

==============================
M000378    D1a(5). #5 like Dem Party
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   D1a(5).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY:

       Is there anything in particular that you like about the
       Democratic party?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 5 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY?
       UNTIL R SAYS NO.]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D1; no further mentions

==============================
M000379    D2. Dislike anything- Dem Party
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   D2.

       Is there anything in particular that you don't like
       about the Democratic party?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order of the D1/D2 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about
       Democratic Party) and the D3/D4 series ('likes' and
       'dislikes' about the Republican party) was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. YES
       5. NO              --> SKIP TO D3 or D5

==============================
M000380    D2a(1). #1 dislike Dem Party
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9001
           Numeric

   D2a(1).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY:

       Is there anything in particular that you don't like
       about the Democratic party?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 1 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
       UNTIL R SAYS NO.]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       9001. R has been influenced by spouse
       9002. R has been influenced by someone else
       9995. NA
       9998. DK
       9999. Refused to say
       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D2

==============================
M000381    D2a(2). #2 dislike Dem Party
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   D2a(2).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY:

       Is there anything in particular that you don't like
       about the Democratic party?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 2 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
       UNTIL R SAYS NO.]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D2; no further mentions

==============================
M000382    D2a(3). #3 dislike Dem Party
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   D2a(3).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY:

       Is there anything in particular that you don't like
       about the Democratic party?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 3 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
       UNTIL R SAYS NO.]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D2; no further mentions

==============================
M000383    D2a(4). #4 dislike Dem Party
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   D2a(4).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY:

       Is there anything in particular that you don't like
       about the Democratic party?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 4 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
       UNTIL R SAYS NO.]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D2; no further mentions

==============================
M000384    D2a(5). #5 dislike Dem Party
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   D2a(5).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY:

       Is there anything in particular that you don't like
       about the Democratic party?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 5 - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
       UNTIL R SAYS NO.]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D2; no further mentions

==============================
M000385    D3. Like anything- Rep Party
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   D3.

       Is there anything in particular that you like about the
       Republican party?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order of the D1/D2 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about
       Democratic Party) and the D3/D4 series ('likes' and
       'dislikes' about the Republican party) was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. YES
       5. NO              --> SKIP TO D4

       8. DON'T KNOW      --> SKIP TO D4
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000386    D3a(1). #1 like Rep Party
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9001
           Numeric

   D3a(1).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY:

       Is there anything in particular that you like about the
       Republican party?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 1 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY?
       UNTIL R SAYS NO.]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       9001. R has been influenced by spouse
       9002. R has been influenced by someone else
       9995. NA
       9998. DK
       9999. Refused to say
       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D3

==============================
M000387    D3a(2). #2 like Rep Party
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   D3a(2).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY:

       Is there anything in particular that you like about the
       Republican party?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 2 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY?
       UNTIL R SAYS NO.]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D3; no further mentions

==============================
M000388    D3a(3). #3 like Rep Party
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   D3a(3).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY:

       Is there anything in particular that you like about the
       Republican party?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 3 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY?
       UNTIL R SAYS NO.]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D3; no further mentions

==============================
M000389    D3a(4). #4 like Rep Party
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   D3a(4).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY:

       Is there anything in particular that you like about the
       Republican party?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 4 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY?
       UNTIL R SAYS NO.]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D3; no further mentions

==============================
M000390    D3a(5). #5 like Rep Party
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   D3a(5).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R LIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY:

       Is there anything in particular that you like about the
       Republican party?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 5 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE YOU LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY?
       UNTIL R SAYS NO.]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D3; no further mentions

==============================
M000391    D4. Dislike anything- Rep Party
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   D4.

       Is there anything in particular that you don't like
       about the Republican party?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order of the D1/D2 series ('likes' and 'dislikes' about
       Democratic Party) and the D3/D4 series ('likes' and
       'dislikes' about the Republican party) was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. YES
       5. NO              --> SKIP TO D1 or D5

       8. DON'T KNOW      --> SKIP TO D1 or D5
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000392    D4a(1). #1 dislike Rep Party
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9001
           Numeric

   D4a(1).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY:

       Is there anything in particular that you don't like
       about the Republican party?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 1 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY?
       UNTIL R SAYS NO.]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       9001. R has been influenced by spouse
       9002. R has been influenced by someone else
       9995. NA
       9998. DK
       9999. Refused to say
       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D4

==============================
M000393    D4a(2). #2 dislike Rep Party
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   D4a(2).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY:

       Is there anything in particular that you don't like
       about the Republican party?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 2 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY?
       UNTIL R SAYS NO.]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D4; no further mentions

==============================
M000394    D4a(3). #3 dislike Rep Party
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   D4a(3).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY:

       Is there anything in particular that you don't like
       about the Republican party?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 3 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY?
       UNTIL R SAYS NO.]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D4; no further mentions

==============================
M000395    D4a(4). #4 dislike Rep Party
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   D4a(4).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY:

       Is there anything in particular that you don't like
       about the Republican party?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 4 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY?
       UNTIL R SAYS NO.]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D4; no further mentions

==============================
M000396    D4a(5). #5 dislike Rep Party
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   D4a(5).

   IF R SAYS THERE IS SOMETHING R DISLIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY:

       Is there anything in particular that you don't like
       about the Republican party?
       (What is that?)

       MENTION 5 - REPUBLICAN PARTY 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTING ELSE YOU DON'T LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY?
       UNTIL R SAYS NO.]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in D4; no further mentions

==============================
M000397    D5. Preference for divided government
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   D5.

       Do you think it is better when one party controls both
       the presidency and Congress, better when control is
       split between the Democrats and Republicans, or doesn't
       it matter?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. BETTER WHEN ONE PARTY CONTROLS BOTH
       3. BETTER WHEN CONTROL IS SPLIT
       5. IT DOESN'T MATTER

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000398    E1/E1.T. Better/worse off in last year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   E1/E1.T.

       FTF:
       We are interested in how people are getting along
       financially these days. Would you say that you (and your
       family living here) are better off, worse off, or just
       about the same financially as you were a year ago?

       TELEPHONE:
       We are interested in how people are getting along
       financially these days. Would you say that you (and your
       family) are better off, worse off, or just about the
       same financially as you were a year ago?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       A half-sample of respondents was randomly selected for
       administration of the E section.

       1. BETTER
       3. WORSE          --> Skip to E1b
       5. THE SAME       --> Skip to E2

       8. DK             --> Skip to E2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R not selected for half-sample

==============================
M000399    E1a. How much better off- last year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   E1a.

   IF R'S FAMILY HAS BEEN BETTER OFF IN LAST YEAR:

       Much better or somewhat better?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Much Better      --> E2
       5. Somewhat Better  --> E2

       8. DK               --> E2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in E1/E1.T

==============================
M000400    E1b. How much worse off- last year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   E1b.

   IF R'S FAMILY HAS BEEN WORSE OFF IN LAST YEAR:

       Much worse or somewhat worse?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Much Worse
       5. Somewhat Worse

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in E1/E1.T

==============================
M000401    E1x. Summary R econ situation last year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   E1x.

       Would you say that you (and your family [FTF: living
       here]) are better off, worse off, or just about the same
       financially as you were a year ago?
       Much better/worse or somewhat better/worse?

       SUMMARY - R FINANCIAL SITUATION IN PAST YEAR
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from E1/E1.T and E1a/E1b.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. Same
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK (in E1 or E1a/E1b)
       9. RF (in E1 or E1a/E1b)
       0. NA; INAP, R not selected for half-sample

==============================
M000402    E2/E2.T. Did R delay med/dent treatment
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   E2/E2.T.

       FTF:
       In the past year did you (or anyone in your family
       living here) put off medical or dental treatment
       because you didn't have the money?

       TELEPHONE:
       In the past year did you (or anyone in your family)
       put off medical or dental treatment because you didn't
       have the money?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       A half-sample of respondents was randomly selected for
       administration of the E section.

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R not selected for half-sample

==============================
M000403    E3/E3.T. Expect better/worse in next year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   E3/E3.T.

       FTF:
       Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you
       (and your family living here) will be better off
       financially, worse off, or just about the same as now?

       TELEPHONE:
       Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you
       (and your family) will be better off financially, worse
       off, or just about the same as now?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       A half-sample of respondents was randomly selected for
       administration of the E section.

       1. BETTER
       3. WORSE          --> Skip to E3B
       5. THE SAME       --> Skip to F1

       8. DK             --> Skip to F1
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R not selected for half-sample

==============================
M000404    E3a. How much better off- next year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   E3a.

   IF R THINKS FAMILY WILL BE BETTER OFF A YEAR FROM NOW:

       Much better off or somewhat better off?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH BETTER       --> SKIP to F1
       5. SOMEWHAT BETTER   --> SKIP to F1

       8. DK                --> SKIP to F1
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in E3/E3.T

==============================
M000405    E3b. How much worse off- next year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   E3b.

   IF R THINKS FAMILY WILL BE WORSE OFF A YEAR FROM NOW:

       Much worse off or somewhat worse off?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH WORSE
       5. SOMEWHAT WORSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in E3/E3.T

==============================
M000406    E3x. Summary R econ situation next year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   E3x.

       Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you
       (and your family [FTF: living here]) will be better off
       financially, worse off, or just about the same as now?
       Much better/worse off or somewhat better/worse off?

       SUMMARY: R FINANCIAL SITUATION IN NEXT YEAR
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from E3 and E3a/b.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. Just about the same
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK (in E3 or E3a/E3b)
       9. RF (in E 3 or E3a/E3b)
       0. NA; INAP, R not selected for half sample


==============================
M000407    F1a. Angry- Gore affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F1a.

       (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind
       of person he is, or because of something he has
       done) -- ever made you feel:
       ANGRY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore
       F1 series, GW Bush F2 series , and Buchanan F3 series) is
       randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects
       is also randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. YES
       5. NO    --> SKIP to next F1 in randomization

       8. DK    --> SKIP to next F1 in randomization
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000408    F1aa. Angry- how often Gore affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F1aa.

   IF R SAYS GORE HAS MADE R FEEL ANGRY:

       How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often,
       fairly often, occasionally, or rarely?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Very often
       2. Fairly often
       3. Occasionally
       4. Rarely

==============================
M000409    F1b. Hopeful- Gore affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F1b.

       (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind
       of person he is, or because of something he has
       done) -- ever made you feel:
       HOPEFUL
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore
       F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is
       randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects
       is also randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. YES
       5. NO    --> SKIP to next F1 in randomization

       8. DK    --> SKIP to next F1 in randomization
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000410    F1bb. Hopeful- how often Gore affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F1bb.

   IF R SAYS GORE HAS MADE R FEEL HOPEFUL:

       How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very
       often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Very often
       2. Fairly often
       3. Occasionally
       4. Rarely

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F1b

==============================
M000411    F1c. Afraid- Gore affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F1c.

       (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind
       of person he is, or because of something he has
       done) -- ever made you feel:
       AFRAID
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore
       F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is
       randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects
       is also randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. Yes
       5. No  --> Next F1 In Randomization

       8. DK  --> Next F1 In Randomization
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000412    F1cc. Afraid- how often Gore affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F1cc.

   IF R SAYS GORE HAS MADE R FEEL AFRAID:

       How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very
       often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Very Often
       2. Fairly Often
       3. Occasionally
       4. Rarely

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F1c

==============================
M000413    F1d. Proud- Gore affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F1d.

       (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind
       of person he is, or because of something he has
       done) -- ever made you feel:
       PROUD
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore
       F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is
       randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects
       is also randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. YES
       5. NO    --> SKIP to next F1 in randomization

       8. DK    --> SKIP to next F1 in randomization
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000414    F1dd. Proud- how often Gore affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F1dd.

   IF R SAYS GORE HAS MADE R FEEL PROUD:

       How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often,
       fairly often, occasionally, or rarely?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Very Often
       2. Fairly Often
       3. Occasionally
       4. Rarely

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F1d

==============================
M000415    F2a. Angry- Bush affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F2a.

       (Think about George W. Bush.)  Has George W. Bush
       (because of the kind of person he is, or because of
       something he has done --) ever made you feel:
       ANGRY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore
       F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is
       randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects
       is also randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. YES
       5. NO    --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization

       8. DK    --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000416    F2aa. Angry- how often Bush affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F2aa.

   IF R SAYS GEORGE W. BUSH HAS MADE R ANGRY:

       How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often,
       fairly often, occasionally, or rarely?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Very often
       2. Fairly often
       3. Occasionally
       4. Rarely

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F2a

==============================
M000417    F2b. Hopeful- Bush affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F2b.

       (Think about George W. Bush.)  Has George W. Bush
       (because of the kind of person he is, or because of
       something he has done --) ever made you feel:
       HOPEFUL
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore
       F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is
       randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects
       is also randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. YES
       5. NO    --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization

==============================
M000418    F2bb. Hopeful- how often Bush affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F2bb.

   IF R SAYS GEORGE W. BUSH HAS MADE R HOPEFUL:

       How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very
       often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Very often
       2. Fairly often
       3. Occasionally
       4. Rarely

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F26

==============================
M000419    F2c. Afraid- Bush affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F2c.

       (Think about George W. Bush.)  Has George W. Bush
       (because of the kind of person he is, or because of
       something he has done --) ever made you feel:
       AFRAID
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore
       F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is
       randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects
       is also randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. YES
       5. NO    --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization

       8. DK    --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000420    F2cc. Afraid- how often Bush affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F2cc.

   IF R SAYS GEORGE W. BUSH HAS MADE R AFRAID:

       How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very
       often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Very often
       2. Fairly often
       3. Occasionally
       4. Rarely

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F2c

==============================
M000421    F2d. Proud- Bush affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F2d.

       (Think about George W. Bush.)  Has George W. Bush
       (because of the kind of person he is, or because of
       something he has done --) ever made you feel:
       PROUD
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore
       F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is
       randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects
       is also randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. YES
       5. NO    --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization

       8. DK    --> SKIP to next F2 in randomization
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000422    F2dd. Proud- how often Bush affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F2dd.

   IF R SAYS GEORGE W. BUSH HAS MADE R PROUD:

       How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often,
       fairly often, occasionally, or rarely?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Very often
       2. Fairly often
       3. Occasionally
       4. Rarely

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F2d

==============================
M000423    F3a. Angry- Buchanan affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F3a.

       (Think about Pat Buchanan.)  Has Pat Buchanan (because
       of the kind of person he is, or because of
       something he has done --) ever made you feel:
       ANGRY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore
       F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is
       randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects
       is also randomized.
       Buchanan affects were dropped during the field period
       (09/28/00).

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. Yes
       5. No  --> Next F3 In Randomization

       8. DK    --> SKIP to next F3 in randomization
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, question dropped

==============================
M000424    F3aa. Angry- how often Buchanan affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F3aa.

   IF R SAYS BUCHANAN HAS MADE R ANGRY:

       How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often,
       fairly often, occasionally, or rarely?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Very often
       2. Fairly often
       3. Occasionally
       4. Rarely

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F3a

==============================
M000425    F3b. Hopeful- Buchanan affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F3b.

       (Think about Pat Buchanan.)  Has Pat Buchanan (because
       of the kind of person he is, or because of
       something he has done --) ever made you feel:
       HOPEFUL
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore
       F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is
       randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects
       is also randomized.
       Buchanan affects were dropped during the field period
       (09/28/00).

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. Yes
       5. No   --> Next F3 In Randomization

       8. DK    --> SKIP to next F3 in randomization
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, question dropped

==============================
M000426    F3bb. Hopeful- how often Buchanan affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F3bb.

   IF R SAYS BUCHANAN HAS MADE R HOPEFUL:

       How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very
       often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Very often
       2. Fairly often
       3. Occasionally
       4. Rarely

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F3b

==============================
M000427    F3c. Afraid- Buchanan affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F3c.

       (Think about Pat Buchanan.)  Has Pat Buchanan (because
       of the kind of person he is, or because of
       something he has done --) ever made you feel:
       AFRAID
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore
       F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is
       randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects
       is also randomized.
       Buchanan affects were dropped during the field period
       (09/28/00).

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. Yes
       5. No   --> Next F3 In Randomization

       8. DK    --> SKIP to next F3 in randomization
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, question dropped

==============================
M000428    F3cc. Afraid- how often Buchanan affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F3cc.

   IF R SAYS BUCHANAN HAS MADE R AFRAID:

       How often would you say you've felt afraid-- very
       often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Very often
       2. Fairly often
       3. Occasionally
       4. Rarely

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F3c

==============================
M000429    F3d. Proud- Buchanan affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F3d.

       (Think about Pat Buchanan.)  Has Pat Buchanan (because
       of the kind of person he is, or because of
       something he has done --) ever made you feel:
       PROUD
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order of Presidential candidate affects series (Gore
       F1 series, GW Bush F2 series, and Buchanan F3 series) is
       randomized; for each candidate, the order of affects
       is also randomized.
       Buchanan affects were dropped during the field period
       (09/28/00).

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. Yes
       5. No  --> Next F3 In Randomization

       8. DK    --> SKIP to next F3 in randomization
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, question dropped

==============================
M000430    F3dd. Proud- how often Buchanan affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F3dd.

   IF R SAYS BUCHANAN HAS MADE R PROUD:

       How often would you say you've felt proud -- very
       often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Very often
       2. Fairly often
       3. Occasionally
       4. Rarely

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in F3d

==============================
M000431    F6(1). #1 most important problem
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 991
           Numeric

   F6(1).

       What do you think are the most important problems facing
       this country?

       MENTION 1 - MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT PROBLEMS FACING THE COUNTRY?
       UNTIL R SAYS NONE]
       A half sample of Rs were randomly selected for administration of
       the 'most important problem' questions F6-F7.
       See MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM master code.
       Codes 001-899 and:

       990. Other specific mention not codeable elsewhere

       991. "There were no issues"; "no issues, just party politics"
       992. "There was no campaign in my district"
       995. NA
       998. DK
       999. RF
       000. Inap, R not selected for half-sample administration (see
            Pre-Admin.2b, P000005b=0)

==============================
M000432    F6(2). #2 most important problem
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   F6(2).

       What do you think are the most important problems facing
       this country?

       MENTION 2 - MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT PROBLEMS FACING THE COUNTRY?
       UNTIL R SAYS NONE]
       See MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM master code.
       Codes 001-899 and:

       990. Other specific mention not codeable elsewhere

       000. INAP, 000, 991-999 in F6(1); no further mention

==============================
M000433    F6(3). #3 most important problem
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   F6(3).

       What do you think are the most important problems facing
       this country?

       MENTION 3 - MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT PROBLEMS FACING THE COUNTRY?
       UNTIL R SAYS NONE]
       See MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM master code.
       Codes 001-899 and:

       990. Other specific mention not codeable elsewhere

       000. INAP, 000, 991-999 in F6(1); no further mention

==============================
M000434    F6(4). #4 most important problem
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   F6(4).

       What do you think are the most important problems facing
       this country?

       MENTION 4 - MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT PROBLEMS FACING THE COUNTRY?
       UNTIL R SAYS NONE]
       See MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM master code.
       Codes 001-899 and:

       990. Other specific mention not codeable elsewhere

       000. INAP, 000, 991-999 in F6(1); no further mention

==============================
M000435    F6x. Checkpoint for # of mentions
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   F6x.

       CHECKPOINT: NUMBER OF IMPORTANT PROBLEMS MENTIONED BY R
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [IF UNSURE WHETHER ONE PROBLEM OR MORE THAN ONE PROBLEM, CODE
       MORE THAN 1.]
       A half sample of Rs were randomly selected for administration of
       the 'most important problem' questions F6-F7.

       0. No problem mentioned (000, 991-999 in F6(1))
       1. One problem mentioned
       2. Two or more problems mentioned

       9. R not selected for administration of F6-F7

==============================
M000436    F7. Choice - most important problem
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 998
           Numeric

   F7.

   IF R HAS MADE 2 OR MORE MENTIONS OF 'MOST IMPORTANT' PROBLEM:

       Of those you've mentioned, what would you say is the
       single most important problem the country faces?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       A half sample of Rs were randomly selected for administration of
       the 'most important problem' questions F6-F7.
       See MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM master code.
       If R mentioned only 1 problem, that mention is duplicated here.
       Codes 001-899 and:

       990. Other specific mention not codeable elsewhere

       998. DK
       999. RF
       000. Inap, R not selected for administration of F6-F7 (0 in F6x)

==============================
M000437    F8. Gov't performance on most imp problem
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F8.

   IF R HAS MADE ANY MENTION OF 'MOST IMPORTANT' PROBLEM:

       How good a job is the government in Washington doing in
       dealing with this problem -- a good job, only fair, or a
       poor job?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       A half-sample of respondents was randomly selected for
       administration of section F.

       1. A GOOD JOB
       3. ONLY FAIR
       5. A POOR JOB

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R not selected for section
          F administration; 0,9 in F6x

==============================
M000438    F9. Party performance on most imp problem
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F9.

   IF R HAS MADE ANY MENTION OF 'MOST IMPORTANT' PROBLEM:

       Which political party do you think would be most likely
       to get the government to do a better job in
       dealing with this problem -- the Republicans, the
       Democrats, or wouldn't there be much difference
       between them?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       A half-sample of respondents was randomly selected for
       administration of section F.

       1. REPUBLICANS
       3. DEMOCRATS
       5. THERE WOULDN'T BE MUCH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM
       7. NEITHER PARTY [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R not selected for section
          F administration; 0,9 in F6x

==============================
M000439    G1a. Self placement lib-con scale
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G1a.

   IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:

       FTF:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a
       general description of the administration of liberal-
       conservative placements.
       FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       the 7-point scale (G1-G5) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E).
       For the telephone version of the 7-point scale, see G1a.T;
       for FTF (and telephone) branching format, see G6.E (P000442).

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL                   --> Skip to G2
       2. LIBERAL                             --> Skip to G2
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL                    --> Skip to G2
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD        --> G1b
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE               --> Skip to G2
       6. CONSERVATIVE                        --> Skip to G2
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE              --> Skip to G2

       8. DK                                  --> G1b
       9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode; R
          selected for branching version
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH [DO NOT PROBE] --> G1b

==============================
M000439a   G1a.T. Self placement lib-con scale phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G1a.T.

   IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:

       TELEPHONE:
       When it comes to politics, do you usually think of
       yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly
       liberal; moderate or middle of the road, slightly
       conservative, conservative, extremely conservative,
       or haven't you thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a
       general description of the administration of liberal-
       conservative placements.
       Phone respondents were randomly selected to be
       administered the 7-point scale (G1.T-G5.T) or branching
       format (G6.E-G10.E).
       For the FTF version of the 7-point scale, see G1a; for
       telephone (and FTF) branching format, see G6.E (P000442)

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL                   --> Skip to G2
       2. LIBERAL                             --> Skip to G2
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL                    --> Skip to G2
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD        --> G1b
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE               --> Skip to G2
       6. CONSERVATIVE                        --> Skip to G2
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE              --> Skip to G2

       8. DK                                  --> G1b
       9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode; R
          selected for branching version
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH [DO NOT PROBE] --> G1b

==============================
M000440    G1ax. Summary: combined FTF/ph
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G1ax.

   IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:

       FTF:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?

       TELEPHONE:
       When it comes to politics, do you usually think of
       yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly
       liberal; moderate or middle of the road, slightly
       conservative, conservative, extremely conservative,
       or haven't you thought much about this?

       COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT-SCALE LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE SELF-PLACEMENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from G1a and G1a.T.

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL
       2. LIBERAL
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE
       6. CONSERVATIVE
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, R selected for branching version
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH [DO NOT PROBE]

==============================
M000441    G1b. Had to choose lib-con self-placemt
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G1b.

   IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:
   IF SELF-PLACEMENT IS MODERATE, DK OR HAVEN'T THOUGHT:

       If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a
       liberal or a conservative?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. LIBERAL
       3. CONSERVATIVE
       5. MODERATE
       7. R REFUSES TO CHOOSE

       8. DK
       0. NA; INAP, 1-3, 5-7 or RF/NA in G1a or G1a.T; R selected
          for branching version

==============================
M000441a   G1bx. Summary: comb FTF/phone-lib-con
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G1bx.

   IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:

       FTF:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?
       If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a
       liberal or a conservative?

       TELEPHONE:
       When it comes to politics, do you usually think of
       yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly
       liberal; moderate or middle of the road, slightly
       conservative, conservative, extremely conservative,
       or haven't you thought much about this?
       If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a
       liberal or a conservative?

       SUMMARY:  3-CATEGORY LIB-CON SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT-SCALE SERIES:
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from G1ax and G1b.
       This is the traditional summary used in 7-pt scale FTF
       administration in previous years.
       Recode values used for each category appear in the order: G1a,G1b.

       1. Liberal  (1/2/3,0; 0/4/8,1)
       3. Moderate  (0/4/8,5; 4,7/8/9/NA)
       5. Conservative  (5/6/7,0; 0/4/8,3)
       7. Refused to choose  (0/8,7)

       8. DK  (0/8,8)
       9. NA/RF to entire question series  (RF/NA,0)
       0. NA to follow up question G4aa  (0/8,9/NA)

==============================
M000442    G6.E. Self placement lib-con branching
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G6.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:

       We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and
       conservatives.
       When it comes to politics, do you usually think of
       yourself as a liberal, a conservative, a moderate, or
       haven't you thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a
       general description of the administration of liberal-
       conservative placements.
       See also:  G1a and G1a.T (P000439 and P000439a).
       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       the 7-point scale (G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T) or branching format
       (G6.E-G10.E)

       1. A LIBERAL                            --> SKIP TO G6b.E
       3. A CONSERVATIVE                       --> SKIP TO G6a.E
       5. A MODERATE                           --> SKIP TO G6a.E
       7. NEITHER  [VOL]                       --> SKIP TO G6a.E

       8. DK                                   --> SKIP TO G6a.E
       9. RF; NA; INAP, R selected for
          7-point scale version
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH [DO NOT PROBE]  --> SKIP TO G6a.E

==============================
M000443    G6a.E. Had to choose lib-con branching
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G6a.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:
   IF SELF-PLACEMENT IS DK/NEITHER/MODERATE/NO THOUGHT:

       If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a
       liberal or a conservative?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. LIBERAL                     --> SKIP TO G7.E
       3. CONSERVATIVE                --> SKIP TO G7.E
       5. MODERATE[VOL]               --> SKIP TO G7.E
       7. R REFUSES TO CHOOSE [VOL]   --> SKIP TO G7.E

       8. DON'T KNOW                  --> SKIP TO G7.E
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,3,9 in G6.E

==============================
M000444    G6b.E. R strong liberal or not
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G6b.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:
   IF SELF-PLACEMENT IS LIBERAL:

       Would you call yourself a strong liberal or a not very
       strong liberal?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONG LIBERAL            --> SKIP TO G7.E
       5. NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL   --> SKIP TO G7.E

       8. DK                        --> SKIP TO G7.E
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3,5,7,8,9,0 in G6.E

==============================
M000445    G6c.E. R strong conservative or not
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G6c.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:
   IF SELF-PLACEMENT IS CONSERVATIVE:

       Would you call yourself a strong conservative or a not
       very strong conservative?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONG CONSERVATIVE
       5. NOT VERY STRONG CONSERVATIVE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,5,7,8,9,0 in G6.E

==============================
M000446    G6x1. Summary self plcmnt lib-con scale/brnch
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G6x1.

   BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES:

       7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place yourself on
       this scale, or haven't you thought much about this?
       If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a
       liberal or a conservative?
       7-POINT SCALE PHONE: When it comes to politics, do you
       usually think of yourself as extremely liberal, liberal,
       slightly liberal; moderate or middle of the road,
       slightly conservative, conservative, extremely
       conservative, or haven't you thought much about this?
       If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a
       liberal or a conservative?
       BRANCHING (FTF AND PHONE):
       When it comes to politics, do you usually think of
       yourself as a liberal, a conservative, a moderate, or
       haven't you thought much about this?
       If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a
       liberal or a conservative?
       Would you call yourself a strong liberal or a not very
       strong liberal?
       Would you call yourself a strong conservative or a not
       very strong conservative?

       COMBINED 7-POINT LIB-CON SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE /BRANCHING
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from:
       - branching data in G6.E, G6a.E, G6b.E, G6c.E.
       - 7-pt scale data in G1ax, G1b.
       NOTE: To make 7pt scale data comparable with the construction
       of a 7-pt summary of branching data, both the 7pt-scale data in
       G1ax and the "had to choose" data in G1b were used for
       constructing this summary.  For both 7pt-scale and branching cases,
       Rs who answered moderate (4 in 7pt-scale) or DK or 'haven't thought
       much' (branching: or 'neither') were asked for the "had to choose"
       selection of liberal or conservative. Branching: If R selected
       liberal or conservative but strength followup was missing data
       (typically: DK) then 'not strong' has been coded in G6x1.

       1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: strong liberal
       2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: not strong liberal
       3. SCALE: 3; had to choose liberal / BRANCHING: had to choose liberal
       4. SCALE: 4; had to choose moderate/ BRANCHING: had to choose moderate
       5. SCALE: 5; had to choose conserv/ BRANCHING: had to choose conserv
       6. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: not strong conservative
       7. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: strong conservative

       8. DK
       9. R refuses to choose
       0. NA

==============================
M000446a   G6x1a. 7pt lib-con summary - FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G6x1a.

   IF FTF MODE:
   BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES:

       7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place yourself on
       this scale, or haven't you thought much about this?
       If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a
       liberal or a conservative?
       BRANCHING (FTF):
       When it comes to politics, do you usually think of
       yourself as a liberal, a conservative, a moderate, or
       haven't you thought much about this?
       If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a
       liberal or a conservative?
       Would you call yourself a strong liberal or a not very
       strong liberal?
       Would you call yourself a strong conservative or a not
       very strong conservative?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This is the the equivalent of G6x1 for FTF cases only, summarizing
       FTF data from both 7-pt scale and branching formats.

       1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: strong liberal
       2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: not strong liberal
       3. SCALE: 3; had to choose liberal / BRANCHING: had to choose liberal
       4. SCALE: 4; had to choose moderate/ BRANCHING: had to choose moderate
       5. SCALE: 5; had to choose conserv/ BRANCHING: had to choose conserv
       6. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: not strong conservative
       7. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: strong conservative

       8. DK
       9. R refuses to choose
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000446b   G6x1b. 7pt lib-con summary - PHONE
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G6x1b.

   IF PHONE MODE:
   BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES:

       7-POINT SCALE PHONE: Where would you place yourself on
       this scale, or haven't you thought much about this?
       If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a
       liberal or a conservative?
       BRANCHING (PHONE):
       When it comes to politics, do you usually think of
       yourself as a liberal, a conservative, a moderate, or
       haven't you thought much about this?
       If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a
       liberal or a conservative?
       Would you call yourself a strong liberal or a not very
       strong liberal?
       Would you call yourself a strong conservative or a not
       very strong conservative?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This is the the equivalent of G6x1 for phone cases only, summarizing
       telephone data from both 7-pt scale and branching formats.

       1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: strong liberal
       2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: not strong liberal
       3. SCALE: 3; had to choose liberal / BRANCHING: had to choose liberal
       4. SCALE: 4; had to choose moderate/ BRANCHING: had to choose moderate
       5. SCALE: 5; had to choose conserv/ BRANCHING: had to choose conserv
       6. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: not strong conservative
       7. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: strong conservative

       8. DK
       9. R refuses to choose
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000447    G6x2. Comb.7pt & branching summ
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G6x2.

   BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES:

       7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place yourself on
       this scale, or haven't you thought much about this?
       7-POINT SCALE PHONE: When it comes to politics, do you
       usually think of yourself as extremely liberal, liberal,
       slightly liberal; moderate or middle of the road,
       slightly conservative, conservative, extremely
       conservative, or haven't you thought much about this?
       7PT FTF AND PHONE: If you had to choose, would you
       consider yourself a  liberal or a conservative?
       BRANCHING (FTF AND PHONE):
       When it comes to politics, do you usually think of
       yourself as a liberal, a conservative, a moderate, or
       haven't you thought much about this?
       If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a
       liberal or a conservative?
       Would you call yourself a strong liberal/conservative or
       a not very strong liberal/ conservative?

       SUMMARY:  3-CATEGORY LIB-CON SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT/BRANCHING
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Collapsed from G6x1.

       1. Liberal  (1-3 in G6x1)
       3. Moderate  (4 in G6x1)
       5. Conservative  (5-7 in G6x1)
       7. Refused to choose (9 in G6x1)

       8. DK (8 in G6x1)
       0. NA (0 in G6x1)

==============================
M000448    G2. Clinton placement lib-con scale FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G2.

   IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:

       FTF:
       Where would you place Bill Clinton on this scale?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE 'DK']
       See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a
       general description of the administration of liberal-
       conservative placements.
       FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       the 7-point scale (G1-G5) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E).
       For the telephone version of the 7-point scale, see G2.T.;
       for branching format, see G7.E (P000450).

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL
       2. LIBERAL
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE
       6. CONSERVATIVE
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; R selected for branching version

==============================
M000448a   G2.T. Clinton plcmnt lib-con scale phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G2.T.

   IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Bill Clinton?
       Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly
       liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly
       conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE 'DK']
       See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a
       general description of the administration of liberal-
       conservative placements.
       FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       the 7-point scale (G1-G5) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E).
       For the telephone version of the 7-point scale, see G2.T.;
       for branching format, see G7.E (P000450).
       Phone respondents were randomly selected to be
       administered the 7-point scale (G1.T-G5.T) or branching
       format (G6.E-G10.E).
       For the FTF version of the 7-point scale, see G2; for
       branching format, see G7.E (P000450).

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL
       2. LIBERAL
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE
       6. CONSERVATIVE
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; R selected for branching version

==============================
M000449    G2x. Combined FTF/ph Clinton lib-con
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G2x.

   IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:

       FTF:
       Where would you place Bill Clinton on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he is extremely
       liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle
       of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or
       extremely conservative?

       COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT-SCALE LIB-CON CLINTON PLACEMENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from G2/G2.T.

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL
       2. LIBERAL
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE
       6. CONSERVATIVE
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for branching version

==============================
M000450    G7.E. Clinton placement lib-con branch
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G7.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:

       What about Bill Clinton?
       Is Bill Clinton a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE 'DK']
       See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a
       general description of the administration of liberal-
       conservative placements.
       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       the 7-point scale (G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T) or branching format
       (G6.E-G10.E)

       1. LIBERAL         --> G7a.E
       2. CONSERVATIVE    --> SKIP TO G7b.E
       3. MODERATE        --> SKIP TO RANDOMIZED G8.E, G9.E, OR G10.E

       8. DON'T KNOW      --> SKIP TO RANDOMIZED G8.E, G9.E, OR G10.E
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version

==============================
M000451    G7a.E. Clinton strong liberal or not
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G7a.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:
   IF CLINTON PLACEMENT IS LIBERAL:

       Would you call Bill Clinton a strong liberal or a not
       very strong liberal?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONG LIBERAL           --> SKIP TO G8.E, G9.E, OR G10.E
       5. NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL  --> SKIP TO G8.E, G9.E, OR G10.E

       8. DK                       --> SKIP TO G8.E, G9.E OR G10.E
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 2,3,8,9,0 in G7.E

==============================
M000452    G7b.E. Clinton strong conservtive or not
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G7b.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:
   IF CLINTON PLACEMENT IS CONSEVATIVE:

       Would you call Bill Clinton a strong conservative or a
       not very strong conservative?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONG CONSERVATIVE
       5. NOT VERY STRONG CONSERVATIVE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9,0 in G7.E

==============================
M000453    G7x1.E. 5-pt br summary Clinton lib-con
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G7x1.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:

       What about Bill Clinton? Is Bill Clinton a liberal, a
       conservative, or a moderate?
       Would you call Bill Clinton a strong liberal/
       conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative?

       SUMMARY: 5PT LIB-CON CLINTON PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from G7.E/G7a.E/G7b.E.

       1. Strong liberal
       2. Not very strong liberal
       3. Moderate
       4. Not very strong conservative
       5. Strong conservative

       8. DK in G7.E
       9. RF in G7.E
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version

==============================
M000454    G7x2. Comb.7pt/br summ Clinton lib-con
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G7x2.

   BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES:

       7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place Bill Clinton on
       this scale?
       7-POINT SCALE PHONE: What about Bill Clinton? Do you
       think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly
       liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly
       conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?
       BRANCHING (FTF AND PHONE):
       What about Bill Clinton? Is Bill Clinton a liberal, a
       conservative, or a moderate?
       Would you call Bill Clinton a strong liberal/
       conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative?

       COMBINED 5-PT LIB-CON CLINTON PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE /BRANCHING
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from G2x and G7x1.E

       1. SCALE: 1 ; BRANCHING: Strong liberal
       2. SCALE: 2 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong liberal
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Moderate
       4. SCALE: 6 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong conservative
       5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Strong conservative

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000455    G3. Gore placement lib-con scale FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G3.

   IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:

       FTF:
       Where would you place Al Gore on this scale?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE 'DK']
       See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a
       general description of the administration of liberal-
       conservative placements.
       FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       the 7-point scale (G1-G5) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E).
       For the telephone version of the 7-point scale, see G3.T;
       for branching version, see G8.E (P000459).
       The order in which G3, G4, and G5 were administered was
       randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL
       2. LIBERAL
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE
       6. CONSERVATIVE
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE

       8. DK                   --> SKIP TO NEXT PRES. CAND OR G11
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; R selected for branching version

==============================
M000455a   G3.T. Gore placement lib-con scale phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G3.T.

   IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Al Gore?
       (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly
       liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly
       conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE 'DK']
       See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a
       general description of the administration of liberal-
       conservative placements.
       Phone respondents were randomly selected to be
       administered the 7-point scale (G1.T-G5.T) or branching
       format (G6.E-G10.E).
       For the FTF version of the 7-point scale, see G3; for
       branching version, see G8.E (P000459).
       The order in which G3.T, G4.T, and G5.T were administered
       was randomized.

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL
       2. LIBERAL
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE
       6. CONSERVATIVE
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE

       8. DK                         --> SKIP TO NEXT PRES. CAND OR G11
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; R selected for branching version

==============================
M000456    G3x. Combined FTF/ph Gore lib-con scale
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G3x.

   IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:

       FTF:
       Where would you place Al Gore on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Al Gore? (Do you think he is extremely
       liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle
       of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or
       extremely conservative?)

       SUMMARY: COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT-SCALE LIB-CON GORE PLACEMENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from G3/G3.T

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL
       2. LIBERAL
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE
       6. CONSERVATIVE
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for branching version

==============================
M000457    G3a. Gore-certain lib-con placement FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G3a.

   IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:
   IF GORE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK:

       FTF:
       How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty
       certain or not very certain?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY CERTAIN        --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN      --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN    --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11

       8. DK                  --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; 8,9,0 in G3

==============================
M000458    G3a.T. Gore-certain lib-con plcmnt phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G3a.T.

   IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:
   IF GORE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK:

       TELEPHONE:
       How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty
       certain or not very certain?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY CERTAIN        --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN      --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN    --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11

       8. DK                  --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 8,9,0 in G3.T

==============================
M000458a   G3ax.T. Combined - certain Gore lib-con placement
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G3ax.T.

   IF GORE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK:

       FTF:
       How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty
       certain or not very certain?

       TELEPHONE:
       How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty
       certain or not very certain?

       COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT SCALE CERTAINTY - GORE PLACEMENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This combines data from G3a and G3a.T.

       1. VERY CERTAIN
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9, NA in G3/G3.T; R selected for branching format

==============================
M000459    G8.E. Gore placement lib-con branch
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G8.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:

       What about Al Gore?
       (Is Al Gore a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE 'DK']
       See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a
       general description of the administration of liberal-
       conservative placements.
       See also G3 and G3.T (P000455 and P000455a).
       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       the 7-point scale (G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T) or branching format
       (G6.E-G10.E)
       The order in which G8.E, G9.E, and G10.E were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. LIBERAL         --> G8a.E
       2. CONSERVATIVE    --> SKIP TO G8b.E
       3. MODERATE        --> SKIP TO  G8c.E

       8. DON'T KNOW      --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version

==============================
M000460    G8a.E. Gore strong liberal or not
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G8a.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:
   IF GORE PLACEMENT IS LIBERAL:

       Would you call Al Gore a strong liberal or a not very
       strong liberal?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONG LIBERAL            --> SKIP TO G8c.E
       5. NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL   --> SKIP TO G8c.E

       8. DON'T KNOW                --> SKIP TO NEXT  NAME IN RANDOMIZATION
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 2,3,8,9,0 in G8.E

==============================
M000461    G8b.E. Gore strong conservative or not
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G8b.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:
   IF GORE PLACEMENT IS CONSERVATIVE:

       Would you call Al Gore a strong conservative or a not
       very strong conservative?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONG CONSERVATIVE          --> G8c.E
       5. NOT VERY STRONG CONSERVATIVE --> G8c.E

       8. DON'T KNOW                   --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9,0 in G8.E

==============================
M000462    G8x1.E. 5-pt br summary Gore lib-con
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G8x1.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:

       What about Al Gore? (Is Al Gore a liberal, a
       conservative, or a moderate?)
       Would you call Al Gore a strong liberal/conservative or
       a not very strong liberal/conservative?

       SUMMARY: 5PT LIB-CON GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from G8.E/G8a.E/G8b.E

       1. Strong liberal
       2. Not very strong liberal
       3. Moderate
       4. Not very strong conservative
       5. Strong conservative

       8. DK in G8.E
       9. RF in G8.E
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version

==============================
M000463    G8x2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore lib-con
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G8x2.

   BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES:

       7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this
       scale?
       7-POINT SCALE PHONE: What about Al Gore? (Do you think
       he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal,
       moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative,
       conservative, or extremely conservative?)
       BRANCHING (FTF AND PHONE:)
       What about Al Gore? (Is Al Gore a liberal, a
       conservative, or a moderate?)
       Would you call Al Gore a strong liberal/conservative or
       a not very strong liberal/conservative?

       COMBINED 5-POINT LIB-CON GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from G3x and G8x1.E

       1. SCALE: 1 ; BRANCHING: Strong liberal
       2. SCALE: 2 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong liberal
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Moderate
       4. SCALE: 6 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong conservative
       5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Strong conservative

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000464    G8c.E. Gore-certain lib-con placement br
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G8c.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:
   IF GORE PLACEMENT IS MODERATE/
   IF STRENGTH OF LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK:

       How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty
       certain or not very certain?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY CERTAIN        --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN      --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN    --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11

       8. DK                  --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in G8.E; 8,9,or NA in G8a.E/G8b.E

==============================
M000464a   G8cx 7pt/branching summary Gore crtn l-c
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G8cx.

   BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES:

       How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty
       certain or not very certain?

       COMBINED LIB-CON CERTAINTY - GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT/BRANCHING
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from G3ax.T and G8c.E.

       1. VERY CERTAIN
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in G3/G3.T/G8.E; 8,9,or NA in G8a.E/G8b.E

==============================
M000465    G4. Bush placement lib-con scale FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G4.

   IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:

       FTF:
       Where would you place George W. Bush on this scale?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE 'DK']
       See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a
       general description of the administration of liberal-
       conservative placements.
       FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       the 7-point scale (G1-G5) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E).
       For the telephone version of the 7-point scale, see G4.T;
       for branching format see G9.E (P000469).
       The order in which G3, G4, and G5 were administered was
       randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL
       2. LIBERAL
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE
       6. CONSERVATIVE
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE

       8. DK                          --> SKIP TO NEXT PRES CAND OR G11
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; R selected for branching version

==============================
M000465a   G4.T. Bush placement lib-con scale phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G4.T.

   IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:

       TELEPHONE:
       What about George W. Bush?
       (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly
       liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly
       conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

        [DO NOT PROBE 'DK']
       See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a
       general description of the administration of liberal-
       conservative placements.
       Phone respondents were randomly selected to be
       administered the 7-point scale (G1.T-G5.T) or branching
       format (G6.E-G10.E).
       For the FTF version of the 7-point scale, see G4; for
       branching format see G9.E (P000469).
       The order in which G3.T, G4.T, and G5.T were administered
       was randomized.

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL
       2. LIBERAL
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE
       6. CONSERVATIVE
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE

       8. DK                          --> SKIP TO NEXT PRES CAND OR G11
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; R selected for branching version


==============================
M000466    G4x. Combined FTF/ph Bush lib-con scale
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G4x.

   IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:

       FTF:
       Where would you place George W. Bush on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he is extremely
       liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle
       of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or
       extremely conservative?)

       SUMMARY: COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT-SCALE LIB-CON GW BUSH PLACEMENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from G4/G4.T

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL
       2. LIBERAL
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE
       6. CONSERVATIVE
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for branching version

==============================
M000467    G4a. Bush-certain lib-con placement FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G4a.

   IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:
   IF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS NOT DK:

       FTF:
       How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty
       certain or not very certain?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY CERTAIN        --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN      --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN    --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11

       8. DK                  --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; 8,9,0 in G4

==============================
M000468    G4a.T. Bush-certain plcmnt lib-con phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G4a.T.

   IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:
   IF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS NOT DK:

       TELEPHONE:
       How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty
       certain or not very certain?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY CERTAIN        --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN      --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN    --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11

       8. DK                  --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 8,9,0 in G4.T

==============================
M000468a   G4ax.T. Combined - certain GW Bush lib-con placement
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G4ax.T.

   IF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS NOT DK:

       FTF:
       How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty
       certain or not very certain?

       TELEPHONE:
       How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty
       certain or not very certain?

       COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT SCALE CERTAINTY - GW BUSH PLACEMENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This combines data from G4a and G4a.T.

       1. VERY CERTAIN
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in G4/G4.T; R selected for branching format

==============================
M000469    G9.E. Bush placement lib-con branch
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G9.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:

       What about George W. Bush?
       (Is George W. Bush a liberal, a conservative, or a
       moderate?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE 'DK']
       See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a
       general description of the administration of liberal-
       conservative placements.
       See also G4 and G4.T (P000465 and P000465a).
       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       the 7-point scale (G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T) or branching format
       (G6.E-G10.E)
       The order in which G8.E, G9.E, and G10.E were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. LIBERAL                 --> G9a.E
       2. CONSERVATIVE            --> SKIP TO G9b.E
       3. MODERATE                --> SKIP TO G9c.E

       8. DON'T KNOW              --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected
          for 7-point scale version

==============================
M000470    G9a.E. Bush strong liberal or not
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G9a.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:
   IF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS LIBERAL:

       Would you call George W. Bush a strong liberal or a not
       very strong liberal?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONG LIBERAL          --> SKIP TO G9c.E
       5. NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G9c.E

       8. DON'T KNOW              --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 2,3,8,9,0 in G9.E

==============================
M000471    G9b.E. Bush strong conservative or not
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G9b.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:
   IF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS CONSERVATIVE:

       Would you call George W. Bush a strong conservative or
       a not very strong conservative?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONG CONSERVATIVE          --> SKIP TO G9c.E
       5. NOT VERY STRONG CONSERVATIVE --> SKIP TO G9c.E

       8. DON'T KNOW              --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9,0 in G9.E

==============================
M000472    G9x1.E. 5-pt br summary Bush lib-con
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G9x1.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:

       What about George W. Bush? (Is George W. Bush a liberal,
       a conservative, or a moderate?)
       Would you call George W. Bush a strong liberal/
       conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative?

       SUMMARY: 5PT LIB-CON GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from G9.E/G9a.E/G9b.E

       1. Strong liberal
       2. Not very strong liberal
       3. Moderate
       4. Not very strong cosnervative
       5. Strong conservative

       8. DK in G9.E
       9. RF in G9.E
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version

==============================
M000473    G9x2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush lib-con
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G9x2.

   BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES:

       7-POINT SCALE FTF:
       Where would you place George W. Bush on this scale?
       7-POINT SCALE PHONE: What about George W. Bush? (Do you
       think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly
       liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly
       conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?)
       BRANCHING (FTF AND PHONE:)
       What about George W. Bush? (Is George W. Bush a liberal,
       a conservative, or a moderate?)
       Would you call George W. Bush a strong liberal/
       conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative?

       COMBINED 5-POINT LIB-CON GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE /BRANCH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from G4x and G9x1.E

       1. SCALE: 1 ; BRANCHING: Strong liberal
       2. SCALE: 2 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong liberal
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Moderate
       4. SCALE: 6 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong conservative
       5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Strong conservative

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000474    G9c.E. Bush-certain lib-con placement br
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G9c.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:
   IF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS MODERATE/
   IF STRENGTH OF LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK:

       How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty
       certain or not very certain?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY CERTAIN      --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN    --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN  --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11

       8. DK                --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in G9.E; 8,9 or NA in G9a.E/G9b.E

==============================
M000474a   G9cx 7pt/branching summary Bush crtn l-c
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G9cx.

   BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES:

       How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty
       certain or not very certain?

       COMBINED LIB-CON CERTAINTY - GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT/BRANCHING
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from G4ax.T and G9c.E.

       1. VERY CERTAIN
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in G4/G4.T/G9.E; 8,9,or NA in G9a.E/G9b.E

==============================
M000475    G5. Buchanan placement lib-con scale FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G5.

   IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:

       FTF:
       Where would you place Pat Buchanan on this scale?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE 'DK']
       See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a
       general description of the administration of liberal-
       conservative placements.
       FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       the 7-point scale (G1-G5) or branching format (G6.E-G10.E).
       For the telephone version of the 7-point scale version
       see G5.T; for branching format see G10.E (P000479).
       The order in which G3, G4, and G5 were administered was
       randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL
       2. LIBERAL
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE
       6. CONSERVATIVE
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE

       8. DK                           --> SKIP TO NEXT PRES CAND OR G11
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; R selected for branching version

==============================
M000475a   G5.T. Buchan plcmnt lib-con scale phon
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G5.T.

   IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Pat Buchanan?
       (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly
       liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly
       conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE 'DK']
       See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a
       general description of the administration of liberal-
       conservative placements.
       Phone respondents were randomly selected to be
       administered the 7-point scale (G1.T-G5.T) or branching
       format (G6.E-G10.E)
       For the FTF version of the 7-point scale version see G5;
       for branching format see G10.E (P000479).
       The order in which G3.T, G4.T, and G5.T were administered
       was randomized.

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL
       2. LIBERAL
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE
       6. CONSERVATIVE
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE

       8. DK                           --> SKIP TO NEXT PRES CAND OR G11
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; R selected for branching version

==============================
M000476    G5x. Combined FTF/ph Buchan lib-con scl
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G5x.

   IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:

       FTF:
       Where would you place Pat Buchanan on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Pat Buchanan? (Do you think he is extremely
       liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle
       of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or
       extremely conservative?)

       SUMMARY: COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT-SCALE LIB-CON BUCHANAN PLACEMENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from G5/G5.T

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL
       2. LIBERAL
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE
       6. CONSERVATIVE
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for branching version

==============================
M000477    G5a. Buchan-crtn lib-con plcemnt FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G5a.

   IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:
   IF BUCHANAN PLACEMENT IS NOT DK:

       FTF:
       How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty
       certain or not very certain?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY CERTAIN       --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN     --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN   --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11

       8. DK                 --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; 8,9,0 in G5

==============================
M000478    G5a.T. Buchan-crtn lib-con plcemnt phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G5a.T.

   IF R SELECTED FOR 7-POINT SCALE VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:
   IF BUCHANAN PLACEMENT IS NOT DK:

       TELEPHONE:
       How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty
       certain or not very certain?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY CERTAIN       --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN     --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN   --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11

       8. DK                 --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 8,9,0 in G5.T

==============================
M000478a   G5ax.T. Combined - certain Buchanan lib-con placement
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G5ax.T.

       FTF:
       How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty
       certain or not very certain?

       TELEPHONE:
       How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty
       certain or not very certain?

       COMBINED FTF/PHONE 7PT SCALE CERTAINTY - BUCHANAN PLACEMENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This combines data from G5a and G5a.T.

       1. VERY CERTAIN
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in G5/G4.T; R selected for branching format

==============================
M000479    G10.E. Buchanan placement lib-con branch
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G10.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:

       What about Pat Buchanan?
       (Is Pat Buchanan a liberal, a conservative, or a
       moderate?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE 'DK']
       See Form description item Pre-Admin.2d (P000005e) for a
       general description of the administration of liberal-
       conservative placements.
       See also G5 and G5.T (P000475 and P000475a).
       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       the 7-point scale (G1-G5/G1.T-G5.T) or branching format
       (G6.E-G10.E)
       The order in which G8.E, G9.E, and G10.E were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. LIBERAL                      --> G10a.E
       2. CONSERVATIVE                 --> SKIP TO G10b.E
       3. MODERATE                     --> SKIP TO G10c.E

       8. DON'T KNOW                   --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for
          7-point scale version

==============================
M000480    G10a.E. Buchanan strong liberal or not
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G10a.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:
   IF BUCHANAN PLACEMENT IS LIBERAL:

       Would you call Pat Buchanan a strong liberal or a not
       very strong liberal?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONG LIBERAL          --> SKIP TO G10c.E
       5. NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL --> SKIP TO G10c.E

       8. DON'T KNOW              --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 2,3,8,9,0 in G10.E

==============================
M000481    G10b.E. Buchan strong conserv or not
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G10b.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:
   IF BUCHANAN PLACEMENT IS CONSERVATIVE:

       Would you call Pat Buchanan a strong conservative or a
       not very strong conservative?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONG CONSERVATIVE          --> G10c.E
       5. NOT VERY STRONG CONSERVATIVE --> G10c.E

       8. DON'T KNOW                   --> SKIP TO NEXT NAME IN RANDOMIZATION
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9,0 in G10.E

==============================
M000482    G10x1.E. 5-pt br summary Buchan lib-con
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G10x1.E.

   IF R SELECTED BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:

       What about Pat Buchanan? (Is Pat Buchanan a liberal, a
       conservative, or a moderate?)
       Would you call Pat Buchanan a strong liberal/
       conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative?

       SUMMARY: 5PT LIB-CON BUCHANAN PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from G10.E/G10a.E/G10b.E

       1. Strong liberal
       2. Not very strong liberal
       3. Moderate
       4. Not very strong conservative
       5. Strong conservative

       8. DK in G10.E
       9. RF in G10.E
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for 7-point scale version

==============================
M000483    G10x2. Comb.7pt/br summ Buchan lib-con
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G10x2.

   BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES:

       7-POINT SCALE FTF: Where would you place Pat Buchanan on
       this scale?
       7-POINT SCALE PHONE: What about Pat Buchanan? (Do you
       think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly
       liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly
       conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?)
       BRANCHING (FTF AND PHONE)
       What about Pat Buchanan? (Is Pat Buchanan a liberal, a
       conservative, or a moderate?)
       Would you call Pat Buchanan a strong liberal/
       conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative?

       COMBINED 5PT LIB-CON GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE /BRANCH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from G5x and G10x1.E

       1. SCALE: 1 ; BRANCHING: Strong liberal
       2. SCALE: 2 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong liberal
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Moderate
       4. SCALE: 6 ; BRANCHING: Not very strong conservative
       5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Strong conservative

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000484    G10c.E. Certain-Buchan plcmnt lib-con br
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G10c.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR BRANCHING VERSION OF LIB-CON SERIES:
   IF BUCHANAN PLACEMENT IS MODERATE/
   IF STRENGTH OF LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK:

       How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty
       certain or not very certain?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY CERTAIN      --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN    --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN  --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE OR G11

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in G5/G5.T/G10.E; 8,9,or NA in G10a.E/G10b.E

==============================
M000484a   G10cx. 7pt/branching summ Buchan l-c crt
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G10cx.

   BOTH 7-POINT SCALE AND BRANCHING LIB-CON SERIES:

       How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty
       certain or not very certain?

       COMBINED LIB-CON CERTAINTY - GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT/BRANCHING
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from G5ax.T and G10c.E.

       1. VERY CERTAIN
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000485    G11.  Who does R think will be elected
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11.

       Who do you think will be elected President in November?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. AL GORE
       2. GEORGE W. BUSH
       3. PAT BUCHANAN
       4. RALPH NADER
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL]

       8. DK                     --> SKIP to G11b
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000486    G11a. Race close or not- cand named
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11a.

   IF R NAMES PRES. CANDIDATE WHO R THINKS WILL WIN ELECTION:

       Do you think the Presidential race will be close or will
       [NAME GIVEN IN G11] win by quite a bit?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. WILL BE CLOSE       --> SKIP to H1 or H1.E
       5. WIN BY QUITE A BIT  --> SKIP to H1 or H1.E

       8. DK                  --> SKIP to H1 or H1.E
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in G11

==============================
M000487    G11b. Race close or not- cand not named
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11b.

   IF R SAYS HE/SHE DOESN'T KNOW WHO WILL WIN THE PRES. ELECTION:

       Do you think the Presidential race will be close or will
       one candidate win by quite a bit?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. WILL BE CLOSE
       5. WIN BY QUITE A BIT

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1-7 in G11

==============================
M000488a   H1. US econ bttr/worse in last year stan
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H1.

   IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION:

       Now thinking about the economy in the country as a
       whole, would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR the
       nation's economy has gotten better, stayed about the
       same, or gotten worse?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H1
       or H1.E

       1. GOTTEN BETTER           --> SKIP TO H1a
       3. STAYED ABOUT THE SAME   --> SKIP TO H2
       5. GOTTEN WORSE            --> SKIP TO H1b

       8. DK                      --> SKIP TO H2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for H1.E

==============================
M000488b   H1.E. US econ bttr/worse in last year ex
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H1.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION:

       Now thinking about the economy in the country as a
       whole, would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR the
       nation's economy has gotten worse, stayed about the
       same, or gotten better?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H1
       or H1.E

       1. GOTTEN WORSE.           --> SKIP TO H1b
       3. STAYED ABOUT THE SAME   --> SKIP TO H2
       5. GOTTEN BETTER           --> SKIP TO H1a

       8. DK                      --> SKIP TO H2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for H1.

==============================
M000489    H1a. How much better US econ past year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H1a.

   IF R THINKS ECONOMY BETTER IN THE LAST YEAR:

       Much better or somewhat better?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH BETTER       --> SKIP TO H2
       5. SOMEWHAT BETTER   --> SKIP TO H2

       8. DK                --> SKIP TO H2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9 or NA in H1; 1,3,8,9 or NA in H1.E

==============================
M000490    H1b. How much worse US econ last year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H1b.

   IF R THINKS ECONOMY WORSE IN THE LAST YEAR:

       Much worse or somewhat worse?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. SOMEWHAT WORSE
       5. MUCH WORSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9 or NA in H1; 3,5,8,9 or NA in H1.E

==============================
M000491    H1x. Summary US econ btr/worse last year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H1x.

       STANDARD VERSION:
       Now thinking about the economy in the country as a
       whole, would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR the
       nation's economy has gotten worse, stayed about the
       same, or gotten better?
       EXPERIMENTAL VERSION:
       Now thinking about the economy in the country as a
       whole, would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR the
       nation's economy has gotten worse, stayed about the
       same, or gotten better?
       BOTH VERSIONS: Much better/worse or somewhat
       better/worse?

       COMBINED VERSION SUMMARY: ECONOMY IN LAST YEAR
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from H1/H1.E and H1a,H1b.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. Stayed about the same
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK in H1/H1.E or H1a/b
       9. RF in H1/H1.E or H1a/b
       0. NA

==============================
M000492a   H2. Esr/hrdr to find work last year stan
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H2.

   IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION:

       Would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR, it has gotten
       harder for people across the country to find enough
       work, stayed about the same, or gotten easier for people
       to find enough work?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H2
       or H2.E

       1. GOTTEN HARDER      --> SKIP TO H2a
       3. STAYED THE SAME    --> SKIP TO H4
       5. GOTTEN EASIER      --> SKIP TO H2b

       8. DK                 --> SKIP TO H4
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for H2.E

==============================
M000492b   H2.E. Esr/hrdr to find work last year ex
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H2.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION:

       Would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR, it has gotten
       easier for people across the country to find enough
       work, stayed about the same, or gotten harder for people
       to find enough work?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H2
       or H2.E

       1. GOTTEN EASIER      --> SKIP TO H2b
       3. ABOUT THE SAME     --> SKIP TO H4
       5. GOTTEN HARDER

       8. DK                 --> SKIP TO H4
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for H2

==============================
M000493    H2a. How much harder to find work lst yr
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H2a.

   IF R SAYS IT HAS GOTTEN HARDER TO FIND WORK IN THE LAST YEAR:

       Much harder or a little harder?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH HARDER      --> H4
       5. A LITTLE HARDER  --> H4

       8. DK               --> H4
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9 or NA in H2; 1,3,8,9 or NA in H2.E

==============================
M000494    H2b. How much easier to find work lst yr
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H2b.

   IF R SAYS IT HAS GOTTEN EASIER TO FIND WORK IN THE LAST YEAR:

       Much easier or a little easier?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH EASIER
       5. A LITTLE EASIER

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9 or NA in H2; 3,5,8,9 or NA in H2.E

==============================
M000495    H2x. Summary employ opps in last year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H2x.

       STANDARD VERSION:
       Would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR, it has gotten
       harder for people across the country to find enough
       work, stayed about the same, or gotten easier for people
       to find enough work?
       EXPERIMENTAL VERSION:
       Would you say that OVER THE PAST YEAR, it has gotten
       easier for people across the country to find enough
       work, stayed about the same, or gotten harder for people
       to find enough work?
       BOTH VERSIONS: Much harder/easier or a little
       harder/easier?

       COMBINED VERSION SUMMARY: EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN LAST YEAR
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from H2/H2.E and H2a,H2b.

       1. Much harder
       2. Somewhat harder
       3. Stayed about the same
       4. Somewhat easier
       5. Much easier

       8. DK in H2/H2.E or H2a/b
       9. RF in H2/H2.E or H2a/b
       0. NA

==============================
M000496a   H4. US econ bttr/worse in next year stan
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H4.

   IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION:

       What about THE NEXT 12 MONTHS?  Do you expect the
       economy, in the country as a whole, to get better,
       stay about the same, or get worse?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H4
       or H4.E

       1. GET BETTER             --> SKIP TO H4a
       3. STAY ABOUT THE SAME    --> SKIP TO H5
       5. GET WORSE              --> SKIP TO H4b

       8. DK                     --> SKIP TO H5
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for H4.E

==============================
M000496b   H4.E. US econ bttr/worse in next year ex
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H4.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION:

       What about THE NEXT 12 MONTHS?  Do you expect the
       economy, in the country as a whole, to get worse,
       stay about the same, or get better?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H4
       or H4.E

       1. GET WORSE              --> SKIP TO H4b
       3. STAY ABOUT THE SAME    --> SKIP TO H5
       5. GET BETTER

       8. DK                     --> SKIP TO H5
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for H4

==============================
M000497    H4a. How much better US econ in nxt year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H4a.

   IF R EXPECTS ECONOMY TO GET BETTER IN THE NEXT 12 MONTHS:

       Much better or somewhat better?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH BETTER       --> SKIP TO H5
       5. SOMEWHAT BETTER   --> SKIP TO H5

       8. DK                --> SKIP TO H5
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9 or NA in H4; 1,3,8,9 or NA in H4.E

==============================
M000498    H4b. How much worse US econ in nxt year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H4b.

   IF R EXPECTS ECONOMY TO GET WORSE IN THE NEXT 12 MONTHS:

       Much worse or somewhat worse?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH WORSE
       5. SOMEWHAT WORSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9 or NA in H4; 3,5,8,9 or NA in H4.E

==============================
M000499    H4x. Summary US econ in next year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H4x.

       STANDARD VERSION:
       What about THE NEXT 12 MONTHS?  Do you expect the
       economy, in the country as a whole, to get better,
       stay about the same, or get worse?
       EXPERIMENTAL VERSION:
       What about THE NEXT 12 MONTHS?  Do you expect the
       economy, in the country as a whole, to get worse,
       stay about the same, or get better?
       Much worse or somewhat worse?

       SUMMARY: ECONOMY IN NEXT 12 MONTHS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from H4/H4.E and H4a,H4b.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. Stayed about the same
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK in H4/H4.E or Ha/b
       9. RF in H4/H4.E or Ha/b
       0. NA

==============================
M000500    H5.  Approve/dissap Clinton w/economy
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H5.

       Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is
       handling the economy?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. APPROVE
       5. DISAPPROVE    --> SKIP to H5b

       8. DK            --> SKIP to H6
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000501    H5a. How much approve Clinton w/economy
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H5a.

   IF R APPROVES OF CLINTON'S HANDLING JOB AS PRESIDENT:

       Do you approve strongly or not strongly?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY      --> SKIP to H7
       5. NOT STRONGLY  --> SKIP to H7

       8. DK            --> SKIP to H7
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in H5

==============================
M000502    H5b. How much dissprv Clinton w/economy
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H5b.

   IF R DISAPPROVES OF CLINTON'S HANDLING JOB AS PRESIDENT:

       Do you disapprove strongly or not strongly?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY
       5. NOT STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,8,9,0 in H5

==============================
M000503    H5x. Summary Clinton w/economy
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H5x.

       Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is
       handling the economy?
       Do you approve/disapprove strongly or not strongly?

       SUMMARY: APPROVAL OF CLINTON JOB AS PRESIDENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from H5 and H5a/H5b.

       1. Approve strongly
       2. Approve not strongly
       4. Disapprove not strongly
       5. Disapprove strongly

       8. DK in H5 or H5a/b
       9. RF in H5 or H5a/b
       0. NA

==============================
M000504    H6.  Is R invested in stock market
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H6.

       Do you personally, or jointly with a spouse, have any
       money invested in the stock market right now --
       either in an individual stock or in a mutual fund?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000505    H7. Which party R thinks best to handle econ
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H7.

       Which party do you think would do a better job of
       handling the nation's economy..., the Democrats, the
       Republicans, or wouldn't there be much difference
       between them?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [IF 'DK' OR 'NEITHER PARTY' IS VOLUNTEERED, DO NOT PROBE]

       1. DEMOCRATS
       3. REPUBLICANS
       5. WOULDN'T BE MUCH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM/NO DIFFERENCE
       7. NEITHER PARTY [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000506    H8. Which party R thinks would avoid war
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H8.

       Looking ahead, do you think the problem of keeping out
       of war would be handled better IN THE NEXT FOUR YEARS by
       the Democrats, the Republicans, or about the same by
       both?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [IF 'DK' OR 'NEITHER PARTY' IS VOLUNTEERED, DO NOT PROBE]

       1. DEMOCRATS
       3. REPUBLICANS
       5. ABOUT THE SAME BY BOTH
       7. NEITHER PARTY [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000507    H9. Us position in world weaker/stronger
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H9.

       Turning to some other types of issues facing the
       country.  During the past year, would you say that
       the United States' position in the world has grown
       weaker, stayed about the same, or has it grown stronger?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. WEAKER
       3. STAYED ABOUT THE SAME
       5. STRONGER

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000508    H10. Increase/decrease immigratration
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H10.

       Do you think the number of immigrants from foreign
       countries who are permitted to come to the United States
       to live should be increased, decreased, or left the same
       as it is now?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. INCREASED
       3. DECREASED
       5. LEFT THE SAME AS IT IS NOW   --> SKIP TO H11 OR H11.E

       8. DON'T KNOW                   --> SKIP TO H11 OR H11.E
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000509    H10a. Inc/dec immigratn little or a lot
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H10a.

   IF R THINKS NUMBER OF IMMIGRANTS SHOULD BE INCREASED/
   IF R THINKS NUMBER OF IMMIGRANTS SHOULD BE DECREASED:

       A little or a lot?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A LITTLE
       5. A LOT

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in H10

==============================
M000510    H10x. Summary immigration level
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H10x.

       Do you think the number of immigrants from foreign
       countries who are permitted to come to the United States
       to live should be increased, decreased, or left the same
       as it is now?
       A little or a lot?

       SUMMARY: IMMIGRATION LEVEL
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from H10 and H10a.

       1. Increased a lot
       2. Increased a little
       3. Left the same
       4. Decreased a little
       5. Decreased a lot

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in H10

==============================
M000511a   H11. Favor/oppose import limits stan
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H11.

   IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION:

       Some people have suggested placing new limits on foreign
       imports in order to protect American jobs.  Others
       say that such limits would raise consumer prices and
       hurt American exports. Do you favor or oppose placing
       new limits on imports, or haven't you thought much about
       this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H11
       or H11.E

       1. FAVOR                             --> SKIP TO H12
       5. OPPOSE                            --> SKIP TO H12
       7. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS   --> SKIP TO H12

       8. DK                                --> SKIP TO H12
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for H11.E

==============================
M000511b   H11.E. Favor/opp import limits ex
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H11.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION:

       Some people have suggested placing new limits on foreign
       imports in order to protect American jobs.  Others
       say that such limits would raise consumer prices and
       hurt American exports. Do you favor or oppose placing
       new limits on imports?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H11
       or H11.E

       1. FAVOR
       5. OPPOSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for H11

==============================
M000512    H11x. Combined versions import limits
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 7
           Numeric

   H11x.

       STANDARD VERSION:
       Some people have suggested placing new limits on foreign
       imports in order to protect American jobs.  Others
       say that such limits would raise consumer prices and
       hurt American exports. Do you favor or oppose placing
       new limits on imports, or haven't you thought much about
       this?
       EXPERIMENTAL VERSION:
       Some people have suggested placing new limits on foreign
       imports in order to protect American jobs.  Others
       say that such limits would raise consumer prices and
       hurt American exports. Do you favor or oppose placing
       new limits on imports?

       COMBINED VERSION SUMMARY: IMPORT LIMITS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from H11 and H11.E

       1. Favor
       5. Oppose

       7. Haven't thought much (H11 only)
       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000513a   H12. US better off to stay at home stan
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H12.

   IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION:

       Do you agree or disagree with this statement:
       This country would be better off if we just stayed home
       and did not concern ourselves with problems in other
       parts of the world.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H12
       or H12.E

       1. AGREE                    --> SKIP to H13
       5. DISAGREE                 --> SKIP to H13

       8. DK                       --> SKIP to H13
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for H12.E

==============================
M000513b   H12.E. US better off to stay at home ex
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H12.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION:

       Do you think this country would be better off if we just
       stayed home and did not concern ourselves with problems
       in other parts of the world, or do you think that this
       country would be better off trying to solve some
       problems in other parts of the world?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered H12
       or H12.E

       1. BETTER OFF IF WE JUST STAYED HOME
       5. BETTER OFF TRYING TO SOLVE SOME PROBLEMS

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for H12

==============================
M000514    H12x. Combined versions isolationism
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H12x.

       STANDARD VERSION:
       Do you agree or disagree with this statement:
       This country would be better off if we just stayed home
       and did not concern ourselves with problems in other
       parts of the world.
       EXPERIMENTAL VERSION:
       Do you think this country would be better off if we just
       stayed home and did not concern ourselves with problems
       in other parts of the world, or do you think that this
       country would be better off trying to solve some
       problems in other parts of the world?

       COMBINED VERSION SUMMARY: ISOLATIONISM
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from H12 and H12.E

       1. Agree/ Better off to stay home
       5. Disagree/ Better off trying to solve problems

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000515    H13.  Clinton foreign rel approve/disappr
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H13.

       Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is
       handling our relations with foreign countries?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. APPROVE
       5. DISAPPROVE  --> SKIP to H13b

       8. DK          --> SKIP to K1
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000516    H13a. Strength appove Clinton frgn rel
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H13a.

   IF R APPROVES CLINTON'S HANDLING OF FOREIGN RELATIONS:

       Do you approve strongly or not strongly?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY      --> SKIP TO K1
       5. NOT STRONGLY  --> SKIP TO K1

       8. DK            --> SKIP TO K1
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in H13

==============================
M000517    H13b. Strength dissapr Clinton frgn rel
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H13b.

   IF R DISAPPROVES CLINTON'S HANDLING OF FOREIGN RELATIONS:

       Do you disapprove strongly or not strongly?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY
       5. NOT STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,8,9,0 in H13

==============================
M000518    H13x. Summary Clinton foreign relations
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H13x.

       Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is
       handling our relations with foreign countries?
       Do you approve/disapprove strongly or not strongly?

       SUMMARY: CLINTON HANDLING OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from H13 and H13a/b.

       1. Approve strongly
       2. Approve not strongly
       4. Disapprove not strongly
       5. Disapprove strongly

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in H13

==============================
M000519    K1.  Does R consider self Rep Dem or Ind
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K1.

       Generally speaking, do you think of yourself as a
       Republican, a Democrat, an Independent, or what?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. DEMOCRAT
       2. REPUBLICAN            --> SKIP TO K1b
       3. INDEPENDENT           --> SKIP TO K1c
       4. OTHER PARTY [SPECIFY] --> SKIP TO K1c
       5. NO PREFERENCE         --> SKIP TO K1c

       8. DK                    --> SKIP TO K1c
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000520    K1a. Is R a strong Democrat or not
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K1a.

   IF R CONSIDERS SELF A DEMOCRAT:

       Would you call yourself a strong Democrat or a not very
       strong Democrat?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONG            --> SKIP TO K2, K3, OR K4
       5. NOT VERY STRONG   --> SKIP TO K2, K3, OR K4

       8. DK                --> SKIP TO K2, K3, OR K4
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 2-5, 8,9,0 in K1

==============================
M000521    K1b. Is R a strong Republican or not
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K1b.

   IF R CONSIDERS SELF A REPUBLICAN:

       Would you call yourself a strong Republican or a not
       very strong Republican?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONG            --> SKIP TO K2, K3, OR K4
       5. NOT VERY STRONG   --> SKIP TO K2, K3, OR K4

       8. DK                --> SKIP TO K2, K3, OR K4
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,3,4,5,8,9,0 in K1

==============================
M000522    K1c. Is R closer to Rep or Dem Party
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K1c.

   IF R'S PARTY PREFERENCE IS INDEPENDENT, NO PREFERENCE, OTHER, DK:

       Do you think of yourself as closer to the Republican
       Party or to the Democratic party?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. CLOSER TO REPUBLICAN
       3. NEITHER [VOL]
       5. CLOSER TO DEMOCRATIC

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,2,9,0 in K1

==============================
M000523    K1x. Party ID summary
           MD1: EQ 8,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   K1x.

       Generally speaking, do you think of yourself as a
       Republican, a Democrat, an Independent, or what?
       Would you call yourself a strong Democrat/Republican or
       a not very strong Democrat/ Republican?
       Do you think of yourself as closer to the Republican
       Party or to the Democratic party?

       SUMMARY: PARTY ID
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from K1, K1a/b, K1c.
       Code 8 (apolitical) was used only if the respondent had a
       code of 5 (no preference) in K1 and a code of 3,8 or 9 in
       K1c AND also showed little or no interest in politics in
       response to the following survey questions:  PRE question
       A1.(interest in campaigns), PRE question B1 (care about
       Congressional race outcome), POST question C1 (voted), POST
       question F5 (follow public affairs); respondents who
       showed an interest in politics were coded 3.

       0. Strong Democrat (1,1,0 in K1, K1a/b, K1c)
       1. Weak Democrat (1,5/8/9,0 in K1, K1a/b, K1c)
       2. Independent-Democrat (3/4/5/8,0,5 in K1,  K1a/b, K1c
       3. Independent-Independent (3,0,3/8/9 in K1, K1a/b, K1c;
          8,0,3 and 5,0,3/8/9 if not apolitical)
       4. Independent-Republican (3/4/5/8,0,1 in K1, K1a/b, K1c)
       5. Weak Republican (2,5/8/9,0 in K1, K1a/b, K1c)
       6. Strong Republican (2,1,0 in K1, K1a/b, K1c)
       7. Other; minor party; refuses to say (4,0,3/8/9 in K1, K1a/b, K1c)

       8. Apolitical (8,0,3 or 5,0,3/8/9 in E6, E6a/b, E6c and no interest
          in politics
       9. NA (8/9,0,0 in E6, E6a/b, E6c)


==============================
M000524    K2a. Gore trait - moral
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K2a.

       Think about Al Gore.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>'
       describe Al Gore extremely  well, quite well, not too
       well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Gore
       extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       GORE TRAIT - MORAL
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were
       administered was randomized. Within each series, the order
       of the traits about that candidate was also randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000525    K2b. Gore trait - really cares
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K2b.

       Think about Al Gore.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>'
       describe Al Gore extremely  well, quite well, not too
       well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Gore
       extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       GORE TRAIT - REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were
       administered was randomized. Within each series, the order
       of the traits about that candidate was also randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000526    K2c. Gore trait - knowledgeable
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K2c.

       Think about Al Gore.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>'
       describe Al Gore extremely  well, quite well, not too
       well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Gore
       extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       GORE TRAIT - KNOWLEDGEABLE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were
       administered was randomized. Within each series, the order
       of the traits about that candidate was also randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000527    K2d. Gore trait - strong leader
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K2d.

       Think about Al Gore.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>'
       describe Al Gore extremely  well, quite well, not too
       well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Gore
       extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       GORE TRAIT - PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were
       administered was randomized. Within each series, the order
       of the traits about that candidate was also randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000528    K2e. Gore trait - dishonest
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K2e.

       Think about Al Gore.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>'
       describe Al Gore extremely  well, quite well, not too
       well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Gore
       extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       GORE TRAIT - DISHONEST
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were
       administered was randomized. Within each series, the order
       of the traits about that candidate was also randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000529    K2f. Gore trait - intelligent
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K2f.

       Think about Al Gore.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>'
       describe Al Gore extremely  well, quite well, not too
       well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Gore
       extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       GORE TRAIT - INTELLIGENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were
       administered was randomized. Within each series, the order
       of the traits about that candidate was also randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000530    K2g. Gore trait - out of touch
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K2g.

       Think about Al Gore.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>'
       describe Al Gore extremely  well, quite well, not too
       well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Gore
       extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       GORE TRAIT - OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were
       administered was randomized. Within each series, the order
       of the traits about that candidate was also randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000531    K3a. Bush trait - moral
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K3a.

       Think about George W. Bush.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>'
       describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe George
       W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or
       not well at all?])

       BUSH TRAIT - MORAL
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were
       administered was randomized. Within each series, the order
       of the traits about that candidate was also randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000532    K3b. Bush trait - really cares
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K3b.

       Think about George W. Bush.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>'
       describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe George
       W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or
       not well at all?])

       BUSH TRAIT - REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were
       administered was randomized. Within each series, the order
       of the traits about that candidate was also randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000533    K3c. Bush trait - knowledgeable
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K3c.

       Think about George W. Bush.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>'
       describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe George
       W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or
       not well at all?])

       BUSH TRAIT - KNOWLEDGEABLE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were
       administered was randomized. Within each series, the order
       of the traits about that candidate was also randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000534    K3d. Bush trait - strong leader
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K3d.

       Think about George W. Bush.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>'
       describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe George
       W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or
       not well at all?])

       BUSH TRAIT - PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were
       administered was randomized. Within each series, the order
       of the traits about that candidate was also randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000535    K3e. Bush trait - dishonest
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K3e.

       Think about George W. Bush.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>'
       describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe George
       W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or
       not well at all?])

       BUSH TRAIT - DISHONEST
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were
       administered was randomized. Within each series, the order
       of the traits about that candidate was also randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000536    K3f. Bush trait - intelligent
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K3f.

       Think about George W. Bush.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>'
       describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe George
       W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or
       not well at all?])

       BUSH TRAIT - INTELLIGENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were
       administered was randomized. Within each series, the order
       of the traits about that candidate was also randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000537    K3g. Bush trait - out of touch
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K3g.

       Think about George W. Bush.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>'
       describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe George
       W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or
       not well at all?])

       BUSH TRAIT - OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were
       administered was randomized. Within each series, the order
       of the traits about that candidate was also randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000538    K4a. Buchanan trait - moral
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K4a.

       Think about Pat Buchanan.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>'
       describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan
       extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at
       all?])

       BUCHANAN TRAIT - MORAL
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were
       administered was randomized. Within each series, the order
       of the traits about that candidate was also randomized.
       Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period
       (09/28/00)

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; question dropped

==============================
M000539    K4b. Buchanan trait - really cares
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K4b.

       Think about Pat Buchanan.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>'
       describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan
       extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at
       all?])

       BUCHANAN TRAIT - REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were
       administered was randomized. Within each series, the order
       of the traits about that candidate was also randomized.
       Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period
       (09/28/00)

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; question dropped

==============================
M000540    K4c. Buchanan trait- knowledgeable
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K4c.

       Think about Pat Buchanan.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>'
       describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan
       extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at
       all?])

       BUCHANAN TRAIT - KNOWLEDGEABLE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were
       administered was randomized. Within each series, the order
       of the traits about that candidate was also randomized.
       Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period
       (09/28/00)

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; question dropped

==============================
M000541    K4d. Buchanan trait - strong leader
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K4d.

       Think about Pat Buchanan.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>'
       describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan
       extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at
       all?])

       BUCHANAN TRAIT - PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were
       administered was randomized. Within each series, the order
       of the traits about that candidate was also randomized.
       Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period
       (09/28/00)

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; question dropped

==============================
M000542    K4e. Buchanan trait - dishonest
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K4e.

       Think about Pat Buchanan.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>'
       describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan
       extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at
       all?])

       BUCHANAN TRAIT - DISHONEST
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were
       administered was randomized. Within each series, the order
       of the traits about that candidate was also randomized.
       Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period
       (09/28/00)

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; question dropped

==============================
M000543    K4f. Buchanan trait - intelligent
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K4f.

       Think about Pat Buchanan.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>'
       describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan
       extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at
       all?])

       BUCHANAN TRAIT - INTELLIGENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were
       administered was randomized. Within each series, the order
       of the traits about that candidate was also randomized.
       Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period
       (09/28/00)

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; question dropped

==============================
M000544    K4g. Buchanan trait - out of touch
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K4g.

       Think about Pat Buchanan.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>'
       describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Buchanan
       extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at
       all?])

       BUCHANAN TRAIT - OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       The order in which the 3 series K2, K3, and K4 were
       administered was randomized. Within each series, the order
       of the traits about that candidate was also randomized.
       Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period
       (09/28/00)

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; question dropped

==============================
M000545    L1a. Self plcmnt-services/spend scl FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1a.

       FTF:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       For telephone (branching) version of this question see L1a.T.

       1. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY FEWER SERVICES    --> L1b
       2.                                            --> L1b
       3.                                            --> L1b
       4.                                            --> L1b
       5.                                            --> L1b
       6.                                            --> L1b
       7. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY MORE SERVICES     --> L1b

       8. DK                                         --> L1b
       9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS            --> L1b

==============================
M000546    L1a.T. Self plcmnt-services/spend scl phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1a.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       For FTF (7-point scale) version of this question see L1a.

       1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING          --> L1a1.T
       5. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING         --> L2.T
       7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL]  --> L1b.T

       8. DK                                       --> L1b.T
       9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS          --> L1b.T

==============================
M000547    L1a1.T. How much reduce serv/spend phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1a1.T.

   IF R THINKS THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD REDUCE SERVICES AND SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       Should the government reduce services and spending a
       great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL    --> L1b.T
       5. ONLY SOME       --> L1b.T

       8. DK              --> L1b.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L1a.T

==============================
M000548    L1a2.T. How much incr serv/spend phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1a2.T.

   IF R THINKS THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD INCREASE SERVICES AND SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       Should the government increase services and spending a
       great deal or (increase services and spending) only some?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL    --> L1b.T
       5. ONLY SOME       --> L1b.T

       8. DK              --> L1b.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L1a.T

==============================
M000549    L1ax1. 5-pt br summary of self on serv/spend
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 7
           Numeric

   L1ax1.

       TELEPHONE:
       Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       Should the government reduce/increase services and
       spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and
       spending) only some?

       SUMMARY: SPT SERV/SPEND SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L1a.T and L1a1.T/L1a2.T

       1. Reduce spending and services a great deal
       2. Reduce spending and services only some
       3. Stay same as now (3 in L1a.T)
       4. Increase spending and services only some
       5. Increase spending and services a great deal

       7. Haven't thought much
       8. DK in L1a.T or L1a1.T/L1a2.T
       9. RF in L1a.T or L1a1.T/L1a2.T
       0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1a.T; FTF mode

==============================
M000550    L1ax2. Comb.7pt/br summ of self on serv/spend
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1ax2.

       FTF:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?

       TELEPHONE:
       Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       Should the government reduce/increase services and
       spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and
       spending) only some?

       COMBINED 5PT SERV/SPEND SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE /BRANCH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L1a and L1ax1

       1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services a great deal
       2. SCALE 2; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services only some
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Stay same as now (3 in L1a.T)
       4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services only some
       5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services a great deal

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1a or L1a.T
       0. Haven't thought much

==============================
M000551    L1b. Clinton- serv/spend scale FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1b.

       FTF:
       Where would you place Bill Clinton on this issue?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       FTF: L1b was administered first, then L1c and L1d were
       randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f
       were administered as the 4th or 5th names.
       For the telephone version of this question see L1b.T

       1. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY
          FEWER SERVICES           --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       2.                          --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       3.                          --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       4.                          --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       5.                          --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       6.                          --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       7. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY
          MORE SERVICES            --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2

       8. DK                       --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000552    L1b.T. Clinton- serve/spend scale phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1b.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Bill Clinton?  Do you think he would like the
       government to provide fewer services in order to
       reduce spending or provide more services even if it
       means an increase in spending?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       PHONE: L1b.T was administered first, then L1c and L1d were
       randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f
       were administered as the 4th or 5th names.
       For the FTF version of this question, see L1b.

       1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING            --> L1b1.T
       5. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING           --> L1b2.T
       7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL]    --> NEXT NAME

       8. DK                                         --> NEXT NAME
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000553    L1b1.T. Clinton- how much red srv/spd ph
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1b1.T.

   IF R THINKS CLINTON WOULD LIKE TO REDUCE SERVICES AND SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       (Do you think he would like to) reduce services and
       spending a great deal or (reduce services and
       spending) only some?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL   --> NEXT NAME
       5. ONLY SOME      --> NEXT NAME

       8. DK             --> NEXT NAME
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L1b.T

==============================
M000554    L1b2.T. Clinton- how much inc srv/spd ph
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1b2.T.

   IF R THINKS CLINTON WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE SERVICES AND SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       (Do you think he would like to) increase services and
       spending a great deal or (increase services and
       spending) only some?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL   --> NEXT NAME
       5. ONLY SOME      --> NEXT NAME

       8. DK             --> NEXT NAME
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L1b.T

==============================
M000555    L1bx1. 5-pt br summary Clinton srv/spnd
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1bx1.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Bill Clinton?  Do you think he would like the
       government to provide fewer services in order to
       reduce spending or provide more services even if it
       means an increase in spending?
       (Do you think he would like to) reduce/increase services
       and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services
       and spending) only some?

       SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND CLINTON PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L1b.T and L1b1.T/L1b2.T

       1. Reduce spending and services a great deal
       2. Reduce spending and services only some
       3. Stay same as now (3 in L1b.T)
       4. Increase spending and services only some
       5. Increase spending and services a great deal

       8. DK in L1b.T or L1b1.T/L1b2.T
       9. RF in L1b.T or L1b1.T/L1b2.T
       0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1b.T; FTF mode

==============================
M000556    L1bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Clinton srv/spnd
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1bx2.

       FTF:
       Where would you place Bill Clinton on this issue?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Bill Clinton?  Do you think he would like the
       government to provide fewer services in order to
       reduce spending or provide more services even if it
       means an increase in spending?
       (Do you think he would like to) reduce/increase services
       and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services
       and spending) only some?

       SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND CLINTON PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L1b and L1bx1

       1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services a great deal
       2. SCALE 2; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services only some
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Stay same as now (3 in L1b.T)
       4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services only some
       5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services a great deal

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1b or L1b.T

==============================
M000557    L1c. Gore- serv/spend scale FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1c.

       FTF:
       Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       FTF: L1b was administered first, then L1c and L1d were
       randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f
       were administered as the 4th or 5th names.
       For the telephone version of this question, see L1c.T

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY
          FEWER SERVICES           --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       2.                          --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       3.                          --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       4.                          --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       5.                          --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       6.                          --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       7. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY
          MORE SERVICES            --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2

       8. DK                       --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000558    L1c.T. Gore- serv/spend scale phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1c.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Al Gore?  (Do you think he would like the
       government to provide fewer services in order to
       reduce spending or provide more services even if it
       means an increase in spending?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       PHONE: L1b.T was administered first, then L1c and L1d were
       randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f
       were administered as the 4th or 5th names.
       For the FTF version of this question, see L1c.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING        --> L1c1.T
       5. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING       --> L1c2.T
       7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL]-->NEXT NAME/PARTY OR-->L2.T

       8. DK                                     -->NEXT NAME/PARTY OR-->L2.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000559    L1c1.T. Gore- how much red serv/spend ph
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1c1.T.

   IF R THINKS GORE WOULD LIKE TO REDUCE SERVICES AND SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       (Do you think he would like to) reduce services and
       spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending)
       only some?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL   --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T
       5. ONLY SOME      --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T

       8. DK             --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L1c.T

==============================
M000560    L1c2.T. Gore- how much inc serv/spend ph
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1c2.T.

   IF R THINKS GORE WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE SERVICES AND SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       (Do you think he would like to) increase services and
       spending a great deal or (increase services and
       spending) only some?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL   --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T
       5. ONLY SOME      --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T

       8. DK             --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L1c.T

==============================
M000561    L1cx1. 5-pt br summary Gore serv/spend
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1cx1.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Al Gore?  (Do you think he would like the
       government to provide fewer services in order to
       reduce spending or provide more services even if it
       means an increase in spending?)
       (Do you think he would like to) reduce/increase services
       and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services
       and spending) only some?

       SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L1c.T and L1c1.T/L1c2.T

       1. Reduce spending and services a great deal
       2. Reduce spending and services only some
       3. Stay same as now (3 in L1c.T)
       4. Increase spending and services only some
       5. Increase spending and services a great deal

       8. DK in L1c.T or L1c1.T/L1c2.T
       9. RF in L1c.T or L1c1.T/L1c2.T
       0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1c.T; FTF mode

==============================
M000562    L1cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore serv/spend
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1cx2.

       FTF:
       Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Al Gore?  (Do you think he would like the
       government to provide fewer services in order to
       reduce spending or provide more services even if it
       means an increase in spending?)
       (Do you think he would like to) reduce/increase services
       and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services
       and spending) only some?

       SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L1c and L1cx1

       1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services a great deal
       2. SCALE 2; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services only some
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Stay same as now (3 in L1c.T)
       4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services only some
       5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services a great deal

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1c or L1c.T

==============================
M000563    L1d. Bush- serv/spend scale FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1d.

       FTF:
       Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       FTF: L1b was administered first, then L1c and L1d were
       randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f
       were administered as the 4th or 5th names.
       For the telephone version of this question, see L1d.T

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE
          MANY FEWER SERVICES     --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       2.                         --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       3.                         --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       4.                         --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       5.                         --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       6.                         --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       7. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE
          MANY MORE SERVICES      --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2

       8. DK                      --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000564    L1d.T. Bush- serv/spend scale phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1d.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about George W. Bush?  (Do you think he would like
       the government to provide fewer services in order
       to reduce spending or provide more services even if it
       means an increase in spending?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       PHONE: L1b.T was administered first, then L1c and L1d were
       randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f
       were administered as the 4th or 5th names.
       For the telephone version of this question, see L1d.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING        -->L1d1.T
       5. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING       -->L1d2.T
       7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL]-->NEXT NAME/PARTY OR-->L2.T

       8. DK                                     -->NEXT NAME/PARTY OR-->L2.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000565    L1d1.T. Bush- how much reduce serv/spend ph
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1d1.T.

   IF R THINKS GW BUSH WOULD LIKE TO REDUCE SERVICES AND SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       (Do you think he would like to) reduce services and
       spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending)
       only some?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL  --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T
       5. ONLY SOME     --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T

       8. DK            --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L1d.T

==============================
M000566    L1d2.T. Bush- how much increase serv/spend ph
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1d2.T.

   IF R THINKS GW BUSH WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE SERVICES AND SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       (Do you think he would like to) increase services and
       spending a great deal or (increase services and
       spending) only some?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL  --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T
       5. ONLY SOME     --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T

       8. DK            --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L1d.T

==============================
M000567    L1dx1. 5-pt br summary Bush serv/spend
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1dx1.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about George W. Bush?  (Do you think he would like
       the government to provide fewer services in order
       to reduce spending or provide more services even if it
       means an increase in spending?)
       (Do you think he would like to) reduce/increase services
       and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services
       and spending) only some?

       SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L1d.T and L1d1.T/L1d2.T

       1. Reduce spending and services a great deal
       2. Reduce spending and services only some
       3. Stay same as now (3 in L1d.T)
       4. Increase spending and services only some
       5. Increase spending and services a great deal

       8. DK in L1d.T or L1d1.T/L1d2.T
       9. RF in L1d.T or L1d1.T/L1d2.T
       0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1d.T; FTF mode

==============================
M000568    L1dx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush serv/spend
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1dx2.

       FTF:
       Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about George W. Bush?  (Do you think he would like
       the government to provide fewer services in order
       to reduce spending or provide more services even if it
       means an increase in spending?)
       (Do you think he would like to) reduce/increase services
       and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services
       and spending) only some?

       SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE /BRANCH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L1d and L1dx1

       1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services a great deal
       2. SCALE 2; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services only some
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Stay same as now (3 in L1d.T)
       4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services only some
       5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services a great deal

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1d or L1d.T

==============================
M000569    L1e. Dem Party- serv/spend scale FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1e.

       FTF:
       Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this
       issue)?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       FTF: L1b was administered first, then L1c and L1d were
       randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f
       were administered as the 4th or 5th names.
       For the telephone version of this question, see L1e.T

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY
          FEWER SERVICES          --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       2.                         --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       3.                         --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       4.                         --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       5.                         --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       6.                         --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       7. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY
          MORE SERVICES           --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2

       8. DK                      --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000570    L1e.T. Dem Party- serv/spend scale phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1e.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Democratic Party?  (Do you think they
       would like the government to provide fewer services in
       order to reduce spending or provide more services even
       if it means an increase in spending?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       PHONE: L1b.T was administered first, then L1c and L1d were
       randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f
       were administered as the 4th or 5th names.
       For the telephone version of this question, see L1e.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING         --> L1e1.T
       5. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING        --> L1e2.T
       7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL] --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T

       8. DK                                      --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000571    L1e1.T. Dem Party-how much red srv/sp ph
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1e1.T.

   IF R THINKS DEMOCRATIC PARTY WANTS TO REDUCE SERVICES/SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       (Do you think they would like to) reduce services and
       spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending)
       only some?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL   --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T
       5. ONLY SOME      --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T

       8. DK             --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L1e.T

==============================
M000572    L1e2.T. Dem Party-how much inc srv/sp ph
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1e2.T.

   IF R THINKS DEMOCRATIC PARTY WANTS TO INCREASE SERVICES/SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       (Do you think they would like to) increase services and
       spending a great deal or (increase services and
       spending) only some?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A Great Deal --> Next Party or L2
       5. Only Some    --> Next Party or L2

       8. DK           --> Next Party Or L2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L1e.T

==============================
M000573    L1ex1. 5-pt br summary Dem Party srv/spd
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1ex1.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Democratic Party?  (Do you think they
       would like the government to provide fewer services in
       order to reduce spending or provide more services even
       if it means an increase in spending?)
       (Do you think they would like to) reduce/increase
       services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase
       services and spending) only some?

       SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L1e.T and L1e1.T/L1e2.T

       1. Reduce spending and services a great deal
       2. Reduce spending and services only some
       3. Stay same as now (3 in L1e.T)
       4. Increase spending and services only some
       5. Increase spending and services a great deal

       8. DK in L1e.T or L1e1.T/L1e2.T
       9. RF in L1e.T or L1e1.T/L1e2.T
       0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1e.T; FTF mode

==============================
M000574    L1ex2. Comb.7pt/br summ Dem Party srv/sp
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1ex2.

       FTF:
       Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this
       issue)?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Democratic Party?  (Do you think they
       would like the government to provide fewer services in
       order to reduce spending or provide more services even
       if it means an increase in spending?)
       (Do you think they would like to) reduce/increase
       services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase
       services and spending) only some?

       SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L1e and L1ex1

       1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services a great deal
       2. SCALE 2; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services only some
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Stay same as now (3 in L1e.T)
       4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services only some
       5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services a great deal

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1e or L1e.T

==============================
M000575    L1f. Rep Party- serv/spend scale FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1f.

       FTF:
       Where would you place the Republican Party (on this
       issue)?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       FTF: L1b was administered first, then L1c and L1d were
       randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f
       were administered as the 4th or 5th names.
       For the telephone version of this question, see L1f.T

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY
          FEWER SERVICES          --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       2.                         --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       3.                         --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       4.                         --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       5.                         --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       6.                         --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       7. GOVT SHOULD PROVIDE MANY
          MORE SERVICES           --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2

       8. DK                      --> NEXT NAME /PARTY OR --> L2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000576    L1f.T. Rep Party- serv/spend scale phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1f.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Republican Party?  (Do you think they
       would like the government to provide fewer services in
       order to reduce spending or provide more services even
       if it means an increase in spending?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       PHONE: L1b.T was administered first, then L1c and L1d were
       randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L1e and L1f
       were administered as the 4th or 5th names.
       For the telephone version of this question, see L1f.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING      --> L1f1.T
       5. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING     --> L1f2.T
       7. SHOULD STAY SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL]  --> Next Party or L2

       8. DK                                   --> Next Party Or L2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000577    L1f1.T. Rep Party-how much red srv/sp ph
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1f1.T.

   IF R THINKS REPUBLICAN PARTY WANTS TO REDUCE SERVICES/SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       (Do you think they would like to) reduce services and
       spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending)
       only some?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL   --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T
       5. ONLY SOME      --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T

       8. DK             --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L1f.T

==============================
M000578    L1f2.T. Rep Party-how much inc srv/sp ph
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1f2.T.

   IF R THINKS DEMOCRATIC PARTY WANTS TO INCREASE SERVICES/SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       (Do you think they would like to) increase services and
       spending a great deal or (increase services and
       spending) only some?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL    --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T
       5. ONLY SOME       --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T

       8. DK              --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L2.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L1f.T

==============================
M000579    L1fx1. 5-pt br summary Rep Party srv/spd
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1fx1.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Republican Party?  (Do you think they
       would like the government to provide fewer services in
       order to reduce spending or provide more services even
       if it means an increase in spending?)
       (Do you think they would like to) reduce/increase
       services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase
       services and spending) only some?

       SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND REP PTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L1f.T and L1f1.T/L1f2.T

       1. Reduce spending and services a great deal
       2. Reduce spending and services only some
       3. Stay same as now (3 in L1f.T)
       4. Increase spending and services only some
       5. Increase spending and services a great deal

       8. DK in L1f.T or L1f1.T/L1f2.T
       9. RF in L1f.T or L1f1.T/L1f2.T
       0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1f.T; FTF mode

==============================
M000580    L1fx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Rep Party srv/sp
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L1fx2.

       FTF:
       Where would you place the Republican Party (on this
       issue)?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Republican Party?  (Do you think they
       would like the government to provide fewer services in
       order to reduce spending or provide more services even
       if it means an increase in spending?)
       (Do you think they would like to) reduce/increase
       services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase
       services and spending) only some?

       SUMMARY: 5PT SERV/SPEND REP PTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L1f and L1fx1

       1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services a great deal
       2. SCALE 2; BRANCHING: Reduce spending and services only some
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: Stay same as now (3 in L1f.T)
       4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services only some
       5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase spending and services a great deal

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, DK/RF/NA in L1f or L1f.T

==============================
M000581    L2a. Self plcemnt-def spending scale FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L2a.

       FTF:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       For the telephone version of this question, see L2a.T

       1. GOVT SHOULD DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING   --> L2b
       2.                                         --> L2b
       3.                                         --> L2b
       4.                                         --> L2b
       5.                                         --> L2b
       6.                                         --> L2b
       7. GOVT SHOULD INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING   --> L2b

       8. DK                                      --> L2b
       9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS         --> L2b

==============================
M000582    L2a.T. Self plcemnt-def spending scale phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L2a.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you have an opinion on this issue or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       For the FTF version of this question, see L2a.

       1. YES, HAVE AN OPINION
       5. NO, NO OPINION (HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH)    --> L2b.T

       8. DK                                       --> L2b.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000583    L2a1.T. Govt inc/dec def spending phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L2a1.T.

   IF R DOES NOT SAY HE/SHE HAS NO OPINION ABOUT DEFENSE SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you feel the government should decrease defense
       spending, increase defense spending, or is the
       government spending on defense about the right amount
       now?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING  --> L2a1a.T
       3. INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING  --> L2a1b.T
       5. ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT     --> L2b.T/L2c.T

       8. DK                         --> L2b.T/L2c.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,0 in L2a.T

==============================
M000584    L2a1a.T. How much reduce def spending ph
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L2a1a.T.

   IF R SAYS DOES NOT SAY HE/SHE HAS NO OPINION ABOUT DEFENSE SPENDING:
   IF R SAYS THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD REDUCE DEFENSE SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       Should the government reduce defense spending a lot
       or a little?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A LOT      --> L2bT/L2c.T
       5. A LITTLE   --> L2b.T/L2c.T

       8. DK         --> L2b.T/L2c.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 3,5,8,9,0 in L2a1.T

==============================
M000585    L2a1b.T. How much incres def spending ph
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L2a1b.T.

   IF R SAYS DOES NOT SAY HE/SHE HAS NO OPINION ABOUT DEFENSE SPENDING:
   IF R SAYS THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       Should the government increase defense spending
       a lot or a little?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A LOT      --> L2b.T/L2c.T
       5. A LITTLE   --> L2b.T/L2c.T

       8. DK         --> L2b.T/L2c.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,5,8,9,0 in L2a1.T

==============================
M000586    L2ax1. 5-pt br summary defense spending
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 7
           Numeric

   L2ax1.

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you have an opinion on this issue or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       Do you feel the government should decrease defense
       spending, increase defense spending, or is the
       government spending on defense about the right amount
       now?
       Should the government decrease/increase defense spending
       a lot or a little?

       SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L2a.T, L2a1.T and L2a1a.T/L2a1b.T

       1. Decrease defense spending a lot
       2. Decrease defense spending a little
       3. About the right amount (5 in L2a1.T)
       4. Increase defense spending a little
       5. Increase defense spending a lot

       7. Haven't thought much (5 in L2a.T)
       8. DK in L2a1.T or L2a1a.T/L2a1b.T
       9. RF in L2a1.T or L2a1a.T/L2a1b.T
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2a.T or L2a1.T; FTF mode

==============================
M000587    L2ax2. Comb.7pt/br summ defense spending
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L2ax2.

       FTF:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you have an opinion on this issue or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       Do you feel the government should decrease defense
       spending, increase defense spending, or is the
       government spending on defense about the right amount
       now?
       Should the government decrease/increase defense spending
       a lot or a little?

       SUMMARY: 5PT DEFENSE SPENDING SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L2a and from L2a.T/L2a1.T/L2a1a.T/L2a1b.T.

       1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a lot
       2. SCALE: 2; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a little
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: About the right amount (5 in L2a1.T)
       4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a little
       5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a lot

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2a; 8,9,NA in L2a.T or L2a1.T; FTF mode
       0. Haven't thought much

==============================
M000588    L2b. Gore- defense spending scale FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L2b.

       FTF:
       Where would you place Al Gore on this issue?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       FTF: L2b and L2c were randomly administered as the 1st or
       2nd names. L2e and L2f were then randomly administered as
       the 3rd or 4th names.
       For the telephone version of this question, see L2b.T

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. GOVT SHOULD DECREASE
          DEFENSE SPENDING        --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       2.                         --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       3.                         --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       4.                         --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       5.                         --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       6.                         --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       7. GOVT SHOULD INCREASE
          DEFENSE SPENDING        --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3

       8. DK                      --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000589    L2b.T. Gore- defense spending scale ph
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L2b.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Al Gore?  Do you think he believes we should
       decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or
       that Government spending on defense is about the right
       amount now?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       PHONE: L2b.T and L2c.T were randomly administered as the
       1st or 2nd names. L2e.T and L2f.T were then randomly
       administered as the 3rd or 4th names.
       For the telephone version of this question, see L2b.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING     --> L2b1.T
       3. INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING     --> L2b1.T
       5. ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT        --> NEXT NAME/PARTY

       8. DK                            --> NEXT NAME/PARTY
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000590    L2b1.T. Gore-how much red/inc def spn ph
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L2b1.T.

   IF R SAYS GORE WANTS TO REDUCE DEFENSE SPENDING/
   IF R SAYS GORE WANTS TO INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       A lot or a little?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A LOT      --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR  --> L3.T
       5. A LITTLE   --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR  --> L3.T

       8. DK         --> NEXT NAME.PARTY OR  --> L3.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,8,9,0 in L2b.T


==============================
M000591    L2bx1. 5-pt br summary Gore def spend
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L2bx1.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Al Gore?  Do you think he believes we should
       decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or
       that Government spending on defense is about the right
       amount now?
       A lot or a little?

       SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L2b.T and L2b1.T/L2b2.T

       1. Decrease defense spending a lot
       2. Decrease defense spending a little
       3. About the right amount (5 in L2b.T)
       4. Increase defense spending a little
       5. Increase defense spending a lot

       8. DK in L2b.T or L2b1.T/L2b2.T
       9. RF in L2b.T or L2b1.T/L2b2.T
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2b.T; FTF mode

==============================
M000592    L2bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore def spend
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L2bx2.

       FTF:
       Where would you place Al Gore on this issue?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Al Gore?  Do you think he believes we should
       decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or
       that Government spending on defense is about the right
       amount now?
       A lot or a little?

       SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L2b and L2bx1.

       1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a lot
       2. SCALE: 2; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a little
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: About the right amount (5 in L2b.T)
       4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a little
       5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a lot

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2b or L2b.T; FTF mode

==============================
M000593    L2c. Bush- defense spending scale FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L2c.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at Page 6).
       Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       FTF: L2b and L2c were randomly administered as the 1st or
       2nd names. L2e and L2f were then randomly administered as
       the 3rd or 4th names.
       For the telephone version of this question, see L2c.T

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. GOVT SHOULD DECREASE
          DEFENSE SPENDING         --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       2.                          --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       3.                          --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       4.                          --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       5.                          --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       6.                          --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       7. GOVT SHOULD INCREASE
          DEFENSE SPENDING         --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3

       8. DK                       --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000594    L2c.T. Bush- defense spending scale ph
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L2c.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about George W. Bush?  (Do you think he believes we
       should decrease defense spending, increase defense
       spending, or that Government spending on defense is
       about the right amount now?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       PHONE: L2b.T and L2c.T were randomly administered as the
       1st or 2nd names. L2e.T and L2f.T were then randomly
       administered as the 3rd or 4th names.
       For the telephone version of this question, see L2c.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING   --> L2c1.T
       3. INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING   --> L2c1.T
       5. ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT      --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3.T

       8. DK                          --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000595    L2c1.T. Bush-how much red/inc def spd ph
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L2c1.T.

   IF R SAYS GW BUSH WANTS TO REDUCE DEFENSE SPENDING/
   IF R SAYS GW BUSH WANTS TO INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       A lot or a little?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A LOT      --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR  --> L3.T
       5. A LITTLE   --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR  --> L3.T

       8. DK         --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR  --> L3.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,8,9,0 in L2c.T

==============================
M000596    L2cx1. 5-pt br summary Bush def spend
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L2cx1.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about George W. Bush?  (Do you think he believes we
       should decrease defense spending, increase defense
       spending, or that Government spending on defense is
       about the right amount now?)
       A lot or a little?

       SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCH SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L2c.T and L2c1.T/L2c2.T

       1. Decrease defense spending a lot
       2. Decrease defense spending a little
       3. About the right amount (5 in L2c.T)
       4. Increase defense spending a little
       5. Increase defense spending a lot

       8. DK in L2c.T or L2c1.T/L2c2.T
       9. RF in L2c.T or L2c1.T/L2c2.T
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2c.T; FTF mode

==============================
M000597    L2cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush def spend
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L2cx2.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at Page 6).
       Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about George W. Bush?  (Do you think he believes we
       should decrease defense spending, increase defense
       spending, or that Government spending on defense is
       about the right amount now?)
       A lot or a little?

       SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING GW BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L2c and L2cx1.

       1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a lot
       2. SCALE: 2; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a little
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: About the right amount (5 in L2c.T)
       4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a little
       5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a lot

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2c or L2c.T; FTF mode

==============================
M000598    L2d. Dem Party-def spending scale FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L2d.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at Page 6).
       Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this
       issue)?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       FTF: L2b and L2c were randomly administered as the 1st or
       2nd names. L2e and L2f were then randomly administered as
       the 3rd or 4th names.
       For the telephone version of this question, see L2d.T

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. GOVT SHOULD DECREASE
          DEFENSE SPENDING            --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       2.                             --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       3.                             --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       4.                             --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       5.                             --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       6.                             --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       7. GOVT SHOULD INCREASE
          DEFENSE SPENDING            --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3

       8. DK                          --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000599    L2d.T. Dem Party-def spend scale phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L2d.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Democratic Party?  (Do you think they
       believe we should decrease defense spending, increase
       defense spending, or that Government spending on defense
       is about the right amount now?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       PHONE: L2b.T and L2c.T were randomly administered as the
       1st or 2nd names. L2e.T and L2f.T were then randomly
       administered as the 3rd or 4th names.
       For the telephone version of this question, see L2d.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING     --> L2d1.T
       3. INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING     --> L2d1.T
       5. ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT        --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T

       8. DK                            --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000600    L2d1.T. Dem Party-how much red/inc ds ph
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L2d1.T.

   IF R SAYS DEMOCRATIC PARTY WANTS TO REDUCE DEFENSE SPENDING/
   IF R SAYS DEMOCRATIC PARTY WANTS TO INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       A lot or a little?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A LOT      --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T
       5. A LITTLE   --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T

       8. DK         --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,8,9,0 in L2d.T

==============================
M000601    L2dx1. 5-pt br summary Dem Party def sp
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L2dx1.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Democratic Party?  (Do you think they
       believe we should decrease defense spending, increase
       defense spending, or that Government spending on defense
       is about the right amount now?
       A lot or a little?

       SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCH SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from  L2d.T and L2d1.T/L2d2.T

       1. Decrease defense spending a lot
       2. Decrease defense spending a little
       3. About the right amount (5 in L2d.T)
       4. Increase defense spending a little
       5. Increase defense spending a lot

       8. DK in L2d.T or L2d1.T/L2d2.T
       9. RF in L2d.T or L2d1.T/L2d2.T
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2d.T; FTF mode

==============================
M000602    L2dx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Dem Party def sp
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L2dx2.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at Page 6).
       Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this
       issue)?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Democratic Party?  (Do you think they
       believe we should decrease defense spending, increase
       defense spending, or that Government spending on defense
       is about the right amount now?
       A lot or a little?

       SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING DEM PTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L2d and L2dx1.

       1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a lot
       2. SCALE: 2; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a little
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: About the right amount (5 in L2d.T)
       4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a little
       5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a lot

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2d or L2d.T; FTF mode

==============================
M000603    L2e. Rep Party-def spending scale FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L2e.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at Page 6).
       Where would you place the Republican Party (on this
       issue)?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       FTF: L2b and L2c were randomly administered as the 1st or
       2nd names. L2e and L2f were then randomly administered as
       the 3rd or 4th names.
       For the telephone version of this question, see L2e.T

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. GOVT SHOULD DECREASE
          DEFENSE SPENDING            --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       2.                             --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       3.                             --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       4.                             --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       5.                             --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       6.                             --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       7. GOVT SHOULD INCREASE
          DEFENSE SPENDING            --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3

       8. DK                          --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L3
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000604    L2e.T. Rep Party-def spend scale phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L2e.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Republican Party?  (Do you think they
       believes we should decrease defense spending,
       increase defense spending, or that Government spending on
       defense is about the right amount now?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       PHONE: L2b.T and L2c.T were randomly administered as the
       1st or 2nd names. L2e.T and L2f.T were then randomly
       administered as the 3rd or 4th names.
       For the telephone version of this question, see L2e.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. DECREASE DEFENSE SPENDING     --> L2e1.T
       3. INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING     --> L2e1.T
       5. ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT        --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T

       8. DK                            --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L3.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000605    L2e1.T. Rep Party-how much inc/red ds ph
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L2e1.T.

   IF R SAYS REPUBLICAN PARTY WANTS TO REDUCE DEFENSE SPENDING/
   IF R SAYS REPUBLICAN PARTY WANTS TO INCREASE DEFENSE SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       A lot or a little?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A LOT      --> NEXT PARTY OR L3.T
       5. A LITTLE   --> NEXT PARTY OR L3.T

       8. DK         --> NEXT PARTY OR L3.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,8,9,0 in L2e.T


==============================
M000606    L2ex1. 5-pt br summary Rep Party def sp
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L2ex1.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Republican Party?  (Do you think they
       believes we should decrease defense spending,
       increase defense spending, or that Government spending on
       defense is about the right amount now?)
       A lot or a little?

       SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING REP PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCH SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L2e.T and L2e1.T/L2e2.T

       1. Decrease defense spending a lot
       2. Decrease defense spending a little
       3. About the right amount (5 in L2e.T)
       4. Increase defense spending a little
       5. Increase defense spending a lot

       8. DK in L2e.T or L2e1.T/L2e2.T
       9. RF in L2e.T or L2e1.T/L2e2.T
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2e.T; FTF mode

==============================
M000607    L2ex2. Comb.7pt/br summ Rep Party def sp
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L2ex2.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at Page 6).
       Where would you place the Republican Party (on this
       issue)?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Republican Party?  (Do you think they
       believes we should decrease defense spending,
       increase defense spending, or that Government spending on
       defense is about the right amount now?)
       A lot or a little?

       SUMMARY: 5PT DEF SPENDING REP PTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L2e and L2ex1.

       1. SCALE: 1; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a lot
       2. SCALE: 2; BRANCHING: Decrease defense spending a little
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5; BRANCHING: About the right amount (5 in L2e.T)
       4. SCALE: 6; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a little
       5. SCALE: 7; BRANCHING: Increase defense spending a lot

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in L2e or L2e.T; FTF mode

==============================
M000608    L3(1). Ckpt: FTF/ph, reg/exp.
           Numeric

   L3(1).

       CHECKPOINT:  MODE AND VERSION
       FOR GOVT/PRIVATE MEDICAL INSURANCE SELF-PLACEMENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       FTF:  Rs were randomly assigned to the standard 7-point scale
       or to an experimental version of the 7-point scale (with
       endpoints reversed).
       Phone:  Rs were randomly assigned to 2 versions of the
       branching format; in the 2nd version, the initial placement
       question is coded in reverse.

       1. FTF standard version
       2. FTF experimental version
       3. PHONE version 1
       4. PHONE version 2

==============================
M000608a   L3a. Self placement-private or govt insur
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L3a.

   IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION:

       FTF:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See L3 for complete text.
       FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       either L3a (standard) or L3a.E (experimental).
       The endpoints are reversed in the experimental version
       of this question.
       For telephone versions of this question, see L3a.T and
       L3a.TE.

       1. GOVT INSURANCE PLAN           --> SKIP TO L4
       2.                               --> SKIP TO L4
       3.                               --> SKIP TO L4
       4.                               --> SKIP TO L4
       5.                               --> SKIP TO L4
       6.                               --> SKIP TO L4
       7. PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN        --> SKIP TO L4

       8. DK                            --> SKIP TO L4
       9. RF; NA; INAP, 2, 3, 4 in L3(1)
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH          --> SKIP TO L4


==============================
M000608b   L3a.E. Self placement-insur scale FTF ex
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L3a.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION:

       FTF:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See L3.E for complete text.
       FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       either L3a (standard) or L3a.E (experimental).
       The endpoints are reversed in the experimental version
       of this question.
       For telephone versions of this question, see L3a.T and
       L3a.TE.

       1. PRIVATE  INSURANCE PLAN         --> L4
       2.                                 --> L4
       3.                                 --> L4
       4.                                 --> L4
       5.                                 --> L4
       6.                                 --> L4
       7. GOVT INSURANCE PLAN             --> L4

       8. DK                              --> L4
       9. RF; NA; INAP, 1, 3, 4 in L3(1)
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS --> L4

==============================
M000609    L3ax. Comb. FTF versions R insurnc scale
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L3ax.

       FTF:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?

       COMBINED FTF: STANDARD/EXPERIMENTAL 7 PT MEDICAL INSURANCE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L3a/L3a.E.

       1. GOVT INSURANCE PLAN
       2.
       3.
       4.
       5.
       6.
       7. PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, phone mode [3, 4 in L3(1)]
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH

==============================
M000610a   L3a.T. Self placement-insur scale phone stan
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L3a.T.

   IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 1:

       TELEPHONE:
       Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See L3.T for complete text.
       Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       either L3a.T (version 1) or L3a.TE (version 2).
       The coding is reversed in version 2 of this question.
       For FTF versions of this question, see L3a and L3a.E.

       1. SHOULD BE A GOVT INSURANCE PLAN         --> SKIP TO L3a1.T
       5. INDIVIDUALS SHOULD PAY MEDICAL EXPENSES
          THROUGH PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN          --> SKIP TO L3a2.T
       7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL] --> SKIP TO L4

       8. DK                                      --> SKIP TO L4.T
       9. RF; NA; INAP, 1, 2, 4 in L3(1)
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS         --> SKIP TO L4.T

==============================
M000610b   L3a.TE. Self placement-insur scale phone ex
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L3a.TE.

   IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 2:

       TELEPHONE:
       Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See L3.TE for complete text.
       Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       either L3a.T (version 1) or L3a.TE (version 2).
       The coding is reversed in version 2 of this question.
       For FTF versions of this question, see L3a and L3a.E.

       1. INDIVIDUALS SHOULD PAY MEDICAL EXPENSES
          THROUGH PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN            --> L3a2.T
       5. SHOULD BE A GOVT INSURANCE PLAN           --> L3a1.T
       7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW         --> L4.T

       8. DK                                        --> L4.T
       9. RF; NA; INAP, 1, 2, 3 in L3(1)
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS           --> L4.T

==============================
M000611    L3ax.TE. Comb. Ph versions R insur scale
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L3ax.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you
       thought much about this?

       COMBINED PHONE VERSION 1/VERSION 2 - MEDICAL INSURANCE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L3a.T and L3a.TE

       1. SHOULD BE A GOVT INSURANCE PLAN
       5. INDIVIDUALS SHOULD PAY MEDICAL EXPENSES
          THROUGH PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN
       7. SHOULD STAY THE SAME AS IT IS NOW [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode [1,2 in L3(1)]
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS

==============================
M000612    L3a1/a2.T. Strength of insurance plan
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L3a1/a2.T.

   BOTH TELEPHONE VERSIONS:
   IF R FEELS THERE SHOULD BE GOVERNMENT INSURANCE PLAN/
   IF R FEELS INDIVIDUALS SHOULD PAY THROUGH PRIVATE INSURANCE PLAN:

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you feel strongly or not strongly that there should
       be a government insurance plan?/
       Do you feel strongly or not strongly that individuals
       should pay through private insurance plan?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY       --> L4.T
       5. NOT STRONGLY   --> L4.T

       8. DK             --> L4.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,0 or RF/NA in L3a.T or L3a.TE

==============================
M000613    L3x1. 5-pt br summary R on pri/govt insurance
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L3x1.

       TELEPHONE:
       Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       Do you feel strongly or not strongly that there should
       be a a government insurance plan?/
       Do you feel strongly or not strongly that individuals
       should pay through private insurance plan?

       SUMMARY:  5PT MED INSURANCE SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built L3ax.T and L3a1.T/L3a2.T

       1. Strongly - government insurance plan
       2. Not strongly - government insurance plan
       3. Stay the same as it is now
       4. Not strongly - individual insurance
       5. Strongly - individual insurance

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode [1,2 in L3(1)]
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS

==============================
M000614    L3x2. Comb.7pt/br summ of R on pri/govt insurance
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L3x2.

       FTF:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?

       TELEPHONE:
       Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       Do you feel strongly or not strongly that there should
       be a a government insurance plan?/
       Do you feel strongly or not strongly that individuals
       should pay through private insurance plan?

       SUMMARY: 5PT MED INSURANCE SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L3ax and L3ax.T

       1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt insurance plan
       2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt insurance plan
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5 ; BRANCHING: Stay the same as it is now
       4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - individual insurance
       5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Strongly - individual insurance

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS

==============================
M000615    L4a. R plcmnt-guar job/std liv scl FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L4a.

       FTF:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       For the telephone version of this question see L4a.T.

       1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING   --> L4b.
       2.                                                  --> L4b.
       3.                                                  --> L4b.
       4.                                                  --> L4b.
       5.                                                  --> L4b.
       6.                                                  --> L4b.
       7. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN     --> L4b.

       8. DK                                               --> L4b.
       9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS                  --> L4b.

==============================
M000616    L4a.T. R plcmnt-guar job/std liv scl ph
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L4a.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       For the FTF version of this question see L4a.

       1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING  --> L4a1.T
       5. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN    --> L4a2.T
       7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL]                --> L4b.T/L4c.T

       8. DK                                              --> L4b.T/L4c.T
       9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS                 --> L4b.T/L4c.T

==============================
M000617    L4a1.T. How much should gov guar jobs
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L4a1.T.

   IF R THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING:

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you feel strongly that the government should see to
       it that every person has a job and a good standard of
       living, or not so strongly?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY       --> L4b.T/L4c.T
       5. NOT STRONGLY   --> L4b.T/L4c.T

       8. DK             --> L4b.T/L4c.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in L4a.T

==============================
M000618    L4a2t. How much should ppl get by on own
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L4a2.T.

   IF R THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD LET EACH GET AHEAD ON THEIR OWN:

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you feel strongly that the government should just let
       each person get ahead on their own, or not so strongly?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY       --> L4b.T/L4c.T
       5. NOT STRONGLY   --> L4b.T/L4c.T

       8. DK             --> L4b.T/L4c.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in L4a.T

==============================
M000619    L4x1. 5-pt br summary guaranteed jobs
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L4x1.

       TELEPHONE:
       Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       Do you feel strongly that the government should see to
       it that every person has a job and a good standard of
       living, or not so strongly?
       Do you feel strongly that the government should just let
       each person get ahead on their own, or not so strongly?

       SUMMARY: 5PT GUARANTEED JOBS SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L4a; built from L4a.T and L4a1.T/L4a2.T

       1. Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living
       2. Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living
       3. Other/depends/neither
       4. Not strongly - govt leave people on own
       5. Strongly - govt leave people on own

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS

==============================
M000620    L4x2. Comb.7pt/br summ guaranteed jobs
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L4x2.

       FTF:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?

       TELEPHONE:
       Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       Do you feel strongly that the government should see to
       it that every person has a job and a good standard of
       living, or not so strongly?
       Do you feel strongly that the government should just let
       each person get ahead on their own, or not so strongly?

       SUMMARY: 5PT GUARANTEED JOBS SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L4a and L4x1.

       1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living
       2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither
       4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt leave people on own
       5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt leave people on own

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS

==============================
M000621    L4b. Gore-guar job/std liv scl FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L4b.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at Page 9)
       Where would you place Al Gore on this issue?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       FTF:  L4b and L4c were randomly administered as the 1st or
       2nd names; L4e and L4f were then randomly administered as
       the 3rd or 4th names.
       For the telephone version of this question see L4b.T.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND
          STANDARD OF LIVING                   --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.
       2.                                      --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5
       3.                                      --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5
       4.                                      --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5
       5.                                      --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5
       6.                                      --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5
       7. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON
          GET AHEAD ON OWN                     --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5

       8. DK                                   --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000622    L4b.T. Gore-guar job/std liv scl phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L4b.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Al Gore?  Do you think he feels government
       should see to it that every person has a job and a good
       standard of living, or that government should just let
       each person get ahead on their own?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       PHONE:  L4b.T and L4c.T were randomly administered as the
       1st or 2nd names; L4e.T and L4f.T were then randomly
       administered as the 3rd or 4th names.
       For the FTF version of this question see L4b.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND
          STANDARD OF LIVING                  --> L4b1.T
       5. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET
          AHEAD ON OWN                        --> L4b2T
       7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL]      --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR -->L5.T

       8. DK                                  --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000623    L4b1/b2.T. Gore-strength of guar job
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L4b1/b2.T.

   IF R SAYS GORE THINKS GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD LIVING/
   IF R SAYS GORE THINKS GOVT SHOULD LET EACH ON OWN:

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly
       that the government should see to jobs and a good
       standard of living?
       Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly
       that the government should just let each person get
       ahead on their own?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY       --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR  --> L5.T
       5. NOT STRONGLY   --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR  --> L5.T

       8. DK             --> NEXT NAME.PARTY OR  --> L5.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L4b.T

==============================
M000624    L4bx1. 5-pt br summary Gore guar job
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L4bx1.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Al Gore?  Do you think he feels government
       should see to it that every person has a job and a good
       standard of living, or that government should just let
       each person get ahead on their own?
       Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the
       government should see to jobs and a good standard of
       living?
       Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the
       government should just let each person get ahead on
       their own?

       SUMMARY: 5PT GUARANTEED JOBS GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L4b.T and L4b1.T/L4b2.

       1. Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living
       2. Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living
       3. Other/depends/neither
       4. Not strongly - govt leave people on own
       5. Strongly - govt leave people on own

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000625    L4bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore guar job
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L4bx2.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at Page 9)
       Where would you place Al Gore on this issue?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Al Gore?  Do you think he feels government
       should see to it that every person has a job and a good
       standard of living, or that government should just let
       each person get ahead on their own?
       Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the
       government should see to jobs and a good standard of
       living?
       Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the
       government should just let each person get ahead on
       their own?

       SUMMARY: 5PT GUARANTEED JOBS GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L4b and L4bx1.

       1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living
       2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither
       4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt leave people on own
       5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt leave people on own

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000626    L4c. Bush-guar job/std liv scl FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L4c.

       FTF:
       Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       FTF:  L4b and L4c were randomly administered as the 1st or
       2nd names; L4e and L4f were then randomly administered as
       the 3rd or 4th names.
       For the telephone version of this question see L4c.T.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING
       2.
       3.
       4.
       5.
       6.
       7. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000627    L4c.T. Bush-guar job/std liv scl phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L4c.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about George W. Bush?  (Do you think he feels
       government should see to it that every person has a
       job and a good standard of living, or that government
       should just let each person get ahead on their own?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       PHONE:  L4b.T and L4c.T were randomly administered as the
       1st or 2nd names; L4e.T and L4f.T were then randomly
       administered as the 3rd or 4th names.
       For the FTF version of this question see L4c.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND
          STANDARD OF LIVING                 --> L4c1.T
       5. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET
          AHEAD ON OWN                       --> L4c1.T
       7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL]     --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.T

       8. DK                                 --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000628    L4c1/c2.T. Bush-strength guar job
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L4c1/c2.T.

   IF R SAYS GW BUSH THINKS GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD LIVING/
   IF R SAYS GW BUSH THINKS GOVT SHOULD LET EACH ON OWN:

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly
       that the government should see to jobs and a good
       standard of living?
       Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly
       that the government should just let each person get
       ahead on their own ?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY                --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.T
       5. NOT STRONGLY            --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L5.T

       8. DK                      --> NEXT NAME.PARTY OR --> L5.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L4c.T

==============================
M000629    L4cx1. 5-pt br summary Bush guar job
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L4cx1.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about George W. Bush?  (Do you think he feels
       government should see to it that every person has a
       job and a good standard of living, or that government
       should just let each person get ahead on their own?)
       Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the
       government should see to jobs and a good standard of
       living?
       Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the
       government should just let each person get ahead on
       their own ?

       SUMMARY: 5PT GUARANTEED JOBS BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from  L4c.T and L4c1.T/L4c2.T

       1. Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living
       2. Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living
       3. Other/depends/neither
       4. Not strongly - govt leave people on own
       5. Strongly - govt leave people on own

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000630    L4cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush guar job
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L4cx2.

       FTF:
       Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about George W. Bush?  (Do you think he feels
       government should see to it that every person has a
       job and a good standard of living, or that government
       should just let each person get ahead on their own?)
       Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the
       government should see to jobs and a good standard of
       living?
       Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that the
       government should just let each person get ahead on
       their own ?

       SUMMARY: 5PT GUARANTEED JOBS BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L4c and L4cx1.

       1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living
       2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither
       4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt leave people on own
       5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt leave people on own

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000631    L4d. Dem Party-guar job/std liv scl FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L4d.

       FTF:
       Where would you place the Democratic Party
       (on this issue)?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       FTF:  L4b and L4c were randomly administered as the 1st or
       2nd names; L4e and L4f were then randomly administered as
       the 3rd or 4th names.
       For the telephone version of this question see L4d.T.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING
       2.
       3.
       4.
       5.
       6.
       7. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000632    L4d.T. Dem Party-guar job/std liv scl ph
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L4d.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Democratic Party?  (Do you think they feel
       government should see to it that every person
       has a job and a good standard of living, or that
       government should just let each person get ahead on
       their own?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       PHONE:  L4b.T and L4c.T were randomly administered as the
       1st or 2nd names; L4e.T and L4f.T were then randomly
       administered as the 3rd or 4th names.
       For the FTF version of this question see L4d.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND
          STANDARD OF LIVING                   --> L4d1.T
       5. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET
          AHEAD ON OWN                         --> L4d1.T
       7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER  [VOL]      --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L5.T

       8. DK                                   --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L5.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000633    L4d1/d2.T. Dem Party-strength guar job
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L4d1/d2.T.

   IF R SAYS DEM PARTY THINKS GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STD OF LIVING/
   IF R SAYS DEM PARTY THINKS GOVT SHOULD LET EACH ON OWN:

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly
       that the government should see to jobs and a good
       standard of living?
       Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly
       that the government should just let each person get
       ahead on their own ?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY       --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L5.T
       5. NOT STRONGLY   --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L5.T

       8. DK             --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L5.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L4d.T

==============================
M000634    L4dx1. 5-pt br summary Dem Party guar jb
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L4dx1.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Democratic Party?  (Do you think they feel
       government should see to it that every person
       has a job and a good standard of living, or that
       government should just let each person get ahead on
       their own?)
       Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the
       government should see to jobs and a good standard of
       living?
       Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the
       government should just let each person get ahead on
       their own ?

       SUMMARY: 5PT GUAR JOBS DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L4d.T and L4d1.T/L4d2.T

       1. Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living
       2. Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living
       3. Other/depends/neither
       4. Not strongly - govt leave people on own
       5. Strongly - govt leave people on own

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000635    L4dx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Dem Party gua jb
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L4dx2.

       FTF:
       Where would you place the Democratic Party
       (on this issue)?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Democratic Party?  (Do you think they feel
       government should see to it that every person
       has a job and a good standard of living, or that
       government should just let each person get ahead on
       their own?)
       Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the
       government should see to jobs and a good standard of
       living?
       Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly that the
       government should just let each person get ahead on
       their own ?

       SUMMARY: 5PT GUAR JOBS DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L4d and L4dx1.

       1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living
       2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither
       4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt leave people on own
       5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt leave people on own

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000636    L4e. Rep Party-guar job/std liv FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L4e.

       FTF:
       Where would you place the Republican Party (on this
       issue)?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       FTF:  L4b and L4c were randomly administered as the 1st or
       2nd names; L4e and L4f were then randomly administered as
       the 3rd or 4th names.
       For the telephone version of this question see L4e.T.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING
       2.
       3.
       4.
       5.
       6.
       7. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode


==============================
M000637    L4e.T. Rep Party-guar job/std liv phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L4e.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Republican Party?  (Do you think they feel
       government should see to it that every person has a job
       and a good standard of living, or that government should
       just let each person get ahead on their own?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       PHONE:  L4b.T and L4c.T were randomly administered as the
       1st or 2nd names; L4e.T and L4f.T were then randomly
       administered as the 3rd or 4th names.
       For the FTF version of this question see L4e.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STANDARD
          OF LIVING                                   --> L4e1.T
       5. GOVT SHOULD LET EACH PERSON GET AHEAD ON OWN-->NEXT PARTY OR-->L5.T
       7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER  [VOL]             --> L4e1.T

       8. DK                                      --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L5.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000638    L4e1/e2.T. Rep Party-strength guar job
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L4e1/e2.T.

   IF R SAYS REP PARTY THINKS GOVT SHOULD SEE TO JOBS AND STD OF LIVING/
   IF R SAYS REP PARTY THINKS GOVT SHOULD LET EACH ON OWN:

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly
       that the government should see to jobs and a good
       standard of living?
       Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly
       that the government should just let each person get
       ahead on their own?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY       --> NEXT PARTY OR L5.T
       5. NOT STRONGLY   --> NEXT PARTY OR L5.T

       8. DK             --> NEXT PARTY OR L5.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L4e.T

==============================
M000639    L4ex1. 5-pt br summ Rep Party guar job
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L4ex1.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Republican Party?  (Do you think they feel
       government should see to it that every person has a job
       and a good standard of living, or that government should
       just let each person get ahead on their own?)
       Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly
       that the government should see to jobs and a good
       standard of living?
       Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly
       that the government should just let each person get
       ahead on their own?

       SUMMARY: 5PT GUAR JOBS REP PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L4e.T and L4e1.T/L4e2.T

       1. Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living
       2. Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living
       3. Other/depends/neither
       4. Not strongly - govt leave people on own
       5. Strongly - govt leave people on own

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000640    L4ex2. Comb.7pt/br summ Rep Party guar job
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L4ex2.

       FTF:
       Where would you place the Republican Party (on this
       issue)?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Republican Party?  (Do you think they feel
       government should see to it that every person has a job
       and a good standard of living, or that government should
       just let each person get ahead on their own?)
       Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly
       that the government should see to jobs and a good
       standard of living?
       Do you think they feel strongly or not strongly
       that the government should just let each person get
       ahead on their own?

       SUMMARY: 5PT GUAR JOBS REP PARTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L4e and L4ex1.

       1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt see to jobs & std living
       2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt see to jobs & std living
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither
       4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - govt leave people on own
       5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Strongly - govt leave people on own

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000641    L5a. R plcmnt-aid to blacks scale FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5a.

       FTF:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See L5 for complete text.
       For the telephone version of this question see L5a.T.

       1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS          --> L5b.
       2.                                  --> L5b.
       3.                                  --> L5b.
       4.                                  --> L5b.
       5.                                  --> L5b.
       6.                                  --> L5b.
       7. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES    --> L5b.

       8. DK                               --> L5b.
       9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS  --> L5b.

==============================
M000642    L5a.T. R plcmnt-aid to blacks scale phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5a.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See L5.T for complete text.
       For the FTF version of this question see L5a.

       1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS           --> L5a1.T
       5. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES     --> L5a1.T
       7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL]  --> L5b.T

       8. DK                                --> L5b.T
       9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS   --> L5b.T

==============================
M000643    L5a1/a2.T. R-strength aid to blacks
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5a1/a2.T.

   IF R THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD HELP BLACKS/
   IF R THINKS BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES:

       TELEPHONE:
       Should the government help blacks to a great extent or
       only to some extent?
       Should blacks have to help themselves to a great extent
       or only to some extent?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. GREAT EXTENT   --> L5b.T
       5. ONLY SOME      --> L5b.T

       8. DK             --> L5b.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L5a.T

==============================
M000644    L5ax1. 5-pt br summary R aid to blacks
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5ax1.

       TELEPHONE:
       Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       Should the government help blacks to a great extent or
       only to some extent?
       Should blacks have to help themselves to a great extent
       or only to some extent?

       SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L5a.T and L5a1.T/L5a2.T.

       1. Govt help blacks to great extent
       2. Govt help blacks to some extent
       3. Other/neither/depends
       4. Should help themselves to some extent
       5. Should help themselves to a great extent

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode
       0. Haven't thought much about it

==============================
M000645    L5ax2. Comb.7pt/br summ R aid to blacks
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5ax2.

       FTF:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?

       TELEPHONE:
       Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       Should the government help blacks to a great extent or
       only to some extent?
       Should blacks have to help themselves to a great extent
       or only to some extent?

       SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L5a and L5ax1.

       1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to great extent
       2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to some extent
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/neither/depends
       4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to some extent
       5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to a great extent

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode
       0. Haven't thought much about it

==============================
M000646    L5b. Clinton plcmnt-aid to blacks scale FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5b.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 10)
       Where would you place Bill Clinton on this issue?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       See L5 for complete text.
       FTF: L5b is administered first, then L5c and L5d are
       randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e and L5f
       are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names.
       For the telephone version of this question see L5b.T.

       1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS       --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       2.                               --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       3.                               --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       4.                               --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       5.                               --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       6.                               --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       7. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.

       8. DK                            --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000647    L5b.T. Clinton-aid to blacks scale phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5b.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Bill Clinton?  (Do you think he feels that
       government should make every effort to improve
       the social and economic position of blacks, or that
       government should not make any special effort
       to help blacks because they should help themselves?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       See L5.T for complete text.
       TELEPHONE: L5b.T is administered first, then L5c.T and
       L5d.T are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names.
       L5e.T and L5f.T are then randomly administered as the 4th
       or 5th names.
       For the FTF version of this question see L5b.

       1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS            --> L5b1.T
       5. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES      --> L5b1.T
       7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL]     --> NEXT NAME

       8. DK                                 --> NEXT NAME
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000648    L5b1/b2.T. Clinton-strength aid to blacks
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5b1/b2.T.

   IF R SAYS CLINTON THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD HELP BLACKS/
   IF R SAYS CLINTON THINKS BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES:

       TELEPHONE:
       (Do you think he feels the government should)
       help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent?
       (Do you think he feels blacks should have to)
       help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. GREAT EXTENT            --> NEXT NAME
       5. ONLY SOME               --> NEXT NAME

       8. DK                      --> NEXT NAME
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L5b.T

==============================
M000649    L5bx1. 5-pt br summary Clinton aid to blacks
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5bx1.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Bill Clinton?  (Do you think he feels that
       government should make every effort to improve
       the social and economic position of blacks, or that
       government should not make any special effort
       to help blacks because they should help themselves?)
       (Do you think he feels the government should)
       help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent?
       (Do you think he feels blacks should have to)
       help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent?

       SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS CLINTON PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L5b.T and L5b1.T/L5b2.T.

       1. Govt help blacks to great extent
       2. Govt help blacks to some extent
       3. Other/neither/depends
       4. Should help themselves to some extent
       5. Should help themselves to a great extent

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000650    L5bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Clinton aid to blacks
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5bx2.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 10)
       Where would you place Bill Clinton on this issue?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Bill Clinton?  (Do you think he feels that
       government should make every effort to improve
       the social and economic position of blacks, or that
       government should not make any special effort
       to help blacks because they should help themselves?)
       (Do you think he feels the government should)
       help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent?
       (Do you think he feels blacks should have to)
       help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent?

       SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS CLINTON PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L5b and L5bx1.

       1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to great extent
       2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to some extent
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/neither/depends
       4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to some extent
       5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to a great extent

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000651    L5c. Gore plcmnt-aid to blacks scale FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5c.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 10)
       Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       See L5 for complete text.
       FTF: L5b is administered first, then L5c and L5d are
       randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e and L5f
       are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names.
       For the telephone version of this question see L5c.T.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS       --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       2.                               --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       3.                               --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       4.                               --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       5.                               --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       6.                               --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       7. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.

       8. DK                            --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000652    L5c.T. Gore-aid to blacks scale phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5c.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Al Gore?  (Do you think he feels that
       government should make every effort to improve the
       social and economic position of blacks, or that
       government should not make any special effort to help
       blacks because they should help themselves?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       See L5.T for complete text.
       TELEPHONE: L5b.T is administered first, then L5c.T and
       L5d.T are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names.
       L5e.T and L5f.T are then randomly administered as the 4th
       or 5th names.
       For the FTF version of this question see L5c.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS            --> L5c1.T
       5. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES      --> L5c1.T
       7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL]     --> NEXT NAME/PARTY

       8. DK                                 --> NEXT NAME/PARTY
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000653    L5c1/c2.T. Gore-strength aid to blacks
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5c1/c2.T.

   IF R SAYS GORE THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD HELP BLACKS/
   IF R SAYS GORE THINKS BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES:

       TELEPHONE:
       (Do you think he feels the government should)
       help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent?
       (Do you think he feels blacks should have to)
       help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. GREAT EXTENT   --> NEXT NAME/PARTY
       5. ONLY SOME      --> NEXT NAME/PARTY

       8. DK             --> NEXT NAME/PARTY
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L5c.T

==============================
M000654    L5cx1. 5-pt br summary Gore aid to blks
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5cx1.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Al Gore?  (Do you think he feels that
       government should make every effort to improve the
       social and economic position of blacks, or that
       government should not make any special effort to help
       blacks because they should help themselves?)
       (Do you think he feels the government should)
       help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent?
       (Do you think he feels blacks should have to)
       help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent?

       SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L5c.T and L5c1.T/L5c2.T.

       1. Govt help blacks to great extent
       2. Govt help blacks to some extent
       3. Other/neither/depends
       4. Should help themselves to some extent
       5. Should help themselves to a great extent

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000655    L5cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore aid to blks
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5cx2.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 10)
       Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Al Gore?  (Do you think he feels that
       government should make every effort to improve the
       social and economic position of blacks, or that
       government should not make any special effort to help
       blacks because they should help themselves?)
       (Do you think he feels the government should)
       help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent?
       (Do you think he feels blacks should have to)
       help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent?

       SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L5c and L5cx1.

       1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to great extent
       2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to some extent
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/neither/depends
       4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to some extent
       5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to a great extent

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000656    L5d. Bush plcmnt-aid to blacks scale FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5d.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 10)
       Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       See L5 for complete text.
       FTF: L5b is administered first, then L5c and L5d are
       randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e and L5f
       are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names.
       For the telephone version of this question see L5d.T.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS       --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       2.                               --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       3.                               --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       4.                               --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       5.                               --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       6.                               --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       7. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.

==============================
M000657    L5d.T. Bush-aid to blacks scale phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5d.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about George W. Bush?
       (Do you think he feels that government should make every
       effort to improve the social and economic position of
       blacks, or that government should not make any special
       effort to help blacks because they should help
       themselves?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       See L5.T for complete text.
       TELEPHONE: L5b.T is administered first, then L5c.T and
       L5d.T are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names.
       L5e.T and L5f.T are then randomly administered as the 4th
       or 5th names.
       For the FTF version of this question see L5d.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS           --> L5d1.T
       5. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES     --> L5d1.T
       7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER    [VOL]  --> NEXT NAME/PARTY

       8. DK                                --> NEXT NAME/PARTY
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000658    L5d1/d2.T. Bush-strength aid to blacks
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5d1/d2.T.

   IF R SAYS GW BUSH THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD HELP BLACKS/
   IF R SAYS GW BUSH THINKS BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES:

       TELEPHONE:
       (Do you think he feels the government should) help
       blacks to a great extent or only to some extent?
       (Do you think he feels blacks should have to) help
       themselves to a great extent or only to some extent?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. GREAT EXTENT                 --> NEXT NAME/PARTY
       5. ONLY SOME                    --> NEXT NAME/PARTY

       8. DK                          --> NEXT NAME/PARTY
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L5d.T

==============================
M000659    L5dx1. 5-pt br summary Bush aid to blks
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5dx1.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about George W. Bush?
       (Do you think he feels that government should make every
       effort to improve the social and economic position of
       blacks, or that government should not make any special
       effort to help blacks because they should help
       themselves?)
       (Do you think he feels the government should)
       help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent?
       (Do you think he feels blacks should have to)
       help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent?

       SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L5d.T and L5d1.T/L5d2.T.

       1. Govt help blacks to great extent
       2. Govt help blacks to some extent
       3. Other/neither/depends
       4. Should help themselves to some extent
       5. Should help themselves to a great extent

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000660    L5dx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush aid to blks
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5dx2.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 10)
       Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about George W. Bush?
       (Do you think he feels that government should make every
       effort to improve the social and economic position of
       blacks, or that government should not make any special
       effort to help blacks because they should help
       themselves?)
       (Do you think he feels the government should)
       help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent?
       (Do you think he feels blacks should have to)
       help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent?

       SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L5d and L5dx1.

       1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to great extent
       2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to some extent
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/neither/depends
       4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to some extent
       5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to a great extent

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000661    L5e. Dem Party plcmnt-aid to blks scale FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5e.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 10)
       Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this
       issue)?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       See L5 for complete text.
       FTF: L5b is administered first, then L5c and L5d are
       randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e and L5f
       are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names.
       For the telephone version of this question see L5e.T.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS      --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       2.                              --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       3.                              --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       4.                              --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       5.                              --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       6.                              --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       7. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES--> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.

       8. DK                           --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000662    L5e.T. Dem Party-aid to blks scale phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5e.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they feel
       that government should make every effort to
       improve the social and economic position of blacks, or
       that government should not make any special
       effort to help blacks because they should help
       themselves?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       See L5.T for complete text.
       TELEPHONE: L5b.T is administered first, then L5c.T and
       L5d.T are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names.
       L5e.T and L5f.T are then randomly administered as the 4th
       or 5th names.
       For the FTF version of this question see L5e.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS            --> L5e1.T
       5. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES      --> L5e1.T
       7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER   [VOL]   --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L6.

       8. DK                                 --> NEXT PARTY OR -->L6.
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000663    L5e1/e2.T. Dem Party-strgth aid to blks
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5e1/e2.T.

   IF R SAYS DEMOCRATIC PARTY THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD HELP BLACKS/
   IF R SAYS DEMOCRATIC PARTY THINKS BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES:

       TELEPHONE:
       (Do you think they feel the government should) help
       blacks to a great extent or only to some extent?
       (Do you think they feel blacks should have to) help
       themselves to a great extent or only to some extent?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. GREAT EXTENT    --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L6.
       5. ONLY SOME       --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L6.

       8. DK              --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L6.
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L5e.T

==============================
M000664    L5ex1. 5-pt br summary Dem Party aid blks
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5ex1.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they feel
       that government should make every effort to improve the
       social and economic position of blacks, or that
       government should not make any special effort to help
       blacks because they should help themselves?)
       (Do you think they feel the government should)
       help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent?
       (Do you think they feel blacks should have to) help
       themselves to a great extent or only to some extent?

       SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L5e.T and L5e1.T/L5e2.T.

       1. Govt help blacks to great extent
       2. Govt help blacks to some extent
       3. Other/neither/depends
       4. Should help themselves to some extent
       5. Should help themselves to a great extent

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000665    L5ex2. Comb.7pt/br summ Dem Party aid blks
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5ex2.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 10)
       Where would you place the Democratic Party (on this
       issue)?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think they feel
       that government should make every effort to improve the
       social and economic position of blacks, or that
       government should not make any special effort to help
       blacks because they should help themselves?)
       (Do you think they feel the government should)
       help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent?
       (Do you think they feel blacks should have to) help
       themselves to a great extent or only to some extent?

       SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS DEM PARTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L5e and L5ex1.

       1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to great extent
       2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to some extent
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/neither/depends
       4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to some extent
       5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to a great extent

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000666    L5f. Rep Party plcmnt-aid to blks scale FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5f.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 10)
       Where would you place the Republican Party (on this
       issue)?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       See L5 for complete text.
       FTF: L5b is administered first, then L5c and L5d are
       randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names. L5e and L5f
       are then randomly administered as the 4th or 5th names.
       For the telephone version of this question see L5f.T.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS       --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       2.                               --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       3.                               --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       4.                               --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       5.                               --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       6.                               --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       7. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.

       8. DK                            --> NEXT NAME/PARTY OR --> L6.
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000667    L5f.T. Rep Party-aid to blks scale phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5f.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Republican Party?  (Do you think they
       feel that government should make every effort to
       improve the social and economic position of blacks, or
       that government should not make any special effort to
       help blacks because they should help themselves?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       See L5.T for complete text.
       TELEPHONE: L5b.T is administered first, then L5c.T and
       L5d.T are randomly administered as the 2nd or 3rd names.
       L5e.T and L5f.T are then randomly administered as the 4th
       or 5th names.
       For the FTF version of this question see L5f.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. GOVT SHOULD HELP BLACKS         --> L5f1.T
       5. BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES   --> L5f1.T
       7. OTHER/IT DEPENDS/NEITHER [VOL]  --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L6.

       8. DK                              --> NEXT PARTY OR --> L6.
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000668    L5f1/f2.T. Rep Party-strgth aid to blks
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5f1/f2.T.

   IF R SAYS REPUBLICAN PARTY THINKS GOVERNMENT SHOULD HELP BLACKS/
   IF R SAYS REPUBLICAN PARTY THINKS BLACKS SHOULD HELP THEMSELVES:

       TELEPHONE:
       (Do you think they feel the government should) help
       blacks to a great extent or only to some extent?
       (Do you think they feel blacks should have to) help
       themselves to a great extent or only to some extent?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. GREAT EXTENT              --> NEXT PARTY OR L6.
       5. ONLY SOME                 --> NEXT PARTY OR L6.

       8. DK                        --> NEXT PARTY OR L6.
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in L5f.T

==============================
M000669    L5fx1. 5-pt br summary Rep Party aid blks
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5fx1.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they feel
       that government should make every effort to improve the
       social and economic position of blacks, or that
       government should not make any special effort to help
       blacks because they should help themselves?)
       (Do you think they feel the government should)
       help blacks to a great extent or only to some extent?
       (Do you think they feel blacks should have to) help
       themselves to a great extent or only to some extent?

       SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS REP PARTY PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L5f.T and L5f1.T/L5f2.T.

       1. Govt help blacks to great extent
       2. Govt help blacks to some extent
       3. Other/neither/depends
       4. Should help themselves to some extent
       5. Should help themselves to a great extent

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000670    L5fx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Rep Party aid blks
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5fx2.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 10)
       Where would you place the Republican Party (on this
       issue)?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Republican Party? (Do you think they feel
       that government should make every effort to improve the
       social and economic position of blacks, or that
       government should not make any special effort to help
       blacks because they should help themselves?)
       (Do you think they feel the government should) help
       blacks to a great extent or only to some extent?
       (Do you think they feel blacks should have to)
       help themselves to a great extent or only to some extent?

       SUMMARY: 5PT AID BLACKS REP PARTY PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L5f and L5fx1.

       1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to great extent
       2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Govt help blacks to some extent
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/neither/depends
       4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to some extent
       5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Should help themselves to a great extent

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000671a   L6. Appr/disappr affirmative action stan
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L6.

   IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION:

       Some people think that if a company has a history of
       discriminating against blacks when making hiring
       decisions, then they should be required to have an
       affirmative action program that gives blacks preference
       in hiring.
       What do you think? Should companies that have
       discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative
       action program?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       either L6 (standard) or L6.E (experimental).

       1. YES, THEY SHOULD HAVE TO HAVE
          AFFIRMATIVE ACTION                 --> GO TO L6a
       5. NO, THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE TO HAVE
          AFFIRMATIVE ACTION                 --> GO TO L6b
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL]              --> GO TO L7

       8  DK                                 --> GO TO L7
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for L6.E

==============================
M000671b   L6.E. Appr/disappr affirmative action ex
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L6.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION:

       Some people think that if a company has a history of
       discriminating against blacks when making hiring
       decisions, then they should be required to have an
       affirmative action program that gives blacks
       preference in hiring.
       What do you think? Should companies that have
       discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative
       action program or should companies not have to have an
       affirmative action program?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       either L6 (standard) or L6.E (experimental).

       1. YES, THEY SHOULD HAVE TO HAVE
          AFFIRMATIVE ACTION                 --> GO TO L6a
       5. NO, THEY SHOULD NOT HAVE TO HAVE
          AFFIRMATIVE ACTION                 --> GO TO L6b
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL]              --> GO TO L7

       8. DK                                 --> GO TO L7
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for L6

==============================
M000672    L6a. Strength for affirmative action
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L6a.

   IF R SAYS COMPANIES SHOULD HAVE TO HAVE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION:

       Do you feel strongly or not strongly (that they should
       have to have affirmative action)?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY                --> GO TO L7
       5. NOT STRONGLY            --> GO TO L7

       8. DK                      --> GO TO L7
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,7,8,9 or NA in L6 or L6.E

==============================
M000673    L6b. Strength against affirmative action
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L6b.

   IF R SAYS COMPANIES SHOULD NOT HAVE TO HAVE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION:

       Do you feel strongly or not strongly (that they should
       not have to have affirmative action)?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY
       5. NOT STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,7,8,9 or NA in L6 or L6.E

==============================
M000674    L6x. Summary affirmative action
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L6x.

       STANDARD VERSION:
       Some people think that if a company has a history of
       discriminating against blacks when making hiring
       decisions, then they should be required to have an
       affirmative action program that gives blacks preference
       in hiring. What do you think? Should companies that have
       discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative
       action program?
       EXPERIMENTAL VERSION:
       Some people think that if a company has a history of
       discriminating against blacks when making hiring
       decisions, then they should be required to have an
       affirmative action program that gives blacks
       preference in hiring. What do you think? Should
       companies that have discriminated against blacks
       have to have an affirmative action program or should
       companies not have to have an affirmative action program?

       COMBINED AFFIRMATIVE ACTION (STANDARD/EXPERIMENTAL)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L6, L6.E.

       1. Yes, they should have to have affirmative action
       5. No, they should not have to have affirmative action
       7. Other

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000674a   L6x1. Summary - Strength of feeling
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 7
           Numeric

   L6x1.

       STANDARD VERSION:
       Some people think that if a company has a history of
       discriminating against blacks when making hiring
       decisions, then they should be required to have an
       affirmative action program that gives blacks preference
       in hiring. What do you think? Should companies that have
       discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative
       action program?
       EXPERIMENTAL VERSION:
       Some people think that if a company has a history of
       discriminating against blacks when making hiring
       decisions, then they should be required to have an
       affirmative action program that gives blacks
       preference in hiring. What do you think? Should
       companies that have discriminated against blacks
       have to have an affirmative action program or should
       companies not have to have an affirmative action program?
       BOTH VERSIONS:
       Do you feel strongly or not strongly (that they should
       not have to have affirmative action)?

       SUMMARY - AFFIRMATIVE ACTION (STANDARD/EXPERIMENTAL)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L6, L6.E and L6a/L6b.

       1. Strongly - should have to have affirmative action
       2. Not strongly - should have to have affirmative action
       4. Not strongly - shouldn't have to have  affirmative action
       5. Strongly - shouldn't have to have affirmative action

       7. Other
       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000675    L7a. Inc/dec build and repair highways
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L7a.

       BUILDING AND REPAIRING HIGHWAYS
       (If you had a say in making up the federal budget this
       year, should federal spending on BUILDING AND REPAIRING
       HIGHWAYS be increased decreased or kept about the same?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See L7 intro.

       1. INCREASED
       3. DECREASED
       5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME
       7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000676    L7b. Inc/dec welfare programs
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L7b.

       What about WELFARE PROGRAMS?
       (Should federal spending on WELFARE PROGRAMS be
       increased, decreased, or kept about the same?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See L7 intro.
       The order of L7b-L7p was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. INCREASED
       3. DECREASED
       5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME
       7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000677    L7c. Inc/dec spending on aids research
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L7c.

       What about SPENDING ON AIDS RESEARCH?
       (Should federal spending on SPENDING ON AIDS RESEARCH be
       increased, decreased, or kept about the same?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See L7 intro.
       The order of L7b-L7p was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. INCREASED
       3. DECREASED
       5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME
       7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000678    L7d. Inc/dec foreign aid
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L7d.

       What about FOREIGN AID?
       (Should federal spending on FOREIGN AID be increased,
       decreased, or kept about the same?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See L7 intro.
       The order of L7b-L7p was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. INCREASED
       3. DECREASED
       5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME
       7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000679    L7e. Inc/dec food stamps
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L7e.

       What about FOOD STAMPS?
       (Should federal spending on FOOD STAMPS be increased,
       decreased, or kept about the same?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See L7 intro.
       The order of L7b-L7p was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. INCREASED
       3. DECREASED
       5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME
       7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000680    L7f. Inc/dec aid to poor people
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L7f.

       What about AID TO POOR PEOPLE?
       (Should federal spending on AID TO POOR PEOPLE be
       increased, decreased, or kept about the same?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See L7 intro.
       The order of L7b-L7p was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. INCREASED
       3. DECREASED
       5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME
       7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000681    L7g. Inc/dec Social Security
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L7g.

       What about SOCIAL SECURITY?
       (Should federal spending on SOCIAL SECURITY be
       increased, decreased, or kept about the same?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See L7 intro.
       The order of L7b-L7p was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. INCREASED
       3. DECREASED
       5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME
       7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000682    L7h. Inc/dec environmental protection
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L7h.

       What about ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION?
       (Should federal spending on ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION be
       increased, decreased, or kept about the same?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See L7 intro.
       The order of L7b-L7p was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. INCREASED
       3. DECREASED
       5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME
       7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000683    L7j. Inc/dec public schools
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L7j.

       What about PUBLIC SCHOOLS?
       (Should federal spending on PUBLIC SCHOOLS be increased,
       decreased, or kept about the same?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See L7 intro.
       The order of L7b-L7p was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. INCREASED
       3. DECREASED
       5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME
       7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000684    L7k. Inc/dec dealing with crime
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L7k.

       What about DEALING WITH CRIME?
       (Should federal spending on DEALING WITH CRIME be
       increased, decreased, or kept about the same?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See L7 intro.
       The order of L7b-L7p was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. INCREASED
       3. DECREASED
       5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME
       7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000685    L7m. Inc/dec child care
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L7m.

       What about CHILD CARE?
       (Should federal spending on CHILD CARE be increased,
       decreased, or kept about the same?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See L7 intro.
       The order of L7b-L7p was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. INCREASED
       3. DECREASED
       5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME
       7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000686    L7n. Inc/dec against illegal immigrants
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L7n.

       What about TIGHTENING BORDER SECURITY TO PREVENT ILLEGAL
       IMMIGRATION?
       (Should federal spending on TIGHTENING BORDER SECURITY
       TO PREVENT ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION be increased, decreased,
       or kept about the same?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See L7 intro.
       The order of L7b-L7p was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. INCREASED
       3. DECREASED
       5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME
       7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000687    L7p. Inc/dec aid to blacks
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L7p.

       What about AID TO BLACKS?
       (Should federal spending on AID TO BLACKS be increased,
       decreased, or kept about the same?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See L7 intro.
       The order of L7b-L7p was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. INCREASED
       3. DECREASED
       5. KEPT ABOUT THE SAME
       7. CUT OUT ENTIRELY [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000688    L8. App/dis using surplus for tax cuts
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L8.

       Recently, there has been a lot of talk about how to
       spend the extra money the federal government is likely
       to have in the near future.  Some people have proposed
       that most of the expected federal budget surplus should
       be used to cut taxes.
       Do you approve or disapprove of this proposal?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. APPROVE
       5. DISAPPROVE

       8. DON'T KNOW   --> SKIP TO L9
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000689    L8a/b. Strength app/dis tax cuts
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L8a/b.

   IF R APPROVES USING FEDERAL BUDGET SURPLUS TO CUT TAXES/
   IF R DISAPPROVES USING FEDERAL BUDGET SURPLUS TO CUT TAXES:

       Do you approve of this proposal strongly or not
       strongly?/
       Do you disapprove of this proposal strongly or not
       strongly?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY
       5. NOT STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in L8

==============================
M000690    L8x. Summary tax cuts from surplus
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L8x.

       Some people have proposed that most of the expected
       federal budget surplus should be used to cut taxes.  Do
       you approve or disapprove of this proposal?
       Do you approve of this proposal strongly or not strongly?
       Do you disapprove of this proposal strongly or not
       strongly?

       SUMMARY: TAX CUT FROM SURPLUS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L8 and L8a/b.

       1. Approve strongly
       2. Approve not strongly
       4. Disapprove not strongly
       5. Disapprove strongly

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000691    L9. App/dis surplus for Soc Sec medicare
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L9.

       Some people have proposed that most of the expected
       federal budget surplus should go to protecting social
       security and Medicare.  Do you approve or disapprove
       of this proposal?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. APPROVE
       5. DISAPPROVE

       8. DON'T KNOW   --> SKIP TO M1
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000692    L9a/b. Strength app/dis Soc Sec medicare
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L9a/b.

   IF R APPROVES USING SURPLUS FOR SOCIAL SECURITY & MEDICARE/
   IF R DISAPPROVES USING SURPLUS FOR SOCIAL SECURITY & MEDICARE:

       Do you approve of this proposal strongly or not
       strongly?/
       Do you disapprove of this proposal strongly or not
       strongly?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY
       5. NOT STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in L9

==============================
M000693    L9x. Summary surplus for Soc Sec medcare
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L9x.

       Some people have proposed that most of the expected
       federal budget surplus should go to protecting social
       security and Medicare.  Do you approve or disapprove
       of this proposal?
       Do you approve of this proposal strongly or not strongly?
       Do you disapprove of this proposal strongly or not
       strongly?

       SUMMARY: USE SURPLUS TO PROTECT SOCIAL SECURITY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from L9 and L9a/b.

       1. Approve strongly
       2. Approve not strongly
       4. Disapprove not strongly
       5. Disapprove strongly

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000694    M1/M1.T. Abortion self-placement
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M1/M1.T.

       FTF:
       Please look at page 11 of the booklet.
       There has been some discussion about abortion during
       recent years.  Which one of the opinions on this page
       best agrees with your view?  You can just tell me the
       number of the opinion you choose.

       TELEPHONE:
       There has been some discussion about abortion during
       recent years.  I am going to read you a short list
       of opinions. Please tell me which one of the opinions
       best agrees with your view?  You can just tell me
       the number of the opinion you choose.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED.
       2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE OF RAPE, INCEST,
          OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS IN DANGER.
       3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS OTHER THAN RAPE,
          INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE WOMAN'S LIFE, BUT ONLY AFTER THE NEED FOR
          THE ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED.
       4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN AN ABORTION AS
          A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE.
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000695    M1a. Importance of abortion to R
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M1a.

   ALL ABORTION RESPONDENTS:

       How important is this issue to you personally?  Not at
       all important, not too important, somewhat important,
       very important, or extremely important?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT
       2. NOT TOO IMPORTANT
       3. SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT
       4. VERY IMPORTANT
       5. EXTREMELY IMPORTANT

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000696    M1b/M1b.T. Gore-abortion scale
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M1b/M1b.T.

       FTF:
       Where would you place Al Gore on abortion?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Al Gore (on abortion)?  Which opinion best
       agrees with his views?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       The order in which abortion items M1b/M1b.T and M1c/M1c.T
       were administered was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED.
       2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE OF RAPE, INCEST,
          OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS IN DANGER.
       3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS OTHER THAN RAPE,
          INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE WOMAN'S LIFE, BUT ONLY AFTER THE NEED FOR
          THE ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED.
       4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN AN ABORTION AS
          A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE.
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL]

       8. DK                                 --> SKIP TO M1c OR M2
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000697    M1b1. Gore-certain abortion placement
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M1b1.

   IF GORE'S POSITION ON ABORTION IS NOT DK/REF:

       How certain are you of Al Gore's position? Very certain,
       pretty certain, or not very certain?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY CERTAIN
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in M1b/M1b.T

==============================
M000698    M1c/M1c.T. Bush-abortion scale
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M1c/M1c.T.

       FTF:
       Where would you place George W. Bush (on abortion)?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about George W. Bush (on abortion)?  Which opinion
       best agrees with his views?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       The order in which abortion items M1b/M1b.T and M1c/M1c.T
       were administered was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED.
       2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE OF RAPE, INCEST,
          OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS IN DANGER.
       3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS OTHER THAN RAPE,
          INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE WOMAN'S LIFE, BUT ONLY AFTER THE NEED FOR
          THE ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED.
       4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN AN ABORTION AS
          A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE.
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL]

       8. DK                     --> SKIP TO M1b OR M2
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000699    M1c1. Bush-certain abortion placement
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M1c1.

   IF GEORGE W. BUSH'S POSITION ON ABORTION IS NOT DK/REF:

       How certain are you of George W. Bush's position? Very
       certain, pretty certain, or not very certain?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY CERTAIN
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in M1c/M1c.T

==============================
M000700    M2. App/dis abortion parental consent
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M2.

       Would you favor or oppose a law in your state that would
       require a teenage girl under age 18 to receive her
       parent's permission before she could obtain an abortion?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. FAVOR
       5. OPPOSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000701    M2a. Strength abortion parental consent
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M2a.

   IF R FAVORS ABORTION LAW REQUIRING MINORS' PARENTAL PERMISSION/
   IF R OPPOSES ABORTION LAW REQUIRING MINORS' PARENTAL PERMISSION:

       Strongly or not strongly?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY
       5. NOT STONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in M2

==============================
M000702    M2x. Summary abortion parental consent
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M2x.

       Would you favor or oppose a law in your state that would
       require a teenage girl under age 18 to receive her
       parent's permission before she could obtain an abortion?
       Strongly or not strongly?

       SUMMARY: PARENTAL CONSENT FOR ABORTIONS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from M2 and M2a.

       1. Favor strongly
       2. Favor not strongly
       4. Oppose not strongly
       5. Oppose strongly

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000703    M3. Fav/oppose prtl-birth abortion ban
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M3.

       There has been discussion recently about a proposed law
       to ban certain types of late-term abortions, sometimes
       called partial birth abortions.
       Do you favor or oppose a law that would make these types
       of abortions illegal?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. FAVOR
       5. OPPOSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000704    M3a/b. Strength fav/opp p-b abortion ban
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M3a/b.

   IF R FAVORS BAN ON LATE-TERM ABORTIONS/
   IF R OPPOSES BAN ON LATE-TERM ABORTIONS:

       Do you strongly or not strongly favor/oppose a law that
       would that would make these types of abortions illegal?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY
       5. NOT STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in M3

==============================
M000705    M3x. Summary partial-birth abortion ban
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M3x.

       There has been discussion recently about a proposed law
       to ban certain types of late-term abortions, sometimes
       called partial birth abortions.
       Do you favor or oppose a law that would make these types
       of abortions illegal?
       Do you strongly or not strongly favor/oppose a law that
       would that would make these types of abortions illegal?

       SUMMARY: BAN ON LATE-TERM ABORTIONS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from M3 and M3a/b.

       1. Favor strongly
       2. Favor not strongly
       4. Oppose not strongly
       5. Oppose strongly

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000706    M4. Ckpt: FTF/ph, reg/exp.
           Numeric

   M4(1).

       CHECKPOINT: MODE AND VERSION
       FOR ENVIRONMENT VERSUS JOBS SELF-PLACEMENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       FTF:  Rs were randomly assigned to the standard 7-point scale
       or to an experimental version of the 7-point scale (without
       "haven't thought much about it" option).
       Phone:  Rs were randomly assigned to 2 versions of the
       branching format; in the 2nd version, the initial placement
       question does not include the "haven't thought much about it"
       option.

       1. FTF standard version (M4a)
       2. FTF experimental version (M4a.E)
       3. PHONE version 1 (M4a.T)
       4. PHONE version 2 (M4a.TE)

==============================
M000707a   M4a. R-jobs/envir scale FTF stan
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M4a.

   IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION:

       FTF:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See M4 for complete text.
       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       either M4a (standard) or M4a.E (experimental).
       For the telephone versions of this question see M4a.T
       and M4a.TE.

       1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB
          & STANDARD OF LIVING                               --> SKIP TO M4b
       2.                                                    --> SKIP TO M4b
       3.                                                    --> SKIP TO M4b
       4.                                                    --> SKIP TO M4b
       5.                                                    --> SKIP TO M4b
       6.                                                    --> SKIP TO M4b
       7. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT
          THAN ENVIRONMENT                                   --> SKIP TO M4b

       8. DK                                                 --> SKIP TO M4b
       9. RF; NA; INAP, 2, 3, 4 in M4(1)
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS                    --> SKIP TO M4b

==============================
M000707b   M4a.E. R-jobs/envir scale FTF ex
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M4a.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION:

       FTF:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See M4.E for complete text.
       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       either M4a (standard) or M4a.E (experimental).
       For the telephone versions of this question see M4a.T
       and M4a.TE.

       1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB
          & STANDARD OF LIVING                               --> SKIP TO M4b
       2.                                                    --> SKIP TO M4b
       3.                                                    --> SKIP TO M4b
       4.                                                    --> SKIP TO M4b
       5.                                                    --> SKIP TO M4b
       6.                                                    --> SKIP TO M4b
       7. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN
          ENVIRONMENT                                        --> SKIP TO M4b

       8. DK                                                 --> SKIP TO M4b
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 4 in M4(1)

==============================
M000708    M4ax. Comb. FTF versions jobs/envir
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M4ax.

       FTF STANDARD VERSION:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?
       FTF EXPERIMENTAL VERSION:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale?

       COMBINED FTF STANDARD/EXPERIMENTAL - 7PT JOBS VS. ENVIRONMENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from M4a, M4a.E.

       1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB
          & STANDARD OF LIVING
       2.
       3.
       4.
       5.
       6.
       7. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT THAN
          ENVIRONMENT

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS (M4a only)

==============================
M000709a   M4a.T. R-jobs/envir br phone stan
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M4a.T.

   IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 1:

       TELEPHONE:
       Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See M4.T for complete text.
       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       either M4a.T (version 1) or M4a.TE (version 2).
       For the FTF versions of this question see M4a and  M4a.E.

       1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB &
          STANDARD OF LIVING                           --> M4a1.T/
       5. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT
          THAN ENVIRONMENT                             --> M4a1.T
       7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL]             --> SKIP TO M4b/M4c.T

       8. DK                                           --> SKIP TO M4b/M4c.T
       9. RF; NA; INAP, 1, 2, 4 in M4(1)
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH

==============================
M000709b   M4a.TE. R-jobs/envir phone ex
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M4a.TE.

   IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 2:

       TELEPHONE:
       Which is closer to the way you feel?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See M4.TE for complete text.
       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       either M4a.T (version 1) or M4a.TE (version 2).
       For the FTF versions of this question see M4a and  M4a.E.

       1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB &
          STANDARD OF LIVING                           --> M4a1.T/
       5. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT
          THAN ENVIRONMENT                             --> M4a1.T
       7. OTHER,  IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL]            --> SKIP TO M4b/M4c.T

       8. DK                                           --> SKIP TO M4b/M4c.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 2, 3 in M4(1)

==============================
M000710    M4ax.T. Comb. Ph versions jobs/envir
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M4ax.T.

       TELEPHONE VERSION 1:
       Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       TELEPHONE VERSION 2:
       Which is closer to the way you feel?

       COMBINED TELEPHONE VERSIONS - ENVIRONMENT VS. JOBS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from M4a.T and M4a.TE

       1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB &
          STANDARD OF LIVING
       5. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT
          THAN ENVIRONMENT
       7. OTHER,  IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH (M4a.T only)

==============================
M000711    M4a1/a2.T. Strength jobs/envir
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M4a1/a2.T.

   BOTH TELEPHONE VERSIONS:
   IF PROTECTING ENVIRONMENT IS MORE IMPORTANT/
   IF MAINTAINING JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING ARE MORE IMPORTANT:

       TELEPHONE:
       Is protecting the environment much more important (than
       maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only
       somewhat more important?/
       Are maintaining jobs and standard of living much more
       important (than protecting the environment) or
       only somewhat more important?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH MORE IMPORTANT           --> M4b.T/M4c.T
       5. ONLY SOMEWHAT MORE IMPORTANT  --> M4b.T/M4c.T

       8. DK                            --> M4b.T/M4c.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 0,7,8 or RF/NA in M4a.T; 7,8,9 or NA in M4a.TE

==============================
M000712    M4a1x1. 5-pt br summary jobs/envir
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M4a1x1.

       TELEPHONE VERSION 1:
       Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       TELEPHONE VERSION 2:
       Which is closer to the way you feel?
       BOTH TELEPHONE VERSIONS:
       Is protecting the environment much more important (than
       maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only
       somewhat more important?
       Are maintaining jobs and standard of living much more
       important (than protecting the environment) or only
       somewhat more important?

       SUMMARY: 5PT ENV/JOBS SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from M4ax.T and M4a1/a2.T

       1. Environment much more important
       2. Environment somewhat more important
       3. Other/depends/neither
       4. Jobs somewhat more important
       5. Jobs much more important

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode
       0. Haven't thought much (from M4a.T only)

==============================
M000713    M4a1x2. Comb.7pt/br summ jobs/envir
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M4a1x2.

       FTF STANDARD VERSION:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?
       FTF EXPERIMENTAL VERSION:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale?

       TELEPHONE VERSION 1:
       Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       TELEPHONE VERSION 2:
       Which is closer to the way you feel?
       BOTH TELEPHONE VERSIONS:
       Is protecting the environment much more important (than
       maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only
       somewhat more important?
       Are maintaining jobs and standard of living much more
       important (than protecting the environment) or only
       somewhat more important?

       SUMMARY: 5PT ENV/JOBS SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from M4a and M4a1x1.

       1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Environment much more important
       2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Environment somewhat more important
       3. SCALE: 3 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither
       4. SCALE: 4 / BRANCHING: Jobs somewhat more important
       5. SCALE: 5 / BRANCHING: Jobs much more important

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA
       0. Haven't thought much (from M4a and M4a.T only)

==============================
M000714    M4b. Gore-jobs/envir scale FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M4b.

       FTF:
       Where would you place Al Gore on this issue?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       See M4 for complete text.
       FTF: M4b and M4c were administered in random order.
       For the telephone version of this question see M4b.T.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB &
          STANDARD OF LIVING                               --> M4c. OR M5.
       2.                                                  --> M4c. OR M5.
       3.                                                  --> M4c. OR M5.
       4.                                                  --> M4c. OR M5.
       5.                                                  --> M4c. OR M5.
       6.                                                  --> M4c. OR M5.
       7. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT
          THAN ENVIRONMENT                                 --> M4c. OR M5.

       8. DK                                               --> M4c. OR M5.
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000715    M4b.T. Gore-jobs/envir scale phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M4b.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Al Gore? Do you think he thinks it is
       important to protect the environment even if it costs
       some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as
       important as maintaining jobs and our standard of
       living?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       See M4.T for complete text.
       TELEPHONE: M4b and M4c were administered in random order.
       For the FTF version of this question see M4b.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS
          JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING               --> SKIP TO M4c.T OR --> M5.
       5. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE
          IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT             --> SKIP TO M4c.T OR --> M5.
       7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL]       --> SKIP TO M4c.T OR --> M5.

       8. DK                                     --> SKIP TO M4c.T OR --> M5.
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000716    M4b1/b2.T. Gore-strength jobs/envir
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M4b1/b2.T.

   IF R SAYS GORE THINKS PROTECTING ENVIRONMENT IS MORE IMPORTANT/
   IF R SAYS GORE THINKS JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING ARE MORE IMPORTANT:

       TELEPHONE:
       Does he think protecting the environment much
       more important (than maintaining jobs and  standard of
       living) or only somewhat more important?/
       Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of
       living much more important (than protecting the
       environment) or only somewhat more important?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH MORE  IMPORTANT
       5. SOMEWHAT MORE IMPORTANT

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 or NA in M4b.T

==============================
M000717    M4bx1. 5-pt br summary jobs/envir
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M4bx1.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Al Gore? Do you think he thinks it is
       important to protect the environment even if it costs
       some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as
       important as maintaining jobs and our standard of
       living?
       Does he think protecting the environment much
       more important (than maintaining jobs and  standard of
       living) or only somewhat more important?
       Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of
       living much more important (than protecting the
       environment) or only somewhat more important?

       SUMMARY: 5PT ENV/JOBS GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from M4b.T and M4b1.T/M4b2.T.

       1. Environment much more important
       2. Environment somewhat more important
       3. Other/depends/neither
       4. Jobs somewhat more important
       5. Jobs much more important

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000718    M4bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore jobs/envir
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M4bx2.

       FTF:
       Where would you place Al Gore on this issue?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Al Gore? Do you think he thinks it is
       important to protect the environment even if it costs
       some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as
       important as maintaining jobs and our standard of
       living?
       Does he think protecting the environment much
       more important (than maintaining jobs and  standard of
       living) or only somewhat more important?
       Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of
       living much more important (than protecting the
       environment) or only somewhat more important?

       SUMMARY: 5PT ENV/JOBS GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Environment much more important
       2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Environment somewhat more important
       3. SCALE: 3 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither
       4. SCALE: 4 / BRANCHING: Jobs somewhat more important
       5. SCALE: 5 / BRANCHING: Jobs much more important

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000719    M4c. Bush-jobs/envir scale FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M4c.

       FTF:
       Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       See M4 for complete text.
       FTF: M4b and M4c were administered in random order.
       For the telephone version of this question see M4c.T.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS JOB &
          STANDARD OF LIVING                             --> M4b. OR M5.
       2.                                                --> M4b. OR M5.
       3.                                                --> M4b. OR M5.
       4.                                                --> M4b. OR M5.
       5.                                                --> M4b. OR M5.
       6.                                                --> M4b. OR M5.
       7. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE IMPORTANT
          THAN ENVIRONMENT                               --> M4b. OR M5.

       8. DK                                             --> M4b. OR M5.
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000720    M4c.T. Bush-jobs/envir scale phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M4c.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about George W. Bush? Do you think he thinks it is
       important to protect the environment even if it
       costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is
       not as important as maintaining jobs and our
       standard of living?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       See M4.T for complete text.
       TELEPHONE: M4b and M4c were administered in random order.
       For the FTF version of this question see M4c.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. PROTECT ENVIRONMENT, EVEN IF IT COSTS
          JOB & STANDARD OF LIVING              --> SKIP TO M4b.T OR --> M5.
       5. JOBS & STANDARD OF LIVING MORE
          IMPORTANT THAN ENVIRONMENT            --> SKIP TO M4b.T OR --> M5.
       7. OTHER,  IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL]     --> SKIP TO M4b.T OR --> M5.

       8. DK                                    --> SKIP TO M4b.T OR --> M5.
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000721    M4c1/c2.T. Bush-strength jobs/envir
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M4c1/c2.T.

   IF R SAYS GW BUSH THINKS PROTECTING ENVIRONMENT IS MORE IMPORTANT/
   IF R SAYS GW BUSH THINKS JOBS AND STANDARD OF LIVING ARE MORE IMPORTANT:

       TELEPHONE:
       Does he think protecting the environment much
       more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of
       living) or only somewhat more important?/
       Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of
       living much more important (than protecting the
       environment) or only somewhat more important?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH MORE IMPORTANT
       5. SOMEWHAT MORE IMPORTANT

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 or NA in M4c.T

==============================
M000722    M4cx1. 5-pt br summary Bush jobs/envir
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M4cx1.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about George W. Bush? Do you think he thinks it is
       important to protect the environment even if it
       costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is
       not as important as maintaining jobs and our
       standard of living?
       Does he think protecting the environment much
       more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of
       living) or only somewhat more important?
       Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of
       living much more important (than protecting the
       environment) or only somewhat more important?

       SUMMARY: 5PT ENV/JOBS BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from M4c.T and M4c1.T/M4c2.T.

       1. Environment much more important
       2. Environment somewhat more important
       3. Other/depends/neither
       4. Jobs somewhat more important
       5. Jobs much more important

==============================
M000723    M4cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush jobs/envir
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M4cx2.

       FTF:
       Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about George W. Bush? Do you think he thinks it is
       important to protect the environment even if it
       costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is
       not as important as maintaining jobs and our
       standard of living?
       Does he think protecting the environment much
       more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of
       living) or only somewhat more important?
       Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of
       living much more important (than protecting the
       environment) or only somewhat more important?

       SUMMARY: 5PT ENV/JOBS BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from M4c and M4cx1.

       1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Environment much more important
       2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Environment somewhat more important
       3. SCALE: 3 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither
       4. SCALE: 4 / BRANCHING: Jobs somewhat more important
       5. SCALE: 5 / BRANCHING: Jobs much more important

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000724    M5. Fav/oppose homosexuals in military
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M5.

       Do you think homosexuals should be allowed to serve in
       the United States Armed Forces or don't you think so?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. HOMOSEXUALS SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO SERVE         --> M5a
       5. HOMOSEXUALS SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO SERVE     --> M5b

       8. DK                                             --> M6a
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000725    M5a. Strngth fav homosexuals in military
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M5a.

   IF R SAYS ALLOW HOMOSEXUALS TO SERVE IN ARMED FORCES:

       Do you feel strongly or not strongly that homosexuals
       should be allowed to serve?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY      --> M6a
       5. NOT STRONGLY  --> M6a

       8. DK            --> M6a
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in M5

==============================
M000726    M5b. Strngth opp homosexuals in military
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M5b.

   IF R SAYS DO NOT ALLOW HOMOSEXUALS TO SERVE IN ARMED FORCES:

       Do you feel strongly or not strongly that homosexuals
       should not be allowed to serve?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY
       5. NOT STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,8,9,0 in M5

==============================
M000727    M5x. Summary homosexuals in military
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M5x.

       Do you think homosexuals should be allowed to serve in
       the United States Armed Forces or don't you think so?
       Do you feel strongly or not strongly that homosexuals
       should be allowed to serve?
       Do you feel strongly or not strongly that homosexuals
       should not be allowed to serve?

       SUMMARY: HOMOSEXUALS IN ARMED FORCES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from M5 and M5a/b.

       1. Strongly - should be allowed to serve
       2. Not strongly - should be allowed to serve
       4. Not strongly - should not be allowed to serve
       5. Strongly - should not be allowed to serve

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000728    M6a. R-gun control scale
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M6a.

       Do you think the federal government should make it more
       difficult for people to buy a gun than it is  now, make
       it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules
       about the same as they are now?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MORE DIFFICULT                   --> SKIP TO M6a1
       3. MAKE IT EASIER                   --> SKIP TO M6a2
       5. KEEP THESE RULES ABOUT THE SAME  --> SKIP TO M6a3

       8. DK                               --> SKIP TO M6a3
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000729    M6a1. R-strength more gun control
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M6a1.

   IF R SAYS GOVT SHOULD MAKE IT MORE DIFFICULT TO BUY A GUN:

       A lot more difficult or somewhat more difficult?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A LOT MORE DIFFICULT      --> SKIP TO M6a3
       5. SOMEWHAT MORE DIFFICULT   --> SKIP TO M6a3

       8. DK                        --> SKIP TO M6a3
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in M6a

==============================
M000730    M6a2. R-strength less gun control
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M6a2.

   IF R SAYS GOVT SHOULD MAKE IT EASIER TO BUY A GUN:

       A lot easier or somewhat easier?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A LOT EASIER
       5. SOMEWHAT EASIER

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in M6a

==============================
M000731    M6ax. Summary gun control
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M6ax.

       Do you think the federal government should make it more
       difficult for people to buy a gun than it is  now, make
       it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules
       about the same as they are now?
       A lot easier/more difficult or somewhat easier/more
       difficult?

       SUMMARY: R POSITION ON GUN RESTRICTIONS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from M6 and M6a/b.

       1. A lot more difficult
       2. Somewhat more difficult
       3. Keep rules about the same
       4. Somewhat easier
       5. A lot easier

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000732    M6a3. R-importance of gun control
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M6a3.

   ALL GUN RESTRICTION RESPONDENTS:

       How important is this issue to you personally?  Not at
       all important, not too important, somewhat important,
       very important, or extremely important?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT
       2. NOT TOO IMPORTANT
       3. SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT
       4. VERY IMPORTANT
       5. EXTREMELY IMPORTANT

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000733    M6b. Gore plcmnt-gun control scale
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M6b.

       Where would you place Al Gore?  Do you think he would
       like to make it more difficult for people to buy a
       gun, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep
       these rules about the same as they are now?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE]
       M6c and M6c were administered in random order.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. MORE DIFFICULT
       3. MAKE IT  EASIER
       5. KEEP THESE RULES ABOUT THE SAME   --> SKIP TO M6b3

       8. DK                                --> SKIP TO M6c
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000734    M6b1/b2. Gore-strength more/less gun ctl
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M6b1/b2.

   IF R THINKS GORE WOULD LIKE IT EASIER TO BUY A GUN/
   IF R THINKS GORE WOULD LIKE IT MORE DIFFICULT TO BUY A GUN:

       A lot easier or somewhat easier?/
       A lot more difficult or somewhat more difficult?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A LOT       --> M6b3
       5. SOMEWHAT    --> M6b3

       8. DK          --> SKIP TO M6c
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in M6b

==============================
M000735    M6bx. Summary Gore gun control
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M6bx.

       Where would you place Al Gore?  Do you think he would
       like to make it more difficult for people to buy a
       gun, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep
       these rules about the same as they are now?
       A lot easier/more difficult or somewhat easier/ more
       difficult?

       SUMMARY: GORE POSITION ON GUN RESTRICTIONS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from M6b and M6b1/b2.

       1. A lot more difficult
       2. Somewhat more difficult
       3. Keep rules about the same
       4. Somewhat easier
       5. A lot easier

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000736    M6b3. Gore-certain gun control placement
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M6b3.

   IF R SAYS GORE WANTS MORE DIFFICULT/EASIER TO BUY GUN:
   IF STRENGTH OF GORE PLACEMENT IS NOT DK/RF:

       How certain are you of Al Gore's position? Very certain,
       pretty certain, or not very certain?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY CERTAIN
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in M6b1/M6b2

==============================
M000737    M6c. Bush plcmnt-gun control scale
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M6c.

       Where would you place George W. Bush?  Do you think he
       would like to make it more difficult for people to buy a
       gun, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep
       these rules about the same as they are now?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE]
       M6c and M6c were administered in random order.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. MORE DIFFICULT
       3. MAKE IT EASIER
       5. KEEP THESE RULES ABOUT THE SAME  --> M6c2

       8. DK                               --> N1/n1.e
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000738    M6c1/c2. Bush-strength more/less gun ctl
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M6c1/c2.

   IF R THINKS G.W. BUSH WOULD LIKE IT EASIER TO BUY A GUN/
   IF R THINKS G.W. BUSH WOULD LIKE IT MORE DIFFICULT TO BUY A GUN:

       A lot easier or somewhat easier?
       A lot more difficult or somewhat more difficult?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A LOT       --> M6c3
       5. SOMEWHAT    --> M6c3

       8. DK          --> SKIP TO N1/N1.E
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in M6c

==============================
M000739    M6cx. Summary Bush gun control
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M6cx.

       Where would you place George W. Bush?  Do you think he
       would like to make it more difficult for people to buy a
       gun, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep
       these rules about the same as they are now?
       A lot easier/more difficult or somewhat easier/ more
       difficult?

       SUMMARY: GW BUSH POSITION ON GUN RESTRICTIONS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from M6c and M6c1/c2.

       1. A lot more difficult
       2. Somewhat more difficult
       3. Keep rules about the same
       4. Somewhat easier
       5. A lot easier

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000740    M6c3. Bush-certain gun control placement
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M6c3.

   IF R SAYS GW BUSH WANTS MORE DIFFICULT/EASIER TO BUY GUN:
   IF STRENTH OF GW BUSH PLACEMENT IS NOT DK/RF:

       How certain are you of George W. Bush's position? Very
       certain, pretty certain, or not very certain?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY CERTAIN
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in M6c1/M6c2

==============================
M000741a   N1. Fav/opp school voucher program stan
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   N1.

   IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION:

       Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that
       would allow parents to use tax funds to send their
       children to the school of their choice, even if it were
       a private school?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       either N1 (standard) or N1.E (experimental).

       1. FAVOR SCHOOL VOUCHER  PROGRAM      --> SKIP TO NIa
       5. OPPOSE SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM      --> SKIP TO N1a

       8. DK                                 --> SKIP TO N2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for N1.E

==============================
M000741b   N1.E. Fav/opp school voucher program ex
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   N1.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION:

       Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that
       would allow parents to use tax funds to send their
       children to the school of their choice, even if it were a
       private school, or haven't you thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       either N1 (standard) or N1.E (experimental).

       1. FAVOR SCHOOL VOUCHER  PROGRAM      --> N1a
       5. OPPOSE SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM      --> N1a

       8. DK                                 --> SKIP TO N2
       9. RF; NA; INAP, R selected for N1
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS    --> SKIP TO N2

==============================
M000742    N1x. Combined versions school vouchers
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   N1x.

       STANDARD VERSION:
       Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that
       would allow parents to use tax funds to send their
       children to the school of their choice, even if it were
       a private school?
       EXPERIMENTAL VERSION:
       Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that
       would allow parents to use tax funds to send their
       children to the school of their choice, even if it were a
       private school, or haven't you thought much about this?

       COMBINED VERSIONS - SCHOOL VOUCHERS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from N1 and N1.E.

       1. FAVOR SCHOOL VOUCHER  PROGRAM
       5. OPPOSE SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, R selected for N1
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS (N1.E only)

==============================
M000743    N1a/b. Strength fav/opp school vouchers
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   N1a/b.

   IF R FAVORS SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM/
   IF R OPPOSES SCHOOL VOUCHER PROGRAM:

       Do you favor/oppose a school voucher program strongly or
       not strongly?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: an error in the instrument programming excluded
       for this question respondents from the standard version;
       only respondents from N1.E were asked N1a/b.

       1. STRONGLY
       5. NOT STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,8,9 or NA in N1.E; R selected
          for N1 and excluded in error from N1a/b

==============================
M000744    N1ax. Summary school vouchers
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   N1ax.

       STANDARD VERSION:
       Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that
       would allow parents to use tax funds to send their
       children to the school of their choice, even if it were
       a private school?
       EXPERIMENTAL VERSION:
       Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that
       would allow parents to use tax funds to send their
       children to the school of their choice, even if it were a
       private school, or haven't you thought much about this?
       BOTH VERSIONS:
       Do you favor/oppose a school voucher program strongly or
       not strongly?

       SUMMARY: R POSITION ON SCHOOL VOUCHERS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Build from N1x and N1a/b.

       1. Favor strongly
       2. Favor not strongly
       4. Oppose not strongly
       5. Oppose strongly

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, R selected for N1
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS (N1.E only)

==============================
M000745    N2. R fav/opp English official language
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   N2.

       Do you favor a law making English the official language
       of the United States, meaning government business
       would be conducted in English only, or do you oppose
       such a law?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. FAVOR
       3. NEITHER FAVOR NOR OPPOSE [VOL]
       5. OPPOSE

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA


==============================
M000746    N3. R interest in school integration
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   N3.

       Some people say that the government in Washington should
       see to it that white and black children go to the
       same schools. Others claim that this is not the
       government's business.
       Have you been interested enough in this question to
       favor one side over the other?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO    --> SKIP TO N4

       8. DK    --> SKIP TO N4
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000747    N3a. Fav/opp gov help school integration
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   N3a.

   IF R HAS OPINION WHETHER GOVT SEE TO BLACK/WHITE KIDS IN SAME SCHOOLS:

       Do you think the government in Washington should see to
       it that white and black children go to the same schools
       or stay out of this area as it is not the government's
       business?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. SEE TO IT THAT WHITE AND BLACK CHILDREN GO TO
          THE SAME SCHOOLS
       5. STAY OUT OF THIS AREA AS IT IS NOT THE GOVERNMENT'S BUSINESS
       7. OTHER; DEPENDS

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in N3

==============================
M000748    N4. Fav/opp h-sexual couples adopt chldn
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   N4.

       Do you think gay or lesbian couples, in other words,
       homosexual couples, should be legally permitted to adopt
       children?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000749    N5. Fav/opp death penalty
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   N5.

       Do you favor or oppose the death penalty for persons
       convicted of murder?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. FAVOR    --> SKIP TO N5a
       5. OPPOSE   --> SKIP TO N5b

       8. DK       --> SKIP TO P1
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000750    N5a. How much favor death penalty
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   N5a.

   IF R FAVORS DEATH PENALTY FOR PERSONS CONVICTED OF MURDER:

       (Do you favor the death penalty for persons convicted of
       murder) strongly or not strongly?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY          --> P1/P1.E
       5. NOT STRONGLY      --> P1/P1.E

       8. DK                --> P1/P1.E
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in N5

==============================
M000751    N5b. How much oppose death penalty
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   N5b.

   IF R OPPOSES DEATH PENALTY FOR PERSONS CONVICTED OF MURDER:

       (Do you oppose the death penalty for persons convicted of
       murder) strongly or not strongly?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY
       5. NOT STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,8,9,0 in N5

==============================
M000752    N5x. Summary R position on death penalty
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   N5x.

       Do you favor or oppose the death penalty for persons
       convicted of murder?
       (Do you favor/oppose the death penalty for persons
       convicted of murder) strongly or not strongly?

       SUMMARY: R POSITION ON DEATH PENALTY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from N5 and N5a/b.

       1. Favor strongly
       2. Favor not strongly
       4. Oppose  not strongly
       5. Oppose strongly

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA


==============================
M000753    P1. Ckpt: FTF/ph, reg/exp.
           Numeric

   P1(1).

       CHECKPOINT: MODE AND VERSION
       FOR WOMEN'S EQUAL ROLE SELF-PLACEMENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       FTF:  Rs were randomly assigned to the standard 7-point scale
       or to an experimental version of the 7-point scale (without
       "haven't thought much about it" option).
       Phone:  Rs were randomly assigned to 2 versions of the
       branching format; in the 2nd version, the initial placement
       question does not include the "haven't thought much about it"
       option.

       1. FTF standard
       2. FTF experimental
       3. PHONE version 1
       4. PHONE version 2

==============================
M000754a   P1a. R plcmnt equal role scale FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P1a.

   IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION:

       FTF:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See P1 for complete text.
       FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       either P1a (standard) or P1a.E (experimental).
       For the telephone versions of this question see P1a.T and
       P1a.TE.

       1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES   --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c.
       2.                                         --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c.
       3.                                         --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c.
       4.                                         --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c.
       5.                                         --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c.
       6.                                         --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c.
       7. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME          --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c.

       8. DK                                      --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c.
       9. RF; NA; INAP, 2,3,4 in P1(1)
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS         --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c.

==============================
M000754b   P1a.E. R plcmnt equal role scale
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P1a.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION:

       FTF:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See P1 for complete text.
       FTF respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       either P1a (standard) or P1a.E (experimental).
       For the telephone versions of this question see P1a.T and
       P1a.TE.

       1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES         --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c.
       2.                                               --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c.
       3.                                               --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c.
       4.                                               --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c.
       5.                                               --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c.
       6.                                               --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c.
       7. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME                --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c.

       8. DK                                            --> SKIP TO P1.b/P1c.
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,3,4 in P1(1)

==============================
M000755    P1ax. Comb. FTF versions R equal role sc
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P1ax.

       FTF STANDARD FORMAT:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?
       FTF EXPERIMENTAL FORMAT:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale?

       COMBINED FTF STANDARD/EXPERIMENTAL VERSIONS - WOMEN'S ROLE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from P1a and P1a.E.

       1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES
       2.
       3.
       4.
       5.
       6.
       7. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS (P1a only)

==============================
M000756a   P1a.T. R equal role branch stan
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P1a.T.

   IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 1:

       TELEPHONE:
       Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See P1.T for complete text.
       Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       either P1a.T (version 1) or P1a.TE (version 2).
       For the FTF versions of this question see P1a and P1a.E.

       1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES    --> P1a1.T
       5. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME           --> P1a1.T
       7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL]         --> P1b.T/P1c.T

       8. DK                                       --> P1b.T/P1c.T
       9. RF; NA; INAP, 1,2,4 in P1(1)
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH

==============================
M000756b   P1a.TE. R equal role branch ex
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P1a.TE.

   IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 2:

       TELEPHONE:
       Which is closer to the way you feel?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See P1.T for complete text.
       Phone respondents were randomly selected to be administered
       either P1a.T (version 1) or P1a.TE (version 2).
       For the FTF versions of this question see P1a and P1a.E.

       1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES    --> P1a1.T
       5. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME           --> P1a1.T
       7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL]         --> P1b.T/P1c.T

       8. DK                                       --> P1b.T/P1c.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,2,3 in P1(1)

==============================
M000757    P1ax.T. Comb. Ph. Versions R eql role br
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P1ax.T.

       TELEPHONE VERSION 1:
       Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       TELEPHONE VERSION 2:
       Which is closer to the way you feel?

       COMBINED TELEPHONE VERSIONS - WOMEN'S ROLE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from P1a.T and P1a.TE.

       1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES
       5. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME
       7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH (P1a.T only)

==============================
M000758    P1a1/a2.T. R strength equal roles
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P1a1/a2.T.

   BOTH TELEPHONE VERSIONS:
   IF R SAYS MEN AND WOMEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES/
   IF R SAYS A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME:

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you feel strongly or not strongly that men and women
       should have equal roles?/
       Do you feel strongly or not strongly that a woman's
       place is in the home?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY       --> SKIP TO  P1b.T/P1c.T
       5. NOT STRONGLY   --> SKIP TO  P1b.T/P1c.T

       8. DK             --> SKIP TO  P1b.T/P1c.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 0,7,8 or RF/NA in P1a.T; 7,8,9 or NA in P1a.TE

==============================
M000759    P1a1x1. 5-pt br summary R equal role
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P1a1x1.

       TELEPHONE VERSION 1:
       Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       TELEPHONE VERSION 2:
       Which is closer to the way you feel?
       BOTH TELEPHONE VERSIONS:
       Do you feel strongly or not strongly that men
       and women should have equal roles?
       Do you feel strongly or not strongly that a
       woman's place is in the home?

       SUMMARY: 5PT WOMENS ROLE SELF-PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from P1ax.T and P1a1/a2.T

       1. Strongly - women equal role
       2. Not strongly - equal role
       3. Other/depends/neither
       4. Not strongly - place is in the home
       5. Strongly - place is in the home

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH (standard format only)

==============================
M000760    P1a1x2. Comb.7pt/br summ R equal role
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P1a1x2.

       FTF STANDARD FORMAT:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?
       FTF EXPERIMENTAL FORMAT:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale?

       TELEPHONE VERSION 1:
       Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       TELEPHONE VERSION 2:
       Which is closer to the way you feel?
       BOTH VERSIONS:
       Do you feel strongly or not strongly that men
       and women should have equal roles?
       Do you feel strongly or not strongly that a
       woman's place is in the home?

       SUMMARY: 5PT WOMENS ROLE SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from P1ax and P1a1x1

       1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - women equal role
       2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - equal role
       3. SCALE: 3 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither
       4. SCALE: 4 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - place is in the home
       5. SCALE: 5 / BRANCHING: Strongly - place is in the home

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH (standard format only)

==============================
M000761    P1b. Gore-equal role scale FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P1b.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 13)
       Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       See P1 for complete text.
       FTF: P1b and P1c were administered in random order.
       For the telephone version of this question see P1b.T.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES   --> SKIP TO  P1c./P2
       2.                                         --> SKIP TO  P1c./P2
       3.                                         --> SKIP TO  P1c./P2
       4.                                         --> SKIP TO  P1c./P2
       5.                                         --> SKIP TO  P1c./P2
       6.                                         --> SKIP TO  P1c./P2
       7. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME          --> SKIP TO  P1c./P2

       8. DK                                      --> SKIP TO  P1c./P2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000762    P1b.T. Gore-equal role scale phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P1b.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels that women
       should have an equal role with men in running
       business, industry and government, OR that a woman's
       place is in the home?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       See P1 for complete text.
       TELEPHONE: P1b.T and P1c.T were administered in random
       order.
       For the FTF version of this question see P1b.

       1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES       --> P1b1.T
       5. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME              --> P1b1.T
       7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL]            --> P1c.T OR --> P2.T

       8. DK                                          --> P1c.T OR --> P2.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000763    P1b1/b2.T. Gore-strength equal role
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P1b1/b2.T.

   IF R THINKS GORE FEELS MEN AND WOMEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES/
   IF R THINKS GORE FEELS THAT A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME:

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that men
       and women should have equal role?/
       Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that a
       woman's place is in the home?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY       --> P1c.T OR  --> P2.T
       5. NOT STRONGLY   --> P1c.T OR  --> P2.T

       8. DK             --> P1c.T OR  --> P2.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in P1b.T

==============================
M000764    P1bx1. 5-pt br summary Gore equal role
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P1bx1.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels that women
       should have an equal role with men in running
       business, industry and government, OR that a woman's
       place is in the home?
       Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly
       that men and women should have equal role?
       Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly
       that a woman's place is in the home?

       SUMMARY: 5PT WOMENS ROLE GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from P1b.T and P1b1/b2.T

       1. Strongly - women equal role
       2. Not strongly - equal role
       3. Other/depends/neither
       4. Not strongly - place is in the home
       5. Strongly - place is in the home

==============================
M000765    P1bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore equal role
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P1bx2.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 13)
       Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels that women
       should have an equal role with men in running
       business, industry and government, OR that a woman's
       place is in the home?
       Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly
       that men and women should have equal role?
       Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly
       that a woman's place is in the home?

       SUMMARY: 5PT WOMENS ROLE GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from P1b and P1bx1

       1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - women equal role
       2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - equal role
       3. SCALE: 3 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither
       4. SCALE: 4 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - place is in the home
       5. SCALE: 5 / BRANCHING: Strongly - place is in the home

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000766    P1c. Bush-equal role scale FTF
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P1c.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 13)
       Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       See P1 for complete text.
       FTF: P1b and P1c were administered in random order.
       For the telephone version of this question see P1c.T.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES   --> SKIP TO  P1c./P2
       2.                                         --> SKIP TO  P1c./P2
       3.                                         --> SKIP TO  P1c./P2
       4.                                         --> SKIP TO  P1c./P2
       5.                                         --> SKIP TO  P1c./P2
       6.                                         --> SKIP TO  P1c./P2
       7. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME          --> SKIP TO  P1c./P2

       8. DK                                         --> SKIP TO  P1b./P2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000767    P1c.T. Bush-equal role scale phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P1c.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about George W. Bush? Do you think he feels that
       women  should have an equal role with men in running
       business, industry and government, OR that a woman's
       place is in the home?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       See P1 for complete text.
       TELEPHONE: P1b.T and P1c.T were administered in random
       order.
       For the FTF version of this question see P1c.

       1. WOMEN AND MEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES
       5. A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME
       7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL]

       8. DK                                      --> P1b.T OR --> P2.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000768    P1c1/c2.T. Bush-strength equal role
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P1c1/c2.T.

   IF R THINKS GW BUSH FEELS MEN AND WOMEN SHOULD HAVE EQUAL ROLES/
   IF R THINKS GW BUSH FEELS THAT A WOMAN'S PLACE IS IN THE HOME:

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that men
       and women should have equal roles?/
       Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that a
       woman's place is in the home?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY                   --> P1c.T OR  --> P2.T
       5. NOT STRONGLY               --> P1c.T OR  --> P2.T

       8. DK                         --> P1c.T OR  --> P2.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 7,8,9,0 in P1c.T

==============================
M000769    P1cx1. 5-pt br summary Bush equal role
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P1cx1.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about George W. Bush? Do you think he feels that
       women  should have an equal role with men in running
       business, industry and government, OR that a woman's
       place is in the home?
       Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly
       that men and women should have equal role?
       Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly
       that a woman's place is in the home?

       SUMMARY: 5PT WOMENS ROLE BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from P1c.T and P1c1/c2.T

       1. Strongly - women equal role
       2. Not strongly - equal role
       3. Other/depends/neither
       4. Not strongly - place is in the home
       5. Strongly - place is in the home

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; FTF mode

==============================
M000770    P1cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush equal role
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P1cx2.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 13)
       Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about George W. Bush? Do you think he feels that
       women should have an equal role with men in running
       business, industry and government, OR that a woman's
       place is in the home?
       Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly
       that men and women should have equal role?
       Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly
       that a woman's place is in the home?

       SUMMARY: 5PT WOMENS ROLE BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from P1c and P1cx1.

       1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Strongly - women equal role
       2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - equal role
       3. SCALE: 3 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither
       4. SCALE: 4 / BRANCHING: Not strongly - place is in the home
       5. SCALE: 5 / BRANCHING: Strongly - place is in the home

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000771    P2a. self placmnt-envir regulation scale
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P2a.

       FTF:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See P2 for complete text.
       For the telephone version of this question see P2a.T

       1. TOUGHER REGULATIONS ON BUSINESS NEEDED TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT
       2.
       3.
       4.
       5.
       6.
       7. REGULATIONS TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT ALREADY TOO MUCH A BURDEN
          ON BUSINESS

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS

==============================
M000772    P2a.T. R-envir regulation branch
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P2a.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See P2.T for complete text.
       For the FTF version of this question see P2a.

       1. TOUGHER REGULATIONS ON BUSINESS NEEDED TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT
       5. REGULATIONS TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT ALREADY TOO MUCH A BURDEN
          ON BUSINESS
       7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS

==============================
M000773    P2a1.T. How much tougher regulation
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P2a1.T.

   IF R THINKS TOUGHER REGULATION ON BUSINESS NEEDED:

       TELEPHONE:
       Do we need to toughen regulations to protect the
       environment a lot, or just somewhat?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A LOT                       --> P2a3
       5. SOMEWHAT                    --> P2a3

       8. DK                          --> P2a3
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in P2a.T

==============================
M000774    P2a2.T. How much are regulatns a burden
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P2a2.T.

   IF R THINKS REGULATIONS ALREADY TOO MUCH BURDEN:

       TELEPHONE:
       Are regulations to protect the environment way too much
       of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. WAY TOO MUCH
       5. SOMEWHAT

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in P2a.T

==============================
M000775    P2ax1. 5-pt br summary R envir regul
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P2ax1.

       TELEHPONE:
       Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       Do we need to toughen regulations to protect the
       environment a lot, or just somewhat?
       Are regulations to protect the environment way too much
       of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden?

       SUMMARY: 5PT ENVIR REG SELF-LACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from P2a.T and P2a1/a2.T

       1. Toughen regulations a lot
       2. Toughen regulations a little
       3. Other/depends/neither
       4. Regulations somewhat of a burden
       5. Regulations way too much burden

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode
       0. Haven't thought much about it

==============================
M000776    P2ax2. Comb.7pt/br summ R envir regul
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P2ax2.

       FTF:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?

       TELEHPONE:
       Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       Do we need to toughen regulations to protect the
       environment a lot, or just somewhat?
       Are regulations to protect the environment way too much
       of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden?

       SUMMARY: 5PT ENVIR REG SELF-PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from P2a and P2ax1.

       1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Toughen regulations a lot
       2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Toughen regulations a little
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither
       4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Regulations somewhat of a burden
       5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Regulations way too much burden

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA
       0. Haven't thought much about it

==============================
M000777    P2aa. How important is envir regulation
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P2aa.

   ALL ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION RESPONDENTS:

       How important is this issue to you personally?  Not at
       all important, not too important, somewhat important,
       very important, or extremely important?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT
       2. NOT TOO IMPORTANT
       3. SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT
       4. VERY IMPORTANT
       5. EXTREMELY IMPORTANT

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000778    P2b. Gore placmnt-envir regulation scale
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P2b.

       FTF:
       Where would you place Al Gore on this issue?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       See P2 for complete text.
       P2b and P2c were administered in random order.
       For the telephone version of this question see P2b.T

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. TOUGHER REGULATIONS ON BUSINESS
          NEEDED TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT           --> P2bb
       2.                                         --> P2bb
       3.                                         --> P2bb
       4.                                         --> P2bb
       5.                                         --> P2bb
       6.                                         --> P2bb
       7. REGULATIONS TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT
          ALREADY TOO MUCH A BURDEN ON BUSINESS

       8. DK                                      --> SKIP TO  P2c OR P3
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000779    P2b.T. Gore-envir regulation branch
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P2b.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we need much
       tougher government regulations on business in order to
       protect the environment, OR that current regulations to
       protect the environment are already too much of a burden
       on business?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       See P2.T for complete text.
       P2b.T and P2c.T were administered in random order.
       For the FTF version of this question see P2b.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. TOUGHER REGULATIONS ON BUSINESS NEEDED TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT
       5. REGULATIONS TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT ALREADY TOO MUCH A BURDEN
          ON BUSINESS
       7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000780    P2b1.T. Gore-strength tougher regulation
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P2b1.T.

   IF R THINKS GORE FEELS TOUGHER ENV REGULATION ON BUSINESS NEEDED:

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you think he believes that we need to toughen
       regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just
       somewhat?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A LOT                    --> P2bb
       5. SOMEWHAT                 --> P2bb

       8. DK                       --> P2c.T OR  --> P3.
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in P2b.T

==============================
M000781    P2b2.T. Gore-strength regulation burden
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P2b2.T.

   IF R THINKS GORE FEELS ENV REGULATIONS ALREADY TOO MUCH BURDEN:

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you think he believes regulations to protect the
       environment are way too much of a burden on business or
       just somewhat of a burden?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. WAY TOO MUCH                --> P2bb
       5. SOMEWHAT                    --> P2bb

       8. DK                          --> P2c.T OR  -->P3.
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in P2b.T

==============================
M000782    P2bx1. 5-pt br summary Gore envir regul
           Numeric

   P2bx1.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we need much
       tougher government regulations on business in order to
       protect the environment, OR that current regulations to
       protect the environment are already too much of a burden
       on business?
       Do you think he believes that we need to toughen
       regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just
       somewhat?
       Do you think he believes regulations to protect the
       environment are way too much of a burden on business or
       just somewhat of a burden?

       SUMMARY: 5PT ENVIR REG GORE PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from P2b.T and P2b1/b2.T.

       1. Toughen regulations a lot
       2. Toughen regulations a little
       3. Other/depends/neither
       4. Regulations somewhat of a burden
       5. Regulations way too much burden

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000783    P2bx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Gore envir regul
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P2bx2.

       FTF:
       Where would you place Al Gore on this issue?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we need much
       tougher government regulations on business in order to
       protect the environment, OR that current regulations to
       protect the environment are already too much of a burden
       on business?
       Do you think he believes that we need to toughen
       regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just
       somewhat?
       Do you think he believes regulations to protect the
       environment are way too much of a burden on business or
       just somewhat of a burden?

       SUMMARY: 5PT ENVIR REG GORE PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Bult from P2b and P2bx1.

       1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Toughen regulations a lot
       2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Toughen regulations a little
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither
       4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Regulations somewhat of a burden
       5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Regulations way too much burden

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000784    P2bb. Gore-certain envir regulation
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P2bb.

   IF R'S PLACEMENT OF GORE IS NOT DK OR OTHER/DEPENDS/NEITHER:

       How certain are you of Al Gore's position? Very certain,
       pretty certain, or not very certain?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY CERTAIN
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in P2b; 7,8,9 or NA in P2b.T

==============================
M000785    P2c. Bush placemnt-envir regulation scale
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P2c.

       FTF:
       Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       See P2 for complete text.
       P2b and P2c were administered in random order.
       For the telephone version of this question see P2c.T

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. TOUGHER REGULATIONS ON BUSINESS NEEDED TO
          PROTECT ENVIRONMENT                          --> P2cc
       2.                                              --> P2cc
       3.                                              --> P2cc
       4.                                              --> P2cc
       5.                                              --> P2cc
       6.                                              --> P2cc
       7. REGULATIONS TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT ALREADY
          TOO MUCH A BURDEN ON BUSINESS                --> P2cc

       8. DK                                           --> P2b OR P3
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M000786    P2c.T. Bush-envir regulation branch
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P2c.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about George W. Bush? Do you think he believes we
       need much tougher government regulations on business in
       order to protect the environment, OR that current
       regulations to protect the environment are already too
       much of a burden on business?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE DK]
       See P2.T for complete text.
       P2b.T and P2c.T were administered in random order.
       For the FTF version of this question see P2c.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. TOUGHER REGULATIONS ON BUSINESS NEEDED TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT
       5. REGULATIONS TO PROTECT ENVIRONMENT ALREADY TOO MUCH A BURDEN
          ON BUSINESS
       7. OTHER, IT DEPENDS, NEITHER [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000787    P2c1.T. Bush-strength tougher regulation
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P2c1.T.

   IF R THINKS GW BUSH FEELS TOUGHER ENV REGULATION ON BUSINESS NEEDED:

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you think he believes that we need to toughen
       regulations to protect the environment a lot, or
       just somewhat?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A LOT                   --> P2cc
       5. SOMEWHAT                --> P2cc

       8. DK                      --> P2b.T OR  --> P3.
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 5,7,8,9,0 in P2c.T

==============================
M000788    P2c2.T. Bush-strength regulation burden
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P2c2.T.

   IF R THINKS GW BUSH FEELS ENV REGULATIONS ALREADY TOO MUCH BURDEN:

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you think he believes regulations to protect the
       environment are way too much of a burden on business or
       just somewhat of a burden?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. WAY TOO MUCH                   --> P2cc
       5. SOMEWHAT                       --> P2cc

       8. DK                            --> P2b.T OR  --> P3
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,7,8,9,0 in P2c.T

==============================
M000789    P2cx1. 5-pt br summary Bush envir regul
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P2cx1.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about George W. Bush? Do you think he believes we
       need much tougher government regulations on business in
       order to protect the environment, OR that current
       regulations to protect the environment are already too
       much of a burden on business?
       Do you think he believes that we need to toughen
       regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just
       somewhat?
       Do you think he believes regulations to protect the
       environment are way too much of a burden on business or
       just somewhat of a burden?

       SUMMARY: 5PT ENVIR REG BUSH PLACEMENT FROM BRANCHING SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from P2c.T and P2c1/c2.T

       1. Toughen regulations a lot
       2. Toughen regulations a little
       3. Other/depends/neither
       4. Regulations somewhat of a burden
       5. Regulations way too much burden

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M000790    P2cx2. Comb.7pt/br summ Bush envir regul
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P2cx2.

       FTF:
       Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about George W. Bush? Do you think he believes we
       need much tougher government regulations on business in
       order to protect the environment, OR that current
       regulations to protect the environment are already too
       much of a burden on business?
       Do you think he believes that we need to toughen
       regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just
       somewhat?
       Do you think he believes regulations to protect the
       environment are way too much of a burden on business or
       just somewhat of a burden?

       SUMMARY: 5PT ENVIR REG BUSH PLACEMENT FROM 7PT SCALE/BRANCHING
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from P2c and P2cx1.

       1. SCALE: 1 / BRANCHING: Toughen regulations a lot
       2. SCALE: 2 / BRANCHING: Toughen regulations a little
       3. SCALE: 3,4,5 / BRANCHING: Other/depends/neither
       4. SCALE: 6 / BRANCHING: Regulations somewhat of a burden
       5. SCALE: 7 / BRANCHING: Regulations way too much burden

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000791    P2cc. Bush-certain envir regulation
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P2cc.

   IF R'S PLACEMENT OF GW BUSH IS NOT DK OR OTHER/DEPENDS/NEITHER:

       How certain are you of George W. Bush's position? Very
       certain, pretty certain, or not very certain?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY CERTAIN
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9 or NA in P2c; 7,8,9 or NA in P2c.T

==============================
M000792    P3. R expect to vote in Nov election
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P3.

       So far as you know now, do you expect to vote in the
       national elections this coming November or not?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO           --> SKIP TO P3c

       8. DON'T KNOW   --> SKIP TO P3c
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000793    P3a. Who will R vote for President
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P3a.

   IF R EXPECTS TO VOTE IN NOVEMBER ELECTION:

       Who do you think you will vote for in the election for
       President?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: NEEDLESS TO SAY, THE ELECTION FOR PRESIDENT OF THE
       UNITED STATES IS A LONG TIME AWAY IN NOVEMBER.  BUT I'D
       LIKE TO ASK YOU FOR YOUR BEST GUESS ABOUT WHO YOU WILL
       VOTE FOR IN THE ELECTION FOR PRESIDENT IN NOVEMBER.]

       1. AL GORE
       2. GEORGE W. BUSH
       3. PAT BUCHANAN
       4. RALPH NADER
       5. NONE (if voter, will not vote for president) [VOL]  --> SKIP TO P3c
       7. OTHER, (SPECIFY):

       8. DON'T KNOW                                          --> SKIP TO P4
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in P3

==============================
M000794    P3b. Strength of preference for candidate
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P3b.

   IF R EXPECTS TO VOTE IN NOVEMBER ELECTION:
   IF INTENDED PRESIDENTIAL VOTE IS NOT NONE OR DK/RF:

       Would you say that your preference for
       [GORE/BUSH/BUCHANAN/OTHER] is strong or not strong?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONG       --> SKIP TO P4
       5. NOT STRONG   --> SKIP TO P4

       8. DK           --> SKIP TO P4
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9 or 0 in P3a

==============================
M000795    P3c. If R voted, who would R vote for President
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P3c.

   IF TURNOUT INTENT IS WILL NOT/DK IF WILL VOTE IN NOVEMBER/
   IF VOTE INTENT IS TO VOTE BUT NOT FOR PRESIDENT:

       If you were going to vote, who do you think you would
       vote for in the election for President?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: NEEDLESS TO SAY, THE ELECTION FOR PRESIDENT OF THE
       UNITED STATES IS A LONG TIME AWAY IN NOVEMBER.  BUT I'D
       LIKE TO ASK YOU FOR YOUR BEST GUESS ABOUT WHO YOU WOULD
       VOTE FOR IN THE ELECTION FOR PRESIDENT IN NOVEMBER.]

       1. AL GORE
       2. GEORGE W. BUSH
       3. PAT BUCHANAN
       4. RALPH NADER
       5. NONE (if voter, will not vote for president) [VOL] --> SKIP TO P4
       7. OTHER, (SPECIFY):

       8. DON'T KNOW                                         --> SKIP TO P4
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0, 9 in P3; 1-4,7,8,9 or NA in P3a

==============================
M000796    P3d. Strength of preference for candidate
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P3d.

   IF TURNOUT INTENT IS WILL NOT/DK IF WILL VOTE IN NOVEMBER/
   IF VOTE INTENT IS TO VOTE BUT NOT FOR PRESIDENT:
   IF R NAMES PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE HE WOULD VOTE FOR IF VOTING:

       Would you say that your preference for <CANDIDATE NAMED>
       is strong or not strong?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONG
       5. NOT STRONG

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,0,8,9 in P3c

==============================
M000797    P4. Which party will control the House
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P4.

       The next couple of questions are about what you think
       will happen as a result of the upcoming elections.
       After the November election, which party do you think
       will have the most members in the U.S. House of
       Representatives -- the Republicans or the Democrats?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. REPUBLICANS
       5. DEMOCRATS

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000798    P5. Which party will control the Senate
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P5.

       Again, after the November election, which party do you
       think will have the most members in the U.S. Senate,
       -- the Republicans or the Democrats?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. REPUBLICANS
       5. DEMOCRATS

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000799    P6. Interest in fair treatment in jobs
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P6.

       Some people feel that if black people are not getting
       fair treatment in jobs, the government in Washington
       ought to see to it that they do.  Others feel that this
       is not the federal government's business.
       Have you had enough interest in this question to favor
       one side over the other?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES, HAVE INTEREST IN QUESTION    --> P6a
       5. NO, HAVEN'T HAD INTEREST          --> P7

       8. DK                                --> P7
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000800    P6a. Govt should ensure Blacks equ trtment in jobs
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P6a.

   IF R HAS HAD INTEREST IN ISSUE OF FAIR TREATMENT IN JOBS:

       How do you feel?  Should the government in Washington
       see to it that black people get fair treatment in jobs
       OR is this not the federal government's business?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. GOVERNMENT IN WASHINGTON SHOULD SEE TO IT THAT BLACK PEOPLE
          GET FAIR TREATMENT IN JOBS
       5. THIS IS NOT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S BUSINESS
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY)

       8. DK                        -->P7
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in P6

==============================
M000801    P6a1. Strength blacks equal trtmnt jobs
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P6a1.

   IF R HAS HAD INTEREST IN ISSUE OF FAIR TREATMENT IN JOBS:
   IF R'S POSITION IS SEE TO FAIR TREATMENT/
   IF R'S POSITION IS NOT THE FEDERAL GOVT'S BUSINESS:

       Do you feel strongly or not strongly about that?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY
       5. NOT STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,7,8,9 in P6a

==============================
M000802    P6x. Summary blacks equal treatment jobs
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 7
           Numeric

   P6x.

       How do you feel?  Should the government in Washington
       see to it that black people get fair treatment in jobs
       OR is this not the federal government's business?
       Do you feel strongly or not strongly about that?

       SUMMARY: R POSITION ON FAIR TREATMENT IN JOBS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from P6,P6a,P6a1.

       1. Strongly - govt should see to fair treatment
       2. Not strongly - govt should see to fair treatment
       4. Not strongly - not the government's business
       5. Strongly - not the government's business

       7. Other
       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no interest (5 in P6)

==============================
M000803    P7. Preferences for blacks in jobs
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P7.

       Some people say that because of past discrimination,
       blacks should be given preference in hiring and
       promotion.  Others say that such preference in hiring and
       promotion of blacks is wrong because it gives blacks
       advantages they haven't earned.
       What about your opinion -- are you for or against
       preferential hiring and promotion of blacks?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. FOR PREFERENTIAL HIRING AND
          PROMOTION OF BLACKS               --> P7a
       5. AGAINST PREFERENTIAL HIRING AND
          PROMOTION   OF BLACKS            --> P7b
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY)                  --> section Q as randomly selected

       8. DK                               --> section Q as randomly selected
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000804    P7a. Strength for preference blks jobs
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P7a.

   IF R FAVORS PREFERENCE IN HIRING AND PROMOTION OF BLACKS:

       Do you favor preference in hiring and promotion strongly
       or not strongly?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY
       5. NOT STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,7,8,9,0 in P7

==============================
M000805    P7b. Strength against preference blks jobs
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P7b.

   IF R OPPOSES PREFERENCE IN HIRING AND PROMOTION OF BLACKS:

       Do you oppose preference in hiring and promotion
       strongly or not strongly?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONGLY
       5. NOT STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,7,8,9,0 in P7

==============================
M000806    P7x. Summary preference for blacks jobs
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 7
           Numeric

   P7x.

       What about your opinion- are you for or against
       preferential hiring and promotion of blacks?
       Do you favor/oppose preference in hiring and promotion
       strongly or not strongly?

       SUMMARY: R POSITION ON AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN JOBS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from P7 and P7a/b.

       1. Favor strongly
       2. Favor not strongly
       4. Oppose not strongly
       5. Oppose strongly

       7. Other
       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA


==============================
M000807    Q1.  Budget deficit lg/sm since 1992
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q1.

       As you know, Bill Clinton was first elected President in
       November 1992.  He will soon be leaving office after
       8 years as President.  The next several questions ask
       whether you think things have changed since Clinton
       came into office.
       First, would you say that compared to 1992, the federal
       budget deficit is now smaller, larger, or about the same?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects
       and traits battery (Q14-Q15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Pre election
       instrument they were assigned administration in the
       Post (S1-S11) and vice versa.

       1. GOTTEN SMALLER
       3. GOTTEN LARGER                     --> SKIP TO Q1b
       5. STAYED ABOUT THE SAME             --> SKIP TO Q2

       8. DK                                --> SKIP TO Q2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15
          sections in the Pre

==============================
M000808    Q1a. Deficit much/somewhat smaller
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q1a.

   IF R SAYS THE BUDGET DEFICIT IS SMALLER THAN IN 1992:

       (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much smaller
       or somewhat smaller?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH SMALLER       --> SKIP TO Q2
       5. SOMEWHAT SMALLER   --> SKIP TO Q2

       8. DK                 --> SKIP TO Q2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q1

==============================
M000809    Q1b. Deficit much/somewhat larger
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q1b.

   IF R SAYS THE BUDGET DEFICIT IS LARGER THAN IN 1992:

       (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much larger
       or somewhat larger?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH LARGER
       5. SOMEWHAT LARGER

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q1

==============================
M000810    Q1x. Summary budget deficit since 1992
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q1x.

       First, would you say that compared to 1992, the federal
       budget deficit is now smaller, larger, or about the same?
       (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much smaller/
       larger or somewhat smaller/larger?

       SUMMARY: BUDGET DEFICIT SINCE 1992
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Q1 and Q1a/b.

       1. Much smaller
       2. Somewhat smaller
       3. About the same
       4. Somewhat larger
       5. Much larger

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP,  R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre

==============================
M000811    Q2.  Spending on poor inc/dec since 1992
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q2.

       Has federal spending on assistance to the poor been
       increased, decreased, or has it stayed about the same as
       in 1992?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects
       and traits battery (Q14-Q15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Pre election
       instrument they were assigned administration in the
       Post (S1-S11) and vice versa.

       1 INCREASED
       3 DECREASED
       5 STAYED ABOUT THE SAME                --> SKIP TO Q3

       8 DK                                  --> SKIP TO Q3
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre

==============================
M000812    Q2a. How much inc/dec aid to poor
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q2a.

   IR SAYS SPENDING ON POOR HAS DECREASED SINCE 1992/
   IR SAYS SPENDING ON POOR HAS INCREASED SINCE 1992:

       A lot or somewhat?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A LOT
       5. SOMEWHAT

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Q2

==============================
M000813    Q2x. Summary assistance to poor
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q2x.

       Has federal spending on assistance to the poor been
       increased, decreased, or has it stayed about the same as
       in 1992?
       A lot or somewhat?

       SUMMARY: FEDERAL ASSISTANCE TO THE POOR
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Q2 and Q2a.

       1. Increases a lot
       2. Increased somewhat
       3. Stayed about the same
       4. Decreased somewhat
       5. Decreased a lot

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP,  R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre

==============================
M000814    Q3.  Economy better/worse compared to 1992
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q3.

       Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's
       economy is better, worse, or about the same?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects
       and traits battery (Q14-Q15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Pre election
       instrument they were assigned administration in the
       Post (S1-S11) and vice versa.

       1. BETTER
       3. WORSE                     --> SKIP TO Q3b
       5. THE SAME                  --> SKIP TO Q4

       8. DK                        --> SKIP TO Q4
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre

==============================
M000815    Q3a. Economy much/somewhat better
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q3a.

   IF R SAYS NATION'S ECONOMY IS BETTER SINCE 1992:

       (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH BETTER       --> SKIP TO Q4
       5. SOMEWHAT BETTER   --> SKIP TO Q4

       8. DK                --> SKIP TO Q4
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q3

==============================
M000816    Q3b. Economy much/somewhat worse
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q3b.

   IF R SAYS NATION'S ECONOMY IS WORSE SINCE 1992:

       (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH WORSE
       5. SOMEWHAT WORSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q3

==============================
M000817    Q3x. Summary economy since 1992
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q3x.

       Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's
       economy is better, worse, or about the same?
       (Would you say) much better/worse or somewhat better/
       worse?

       SUMMARY: ECONOMY SINCE 1992
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Q3 and Q3a/b.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. About the same
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP,  R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre

==============================
M000818    Q4. Clinton made economy better/worse
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q4.

       Since 1992, would you say President Clinton has made the
       nation's economy better, made the economy worse,
       or had no effect on the economy one way or the other?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects
       and traits battery (Q14-Q15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Pre election
       instrument they were assigned administration in the
       Post (S1-S11) and vice versa.

       1. MADE THE ECONOMY BETTER
       3. MADE THE ECONOMY WORSE            --> SKIP TO Q4b
       5. NO EFFECT                         --> SKIP TO Q5

       8. DK                                --> SKIP TO Q5
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre

==============================
M000819    Q4a. Clinton made econ much/somewhat better
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q4a.

   IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE ECONOMY BETTER SINCE 1992:

       Much better or somewhat better?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH BETTER          --> SKIP TO Q5
       5. SOMEWHAT BETTER      --> SKIP TO Q5

       8. DK                   --> SKIP TO Q5
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q4

==============================
M000820    Q4b. Clinton made econ much/somewhat worse
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q4b.

   IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE ECONOMY WORSE SINCE 1992:

       Much worse or somewhat worse?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH WORSE
       5. SOMEWHAT WORSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q4

==============================
M000821    Q4x. Summary Clinton effect on US econ
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q4x.

       Since 1992, would you say President Clinton has made the
       nation's economy better, made the economy worse,
       or had no effect on the economy one way or the other?
       Much better/worse or somewhat better/worse?

       SUMMARY: CLINTON EFFECT ON ECONOMY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Q4 and Q4a/b.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. No effect
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP,  R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre

==============================
M000822    Q5.  Clinton admin hurt/help R personally
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q5.

       Have you personally been helped or have you been hurt
       economically by the Clinton Administration, or hasn't
       it affected you one way or the other?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects
       and traits battery (Q14-Q15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Pre election
       instrument they were assigned administration in the
       Post (S1-S11) and vice versa.

       1. HELPED
       3. HURT
       5. NOT AFFECTED

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre

==============================
M000823    Q6.  U.S. more/less secure since 1992
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q6.

       Would you say that compared to 1992, the United States
       is more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or
       hasn't this changed very much?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects
       and traits battery (Q14-Q15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Pre election
       instrument they were assigned administration in the
       Post (S1-S11) and vice versa.

       1. MORE SECURE
       3. LESS SECURE                 --> SKIP TO Q6b
       5. NO CHANGE                   --> SKIP TO Q7

       8. DK                         --> SKIP TO Q7
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre

==============================
M000824    Q6a. U.S. much more secure from enemies
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q6a.

   IF R SAYS U.S. MORE SECURE FROM ENEMIES SINCE 1992:

       (Would you say) much more secure or somewhat more secure?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH MORE SECURE         --> SKIP TO Q7
       5. SOMEWHAT MORE SECURE     --> SKIP TO Q7

       8. DK                       --> SKIP TO Q7
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q6

==============================
M000825    Q6b. U.S much less secure from enemies
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q6b.

   IF R SAYS U.S. LESS SECURE FROM ENEMIES SINCE 1992:

       (Would you say) much less secure or somewhat less secure?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH LESS SECURE
       5. SOMEWHAT LESS SECURE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q6

==============================
M000826    Q6x. Summary US secure from for enemies
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q6x.

       Would you say that compared to 1992, the United States
       is more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or
       hasn't this changed very much?
       (Would you say) much more/less secure or somewhat more/
       less secure?

       SUMMARY: U.S. SECURITY FROM FOREIGN ENEMIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Q6 and Q6a/b.

       1. Much more secure
       2. Somewhat more secure
       3. Not changed very much
       4. Somewhat less secure
       5. Much less secure

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP,  R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre

==============================
M000827    Q7.  Clinton made U.S. more/less secure
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q7.

       Would you say that Clinton administration has made the
       United States more secure from its foreign enemies, less
       secure, or hasn't it made much difference either way?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects
       and traits battery (Q14-Q15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Pre election
       instrument they were assigned administration in the
       Post (S1-S11) and vice versa.

       1. MORE SECURE
       3. LESS SECURE                 --> SKIP TO Q7b
       5. NO CHANGE                   --> SKIP TO Q8

       8. DK                          --> SKIP TO Q8
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre

==============================
M000828    Q7a. Clinton made U.S. much/smwhat more secure
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q7a.

   IF R SAYS CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. MORE SECURE:

       Much more secure or somewhat more secure?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH MORE SECURE       --> SKIP TO Q8
       5. SOMEWHAT MORE SECURE   --> SKIP TO Q8

       8. DK                     --> SKIP TO Q8
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q7

==============================
M000829    Q7b. Clinton made U.S. much/smwhat less secure
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q7b.

   IF R SAYS CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. LESS SECURE:

       Much less secure or somewhat less secure?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH LESS SECURE
       5. SOMEWHAT LESS SECURE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q7

==============================
M000830    Q7x. Summ- Clinton impact on U.S. security
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q7x.

       Would you say that Clinton administration has made the
       United States more secure from its foreign enemies, less
       secure, or hasn't it made much difference either way?
       Much more/less secure or somewhat more/less secure?

       SUMMARY: CLINTON ADMINISTRATION EFFECT ON U.S. SECURITY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Q7 and Q7a/b.

       1. Much more secure
       2. Somewhat more secure
       3. Hasn't made much difference
       4. Somewhat less secure
       5. Much less secure

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP,  R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre

==============================
M000831    Q8.  U.S. crime rate better/worse since 1992
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q8.

       Would you say that compared to 1992 the nation's crime
       rate has gotten better, gotten worse, or stayed about
       the same?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects
       and traits battery (Q14-Q15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Pre election
       instrument they were assigned administration in the
       Post (S1-S11) and vice versa.

       1. BETTER
       3. WORSE                       --> SKIP TO Q8b
       5. THE SAME                    --> SKIP TO Q9

       8. DK                          --> SKIP TO Q9
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre

==============================
M000832    Q8a. U.S. crime rate much or smwhat better
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q8a.

   IF R SAYS U.S. CRIME RATE HAS GOTTEN BETTER SINCE 1992:

       (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH BETTER       --> SKIP TO Q9
       5. SOMEWHAT BETTER   --> SKIP TO Q9

       8. DK                --> SKIP TO Q9
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q8

==============================
M000833    Q8b. U.S. crime rate much or smwhat worse
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q8b.

   IF R SAYS U.S. CRIME RATE HAS GOTTEN WORSE SINCE 1992:

       (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH WORSE
       5. SOMEWHAT WORSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q8

==============================
M000834    Q8x. Summary - U.S. crime rate since 1992
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q8x.

       Would you say that compared to 1992 the nation's crime
       rate has gotten better, gotten worse, or stayed about
       the same?
       (Would you say) much better/worse or somewhat better/
       worse?

       SUMMARY: U.S. CRIME RATE SINCE 1992
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Q8 and Q8a/b.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. Stayed about the same
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP,  R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre

==============================
M000835    Q9.  Clinton made crime rate better/worse
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q9.

       Would you say that Clinton administration has made the
       nation's crime rate better, worse, or hasn't it made
       much difference either way?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects
       and traits battery (Q14-Q15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Pre election
       instrument they were assigned administration in the
       Post (S1-S11) and vice versa.

       1. BETTER
       3. WORSE                          --> SKIP TO Q9b
       5. NO DIFFERENCE                  --> SKIP TO Q10

       8. DK                            --> SKIP TO Q10
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre

==============================
M000836    Q9a. Clinton made crime rate much/smwhat btr
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q9a.

   IF R SAYS CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. CRIME RATE BETTER:

       Much better or somewhat better?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH BETTER       --> SKIP TO Q10
       5. SOMEWHAT BETTER   --> SKIP TO Q10

       8. DK                --> SKIP TO Q10
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q9

==============================
M000837    Q9b. Clinton made crime rate much/smwhat wrse
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q9b.

   IF R SAYS CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. CRIME RATE WORSE:

       Much worse or somewhat worse?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH WORSE
       5. SOMEWHAT WORSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q9

==============================
M000838    Q9x. Summary - Clinton impact on crime rate
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q9x.

       Would you say that Clinton administration has made the
       nation's crime rate better, worse, or hasn't it made
       much difference either way?
       Much better/worse or somewhat better/worse?

       SUMMARY: EFFECT OF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION ON CRIME RATE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Q9 and Q9a/b.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. Hasn't made much difference
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP,  R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre

==============================
M000839    Q10. Moral climate btr/worse since 1992
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q10.

       Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's moral
       climate has gotten better, stayed about the same, or
       gotten worse?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects
       and traits battery (Q14-Q15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Pre election
       instrument they were assigned administration in the
       Post (S1-S11) and vice versa.

       1. BETTER
       3. WORSE                        --> SKIP TO Q10b
       5. THE SAME                     --> SKIP TO Q11

       8. DK                           --> SKIP TO Q11
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre

==============================
M000840    Q10a.Moral climate much/smwhat better
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q10a.

   IF R SAYS MORAL CLIMATE IS BETTER SINCE 1992:

       (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH BETTER       --> SKIP TO Q11
       5. SOMEWHAT BETTER   --> SKIP TO Q11

       8. DK                --> SKIP TO Q11
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q10

==============================
M000841    Q10b.Moral climate much/smwhat worse
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q10b.

   IF R SAYS MORAL CLIMATE IS WORSE SINCE 1992:

       (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH WORSE
       5. SOMEWHAT WORSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q10

==============================
M000842    Q10x. Summary moral climate since 1992
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q10x.

       Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's moral
       climate has gotten better, stayed about the same, or
       gotten worse?
       (Would you say) much better/worse or somewhat better/
       worse?

       SUMMARY: U.S. MORAL CLIMATE SINCE 1992
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Q10 and Q10a/b.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. Stayed about the same
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre

==============================
M000843    Q11. Clinton made moral climate btr/worse
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q11.

       Has the Clinton administration made the nation's moral
       climate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference
       either way?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects
       and traits battery (Q14-Q15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Pre election
       instrument they were assigned administration in the
       Post (S1-S11) and vice versa.

       1. BETTER
       3. WORSE                        --> SKIP TO Q11b
       5. NO DIFFERENCE                --> SKIP TO Q14

       8. DK                          --> SKIP TO Q14
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre

==============================
M000844    Q11a.Clinton made moral climate much/swht btr
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q11a.

   IF R SAYS CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE MORAL CLIMATE BETTER:

       Much better or somewhat better?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH BETTER       --> SKIP TO Q14
       5. SOMEWHAT BETTER   --> SKIP TO Q14

       8. DK                --> SKIP TO Q14
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in Q11

==============================
M000845    Q11b.Clinton made moral climate much/swht wrse
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q11b.

   IF R SAYS CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE MORAL CLIMATE WORSE:

       Much worse or somewhat worse?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH WORSE
       5. SOMEWHAT WORSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in Q11

==============================
M000846    Q11x. Summary - Clinton impact on moral climate
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q11x.

       Has the Clinton administration made the nation's moral
       climate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference
       either way?
       Much better/worse or somewhat better/worse?

       SUMMARY: EFFECT OF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION ON MORAL CLIMATE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Q11 and Q11a/b.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. Hasn't made much difference
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, ; INAP, R selected for Q14-Q15 sections in the Pre

==============================
M000847    Q14a. Angry- Clinton affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q14a.

       (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is
       or because of something he has done, ever made you
       feel:)
       ANGRY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Clinton affects were asked in random order.
       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects
       and traits battery (Q14-Q15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Pre election
       instrument they were assigned administration in the
       Post (S1-S11) and vice versa.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. YES
       5. NO           --> SKIP to next affect

       8. DK           --> SKIP to next affect
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre

==============================
M000848    Q14a1. Angry- how oft Clinton affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q14a1.

   IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R ANGRY:

       How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often,
       fairly often, occasionally, or rarely?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY OFTEN
       2. FAIRLY OFTEN
       3. OCCASIONALLY
       4. RARELY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Q14a

==============================
M000849    Q14b. Hopeful- Clinton affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q14b.

       (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is
       or because of something he has done, ever made you
       feel:)
       HOPEFUL
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Clinton affects were asked in random order.
       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects
       and traits battery (Q14-Q15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Pre election
       instrument they were assigned administration in the
       Post (S1-S11) and vice versa.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. YES
       5. NO          --> SKIP to next affect

       8. DK          --> SKIP to next affect
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre

==============================
M000850    Q14b1. Hopeful- how oft Clinton affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q14b1.

   IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R HOPEFUL:

       How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very
       often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY OFTEN
       2. FAIRLY OFTEN
       3. OCCASIONALLY
       4. RARELY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Q14b

==============================
M000851    Q14c. Afraid- Clinton affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q14c.

       (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is
       or because of something he has done, ever made you
       feel:)
       AFRAID
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Clinton affects were asked in random order.
       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects
       and traits battery (Q14-Q15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Pre election
       instrument they were assigned administration in the
       Post (S1-S11) and vice versa.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. YES
       5. NO            --> SKIP to next affect

       8. DK            --> SKIP to next affect
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre

==============================
M000852    Q14c1. Afraid- how often Clinton affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q14c1.

   IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R AFRAID:

       How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very
       often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY OFTEN
       2. FAIRLY OFTEN
       3. OCCASIONALLY
       4. RARELY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Q14c

==============================
M000853    Q14d. Proud- Clinton affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q14d.

       (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is
       or because of something he has done, ever made you
       feel:)
       PROUD
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Clinton affects were asked in random order.
       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects
       and traits battery (Q14-Q15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Pre election
       instrument they were assigned administration in the
       Post (S1-S11) and vice versa.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. YES
       5. NO            --> SKIP to next affect

       8. DK            --> SKIP to next affect
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre

==============================
M000854    Q14d1. Proud- how oft Clinton affect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q14d1.

   IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R AFRAID:

       How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often,
       fairly often, occasionally, or rarely?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY OFTEN
       2. FAIRLY OFTEN
       3. OCCASIONALLY
       4. RARELY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Q14d

==============================
M000855    Q15a/Q15a.T. Clinton trait-moral
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q15a/Q15a.T.

       FTF:
       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       TELEPHONE:
       In your opinion, does the phrase he (is)'<TRAIT>'
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <TRAIT>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or
       not well at all?])

       MORAL
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       Clinton traits were asked in random order.
       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects
       and traits battery (Q14-Q15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Pre election
       instrument they were assigned administration in the
       Post (S1-S11) and vice versa.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1 EXTREMELY WELL
       2 QUITE WELL
       3 NOT TOO WELL
       4 NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre

==============================
M000856    Q15b/Q15b.T. Clinton trait-really cares
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q15b/Q15b.T.

       FTF:
       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       TELEPHONE:
       In your opinion, does the phrase he (is) '<TRAIT>'
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <TRAIT>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or
       not well at all?])

       REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       Clinton traits were asked in random order.
       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects
       and traits battery (Q14-Q15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Pre election
       instrument they were assigned administration in the
       Post (S1-S11) and vice versa.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1 EXTREMELY WELL
       2 QUITE WELL
       3 NOT TOO WELL
       4 NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre

==============================
M000857    Q15c/Q15c.T. Clinton trait-knowledgeable
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q15c/Q15c.T.

       FTF:
       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       TELEPHONE:
       In your opinion, does the phrase he (is) '<TRAIT>'
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <TRAIT>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or
       not well at all?])

       KNOWLEDGEABLE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       Clinton traits were asked in random order.
       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects
       and traits battery (Q14-Q15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Pre election
       instrument they were assigned administration in the
       Post (S1-S11) and vice versa.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1 EXTREMELY WELL
       2 QUITE WELL
       3 NOT TOO WELL
       4 NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre

==============================
M000858    Q15d/Q15d.T. Clinton trait-strong leader
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q15d/Q15d.T.

       FTF:
       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       TELEPHONE:
       In your opinion, does the phrase he (is) '<TRAIT>'
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <TRAIT>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or
       not well at all?])

       PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       Clinton traits were asked in random order.
       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects
       and traits battery (Q14-Q15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Pre election
       instrument they were assigned administration in the
       Post (S1-S11) and vice versa.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1 EXTREMELY WELL
       2 QUITE WELL
       3 NOT TOO WELL
       4 NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre

==============================
M000859    Q15e/Q15e.T. Clitnon trait-dishonest
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q15e/Q15e.T.

       FTF:
       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       TELEPHONE:
       In your opinion, does the phrase he (is) '<TRAIT>'
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <TRAIT>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or
       not well at all?])

       DISHONEST
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       Clinton traits were asked in random order.
       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects
       and traits battery (Q14-Q15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Pre election
       instrument they were assigned administration in the
       Post (S1-S11) and vice versa.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1 EXTREMELY WELL
       2 QUITE WELL
       3 NOT TOO WELL
       4 NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre

==============================
M000860    Q15f/Q15f.T. Clinton trait-intelligent
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q15f/Q15f.T.

       FTF:
       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       TELEPHONE:
       In your opinion, does the phrase he (is) '<TRAIT>'
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <TRAIT>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or
       not well at all?])

       INTELLIGENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       Clinton traits were asked in random order.
       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects
       and traits battery (Q14-Q15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Pre election
       instrument they were assigned administration in the
       Post (S1-S11) and vice versa.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1 EXTREMELY WELL
       2 QUITE WELL
       3 NOT TOO WELL
       4 NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre

==============================
M000861    Q15g/Q15g.T. Clinton trait-out of touch
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q15g/Q15g.T.

       FTF:
       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       TELEPHONE:
       In your opinion, does the phrase he (is) '<TRAIT>'
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <TRAIT>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or
       not well at all?])

       OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       Clinton traits were asked in random order.
       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (Q1-Q11) or the affects
       and traits battery (Q14-Q15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Pre election
       instrument they were assigned administration in the
       Post (S1-S11) and vice versa.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1 EXTREMELY WELL
       2 QUITE WELL
       3 NOT TOO WELL
       4 NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for Q1-Q11 in the Pre

==============================
M000862    R1. How opinionated is R
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R1.

       Some people have opinions about almost everything; other
       people have opinions about just some things; and still
       other people have very few opinions.
       What about you? Would you say you have opinions about
       almost everything, about many things, about some things,
       or about very few things?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. ALMOST EVERYTHING
       2. MANY THINGS
       3. SOME THINGS
       4. VERY FEW THINGS

==============================
M000863    R1a. Fewer or more opinions than avg
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R1a.

       Compared to the average person do you have fewer
       opinions about whether things are good or bad, about the
       same number of opinions, or more opinions?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. FEWER OPINIONS
       3. ABOUT THE SAME NUMBER OF OPINIONS
       5. MORE OPINIONS

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000864    R1a1. How much more opinions than avg
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R1a1.

   IF R SAYS HE/SHE HAS MORE OPINIONS THAN THE AVERAGE PERSON:

       Would you say that you have a lot more opinions or just
       somewhat more opinions?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A LOT MORE OPINIONS      --> SKIP TO R2
       5. SOMEWHAT MORE OPINIONS   --> SKIP TO R2

       8. DK                       --> SKIP TO R2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,3,8,9,0 in R1a

==============================
M000865    R1a2. More much fewer opinions than avg
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R1a2.

   IF R SAYS HE/SHE HAS FEWER OPINIONS THAN THE AVERAGE PERSON:

       Would you say that you have a lot fewer opinions or just
       somewhat fewer opinions?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A LOT FEWER OPINIONS
       5. SOMEWHAT FEWER OPINIONS

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in R1a

==============================
M000866    R1x. Summary degree R opinionated
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R1x.

       Compared to the average person do you have fewer
       opinions about whether things are good or bad, about the
       same number of opinions, or more opinions?
       Would you say that you have a lot more/fewer opinions or
       just somewhat more/fewer opinions?

       SUMMARY: DEGREE R OPINIONATED
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from R1a and R1a1/R1a2.

       1. A lot fewer
       2. Somewhat fewer
       3. About the same
       4. Somewhat more
       5. A lot more

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000867    R2. Does R like respnsbty for thinking
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R2.

       Some people like to have responsibility for handling
       situations that require a lot of thinking, and other
       people don't like to have responsibility for situations
       like that.
       What about you?  Do you like having responsibility for
       handling situations that require a lot of thinking, do
       you dislike it, or do you neither like it nor dislike it?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. LIKE
       3. DISLIKE                   --> SKIP TO R2b
       5. NEITHER LIKE OR DISLIKE   --> SKIP TO R3

       8. DK                        --> SKIP TO R3
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000868    R2a. How much like respnbty for thinking
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R2a.

   IF R SAYS R LIKES SITUATIONS REQUIRING A LOT OF THINKING:

       Do you like it a lot or just somewhat?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A LOT            --> SKIP TO R3
       5. SOMEWHAT         --> SKIP TO R3

       8. DK               --> SKIP TO R3
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3,5,8,9,0 in R2

==============================
M000869    R2b. How much dislike rsbty for thinking
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R2b.

   IF R SAYS R DISLIKES SITUATIONS REQUIRING A LOT OF THINKING:

       Do you dislike it a lot or just somewhat?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. DISLIKE IT A LOT
       5. DISLIKE IT SOMEWHAT

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,5,8,9,0 in R2

==============================
M000870    R2x. Summary like/dislike thinking
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R2x.

       What about you?  Do you like having responsibility for
       handling situations that require a lot of thinking, do
       you dislike it, or do you neither like it nor dislike it?
       Do you like/dislike it a lot or just somewhat?

       SUMMARY: R LIKE/DISLIKE FOR INTENSIVE THOUGHT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from R2 and R2a/b.

       1. Like it a lot
       2. Like it somewhat
       3. Neither like it nor dislike it
       4. Dislike it somewhat
       5. Dislike it a lot

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000871    R3. Like simple or complex problems
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R3.

       Some people prefer to solve simple problems instead of
       complex ones, whereas other people prefer to solve
       more complex problems.
       Which type of problem do you prefer to solve: simple or
       complex?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. SIMPLE
       5. COMPLEX

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000872    S1. Is religion important to R
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S1.

       Do you consider religion to be an important part of your
       life, or not?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. IMPORTANT
       5. NOT IMPORTANT      --> SKIP TO S3

       8. DON'T KNOW         --> SKIP TO S3
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000873    S2. How much guidance from religion
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S2.

   IF R SAYS THAT RELIGION IS IMPORTANT:

       Would you say your religion provides some guidance in
       your day-to-day living, quite a bit of guidance, or a
       great deal of guidance in your day-to-day life?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. SOME
       3. QUITE A BIT
       5. A GREAT DEAL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in S1

==============================
M000874    S3/S3.T. How often does R pray
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S3/S3.T.

       FTF:
       Please look at page 15 of the booklet.
       People practice their religion in different ways.
       Outside of attending religious services, do you pray
       several times a day, once a day, a few times a week,
       once a week or less or never?

       TELEPHONE:
       People practice their religion in different ways.
       Outside of attending religious services, do you pray
       several times a day, once a day, a few times a week,
       once a week or less or never?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. SEVERAL TIMES A DAY
       2. ONCE A DAY
       3. A FEW TIMES A WEEK
       4. ONCE A WEEK OR LESS
       5. NEVER
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY)

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000875    S4/S4.T. How often does R read the bible
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S4/S4.T.

       FTF:
       Still looking at page 15 of the booklet.
       Outside of attending religious services, do you read the
       Bible several times a day, once a day, a few times a
       week, once a week or less or never?

       TELEPHONE:
       Outside of attending religious services, do you read the
       Bible several times a day, once a day, a few times a
       week, once a week or less or never?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. SEVERAL TIMES A DAY
       2. ONCE A DAY
       3. A FEW TIMES A WEEK
       4. ONCE A WEEK OR LESS
       5. NEVER
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY)

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000876    S5/S5.T. Bible is word of God or men
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S5/S5.T.

       FTF:
       Please look at page 16 of the booklet.
       Which of these statements comes closest to describing
       your feelings about the Bible? You can just give me
       the number of your choice.

       TELEPHONE:
       I am going to read you a short list of statements.
       Please tell me which of these statements comes closest to
       describing your feelings about the Bible?  You can just
       give me the number of the statement you choose.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. THE BIBLE IS THE ACTUAL WORD OF GOD AND IS TO BE TAKEN
          LITERALLY, WORD FOR WORD.
       2. THE BIBLE IS THE WORD OF GOD BUT NOT EVERYTHING IN IT SHOULD
          BE TAKEN LITERALLY, WORD FOR WORD.
       3. THE BIBLE IS A BOOK WRITTEN BY MEN AND IS NOT THE WORD OF GOD.
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000877    X1. Attend religious services
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   X1.

       Lots of things come up that keep people from attending
       religious services even if they want to. Thinking about
       your life these days, do you ever attend religious
       services, apart from occasional weddings, baptisms or
       funerals?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES  --> SKIP TO X2
       5. NO   --> SKIP TO X1a

       8. DK   --> SKIP TO X1a
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000878    X1a. Part of a church or denomination
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   X1a.

   IF R DOES NOT ATTEND RELIGIOUS SERVICES:

       Regardless of whether you now attend any religious
       services do you ever think of yourself as part of a
       particular church or denomination?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES            --> X3
       5. NO             --> GO TO Y1

       8. DK             --> GO TO Y1
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,9,0 in X1

==============================
M000879    X2. Attend religious services how often
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   X2.

   IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES:

       Do you go to religious services every week, almost every
       week, once or twice a month, a few times a year, or
       never?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. EVERY WEEK             --> X2a
       2. ALMOST EVERY WEEK      --> X3
       3. ONCE OR TWICE A MONTH  --> X3
       4. A FEW TIMES A YEAR     --> X3
       5. NEVER                  --> X3

       8. DK                     --> X3
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in X1

==============================
M000880    X2a. Attend relig serv > once/week
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   X2a.

   IF R SAYS ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES 'EVERY WEEK':

       Would you say you go to religious services once a week
       or more often than once a week?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. ONCE A WEEK
       2. MORE OFTEN THAN ONCE A WEEK

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9, 0 in X1; 2-5,8,9 or NA in X2

==============================
M000881    X3. Attend church checkpoint
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   X3.

   IF R ATTENDS CHURCH: /
   IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR
   DENOMINATION:

       CHECKPOINT: CHURCH ATTENDANCE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES                 --> X3a
       5. NO  (5 in X1)       --> X3b

       9. RF (9 in X1)
       0. INAP, 0 in X1

==============================
M000882    X3a. Attend protestant/Cath/Jewish/other
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   X3a.

   IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES:

       Do you mostly attend a place of worship that is
       Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, or something else?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. PROTESTANT   --> X4
       2. CATHOLIC     --> X7
       3. JEWISH       --> X6a
       7. OTHER        --> X4

       8. DK           --> SKIP TO Y1
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,5,9 in X3

==============================
M000883    X3b. Belong protestant/Cath/Jewish/other
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   X3b.

   IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR
   DENOMINATION:

       Do you consider yourself Protestant, Roman Catholic,
       Jewish, or something else?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. PROTESTANT   --> X4
       2. CATHOLIC     --> SKIP TO X7
       3. JEWISH       --> SKIP TO X6b
       7. OTHER        --> X4

       8. DK           --> SKIP TO Y1
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9 or NA in X1a; 1,0,9 in X3

==============================
M000884    X4. Denomination/other specify
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 95
           Numeric

   X4.

   IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER'/
   IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH OR
   DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER':

       What church or denomination is that?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1.  BAPTIST                                   --> SKIP TO X4b
       2.  EPISCOPALIAN/ANGLICAN/CHURCH OF ENGLAND   --> SKIP TO X7
       3.  LUTHERAN                                  --> SKIP TO X4c
       4.  METHODIST                                 --> SKIP TO X4d
       5.  JUST PROTESTANT                           --> SKIP TO X7
       6.  PRESBYTERIAN                              --> SKIP TO X4e
       7.  REFORMED                                  --> SKIP TO X4f
       8.  BRETHREN                                  --> SKIP TO X4g
       9.  EVANGELICAL UNITED BRETHREN               --> SKIP TO X7
       10. CHRISTIAN OR JUST CHRISTIAN               --> SKIP TO X4h
       11. CHRISTIAN SCIENTIST                       --> SKIP TO X7
       12. CHURCH (or CHURCHES) OF CHRIST            --> SKIP TO X4i
       13. UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST                   --> SKIP TO X7
       14. DISCIPLES OF CHRIST                       --> SKIP TO X7
       15. CHURCH OF GOD                             --> SKIP TO X4j
       16. ASSEMBLY OF GOD                           --> SKIP TO X7
       17. CONGREGATIONALIST                         --> SKIP TO X7
       18. HOLINESS                                  --> SKIP TO X4k
       19. PENTACOSTAL                               --> SKIP TO X4k
       20. FRIENDS, QUAKER                           --> SKIP TO X7
       21. ORTHODOX, e.g. Greek, Russian (SPECIFY);C --> SKIP TO X7
       22. NON-DENOMINATIONAL - PROTESTANT           --> SKIP TO X7
       23. MORMONS                                   --> SKIP TO X7
       24. JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES                       --> SKIP TO X7
       25. LATTER DAY SAINTS                         --> SKIP TO X7
       26. UNITARIAN/UNIVERSALIST                    --> SKIP TO X7
       27. BUDDHIST                                  --> SKIP TO X7
       28. HINDU                                     --> SKIP TO X7
       29. MUSLIM/ISLAM                              --> SKIP TO X7
       30. NATIVE AMERICAN                           --> SKIP TO X7

       95. NA
       98. DK                                        --> SKIP TO X7
       99. RF
       00. INAP, 9,0 in X1; 5,8,9 or NA in X1a; 2,3,8,9 or NA in X3a/b
       90. OTHER (SPECIFY)                           --> SKIP TO X4m

==============================
M000885    X4(1). (blanked) denomination other
           Character

   X4(1).

   IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER'/
   IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH
     OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER':
   IF R DENOMINATION IS 'OTHER':

       What church or denomination is that?

       TEXT OF X4 DENOMINATION CODE 90 'OTHER' (BLANKED)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This variable has been blanked to preserve confidentiality.

==============================
M000886    X4a. Baptist group
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   X4a.

   IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a /
   IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH
     OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b:
   IF R DENOMINATION IS BAPTIST IN X4:

       With which Baptist group is your church associated?
       Is it the Southern Baptist Convention, the American
       Baptist Churches in the U.S.A., the American Baptist
       Association, an independent Baptist church or some other
       Baptist group?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION        --> X7
       2. AMERICAN BAPTIST CHURCHES IN USA   --> X7
       3. AMERICAN BAPTIST ASSOCIATION       --> X7
       4. INDEPENDENT BAPTIST                --> X7
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY)                    --> X7

       8. DK                                 --> X7
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,2-99 in X4

==============================
M000887    X4b. Independent Baptist group
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   X4b.

   IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a /
   IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH
     OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b:
   IF R DENOMINATION IS BAPTIST IN X4:
   IF R'S CHURCH IS INDEPENDENT BAPTIST:

       Are you affiliated with any larger Baptist group or is
       this strictly a local church?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. LARGER BAPTIST GROUP [SPECIFY]   --> X7
       2. LOCAL                            --> X7

       8. DK                                 --> X7
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1-3,7,8,9,0 in X4a

==============================
M000888    X4c. Lutheran group
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   X4c.

   IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a /
   IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH
     OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b:
   IF R DENOMINATION IS LUTHERAN IN X4:

       Is this church part of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in
       American, the Missouri Synod, or some other Lutheran
       group?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH      --> X7
       2. MISSOURI SYNOD                   --> X7
       7. OTHER [SPECIFY]                  --> X7

       8. DK                                 --> X7
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,1,2,4-99 in X4

==============================
M000889    X4d. Methodist group
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   X4d.

   IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a /
   IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH
     OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b:
   IF R DENOMINATION IS METHODIST IN X4:

       Is your church part of the United Methodist Church,
       African Methodist Episcopal, or some  other Methodist
       group?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. UNITED METHODIST CHURCH      --> X7
       2. AFRICAN METHODIST EPISCOPAL  --> X7
       7. OTHER [SPECIFY]              --> X7

       8. DK                                 --> X7
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,1-3,5-99 in X4

==============================
M000890    X4e. Presbyterian group
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   X4e.

   IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a /
   IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH
     OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b:
   IF R DENOMINATION IS PRESBYTERIAN IN X4:

       Is this the Presbyterian Church in the USA or some other
       Presbyterian group?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH USA (FORMERLY
          UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH)       --> X7
       7. OTHER [SPECIFY]                   --> X7

       8. DK                                --> X7
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,1-5,7-99 in X4

==============================
M000891    X4f. Reformed group
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   X4f.

   IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a /
   IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH
     OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b:
   IF R DENOMINATION IS REFORMED IN X4:

       Is this the Christian Reformed Church, the Reformed
       Church in America or some  Other Reformed group?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH          --> X7
       2. THE REFORMED CHURCH IN AMERICA     --> X7
       7. OTHER [SPECIFY]                    --> X7

       8. DK                                 --> X7
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,1-6,8-99 in X4

==============================
M000892    X4g. Brethren group
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   X4g.

   IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a /
   IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH
     OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b:
   IF R DENOMINATION IS BRETHREN IN X4:

       Is this the church of the Brethren, the Plymouth
       Brethren, or what?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. CHURCH OF THE BRETHREN             --> X7
       2. THE PLYMOUTH BRETHREN              --> X7
       7. OTHER [SPECIFY]                    --> X7

       8. DK                                 --> X7
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,1-7,9-99 in X4

==============================
M000893    X4h. Christian group
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   X4h.

   IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a /
   IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH
     OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b:
   IF R SAYS DENOMINATION IS 'CHRISTIAN' IN X4:

       When you say "Christian" does that mean the denomination
       called the "Christian Church Disciples of Christ," or
       some other Christian denomination, or do you mean to say
       "I am just a Christian"?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. DISCIPLES OF CHRIST                --> X7
       2. I AM JUST A CHRISTIAN              --> X7
       7. OTHER [SPECIFY]                    --> X7

       8. DK                                 --> X7
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,1-9,11-99 in X4

==============================
M000894    X4i. Church of Christ group
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   X4i.

   IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a /
   IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH
     OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b:
   IF R DENOMINATION IS CHURCH OF CHRIST IN X4:

       Is this the Church of Christ or the United Church of
       Christ?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. CHURCH OF CHRIST                   --> X7
       2. UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST            --> X7

       8. DK                                 --> X7
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,1-11,13-99 in X4

==============================
M000895    X4j. Church of God group
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   X4j.

   IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a /
   IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH
     OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b:
   IF R DENOMINATION IS CHURCH OF GOD IN X4:

       Is this the Church of God of Anderson, Indiana; the
       Church of God of Cleveland, Tennessee; the Church of God
       in Christ; or some other Church of God?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. ANDERSON, INDIANA                  --> X7
       2. CLEVELAND, TENNESSEE               --> X7
       3. CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST            --> X7
       7. OTHER [SPECIFY]                    --> X7

       8. DK                                 --> X7
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,1-14,16-99 in X4

==============================
M000896    X4k. (blanked) holiness/pentacostal
           Character

   X4k.

   IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a /
   IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH
     OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b:
   IF R DENOMINATION IS HOLINIESS OR PENTACOSTAL IN X4:

       What kind of church is that?  What is it called exactly?
       Is that part of a larger church or denomination?
       What is the church called?

       HOLINESS OR PENTACOSTAL TEXT (18 and 19 in X4)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [THESE QUESTIONS ARE PROBES.  USE THESE AND OTHERS TO GET
       AS MUCH SPECIFIC INFORMATION AS POSSIBLE]
       This field has been blanked.  The open-ended responses are
       hand-coded into the religion summary variable.

==============================
M000897    X4a-j. (blanked) other
           Character

   X4a-j.

   IF R'S DENOMINATION SPECIFIES 'OTHER' IN X4a-X4k:

       TEXT OF OTHER (SPECIFY) IN DENOMINATIONAL FOLLOWUPS:
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This field has been blanked.  The open-ended responses are
       hand-coded into the religion summary variable.

==============================
M000898    X4m. (blanked) other group/denomination
           Character

   X4m.

   IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a /
   IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH
     OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3b:
   IF R DENOMINATION 'OTHER' IN X4:

       What is it called exactly?  Is that church part of a
       denomination?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [USE ANY OR ALL AS NECESSARY; GET AS MUCH DETAIL AS POSSIBLE]
       This field has been blanked.  The open-ended responses are
       hand coded into the religion summary variable.

==============================
M000899    X4m1. Is other group christian
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   X4m1.

   IF R ATTENDS CHURCH AND ATTENDS AS PROTESTANT OR 'OTHER' IN X3a /
   IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF CHURCH
     OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF 'OTHER' IN X3b:
   IF R DENOMINATION 'OTHER' IN X4:

       Is that group Christian?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES                  --> X7
       5. NO                   --> X7

       8. DK                   --> X7
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,1-30,95-99 in X4

==============================
M000900    X6a. Attend Jewish group
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   X6a.

   IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES AND IS JEWISH IN X3a:

       Do you usually attend a synagogue or temple that is
       Orthodox, Conservative, Reform or what?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. ORTHODOX`            --> X7
       2. CONSERVATIVE         --> X7
       3. REFORM               --> X7
       7. OTHER [SPECIFY]      --> X7

       8. DK                   --> X7
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,2,7,8,9,0 in X3a

==============================
M000901    X6b. Jewish denomination
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   X6b.

   IF R DOES NOT ATTEND RELIGIOUS SERVICES BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF
     CHURCH OR DENOMINATION AND CONSIDERS SELF JEWISH IN X3b:

       Do you consider yourself Orthodox, Conservative, Reform,
       or what?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. ORTHODOX               --> X7
       2. CONSERVATIVE           --> X7
       3. REFORM                 --> X7
       7. OTHER [SPECIFY]        --> X7

       8. DK                     --> X7
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,2,7,8,9,0 in X3b

==============================
M000902    X7. Member place of worship
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   X7.

   IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES/
   IF R DOES NOT ATTEND RELIGIOUS SERVICES BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF
     CHURCH OR DENOMINATION:

       Are you officially a member of a parish, congregation,
       temple or other place of worship?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES         --> X8 or Y1
       5. NO          --> X8 or Y1

       8. DK          --> X8 or Y1
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,9 in X1; 5,8,9 or NA in X1a

==============================
M000903    X8. Born-again christian
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   X8.

   IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES/
   IF R DOES NOT ATTEND RELIGIOUS SERVICES BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF
     A CHURCH OR DENOMINATION:
   IF R IDENTIFIES A CHRISTIAN RELIGION IN X3a, X3b, X4 OR X4m1:

       Would you call yourself a born-again Christian, that is,
       have you personally had a conversion experience related
       to Jesus Christ?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,9 in X1; 5,8,9 or NA in X1a; 3,8,9 or NA in X3a/b;
          5,8,9 or NA in X4m1

==============================
M000904    X9x. Religion summary
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 995
           Numeric

   X9x.

       Do you mostly attend a place of worship that is
       Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, or something else /
       Do you consider yourself Protestant, Roman Catholic,
       Jewish, or something else?
       JEWISH:
       Do you usually attend a synagogue or temple that is
       Orthodox, Conservative, Reform or what/
       Do you consider yourself Orthodox, Conservative, Reform,
       or what?
       PROTESTANT OR SOMETHING ELSE:
       What church or denomination is that?
         IF BAPTIST: With which Baptist group is your church
         associated? Is it the Southern Baptist Convention, the
         American Baptist Churches in the U.S.A., the American
         Baptist Association, an independent Baptist church or
         some other Baptist group? (INDEPENDENT BAPTIST:) Are
         you affiliated with any larger Baptist group or is
         this strictly a local church?
         IF LUTHERAN: Is this church part of the Evangelical
         Lutheran Church in American, the Missouri Synod, or
         some other Lutheran group?
         IF METHODIST: Is your church part of the United
         Methodist Church, African Methodist Episcopal, or some
         other Methodist group?
         IF PRESBYTERIAN: Is this the Presbyterian Church in
         the USA or some other Presbyterian group?
         IF REFORMED: Is this the Christian Reformed Church,
         the Reformed Church in America or some  Other Reformed
         group?
         IF BRETHREN: Is this the church of the Brethren, the
         Plymouth Brethren, or what?'
         IF 'CHRISTIAN': When you say "Christian" does that
         mean the denomination called the "Christian Church
         Disciples of  Christ" or some other Christian
         denomination, or do you mean to say "I am just a
         Christian"?
         IF CHURCH OF CHRIST: Is this the Church of Christ or
         the United Church of Christ?
         IF CHURCH OF GOD: Is this the Church of God of
         Anderson, Indiana; the Church of God of Cleveland,
         Tennessee; the Church of God in Christ; or some other
         Church of God?
         IF PENTECOSTAL OR HOLINESS: What kind of church is
         that? What is it called exactly? Is that part of a
         larger church or denomination?  What is that church
         called?
         IF OTHER: What is it called exactly? Is that church
         part of a  denomination?
         IF OTHER: Is that group Christian?

       RELIGION SUMMARY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This variable summarizes the information gathered in
       questions X3a/b, X4, X4a-m, X4m1, X6a/b.  Information
       collected in the open-ended responses to the religion
       section component questions have been hand coded into this
       summary variable. NOTE: in 1 case, an R whose initial religious
       group was identified as Protestant was discovered, upon further
       probing, to be Roman Catholic.

       Codes 010-990 and:

       995. NA
       998. DK
       999. RF
       000. INAP, no religious identification or preference (and R does
            not attend religious services)

==============================
M000905    Y1(1). Month of birth
           MD1: EQ 98,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Y1(1).

       What is the month, day and year of your birth?

       MONTH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       01-12

       98. DK
       99. RF; NA

==============================
M000906    Y1(2). Day of birth (blanked)
           Numeric

   Y1(2).

       What is the month, day and year of your birth?

       DAY (BLANKED)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This variable is blanked.

==============================
M000907    Y1(3). Year of birth
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9998
           Numeric

   Y1(3).

       What is the month, day and year of your birth?

       YEAR
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       9998. DK
       9999. RF
       0000. NA

==============================
M000908    Y1x. Respondent age
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Y1x.

       What is the month, day and year of your birth?

       SUMMARY - RESPONDENT AGE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Age was calculated by subtracting the year of birth from
       2000.  For cases where R refused to give year of birth
       or year of birth was NA in the survey variable, a check
       was made of Household listing information: if age of R
       was included in the Household listing, it was included
       here from the Household listing.

       Codes 17-96 and:
       97. 97 and older

       00. NA

==============================
M000909    Y2. Marital status
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y2.

       Are you married now and living with your (husband/wife)
       -- or are you widowed, divorced, separated, or have you
       never married?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: in cases 8,49,77,157,377,535,580,814,1087,1117,1202,1212,
       1381,1639,1731 the partner/spouse identified in P000909 (marital
       status) was not a resident of the HU or was residing elsewhere
       on temporary basis. In cases 1281,1516,46,312,133,23,222 there
       is no information about spouse/partner.

       1. MARRIED
       2. WIDOWED
       3. DIVORCED
       4. SEPARATED
       5. NEVER MARRIED
       6. PARTNERED, NOT MARRIED [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000910    Y3. Highest grade completed
           MD1: EQ 98,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Y3.

       What is the highest grade of school or year of college
       you have completed?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       00-12  YEARS
       13-16  YEARS      --> SKIP TO Y3b
       17.    17+ YEARS  --> SKIP TO Y3b

       98. DK
       99. RF; NA

==============================
M000911    Y3a. Diploma/GED
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y3a.

   IF HIGHEST GRADE OF EDUCATION IS 0-12 YEARS OR DK:

       Did you get a high school diploma or pass a high school
       equivalency test?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES  --> SKIP TO Y4 IF MARRIED/PARTNERED, IF NOT SKIP TO Y5
       5. NO   --> SKIP TO Y4 IF MARRIED/PARTNERED, IF NOT SKIP TO Y5

       8. DK   --> SKIP TO Y4 IF MARRIED/PARTNERED, IF NOT SKIP TO Y5
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 13-16 or NA in Y3

==============================
M000912    Y3b. Highest degree earned
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   Y3b.

   IF HIGHEST GREADE OF EDUCATION IS 13+ YEARS:

       What is the highest degree that you have earned?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       01. BACHELOR'S DEGREE
       02. MASTER'S DEGREE
       03. PhD, LIT, SCD, DFA, DLIT, DPH, DPHIL, JSC, SJD
       04. LLB, JD
       05. MD, DDS, DVM, MVSA, DSC, DO
       06. JDC, STD, THD
       07. ASSOCIATE DEGREE (AA)
       96. NO DEGREE EARNED

       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; INAP, 0-12, 99 in Y3

==============================
M000913    Y3x. R educ summary
           MD1: EQ 8,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Y3x.

       What is the highest grade of school or year of college
       you have completed?
       Did you get a high school diploma or pass a high school
       equivalency test?
       What is the highest degree that you have earned?

       SUMMARY: R EDUCATION
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Y3, Y3a, Y3b.

       1. 8 grades or less and no diploma or equivalency
          [0-8 in Y3, 5 in Y3a]
       2. 9-11 grades, no further schooling (incl. 12 years
          without diploma or equivalency) [9-12 in Y3, 5 in Y3a]
       3. High school diploma or equivalency test [0-12 in Y3,
          1 in Y3a]
       4. More than 12 years of schooling, no higher degree
          (13-17 in Y3, 96 in Y3b)
       5. Junior or community college level degrees (AA degrees) (07 in Y3b)
       6. BA level degrees; 17+ years, no advanced degree (01 in Y3b)
       7. Advanced degree, including LLB [13-17 in Y3, 2-6 in Y3b]

       8. DK   [98 in Y3, 8 in Y3a; 98 in Y3b]
       9. NA  [99 in Y3; 9 in Y3a; 99 or NA in Y3b]

==============================
M000914    Y4. Highest grade of partner
           MD1: EQ 98,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Y4.

   IF MARRIED OR PARTNERED:

       What is the highest grade of school or year of college
       (your husband/your wife/your partner) has completed?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       00-12  YEARS
       13-16  YEARS       --> SKIP TO Y4b
       17.    17+ YEARS   --> SKIP TO Y4b

       98. DK
       99. RF; NA; INAP, 2-5,8,9,0 in Y2

==============================
M000915    Y4a. Partner diploma/GED
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y4a.

   IF HIGHEST GRADE OF SPOUSE/PARTNER IS 0-12 YEARS OR DK:

       Did (he/she) get a high school diploma or pass a high
       school equivalency test?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES      --> SKIP TO Y5
       5. NO       --> SKIP TO Y5

       8. DK       --> SKIP TO Y5
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 13-17, 99 in Y4

==============================
M000916    Y4b. Partner highest degree
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   Y4b.

   IF HIGHEST GRADE OF SPOUSE/PARTNER EDUCATION IS 13+ YEARS:

       What is the highest degree that(he/she) has earned?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       01. BACHELOR'S DEGREE
       02. MASTER'S DEGREE
       03. PhD, LIT, SCD, DFA, DLIT, DPH, DPHIL, JSC, SJD
       04. LLB, JD
       05. MD, DDS, DVM, MVSA, DSC, DO
       06. JDC, STD, THD
       07. ASSOCIATE DEGREE (AA)
       96. NO DEGREE EARNED

       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; INAP, 1-12, 98, 99 in Y4

==============================
M000917    Y4x. Sp educ. Summary
           MD1: EQ 8,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Y4x.

       What is the highest grade of school or year of college
       (your husband/your wife/your partner) has completed?
       Did (he/she) get a high school diploma or pass a high
       school equivalency test?
       What is the highest degree that(he/she) has earned?

       SUMMARY: SPOUSE/PARTNER EDUCATION
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Y4, Y4a, Y4b.
       Note: 3 cases [561,1017,1719] coded 98 (DK) for number of school
       years in Y4 and 'no' in Y4a (no high school diploma) are coded 2
       here; 3 cases [77,1057,1799] where R indicated 12 years of schooling
       but DK for Y4a diploma are coded 2.

       1. 8 grades or less and no diploma or equivalency
          [0-8 in Y4, 5 in Y4a]
       2. 9-11 grades, no further schooling (incl. 12 years
          without diploma or equivalency) [9-12 in Y4, 5 in Y4a]
       3. High school diploma or equivalency test [0-12 in Y4,
          1 in Y4a]
       4. More than 12 years of schooling, no higher degree
          (13-17 in Y4, 96 in Y4b)
       5. Junior or community college level degrees (AA degrees) (07 in Y4b)
       6. BA level degrees; 17+ years, no advanced degree (01 in Y4b)
       7. Advanced degree, including LLB [13-17 in Y4, 2-6 in Y4b]

       8. DK   [98 in Y4, 8 in Y4a; 98 in Y4b]
       9. NA  [99 in Y4; 9 in Y4a; 99 or NA in Y4b]

==============================
M000918    Y6(1). Assigned employment status
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Y6(1).

       Please look at page 17 of the booklet.
       We'd like to know if you are working now, temporarily
       laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently
       disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what?

       ASSIGNED EMPLOYMENT SERIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See notes Y6.
       This variable describes the series of employment questions
       to which R is initially assigned according to R's self-
       identification of employment status.
       By contrast, the Y6(2) and Y6(3) employment status summary
       variables are built using relevant information from R's
       Y6(1) self-identification and also from information
       obtained during questioning (especially number of hours
       worked).
       Initial series assignment from multiple mentions given
       by R for his or her own employment status is as follows:
         RET ONLY   or (RET and any others)      -->retired series
         HM/ST ONLY or (HM/ST and UN/DIS/WN/TLO) -->hmkr/st series
         DIS ONLY   or (DIS and UN/WN/TLO)       -->disabled series
         WN/TLO ONLY                             -->wrkg now series
       Note that Rs initially assigned per Y6(1) to the RETIRED,
       DISABLED or HOMEMAKER/STUDENT series are redirected from
       within those series to the WORKING NOW series if the R was
       also currently working (both series completed if retired
       or disabled). For this reason, the WORKING NOW series
       appears last in codebook variables:
       - P000921-000931 UNEMPLOYED [UN]
       - P000932-000944 RETIRED [RET]
       - P000945-000956 PERMANENTLY DISABLED [DIS]
       - P000957-000967 HOMEMAKER/STUDENT [HM/ST]
       - P000968-000978 WORKING NOW/TEMP. LAID OFF [WN/TLO]

       1. Assigned WORKING NOW series - working now (Y7-Y7j)
       2. Assigned WORKING NOW series - temporarily laid off (Y7-Y7j)
       3. Assigned UNEMPLOYED series (Y9-Y10h)
       4. Assigned RETIRED series (Y11-Y12j)
       5. Assigned PERMANENTLY DISABLED series (Y13-Y14j)
       6. Assigned HOMEMAKER series (Y15-Y16j)
       7. Assigned STUDENT series (Y15-Y16j)

==============================
M000919    Y6(2). 2 digit employment status
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Y6(2).

       Please look at page 17 of the booklet.
       We'd like to know if you are working now, temporarily
       laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently
       disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what?

       EMPLOYMENT STATUS 2 DIGIT SUMMARY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See notes Y6.
       Built using Y5, Y12g, Y14g, Y15, Y7e.

       This is a summary which describes R's occupation status
       as categorized AFTER all information has been collected.
       Note that case 1263 has been coded 81 rather than 18
       although number of hours worked (P000974) was coded as
       DK; for this case, information in the thumbnail indicated
       that R worked only a few hours a week.

       10. WORKING NOW only
       15. WORKING NOW and retired (R volunteers), currently working 20 or
           more hours per week
       16. WORKING NOW and permanently disabled, currently working 20 or
           more hours per week
       17. WORKING NOW and homemaker (R volunteers), currently working 20 or
           more hours per week
       18. WORKING NOW and student (R volunteers), currently working 20 or
           more hours per week
       20. TEMPORARILY LAID OFF
       40. UNEMPLOYED
       50. RETIRED, no other occupation
       51. RETIRED and working now (R volunteers), currently working fewer
           than 20 hours per week
       60. PERMANENTLY DISABLED, not working
       61. PERMANENTLY DISABLED and working now, currently working fewer
           than 20 hours per week
       70. HOMEMAKER, no other occupation
       71. HOMEMAKER and working now (R volunteers), currently working fewer
           than 20 hours per week
       75. HOMEMAKER and student (R volunteers), no other occupation
       80. STUDENT, no other occupation
       81. STUDENT and working now (R volunteers), currently working fewer
           than 20 hours per week

       00. NA

==============================
M000920    Y6(3). 1 digit employment status
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Y6(3).

       Please look at page 17 of the booklet.
       We'd like to know if you are working now, temporarily
       laid off, or are you unemployed, retired, permanently
       disabled, a homemaker, a student, or what?

       EMPLOYMENT STATUS 1 DIGIT SUMMARY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Y6(2)

       1. R WORKING NOW (working now or working 20 hours or more per week
          if also retired, permanently disabled, homemaker or student
       2. R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF  [20 in Y6(2)]
       4. R UNEMPLOYED  [40 in Y6(2)]
       5. R RETIRED, not working or working fewer than 20 hours per week
          [50,51 in Y6(2)]
       6. R PERMANENTLY DISABLED, not working or working fewer than 20
          hours per week [60,61 in Y6(2)]
       7. R HOMEMAKER, not working or working fewer than 20 hours per week
          [also nonworking Rs who are both homemakers and students--
          70,71,75 in Y6(2)]
       8. R STUDENT, not working or working fewer than 20 hours per week
          ([80,81 in Y6(2)]

       0. NA

==============================
M000921    Y9. R unemp: ever worked for pay
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y9.

   IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY:

       Have you ever done any work for pay?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO           --> Y10g

       8. DK           --> Y10g
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1)

==============================
M000922    Y10a(1). 2-digit occup
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 95
           Numeric

   Y10a(1).

   IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY:
   IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY:

       What kind of work did you do on your last regular job
       (What was your occupation?)
       What were your most important duties or activities?

       R UNEMPLOYED: 2 DIGIT OCCUPATION CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See the OCCUPATION master code.
       The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1), at end of
       R employment section.
       The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has
       been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect
       respondents' anonymity.

       Codes 1-71 and:

       95. NA
       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9


==============================
M000922a   Y10a(2). 3-digit occup (blanked)
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 995
           Numeric

   Y10a(2).

   IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY:
   IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY:

       What kind of work did you do on your last regular job
       (What was your occupation?)
       What were your most important duties or activities?

       R UNEMPLOYED: 3 DIGIT CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE (BLANKED)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See the OCCUPATION master code.
       The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1a), at end of
       R employment section.
       The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has
       been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect
       respondents' anonymity.  Contact ANES Project Staff for
       information about a procedure by which it is possible to
       gain access to the full 3-digit code values.

       Codes 1-905 and:

       995. NA
       998. DK
       999. RF
       000. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9

==============================
M000923    Y10a(3). 1-digit occup summary
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 95
           Numeric

   Y10a(3).

   IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY:
   IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY:

       What kind of work did you do on your last regular job
       (What was your occupation?)
       What were your most important duties or activities?

       UNEMPLOYED: COLLAPSED CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Collapsed from Y10a(2).
       The stacked version of this question is at Y17(2), at end of
       R employment section.

       1.  Executive, Administrative and Managerial (Census
           categories 001-039)
       2.  Professional Specialty Occupations (Census categories
           040-199)
       3.  Technicians and Related Support Occupations (Census
           categories 200-235)
       4.  Sales Occupation (Census categories 236-285)
       5.  Administrative Support, including clerical (Census
           categories 286-389)
       6.  Private Household (Census categories 403-407)
       7.  Protective Service (Census categories 408-427)
       8.  Service except Protective and Household (Census
           categories 428-469)
       9.  Farming, Forestry and Fishing Occupations (Census
           categories 470-499)
       10. Precision Production, Craft and Repair Occupations
          (Census categories 500-699)
       11. Machine Operators, Assemblers and Inspectors (Census
           categories 700-799)
       12. Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (Census
           categories 800-859)
       13. Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers
          (Census categories 860-890)
       14. Member of Armed Forces (Census category 903-905)

       95. NA
       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9

==============================
M000924    Y10a(4). Prestige code (blanked)
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99.99
           Numeric

   Y10a(4).

   IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY:
   IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY:

       What kind of work did you do on your last regular job
       (What was your occupation?)
       What were your most important duties or activities?

       R OCCUPATION: PRESTIGE SCORE (BLANKED)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The stacked version of this question is at Y17(3), at end of
       R employment section.
       Prestige scores are based on Occupational Prestige Ratings
       from the 1989 General Social Survey, by James A. Davis,
       Robert W. Hodge, Keiko Nakao, Tom W. Smith, and Judith
       Treas (ICPSR 9593), Inter-university Consortium for
       Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor MI  48106,
       December 1991.
       Prestige Score data have been coded 0 missing to preserve
       respondents' anonymity.  Contact ANES project staff for
       information about a procedure by which it is possible to
       gain access to this data.

       99.99. 995,998,999 in Y10a(2)
       00.00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9

==============================
M000925    Y10b. R unemp: past industry code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 995
           Numeric

   Y10b.

   IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY:
   IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY:

       What kind of business or industry was that?

       R OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The stacked version of this question is at Y17(4), at end of
       R employment section.
       See 1980 CENSUS INDUSTRY Master Code.

       Codes 10-932 and:

       995. NA
       998. DK
       999. RF
       000. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9

==============================
M000926    Y10c. R unemp: past self employed
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y10c.

   IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY:
   IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY:

       Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or
       what?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. SOMEONE ELSE
       3. BOTH SELF AND SOMEONE ELSE
       5. SELF-EMPLOYED               --> Y10e

       8. DK                          --> Y10e
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in Y9

==============================
M000927    Y10d. R unemp: past employed by govt
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y10d.

   IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY:
   IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY:
   IF WAS NOT SELF-EMPLOYED ONLY:

       Were you employed by a federal, state or local
       government?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y10c

==============================
M000928    Y10e. R unemp: work last 6 months
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y10e.

   IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY:
   IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY:

       Have you had a job in the last six months?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO           --> Y10g

       8. DK           --> Y10g
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in Y9

==============================
M000929    Y10f. R unemp: hrs/wk 6 months
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   Y10f.

   IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY:
   IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY:
   IF HAS HAD A JOB IN THE LAST 6 MOS:

       About how many hours did you work on your job in the
       average week?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1-168

       996. INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y10e
       998. DK
       999. RF
       000. NA

==============================
M000930    Y10g. R unemp: looking for work now
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y10g.

   IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY:

       Are you looking for work at the present time?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO   --> Y25

       8. DK   --> Y25
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1)

==============================
M000931    Y10h. R unemp: worry about find job
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y10h.

   IF UNEMPLOYED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY:
   IF LOOKING FOR WORK AT PRESENT:

       How worried are you about not being able to find a job
       in the near future; a lot, somewhat, or not much at all?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A LOT            --> Y25
       3. SOMEWHAT         --> Y25
       5. NOT MUCH AT ALL  --> Y25

       8. DK               --> Y25
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y10g

==============================
M000932    Y11(1). Retired: month of retirement
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Y11(1).

   IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1):

       When did you retire?

       MONTH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       MONTH:
       01. JANUARY
       02. FEBRUARY
       03. MARCH
       04. APRIL
       05. MAY
       06. JUNE
       07. JULY
       08. AUGUST
       09. SEPTEMBER
       10. OCTOBER
       11. NOVEMBER
       12. DECEMBER

       96. INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1)
       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA

==============================
M000933    Y11(2). Retired: year of retirement
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9996
           Numeric

   Y11(2).

   IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1):

       When did you retire?

       YEAR
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       9996. INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1)
       9998. DK
       9999. RF
       0000. NA

==============================
M000934    Y12a(1). 2-digit occup retired
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 95
           Numeric

   Y12a(1).

   IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1):

       What kind of work did you do on your last regular job
       (What was your occupation?)
       What were your most important duties or activities?

       R RETIRED: 2 DIGIT OCCUPATION CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See the OCCUPATION master code.
       The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1), at end of
       R employment section.
       The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has
       been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect
       respondents' anonymity.

       95. NA
       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1)

==============================
M000934a   Y12a(2). 3-digit occup (blanked) retired
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 995
           Numeric

   Y12a(2).

   IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1):

       What kind of work did you do on your last regular job
       (What was your occupation?)
       What were your most important duties or activities?

       R RETIRED: 3 DIGIT CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE (BLANKED)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See the OCCUPATION master code.
       The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1a), at end of
       R employment section.
       The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has
       been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect
       respondents' anonymity.  Contact ANES Project Staff for
       information about a procedure by which it is possible to
       gain access to the full 3-digit code values.

       Codes 1-905 and:

       995. NA
       998. DK
       999. RF
       000. INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1)

==============================
M000935    Y12a(3). 1-digit occup summary retired
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 95
           Numeric

   Y12a(3).

   IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1):

       What kind of work did you do on your last regular job
       (What was your occupation?)
       What were your most important duties or activities?

       R RETIRED: COLLAPSED CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Collapsed from Y10a(2).
       The stacked version of this question is at Y17(2), at end of
       R employment section.

       1.  Executive, Administrative and Managerial (Census
           categories 001-039)
       2.  Professional Specialty Occupations (Census categories
           040-199)
       3.  Technicians and Related Support Occupations (Census
           categories 200-235)
       4.  Sales Occupation (Census categories 236-285)
       5.  Administrative Support, including clerical (Census
           categories 286-389)
       6.  Private Household (Census categories 403-407)
       7.  Protective Service (Census categories 408-427)
       8.  Service except Protective and Household (Census
           categories 428-469)
       9.  Farming, Forestry and Fishing Occupations (Census
           categories 470-499)
       10. Precision Production, Craft and Repair Occupations
          (Census categories 500-699)
       11. Machine Operators, Assemblers and Inspectors (Census
           categories 700-799)
       12. Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (Census
           categories 800-859)
       13. Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers
          (Census categories 860-890)
       14. Member of Armed Forces (Census category 903-905)

       95. NA
       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9

==============================
M000936    Y12a(4). Prestige code (blanked) retired
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99.99
           Numeric

   Y12a(4).

   IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1):

       What kind of work did you do on your last regular job
       (What was your occupation?)
       What were your most important duties or activities?

       R OCCUPATION: PRESTIGE SCORE (BLANKED)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The stacked version of this question is at Y17(3), at end of
       R employment section.
       Prestige scores are based on Occupational Prestige Ratings
       from the 1989 General Social Survey, by James A. Davis,
       Robert W. Hodge, Keiko Nakao, Tom W. Smith, and Judith
       Treas (ICPSR 9593), Inter-university Consortium for
       Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor MI  48106,
       December 1991.
       Prestige Score data have been coded 0 missing to preserve
       respondents' anonymity.  Contact ANES project staff for
       information about a procedure by which it is possible to
       gain access to this data.

       99.99. 995,998,999 in Y12a(2)
       00.00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9

==============================
M000937    Y12b. R ret: industry code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 995
           Numeric

   Y12b.

   IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1):

       What kind of business or industry was that?

       R OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The stacked version of this question is at Y17(4), at end of
       R employment section.
       See 1980 CENSUS INDUSTRY Master Code.

       Codes 10-932 and:

       995. NA
       998. DK
       999. RF
       000. INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1)

==============================
M000938    Y12c. R ret: self employed
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y12c.

   IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1):

       Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or
       what?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. SOMEONE ELSE
       3. BOTH SELF AND SOMEONE ELSE
       5. SELF-EMPLOYED                --> Y12e

       8. DK                           --> Y12e
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1)

==============================
M000939    Y12d. R ret: employed by govt
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y12d.

   IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1):
   IF WAS NOT SELF-EMPLOYED ONLY:

       Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or
       what?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y12c


==============================
M000940    Y12e. R ret: work last 6 months
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y12e.

   IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1):

       Have you had a job in the last six months?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO   --> Y12g

       8. DK   --> Y12g
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1)

==============================
M000941    Y12f. R ret: hours/wk work 6 months
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   Y12f.

   IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1):
   IF HAS HAD A JOB IN LAST 6 MOS:

       About how many hours did you work on your job in the
       average week?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1-168

       996. INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y12e
       998. DK
       999. RF
       000. NA

==============================
M000942    Y12g. R ret: working for pay
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y12g.

   IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1):

       Are you doing any work for pay at the present time?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES          --> SKIP TO Y7 (below)
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,2,3,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1)

==============================
M000943    Y12h. R ret: looking for work now
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y12h.

   IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1):
   IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT:

       Are you looking for work at the present time?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO          --> Y25

       8. DK          --> Y25
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,8,9,0 in Y12g

==============================
M000944    Y12j. R ret: worry about finding job
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y12j.

   IF RETIRED IS AN EMPLOYMENT STATUS CATEGORY IN Y6(1):
   IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT:
   IF R IS LOOKING FOR WORK:

       How worried are you about not being able to find a job
       in the near future -- a lot, somewhat, or not much at
       all?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A LOT            --> Y25
       3. SOMEWHAT         --> Y25
       5. NOT MUCH AT ALL  --> Y25

       8. DK               --> Y25
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in Y12h

==============================
M000945    Y13. R disabled: ever worked for pay
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y13.

   IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED:

       Have you ever done any work for pay?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO            --> Y14h

       8. DK            --> Y14h
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1-4,6,7,0 in Y6(1)

==============================
M000946    Y14a(1). 2-digit occup disabled
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 995
           Numeric

   Y14a(1).

   IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED:
   IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY:

       What kind of work did you do on your last regular job
       (What was your occupation?)
       What were your most important duties or activities?

       R DISABLED: 2 DIGIT OCCUPATION CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See the OCCUPATION master code.
       The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1), at end of
       R employment section.
       The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has
       been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect
       respondents' anonymity.

       95. NA
       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. INAP, 1-4,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y13

==============================
M000946a   Y14a(2). 3-digit occup (blanked) disable
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 995
           Numeric

   Y14a(2).

   IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED:
   IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY:

       What kind of work did you do on your last regular job
       (What was your occupation?)
       What were your most important duties or activities?

       R DISABLED: 3 DIGIT CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE (BLANKED)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See the OCCUPATION master code.
       The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1a), at end of
       R employment section.
       The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has
       been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect
       respondents' anonymity.  Contact ANES Project Staff for
       information about a procedure by which it is possible to
       gain access to the full 3-digit code values.

       Codes 1-905 and:

       995. NA
       998. DK
       999. RF
       000. INAP, 1-4,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y13

==============================
M000947    Y14a(3). 1-digit occup summary disabled
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 95
           Numeric

   Y14a(3).

   IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED:
   IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY:

       What kind of work did you do on your last regular job
       (What was your occupation?)
       What were your most important duties or activities?

       R DISABLED: COLLAPSED CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Collapsed from Y10a(2).
       The stacked version of this question is at Y17(2), at end of
       R employment section.

       1.  Executive, Administrative and Managerial (Census
           categories 001-039)
       2.  Professional Specialty Occupations (Census categories
           040-199)
       3.  Technicians and Related Support Occupations (Census
           categories 200-235)
       4.  Sales Occupation (Census categories 236-285)
       5.  Administrative Support, including clerical (Census
           categories 286-389)
       6.  Private Household (Census categories 403-407)
       7.  Protective Service (Census categories 408-427)
       8.  Service except Protective and Household (Census
           categories 428-469)
       9.  Farming, Forestry and Fishing Occupations (Census
           categories 470-499)
       10. Precision Production, Craft and Repair Occupations
          (Census categories 500-699)
       11. Machine Operators, Assemblers and Inspectors (Census
           categories 700-799)
       12. Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (Census
           categories 800-859)
       13. Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers
          (Census categories 860-890)
       14. Member of Armed Forces (Census category 903-905)

       95. NA
       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9


==============================
M000948    Y14a(4). Prestige code (blanked) disable
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99.99
           Numeric

   Y14a(4).

   IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED:
   IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY:

       What kind of work did you do on your last regular job
       (What was your occupation?)
       What were your most important duties or activities?

       R OCCUPATION: PRESTIGE SCORE (BLANKED)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The stacked version of this question is at Y17(3), at end of
       R employment section.
       Prestige scores are based on Occupational Prestige Ratings
       from the 1989 General Social Survey, by James A. Davis,
       Robert W. Hodge, Keiko Nakao, Tom W. Smith, and Judith
       Treas (ICPSR 9593), Inter-university Consortium for
       Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor MI  48106,
       December 1991.
       Prestige Score data have been coded 0 missing to preserve
       respondents' anonymity.  Contact ANES project staff for
       information about a procedure by which it is possible to
       gain access to this data.

       99.99. 995,998,999 in Y14a(2)
       00.00 INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9

==============================
M000949    Y14b. R dis: industry code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 995
           Numeric

   Y14b.

   IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED:
   IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY:

       What kind of business or industry was that?

       R OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The stacked version of this question is at Y17(4), at end of
       R employment section.
       See 1980 CENSUS INDUSTRY Master Code.

       Codes 10-932 and:

       995. NA
       998. DK
       999. RF
       000. INAP, 1-4,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y13

==============================
M000950    Y14c. R dis: self employed
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y14c.

   IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED:
   IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY:

       Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or
       what?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. SOMEONE ELSE
       3. BOTH SELF AND SOMEONE ELSE
       5. SELF-EMPLOYED                 --> Y14e

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y13

==============================
M000951    Y14d. R dis: work for govt
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y14d.

   IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED:
   IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY:
   IF WAS NOT SELF-EMPLOYED ONLY:

       Were you employed by a federal, state or local
       government?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y14c

==============================
M000952    Y14e. R dis: work last 6 months
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y14e.

   IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED:
   IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY:

       Have you had a job in the last six months?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO          --> Y14g

       8. DK          --> Y14g
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y13

==============================
M000953    Y14f. R dis: hours/wk work 6 mnths
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   Y14f.

   IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED:
   IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY:
   IF HAS HAD A JOB IN THE LAST 6 MOS:

       About how many hours did you work on your job in the
       average week?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1-168

       996. INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y14e
       998. DK
       999. RF
       000. NA

==============================
M000954    Y14g. R dis: working for pay now
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y14g.

   IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED:
   IF HAS EVER DONE WORK FOR PAY:
   IF HAS HAD A JOB IN THE LAST 6 MOS:

       Are you doing any work for pay at the present time?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: Rs who respond "yes" to this question are also
       asked the WORKING NOW series for current employment.

       1. YES   --> SKIP TO Y7 (below)
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y14e

==============================
M000955    Y14h. R dis: looking for work now
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y14h.

   IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED:
   IF R HAS NEVER WORKED FOR PAY/
   IF R HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY BUT NOT IN LAST 6 MOS./
   IF R HAS WORKED IN LAST 6 MOS. BUT IS NOT WORKING NOW:

       Are you looking for work at the present time?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO          --> Y25

       8. DK          --> Y25
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9,0 in Y13; 8,9 or NA in Y14e; 1,8,9 or NA in Y14g

==============================
M000956    Y14j. R dis: worry about finding job
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y14j.

   IF DISABLED IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED:
   IF R HAS NEVER WORKED FOR PAY/
   IF R HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY BUT NOT IN LAST 6 MOS./
   IF R HAS WORKED IN LAST 6 MOS. BUT IS NOT WORKING NOW:
   IF LOOKING FOR WORK AT PRESENT:

       How worried are you about not being able to find a job
       in the near future; a lot, somewhat, or not much at all?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A LOT             --> Y25
       3. SOMEWHAT          --> Y25
       5. NOT MUCH AT ALL   --> Y25

       8. DK                --> Y25
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y14h

==============================
M000957    Y15. Homemaker/student: work for pay
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y16.

   IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED:

       Are you doing any work for pay at the present time?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES   --> SKIP TO Y7 (below)
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,2,3,4,5,0 in Y6(1)

==============================
M000958    Y15a. Hmk/stu: work last 6 mon
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y16a.

   IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED:
   IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT:

       In the last six months, did you do any work for pay?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO           --> Y16h

       8. DK           --> Y16h
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1,8,9,0 in Y16

==============================
M000959    Y16a(1). 2-digit occup hmk/stu
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 95
           Numeric

   Y16a(1).

   IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED:
   IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT:
   IF R HAS WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MOS.:

       What kind of work did you do on your last regular job
       (What was your occupation?)
       What were your most important duties or activities?

       R HOMEMAKER/STUDENT: 2 DIGIT OCCUPATION CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See the OCCUPATION master code.
       The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1), at end of
       R employment section.
       The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has
       been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect
       respondents' anonymity.

       95. NA
       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. INAP, 1,2,3,4,5,0 in Y6(1); 1,8,9 or NA in Y16; 5,8,9 or NA
            in Y16a

==============================
M000959a   Y16a(2). 3-digit occup (blanked) hmk/stu
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 995
           Numeric

   Y16a(2).

   IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED:
   IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT:
   IF R HAS WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MOS.:

       What kind of work did you do on your last regular job
       (What was your occupation?)
       What were your most important duties or activities?

       R HOMEMAKER/STUDENT: 3 DIGIT CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE (BLANKED)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See the OCCUPATION master code.
       The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1a), at end of
       R employment section.
       The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has
       been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect
       respondents' anonymity.  Contact ANES Project Staff for
       information about a procedure by which it is possible to
       gain access to the full 3-digit code values.

       Codes 1-905 and:

       995. NA
       998. DK
       999. RF
       000. INAP, 1,2,3,4,5,0 in Y6(1); 1,8,9 or NA in Y16; 5,8,9 or NA
            in Y16a

==============================
M000960    Y16a(3). 1-digit occup summary hmk/stu
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 95
           Numeric

   Y16a(3).

   IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED:
   IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT:
   IF R HAS WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MOS.:

       What kind of work did you do on your last regular job
       (What was your occupation?)
       What were your most important duties or activities?

       R HOMEMAKER/STUDENT: COLLAPSED CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Collapsed from Y10a(2).
       The stacked version of this question is at Y17(2), at end of
       R employment section.

       1.  Executive, Administrative and Managerial (Census
           categories 001-039)
       2.  Professional Specialty Occupations (Census categories
           040-199)
       3.  Technicians and Related Support Occupations (Census
           categories 200-235)
       4.  Sales Occupation (Census categories 236-285)
       5.  Administrative Support, including clerical (Census
           categories 286-389)
       6.  Private Household (Census categories 403-407)
       7.  Protective Service (Census categories 408-427)
       8.  Service except Protective and Household (Census
           categories 428-469)
       9.  Farming, Forestry and Fishing Occupations (Census
           categories 470-499)
       10. Precision Production, Craft and Repair Occupations
          (Census categories 500-699)
       11. Machine Operators, Assemblers and Inspectors (Census
           categories 700-799)
       12. Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (Census
           categories 800-859)
       13. Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers
          (Census categories 860-890)
       14. Member of Armed Forces (Census category 903-905)

       95. NA
       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9

==============================
M000961    Y16a(4). Prestige code (blanked) hmk/stu
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99.99
           Numeric

   Y16a(4).

   IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED:
   IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT:
   IF R HAS WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MOS.:

       What kind of work did you do on your last regular job
       (What was your occupation?)
       What were your most important duties or activities?

       R OCCUPATION: PRESTIGE SCORE (BLANKED)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The stacked version of this question is at Y17(3), at end of
       R employment section.
       Prestige scores are based on Occupational Prestige Ratings
       from the 1989 General Social Survey, by James A. Davis,
       Robert W. Hodge, Keiko Nakao, Tom W. Smith, and Judith
       Treas (ICPSR 9593), Inter-university Consortium for
       Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor MI  48106,
       December 1991.
       Prestige Score data have been coded 0 missing to preserve
       respondents' anonymity.  Contact ANES project staff for
       information about a procedure by which it is possible to
       gain access to this data.

       99.99. 995,998,999 in Y16a(2)
       00.00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9

==============================
M000962    Y16b. Hmk/stu: industry code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 995
           Numeric

   Y16b.

   IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED:
   IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT:
   IF R HAS WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MOS.:

       What kind of business or industry was that?

       R OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The stacked version of this question is at Y17(4), at end of
       R employment section.
       See 1980 CENSUS INDUSTRY Master Code.

       Codes 10-932 and:

       995. NA
       998. DK
       999. RF
       000. INAP, 1,2,3,4,5,0 in Y6(1); 1,8,9 or NA in Y16; 5,8,9 or NA
            in Y16a

==============================
M000963    Y16c. Hmk/stu: self employed
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y16c.

   IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED:
   IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT:
   IF R HAS WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MOS.:

       Did you work for someone else, were you self-employed or
       what?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. SOMEONE ELSE
       3. BOTH SELF AND SOMEONE ELSE
       5. SELF-EMPLOYED                     --> Y16f

       8. DK                                --> Y16f
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y16a

==============================
M000964    Y16d. Hmk/stu: worked for govt
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y16d.

   IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED:
   IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT:
   IF R HAS WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MOS.:
   IF R WAS NOT SELF-EMPLOYED ONLY:

       Were you employed by a federal, state or local
       government?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y16c

==============================
M000965    Y16f. Hmk/stu: hrs/wk wrk last 6 months
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   Y16f.

   IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED:
   IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT:
   IF R HAS WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MOS.:

       About how many hours did you work on your job in the
       average week?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1-168

       996. INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y16a
       998. DK
       999. RF
       000. NA

==============================
M000966    Y16h. Hmk/stu: looking for work
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y16h.

   IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED:
   IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT:

       Are you looking for work at the present time?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO            --> Y25

       8. DK            --> Y25
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP,  1,8,9,0 in Y16

==============================
M000967    Y16j. Hmk/stu: worry about finding job
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y16j.

   IF HMAKER/STUDENT IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY AND NOT ALSO RETIRED:
   IF R IS NOT DOING ANY WORK FOR PAY AT PRESENT:
   IF R IS LOOKING FOR WORK:

       How worried are you about not being able to find a job
       in the near future -- a lot, somewhat, or not much at
       all?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A LOT             --> Y25
       3. SOMEWHAT          --> Y25
       5. NOT MUCH AT ALL   --> Y25

       8. DK                --> Y25
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y16h

==============================
M000968    Y7a(1). 2-digit occup R work now
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 95
           Numeric

   Y7a(1).

   IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/
   IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING:

       What is your main occupation (What sort of work do you
       do?)
       What are your most important activities or duties?

       R WORKING NOW/TLO: 2 DIGIT OCCUPATION CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See the OCCUPATION master code.
       The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1), at end of
       R employment section.
       The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has
       been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect
       respondents' anonymity.

       95. NA
       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. INAP, 0 in Y6(1); 3,4,5,6,7 in Y6(1) and not also working
            [40,50,60,70,75,80 or 0 in Y6(2)]

==============================
M000968a   Y7a(2). 3-digit occup (blanked) R wk now
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 995
           Numeric

   Y7a(2).

   IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/
   IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING:

       What is your main occupation (What sort of work do you
       do?)
       What are your most important activities or duties?

       R WORKING NOW/TLO: 3 DIGIT CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE (BLANKED)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See the OCCUPATION master code.
       The stacked version of this question is at Y17(1a), at end of
       R employment section.
       The original 3-digit 1980 Census Occupation variable has
       been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect
       respondents' anonymity.  Contact ANES Project Staff for
       information about a procedure by which it is possible to
       gain access to the full 3-digit code values.

       Codes 1-905 and:

       995. NA
       998. DK
       999. RF
       000. INAP, 0 in Y6(1); 3,4,5,6,7 in Y6(1) and not also working
            [40,50,60,70,75,80 or 0 in Y6(2)]

==============================
M000969    Y7a(3). 1-digit occup summary R work now
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 95
           Numeric

   Y7a(3).

   IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/
   IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING:

       What is your main occupation (What sort of work do you
       do?)
       What are your most important activities or duties?

       R WORKING NOW/TLO: COLLAPSED CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Collapsed from Y10a(2).
       The stacked version of this question is at Y17(2), at end of
       R employment section.

       1.  Executive, Administrative and Managerial (Census
           categories 001-039)
       2.  Professional Specialty Occupations (Census categories
           040-199)
       3.  Technicians and Related Support Occupations (Census
           categories 200-235)
       4.  Sales Occupation (Census categories 236-285)
       5.  Administrative Support, including clerical (Census
           categories 286-389)
       6.  Private Household (Census categories 403-407)
       7.  Protective Service (Census categories 408-427)
       8.  Service except Protective and Household (Census
           categories 428-469)
       9.  Farming, Forestry and Fishing Occupations (Census
           categories 470-499)
       10. Precision Production, Craft and Repair Occupations
          (Census categories 500-699)
       11. Machine Operators, Assemblers and Inspectors (Census
           categories 700-799)
       12. Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (Census
           categories 800-859)
       13. Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers
          (Census categories 860-890)
       14. Member of Armed Forces (Census category 903-905)

==============================
M000970    Y7a(4). Prestige code (blanked) R wk now
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   Y7a(4).

   IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/
   IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING:

       What is your main occupation (What sort of work do you
       do?)
       What are your most important activities or duties?

       R OCCUPATION: PRESTIGE SCORE (BLANKED)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The stacked version of this question is at Y17(3), at end of
       R employment section.
       Prestige scores are based on Occupational Prestige Ratings
       from the 1989 General Social Survey, by James A. Davis,
       Robert W. Hodge, Keiko Nakao, Tom W. Smith, and Judith
       Treas (ICPSR 9593), Inter-university Consortium for
       Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor MI  48106,
       December 1991.
       Prestige Score data have been coded 0 missing to preserve
       respondents' anonymity.  Contact ANES project staff for
       information about a procedure by which it is possible to
       gain access to this data.

       98.00  903,904,905 in Y7a(2)
       99.99. 995,998,999 in Y7a(2)
       00.00. INAP, 1,2,4,5,6,7,0 in Y6(1); 5,8,9 or NA in Y9

==============================
M000971    Y7b. Work now/TLO: industry code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 995
           Numeric

   Y7b.

   IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/
   IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING:

       What kind of (business/industry) is that?

       R OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The stacked version of this question is at Y17(4), at end of
       R employment section.
       See 1980 CENSUS INDUSTRY Master Code.

       Codes 10-932 and:

       995. NA
       998. DK
       999. RF
       000. INAP, 0 in Y6(1); 3,4,5,6,7 in Y6(1) and not also working
            [40,50,60,70,75,80 or 0 in Y6(2)]

==============================
M000972    Y7c. Work now/TLO: self employed
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y7c.

   IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/
   IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING:

       Do you work for someone else, are you self-employed or
       what?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. SOMEONE ELSE
       3. BOTH SELF AND SOMEONE ELSE
       5. SELF-EMPLOYED                --> Y7e

       8. DK                           --> Y7e
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0 in Y6(1); 3,4,5,6,7 in Y6(1) and not also working

==============================
M000973    Y7d. Work now/TLO: work for govt
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y7d.

   IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/
   IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING:
   IF NOT SELF-EMPLOYED ONLY:

       Are you employed by a federal, state or local government?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y7c

==============================
M000974    Y7e. Work now/TLO: hours work
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   Y7e.

   IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/
   IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING:

       About how many hours do you work on your job in the
       average week?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1-168

       996. INAP, 0 in Y6(1); 3,4,5,6,7 in Y6(1) and not also working
       998. DK
       999. RF
       000. NA

==============================
M000975    Y7f. Work now/TLO: work hours right
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y7f.

   IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/
   IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING:
   IF NUMBER OF HOURS WORKED IS NOT DK/REF:

       Is that more hours than you want to work, fewer hours
       than you want to work, or generally about right?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MORE
       3. FEWER
       5. ABOUT RIGHT

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0, 996-998 in Y7e

==============================
M000976    Y7g. Work now/TLO: worry lose job
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y7g.

   IF WORKING NOW/TLO IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/
   IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING:

       How worried are you about losing your job in the near
       future:  a lot, somewhat, or not much at all?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A LOT
       3. SOMEWHAT
       5. NOT MUCH AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0 in Y6(1); 3,4,5,6,7 in Y6(1) and not also working

==============================
M000977    Y7h. Work now: out work/layoff last 6mo
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y7h.

   IF WORKING NOW IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/
   IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING:

       Were you out of work or laid off at any time during the
       last six months?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 2,0 in Y6(1); 3,4,5,6,7 in Y6(1) and not also working

==============================
M000978    Y7j. Work now: reduction in hrs/pay
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y7j.

   IF WORKING NOW IS HIGHEST Y6(1) CATEGORY/
   IF RETIRED OR DISABLED OR HOMEMAKER/STUDENT BUT ALSO WORKING:

       During the last six months, have you had a reduction in
       your work hours or had to take a cut in pay at any time
       for reasons other than illness or personal choice?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 2,0 in Y6(1); 3,4,5,6,7 in Y6(1) and not also working

==============================
M000979    Y17(1). Stacked - 2 digit occup
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 95
           Numeric

   Y17(1).

   IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ :
   IF R IS RETIRED:/
   IF R IS UNEMPLOYED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: /
   IF R IS DISABLED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY:

       What is/was your main occupation?  What sort of work
       do/did you do?

       STACKED - 2 DIGIT OCCUPATION CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See notes Y6.
       Built from Y7a(1), Y10a(1), Y12a(1), Y14a(1).
       This variable combines employment data for all Rs except
       nonworking homemakers and students (i.e., their data for
       employment in the past 6 months are omitted).
       The disabled and homemakers or students who are also
       currently working have their current occupation from
       Y7a coded here.  Retirees who are also currently
       working have past occupation from Y12a coded here
       rather than current occupation in Y7a. If R is disabled
       and not working but has worked in the past, or if R is
       unemployed, then past employment is represented here.

       The original 3-digit 1990 US Census Occupation variable
       has been recoded into 71 subgroups, in order to protect
       Respondents' anonymity.
       See CENSUS OCCUPATION Master Code.

       Codes 01-71 and:

       95. NA
       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. Inap, 70, 75, 80, 0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9 ; 5,8,9,NA in Y13

==============================
M000979a   Y17(1a). Stacked - 3 dig occup (blanked)
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 995
           Numeric

   Y17(1a).

   IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ :
   IF R IS RETIRED:/
   IF R IS UNEMPLOYED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: /
   IF R IS DISABLED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY:

       What is/was your main occupation?  What sort of work
       do/did you do?
       What are/were your most important activities or duties?

       STACKED - 3-DIGIT CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE (BLANKED)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See notes Y6.
       Built from Y7a(2), Y10a(2), Y12a(2), Y14a(2).
       This variable combines employment data for all Rs except
       nonworking homemakers and students (i.e., their data for
       employment in the past 6 months are omitted).
       The disabled and homemakers or students who are also
       currently working have their current occupation from
       Y7a coded here.  Retirees who are also currently
       working have past occupation from Y12a coded here
       rather than current occupation in Y7a. If R is disabled
       and not working but has worked in the past, or if R is
       unemployed, then past employment is represented here.

       This variable has been blanked to preserve confidentiality.

       Codes 1-905 and:

       995. NA
       998. DK
       999. RF
       000. Inap, 70, 75, 80, 0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9 ; 5,8,9,NA in Y13

==============================
M000980    Y17(2). Stacked - 1 digit occup
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 95
           Numeric

   Y17(2).

   IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ :
   IF R IS RETIRED:/
   IF R IS UNEMPLOYED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: /
   IF R IS DISABLED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY:

       What is/was your main occupation?  What sort of work
       do/did you do?
       What are/were your most important activities or duties?

       STACKED - COLLAPSED CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See notes Y6.
       Built from Y7a(3), Y10a(3), Y12a(3), Y14a(3).
       This variable combines employment data for all Rs except
       nonworking homemakers and students (i.e., their data for
       employment in the past 6 months are omitted).
       The disabled and homemakers or students who are also
       currently working have their current occupation from
       Y7a coded here.  Retirees who are also currently
       working have past occupation from Y12a coded here
       rather than current occupation in Y7a. If R is disabled
       and not working but has worked in the past, or if R is
       unemployed, then past employment is represented here.

       1.  Executive, Administrative and Managerial (Census
           categories 001-039)
       2.  Professional Specialty Occupations (Census categories
           040-199)
       3.  Technicians and Related Support Occupations (Census
           categories 200-235)
       4.  Sales Occupation (Census categories 236-285)
       5.  Administrative Support, including clerical (Census
           categories 286-389)
       6.  Private Household (Census categories 403-407)
       7.  Protective Service (Census categories 408-427)
       8.  Service except Protective and Household (Census
           categories 428-469)
       9.  Farming, Forestry and Fishing Occupations (Census
           categories 470-499)
       10. Precision Production, Craft and Repair Occupations
          (Census categories 500-699)
       11. Machine Operators, Assemblers and Inspectors (Census
           categories 700-799)
       12. Transportation and Material Moving Occupations (Census
           categories 800-859)
       13. Handlers, Equipment Cleaners, Helpers and Laborers
          (Census categories 860-890)
       14. Member of Armed Forces (Census category 903-905)

       95. NA
       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. Inap, 70, 75, 80, 0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9 ; 5,8,9,NA in Y13

==============================
M000981    Y17(3). Stacked - occ prestige (blanked)
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   Y17(3).

   IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ :
   IF R IS RETIRED:/
   IF R IS UNEMPLOYED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: /
   IF R IS DISABLED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY:

       What is/was your main occupation?  What sort of work
       do/did you do?
       What are/were your most important activities or duties?

       STACKED - OCCUPATION PRESTIGE (BLANKED)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See notes Y6.
       Built from Y7a(4), Y10a(4), Y12a(4), Y14a(4).
       This variable represents employment data for all Rs except
       nonworking homemakers and students (i.e., their data for
       employment in the past 6 months are not used).
       The disabled and homemakers or students who are also
       currently working have their current occupation from
       Y7a represented here.  Retirees who are also currently
       working have past occupation from Y12a represented here
       rather than current occupation in Y7a. If R is disabled
       and not working but has worked in the past, or if R is
       unemployed, then past employment is represented here.

       Prestige scores are based on Occupational Prestige Ratings
       from the 1989 General Social Survey, by James A. Davis,
       Robert W. Hodge, Keiko Nakao, Tom W. Smith, and Judith
       Treas (ICPSR 9593), Inter-university Consortium for
       Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor MI  48106,
       December 1991.
       Prestige Score data have been coded 0 missing to preserve
       respondents' anonymity.

       98.00  903,904,905 in Y7a(2)/Y10a(2)/Y12a(2)/Y14a(2)
       99.99. 995,998,999 in Y7a(2)/Y10a(2)/Y12a(2)/Y14a(2)
       00.00. INAP, 70, 75, 80, 0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9 ; 5,8,9,NA in Y13

==============================
M000982    Y17(4). Stacked - industry
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 995
           Numeric

   Y17(4).

   IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ :
   IF R IS RETIRED:/
   IF R IS UNEMPLOYED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: /
   IF R IS DISABLED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY:

       What do/did they make or do where you work/ed?
       What kind of a business or industry is/was that?

       STACKED - OCCUPATION INDUSTRY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See notes Y6.
       Built from Y7b, Y10b, Y12b, Y14b.
       This variable combines industry data for all Rs except
       nonworking homemakers and students (i.e., their data for
       industry of employment in the past 6 months are omitted).
       The disabled and homemakers or students who are also
       currently working have industry of their current occupation
       from Y7b coded here.  Retirees who are also currently
       working have industry of past occupation from Y12b coded
       here rather than industry of current occupation in Y7b.
       If R is disabled and not working but has worked in the past,
       or if R is unemployed, then past employment is represented here.

       Codes 10-932 and:

       995. NA
       998. DK
       999. RF
       000. INAP, 70, 75, 80, 0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9 ; 5,8,9,NA in Y13

==============================
M000983    Y17(5). Stacked - work for self
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y17(5).

   IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ :
   IF R IS RETIRED:/
   IF R IS UNEMPLOYED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: /
   IF R IS DISABLED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY:

       Do/did you work for someone else, are/were you
       self- employed, or what?

       STACKED - WORK FOR SELF
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See notes Y6.
       Built from Y7c, Y10c, Y12c, Y14c.
       This variable combines data for all Rs except nonworking
       homemakers and students (i.e., their data for employment
       in the past 6 months are omitted).
       The disabled and homemakers or students who are also
       currently working have description of their current occupation
       from Y7c coded here.  Retirees who are also currently
       working have description of past occupation from Y12c coded
       here rather than for current occupation in Y7c.
       If R is disabled and not working but has worked in the past,
       or if R is unemployed, then past employment is represented here.

       1. SOMEONE ELSE
       3. BOTH SELF AND SOMEONE ELSE
       5. SELF-EMPLOYED

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 70, 75, 80, 0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9 ; 5,8,9,NA in Y13

==============================
M000984    Y17(6). Stacked - employed by govt
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y17(6).

   IF R WORKED NOT EXCLUSIVELY FOR SELF and:
   IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ :
   IF R IS RETIRED: /
   IF R IS UNEMPLOYED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY: /
   IF R IS DISABLED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY:

       Are/were you employed by a federal, state or local
       government?

       STACKED - EMPLOYED BY GOVERNMENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See notes Y6.
       Built from Y7d, Y10d, Y12d, Y14d.
       This variable combines data for all Rs except nonworking
       homemakers and students (i.e., their data for employment
       in the past 6 months are omitted).
       The disabled and homemakers or students who are also
       currently working have description of their current occupation
       from Y7d coded here.  Retirees who are also currently
       working have description of past occupation from Y12d coded
       here rather than for current occupation in Y7d.
       If R is disabled and not working but has worked in the past,
       or if R is unemployed, then past employment is represented here.

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 70, 75, 80, 0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9 ; 5,8,9,NA in Y13;
          5,8,9,NA in Y10c/Y12c/Y14c/Y7c

==============================
M000985    Y17(7). Stacked - hours per week
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   Y17(7).

   IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ :
   IF R IS RETIRED BUT HAS WORKED IN PAST 6 MONTHS: /
   IF R IS UNEMPLOYED BUT HAS WORKED IN PAST 6 MONTHS: /
   IF R IS DISABLED BUT HAS WORKED IN PAST 6 MONTHS:

       About how many hours do/did you work on your job in the
       average week?

       STACKED - HOURS WORKING/WORKED PER WEEK
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See notes Y6.
       Built from Y7e, Y10f, Y12f, Y14f.
       This variable combines data for all Rs currently working
       or who have worked within the past six months:
       - Employed or temp. laid off  [present employment Y7e],
       - Unemployed  [employment within past 6 months Y10f],
       - Retired  [employment within past 6 months Y12f],
       - Permanently disabled [employment within past 6 months Y14f].

       Note that homemakers or students without current outside
       employment are coded 00 [Y16f data are NOT used].  The
       disabled and homemakers or students who are also currently
       working have data for their current occupation from Y7e coded
       here.  For retirees, since data for number of hours worked
       describes recent employment within past 6 months, this may
       in effect describe pre-retirement employment (i.e. for very
       recent retirees), current employment (i.e. for working retirees
       at a post-retirement job that has been held in the last 6 months),
       or employment that is neither pre-retirement nor a current job
       bur rather an interim position.

       1-168

       996. INAP, 70,75,80,0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9; 5,8,9,NA in Y13;
            5,8,9,NA in Y10e, Y12e or Y14e
       998. DK
       999. RF
       000. NA

==============================
M000986    Y17(8). Stacked - worr abt los/find job
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y17(8).

   IF R IS WORKING NOW OR TLO/ :
   IF R IS RETIRED AND NOT CURRENTLY WORKING: /
   IF R IS UNEMPLOYED:/
   IF R IS DISABLED AND NOT CURRENTLY WORKING:

       How worried are you about losing your job/ not being
       able to find a job in the near future:
       A LOT, SOMEWHAT, or NOT MUCH AT ALL?

       STACKED - WORRIED ABOUT LOSING/FINDING JOB
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See notes Y6.
       Built from Y7g, Y10h, Y12j, Y14j.
       This variable combines data for all Rs who are currently:
       - Employed or temp. laid off  [Y7g], (including working
         retired and working disabled)
       - Unemployed  [Y10h],
       - Retired and not working  [Y12j],
       - Permanently disabled and not working  [Y14j].
       Note that homemakers or students without current outside
       employment are coded 0 [Y16j data are NOT used].

       1. A LOT
       3. SOMEWHAT
       5. NOT MUCH AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 70, 75, 80, 0 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y10g; 5,8,9,NA in
          Y12h; 5,8,9,NA in Y14h

==============================
M000987    Y17(9). Stacked - job in past 6 mos.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y17(9).

   IF R IS UNEMPLOYED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY /
   IF R IS RETIRED/
   IF R IS DISABLED AND HAS EVER WORKED FOR PAY:

       Have you had a job in the past 6 months?

       STACKED - JOB IN PAST 6 MONTHS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See notes Y6.
       Built from Y10e, Y12e, Y14e.
       This variable combines data for all Rs who are currently:
       - Unemployed  [Y10e],
       - Retired [Y12e],
       - Permanently disabled, if R has ever worked  [Y14e]
       NOTE: For nonworking homemakers and students, data from Y16a
       are NOT included.

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; Inap, 0,10,17,18,20,70,71,75,80,81 in Y6(2); 5,8,9,NA in Y9;
          5,8,9,NA in Y13

==============================
M000988    Y17(10). Stacked - looking for work
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y17(10).

   IF R IS RETIRED AND NOT CURRENTLY WORKING: /
   IF R IS UNEMPLOYED: /
   IF R IS DISABLED AND NOT WORKING NOW:

       Are you looking for work at the present time?

       STACKED - LOOKING FOR WORK
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See notes Y6.
       Built from Y10g, Y12h, Y14h.
       This variable combines data for all Rs who are currently:
       - Unemployed  [Y10g],
       - Retired, if R is not currently working  [Y12h],
       - Permanently disabled, if R has ever worked but is not currently
working  [Y14h].
       NOTE: For nonworking homemakers and students, data from Y16h
       are NOT included.

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; Inap, 0,10,17,18,20,70,71,75,80,81 in Y6(2);
          1,8,9,NA in Y12g; 1,8,9,NA in Y14g

==============================
M000989    Y17(11). Stacked - ever work for pay
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y17(11).

   IF R IS UNEMPLOYED: /
   IF R IS DISABLED:

       Have you ever done any work for pay?

       STACKED - EVER WORK FOR PAY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See notes Y4.
       Built from Y9 and Y13.

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 10,15,17,18,20,50,51,70,71,75,80,81,0 in Y6(2)

==============================
M000990    Y25. Anyone in HH belong to union
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y25.

       Do you or anyone else in this household belong to a
       labor union?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO    --> SKIP TO Y26

       8. DK    --> SKIP TO Y26
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000991a   Y25a1. Who belongs to union #1
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y25a1.

   IF SOMEONE IN HOUSEHOLD BELONGS TO LABOR UNION:

       Who is it that belongs?

       MENTION 1
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. RESPONDENT
       2. R's WIFE OR FEMALE PARTNER
       3. R's HUSBAND OR MALE PARTNER
       4. SOMEONE ELSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in Y25

==============================
M000991b   Y25a2. Who belongs to union #2
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y25a2.

   IF SOMEONE IN HOUSEHOLD BELONGS TO LABOR UNION

       Who is it that belongs?

       MENTION 2
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. RESPONDENT
       2. R's WIFE OR FEMALE PARTNER
       3. R's HUSBAND OR MALE PARTNER
       4. SOMEONE ELSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in Y25; no further mention

==============================
M000991c   Y25a3. Who belongs to union #3
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y25a3.

   IF SOMEONE IN HOUSEHOLD BELONGS TO LABOR UNION

       Who is it that belongs?

       MENTION 3
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. RESPONDENT
       2. R's WIFE OR FEMALE PARTNER
       3. R's HUSBAND OR MALE PARTNER
       4. SOMEONE ELSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0,5,8,9 in Y25; no further mention

==============================
M000992    Y26. IWR chkpt: # of Persons age 14+
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Y26.

       INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT:
       IS R THE ONLY HOUSEHOLD MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: This variable was completed by interviewers.
       In 67 cases, households corresponding to more than 1 adult were
       incorrectly coded 1 in this variable; as a result of the effect
       upon the skip pattern, household income was not asked.
       For these cases, the following revisions have been made to the
       original data:  P000992 recoded to 5; P000993 [HH income] and
       P000994 [HH income summary] recoded to 00 NA; P000995 [R income]
       assigned the value formerly coded in P000996; P000996 recoded
       to 96 Inap.

       1. YES, R IS ONLY HH MEMBER 14+       --> SKIP TO Y28
       5. NO, THERE ARE OTHER HH MEMBERS 14+

       9. NA

==============================
M000993    Y27/Y27.T. HH income - others in HH 14+
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Y27/Y27.T.

   IF NO, R IS NOT ONLY MEMBER AGE 14+:

       FTF:
       Please look at page 18 of the booklet.
       Please look at the booklet and tell me the letter of the
       income group that includes the income of all
       members of your family living here in 1999 before taxes.
       This figure should include salaries, wages, pensions,
       dividends, interest, and all other income.

       TELEPHONE:
       I am going to read you a list of income categories.
       Please tell me which category best describes the.
       total income of all members of your family living in
       your house in 1999 before taxes.  This figure
       should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends,
       interest, and all other income.  Please stop me
       when I get to your family's income.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [IF UNCERTAIN: WHAT WOULD BE YOUR BEST GUESS?]

       1.   A. NONE OR LESS THAN $4,999
       2.   B. $5,000-$9,999
       3.   C. $10,000-$14,999
       4.   D. $15,000-$24,999
       5.   E. $25,000-$34,999
       6.   F. $35,000-$49,999
       7.   G. $50,000-$64,999
       8.   H. $65,000-$74,999
       9.   J. $75,000-$84,999
       10.  K. $85,000-$94,999
       11.  M. $95,000-$104,999
       12.  N. $105,000-$114,999
       13.  P. $115,000-$124,999
       14.  Q. $125,000-$134,999
       15.  R. $135,000-$144,999
       16.  S. $145,000-$154,999
       17.  T. $155,000-$164,999
       18.  U. $165,000-$174,999
       19.  V. $175,000-$184,999
       20.  W. $185,000-$194,999
       21.  X. $195,000-$199,999
       22.  Y. $200,000 and over

       96. INAP, 1,9 in Y26
       98.  DK
       99.  Z. REFUSED
       00.  NA

==============================
M000994    Y27x. HH income -all HHs
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   Y27x.

   IF NO, R IS NOT ONLY HOUSEHOLD MEMBER AGE 14+ /
   IF YES, R IS ONLY HOUSEHOLD MEMBER AGE 14+:

       FTF - R ONLY HH MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER:
       Please look at page 18 of the booklet.
       Please look at the booklet and tell me the letter of the
       income group that includes the income of all
       members of your family living here in 1999 before taxes.
       This figure should include salaries, wages, pensions,
       dividends, interest, and all other income.
       FTF - R ONLY HH MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER:
       (RB, page 18) Please tell me the letter of the income
       group that includes the income you had in 1999 before
       taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages,
       pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income.

       TELEPHONE - R ONLY HH MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER:
       I am going to read you a list of income categories.
       Please tell me which category best describes the.
       total income of all members of your family living in
       your house in 1999 before taxes.  This figure
       should include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends,
       interest, and all other income.  Please stop me
       when I get to your family's income.
       TELEPHONE - R ONLY HH MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER:
       I am going to read you a list of all icome categories.
       Please tell me which category best describes the total
       income you had in 1999 before taxes.  This figure should
       include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest,
       and all other income.  Please stop me when I get to your
       income category.

       SUMMARY: HOUSEHOLD INCOME
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [IF UNCERTAIN: WHAT WOULD BE YOUR BEST GUESS?]
       This variables combines data for Respondents from
       households with other members age 14 and older and data for
       Respondents who are the only member age 14 and older.

       1.   A. NONE OR LESS THAN $4,999
       2.   B. $5,000-$9,999
       3.   C. $10,000-$14,999
       4.   D. $15,000-$24,999
       5.   E. $25,000-$34,999
       6.   F. $35,000-$49,999
       7.   G. $50,000-$64,999
       8.   H. $65,000-$74,999
       9.   J. $75,000-$84,999
       10.  K. $85,000-$94,999
       11.  M. $95,000-$104,999
       12.  N. $105,000-$114,999
       13.  P. $115,000-$124,999
       14.  Q. $125,000-$134,999
       15.  R. $135,000-$144,999
       16.  S. $145,000-$154,999
       17.  T. $155,000-$164,999
       18.  U. $165,000-$174,999
       19.  V. $175,000-$184,999
       20.  W. $185,000-$194,999
       21.  X. $195,000-$199,999
       22.  Y. $200,000 and over

98.  DK
       99.  Z. REFUSED
       00.  NA (9 in

==============================
M000995    Y27a/Y27a.T. R income - others in HH 14+
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Y27a/Y27a.T.

   IF NO, R IS NOT ONLY HOUSEHOLD MEMBER AGE 14+:

       FTF:
       (RB, still on page 18) Now we are interested in the
       income that you yourself received in 1999, not
       including any of the income received by (your spouse and
       the rest of your family). Please look at this page and
       tell me the income you yourself had in 1999 before
       taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages,
       pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income.

       TELEPHONE:
       Now we are interested in the income that you yourself
       received in 1999, not including any of the income
       received by (your spouse and) the rest of your family.
       Please tell me which category best describes the income
       you yourself had in 1999 before taxes. This figure
       should include salaries wages, pensions, dividends,
       interest, and all other income. Please stop me when I
       get to your income category.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [IF UNCERTAIN: WHAT WOULD BE YOUR BEST GUESS?]

       1.   A. NONE OR LESS THAN $4,999
       2.   B. $5,000-$9,999
       3.   C. $10,000-$14,999
       4.   D. $15,000-$24,999
       5.   E. $25,000-$34,999
       6.   F. $35,000-$49,999
       7.   G. $50,000-$64,999
       8.   H. $65,000-$74,999
       9.   J. $75,000-$84,999
       10.  K. $85,000-$94,999
       11.  M. $95,000-$104,999
       12.  N. $105,000-$114,999
       13.  P. $115,000-$124,999
       14.  Q. $125,000-$134,999
       15.  R. $135,000-$144,999
       16.  S. $145,000-$154,999
       17.  T. $155,000-$164,999
       18.  U. $165,000-$174,999
       19.  V. $175,000-$184,999
       20.  W. $185,000-$194,999
       21.  X. $195,000-$199,999
       22.  Y. $200,000 and over

       96.  INAP, 1,9 in Y26
       98.  DK
       99.  Z. REFUSED
       00.  NA

==============================
M000996    Y28/Y28.T. R income - only HH member 14+
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Y28/Y28a.T.

   IF YES, R IS ONLY HOUSEHOLD MEMBER AGE 14+:

       FTF:
       (RB, page 18) Please tell me the letter of the income
       group that includes the income you had in 1999 before
       taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages,
       pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income.

       TELEPHONE:
       I am going to read you a list of all icome categories.
       Please tell me which category best describes the total
       income you had in 1999 before taxes.  This figure should
       include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest,
       and all other income.  Please stop me when I get to your
       income category.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [IF UNCERTAIN: WHAT WOULD BE YOUR BEST GUESS?]

       1.   A. NONE OR LESS THAN $4,999
       2.   B. $5,000-$9,999
       3.   C. $10,000-$14,999
       4.   D. $15,000-$24,999
       5.   E. $25,000-$34,999
       6.   F. $35,000-$49,999
       7.   G. $50,000-$64,999
       8.   H. $65,000-$74,999
       9.   J. $75,000-$84,999
       10.  K. $85,000-$94,999
       11.  M. $95,000-$104,999
       12.  N. $105,000-$114,999
       13.  P. $115,000-$124,999
       14.  Q. $125,000-$134,999
       15.  R. $135,000-$144,999
       16.  S. $145,000-$154,999
       17.  T. $155,000-$164,999
       18.  U. $165,000-$174,999
       19.  V. $175,000-$184,999
       20.  W. $185,000-$194,999
       21.  X. $195,000-$199,999
       22.  Y. $200,000 and over

       96.  INAP, 5,9 in Y26
       98.  DK
       99.  Z. REFUSED
       00.  NA

==============================
M000997    Y28x. R income -all HHs
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   Y28x.

   IF NO, R IS NOT ONLY MEMBER AGE 14+ /
   IF YES, R IS ONLY MEMBER AGE 14+:

       FTF - R ONLY HH MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER:
       (RB, still on page 18) Now we are interested in the
       income that you yourself received in 1999, not
       including any of the income received by (your spouse and
       the rest of your family). Please look at this page and
       tell me the income you yourself had in 1999 before
       taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages,
       pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income.
       FTF - R ONLY HH MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER:
       (RB, page 18) Please tell me the letter of the income
       group that includes the income you had in 1999 before
       taxes. This figure should include salaries, wages,
       pensions, dividends, interest, and all other income.

       TELEPHONE - R ONLY HH MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER:
       Now we are interested in the income that you yourself
       received in 1999, not including any of the income
       received by (your spouse and) the rest of your family.
       Please tell me which category best describes the income
       you yourself had in 1999 before taxes. This figure
       should include salaries wages, pensions, dividends,
       interest, and all other income. Please stop me when I
       get to your income category.
       TELEPHONE - R ONLY HH MEMBER AGE 14 OR OLDER:
       I am going to read you a list of all icome categories.
       Please tell me which category best describes the total
       income you had in 1999 before taxes.  This figure should
       include salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest,
       and all other income.  Please stop me when I get to your
       income category.

       SUMMARY: R INCOME
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [IF UNCERTAIN: WHAT WOULD BE YOUR BEST GUESS?]

       1.   A. NONE OR LESS THAN $4,999
       2.   B. $5,000-$9,999
       3.   C. $10,000-$14,999
       4.   D. $15,000-$24,999
       5.   E. $25,000-$34,999
       6.   F. $35,000-$49,999
       7.   G. $50,000-$64,999
       8.   H. $65,000-$74,999
       9.   J. $75,000-$84,999
       10.  K. $85,000-$94,999
       11.  M. $95,000-$104,999
       12.  N. $105,000-$114,999
       13.  P. $115,000-$124,999
       14.  Q. $125,000-$134,999
       15.  R. $135,000-$144,999
       16.  S. $145,000-$154,999
       17.  T. $155,000-$164,999
       18.  U. $165,000-$174,999
       19.  V. $175,000-$184,999
       20.  W. $185,000-$194,999
       21.  X. $195,000-$199,999
       22.  Y. $200,000 and over

98.  DK
       99.  Z. REFUSED
       00.  NA (9 in

==============================
M000998    Y29. Ever think of self as wrk/mid class
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y29.

       (Not using the booklet)
       There's been some talk these days about different social
       classes.  Most people say they belong either to the
       middle class or the working class.  Do you ever think of
       yourself as belonging in one of these classes?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO    --> Y29b

       8. DK    --> Y29b
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M000999    Y29a. Which one (workng or middle class)
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y29a.

   IF R CONSIDERS SELF MEMBER OF MIDDLE OR WORKING CLASS:

       Which one?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MIDDLE CLASS     --> Y29c
       5. WORKING CLASS    --> Y29e
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY)  --> Y30

       8. DK               --> Y30
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y29

==============================
M001000    Y29b. If had to choose class
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y29b.

   IF R DOESN'T CONSIDER SELF MIDDLE OR WORKING CLASS:

       Well, if you had to make a choice, would you call
       yourself middle class or working class?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MIDDLE CLASS         --> SKIP TO Y29c
       5. WORKING CLASS        --> SKIP TO Y29e
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY)      --> SKIP TO Y30

       8. DK                   --> SKIIP TO Y30
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0 in Y29; 1,5 or NA in Y29a

==============================
M001001    Y29c. Middle class- avg or upper
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y29c.

   IF R CONSIDERS SELF MIDDLE CLASS:

       Would you say that you are about average middle class or
       that you are in the upper part of the middle class?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. AVERAGE MIDDLE
       5. UPPER MIDDLE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0 in 429; 5 or NA in Y29a; 5,7,8,9, NA in Y29b

==============================
M001002    Y29d. Middle class - feel close to class
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y29d.

   IF R CONSIDERS SELF MIDDLE CLASS:

       Would you say you feel pretty close to middle class
       people, or that you don't feel much closer to them than
       to people in other classes?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. CLOSE       --> SKIP TO Y30
       5. NOT CLOSE   --> SKIP TO Y30

       8. DK          --> SKIP TO Y30
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0 in 429; 5 or NA in Y29a; 5,7,8,9, NA in Y29b

==============================
M001003    Y29e. Working class - avg or upper
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y29e.

   IF R CONSIDERS SELF WORKING CLASS:

       Would you say that you are about average working class
       or that you are in the upper part of the working class?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. AVERAGE WORKING
       5. UPPER WORKING

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0 in Y29; 1 or NA in Y29a; 1,7,8,9, NA in Y29b

==============================
M001004    Y29f. Working class -feel close to class
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y29f.

   IF R CONSIDERS SELF WORKING CLASS:

       Would you say you feel pretty close to working class
       people, or that you don't feel much closer to them than
       to people in other classes?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. CLOSE
       5. NOT CLOSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0 in Y29; 1 or NA in Y29a; 1,7,8,9, NA in Y29b

==============================
M001005    Y29x. Soc.class summary
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y29x.

       (Not using the booklet)
       There's been some talk these days about different social
       classes.  Most people say they belong either to the
       middle class or the working class.  Do you ever think of
       yourself as belonging in one of these classes?
       (IF YES:) Which one?
       (IF NO:) Well, if you had to make a choice, would you
       call yourself middle class or working class?
       (IF MIDDLE CLASS:) Would you say that you are about
       average middle class or that you are in the upper part
       of the middle class?
       (IF WORKING CLASS:) Would you say that you are about
       average working class or that you are in the upper part
       of the working class?

       SUMMARY: R SOCIAL CLASS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Y29, Y29a, Y29b,Y29c,Y29e.

       1. Average working class
       2. Working class -- NA if average or upper
       3. Upper working class
       4. Average middle class
       5. Middle class - NA if average or upper
       6. Upper middle class
       7. Other

       8. DK in Y29b
       9. RF in Y29b
       0. NA in Y29/Y29b

==============================
M001006a   Y30(1). Racial group #1 self-description
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   Y30(1).

       What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you?

       MENTION 1 - RACIAL/ETHNIC GROUP
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       10. BLACK
       20. ASIAN
       30. NATIVE AMERICAN
       40. HISPANIC OR LATINO
       50. WHITE
       60. OTHER SPECIFY - MISC.
       75. OTHER SPECIFY - EAST INDIAN
       76. OTHER SPECIFY - PACIFIC ISLANDER
       79. OTHER SPECIFY - MORE THAN 3 MAJOR GROUPS
       80. OTHER SPECIFY - 'AMERICAN'
       90. OTHER SPECIFY - 'NONE'; 'DOESN'T MATTER" ETC.

       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA

==============================
M001006b   Y30(2). Racial group #2 self-description
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Y30(2).

       What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you?

       MENTION 2 - RACIAL/ETHNIC GROUP
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       10. BLACK
       20. ASIAN
       30. NATIVE AMERICAN
       40. HISPANIC OR LATINO
       50. WHITE
       60. OTHER SPECIFY - MISC.
       75. OTHER SPECIFY - EAST INDIAN
       76. OTHER SPECIFY - PACIFIC ISLANDER
       79. OTHER SPECIFY - MORE THAN 3 MAJOR GROUPS
       80. OTHER SPECIFY - 'AMERICAN'
       90. OTHER SPECIFY - 'NONE'; 'DOESN'T MATTER" ETC.

       00. NA; INAP, no further mention

==============================
M001006c   Y30(3). Racial group #3 self-description
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Y30(3).

       What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you?

       MENTION 3 - RACIAL/ETHNIC GROUP
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       10. BLACK
       20. ASIAN
       30. NATIVE AMERICAN
       40. HISPANIC OR LATINO
       50. WHITE
       60. OTHER SPECIFY - MISC.
       70. JEWISH
       75. OTHER SPECIFY - EAST INDIAN
       76. OTHER SPECIFY - PACIFIC ISLANDER
       79. OTHER SPECIFY - MORE THAN 3 MAJOR GROUPS
       80. OTHER SPECIFY - 'AMERICAN'
       90. OTHER SPECIFY - 'NONE'; 'DOESN'T MATTER" ETC.

       00. NA; INAP, no further mention

==============================
M001007    Y30a. Both parents born in U.S.?
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y30a.

       Were both of your parents born in this country?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

==============================
M001008    Y30b(1). Ethnic/nationality group #1
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   Y30b(1).

       In addition to being American, what do you consider your
       main ethnic group or nationality group?

       MENTION 1 - ETHNIC OR NATIONALITY GROUP
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See ETHNICITY master code.

       Codes 1-89, 91-94 and:

       90. None
       96. 'American'
       97. Other group; combinations not codeable elsewhere

       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA

==============================
M001009    Y30b(2). Ethnic/nationality group #2
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Y30b(2).

       In addition to being American, what do you consider your
       main ethnic group or nationality group?

       MENTION 2 - ETHNIC OR NATIONALITY GROUP
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See ETHNICITY master code.

       Codes 1-89,91-94 and:

       90. None
       96. 'American'
       97. Other group; combinations not codeable elsewhere

       00. NA; no further mention

==============================
M001010    Y30bx. IWR ckpt: >2 ethnic mentions?
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Y30bx1.

       INTERVIEWER CHECKPPOINT: NUMBER OF NATIONALITY OR ETHNIC GROUPS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents who have identified more than one group
       are asked the 'choice' question Y30c.

       0. NO NATIONALITY/GROUP MENTIONED
       1. ONE NATIONALITY OR ETHNIC GROUP MENTIONED
       2. 2 OR MORE NATIONALITY/GROUPS MENTIONED

       9. RESPONDENT REFUSED OR DK/NA ANSWER TO NATIONALITY OR ETHNICITY

==============================
M001010a   Y30bx2. Number of ethnic groups mentioned
           MD1: EQ 96,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   Y30bx2.

       NUMBER OF NATIONALITY OR ETHNIC GROUPS MENTIONED BY R
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This is the exact number of mentions given by R

       00. No mention (0 in Y30bx1)
       01. One mention
       02. Two mentions
       .
       .
       06. Six mentions

       96. Ethnicity question NA
       98. R responded DK to ethnicity question
       99. R refused ethnicity question

==============================
M001011    Y30c. Choice of ethnic/nationality group
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   Y30c.

   IF MORE THAN 1 NATIONALITY/ETHNIC GROUP IDENTIFIED:

       With which of these groups do you most closely identify?

       CHOICE - ETHNIC OR NATIONALITY GROUP
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See ETHNICITY master code.
       Rs giving only 1 mention to Y22 were not asked this
       question; their single response to Y22 has been duplicated
       in this variable.
       Note that this variable was coded according to IWR
       indentification of number of ethnic groups mentioned;
       in some instances, the IWR counted only 1 mention
       when in fact more than 1 was given by R.  For such
       cases, the 'choice' variable (Y30c) was unasked.

       Codes 1-89,91-94 and:

       90. None; neither
       95. Both/all of them
       96. 'American'
       97. Other group; combinations not codeable elsewhere

       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; 0,9 in Y30bx1

==============================
M001012    Y30x/Y31. Spanish or Hispanic descent
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y30x/Y31.

       INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT:
       IS SPANISH OR HISPANIC GROUP MENTIONED AS MAIN GROUP?
       (IF NO:)
       Are you of Spanish or Hispanic origin or descent?

       IS R OF SPANISH OR HISPANIC ORIGIN OR DESCENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The question about Spanish or Hispanic descent was
       directed to the respondent at the interviewer's
       discretion if the interviewer decided that R had
       not already mentioned a Spanish or Hispanic group
       in the ethnicity mentions.  In a few cases, mentions
       coded 4,5,8,12 or 16 in Y30b(1) or Y30b(2) contradict
       what has been coded in this checkpoint.
       Note that, if R gave more than 2 mentions in Y30, the
       code for the specific Spanish or Hispanic group may not
       be represented in the 2 variables for Y30.
       See also Pre-Csheet.37 and Pre-Csheet.28 (P000068,P000069)
       and Post-Csheet.32 and Post-Csheet.33 (P000184d, P000184e).

       1. YES
       5. NO              --> SKIP TO Z1

       8. DK              --> SKIP TO Z1
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M001013    Y31a/Y31a.T. Category of Hispanic descnt
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y31a/Y31a.T.

   IF R MENTIONED SPANISH OR HISPANIC GROUP/
   IF R SAYS HE/SHE HAS SPANISH OR HISPANIC DESCENT:

       FTF:
       Please look at page 19 of the booklet and tell me which
       category best describes your Hispanic origin.

       TELEPHONE:
       Would you describe your Hispanic origin as Mexican,
       Puerto Rican, Cuban, Latin American, Central American,
       or Spanish?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [CODE SPANISH OR HISPANIC GROUP W/O ASKING, IF R Y31a
       MENTIONS ONE OF THE RESPONSE OPTIONS BELOW]

       1. MEXICAN
       2. PUERTO RICAN
       3. CUBAN
       4. LATIN AMERICAN
       5. CENTRAL AMERICAN
       6. SPANISH
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in Y30x/Y31

==============================
M001014    Z1. Where R grew up-ICPSR st/cntry code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 998
           Numeric

   Z1.

       Where was it that you grew up?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [IF UNITED STATES: WHICH STATE OR STATES?]
       Use STATE AND COUNTRY codes
       101-997 and:

       998. DK
       999. RF
       000. NA

==============================
M001015    Z2. FTF- urbanicity where grew up
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Z2.

       FTF:
       Looking at page 20 of the booklet.
       Looking at this list, please tell me where you were
       mostly brought up?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       For telephone format, see Z2.T/Z2a.T/Z2b.T

       1. ON A FARM
       2. IN THE COUNTRY, NOT ON A FARM
       3. IN A SMALL CITY OR TOWN (UNDER 50,000 PEOPLE)
       4. IN A MEDIUM-SIZED CITY (50,000 - 100,000)
       5. IN A LARGE CITY (100,000 - 500,000)
       6. IN A SUBURB OF A LARGE CITY
       7. IN A VERY LARGE CITY (OVER 500,000)
       8. IN A SUBURB OF A VERY LARGE CITY

       9. DK
       0. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M001016    Z2.T. Phone -urbanicity where grew up
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z2.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       I am going to read you a list of categories.  Please
       tell me which category best describes where you were
       mostly brought up?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [READ ANSWER LIST]
       For FTF format, see Z2.

       1. ON A FARM
       3. IN THE COUNTRY, NOT ON A FARM
       5. IN A CITY
       7. OR, IN A SUBURB OF A CITY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode

==============================
M001017    Z2a. Phone -urbanicity where grew up
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z2a.T.

   IF R BROUGHT UP IN A CITY:

       TELEPHONE:
       Were you mostly brought up in.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [READ ENTIRE ANSWER LIST]
       For FTF format, see Z2.

       1. IN A SMALL CITY OR TOWN  UNDER 50,000 PEOPLE
       3. IN A MEDIUM-SIZED CITY  50,000-100,000
       5. IN A LARGE CITY, 100,000-500,000
       7. OR, IN A VERY LARGE CITY, OVER 500,000

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,3,7,8,9,0 in Z2.T

==============================
M001018    Z2b. Phone - urbanicity where grew up
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z2b.T.

   IF R BROUGHT UP IN A SUBURB OF A CITY:

       TELEPHONE:
       Were you mostly brought up in.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [READ ENTIRE ANSWER LIST]
       For FTF format, see Z2.

       1. IN A SUBURB OF A LARGE CITY (100,000 TO 500,000 PEOPLE)
       5. OR IN A SUBURB OF A VERY LARGE CITY (OVER 500,000 PEOPLE)

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1,3,5,8,9,0 in Z2.T

==============================
M001019    Z2x. Comb. Summary where R grew up
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z2x.

       FTF:
       Looking at page 20 of the booklet.
       Looking at this list, please tell me where you were
       mostly brought up?

       TELEPHONE:
       I am going to read you a list of categories.  Please
       tell me which category best describes where you were
       mostly brought up?
       Were you mostly brought up in.

       SUMMARY: SIZE OF PLACE WHERE R GREW UP
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Z2 and Z2.T/Z2a.T/Z2b.T.

       1. ON A FARM
       2. IN THE COUNTRY, NOT ON A FARM
       3. IN A SMALL CITY OR TOWN (UNDER 50,000 PEOPLE)
       4. IN A MEDIUM-SIZED CITY (50,000 - 100,000)
       5. IN A LARGE CITY (100,000 - 500,000)
       6. IN A SUBURB OF A LARGE CITY
       7. IN A VERY LARGE CITY (OVER 500,000)
       8. IN A SUBURB OF A VERY LARGE CITY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M001020a   Z3(1). Mos. -how long lived in community
           MD1: EQ 96,  MD2: GE 97
           Numeric

   Z3(1).

       (Not using the booklet)
       How long have you lived in your present
       (CITY/TOWN/TOWNSHIP/COUNTY)?

       MONTHS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0-23 and:

       96. ALL MY LIFE
       97. NA
       98. DK
       99. RF

==============================
M001020b   Z3(2). Yrs. -how long lived in community
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 997
           Numeric

   Z3(2).

       (Not using the booklet)
       How long have you lived in your present
       (CITY/TOWN/TOWNSHIP/COUNTY)?

       YEARS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0-89 and:

       995. INAP, 96 in Z3(1)
       997. NA
       998. DK
       999. RF

==============================
M001020c   Z3x. Summ. - how long lived in community
           MD1: EQ 96,  MD2: GE 97
           Numeric

   Z3x.

       (Not using the booklet)
       How long have you lived in your present
       (CITY/TOWN/TOWNSHIP/COUNTY)?

       SUMMARY: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN COMMUNITY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Z3(1) and Z3(2).

       0. O-11 months
       1. 12-23 months
       2. 2 years
       .
       .
       89. 89 years

       96. 'All my life'
       97. NA
       98. DK
       99. RF

==============================
M001021a   Z4(1)/Z4(1).T. Mos.-length resid in home
           MD1: EQ 96,  MD2: GE 97
           Numeric

   Z4(1)/Z4(1).T.

       FTF:
       How long have you lived in this (house/condo/apartment)?

       TELEPHONE:
       How long have you lived in your current home?

       MONTHS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0-23 and:

       96. ALL MY LIFE
       97. NA
       98. DK
       99. RF

==============================
M001021b   Z4(2)/Z4(1).T. Yrs.-length resid in home
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 997
           Numeric

   Z4(2)/Z4(2).T.

       FTF:
       How long have you lived in this (house/condo/apartment)?

       TELEPHONE:
       How long have you lived in your current home?

       YEARS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0-100 and:

       995. INAP, 96 in Z4(1)/Z4(1).T
       997. NA
       998. DK
       999. RF

==============================
M001021c   Z4x. Summ. - length residence in home
           MD1: EQ 96,  MD2: GE 97
           Numeric

   Z4x.

       FTF:
       How long have you lived in this (house/condo/apartment)?

       TELEPHONE:
       How long have you lived in your current home?

       SUMMARY: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN HOME
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Z4(1)/Z4(1).T and Z4(2)/Z4(2).T.

       0. O-11 months
       1. 12-23 months
       2. 2 years
       .
       .
       89. 89 years

       96. 'All my life'
       97. NA
       98. DK
       99. RF

==============================
M001022    Z5. Does R family own/rent home
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z5.

       (Do you/Does your family) own your home, pay rent, or
       what?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. OWN HOUSE
       5. PAY RENT
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY)

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M001023    Z8. Does R have children
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z8.

       These are the last few questions.  Often we find that
       people who have children or commute great distances
       have less time to participate in politics.
       How about you? Do you have any children?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       (INCLUDE STEP AND ADOPTED CHILDREN)

       1. YES
       3. YES, STEPCHILDREN/ADOPTED [VOL]
       5. NO   --> SKIP TO Z9

       8. DK   --> SKIP TO Z9
       9. RF
       0. NA

==============================
M001024    Z8a. How many children R has under 18
           MD1: EQ 95,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Z8a.

   IF R HAS ANY CHILDREN:

       How many children do you have under 18?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       O.      --> SKIP TO Z9
       1-25.

       95. NA
       96. INAP, 0,5,8,9 in Z8
       98. DK
       99. RF

==============================
M001025    Z8b. R's children under 18 living w/R
           MD1: EQ 95,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   Z8b.

   IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD:

       How many of them live with you at least half of the time?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       O.      --> SKIP TO Z9
       1-25.

       95. NA
       96. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a
       98. DK
       99. RF

==============================
M001026a   Z8c(1). Mention 1 minor child age
           MD1: EQ 95,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   Z8c(1).

   IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD:

       What are the ages of your children?

       MENTION 1
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1-17

       95. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a
       98. DK
       99. RF

==============================
M001026b   Z8c(2). Mention 2 minor child age
           MD:  EQ 95
           Numeric

   Z8c(2).

   IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD:

       What are the ages of your children?

       MENTION 2
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1-17

       95. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a; 98 in Z8c(1); no further mention

==============================
M001026c   Z8c(3). Mention 3 minor child age
           MD:  EQ 95
           Numeric

   Z8c(3).

   IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD:

       What are the ages of your children?

       MENTION 3
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1-17

       95. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a; 98 in Z8c(1); no further mention

==============================
M001026d   Z8c(4). Mention 4 minor child age
           MD:  EQ 95
           Numeric

   Z8c(4).

   IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD:

       What are the ages of your children?

       MENTION 4
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1-17

       95. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a; 98 in Z8c(1); no further mention

==============================
M001026e   Z8c(5). Mention 5 minor child age
           MD:  EQ 95
           Numeric

   Z8c(5).

   IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD:

       What are the ages of your children?

       MENTION 5
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1-17

       95. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a; 98 in Z8c(1); no further mention

==============================
M001026f   Z8c(6). Mention 6 minor child age
           MD:  EQ 95
           Numeric

   Z8c(6).

   IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD:

       What are the ages of your children?

       MENTION 6
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1-17

       95. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a; 98 in Z8c(1); no further mention

==============================
M001026g   Z8c(7). Mention 7 minor child age
           MD:  EQ 95
           Numeric

   Z8c(7).

   IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD:

       What are the ages of your children?

       MENTION 7
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1-17

       95. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a; 98 in Z8c(1); no further mention

==============================
M001026h   Z8c(8). Mention 8 minor child age
           MD:  EQ 95
           Numeric

   Z8c(8).

   IF R HAS CHILDREN UNDER 18 YEARS OLD:

       What are the ages of your children?

       MENTION 8
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1-17

       95. INAP, 0, 95-99 in Z8a; 98 in Z8c(1); no further mention

==============================
M001027    Z9. How many miles R drives per day
           MD1: EQ 998,  MD2: GE 999
           Numeric

   Z9.

       (And finally), about how many miles do you drive in a
       typical day?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0-996
       997. 997 and more

       998. DK
       999. NA

==============================
M001028    ZZ0. Education estimate if missed in IW
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ0.

   IF HIGHEST GRADE AND Y3a (DIPLOMA) ARE BOTH MISSING /
   IF HIGHEST GRADE <12 AND Y3a (DIPLOMA) ARE BOTH MISSING:

       ALTHOUGH THERE IS NO WAY OF BEING 100% ACCURATE, PLEASE
       GIVE YOUR BEST ESTIMATE OF THE RESPONDENT'S PROBABLE
       APPROXIMATE EDUCATION LEVEL [IF YOU FIND IT IMPOSSIBLE
       TO CHOOSE BETWEEN 2 CHOICES, SELECT 'OTHER' AND
       EXPLAIN]
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. LOW - PROBABLY LESS THAN HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA
       2. PROBABLY HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA
       3. AT LEAST SOME COLLEGE
       4. OTHER  (SPECIFY)

       0. NA; INAP, education data not missing

==============================
M001029    ZZ1. IWR obs: R gender
           Numeric

   ZZ1.

       R's sex is:
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MALE
       2. FEMALE

==============================
M001030    ZZ2. FTF IWR obs: R race
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   ZZ2.

       FTF:
       R's race is:
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. WHITE
       2. BLACK

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M001031a   ZZ3(1). FTF: #1 others present during IW
           MD1: EQ 8,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   ZZ3(1).

       FTF:
       Others present at time of interview:

       MENTION 1
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0. NONE
       1. CHLDREN UNDER 6
       2. OLDER CHILDREN
       3. SPOUSE
       4. OTHER RELATIVES
       5. OTHER ADULTS

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode

==============================
M001031b   ZZ3(2). FTF: #2 others present during IW
           MD1: EQ 8,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   ZZ3(2).

       FTF:
       Others present at time of interview:

       MENTION 2
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. CHLDREN UNDER 6
       2. OLDER CHILDREN
       3. SPOUSE
       4. OTHER RELATIVES
       5. OTHER ADULTS

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode; no further mention

==============================
M001031c   ZZ3(3). FTF: #3 others present during IW
           MD1: EQ 8,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   ZZ3(3).

       FTF:
       Others present at time of interview:

       MENTION 3
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. CHLDREN UNDER 6
       2. OLDER CHILDREN
       3. SPOUSE
       4. OTHER RELATIVES
       5. OTHER ADULTS

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode; no further mention

==============================
M001031d   ZZ3(4). FTF: #4 others present during IW
           MD1: EQ 8,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   ZZ3(4).

       FTF:
       Others present at time of interview:

       MENTION 4
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. CHLDREN UNDER 6
       2. OLDER CHILDREN
       3. SPOUSE
       4. OTHER RELATIVES
       5. OTHER ADULTS

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode; no further mention

==============================
M001031e   ZZ3(5). FTF: #5 others present during IW
           MD1: EQ 8,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   ZZ3(5).

       FTF:
       Others present at time of interview:

       MENTION 5
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. CHLDREN UNDER 6
       2. OLDER CHILDREN
       3. SPOUSE
       4. OTHER RELATIVES
       5. OTHER ADULTS

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode; no further mention

==============================
M001032    ZZ4. IWR obs: R cooperation
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ4.

       R's cooperation was:
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY GOOD
       2. GOOD
       3. FAIR
       4. POOR
       5. VERY POOR

       0. NA

==============================
M001033    ZZ5. IWR obs: R informed about politics
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ5.

       R's general level of information about politics and
       public affairs seemed:
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY HIGH
       2. FAIRLY HIGH
       3. AVERAGE
       4. FAIRLY LOW
       5. VERY LOW

       0. NA

==============================
M001034    ZZ6. IWR obs: R intelligence
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ6.

       R's apparent intelligence:
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY HIGH
       2. FAIRLY HIGH
       3. AVERAGE
       4. FAIRLY LOW
       5. VERY LOW

       0. NA

==============================
M001035    ZZ7. IWR obs: R suspicious
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ7.

       How suspicious did R seem to be about the study before
       the interview?:
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. NOT AT ALL SUSPICIOUS
       2. SOMEWHAT SUSPICIOUS
       3. VERY SUSPICIOUS

       0. NA

==============================
M001036    ZZ8. IWR obs: R interest in IW
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ8.

       Overall, how great was R's interest in the interview?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY HIGH
       2. FAIRLY HIGH
       3. AVERAGE
       4. FAIRLY LOW
       5. VERY LOW

       0. NA

==============================
M001037    ZZ9. IWR obs: R sincerity
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ9.

       How sincere did R seem in his/her answers?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. COMPLETE SINCERE              --> ZZ10
       3. USUALLY SINCERE               --> ZZ9a
       5. OFTEN SEEMED TO BE INSINCERE  --> ZZ9a

       0. NA

==============================
M001038    ZZ9a. IWR: obs: insincere in what part(blanked)
           Character

   ZZ9a.

   IF NOT COMPLETELY SINCERE:

       Were there any particular parts of the interview for
       which you doubted R's sincerity?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [IF SO NAME THEM BY SECTION OR QUESTION NUMBER]
       This variable is blanked.

==============================
M001039    ZZ10. IWR obs: R report income correctly
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ10.

       FTF:
       Do you feel R reported income accurately?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES, THINK R REPORTED INCOME CORRECTLY
       2. NO, THINK R REPORTED INCOME INCORRECTLY
       3. NO, THINK R REPORTED INCOME DISHONESTLY
       4. R REFUSED INCOME Q's

       0. NA; INAP, phone mode

==============================
M001040    ZZ10a. IWR obs: est income -surv inc off
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 97
           Numeric

   ZZ10a.

   IF R DID NOT REPORT INCOME OR IWR SUSPECTS DID NOR REPORT CORRECTLY:

       If possible, give a reasonable estimate of what R's
       family income is (before taxes in 1999).
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1.   A. NONE OR LESS THAN $4,999
       2.   B. $5,000-$9,999
       3.   C. $10,000-$14,999
       4.   D. $15,000-$24,999
       5.   E. $25,000-$34,999
       6.   F. $35,000-$49,999
       7.   G. $50,000-$64,999
       8.   H. $65,000-$74,999
       9.   J. $75,000-$84,999
       10.  K. $85,000-$94,999
       11.  M. $95,000-$104,999
       12.  N. $105,000-$114,999
       13.  P. $115,000-$124,999
       14.  Q. $125,000-$134,999
       15.  R. $135,000-$144,999
       16.  S. $145,000-$154,999
       17.  T. $155,000-$164,999
       18.  U. $165,000-$174,999
       19.  V. $175,000-$184,999
       20.  W. $185,000-$194,999
       21.  X. $195,000-$199,999
       22.  Y. $200,000 and over

       97.  DK
       98.  Y. Impossible to estimate
       00.  NA; INAP, 1 in ZZ10; phone mode

==============================
M001041a   ZZ11(1). Mention 1 - R reaction to IW
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ11(1).

       R's reaction to interview:

       MENTION 1
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL
       11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG
       12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED
       13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS
       15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED.  AFTER STARTING IW, R
           MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW
       20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD
           EYESIGHT ETC.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS
           SLOW READER.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW
       31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES,
           OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION.
       40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS
       41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT
       45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS
       50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY)
       70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS
           COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT)
       80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK

       00. NA

==============================
M001041b   ZZ11(2). Mention 2 - R reaction to IW
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ11(2).

       R's reaction to interview:

       MENTION 2
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL
       11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG
       12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED
       13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS
       15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED.  AFTER STARTING IW, R
           MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW
       20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD
           EYESIGHT ETC.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS
           SLOW READER.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW
       31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES,
           OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION.
       40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS
       41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT
       45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS
       50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY)
       70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS
           COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT)
       80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK

       00. NA; no further mention

==============================
M001041c   ZZ11(3). Mention 3 - R reaction to IW
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ11(3).

       R's reaction to interview:

       MENTION 3
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL
       11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG
       12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED
       13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS
       15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED.  AFTER STARTING IW, R
           MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW
       20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD
           EYESIGHT ETC.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS
           SLOW READER.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW
       31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES,
           OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION.
       40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS
       41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT
       45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS
       50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY)
       70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS
           COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT)
       80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK

       00. NA; no further mention

==============================
M001041d   ZZ11(4). Mention 4 - R reaction to IW
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ11(4).

       R's reaction to interview:

       MENTION 4
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL
       11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG
       12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED
       13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS
       15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED.  AFTER STARTING IW, R
           MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW
       20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD
           EYESIGHT ETC.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS
           SLOW READER.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW
       31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES,
           OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION.
       40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS
       41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT
       45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS
       50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY)
       70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS
           COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT)
       80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK

       00. NA; no further mention

==============================
M001041e   ZZ11(5). Mention 5 - R reaction to IW
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ11(5).

       R's reaction to interview:

       MENTION 5
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL
       11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG
       12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED
       13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS
       15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED.  AFTER STARTING IW, R
           MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW
       20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD
           EYESIGHT ETC.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS
           SLOW READER.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW
       31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES,
           OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION.
       40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS
       41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT
       45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS
       50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY)
       70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS
           COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT)
       80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK

       00. NA; no further mention

==============================
M001041f   ZZ11(6). Mention 6 - R reaction to IW
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ11(6).

       R's reaction to interview:

       MENTION 6
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL
       11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG
       12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED
       13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS
       15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED.  AFTER STARTING IW, R
           MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW
       20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD
           EYESIGHT ETC.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS
           SLOW READER.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW
       31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES,
           OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION.
       40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS
       41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT
       45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS
       50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY)
       70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS
           COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT)
       80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK

       00. NA; no further mention

==============================
M001041g   ZZ11(7). Mention 7 - R reaction to IW
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ11(7).

       R's reaction to interview:

       MENTION 7
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL
       11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG
       12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED
       13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS
       15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED.  AFTER STARTING IW, R
           MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW
       20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD
           EYESIGHT ETC.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS
           SLOW READER.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW
       31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES,
           OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION.
       40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS
       41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT
       45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS
       50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY)
       70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS
           COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT)
       80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK

       00. NA; no further mention

==============================
M001041h   ZZ11(8). Mention 8 - R reaction to IW
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ11(8).

       R's reaction to interview:

       MENTION 8
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL
       11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG
       12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED
       13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS
       15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED.  AFTER STARTING IW, R
           MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW
       20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD
           EYESIGHT ETC.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS
           SLOW READER.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW
       31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES,
           OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION.
       40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS
       41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT
       45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS
       50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY)
       70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS
           COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT)
       80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK

       00. NA; no further mention

==============================
M001041j   ZZ11(9). Mention 9 - R reaction to IW
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ11(9).

       R's reaction to interview:

       MENTION 9
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL
       11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG
       12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED
       13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS
       15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED.  AFTER STARTING IW, R
           MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW
       20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD
           EYESIGHT ETC.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS
           SLOW READER.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW
       31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES,
           OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION.
       40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS
       41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT
       45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS
       50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET (FTF ONLY)
       70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS
           COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT)
       80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK

       00. NA; no further mention

==============================
M001042    Pre.Rand.A4/A5. Order-Gore,GWB lik/dis
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.A4/A5.

       Order of Gore and Bush in Pre A4-A5 Likes/dislikes
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Gore first
       2. GW Bush first

       9. NA

==============================
M001043    Pre.Rand.C1b. Pos-Gore in therms
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.C1b.

       Position of Gore in Pre Thermometers
       C1b-C1e / C1b.T-C1e.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Clinton's name was always first.

       Codes 2 (2nd name) to 5 (5th name) and:

==============================
M001044    Pre.Rand.C1c. Pos-GW Bush in therms
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.C1c.

       Position of GW Bush in Pre Thermometers
       C1b-C1e / C1b.T-C1e.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Clinton's name was always first.

       Codes 2 (2nd name) to 5 (5th name) and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001045    Pre.Rand.C1d. Pos-Buchanan in therms
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.C1d.

       Position of Buchanan in Pre Thermometers
       C1b-C1e / C1b.T-C1e.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Clinton's name was always first.

       Codes 2 (2nd name) to 5 (5th name) and:

       9. NA


==============================
M001046    Pre.Rand.C1e. Pos-Nader in thermoms
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.C1e.

       Position of Nader in Pre Thermometers
       C1b-C1e / C1b.T-C1e.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Clinton's name was always first.

       Codes 2 (2nd name) to 5 (5th name) and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001047    Pre.Rand.C1f/g. Pos-Mccain, Bradley ther
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.C1f/g.

       Position of McCain and Bradley in Pre Thermometers
       C1f-C1g / C1f.T-C1g.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. McCain 6th name, Bradley 7th name
       2. Bradley 6th name, McCain 7th name

       9. NA

==============================
M001048    Pre.Rand.C1h/k. Pos-Cheney,Liebermn ther
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.C1h/k.

       Position of Lieberman and Cheney in Pre Thermometers
       C1h-C1j / C1h.T-C1j.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Lieberman 8th name, Cheney 9th name
       2. Cheney 8th name, Lieberman 9th name

       9. NA

==============================
M001049    Pre.Rand.C2. Order-parties in therms
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.C2.

       Order of 3 major parties in Pre thermometers
       C2a-C2c
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Democratic 1st, Republican 2nd, Reform 3rd
       2. Democratic 1st, Reform 2nd, Republican 3rd
       3. Republican 1st, Democratic 2nd, Reform 3rd
       4. Republican 1st, Reform 2nd, Democratic 3rd
       5. Reform 1st, Democratic 2nd, Republican 3rd
       6. Reform 1st, Republican 2nd, Democratic 3rd

       9. NA

==============================
M001050    Pre.Rand.D1/D3. Order-parties in lik/dis
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.D1/D3.

       Order of 2 major parties in Pre 'Likes-Dislikes'
       D1-D2/D3-D4
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Democratic party first (D1-D2), Republican party 2nd (D3-D4)
       2. Republican Party first (D1-D2), Democratic party 2nd (D3-D4)

       9. NA

==============================
M001051    Pre.Rand.F1-F3. Order-Gore, GWB, Buchn
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.F1-F3.

       Order of Gore, GW Bush, Buchanan in Pre Affects series
       F1,F2,F3
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Gore 1st, GW Bush 2nd, Buchanan 3rd
       2. Gore 1st, Buchanan 2nd, GW Bush 3rd
       3. GW Bush 1st, Gore 2nd, Buchanan 3rd
       4. GW Bush 1st, Buchanan 2nd, Gore 3rd
       5. Buchanan 1st, Gore 2nd, GW Bush 3rd
       6. Buchanan 1st, GW Bush 2nd, Gore 3rd

       9. NA

==============================
M001052    Pre.Rand.F1a. Pos-angry -Gore affects
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.F1.

       Pre: Position of Angry among Gore Affects F1a-F1d
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-4 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001053    Pre.Rand.F1b. Pos-hopeful -Gore affects
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.F1b.

       Pre: Position of Hopeful among Gore Affects F1a-F1d
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-4 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001054    Pre.Rand.F1c. Pos-afraid -Gore affects
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.F1c.

       Pre: Position of Afraid among Gore Affects F1a-F1d
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-4 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001055    Pre.Rand.F1d. Pos-proud -Gore affects
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.F1d.

       Pre: Position of Proud among Gore Affects F1a-F1d
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-4 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001056    Pre.Rand.F2a. Pos-angry -GW Bush affects
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.F2a.

       Pre: Position of Angry among GW Bush Affects F2a-F2d
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-4 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001057    Pre.Rand.F2b. Pos-hopeful -GWB affects
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.F2b.

       Pre: Position of Hopeful among GW Bush Affects F2a-F2d
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-4 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001058    Pre.Rand.F2c. Pos-afraid -GWB affects
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.F2c.

       Pre: Position of Afraid among GW Bush Affects F2a-F2d
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-4 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001059    Pre.Rand.F2d. Pos-proud -GWB affects
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.F2d.

       Pre: Position of Proud among GW Bush Affects F2a-F2d
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-4 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001060    Pre.Rand.F3a. Pos-angry -Buchnn affects
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.F3a.

       Pre: Position of Angry among Buchanan Affects F3a-F3d
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-4 and:

       9. NA


==============================
M001061    Pre.Rand.F3b. Pos-hopeful -Buchnn affcts
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.F3b.

       Pre: Position of Hopeful among Buchanan Affects F3a-F3d
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-4 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001062    Pre.Rand.F3c. Pos-afraid -Buchnn affcts
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.F3c.

       Pre: Position of Afraid among Buchanan Affects F3a-F3d
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-4 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001063    Pre.Rand.F3d. Pos-proud -Buchnn affcts
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.F3d.

       Pre: Position of Proud among Buchanan Affects F3a-F3d
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-4 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001064    Pre.Rand.G3-G5. Ord-Gore,GWB,Buch lib/con
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.G3-G5.

       Order of Gore, GW Bush, Buchanan in Pre
       Liberal-Conservative placements G3-G5 / G3.T-G5.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Clinton placement was always first.

       1. Gore 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Buchanan 4th
       2. Gore 2nd, Buchanan 3rd, GW Bush 4th
       3. GW Bush 2nd, Gore 3rd, Buchanan 4th
       4. GW Bush 2nd, Buchanan 3rd, Gore 4th
       5. Buchanan 2nd, Gore 3rd, GW Bush 4th
       6. Buchanan 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Gore 4th

       9. NA

==============================
M001065    Pre.Rand.G8-G10.E. Ord-Gore,GWB,Buch lib/c
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.G8-10.E.

       Order of Gore, GW Bush, Buchanan in Pre
       Liberal-Conservative placements G8.E-G10.E
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Clinton placement was always first.

       1. Gore 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Buchanan 4th
       2. Gore 2nd, Buchanan 3rd, GW Bush 4th
       3. GW Bush 2nd, Gore 3rd, Buchanan 4th
       4. GW Bush 2nd, Buchanan 3rd, Gore 4th
       5. Buchanan 2nd, Gore 3rd, GW Bush 4th
       6. Buchanan 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Gore 4th

==============================
M001066    Pre.Rand.K2-K4. Ord-Gore,GWB,Buch traits
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.K2-K4.

       Order of Gore, GW Bush, Buchanan in Pre Traits series
       K2,K3,K4
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Gore 1st, GW Bush 2nd, Buchanan 3rd
       2. Gore 1st, Buchanan 2nd, GW Bush 3rd
       3. GW Bush 1st, Gore 2nd, Buchanan 3rd
       4. GW Bush 1st, Buchanan 2nd, Gore 3rd
       5. Buchanan 1st, Gore 2nd, GW Bush 3rd
       6. Buchanan 1st, GW Bush 2nd, Gore 3rd

       9. NA

==============================
M001067    Pre.Rand.K2a. Order-moral -Gore traits
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.K2a.

       Pre: Order of Moral among Gore traits K2a-K2g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001068    Pre.Rand.K2b. Order-cares -Gore traits
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.K2b.

       Pre: Order of Really Cares among Gore traits K2a-K2g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001069    Pre.Rand.K2c. Order-knowldg -Gore traits
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.K2c.

       Pre: Order of Knowledgeable among Gore traits K2a-K2g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001070    Pre.Rand.K2d. Order-leader -Gore traits
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.K2d.

       Pre: Order of Leadership among Gore traits K2a-K2g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001071    Pre.Rand.K2e. Order-dishon -Gore traits
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.K2e.

       Pre: Order of Dishonest among Gore traits K2a-K2g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001072    Pre.Rand.K2f. Order-intell -Gore traits
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.K2f.

       Pre: Order of Intelligent among Gore traits K2a-K2g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001073    Pre.Rand.K2g. Ord-out touch -Gore traits
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.K2g.

       Pre: Order of Out of Touch among Gore traits K2a-K2g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001074    Pre.Rand.K3a. Order-moral -GWB traits
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.K3a.

       Pre: Order of Moral among GW Bush traits K3a-K3g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001075    Pre.Rand.K3b. Order-cares -GWB traits
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.K3b.

       Pre: Order of Really Cares among GW Bush traits K3a-K3g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA


==============================
M001076    Pre.Rand.K3c. Order-knowldg -GWB traits
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.K3c.

       Pre: Order of Knowledgeable among GW Bush traits K3a-K3g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001077    Pre.Rand.K3d. Order-leader -GWB traits
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.K3d.

       Pre: Order of Leadership among GW Bush traits K3a-K3g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001078    Pre.Rand.K3e. Order-dishon -GWB traits
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.K3e.

       Pre: Order of Dishonest among GW Bush traits K3a-K3g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001079    Pre.Rand.K3f. Order-intell -GWB traits
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.K3f.

       Pre: Order of Intelligent among GW Bush traits K3a-K3g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001080    Pre.Rand.K3g. Ord-out touch -GWB traits
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.K3g.

       Pre: Order of Out of Touch among GW Bush traits K3a-K3g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001081    Pre.Rand.K4a. Ord-moral -Buchanan traits
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.K4a.

       Pre: Order of Moral among Buchanan traits K4a-K4g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period
       (09/28/00).

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA; Question dropped

==============================
M001082    Pre.Rand.K4b. Ord-cares -Buchanan traits
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.K4b.

       Pre: Order of Really Cares among Buchanan traits K4a-K4g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period
       (09/28/00).

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA; Question dropped

==============================
M001083    Pre.Rand.K4c. Ord-knowl -Buchanan traits
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.K4c.

       Pre: Order of Knowledgeable among Buchanan traits K4a-K4g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period
       (09/28/00).

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA; Question dropped

==============================
M001084    Pre.Rand.K4d. Ord-leader -Buchann traits
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.K4d.

       Pre: Order of Leadership among Buchanan traits K4a-K4g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period
       (09/28/00).

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA; Question dropped

==============================
M001085    Pre.Rand.K4e. Ord-dishon -Buchann traits
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.K4e.

       Pre: Order of Dishonest among Buchanan traits K4a-K4g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period
       (09/28/00).

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA; Question dropped

==============================
M001086    Pre.Rand.K4f. Ord-intell -Buchann traits
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.K4f.

       Pre: Order of Intelligent among Buchanan traits K4a-K4g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period
       (09/28/00).

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA; Question dropped

==============================
M001087    Pre.Rand.K4g. Ord-out touch-Buchnn traits
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.K4g.

       Pre: Order of Out of Touch among Buchanan traits K4a-K4g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Buchanan traits were dropped during the field period
       (09/28/00).

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA; Question dropped

==============================
M001088    Pre.Rand.L1c/L1d. Order-Gore,GWB serv/sp
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.L1c/L1d.

       Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among Services/Spending
       placements L1c-L1d / L1c-L1d.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Clinton's name was always first.

       1. Gore 2nd name; GW Bush 3rd name
       2. GW Bush 2nd name; Gore 3rd name

       9. NA

==============================
M001089    Pre.Rand.L1e/L1f. Order-Gore,GWB serv/sp
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.L1e/L1f.

       Pre: Order of major parties among Services/Spending
       placements L1e-L1f / L1e-L1f.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Clinton's name was always first.

       1. Democratic party 4th name; Republican party 5th
       2. Republican party 4th name; Democratic party 5th

       9. NA

==============================
M001090    Pre.Rand.L2b/L2c. Order-Gore,GWB def sp
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.L2b/L2c.

       Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among Defense Spending
       placements L2b-L2c / L2b.T-L2c.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name
       2. GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name

       9. NA

==============================
M001091    Pre.Rand.L2d/L2e. Order-parties defse sp
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.L2d/L2e.

       Pre: Order of major parties among Defense Spending
       placements L2d-L2e / L2d.T-L2e.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Democratic Party 3rd name, Republican Party 4th
       2. Republican Party 3rd name, Democratic Party 4th

       9. NA

==============================
M001092    Pre.Rand.L4b/L4c. Order-Gore,GWB guarjob
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.L4b/L4c.

       Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among Guaranteed Jobs
       placements L4b-L4c / L4b.T-L4c.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name
       2. GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name

       9. NA

==============================
M001093    Pre.Rand.L4d/L4e. Order-parties guar job
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.L4d/L4e.

       Pre: Order of major parties among Guaranteed Jobs
       placements L4d-L4e / L4d.T-L4e.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Democratic Party 3rd name, Republican Party 4th
       2. Republican Party 3rd name, Democratic Party 4th

       9. NA


==============================
M001094    Pre.Rand.L5c/L5d. Ord-Gore,GWB aid blcks
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.L5c/L5d.

       Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among Aid to Blacks
       placements L5c-L5d /L5c.T-L5d.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Clinton's name was always first.

       1. Gore 2nd name; GW Bush 3rd name
       2. GW Bush 2nd name; Gore 3rd name

       9. NA

==============================
M001095    Pre.Rand.L5e/L5f. Order-parties aid blks
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.L5e/L5f.

       Pre Order of major parties among Aid to Blacks
       placements L5e-L5f /L5e.T-L5f.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Clinton's name was always first.

       1. Democratic party 4th name; Republican party 5th
       2. Republican party 4th name; Democratic party 5th

       9. NA

==============================
M001096    Pre.Rand.L7b. Order-welfare -fed spendng
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.L7b.

       Order of Welfare among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a).

       Codes 2-13 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001097    Pre.Rand.L7c. Order-aids resch-fed spend
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.L7c.

       Order of Aids Research among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a).

       Codes 2-13 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001098    Pre.Rand.L7d. Order-forgn aid -fed spend
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.L7d.

       Order of Foreign Aid among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a).

       Codes 2-13 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001099    Pre.Rand.L7e. Order-food stps -fed spend
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.L7e.

       Order of Food Stamps among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a).

       Codes 2-13 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001100    Pre.Rand.L7f. Order-aid poor -fed spend
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.L7f.

       Order of Aid to Poor among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a).

       Codes 2-13 and:

       9. NA


==============================
M001101    Pre.Rand.L7g. Order-soc sec -fed spend
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.L7g.

       Order of Soc Security among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a).

       Codes 2-13 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001102    Pre.Rand.L7h. Ord-env protect -fed spend
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.L7h.

       Order of Env Protection among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a).

       Codes 2-13 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001103    Pre.Rand.L7j. Ord-publ schls -fed spend
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.L7j.

       Order of Public Schls among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a).

       Codes 2-13 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001104    Pre.Rand.L7k. Ord-deal w/crime-fed spend
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.L7k.

       Order of Deal w/Crime among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a).

       Codes 2-13 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001105    Pre.Rand.L7m. Order-child care-fed spend
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.L7m.

       Order of Child Care among Pre Federal spendinging items L7b-L7p
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a).

       Codes 2-13 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001106    Pre.Rand.L7n. Order-border sec-fed spend
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.L7n.

       Order of Border Security amng Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a).

       Codes 2-13 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001107    Pre.Rand.L7p. Order-aid blacks-fed spend
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.L7p.

       Order of Aid to Blacks among Pre Federal spending items L7b-L7p
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       'Repairing the highways' was always first (L7a).

       Codes 2-13 and:

       9. NA

==============================
M001108    Pre.Rand.M1b/M1c. Ord-Gore-GWB abortion
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.M1b/M1c.

       Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among Abortion placements
       M1b-M1c / M1b.T-M1c.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name
       2. GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name

       9. NA

==============================
M001109    Pre.Rand.M4b/M4c. Ord-Gore-envir/jobs
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.M4b/M4c.

       Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among Environment-Jobs
       placements M4b-M4c / M4b.T-M4c.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name
       2. GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name

       9. NA

==============================
M001110    Pre.Rand.M6b/M6c. Ord-Gore-gun restrictn
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.M6b/M6c.

       Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush for Gun restriction
       placement M6b-M6c
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name
       2. GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name

       9. NA

==============================
M001111    Pre.Rand.P1b/P1c. Ord-Gore-women's role
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.P1b/P1c.

       Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among Women's Role
       placements P1b-P1c / P1b.T-P1c.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name
       2. GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name

       9. NA

==============================
M001112    Pre.Rand.P2b/P2c. Ord-Gore-envir reg
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.P2b/P2c.

       Pre: Order of Gore and GW Bush among Environmental
       regulation placements P2b-P2c / P2b.T-P2c.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Gore 1st name, GW Bush 2nd name
       2. GW Bush 1st name, Gore 2nd name

       9. NA

==============================
M001113    Pre.Rand.Q14a. Ord-angry-Clinton affcts
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.Q14a.

       Pre: Order of Angry among Clinton Affects Q14a-Q14d.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-4 and:

       9. NA
       0. Question administered in Post

==============================
M001114    Pre.Rand.Q14b. Ord-hopeful-Clinton affcts
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.Q14b.

       Pre: Order of Hopeful among Clinton Affects Q14a-Q14d.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-4 and:

       9. NA
       0. Question administered in Post

==============================
M001115    Pre.Rand.Q14c. Ord-afraid -Clinton affcts
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.Q14c.

       Pre: Order of Afraid among Clinton Affects Q14a-Q14d.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-4 and:

       9. NA
       0. Question administered in Post

==============================
M001116    Pre.Rand.Q14d. Ord-proud-Clinton affcts
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.Q14d.

       Pre: Order of Proud among Clinton Affects Q14a-Q14d.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-4 and:

       9. NA
       0. Question administered in Post

==============================
M001117    Pre.Rand.Q15a. Ord-moral-Clinton traits
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.Q15a.

       Pre: Order of Moral among Clinton traits Q15a-Q15g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA
       0. Question administered in Post

==============================
M001118    Pre.Rand.Q15b. Ord-cares-Clinton traits
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.Q15b.

       Pre: Order of Really Cares among Clinton traits Q15a-Q15g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA
       0. Question administered in Post

==============================
M001119    Pre.Rand.Q15c. Ord-knowl-Clinton traits
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.Q15c.

       Pre: Order of Knowledgeable amng Clinton traits Q15a-Q15g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA
       0. Question administered in Post

==============================
M001120    Pre.Rand.Q15d. Ord-leader-Clinton traits
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.Q15d.

       Pre: Order of Leadership among Clinton traits Q15a-Q15g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA
       0. Question administered in Post

==============================
M001121    Pre.Rand.Q15e. Ord-dishon-Clinton traits
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.Q15e.

       Pre: Order of Dishonest among Clinton traits Q15a-Q15g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA
       0. Question administered in Post

==============================
M001122    Pre.Rand.Q15f. Ord-intell-Clinton traits
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.Q15f.

       Pre: Order of Intelligent among Clinton traits Q15a-Q15g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA
       0. Question administered in Post

==============================
M001123    Pre.Rand.Q15g. Ord-out touch-Clint trait
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Pre-Rand.Q15g.

       Pre: Order of Out of Touch among Clinton traits Q15a-Q15g
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Codes 1-7 and:

       9. NA
       0. Question administered in Post

==============================
M001201    A1. R interest in campaigns
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   A1.

       Some people don't pay much attention to political
       campaigns. How about you? Would you say that you
       were very much interested, somewhat interested, or not
       much interested in following the political campaigns
       this year?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY MUCH INTERESTED
       3. SOMEWHAT INTERESTED
       5. NOT MUCH INTERESTED

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001202    A2. R watched programs about campaign
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   A2.

       Did you watch any programs about the campaign on
       television?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO           --> SKIP TO A3

       8. DK           --> SKIP TO A3
       9. RF           --> SKIP TO A3
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001203    A2a. How many programs R watched about campaign
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   A2a.

   IF R WATCHED PROGRAMS ABOUT CAMPAIGN:

       Would you say you watched a good many, several, or just
       one or two?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GOOD MANY
       3. SEVERAL
       5. JUST ONE OR TWO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in A2

==============================
M001204    A3. Does R ever discuss politics
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   A3.

       Do you ever discuss politics with your family or friends?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO           --> SKIP TO A4

       8. DK           --> SKIP TO A4
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001205    A3a. How often does R discuss politics
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   A3a.

   IF R DISCUSSES POLITICS:

       How many days in the past week did you talk about
       politics with family or friends?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1-7

       96. NONE (NO DAYS)
       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9 in A3; no Post interview

==============================
M001206    A4. Does R recall names of House candidates
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   A4.

   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:

       Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for
       Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in
       Washington -- who ran in the November election from this
       district?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES, REMEMBER
       5. NO, DON'T REMEMBER  --> SKIP TO B1

       8. DK                  --> SKIP TO B1
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; Washington D.C.

==============================
M001207    A4a1. Hse name recall 1 - cand code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   A4a1.

   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES:

       Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for
       Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in
       Washington -- who ran in the November election from this
       district?
       Who were they?

       1ST RECALLED NAME - CANDIDATE CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANY OTHERS?]
       ** codes 30,38,39 used only if name appears on candidate
       list (if name not on candidate list, code 97 is used)

       30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent **
       31. Democratic candidate in open House race
       32. Republican candidate in open House race
       33. Democratic House incumbent
       34. Republican House incumbent
       35. Democratic House challenger
       36. Republican House challenger
       38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent **
       39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent
       97. Name not on candidate list for this race

       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; Inap, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.;
           no Post interview

==============================
M001208    A4b1. Hse party recall 1
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   A4b1.

   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES:

       Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for
       Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in
       Washington -- who ran in the November election from this
       district?
       Who were they?
       What is <NAME'S> party?

       1ST RECALLED NAME - RECALLED PARTY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. DEMOCRAT
       5. REPUBLICAN
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY)

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R says he/she does not recall names; Washington D.C.;
          no Post interview

==============================
M001209    A4(1)x1. Actual party of recall 1
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   A4(1)x1.

   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES:

       Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for
       Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in
       Washington -- who ran in the November election from this
       district?
       Who were they?

       1ST RECALLED NAME - ACTUAL PARTY OF CANDIDATE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Democrat
       5. Republican
       7. Other

       0. INAP, 00,97,98 in A4a1

==============================
M001210    A4(2)x2. Accuracy of recall 1
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   A4(2)x2.

   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES:

       Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for
       Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in
       Washington -- who ran in the November election from this
       district?
       Who were they?
       What is <NAME'S> party?

       1ST RECALLED NAME - ACCURACY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from A4a1 and A4b1.

       1.  Valid candidate name given and correct party
           associated with name
       2.  Valid candidate name given but incorrect party
           associated with name
       3.  Valid candidate name given, DK or NA for party
           associated with name
       4.  Invalid candidate name given with any mention of
           party associated with name
       5.  Invalid candidate name given with DK or NA for party
           associated with name
       6.  No candidate name given (DK or NA) -- any party
           mention
       7.  No candidate name given (DK) -- DK or NA for party

       9.  NA/RF for candidate name and NA/RF for party mention
       0.  Inap, 5,8,9,0 in A4

==============================
M001211    A4a2. Hse name recall 2 - cand code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   A4a2.

   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES:

       Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for
       Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in
       Washington -- who ran in the November election from this
       district?
       Who were they?

       2nd RECALLED NAME - CANDIDATE CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANY OTHERS?]
       ** codes 30,38,39 used only if name appears on candidate
       list (if name not on candidate list, code 97 is used)

       30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent **
       31. Democratic candidate in open House race
       32. Republican candidate in open House race
       33. Democratic House incumbent
       34. Republican House incumbent
       35. Democratic House challenger
       36. Republican House challenger
       38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent **
       39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent
       97. Name not on candidate list for this race

       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; Inap, no Post interview; R says he/she does not recall names;
           Washington D.C.; no further mention

==============================
M001212    A4b2. Hse party recall 2
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   A4b2.

   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES:

       Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for
       Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in
       Washington -- who ran in the November election from this
       district?
       Who were they?
       What is <NAME'S> party?

       2nd RECALLED NAME - RECALLED PARTY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. DEMOCRAT
       5. REPUBLICAN
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY)

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; R says he/she does not recall names;
          Washington D.C.; no further mention

==============================
M001213    A4(2)x1. Actual party of recall 2
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   A4(2)x1.

   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES:

       Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for
       Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in
       Washington -- who ran in the November election from this
       district?
       Who were they?

       2nd RECALLED NAME - ACTUAL PARTY OF CANDIDATE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Democrat
       5. Republican
       7. Other

       0. INAP, 00,97,98 in A4a2

==============================
M001214    A4(2)x2. Accuracy of recall 2
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   A4(2)x2.

   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES:

       Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for
       Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in
       Washington -- who ran in the November election from this
       district?
       Who were they?
       What is <NAME'S> party?

       2nd RECALLED NAME - ACCCURACY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from A4a2 and A4b2.

       1.  Valid candidate name given and correct party
           associated with name
       2.  Valid candidate name given but incorrect party
           associated with name
       3.  Valid candidate name given, DK or NA for party
           associated with name
       4.  Invalid candidate name given with any mention of
           party associated with name
       5.  Invalid candidate name given with DK or NA for party
           associated with name
       6.  No candidate name given (DK or NA) -- any party
           mention
       7.  No candidate name given (DK) -- DK or NA for party

       9.  NA for candidate name and NA for party mention
       0.  Inap, 5,8,9,0 in A4; no further mention

==============================
M001215    A4a3. Hse name recall 3 - cand code
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   A4a3.

   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES:

       Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for
       Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in
       Washington -- who ran in the November election from this
       district?
       Who were they?

       3RD RECALLED NAME - CANDIDATE CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANY OTHERS?]
       ** codes 30,38,39 used only if name appears on candidate
       list (if name not on candidate list, code 97 is used)

       30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent **
       31. Democratic candidate in open House race
       32. Republican candidate in open House race
       33. Democratic House incumbent
       34. Republican House incumbent
       35. Democratic House challenger
       36. Republican House challenger
       38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent **
       39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent
       97. Name not on candidate list for this race
       98. DK

       00. NA; Inap, no Post interview; R says he/she does not recall names;
           Washington D.C.; no further mention

==============================
M001216    A4b3. Hse party recall 3
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   A4b3.

   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES:

       Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for
       Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in
       Washington -- who ran in the November election from this
       district?
       Who were they?
       What is <NAME'S> party?

       3RD RECALLED NAME - RECALLED PARTY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. DEMOCRAT
       5. REPUBLICAN
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY)

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; R says he/she does not recall names;
          Washington D.C.; no further mention

==============================
M001217    A4(3)x1. Actual party of recall 3
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   A4(3)x1.

   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES:

       Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for
       Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in
       Washington -- who ran in the November election from this
       district?
       Who were they?

       3RD RECALLED NAME - ACTUAL PARTY OF CANDIDATE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. Democrat
       5. Republican
       7. Other

       0. INAP, 00,97,98 in A4a3

==============================
M001218    A4(3)x2. Accuracy of recall 3
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   A4(3)x2.

   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF R SAYS HE/SHE RECALLS NAMES OF HOUSE CANDIDATES:

       Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for
       Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in
       Washington -- who ran in the November election from this
       district?
       Who were they?
       What is <NAME'S> party?

       3RD RECALLED NAME - ACCURACY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from A4a3 and A4b3.

       1.  Valid candidate name given and correct party
           associated with name
       2.  Valid candidate name given but incorrect party
           associated with name
       3.  Valid candidate name given, DK or NA for party
           associated with name
       4.  Invalid candidate name given with any mention of
           party associated with name
       5.  Invalid candidate name given with DK or NA for party
           associated with name
       6.  No candidate name given (DK or NA) -- any party
           mention
       7.  No candidate name given (DK) -- DK or NA for party

       9.  NA for candidate name and NA for party mention
       0.  Inap, 5,8,9,0 in A4; no further mention

==============================
M001219    B1. Party talked to R about campaign
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B1.

       As you know, the political parties try to talk to as
       many people as they can to get them to vote for their
       candidate.
       Did anyone from one of the political parties call you up
       or come around and talk to you about the campaign this
       year?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO     --> SKIP TO B1b

       8. DK     --> SKIP TO B1b
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001220    B1a. Party that spoke to R about campgn
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B1a.

   IF SOMEONE FROM PARTY SPOKE TO R ABOUT CAMPAIGN:

       Which party was that?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. DEMOCRATS
       5. REPUBLICANS
       6. BOTH
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY)

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in B1

==============================
M001221    B1b. Anyone else talk to R about cands
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B1b.

       Other than someone from the two major parties, did
       anyone (else) call you up or come around and talk to
       you about supporting specific candidates in this last
       election?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview


==============================
M001222    B1c. Party send R mail about campaign
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B1c.

       Did anyone from one of the political parties send you
       mail about the campaign this year?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO   --> SKIP TO B1D

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001223    B1c1. Party that sent mail about campaign
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B1c1.

   IF POLITICAL PARTY SENT MAIL:

       Which party was that?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. DEMOCRATS
       5. REPUBLICANS
       6. BOTH
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY)

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in B1c

==============================
M001224    B1d. Anyone else send mail about campaign
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B1d.

       Other than someone from the two major parties, did
       anyone (else) send you mail about supporting specific
       candidates in this last election?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview


==============================
M001225    B2. Did R try to influence vote of others
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B2.

       We would like to find out about some of the things
       people do to help a party or a candidate win an
       election. During the campaign, did you talk to any
       people and try to show them why they should vote for or
       against one of the parties or candidates?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001226    B3. Did R display button/sticker/sign
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B3.

       Did you wear a campaign button, put a campaign sticker
       on your car, or place a sign in your window or in front
       of your house?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001227    B4. Did R go to meetings/rallies etc.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B4.

       Did you go to any political meetings, rallies, speeches,
       dinners, or things like that in support of a particular
       candidate?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001228    B5. Did R do any other campaign work
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B5.

       Did you do any (other) work for one of the parties or
       candidates?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001229    B6. Did R contribute to candidate
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B6.

       During an election year people are often asked to make a
       contribution to support campaigns. Did you give money to
       an individual candidate running for public office?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO    --> SKIP TO B7

       8. DK    --> SKIP TO B7
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001230    B6a. Party of candidate - R contribution
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B6a.

   IF R GAVE MONEY TO INDIVIDUAL CANDIDATE:

       Which party did that candidate belong to?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. DEMOCRATS
       3. REPUBLICANS
       5. OTHER (SPECIFY)
       6. BOTH DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE AND REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE (VOL)

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in B6

==============================
M001231    B7. Did R give money to party
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B7.

       Did you give money to a political party during this
       election year?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO      --> SKIP TO B8

       8. DK      --> SKIP TO B8
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001232    B7a. Party - R contribution
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B7a.

   IF R GAVE MONEY TO POLITICAL PARTY:

       To which party did you give money?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. DEMOCRATS
       3. REPUBLICANS
       5. OTHER (SPECIFY)
       6. BOTH DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in B7

==============================
M001233    B8. Did R give to group for/against candidate
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B8.

       Did you give any money to any other group that supported
       or opposed candidates?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview


==============================
M001234    B9. Did anyone talk to R about registering or voting
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B9.

       During the campaign this year, did anyone talk to you
       about registering to vote or getting out to vote?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES, SOMEONE DID
       5. NO, NO ONE DID

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001235    B10. Did moral/relig groups discuss cmpaign w/R
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B10.

       Were there any groups concerned with moral or religious
       issues that tried to encourage you to vote in a
       particular way?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES, THERE WERE GROUPS
       5. NO, NO GROUPS TRIED TO ENCOURAGE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001236    B11. Clergy provide election information
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B11.

       Was information about candidates, parties, or political
       issues made available in your place of worship before
       the election?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DK RESPONSE]

       1. YES
       5. NO, NO INFORMATION AVAILABLE
       7. NO, DON'T GO TO CHURCH [VOL]   --> C1

       8. DK                             --> C1
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001237    B12. Did clergy encourage R to vote for cand or prty
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   B12.

   IF R DID NOT INDICATE NON-ATTENDANCE IN B11:

       Did the clergy or other church leaders at your place of
       worship encourage you to vote for a particular candidate
       or party?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO      --> SKIP TO  C1

       8. DK      --> SKIP TO C1
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 7, 8, 9, 0 in B11

==============================
M001238    B12a1. Clergy endorsement 1
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   B12a1.

   IF CLERGY/CHURCH ENDORSED CANDIDATE/PARTY:

       Which candidate?

       MENTION 1 - CANDIDATE CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [IF R SAYS CAN'T REMEMBER CANDIDATE NAME, PROBE: WHICH
       ELECTION OR WHAT OFFICE? ANY OTHERS?]

       PRESIDENT:
       01. Democratic Presidential candidate (2000: Gore)
       02. Republican Presidential candidate (2000: GW Bush)
       03. Independent/3rd party Presidential candidate (2000:Buchanan,Nader)
       05. Anti-Democratic Presidential candidate (2000: Anti-Gore)
       06. Anti-Republican Presidential candidate (2000: Anti-Bush)
       SENATE:
       11. Democratic Senate candidate in state without incumbent
       12. Republican Senate candidate in state without incumbent
       13. Democratic Senate incumbent candidate
       14. Republican Senate incumbent candidate
       15. Republican Senate challenger candidate
       16. Republican Senate challenger candidate
       HOUSE:
       31. Democratic House candidate in district without incumbent
       32. Republican House candidate in district without incumbent
       33. Democratic House incumbent candidate
       34. Republican House incumbent candidate
       35. Democratic House challenger candidate
       36. Republican House challenger candidate
       OTHER - PARTY-SPECIFIC:
       71. Democratic Candidate(s)--NA which office
       72. Republican Candidate(s)--NA which office
       73. Other Democratic Candidate--any office level
       74. Other Republican Candidate--any office level
       80. Other independent or minor party candidate--any office level
       81. Democratic Party
       82. Republican Party
       85. Anti-'Democrats'; against any Democratic cand exc.Presidential
       86. Anti-'Republicans'; against any Republican cand exc. Presidential
       89. Other party
       OTHER - NOT PARTY SPECIFIC:
       90. Vote on particular issue
       91. 'Just to vote'
       94. Nonpartisan/judicial candidate
       95. Other candidate(s) for state/local offices (office level given
           but party NA)
       96. Other groups or individuals which are neither parties nor
           organized supporters of specific candidates
       97. Candidate name given but party and office level NA (low priority)

       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in B12

==============================
M001239    B12a2. Clergy endorsement 2
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   B12a2.

   IF CLERGY/CHURCH ENDORSED CANDIDATE/PARTY:

       Which candidate?

       MENTION 2 - CANDIDATE CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [IF R SAYS CAN'T REMEMBER CANDIDATE NAME, PROBE: WHICH
       ELECTION OR WHAT OFFICE? ANY OTHERS?]

       PRESIDENT:
       01. Democratic Presidential candidate (2000: Gore)
       02. Republican Presidential candidate (2000: GW Bush)
       03. Independent/3rd party Presidential candidate (2000:Buchanan,Nader)
       05. Anti-Democratic Presidential candidate (2000: Anti-Gore)
       06. Anti-Republican Presidential candidate (2000: Anti-Bush)
       SENATE:
       11. Democratic Senate candidate in state without incumbent
       12. Republican Senate candidate in state without incumbent
       13. Democratic Senate incumbent candidate
       14. Republican Senate incumbent candidate
       15. Republican Senate challenger candidate
       16. Republican Senate challenger candidate
       HOUSE:
       31. Democratic House candidate in district without incumbent
       32. Republican House candidate in district without incumbent
       33. Democratic House incumbent candidate
       34. Republican House incumbent candidate
       35. Democratic House challenger candidate
       36. Republican House challenger candidate
       OTHER - PARTY-SPECIFIC:
       71. Democratic Candidate(s)--NA which office
       72. Republican Candidate(s)--NA which office
       73. Other Democratic Candidate--any office level
       74. Other Republican Candidate--any office level
       80. Other independent or minor party candidate--any office level
       81. Democratic Party
       82. Republican Party
       85. Anti-'Democrats'; against any Democratic cand exc.Presidential
       86. Anti-'Republicans'; against any Republican cand exc. Presidential
       89. Other party
       OTHER - NOT PARTY SPECIFIC:
       90. Vote on particular issue
       91. 'Just to vote'
       94. Nonpartisan/judicial candidate
       95. Other candidate(s) for state/local offices (office level given
           but party NA)
       96. Other groups or individuals which are neither parties nor
           organized supporters of specific candidates
       97. Candidate name given but party and office level NA (low priority)

       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in B12; no further mention

==============================
M001240    B12a3. Clergy endorsement 3
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   B12a3.

   IF CLERGY/CHURCH ENDORSED CANDIDATE/PARTY:

       Which candidate?

       MENTION 3 - CANDIDATE CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [IF R SAYS CAN'T REMEMBER CANDIDATE NAME, PROBE: WHICH
       ELECTION OR WHAT OFFICE? ANY OTHERS?]

       PRESIDENT:
       01. Democratic Presidential candidate (2000: Gore)
       02. Republican Presidential candidate (2000: GW Bush)
       03. Independent/3rd party Presidential candidate (2000:Buchanan,Nader)
       05. Anti-Democratic Presidential candidate (2000: Anti-Gore)
       06. Anti-Republican Presidential candidate (2000: Anti-Bush)
       SENATE:
       11. Democratic Senate candidate in state without incumbent
       12. Republican Senate candidate in state without incumbent
       13. Democratic Senate incumbent candidate
       14. Republican Senate incumbent candidate
       15. Republican Senate challenger candidate
       16. Republican Senate challenger candidate
       HOUSE:
       31. Democratic House candidate in district without incumbent
       32. Republican House candidate in district without incumbent
       33. Democratic House incumbent candidate
       34. Republican House incumbent candidate
       35. Democratic House challenger candidate
       36. Republican House challenger candidate
       OTHER - PARTY-SPECIFIC:
       71. Democratic Candidate(s)--NA which office
       72. Republican Candidate(s)--NA which office
       73. Other Democratic Candidate--any office level
       74. Other Republican Candidate--any office level
       80. Other independent or minor party candidate--any office level
       81. Democratic Party
       82. Republican Party
       85. Anti-'Democrats'; against any Democratic cand exc.Presidential
       86. Anti-'Republicans'; against any Republican cand exc. Presidential
       89. Other party
       OTHER - NOT PARTY SPECIFIC:
       90. Vote on particular issue
       91. 'Just to vote'
       94. Nonpartisan/judicial candidate
       95. Other candidate(s) for state/local offices (office level given
           but party NA)
       96. Other groups or individuals which are neither parties nor
           organized supporters of specific candidates
       97. Candidate name given but party and office level NA (low priority)

       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in B12a; no further mention

==============================
M001241    C1. Did R vote
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C1.

       In talking to people about elections, we often find that
       a lot of people were not able to vote because they
       weren't registered, they were sick, or they just didn't
       have time.
       Which of the following statements best describes you:
       One, I did not vote (in the election this November);
       Two, I thought about voting this time - but didn't;
       Three, I usually vote, but didn't this time; or
       Four, I am sure I voted?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [INTERVIEWER: PLEASE READ ALL OPTIONS]

       1. I DID NOT VOTE (IN THE ELECTION THIS NOVEMBER).
       2. I THOUGHT ABOUT VOTING THIS TIME, BUT DIDN'T.
       3. I USUALLY VOTE, BUT DIDN'T THIS TIME.
       4. I AM SURE I VOTED                             --> SKIP TO C3

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001242    C2. Was R registered
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C2.

   IF R DID NOT VOTE:

       Were you registered to vote in this election?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO                                            --> SKIP TO C9(2)
       6. VOL:  NOT REQUIRED TO REGISTER IN R'S STATE   --> SKIP TO C9(2)

       8. DK                                            --> SKIP TO C9(2)
       9. RF                                            --> SKIP TO C9(2)
       0. NA; INAP, 0, 4 in C1

==============================
M001243    C3. Registered in county of IW?
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C3.

   IF R IS REGISTERED/
   IF R VOTED:

       Your residence is located in <NAME'S> County.
       Are you registered to vote in <NAME'S> County? /
       Your residence is located in Washington D.C.
       Are you registered to vote in Washington D.C.?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES, REGISTERED IN (PRELOAD COUNTY)  --> IF C1 IS YES GO TO C4,
          /WASHINGTON D.C                          ELSE GO TO C9(1))
       5. NO, REGISTERED IN OTHER COUNTY       --> SKIP TO C3a

       8. DK  --> IF C1 IS YES GO TO C4, ELSE GO TO C9(1)
       9. RF  --> IF C1 IS YES GO TO C4, ELSE GO TO C9(1)
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; 5, 6, 8, 9 or NA in C2

==============================
M001244    C3a1. State of registration
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   C3a1.

   IF R NOT REGISTERED IN COUNTY/ IN WASHINGTON D.C.:

       In what county and state are you registered?

       STATE OF REGISTRATION
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       ICPSR state code

       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; INAP, 1, 8, 9, 0 in C3

==============================
M001244a   C3a2. County of registration (blank)
           Character

   C3a2.

   IF R NOT REGISTERED IN COUNTY/ IN WASHINGTON D.C.:

       In what county and state are you registered?

       COUNTY OF REGISTRATION (BLANKED)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This variable has been blanked to preserve the confidentiality
       of the respondent.

==============================
M001245    C4. Did R vote on election day or before
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C4.

   IF R VOTED:

       Did you vote on election day -- that is, November 7th
       2000, or did you vote at some time before this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. ELECTION DAY                --> SKIP TO C5
       5. SOME TIME BEFORE THIS       --> C4a

       8. DK                          --> SKIP TO C5
       9. RF                          --> SKIP TO C5
       0. NA; INAP, 1-3, 8, 9, 0 in C1

==============================
M001246    C4a. How long before election did R vote
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   C4a.

   IF R VOTED PRIOR TO ELECTION DAY:

       How long before November 7th did you vote?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: A FEW DAYS, A WEEK, LONGER THAN THAT?]

       01. Less than one week, 1-6 days
       02. One week; 7 days
       03. 1-2 weeks; 8-14 days
       04. 2-3 weeks; 15-21 days
       05. 3-4 weeks; 22-28 days
       06. One month; 29-31 days
       07. More than one month; 32-60 days
       11. A few days; a couple of days; several days -- NFS
       12. A few weeks; a couple of weeks; several weeks -- NFS
       91. More than a few days -- NFS
       92. More than a few weeks --NFS
       97. Other

       98. DK; not sure
       99. RF
       00. NA; INAP, 1, 8, 9, 0 in C4

==============================
M001247    C4b. Did R vote in person or absentee
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C4b.

   IF R VOTED PRIOR TO ELECTION DAY:

       Did you vote in person or by absentee ballot?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. IN PERSON                             --> SKIP TO C5
       5. ABSENTEE BALLOT                       --> SKIP TO C5
       7. R VOLUNTEERS: BY MAIL [OREGON ONLY]   --> SKIP TO C5

       8. DK                                    --> SKIP TO C5
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 8, 9, 0 in C4

==============================
M001248    C5. Did R vote for President?
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C5.

   IF R VOTED:

       How about the election for President? Did you vote for a
       candidate for President?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES, VOTED FOR PRESIDENT
       5. NO, DIDN'T VOTE FOR PRESIDENT      --> SKIP TO C9

       8. DK                                 --> SKIP TO C9
       9. RF                                 --> SKIP TO C9
       0. NA; INAP, 1-3, 8, 9, 0 in C1

==============================
M001249    C6. R vote cast for President
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C6.

   IF R VOTED FOR PRESIDENT:

       Who did you vote for?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. AL GORE                                         --> SKIP TO C6a
       3. GEORGE W. BUSH                                  --> SKIP TO C6a
       5. PAT BUCHANAN                                    --> SKIP TO C6a
       6. RALPH NADER                                     --> SKIP TO C6a
       2. HOWARD PHILLIPS - CONSTITUTION PARTY CANDIDATE  --> SKIP TO C6a
       4. HARRY BROWN - LIBERTARIAN CANDIDATE             --> SKIP TO C6a
       7. R REPORTS VOTING FOR SELF                       --> SKIP TO C6a

       8. DK                                              --> SKIP TO C9
       9. RF                                              --> SKIP TO C9
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C5

==============================
M001250    C6a. How strong R support Pres cand
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C6a.

   IF PRESIDENTIAL VOTE CAST IS NOT DK/REF:

       Would you say that your preference for (IF NAME GIVEN:
       <candidate name>) / (IF OTHER SPECIFY: this candidate)
       was strong or not strong?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONG
       5. NOT STRONG

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in C6

==============================
M001251    C7. Timing of Pres vote decision
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   C7.

   IF PRESIDENTIAL VOTE CAST IS NOT DK/REF:

       How long before the election did you decide that you
       were going to vote the way you did?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE IF NECESSARY "WOULD THAT HAVE BEEN A FEW DAYS BEFORE
       THE ELECTION, A WEEK, OR LONGER THAN THAT?]

       01. Knew all along/from the first; always vote for the same party;
           before the convention/nomination (no mention of Gore/Bush/
           Buchanan/Nader); before the primaries; 9 months or more
       02. Before the convention because of Gore's/ Bush's/ Buchanan's/
           Nader's candidacy; as soon as Gore/Bush/Buchanan/Nader said he
           would run; "months before"; "early on"; "long time/quite a bit
           before the election"
       03. At the time of the Republican convention/ when Bush was nominated;
           just after the Republican convention; 3 months; July; "a few
           months";"2-3 months"
       04. During the Democratic convention when Gore was nominated; just
           after the Democratic convention; 4 months; August
       05. After the convention(s); during the campaign (NFS); 2 months; "a
           couple of months"; September
       06. Five to seven weeks before the election
       07. One month; three weeks; October; after the Presidential debates
       08. About two weeks before the election; "ten days"
       09. In the last few days of the campaign; the last part of it
       10. On election day
       11. During/after the primaries (not codeable in 02); "several
           months"; 5-8 months
       12. After the vice-presidential debate
       97. Other

       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in C6

==============================
M001252a   C8(1). If R cld have cast more than one vote -1st
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   C8(1).

   IF PRESIDENTIAL VOTE CAST IS NOT DK/REF:

       If you could have cast more than one vote in the
       Presidential election this (past) November, is there any
       other candidate you would have found acceptable and have
       voted for?

       MENTION 1
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1.  AL GORE
       3.  GEORGE W BUSH
       5.  PAT BUCHANAN
       6.  RALPH NADER
       7.  OTHER (SPECIFY)
       8.  NO OTHER CANDIDATE (VOL)

       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in C6

==============================
M001252b   C8(2). If R cld have cast more than one vote -2nd
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   C8(2).

   IF PRESIDENTIAL VOTE CAST IS NOT DK/REF:

       If you could have cast more than one vote in the
       Presidential election this (past) November, is there any
       other candidate you would have found acceptable and have
       voted for?

       MENTION 2
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1.  AL GORE
       3.  GEORGE W BUSH
       5.  PAT BUCHANAN
       6.  RALPH NADER
       7.  OTHER (SPECIFY)
       8.  NO OTHER CANDIDATE (VOL)

       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in C6; no further mention

==============================
M001252c   C8(3). If R cld have cast more than one vote -3rd
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   C8(3).

   IF PRESIDENTIAL VOTE CAST IS NOT DK/REF:

       If you could have cast more than one vote in the
       Presidential election this (past) November, is there any
       other candidate you would have found acceptable and have
       voted for?

       MENTION 3
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1.  AL GORE
       3.  GEORGE W BUSH
       5.  PAT BUCHANAN
       6.  RALPH NADER
       7.  OTHER (SPECIFY)
       8.  NO OTHER CANDIDATE (VOL)

       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in C6; no further mention

==============================
M001253a   C9(1). Hse ckpt: vote in/out county
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   C9(1).

       CHECKPOINT: VOTE IN COUNTY OF INTERIVEW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. R VOTED WITHIN COUNTY OF INTERVIEW
       2. R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF INTERVIEW
       3. R DID NOT VOTE (AND DK IF VOTED)
       4. WASHINGTON DC

       9. R VOTED - NA WHERE VOTED (TREAT AS WITHIN COUNTY)
       0. INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001253b   C9(2). Hse ckpt: order of Dem/Rep names
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   C9(2).

   IF R VOTED:

       CHECKPOINT: RANDOM ORDER OF DEMOCRATIC/REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE NAMES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This describes, for House vote and nonvoter House preference,
       the order in which names appeared on the FTF
       ballot card or the order in which names were read in
       Telephone administration.
       NOTE: in VT01 and VA05, the independent incumbent
       candidate was randomized, in the FTF ballot card and in
       the order of names in the Telephone wording, as if the
       candidate were a major party candidate:  VT01 candidate
       Bernie Sanders was randomized as if a Democratic name,
       and in VA05 Virgil Goode Jr. was randomized as if a
       Republican name (no Democratic name was preloaded for VT01
       and no Republican name was preloaded for VA05).
       All other ind/3rd-party candidate names appearing on the
       FTF ballot card or included in Telephone wording appear
       last in order.
       NOTE: ind/3rd-party candidate names are included in
       response codes/question wording whenever they have been
       preloaded;  ind/3rd-party names are preloaded only for
       candidates who have been identified as especially viable.
       See note concerning randomization failure in P000262.

       1. Democratic names first (FTF: BLUE BALLOT CARD)
       2. Republican names first (FTF: GOLD BALLOT CARD)

       0. INAP, 1-3, 8, 9, 0 in C1; Washington D.C.

==============================
M001254    C9a/C11a.T. In-county: vote for House?
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C9a/C11a.T.

   IF R VOTED:
   IF VOTED IN COUNTY OF RESIDENCE:
   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:

       FTF:
       Here is a list of candidates for the major races in this
       district. How about the election for the House of
       Representatives in Washington. Did you vote for a
       candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives?

       TELEPHONE:
       How about the election for the House of Representatives
       in Washington. Did you vote for a candidate for the U.S.
       House of Representatives?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       FTF: [SHOW <BLUE/GOLD> BALLOT CARD]

       1. YES, VOTED FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
       5. NO, DIDN'T VOTE FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 2, 3, 4, 9, 0 in C9(1)

==============================
M001255    C9b(1)/C11bx1.T. In-county House vote
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C9b(1)/C11bx1.T.

   IF R VOTED:
   IF VOTED IN COUNTY OF RESIDENCE:
   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF R VOTED FOR CONGRESS:

       FTF:
       Who did you vote for?

       TELEPHONE:
       Did you vote for
       (the Democrat, <NAME>, or)
       (the Republican, <NAME>)
       (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE: or the <PARTY> candidate,
       <NAME>?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See C9(2) for the order in which names were presented on
       the ballot card/ read over the phone.
       The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present
       on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that
       candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into
       the instrument).
       Code 7 includes cases where R volunteered that he/she
       voted "a straight ticket" but no candidate for R's party
       ran; it also includes cases where R insists that he/she
       voted for a specific party's candidate but no candidate
       from that party ran in R's district.
       CODE 6 NOTE:  In 8 cases where R resided in county of interview,
       R did not select one of the names from the district of the
       interview location but provided a name which was later
       identified as belonging to another congressional district.
       These cases have been coded 6 in P001255 but the candidate code
       and party identification according to the other district are
       coded in P001256 and P001257.  In Pre-Sample.7 (P000085) and
       Pre-Sample.8 (P000086) these cases are coded as a vote outside
       CD of interview.
       TELEPHONE:  The order in which the names of the major
       party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)].
       If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate
       list, his/her name was read last.

       1. <PRELOAD DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE NAME>
       3. <PRELOAD IND/3RD-PARTY INCUMBENT NAME
       5. <PRELOAD REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE NAME
       6. R PROVIDED NAME FROM ANOTHER DISTRICT
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY)

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C9a/C11a.T

==============================
M001256    C9b/(2)/C11bx2.T. In-Hse vote-cand code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   C9b(2)/C11bx2.T.

   IF R VOTED:
   IF VOTED IN COUNTY OF RESIDENCE:
   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF R VOTED FOR CONGRESS:

       FTF:
       Who did you vote for?

       TELEPHONE:
       Did you vote for
       (the Democrat, <NAME>, or)
       (the Republican, <NAME>)
       (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE: or the <PARTY> candidate,
       <NAME>?)

       IN-COUNTY: HOUSE VOTE - CANDIDATE CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       ** The names of independent/3rd party candidates were
       present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only
       if that candidate's name was on the candidate list
       (preloaded into the instrument).
       TELEPHONE:  The order in which the names of the major
       party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)].
       If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate
       list, his/her name was read last.

       30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent **
       31. Democratic candidate in open House race
       32. Republican candidate in open House race
       33. Democratic House incumbent
       34. Republican House incumbent
       35. Democratic House challenger
       36. Republican House challenger
       38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent **
       39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent
       97. Name not on candidate list for this race

       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C9a/C11a.T

==============================
M001257    C9b(3)/C11bx.T. In-House vote - party
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C9b(3)/C11bx.T.

   IF R VOTED:
   IF VOTED IN COUNTY OF RESIDENCE:
   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF R VOTED FOR CONGRESS:

       FTF:
       Who did you vote for?

       TELEPHONE:
       Did you vote for
       (the Democrat, <NAME>, or)
       (the Republican, <NAME>)
       (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE: or the <PARTY> candidate,
       <NAME>?)

       IN-COUNTY: HOUSE VOTE - PARTY SUMMARY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The names of independent/3rd party candidates were
       present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only
       if that candidate's name was on the candidate list
       (preloaded into the instrument).
       TELEPHONE:  The order in which the names of the major
       party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)].
       If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate
       list, his/her name was read last.

       1. Democratic
       2. Republican
       3. Other (3rd party or independent candidate)
       7. Name not on candidate list for this race

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C9a/C11a.T

==============================
M001258    C10a/C12a.T. Out-county: vote for House?
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C10a/C12a.T.

   IF R VOTED:
   IF VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE:
   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:

       How about the election for the House of Representatives
       in Washington. Did you vote for a candidate for the U.S.
       House of Representatives?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       FTF: [DO NOT SHOW BALLOT CARD]

       1. YES, VOTED FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
       5. NO, DIDN'T VOTE FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
       7. R VOLUNTEERS: NO RACE IN STATE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 4, 9, 0 in C9(1)

==============================
M001259    C10b1/C12b1.T. Out- House vote - cand code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   C10b1/C12b1.T.

   IF R VOTED:
   IF VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE:
   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF R VOTED FOR CONGRESS:

       Who did you vote for?
       Which party was that?

       OUT-OF-COUNTY:  HOUSE VOTE - CANDIDATE CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       If R gave the name of a candidate from within his district
       of residence, it has been coded accordingly (codes
       30,31,32,33,34,35,36,39).

       VOTED OUTSIDE DISTRICT OF IW:
          DISTRICT WITH NO RUNNING INCUMBENT: (VOTE VAR ONLY)
       81. Democratic candidate
       82. Republican candidate
          DISTRICT WITH RUNNING INCUMBENT:
       83. Democratic incumbent
       84. Republican incumbent
       85. Democratic challenger
       86. Republican challenger
          ALL DISTRICTS:
       80. Third party or independent candidate **
       91. Democrat--no name given
       92. Republican--no name given
       97. Name not on candidate list (name unidentified with party or
           candidate or CD not identified)

       98. DK                       --> C14a
       99. RF
       00. NA; INAP, 5, 7, 8, 9, 0 in C10a/C12a.T

==============================
M001260    C10b2/C12b2.T. Out- House vote - party
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C10b2/C12b2.T.

   IF R VOTED:
   IF REGISTERED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE:
   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF R VOTED FOR CONGRESS:

       Who did you vote for?
       Which party was that?

       OUT-OF-COUNTY:  HOUSE VOTE - PARTY SUMMARY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. DEMOCRAT
       2. REPUBLICAN
       3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate)
       7. Name not on candidate list for this race

       8. DK                     --> C14a
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 7, 8, 9, 0 in C10a/C12a.T

==============================
M001261    C10c/C12c.T. Out- party ment of Hse vote
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C10c/C12c.T.

   IF R VOTED:
   IF REGISTERED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE:
   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF R VOTED FOR CONGRESS:

       Which party was that?

       PARTY ASSOCIATED BY RESPONDENT WITH HOUSE VOTE (OUT OF COUNTY)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. DEMOCRAT
       5. REPUBLICAN
       7. OTHER: SPECIFY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 7, 8, 9, 0 in C10a/C12a.T

==============================
M001262    C10x1/C12x1.T. Summ- Hose vote cand code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   C10x1/C12x1.T.

   IF R VOTED:
   IF VOTED IN/OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE:
   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF R VOTED FOR CONGRESS:

       IN-COUNTY FTF:
       Who did you vote for?
       OUT-OF-COUNTY FTF AND TELEPHONE:
       Who did you vote for?
       Which party was that?

       IN-COUNTY TELEPHONE:
       Did you vote for
       (the Democrat, <NAME>, or)
       (the Republican, <NAME>)
       (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE: or the <PARTY> candidate,
       <NAME>?)

       SUMMARY: HOUSE VOTE - CANDIDATE CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from C9b(2)/C11bx2.T and C10b1/C12b1.T.
       ** IN-COUNTY: The names of independent/3rd party candidates were
       present on the ballot card or read to the respondent only
       if that candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into
       the instrument).
       IN-COUNTY TELEPHONE:  The order in which the names of the major
       party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)].
       If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate
       list, his/her name was read last.

       30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent **
       31. Democratic candidate in open House race
       32. Republican candidate in open House race
       33. Democratic House incumbent
       34. Republican House incumbent
       35. Democratic House challenger
       36. Republican House challenger
       38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent **
       39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent
       97. Name not on candidate list for this race
       VOTED OUTSIDE DISTRICT OF IW (CODES 81-92):
         DISTRICT WITH NO RUNNING INCUMBENT:
       81. Democratic candidate
       82. Republican candidate
         DISTRICT WITH RUNNING INCUMBENT:
       83. Democratic incumbent
       84. Republican incumbent
       85. Democratic challenger
       86. Republican challenger
         ALL OUT OUT-OF-COUNTY DISTRICTS:
       80. Third party or independent candidate **
       91. Democrat--no name given
       92. Republican--no name given
       97. Name not on candidate list

       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; INAP, 3,4,0 in C9(1); 5,8,9,NA in C9a/C11a.T or 5,7,8,9, NA
           in C10a/C12a.T

==============================
M001263    C10x2/C12x2.T. Summary- House vote party
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C10x2/C12x2.T.

   IF R VOTED:
   IF VOTED IN/OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE:
   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF R VOTED FOR CONGRESS:

       IN-COUNTY FTF:
       Who did you vote for?
       OUT-OF-COUNTY FTF AND TELEPHONE:
       Who did you vote for?
       Which party was that?

       IN-COUNTY TELEPHONE:
       Did you vote for
       (the Democrat, <NAME>, or)
       (the Republican, <NAME>)
       (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE: or the <PARTY> candidate,
       <NAME>?)

       SUMMARY: HOUSE VOTE - PARTY SUMMARY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from C10x1/C12x1.T

       1. Democratic
       2. Republican
       3. Other (independent and 3rd party)
       7. Name not on candidate list for this race

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001264    C13(1). Sen ckpt: vote in/out county
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   C13(1).

   IF R VOTED:

       SENATE CHECKPOINT: RACE IN STATE OF INTERVIEW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       For identification of states without races, see the Senate type
       race variable (P000204).

       1. Race in state of interview
       2. No race in state of inerview

==============================
M001265    C13(2). Sen ckpt: order of Dem/Rep names
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   C13(2).

       SENATE CHECKPOINT: R VOTED IN/OUTSIDE COUNTY OF INTERVIEW
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. R VOTED WITHIN COUNTY OF INTERVIEW
       2. R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF INTERVIEW
       3. R DID NOT VOTE/DK IF VOTED
       4. WASHINGTON DC

       9. R VOTED - NA WHERE VOTED (TREATED AS WITHIN COUNTY)
       0. INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001266    C13a/C15a.T. In-county: vote for Senate?
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C13a/C15a.T.

   IF R VOTED:
   IF SENATE ELECTION IN STATE:
   IF R VOTED IN COUNTY OF RESIDENCE:

       How about the election for the United States Senate?
       Did you vote for a candidate for the U.S. Senate?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       FTF: [SHOW <BLUE/GOLD> BALLOT CARD]

       1. YES, VOTED FOR SENATE
       5. NO, DIDN'T VOTE FOR SENATE

       8. DK                            --> D1
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 2 in C13(1) and/or 2, 3, 4, 0 in C13(2)

==============================
M001267    C13b1/C15bx1.T. In county - Senate vote
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C13b1/C15bx1.T.

   IF R VOTED:
   IF SENATE ELECTION IN STATE:
   IF R VOTED IN COUNTY OF RESIDENCE:
   IF VOTED FOR SENATE:

       FTF:
       Who did you vote for?

       TELEPHONE:
       Did you vote for
       (the Democrat, <NAME>, or)
       (the Republican, <NAME>)
       (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.1: [or] the <PARTY>
       candidate,<NAME>?)
       (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.2: or the <PARTY>
       candidate,<NAME>?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See C9(2) for the order in which names were presented on the
       ballot card/ read over the phone.
       The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on
       the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that
       candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the
       instrument).
       Code 7 includes cases where R volunteered that he/she
       voted "a straight ticket" but no candidate for R's party
       ran; it also includes cases where R insists that he/she
       voted for a specific party's candidate but no candidate
       from that party ran in R's district.
       MISSOURI NOTE:  In 4 cases in Missouri (IDs 581,1071,1072,1507)
       Rs voted for Mel Carnihan (deceased).  Because this name was
       not included in the preload, these responses were coded 7.
       TELEPHONE:  The order in which the names of the major party
       candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)].
       If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list,
       his/her name was read last.

       1. <PRELOAD DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE NAME>     --> D1
       3. <PRELOAD 1ST IND/3RD-PARTY CAND NAME>   --> D1
       4. <PRELOAD 2ND IND/3RD-PARTY CAND NAME>   --> D1
       5. <PRELOAD REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE NAME      --> D1
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY)                         --> D1

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C13a/C15a.T

==============================
M001268    C13b2/C15bx2.T. In county -Sen vote - cand code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   C13b2/C15bx2.T.

   IF R VOTED:
   IF SENATE ELECTION IN STATE:
   IF R VOTED IN COUNTY OF RESIDENCE:
   IF VOTED FOR SENATE:

       FTF:
       Who did you vote for?

       TELEPHONE:
       Did you vote for
       (the Democrat, <NAME>, or)
       (the Republican, <NAME>)
       (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.1: [or] the <PARTY>
       candidate,<NAME>?)
       (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.2: or the <PARTY>
       candidate,<NAME>?)

       IN-COUNTY: SENATE VOTE -  CANDIDATE CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       ** The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on
       the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that
       candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the
       instrument).
       TELEPHONE:  The order in which the names of the major party
       candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)].
       If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list,
       his/her name was read last.

       08. Third party or independent Senate candidate --2nd nonincumbent**
       09. Third party or independent Senate candidate --incumbent
       10. Third party or independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent**
       11. Democratic candidate in open Senate race
       12. Republican candidate in open Senate race
       13. Democratic Senate incumbent
       14. Republican Senate incumbent
       15. Democratic Senate challenger
       16. Republican Senate challenger
       97. Name not on candidate list for this race

       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C13a/C15a.T

==============================
M001269    C13b3/C15bx3.T. In county- Sen vote - party
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C13b3/C15bx3.T.

   IF R VOTED:
   IF SENATE ELECTION IN STATE:
   IF R VOTED IN COUNTY OF RESIDENCE:
   IF VOTED FOR SENATE:

       FTF:
       Who did you vote for?

       TELEPHONE:
       Did you vote for
       (the Democrat, <NAME>, or)
       (the Republican, <NAME>)
       (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.1: [or] the <PARTY>
       candidate,<NAME>?)
       (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.2: or the <PARTY>
       candidate,<NAME>?)

       IN-COUNTY: SENATE VOTE -  PARTY SUMMARY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on
       the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that
       candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the
       instrument).
       TELEPHONE:  The order in which the names of the major party
       candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)].
       If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list,
       his/her name was read last.

       1. DEMOCRAT
       2. REPUBLICAN
       3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate)
       7. Name not on candidate list for this race

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C13a/C15a.T

==============================
M001270    C14a/C16a.T. Out-county:vote for Senate?
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C14a/C16a.T.

   IF R VOTED:
   IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE:

       How about the election for the United States Senate?
       Did you vote for a candidate for the U.S. Senate?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       FTF: [DO NOT SHOW BALLOT CARD]

       1. YES, VOTED FOR SENATE
       5. NO, DIDN'T VOTE FOR SENATE              --> D1
       7. R VOLUNTEERS:  NO RACE IN STATE OF VOTE --> D1

       8. DK                                      --> D1
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 4, 9, 0 in C13(2)

==============================
M001271    C14b1/C16b1.T. Out of county - Sen vote -cand code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   C14b1/C16b1.T.

   IF R VOTED:
   IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE:
   IF R VOTED FOR SENATE:

       Who did you vote for?
       Which party was that?

       OUT-OF COUNTY: SENATE VOTE -  CANDIDATE CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       If R gave the name of a candidate from within his district
       of residence, it has been coded accordingly (codes
       08,10,11,12,13,14,15,16).

       CODES 80-92: IF R VOTED OUTSIDE DISTRICT OF IW
       80. Third party or independent Senate candidate
       81. Democratic candidate in open Senate race
       82. Republican candidate in open Senate race
       83. Democratic Senate incumbent
       84. Republican Senate incumbent
       85. Democratic Senate challenger
       86. Republican Senate challenger
       91. Democrat - no name given
       92. Republican - no name given
       97. Name given not on candidate list for this race (name not
           identified with candidate or party, or CD not identified)

       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; INAP, 5, 7, 8, 9, 0 in C14a/C16a.T

==============================
M001272    C14b2/C16b2.T. Out of county - Senate vote party
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C14b2/C16b2.T.

   IF R VOTED:
   IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE:
   IF R VOTED FOR SENATE:

       Who did you vote for?
       Which party was that?

       OUT-OF COUNTY: SENATE VOTE -  PARTY SUMMARY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. DEMOCRAT
       2. REPUBLICAN
       3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate)
       7. Name not on candidate list for this race

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 7, 8, 9, 0 in C14a/C16a.T

==============================
M001273    C14c/C16c.T. Out of county- party of Sen vote
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C14c/C16c.T.

   IF R VOTED:
   IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE:
   IF R VOTED FOR SENATE:

       Which party was that?

       PARTY ASSOCIATED BY RESPONDENT WITH SENATE VOTE (OUT OF COUNTY)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. DEMOCRAT        --> D1
       5. REPUBLICAN      --> D1
       7. OTHER: SPECIFY: --> D1

       8. DK              --> D1
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 7, 8, 9, 0 in C14a/C16a.T

==============================
M001274    C14x1/C16x1.T. Summ- Sen vote - cand code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   C14x1/C16x1.T.

   IF R VOTED:
   IF VOTED IN/OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE:
   IF R VOTED FOR SENATE:

       SUMMARY: SENATE VOTE - CANDIDATE CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       **IN-COUNTY: The names of independent/3rd party candidates were
       present on  the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that
       candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the
       instrument).
       IN-COUNTY TELEPHONE:  The order in which the names of the major party
       candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)].
       If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list,
       his/her name was read last.

       08. Third party or independent Senate candidate --2nd nonincumbent**
       09. Third party or independent Senate candidate --incumbent
       10. Third party or independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent**
       11. Democratic candidate in open Senate race
       12. Republican candidate in open Senate race
       13. Democratic Senate incumbent
       14. Republican Senate incumbent
       15. Democratic Senate challenger
       16. Republican Senate challenger
       CODES 80-92: IF R VOTED OUTSIDE DISTRICT OF IW
       80. Third party or independent Senate candidate
       81. Democratic candidate in open Senate race
       82. Republican candidate in open Senate race
       83. Democratic Senate incumbent
       84. Republican Senate incumbent
       85. Democratic Senate challenger
       86. Republican Senate challenger
       91. Democrat - no name given
       92. Republican - no name given
       97. Name given not on candidate list for this race; 'outside' name
           not identified with candidate or party, or 'outside' CD not
           identified)

       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; INAP, 3,4,0 in C13(2); 1,9 in C13(2) and 2 in C13(1);
           5,8,9,NA in C13a/C15a.T or 5,7,8,9,NA in C14a/C16a.T

==============================
M001275    C14x2/C16x2.T. Summary- Sen vote - party
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   C14x2/C16x2.T.

   IF R VOTED:
   IF VOTED IN/OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE:
   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF R VOTED FOR SENATE:

       SUMMARY: SENATE VOTE - PARTY SUMMARY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from C14x1/C16x1.T

       1. DEMOCRAT
       2. REPUBLICAN
       3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate)
       7. Name not on candidate list for this race

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3,4,0 in C13(2); 1,9 in C13(2) and 2 in C13(1);
           5,8,9,NA in C13a/C15a.T or 5,7,8,9,NA in C14a/C16a.T

==============================
M001276    C17. Nonvoter - prefer any Pres cand?
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C17.

   IF R DID NOT VOTE:

       How about the election for President?
       Did you prefer one of the candidates for President?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0, 4 in C1

==============================
M001277    C17a. Nonvoter- Pres cand preferred
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C17a.

   IF R DID NOT VOTE:
   IF R SAYS HE/SHE PREFERRED A CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT:

       Who did you prefer?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. AL GORE
       3. GEORGE W. BUSH
       5. PAT BUCHANAN
       6. RALPH NADER
       7. OTHER

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C17

==============================
M001278    C17b. Nonvoter-strength Pres cand pref
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C17b.

   IF R DID NOT VOTE:
   IF R SAYS HE/SHE PREFERRED A CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT:
   IF NAMED PREFERENCE IS NOT DK/RF:

       Would you say your preference for this candidate was
       strong or not strong?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. STRONG
       5. NOT STRONG

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in C17a

==============================
M001279    C18/C18.T. Nonvoter-prefer Hse cand?
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C18/C18.T.

   IF R DID NOT VOTE:
   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:

       FTF:
       Here is a list of candidates for the major races in this
       district.  How about the election for the House of
       Representatives in Washington?  Did you prefer one of the
       candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives?

       TELEPHONE:
       How about the election for the House of Representatives
       in Washington?  Did you prefer one of the candidates for
       the U.S. House of Representatives?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       FTF: [SHOW BLUE/GOLD CARD]

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 2, 4, 9, 0 in C9(1)

==============================
M001280    C18a/C18a.T. Nonvoter-Hse cand pref
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C18a/C18a.T.

   IF R DID NOT VOTE:
   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF R SAYS HE/SHE PREFERRED ONE OF THE HOUSE CANDIDATES:

       FTF:
       Which candidate did you prefer?

       TELEPHONE:
       Did you prefer
       (the Democrat, <NAME>, or)
       (the Republican, <NAME>)
       (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE: or the <PARTY> candidate,
       <NAME>?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See C9(2) for the order in which names were presented on
       the ballot card/ read over the phone.
       The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present
       on the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that
       candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into
       the instrument).
       TELEPHONE:  The order in which the names of the major
       party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)].
       If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate
       list, his/her name was read last.

       1. <preload Democratic candidate name>
       3. <preload Ind/3rd-party cand name>
       5. <preload Republican candidate name>
       7. Other - specify

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C18/C18.T

==============================
M001281    C18a1/C18a1.T.Nonvotr-Hse cand pref code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 97
           Numeric

   C18a1/C18a1.T.

   IF R DID NOT VOTE:
   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF R SAYS HE/SHE PREFERRED ONE OF THE HOUSE CANDIDATES:

       FTF:
       Which candidate did you prefer?

       TELEPHONE:
       Did you prefer
       (the Democrat, <NAME>, or)
       (the Republican, <NAME>)
       (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE: or the <PARTY> candidate,
       <NAME>?)

       NONVOTER: HOUSE PREFERENCE - CANDIDATE CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       ** The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on
       the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that
       candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the
       instrument).
       TELEPHONE:  The order in which the names of the major party
       candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)].
       If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list,
       his/her name was read last.

       30. Third party or independent House candidate --nonincumbent **
       31. Democratic candidate in open House race
       32. Republican candidate in open House race
       33. Democratic House incumbent
       34. Republican House incumbent
       35. Democratic House challenger
       36. Republican House challenger
       38. Third party or independent House candidate--2nd nonincumbent **
       39. Third party or independent House candidate--incumbent

       97. Name not on candidate list for this race
       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C18/C18.T

==============================
M001282    C18a2/C18a2.T.Nonvoter-Hse cand pref pty
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C18a2/C18a2.T.

   IF R DID NOT VOTE:
   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF R SAYS HE/SHE PREFERRED ONE OF THE HOUSE CANDIDATES:

       FTF:
       Which candidate did you prefer?

       TELEPHONE:
       Did you prefer
       (the Democrat, <NAME>, or)
       (the Republican, <NAME>)
       (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE: or the <PARTY> candidate,
       <NAME>?)

       NONVOTER: HOUSE PREFERENCE - PARTY SUMMARY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on
       the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that
       candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the
       instrument).
       TELEPHONE:  The order in which the names of the major party
       candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)].
       If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list,
       his/her name was read last.

       1. DEMOCRAT
       2. REPUBLICAN
       3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate)
       7. Name not on candidate list for this race

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C18/C18.T

==============================
M001283    C19a/C19.T. Nonvoter-pref Senate cand?
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C19a/C19.T.

   IF R DID NOT VOTE:
   IF SENATE ELECTION IN STATE:

       How about the election for the United States Senate?
       Did you prefer one of the candidates for the U.S. Senate?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       FTF: [SHOW BLUE/GOLD BALLOT CARD]

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 2 in C13(1) and/or; 1, 2, 4, 9, 0 in C13(2)

==============================
M001284    C19b/C19a.T. Nonvoter-Sen cand pref
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C19b/C19a.T.

   IF R DID NOT VOTE:
   IF SENATE ELECTION IN STATE:
   IF R SAYS HE/SHE PREFERRED A SENATE CANDIDATE:

       FTF:
       Which candidate did you prefer?

       TELEPHONE:
       Did you prefer
       (the Democrat, <NAME>, or)
       (the Republican, <NAME>)
       (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.1: [or] the <PARTY>
       candidate,<NAME>?)
       (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.2: or the <PARTY>
       candidate,<NAME>?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       See C9(2) for the order in which names were presented on the
       ballot card/ read over the phone.
       The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on
       the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that
       candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the
       instrument).
       TELEPHONE:  The order in which the names of the major
       party candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)].
       If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate
       list, his/her name was read last.

       1. <PRELOAD DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE NAME>
       3. <PRELOAD 1ST INDEPENDENT/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NAME>
       4. <PRELOAD 2ND INDEPENDENT/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NAME>
       5. <PRELOAD REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE NAME>
       7. OTHER; SPECIFY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C19a/C19.T

==============================
M001285    C19b1/C19a1.T. Nonvotr-Sen cand pref code
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 97
           Numeric

   C19b1/C19a1.T.

   IF R DID NOT VOTE:
   IF SENATE ELECTION IN STATE:
   IF R SAYS HE/SHE PREFERRED A SENATE CANDIDATE:

       FTF:
       Which candidate did you prefer?

       TELEPHONE:
       Did you prefer
       (the Democrat, <NAME>, or)
       (the Republican, <NAME>)
       (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.1: [or] the <PARTY>
       candidate,<NAME>?)
       (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.2: or the <PARTY>
       candidate,<NAME>?)

       NONVOTER: HOUSE PREFERENCE - CANDIDATE CODE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       ** The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on
       the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that
       candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the
       instrument).
       TELEPHONE:  The order in which the names of the major party
       candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)].
       If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list,
       his/her name was read last.

       08. Third party or independent Senate candidate --2nd nonincumbent**
       09. Third party or independent Senate candidate --incumbent
       10. Third party or independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent**
       11. Democratic candidate in open Senate race
       12. Republican candidate in open Senate race
       13. Democratic Senate incumbent
       14. Republican Senate incumbent
       15. Democratic Senate challenger
       16. Republican Senate challenger

       97.  Name not on candidate list for this race
       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C19a/C19.T

==============================
M001286    C19b2/C19a2.T. Nonvoter-Sen cand pref pty
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C19b2/C19a2.T.

   IF R DID NOT VOTE:
   IF SENATE ELECTION IN STATE:
   IF R SAYS HE/SHE PREFERRED A SENATE CANDIDATE:

       FTF:
       Which candidate did you prefer?

       TELEPHONE:
       Did you prefer
       (the Democrat, <NAME>, or)
       (the Republican, <NAME>)
       (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.1: [or] the <PARTY>
       candidate,<NAME>?)
       (IF IND/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE NO.2: or the <PARTY>
       candidate,<NAME>?)

       NONVOTER: HOUSE PREFERENCE - PARTY SUMMARY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The names of independent/3rd party candidates were present on
       the ballot card or read to the respondent only if that
       candidate's name was on the candidate list (preloaded into the
       instrument).
       TELEPHONE:  The order in which the names of the major party
       candidates was read was randomized [see C9(2)].
       If an independent/3rd party candidate was on the candidate list,
       his/her name was read last.

       1. DEMOCRAT
       2. REPUBLICAN
       3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate)
       7. Name not on candidate list for this race

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in C19a/C19.T

==============================
M001287    (Blank)
           Numeric

   .

       THIS VARIABLE IS BLANK
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

====================
M001288    (Blank)
           Numeric

   .

       THIS VARIABLE IS BLANK
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

====================
M001289    (Blank)
           Numeric

   .

       THIS VARIABLE IS BLANK
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

====================
M001290    (Blank)
           Numeric

   .

       THIS VARIABLE IS BLANK
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

====================
M001291    C20. How fair was November election
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   C20.

       Please continue thinking about the November election.
       In some countries, people believe their elections are
       conducted fairly.  In other countries, people believe
       that their elections are conducted unfairly.  Thinking
       of the presidential election we've just had, do you
       believe it was very fair, somewhat fair, neither fair
       nor unfair, somewhat unfair, or very unfair?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This variable was added 11/10/2000.

       1. VERY FAIR
       2. SOMEWHAT FAIR
       3. NEITHER FAIR NOR UNFAIR
       4. SOMEWHAT UNFAIR
       5. VERY UNFAIR

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; interview or portion of interview
          administered before question added

==============================
M001292    D1a/D1a.T. Thermometer Clinton
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D1a/D1a.T.

       FTF:
       (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:)
       BILL CLINTON

       TELEPHONE:
       Our first person is Bill Clinton.  Where on that feeling
       thermometer would you rate Bill Clinton?

       THERMOMETER - BILL CLINTON
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly
       administered as the 2nd-4th names.  D1e and D1f were administered
       as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered
       as the 7th-12th names.

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001293    D1b/D1b.T. Thermometer Gore
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D1b/D1b.T.

       FTF:
       (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:)
       AL GORE

       TELEPHONE:
       The next person is AL GORE. (Where on that feeling
       thermometer would you rate him/her?)

       THERMOMETER - AL GORE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly
       administered as the 2nd-4th names.  D1e and D1f were administered
       as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered
       as the 7th-12th names.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001294    D1c/D1c.T. Thermometer GW Bush
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D1c/D1c.T.

       FTF:
       (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:)
       GEORGE W. BUSH

       TELEPHONE:
       The next person is GEORGE W. BUSH. (Where on that
       feeling thermometer would you rate him/her?)

       THERMOMETER - GEORGE W. BUSH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly
       administered as the 2nd-4th names.  D1e and D1f were administered
       as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered
       as the 7th-12th names.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001295    D1d/D1d.T. Thermometer Nader
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D1d/D1d.T.

       FTF:
       (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:)
       RALPH NADER

       TELEPHONE:
       The next person is RALPH NADER. (Where on that feeling
       thermometer would you rate him/her?)

       THERMOMETER - RALPH NADER
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly
       administered as the 2nd-4th names.  D1e and D1f were administered
       as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered
       as the 7th-12th names.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001296    D1e/D1e.T. Thermometer Jesse Jackson
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D1e/D1e.T.

       FTF:
       (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:)
       JESSE JACKSON

       TELEPHONE:
       The next person is JESSE JACKSON. (Where on that feeling
       thermometer would you rate him/her?)

       THERMOMETER - JESSE JACKSON
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly
       administered as the 2nd-4th names.  D1e and D1f were administered
       as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered
       as the 7th-12th names.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001297    D1f/D1f.T. Thermometer former Pres Bush
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D1f/D1f.T.

       FTF:
       (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:)
       FORMER PRESIDENT, GEORGE BUSH

       TELEPHONE:
       The next person is FORMER PRESIDENT, GEORGE BUSH. (Where
       on that feeling thermometer would you rate him/her?)

       THERMOMETER - FORMER PRESIDENT, GEORGE BUSH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly
       administered as the 2nd-4th names.  D1e and D1f were administered
       as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered
       as the 7th-12th names.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001298    D1g/D1g.T. Thermometer Dem House cand
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D1g/D1g.T.

   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE RUNNING IN HOUSE RACE:

       FTF:
       (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:)
       <DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE>

       TELEPHONE:
       The next person is <DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE>. (Where
       on that feeling thermometer would you rate him/her?)

       THERMOMETER - <DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE>
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly
       administered as the 2nd-4th names.  D1e and D1f were administered
       as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered
       as the 7th-12th names.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Democratic House candidate; no Post interview;
            Washington DC
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001299    D1h/D1h.T. Thermometer Rep House cand
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D1h/D1h.T.

   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE RUNNING IN HOUSE RACE:

       FTF:
       (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:)
       <REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE>

       TELEPHONE:
       The next person is <REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE>. (Where
       on that feeling thermometer would you rate him/her?)

       THERMOMETER - <REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE>
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly
       administered as the 2nd-4th names.  D1e and D1f were administered
       as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered
       as the 7th-12th names.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Republican House candidate; no Post interview;
            Washington DC
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001300    D1j/D1j.T. Thermometer retiring Hse rep
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D1j/D1j.T.

   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF HOUSE INCUMBENT IS NOT RUNNING:

       FTF:
       (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:)
       <RETIRING HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE>

       TELEPHONE:
       The next person is <RETIRING HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE>.
       (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate
       him/her?)

       THERMOMETER - <RETIRING HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE>
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly
       administered as the 2nd-4th names.  D1e and D1f were administered
       as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered
       as the 7th-12th names.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, retiring House Representative; no Post interview;
            Washington DC
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001300a   D1jx. Checkpt:Hse retiree also Sen cand?
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   D1jx.

       CHECKPOINT:  IS RETIRING HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE ALSO
       THE SENATE DEMOCRATIC OR REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0. House retiree is not also Senate candidate
       1. House retiree is also the Senate Democratic candidate
       2. House retiree is also the Senate Republican candidate

       9. Washington D.C.; no Post interview

==============================
M001301    D1k/D1k.T. Thermometer Dem Senate cand
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D1k/D1k.T.

   IF NOT WASHINIGTON D.C.:
   IF SENATE RACE IN STATE:
   IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN SENATE RACE:
   IF DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE IS NOT ALSO RETIRING HOUSE CANDIDATE:

       FTF:
       (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:)
       <DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE>

       TELEPHONE:
       The next person is <DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE>.
       (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate
       him/her?)

       THERMOMETER - <DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE>
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly
       administered as the 2nd-4th names.  D1e and D1f were administered
       as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered
       as the 7th-12th names.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Democratic Senate candidate; no Post interview;
            Washington D.C.; 1 in D1jx.
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001302    D1m/D1m.T. Thermometer Rep Senate cand
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D1m/D1m.T.

   IF NOT WASHINIGTON D.C.:
   IF SENATE RACE IN STATE:
   IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN SENATE RACE:
   IF REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE IS NOT ALSO RETIRING HOUSE CANDIDATE:

       FTF:
       (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:)
       <REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE>

       TELEPHONE:
       The next person is <REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE>.
       (Where on that feeling thermometer would you rate
       him/her?)

       THERMOMETER - <REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE>
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly
       administered as the 2nd-4th names.  D1e and D1f were administered
       as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered
       as the 7th-12th names.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Republican Senate candidate; no Post interview;
            Washington D.C.; 2 in D1jx
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001303    D1n/D1n.T. Thermometer Ind House cand
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D1n/D1n.T.

   IF CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT IS VT01 OR VA05:

       FTF:
       (Looking at page 1 of the booklet) (How would you rate:)
       <INDEPENDENT HOUSE INCUMBENT CANDIDATE>

       TELEPHONE:
       The next person is <INDEPENDENT HOUSE INCUMBENT
       CANDIDATE>. (Where on that feeling thermometer would you
       rate him/her?)

       THERMOMETER - <INDEPENDENT HOUSE INCUMBENT CANDIDATE>
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       D1a was administered first, and D1b-D1d were randomly
       administered as the 2nd-4th names.  D1e and D1f were administered
       as the 5th and 6th names, and D1g-D1n were randomly administered
       as the 7th-12th names.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no incumbent Independent House candidate (VT01, VA05);
            no Post interview or Washington D.C.; 0,9 in D1nx.
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001303a   D1nx. Checkpoint: VT01 or VA05
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   D1nx.

       CHECKPOINT:  VT01 OR VA05
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0. CD OF INTERVIEW IS NEITHER VT01 NOR VA05
       1. CD OF INTERVIEW IS VT01
       2. CD OF INTERVIEW IS VA05

       9. Washington D.C.; no Post interview

==============================
M001304    D2a. Thermometer supreme court
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D2a.

       (How would you rate:)

       THERMOMETER - THE SUPREME COURT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001305    D2b. Thermometer Congress
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D2b.

       (How would you rate:)

       THERMOMETER - CONGRESS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001306    D2c. Thermometer military
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D2c.

       (How would you rate:)

       THERMOMETER - THE MILITARY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001307    D2d. Thermometer federal govt in Wash DC
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D2d.

       (How would you rate:)

       THERMOMETER - THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN WASHINGTON
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001308    D2e. Thermometer blacks
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D2e.

       (How would you rate:)

       THERMOMETER - BLACKS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001309    D2f. Thermometer whites
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D2f.

       (How would you rate:)

       THERMOMETER - WHITES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001310    D2g. Thermometer conservatives
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D2g.

       (How would you rate:)

       THERMOMETER - CONSERVATIVES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001311    D2h. Thermometer liberals
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D2h.

       (How would you rate:)

       THERMOMETER - LIBERALS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001312    D2j. Thermometer labor unions
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D2j.

       (How would you rate:)

       THERMOMETER - LABOR UNIONS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001313    D2k. Thermometer big business
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D2k.

       (How would you rate:)

       THERMOMETER - BIG BUSINESS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001314    D2m. Thermometer poor people
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D2m.

       (How would you rate:)

       THERMOMETER - POOR PEOPLE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001315    D2n. Thermometer people on welfare
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D2n.

       (How would you rate:)

       THERMOMETER - PEOPLE ON WELFARE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001316    D2p. Thermometer Hispanics
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D2p.

       (How would you rate:)

       THERMOMETER - HISPANICS (HISPANIC-AMERICANS)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001317    D2q. Thermometer Chrstn Fundamentalists
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D2q.

       (How would you rate:)

       THERMOMETER - CHRISTIAN FUNDAMENTALISTS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001318    D2r. Thermometer women's movement
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D2r.

       (How would you rate:)

       THERMOMETER - THE WOMEN'S MOVEMENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001319    D2s. Thermometer older people
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D2s.

       (How would you rate:)

       THERMOMETER - OLDER PEOPLE (THE ELDERLY)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001320    D2t. Thermometer environmentalists
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D2t.

       (How would you rate:)

       THERMOMETER - ENVIRONMENTALISTS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001321    D2u. Thermometer homosexuals
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D2u.

       (How would you rate:)

       THERMOMETER - GAY MEN AND LESBIANS, THAT IS, HOMOSEXUALS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001322    D2v. Thermometer Christian Coalition
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D2v.

       (How would you rate:)

       THERMOMETER - THE CHRISTIAN COALITION
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001323    D2w. Thermometer Catholics
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D2w.

       (How would you rate:)

       THERMOMETER - CATHOLICS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001324    D2x. Thermometer Jews
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D2x.

       (How would you rate:)

       THERMOMETER - JEWS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001325    D2xx. Thermometer Protestants
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D2xx.

       (How would you rate:)

       THERMOMETER - PROTESTANTS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001326    D2y. Thermometer feminists
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D2y.

       (How would you rate:)

       THERMOMETER - FEMINISTS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

==============================
M001327    D2z. Thermometer Asian-americans
           MD1: EQ 995,  MD2: GE 996
           Numeric

   D2z.

       (How would you rate:)

       THERMOMETER - ASIAN-AMERICANS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW"
       DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO
       YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?]
       The order in which thermometers D2a-D2z were administered
       was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       0-100

       995. NA
       996. INAP, no Post interview
       997. DON'T RECOGNIZE
       998. DK WHERE TO RATE
       999. RF

............................................................................

   E0.

       Next I would like to ask you some questions about the
       candidate(s) who ran in this district for the U.S.
       House of Representatives.

==============================
M001328    E1. Like anything- Dem House cand
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   E1.

   IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE/
   IF VTO1:

       Was there anything in particular that you liked about
       <NAME>, the Democratic candidate (VT01: <INDEPENDENT
       CANDIDATE>) for the U.S. House of Representatives?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order in which the E1-E2 series and the E3-E4 series
       was administered was randomized.
       In VT01, the name of the independent incumbent candidate
       was administered in place of a Democratic candidate name.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. YES                                         --> SKIP  TO E1a
       5. NO                                          --> SKIP TO E2
       7. R VOLUNTEERS: I DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT
          THIS CANDIDATE                              --> E3 or E5a

       8. DK                                          --> SKIP TO E2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; no Democratic candidate in House
          race

==============================
M001329    E1a(1). #1 like Dem House candidate
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9001
           Numeric

   E1a(1).

   IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE:

       (What was that?)

       MENTION 1 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE?
       UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       9001. R has been influenced by spouse
       9002. R has been influenced by someone else
       9995. NA
       9998. DK
       9999. Refused to say
       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E1; no Post IW

==============================
M001330    E1a(2). #2 like Dem House candidate
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   E1a(2).

   IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE:

       (What was that?)

       MENTION 2 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE?
       UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E1; no further mention; no Post IW

==============================
M001331    E1a(3). #3 like Dem House candidate
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   E1a(3).

   IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE:

       (What was that?)

       MENTION 3 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE?
       UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E1; no further mention; no Post IW

==============================
M001332    E1a(4). #4 like Dem House candidate
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   E1a(4).

   IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE:

       (What was that?)

       MENTION 4 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE?
       UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E1; no further mention; no Post IW

==============================
M001333    E1a(5). #5 like Dem House candidate
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   E1a(5).

   IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE:

       (What was that?)

       MENTION 5 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE?
       UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E1; no further mention; no Post IW

==============================
M001334    E2. Dislike anything- Dem House cand
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   E2.

   IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE/
   IF VTO1:

       Was there anything in particular that you didn't like
       about <NAME>, the Democratic candidate (VT01:
       <INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE>) for the U.S. House of
       Representatives?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order in which the E1-E2 series and the E3-E4 series
       was administered was randomized.
       In VT01, the name of the independent incumbent candidate
       was administered in place of a Democratic candidate name.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. YES, R NAMES SOMETHING DISLIKED      --> SKIP TO E2a
       5. NO, NOTHING DISLIKED                 --> SKIP TO E3

       8. DK                                   --> SKIP TO E3
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP,0, 7 in E1; Democratic candidate
          in House race; Washington D.C.

==============================
M001335    E2a(1). #1 dislike Dem House candidate
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9001
           Numeric

   E2a(1).

   IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE:

       (What was that?)

       MENTION 1 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE?
       UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       9001. R has been influenced by spouse
       9002. R has been influenced by someone else
       9995. NA
       9998. DK
       9999. Refused to say
       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E2; no Post IW

==============================
M001336    E2a(2). #2 dislike Dem House candidate
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   E2a(2).

   IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE:

       (What was that?)

       MENTION 2 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE?
       UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E2; no further mention; no Post IW

==============================
M001337    E2a(3). #3 dislike Dem House candidate
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   E2a(3).

   IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE:

       (What was that?)

       MENTION 3 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE?
       UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E2; no further mention; no Post IW

==============================
M001338    E2a(4). #4 dislike Dem House candidate
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   E2a(4).

   IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE:

       (What was that?)

       MENTION 4 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE?
       UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E2; no further mention; no Post IW

==============================
M001339    E2a(5). #5 dislike Dem House candidate
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   E2a(5).

   IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT DEMOCRATIC/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE:

       (What was that?)

       MENTION 5 - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE?
       UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E2; no further mention; no Post IW

==============================
M001340    E3. Like anything- Repub House cand
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   E3.

   IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE/
   IF VA05:

       Was there anything in particular that you liked about
       <NAME>, the Republican candidate (VA05: <INDEPENDENT
       CANDIDATE>) for the U.S. House of Representatives?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order in which the E1-E2 series and the E3-E4 series
       was administered was randomized.
       In VA05, the name of the independent incumbent candidate
       was administered in place of a Republican candidate name.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. YES, R NAMES SOMETHING LIKED           --> SKIP TO E3a
       5. NO, NOTHING LIKED                      --> SKIP TO E4
       7. R VOLUNTEERS:  I DON'T KNOW ANYTHING
          ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE                   --> SKIP TO E3 or E5a

       8. DK                                     --> SKIP TO E4
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; no Republican candidate in House
          race; Washington D.C.

==============================
M001341    E3a(1). #1 like Repub House candidate
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9001
           Numeric

   E3a(1).

   IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE:

       (What was that?)

       MENTION 1 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE?
       UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       9001. R has been influenced by spouse
       9002. R has been influenced by someone else
       9995. NA
       9998. DK
       9999. Refused to say
       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E3; no Post IW

==============================
M001342    E3a(2). #2 like Repub House candidate
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   E3a(2).

   IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE:

       (What was that?)

       MENTION 2 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE?
       UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E3; no further mention; no Post IW

==============================
M001343    E3a(3). #3 like Repub House candidate
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   E3a(3).

   IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE:

       (What was that?)

       MENTION 3 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE?
       UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E3; no further mention; no Post IW

==============================
M001344    E3a(4). #4 like Repub House candidate
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   E3a(4).

   IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE:

       (What was that?)

       MENTION 4 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE?
       UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E3; no further mention; no Post IW

==============================
M001345    E3a(5). #5 like Repub House candidate
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   E3a(5).

   IF R LIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE:

       (What was that?)

       MENTION 5 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'LIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU LIKED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE?
       UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E3; no further mention; no Post IW

==============================
M001346    E4. Dislike anything- Repub House cand
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   E4.

   IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE/
   IF VA05:

       Was there anything in particular that you didn't like
       about <NAME>, the Republican candidate (VA05:
       <INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE>) for the U.S. House of
       Representatives?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order in which the E1-E2 series and the E3-E4 series
       was administered was randomized.
       In VA05, the name of the independent incumbent candidate
       was administered in place of a Republican candidate name.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. YES, R NAMES SOMETHING DISLIKED      --> SKIP TO E4a
       5. NO, NOTHING DISLIKED                 --> SKIP TO E5

       8. DK                                   --> SKIP TO E5a
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; 7 in E3

==============================
M001347    E4a(1). #1 dislike Repub House candidate
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9001
           Numeric

   E4a(1).

   IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE:

       (What was that?)

       MENTION 1 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: Anything else that you liked about this candidate?
       UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       9001. R has been influenced by spouse
       9002. R has been influenced by someone else
       9995. NA
       9998. DK
       9999. Refused to say
       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E4; no Post IW

==============================
M001348    E4a(2). #2 dislike repun House candidate
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   E4a(2).

   IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE:

       (What was that?)

       MENTION 2 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: Anything else that you liked about this candidate?
       UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E4; no further mention; no Post IW

==============================
M001349    E4a(3). #3 dislike Repub House candidate
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   E4a(3).

   IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE:

       (What was that?)

       MENTION 3 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: Anything else that you liked about this candidate?
       UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E4; no further mention; no Post IW

==============================
M001350    E4a(4). #4 dislike Repub House candidate
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   E4a(4).

   IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE:

       (What was that?)

       MENTION 4 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: Anything else that you liked about this candidate?
       UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E4; no further mention; no Post IW

==============================
M001351    E4a(5). #5 dislike Repub House candidate
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   E4a(5).

   IF R DISLIKED SOMETHING ABOUT REPUBLICAN/INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE:

       (What was that?)

       MENTION 5 - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 'DISLIKES'
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: Anything else that you liked about this candidate?
       UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]
       See PARTY-CANDIDATE MASTER CODE.
       Codes 1-1304 and:

       8999. Other miscellaneous

       0000. Inap 5,8,9,0 in E4; no further mention; no Post IW

==============================
M001352    E5. Checkpt: number of Hse cands
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   E5.

       CHECKPOINT:  NUMBER OF HOUSE CANDIDATES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. One House candidate in candidate list
       2. Two or more House candidates in candidate list

       9. Washington DC
       0. No Post IW

==============================
M001353a   E5a(1). 2 cands- either cand incumbent
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   E5a(1).

   IF 2 OR MORE CANDIDATES IN HOUSE RACE:

       Do you happen to know if either of these candidates,
       <DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE NAME>/ <INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT CAND
       NAME> or <REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE NAME>/(VA05: <INDEPENDENT
       INCUMBENT CAND NAME>), was already in the U.S. House of
       Representatives before the election?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR NO: DO YOU MEAN "NEITHER CANDIDATE" OR "DON'T
       KNOW"?]

       1. YES, <DEMOCRATIC NAME>        --> E6
       2. YES, <REPUBLICAN NAME>        --> E6
       3. YES <INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE>   --> E6
       4. BOTH [VOL]                    --> E6
       5. NO, NEITHER WAS [VOL]         --> E6
       7. DON'T KNOW, NOT SURE [VOL]    --> E6

       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in E5

==============================
M001353b   E5a(2). Cand iden as incum- 2 cand race
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   E5a(2).

   IF 2 OR MORE CANDIDATES IN HOUSE RACE:

       Do you happen to know if either of these candidates,
       <DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE NAME>/ (VT01: <INDEPENDENT
       INCUMBENT CAND ) NAME> or <REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE
       NAME>/(VA05: <INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT CAND NAME>), was
       already in the U.S. House of  Representatives before the
       election?

       INCUMBENT HOUSE CANDIDATE CODE - 2 CANDIDATE RACE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR NO: DO YOU MEAN "NEITHER CANDIDATE" OR "DON'T
       KNOW"?]
       In VT01, the name of the independent incumbent candidate
       was administered in place of a Democratic candidate name.
       In VA05, the name of the independent incumbent candidate
       was administered in place of a Republican candidate name.

       30. INCUMBENT INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE (VA05/VT01)
       31. DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN OPEN RACE
       32. REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN OPEN RACE
       33. DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT CANDIDATE
       34. REPUBLICAN INCUMBENT CANDIDATE
       35. DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGER
       36. REPUBLICAN CHALLENGER
       39. NONINCUMBENT INDEPENDENT/3RD PARTY CANDIDATE
       90. "BOTH"

       00. NA; INAP, 5, 7, 9, 0 in E5a(1)

==============================
M001354    E5b(1). 1 cand- is candidate incumbent
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   E5b(1).

   IF ONLY 1 CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE:

       Do you happen to know if  <NAME OF DEMOCRATIC OR
       REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE> was already in the U.S. House of
       Representatives before the election?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR NO: DO YOU MEAN "NO, HE/SHE WASN'T" OR "DON'T
       KNOW"?]

       1. YES
       5. NO
       7. DON'T KNOW, NOT SURE [VOL]

       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 2, 9, 0 in E5

==============================
M001355    E5b(2). Cand iden as incum- 1 cand race
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   E5b(2).

   IF ONLY 1 CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE:

       Do you happen to know if <NAME OF DEMOCRATIC OR
       REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE> was already in the U.S. House of
       Representatives before the election?

       INCUMBENT HOUSE CANDIDATE CODE - 1 CANDIDATE RACE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE FOR NO: DO YOU MEAN "NO, HE/SHE WASN'T" OR "DON'T
       KNOW"?]

       31. DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN OPEN RACE
       32. REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN OPEN RACE
       33. DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT CANDIDATE
       34. REPUBLICAN INCUMBENT CANDIDATE

       00. INAP, 5, 7, 9, 0 in E5b(1)

==============================
M001356    E6. Party control House before election
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   E6.

       Do you happen to know which party had the most members
       in the House of Representatives in Washington
       BEFORE the election (this/last) month?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       (IF NECESSARY: WHICH ONE?)
       [DON'T PROBE DK]

       1. THE DEMOCRATS
       5. THE REPUBLICANS

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001357    E7. Party control Senate before election
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   E7.

       Do you happen to know which party had the most members
       in the U.S. Senate BEFORE the election (this/last)
       month?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       (IF NECESSARY: WHICH ONE?)
       [DON'T PROBE DK]

       1. THE DEMOCRATS
       5. THE REPUBLICANS

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001358    F1. Appr/dissapr House incumbent
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F1.

       In general, do you approve or disapprove of the way
       Representative <RUNNING INCUMBENT OR RETIRING INCUMBENT
       NAME> has been handling <HIS/HER> job?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. APPROVE         --> SKIP TO  F1a
       5. DISAPPROVE      --> SKIP TO F1b

       8. DK              --> F2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; Washington D.C.

==============================
M001359    F1a. Strength approve House incumbent
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F1a.

   IF R APPROVES RETIRING HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE:

       Do you approve strongly or not strongly?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. APPROVE STONGLY   --> SKIP TO F2
       5. NOT STRONGLY      --> SKIP TO F2

       8. DK                --> SKIP TO F2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in F1

==============================
M001360    F1b. Strength disappr House incumbent
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F1b.

   IF R DISAPPROVES RETIRING HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE:

       Do you disapprove strongly or not strongly?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. DISAPPROVE STRONGLY
       5. NOT STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 8, 9, 0 in F1

==============================
M001361    F1x. Summary- approve/disapp Hse incumb
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F1x.

       In general, do you approve or disapprove of the way
       Representative <RUNNING INCUMBENT OR RETIRING INCUMBENT
       NAME> has been handling <HIS/HER> job?
       Do you approve strongly or not strongly?/
       Do you disapprove strongly or not strongly?

       SUMMARY: APPROVE RETIRING HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from F1 and F1a/b.

       1. Approve strongly
       2. Approve not strongly
       4. Disapprove not strongly
       5. Disapprove strongly

       8. DK in F1 or F1a/b
       9. RF in F1a or F1a/b
       0. NA

==============================
M001362    F2. Special action by incumbent
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F2.

       Do you happen to remember anything special that
       Representative <RUNNING INCUMBENT OR RETIRING INCUMBENT
       NAME> has done for the people in <HIS/HER> district
       while <HE/SHE> has been in Congress?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; Washington D.C.

==============================
M001363    F3. R know #yrs Hse incumbent has serv
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F3.

       Do you happen to know about how many years <HE/SHE> has
       been in the House of Representatives?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES, R KNOWS      --> SKIP TO F3a
       5. NO                --> SKIP TO F3b

       8. DK                --> SKIP TO F3b
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; Washington D.C.

==============================
M001364    F3a. #yrs House incumbent has been in of
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   F3a.

   IF R SAYS KNOWS HOW LONG RETIRING REPRESENTATIVE HAS BEEN IN OFFICE:

       (About how many?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Actual number coded.

       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in F3

==============================
M001365    F3b. Incumbent more/less 12 yrs in offic
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F3b.

   IF R DK HOW LONG RETIRING REPRESENTATIVE HAS BEEN IN OFFICE:

       Would you say less than 12 years, about 12 years, or
       more than 12 years?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DK]

       1. LESS THAN 12 YEARS
       3. ABOUT 12 YEARS
       5. MORE THAN 12 YEARS

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in F3
       ^^^^

==============================
M001366    F4. House incumb kept in touch w/distric
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F4.

       How good a job would you say U.S. Representative <NAME>
       does of keeping in touch with the people  in your
       district -- does (he/she) do a very good job, fairly
       good, fairly poor, or a very poor job of keeping in
       touch with the people in this district?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY GOOD
       2. FAIRLY GOOD
       3. FAIRLY POOR
       4. VERY POOR

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; Washington D.C.

==============================
M001367    F5. R follows govt and public affairs
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   F5.

       Some people seem to follow what's going on in government
       and public affairs most of the time, whether there's an
       election going on or not. Others aren't thatinterested.
       Would you say you follow what's going on in government
       and public affairs most of the time, some of the time,
       only now and then, or hardly at all?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MOST OF THE TIME
       2. SOME OF THE TIME
       3. ONLY NOW AND THEN
       4. HARDLY AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview


==============================
M001368    G1a/G1a.T. R placement lib-con scale
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G1a/G1a.T.

       FTF:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?

       TELEPHONE:
       When it comes to politics, do you usually think of
       yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly
       liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly
       conservative, conservative, extremely conservative, or
       haven't you thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE]

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL                    --> G2b
       2. LIBERAL                              --> G2b
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL                     --> G2b
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD         --> G1b
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE                --> G2b
       6. CONSERVATIVE                         --> G2b
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE               --> G2b

       8. DK                                   --> G1b
       9. RF; NA; INAP, no Post interview
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH [DO NOT PROBE]  --> G1b

==============================
M001369    G1b. Had to choose lib-con self-placemt
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G1b.

   IF R LIB-CON SELF-PLACEMENT IS MODERATE/DK/HAVEN'T THOUGHT:

       If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a
       liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. LIBERAL
       3. CONSERVATIVE
       5. MODERATE [VOL]
       7. R REFUSES TO CHOOSE [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1-3, 5-7 in G1a/G1a.T; no Post interview

==============================
M001370    G1x. 3-category lib-con summary
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G1x.

       FTF:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?
       If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a
       liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?

       TELEPHONE:
       When it comes to politics, do you usually think of
       yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly
       liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly
       conservative, conservative, extremely conservative, or
       haven't you thought much about this?
       If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a
       liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?

       3-CATEGORY LIB-CON SUMMARY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from G1a/G1a.T and G1b.
       This is the traditional summary used in 7-pt scale FTF
       administration in previous years.
       Recode values used for each category appear in the order:
       G1a/G1a.T,G1b.

       1. Liberal  (1/2/3,0; 0/4/8,1)
       3. Moderate  (0/4/8,5; 4,7/8/9/NA)
       5. Conservative  (5/6/7,0; 0/4/8,3)
       7. Refused to choose  (0/8,7/9)

       8. DK  (0/8,8)
       9. NA/RF to entire question series  (RF/NA,0)
       0. NA to follow up question G4aa  (0/8,NA); No Post IW

==============================
M001371    G2/G2.T. Clinton placement lib-con scale
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G2/G2.T.

       FTF:
       Where would you place Bill Clinton on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he is extremely
       liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle
       of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or
       extremely conservative?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DK]

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL
       2. LIBERAL
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE
       6. CONSERVATIVE
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001372    G3/G3.T. Gore placement lib-con scale
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G3/G3.T.

       FTF:
       Where would you place Al Gore on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Al Gore?
       (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly
       liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly
       conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DK]
       The order in which G3-G5/G3.T-G5.T were administered was
       randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL
       2. LIBERAL
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE
       6. CONSERVATIVE
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE

       8. DK           --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE IN RANDOMIZATION OR G6/G6.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001373    G3a/G3a.T. Gore-certain lib-con placemnt
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G3a/G3a.T.

   IF LIB-CON PLACEMENT OF GORE IS NOT DK:

       How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty
       certain or not very certain?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY CERTAIN
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G3/G3.T

==============================
M001374    G4/G4.T. Bush placement lib-con scale
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G4/G4.T.

       FTF:
       Where would you place George W. Bush on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about George W. Bush?
       (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly
       liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly
       conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DK]
       The order in which G3-G5/G3.T-G5.T were administered was
       randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL
       2. LIBERAL
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE
       6. CONSERVATIVE
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE

       8. DK            --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE IN RANDOMIZATION OR G6/G6.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001375    G4a/G4a.T. Bush-certain lib-con placemnt
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G4a/G4a.T.

   IF LIB-CON PLACEMENT OF GW BUSH IS NOT DK:

       How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty
       certain or not very certain?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY CERTAIN
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G4/G4.T

==============================
M001376    G5/G5.T. Buchanan placemnt lib-con scale
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G5/G5.T.

       FTF:
       Where would you place Pat Buchanan on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about Pat Buchanan?
       (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly
       liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly
       conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DK]
       The order in which G3-G5/G3.T-G5.T were administered was
       randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL
       2. LIBERAL
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE
       6. CONSERVATIVE
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE

       8. DK            --> NEXT PRES. CANDIDATE IN RANDOMIZATION OR G6/G6.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001377    G5a/G5a.T. Buchanan-certain lib-con
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G5a/G5a.T.

   IF LIB-CON PLACEMENT OF BUCHANAN IS NOT DK:

       How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty
       certain or not very certain?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY CERTAIN
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G5/G5.T

==============================
M001378    G6. Ckpt: number of cands/VT01/VA05
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   G6.

       CHECKPOINT:
       NUMBER OF CANDIDATES/ VT01 OR VA05
       FOR LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE HOUSE CANDIDATE PLACEMENTS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       In VT01, liberal-conservative placement of the independent House
       incumbent was asked in place of Democratic candidate placement.
       In VA05, liberal-conservative placement of the independent House
       incumbent was asked in place of Republican candidate placement.

       1. Democratic and Republican candidates in House race
       2. Democratic candidate only in House race
       3. Republican candidate only in House race
       4. VT01: independent incumbent candidate in place of Democratic
          candidate; Republican challenger
       5. VA05: independent incumbent candidate in place of Republican
          candidate; Democratic challenger

       9. INAP, no Post interview; Washington D.C.

==============================
M001378a   G6(1)/G6(1).T. Dem Hse cand placemt-lib
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G6(1)/G6(1).T.

   IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE:
   IF CANDIDATE THERMOMETER IS NOT 997 (D1g):

       FTF:
       Where would you place <DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE>
       on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about <DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE>?
       (Do you think he/she is extremely liberal, slightly
       liberal,  moderate or middle of the road, slightly
       conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DK]
       Respondents were asked G6(1)/G6(1).T in all districts except
       VT01; G6(2)/G6(2).T was asked in VT01.
       FTF:  The order in which G6(1)/G6(2) and G7(1)/G7(2) was
       administered was randomized.
       TELEPHONE: The order in which G6(1)/T/G6(2).T and
       G7(1).T/G7(2).T was administered was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL
       2. LIBERAL
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE
       6. CONSERVATIVE
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE

       8. DK                           --> G7 OR PARTY PLACEMENTS
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3, 4, 9 in G6; 997 in D1g

==============================
M001378b   G6.(2)/G6(2).T. #1 incum Ind cand place
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G6(2)/G6(2).T.

   IF VT01 (INCUMBENT INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE):
   IF CANDIDATE THERMOMETER IS NOT 997 (D1n):

       FTF:
       Where would you place <INCUMBENT INDPENDENT HOUSE
       CANDIDATE> on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about <INCUMBENT INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE>?
       (Do you think he/she is extremely liberal, slightly
       liberal,  moderate or middle of the road, slightly
       conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DK]
       Respondents were asked G6(1)/G6(1).T in all districts except
       VT01; G6(2)/G6(2).T was asked in VT01.
       FTF:  The order in which G6(1)/G6(2) and G7(1)/G7(2) was
       administered was randomized.
       TELEPHONE: The order in which G6(1)/T/G6(2).T and
       G7(1).T/G7(2).T was administered was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL
       2. LIBERAL
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE
       6. CONSERVATIVE
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE

       8. DK                       --> G7 OR PARTY PLACEMENTS
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 2, 3, 5, 9 in G6; 997 in D1n

==============================
M001379a   G6a1/G6a1.T. Dem Hse cand-crtn lib-con
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G6a1/G6a1.T.

   IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE:
   IF LIB-CON PLACEMENT OF DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE IS NOT DK:

       How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty
       certain or not very certain?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were asked G6a1/G6a1.T in all districts except
       VT01; G6a2/G6a2.T was asked in VT01.

       1. VERY CERTAIN
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G6(1)/G6(1).T

==============================
M001379b   G6a2/G6a2.T. #1 incum Ind cand-crtn lib
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G6a2/G6a2.T.

   IF VT01 (INCUMBENT INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE):
   IF LIB-CON PLACEMENT OF INCUMBENT IND. HOUSE CANDIDATE IS NOT DK:

       How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty
       certain or not very certain?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were asked G6a1/G6a1.T in all districts except
       VT01; G6a2/G6a2.T was asked in VT01.

       1. VERY CERTAIN
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN

==============================
M001380a   G7.(1)/G7(1).T. Rep Hse cand placmnt-lib
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G7(1)/G7(1).T.

   IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IS IN HOUSE RACE:
   IF CANDIDATE THERMOMETER IS NOT 997 (D1h):

       FTF:
       Where would you place <REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE>
       on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about <REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE>?
       (Do you think he/she is extremely liberal, liberal,
       slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road,
       slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely
       conservative?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DK]
       Respondents were asked G7(1)/G7(1).T in all districts except
       VA05; G7(2)/G7(2).T was asked in VA05.
       FTF:  The order in which G6(1)/G6(2) and G7(1)/G7(2) was
       administered was randomized.
       TELEPHONE: The order in which G6(1)/T/G6(2).T and
       G7(1).T/G7(2).T was administered was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL
       2. LIBERAL
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE
       6. CONSERVATIVE
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE

       8. DK                               --> G7 OR PARTY PLACEMENTS
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 2, 5, 9 in G6; 997 in D1h

==============================
M001380b   G7.(2)/G7(2).T. #2 incum Ind cand-lib
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G7(2)/G7(2).T.

   IF VA05 (INCUMBENT INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE):
   IF CANDIDATE THERMOMETER IS NOT 997 (D1n):

       FTF:
       Where would you place <INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT HOUSE
       CANDIDATE> on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about <INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT HOUSE CANDIDATE>?
       (Do you think he/she is extremely liberal, liberal,
       slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road,
       slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely
       conservative?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DK]
       Respondents were asked G7(1)/G7(1).T in all districts except
       VA05; G7(2)/G7(2).T was asked in VA05.
       FTF:  The order in which G6(1)/G6(2) and G7(1)/G7(2) was
       administered was randomized.
       TELEPHONE: The order in which G6(1)/T/G6(2).T and
       G7(1).T/G7(2).T was administered was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL
       2. LIBERAL
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE
       6. CONSERVATIVE
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE

       8. DK                             --> G7 OR PARTY PLACEMENTS
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 2, 3, 4, 9 in G6; 997 in D1n

==============================
M001381a   G7a1/G7a1.T. Rep Hse cand-certn lib-con
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G7a1/G7a1.T.

   IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE:
   IF LIB-CON PLACEMENT OF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IS NOT DK:

       How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty
       certain or not very certain?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were asked G7a1/G7a1.T in all districts except
       VT01; G7a2/G7a2.T was asked in VT01.

       1. VERY CERTAIN
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G7(1)/G7(1).T

==============================
M001381b   G7a2/G7a2.T. #2 incum Ind cand lib-con
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G7a2/G7a2.T.

   IF VA05 (INCUMBENT INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE):
   IF LIB-CON PLACEMENT OF INCUMBENT IND. HOUSE CANDIDATE IS NOT DK:

       How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty
       certain or not very certain?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were asked G7a1/G7a1.T in all districts except
       VT01; G7a2/G7a2.T was asked in VT01.

       1. VERY CERTAIN
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G7(2)/G7(2).T

==============================
M001382    G8/G8.T. Dem Party placemnt lib-con scale
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G8/G8.T.

       FTF:
       Where would you place the Democratic Party on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Democratic Party?
       (Do you think they are extremely liberal, liberal,
       slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road,
       slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely
       conservative?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DK]
       The order in which G8-G10/G8.T-G10.T were administered was
       randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL
       2. LIBERAL
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE
       6. CONSERVATIVE
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE

       8. DK                           --> NEXT PARTY IN RANDOMIZATION OR G11
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001383    G9/G9.T. Repub Party placement lib-con
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G9/G9.T.

       FTF:
       Where would you place the Republican Party on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Republican Party?
       (Do you think they are extremely liberal, liberal,
       slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road,
       slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely
       conservative?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DK]
       The order in which G8-G10/G8.T-G10.T were administered was
       randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL
       2. LIBERAL
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE
       6. CONSERVATIVE
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE

       8. DK                           --> NEXT PARTY IN RANDOMIZATION OR G11
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001384    G10/G10.T. Reform Party placemnt lib-con
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G10/G10.T.

       FTF:
       Where would you place the Reform Party on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about the Reform Party?
       (Do you think they are extremely liberal, liberal,
       slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road,
       slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely
       conservative?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DK]
       The order in which G8-G10/G8.T-G10.T were administered was
       randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY LIBERAL
       2. LIBERAL
       3. SLIGHTLY LIBERAL
       4. MODERATE; MIDDLE OF THE ROAD
       5. SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE
       6. CONSERVATIVE
       7. EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE

       8. DK                 --> NEXT PARTY IN RANDOMIZATION OR G11
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001385    G11a. R placement- services/spend scale
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11a.

       FTF:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING           --> G11b or G11c
       2.                                           --> G11b or G11c
       3.                                           --> G11b or G11c
       4.                                           --> G11b or G11c
       5.                                           --> G11b or G11c
       6.                                           --> G11b or G11c
       7. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING          --> G11b or G11c

       8. DK                                        --> G11b or G11c
       9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode (see Post Admin. 1); no Post interview
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS           --> G11b or G11c

==============================
M001386    G11a.T. R placemnt-services/spend branch
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11a.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       How about you?  Do you think the government should
       provide fewer services, many more services, or continue
       providing services at the present level, or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING       --> G11a1.T
       3. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING      --> G11a2.T
       5. CONTINUE AT PRESENT LEVEL             --> G11a3.T

       8. DK                                    --> G11a3.T
       9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode (see Post
          Admin. 1); no Post interview
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS       --> G11a3.T

==============================
M001387    G11a1.T. How much reduce services/spend
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11a1.T.

   IF R THINKS GOVT SHOULD REDUCE SERVICES AND SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       Should the government reduce services and spending a
       great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL --> G11b.T
       5. ONLY SOME    --> G11b.T

       8. DK           --> G11b.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11a.T

==============================
M001388    G11a2.T. How much increase servics/spend
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11a2.T.

   IF R THINKS GOVT SHOULD INCREASE SERVICES AND SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       Should the government increase services and spending a
       great deal or (increase services and spending) only some?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL   --> G11b.T
       5. ONLY SOME      --> G11b.T

       8. DK             --> G11b.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11a.T

==============================
M001389    G11a3.T. If serv/spend changed, would favor inc/dec
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11a3.T.

   IF R THINKS SERVICES/SPENDING SHOULD STAY SAME/DK/HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH:

       TELEPHONE:
       If the level of services and spending were to be changed,
       would you be more in favor of an increase or a decrease?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. INCREASE
       3. DECREASE
       5. R REFUSES TO CHOOSE [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 3 in G11a.T; FTF mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001390    G11ax. PH Summary R serv/spend scale
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11ax1.

       TELEPHONE:
       How about you?  Do you think the government should
       provide fewer services, many more services, or continue
       providing services at the present level, or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       (IF REDUCE:) Should the government reduce services and
       spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending)
       only some?
       (IF INCREASE:) Should the government increase services
       and spending a great deal or (increase services and
       spending) only some?
       (IF SAME:) If the level of services and spending were to
       be changed, would you be more in favor of an increase or
       a decrease?

       BRANCHING SUMMARY: 7-POINT SERVICES/SPENDING SELF-PLACEMENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from G11a.T, G11a1.T, G11a2.T, G11a3.T.

       1. REDUCE A GREAT DEAL (1,1,0,0)
       2. REDUCE ONLY SOME (1,5/8/9/NA,0,0)
       3. NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR DECREASE (0/5/8,0,0,3)
       4. STAY THE SAME (5,0,0,5/8/9/NA)
       5. NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR INCREASE (0/5/8,0,0,1)
       6. INCREASE ONLY SOME (3,0,1,0)
       7. INCREASE A GREAT DEAL (3,0,5/8/9/NA,0)

==============================
M001390a   G11ax. Summary R serv/spend scale
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11ax2.

       FTF:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't
       you thought much about this?

       TELEPHONE:
       How about you?  Do you think the government should
       provide fewer services, many more services, or continue
       providing services at the present level, or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       (IF REDUCE:) Should the government reduce services and
       spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending)
       only some?
       (IF INCREASE:) Should the government increase services
       and spending a great deal or (increase services and
       spending) only some?
       (IF SAME/DK/HAVEN'T THOUGHT:) If the level of services
       and spending were to be changed, would you be more in
       favor of an increase or a decrease?

       SUMMARY: 7-POINT SERVICES/SPENDING SELF-PLACEMENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from G11a and G11ax1.

       1. SCALE: 1/ BRANCHING: REDUCE A GREAT DEAL
       2. SCALE: 2/ BRANCHING: REDUCE ONLY SOME
       3. SCALE: 3/ BRANCHING: NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR DECREASE
       4. SCALE: 4/ BRANCHING: STAY THE SAME
       5. SCALE: 5/ BRANCHING: NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR INCREASE
       6. SCALE: 6/ BRANCHING: INCREASE ONLY SOME
       7. SCALE: 7/ BRANCHING: INCREASE A GREAT DEAL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP,no Post IW

==============================
M001391    G11b. Ckpt: number of cands/VT01/VA05
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   G11b.

       CHECKPOINT:
       NUMBER OF CANDIDATES/ VT01 OR VA05
       FOR SERVICES/SPENDING HOUSE CANDIDATE PLACEMENTS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       In VT01, services/spending placement of the independent House
       incumbent was asked in place of Democratic candidate placement.
       In VA05, services/spending placement of the independent House
       incumbent was asked in place of Republican candidate placement.

       1. Democratic and Republican candidates in House race
       2. Democratic candidate only in House race
       3. Republican candidate only in House race
       4. VT01: independent incumbent candidate in place of Democratic
          candidate; Republican challenger
       5. VA05: independent incumbent candidate in place of Republican
          candidate; Democratic challenger

       9. INAP, no Post interview; Washington D.C.

==============================
M001391a   G11b1. Dem Hse candidate on services/spending
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11b1.

   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE:
   IF DEM CAND NOT CODED 997 IN D1g THERMOMETER:

       FTF:
       Where would you place <DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE> on
       this issue?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DK]
       FTF:  The order in which G11b(1)/G11b(2) and G11c(1)/G11c(2)
       were administered was randomized.
       In VT01, the name of the independent incumbent candidate
       was administered in place of a Democratic candidate name:
       in VT01, FTF respondents were administered G11b(2).
       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING         --> G12
       2.                                         --> G12
       3.                                         --> G12
       4.                                         --> G12
       5.                                         --> G12
       6.                                         --> G12
       7. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING        --> G12

       8. DK                                      --> G12
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; 3, 4, 9 in G11b;
          candidate coded 997 in thermometer

==============================
M001391b   G11b2. #1 Ind incumbent Hse cand on services/spend
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11b2.

   IF VT01:
   IF INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT CAND NOT CODED 997 IN D1n THERMOMETER:

       FTF:
       Where would you place (VT01: <INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT
       HOUSE CANDIDATE>) on this issue?

       [DON'T PROBE DK]
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       FTF:  The order in which G11b(1)/G11b(2) and G11c(1)/G11c(2)
       were administered was randomized.
       In VT01, the name of the independent incumbent candidate
       was administered in place of a Democratic candidate name:
       in districts other than VT01, FTF respondents were
       administered G11b(1).

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING         --> G12
       2.                                         --> G12
       3.                                         --> G12
       4.                                         --> G12
       5.                                         --> G12
       6.                                         --> G12
       7. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING        --> G12

       8. DK                                      --> G12
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; 1, 2, 3, 5, 9 in G11b;
          candidate coded 997 in thermometer

==============================
M001392a   G11b(1).T. Dem Hse cand on services/spending
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11b1.T.

   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE:
   IF DEM CAND NOT CODED 997 IN D1g THERMOMETER:

       TELEPHONE:
       What about <DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE>?
       Do you think <HE/SHE> would like the government to
       provide fewer services in order to reduce spending,
       provide many services even if it means an increase in
       spending, or continue services at the present level?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DK]
       PHONE:  The order in which G11b(1).T/G11b(2).T and
       G11c(1).T/G11c(2).T were administered was randomized.
       In VT01, the name of the independent incumbent candidate
       was administered in place of a Democratic candidate name:
       in VT01, Phone respondents were administered G11b(2).T.
       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING   --> G11b1.T
       3. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING  --> G11b2.T
       5. CONTINUE SERVICES AT PRESENT LEVEL--> G11b3.T

       8. DK                                --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 3, 4, 9 in G11b;
          candidate coded 997 in thermometer

==============================
M001392b   G11b(2).T. #1 Ind incumbent Hse cand on serv/spend
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11b2.T.

   IF VT01:
   IF INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT CAND NOT CODED 997 IN D1n THERMOMETER:

       TELEPHONE:
       What about (VT01: <INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT HOUSE
       CANDIDATE>)?
       Do you think <HE/SHE> would like the government to
       provide fewer services in order to reduce spending,
       provide many services even if it means an increase in
       spending, or continue services at the present level?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DK]
       PHONE:  The order in which G11b(1).T/G11b(2).T and
       G11c(1).T/G11c(2).T were administered was randomized.
       In VT01, the name of the independent incumbent candidate
       was administered in place of a Democratic candidate name:
       in districts other than VT01, Phone respondents were
       administered G11b(1).T

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING   --> G11b1.T
       3. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING  --> G11b2.T
       5. CONTINUE SERVICES AT PRESENT LEVEL--> G11b3.T

       8. DK                                --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1, 2, 3, 5, 9 in G11b;
          candidate coded 997 in thermometer

==============================
M001393a   G11b1(1).T. Dem cand- how much reduce services/spend
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11b1(1).T.

   IF R THINKS DEM HOUSE CAND WOULD LIKE TO REDUCE SERVICES AND SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you think <HE/SHE> would like to reduce services and
       spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending)
       only some?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL   --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       5. ONLY SOME      --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T

       8. DK             --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11b(1).T

==============================
M001393b   G11b1(2).T. #2 Ind incumbnt Hse cand- how much red
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11b1(2).T.

   IF R THINKS VT01 IND HSE CAND WOULD LIKE TO REDUCE SERVICES/SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you think <HE/SHE> would like to reduce services and
       spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending)
       only some?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL   --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       5. ONLY SOME      --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T

       8. DK             --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11b(2).T


==============================
M001394a   G11b2(1).T. Dem Hse cand-how much incrsease ser/sp
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11b2(1).T.

   IF R THINKS DEM HOUSE CAND WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE SERVICES AND SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you think <HE/SHE> would like to increase services and
       spending a great deal or (increase services and
       spending) only some?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL   --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       5. ONLY SOME      --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T

       8. DK             --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11b(1).T

==============================
M001394b   G11b2(2).T. #1 Ind incumbent Hse cand- how much incr
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11b2(2).T.

   IF R THINKS VT01 IND HSE CAND WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE SERVICES/SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you think <HE/SHE> would like to increase services and
       spending a great deal or (increase services and
       spending) only some?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL   --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       5. ONLY SOME      --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T

       8. DK             --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11b(2).T

==============================
M001395a   G11b3(1).T. Dem Hse cnd- if serv/spnd chnged, inc/dec
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11b3(1).T.

   IF R THINKS DEM HOUSE CAND WOULD LIKE SERVICES/SPENDING UNCHANGED:

       TELEPHONE:
       If the level of services and spending were to be
       changed, do you think <HE/SHE> would be more in favor of
       an increase or a decrease?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. INCREASE   --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       3. DECREASE   --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       5. NEITHER    --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T

       8. DK         --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 8, 9, 0 in G11b(1).T

==============================
M001395b   G11b3(2).T. #1 Ind inc Hse cand- if chnged, incr/decr
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11b3(2).T.

   IF R THINKS VT01 IND HOUSE CAND WOULD LIKE SERVICES/SPENDING UNCHANGED:

       TELEPHONE:
       If the level of services and spending were to be
       changed, do you think <HE/SHE> would be more in favor of
       an increase or a decrease?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. INCREASE   --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       3. DECREASE   --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       5. NEITHER    --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T

       8. DK         --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 8, 9, 0 in G11b(2).T

==============================
M001396    G11bx1. PH Dem cand serv/spend summary
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11bx1.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about <DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE/VT01 INDEPENDENT
       INCUMBENT HOUSE CANDIDATE>?  Do you think <HE/SHE> would
       like the government to provide fewer services in order
       to reduce spending, provide many services even if it
       means an increase in spending, or continue services at
       the present level?
       (IF REDUCE:) Do you think <HE/SHE> would like to reduce
       services and spending a great deal or (reduce services
       and spending) only some?
       (IF INCREASE:) Do you think <HE/SHE> would like to
       increase services and spending a great deal or (increase
       services and spending) only some?
       (IF SAME): If the level of services and spending were
       to be changed, do you think <HE/SHE> would be more in
       favor of an increase or a decrease?

       BRANCHING SUMMARY: 7PT SERV/SPEND DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CAND PLACEMENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from G11b1/G11b2.T, G11b1(1)/G11b1(2).T, G11b2(1).T/G11b2(2).T,
       G11b3(1).T/G11b3(2).T.

       1. REDUCE A GREAT DEAL (1,1,0,0)
       2. REDUCE ONLY SOME (1,5/8/9/NA,0,0)
       3. NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR DECREASE (5/8,0,0,3)
       4. STAY THE SAME (5,0,0,5/8/9/NA)
       5. NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR INCREASE (5/8,0,0,1)
       6. INCREASE ONLY SOME (3,0,1,0)
       7. INCREASE A GREAT DEAL (3,0,5/8/9/NA,0)

       8. DK (8,0,0,5,8/9/NA)
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Democratic candidate and not VT01;
          candidate coded 997 in thermometer; no Post IW

==============================
M001396a   G11bx2. PH Dem cand serv/spend summary
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11bx2.

       FTF:
       Where would you place <DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE/ VT01
       INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT HOUSE CANDIDATE> on this issue?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about <DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE/VT01 INDEPENDENT
       INCUMBENT HOUSE CANDIDATE>?  Do you think <HE/SHE> would
       like the government to provide fewer services in order
       to reduce spending, provide many services even if it
       means an increase in spending, or continue services at
       the present level?
       (IF REDUCE:) Do you think <HE/SHE> would like to reduce
       services and spending a great deal or (reduce services
       and spending) only some?
       (IF INCREASE:) Do you think <HE/SHE> would like to
       increase services and spending a great deal or (increase
       services and spending) only some?
       (IF SAME): If the level of services and spending were
       to be changed, do you think <HE/SHE> would be more in
       favor of an increase or a decrease?

       SUMMARY: 7-POINT SERVICES/SPEND DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CAND PLACEMENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from and G11b1/G11b2 and G11bx1.

       1. SCALE: 1/ BRANCHING: REDUCE A GREAT DEAL
       2. SCALE: 2/ BRANCHING: REDUCE ONLY SOME
       3. SCALE: 3/ BRANCHING: NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR DECREASE
       4. SCALE: 4/ BRANCHING: STAY THE SAME
       5. SCALE: 5/ BRANCHING: NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR INCREASE
       6. SCALE: 6/ BRANCHING: INCREASE ONLY SOME
       7. SCALE: 7/ BRANCHING: INCREASE A GREAT DEAL

       8. DK (8,0,0,5,8/9/NA)
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Democratic candidate and not VT01;
          candidate coded 997 in thermometer; no Post IW

==============================
M001397a   G11c1. Repub House candidate on services/spend
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11c1.

   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE:
   IF REP CANDIDATE NOT CODED 997 IN D1h THERMOMETER:

       FTF:
       Where would you place <REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE>
       on this issue?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DK]
       FTF:  The order in which G11b(1)/G11b(2) and G11c(1)/G11c(2)
       were administered was randomized.
       In VA05, the name of the independent incumbent candidate
       was administered in place of a Republican candidate name:
       in VA05, FTF respondents were administered G11c(2).
       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING     --> G12
       2.                                     --> G12
       3.                                     --> G12
       4.                                     --> G12
       5.                                     --> G12
       6.                                     --> G12
       7. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING    --> G12

       8. DK                                  --> G12
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; 2, 5, 9 in G11b;
          candidate coded 997 in thermometer

==============================
M001397b   G11c2. #2 Ind inc Hse cand on services/spending
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11c2.

   IF VA05:
   IF INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT CANDIDATE NOT CODED 997 IN D1n THERMOMETER:

       FTF:
       Where would you place (VA05: <INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT
       HOUSE CANDIDATE>) on this issue?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DK]
       FTF:  The order in which G11b(1)/G11b(2) and G11c(1)/G11c(2)
       were administered was randomized.
       In VA05, the name of the independent incumbent candidate
       was administered in place of a Republican candidate name:
       in districts other than VA05, FTF respondents were
       administered G11c(1).

       1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING         --> G12
       2.                                         --> G12
       3.                                         --> G12
       4.                                         --> G12
       5.                                         --> G12
       6.                                         --> G12
       7. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING        --> G12

       8. DK                                      --> G12
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, Phone mode; 1, 2, 3, 4, 9 in G11b;
          candidate coded 997 in thermometer

==============================
M001398a   G11c(1).T. Rep Hse cand on services/spending
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11c1.T.

   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE:
   IF REP CANDIDATE NOT CODED 997 IN D1h THERMOMETER:

       TELEPHONE:
       What about <REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE>?
       Do you think <HE/SHE> would like the government to
       provide fewer services in order to reduce spending,
       provide many more services even if it means an increase
       in spending, or continue services at the present level?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DK]
       FTF:  The order in which G11b(1).T/G11b(2).T and G11c(1).T/
       G11c(2).T were administered was randomized.
       In VA05, the name of the independent incumbent candidate
       was administered in place of a Republican candidate name:
       in VA05, Phone respondents were administered G11c(2).T
       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING   --> G11c1.T
       3. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING  --> G11c2.T
       5. CONTINUE SERVICES AT PRESENT LEVEL--> G11c3.T

       8. DK                                --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 2, 5, 9 in G11b;
          candidate coded 997 in thermometer

==============================
M001398b   G11c(2).T. #2 Ind incumbent Hse cand on services/spnd
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11c2.T.

   IF VA05:
   IF INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT CANDIDATE NOT CODED 997 IN D1n THERMOMETER:

       TELEPHONE:
       What about (VA05: <INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT HOUSE
       CANDIDATE>)?
       Do you think <HE/SHE> would like the government to
       provide fewer services in order to reduce spending,
       provide many more services even if it means an increase
       in spending, or continue services at the present level?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DK]
       FTF:  The order in which G11b(1).T/G11b(2).T and G11c(1).T/
       G11c(2).T were administered was randomized.
       In VA05, the name of the independent incumbent candidate
       was administered in place of a Republican candidate name:
       in districts other than VA05, Phone respondents were
       administered G11c(1).T

       1. FEWER SERVICES; REDUCE SPENDING   --> G11c1.T
       3. MORE SERVICES; INCREASE SPENDING  --> G11c2.T
       5. CONTINUE SERVICES AT PRESENT LEVEL--> G11c3.T

       8. DK                                --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; 1, 2, 3, 4, 9 in G11b;
          candidate coded 997 in thermometer

==============================
M001399a   G11c1(1).T. Rep Hse cand- how much reduce services/sp
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11c1(1).T.

   IF R THINKS REPUBLICAN HSE CAND WOULD LIKE TO REDUCE SERVICES/SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you think <HE/SHE> would like to reduce services and
       spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending)
       only some?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL   --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       5. ONLY SOME      --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T

       8. DK             --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11c(1).T

==============================
M001399b   G11c1(2).T. #2 Ind incumbent Hse cand- how much reduc
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11c1(2).T.

   IF R THINKS VA05 HSE CAND WOULD LIKE TO REDUCE SERVICES/SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you think <HE/SHE> would like to reduce services and
       spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending)
       only some?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL   --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       5. ONLY SOME      --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T

       8. DK             --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11c(2).T

==============================
M001400a   G11c2(1).T. Rep Hse cand-how much incrsease serv/spd
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11c2(1).T.

   IF R THINKS REPUB HSE CAND WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE SERVICES/SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you think <HE/SHE> would like to increase services and
       spending a great deal or (increase services and
       spending) only some?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL   --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       5. ONLY SOME      --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T

       8. DK             --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11c(1).T

==============================
M001400b   G11c2(2).T. #2 Ind incumbent Hse cand- how much incre
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11c2(2).T.

   IF R THINKS VA05 IND HSE CAND WOULD LIKE TO INCREASE SERVICES/SPENDING:

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you think <HE/SHE> would like to increase services and
       spending a great deal or (increase services and
       spending) only some?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL   --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       5. ONLY SOME      --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T

       8. DK             --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in G11c(2).T

==============================
M001401a   G11c3(1).T. Rep Hse cand- if serv/spend chngd, inc/de
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11c3(1).T.

   IF R THINKS REPUB HSE CAND WOULD LIKE SERVICES/SPENDING UNCHANGED:

       TELEPHONE:
       If the level of services and spending were to be
       changed, do you think <HE/SHE> would be more in favor of
       an increase or a decrease?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. INCREASE   --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       3. DECREASE   --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       5. NEITHER    --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T

       8. DK         --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 8, 9, 0 in G11c(1).T

==============================
M001401b   G11c3(2).T. #2 Ind incumbt Hse cand- if srv/spd chang
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11c3(2).T.

   IF R THINKS VA05 IND HSE CAND WOULD LIKE SERVICES/SPENDING UNCHANGED:

       TELEPHONE:
       If the level of services and spending were to be
       changed, do you think <HE/SHE> would be more in favor of
       an increase or a decrease?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. INCREASE   --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       3. DECREASE   --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       5. NEITHER    --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T

       8. DK         --> NEXT HOUSE CANDIDATE OR G12.T
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 8, 9, 0 in G11c(2).T

==============================
M001402    G11cx1. PH Summary Rep cand services/spending
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11cx1.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about <REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE/VA05 INDEPENDENT
       INCUMBENT HOUSE CANDIDATE>?  Do you think <HE/SHE> would
       like the government to provide fewer services in order
       to reduce spending, provide many services even if it
       means an increase in spending, or continue services at
       the present level?
       (IF REDUCE:) Do you think <HE/SHE> would like to reduce
       services and spending a great deal or (reduce services
       and spending) only some?
       (IF INCREASE:) Do you think <HE/SHE> would like to
       increase services and spending a great deal or (increase
       services and spending) only some?
       (IF SAME): If the level of services and spending were
       to be changed, do you think <HE/SHE> would be more in
       favor of an increase or a decrease?

       BRANCHING SUMMARY: 7PT SERV/SPENDING REPUB HOUSE CAND PLACEMENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from G11c1/G11c2.T, G11c1(1)/G11c1(2).T, G11c2(1).T/G11c2(2).T,
       G11c3(1).T/G11c3(2).T.

       1. REDUCE A GREAT DEAL (1,1,0,0)
       2. REDUCE ONLY SOME (1,5/8/9/NA,0,0)
       3. NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR DECREASE (5/8,0,0,3)
       4. STAY THE SAME (5,0,0,5/8/9/NA)
       5. NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR INCREASE (5/8,0,0,1)
       6. INCREASE ONLY SOME (3,0,1,0)
       7. INCREASE A GREAT DEAL (3,0,5/8/9/NA,0)

       8. DK (8,0,0,5,8/9/NA)
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Republican candidate and not VA05;
          candidate coded 997 in thermometer; no Post IW

==============================
M001402a   G11cx2. Summary Rep cand services/spending
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G11cx2.

       FTF:
       Where would you place <REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE/ VA05
       INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT HOUSE CANDIDATE> on this issue?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about <REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE/VA05 INDEPENDENT
       INCUMBENT HOUSE CANDIDATE>?  Do you think <HE/SHE> would
       like the government to provide fewer services in order
       to reduce spending, provide many services even if it
       means an increase in spending, or continue services at
       the present level?
       (IF REDUCE:) Do you think <HE/SHE> would like to reduce
       services and spending a great deal or (reduce services
       and spending) only some?
       (IF INCREASE:) Do you think <HE/SHE> would like to
       increase services and spending a great deal or (increase
       services and spending) only some?
       (IF SAME): If the level of services and spending were
       to be changed, do you think <HE/SHE> would be more in
       favor of an increase or a decrease?

       SUMMARY: 7-POINT SERVICES/SPEND REPUBLICAN HOUSE CAND PLACEMENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. SCALE: 1/ BRANCHING: REDUCE A GREAT DEAL
       2. SCALE: 2/ BRANCHING: REDUCE ONLY SOME
       3. SCALE: 3/ BRANCHING: NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR DECREASE
       4. SCALE: 4/ BRANCHING: STAY THE SAME
       5. SCALE: 5/ BRANCHING: NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR INCREASE
       6. SCALE: 6/ BRANCHING: INCREASE ONLY SOME
       7. SCALE: 7/ BRANCHING: INCREASE A GREAT DEAL

       8. DK (8,0,0,5,8/9/NA)
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Republican candidate and not VA05;
          candidate coded 997 in thermometer; no Post IW

==============================
M001403    G12/G12.T. R placement- abortion scale
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G12/G12.T.

       FTF:
       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       There has been some discussion about abortion during
       recent years.  Which one of the opinions on this
       page best agrees with your view?  You can just tell me
       the number of the opinion you choose.

       TELEPHONE:
       There has been some discussion about abortion during
       recent years.  I am going to read you a short list
       of opinions. Please tell me which one of the opinions
       best agrees with your view?  You can just tell me the
       number of the opinion you choose.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED.
       2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE OF RAPE,
          INCEST, OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS IN DANGER.
       3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS OTHER THAN
          RAPE, INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE WOMAN'S LIFE,  BUT ONLY
          AFTER THE NEED FOR THE ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY
          ESTABLISHED.
       4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN AN
          ABORTION AS A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE.
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001404    G12a. How important is abortion issue to R
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G12a.

   ALL ABORTION RESPONDENTS:

       How important is this issue to you personally?  Not at
       all important, not too important, somewhat important,
       very important, or extremely important?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT
       2. NOT TOO IMPORTANT
       3. SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT
       4. VERY IMPORTANT
       5. EXTREMELY IMPORTANT

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 9, 0 in G12/G12.T

==============================
M001405    G12b. Checkpoint: number of cands/VT01/VA05
           MD:  EQ 9
           Numeric

   G12b.

       CHECKPOINT:
       NUMBER OF CANDIDATES/ VT01 OR VA05
       FOR ABORTION HOUSE CANDIDATE PLACEMENTS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       In VT01, abortion placement of the independent House
       incumbent was asked in place of Democratic candidate placement.
       In VA05, abortion placement of the independent House
       incumbent was asked in place of Republican candidate placement.

       1. Democratic and Republican candidates in House race
       2. Democratic candidate only in House race
       3. Republican candidate only in House race
       4. VT01: independent incumbent candidate in place of Democratic
          candidate; Republican challenger
       5. VA05: independent incumbent candidate in place of Republican
          candidate; Democratic challenger

       9. INAP, no Post interview; Washington D.C.

==============================
M001405a   G12b1/G12b1.T. Dem Hse cand placmt on abortion
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G12b1/G12b1.T.

   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE:
   IF DEM CANDIDATE NOT CODED 997 IN D1g THERMOMETER:

       FTF:
       Where would you place <DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE>
       (on abortion)?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about <DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE> (on abortion)?
       Which opinion best agrees with [HIS/HER] views?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DK]
       G12b(1)/G12b(1).T was adminstered in all districts except
       VT01; in VT01, G12b(2)/G12b(2).T was administered.
       FTF: The order in which G12b(1)/G12b(2) AND
       G12c(1)/G12c(2) were administered was randomized.
       TELEPHONE:  The order in which G12b(1).T/G12b(2).T and
       G12c(1).T/G12c(2).T were administered was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED.   --> G12c or G13
       2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE
          OF RAPE, INCEST, OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS
          IN DANGER.                                    --> G12c or G13
       3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS
          OTHER THAN RAPE, INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE
          WOMAN'S LIFE, BUT ONLYAFTER THE NEED FOR THE
          ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED.        --> G12c or G13
       4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO
          OBTAIN AN ABORTION AS A MATTER OF PERSONAL
          CHOICE.                                       --> G12c or G13
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL]                         --> G12c or G13

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3, 4, 9 in G12b; 997 in D1g

==============================
M001405b   G12b2/G12b2.T. #1 Ind inc cand plac on abort
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G12b2/G12b2.T.

   IF VT01:
   IF INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT CANDIDATE NOT CODED 997 IN D1g THERMOMETER:

       FTF:
       Where would you place (VT01: <INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT
       HOUSE CANDIDATE>) (on abortion)?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about <INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT HOUSE CANDIDATE> (on
       abortion)?
       Which opinion best agrees with [HIS/HER] views?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DK]
       G12b(1)/G12b(1).T was adminstered in all districts except
       VT01; in VT01, G12b(2)/G12b(2).T was administered.
       FTF: The order in which G12b(1)/G12b(2) AND
       G12c(1)/G12c(2) were administered was randomized.
       TELEPHONE:  The order in which G12b(1).T/G12b(2).T and
       G12c(1).T/G12c(2).T were administered was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED.   --> G12c or G13
       2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE
          OF RAPE, INCEST, OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS
          IN DANGER.                                    --> G12c or G13
       3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS
          OTHER THAN RAPE, INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE
          WOMAN'S LIFE, BUT ONLYAFTER THE NEED FOR THE
          ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED.        --> G12c or G13
       4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO
          OBTAIN AN ABORTION AS A MATTER OF PERSONAL
          CHOICE.                                       --> G12c or G13
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL]                         --> G12c or G13

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 2, 3, 5, 9 in G12b; 997 in D1n

==============================
M001406a   G12b1(1)/G12b1(1).T. Dem Hse cand-cetainty of plcmt
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G12b1(1)/G12b1(1).T.

   IF ABORTION PLACEMENT OF DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE IS NOT DK:

       How certain are you of <DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE>'s
       position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very
       certain?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       G12b1(1)/G12b1(1).T was adminstered in all districts
       except VT01; in VT01, G12b1(2)/G12b1(2).T was administered.

       1. VERY CERTAIN
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G12b(1)/G12b(1).T

==============================
M001406b   G12b1(2)/G12b1(2).T. #1 Ind inc cnd-certainty of plc
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G12b1(2)/G12b1(2).T.

   IF ABORTION PLACEMENT OF VT01 INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT CANDIDATE IS NOT DK:

       How certain are you of <VT01 INCUMBENT INDEPENDENT HOUSE
       CANDIDATE>'s position? Very certain, pretty certain, or
       not very certain?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       G12b1(1)/G12b1(1).T was adminstered in all districts
       except VT01; in VT01, G12b1(2)/G12b1(2).T was administered.

       1. VERY CERTAIN
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G12b(2)/G12b(2).T

==============================
M001407a   G12c1/G12c1.T. Rep Hse cand placmt on abortion
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G12c1/G12c1.T.

   IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
   IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE:
   IF REP CANDIDATE NOT CODED 997 IN D1H THERMOMETER:

       FTF:
       Where would you place <REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE>
       (on abortion)?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about <REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE> (on abortion)?
       Which opinion best agrees with <HIS/HER> views?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DK]
       G12c(1)/G12c(1).T was adminstered in all districts except
       VA05; in VT01, G12c(2)/G12c(2).T was administered.
       FTF: The order in which G12b(1)/G12b(2) and
       G12c(1)/G12c(2) were administered was randomized.
       TELEPHONE:  The order in which G12b(1).T/G12b(2).T and
       G12c(1).T/G12c(2).T were administered was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED.       --> G12b or G13
       2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE
          OF RAPE, INCEST, OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS
          IN DANGER.                                        --> G12b or G13
       3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS
          OTHER THAN RAPE, INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE
          WOMAN'S LIFE, BUT ONLY AFTER THE NEED FOR THE
          ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED.            --> G12b or G13
       4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN
          AN ABORTION AS A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE.       --> G12b or G13
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL]                             --> G12b or G13

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 2, 5, 9 in G12b; 997 in D1h

==============================
M001407b   G12c2/G12c2.T. #2 Ind inc cand placmt on abort
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G12c2/G12c2.T.

   IF VA05:
   IF INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT CANDIDATE NOT CODED 997 IN D1H THERMOMETER:

       FTF:
       Where would you place (VA05: <INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT
       HOUSE CANDIDATE>) (on abortion)?

       TELEPHONE:
       What about (VA05: <INDEPENDENT INCUMENT HOUSE
       CANDIDATE>) (on abortion)?
       Which opinion best agrees with <HIS/HER> views?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DK]
       G12c(1)/G12c(1).T was adminstered in all districts except
       VA05; in VA05, G12c(2)/G12c(2).T was administered.
       FTF: The order in which G12b(1)/G12b(2) AND
       G12c(1)/G12c(2) were administered was randomized.
       TELEPHONE:  The order in which G12b(1).T/G12b(2).T and
       G12c(1).T/G12c(2).T were administered was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. BY LAW, ABORTION SHOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED.       --> G12b or G13
       2. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION ONLY IN CASE
          OF RAPE, INCEST, OR WHEN THE WOMAN'S LIFE IS
          IN DANGER.                                        --> G12b or G13
       3. THE LAW SHOULD PERMIT ABORTION FOR REASONS
          OTHER THAN RAPE, INCEST, OR DANGER TO THE
          WOMAN'S LIFE, BUT ONLY AFTER THE NEED FOR THE
          ABORTION HAS BEEN CLEARLY ESTABLISHED.            --> G12b or G13
       4. BY LAW, A WOMAN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABLE TO OBTAIN
          AN ABORTION AS A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE.       --> G12b or G13
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY) [VOL]                             --> G12b or G13

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 2, 3, 4, 9 in G12b; 997 in Dln

==============================
M001408a   G12c1(1)/G12c1(1).T. Rep Hse cand-certainty of plct
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G12c1(1)/G12c1(1).T.

   IF ABORTION PLACEMENT OF REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE IS NOT DK:

       How certain are you of <REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE>'s
       position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very
       certain?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       G12c(1)/G12c(1).T was adminstered in all districts except
       VA05; in VA05, G12c(2)/G12c(2).T was administered.

       1. VERY CERTAIN
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G12c(1)/G12c(1).T

==============================
M001408b   G12c1(2)/G12c1(2).T. #2 Ind inc cnd-certainty of plc
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G12c1(2)/G12c1(2).T.

   IF ABORTION PLACEMENT OF VA05 INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT CANDIDATE IS NOT DK:

       How certain are you of <VA05 IND HOUSE CANDIDATE>'s
       position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very
       certain?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       G12c(1)/G12c(1).T was adminstered in all districts except
       VA05; in VA05, G12c(2)/G12c(2).T was administered.

       1. VERY CERTAIN
       3. PRETTY CERTAIN
       5. NOT VERY CERTAIN

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8, 9, 0 in G12c(2)/G12c(2).T

==============================
M001409    G13. R thinks of themself as Republican or Democrat
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   G13.

       Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as a
       Democrat or Republican?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. DEMOCRAT
       3. REPUBLICAN
       5. NEITHER [VOL]
       7. OTHER  [SPECIFY]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001410    H1. R better/worse off in last year financially
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H1.

       We are interested in how people are getting along
       financially these days. Would you say that you (and your
       family living here/there) are better off, worse off, or
       just about the same financially as you were a year ago?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The respondent was randomly selected to be administered
       section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post.

       1. BETTER
       3. WORSE        --> SKIP H1b
       5. THE SAME     --> SKIP H2

       8. DK           --> SKIP H2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; R not administered '
          section H in Post

==============================
M001411a   H1a. How much better off in last yer financially
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H1a.

   IF R FINANCIAL SITUATION BETTER IN LAST YEAR:

       Much better or somewhat better?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH BETTER       --> SKIP H2
       5. SOMEWHAT BETTER   --> SKIP H2

       8. DK                --> SKIP H2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in H1

==============================
M001411b   H1b. How much worse off last year financially
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H1b.

   IF R FINANCIAL SITUATION WORSE IN LAST YEAR:

       Much worse or somewhat worse?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH WORSE
       5. SOMEWHAT WORSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in H1

==============================
M001412    H1x. Summary of R's financial situation in last year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H1x.

       We are interested in how people are getting along
       financially these days. Would you say that you (and your
       family living here/there) are better off, worse off, or
       just about the same financially as you were a year ago?
       Much better or somewhat better?
       Much worse or somewhat worse?

       SUMMARY: R FINANCIAL SITUATION IN PAST YEAR
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The respondent was randomly selected to be administered
       section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. The same
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK in H1 or H1a/b
       9. RF in H1 or H1a/b
       0. NA; INAP, no Post IW; R selected for administration in the Pre

==============================
M001412a   H1x1. Pre/Post Summary of R financial situation
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H1x1.

       We are interested in how people are getting along
       financially these days. Would you say that you (and your
       family living here/there) are better off, worse off, or
       just about the same financially as you were a year ago?
       Much better or somewhat better?
       Much worse or somewhat worse?

       COMBINED PRE/POST SUMMARY: R FINANCIAL SITUATION IN PAST YEAR
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The respondent was randomly selected to be administered
       section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post.
       Built from Pre E1x and Post H1x

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. The same
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001413    H2. Put off medical or dental treatmnt in last year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H2.

       In the past year did you (or anyone in your family living
       here/there) put off medical or dental treatment because
       you didn't have the money?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The respondent was randomly selected to be administered
       section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post.

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; R not administered section
          H in Post

==============================
M001413a   H2x. Pre/Po: Put off medical or dental treatment
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H2x.

       In the past year did you (or anyone in your family living
       here/there) put off medical or dental treatment because
       you didn't have the money?

       COMBINED PRE/POST: MEDICAL OR DENTAL TREATMENT POSTPONED
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The respondent was randomly selected to be administered
       section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post.
       Built from Pre E2 and Post H2.

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001414    H3. R expects next year to be better/worse financial
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H3.

       Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you
       (and your family living here/there) will be better off
       financially, worse off, or just about the same as now?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The respondent was randomly selected to be administered
       section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post.

       1. BETTER
       3. WORSE         --> Skip H3b
       5. THE SAME      --> Skip H4

       8. DK            --> Skip H4
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; R not administered
          section H in Post

==============================
M001415    H3a. How much better off next year financially
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H3a.

   IF R THINKS FINANCIAL SITUATION WILL BE BETTER IN NEXT YEAR:

       Much better off or somewhat better off?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH BETTER       --> SKIP H4
       5. SOMEWHAT BETTER   --> SKIP H4

       8. DK                --> Skip H4
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in H3

==============================
M001416    H3b. How much worse off next year financially
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H3b.

   IF R THINKS FINANCIAL SITUATION WILL BE WORSE IN NEXT YEAR:

       Much worse off or somewhat worse off?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH WORSE
       5. SOMEWHAT WORSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in H3

==============================
M001417    H3x. Summary: R financial expectations in next year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H3x.

       Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you
       (and your family living here/there) will be better off
       financially, worse off, or just about the same as now?
       Much better or somewhat better?
       Much worse or somewhat worse?

       SUMMARY: R FINANCIAL SITUATION IN NEXT YEAR
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The respondent was randomly selected to be administered
       section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. About the same
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK in H3 or H3a/b
       9. RF in H3 or H3a/b
       0. NA; INAP, no post IW; administered in Pre

==============================
M001417a   H3x1. Pre/Po: Financial situation in next year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H3x1.

       Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you
       (and your family living here/there) will be better off
       financially, worse off, or just about the same as now?
       Much better or somewhat better?
       Much worse or somewhat worse?

       PRE/POST SUMMARY: R FINANCIAL SITUATION IN NEXT YEAR
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The respondent was randomly selected to be administered
       section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. About the same
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001418    H4. How afraid is R of assault in next year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   H4.

       How afraid are you that a member of your family, or a
       close friend, or you yourself might be the victim of
       an assault during the coming year?  Would you say you
       are very afraid, somewhat afraid, a little bit afraid,
       or not afraid?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The respondent was randomly selected to be administered
       section H in the Pre (as section E) or Post.
       NOTE: due to an error in the application logic, this variable
       was administered only to cases selected for Post administration of
       questions H1-H3.

       1. VERY AFRAID
       3. SOMEWHAT AFRAID
       5. A LITTLE BIT AFRAID
       7. NOT AFRAID

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, logic error; no Post interview

==============================
M001419    J1. R's attitude about serving on jury duty
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   J1.

       If you were selected to serve on a jury, would you be
       happy to do it or would you rather not serve?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. HAPPY TO DO IT
       5. RATHER NOT SERVE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001420    J2a. Less govt, or more things government should do
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   J2a.

       ONE, the less government, the better; OR
       TWO, there are more things that government should be
       doing?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [IF NECESSARY, PROBE "WHICH IS CLOSER"]

       1. THE LESS GOVERNMENT THE BETTER
       2. MORE THINGS GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE DOING

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001421    J2b. Strong govt to handle cmplx prbls or free mrket
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   J2b.

       ONE, we need a strong government to handle today's
       complex economic problems; OR
       TWO, the free market can handle these problems without
       government being involved.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [IF NECESSARY, PROBE "WHICH IS CLOSER"]

       1. NEED A STRONG GOV'T TO HANDLE COMPLEX ECONOMIC PROBLEMS
       2. FREE MARKET CAN HANDLE WITHOUT GOV'T INVOLVEMENT

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001422    J2c. Reason govt is bigger- meddlesome or big prblms
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   J2c.

       ONE, the main reason government has become bigger over
       the years is because it has gotten involved in
       things that people should do for themselves; OR
       TWO, government has become bigger because the problems
       we face have become bigger.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [IF NECESSARY, PROBE "WHICH IS CLOSER"]

       1. GOV'T BIGGER BECAUSE IT'S INVOLVED IN THINGS PEOPLE SHOULD
          HANDLE THEMSELVES
       2. GOV'T BIGGER BECAUSE PROBLEMS BIGGER

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001423    J2d. Better cooperative or self-reliant
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   J2d.

       ONE, it is more important to be a cooperative person who
       works well with others; OR
       TWO, it is more important to be a self-reliant person
       able to take care of oneself.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [IF NECESSARY, PROBE "WHICH IS CLOSER"]

       1. MORE IMPT. TO BE COOPERATIVE
       2. MORE IMPT. TO BE SELF-RELIANT

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001424    J3. # times R watched jeopardy
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   J3.

       Now I'd like to ask you a few short questions about
       television viewing, because what you watch often
       determines what political advertising you will see.
       How many times in the last week have you watched
       "Jeopardy"?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1-20. NUMBER OF TIMES
       95.   EVERY DAY
       96.   NEVER, NOT AT ALL
       97.   R VOLUNTEERS,"NEVER WATCHES TELEVISION"   --> SKIP TO J 8

       98.   DON'T KNOW
       99.   RF
       00.   NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001425    J4. # times R watched wheel of fortune
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   J4.

       How many times in the last week have you watched "Wheel
       of Fortune"?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1-20. NUMBER OF TIMES
       95.   EVERY DAY
       96.   NEVER, NOT AT ALL

       98.   DON'T KNOW
       99.   RF
       00.   NA; INAP, no Post interview; 97 in J3

==============================
M001426    J5. # times R watched morning news
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   J5.

       How many times in the last week have you watched morning
       news programs such as "Today," "Good Morning America,"
       or "The Early Show"?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1-20. NUMBER OF TIMES
       95.   EVERY DAY
       96.   NEVER, NOT AT ALL

       98.   DON'T KNOW
       99.   RF
       00.   NA; INAP, no Post interview; 97 in J3

==============================
M001427    J6. # times R watched daytime talk show
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   J6.

       How many times in the last week have you watched daytime
       television talk shows such as "Oprah Winfrey," "Rosie
       O'Donnell," or "Jerry Springer"?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1-20. NUMBER OF TIMES
       95.   EVERY DAY
       96.   NEVER, NOT AT ALL

       98.   DON'T KNOW
       99.   RF
       00.   NA; INAP, no Post interview; 97 in J3

==============================
M001428    J7. Network news program R watches most
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   J7.

       Which of the network news programs do you watch most
       often - "World News Tonight" on ABC, "NBC Nightly News,"
       "The CBS Evening News," or some other network news
       program?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. ABC
       3. NBC
       5. CBS
       6. WATCH NO NETWORK NEWS PROGRAM [VOL]
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY)

       8.   DON'T KNOW
       9.   RF
       0.   NA; INAP, no Post interview; 97 in J3

==============================
M001429    J8. How much can you trust the media
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   J8.

       How much of the time do you think you can trust the
       media to report the news fairly?  Just about always,
       most of the time, only some of the time, or almost never?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. JUST ABOUT ALWAYS
       2. MOST OF THE TIME
       3. ONLY SOME OF THE TIME
       4. ALMOST NEVER [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001430    J9. Does R listen to political talk radio
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   J9.

       There are a number of programs on radio in which people
       call in to voice their opinions about politics.  Do
       you ever listen to political talk radio programs of this
       type?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES, LISTEN        --> GO TO J9a
       5. NO, DON'T LISTEN   --> GO TO J10

       8. DK                 --> GO TO J10
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001431    J9a. How often does R listen to talk radio
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   J9a.

   IF R LISTENS TO POLITICAL TALK RADIO:

       How often do you listen to those programs -- every day,
       most days, once or twice a week, or only occasionally?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. EVERYDAY
       2. MOST DAYS
       3. ONCE OR TWICE A WEEK
       4. ONLY OCCASIONALLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in J9

==============================
M001432    J9b. How closely does R listen to talk radio
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   J9b.

   IF R LISTENS TO POLITICAL TALK RADIO:

       Some people listen carefully to these talk radio
       programs while others just keep them on in the
       background while they do other things. How about you?
       When you turn on a political talk radio program, would
       you say you pay very close attention, fairly close
       attention, occasional attention, or very little
       attention?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY CLOSE ATTENTION
       2. FAIRLY CLOSE ATTENTION
       3. OCCASIONAL ATTENTION
       4. VERY LITTLE ATTENTION

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in J9

==============================
M001433    J10. Does R have Internet or WWW access
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   J10.

       Do you have acces to the Internet or the World Wide Web?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO    --> J11

       8. DK   --> J11
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001434    J10a. Has R seen election info on Internet
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   J10a.

   IF R HAS ACCESS TO THE INTERNET:

       Have you seen any information about this election
       campaign on the (Internet/Web)?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in J10

==============================
M001435    J11. Important differences b/w Reps/Dems
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   J11.

       Do you think there are any important differences in what
       the Republicans and Democrats stand for?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES, DIFFERENCES
       5. NO, NO DIFFERENCES

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001436a   J11a1(1). #1 difference b/w Reps/Dems
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 995
           Numeric

   J11a1(1).

   IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS:

       What are those differences?

       MENTION 1 - DIFFERENCE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]
       See PARTY DIFFERENCES master code.
       Codes 001-985 and:

       990. Other comments

       995. NA
       998. DK
       999. RF
       000. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11

==============================
M001436b   J11a1(2). #1 party refnce b/w Reps/Dems
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   J11a1(2).

   IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS:

       What are those differences?

       MENTION 1 - PARTY REFERENCE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]

       1. Democratic party mention
       2. Democratic Presidential candidate
       4. Republican Presidential candidate
       5. Republican Party mention
       6. Other party mentioned instead
       7. Unclear party reference-- some  substantive area of party
          difference

       8. DK (998 in J11a1(1))
       9. RF (999 in J11a1(1))
       0. NA (995 in J11a1(1)); Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11

==============================
M001436c   J11a2(1). #2 difference b/w Reps/Dems
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   J11a2(1).

   IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS:

       What are those differences?

       MENTION 2 - DIFFERENCE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]
       See PARTY DIFFERENCES master code.
       Codes 001-985 and:

       990. Other comments

       000. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further
            mention; no Post IW

==============================
M001436d   J11a2(2). #2 party refnce b/w Reps/Dems
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   J11a2(2).

   IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS:

       What are those differences?

       MENTION 2 - PARTY REFERENCE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]

       1. Democratic party mention
       2. Democratic Presidential candidate
       4. Republican Presidential candidate
       5. Republican Party mention
       6. Other party mentioned instead
       7. Unclear party reference-- some  substantive area of party
          difference

       0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further
          mention; no Post IW

==============================
M001436e   J11a3(1). #3 difference b/w Reps/Dems
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   J11a3(1).

   IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS:

       What are those differences?

       MENTION 3 - DIFFERENCE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]
       See PARTY DIFFERENCES master code.
       Codes 001-985 and:

       990. Other comments

       000. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further
            mention; no Post IW

==============================
M001436f   J11a3(2). #3 party refnce b/w Reps/Dems
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   J11a3(2).

   IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS:

       What are those differences?

       MENTION 3 - PARTY REFERENCE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]

       1. Democratic party mention
       2. Democratic Presidential candidate
       4. Republican Presidential candidate
       5. Republican Party mention
       6. Other party mentioned instead
       7. Unclear party reference-- some  substantive area of party
          difference

       0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further
          mention; no Post IW

==============================
M001436g   J11a4(1). #4 difference b/w Reps/Dems
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   J11a4(1).

   IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS:

       What are those differences?

       MENTION 4 - DIFFERENCE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]
       See PARTY DIFFERENCES master code.
       Codes 001-985 and:

       990. Other comments

       000. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further
            mention; no Post IW

==============================
M001436h   J11a4(2). #4 party refnce b/w Reps/Dems
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   J11a4(2).

   IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS:

       What are those differences?

       MENTION 4 - PARTY REFERENCE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]

       1. Democratic party mention
       2. Democratic Presidential candidate
       4. Republican Presidential candidate
       5. Republican Party mention
       6. Other party mentioned instead
       7. Unclear party reference-- some  substantive area of party
          difference

       0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further
          mention; no Post IW

==============================
M001436j   J11a5(1). #5 difference b/w Reps/Dems
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   J11a5(1).

   IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS:

       What are those differences?

       MENTION 5 - DIFFERENCE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]
       See PARTY DIFFERENCES master code.
       Codes 001-985 and:

       990. Other comments

       000. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further
            mention; no Post IW

==============================
M001436k   J11a5(2). #5 party refnce b/w Reps/Dems
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   J11a5(2).

   IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS:

       What are those differences?

       MENTION 5 - PARTY REFERENCE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]

       1. Democratic party mention
       2. Democratic Presidential candidate
       4. Republican Presidential candidate
       5. Republican Party mention
       6. Other party mentioned instead
       7. Unclear party reference-- some  substantive area of party
          difference

       0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further
          mention; no Post IW

==============================
M001436m   J11a6(1). #6 difference b/w Reps/Dems
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   J11a6(1).

   IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS:

       What are those differences?

       MENTION 6 - DIFFERENCE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]
       See PARTY DIFFERENCES master code.
       Codes 001-985 and:

       990. Other comments

       000. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further
            mention; no Post IW

==============================
M001436n   J11a6(2). #6 party refnce b/w Reps/Dems
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   J11a6(2).

   IF R SAYS IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS:

       What are those differences?

       MENTION 6 - PARTY REFERENCE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE: ANY OTHER IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES? UNTIL R SAYS "NO."]

       1. Democratic party mention
       2. Democratic Presidential candidate
       4. Republican Presidential candidate
       5. Republican Party mention
       6. Other party mentioned instead
       7. Unclear party reference-- some  substantive area of party
          difference

       0. Inap, 5,8,9,0 in J11; 995,998,999 in J11a1(1); no further
          mention; no Post IW

==============================
M001437    K1a. Whites influence
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K1a.

       The first group is WHITES.
       Would you say they have too much influence, just about
       the right amount of influence, or too little influence?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE
       2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT
       3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001438    K1b. Blacks influence
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K1b.

       What about BLACKS?
       (Would you say they have too much influence, just about
       the right amount of influence, or too little influence?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE
       2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT
       3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001439    K1c. Hispanics influence
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K1c.

       What about HISPANICS (HISPANIC-AMERICANS)?
       (Would you say they have too much influence, just about
       the right amount of influence, or too little influence?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE
       2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT
       3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001440    K1d. Asian-Americans influence
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K1d.

       What about ASIAN AMERICANS?
       (Would you say they have too much influence, just about
       the right amount of influence, or too little influence?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE
       2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT
       3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001441    K1e. Jews influence
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K1e.

       What about JEWS?
       (Would you say they have too much influence, just about
       the right amount of influence, or too little influence?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE
       2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT
       3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001442    K1f. Protestants influence
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K1f.

       What about PROTESTANTS?
       (Would you say they have too much influence, just about
       the right amount of influence, or too little influence?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE
       2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT
       3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001443    K1g. Catholics influence
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K1g.

       What about CATHOLICS?
       (Would you say they have too much influence, just about
       the right amount of influence, or too little influence?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE
       2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT
       3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001444    K1h. Men influence
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K1h.

       What about MEN?
       (Would you say they have too much influence, just about
       the right amount of influence, or too little influence?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE
       2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT
       3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001445    K1j. Women influence
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K1j.

       And the last group is WOMEN.
       (Would you say they have too much influence, just about
       the right amount of influence, or too little influence?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. TOO MUCH INFLUENCE
       2. JUST ABOUT THE RIGHT AMOUNT
       3. TOO LITTLE INFLUENCE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001446a   K2a. Identify Trent Lott -standard
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K2a.

   IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS:

       The first name is TRENT LOTT.
       What job or political office does he NOW hold?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DON'T KNOWS]
       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the
       K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E
       battery with "Don't Know" probes.

       1. CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES LOTT AS SENATE MAJORITY LEADER
       5. IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG

       8. R makes no attempt to guess
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for K2a.E; no Post interview

==============================
M001446b   K2a.E. Identify Trent Lott -experimental
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K2a.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS:

       The first name is TRENT LOTT.
       What job or political office does he NOW hold?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"]
       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the
       K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E
       battery with "Don't Know" probes.

       1. CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES LOTT AS SENATE MAJORITY LEADER
       5. IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG

       8. R makes no attempt to guess
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, R selected for K2a; no Post interview

==============================
M001447    K2ax. Summary identify Trent Lott
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K2ax.

       The first name is TRENT LOTT.
       What job or political office does he NOW hold?

       SUMMARY: TRENT LOTT OFFICE RECOGNITION
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DON'T KNOWS]/
       [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"]
       Built from K2a/K2a.E
       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the
       K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E
       battery with "Don't Know" probes.

       1. CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES LOTT AS SENATE MAJORITY LEADER
       5. IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG

       8. R makes no attempt to guess
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001448    K2a1.E. Identify Trent Lott- DK probe used
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   K2a1.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS:

       The first name is TRENT LOTT.
       What job or political office does he NOW hold?

       CHECKPOINT:  LOTT - PROBE USED?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"]
       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the
       K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E
       battery with "Don't Know" probes.

       1. YES
       5. NO

       0. NA; INAP, R selected for K2a; no Post interview

==============================
M001449a   K2b. Identify William Rehnquist -standard
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K2b.

   IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS:

       WILLIAM REHNQUIST [PRON: Renn-kwist]
       (What job or political office does he NOW hold?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DON'T KNOWS]
       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the
       K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E
       battery with "Don't Know" probes.

       1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES REHNQUIST AS CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
       5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG

       8.R makes no attempt to guess
       9.RF
       0.NA; INAP, R selected for K2b.E; no Post interview

==============================
M001449b   K2b.E. Identify William Rehnquist -experimental
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K2b.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS:

       WILLIAM REHNQUIST [PRON: Renn-kwist]
       (What job or political office does he NOW hold?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"]
       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the
       K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E
       battery with "Don't Know" probes.

       1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES REHNQUIST AS CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
       5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG

       8.R makes no attempt to guess
       9.RF
       0.NA; INAP, R selected for K2b; no Post interview

==============================
M001450    K2bx. Summary identify William Rehnquist
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K2bx.

       WILLIAM REHNQUIST [PRON: Renn-kwist]
       (What job or political office does he NOW hold?)

       SUMMARY: REHNQUIST OFFICE RECOGNITION
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DON'T KNOWS]/
       [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"]
       Built from K2b/K2b.E
       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the
       K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E
       battery with "Don't Know" probes.

       1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES REHNQUIST AS CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
       5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG

       8.R makes no attempt to guess
       9.RF
       0.NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001451    K2b1.E. Identify William Rehnquist - DK probe used
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   K2b1.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS:

       WILLIAM REHNQUIST [PRON: Renn-kwist]
       (What job or political office does he NOW hold?)

       CHECKPOINT:  PROBE USED?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"]
       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the
       K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E
       battery with "Don't Know" probes.

       1. YES
       5. NO

       0. NA; INAP, R selected for K2b; no Post interview

==============================
M001452a   K2c. Identify Tony Blair -standard
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K2c.

   IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS:

       TONY BLAIR
       (What job or political office does he NOW hold?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DON'T KNOWS]
       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the
       K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E
       battery with "Don't Know" probes.

       1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES BLAIR AS PRIME MINISTER OF ENGLAND/GREAT
         BRITAIN
       5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG

       8.R makes no attempt to guess
       9.RF
       0.NA; INAP, R selected for K2c.E; no Post interview

==============================
M001452b   K2c.E. Identify Tony Blair-experimental
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K2c.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS:

       TONY BLAIR
       (What job or political office does he NOW hold?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"]
       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the
       K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E
       battery with "Don't Know" probes.

       1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES BLAIR AS PRIME MINISTER OF ENGLAND/GREAT
         BRITAIN
       5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG

       8.R makes no attempt to guess
       9.RF
       0.NA; INAP, R selected for K2c; no Post interview

==============================
M001453    K2cx. Summary identify Tony Blair
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K2cx.

       TONY BLAIR
       (What job or political office does he NOW hold?)

       SUMMARY: BLAIR OFFICE RECOGNITION
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DON'T KNOWS]/
       [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"]
       Built from K2c/K2c.E
       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the
       K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E
       battery with "Don't Know" probes.

       1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES BLAIR AS PRIME MINISTER OF ENGLAND/GREAT
         BRITAIN
       5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG

       8.R makes no attempt to guess
       9.RF
       0.NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001454    K2c1.E. Identify Tony Blair - DK probe used
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   K2c1.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS:

       TONY BLAIR
       (What job or political office does he NOW hold?)

       CHECKPOINT:  PROBE USED?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"]

       1. YES
       5. NO

       0. NA; INAP, R selected for K2c; no Post interview

==============================
M001455a   K2d. Identify Janet Reno -standard
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K2d.

   IF R SELECTED FOR STANDARD VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS:

       JANET RENO
       (What job or political office does she NOW hold?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DON'T KNOWS]
       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the
       K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E
       battery with "Don't Know" probes.

       1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES RENO AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
       5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG

       8.R makes no attempt to guess
       9.RF
       0.NA; INAP, R selected for K2d.E; no Post interview

==============================
M001455b   K2d.E. Identify Janet Reno -experimental
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K2d.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS:

       JANET RENO
       (What job or political office does she NOW hold?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"]
       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the
       K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E
       battery with "Don't Know" probes.

       1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES RENO AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
       5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG

       8.R makes no attempt to guess
       9.RF
       0.NA; INAP, R selected for K2d; no Post interview

==============================
M001456    K2dx. Summary identify Janet Reno
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K2dx.

       JANET RENO
       (What job or political office does she NOW hold?)

       SUMMARY: RENO OFFICE RECOGNITION
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DON'T PROBE DON'T KNOWS]/
       [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"]
       Built from K2d/K2d.E
       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the
       K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E
       battery with "Don't Know" probes.

       1.CORRECTLY IDENTIFIES RENO AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
       5.IDENTIFICATION IS INCOMPLETE OR WRONG

       8.R makes no attempt to guess
       9.RF
       0.NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001457    K2d1.E. Identify Janet Reno -DK probe used
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   K2d1.E.

   IF R SELECTED FOR EXPERIMENTAL VERSION OF OFFICE RECOGNITION ITEMS:

       JANET RENO
       (What job or political office does she NOW hold?)

       CHECKPOINT:  PROBE USED?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE DON'T KNOWS WITH, "WELL, WHAT'S YOUR BEST GUESS?"]
       Respondents were randomly selected to be administered the
       K2a-K2d battery without "Don't Know" probes or the K2a.E-K2d.E
       battery with "Don't Know" probes.

       1. YES
       5. NO

       0. NA; INAP, R selected for K2d; no Post interview

==============================
M001458    K3a. In what state does Bush live
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K3a.

       What U.S. state does George W. Bush live in now?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE DK WITH, "WELL, WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?"]

       1. CONNECTICUT
       2. TENNESSEE
       3. TEXAS
       4. WYOMING
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY)

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001459    K3a1. Respondent was probed for DK answer
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   K3a1.

       CHECKPOINT:  PROBE USED?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001460    K3b. What is Bush's religion
           MD1: EQ 8,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   K3b.

       What is George W. Bush's religion?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE DK WITH, "WELL, WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?"]

       0. NONE
       1. BAPTIST
       2. METHODIST
       3. JEWISH
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY)

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001461    K3b1. Respondent was probed for DK answer
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   K3b1.

       CHECKPOINT:  PROBE USED?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001462    K4a. What state is Gore from
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K4a.

       What U.S. state is Al Gore from originally?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE DK WITH, "WELL, WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?"]

       1. CONNECTICUT
       2. TENNESSEE
       3. TEXAS
       4. WYOMING
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY)

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001463    K4a1. Respondent was probed for DK answer
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   K4a1.

       CHECKPOINT:  PROBE USED?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001464    K4b. What is Gore's religion
           MD1: EQ 8,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   K4b.

       What is Al Gore's religion?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE DK WITH, "WELL, WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?"]

       0. NONE
       1. BAPTIST
       2. METHODIST
       3. JEWISH
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY)

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001465    K4b1. Respondent was probed for DK answer
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   K4b1.

       CHECKPOINT:  PROBE USED?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001466    K5a. In what state does Cheney live
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K5a.

       What U.S. state does Dick Cheney live in now?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE DK WITH, "WELL, WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?"]

       1. CONNECTICUT
       2. TENNESSEE
       3. TEXAS
       4. WYOMING
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY)

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001467    K5a1. Respondent was probed for DK answer
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   K5a1.

       CHECKPOINT:  PROBE USED?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001468    K5b. What is Cheney's religion
           MD1: EQ 8,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   K5b.

       What is Dick Cheney's religion?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE DK WITH, "WELL, WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?"]

       0. NONE
       1. BAPTIST
       2. METHODIST
       3. JEWISH
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY)

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001469    K5b1. Respondent was probed for DK answer
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   K5b1.

       CHECKPOINT:  PROBE USED?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001470    K6a. In what state does Lieberman live
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K6a.

       What U.S. state does Joseph Lieberman live in now?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE DK WITH, "WELL, WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?"]

       1. CONNECTICUT
       2. TENNESSEE
       3. TEXAS
       4. WYOMING
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY)

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001471    K6a1. Respondent was probed for DK answer
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   K6a1.

       CHECKPOINT:  PROBE USED?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001472    K6b. What is Lieberman's religion
           MD1: EQ 8,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   K6b.

       What is Joseph Lieberman's religion?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [PROBE DK WITH, "WELL, WHAT IS YOUR BEST GUESS?"]

       0. NONE
       1. BAPTIST
       2. METHODIST
       3. JEWISH
       7. OTHER (SPECIFY)

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001473    K6b1. Respondent was probed for DK answer
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   K6b1.

       CHECKPOINT:  PROBE USED?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001474    K7. Volunteer work in last year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K7.

       Many people say they have less time these days to do
       volunteer work. What about you, were you able to devote
       any time to volunteer work in the last 12 months or did
       you not do so?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001475    K8. Are people trustworthy
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K8.

       Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be
       trusted, or that you can't be too careful in dealing
       with people?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MOST PEOPLE CAN BE TRUSTED
       5. CAN'T BE TOO CAREFUL

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001476    K9. People take advantage or act fairly
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K9.

       Do you think most people would try to take advantage of
       you if they got the chance or would they try to be fair?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. TAKE ADVANTAGE
       5. TRY TO BE FAIR

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001477    K10. People helpful or selfish
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K10.

       Would you say that most of the time people try to be
       helpful, or that they are just looking out for
       themselves?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. TRY TO BE HELPFUL
       5. JUST LOOKING OUT FOR THEMSELVES

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001478    K11. Fav/opp laws protect against job discrm homosexu
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K11.

       Recently there has been a lot of talk about job
       discrimination.  Do you favor or oppose laws to protect
       homosexuals against job discrimination?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. FAVOR
       5. OPPOSE       --> SKIP TO K11b

       8. DK           --> SKIP TO K12
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001479    K11a. How much favor law protecting homosexuals
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K11a.

   IF R FAVORS PROTECTING HOMOSEXUALS AGAINST JOB DISCRIMINATION:

       Do you favor such laws strongly or not strongly?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. FAVOR STRONGLY      --> K12
       5. FAVOR NOT STRONGLY  --> K12

==============================
M001480    K11b. How much oppose law protecting homosexuals
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K11b.

   IF R OPPOSES PROTECTING HOMOSEXUALS AGAINST JOB DISCRIMINATION:

       Do you oppose such laws strongly or not strongly?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. OPPOSE STRONGLY
       5. OPPOSE NOT STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 8, 9, 0 in K11

==============================
M001481    K11x. Summary protctng homosxls against job discrim
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K11x.

       Recently there has been a lot of talk about job
       discrimination.  Do you favor or oppose laws to protect
       homosexuals against job discrimination?
       (IF FAVOR/OPPOSE:)
       Do you favor such laws strongly or not strongly?/
       Do you oppose such laws strongly or not strongly?

       SUMMARY: PROTECTING HOMOSEXUALS AGAINST JOB DISCRIMINATION
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Bult from K11 and K11a/b

       1. Favor strongly
       2. Favor not strongly
       4. Disapprove not strongly
       5. Disapprove strongly

       8. DK in K11 or K11a/b
       9. RF in K11 or K11a/b
       0. NA; INAP, no Post IW


==============================
M001482    K12a. R placmnt crime -address social prblms/punish
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K12a.

       FTF:
       Where would you place yourself on this scale or haven't
       you thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS THAT CAUSE CRIME
       2.
       3.
       4.
       5.
       6.
       7. MAKE SURE CRIMINALS ARE CAUGHT, CONVICTED AND PUNISHED

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS

==============================
M001482a   K12a.T. R placmnt crime -address social prbl/punish
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K12a.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       How about you? Do  you think that the best way to reduce
       crime is to address social problems or to make sure
       criminals are caught, convicted, and punished, or that
       we should do something in between, or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS THAT CAUSE CRIME         --> K12a1.T
       3. MAKE SURE CRIMINALS ARE CAUGHT, CONVICTED
          AND PUNISHED                                     --> K12a2.T
       5. DO SOMETHING IN BETWEEN                          --> K12a3.T

       8. DK                                               --> K13a3.T
       9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS                  --> K13a3.T

==============================
M001483    K12a1.T. How much btr is approach -adressing social
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K12a1.T.

   IF R'S OPINION IS TO ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS:

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you think that addressing the social problems that
       cause crime, rather than making sure criminals are
       caught, convicted, and punished is a much better way or
       somewhat better way to reduce crime?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH BETTER         --> K13
       5. SOMEWHAT BETTER     --> K13

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in K12a.T

==============================
M001484    K12a2.T. How much btr is approach -punishing crimls
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K12a2.T.

   IF R'S OPINION IS TO MAKE SURE CRIMINALS ARE CAUGHT AND PUNISHED:

       TELEPHONE:
       Do you think that making sure criminals are caught,
       convicted, and punished, rather than addressing the
       social problems that cause crime is a much better way or
       a somewhat better way to reduce crime?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH BETTER         --> K13
       5. SOMEWHAT BETTER     --> K13

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in K12a.T

==============================
M001485    K12a3.T. If had to choose, which approach is better
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K12a3.T.

   IF R'S OPINION IS 'SOMETHING IN BETWEEN'/DK/HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH:

       TELEPHONE:
       If you had to choose, which way would you say is better
       at reducing crime -- addressing the social problems that
       cause or crime or making sure criminals are caught,
       convicted, and punished?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. ADDRESSING SOCIAL PROBLEMS
       5. MAKING SURE CRIMINALS ARE CAUGHT, CONVICTED AND PUNISHED
       7. R REFUSES TO CHOOSE [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 9 in K12a.T

==============================
M001486    K12ax1. PH Summary- R placement on ways to reduce crime
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K12ax1.

       TELEPHONE:
       How about you? Do  you think that the best way to reduce
       crime is to address social problems or to make sure
       criminals are caught, convicted, and punished, or that
       we should do something in between, or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       (IF ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS:) Do you think that
       addressing the social problems that cause crime, rather
       than making sure criminals are caught, convicted, and
       punished is a much better way or somewhat better way to
       reduce crime?
       (IF PUNISH CRIMINALS:) Do you think that making sure
       criminals are caught, convicted, and punished, rather
       than addressing the social problems that cause crime is
       a much better way or a somewhat better way to reduce
       crime?
       (IF DK/HAVEN'T THOUGHT/'IN-BETWEEN'): If you had to
       choose, which way would you say is better at reducing
       crime -- addressing the social problems that cause or
       crime or making sure criminals are caught, convicted,
       and punished?

       BRANCHING SUMMARY: CRIME REDUCTION SELF-PLACEMENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from K12a.T, K12a1.T, K12a2.T, K12a3.T.

       1. MUCH BETTER TO ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS
       2. SOMEWHAT BETTER TO ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS
       3. NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR ADRESSING PROBLEMS
       4. IN-BETWEEN
       5. NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR PUNISHING CRIMINALS
       6. SOMEWHAT BETTER TO PUNISH CRIMINALS
       7. MUCH BETTER TO PUNISH CRIMINALS

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post IW
       0. Haven't thought much

==============================
M001486a   K12ax2. Summary- R placement on ways to reduce crime
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K12ax2.

       TELEPHONE:
       How about you? Do  you think that the best way to reduce
       crime is to address social problems or to make sure
       criminals are caught, convicted, and punished, or that
       we should do something in between, or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       (IF ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS:) Do you think that
       addressing the social problems that cause crime, rather
       than making sure criminals are caught, convicted, and
       punished is a much better way or somewhat better way to
       reduce crime?
       (IF PUNISH CRIMINALS:) Do you think that making sure
       criminals are caught, convicted, and punished, rather
       than addressing the social problems that cause crime is
       a much better way or a somewhat better way to reduce
       crime?
       (IF DK/HAVEN'T THOUGHT/'IN-BETWEEN'): If you had to
       choose, which way would you say is better at reducing
       crime -- addressing the social problems that cause or
       crime or making sure criminals are caught, convicted,
       and punished?

       SUMMARY: CRIME REDUCTION SELF-PLACEMENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from K12 and K12ax1

       1. SCALE: 1/ BRANCHING: MUCH BETTER TO ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS
       2. SCALE: 2/ SOMEWHAT BETTER TO ADDRESS SOCIAL PROBLEMS
       3. SCALE: 3/ NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR ADRESSING PROBLEMS
       4. SCALE: 4/ IN-BETWEEN
       5. SCALE: 5/ NEITHER BUT SLIGHTLY FAVOR PUNISHING CRIMINALS
       6. SCALE: 6/ SOMEWHAT BETTER TO PUNISH CRIMINALS
       7. SCALE: 7/ MUCH BETTER TO PUNISH CRIMINALS

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, no Post IW
       0. Haven't thought much

==============================
M001487    K13. How worried is R about nuclear war
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K13.

       How worried are you about our country getting into a
       nuclear war at this time? Are you very worried,
       somewhat worried, or not worried at all?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Through an error in the survey application program,
       this variable was administered only to telephone Rs.

       1. VERY WORRIED
       3. SOMEWHAT WORRIED
       5. NOT WORRIED AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001488    K14. How worried is R about conventional war
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K14.

       How worried are you about our country getting into a
       conventional war at this time, one in which nuclear
       weapons are not used? Are you very worried, somewhat
       worried, or not worried at all?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Through an error in the survey application program,
       this variable was administered only to FTF Rs.

       1. VERY WORRIED
       3. SOMEWHAT WORRIED
       5. NOT WORRIED AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001489    K15a. Campn fin- protect govt from infl or individ
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K15a.

       Which is closer to the way you think, or haven't you
       thought much about this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. PROTECT GOVERNMENT FROM EXCESSIVE INFLUENCE
       5. PROTECTING THE FREEDOM OF INDIVIDUALS

       8. DK
       9. RF; NA; INAP, no Post interview
       0. HAVEN'T THOUGHT MUCH ABOUT THIS

==============================
M001490    K16. How should the financing of campaigns change
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   K16.

       In general, which of the following statements best
       represents what you feel about the way political
       campaigns are financed in this country: it needs to be
       completely overhauled, it needs major changes, it
       needs minor changes, or it is basically fine the way it
       is?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. COMPLETELY OVERHAULED
       3. MAJOR CHANGES
       5. MINOR CHANGES
       7. FINE THE WAY IT IS

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001491    L5. Worked on community issue in last year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L5.

       During the past 12 months, have you worked with other
       people to deal with some issue facing your community?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001492    L6. Contacted public official to express in last year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L6.

       During the past twelve months, have you telephoned,
       written a letter to, or visited a government official
       to express your views on a public issue?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001493    L7. Attend commun meeting about issue in last year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L7.

       During the past twelve months, did you attend a meeting
       about an issue facing your community or schools?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001494    L8. Is R a member of any organizations
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L8.

       Here is a list of some organizations people can belong
       to.  There are labor unions, associations of people who
       do the same kinds of work, fraternal groups such as
       Lions or Kinterviewanis, hobby clubs or sports teams,
       groups working on political issues, community groups,
       and school groups.  Of course, there are lots of other
       types of organizations, too.  Not counting membership
       in a local church or synagogue, are you a member of any
       of these kinds of organizations?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO   --> L9

       8. DK   --> L9
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001495    L8a. How many organizations is R currently a member
           MD1: EQ 98,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   L8a.

       How many organizations are you currently a member of?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0.      NO ORGANIZATIONS           --> L9
       1.      ONE ORGANIZATION           --> L8b
       2-96.   ORGANIZATIONS              --> L8bb
       97.     97 OR MORE ORGANIZATIONS   --> L8bb

       98. DK                             --> L8bb
       99. RF; NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in L8

==============================
M001496    L8b. 1 org-how many hours per week spent for org
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   L8b.

   IF R BELONGS TO ONE ORGANIZATION ONLY:

       If you average across the past twelve months, about how
       many hours per week did you spend doing things with or
       for your organizations?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Number of hours coded and:

       96. NONE (NO HOURS)
       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; INAP, 0, 2-99 in L8a

==============================
M001497    L8c. 1 org-do orgs try to influence government
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L8c.

   IF R BELONGS TO ONE ORGANIZATION ONLY:

       Does the organization you belong to ever try to influence
       government?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0, 2-99 in L8a

==============================
M001498    L8d. 1 org-does org try to influence schools
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L8d.

   IF R BELONGS TO ONE ORGANIZATION ONLY:

       Does the organization you belong to ever try to influence
       schools?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES          --> L9
       5. NO           --> L9

       8. DON'T KNOW   --> L9
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0, 2-99 in L8a

==============================
M001499    L8bb. 2+ org-how many hours per week spent for org
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   L8bb.

   IF R BELONGS TO TWO OR MORE ORGANIZATIONS OR DK HOW MANY:

       If you average across the past twelve months, about how
       many hours per week did you spend doing things with or
       for your organizations?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Number of hours coded and:

       96. NONE (NO HOURS)
       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; INAP, 0, 1, 98, 99 in L8a

==============================
M001500    L8cc. 2+ org-does org try to inflnce government
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L8cc.

   IF R BELONGS TO TWO OR MORE ORGANIZATIONS OR DK HOW MANY:

       Do any of the organizations you belong to ever try to
       influence government?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0, 1, 98, 99 in L8a

==============================
M001501    L8dd. 2+ org-does org try to inflnce schools
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L8dd.

   IF R BELONGS TO TWO OR MORE ORGANIZATIONS OR DK HOW MANY:

       Do any of the organizations you belong to ever try to
       influence schools?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0, 1, 98, 99 in L8a

==============================
M001502    L8x1. Summary hours per week spent for org
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 96
           Numeric

   L8x1.

   IF R BELONGS TO ONE OR MORE ORGANIZATIONS:

       If you average across the past twelve months, about how
       many hours per week did you spend doing things with or
       for your organization(s)?

       SUMMARY: NUMBER OF HOURS/WEEK WITH ORGANIZATIONS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Number of hours coded and:

       96. NONE (NO HOURS)
       98. DK
       99. RF
       00. NA; INAP, 0, 2-99 in L8a

==============================
M001503    L8x2. Summary org influence schools
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L8x2.

   IF R BELONGS TO ONE OR MORE ORGANIZATIONS:

       Does the organization you belong to ever try to influence
       government?/
       Do any of the organizations you belong to ever try to
       influence government?

       SUMMARY: ORGANIZATION INFLUENCE GOVERNMENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0, 98, 99 in L8a

==============================
M001504    L8x3. Summary org influence government
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L8x3.

   IF R BELONGS TO ONE OR MORE ORGANIZATIONS:

       Does the organization you belong to ever try to influence
       schools/
       Do any of the organizations you belong to ever try to
       influence schools?

       SUMMARY: ORGANIZATION INFLUENCE SCHOOLS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 0, 98, 99 in L8a

==============================
M001505    L9. Contributed to church or charity in last year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L9.

       Many people are finding it more difficult to make
       contributions to church or charity as much as they used
       to. How about you -- were you able to contribute any
       money to church or charity in the last 12 months?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001506    L10. Taken part in Protest or march in last year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L10.

       Aside from a strike against your employer, in the past
       twelve months, have you taken part in a protest, march,
       or demonstration on some national or local issue?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001507    L10a. How many times protested/marched
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   L10a.

   IF R TAKEN PART IN PROTEST, MARCH OR DEMONSTRATION ON LOCAL ISSUE:

       About how many times was that -- once, two or three
       times, or four times or more?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. ONCE
       2. TWO OR THREE
       4. FOUR TIMES OR MORE
       7. CAN'T REMEMBER [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in L10


==============================
M001508    M3a/M3a.T. Blks should overcome prejudice w/o favors
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M3a/M3a.T.

       'Irish, Italians, Jewish and many other minorities
       overcame prejudice and worked their way up. Blacks
       should do the same without any special favors.'
       Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. AGREE STRONGLY
       2. AGREE SOMEWHAT
       3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE
       4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT
       5. DISAGREE STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001509    M3b/M3b.T. Blacks have gotten less than they deserve
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M3b/M3b.T.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet.)
       'Over the past few years, blacks have gotten less than
       they deserve.'
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)

       TELEPHONE:
       'Over the past few years, blacks have gotten less than
       they deserve.'
       Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. AGREE STRONGLY
       2. AGREE SOMEWHAT
       3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE
       4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT
       5. DISAGREE STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001510    M3c/M3c.T. If blks wld try harder they cld be welloff
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M3c/M3c.T.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet.)
       'It's really a matter of some people not trying hard
       enough; if blacks would only try harder they could be
       just as well off as whites.'
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)

       TELEPHONE:
       'It's really a matter of some people not trying hard
       enough; if blacks would only try harder they could
       be just as well off as whites.'
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. AGREE STRONGLY
       2. AGREE SOMEWHAT
       3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE
       4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT
       5. DISAGREE STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001511    M3d/M3d.T. Past discrim impacts blks today
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   M3d/M3d.T.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet.)
       'Generations of slavery and discrimination have created
       conditions that make it difficult for blacks to work
       their  way out of the lower class.'
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)

       TELEPHONE:
       'Generations of slavery and discrimination have created
       conditions that make it difficult for blacks to work
       their way out of the lower class.'
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. AGREE STRONGLY
       2. AGREE SOMEWHAT
       3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE
       4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT
       5. DISAGREE STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001512    N1. R have opinion on strength of federal govt
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   N1.

       Now I'd like to ask you about your feelings toward the
       federal government.
       Some people are afraid the government in Washington is
       getting too powerful for the good of the country and the
       individual person. Others feel that the government in
       Washington is not getting too strong. Do you have an
       opinion on this or not?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO         --> N2

       8. DK         --> N2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001513    N1a. Govt is getting too powerful or not too strong
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   N1a.

   IF R HAS AN OPINION:

       What is your feeling, do you think the government is
       getting too powerful or do you think the government is
       not getting too strong?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. GOVERNMENT TOO POWERFUL              --> SKIP TO N1b
       5. GOVERNMENT NOT GETTING TOO STRONG
       7. OTHER; DEPENDS (SPECIFY)             --> SKIP TO N2

       8. DK                                   --> SKIP TO N2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in N1

==============================
M001514    N1a1. Should govt become more powerful
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   N1a1.

   IF R THINKS GOVT NOT GETTING TOO STRONG:

       Do you think the government should become more powerful
       or should it stay the way it is?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. BECOME MORE POWERFUL    --> N1b
       5. STAY THE WAY IT IS      --> N2

       8. DK                      --> N2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 7, 8, 9, 0 in N1a

==============================
M001515    N1b. Which party favors a strong federal govt
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   N1b.

   IF R THINKS GOVT TOO POWERFUL IN N1a/
   IF R THINKS GOVT SHOULD BECOME MORE POWERFUL IN N1a1:

       Which party do you think is more likely to favor a
       powerful government in Washington -- the Democrats, the
       Republicans, or wouldn't there be much difference
       between them on this?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. DEMOCRATS
       3. REPUBLICANS
       5. NO DIFFERENCE

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 7, 8, 9, 0 in N1a; 5, 8, 9 or NA in N1a1

==============================
M001516    N2a/N2a.T. Does R have good undrstdg of pol issues
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   N2a/N2a.T.

       ' I feel that I have a pretty good understanding of the
       important political issues facing our country. '
       Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. AGREE STRONGLY
       2. AGREE SOMEWHAT
       3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE
       4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT
       5. DISAGREE STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001517    N2b/N2b.T. R well-qulfd to participate in politics
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   N2b/N2b.T.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet.)
       ' I consider myself well-qualified to participate in
       politics. '
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)

       TELEPHONE:
       ' I consider myself well-qualified to participate in
       politics. '
       Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. AGREE STRONGLY
       2. AGREE SOMEWHAT
       3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE
       4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT
       5. DISAGREE STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001518    N2c/N2c.T. Could do good job in public office
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   N2c/N2c.T.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet.)
       ' I feel that I could do as good a job in public office
       as most other people. '
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)

       TELEPHONE:
       ' I feel that I could do as good a job in public office
       as most other people. '
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. AGREE STRONGLY
       2. AGREE SOMEWHAT
       3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE
       4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT
       5. DISAGREE STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001519    N2d/N2d.T. Better informed about govt than most
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   N2d/N2d.T.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet.)
       ' I think that I am better informed about politics and
       government than most people. '
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)

       TELEPHONE:
       ' I think that I am better informed about politics and
       government than most people. '
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. AGREE STRONGLY
       2. AGREE SOMEWHAT
       3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE
       4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT
       5. DISAGREE STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001520    N3. Does R believe their vote matters
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   N3.

       So many other people vote in the national election that
       it doesn't matter much to me whether I vote or not.
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This variable was added 11/10/2000.

       1. AGREE STRONGLY
       2. AGREE SOMEWHAT
       3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE
       4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT
       5. DISAGREE STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview;
          question not implemented at time of interview

==============================
M001521    P1a/P1a.T. Society needs to give everyone equal oppr
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P1a/P1a.T.

       ' Our society should do whatever is necessary to make
       sure that everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed. '
       Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. AGREE STRONGLY
       2. AGREE SOMEWHAT
       3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE
       4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT
       5. DISAGREE STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001522    P1b/P1b.T. We've pushed equal rights too far
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P1b/P1b.T.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet)
       ' We have gone too far in pushing equal rights in this
       country.'
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)

       TELEPHONE:
       ' We have gone too far in pushing equal rights in this
       country.'
       Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. AGREE STRONGLY
       2. AGREE SOMEWHAT
       3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE
       4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT
       5. DISAGREE STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001523    P1c/P1c.T. We don't give everyone equal chance
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P1c/P1c.T.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet)
       ' One of the big problems in this country is that we
       don't give everyone an equal chance. '
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)

       TELEPHONE:
       ' One of the big problems in this country is that we
       don't give everyone an equal chance. '
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. AGREE STRONGLY
       2. AGREE SOMEWHAT
       3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE
       4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT
       5. DISAGREE STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001524    P1d/P1d.T. Better if we worried less about equality
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P1d/P1d.T.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet)
       ' This country would be better off if we worried less
       about how equal people are. '
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)

       TELEPHONE:
       ' This country would be better off if we worried less
       about how equal people are. '
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. AGREE STRONGLY
       2. AGREE SOMEWHAT
       3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE
       4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT
       5. DISAGREE STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001525    P1e/P1e.T. OK if some people have more chances than
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P1e/P1e.T.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet)
       ' It is not really that big a problem if some people
       have more of a chance in life than others. '
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)

       TELEPHONE:
       'It is not really that big a problem if some people have
       more of a chance in life than others.'
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. AGREE STRONGLY
       2. AGREE SOMEWHAT
       3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE
       4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT
       5. DISAGREE STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001526    P1f/P1f.T. We'd have fewr probs if people treated eq
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   P1f/P1f.T.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet)
       ' If people were treated more equally in this country we
       would have many fewer problems. '
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)

       TELEPHONE:
       'If people were treated more equally in this country we
       would have many fewer problems.'
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. AGREE STRONGLY
       2. AGREE SOMEWHAT
       3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE
       4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT
       5. DISAGREE STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001527    Q1a/Q1a.T. Public officials don't care
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q1a/Q1a.T.

       ' Public officials don't care much what people like
       me think. '
       Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. AGREE STRONGLY
       2. AGREE SOMEWHAT
       3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE
       4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT
       5. DISAGREE STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001528    Q1b/Q1b.T. People dont have say in govt
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q1b/Q1b.T.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet)
       ' People like me don't have any say about what the
       government does. '
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)

       TELEPHONE:
       ' People like me don't have any say about what the
       government does. '
       Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. AGREE STRONGLY
       2. AGREE SOMEWHAT
       3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE
       4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT
       5. DISAGREE STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001529    Q1c/Q1c.T. Politics too complicated
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q1c/Q1c.T.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet)
       ' Sometimes politics and government seem so complicated
       that a person like me can't really understand what's going on. '
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)

       TELEPHONE:
       ' Sometimes politics and government seem so complicated
       that a person like me can't really understand what's
       going on. '
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. AGREE STRONGLY
       2. AGREE SOMEWHAT
       3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE
       4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT
       5. DISAGREE STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001530    Q2a/Q2a.T. New morals are causing society breakdown
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q2a/Q2a.T.

       ' The newer lifestyles are contributing to the breakdown
       of our society. '
       Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. AGREE STRONGLY
       2. AGREE SOMEWHAT
       3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE
       4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT
       5. DISAGREE STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001531    Q2b/Q2b.T. Should adjust views to chgd moral behav
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q2b/Q2b.T.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet)
       ' The world is always changing and we should adjust our
       view of moral behavior to those changes. '
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)

       TELEPHONE:
       ' The world is always changing and we should adjust our
       view of moral behavior to those changes. '
       Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. AGREE STRONGLY
       2. AGREE SOMEWHAT
       3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE
       4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT
       5. DISAGREE STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001532    Q2c/Q2c.T. Less prblms if emphasize trad family ties
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q2c/Q2c.T.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet)
       ' This country would have many fewer problems if there
       were more emphasis on traditional family ties. '
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)

       TELEPHONE:
       ' This country would have many fewer problems if there
       were more emphasis on traditional family ties. '
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. AGREE STRONGLY
       2. AGREE SOMEWHAT
       3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE
       4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT
       5. DISAGREE STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001533    Q2d/Q2d.T. Should tolerate other's morality
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q2d/Q2d.T.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 6 in the booklet)
       ' We should be more tolerant of people who choose to live
       according to their own moral standards, even if they are
       very different from our own. '
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)

       TELEPHONE:
       ' We should be more tolerant of people who choose to live
       according to their own moral standards, even  if they
       are very different from our own. '
       (Do you agree strongly, agree somewhat, neither agree nor
       disagree, disagree somewhat, or disagree strongly with
       this statement?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. AGREE STRONGLY
       2. AGREE SOMEWHAT
       3. NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE
       4. DISAGREE SOMEWHAT
       5. DISAGREE STRONGLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001534    Q3a. How much can govt be trusted
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q3a.

       How much of the time do you think you can trust the
       government in Washington to do what is right -- just
       about always, most of the time, or only some of the time?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. JUST ABOUT ALWAYS
       2. MOST OF THE TIME
       3. ONLY SOME OF THE TIME
       4. NEVER [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001535    Q4. How much of taxes does govt waste
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q4.

       Do you think that people in government waste a lot of
       the money we pay in taxes, waste some of it, or don't
       waste very much of it?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. WASTE A LOT
       3. WASTE SOME
       5. DON'T WASTE VERY MUCH

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001536    Q5. Govt run by big intersts or for benefit of all
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q5.

       Would you say the government is pretty much run by a few
       big interests looking out for themselves or that
       it is run for the benefit of all the people?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. GOV'T RUN BY A FEW BIG INTERESTS
       5. GOV'T RUN FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001537    Q6. How many in govt are crooked
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q6.

       Do you think that quite a few of the people running the
       government are crooked, not very many are, or do
       you think hardly any of them are crooked?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. QUITE A FEW ARE CROOKED
       3. NOT VERY MANY ARE CROOKED
       5. HARDLY ANY ARE CROOKED

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001538    Q7. Elections make govt pay attention
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q7.

       How much do you feel that having elections makes the
       government pay attention to what the people think
       -- good deal, some, or not much?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GOOD DEAL
       3. SOME
       5. NOT MUCH

==============================
M001539    Q8. Attn govt pays to people when making decisions
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Q8.

       Over the years, how much attention do you feel the
       government pays to what people think when it decides
       what to do -- a good deal, some, or not much?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GOOD DEAL
       3. SOME
       5. NOT MUCH

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001540    R1a. Close to whites FTF
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   R1a.

       FTF:
       WHITES

       CLOSE TO GROUP - WHITES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Mentioned by R
       5. Not mentioned by R

       0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001541    R1a.T. Close to whites phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R1a.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about whites? Do you feel particularly close to
       whites?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Yes
       5. No

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001542    R1b. Close to poor people FTF
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   R1b.

       FTF:
       POOR PEOPLE

       CLOSE TO GROUP - POOR PEOPLE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Mentioned by R
       5. Not mentioned by R

       0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001543    R1b.T. Close to poor people phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R1b.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       (What about)  poor people
       (Do you feel particularly close to them?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Yes
       5. No

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001544    R1c. Close to Asian Americans FTF
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   R1c.

       FTF:
       ASIAN AMERICANS

       CLOSE TO GROUP - ASIAN AMERICANS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Mentioned by R
       5. Not mentioned by R

       0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001545    R1c.T. Close to Asian americans phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R1c.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       (What about)  Asian Americans
       (Do you feel particularly close to them?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Yes
       5. No

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001546    R1d. Close to liberals FTF
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   R1d.

       FTF:
       LIBERALS

       CLOSE TO GROUP - LIBERALS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Mentioned by R
       5. Not mentioned by R

       0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001547    R1d.T. Close to liberals phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R1d.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       (What about)  liberals
       (Do you feel particularly close to them?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Yes
       5. No

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001548    R1e. Close to elderly FTF
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   R1e.

       FTF:
       THE ELDERLY

       CLOSE TO GROUP - THE ELDERLY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Mentioned by R
       5. Not mentioned by R

       0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001549    R1e.T. Close to elderly phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R1e.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       (What about)  the elderly
       (Do you feel particularly close to them?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Yes
       5. No

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001550    R1f. Close to blacks FTF
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   R1f.

       FTF:
       BLACKS

       CLOSE TO GROUP - BLACKS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Mentioned by R
       5. Not mentioned by R

       0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview


==============================
M001551    R1f.T. Close to blacks phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R1f.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       (What about)  blacks
       (Do you feel particularly close to them?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Yes
       5. No

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001552    R1g. Close to labor unions FTF
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   R1g.

       FTF:
       LABOR UNIONS

       CLOSE TO GROUP - LABOR UNIONS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Mentioned by R
       5. Not mentioned by R

       0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001553    R1g.T. Close to labor unions phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R1g.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       (What about)  labor unions
       (Do you feel particularly close to them?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Yes
       5. No

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001554    R1h. Close to feminists FTF
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   R1h.

       FTF:
       FEMINISTS

       CLOSE TO GROUP - FEMINISTS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Mentioned by R
       5. Not mentioned by R

       0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001555    R1h.T. Close to feminists phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R1h.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       (What about)  feminists
       (Do you feel particularly close to them?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Yes
       5. No

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001556    R1j. Close to southerners FTF
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   R1j.

       FTF:
       SOUTHERNERS

       CLOSE TO GROUP - SOUTHERNERS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Mentioned by R
       5. Not mentioned by R

       0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001557    R1j.T. Close to southerners phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R1j.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       (What about)  southerners
       (Do you feel particularly close to them?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Yes
       5. No

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001558    R1k. Close to business people FTF
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   R1k.

       FTF:
       BUSINESS PEOPLE

       CLOSE TO GROUP - BUSINESS PEOPLE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Mentioned by R
       5. Not mentioned by R

       0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001559    R1k.T. Close to business people phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R1k.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       (What about)  business people
       (Do you feel particularly close to them?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Yes
       5. No

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001560    R1m. Close to young people FTF
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   R1m.

       FTF:
       YOUNG PEOPLE

       CLOSE TO GROUP - YOUNG PEOPLE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Mentioned by R
       5. Not mentioned by R

       0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001561    R1m.T. Close to young people phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R1m.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       (What about)  young people
       (Do you feel particularly close to them?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Yes
       5. No

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001562    R1n. Close to conservatives FTF
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   R1n.

       FTF:
       CONSERVATIVES

       CLOSE TO GROUP - CONSERVATIVES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Mentioned by R
       5. Not mentioned by R

       0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001563    R1n.T. Close to conservatives phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R1n.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       (What about)  conservatives
       (Do you feel particularly close to them?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Yes
       5. No

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview


==============================
M001564    R1p. Close to Hispanic-Americans FTF
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   R1p.

       FTF:
       HISPANIC-AMERICANS

       CLOSE TO GROUP - HISPANIC-AMERICANS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Mentioned by R
       5. Not mentioned by R

       0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001565    R1p.T. Close to Hispanic-Americans ph
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R1p.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       (What about)  Hispanic-Americans
       (Do you feel particularly close to them?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Yes
       5. No

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001566    R1q. Close to women FTF
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   R1q.

       FTF:
       WOMEN

       CLOSE TO GROUP - WOMEN
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Mentioned by R
       5. Not mentioned by R

       0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001567    R1q.T. Close to women phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R1q.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       (What about) women
       (Do you feel particularly close to them?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Yes
       5. No

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001568    R1r. Close to working-class FTF
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   R1r.

       FTF:
       WORKING-CLASS PEOPLE

       CLOSE TO PEOPLE - WORKING-CLASS PEOPLE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Mentioned by R
       5. Not mentioned by R

       0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001569    R1r.T. Close to working-class phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R1r.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       (What about)  working-class people
       (Do you feel particularly close to them?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Yes
       5. No

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001570    R1s .Close to middle-class FTF
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   R1s.

       FTF:
       MIDDLE-CLASS PEOPLE

       CLOSE TO GROUP - MIDDLE-CLASS PEOPLE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Mentioned by R
       5. Not mentioned by R

       0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001571    R1s.T. Close to middle-class phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R1s.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       (What about)  middle-class people
       (Do you feel particularly close to them?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Yes
       5. No

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001572    R1t. Close to men FTF
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   R1t.

       FTF:
       MEN

       CLOSE TO GROUP - MEN
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Mentioned by R
       5. Not mentioned by R

       0. NA to entire question; INAP, Phone mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001573    R1t.T. Close to men phone
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R1t.T.

       TELEPHONE:
       What about) men
       (Do you feel particularly close to them?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Note: cases coded 7 in Post-Admin.1 (P000126) were administered in
       the wrong mode.  In several of these cases, the IWR used phone logic
       although administered FTF.

       1. Yes
       5. No

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, FTF mode; no Post interview

==============================
M001574    R2a/R2a.T. Hardworking- whites
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R2a/R2a.T.

       FTF:
       Where would you rate whites in general on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       Where would you rate whites in general on a scale of 1
       to 7, where 1 indicates hard working, 7 means lazy, and
       4 indicates most whites are not closer to one end or the
       other.

       HARDWORKING RATING - WHITES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order in which groups R2b-R2d/R2b.T-R2d.T were
       administered was randomized.

       1. HARDWORKNG
       2.
       3.
       4.
       5.
       6.
       7. LAZY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001575    R2b/R2b.T. Hardworking- blacks
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R2b/R2b.T.

       FTF:
       Still looking at page 8 of the booklet,
       Where would you rate blacks on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       Where would you rate blacks on a scale of 1 to 7?
       (where 1 indicates hard working, 7 means lazy, and 4
       indicates most blacks are not closer to one end
       or the other.)

       HARDWORKING RATING - BLACKS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order in which groups R2b-R2d/R2b.T-R2d.T were
       administered was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. HARDWORKNG
       2.
       3.
       4.
       5.
       6.
       7. LAZY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001576    R2c/R2c.T. Hardworking- Hispanic-America
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R2c/R2c.T.

       FTF:
       Still looking at page 8 of the booklet,
       Where would you rate Hispanic-Americans on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       Where would you rate:
       Hispanic Americans  on a scale of 1 to 7?
       (where 1 indicates hard working, 7 means lazy, and 4
       indicates most Hispanic-Americans are not closer
       to one end or the other.)

       HARDWORKING RATING - HISPANIC-AMERICANS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order in which groups R2b-R2d/R2b.T-R2d.T were
       administered was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. HARDWORKNG
       2.
       3.
       4.
       5.
       6.
       7. LAZY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001577    R2d/R2d.T. Hardworking- Asian-American
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R2d/R2d.T.

       FTF:
       Still looking at page 8 of the booklet,
       Where would you rate Asian-Americans on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       Where would you rate Asian-Americans on a scale of 1 to
       7? (Where 1 indicates hard working, 7 means lazy, and 4
       indicates most Asian-Americans are not closer to one
       end or the other.)

       HARDWORKING RATING - ASIAN-AMERICANS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order in which groups R2b-R2d/R2b.T-R2d.T were
       administered was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. HARDWORKNG
       2.
       3.
       4.
       5.
       6.
       7. LAZY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001578    R3a/R3a.T. Intelligence- whites
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R3a/R3a.T.

       FTF:
       Where would you rate whites in general on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       Where would you rate whites on a scale of 1 to 7, where 1
       indicates intelligent, 7 means unintelligent, and 4
       indicates most whites are not closer to one end or the
       other.

       INTELLIGENT RATING - WHITES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. INTELLIGENT
       2.
       3.
       4.
       5.
       6.
       7. UNINTELLIGENT

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001579    R3b/R3b.T. Intelligence- blacks
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R3b/R3b.T.

       FTF:
       Still looking at page 9 of the booklet,
       Where would you rate blacks on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       Where would you rate blacks on a scale of 1 to 7? (Where
       1 indicates intelligent, 7 means unintelligent,
       and 4 indicates most blacks are not closer to one end or
       the other.)

       INTELLIGENT RATING - BLACKS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order in which groups Rdb-Rdd/Rdb.T-Rdd.T were
       administered was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. INTELLIGENT
       2.
       3.
       4.
       5.
       6.
       7. UNINTELLIGENT

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001580    R3c/R3c.T. Intelligence- Hispanic-Americ
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R3c/R3c.T.

       FTF:
       Still looking at page 9 of the booklet,
       Where would you rate Hispanic-Americans on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       Where would you rate Hispanic-Americans on a scale of 1
       to 7? (Where 1 indicates intelligent, 7 means
       unintelligent, and 4 indicates most Hispanic-Americans
       are not closer to one end or the other.)

       INTELLIGENT RATING - HISPANIC-AMERICANS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order in which groups Rdb-Rdd/Rdb.T-Rdd.T were
       administered was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. INTELLIGENT
       2.
       3.
       4.
       5.
       6.
       7. UNINTELLIGENT

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001581    R3d/R3d.T. Intelligence- Asian-American
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R3d/R3d.T.

       FTF:
       Still looking at page 9 of the booklet,
       Where would you rate Asian-Americans on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       Where would you rate:
       Asian-Americans on a scale of 1 to 7? (Where 1 indicates
       intelligent, 7 means unintelligent, and 4 indicates most
       Asian-Americans are not closer to one end or the other.)

       INTELLIGENT RATING - ASIAN-AMERICANS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order in which groups Rdb-Rdd/Rdb.T-Rdd.T were
       administered was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. INTELLIGENT
       2.
       3.
       4.
       5.
       6.
       7. UNINTELLIGENT

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001582    R4a/R4a.T. Trustworthy- whites
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R4a/R4a.T.

       FTF:
       Where would you rate whites in general on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       Where would you rate whites on a scale of 1 to 7, where 1
       indicates trustworthy, 7 means untrustworthy, and 4
       indicates most whites are not closer to one end or the other.

       TRUSTWORTHY RATING - WHITES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. TRUSTWORTHY
       2.
       3.
       4.
       5.
       6.
       7. UNTRUSTWORTHY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001583    R4b/R4b.T. Trustworthy- blacks
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R4b/R4b.T.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 10 of the booklet),
       Where would you rate blacks on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       Where would you rate blacks on a scale of 1 to 7? (where
       1 indicates trustworthy, 7 means untrustworthy, and 4
       indicates most blacks are not closer to one end or the
       other.)

       TRUSTWORTHY RATING - BLACKS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order in which groups R4b-R4d/R4b.T-R4d.T were
       administered was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. TRUSTWORTHY
       2.
       3.
       4.
       5.
       6.
       7. UNTRUSTWORTHY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001584    R4c/R4c.T. Trustworthy- Hispanic-America
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R4c/R4c.T.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 10 of the booklet),
       Where would you rate Hispanic-Americans on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       Where would you rate Hispanic-Americans on a scale of 1
       to 7? (Where 1 indicates trustworthy, 7 means
       untrustworthy, and 4 indicates most Hispanic-Americans
       are not closer to one end or the other.)

       TRUSTWORTHY RATING - HISPANIC-AMERICANS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order in which groups R4b-R4d/R4b.T-R4d.T were
       administered was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. TRUSTWORTHY
       2.
       3.
       4.
       5.
       6.
       7. UNTRUSTWORTHY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001585    R4d/R4d.T. Trustworthy- Asian-American
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R4d/R4d.T.

       FTF:
       (Still looking at page 10 of the booklet),
       Where would you rate Asian-Americans on this scale?

       TELEPHONE:
       Where would you rate Asian-Americans on a scale of 1 to
       7?  (Where 1 indicates trustworthy, 7 means
       untrustworthy, and 4 indicates most Asian-Americans are
       not closer to one end or the other.)

       TRUSTWORTHY RATING - ASIAN-AMERICANS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       The order in which groups R4b-R4d/R4b.T-R4d.T were
       administered was randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. TRUSTWORTHY
       2.
       3.
       4.
       5.
       6.
       7. UNTRUSTWORTHY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001586    R5a. Independence or respect for elders
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R5a.

       Please tell me which one you think is more important for
       a child to have:
       INDEPENDENCE OR RESPECT FOR ELDERS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. INDEPENDENCE
       3. BOTH [VOL]
       5. RESPECT FOR ELDERS
       7. NEITHER [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001587    R5b. Obedience or self-reliance
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R5b.

       (Please tell me which one you think is more important
       for a child to have:)
       OBEDIENCE OR SELF-RELIANCE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. OBEDIENCE
       3. BOTH [VOL]
       5. SELF-RELIANCE
       7. NEITHER [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001588    R5c. Curiosity or good manners
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R5c.

       (Please tell me which one you think is more important
       for a child to have:)
       CURIOSITY OR GOOD MANNERS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. CURIOSITY
       3. BOTH [VOL]
       5. GOOD MANNERS
       7. NEITHER [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001589    R5d. Considerate or well behaved
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   R5d.

       (Please tell me which one you think is more important
       for a child to have:)
       BEING CONSIDERATE OR WELL BEHAVED
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. BEING CONSIDERATE
       3. BOTH
       5. WELL BEHAVED
       7. NEITHER [VOL]

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001590    S1.  Budget deficit lar/smal since 1992
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S1.

       As you know, Bill Clinton was first elected President in
       November 1992.  He will soon be leaving office after
       8 years as President.  The next several questions ask
       whether you think things have changed since Clinton came
       into office.
       First, would you say that compared to 1992, the federal
       budget deficit is now smaller, larger, or about the same?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects
       and traits battery (S14-S15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Post election
       instrument they were assigned to administration in the
       Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa.

       1. GOTTEN SMALLER
       3. GOTTEN LARGER           --> SKIP TO S1b
       5. STAYED ABOUT THE SAME   --> SKIP TO S2

       8. DK                      --> SKIP TO S2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post

==============================
M001591    S1a. Deficit much/somewhat smaller
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S1a.

   IF BUDGET DEFICIT SMALLER SINCE 1992:

       (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much smaller
       or somewhat smaller?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH SMALLER       --> SKIP TO S2
       5. SOMEWHAT SMALLER   --> SKIP TO S2


==============================
M001591a   S1b. Deficit much/somewhat larger
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S1b.

   IF BUDGET DEFICIT LARGER SINCE 1992:

       (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much larger or
       somewhat larger?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH LARGER
       5. SOMEWHAT LARGER

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S1

==============================
M001592    S1x. Summary - budget deficit since 92
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S1x.

       First, would you say that compared to 1992, the federal
       budget deficit is now smaller, larger, or about the same?
       (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much smaller
       or somewhat smaller?
       (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much larger or
       somewhat larger?

       SUMMARY: BUDGET DEFICIT SINCE 1992
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from S1 and S2a/b.

       1. Much smaller
       2. Somewhat smaller
       3. About the same
       4. Somewhat larger
       5. Much stronger

==============================
M001592a   S1x1. Summary pre & post - budget deficit
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S1x1.

       First, would you say that compared to 1992, the federal
       budget deficit is now smaller, larger, or about the same?
       (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much smaller
       or somewhat smaller?
       (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much larger or
       somewhat larger?

       COMB SUMMARY: BUDGET DEFICIT SINCE 1992
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Pre Q1s and Post S1x.

       1. Much smaller
       2. Somewhat smaller
       3. About the same
       4. Somewhat larger
       5. Much stronger

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001593    S2. Spending on poor inc/dec since 92
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S2.

       Has federal spending on assistance to the poor been
       increased, decreased, or has it stayed about the same as
       in 1992?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects
       and traits battery (S14-S15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Post election
       instrument they were assigned to administration in the
       Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa.

       1. INCREASED
       3. DECREASED
       5. STAYED ABOUT THE SAME  --> SKIP TO S3

       8. DK                     --> SKIP TO S3
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post

==============================
M001594    S2a. Spend poor a lot/somwhat more/less
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S2a.

   IF FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE POOR INCREASED SINCE 1992/
   IF FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE POOR DECREASED SINCE 1992:

       A lot or somewhat?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A LOT
       5. SOMEWHAT

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S2

==============================
M001595    S2x. Summary - spending on poor since 92
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S2x.

       Has federal spending on assistance to the poor been
       increased, decreased, or has it stayed about the same as
       in 1992?
       A little or a lot?

       SUMMARY: FEDERAL ASSISTANCE TO THE POOR
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from S2 and S2a.

       1. Increased a lot
       2. Increased somewhat
       3. Stayed about the same
       4. Decreased somewhat
       5. Decreased a lot

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW

==============================
M001595a   S2x1. Summary pre & post - spending on poor
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S2x1.

       Has federal spending on assistance to the poor been
       increased, decreased, or has it stayed about the same as
       in 1992?
       A little or a lot?

       COMB. SUMMARY: FEDERAL ASSISTANCE TO THE POOR
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Pre Q2x and Post S2x.

       1. Increased a lot
       2. Increased somewhat
       3. Stayed about the same
       4. Decreased somewhat
       5. Decreased a lot

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001596    S3. Economy better/worse since 1992
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S3.

       Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's
       economy is better, worse, or about the same?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects
       and traits battery (S14-S15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Post election
       instrument they were assigned to administration in the
       Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa.

       1. BETTER
       3. WORSE         --> SKIP TO S3b
       5. THE SAME      --> SKIP TO S4

       8. DK            --> SKIP TO S4
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post

==============================
M001597    S3a. Economy much/somewhat better
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S3a.

   IF U.S. ECONOMY BETTER SINCE 1992:

       (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH BETTER       --> SKIP TO S4
       5. SOMEWHAT BETTER   --> SKIP TO S4

       8. DK                --> SKIP TO S4
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S3

==============================
M001598    S3b. Economy much/somewhat worse
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S3b.

   IF U.S. ECONOMY WORSE SINCE 1992:

       (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH WORSE
       5. SOMEWHAT WORSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S3

==============================
M001599    S3x. Summary - economy since 1992
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S3x.

       Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's
       economy is better, worse, or about the same?
       (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?/
       (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse?

       SUMMARY: ECONOMY SINCE 1992
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from S3, S3a, S3b.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. About the same
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW

==============================
M001599a   S3x1. Summary pre & post - econ since 92
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S3x1.

       Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's
       economy is better, worse, or about the same?
       (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?/
       (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse?

       COMB. SUMMARY: ECONOMY SINCE 1992
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Pre Q3x and Post S3x.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. About the same
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001600    S4. Clinton made economy better/worse since 92
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S4.

       Since 1992, would you say President Clinton has made the
       nation's economy better, made the economy worse,
       or had no effect on the economy one way or the other?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects
       and traits battery (S14-S15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Post election
       instrument they were assigned to administration in the
       Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa.

       1. MADE THE ECONOMY BETTER
       3. MADE THE ECONOMY WORSE      --> SKIP TO S4b
       5. NO EFFECT                   --> SKIP TO S5

       8. DK                          --> SKIP TO S5
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview;  not administered in Post

==============================
M001601    S4a. Clinton made econ much/somewhat better
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S4a.

   IF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. ECONOMY BETTER:

       Much better or somewhat better?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH BETTER        --> SKIP TO S5
       5. SOMEWHAT BETTER    --> SKIP TO S5

       8. DK                 --> SKIP TO S5
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S4

==============================
M001602    S4b. Clinton made econ much/somewhat worse
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S4b.

   IF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. ECONOMY WORSE:

       Much worse or somewhat worse?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH WORSE
       5. SOMEWHAT WORSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S4

==============================
M001603    S4x. Summary - Clinton made econ better/worse
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S4x.

       Since 1992, would you say President Clinton has made the
       nation's economy better, made the economy worse,
       or had no effect on the economy one way or the other?
       Much better or somewhat better?/
       Much worse or somewhat worse?

       SUMMARY: CLINTON EFFECT ON ECONOMY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from S4, S4a, S4b.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. No effect
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW

==============================
M001603a   S4x1. Summary pre & post - Clinton made econ
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S4x1.

       Since 1992, would you say President Clinton has made the
       nation's economy better, made the economy worse,
       or had no effect on the economy one way or the other?
       Much better or somewhat better?/
       Much worse or somewhat worse?

       COMB. SUMMARY: CLINTON EFFECT ON ECONOMY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Pre Q4x and Post S4x.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. No effect
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001604    S5. Clinton admin hurt/help R personally
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S5.

       Have you personally been helped or have you been hurt
       economically by the Clinton Administration, or hasn't
       it affected you one way or the other?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects
       and traits battery (S14-S15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Post election
       instrument they were assigned to administration in the
       Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa.

       1. HELPED
       3. HURT
       5. NOT AFFECTED

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post

==============================
M001604a   S5x. Clinton admin hurt/help R economically?
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S5x.

       Have you personally been helped or have you been hurt
       economically by the Clinton Administration, or hasn't
       it affected you one way or the other?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Pre Q5 and Post S5.
       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects
       and traits battery (S14-S15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Post election
       instrument they were assigned to administration in the
       Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa.

       1. HELPED
       3. HURT
       5. NOT AFFECTED

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post interview

==============================
M001605    S6. U.S. more/less secure since 1992
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S6.

       Would you say that compared to 1992, the United States
       is more secure from its foreign enemies, less
       secure, or hasn't this changed very much?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects
       and traits battery (S14-S15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Post election
       instrument they were assigned to administration in the
       Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa.

       1. MORE SECURE
       3. LESS SECURE    --> SKIP TO S6b
       5. NO CHANGE      --> SKIP TO S7

       8. DK             --> SKIP TO ->S7
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post

==============================
M001606    S6a. U.S. much/somewhat more secure
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S6a.

   IF U.S. MORE SECURE SINCE 1992:

       (Would you say) much more secure or somewhat more secure?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH MORE SECURE       --> SKIP TO S7
       5. SOMEWHAT MORE SECURE   --> SKIP TO S7

==============================
M001607    S6b. U.S. much/somewhat less secure
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S6b.

   IF U.S LESS SECURE SINCE 1992:

       (Would you say) much less secure or somewhat less secure?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH LESS SECURE
       5. SOMEWHAT LESS SECURE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S6

==============================
M001608    S6x. Summary - U.S. security
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S6x.

       Would you say that compared to 1992, the United States
       is more secure from its foreign enemies, less
       secure, or hasn't this changed very much?
       (Would you say) much more secure or somewhat more secure?/
       (Would you say) much less secure or somewhat less secure?

       SUMMARY: U.S. SECURITY FROM FOREIGN ENEMIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from S6, S6a, S6b.

       1. Much more secure
       2. Somewhat more secure
       3. No change
       4. Somewhat less secure
       5. Much less secure

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW

==============================
M001608a   S6x1. Summary pre & post - U.S. security
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S6x1.

       Would you say that compared to 1992, the United States
       is more secure from its foreign enemies, less
       secure, or hasn't this changed very much?
       (Would you say) much more secure or somewhat more secure?/
       (Would you say) much less secure or somewhat less secure?

       COMB. SUMMARY: U.S. SECURITY FROM FOREIGN ENEMIES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Pre Q6x and Post S6x.

       1. Much more secure
       2. Somewhat more secure
       3. No change
       4. Somewhat less secure
       5. Much less secure

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001609    S7. Clinton made U.S. more/less secure
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S7.

       Would you say that the Clinton administration has made
       the United States more secure from its foreign enemies,
       less secure, or hasn't it made much difference either
       way?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects
       and traits battery (S14-S15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Post election
       instrument they were assigned to administration in the
       Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa.

       1. MORE SECURE
       3. LESS SECURE    --> SKIP TO S7b
       5. NO CHANGE      --> SKIP TO S8

       8. DK             --> SKIP TO S8
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post

==============================
M001610    S7a. Clinton made much/smwht more secure
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S7a.

   IF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. MORE SECURE:

       Much more secure or somewhat more secure?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH MORE SECURE       --> SKIP TO S8
       5. SOMEWHAT MORE SECURE   --> SKIP TO S8

       8. DK                    --> SKIP TO S8
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S7

==============================
M001611    S7b. Clinton made much/smwhat less secur
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S7b.

   IF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. LESS SECURE:

       Much less secure or somewhat less secure?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH LESS SECURE
       5. SOMEWHAT LESS SECURE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S7

==============================
M001612    S7x. Summ-Clinton impact on U.S. security
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S7x.

       Would you say that the Clinton administration has made
       the United States more secure from its foreign enemies,
       less secure, or hasn't it made much difference either
       way?
       Much more secure or somewhat more secure?/
       Much less secure or somewhat less secure?

       SUMMARY: CLINTON ADMINISTRATION EFFECT ON U.S. SECURITY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from S7, S7a, S7b.

       1. Much more secure
       2. Somewhat more secure
       3. No change
       4. Somewhat less secure
       5. Much less secure

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW

==============================
M001612a   S7x1. Summ pre & post- Clinton impact on secur
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S7x1.

       Would you say that the Clinton administration has made
       the United States more secure from its foreign enemies,
       less secure, or hasn't it made much difference either
       way?
       Much more secure or somewhat more secure?/
       Much less secure or somewhat less secure?

       COMB. SUMMARY: CLINTON ADMINISTRATION EFFECT ON U.S. SECURITY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Pre Q7x and Post S7x.

       1. Much more secure
       2. Somewhat more secure
       3. No change
       4. Somewhat less secure
       5. Much less secure

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001613    S8. U.S. crime rate better/wors since 92
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S8.

       Would you say that compared to 1992 the nation's crime
       rate has gotten better, gotten worse, or stayed
       about the same?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects
       and traits battery (S14-S15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Post election
       instrument they were assigned to administration in the
       Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa.

       1. BETTER
       3. WORSE      --> SKIP TO S8b
       5. THE SAME   --> SKIP TO S9

       8. DK         --> SKIP TO S9
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post

==============================
M001614    S8a. U.S. crime rate much/smwht better
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S8a.

   IF U.S. CRIME RATE BETTER SINCE 1992:

       (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH BETTER       --> SKIP TO S9
       5. SOMEWHAT BETTER   --> SKIP TO S9

       8. DK                --> SKIP TO S9
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S8

==============================
M001615    S8b. U.S. crime rate much/smwht worse
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S8b.

   IF U.S. CRIME RATE WORSE SINCE 1992:

       (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH WORSE
       5. SOMEWHAT WORSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S8

==============================
M001616    S8x. Summary - U.S. crime rate
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S8x.

       Would you say that compared to 1992 the nation's crime
       rate has gotten better, gotten worse, or stayed
       about the same?
       (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?/
       (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse?

       SUMMARY: U.S. CRIME RATE SINCE 1992
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from S8, S8a, S8b.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. Stayed about the same
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW

==============================
M001616a   S8x1. Summary pre & post - U.S. crime rate
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S8x1.

       Would you say that compared to 1992 the nation's crime
       rate has gotten better, gotten worse, or stayed
       about the same?
       (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?/
       (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse?

       COMB. SUMMARY: U.S. CRIME RATE SINCE 1992
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Pre Q8x and Post S8x.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. Stayed about the same
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001617    S9. Clinton made crime rate better/worse
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S9.

       Would you say that the Clinton administration has made
       the nation's crime rate better, worse, or
       hasn't it made much difference either way?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects
       and traits battery (S14-S15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Post election
       instrument they were assigned to administration in the
       Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa.

       1. BETTER
       3. WORSE          --> SKIP TO S9b
       5. NO DIFFERENCE  --> SKIP TO S10

       8. DK             --> SKIP TO S10
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post

==============================
M001618    S9a. Clinton made crime rate much/smwht bettr
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S9a.

   IF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. CRIME RATE BETTER:

       Much better or somewhat better?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH BETTER       --> SKIP TO S10
       5. SOMEWHAT BETTER   --> SKIP TO S10

       8. DK                --> SKIP TO S10
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S9

==============================
M001619    S9b. Clinton made crime rate much/smwht worse
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S9b.

   IF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S.S CRIME RATE WORSE:

       Much worse or somewhat worse?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH WORSE
       5. SOMEWHAT WORSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S9

==============================
M001620    S9x. Summ-Clinton impact on crime rate
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S9x.

       Would you say that the Clinton administration has made
       the nation's crime rate better, worse, or
       hasn't it made much difference either way?
       Much better or somewhat better?/
       Much worse or somewhat worse?
       0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW

       SUMMARY: EFFECT OF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION ON CRIME RATE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from S9, S9a, S9b.
       0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. No difference
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse
       0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW

==============================
M001620a   S9x1.Summ pre & post - Clinton impact on crime
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S9x1.

       Would you say that the Clinton administration has made
       the nation's crime rate better, worse, or
       hasn't it made much difference either way?
       Much better or somewhat better?/
       Much worse or somewhat worse?
       0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW

       COMB. SUMMARY: EFFECT OF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION ON CRIME RATE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Pre Q9x and Post S9x.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. No difference
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse
       0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001621    S10. Moral climate better/worse since 92
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S10.

       Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's moral
       climate has gotten better, stayed about the same,
       or gotten worse?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects
       and traits battery (S14-S15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Post election
       instrument they were assigned to administration in the
       Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa.

       1. BETTER
       3. WORSE         --> SKIP TO S10b
       5. THE SAME      --> SKIP TO S11

       8. DK            --> SKIP TO S11
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post

==============================
M001622    S10a.Moral climate much/smwht better
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S10a.

   IF U.S MORAL CLIMATE BETTER SINCE 1992:

       (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH BETTER       --> SKIP TO S11
       5. SOMEWHAT BETTER   --> SKIP TO S11

       8. DK                --> SKIP TO S11
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S10

==============================
M001623    S10b. Moral climate much/smwht worse
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S10b.

   IF U.S. MORAL CLIMATE WORSE SINCE 1992:

       (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH WORSE
       5. SOMEWHAT WORSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S10

==============================
M001624    S10x. Summary - moral climate since 92
           Numeric

   S10x.

       Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's moral
       climate has gotten better, stayed about the same,
       or gotten worse?
       (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?/
       (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse?

       SUMMARY: U.S. MORAL CLIMATE SINCE 1992
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from S10, S10a, S10b.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. Stayed about the same
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW

==============================
M001624a   S10x1. Summ pre & post - moral climate since 92
           Numeric

   S10x1.

       Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's moral
       climate has gotten better, stayed about the same,
       or gotten worse?
       (Would you say) much better or somewhat better?/
       (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse?

       COMB. SUMMARY: U.S. MORAL CLIMATE SINCE 1992
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Pre Q10x and Post S10x.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. Stayed about the same
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001625    S11. Clinton made moral climate better/worse
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S11.

       Has the Clinton administration made the nation's moral
       climate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference
       either way?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects
       and traits battery (S14-S15).  If R did not get selected
       for the retrospective battery in the Post election
       instrument they were assigned to administration in the
       Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa.

       1. BETTER
       3. WORSE           --> SKIP TO S11b
       5. NO DIFFERENCE   --> SKIP TO S14

       8. DK              --> SKIP TO S14
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in Post

==============================
M001626    S11a. Clinton made moral clim mch/s better
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S11a.

   IF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. MORAL CLIMATE BETTER:

       Much better or somewhat better?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH BETTER       --> SKIP TO S14
       5. SOMEWHAT BETTER   --> SKIP TO S14

       8. DK                --> SKIP TO S14
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S11

==============================
M001627    S11b. Clinton made moral clim mch/s worse
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S11b.

   IF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. MORAL CLIMATE WORSE:

       Much worse or somewhat worse?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH WORSE
       5. SOMEWHAT WORSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S11

==============================
M001628    S11x. Summ-Clinton impact on moral climate
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S11x.

       Has the Clinton administration made the nation's moral
       climate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference
       either way?
       Much better or somewhat better?/
       Much worse or somewhat worse?

       SUMMARY: EFFECT OF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION ON MORAL CLIMATE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from S11, S11a, S11b.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. No difference
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, administered in Pre; no Post IW

==============================
M001628a   S11x1.Summ pre & post- Clinton impact on moral climate
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S11x1.

       Has the Clinton administration made the nation's moral
       climate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference
       either way?
       Much better or somewhat better?/
       Much worse or somewhat worse?

       COMB. SUMMARY: EFFECT OF CLINTON ADMINISTRATION ON MORAL CLIMATE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Pre Q11x and Post S11x.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. No difference
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001629    S14a. Clinton makes R angry
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S14a.

       (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is
       or because of something he has done, ever made you
       feel:)
       ANGRY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects
       and traits battery (S14-S15).  If R did not get selected
       for the affects/traits battery in the Post election
       instrument they were assigned to administration in the
       Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa.
       The order in which Clinton affects were asked was
       randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. YES
       5. NO   --> SKIP to next affect

       8. DK   --> SKIP to next affect
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post

==============================
M001629a   S14ax. Summ pre & post Clinton - angry
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S14ax.

       (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is
       or because of something he has done, ever made you
       feel:)
       ANGRY

       COMB.PRE/POST: CLINTON AFFECT - ANGRY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Pre Q14a and Post S14a.

       1. YES
       5. NO   --> SKIP to next affect

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001630    S14a1. How often Clinton makes R angry
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S14a1.

   IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R ANGRY:

       How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often,
       fairly often, occasionally, or rarely?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY OFTEN
       2. FAIRLY OFTEN
       3. OCCASIONALLY
       4. RARELY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S14a

==============================
M001630a   S14a1x. Summ pre & post - how often angry
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S14a1x.

       How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often,
       fairly often, occasionally, or rarely?

       COMB. PRE/POST: HOW OFTEN CLINTEN AFFECT - ANGRY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Pre Q14a1 and Post S14a1.

       1. VERY OFTEN
       2. FAIRLY OFTEN
       3. OCCASIONALLY
       4. RARELY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001631    S14b. Clinton makes R hopeful
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S14b.

       (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is
       or because of something he has done, ever made you
       feel:)
       HOPEFUL
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects
       and traits battery (S14-S15).  If R did not get selected
       for the affects/traits battery in the Post election
       instrument they were assigned to administration in the
       Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa.
       The order in which Clinton affects were asked was
       randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. YES
       5. NO   --> SKIP to next affect

       8. DK    --> SKIP to next affect
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post

==============================
M001631a   S14bx. Summ pre & post Clinton -hopeful
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S14bx.

       (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is
       or because of something he has done, ever made you
       feel:)
       HOPEFUL

       COMB. PRE/POST: CLINTON AFFECT - HOPEFUL
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Pre Q14b and Post S14b.

       1. YES
       5. NO   --> SKIP to next affect

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001632    S14b1. How often Clinton make R hopeful
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S14b1.

   IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R HOPEFUL:

       How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very
       often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY OFTEN
       2. FAIRLY OFTEN
       3. OCCASIONALLY
       4. RARELY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S14b

==============================
M001632a   S14b1x. Summ pre & post - how often hopeful
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S14b1x.

       How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very
       often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely?

       COMB. PRE/POST: HOW OFTEN CLINTON AFFECT - HOPEFUL
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Pre Q14b1 and Post S14b1.

       1. VERY OFTEN
       2. FAIRLY OFTEN
       3. OCCASIONALLY
       4. RARELY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001633    S14c. Clinton makes R afraid
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S14c.

       (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is
       or because of something he has done, ever made you
       feel:)
       AFRAID
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects
       and traits battery (S14-S15).  If R did not get selected
       for the affects/traits battery in the Post election
       instrument they were assigned to administration in the
       Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa.
       The order in which Clinton affects were asked was
       randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. YES
       5. NO    --> SKIP to next affect

       8. DK    --> SKIP to next affect
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post

==============================
M001633a   S14cx. Summ pre & post Clinton - afraid
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S14cx.

       (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is
       or because of something he has done, ever made you
       feel:)
       AFRAID

       COMB. PRE/POST: CLINTON AFFECT - AFRAID
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Pre Q14c and Post S14c.

       1. YES
       5. NO    --> SKIP to next affect

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001634    S15c1. How often Clinton makes R afraid
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S14c1.

   IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R AFRAID:

       How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very
       often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY OFTEN
       2. FAIRLY OFTEN
       3. OCCASIONALLY
       4. RARELY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5,8,9,0 in S14c

==============================
M001634a   S14c1x. Summ pre & post - how often afraid
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S14c1x.

       How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very
       often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely?

       COMB. PRE/POST: HOW OFTEN CLINTON AFFECT - AFRAID
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Pre Q14c1 and Post S14c1.

       1. VERY OFTEN
       2. FAIRLY OFTEN
       3. OCCASIONALLY
       4. RARELY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001635    S14d. Clinton makes R proud
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S14d.

       (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is
       or because of something he has done, ever made you
       feel:)
       PROUD
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects
       and traits battery (S14-S15).  If R did not get selected
       for the affects/traits battery in the Post election
       instrument they were assigned to administration in the
       Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa.
       The order in which Clinton affects were asked was
       randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. YES
       5. NO    --> SKIP to next affect

       8. DK    --> SKIP to next affect
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post

==============================
M001635a   S14dx. Summ pre & post Clinton - proud
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S14dx.

       (Has Bill Clinton -- because of the kind of person he is
       or because of something he has done, ever made you
       feel:)
       PROUD

       COMB. PRE/POST: CLINTON AFFECT - PROUD
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Pre Q14d and Post S14d.

       1. YES
       5. NO    --> SKIP to next affect

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001636    S14d1. How often Clinton makes R proud
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S14d1.

   IF R SAYS CLINTON HAS MADE R AFRAID:

       How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very
       often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY OFTEN
       2. FAIRLY OFTEN
       3. OCCASIONALLY
       4. RARELY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in S14d

==============================
M001636a   S14d1x. Summ pre & post - how often proud
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S14d1x.

       How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very
       often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely?

       COMB. PRE/POST: HOW OFTEN CLINTON AFFECT - PROUD
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Pre Q14d1 and Post S14d1.

       1. VERY OFTEN
       2. FAIRLY OFTEN
       3. OCCASIONALLY
       4. RARELY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001637    S15a. Clinton trait - moral
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S15a.

       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       MORAL
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects
       and traits battery (S14-S15).  If R did not get selected
       for the affects/traits battery in the Post election
       instrument they were assigned to administration in the
       Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa.
       The order in which Clinton affects were asked was
       randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post

==============================
M001637a   S15ax. Summ pre & post-Clinton trait - moral
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S15ax.

       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       COMB. PRE/POST: CLINTON TRAIT - MORAL
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Pre Q15a and Post S15a.

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001638    S15b. Clinton trait-cares about people
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S15b.

       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects
       and traits battery (S14-S15).  If R did not get selected
       for the affects/traits battery in the Post election
       instrument they were assigned to administration in the
       Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa.
       The order in which Clinton affects were asked was
       randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post

==============================
M001638a   S15bx. Summ pre & post-Clinton trait-cares
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S15bx.

       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       COMB. PRE/POST: CLITON TRAIT - CARES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Pre Q15b and Post S15b.

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW


==============================
M001639    S15c. Clinton trait - knowledgeable
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S15c.

       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       KNOWLEDGEABLE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects
       and traits battery (S14-S15).  If R did not get selected
       for the affects/traits battery in the Post election
       instrument they were assigned to administration in the
       Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa.
       The order in which Clinton affects were asked was
       randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post

==============================
M001639a   S15cx. Summ pre & post-Clinton knowledgeable
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S15cx.

       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       COMB. PRE/POST: CLITON TRAIT - KNOWLEDGEABLE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Pre Q15c and Post S15c.

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001640    S15d. Clinton trait-strong leadership
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S15d.

       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects
       and traits battery (S14-S15).  If R did not get selected
       for the affects/traits battery in the Post election
       instrument they were assigned to administration in the
       Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa.
       The order in which Clinton affects were asked was
       randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post

==============================
M001640a   S15dx. Summ pre & post-Clinton leadership
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S15dx.

       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       COMB. PRE/POST: CLITON TRAIT - LEADERSHIP
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Pre Q15d and Post S15d.

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001641    S15e. Clinton trait - dishonest
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S15e.

       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       DISHONEST
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects
       and traits battery (S14-S15).  If R did not get selected
       for the affects/traits battery in the Post election
       instrument they were assigned to administration in the
       Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa.
       The order in which Clinton affects were asked was
       randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post

==============================
M001641a   S15ex. Summ pre & post-Clinton dishonest
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S15ex.

       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       COMB. PRE/POST: CLITON TRAIT - DISHONEST
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Pre Q15e and Post S15e.

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001642    S15f. Clinton trait - intelligent
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S15f.

       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       INTELLIGENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects
       and traits battery (S14-S15).  If R did not get selected
       for the affects/traits battery in the Post election
       instrument they were assigned to administration in the
       Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa.
       The order in which Clinton affects were asked was
       randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post

==============================
M001642a   S15fx. Summ pre & post-Clinton-intelligent
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S15fx.

       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       COMB. PRE/POST: CLINTON TRAIT - INTELLIGENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Pre Q15f and Post S15f.

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001643    S15g. Clinton trait - out of touch
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S15g.

       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       Respondents were randomly assigned either to the
       retrospective assessments battery (S1-S11) or the affects
       and traits battery (S14-S15).  If R did not get selected
       for the affects/traits battery in the Post election
       instrument they were assigned to administration in the
       Pre (Q1-Q11) and vice versa.
       The order in which Clinton affects were asked was
       randomized.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post

==============================
M001643a   S15gx. Summ pre & post-Clinton out of touch
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   S15gx.

       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe Bill Clinton extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?
       What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe Bill
       Clinton extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?])

       COMB. PRE/POST: CLITON TRAIT - OUT OF TOUCH
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from Pre Q15g and Post S15g.

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, selected for Post administration and no Post IW

==============================
M001644    T1. Did R watch a Pres debate on tv
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   T1.

       Did you watch a televised presidential debate between Al
       Gore and George W. Bush?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES, WATCHED        --> SKIP TO T1a
       5. NO, DIDN'T WATCH    --> SKIP TO T2

       8. DK                  --> SKIP TO T2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview; not administered in the Post

==============================
M001645    T1a. Did R watch an entire or just part of debate
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   T1a.

   IF R WATCHED PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE:

       Did you watch an entire debate or just part of it?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. WATCHED ENTIRE DEBATE
       5. JUST PART OF IT

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in T1

==============================
M001646    T2. Did R listen to campaign speeches or diss on radio
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   T2.

       Did you listen to any speeches or discussions about the
       campaign on the radio?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES           --> SKIP TO T2a
       5. NO            --> SKIP TO T3

       8. DK            --> SKIP TO T3
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001647    T2a. How much did R listen to radio speeches & diss
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   T2a.

   IF R LISTENED TO RADIO CAMPAIGN PROGRAMS:

       Would you say you listened to a good many, several, or
       just one or two?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GOOD MANY
       3. SEVERAL
       5. JUST ONE OR TWO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in T2

==============================
M001648    T3/T3.T. How much attention to Pres campaign news
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   T3/T3.T.

       FTF:
       Looking at page 12 in the booklet:
       In general, how much attention did you pay to news about
       the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite
       a bit, some, very little, or none?

       TELEPHONE:
       In general, how much attention did you pay to news about
       the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite
       a bit, some, very little, or none?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL
       2. QUITE A BIT
       3. SOME
       4. VERY  LITTLE
       5. NONE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001649    T4/T4.T. How much attention to Cong campaign news
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   T4/T4.T.

       FTF:
       (Still on page 12 in the booklet)
       In general, how much attention did you pay to news about
       the campaigns for election to Congress -- that is,
       the House of Representatives in Washington -- a great
       deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none?

       TELEPHONE:
       In general, how much attention did you pay to news about
       the campaigns for election to Congress -- that is,
       the House of Representatives in Washington -- a great
       deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL
       2. QUITE A BIT
       3. SOME
       4. VERY  LITTLE
       5. NONE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001650    T5/T5.T. Two parties, no labels, or new party
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   T5/T5.T.

       FTF:
       Looking at page 13 of the booklet:
       Here is a question about political parties.
       Which of the following outcomes regarding political
       parties best represents what you would like to see
       happen? You can just tell me the number of the outcome
       you choose.

       TELEPHONE:
       Which one of the following outcomes regarding political
       parties best represents what you would like to see
       happen?
       ONE, a continuation of the two party system of Democrats
       and Republicans.
       TWO, elections in which candidates run as individuals
       without party labels or
       THREE, the growth of one or more parties that could
       effectively challenge the Democrats and Republicans?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. ..A CONTINUATION OF THE TWO PARTY SYSTEM OF DEMOCRATS AND
             REPUBLICANS?
       2. ...ELECTIONS IN WHICH CANDIDATES RUN AS INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT
             PARTY LABELS?
       3. ...THE GROWTH OF ONE OR MORE PARTIES THAT COULD EFFECTIVELY
             CHALLENGE THE DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS?

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001651    T6. Is R satisfied with US Democracy
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   T6.

       On the whole, are you satisfied, fairly satisfied, not
       very satisfied, or not at all satisfied with the way
       democracy works in the United States?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This variable was added 11/10/2000.

       1. SATISFIED
       2. FAIRLY SATISFIED
       3. NOT VERY SATISFIED
       4. NOT AT ALL SATISFIED

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview;
          interview administered before question added

==============================
M001652    V1. Bush effect on US economy
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   V1.

       As you will remember, former President George Bush
       (George W. Bush's father) was elected in November 1988.
       The next several questions ask you to think about his
       four years as President.
       Would you say President Bush made the nation's economy
       better, made the economy worse, or had no effect on the
       economy one way or the other?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MADE THE ECONOMY BETTER
       3. MADE THE ECONOMY WORSE              --> SKIP TO V1b
       5. NO EFFECT                           --> SKIP TO V2
       7. DK ANYTHING ABOUT BUSH SR. [VOL.]   --> SKIP TO Y5

       8. DK                                  --> SKIP TO V2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001653    V1a. How much better Bush made economy
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   V1a.

   IF FORMER PRESIDENT BUSH MADE ECONOMY BETTER:

       Much better or somewhat better?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH BETTER       --> SKIP TO V2
       5. SOMEWHAT BETTER   --> SKIP TO V2

       8. DK                --> SKIP TO V2
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 0 in V1

==============================
M001654    V1b. How much worse Bush made economy
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   V1b.

   IF FORMER PRESIDENT BUSH MADE ECONOMY WORSE:

       Much worse or somewhat worse?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH WORSE
       5. SOMEWHAT WORSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 7, 8, 9, 0 in V1

==============================
M001655    V1x. Summary: Bush effect on economy
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   V1x.

       Would you say President Bush made the nation's economy
       better, made the economy worse, or had no effect on the
       economy one way or the other?
       Much better or somewhat better?/
       Much worse or somewhat worse?

       SUMMARY: EFFECT OF FORMER PRESIDENT BUSH ON 1988-1992 ECONOMY
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from V1, V1a, V1b.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. No effect
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post IW

==============================
M001656    V2. Bush made US more secure
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   V2.

       Would you say that the  Bush administration made the
       United States more secure from its foreign enemies,
       less secure, or didn't it make much difference either
       way?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MORE SECURE
       3. LESS SECURE       --> SKIP TOV2b
       5. NO DIFFERENCE     --> SKIP TO V3

       8. DK                --> SKIP TO V3
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview

==============================
M001657    V2a. Bush made US how much more secure
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   V2a.

   IF FORMER BUSH ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. MORE SECURE:

       Much more secure or somewhat more secure?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH MORE SECURE      --> SKIP TO V3
       5. SOMEWHAT MORE SECURE  --> SKIP TO V3

       8. DK                    --> SKIP TO V3
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in V2

==============================
M001658    V2b. Bush made US how much less secure
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   V2b.

   IF FORMER BUSH ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. LESS SECURE:

       Much less secure or somewhat less secure?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH LESS SECURE
       5. SOMEWHAT LESS SECURE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in V2

==============================
M001659    V2x. Summary: Bush effect on security
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   V2x.

       Would you say that the  Bush administration made the
       United States more secure from its foreign enemies,
       less secure, or didn't it make much difference either
       way?
       Much more secure or somewhat more secure?/
       Much less secure or somewhat less secure?

       SUMMARY: EFFECT OF FORMER PRES BUSH ON U.S. SECURITY 1988-1992
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from V2, V2a, V2b.

       1. Much more secure
       2. Somewhat more secure
       3. No difference
       4. Somewhat less secure
       5. Much less secure

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post IW

==============================
M001660    V3. Bush effect on US crime rate
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   V3.

       Would you say that the  Bush administration made the
       nation's crime rate better, worse, or didn't it make
       much difference either way?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. BETTER
       3. WORSE          --> SKIP TO V3b
       5. NO DIFFERENCE  --> SKIP TO V4

       8. DK             --> SKIP TO V4
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview

==============================
M001661    V3a. Bush made crime rate how mch better
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   V3a.

   IF FORMER BUSH ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. CRIME RATE BETTER:

       Much better or somewhat better?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH BETTER       --> SKIP TO V4
       5. SOMEWHAT BETTER   --> SKIP TO V4

       8. DK                --> SKIP TO V4
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in V3

==============================
M001662    V3b. Bush made crime rate how much worse
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   V3b.

   IF FORMER BUSH ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. CRIME RATE WORSE:

       Much worse or somewhat worse?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH WORSE
       5. SOMEWHAT WORSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in V3

==============================
M001663    V3x. Summary: Bush effect on crime
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   V3x.

       Would you say that the  Bush administration made the
       nation's crime rate better, worse, or didn't it make
       much difference either way?
       Much more secure or somewhat more secure?/
       Much less secure or somewhat less secure?

       SUMMARY: EFFECT OF FORMER PRESIDENT BUSH ON U.S. CRIME 1988-1992
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Built from V3, V3a, V3b.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. No difference
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post IW

==============================
M001664    V4. Bush effect on moral climate
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   V4.

       Did the Bush administration make the nation's moral
       climate better, worse, or didn't it make much difference
       either way?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. BETTER
       3. WORSE           --> SKIP TO V4b
       5. NO DIFFERENCE   --> SKIP TO V5

       8. DK              --> SKIP TO V5
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview

==============================
M001665    V4a. Bush moral climate how much better
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   V4a.

   IF FORMER BUSH ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. MORAL CLIMATE BETTER:

       Much better or somewhat better?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH BETTER       --> SKIP TO V5
       5. SOMEWHAT BETTER   --> SKIP TO V5

       8. DK                --> SKIP TO V5
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 3, 5, 8, 9, 0 in V4

==============================
M001666    V4b. Bush moral climate how much worse
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   V4b.

   IF FORMER BUSH ADMINISTRATION MADE U.S. MORAL CLIMATE WORSE:

       Much worse or somewhat worse?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MUCH WORSE
       5. SOMEWHAT WORSE

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 5, 8, 9, 0 in V4

==============================
M001667    V4x. Summary: Bush effect on moral climate
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   V4x.

       Did the Bush administration make the nation's moral
       climate better, worse, or didn't it make much difference
       either way?
       Much better or somewhat better?/
       Much worse or somewhat worse?

       SUMMARY: EFFECT OF FORMER PRES BUSH ON MORAL CLIMATE 1988-1992
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       Bult from V4, V4a, V4b.

       1. Much better
       2. Somewhat better
       3. No difference
       4. Somewhat worse
       5. Much worse

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post IW

==============================
M001668    V5a. Bush trait - moral
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   V5a.

       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe former President George Bush extremely well,
       quite well, not too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe former
       President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?])

       MORAL
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       Bush Sr. traits were asked in random order.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview

==============================
M001669    V5b. Bush trait - cares about people
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   V5b.

       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe former President George Bush extremely well,
       quite well, not too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe former
       President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?])

       REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       Bush Sr. traits were asked in random order.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview

==============================
M001670    V5c. Bush trait - knowledgeable
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   V5c.

       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe former President George Bush extremely well,
       quite well, not too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe former
       President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?])

       KNOWLEDGEABLE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       Bush Sr. traits were asked in random order.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

==============================
M001671    V5d. Bush trait - strong leadership
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   V5d.

       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe former President George Bush extremely well,
       quite well, not too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe former
       President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?])

       PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       Bush Sr. traits were asked in random order.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview

==============================
M001672    V5e. Bush trait - dishonest
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   V5e.

       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe former President George Bush extremely well,
       quite well, not too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe former
       President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?])

       DISHONEST
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       Bush Sr. traits were asked in random order.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview

==============================
M001673    V5f. Bush trait - intelligent
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   V5f.

       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe former President George Bush extremely well,
       quite well, not too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe former
       President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?])

       INTELLIGENT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       Bush Sr. traits were asked in random order.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview

==============================
M001674    V5g. Bush trait - out of touch
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   V5g.

       Please look at page 4 of the booklet.
       In your opinion, does the phrase 'he is <trait>?"
       describe former President George Bush extremely well,
       quite well, not too well, or not well at all?
       (What about <trait>? [Does this phrase describe former
       President George Bush extremely well, quite well, not
       too well, or not well at all?])

       OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [DO NOT PROBE "DK"]
       Bush Sr. traits were asked in random order.

       Randomization:  Randomization is documented within the
       collection of randomization variables that appear at the end of
       the Pre survey vars.  The question numbers for randomization
       variables closely follow survey question numbers, preceded by
       "Rand" [e.g. for questions A4/A5 there is a randomization
       variable Rand.A4/A5].

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 7 in V1; no Post interview

==============================
M001675    Y5. Is R currently working
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y5.

       Are you currently working?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES   --> Y7
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001676a   Y6a. Why is R not working, reason 1
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y6a.

   IF R NOT CURRENTLY WORKING:

       Please look at page 14 of the booklet.
       We'd like to know if you are temporarily laid off, or
       are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a
       homemaker, a student, or what?

       MENTION 1
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [MULTIPLE MENTIONS; IF TLO AND RETIRED, GO TO Y10; IF
       RETIRED AND ANY OTHER COMBINATION(S) EXCEPT TLO GO TO Y15;
       COMBINATIONS NOT INCLUDING RETIRED OR TLO SKIP TO Z1]

       1. TEMPORARILY LAID OFF --> SKIP TO Y10 IF TLO ONLY
       2. UNEMPLOYED           --> SKIP TO Z1 IF UNEMPLOYED ONLY
       3. RETIRED              --> SKIP TO Y15 IF RETIRED ONLY
       4. PERMANENTLY DISABLED --> SKIP TO Z1 IF DISABLED ONLY
       5. HOMEMAKER            --> SKIP TO Z1 IF HOMEMAKER ONLY
       6. STUDENT              --> SKIP TO Z1 IF STUDENT ONLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5

==============================
M001676b   Y6b. Why is R not working, reason 2
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y6b.

   IF R NOT CURRENTLY WORKING:

       Please look at page 14 of the booklet.
       We'd like to know if you are temporarily laid off, or
       are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a
       homemaker, a student, or what?

       MENTION 2
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [MULTIPLE MENTIONS; IF TLO AND RETIRED, GO TO Y10; IF
       RETIRED AND ANY OTHER COMBINATION(S) EXCEPT TLO GO TO Y15;
       COMBINATIONS NOT INCLUDING RETIRED OR TLO SKIP TO Z1]

       1. TEMPORARILY LAID OFF --> SKIP TO Y10 IF TLO ONLY
       2. UNEMPLOYED           --> SKIP TO Z1 IF UNEMPLOYED ONLY
       3. RETIRED              --> SKIP TO Y15 IF RETIRED ONLY
       4. PERMANENTLY DISABLED --> SKIP TO Z1 IF DISABLED ONLY
       5. HOMEMAKER            --> SKIP TO Z1 IF HOMEMAKER ONLY
       6. STUDENT              --> SKIP TO Z1 IF STUDENT ONLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; no further mention

==============================
M001676c   Y6c. Why is R not working, reason 3
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y6c.

   IF R NOT CURRENTLY WORKING:

       Please look at page 14 of the booklet.
       We'd like to know if you are temporarily laid off, or
       are you unemployed, retired, permanently disabled, a
       homemaker, a student, or what?

       MENTION 3
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [MULTIPLE MENTIONS; IF TLO AND RETIRED, GO TO Y10; IF RETIRED
       AND ANY OTHER COMBINATION(S) EXCEPT TLO GO TO Y15; COMBINATIONS NOT
       INCLUDING RETIRED OR TLO SKIP TO Z1]

       1. TEMPORARILY LAID OFF --> SKIP TO Y10 IF TLO ONLY
       2. UNEMPLOYED           --> SKIP TO Z1 IF UNEMPLOYED ONLY
       3. RETIRED              --> SKIP TO Y15 IF RETIRED ONLY
       4. PERMANENTLY DISABLED --> SKIP TO Z1 IF DISABLED ONLY
       5. HOMEMAKER            --> SKIP TO Z1 IF HOMEMAKER ONLY
       6. STUDENT              --> SKIP TO Z1 IF STUDENT ONLY

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; no further mention

==============================
M001677    Y7. Workers: How satisfied is R with work
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y7.

   IF R CURRENTLY WORKING:

       On the whole, how satisfied are you with the work you
       do?  Would you say you are very satisfied,
       somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, or very
       dissatisfied?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY SATISFIED
       2. SOMEWHAT SATISFIED
       3. SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED
       4. VERY DISSATISFIED

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Y5

==============================
M001678    Y7a. WRKS: Does R spend work time with people
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y7a.

   IF R CURRENTLY WORKING:

       In your current position, do you spend time during the
       day with other people or are you pretty much by yourself?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1.  WITH OTHER PEOPLE
       5.  OR BY YOURSELF

       8.  DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Y5

==============================
M001679    Y8.  WRKS: Rs coworkers looking out for themselves
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y8.

   IF R CURRENTLY WORKING:

       I'm going to ask you a few questions about the people you
       regularly see at work.
       In general, with these people in mind, would you say
       that they are just looking out for themselves all of the
       time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever,
       or never?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. ALL OF THE TIME
       2. MOST OF THE TIME
       3. SOME OF THE TIME
       4. HARDLY EVER
       5. NEVER
       7. R INSISTS [VOL]: NOT APPROPRIATE TO WORK SITUATION  ---> Z1

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Y5

==============================
M001680    Y8a. WRKS: Do Rs coworkers try to take advantage
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y8a.

   IF R CURRENTLY WORKING:

       Would you say those people you see regularly at work try
       to take advantage of others all of the time,
       most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or
       never?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. ALL OF THE TIME
       2. MOST OF THE TIME
       3. SOME OF THE TIME
       4. HARDLY EVER
       5. NEVER

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Y5; 7 in Y8

==============================
M001681    Y8b. WRKS: Do Rs coworkers treat others with respect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y8b.

   IF R CURRENTLY WORKING:

       (Again, thinking about those people you see regularly at
       work) Would you say that they treat others with respect
       all of the time, most of the time, some of the time,
       hardly ever, or never?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. ALL OF THE TIME
       2. MOST OF THE TIME
       3. SOME OF THE TIME
       4. HARDLY EVER
       5. NEVER

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Y5; 7 in Y8

==============================
M001682    Y8c. WRKS: Does honest describe Rs coworkers
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y8c.

   IF R CURRENTLY WORKING:

       Would you say that honest describes the people you work
       with extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. EXTREMELY WELL      --> Z1
       2. QUITE WELL          --> Z1
       3. NOT TOO WELL        --> Z1
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL  --> Z1

       8. DON'T KNOW          --> Z1
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Y5; 7 in Y8

==============================
M001683    Y8d. WRKS:Racial diversity of Rs coworkers
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y8d.

   IF R CURRENTLY WORKING:

       Thinking about the diversity of your workplace, are the
       people who work where you work all White, mostly white,
       about half and half, mostly Black, or all Black?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. ALL WHITE
       2. MOSTLY WHITE
       3. ABOUT HALF AND HALF
       4. MOSTLY BLACK
       5. ALL BLACK
       7. R VOLUNTEERS:  OTHER (SPECIFY)

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Y5; 7 in Y8

==============================
M001684    Y10. Laid off:Does R spend days alone/with others
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y10.

   IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF:

       When you are working, do you spend time during the day
       with other people or are you pretty much by yourself?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. WITH OTHER PEOPLE
       5. OR BY YOURSELF

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; unemployed, disabled, homemaker
          or student and not also retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c

==============================
M001685    Y11.  LOff: Rs coworkers just looking out for selves
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y11.

   IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF:

       I'm going to ask you a few questions about the people you
       regularly see at work.
       In general, with these people in mind, would you say
       that they are just looking out for themselves all of the
       time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever,
       or never?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. ALL OF THE TIME
       2. MOST OF THE TIME
       3. SOME OF THE TIME
       4. HARDLY EVER
       5. NEVER
       7. R INSISTS [VOL]: WAS NOT APPROPRIATE TO WORK SITUATION  ---> Z1

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; unemployed, disabled, homemaker
          or student and not also retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c

==============================
M001686    Y11a. LOff: Do Rs coworkers try to take advantage
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y11a.

   IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF:

       Would you say those people you see regularly at work try
       to take advantage of others all of the time, most of
       the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. ALL OF THE TIME
       2. MOST OF THE TIME
       3. SOME OF THE TIME
       4. HARDLY EVER
       5. NEVER

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; unemployed, disabled, homemaker
          or student and not also retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c; 7 in Y11

==============================
M001687    Y11b. LOff:Do Rs coworkers treat others with respect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y11b.

   IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF:

       (Again, thinking about those people you see regularly at
       work) Would you say that they treat  others with respect
       all of the time, most of the time, some of the time,
       hardly ever, or never?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. ALL OF THE TIME
       2. MOST OF THE TIME
       3. SOME OF THE TIME
       4. HARDLY EVER
       5. NEVER

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; unemployed, disabled, homemaker
          or student and not also retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c; 7 in Y11

==============================
M001688    Y11c. LOFF: Does honest describe Rs coworkers
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y11c.

   IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF:

       Would you say that honest describes the people you work
       with extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. EXTREMELY WELL      --> Z1
       2. QUITE WELL          --> Z1
       3. NOT TOO WELL        --> Z1
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL     --> Z1

       8. DON'T KNOW          --> Z1
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; unemployed, disabled, homemaker
          or student and not also retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c; 7 in Y11

==============================
M001689    Y15. Retired:Does R spend days alone/with others
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y15.

   IF R IS RETIRED:

       Thinking about your last job, did you spend time during
       the day with other people or were you pretty much by
       yourself?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1  WITH OTHER PEOPLE
       5  OR BY YOURSELF

       8  DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; not retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c

==============================
M001690    Y16.  RET:Rs coworker look out for themselves
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y16.

   IF R IS RETIRED:

       For these next few questions please continue thinking
       about your last job.  I'm going to ask you about the
       people you saw regularly at work.
       In general, with these people in mind, would you say
       that they were just looking out for themselves all of
       the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly
       ever, or never?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. ALL OF  THE TIME
       2. MOST OF THE TIME
       3. SOME OF THE TIME
       4. HARDLY EVER
       5. NEVER
       7. R INSISTS [VOL]: WAS NOT APPROPRIATE TO WORK SITUATION  --> Z1

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; not retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c

==============================
M001691    Y16a. RET:Did Rs coworkers try to take advantage
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y16a.

   IF R IS RETIRED:

       Would you say those people you saw regularly at work
       tried to take advantage of others all of the time, most
       of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. ALL OF  THE TIME
       2. MOST OF THE TIME
       3. SOME OF THE TIME
       4. HARDLY EVER
       5. NEVER

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; not retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c;
          7 in Y16

==============================
M001692    Y16b. RET:Were Rs coworkers respectful
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y16b.

   IF R IS RETIRED:

       (Again, thinking about those people you saw regularly at
       work) Would you say that they treated others with
       respect all of the time, most of the time, some of the
       time, hardly ever, or never?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. ALL OF  THE TIME
       2. MOST OF THE TIME
       3. SOME OF THE TIME
       4. HARDLY EVER
       5. NEVER

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; not retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c;
          7 in Y16

==============================
M001693    Y16c. RET: Does honest describe Rs coworkers
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y16c.

   IF R IS RETIRED:

       Would you say that honest described the people you
       worked with extremely well, quite well, not too well, or
       not well at all?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 9, 0 in Y5; not retired in Y6a, Y6b, Y6c;
          7 in Y16

==============================
M001694    Y17x. Summary: R work with others
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y17x.

   IF R CURRENTLY WORKING /
   IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF /
   IF R IS RETIRED:

       In your current position, do you spend time during the
       day with other people or are you pretty much by
       yourself?/
       When you are working, do you spend time during the day
       with other people or are you pretty much by yourself?/
       Thinking about your last job, did you spend time during
       the day with other people or were you pretty much by
       yourself?

       SUMMARY: R WORK WITH OTHERS
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1  WITH OTHER PEOPLE
       5  OR BY YOURSELF

==============================
M001695    Y18x. Summary: co-workers look out for selves
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y18x.

   IF R CURRENTLY WORKING /
   IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF /
   IF R IS RETIRED:

       In general, with these people in mind, would you say
       that they are just looking out for themselves all of the
       time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever,
       or never?/
       In general, with these people in mind, would you say
       that they are just looking out for themselves all of the
       time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever,
       or never?/
       In general, with these people in mind, would you say
       that they were just looking out for themselves all of
       the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly
       ever, or never?

       SUMMARY: CO-WORKERS LOOK OUT FOR SELVES
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. ALL OF  THE TIME
       2. MOST OF THE TIME
       3. SOME OF THE TIME
       4. HARDLY EVER
       5. NEVER
       7. R INSISTS [VOL]: WAS NOT APPROPRIATE TO WORK SITUATION  --> Z1

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in Y5; 2,4,5,6,8,9 in Y6a/Y6b/Y6c; no Post IW

==============================
M001696    Y18ax. Summary: co-workers try to take advantage
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y18ax.

   IF R CURRENTLY WORKING /
   IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF /
   IF R IS RETIRED:

       Would you say those people you see regularly at work try
       to take advantage of others all of the time,
       most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or
       never?/
       Would you say those people you see regularly at work try
       to take advantage of others all of the time, most of
       the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never?/
       Would you say those people you saw regularly at work
       tried to take advantage of others all of the time, most
       of the time, some of the time, hardly ever, or never?

       SUMMARY: CO-WORKERS TAKE ADVANTAGE
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. ALL OF  THE TIME
       2. MOST OF THE TIME
       3. SOME OF THE TIME
       4. HARDLY EVER
       5. NEVER

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in Y5; 2,4,5,6,8,9 in Y6a/Y6b/Y6c; 7 in Y18x;
          no Post IW

==============================
M001697    Y18bx. Summary: co-workers treat others w/respect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y18bx.

   IF R CURRENTLY WORKING /
   IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF /
   IF R IS RETIRED:

       (Again, thinking about those people you see regularly at
       work) Would you say that they treat others with respect
       all of the time, most of the time, some of the time,
       hardly ever, or never?/
       (Again, thinking about those people you see regularly at
       work) Would you say that they treat  others with respect
       all of the time, most of the time, some of the time,
       hardly ever, or never?/
       (Again, thinking about those people you saw regularly at
       work) Would you say that they treated others with
       respect all of the time, most of the time, some of the
       time, hardly ever, or never?

       SUMMARY: CO-WORKERS TREAT OTHERS WITH RESPECT
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. ALL OF  THE TIME
       2. MOST OF THE TIME
       3. SOME OF THE TIME
       4. HARDLY EVER
       5. NEVER

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in Y5; 2,4,5,6,8,9 in Y6a/Y6b/Y6c; 7 in Y18x;
          no Post IW

==============================
M001698    Y18cx. Summary: co-workers honest
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Y18cx.

   IF R CURRENTLY WORKING /
   IF R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF /
   IF R IS RETIRED:

       Would you say that honest describes the people you work
       with extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?/
       Would you say that honest describes the people you work
       with extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not
       well at all?/
       Would you say that honest described the people you
       worked with extremely well, quite well, not too well, or
       not well at all?

       SUMMARY: CO-WORKERS HONEST
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. EXTREMELY WELL
       2. QUITE WELL
       3. NOT TOO WELL
       4. NOT WELL AT ALL

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 8,9,NA in Y5; 2,4,5,6,8,9 in Y6a/Y6b/Y6c; 7 in Y18x;
          no Post IW

==============================
M001699    Z1. Person R discusses politics with: name 1
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z1.

       Now let's shift our attention to another area.
       From time to time, people discuss government, elections
       and politics with other people.  I'd like to ask you
       about the people with whom you discuss these matters.
       These people might or might not be relatives.
       Can you think of anyone?

       R IDENTIFIES NAME 1
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO  --> Z25

       8. DK  -->Z25
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001700    Z3. Person R discusses politics with: name 2
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z3.

       Is there anyone else you talk with about these matters?

       R IDENTIFIES NAME 2
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO   --> Z9

       8. DK   --> Z9
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1

==============================
M001701    Z5. Person R discusses politics with: name 3
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z5.

       Is there anyone else (you talk with about these matters)?

       R IDENTIFIES NAME 3
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO   --> Z9

       8. DK   --> Z9
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z3

==============================
M001702    Z7. Person R discusses politics with: name 4
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z7.

       Is there anyone else (you talk with about these matters)?

       R IDENTIFIES NAME 4
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO   --> Z9

       8. DK   --> Z9
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z5

==============================
M001703    Z9. Is name 1 relative
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z9.

       Is <NAME 1> a spouse or partner, other relative, or
       unrelated to you by blood or marriage?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. SPOUSE OR PARTNER  (A PARTNER IS LIKE A
          SPOUSE, BUT WITHOUT BEING MARRIED)            --> SKIP TO Z10
       3. OTHER RELATIVE, OR                            --> SKIP TO Z9a
       5. UNRELATED BY BLOOD OR MARRIAGE                --> SKIP TO Z9a

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1

==============================
M001704    Z9a. Is name 1 male or female
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z9a.

       IF NECESSARY: Is <NAME 1> male or female?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MALE      --> IF SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE, SKIP TO Z10
       5. FEMALE    --> IF SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE, SKIP TO Z10

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1

==============================
M001705    Z9b. Is name 1 coworker
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z9b.

   IF NAME 1 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE:

       Is <NAME 1> a co-worker?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z9

==============================
M001706    Z9c. Does name 1 go to church with R
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z9c.

   IF NAME 1 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE:

       Do you and <NAME 1> go to the same place of worship?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z9

==============================
M001707    Z9d. Is name 1 a neighbor
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z9d.

   IF NAME 1 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE:

       Does <NAME 1> live in your neighborhood?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z9

==============================
M001708    Z10. How often does R discuss politics w/name 1
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z10.

       When you talk with <NAME 1>, do you discuss political
       matters...often, sometimes, rarely, or never?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. OFTEN
       3. SOMETIMES
       5. RARELY
       7. NEVER

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1

==============================
M001709    Z11. How much does name 1 know about politics
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z11.

       Generally speaking, how much do you think <NAME 1>
       knows about politics?  Would you say:
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL
       3. AN AVERAGE AMOUNT
       5. NOT MUCH AT ALL

       8. DK - DON'T PROBE
       9. RF - DON'T PROBE
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1

==============================
M001710    Z12. How name 1 voted in election
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   Z12.

       I have another question about the first person you have
       named.  How do you think <NAME 1> voted in the
       election?   Do you think he/she voted for Al Gore,
       George Bush, some other candidate, or do you think
       <NAME 1> didn't vote?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1.  AL GORE
       3.  GEORGE W BUSH
       5.  SOME OTHER CANDIDATE (SPECIFY)
       7.  DIDN'T VOTE
       8.  INELIGIBLE TO VOTE [VOL]

       98. DK - DON'T PROBE
       99. RF - DON'T PROBE
       00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1

==============================
M001711    Z13. Is name 2 relative
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z13.

       Is <NAME 2> a spouse or partner, other relative, or
       unrelated to you by blood or marriage?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. SPOUSE OR PARTNER  (A PARTNER IS LIKE A
          SPOUSE, BUT WITHOUT BEING MARRIED)         --> SKIP TO Z14
       3. OTHER RELATIVE, OR                         --> SKIP TO Z13a
       5. UNRELATED BY BLOOD OR MARRIAGE             --> SKIP TO Z13a

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z3

==============================
M001712    Z13a. Is name 2 male or female
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z13a.

       IF NECESSARY: Is <NAME 2> male or female?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MALE      --> IF SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE, SKIP TO Z14
       5. FEMALE    --> IF SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE, SKIP TO Z14

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z3

==============================
M001713    Z13b. Is name 2 coworker
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z13b.

   IF NAME 2 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE:

       Is <NAME 2> a co-worker?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z13

==============================
M001714    Z13c. Does name 2 go to church with R
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z13c.

   IF NAME 2 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE:

       Do you and <NAME 2> go to the same place of worship?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z13

==============================
M001715    Z13d. Is name 2 a neighbor
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z13d.

   IF NAME 2 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE:

       Does <NAME 2> live in your neighborhood?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z13

==============================
M001716    Z14. How often does R discuss politics w/name 2
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z14.

       When you talk with <NAME 2>, do you discuss political
       matters...often, sometimes, rarely, or never?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. OFTEN
       3. SOMETIMES
       5. RARELY
       7. NEVER

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z3

==============================
M001717    Z15. How much does name 2 know about politics
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z15.

       Generally speaking, how much do you think <NAME 2>
       knows about politics? Would you say:
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL
       3. AN AVERAGE AMOUNT, OR
       5. NOT MUCH AT ALL

       8. DK - DON'T PROBE
       9. RF - DON'T PROBE
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z3

==============================
M001718    Z16. How name 2 voted in election
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   Z16.

       Do you think <NAME 2> voted for Al Gore, George Bush,
       some other candidate, or do you think he/she didn't
       vote?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1.  AL GORE
       3.  GEORGE W BUSH
       5.  SOME OTHER CANDIDATE [SPECIFY]
       7.  DIDN'T VOTE
       8.  INELIGIBLE TO VOTE [VOL]

       98. DK - DON'T PROBE
       99. RF - DON'T PROBE
       00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z3

==============================
M001719    Z17. Is name 3 relative
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z17.

       Is <NAME 3> a spouse or partner, other relative, or
       unrelated to you by blood or marriage?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. SPOUSE OR PARTNER  (A PARTNER IS LIKE A
          SPOUSE, BUT WITHOUT BEING MARRIED)          --> SKIP TO Z18
       3. OTHER RELATIVE, OR                          --> SKIP TO Z17a
       5. UNRELATED BY BLOOD OR MARRIAGE              --> SKIP TO Z17a

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z5

==============================
M001720    Z17a. Is name 3 male or female
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z17a.

       IF NECESSARY: Is <NAME 3> male or female?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MALE      --> IF SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE, SKIP TO Z18
       5. FEMALE    --> IF SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE, SKIP TO Z18

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z5

==============================
M001721    Z17b. Is name 3 coworker
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z17b.

   IF NAME 3 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE:

       Is <NAME 3> a co-worker?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z17

==============================
M001722    Z17c. Does name 3 go to church with R
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z17c.

   IF NAME 3 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE:

       Do you and <NAME 3> go to the same place of worship?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z17

==============================
M001723    Z17d. Is name 3 a neighbor
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z17d.

   IF NAME 3 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE:

       Does <NAME 3> live in your neighborhood?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z17

==============================
M001724    Z18. How often does R discuss politics w/name 3
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z18.

       When you talk with <NAME 3>, do you discuss political
       matters...often, sometimes, rarely, or never?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. OFTEN
       3. SOMETIMES
       5. RARELY, OR
       7. NEVER

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z5

==============================
M001725    Z19. How much does name 3 know about politics
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z19.

       Generally speaking, how much do you think <NAME 3>
       knows about politics? Would you say:
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. A GREAT DEAL
       3. AN AVERAGE AMOUNT, OR
       5. NOT MUCH AT ALL

       8. DK - DON'T PROBE
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z5

==============================
M001726    Z20. How name 3 voted in election
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   Z20.

       Do you think <NAME 3> voted for Al Gore, George Bush,
       some other candidate, or do you think fill he/she didn't
       vote?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1.  AL GORE
       3.  GEORGE W BUSH
       5.  SOME OTHER CANDIDATE (SPECIFY) [SPECIFY]
       7.  DIDN'T VOTE
       8.  INELIGIBLE TO VOTE [VOL]

       98. DK - DON'T PROBE
       99. RF - DON'T PROBE
       00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1

==============================
M001727    Z21. Is name 4 relative
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z21.

       Is <NAME 4> a spouse or partner, other relative, or
       unrelated to you by blood or marriage?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. SPOUSE OR PARTNER  (A PARTNER IS LIKE A
          SPOUSE, BUT WITHOUT BEING MARRIED)        --> SKIP TO Z22
       3. OTHER RELATIVE, OR                        --> SKIP TO Z21a
       5. UNRELATED BY BLOOD OR MARRIAGE            --> SKIP TO Z21a

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z7

==============================
M001728    Z21a. Is name 4 male or female
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z21a.

       IF NECESSARY: Is <NAME 4> male or female?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. MALE   --> IF SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE, SKIP TO Z22
       5. FEMALE --> IF SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE, SKIP TO Z22

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z7

==============================
M001729    Z21b. Is name 4 coworker
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z21b.

   IF NAME 4 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE:

       Is <NAME 4> a co-worker?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z21

==============================
M001730    Z21c. Does name 4 go to church with R
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z21c.

   IF NAME 4 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE:

       Do you and <NAME 4> go to the same place of worship?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 1, 3, 0 in Z21

==============================
M001731    Z21d. Is name 4 a neighbor
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z21d.

   IF NAME 4 IS NOT SPOUSE/PARTNER OR OTHER RELATIVE:

       Does <NAME 4> live in your neighborhood?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

==============================
M001732    Z22. How often does R discuss politics w/name 4
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z22.

       When you talk with <NAME 4>, do you discuss political
       matters...often, sometimes, rarely, or never?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. OFTEN
       3. SOMETIMES
       5. RARELY, OR
       7. NEVER

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z7

==============================
M001733    Z23. How much does name 4 know about politics
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z23.

       Generally speaking, how much do you think <NAME 4>
       knows about politics? Would you say:
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1.  A GREAT DEAL
       3.  AN AVERAGE AMOUNT, OR
       5.  NOT MUCH AT ALL

       8. DK - DON'T PROBE
       9. RF - DON'T PROBE
       0. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z7

==============================
M001734    Z24. How name 4 voted in election
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   Z24.

       Do you think <NAME 4> voted for Al Gore, George Bush,
       some other candidate, or do you think fill he/she didn't
       vote?)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1.  AL GORE
       3.  GEORGE W BUSH
       5.  SOME OTHER CANDIDATE (SPECIFY)
       7.  DIDN'T VOTE
       8.  INELIGIBLE TO VOTE [VOL]

       98. DK - DON'T PROBE
       99. RF - DON'T PROBE
       00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1

==============================
M001735    Z25. Has R worked with neighbor on common issue/year
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z25.

       Now, I'd like to ask you a few questions about life in
       your neighborhood.
       During the past twelve months, have you worked with
       others from your neighborhood to deal with a common
       issue or problem?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. YES
       5. NO

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001736    Z26. How satisfied is R with neighbrhood
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z26.

       On the whole, how satisfied are you with your
       neighborhood?  Would you say you are very satisfied,
       somewhat satisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, or very
       dissatisfied?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY SATISIFIED
       2. SOMEWHAT SATISFIED
       3. SOMEWHAT DISSATISFIED
       4. VERY DISSATISFIED

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001737    Z27. Are neighbors just looking out for themselves
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   Z27.

       I'm going to ask you a few questions about the people you
       regularly see in your neighborhood.
       In general, with these people in mind, would you say
       that they are just looking out for themselves all of the
       time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly ever,
       or never?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1.  ALL OF THE TIME
       2.  MOST OF THE TIME
       3.  SOME OF THE TIME
       4.  HARDLY EVER
       5.  NEVER

       98. DK - DON'T PROBE
       99. RF - DON'T PROBE
       00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1

==============================
M001738    Z27a. Do neighbors try to take advantage of others
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   Z27a.

       Would you say those people you see regularly in your
       neighborhood try to take advantage of others all of
       the time, most of the time, some of the time, hardly
       ever, or never?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1.  ALL OF THE TIME
       2.  MOST OF THE TIME
       3.  SOME OF THE TIME
       4.  HARDLY EVER
       5.  NEVER

       98. DK - DON'T PROBE
       99. RF - DON'T PROBE
       00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1

==============================
M001739    Z27b. Do neighbors treat others w/respect
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 98
           Numeric

   Z27b.

       (Again, thinking about those people you see in your
       neighborhood) Would you say they treat others with
       respect all of the time, most of the time, some of the
       time, hardly ever, or never?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1.  ALL OF THE TIME
       3.  MOST OF THE TIME
       5.  SOME OF THE TIME
       7.  HARDLY EVER
       8.  NEVER

       98. DK - DON'T PROBE
       99. RF - DON'T PROBE
       00. NA; INAP, 5, 8, 9, 0 in Z1

==============================
M001740    Z27c. Does honest describe neighbors
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z27c.

       Would you say that honest describes the people in your
       neighborhood extremely well, quite well, not too
       well, or not well at all?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1 EXTREMELY WELL
       2 QUITE WELL
       3 NOT TOO WELL
       4 NOT WELL AT ALL

       8 DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview


==============================
M001741    Z27d. What is the racial diversity of neighborhood
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z27d.

       Thinking about the diversity of your neighborhood, are
       the people who live where you live all White,
       mostly white, about half and half, mostly Black, or all
       Black?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. ALL WHITE
       2. MOSTLY WHITE
       3. ABOUT HALF AND HALF
       4. MOSTLY BLACK
       5. ALL BLACK
       7. R VOLUNEERS: OTHER (SPECIFY)

       8. DON'T KNOW
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001742    Z28. How satisfying is Rs life
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 8
           Numeric

   Z28.

       In general, how satisfying do you find the way you're
       spending your life these days?  Would you call it
       completely satisfying, pretty satisfying, or not very
       satisfying?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. COMPLETELY SATISFYING
       3. PRETTY SATISFYING
       5. NOT VERY SATISFYING

       8. DK
       9. RF
       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001743a   ZZ1(1). Others present for interview
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ1(1).

       Others present at time of interview:

       MENTION 1
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       0. NONE
       1. CHLDREN UNDER 6
       2. OLDER CHILDREN
       3. SPOUSE
       4. OTHER RELATIVES
       5. OTHER ADULTS
       7. PHONE INTERVIEW - COULD NOT TELL

       9. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001743b   ZZ1(2). Others present for interview
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ1(2).

       Others present at time of interview:

       MENTION 2
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. CHLDREN UNDER 6
       2. OLDER CHILDREN
       3. SPOUSE
       4. OTHER RELATIVES
       5. OTHER ADULTS
       7. PHONE INTERVIEW - COULD NOT TELL

       9. NA; INAP, no Post interview; no further mention

==============================
M001743c   ZZ1(3). Others present for interview
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ1(3).

       Others present at time of interview:

       MENTION 3
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. CHLDREN UNDER 6
       2. OLDER CHILDREN
       3. SPOUSE
       4. OTHER RELATIVES
       5. OTHER ADULTS
       7. PHONE INTERVIEW - COULD NOT TELL

       9. NA; INAP, no Post interview; no further mention

==============================
M001744    ZZ2. Rs cooperation
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ2.

       R's cooperation was:
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY GOOD
       2. GOOD
       3. FAIR
       4. POOR
       5. VERY POOR

       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001745    ZZ3. Rs knowledge of politics
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ3.

       R's general level of information about politics and
       public affairs seemed:
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY HIGH
       2. FAIRLY HIGH
       3. AVERAGE
       4. FAIRLY LOW
       5. VERY LOW

       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001746    ZZ4. Rs apparent intelligence
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ4.

       R's apparent intelligence:
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY HIGH
       2. FAIRLY HIGH
       3. AVERAGE
       4. FAIRLY LOW
       5. VERY LOW

       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001747    ZZ5. How suspicious did R seem
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ5.

       How suspicious did R seem to be about the study before
       the interview?:
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. NOT AT ALL SUSPICIOUS
       3. SOMEWHAT SUSPICIOUS
       5. VERY SUSPICIOUS

       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001748    ZZ6. How great Rs interest in IW
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ6.

       Overall, how great was R's interest in the interview?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. VERY HIGH
       2. FAIRLY HIGH
       3. AVERAGE
       4. FAIRLY LOW
       5. VERY LOW

       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001749    ZZ7. How sincere did R seem
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ7.

       How sincere did R seem in his/her answers?
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       1. COMPLETE SINCERE              --> ZZ11
       3. USUALLY SINCERE               --> ZZ7a
       5. OFTEN SEEMED TO BE INSINCERE  --> ZZ7a

       0. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001750    ZZ7a. Areas IWR doubted sincerity
           Character

   ZZ7a.

   IF R NOT COMPLETELY SINCERE:

       Were there any particular parts of the interview for
       which you doubted R's sincerity?

       (BLANKED)
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       [IF SO NAME THEM BY SECTION OR QUESTION NUMBER]
       This response was blanked to preserve the confidentiality
       of the Respondent.

==============================
M001751a   ZZ11(1). Rs reaction to IW
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ11(1).

       R's reaction to interview:

       MENTION 1
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL
       11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG
       12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED
       13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS
       15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED.  AFTER STARTING IW, R
           MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW
       20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD
           EYESIGHT ETC.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS
           SLOW READER.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW
       31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES,
           OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION.
       40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS
       41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT
       45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS
       50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET
       70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS
           COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT)
       80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK

       00. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001751b   ZZ11(2). Rs reaction to IW
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ11(2).

       R's reaction to interview:

       MENTION 2
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL
       11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG
       12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED
       13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS
       15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED.  AFTER STARTING IW, R
           MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW
       20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD
           EYESIGHT ETC.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS
           SLOW READER.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW
       31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES,
           OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION.
       40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS
       41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT
       45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS
       50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET
       70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS
           COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT)
       80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK

       00. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001751c   ZZ11(3). Rs reaction to IW
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ11(3).

       R's reaction to interview:

       MENTION 3
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL
       11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG
       12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED
       13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS
       15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED.  AFTER STARTING IW, R
           MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW
       20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD
           EYESIGHT ETC.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS
           SLOW READER.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW
       31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES,
           OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION.
       40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS
       41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT
       45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS
       50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET
       70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS
           COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT)
       80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK

       00. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001751d   ZZ11(4). Rs reaction to IW
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ11(4).

       R's reaction to interview:

       MENTION 4
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL
       11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG
       12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED
       13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS
       15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED.  AFTER STARTING IW, R
           MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW
       20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD
           EYESIGHT ETC.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS
           SLOW READER.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW
       31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES,
           OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION.
       40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS
       41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT
       45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS
       50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET
       70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS
           COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT)
       80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK

       00. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001751e   ZZ11(5). Rs reaction to IW
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ11(5).

       R's reaction to interview:

       MENTION 5
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL
       11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG
       12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED
       13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS
       15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED.  AFTER STARTING IW, R
           MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW
       20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD
           EYESIGHT ETC.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS
           SLOW READER.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW
       31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES,
           OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION.
       40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS
       41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT
       45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS
       50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET
       70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS
           COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT)
       80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK

       00. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001751f   ZZ11(6). Rs reaction to IW
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ11(6).

       R's reaction to interview:

       MENTION 6
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL
       11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG
       12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED
       13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS
       15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED.  AFTER STARTING IW, R
           MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW
       20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD
           EYESIGHT ETC.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS
           SLOW READER.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW
       31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES,
           OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION.
       40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS
       41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT
       45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS
       50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET
       70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS
           COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT)
       80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK

       00. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001751g   ZZ11(7). Rs reaction to IW
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   ZZ11(7).

       R's reaction to interview:

       MENTION 7
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       10. NEGATIVE - GENERAL
       11. NEGATIVE - TOO LONG
       12. NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED
       13. NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS
       15. R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE IW COMPLETED.  AFTER STARTING IW, R
           MADE COMMENTS INDICATING REGRETS HAVING AGREED TO DO IW
       20. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS ILL/DEAF/TIRED/HAD BAD
           EYESIGHT ETC.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       22. R COMPLAINED AND/OR IWR OBSERVED R WAS CONFUSED BY Qs, R WAS
           SLOW READER.  IW WAS HARD FOR R
       30. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           KNOWLEDGE OR OWN SUITABILITY FOR IW
       31. R EXPRESSED DOUBTS/APOLOGIES/EMBARRASSMENTS OVER LACK OF
           POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, CANDIDATE NAMES, ELECTION ISSUES,
           OR OWN LACK OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION.
       40. R WAS AGITATED OR STRESSED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS
       41. R BECAME ANGRY AT INTERVIEW CONTENT
       45. R BECAME CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSES OR BIAS
       50. R COULD NOT READ RESPONDENT BOOKLET
       70. R APPEARED TO ENJOY THE IW (R WAS
           COOPERATIVE/INTERESTED/PLEASANT)
       80. NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK

       00. NA; INAP, no Post interview

==============================
M001752    Post-Rand.C9(2).
           MD:  EQ 0
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.C9(2).

       Order of Dem and Repub names in Vote section
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       1. Democratic names first (FTF: BLUE BALLOT CARD)
       2. Republican names first (FTF: GOLD BALLOT CARD)

       0. INAP, 1-3, 8, 9, 0 in C1; Washington D.C.

==============================
M001753    Post-Rand.D2b-D2d.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D1b-D1d.

       Order of Gore, GW Bush and Nader in Post Thermometers
       D1b-D1d
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       These names were administered after Clinton (1st name)

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       1. Gore 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Nader 4th
       2. Gore 2nd, Nader 3rd, GW Bush 4th
       3. GW Bush 2nd, Gore 3rd, Nader 4th
       4. GW Bush 2nd, Nader 3rd, Gore 4th
       5. Nader 2nd , Gore 3rd, GW Bush 4th
       6. Nader 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Gore 4th

       9. NA
       0. INAP, no Post IW

==============================
M001754    Post-Rand.D2g.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D1g.

       Order of Democratic House candidate in Post Thermometers
       D1g-D1n
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names.

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 7-12 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA; no Democratic candidate

==============================
M001755    Post-Rand.D2h.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D1h.

       Order of Republican House candidate in Post Thermometers
       D1g-D1n
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names.

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 7-12 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA; no Republican candidate

==============================
M001756    Post-Rand.D2j.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D1j.

       Order of Retiring House Representative in Post
       Thermometers D1g-D1n
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names.

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 7-12 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA; no retiring House representative


==============================
M001757    Post-Rand.D2k.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D1k.

       Order of Democratic Senate candidate in Post
       Thermometers D1g-D1n
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names.

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 7-12 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA; INAP, no Democratic Senate candidate; no race in state

==============================
M001758    Post-Rand.D2m.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D1m.

       Order of Republican Senate candidate in Post
       Thermometers D1g-D1n
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names.

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 7-12 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA; INAP, no Republican Senate candidate; no race in state

==============================
M001759    Post-Rand.D2n.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D1n.

       Order of Independent Incumbent House candidate in Post
       Thermometers D1g-D1n
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       This var represents candidates in VT01 and VA05.
       D1g-D1n were randomly administered as the 7th-12th names.

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 7-12 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA; INAP, no independent incumbent House candidate

==============================
M001760    Post-Rand.D3a.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D2a.

       Order of Supreme Court in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-24 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA

==============================
M001761    Post-Rand.D3b.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D2b.

       Order of Congress in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-24 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA

==============================
M001762    Post-Rand.D3c.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D2c.

       Order of the Military in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-24 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA

==============================
M001763    Post-Rand.D3d.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D2d.

       Order of the Federal Govt in Post Group Thermometers
       D2a-D2z
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-24 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA

==============================
M001764    Post-Rand.D3e.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D2e.

       Order of Blacks in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-24 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA

==============================
M001765    Post-Rand.D3f.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D2f.

       Order of Whites in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-24 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA

==============================
M001766    Post-Rand.D3g.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D2g.

       Order of Conservatives in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-24 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA

==============================
M001767    Post-Rand.D3h.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D2h.

       Order of Liberals in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-24 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA

==============================
M001768    Post-Rand.D3j.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D2j.

       Order of Labor Unions in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-24 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA

==============================
M001769    Post-Rand.D3k.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D2k.

       Order of Big Business in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-24 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA

==============================
M001770    Post-Rand.D3m.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D2m.

       Order of Poor People in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-24 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA

==============================
M001771    Post-Rand.D3n.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D2n.

       Order of People on Welfare in Post Group Thermometers
       D2a-D2z
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-24 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA

==============================
M001772    Post-Rand.D3p.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D2p.

       Order of Hispanics in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-24 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA

==============================
M001773    Post-Rand.D3q.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D2q.

       Order of Christian Fund in Post Group Thermometers
       D2a-D2z
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-24 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA

==============================
M001774    Post-Rand.D3r.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D2r.

       Order of Women's Movement in Post Group Thermometers
       D2a-D2z
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-24 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA

==============================
M001775    Post-Rand.D3s.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D2s.

       Order of Older People in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-24 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA

==============================
M001776    Post-Rand.D3t.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D2t.

       Order of Environmentalists in Post Group Thermometers
       D2a-D2z
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-24 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA

==============================
M001777    Post-Rand.D3u.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D2u.

       Order of Homosexuals in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-24 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA

==============================
M001778    Post-Rand.D3v.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D2v.

       Order of Christian Coalition in Post Group Thermometers
       D2a-D2z
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-24 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA

==============================
M001779    Post-Rand.D3w.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D2w.

       Order of Catholics in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-24 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA

==============================
M001780    Post-Rand.D3x.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D2x.

       Order of Jews in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-24 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA

==============================
M001781    Post-Rand.D3xx.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D2xx.

       Order of Protestants in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-24 and:

==============================
M001782    Post-Rand.D3y.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D2y.

       Order of Feminists in Post Group Thermometers D2a-D2z
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-24 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA

==============================
M001783    Post-Rand.D3z.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 99
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.D2z.

       Order of Asian-Americans in Post Group Thermometers
       D2a-D2z
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-24 and:

       00. Inap, no Post interview
       99. NA

==============================
M001784    Post-Rand.E1/E3.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.E1/E3.

       Post: Order of Democratic/Republican House candidates in
       'Likes-Dislikes' E1-E2/E3-E4
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       1. Democratic House candidate first, Republican House candidate 2nd
       2. Republican House candidate first, Democratic House candidate 2nd

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA

==============================
M001785    Post-Rand.G3-G5.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.G3-G5.

       Post: Order of Gore, GW Bush, Buchanan in Liberal-
       Conservative placements G3-G5/G3.T-G5.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       These names were administered after Clinton (1st name).

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       1. Gore 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Buchanan 4th
       2. Gore 2nd, Buchanan 3rd, GW Bush 4th
       3. GW Bush 2nd, Gore 3rd, Buchanan 4th
       4. GW Bush 2nd, Buchanan 3rd, Gore 4th
       5. Buchanan 2nd , Gore 3rd, GW Bush 4th
       6. Buchanan 2nd, GW Bush 3rd, Gore 4th

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA

==============================
M001786    Post-Rand.G6-G7.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.G6-G7.

       Post: Order of Democratic and Republican House
       candidates in Liberal-Conservative Placements
       G6-G7/G6.T-G7.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       These names were administered after the names of Clinton, Gore,
       GW Bush, and Buchanan.

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       1. Democratic House candidate 5th, Republican House candidate 6th
       2. Republican House candidate 5th, Democratic House candidate 6th

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA
       ^

==============================
M001787    Post-Rand.G8-G10.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.G8-G10.

       Post: Order of Democratic, Republican, and Reform
       parties in Liberal-Conservative Placements
       G8-G10/G8.T-G10.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       These names were administered after the names of Clinton, Gore,
       GW Bush, Buchanan, the Democratic House candidate, and the
       Republican House candidate.

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       1. Democratic Party 7th, Republican Party 8th, Reform Party 9th
       2. Democratic Party 7th, Reform Party 8th, Republican Party 9th
       3. Republican Party 7th, Democratic Party 8th, Reform Party 9th
       4. Republican Party 7th, Reform Party 8th, Democratic Party 9th
       5. Reform Party 7th , Democratic Party 8th, Republican Party 9th
       6. Reform Party 7th, Republican Party 8th, Democratic Party 9th

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA

==============================
M001788    Post-Rand.G11b/c.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.G11b/c.

       Post: Order Democratic and Republican House candidates
       in Services-Spending placements G11b-G11c/G11b.T-G11c.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       1. Democratic House candidate 1st, Republican House candidate 2nd
       2. Republican House candidate 1st, Democratic House candidate 2nd

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA

==============================
M001789    Post-Rand.G12b/c.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.G12b/c.

       Post: Order Democratic and Republican House candidates in
       Abortion placements
       G12b-G12c/G12b.T-G12c.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       1. Democratic House candidate 1st, Republican House candidate 2nd
       2. Republican House candidate 1st, Democratic House candidate 2nd

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA

==============================
M001790    Post-Rand.R2b-R2d.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.R2b-R2d.

       Post: Order of racial groups Hardworking
       R2b-R2d/R2b.T-R2d.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       These names were randomly administered after whites.

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       1. Blacks 2nd, Hispanic-Americans 3rd, Asian-Americans 4th
       2. Blacks 2nd, Asian-Americans 3rd, Hispanic-Americans 4th
       3. Hispanic-Americans 2nd, Blacks 3rd, Asian-Americans 4th
       4. Hispanic-Americans 2nd, Asian-Americans 3rd, Blacks 4th
       5. Asian-Americans 2nd , Blacks 3rd, Hispanic-Americans 4th
       6. Asian-Americans 2nd, Hispanic-Americans 3rd, Blacks 4th

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA

==============================
M001791    Post-Rand.R3b-R3d.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.R3b-R3d.

       Post: Order of racial groups Intelligent
       R3b-R3d/R3b.T-R3d.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       These names were randomly administered after whites.

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       1. Blacks 2nd, Hispanic-Americans 3rd, Asian-Americans 4th
       2. Blacks 2nd, Asian-Americans 3rd, Hispanic-Americans 4th
       3. Hispanic-Americans 2nd, Blacks 3rd, Asian-Americans 4th
       4. Hispanic-Americans 2nd, Asian-Americans 3rd, Blacks 4th
       5. Asian-Americans 2nd , Blacks 3rd, Hispanic-Americans 4th
       6. Asian-Americans 2nd, Hispanic-Americans 3rd, Blacks 4th

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA

==============================
M001792    Post-Rand.R4b-R4d.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.R4b-R4d.

       Post: Order of racial groups Trustworthy
       R4b-R4d/R4b.T-R4d.T
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       These names were randomly administered after whites.

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       1. Blacks 2nd, Hispanic-Americans 3rd, Asian-Americans 4th
       2. Blacks 2nd, Asian-Americans 3rd, Hispanic-Americans 4th
       3. Hispanic-Americans 2nd, Blacks 3rd, Asian-Americans 4th
       4. Hispanic-Americans 2nd, Asian-Americans 3rd, Blacks 4th
       5. Asian-Americans 2nd , Blacks 3rd, Hispanic-Americans 4th
       6. Asian-Americans 2nd, Hispanic-Americans 3rd, Blacks 4th

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA

==============================
M001793    Post-Rand.S14a.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.S14a.

       Post: Order of Angry in Clinton affects S14a-S14d
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-4 and:

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE

==============================
M001794    Post-Rand.S14b.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.S14b.

       Post: Order of Hopeful Clinton affects S14a-S14d
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-4 and:

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE

==============================
M001795    Post-Rand.S14c.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.S14c.

       Post: Order of Afraid Clinton affects S14a-S14d
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-4 and:

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE

==============================
M001796    Post-Rand.S14d.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.S14d.

       Post: Order of Proud Clinton affects S14a-S14d
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-4 and:

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE

==============================
M001797    Post-Rand.S15a.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.S15a.

       Post: Order of Moral in Clinton traits S15a-S15g.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-7 and:

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE

==============================
M001798    Post-Rand.S15b.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.S15b.

       Post: Order of Really Cares in Clinton traits S15a-S15g.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-7 and:

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE

==============================
M001799    Post-Rand.S15c.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.S15c.

       Post: Order of Knowlegeable in Clinton traits S15a-S15g.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-7 and:

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE

==============================
M001800    Post-Rand.S15d.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.S15d.

       Post: Order of Leadership in Clinton traits S15a-S15g.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-7 and:

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE

==============================
M001801    Post-Rand.S15e.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.S15e.

       Post: Order of Dishonest in Clinton traits S15a-S15g.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-7 and:

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE

==============================
M001802    Post-Rand.S15f.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.S15f.

       Post: Order of Intelligent in Clinton traits S15a-S15g.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-7 and:

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE

==============================
M001803    Post-Rand.S15g.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.S15g.

       Post: Order of Out of Touch in Clinton traits S15a-S15g.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-7 and:

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA; INAP, administered in the PRE

==============================
M001804    Post-Rand.V5a.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.V5a.

       Post: Order of Moral in Bush Sr. traits V5a-V5g.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-7 and:

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA

==============================
M001805    Post-Rand.V5b.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.V5b.

       Post: Order of Really Cares in Bush Sr. traits V5a-V5g.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-7 and:

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA

==============================
M001806    Post-Rand.V5c.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.V5c.

       Post: Order of Knowledgeable in Bush Sr. traits V5a-V5g.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-7 and:

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA

==============================
M001807    Post-Rand.V5d.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.V5d.

       Post: Order of Leadership in Bush Sr. traits V5a-V5g.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-7 and:

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA

==============================
M001808    Post-Rand.V5e.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.V5e.

       Post: Order of Dishonest in Bush Sr. traits V5a-V5g.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-7 and:

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA

==============================
M001809    Post-Rand.V5f.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.V5f.

       Post: Order of Intelligent in Bush Sr. traits V5a-V5g.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-7 and:

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA

==============================
M001810    Post-Rand.V5g.
           MD1: EQ 0,  MD2: GE 9
           Numeric

   Post-Rand.V5g.

       Post: Order of Out of Touch in Bush Sr. traits V5a-V5g.
       ---------------------------------------------------------------------

       On 11/16/00 it was discovered that the survey instrument
       program had an error in setting randomization.  Interviews
       --or, for some interviews administered over several days,
       portions of interviews --that were conducted prior to the
       correction of this error (in the 2nd VQ released on 11/16/00)
       were not administered with correctly functioning randomization.
       All cases administered prior to the correction of this error
       were administered as if only one choice in the randomization
       were available (in almost all cases, an identical choice).
       Item Post-Summary.24 (P000262) can be used to identify such
       cases; for these cases, their unrandomized order is represented
       here.

       Codes 1-7 and:

       0. Inap, no Post interview
       9. NA

============================
==============================
M021001         STUDY.1. 2002 'Panel' or Fresh Cross Resp
                Numeric

  STUDY.1

    'Panel'/Fresh Cross
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. 'Panel' case
         2. Fresh cross-section case

==============================
M021002         STUDY.2. 2002 Pre Only or Pre and Post
                Numeric

  STUDY.2

    Pre-only or Pre-and-Post
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Pre interview only
         2. Pre interview and Post interview

==============================
M021100         HHLISTING.0. FRESH CROSS Selection Table
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  HHLISTING.0

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Household Selection Table
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         The Selection Table is used to select a respondent from all
         household members who are eligible adults.(An eligible adult is
         a U.S. citizen who is 18 years of age or older). A Selection
         Table was randomly assigned to all households in the Fresh
         Cross sample component.
         After a complete listing of the HH was taken, each eligible
         adult was assigned a "Number" based on the criteria of gender
         and age [beginning with the oldest male as number 1, males
         numbered by increments of 1 according to descending age;
         females numbered by descending age starting with the number
         one higher than that assigned to the youngest male].  The
         interviewer then used the Selection Table to determine the
         "Number" of the eligible adult to be interviewed.  There were
         8 different selection tables.

              #PERSONS       PERSON SELECTED (person "Number")
                             ---------------------------------
                             A  B1   B2  C   D   E1 E2   F
                  1          1   1   1   1   1   1   1   1
                  2          1   1   1   1   2   2   2   2
                  3          1   1   1   2   2   3   3   3
                  4          1   1   2   2   3   3   4   4
                  5          1   2   2   2   4   3   5   5
                  6 or more  1   2   2   2   4   5   5   6

         1. Selection Table A1
         2. Selection Table B1
         3. Selection Table B2
         4. Selection Table C
         5. Selection Table D
         6. Selection Table E1
         7. Selection Table E2
         8. Selection Table F

         0. NA

         INAP.
         'Panel' case

==============================
M021101a        HHLISTING.1a. 1st HH List Gend-FRESH CR
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  HHLISTING.1a

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Household listing - 1st HH member gender
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the first household member mentioned in the
         household listing of all adult household members. The household
         listing was provided by a household member ('informant').
         The first name in the household listing corresponds to the
         informant.

         1. Male
         2. Female

         0. NA

         INAP.
         'Panel' case

==============================
M021101b        HHLISTING.1b. 1st HH List Age-FRESH CR
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  HHLISTING.1b

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Household listing - 1st HH member age
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the first household member mentioned in the
         household listing (informant).
         Ages 18-90 and:

         00. NA

         INAP.
         'Panel' case

==============================
M021101c        HHLISTING.1c. 1st HH List Citiz-FRESH CR
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  HHLISTING.1c

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Household listing - 1st HH member citizen
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the first household member mentioned in the
         household listing (informant).

         1. Yes, a citizen
         5. No, not a citizen

         0. NA

         INAP.
         'Panel' case

==============================
M021101d        HHLISTING.1d. 1st HH List Pers#-FRESH CR
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  HHLISTING.1d

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Household listing - 1st HH member Person Number
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the first household member mentioned in the
         household listing (informant).
         This represents the 'Person number' (if any) assigned to this
         household member, according to the numbering process used to
         number eligible household members while administering the
         Selection Table respondent selection process (see HHLISTING.0).

         1. HH member is eligible person 1
         2. HH member is eligible person 2
         3. HH member is eligible person 3
         4. HH member is eligible person 4
         5. HH member is eligible person 5
         6. HH member is eligible person 6

         0. NA

         INAP.
         Not an eligible household member; 'Panel' case

==============================
M021102a        HHLISTING.2a. 2nd HH List Gend-FRESH CR
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  HHLISTING.2a

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Household listing - 2nd HH member gender
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the second household member mentioned in the
         household listing; the household listing is a listing, provided
         by a household member or informed contact, of all adult
         household members.

         1. Male
         2. Female

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No further members of Household; 'Panel' case

==============================
M021102b        HHLISTING.2b. 2nd HH List Age-FRESH CR
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  HHLISTING.2b

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Household listing - 2nd HH member age
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the second household member mentioned in the
         household listing.
         Ages 18-90 and:

         00. NA

         INAP.
         No further members of Household; 'Panel' case

==============================
M021102c        HHLISTING.2c. 2nd HH List Citiz-FRESH CR
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  HHLISTING.2c

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Household listing -2nd HH member citizen
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the second household member mentioned in the
         household listing.

         1. Yes, a citizen
         5. No, not a citizen

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No further members of Household; 'Panel' case

==============================
M021102d        HHLISTING.2d. 2nd HH List Pers#-FRESH CR
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  HHLISTING.2d

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Household listing - 2nd HH member Person Number
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the second household member mentioned in the
         household listing.
         This represents the 'Person number' assigned to this household
         member, according to the numbering process used to number
         eligible household members while administering the Selection
         Table respondent selection process (see HHLISTING.0).

         1. HH member is eligible person 1
         2. HH member is eligible person 2
         3. HH member is eligible person 3
         4. HH member is eligible person 4
         5. HH member is eligible person 5
         6. HH member is eligible person 6

         0. NA

         INAP.
         Not an eligible household member; No further members of
         Household; 'Panel' case

==============================
M021102e        HHLISTING.2e. 2nd HH List Relat-FRESH CR
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  HHLISTING.2e

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Household listing - 2nd HH member Relationship to Informant
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the second household member mentioned in the
         household listing.  The description was provided by informant.

         01. Wife
         02. Husband
         03. Girlfriend; female fiance/partner
         04. Boyfriend; male fiance/partner
         11. Daughter/stepdaughter
         12. Son/stepson
         14. Daughter's boyfriend/fiance/husband
         15. Son's girlfriend/fiance/wife
         16. Foster son
         21. Mother
         22. Father
         31. Grandmother
         32. Grandfather
         41. Sister
         42. Brother
         51. Niece
         52. Nephew
         61. Aunt
         62. Uncle
         70. Roommate /friend

         00. NA

         INAP.
         No further members of Household; 'Panel' case

==============================
M021103a        HHLISTING.3a. 3rd HH List Gend-FRESH CR
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  HHLISTING.3a

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Household listing - 3rd HH member gender
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the third household member mentioned in the
         household listing; the household listing is a listing, provided
         by a household member or informed contact, of all adult
         household members.

         1. Male
         2. Female

         0. NA

         INAP.

         No further members of Household; 'Panel' case

==============================
M021103b        HHLISTING.3b. 3rd HH List Age-FRESH CR
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  HHLISTING.3b

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Household listing - 3rd HH member age
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the third household member mentioned in the
         household listing.
         Ages 18-90 and:

         00. NA

         INAP.
         No further members of Household; 'Panel' case

==============================
M021103c        HHLISTING.3c. 3rd HH List Citiz-FRESH CR
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  HHLISTING.3c

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Household listing -3rd HH member citizen
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the third household member mentioned in the
         household listing.

         1. Yes, a citizen
         5. No, not a citizen

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No further members of Household; 'Panel' case

==============================
M021103d        HHLISTING.3d. 3rd HH List Pers#-FRESH CR
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  HHLISTING.3d

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Household listing - 3rd HH member Person Number
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the third household member mentioned in the
         household listing.
         This represents the 'Person number' assigned to this household
         member, according to the numbering process used to number
         eligible household members while administering the Selection
         Table respondent selection process (see HHLISTING.0).

         1. HH member is eligible person 1
         2. HH member is eligible person 2
         3. HH member is eligible person 3
         4. HH member is eligible person 4
         5. HH member is eligible person 5
         6. HH member is eligible person 6

         0. NA

         INAP.
         Not an eligible household member; No further members of
         Household; 'Panel' case

==============================
M021103e        HHLISTING.3e. 3rd HH List Relat-FRESH CR
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  HHLISTING.3e

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Household listing - 3rd HH member Relationship to Informant
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the third household member mentioned in the
         household listing.  The description was provided by informant.

         01. Wife
         02. Husband
         03. Girlfriend; female fiance/partner
         04. Boyfriend; male fiance/partner
         11. Daughter/stepdaughter
         12. Son/stepson
         14. Daughter's boyfriend/fiance/husband
         15. Son's girlfriend/fiance/wife
         16. Foster son
         21. Mother
         22. Father
         31. Grandmother
         32. Grandfather
         41. Sister
         42. Brother
         51. Niece
         52. Nephew
         61. Aunt
         62. Uncle
         70. Roommate /friend

         00. NA

         INAP.
         No further members of Household; 'Panel' case

==============================
M021104a        HHLISTING.4a. 4th HH List Gend-FRESH CR
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  HHLISTING.4a

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Household listing - 4th HH member gender
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the fourth household member mentioned in the
         household listing; the household listing is a listing, provided
         by a household member or informed contact, of all adult
         household members.

         1. Male
         2. Female

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No further members of Household; 'Panel' case

==============================
M021104b        HHLISTING.4b. 4th HH List Age-FRESH CR
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  HHLISTING.4b

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Household listing - 4th HH member age
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the fourth household member mentioned in the
         household listing.
         Ages 18-90 and:

         00. NA

         INAP.
         No further members of Household; 'Panel' case

==============================
M021104c        HHLISTING.4c. 4th HH List Citiz-FRESH CR
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  HHLISTING.4c

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Household listing -4th HH member citizen
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the fourth household member mentioned in the
         household listing.

         1. Yes, a citizen
         5. No, not a citizen

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No further members of Household; 'Panel' case

==============================
M021104d        HHLISTING.4d. 4th HH List Pers#-FRESH CR
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  HHLISTING.4d

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Household listing - 4th HH member Person Number
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the fourth household member mentioned in the
         household listing.
         This represents the 'Person number' assigned to this household
         member, according to the numbering process used to number
         eligible household members while administering the Selection
         Table respondent selection process (see HHLISTING.0).

         1. HH member is eligible person 1
         2. HH member is eligible person 2
         3. HH member is eligible person 3
         4. HH member is eligible person 4
         5. HH member is eligible person 5
         6. HH member is eligible person 6

         0. NA

         INAP.
         Not an eligible household member; no further members of
         Household; 'Panel' case

==============================
M021104e        HHLISTING.4e. 4th HH List Relat-FRESH CR
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  HHLISTING.4e

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Household listing - 4th HH member Relationship to Informant
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the fourth household member mentioned in the
         household listing.  The description was provided by informant.

         01. Wife
         02. Husband
         03. Girlfriend; female fiance/partner
         04. Boyfriend; male fiance/partner
         11. Daughter/stepdaughter
         12. Son/stepson
         14. Daughter's boyfriend/fiance/husband
         15. Son's girlfriend/fiance/wife
         16. Foster son
         21. Mother
         22. Father
         31. Grandmother
         32. Grandfather
         41. Sister
         42. Brother
         51. Niece
         52. Nephew
         61. Aunt
         62. Uncle
         70. Roommate /friend

         00. NA

         INAP.
         No further members of Household; 'Panel' case

==============================
M021105         HHLISTING.5. Number Adults -FRESH CROSS
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  HHLISTING.5

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Number of adults in Household
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. One adult in Household
         2. Two adults in Household
         3. Three adults in Household
         4. Four adults in Household

         0. NA

         INAP.
         'Panel' case

==============================
M021106         HHLISTING.6. Num Elig Adults-FRESH CROSS
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  HHLISTING.6

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Number of eligible adults in Household
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. One eligible adult in Household
         2. Two eligible adults in Household
         3. Three eligible adults in Household
         4. Four eligible adults in Household

         0. NA

         INAP.
         'Panel' case

==============================
M021107         HHLISTING.7. Number children-FRESH CROSS
                Numeric
                Missing eq 99

  HHLISTING.7

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Number of children in Household
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         00. No children in Household
         01. One child in Household
         02. Two children in Household
         03. Three children in Household
         04. Four children in Household
         05. Five children in Household
         06. Six children in Household

         99. NA

         INAP.
         'Panel' case

==============================
M021107a        HHLISTING.7. Age 1st child -FRESH CROSS
                Numeric
                Missing eq 99

  HHLISTING.7a

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Age of 1st child
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Age 1-17 and:
         00. Under 1 year old

         99. NA

         INAP.
         No children in household; 'Panel' case

==============================
M021107b        HHLISTING.7b. Age 2nd child -FRESH CROSS
                Numeric
                Missing eq 99

  HHLISTING.7b

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Age of 2nd child
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Age 1-17 and:
         00. Under 1 year old

         99. NA

         INAP.
         No children in household; no additional children in household;
         'Panel' case

==============================
M021107c        HHLISTING.7c. Age 3rd child -FRESH CROSS
                Numeric
                Missing eq 99

  HHLISTING.7c

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Age of 3rd child
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Age 1-17 and:
         00. Under 1 year old

         99. NA

         INAP.
         No children in household; no additional children in household;
         'Panel' case

==============================
M021107d        HHLISTING.7d. Age 4th child -FRESH CROSS
                Numeric
                Missing eq 99

  HHLISTING.7d

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Age of 4th child
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Age 1-17 and:
         00. Under 1 year old

         99. NA

         INAP.
         No children in household; no additional children in household;
         'Panel' case

==============================
M021107e        HHLISTING.7e. Age 5th child -FRESH CROSS
                Numeric
                Missing eq 99

  HHLISTING.7e

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Age of 5th child
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Age 1-17 and:
         00. Under 1 year old

         99. NA

         INAP.
         No children in household; no additional children in household;
         'Panel' case

==============================
M021107f        HHLISTING.7f. Age 6th child -FRESH CROSS
                Numeric
                Missing eq 99

  HHLISTING.7f

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Age of 6th child
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Age 1-17 and:
         00. Under 1 year old

         99. NA

         INAP.
         No children in household; no additional children in household;
         'Panel' case

==============================
M021108         HHLISTING.8. R Person No. -FRESH CROSS
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  HHLISTING.8

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    R Person Number
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This is the person number assigned to R in the Household Listing
         for administration of the Selection Table.

         1. R is person numbered 1
         2. R is person numbered 2
         3. R is person numbered 3
         4. R is person numbered 4

         0. NA

         INAP.
         'Panel' case

==============================
M021109         HHLISTING.9. HH Composition -FRESH CROSS
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  HHLISTING.9

  IF FRESH-CROSS CASE:

    Household composition
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         The HH composition code is derived from information provided in
         the household listing.  "Adults" are 18 years of age or older;
         all individuals included in the HH composition codes below
         refer to adults.

         10. 1 adult male HHR
         11. 1 adult male HHR plus 1 other non-relative
         12. 1 adult male HHR plus 2 or more non-relatives
         20. 1 adult female HHR
         21. 1 adult female HHR plus 1 other non-relative
         22. 1 adult female HHR plus 2 or more non-relatives
         30. 1 married couple: no children or all children living
             at home are under 18
         40. 1 married couple plus 1 other relative
         50. 1 married couple plus 2 or more other relatives
         51. 1 married couple plus 1 other non-relative
         52. 1 married couple plus 2 or more non-relatives
         55. 1 married couple plus relatives and non-relatives
         60. 1 male HHR plus 1 other relative
         65. 1 male HHR plus relatives and non relatives
         70. 1 male HHR plus 2 or more other relatives
         80. 1 female HHR plus 1 other relative
         85. 1 female HHR plus relatives and non-relatives
         90. 1 female HHR plus 2 or more other relatives

         00. NA

         INAP.
         'Panel' case

==============================
M021201         Sample.1. FIPS State Code
                Numeric
                Missing eq 99

  Sample.1

    FIPS State Code
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This represents the state identified for the Post instrument
    preload.

         01. Alabama             02. Alaska
         04. Arizona             05. Arkansas
         06. California          08. Colorado
         09. Connecticut         10. Delaware
         11. Washington DC       12. Florida
         13. Georgia             15. Hawaii
         16. Idaho               17. Illinois
         18. Indiana             19. Iowa
         20. Kansas              21. Kentucky
         22. Louisiana           23. Maine
         24. Maryland            25. Massachusetts
         26. Michigan            27. Minnesota
         28. Mississippi         29. Missouri
         30. Montana             31. Nebraska
         32. Nevada              33. New Hampshire
         34. New Jersey          35. New Mexico
         36. New York            37. North Carolina
         38. North Dakota        39. Ohio
         40. Oklahoma            41. Oregon
         42. Pennsylvania        44. Rhode Island
         45. South Carolina      46. South Dakota
         47. Tennessee           48. Texas
         49. Utah                50. Vermont
         51. Virginia            53. Washington
         54. West Virginia       55. Wisconsin
         56. Wyoming

         99. NA

==============================
M021201a        Sample.1a. ICPSR State Code
                Numeric
                Missing eq 99

  Sample.1a

    ICPSR State Code
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This represents the state identified for the Post instrument
    preload.

         01. Connecticut       02. Maine
         03. Massachusetts     04. New Hampshire
         05. Rhode Island      06. Vermont
         11. Delaware          12. New Jersey
         13. New York          14. Pennsylvania
         21. Illinois          22. Indiana
         23. Michigan          24. Ohio
         25. Wisconsin         31. Iowa
         32. Kansas            33. Minnesota
         34. Missouri          35. Nebraska
         36. North Dakota      37. South Dakota
         40. Virginia          41. Alabama
         42. Arkansas          43. Florida
         44. Georgia           45. Louisiana
         46. Mississippi       47. North Carolina
         48. South Carolina    49. Texas
         51. Kentucky          52. Maryland
         53. Oklahoma          54. Tennessee
         55. Washington DC     56. West Virginia
         61. Arizona           62. Colorado
         63. Idaho             64. Montana
         65. Nevada            66. New Mexico
         67. Utah              68. Wyoming
         71. California        72. Oregon
         73. Washington

         99. NA

==============================
M021201b        Sample.1b. State Abbreviation
                Character
  Sample.1b

    State abbreviation (alpha)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This represents the state identified for the Post instrument
    preload.

==============================
M021202         Sample.2. Congressional District Number
                Numeric
                Missing eq 99

  Sample.2

    Congressional District Number
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This represents the congressional district identified for the Post
    instrument preload.

         Codes 1-52 and:
         77. Washington DC

         99. Correct district not assigned (see Summary.1)

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M021202a        Sample.2a. FIPS State and District
                Numeric
                Missing eq 9999

  Sample.2a

    FIPS State code and Congressional District Number
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This represents the state and district identified for the Post
    instrument preload.
    The first 2 digits are FIPS state code; last 2 digits are
    Congressional district number. 1100=Washington DC

         9999. Correct district not assigned (see Summary.1)

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M021202b        Sample.2b. ICPSR State and District
                Numeric
                Missing eq 9999

  Sample.2b

    ICPSR State code and Congressional District Number
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This represents the state and district identified for the Post
    instrument preload.
    The first 2 digits are ICPSR state code; last 2 digits are
    Congressional district number. 5500=Washington DC

         9999. Correct district not assigned (see Summary.1)

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M021202c        Sample.2c. State Abbrev and District
                Character
  Sample.2c

    State Abbreviation and Congressional District Number (alpha)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This represents the state and district identified for the Post
    instrument preload.
    "DC00"=Washington DC. "9999" corresponds to 1 in Summary.1

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M021203         Census region
                Numeric

  Sample.3

    Census region
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Built from Sample.2.

         1. Northeast (CT, ME, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT)
         2. North Central (IL, IN, IA, KS, MI, MN, MO, NE, ND,
                   OH, SD, WI)
         3. South (AL, AR, DE, DC, FL, GA, KY, LA, MD, MS, NC,
                   OK, SC, TN, TX, VA, WV)
         4. West (AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NM, NV, OR, UT, WA,
                   WY)

==============================
M021204         2000 Census Urban/Rural Classification
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  Sample.4

    2000 Census Urban/Rural Classification
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         The Pre production address was used for assigning geocodes.

         1. Urban
         2. Rural

         0. NA

==============================
M021205         2000 Census FIPS County code
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  Sample.5

    2000 Census FIPS County code (state and county)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         The Pre production address was used for assigning geocodes.
         This variable has been blanked to preserve respondent
         confidentiality.

         00000. NA

==============================
M021206         2000 Census Place code
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  Sample.6

    2000 Census Place code
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         The Pre production address was used for assigning geocodes.
         This variable has been blanked to preserve respondent
         confidentiality.

         00000. NA

         INAP.
         No defined Census Place

==============================
M021207         2000 Census MSA code
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  Sample.7

    2000 Census MSA code
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         The Pre production address was used for assigning geocodes.
         This variable has been blanked to preserve respondent
         confidentiality.

         0000. NA

         INAP.
         Location not in MSA

==============================
M021208         2000 Census Tract
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  Sample.8

    2000 Census Tract
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         The Pre production address was used for assigning geocodes.
         This variable has been blanked to preserve respondent
         confidentiality.

         0000.00 NA

==============================
M022000         PreAdmin.0. Form of Pre interview
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  PreAdmin.25

    Form of 2002 Pre Interview
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Aside from various randomly assigned wording and
         placement/order options, the following content options were
         randomly assigned to 1/2 samples in the Pre:

          1- either K1 series or K2 series of Federal budget
             spending items (increase/decrease)
          2- L2 general income inequality as open end (L2a/L2b)or
             as closed series (L2c/L2d) [each has wording variants]
          3- Income inequality questions for either race (P1 series)
             or gender (P2 series) [each series includes wording
             variants]

         01.   K1 spending - L2OPEN    - P1RACE
         02.   K1 spending - L2OPEN    - P2GENDER
         03.   K1 spending - L2CLOSED  - P1RACE
         04.   K1 spending - L2CLOSED  - P2GENDER
         06.   K2 spending - L2OPEN    - P1RACE
         06.   K2 spending - L2OPEN    - P2GENDER
         07.   K2 spending - L2CLOSED  - P1RACE
         08.   K2 spending - L2CLOSED  - P2GENDER

         00. NA

==============================
M022001         PreAdmin.1. Release
                Numeric

  PreAdmin.1

    Pre Release number
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. 1st third
         2. 2nd third
         3. remainder

==============================
M022002         PreAdmin.2. Mode
                Numeric

  PreAdmin.2

    Pre Mode
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Telephone

==============================
M022003         PreAdmin.3. Number of calls
                Numeric
                Missing eq 99

  PreAdmin.3

    Pre number of calls
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1-25

         99. NA

==============================
M022004         PreAdmin.4. Result
                Numeric

  PreAdmin.4

    Pre Result
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         There were no partials in the 2002 Pre.

         1. Completed interview

==============================
M022005         PreAdmin.5. Language
                Numeric

  PreAdmin.5

    Pre language
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. English

==============================
M022006         PreAdmin.6. Verification
                Numeric

  PreAdmin.6

    Pre interview verification
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         There was no verification of interviews at the interviewing
         facility.

         5. No verification

==============================
M022007         PreAdmin.7. Evaluation
                Numeric

  PreAdmin.7

    Pre interview evaluation
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         There was no evaluation of interviews at the interviewing
         facility.

         5. No evaluation

==============================
M022008         PreAdmin.8. Tape recorded
                Numeric

  PreAdmin.8

    Pre interview tape-recorded
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Tape recorded
         5. Not tape recorded

==============================
M022009         PreAdmin.9. Interviewed in parts
                Numeric

  PreAdmin.9

    Pre interview in parts
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Interviewed in parts (multiple sessions)
         5. Not interviewed in parts (1 session)

==============================
M022010         PreAdmin.10. Number of parts
                Numeric
                Missing eq 9

  PreAdmin.10

  IF PRE INTERVIEW CONDUCTED IN PARTS:

    Pre number of parts
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         2-5

         9. NA

         INAP.
         Not interviewed in parts (5 in PreAdmin.9)

==============================
M022011         PreAdmin.11. Number of interviewers
                Numeric
                Missing eq 9

  PreAdmin.11

    Pre number of interviewers
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This is the number of interviewers used on the case (1-5).

         9. NA

==============================
M022012a        PreAdmin.12a. Beginning month
                Numeric

  PreAdmin.12a

    Pre interview - beginning month
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         09. September
         10. October
         11. November

==============================
M022012b        PreAdmin.12b. Beginning day
                Numeric

  PreAdmin.12b

    Pre interview - beginning day
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1-31

==============================
M022012c        PreAdmin.12c. Beginning month and day
                Character
  PreAdmin.12c

    Pre interview - beginning month and day (MMDD)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This is a character variable

==============================
M022012d        PreAdmin.12d. Days before election
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  PreAdmin.12d

    Pre Interview - Number of days before election
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Based on beginning date of interview.
         The 2002 national elections were held November 5.

         00. NA

==============================
M022013a        PreAdmin.13a. Ending month
                Numeric

  PreAdmin.13a

    Pre interview - ending month
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         09. September
         10. October
         11. November

==============================
M022013b        PreAdmin.13b. Ending day
                Numeric

  PreAdmin.13b

    Pre interview - ending day
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1-31

==============================
M022013c        PreAdmin.12c. Ending month and day
                Character
  PreAdmin.13c

    Pre interview - ending month and day (MMDD)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This is a character variable

==============================
M022014         PreAdmin.14. Pre Address given
                Numeric

  PreAdmin.14

    Pre payment address given?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

==============================
M022015         PreAdmin.15. Payment mode
                Numeric

  PreAdmin.15

  IF PRE PAYMENT ADDRESS GIVEN:

    Pre payment mode
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Check

         INAP.
         5 in PreAdmin.14

==============================
M022016         PreAdmin.16. Payment amount
                Numeric
  PreAdmin.16

  IF PRE PAYMENT ADDRESS GIVEN:

    Pre payment amount
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         20. Twenty dollars
         40. Forty dollars
         50. Fifty dollars

         INAP.
         5 in PreAdmin.14

==============================
M022017a        PreAdmin.17a. Month payment mailed
                Numeric

  PreAdmin.17a

  IF PRE PAYMENT ADDRESS GIVEN:

    Date Pre payment mailed - month
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         09. September
         10. October
         11. November

         INAP.
         5 in PreAdmin.14

==============================
M022017b        PreAdmin.17b. Day payment mailed
                Numeric

  PreAdmin.17b

  IF PRE PAYMENT ADDRESS GIVEN:

    Date Pre payment mailed - day
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1-31

         INAP.
         5 in PreAdmin.14

==============================
M022018         PreAdmin.18. Pre Interview Lengt
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  PreAdmin.18

    Pre Interview Length
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This is length in minutes.

         0. NA

==============================
M022019         PreAdmin.19. Pre Interviewer IW Number
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  PreAdmin.19

    Pre Interviewer's Interview Number
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This represents the Nth interview of the interviewer.

         0. NA

==============================
M022020         PreAdmin.20. Pre Persuasion letter sent
                Numeric

  PreAdmin.20

    Pre Persuasion letter sent
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         0. No letter sent
         1. Pre persuasion letter sent

==============================
M022021         PreAdmin.21. Date of Pre Persuasion Lett
                Character
  PreAdmin.21

    Date of Pre Persuasion Letter
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This is a character variable MMDD.

         INAP.
         No Pre persuasion letter

==============================
M022022         PreAdmin.22. Type Pre Persuasion Letter
                Numeric

  PreAdmin.22

    Type of Pre Persuasion letter sent
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         For types 21, 22 and 24, increased compensation ($40) was
         offered in the persuasion letter.

         11. 'Panel' Busy
         12. 'Panel' Health
         13. 'Panel' No Contact
         14. 'Panel' Reluctant
         21. Fresh Cross Busy
         22. Fresh Cross Health
         23. Fresh Cross No Contact
         24. Fresh Cross Reluctant
         30. Special

         INAP.
         No Pre persuasion letter

==============================
M022023         PreAdmin.23. Second Persuasion Letter
                Character
  PreAdmin.23

    2nd Persuasion Letter sent
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         At a late stage of the Pre production period (on October 28,
         2002), a special letter offering final maximum compensation
         ($50) was sent to 872 'panel' cases which were not yet
         completions.
         This letter was in addition to the persuasion letter described
         in PreAdmin.22.
         (Note: Fresh cross cases were also offered $50 late in the Pre
         production period, but these offers were made by telephone).

         0. 2nd letter not sent
         1. 2nd persuasion letter sent October 28, 2002

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross case

==============================
M022024         IWR.1. Pre IWR of Record
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  PreIWR.1

    PRE Interviewer of Record
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Interviewer ID number is coded and:

         000. NA

==============================
M022025         IWR.2. Pre IWR Gender
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  PreIWR.2

    PRE Interviewer Gender
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the Pre interviewer of record.
         Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by
         interviewers.

         1. Male
         2. Female

         0. NA

==============================
M022026         IWR.3. Pre IWR Education Level
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  PreIWR.3

    PRE Interviewer Education Level (highest education)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the Pre interviewer of record.
         Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by
         interviewers.

         1. 1-8 grades
         2. Some high school
         3. High school graduate
         4. Some college
         5. College degree
         6. Master's degree
         7. Ph.D

         0. NA

==============================
M022027         IWR.4. Pre IWR Race
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  PreIWR.4

    PRE Interviewer Race
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the Pre interviewer of record.
         Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by
         interviewers.

         1. White
         2. Black
         3. Native American
         4. Asian
         5. Other

         0. NA

==============================
M022027a        IWR.4a. Pre IWR Ethnicity
                Numeric
                Missing eq 9

  PreIWR.4a

    PRE Interviewer Ethnicity
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the Pre interviewer of record.
         Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by
         interviewers.

         0. No ethnicity mentioned
         1. Hispanic
         7. Other

         9. NA

==============================
M022028         IWR.5. Pre IWR languages
                Numeric
                Missing eq 9

  PreIWR.5

    PRE Interviewer Languages
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the Pre interviewer of record.
         Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by
         interviewers.

         0. No languages spoken
         1. Spanish
         7. Other

         9. NA

==============================
M022029         IWR.6. Pre IWR experience
                Numeric
                Missing eq 99

  PreIWR.6

    PRE Interviewer Experience
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the Pre interviewer of record.
         Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by
         interviewers.

         00. None
         01. 1 Year or less
         02. 13-23 Months
         03. 2 years
         04. 4 years
         05. 5 years
         06. 6 years
         07. 7 years
         08. 8 years
         09. 9 years

         99. NA

==============================
M022030         IWR.7. Pre IWR Age
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  PreIWR.7

    PRE Interviewer Age (age groups)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the Pre interviewer of record.
         Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by
         interviewers.

         1. 18-34 years
         2. 35-40 years
         3. 41-45 years
         4. 46-50 years
         5. 51-55 years
         6. 56-60 years
         7. 61-64 years
         8. 65-79 years

         0. NA

==============================
M022401         PreRand.C1. RANDOMIZATION C1 PRE THERM
                Numeric

  PreRand.C1

    RANDOMIZATION C1 PRE THERMOMETER SERIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the order of administration of Pre
         interview thermometer questions (C1 series).  Two orderings
         were possible.

         1. Order  C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r
         2. Order  C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j

==============================
M022402         PreRand.H5J5. RANDOMIZATION PRE H5/J5
                Numeric

  PreRand.H5J5

    RANDOMIZATION PRE H5/J5
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either H4 or J5 in the
         Pre (alternate placements for President Bush performance on the
         economy).

         1. H5 administered in the Pre interview
         2. J5 administered in the Pre interview

==============================
M022403         PreRand.H7. ORDER OF TEXT - PRE H7
                Numeric

  PreRand.H7

    ORDER OF TEXT - PRE H7
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered Pre
         question H7 (party that would perform better on the economy)
         with either "Democrats" or "Republicans" read first.

         1. Democrats first, Republicans second
         2. Republicans first, Democrats second

==============================
M022404         PreRand.J4R1. RANDOMIZATION PRE J4/R1
                Numeric

  PreRand.J4R1

    RANDOMIZATION PRE J4/R1
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered either
         J4a and J4d or else R1a and R1d in the Pre (alternate
         placements for patriotism items).

         1. J4 administered in the Pre interview
         2. R1 administered in the Pre interview

==============================
M022405         PreRand.K1K2. RANDOMIZATION PRE K1/K2
                Numeric

  PreRand.K1K2

    RANDOMIZATION PRE K1/K2
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered either
         the K1 Federal spending items or the K2 Federal spending items.
         (If R was administered K1 in the Pre, then questions
         corresponding to K2 were asked in the Post; if R was
         administered K2 in the Pre, then questions corresponding to
         K1 were asked in the Post.)

         1. R administered K1 in the Pre
         2. R administered K2 in the Pre

==============================
M022406         PreRand.K1. RANDOMIZATION PRE K1 SERIES
                Numeric

  PreRand.K1

    RANDOMIZATION PRE K1 SERIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the order of administration of Pre
         K1 series Federal spending items.  Two orderings were possible.

         1. K1a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h
         2. K1a,g,e,b,c,f,h,d

         INAP.
         Not administered K1 in the Pre

==============================
M022407         PreRand.K1d. RANDOMIZATION PRE K1d WORD
                Numeric

  PreRand.K1d

    RANDOMIZATION PRE K1d WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the random assignment of wording
         in Federal spending item K1d in the Pre.

         1. "Public schools"
         2. "Big city schools"

         INAP.

         Not administered K1 in the Pre

==============================
M022408         PreRand.K1g. RANDOMIZATION PRE K1g WORD
                Numeric

  PreRand.K1g

    RANDOMIZATION PRE K1g WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the random assignment of wording
         in Federal spending item K1g in the Pre.

         1. "Homeland security"
         2. "War on terrorism"

         INAP.
         Not administered K1 in the Pre

==============================
M022409         PreRand.K2. RANDOMIZATION PRE K2 SERIES
                Numeric

  PreRand.K2

    RANDOMIZATION PRE K2 SERIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the order of administration of Pre
         K2 series Federal spending items.  Two orderings were possible.

         1. K1a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h
         2. K1a,g,c,d,e,f,h,b

         INAP.
         Not administered K2 in the Pre

==============================
M022410         PreRand.K2b. RANDOMIZATION PRE K2b WORD
                Numeric

  PreRand.K2b

    RANDOMIZATION PRE K2b WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the random assignment of wording
         in Federal spending item K2b in the Pre.

         1. "Poor people"
         2. "Working poor"

         INAP.
         Not administered K2 in the Pre

==============================
M022411         PreRand.K2h. RANDOMIZATION PRE K2h WORD
                Numeric

  PreRand.K2h

    RANDOMIZATION PRE K2h WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the random assignment of wording
         in Federal spending item K2h in the Pre

         1. "Poor children"
         2. "Black children"

         INAP.
         Not administered K2 in the Pre

==============================
M022412         PreRand.L2. L2 RANDOM SELECTION
                Numeric

  PreRand.L2

    L2 RANDOM SELECTION
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the closed list for L2d consists of questions L2d1,d2,d3,
         d4,d5,d6,d7.

         1. L2a open-end ("better")
         2. L2b open-end ("worse")
         3. L2c closed series ("better")
         4. L2d closed series ("worse")

==============================
M022413         PreRand.L2c. RANDOM PRE L2c SERIES
                Numeric

  PreRand.L2c

    RANDOMIZATION PRE L2c SERIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the order of administration of Pre
         L2c closed-list income inequality series items (reasons why
         some people have better jobs/income).  Two orderings were
         possible.

         1. L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7
         2. L2c2,c4,c5,c6,c3,c1,c7

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2c series

==============================
M022414         PreRand.L2d. RANDOM PRE L2d SERIES
                Numeric

  PreRand.L2d

    RANDOMIZATION PRE L2d SERIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the order of administration of Pre
         L2d closed-list income inequality series items (reasons why
         some people have worse jobs/income).  Two orderings were
         possible.

         1. L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7
         2. L2d2,d4,d5,d6,d3,d1,d7

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2d series

==============================
M022415         PreRand.L9a/b. RANDOM PRE L9a/b WORDING
                Numeric

  PreRand.L9a/b

    RANDOMIZATION PRE L9a/b WORDING ORDER
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered
         L9a/L9b (party better for the rich/poor) with wording "poor"
         first and "rich" second or vice versa.  (Data in L9a are data
         for "poor" wording regardless of order; data in L9b are data
         for "rich" wording regardless of order).

         1. "Poor" first, "rich" second
         2. "Rich" first, "poor" second

==============================
M022416         PreRand.L11a/b. RANDOM PRE L11a/b WORD
                Numeric

  PreRand.L11a/b

    RANDOMIZATION PRE L11b/c ORDER
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered
         L11b first and L11c second, or L11c first and L11b second
         in the Pre (appropriateness of amount paid by rich/poor).

         1. L11b ("rich") first, L11c ("poor") second
         2. L11c ("poor") first, L11b ("rich") second

==============================
M022417         PreRand.M1d. ORDER OF TEXT - PRE M1d
                Numeric

  PreRand.M1d

    ORDER OF TEXT - PRE M1d
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered Pre
         question M1d (party performance on corporate scandals) with
         either "Democrats" or "Republicans" read first.

         1. Democrats first, Republicans second
         2. Republicans first, Democrats second

==============================
M022418         PreRand.M2. RANDOM- M2 SERIES WORDING
                Numeric

  PreRand.M2

    RANDOMIZATION - M2 SERIES WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to alternate wording
         in the M2 tax cut series (all questions in the series were
         randomly assigned to the same wording).

         1. "Congress passed"
         2. "Bush signed"

==============================
M022419         PreRand.P1P2. P1/P2 RANDOM SELECTION
                Numeric

  PreRand.P1P2

    P1/P2 RANDOM SELECTION
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 and P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 and P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 and P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 and P2j,k,m

         1. Series 1: P1 series "whites better jobs/income" wording
         2. Series 2: P1 series "blacks worse jobs/income" wording
         3. Series 3: P2 series "women worse jobs/income" wording
         4. Series 4: P2 series "men better jobs/income" wording

==============================
M022420         PreRand.P1. RANDOMIZATION PRE P1 SERIES
                Numeric

  PreRand.P1

    RANDOMIZATION PRE P1 SERIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were administered a P1 (race) income inequality
         series in 1 of 2 possible orders, randomly assigned.  This order
         was used regardless of which P1 series was administered
         ("whites better/higher" or "blacks worse/lower").

         1. P1a,c,d,e,f,g
         2. P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g

         INAP.
         Not assigned to a P1 series

==============================
M022421         PreRand.P1k/m. RANDOM PRE P1k/m WORDING
                Numeric

  PreRand.P1k/m

    RANDOMIZATION PRE P1k/m WORDING ORDER
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered
         P1k/P1m (party better for whites/blacks) with wording "whites"
         first and "blacks" second or vice versa.  (Data in P1k are data
         for "whites" wording regardless of order; data in P1m are data
         for "blacks" wording regardless of order).

         1. "Whites" first, "blacks" second
         2. "Blacks" first, "whites" second

         INAP.
         Not assigned to a P1 series

==============================
M022422         PreRand.P2. RANDOMIZATION PRE P2 SERIES
                Numeric

  PreRand.P2

    RANDOMIZATION PRE P2 SERIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were administered a P2 (gender) income inequality
         series in 1 of 2 possible orders, randomly assigned.  This order
         was used regardless of which P2 series was administered
         ("women worse/lower" or "men better/higher").

         1. P2a,c,d,e,f,g
         2. P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g

         INAP.
         Not assigned to a P2 series

==============================
M022423         PreRand.P2k/m. RANDOM PRE P2k/m WORDING
                Numeric

  PreRand.P2k/m

    RANDOMIZATION PRE P2k/m WORDING ORDER
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered
         P2k/P2m (party better for women/men) with wording "women"
         first and "men" second or vice versa.  (Data in P2k are data
         for "women" wording regardless of order; data in P2m are data
         for "men" wording regardless of order).

         1. "Women" first, "men" second
         2. "Men" first, "women" second

         INAP.
         Not assigned to a P2 series

==============================
M022424         PreRand.Q1Q4. RANDOM ORDER Q1-Q2/Q3-Q4
                Numeric

  PreRand.Q1Q4

    RANDOMIZED ORDER Q1-Q2/Q3-Q4
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Pre  'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.

         1. Q2-Q4 first, Q1-Q2 second
         2. Q1-Q2 first, Q3-Q4 second

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
M022425         PreRand.Q3d. RANDOM ORDER PRE Q3d SERIES
                Numeric

  PreRand.Q3d

    RANDOMIZED ORDER PRE Q3d SERIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         For Pre  'panel' respondents, the Q3d series of questions (reasons
         for 9/11 attack) were asked in 1 of 2 possible orders, randomly
         assigned.

         1. Q3d1,d2,d5,d6
         2. Q3d5,d6,d1,d2

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
M022426         PreRand.Q3g. RANDOMIZED PRE Q3g WORDING
                Numeric

  PreRand.Q3g

    RANDOMIZED PRE Q3g WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible
         wordings for Q3g (President Bush performance) in the Pre.

         1. "Handling war on terrorism"
         2. "Responded to attack of September 11"

==============================
M022427         PreRand.Q4a4. RANDOMIZED ORDER Q4a4/Q4a5
                Numeric

  PreRand.Q4a4

    RANDOMIZED ORDER Q4a4/Q4a5
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

        ' Panel 'respondents were randomly assigned to be administered
         Q4a4 (whether war against the Taliban worth the cost) either
         before or after Q4a5 (is Bin Laden still alive) in the Pre.

         1. Q4a4 first, Q4a5 second
         2. Q4a5 first, Q4a4 second

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
M023001         A1. How Much Attn to Campaigns
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  A1.

    Some people don't pay much attention to political campaigns.
    How about you? Would you say that you have been VERY MUCH
    INTERESTED, SOMEWHAT INTERESTED or NOT MUCH INTERESTED in the
    political campaigns so far this year?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Very much interested
         3. Somewhat interested
         5. Not much interested

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023002         A6. How Many Days Watched Natl News
                Numeric
                Missing eq 8, ge 9

  A6.

    How many days in the PAST WEEK did you watch the NATIONAL
    network news on TV?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         00. None
         01. One Day
         02. Two Days
         03. Three Days
         04. Four Days
         05. Five Days
         06. Six Days
         07. Every Day

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         99. NA

==============================
M023003         A7. Num Days Local Aft/Early Eve News
                Numeric
                Missing eq 8, ge 9

  A7.

    How many days IN THE PAST WEEK did you watch the local TV news
    shows, either in the late afternoon or in the early-evening?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         00. None
         01. One Day
         02. Two Days
         03. Three Days
         04. Four Days
         05. Five Days
         06. Six Days
         07. Every Day

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         99. NA

==============================
M023004         A10. Num Days Read Newsp in Past Wk
                Numeric
                Missing eq 8, ge 9

  A10.

    How many days IN THE PAST WEEK did you read a daily newspaper?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         00. None
         01. One Day
         02. Two Days
         03. Three Days
         04. Four Days
         05. Five Days
         06. Six Days
         07. Every Day

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         99. NA

==============================
M023005         A12. App/disapp Bush Handling Job as Pre
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  A12.

    Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush is
    HANDLING HIS JOB AS PRESIDENT?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Approve
         5. Disapprove

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023006         A12a. Bush Job as Pres- Approve/Disapp
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  A12a.

  IF R APPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING JOB AS PRESIDENT:/
  IF R DISAPPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING JOB AS PRESIDENT:

    (Do you [approve/disapprove])
    STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Strongly
         5. Not Strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         8,9,0 in A12

==============================
M023006x        A12x. Summary - Bush job as Pres
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  A12x.

    Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush is
    HANDLING HIS JOB AS PRESIDENT?
    (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

    APPROVAL - GEORGE W. BUSH JOB AS PRESIDENT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from A12 and A12a.

         1. Approve strongly
         2. Approve not strongly
         4. Disapprove not strongly
         5. Disapprove strongly

         8. Don't know (A12 or A12a)
         9. Refused (A12 or A12a)
         0. NA (A12 or A12a)

==============================
M023007         B1. How Much R Cares Who Wins House
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  B1.

    As you know, representatives to Congress in Washington are being
    chosen in this election from congressional districts all around
    the country.
    How much would you say that you personally care about the way
    the election to the U.S. House of Representatives comes out:
    do you care VERY MUCH, PRETTY MUCH, NOT VERY MUCH or NOT AT ALL?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Very much
         2. Pretty much
         3. Not very much
         4. Not at all

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023008         B2. Approve/Disapp Congress
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  B2.

    Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way the U.S. Congress
    has been handling its job?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Approve
         5. Disapprove

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023009         B2a. Congress Appr/Disapp How Much
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  B2a.

  IF R APPROVES U.S. CONGRESS HANDLING ITS JOB:/
  IF R DISAPPROVES U.S. CONGRESS HANDLING ITS JOB:

    (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Strongly
         5. Not Strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         8,9,0 in B2

==============================
M023009x        B2x. Summary - Approve Congress Job
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  B2x.

    Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way the U.S. Congress
    has been handling its job?
    (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

    SUMMARY: APPROVAL OF CONGRESS HANDLING ITS JOB
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from B2 and B2a.

         1. Approve strongly
         2. Approve not strongly
         4. Disapprove not strongly
         5. Disapprove strongly

         8. Don't know (B2 or B2a)
         9. Refused (B2 or B2a)
         0. NA (B2 or B2a)

==============================

  C1.

    I'd like to get your feelings toward some people in the news
    these days. I'll read the name of a person and I'll ask you to
    rate that person on a thermometer that runs from 0 to 100
    degrees. Rating above 50 means that you feel favorable and warm
    toward the person. Rating below 50 means that you feel
    unfavorable and cool toward the person.  Rating right at the 50
    degree mark means you don't feel particularly warm or cold.
    You may use any number from 0 to 100 to tell me how favorable
    or unfavorable your feelings are. If we come to a person whose
    name you don't recognize, just tell me and we'll move on to the
    next one.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
M023010         C1a. George W. Bush Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  C1a.

    The first person is:
    George W. Bush
    Where on that thermometer would you rate George W. Bush?

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: GEORGE W. BUSH
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

==============================
M023011         C1b. Cheney Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  C1b.

    (The next person is:)
    Dick Cheney
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate him?)

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: DICK CHENEY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         thermometer):
           C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r
           C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

==============================
M023012         C1c. Gore Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  C1c.

    (The next person is:)
    Al Gore
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate him?)

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: AL GORE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         thermometer):
           C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r
           C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

==============================
M023013         C1d. Lieberman Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  C1d.

    (The next person is:)
    Joseph Lieberman
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate him?)

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: JOSEPH LIEBERMAN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         thermometer):
           C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r
           C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

==============================
M023014         C1e. Nader Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  C1e.

    (The next person is:)
    Ralph Nader
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate him?)

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: RALPH NADER
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         thermometer):
           C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r
           C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

==============================
M023015         C1f. Bill Clinton Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  C1f.

    (The next person is:)
    Bill Clinton
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate him?)

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: BILL CLINTON
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         thermometer):
           C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r
           C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

==============================
M023016         C1h. Colin Powell Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  C1h.

    (The next person is:)
    Colin Powell
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate him?)

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: COLIN POWELL
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         thermometer):
           C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r
           C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

==============================
M023017         C1j. Ashcroft Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  C1j.

    (The next person is:)
    John Ashcroft
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate him?)

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: JOHN ASHCROFT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         thermometer):
           C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r
           C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

==============================
M023018         C1m. Jackson Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  C1m.

    (The next person is:)
    Jesse Jackson
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate him?)

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: JESSE JACKSON
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         thermometer):
           C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r
           C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

==============================
M023019         C1p. Laura Bush Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  C1p.

    (The next person is:)
    Laura Bush
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate her?)

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: LAURA BUSH
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         thermometer):
           C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r
           C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

==============================
M023020         C1r. Hillary Clinton Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  C1r.

    (The next person is:)
    Hillary Clinton
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate her?)

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: HILLARY CLINTON
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         thermometer):
           C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r
           C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

==============================
M023021         D2. Better One Party Control or Split
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  D2.

    Do you think it is better when ONE PARTY CONTROLS both the
    presidency and Congress, better when CONTROL IS SPLIT between
    the Democrats and Republicans, or DOESN'T MATTER?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Better When One Party Controls Both
         3. Better When Control Is Split
         5. It Doesn't Matter

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023022         F1. R 7Pt Scale Lib-Con Self-Placement
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  F1.

    We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and
    conservatives. When it comes to politics, do you usually think
    of yourself as EXTREMELY LIBERAL, LIBERAL, SLIGHTLY LIBERAL,
    MODERATE OR MIDDLE OF THE ROAD, SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE,
    CONSERVATIVE, EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE, or haven't you thought
    much about this?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         01. Extremely Liberal
         02. Liberal
         03. Slightly Liberal
         04. Moderate; Middle of the Road
         05. Slightly Conservative
         06. Conservative
         07. Extremely Conservative

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         90. Haven't thought much [Do Not Probe]
         00. NA

==============================
M023023         F1a. If R Had to Choose Liberal/Conserv
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  F1a.

  IF R LIB-CON SCALE SELF-PLACEMENT IS MODERATE/HAVEN'T THOUGHT/DK:

    If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a LIBERAL or
    a CONSERVATIVE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Liberal
         3. Conservative
         5. Moderate {VOL}
         7. R Refuses to Choose

         8. Don't know
         0. NA

         INAP.
         1-3,5-7,9,0 in F1

==============================
M023024         F1x. Summary - Lib-Con Self-Placement
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  F1x.

    We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and
    conservatives. When it comes to politics, do you usually think
    of yourself as EXTREMELY LIBERAL, LIBERAL, SLIGHTLY LIBERAL,
    MODERATE OR MIDDLE OF THE ROAD, SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE,
    CONSERVATIVE, EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE, or haven't you thought
    much about this?
    If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a LIBERAL or
    a CONSERVATIVE?

    SUMMARY - LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE SELF-PLACEMENT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from F1 and F1a

         1. Liberal  (01/02/03;. or 90/04/08;1)
         3. Moderate  (90/04/08;5 or 04;7/8/0)
         5. Conservative  (05/06/07;. or 90/04/08;3)
         7. Refused to choose (90/08;7 or 09;.)

         8. DK  (90/08;8)
         0. NA to F1; 08,90 in F1 and 0 in F1a

==============================
M023025         G1. R Better/Worse Off in Last Year
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  G1.

    We are interested in how people are getting along financially
    these days. Would you say that you (and your family) are
    BETTER OFF, WORSE OFF, or just about the same financially as
    you were a year ago?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Better
         3. Worse
         5. Same

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023026         G1a. R How Much Bett/Wrs Off in Last Yr
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  G1a.

  IF R IS BETTER OFF FINANCIALLY THAN A YEAR AGO:/
  IF R IS WORSE OFF FINANCIALLY THAN A YEAR AGO:

    (Is that) MUCH [better/worse] off or SOMEWHAT [better/worse]
    off?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Much Better
         2. Somewhat Better
         3. Same (5 in G1)
         4. Somewhat Worse
         5. Much Worse

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         8,9,0 in G1

==============================
M023027         H1. US Economy Better/Worse in Last Yr
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  H1.

    Now thinking about the economy in the country as a whole, would
    you say that over the past year the nation's economy has gotten
    BETTER, STAYED ABOUT THE SAME, or gotten WORSE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Better
         3. Same
         5. Worse

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023028         H1a. How Much US Econ Bet/Wrs in Last Yr
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  H1a.

  IF R SAYS ECONOMY HAS GOTTEN BETTER:/
  IF R SAYS ECONOMY HAS GOTTEN WORSE:

    (Would you say) MUCH [better/worse] or SOMEWHAT [better/
    worse]?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Much Better
         2. Somewhat Better
         3. Same (3 in H1)
         4. Somewhat Worse
         5. Much Worse

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         8,9,0 in H1

==============================
M023029         H5. Approve/Disapp Bush on Economy
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  H5.

  IF R SELECTED FOR H5 ADMINISTRATION:

    Do you APROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush is
    HANDLING THE ECONOMY?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Approval of the President's performance on the economy
         was randomly assigned to administration at H5 or J5 in
         the Pre.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Approve
         5. Disapprove

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for J5 administration

==============================
M023030         H5a. How Much Appr/Disapp Bush on Econ
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  H5a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR H5 ADMINISTRATION:
  IF R APPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING THE ECONOMY:/
  IF R DISAPPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING THE ECONOMY:

    (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Strongly
         5. Not Strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         8,9,0 in H5; R selected for J5 administration

==============================
M023031         H7. Which Pty Bettr Handle Economy
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8
   H7.

    Which party do you think would do a better job of HANDLING THE
    NATION'S ECONOMY... the [Democrats/Republicans], the
    [Republicans/Democrats], or wouldn't there be much difference
    between them?
    {IF 'DK' OR 'NEITHER PARTY' IS VOLUNTEERED, DO NOT PROBE}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order of "Democrats" and "Republicans" in question text is
         randomized.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Democrats
         3. Republicans
         5. Wouldn't Be Much Difference/no Difference
         7. Neither Party {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023032         H9. US Position Stronger/Weaker in Last
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  H9.

    Turning to some other issues facing the country.  During
    the past year, would you say that the United States' position in
    the world has grown WEAKER, STAYED ABOUT THE SAME, or has it
    grown STRONGER?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Weaker
         3. Stayed about the Same
         5. Stronger

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023033         H12. Agree/Dis US Should Stay Home
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  H12.

    Do you AGREE or DISAGREE with this statement: 'This country
    would be better off if we just stayed home and did not concern
    ourselves with problems in other parts of the world.'
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Agree
         5. Disagree

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023034         H13. Appr/Dis Bush Handling Forgn Relat
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  H13.

    Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush is
    HANDLING OUR RELATIONS WITH FOREIGN COUNTRIES?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Approve
         5. Disapprove

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023035         H13a. How Much App/Dis Bush on Foreign R
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  H13a.

  IF R APPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING FOREIGN RELATIONS:/
  IF R DISAPPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING FOREIGN RELATIONS:

    (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Strongly
         5. Not Strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         8,9,0 in H13

==============================
M023035x        H13x. Summary: Bush on Foreign Relations
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  H13x.

    Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush is
    HANDLING OUR RELATIONS WITH FOREIGN COUNTRIES?
    (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

    SUMMARY - APPROVE GEORGE W. BUSH ON FOREIGN RELATIONS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from H13 and H13a.

         1. Approve strongly
         2. Approve not strongly
         4. Disapprove not strongly
         5. Disapprove strongly

         8. Don't know (H13 or H13a)
         9. Refused (H13 or H13a)
         0. NA (H13 or H13a)

==============================
M023036         J1. R Consider Self Dem/Rep/Ind
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  J1.

    Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as a
    REPUBLICAN, a DEMOCRAT, an INDEPENDENT, or what?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Democrat
         2. Republican
         3. Independent
         4. Other Party {VOL} {SPECIFY}
         5. No Preference {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023037         J1a. Strength R Considers Self Dem/Rep
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  J1a.

  IF R IDENTIFIES SELF AS A DEMOCRAT:/
  IF R IDENTIFIES SELF AS A REPUBLICAN:

    Would you call yourself a STRONG [democrat/republican] or a
    NOT VERY STRONG [democrat/republican]?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Strong
         5. Not Very Strong

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         3-5,8,9,0 in J1

==============================
M023038         J1b. Is R Closer to Dem/Rep Party
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  J1b.

  IF R IDENTIFIES AS INDEPENDENT/OTHER PARTY/NO PREFERENCE/DK:

    Do you think of yourself as CLOSER to the Republican Party or
    to the Democratic party?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Closer to Republican
         3. Neither {VOL}
         5. Closer to Democratic

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         1,2,9,0 in J1

==============================
M023038x        J1x. Party Identification Summary
                Numeric
                Missing eq 7, ge 8

  J1x.

    Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as a
    REPUBLICAN, a DEMOCRAT, an INDEPENDENT, or what?
    Would you call yourself a STRONG [democrat/republican] or a
    NOT VERY STRONG [democrat/republican]? /
    Do you think of yourself as CLOSER to the Republican Party or
    to the Democratic party?

    SUMMARY - PARTY IDENTIFICATION
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from J1, J1a, J1b.

         Code 8 (apolitical) was used only if the respondent had a
         code of 5 or 8 in J1 and a code of 3,8,9,0 in J1b AND also
         showed little or no interest in politics in response to the
         following survey questions:  PRE question A1.(interest in
         campaigns, 5), PRE question B1 (care about Congressional race
         outcome, 4), POST question C1x (nonvoter, 5), POST question F5
         (follow public affairs, 4 ); respondents who showed an interest
         in politics were coded 3 in J1x.

         0. Strong Democrat
         1. Weak Democrat
         2. Independent-Democrat
         3. Independent-Independent
         4. Independent-Republican
         5. Weak Republican
         6. Strong Republican

         7. Other; minor party; refuses to say
         8. Apolitical
         9. NA 0 in J1

==============================
M023039         J4a. Has R Shown Flag in Past 12 Months
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  J4a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR J4 ADMINISTRATION:

    In the PAST TWELVE MONTHS, have you flown an American flag or
    displayed the flag in some other way, such as in a window, or
    on your car, or on a T-shirt or other piece of clothing?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Patriotism items were randomly assigned to placement
         at J4a,d or R1a,d.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for R1 administration

==============================
M023040         J4d. Things about US Make R Ashamed(1)
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  J4d.

  IF R SELECTED FOR J4 ADMINISTRATION:

    Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with this
    statement:  'There are some things about America today that
    make me feel ashamed of America.' Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE
    NOR DISAGREE, or DISAGREE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Patriotism items were randomly assigned to placement
         at J4a,d or R1a,d.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Agree
         3. Neither agree nor disagree
         5. Disagree

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for R1 administration

==============================
M023041         J5. Approve/Disapprove Bush on Economy
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  J5.

  IF R SELECTED FOR J5 ADMINISTRATION:

    Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush is
    HANDLING THE ECONOMY?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Approval of the President's performance on the economy
         was randomly assigned to administration at H5 or J5 in
         the Pre.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Approve
         5. Disapprove

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for H5 administration

==============================
M023042         J5a. How Much Appr/Disapp Bush on Econ
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  J5a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR J5 ADMINISTRATION:
  IF R APPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING THE ECONOMY:/
  IF R DISAPPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING THE ECONOMY:

    (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Strongly
         5. Not Strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for H5 administration; 8,9,0 in J5

==============================
M023042x        J5x. Summary: GW Bush on Economy
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  J5x.

    Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush is
    HANDLING THE ECONOMY?
    (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

    SUMMARY - APPROVE GEORGE W. BUSH ON ECONOMY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This summarizes data from H5 and J5 placements.

         1. Approve strongly
         2. Approve not strongly
         4. Disapprove not strongly
         5. Disapprove strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================

  J6.

    Now I am going to read a statement and ask you whether you
    agree or disagree.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
M023043         J6a. Poor Have Same Chance at Fair Trial
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  J6a.

    'In the U.S. today, a poor person has the same chance of
    getting a fair trial as a wealthy person does'.  Do you AGREE,
    NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE, or DISAGREE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Agree
         3. Neither agree nor disagree
         5. Disagree

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================

  K1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES:

    Next I am going to read you a list of federal programs.  For
    each one, I would like you to tell me whether you would like to
    see spending INCREASED or DECREASED.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
M023044         K1a. Highways-Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  K1a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES:

    The first program is :
    Building and repairing highways.

    If you had a say in making up the federal budget this year,
    should federal spending on building and repairing highways be
    INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: BUILDING AND REPAIRING HIGHWAYS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h
           K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K2 series

==============================
M023045         K1b. AIDS Research- Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  K1b.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES:

    (What about)
    spending on AIDS research?

    (Should federal spending on AIDS research be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: AIDS RESEARCH
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h
           K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K2 series

==============================
M023046         K1c. Welfare- Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  K1c.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES:

    (What about)
    welfare programs?

    (Should federal spending on welfare programs be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: WELFARE PROGRAMS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h
           K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K2 series

==============================
M023047a        K1d1. Public Schools- Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  K1d1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'PUBLIC SCHOOLS' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [public schools/big-city schools]?

    (Should federal spending on [public schools/big-city schools]
    be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1/2 of K1d respondents (1/4 sample each) were administered each
         wording.

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h
           K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K2 series; R selected for alternate wording

==============================
M023047b        K1d2. Big City Schools -Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  K1d2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'BIG CITY SCHOOLS' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [public schools/big-city schools]?

    (Should federal spending on [public schools/big-city schools]
    be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: BIG CITY SCHOOLS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1/2 of K1d respondents (1/4 sample each) were administered each
         wording.

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h
           K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K2 series; R selected for alternate wording

==============================
M023048         K1e. Crime- Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  K1e.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES:

    (What about)
    dealing with crime?

    (Should federal spending on dealing with crime be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: DEALING WITH CRIME
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h
           K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K2 series

==============================
M023049         K1f. Child Care- Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  K1f.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES:

    (What about)
    child care?

    (Should federal spending on child care be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: CHILD CARE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h
           K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K2 series

==============================
M023050a        K1g1. Homeland Security-Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  K1g1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'HOMELAND SECURITY' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [Homeland security/the war on terrorism]?

    (Should federal spending on Homeland security be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: HOMELAND SECURITY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1/2 of K1g respondents (1/4 sample each) were administered each
         wording.

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h
           K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K2 series; R selected for alternate wording

==============================
M023050b        K1g2. Terrorism-Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  K1g2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WAR ON TERRORISM' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [Homeland security/the war on terrorism]?

    (Should federal spending on Homeland security be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: THE WAR ON TERRORISM
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1/2 of K1g respondents (1/4 sample each) were administered each
         wording.

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h
           K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K2 series; R selected for alternate wording

==============================
M023051         K1h. Unemp Insurance-Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  K1h.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES:

    (What about)
    unemployment insurance?

    (Should federal spending on unemployment insurance be
    INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h
           K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K2 series

==============================

  K2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES:

    Next I am going to read you a list of federal programs.  For
    each one, I would like you to tell me whether you would like to
    see spending INCREASED or DECREASED.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
M023052         K2a. Environmental Protect-Federal Spend
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  K2a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES:

    The first program is :
    environmental protection

    If you had a say in making up the federal budget this year,
    should federal spending on environmental protection be
    INCREASED, DESCREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h
           K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K1 series

==============================
M023053a        K2b1. Aid To Poor People-Federal Spend
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  K2b1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'POOR PEOPLE' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [aid to poor people/aid to the working poor]?

    (Should federal spending on [aid to poor people /aid to the
    working poor] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: AID TO POOR PEOPLE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1/2 of K2b respondents (1/4 sample each) were administered each
         wording.

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h
           K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K1 series; R selected for alternate wording

==============================
M023053b        K2b2. Aid To Working Poor-Federal Spend
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  K2b2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WORKING POOR' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [aid to poor people/aid to the working poor]?

    (Should federal spending on [aid to poor people /aid to the
    working poor] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: AID TO THE WORKING POOR
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1/2 of K2b respondents (1/4 sample each) were administered each
         wording.

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h
           K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K1 series; R selected for alternate wording

==============================
M023054         K2c. Foreign Aid-Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  K2c.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES:

    (What about)
    foreign aid?

    (Should federal spending on foreign aid be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: FOREIGN AID
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h
           K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K1 series

==============================
M023055         K2d. Social Security-Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  K2d.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES:

    (What about)
    Social Security?

    (Should federal spending on Social Security be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: SOCIAL SECURITY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h
           K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K1 series

==============================
M023056         K2e. Border Security- Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  K2e.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES:

    (What about)
    tightening border security to prevent illegal immigration?

    (Should federal spending on tightening border security to
    prevent illegal immigration be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT
    ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: TIGHTENING BORDER SECURITY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h
           K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K1 series

==============================
M023057         K2f. Aid to Blacks-Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  K2f.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES:

    (What about)
    aid to blacks?

    (Should federal spending on aid to blacks be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: AID TO BLACKS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h
           K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K1 series

==============================
M023058         K2g. Infant Mortality-Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  K2g.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES:

    (What about)
    preventing infant mortality?

    (Should federal spending on preventing infant mortality be
    INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: PREVENTING INFANT MORTALITY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h
           K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K1 series

==============================
M023059a        K2h1. Early Ed For Poor- Federal Spend
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  K2h1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'POOR CHILDREN' WORDING

    (What about)
    [pre-school and early education for poor children/
    pre-school and early education for black children]?

    (Should federal spending on [pre-school and early education
    for poor children/ pre-school and early education for black
    children] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: EARLY EDUCATION FOR POOR CHILDREN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1/2 of K2h respondents (1/4 sample each) were administered each
         wording.

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h
           K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K1 series; R selected for alternate wording

==============================
M023059b        K2h2. Early Ed For Blacks- Federal Spend
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  K2h2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACK CHILDREN' WORDING

    (What about)
    [pre-school and early education for poor children/
    pre-school and early education for black children]?

    (Should federal spending on [pre-school and early education
    for poor children/ pre-school and early education for black
    children] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: EARLY EDUCATION FOR BLACK CHILDREN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1/2 of K2h respondents (1/4 sample each) were administered each
         wording.

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h
           K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K1 series; R selected for alternate wording

==============================
M023060         L1a. Last 20 Yrs Change in Inc Inequal
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L1a.

    Now on a different topic.
    Do you think the difference in incomes between rich people and
    poor people in the United States today is LARGER, SMALLER, or
    ABOUT THE SAME as it was 20 years ago?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Larger
         3. Smaller
         5. About the same

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023061         L1a1. How Much Change in Income Inequal
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L1a1.

  IF R SAYS GAP BETWEEN RICH AND POOR LARGER THAN 20 YEARS AGO:/
  IF R SAYS GAP BETWEEN RICH AND POOR SMALLER THAN 20 YEARS AGO:

    (Would you say the difference in incomes is) MUCH
    [larger/smaller] or SOMEWHAT [larger/smaller]?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Much larger
         2. Somewhat larger
         3. About the same (3 in L1a)
         4. Somewhat smaller
         5. Much smaller

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         8,9,0 in L1a

==============================
M023062         L1a2. Is Change in Inc Inequal Good/Bad
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 7

  L1a2.

  IF R SAYS GAP BETWEEN RICH AND POOR LARGER THAN 20 YEARS AGO:/
  IF R SAYS GAP BETWEEN RICH AND POOR SMALLER THAN 20 YEARS AGO:

    Do you think this is A GOOD THING, A BAD THING, or haven't you
    thought about it?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Good thing
         3. Bad thing

         7. Haven't thought
         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in L1a

==============================
M023063         L2a. Why do Some Have Better Jobs/Income
                Numeric

  L2a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2a ADMINISTRATION:

    In America today, some people have BETTER JOBS and HIGHER
    INCOMES than  others do.  WHY do you think that is -- why do
    some Americans have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do?

    REASON FOR BETTER JOBS/HIGHER INCOME
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable flags cases with text recorded whether or not
         the text itself represents substantive response or opinion
         (including e.g. digressions, statement of no opinion or
         refusal etc.).
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Text present
         5. No text present

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2a administration

==============================
M023064         L2b. Why do Some Have Worse Jobs/Income
                Numeric

  L2b.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2b ADMINISTRATION:

    In America today, some people have WORSE JOBS and LOWER INCOMES
    than others do.  WHY do you think that is -- why do some
    Americans have worse jobs and lower incomes than others do?

    REASON FOR WORSE JOBS/LOWER INCOME
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable flags cases with text recorded whether or not
         the text itself represents substantive response or opinion
         (including e.g. digressions, statement of no opinion or
         refusal etc.).
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Text present
         5. No text present

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2b administration

==============================

  L2c.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2c ADMINISTRATION:

    Next, we'd like to know WHY you think it is, that in America
    today, some people have BETTER JOBS and HIGHER INCOMES than
    others do.  I'm going to read you some possible explanations,
    and I want you to tell me how IMPORTANT you think each is.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
M023065a        L2c1. Why Bett Jobs:more able to learn
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2c1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2c ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people have more in-born ability to learn.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR BETTER JOBS/INCOME: IN-BORN ABILITY TO LEARN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Two orderings L2c series items were possible:
             L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7 OR L2c2,c4,c5,c6,c3,c1,c7
         2. Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the L2d closed list consists of L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2c administration

==============================
M023065b        L2c2. Why Bett Jobs:discrimination
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2c2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2c ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because discrimination holds some people back.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR BETTER JOBS/INCOME: DISCRIMINATION HOLDS BACK
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Two orderings L2c series items were possible:
             L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7 OR L2c2,c4,c5,c6,c3,c1,c7
         2. Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the L2d closed list consists of L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2c administration

==============================
M023065c        L2c3. Why Bett Jobs: don't work as hard
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2c3.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2c ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people just don't work as hard.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR BETTER JOBS/INCOME: SOME PEOPLE DON'T WORK AS HARD
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Two orderings L2c series items were possible:
             L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7 OR L2c2,c4,c5,c6,c3,c1,c7
         2. Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the L2d closed list consists of L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2c administration

==============================
M023065d        L2c4. Why Bett Jobs:no chance at good ed
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2c4.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2c ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people don't get a chance to get a good
    education.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR BETTER JOBS/INCOME: SOME HAVE NO CHANCE AT EDUCATION
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1.Two orderings L2c series items were possible:
             L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7 OR L2c2,c4,c5,c6,c3,c1,c7
         2.Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the L2d closed list consists of L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2c administration

==============================
M023065e        L2c5. Why Bett Jobs:choose low-pay jobs
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2c5.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2c ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people just choose low-paying jobs.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR BETTER JOBS/INCOME: SOME PEOPLE CHOOSE LOW-PAY JOBS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Two orderings L2c series items were possible:
             L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7 OR L2c2,c4,c5,c6,c3,c1,c7
         2. Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the L2d closed list consists of L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2c administration

==============================
M023065f        L2c6. Why Bett Jobs:govt policies
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2c6.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2c ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because government policies have helped high-income workers
    more.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR BETTER JOBS/INCOME: GOV'T POLICIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Two orderings L2c series items were possible:
             L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7 OR L2c2,c4,c5,c6,c3,c1,c7
         2. Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the L2d closed list consists of L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2c administration

==============================
M023065g        L2c7. Why Bett Jobs:God made some differ
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2c7.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2c ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because God made people different from one another.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR BETTER JOBS/INCOME: GOD MADE PEOPLE DIFFERENT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Two orderings L2c series items were possible:
             L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7 OR L2c2,c4,c5,c6,c3,c1,c7
         2. Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
            L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
            L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
            L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
            L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the L2d closed list consists of L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2c administration

==============================

  L2d.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2d ADMINISTRATION:

    Next, we'd like to know WHY you think it is, that in America
    today, some people have WORSE JOBS and LOWER INCOMES than
    others  do.  I'm going to read you some possible explanations,
    and I want you to tell me how IMPORTANT you think each is.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
M023066a        L2d1. Why Wrse Jobs:more able to learn
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2d1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2d ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people have more in-born ability to learn.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR WORSE JOBS/INCOME: IN-BORN ABILITY TO LEARN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Two orderings L2d series items were possible:
           L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7
           L2d2,d4,d5,d6,d3,d1,d7
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the closed list for L2d consists of questions L2d1,d2,d3,
         d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2d administration

==============================
M023066b        L2d2. Why Wrse Jobs:discrimination
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2d2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2d ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because discrimination holds some people back.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR WORSE JOBS/INCOME: DISCRIMINATION HOLDS BACK
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Two orderings L2d series items were possible:
           L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7
           L2d2,d4,d5,d6,d3,d1,d7
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the closed list for L2d consists of questions L2d1,d2,d3,
         d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2d administration

==============================
M023066c        L2d3. Why Wrse Jobs:some don't work hard
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2d3.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2d ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people just don't work as hard.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR WORSE JOBS/INCOME: SOME PEOPLE DON'T WORK AS HARD
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Two orderings L2d series items were possible:
           L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7
           L2d2,d4,d5,d6,d3,d1,d7
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the closed list for L2d consists of questions L2d1,d2,d3,
         d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2d administration

==============================
M023066d        L2d4. Why Wrse Jobs:no chance at good ed
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2d4.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2d ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people don't get a chance to get a good
    education.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR WORSE JOBS/INCOME: SOME HAVE NO CHANCE AT EDUCATION
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Two orderings L2d series items were possible:
           L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7
           L2d2,d4,d5,d6,d3,d1,d7
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the closed list for L2d consists of questions L2d1,d2,d3,
         d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2d administration

==============================
M023066e        L2d5. Why Wrse Jobs:choose low-pay jobs
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2d5.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2d ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people just choose low-paying jobs.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR WORSE JOBS/INCOME: SOME PEOPLE CHOOSE LOW-PAY JOBS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Two orderings L2d series items were possible:
           L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7
           L2d2,d4,d5,d6,d3,d1,d7
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the closed list for L2d consists of questions L2d1,d2,d3,
         d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2d administration

==============================
M023066f        L2d6. Why Wrse Jobs:govt policies
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2d6.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2d ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because government policies have helped high-income workers
    more.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR WORSE JOBS/INCOME: GOV'T POLICIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Two orderings L2d series items were possible:
           L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7
           L2d2,d4,d5,d6,d3,d1,d7
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the closed list for L2d consists of questions L2d1,d2,d3,
         d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2d administration

==============================
M023066g        L2d7. Why Wrse Jobs:God made some differ
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2d7.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2d ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because God made people different from one another.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR WORSE JOBS/INCOME: GOD MADE PEOPLE DIFFERENT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Two orderings L2d series items were possible:
           L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7
           L2d2,d4,d5,d6,d3,d1,d7
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2d consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the closed list for L2d consists of questions L2d1,d2,d3,
         d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2d administration

==============================
M023067         L9a. Party Better for Poor People
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L9a.

    Which political party do you think is generally better for
    [poor/rich] people - the DEMOCRATS, the REPUBLICANS, or is
    there NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE between them?

    PARTY R THINKS IS BETTER FOR POOR PEOPLE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         L9a-L9b are randomly assigned to have a 1/2 sample administered
         with "poor" first and "rich" second. The other 1/2 sample
         administered reverse wording order ("rich" first and "poor"
         second).
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Democrats
         3. Republicans
         5. Not much difference

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023068         L9b. Party Better for Rich People
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L9b.

    And which party do you think is generally better for
    [rich/poor] people - the DEMOCRATS, the REPUBLICANS, or is
    there NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE between them?

    PARTY R THINKS IS BETTER FOR RICH PEOPLE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         L9a-L9b are randomly assigned to have a 1/2 sample administered
         with "poor" first and "rich" second. The other 1/2 sample
         administered reverse wording order ("rich" first and "poor"
         second).
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Democrats
         3. Republicans
         5. Not much difference

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================

  L11.

    Next are a few questions about federal income taxes.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
M023069         L11a. R Pay Right Amount in Taxes
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L11a.

    Do you feel you are asked to pay MORE THAN YOU SHOULD in
    federal income taxes, about the RIGHT AMOUNT, or LESS THAN YOU
    SHOULD?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. More than should pay
         3. About right
         5. Less than should pay
         7. Don't pay at all {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023070         L11b. Rich Pay Right Amount in Taxes
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L11b.

    What about rich people? Do you feel rich people are asked to
    pay MORE THAN THEY SHOULD in federal income taxes, about the
    RIGHT AMOUNT, or LESS THAN THEY SHOULD?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1st 1/2 SAMPLE L11b ("rich") FIRST AND L11c ("poor") SECOND;
         2nd 1/2 SAMPLE L11c ("poor") FIRST AND L11b ("rich") SECOND
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. More than should pay
         3. About right
         5. Less than should pay
         7. Don't pay at all {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023071         L11c. Poor Pay Right Amount in Taxes
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L11c.

    What about poor people? Do you feel poor people are asked to
    pay MORE THAN THEY SHOULD in federal income taxes, about the
    RIGHT AMOUNT, or LESS THAN THEY SHOULD?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1st 1/2 SAMPLE L11b ("rich") FIRST AND L11c ("poor") SECOND;
         2nd 1/2 SAMPLE L11c ("poor") FIRST AND L11b ("rich") SECOND
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. More than should pay
         3. About right
         5. Less than should pay
         7. Don't pay at all {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023072         M1a. Attention to Corporate Scandals
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M1a.

    Over the last year, investigations into a number of large
    corporations such as Enron have found top executives to have
    exaggerated profits through shady accounting procedures.  The
    executives received huge bonuses, but their companies went
    bankrupt and workers lost their jobs and retirement savings.

    How much attention would you say you've paid to those stories
    -- QUITE A LOT, SOME, JUST A LITTLE, or NONE AT ALL?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Quite a lot
         2. Some
         3. Just a little
         4. None

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023073         M1a2. Made R Angry- Corporate Scandals
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M1a2.

  IF R PAID ATTENTION TO CORPORATE SCANDALS:

    Have these stories ever made you angry?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         4,8,9,0 in M1a


==============================
M023074         M1a3. How Many COs Affected by Scandal
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 7

  M1a3.

  IF R PAID ATTENTION TO CORPORATE SCANDALS:

    How common do you think this problem is today:  would you say
    it affects NEARLY ALL large U.S. companies, MANY, SOME, or
    JUST A FEW?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Nearly all
         2. Many
         3. Some
         4. Just a few

         7. Haven't thought about {VOL}
         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         4,8,9,0 in M1a

==============================
M023075         M1d. Which Pty Bett to Deal w/ Corp Scan
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M1d.

    Which party do you think would do a better job making sure that
    these problems do not continue to happen, the [DEMOCRATS/
    REPUBLICANS], the [REPUBLICANS/DEMOCRATS], or WOULDN'T THERE BE
    MUCH DIFFERENCE between them?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered Pre
         question M1d (party performance on corporate scandals) with
         either "Democrats" or "Republicans" read first.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Democrats
         3. Republicans
         5. Wouldn't be much difference
         7. Neither {VOL}

         8  Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023076         M2a. Favor 2001 Tax Cut-Combined Wording
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M2a.

    As you may recall, [Congress passed/President Bush signed] a
    big tax cut last year.  Did you FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut, or
    is this something you haven't thought about?

    FAVOR/OPPOSE TAX CUT: COMBINED WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This combines data from M2a1 and M2a2.
         See notes M2a1/M2a2.

         01. Favor
         05. Oppose
         07. Other/depends/neither {VOL} {SPECIFY}

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         00. NA
         90. Haven't thought about

==============================
M023076a        M2a1. Favor 2001 Tax Cut-Cong Wording
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M2a1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'CONGRESS' WORDING:

    As you may recall, [Congress passed/President Bush signed] a
    big tax cut last year.  Did you FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut, or
    is this something you haven't thought about?

    FAVOR/OPPOSE TAX CUT: CONGRESS WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to alternate wording
         in the M2 tax cut series (all questions in the series were
         randomly assigned to the same wording).
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         01. Favor
         05. Oppose
         07. Other/depends/neither {VOL} {SPECIFY}

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         00. NA
         90. Haven't thought about

         INAP.
         R not selected for this wording

==============================
M023076b        M2a2. Favor 2001 Tax Cut-GW Bush Wording
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M2a2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'PRESIDENT BUSH' WORDING:

    As you may recall, [Congress passed/President Bush signed] a
    big tax cut last year.  Did you FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut, or
    is this something you haven't thought about?

    FAVOR/OPPOSE TAX CUT: PRESIDENT BUSH WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to alternate wording
         in the M2 tax cut series (all questions in the series wee
         randomly assigned to the same wording).
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         01. Favor
         05. Oppose
         07. Other/depends/neither {VOL} {SPECIFY}

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         00. NA
         90. Haven't thought about

         INAP.
         R not selected for this wording

==============================
M023077         M2b. How Much Favor/Opp Tax Cut
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M2b.

  IF R FAVORED TAX CUT LAST YEAR:/
  IF R OPPOSED TAX CUT LAST YEAR:

    Did you [favor/oppose] the tax cut STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See notes M2a1/M2a2.

         1. Strongly
         5. Not strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         7,8,9,90,0 in M2a

==============================
M023077x        M2bx. Summary 2001 Tax Cut:Combined Word
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 6

  M2bx.

    As you may recall, [Congress passed/President Bush signed] a
    big tax cut last year.  Did you FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut, or
    is this something you haven't thought about?
    Did you [favor/oppose] the tax cut STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

    SUMMARY - APPROVE LAST YEAR'S TAX CUT (COMBINED WORDING)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from M2a and M2b.
         See notes M2a1/M2a2.

         1. Approve strongly
         2. Approve not strongly
         4. Disapprove not strongly
         5. Disapprove strongly

         6. Other; depends; neither (7 in M2a)
         7. Haven't thought about it (90 in M2a)
         8. Don't know in M2a or M2b
         9. Refused in M2a or M2b
         0. NA in M2a or M2b

==============================
M023078         M2c. Dem Pty Fav 2001 Tax Cut:Comb Word
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M2c.

    Do you happen to remember - did the Democratic Party FAVOR or
    OPPOSE the tax cut that [Congress passed/President Bush
    signed] last year?

    DEMOCRATIC PARTY FAVOR TAX CUT: COMBINED WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This combines data from M2c1 and M2c2.
         See notes M2c1/M2c2.

         01. Favor
         05. Oppose
         07. Other  {VOL} {SPECIFY}

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         00. NA
         80. Don't remember {VOL}

==============================
M023078a        M2c1. Dem Pty Fav 2001 Tax Cut:Cong Word
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M2c1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'CONGRESS' WORDING:

    Do you happen to remember - did the Democratic Party FAVOR or
    OPPOSE the tax cut that [Congress passed/President Bush
    signed] last year?

    DEMOCRATIC PARTY FAVOR TAX CUT - CONGRESS WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to alternate wording
         in the M2 tax cut series (all questions in the series wee
         randomly assigned to the same wording).
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         01. Favor
         05. Oppose
         07. Other  {VOL} {SPECIFY}

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         00. NA
         80. Don't remember {VOL}

         INAP.
         R not selected for this wording

==============================
M023078b        M2c2. Dem Pty Fav 2001 Tax Cut:Pres Word
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M2c2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'PRESIDENT BUSH' WORDING:

    Do you happen to remember - did the Democratic Party FAVOR or
    OPPOSE the tax cut that [Congress passed/President Bush
    signed] last year?

    DEMOCRATIC PARTY FAVOR TAX CUT - BUSH WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to alternate wording
         in the M2 tax cut series (all questions in the series wee
         randomly assigned to the same wording).
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         01. Favor
         05. Oppose
         07. Other  {VOL} {SPECIFY}

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         00. NA
         80. Don't remember {VOL}

         INAP.
         R not selected for this wording

==============================
M023079         M2e. Rep Pty Fav 2001 Tax Cut:Comb Word
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M2e.

    What about the Republican Party - did the Republican Party
    FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut that [Congress passed/President
    Bush signed] last year?

    REPUBLICAN PARTY FAVOR TAX CUT: COMBINED WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This combines data from M2e1 and M2e2.
         See notes M2e1/M2e2.

         01. Favor
         05. Oppose
         07. Other  {VOL} {SPECIFY}

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         00. NA
         80. Don't remember {VOL}

==============================
M023079a        M2e1. Rep Pty Fav 2001 Tax Cut:Cong Word
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M2e1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'CONGRESS' WORDING:

    What about the Republican Party - did the Republican Party
    FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut that [Congress passed/President
    Bush signed] last year?

    REPUBLICAN PARTY FAVOR TAX CUT - CONGRESS WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to alternate wording
         in the M2 tax cut series (all questions in the series wee
         randomly assigned to the same wording).
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         01. Favor
         05. Oppose
         07. Other  {VOL} {SPECIFY}

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         00. NA
         80. Don't remember {VOL}

         INAP.
         R not selected for this wording

==============================
M023079b        M2e2. Rep Pty Fav 2001 Tax Cut:Pres Word
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M2e2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'PRESIDENT BUSH' WORDING:

    What about the Republican Party - did the Republican Party
    FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut that [Congress passed/President
    Bush signed] last year?

    REPUBLICAN PARTY FAVOR TAX CUT - BUSH WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to alternate wording
         in the M2 tax cut series (all questions in the series wee
         randomly assigned to the same wording).
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         01. Favor
         05. Oppose
         07. Other  {VOL} {SPECIFY}

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         00. NA
         80. Don't remember {VOL}

         INAP.
         R not selected for this wording

==============================
M023080         M2n. How Important is Tax Cut Issue
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M2n.

    How important is this issue to you personally - VERY
    important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL?

    IMPORTANCE OF TAX CUT TO R
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See notes M2a1/M2a2.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023081         M2p. Has Tax Cut Issue Made R Angry
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

    M2p.

    Has this issue ever made you angry?

    TAX CUT EVER MADE R ANGRY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See notes M2a1/M2a2.

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023082         N1. Is Religion Important to R
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  N1.

    Now, on another topic. . .
    Do you consider religion to be an IMPORTANT part of your life,
    or NOT?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Important
         5. Not important

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused

         0. NA

==============================
M023083         N1a. Religion Provide Guidance to R
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  N1a.

  IF R CONSIDERS RELIGION IMPORTANT:

    Would you say your religion provides SOME guidance in your day-
    to-day living, QUITE A BIT of guidance, or A GREAT DEAL of
    guidance in your day-to-day life?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Some
         3. Quite a bit
         5. A great deal

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         0,5,8,9 in N1

==============================
M023084         N3. Does R Attend Relig Service
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  N3.

    Lots of things come up that keep people from attending
    religious services even if they want to. Thinking about your
    life these days, do you ever attend religious services, apart
    from occasional weddings, baptisms, or funerals?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023085         N3a. How Often Attend Relig Services
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  N3a.

  IF R EVER ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES:

    Do you go to religious services EVERY WEEK, ALMOST EVERY WEEK,
    ONCE OR TWICE A MONTH, A FEW TIMES A YEAR, or NEVER?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Every week
         2. Almost every week
         3. Once or twice a month
         4. A few times a year
         5. Never

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in N3

==============================
M023086         N3a1. Once a Wk/More Often Attend Relig
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  N3a1.

  IF R EVER ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES:
  IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES EVERY WEEK:

    Would you say you go to religious services ONCE A WEEK or MORE
    OFTEN THAN ONCE A WEEK?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Once a week
         2. More often than once a week

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in N3; 2-5,8,9,0 in N3a

==============================
M023087         N4. Activities At Place of Worship
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  N4.

    Aside from attending services, in the PAST SIX MONTHS have you
    been an active member at your place of worship - I mean, have
    you done things like serve on committees, give time for special
    projects, or help organize meetings?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023088         N4a. Plan/Chair Meeting at Place Worship
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  N4a.

  IF R REPORTS BEING AN ACTIVE MEMBER AT R'S PLACE OF WORSHIP:

    As part of these activities, have you planned or chaired a
    meeting (in the last six months)?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in N4

==============================
M023089         N4b. Presentation at Place Worship
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  N4b.

  IF R REPORTS BEING AN ACTIVE MEMBER AT R'S PLACE OF WORSHIP:

    (As part of these activities,) have you given a presentation
    or speech (in the last six months)?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in N4

==============================

  P1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:

    Now for some other questions.
    Next, we'd like to know WHY you think it is, that in America
    today, [blacks/whites] tend to have [WORSE/BETTER] JOBS and
    [LOWER/HIGHER] INCOMES than [whites/blacks] do.  I'm going to
    read you some possible explanations, and I want you to tell me
    how IMPORTANT you think each is.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
M023090         P1a1. Whites Bett Jobs:more able to lrn
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P1a1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WHITES BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because whites have more in-born ability to learn'.
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    WHITES BETTER JOBS: MORE IN-BORN ABILITY TO LEARN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
M023090a        P1a2. Blacks Wrse Jobs: less able to lrn
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P1a2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACKS WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because whites have more in-born ability to learn'.

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    BLACKS WORSE JOBS: MORE IN-BORN ABILITY TO LEARN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
M023091         P1b1. Whites Bett Jobs: discrimination
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P1b1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WHITES BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because discrimination holds blacks back'.

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    WHITES BETTER JOBS: DISCRIMINATION HOLDS BLACKS BACK
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
M023091a        P1b2. Blacks Wrse Jobs:discrimination
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P1b2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACKS WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because discrimination holds blacks back'.

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    BLACKS WORSE JOBS: DISCRIMINATION HOLDS BLACKS BACK
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
M023092         P1c1. Whites Bett Jobs:blacks don't work
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P1c1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WHITES BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because blacks just don't work as hard'.

    (Would you say that this is VERY  important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    WHITES BETTER JOBS: BLACKS JUST DON'T WORK AS HARD
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
M023092a        P1c2. Blacks Wrse Jobs:blacks don't work
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P1c2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACKS WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because blacks just don't work as hard'.

    (Would you say that this is VERY  important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    BLACKS WORSE JOBS: BLACKS JUST DON'T WORK AS HARD
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
M023093         P1d1. Whites Bett Jobs:chance at educ
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P1d1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WHITES BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because blacks don't get a chance to get a good education'.

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    WHITES BETTER JOBS: BLACKS DON'T GET CHANCE AT GOOD EDUC.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
M023093a        P1d2. Blacks Wrse Jobs:chance at educ
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P1d2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACKS WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because blacks don't get a chance to get a good education'.

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    BLACKS WORSE JOBS: BLACKS DON'T GET CHANCE AT GOOD EDUC.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
M023094         P1e1. Whites Bett Jobs:blacks opt lowpay
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P1e1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WHITES BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because blacks just choose low-paying jobs'.

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    WHITES BETTER JOBS: BLACKS JUST CHOOSE LOW-PAYING JOBS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
M023094a        P1e2. Blacks Wrse Jobs:blacks opt lowpay
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P1e2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACKS WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because blacks just choose low-paying jobs'.

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    BLACKS WORSE JOBS: BLACKS JUST CHOOSE LOW-PAYING JOBS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race


==============================
M023095         P1f1. Whites Bett Jobs:govt policies
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P1f1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WHITES BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because government policies have helped whites more'.

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    WHITES BETTER JOBS: GOV'T POLICIES HELP WHITES MORE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
M023095a        P1f2. Blacks Wrse Jobs:govt policies
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P1f2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACKS WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because government policies have helped whites more'.

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    BLACKS WORSE JOBS: GOV'T POLICIES HELP WHITES MORE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
M023096         P1g1. Whites Bett Jobs:God made some dif
                Missing Numeric                eq 0, ge 8

  P1g1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WHITES BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because God made people different from one another'.

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    WHITES BETTER JOBS: GOD MADE PEOPLE DIFFERENT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
M023096a        P1g2. Blacks Wrse Jobs:God made some dif
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P1g2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACKS WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because God made people different from one another'.

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    BLACKS WORSE JOBS: GOD MADE PEOPLE DIFFERENT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
M023097         P1j. Blacks same Chance at Fair Trial
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P1j.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:

    Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with the following:
    'In the U.S. today, a black person has the same chance of
    getting a fair trial as a white person does.'  Do you AGREE,
    NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE, or DISAGREE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This question was asked of respondents assigned to either
         series for income inequality by race (P1)
         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Agree
         3. Neither agree nor disagree
         5. Disagree

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for gender inequality series P2

==============================
M023098         P1k. Which party better for Whites
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P1k.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:

    Which political party do you think is generally better for
    [white/black] people - the DEMOCRATS, the REPUBLICANS, or is
    there NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM?

    PARTY BETTER FOR WHITES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         P1k-P1m are randomly assigned to have a 1/2 sample administered
         with "white" first (in P1k) and "black" second (in P1m). The
         other 1/2 sample administered reverse wording order ("black" in
         P1k and "white" in P1m)

         This question was asked of respondents assigned to either
         series for income inequality by race (P1)
         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Democrats
         3. Republicans
         5. Not much difference between them

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for gender inequality series P2

==============================
M023099         P1m. Which party better for Blacks
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P1m.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:

    And which party do you think is generally better for
    [black/white] people - the DEMOCRATS, the REPUBLICANS, or is
    there NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM?

    PARTY BETTER FOR BLACKS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         P1k-P1m are randomly assigned to have a 1/2 sample administered
         with "white" first (in P1k) and "black" second (in P1m). The
         other 1/2 sample administered reverse wording order ("black" in
         P1k and "white" in P1m)

         This question was asked of respondents assigned to either
         series for income inequality by race (P1)
         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Democrats
         3. Republicans
         5. Not much difference between them

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for gender inequality series P2

==============================

  P2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:

    Now for some other questions.
    Next, we'd like to know WHY you think it is, that in America
    today, [women/men] tend to have [WORSE/BETTER] JOBS and
    [LOWER/HIGHER] INCOMES than [men/women] do.  I'm going to
    read you some possible explanations, and I want you to tell me
    how IMPORTANT you think each is.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
M023100         P2a1. Women Wrse Jobs:less able to learn
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P2a1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WOMEN WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because men have more in-born ability to learn'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON WOMEN WORSE JOBS: MEN HAVE MORE IN-BORN ABILITY TO LEARN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
M023100a        P2a2. Men Bett Jobs:more able to learn
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P2a2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'MEN BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because men have more in-born ability to learn'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON MEN BETTER JOBS: MEN HAVE MORE IN-BORN ABILITY TO LEARN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
M023101         P2b1. Women Wrse Jobs:discrimination
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P2b1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WOMEN WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because discrimination holds women back'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON WOMEN WORSE JOBS: DISCRIMINATION HOLDS WOMEN BACK
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
M023101a        P2b2. Men Bett Jobs:discrimination
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P2b2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'MEN BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because discrimination holds women back'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON MEN BETTER JOBS: DISCRIMINATION HOLDS WOMEN BACK
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
M023102         P2c1. Women Wrse Jobs:women don't work
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P2c1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WOMEN WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because women just don't work as hard'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON WOMEN WORSE JOBS: WOMEN JUST DON'T WORK AS HARD
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
M023102a        P2c2. Men Bett Jobs:women don't work hrd
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P2c2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'MEN BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because women just don't work as hard'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON MEN BETTER JOBS: WOMEN JUST DON'T WORK AS HARD
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
M023103         P2d1. Women Wrse Jobs:chance at educ
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P2d1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WOMEN WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because women don't get a chance to get a good education'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON WOMEN WORSE JOBS: WOMEN DON'T GET CHANCE AT GOOD EDUCATION
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
M023103a        P2d2. Men Bett Jobs: chance at educ
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P2d2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'MEN BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because women don't get a chance to get a good education'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON MEN BETTER JOBS: WOMEN DON'T GET CHANCE AT GOOD EDUC.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
M023104         P2e1. Women Wrse Jobs:women opt low pay
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P2e1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WOMEN WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because women just choose low-paying jobs'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON WOMEN WORSE JOBS: WOMEN JUST CHOOSE LOW-PAYING JOBS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
M023104a        P2e2. Men Bett Jobs:women opt low pay
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P2e2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'MEN BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because women just choose low-paying jobs'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON MEN BETTER JOBS: WOMEN JUST CHOOSE LOW-PAYING JOBS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
M023105         P2f1. Women Wrse Jobs:govt policies
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P2f1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WOMEN WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because government policies have helped men more'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON WOMEN WORSE JOBS: GOV'T POLICIES HELP MEN MORE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
M023105a        P2f2. Men Bett Jobs:govt policies
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P2f2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'MEN BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because government policies have helped men more'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON MEN BETTER JOBS: GOV'T POLICIES HELP MEN MORE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
M023106         P2g1. Women Wrse Jobs:God made some diff
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P2g1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WOMEN WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because God made people different from one another'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON WOMEN WORSE JOBS: GOD MADE PEOPLE DIFFERENT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
M023106a        P2g2. Men Bett Jobs:God made some diff
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P2g2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'MEN BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because God made people different from one another'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON MEN BETTER JOBS: GOD MADE PEOPLE DIFFERENT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
M023107         P2j. Women Same Chance at Fair Trial
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P2j.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:

    Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with the following:
    'In the U.S. today, a woman has the same chance of a getting a
    fair trial as a man does.'  Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE NOR
    DISAGREE, or DISAGREE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Agree
         3. Neither agree nor disagree
         5. Disagree

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1

==============================
M023108         P2k. Which Party Better for Women
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P2k.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:

    Which political party do you think is generally better for
    [women/men] - the DEMOCRATS, the REPUBLICANS, or is there
    NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM?

    PARTY BETTER FOR WOMEN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Democrats
         3. Republicans
         5. Not much difference between them

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1

==============================
M023109         P2m. Which Party Better for Men
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  P2m.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:

    And which party do you think is generally better for
    [men/women] - the DEMOCRATS, the REPUBLICANS, or is there
    NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM?

    PARTY BETTER FOR MEN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Democrats
         3. Republicans
         5. Not much difference between them

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1

==============================
M023110         Q1. Did R Vote in 2000 Pres Election
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q1.

  IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT:

    Now I'd like to ask you a few questions about the 2000
    Presidential election.
    In 2000 George W. Bush ran on the Republican ticket against
    Al Gore for the Democrats, and Ralph Nader as a third party
    candidate. Do you remember for sure whether or not you voted in
    that election?
    {DO NOT PROBE 'DK' RESPONSE}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Pre  'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Yes, voted
         5. No, didn't vote

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
M023111         Q1a. Who did R vote for in 2000 Pres Ele
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q1a.

  IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT:
  IF R VOTED IN THE 2000 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION:

    Which one did you vote for?
    {DO NOT PROBE DK RESPONSE}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Pre  'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Al Gore
         3. George W. Bush
         5. Ralph Nader
         7. Other {SPECIFY}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent; 5,8,9 in Q1

==============================
M023112         Q2a. Remember 2000 Election Controversy
                Numeric

  Q2a.

  IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT:

    Whether or not you voted, you might remember that the 2000
    presidential election ended in a big controversy.  What do you
    remember most about that?

    2000 ELECTION: OPENEND RESPONSE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable flags cases with text recorded whether or not
         the text itself represents substantive response or opinion
         (including e.g. digressions, statement of no opinion or
         refusal etc.).

         Pre  'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Text present
         5. No text present

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
M023113         Q2c. 2000 Pres Election Fair or Unfair
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q2c.

  IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT:

    All things considered, would you say that the 2000 presidential
    election was decided in a way that was FAIR or UNFAIR?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Pre  'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Fair
         5. Unfair

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
M023114         Q2c1. How Fair/Unfair 2000 Election
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q2c1.

  IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT:
  IF R FELT 2000 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OUTCOME WAS FAIR /
  IF R FELT 2000 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OUTCOME WAS UNFAIR:

    Do you feel STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY that it was [fair/unfair]?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Pre  'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Strongly
         5. Not strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent; 8,9,0 in Q2c

==============================
M023114x        Q2cx. Summary: 2000 Pres Elect Fair
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q2cx.

  IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT:

    All things considered, would you say that the 2000 presidential
    election was decided in a way that was FAIR or UNFAIR?
    Do you feel STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY that it was [fair/unfair]?

    SUMMARY: FAIRNESS OF 2000 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from Q2c and Q2c1.

         Pre  'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Strongly - feel that 2000 Presidential election was fair
         2. Not strongly - feel that 2000 Presidential election was fair
         3. Not strongly - feel that 2000 Presidential election was unfair
         4. Strongly - feel that 2000 Presidential election was unfair


         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================

  Q3.

  IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT:

    Now for another topic.
    As you know, on September 11th 2001, a group of terrorists took
    control of several U.S. commercial airplanes and crashed them
    into the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in
    Washington.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
M023115         Q3b. Did R See World Trade Ctr Collapse
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q3b.

  IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT:

    Did you happen to see the collapse of the World Trade Center
    towers on live television AS IT WAS ACTUALLY HAPPENING?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Pre  'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Yes
         5. No
         7. R witnessed in person

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
M023116         Q3c. What Terrorists Wanted to Accom
                Numeric

  Q3c.

  IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT:

    What do you think the terrorists were trying to accomplish by
    their actions?

    9/11 TERRORISTS: OPENEND RESPONSE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable flags cases with text recorded whether or not
         the text itself represents substantive response or opinion
         (including e.g. digressions, statement of no opinion or
         refusal etc.).

         1. Text present
         5. No text present

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================

  Q3d.

  IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT:

    Now I'm going to read you a short list of explanations people
    have suggested for September 11.  I would like you to tell me
    how IMPORTANT you think each is in explaining the September
    11th attack.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
M023117a        Q3d1. 9/11 Reason - US Support Israel
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q3d1.

  IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT:

    [The first is:/(What about:)]
    'The United States' support of Israel.'

    (Would you say that U.S. support of Israel is VERY important,
    SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation
    for the terrorist attack on September 11?)

    REASON FOR 9/11: US SUPPORT OF ISRAEL
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         For Pre  'panel' respondents, the Q3d series of questions (reasons
         for 9/11 attack) were asked in 1 of 2 possible orders, randomly
         assigned:
            Q3d1,d2,d5,d6
            Q3d5,d6,d1,d2

         Pre  'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
M023117b        Q3d2. 9/11 Reason - 1991 War w/ Iraq
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q3d2.

  IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT:

    [The first is:/(What about:)]
    'Desert Storm, the U.S. war against Iraq and Saddam Hussein in
    1991'

    (Would you say that Desert Storm is VERY important,
    SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an
    explanation for the terrorist attack on September 11?)

    REASON FOR 9/11: DESERT STORM, US WAR AGAINST IRAQ IN 1991
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         For Pre  'panel' respondents, the Q3d series of questions (reasons
         for 9/11 attack) were asked in 1 of 2 possible orders, randomly
         assigned:
            Q3d1,d2,d5,d6
            Q3d5,d6,d1,d2

         Pre  'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
M023117c        Q3d5. 9/11 Reason - Religious War
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q3d5.

  IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT:

    [The first is:/(What about:)]
    'To carry out a religious war'

    (Would you say that a religious war is VERY important,
    SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an
    explanation for the terrorist attack on September 11?)

    REASON FOR 9/11: TO CARRY OUT A RELIGIOUS WAR
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         For Pre  'panel' respondents, the Q3d series of questions (reasons
         for 9/11 attack) were asked in 1 of 2 possible orders, randomly
         assigned:
            Q3d1,d2,d5,d6
            Q3d5,d6,d1,d2

         Pre  'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
M023117d        Q3d6. 9/11 Reason - US Immoral
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q3d6.

  IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT:

    [The first is:/(What about:)]
    'Because the terrorists believe that America is immoral'

    (Would you say that this belief about America is VERY
    important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an
    explanation for the terrorist attack on September 11?)

    REASON FOR 9/11: TERRORISTS BELIEVE AMERICA IS IMMORAL
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         For Pre  'panel' respondents, the Q3d series of questions (reasons
         for 9/11 attack) were asked in 1 of 2 possible orders, randomly
         assigned:
            Q3d1,d2,d5,d6
            Q3d5,d6,d1,d2

         Pre  'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
M023118         Q3e. How Likely Another Terrorist Attack
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q3e.

  IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT:

    How likely do you think it is that the U.S. will suffer an
    attack as serious as the one in New York and Washington some
    time in the next 12 months? Would you say VERY LIKELY, SOMEWHAT
    LIKELY, SOMEWHAT UNLIKELY, or VERY UNLIKELY?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Pre  'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very Likely
         2. Somewhat Likely
         3. Somewhat Unlikely
         4. Very Unlikely

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
M023119         Q3g. Appr/Dis Bush-9-11Resp/Terrorism
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q3g.

    All things considered, do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the
    way George W. Bush [is handling the war on terrorism/has
    responded to the terrorist attack of September 11]?

    GEORGE W. BUSH APPROVAL COMBINED WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This combines data from Q3g1 and Q3g2.

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible
         wordings for Q3g (President Bush performance) in the Pre.

         Pre  'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre cases from the fresh
         cross-section were asked only Q3g questions.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Approve
         5. Disapprove

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023119a        Q3g1a. Appr/Dis Bush-War on Terrorism
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q3g1a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WAR ON TERRORISM' WORDING:

    All things considered, do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the
    way George W. Bush [is handling the war on terrorism/has
    responded to the terrorist attack of September 11]?

    GEORGE W. BUSH APPROVAL - HANDLING WAR ON TERRORISM
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible
         wordings for Q3g (President Bush performance) in the Pre.

         Pre  'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre cases from the fresh
         cross-section were asked only Q3g questions.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Approve
         5. Disapprove

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording

==============================
M023119b        Q3g1b. Appr/Dis Bush-9-11Response
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q3g1b.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'RESPONDED TO 9/11' WORDING:

    All things considered, do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the
    way George W. Bush [is handling the war on terrorism/has
    responded to the terrorist attack of September 11]?

    GEORGE W. BUSH APPROVAL - RESPONSE TO TERRORIST ATTACKS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible
         wordings for Q3g (President Bush performance) in the Pre.

         Pre  'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre cases from the fresh
         cross-section were asked only Q3g questions.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Approve
         5. Disapprove

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording

==============================
M023119c        Q3g2. How Much App/Dis Bush-9-11/Terror
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q3g2.

  IF R APPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH ON 9-11/WAR ON TERRORISM: /
  IF R DISAPPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH ON 9-11/WAR ON TERRORISM:

    (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See notes Q3g.

         1. Strongly
         5. Not Strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         8,9,0 in Q3g

==============================
M023119x        Q3gx. Summary:App Bush on Terrorism/9-11
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q3gx.

    All things considered, do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the
    way George W. Bush [is handling the war on terrorism/has
    responded to the terrorist attack of September 11]?
    (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

    SUMMARY: APPROVE BUSH ON TERRORISM/SEPT 11 RESPONSE (COMBINED)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from Q3g1 and Q3g2.

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible
         wordings for Q3g (President Bush performance) in the Pre.

         Pre  'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre cases from the fresh
         cross-section were asked only Q3g questions.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Approve strongly
         2. Approve not strongly
         4. Disapprove not strongly
         5. Disapprove strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA


==============================
M023119y        Q3gx1. Summary:App Bush on War on Terr
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q3gx1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WAR ON TERRORISM' WORDING:

    All things considered, do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the
    way George W. Bush is handling the war on terrorism?
    (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

    SUMMARY: APPROVE BUSH ON 'WAR ON TERRORISM'
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from Q3g1 and Q3g2.

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible
         wordings for Q3g (President Bush performance) in the Pre.

         Pre  'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre cases from the fresh
         cross-section were asked only Q3g questions.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Approve strongly
         2. Approve not strongly
         4. Disapprove not strongly
         5. Disapprove strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording

==============================
M023119z        Q3gx2. Summary:App Bush on 9-11 Response
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q3gx2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'RESPONDED TO 9/11' WORDING:

    All things considered, do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the
    way George W. Bush has  responded to the terrorist attack of
    September 11]?
    (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

    SUMMARY: APPROVE BUSH ON 'RESPONSE TO 9/11'
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from Q3g1 and Q3g2.

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible
         wordings for Q3g (President Bush performance) in the Pre.

         Pre  'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre cases from the fresh
         cross-section were asked only Q3g questions.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Approve strongly
         2. Approve not strongly
         4. Disapprove not strongly
         5. Disapprove strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording

==============================

  Q4a.

  IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT:

    After the September 11 terrorist attacks, President Bush
    declared a war on terrorism.  A first step was to launch
    air strikes against the Taliban government of Afghanistan that
    was providing aid and protection to Osama bin Laden and the
    Al-Quaeda terrorists responsible for the September 11 attacks.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
M023120         Q4a4. War in Afghanistan Worth Cost
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q4a4.

  IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT:

    Taking everything into account, do you think the U.S. war
    against the Taliban government in Afghanistan was WORTH THE
    COST or NOT?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

        ' Panel 'respondents were randomly assigned to be administered
         Q4a4 (whether war against the Taliban worth the cost) either
         before or after Q4a5 (is Bin Laden still alive) in the Pre.

         Pre  'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Worth it
         5. Not worth it

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
M023121         Q4a5. Does R Think Bin Laden is Alive
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q4a5.

  IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT:

    Do you think Osama bin Laden is still alive?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

        ' Panel 'respondents were randomly assigned to be administered
         Q4a4 (whether war against the Taliban worth the cost) either
         before or after Q4a5 (is Bin Laden still alive) in the Pre.

         Pre  'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
M023122         Q4a6. Does R Fav/Opp Mil Action-Iraq
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q4a6.

  IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT:

    As you may know, President Bush and his top advisers are
    discussing the possibility of taking military action against
    Iraq to remove Saddam Hussein from power. Do you FAVOR or
    OPPOSE military action against Iraq -- or is this something
    you haven't thought about?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Pre  'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         01. Favor
         05. Oppose
         07. Other; depends {VOL} {SPECIFY}

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         90. Haven't thought about it
         00. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
M023123         Q4a7a. How Much Fav/Opp Mil Action-Iraq
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q4a7a.

  IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT:
  IF R FAVORS OR OPPOSES MILITARY ACTION AGAINST IRAQ:

    Do you [favor/oppose] this policy STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Pre  'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Strongly
         5. Not strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent; 7,8,9,0,90 in Q4a6

==============================
M023123x        Q4a7x. Summary:Fav/Opp Mil Action-Iraq
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 6

  Q4a7x.

  IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT:

    As you may know, President Bush and his top advisers are
    discussing the possibility of taking military action against
    Iraq to remove Saddam Hussein from power. Do you FAVOR or
    OPPOSE military action against Iraq -- or is this something
    you haven't thought about?
    Do you [favor/oppose] this policy STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

    SUMMARY: FAVOR/OPPOSE MILITARY ACTION AGAINST IRAQ
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from Q4a6 and Q4a7a.

         Pre  'panel' cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Approve strongly
         2. Approve not strongly
         4. Disapprove not strongly
         5. Disapprove strongly

         6. Other; depends; neither (7 in M2a)
         7. Haven't thought about it (90 in M2a)
         8. Don't know in M2a or M2b
         9. Refused in M2a or M2b
         0. NA in M2a or M2b

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
M023124         R1a. Has R Shown Flag in Past 12 Mo
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  R1a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR R1 ADMINISTRATION:

    In the PAST TWELVE MONTHS, have you flown an American flag or
    displayed the flag in some other way, such as in a window, or
    on your car, or on a T-shirt or other piece of clothing?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1/2 SAMPLE PRE J4 (REMAINING 1/2 SAMPLE PRE R1)

         Patriotism items were randomly assigned to placement
         at J4a,d or R1a,d.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for J4 administration

==============================
M023124x        R1ax. Summary:Flag Display in Past 12 Mo
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  R1ax.

    In the PAST TWELVE MONTHS, have you flown an American flag or
    displayed the flag in some other way, such as in a window, or
    on your car, or on a T-shirt or other piece of clothing?

    COMBINED J4a/R1a: PATRIOTIC DISPLAY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This summarized data from Pre placements, J4a and R1a.
         See notes R1a.

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023125         R1d. Things about US Make R Ashamed (2)
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  R1d.

  IF R SELECTED FOR R1 ADMINISTRATION:

    Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with this
    statement:  'There are some things about America today that
    make me feel  ashamed of America.'  Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE
    NOR DISAGREE, or DISAGREE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1/2 SAMPLE PRE J4 (REMAINING 1/2 SAMPLE PRE R1)

         Patriotism items were randomly assigned to placement
         at J4a,d or R1a,d.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Agree
         3. Neither agree nor disagree
         5. Disagree

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for J4 administration

==============================
M023125x        R1dx. Summary: US Make R Ashamed
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  R1dx.

    Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with this
    statement:  'There are some things about America today that
    make me feel  ashamed of America.'  Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE
    NOR DISAGREE, or DISAGREE?

    COMBINED J4a/R1a: ASHAMED OF AMERICA
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This summarizes data from both Pre placements, J4d and R1d.
         See notes R1d.

         1. Agree
         3. Neither agree nor disagree
         5. Disagree

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023126a        Y1a. Month of Birth - FRESH CROSS
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 89

  Y1a.

  IF FRESH CROSS:

    Now, on a different topic.
    What is the month, day and year of your birth?

    MONTH OF BIRTH
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         01. JANUARY
         02. FEBRUARY
         03. MARCH
         04. APRIL
         05. MAY
         06. JUNE
         07. JULY
         08. AUGUST
         09. SEPTEMBER
         10. OCTOBER
         11. NOVEMBER
         12. DECEMBER

         89. Refused
         00. NA

         INAP.
        ' Panel 'Respondent

==============================
M023126c        Y1c. Year of Birth - FRESH CROSS
                Numeric
                Missing eq 8889

  Y1c.

  IF FRESH CROSS:

    Now, on a different topic.
    What is the month, day and year of your birth?

    YEAR OF BIRTH
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1912-1984

         8889. Refused

         INAP.
        ' Panel 'Respondent

==============================
M023126x        Y1x. Summary: Respondent's Age
                Numeric
                Missing eq 889, ge 999

  Y1x.

    Now, on a different topic.
    What is the month, day and year of your birth?

    SUMMARY: RESPONDENT AGE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Calculated from year of birth Y1c.
         Age of' Panel 'respondent included by adding 2 years to
         age recorded for 2000 Study.

         889. Refused
         999. NA

==============================
M023127         Y2. R Marital Status - FRESH CROSS
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Y2.

  IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT:

    Are you MARRIED NOW and living with your spouse -
    or are you WIDOWED, DIVORCED, SEPARATED, or have you NEVER
    MARRIED?

    MARITAL STATUS 2002 FRESH CROSS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Married
         2. Widowed
         3. Divorced
         4. Separated
         5. Never married
         6. Partnered, not married {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
        ' Panel 'Respondent

==============================
M023127a        Y2. R Marital Status -' Panel '2000 status
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8  Y2a.

  IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT:

    Are you MARRIED NOW and living with your spouse -
    or are you WIDOWED, DIVORCED, SEPARATED, or have you NEVER
    MARRIED?

    2000 MARITAL STATUS FOR 'PANEL'
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This is 2000 data for 2002' Panel 'respondents.

         1. Married
         2. Widowed
         3. Divorced
         4. Separated
         5. Never married
         6. Partnered, not married {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
        ' Panel 'Respondent

==============================
M023128         Y3. R Highest Grade of School - FRESH CR
                Numeric
                Missing eq 88, ge 89

  Y3.

  IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT:

    What is the highest grade of school or year of college you
    completed?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         00-12  years
         13-16  years
         17.    17+ years

         88. Don't know
         89. Refused
         99. NA

         INAP.
        ' Panel 'Respondent

==============================
M023129         Y3a. R High School Diploma - FRESH CROSS
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Y3a.

  IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT:
  IF R HAS 0-12 YRS OF ED. OR IF HIGHEST ED. LEVEL IS DK/RF/NA:

    Did you get a high school diploma or pass a high school
    equivalency test?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         13-17 in Y3;' Panel 'Respondent

==============================
M023130         Y3b. R Highest Degree - FRESH CROS
                Numeric
                Missing eq 8, ge 9

  Y3b.

  IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDNET:
  IF R HAS MORE THAN 12 YEARS OF EDUCATION:

    What is the highest degree that you have earned?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         00. None (no degree)
         01. BACHELOR'S DEGREE
         02. MASTER'S DEGREE
         03. PhD, LIT, SCD, DFA, DLIT, DPH, DPHIL, JSC, SJD
         04. LLB, JD
         05. MD, DDS, DVM, MVSA, DSC, DO
         06. JDC, STD, THD
         07. ASSOCIATE DEGREE (AA)

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         99. NA

         INAP.
         00-12 in Y3;' Panel 'Respondent

==============================
M023131         Y3x. Summary: R Education
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 9

  Y3x.

  IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDNET:

    What is the highest grade of school or year of college you
    completed?
    Did you get a high school diploma or pass a high school
    equivalency test?
    What is the highest degree that you have earned?

    SUMMARY - R EDUCATION
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Education summary data from the 2000 study has been added
         for' Panel 'respondents.

         1. 8 grades or less and no diploma or equivalency
                   [0-8 in Y3, 5 in Y3a]
         2. 9-11 grades, no further schooling (incl. 12 years
                   without diploma or equivalency) [9-12 in Y3, 5 in Y3a]
         3. High school diploma or equivalency test [0-12 in Y3,
                   1 in Y3a]
         4. More than 12 years of schooling, no higher degree
                   (13-17 in Y3, 00 in Y3b)
         5. Junior or community college level degrees (AA degrees)
                   (07 in Y3b)
         6. BA level degrees; 17+ years, no advanced degree (01 in Y3b)
         7. Advanced degree, including LLB [13-17 in Y3, 2-6 in Y3b]

         9. Refused
         0. NA in Y3, Y3a or Y3b

==============================
M023132         Y4. R Employment Status - FRESH CROSS
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 999

  Y4.

  IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT:

    We'd like to know if you are working now, or are you
    unemployed, retired, (a homemaker), (a student), or what?
    {MULTIPLE RESPONSES}

    FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         The maximum number of mentions was 3 (1 case).

         001. working now
         002. temporarily laid off
         003. unemployed
         004. retired
         005. permanently disabled
         006. homemaker
         007. Student
         014. working now and retired
         016. working now and homemaker
         046. retired and homemaker
         146. working now retired and homemaker

         999. Refused
         000. NA

         INAP.
        ' Panel 'Respondent

==============================
M023132x        Y4x. Pre/Post Employment Status Summary
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  Y4x.

    We'd like to know if you are working now, or are you
    unemployed, retired, a homemaker, (a student), or what?
    {MULTIPLE RESPONSES}

    2002 PRE (FRESH CROSS) AND POST ('PANEL') EMPLOYMENT STATUS SUMMARY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from Pre Y4 (Fresh Cross) and Post Y4 (Panel; duplicates
         data found in P025183).

         001. Working now
         002. Temporarily laid off
         003. Unemployed
         004. Retired
         005. Permanently disabled
         006. Homemaker
         007. Student
         014. Working now and retired
         016. Working now and homemaker
         017. Working now and student
         026. Temporarily laid off and homemaker
         034. Unemployed and retired
         035. Unemployed and permanently disabled
         036. Unemployed and homemaker
         045. Retired and permanently disabled
         046. Retired and homemaker
         047. Retired and student
         067. Homemaker and student
         146. Working now, retired, and homemaker
         167. Working now, homemaker, and student
         467. Retired, homemaker, and student

         000. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview (Panel only)

==============================
M023133         Y6. Labor Union Membership - FRESH CROSS
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Y6.

  IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT:

    Does anyone in this household belong to a labor union?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
        ' Panel 'Respondent

==============================
M023133a        Y6. Labor Union Membership 2000
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Y6(1).

  IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT:

    Does anyone in this household belong to a labor union?

    'PANEL' - 2000 HOUSEHOLD UNION MEMBERSHIP
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This is 2000 data for' Panel 'respondents.

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross Respondent

==============================
M023134         Y6a. Who Belongs to Labor Union - FRESH
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 88

  Y6a.

  IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT:
  IF SOMEONE IN R'S HOUSEHOLD BELONGS TO A LABOR UNION:

    Who is it that belongs?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         The maximum number of mentions was 2.

         01. Respondent
         02. Respondent's spouse
         03. Other family member {SPECIFY}
         04. Someone else {SPECIFY}
         12. Respondent and spouse
         14. Respondent and other family member

         88. Don't know
         89. Refused
         00. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in Y6;' Panel 'Respondent

==============================
M023134a        Y6a(1). 2000 Who Belongs to Labor Union
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Y6a(1).

  IF 'PANEL':
  IF SOMEONE IN R'S HOUSEHOLD BELONGS TO A LABOR UNION:

    Who is it that belongs?

    'PANEL': 2000 UNION MEMBERSHIP
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This summarizes 2000 data for' Panel 'Rs.

         1. Respondent
         2. Respondent's spouse
         3. Someone else
         4. R and spouse
         5. R and someone else
         6. R's spouse and someone else
         7. R, spouse, and someone else

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross respondent

==============================
M023135         Y7. Religious Preference - FRESH CROSS
                Numeric
                Missing eq 8, ge 9

  Y7.

  IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT:

    Is your religious preference PROTESTANT, ROMAN CATHOLIC,
    JEWISH, or something else?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         00. None/Atheist/Agnostic
         01. Protestant
         02. Roman Catholic
         03. Jewish
         07. Other {SPECIFY}

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         99. NA

         INAP.
        ' Panel 'Respondent

==============================
M023136         Y7a. Religious Denomination FRESH CROSS
                Numeric
                Missing eq 88, ge 89

  Y7a.

  IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT:
  IF R'S RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE IS PROTESTANT OR "OTHER":

    What church or denomination is that?
    {CODE MENTION.  IF UNSURE CODE "OTHER" AND SPECIFY R'S RESPONSE}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         00.  Non-denominational Christian
         01.  Baptist
         02.  Episcopalian/Anglican/Church of England
         03.  Lutheran
         04.  Methodist
         05.  Just Protestant; Protestant DK/NA type
         06.  Presbyterian
         07.  Reformed
         08.  Brethren
         09.  Evangelical United Brethren
         10.  Christian or Just Christian
         11.  Christian Scientist
         12.  Church (Or Churches) of Christ
         13.  United Church of Christ
         14.  Disciples of Christ
         15.  Church of God
         16.  Assembly of God
         17.  Congregationalist
         18.  Holiness
         19.  Pentecostal
         20.  Friends, Quaker
         21.  Orthodox, E.g. Greek, Russian {SPECIFY}
         22.  Non-denominational - Protestant
         23.  Mormons
         24.  Jehovah's Witnesses
         25.  Latter Day Saints
         26.  Unitarian/universalist
         27.  Seventh day Adventist
         30.  Christian NA denomination
         35.  Buddhist
         45.  Hindu
         55.  Muslim/islam
         65.  Native American
         87.  Other {SPECIFY}

         88. Don't know
         89. Refused
         99. NA

         INAP.
         00,02,03,08,09,99 in Y7;' Panel 'Respondent

==============================
M023137         Y7a1. Southern Baptist/Oth (FRESH CROSS)
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Y7a1.

  IF FRESH CROSS:
  IF R'S RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE IS PROTESTANT OR "OTHER":
  IF R IDENTIFIES AS BAPTIST:

    2000:
    Is that SOUTHERN BAPTIST or SOMETHING ELSE?
    2002:
    With which Baptist group is your church associated? Is it the
    Southern Baptist Convention, the American Baptist Churches in
    the U.S.A., the American Baptist Association, an independent
    Baptist church or some other Baptist group?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Data from 2000 has been added for' Panel 'cases.

         1. Southern Baptist
         7. Something else

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         00,02,03,08,09,99 in Y7; 00,02-87,88,89,99 in Y7a; Panel
         Respondent

==============================
M023138         Y7x1. R Religion Summary 1
                Numeric
                Missing eq 8, ge 9

  Y7x1.

    2002:
    Is your religious preference PROTESTANT, ROMAN CATHOLIC,
    JEWISH, or something else?
    2000:
    (IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES:)  Do you mostly attend a
    place of worship that is Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, or
    something else? /
    (IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF
    CHURCH OR DENOMINATION:)  Do you consider yourself Protestant,
    Roman Catholic, Jewish, or something else?

    RELIGION SUMMARY 1 - 'PANEL' (2000) AND CROSS (2002)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         2002: Built from Y7 and Y7a.
         2000: Built from 2000 Summary variable.

         Note the change in question flow, which especially affects
         cases coded 0.
         In 2000, code 0 includes cases of Rs who said they did not
         attend church and who then answered 'No' when asked if they
         thought of themselves as part of a church or denomination.

         00. None incl. atheist/agnostic
         01. Protestant
         02. Roman Catholic
         03. Jewish
         07. Other {SPECIFY}

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         99. NA

         INAP.
         R refused or NA whether attends church (2000)

==============================
M023138a        Y7x2. R Religion Summary 2
                Numeric
                Missing eq 88, ge 89

  Y7x2.

    2002:
    Is your religious preference PROTESTANT, ROMAN CATHOLIC,
    JEWISH, or something else?
    What church or denomination is that?
    2000:
    (IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES:)  Do you mostly attend a
    place of worship that is Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, or
    something else? What church or denomination is that? /
    (IF R DOES NOT ATTEND CHURCH BUT THINKS OF SELF AS PART OF
    CHURCH OR DENOMINATION:)  Do you consider yourself Protestant,
    Roman Catholic, Jewish, or something else? What Church or
    Denomination is that?

    RELIGION SUMMARY 2 - 'PANEL' (2000) AND CROSS (2002)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Fresh Cross:  Built from Y7 and Y7a.
         Panel: Built from 2000 Religious identification summary.

         Please note the change in question flow, which especially
         affects cases coded 'None (incl. agnostic/atheist'.

         00.  Non-denominational Christian
         01.  Baptist
         02.  Episcopalian/anglican/church of England
         03.  Lutheran
         04.  Methodist
         05.  Just Protestant; Protestant DK/RF/NA denomination;
              other Protestant
         06.  Presbyterian
         07.  Reformed
         08.  Brethren
         09.  Evangelical United Brethren
         10.  Christian or Just Christian
         11.  Christian Scientist
         12.  Church (Or Churches) of Christ
         13.  United Church of Christ
         14.  Disciples of Christ
         15.  Church of God
         16.  Assembly of God
         17.  Congregationalist
         18.  Holiness
         19.  Pentecostal
         20.  Friends, Quaker; Anabaptist; Mennonite
         21.  Orthodox, E.g. Greek, Russian {SPECIFY}
         22.  Non-denominational - Protestant
         23.  Mormons
         24.  Jehovah's Witnesses
         25.  Latter Day Saints
         26.  Unitarian/universalist
         27.  Seventh day Adventist
         30.  Christian NA denomination
         32.  Roman Catholic
         35.  Buddhist
         40.  Jewish
         45.  Hindu
         55.  Muslim/islam
         65.  Native American
         77.  Other {SPECIFY}
         80.  None incl. agnostic/atheist (in 2000, includes cases
              of Rs who said they did not attend church and who then
              answered 'No' when asked if they thought of themselves
              as part of a church or denomination)
         88. Don't know
         89. Refused
         99. NA

INAP.
         R refused or NA whether attends church (2000)

==============================
M023139         Z1. How Long in Community - FRESH CROSS
                Numeric
                Missing eq 888, ge 889

  Z1.

  IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT:

    How long have you lived in your present community?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Years are rounded to the next highest year if months
         are more than 6.

         000. Less than 1 year
         001. 13-18 months
         002. 19-24 months; 2 years
         003-097 years
         098. All my life

         888. Don't know
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
        ' Panel 'Respondent

==============================
M023139a        Z1a. 2000 Study Num Years in Community
                Numeric
                Missing eq 888, ge 889

  Z1a.

  IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT:

    'PANEL' RESPONDENTS:  2000 STUDY NUMBER OF YEARS IN COMMUNITY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This is' Panel 'respondent's reported status in 2000.

         000. Less than 1 year
         001. 13-18 months
         002. 19-24 months; 2 years
         003-097 years
         098. All my life

         888. Don't know
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
M023140         Z2. How Long in Home - FRESH CROSS
                Numeric
                Missing eq 888, ge 889

  Z2.

  IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT:

    How long have you lived in your current home?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Years are rounded to the next highest year if months
         are more than 6.
         Note: case ID 1128 has indicated a number of years greater
         in R's home than in R's community.

         000. Less than 1 year
         001. 13-18 months
         002. 19-24 months; 2 years
         003-097 years
         098. All my life

         888. Don't know
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
        ' Panel 'Respondent

==============================
M023140a        Z2a. 2000 Study Num Years in House-'PANEL'
                Numeric
                Missing eq 888, ge 889

  Z2a.

  IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT:

    'PANEL' RESPONDENTS:  2000 STUDY NUMBER OF YEARS IN HOUSE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This is' Panel 'respondent's reported status in 2000.

         000. Less than 1 year
         001. 13-18 months
         002. 19-24 months; 2 years
         003-097 years
         098. All my life

         888. Don't know
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section Respondent

==============================
M023141         Z3. Family Own Home or Rent
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Z3.

    {IF 'PANEL': Now on a different topic.}
    (Do you/Does your family) own your home, pay rent, or what?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Own house
         5. Pay rent
         7. Other {SPECIFY}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023142         Z4. R Have Money in Stock Market
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Z4.

    Do you personally (or jointly with a spouse), have any MONEY
    INVESTED IN THE STOCK MARKET RIGHT NOW -- either in an
    individual stock or in a mutual fund?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023143         Z5b. Family Medicare Benefits
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Z5b.

    Do you (or any family member living with you) CURRENTLY
    receive payments from: Medicare?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023144         Z5c. Family Medicaid Benefits
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Z5c.

    Do you (or any family member living with you) CURRENTLY
    receive payments from: Medicaid?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023145         Z5g. Family Retirement Account/Pension
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Z5g.

    Do you (or any family member living with you) CURRENTLY have
    retirement savings either in a pension plan or a retirement
    account, like an IRA?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================

  Z6.

    We are interested in how people are getting along financially
    these days.  The next questions are about the total income of
    all members of your family living in your house in 2001, before
    taxes and other deductions.  The figure should include
    salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other
    income.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
M023146         Z6a. Is Fam Income More/Less than 50K
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Z6a.

    Is your total household income less than $50,000 or more than
    $50,000?
    {PROBE IF NEEDED: What would be your best guess?}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Less than $50,000
         3. More than $50,000
         7. Income was (about) $50,000 {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023147         Z6b. Category Fam Income More Than 50K
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Z6b.

  IF R'S TOTAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME IS MORE THAN $50,000:

    Which category best describes your total household income:
    $50,000-$64,999, $65,000-$84,999, or more than $84,999?
    {PROBE IF NEEDED: What would be your best guess?}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. $50,000-$64,999
         3. $65,000-$84,999
         5. More than $84,999

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         1,7,8,9,0 in Z6a

==============================
M023148         Z6c. Category Fam Income Less Than 50K
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Z6c.

  IF R'S TOTAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME IS LESS THAN $50,000:

    Which category best describes your total household income:
    $0-$14,999, $15,000-$34,999, or $35,000-$49,999?
    {PROBE IF NEEDED: What would be your best guess?}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. $0-$14,999
         3. $15,000-$34,999
         5. $35,000-$49,999

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         3,7,8,9,0 in Z6a


==============================
M023149         Z6x. Summary: Household Income
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 88

  Z6x.

    We are interested in how people are getting along financially
    these days.  The next questions are about the total income of
    all members of your family living in your house in 2001, before
    taxes and other deductions.  The figure should include
    salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other
    income.
    Is your total household income less than $50,000 or more than
    $50,000? {PROBE IF NEEDED: What would be your best guess?}
    Which category best describes your total household income:
    $50,000-$64,999, $65,000-$84,999, or more than $84,999?
    {PROBE IF NEEDED: What would be your best guess?}
    Which category best describes your total household income:
    $0-$14,999, $15,000-$34,999, or $35,000-$49,999?

    SUMMARY - HOUSEHOLD INCOME
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from Z6a, Z6b and Z6c.

         01. $0     -$14,999
         02. $15,000-$34,999
         03. $35,000-$49,999
         04. Just about $50,000 [VOL]
         05. $50,000-$64,999
         06. $65,000-$84,999
         07. More than $84,999
         08. Less than $50,000 - DK/NA/RF additional subcategorizaton
         09. More than $50,000 - DK/NA/RF additional subcategorization

         88. Don't know household income (8 in Z6a)
         89. Refused household income (9 in Z6a)
         00. NA (0 in Z6a)

==============================
M023150         Z7x. Race Summary
                Numeric
                Missing eq 88, ge 89

  Z7x.

    What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you?
    Are you of Spanish or Hispanic origin or descent?

    SUMMARY: RESPONDENT RACE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Constructed from Z7a-Z7e, text of Z7f, and Z9.
         For' Panel 'cases, data from 2000 are included.

         01. Black only mentioned
         02. Asian/Pacific Islander only mentioned
         03. Native American only mentioned
         04. Hispanic only mentioned
         05. White only mentioned
         12. Black and Asian/Pacific Islander mentioned
         13. Black and Native American mentioned
         14. Black and Hispanic mentioned
         15. Black and White mentioned
         23. Asian/Pacific Islander and Native American mentioned
         24. Asian/Pacific Islander and Hispanic mentioned
         25. Asian/Pacific Islander and White mentioned
         34. Native American and Hispanic mentioned
         35. Native American and White mentioned
         45. Hispanic and White mentioned
         77. Other (not codeable elsewhere) including 3 or more
             racial groups

         88. Don't know
         89. Refused
         99. NA

==============================
M023150a        Z7a. Mention Black: R Racial Groups
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Z7a.

  IF FRESH CROSS:

    What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you?
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    MENTION BLACK
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1. Mentioned
         5. Not mentioned

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused to answer question
         0. NA

         INAP.
        ' Panel 'Respondent

==============================
M023150b        Z7b. Mention Asian: R Racial Groups
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Z7b.

  IF FRESH CROSS:

    What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you?
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    MENTION ASIAN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1. Mentioned
         5. Not mentioned

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused to answer question
         0. NA

         INAP.
        ' Panel 'Respondent

==============================
M023150c        Z7c. Mention Native Am: R Racial Groups
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Z7c.

  IF FRESH CROSS:

    What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you?
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    MENTION NATIVE AMERICAN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1. Mentioned
         5. Not mentioned

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused to answer question
         0. NA

         INAP.
        ' Panel 'Respondent

==============================
M023150d        Z7d. Mention Hispanic: R Racial Groups
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Z7d.

  IF FRESH CROSS:

    What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you?
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    MENTION HISPANIC
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1. Mentioned
         5. Not mentioned

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused to answer question
         0. NA

         INAP.
        ' Panel 'Respondent

==============================
M023150e        Z7e. Mention White: R Racial Groups
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Z7e.

  IF FRESH CROSS:

    What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you?
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    MENTION WHITE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1. Mentioned
         5. Not mentioned

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused to answer question
         0. NA

         INAP.
        ' Panel 'Respondent

==============================
M023150f        Z7f. Mention Other: R Racial Groups
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Z7f.

  IF FRESH CROSS:

    What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you?
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    MENTION OTHER
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1. Mentioned
         5. Not mentioned

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused to answer question
         0. NA

         INAP.
        ' Panel 'Respondent

==============================
M023151         Z9. R Hispanic
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Z9.

  IF FRESH CROSS:

    {IF HISPANIC OR LATINO MENTIONED FOR RACE, CODE AND DO NOT ASK,
    OTHERWISE ASK:}
    Are you of Spanish or Hispanic origin or descent?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

        ' Panel 'data from the 2000 Study have been included.

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
        ' Panel 'Respondent

==============================
M023152         Z9a. Type Hispanic R
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Z9a.

  IF FRESH CROSS:
  IF R IDENTIFIES AS BEING OF SPANISH OR HISPANIC ORIGIN OR DESCENT:

    Would you describe your Hispanic origin as MEXICAN,
    PUERTO RICAN, CUBAN, LATIN AMERICA, CENTRAL AMERICAN,
    or SPANISH?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

        ' Panel 'data from the 2000 Study have been included.

         1. Mexican
         2. Puerto Rican
         3. Cuban
         4. Latin American
         5. Central American
         6. Spanish
         7. Other {VOL} {SPECIFY}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in Z9;' Panel 'Respondent

==============================
M023153         Z10. R Gender
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 9

  Z10.

    {ASK ONLY IF UNSURE, OTHERWISE CODE WITHOUT ASKING:}
    Finally, are you MALE or FEMALE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Male
         2. Female

         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M023154         ZZ4. IWR: R Cooperation
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ4.

    R's cooperation was:
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Very good
         2. Good
         3. Fair
         4. Poor
         5. Very poor

         0. NA

==============================
M023155         ZZ5. IWR: R Level of Information
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ5.

    R's general level of information about politics and public
    affairs seemed:
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Very high
         2. Fairly high
         3. Average
         4. Fairly low
         5. Very low

         0. NA

==============================
M023156         ZZ6. IWR: R Intelligence
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ6.

    R's apparent intelligence:
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Very high
         2. Fairly high
         3. Average
         4. Fairly low
         5. Very low

         0. NA

==============================
M023157         ZZ7. IWR: How Suspicious Was R
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ7.

    How suspicious did R seem to be about the study before the
    interview?:
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Not at all suspicious
         3. Somewhat suspicious
         5. Very suspicious

         0. NA

==============================
M023158         ZZ8. IWR: R Interest in Interview
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ8.

    Overall, how great was R's interest in the interview?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Very high
         2. Fairly high
         3. Average
         4. Fairly low
         5. Very low

         0. NA

==============================
M023159         ZZ9. IWR: How Sincere Was R
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ9.

    How sincere did R seem to be in his/her answers?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Completely sincere
         3. Usually sincere
         5. Often seemed to be insincere

         0. NA

==============================
M023160         ZZ9a. IWR: Parts Where Doubt R Sincerity
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ9a.

  IF IWR REPORTED THAT R WAS USUALLY SINCERE:/
  IF IWR REPORTED THAT R OFTEN SEEMED TO BE INSINCERE:

    Were there any particular parts of the interview for which you
    doubted R's sincerity?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         0. NA

         INAP.
         1,0 in ZZ9

==============================
M023161         ZZ10. IWR: R Reported Income Accurately
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  ZZ10.

    Do you feel R reported income accurately?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes, think R reported correctly
         2. No, think R reported incorrectly
         3. Refused income questions
         5. No, think R reported dishonestly

         8. Don't know
         0. NA

==============================
M023162         ZZ10a. IWR: Estimate R Family Income
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 888888

  ZZ10a.

  IF IWR DID NOT FEEL R REPORTED INCOME CORRECTLY :/
  IF R REFUSED INCOME QUESTIONS OR DK/NA IF REPORTED CORRECTLY:

    If possible, give a reasonable estimate of what R's family
    income is (before taxes in 2001).
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Coded in 1000s of dollars (range 10,000-90,000)

         888888. DK
         000000. NA

         INAP.
         1 in ZZ10

==============================
M023163         ZZ11a. IWR: Estimate R Age
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 98

  ZZ11a.

    What would you estimate R's age to be?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Coded 18-96 and:

         97. 97 and older

         98. Hard to guess {SPECIFY}
         00. NA

==============================
M023164         ZZ11b. IWR: Estimate R Education
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  ZZ11b.

    What would you estimate R's level of education to be?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Low - probably less than high school diploma
         2. Probably has a high school diploma but probably no college
         3. Probably a little college
         4. Probably a college degree

         8. Hard to guess {SPECIFY}
         0. NA

==============================
M023165a        ZZ12a. IWR:IW Rxns- Negative General
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12a.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    NEGATIVE - GENERAL
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.  "Negative - general"
         5.  Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

==============================
M023165b        ZZ12b. IWR:IW Rxns-Too Long
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12b.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    NEGATIVE - TOO LONG
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.  "Negative - too long"
         5.  Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

==============================
M023165c        ZZ12c. IWR:IW Rxns-Too Complicated
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12c.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.  "Negative - too complicated"
         5.  Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

==============================
M023165d        ZZ12d. IWR:IW Rxns-Boring/Tedious
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12d.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.  "Negative - boring/tedious/repetitious"
         5.  Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

==============================
M023165e        ZZ12e. IWR:IW Rxns-Wanted to Stop
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12e.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE INTERVIEW COMPLETED
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.   "R wanted to stop before interview completed.  After
              starting the interview R made comments indicating
              he/she regretted having agreed to be interviewed"
         5.   Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

==============================
M023165f        ZZ12f. IWR:IW Rxns- Ill/Deaf/Tired
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12f.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    R ILL/DEAF/TIRED ETC.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.   "R complained and/or interviewer observed that R was
              ill/deaf/tired/had bad eyesight etc.; interview was
              obviously hard for R"
         5.   Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

==============================
M023165g        ZZ12g. IWR:IW Rxns-Confused
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12g.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    R CONFUSED BY QUESTIONS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.   "R complained and/or interviewer observed that R was
              confused by questions "couldn't understand the
              scales"; interview was obviously hard for R"
         5.   Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

==============================
M023165h        ZZ12h. IWR:IW Rxns-Lack of Knowledge
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12h.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    R SELF-CONSCIOUS - LACK OF KNOWLEDGE/SUITABILITY FOR INTERVIEWING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.   "R expressed (especially repeatedly) doubts/apologies/
              embarrassment over lack of knowledge or own
              suitability for interview"
         5.   Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

==============================
M023165j        ZZ12j. IWR:IW Rxns-Lack Political Knwldg
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12j.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    R SELF-CONSCIOUS - LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.   "R expressed (especially repeatedly) doubts/apologies/
              embarrassment over lack of POLITICAL knowledge"
         5.   Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

==============================
M023165k        ZZ12k. IWR:IW Rxns-Agitated by Process
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12k.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    R AGITATED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.  "R was agitated or stressed by interview PROCESS"
         5.  Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

==============================
M023165m        ZZ12m. IWR:IW Rxns-Angry at Content
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12m.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    R ANGRY ABOUT INTERVIEW CONTENT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.  "R became angry at interview CONTENT"
         5.  Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

==============================
M023165n        ZZ12n. IWR:IW Rxns-Sampling Concerns
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12n.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    R CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSE/BIAS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.   "R became concerned about sampling purpose or bias:
              'why do you come to the old folks home?' 'why THIS
              neighborhood?' 'why/why not blacks/Hispanics?' 'why
              me?' etc."
         5.   Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

==============================
M023165p        ZZ12p. IWR:IW Rxns- Positive
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12p.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    POSITIVE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.   "R appeared to enjoy the interview (R was "cooperative"
              /"interested"/"pleasant" etc.)"
         5.   Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

==============================
M023165q        ZZ12q. IWR:IW Rxns- Neutral/None
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12q.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.  "Neutral or no feedback (1st mention only)"
         5.  Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

==============================
M023168         PROB1. Problem 1 Recorded
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 9

  PROB1.

    Is there any difficulty administering an interview by phone
    to this R?

    {EXAMPLES: hard of hearing, illness that makes it difficult for
    R to stay on the phone very long, etc.}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes {SPECIFY}
         5. No

         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
M024000         PostAdmin.0. Form of Post interview
                Numeric

  PostAdmin.25

    Form of 2002 Post Interview
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Aside from various randomly assigned wording and
         placement/order options, the following content options were
         randomly assigned to 1/2 samples in the Post:

          1- either D3 or D4 Bush Traits questions
          2- either K4 or K5 social trust item
          3- either L1 series or L2 series Federal spending items
          4- either M5 affirmative action or M6 equal pay items
          5- M11 general income inequality as openend (M11c/M11d)or
             as closed series (M11a/M11b) [each has wording variants]
         Note that for the spending items and income inequality options,
         the alternate option had been assigned to the pre.

         01. D3 - K4 - L1 - M5 race - M11 open
         02  D3 - K4 - L1 - M5 race - M11 closed
         03. D3 - K4 - L1 - M6 gend - M11 open
         04. D3 - K4 - L1 - M6 gend - M11 closed
         05. D3 - K4 - L2 - M5 race - M11 open
         06. D3 - K4 - L2 - M5 race - M11 closed
         07. D3 - K4 - L1 - M5 race - M11 open
         08. D3 - K4 - L2 - M6 gend - M11 open
         09. D3 - K4 - L2 - M6 gend - M11 closed
         10. D3 - K5 - L1 - M5 race - M11 open
         11. D3 - K5 - L1 - M5 race - M11 closed
         12. D3 - K5 - L1 - M6 gend - M11 open
         13. D3 - K5 - L1 - M6 gend - M11 closed
         14. D3 - K5 - L2 - M5 race - M11 open
         15. D3 - K5 - L2 - M6 gend - M11 open
         16. D3 - K5 - L2 - M5 race - M11 closed
         17. D3 - K5 - L2 - M6 gend - M11 open
         18. D3 - K5 - L2 - M6 gend - M11 closed
         19. D4 - K4 - L1 - M5 race - M11 open
         20. D4 - K4 - L1 - M5 race - M11 closed
         21. D4 - K4 - L1 - M6 gend - M11 open
         22. D4 - K4 - L1 - M6 gend - M11 closed
         23. D4 - K4 - L2 - M5 race - M11 open
         24. D4 - K4 - L2 - M5 race - M11 closed
         25. D4 - K4 - L1 - M5 race - M11 open
         26. D4 - K4 - L2 - M6 gend - M11 open
         27. D4 - K4 - L2 - M6 gend - M11 closed
         28. D4 - K5 - L1 - M5 race - M11 open
         29. D4 - K5 - L1 - M5 race - M11 closed
         30. D4 - K5 - L1 - M6 gend - M11 open
         31. D4 - K5 - L1 - M6 gend - M11 closed
         32. D4 - K5 - L2 - M5 race - M11 open
         33. D4 - K5 - L2 - M6 gend - M11 open
         34. D4 - K5 - L2 - M5 race - M11 closed
         35. D4 - K5 - L2 - M6 gend - M11 closed
         36. D4 - K5 - L2 - M6 gend - M11 closed

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
M024001         PostAdmin.1. Release
                Numeric

  PostAdmin.1

    Post Release number
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. There was a single release in the Post

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
M024002         PostAdmin.2. Mode
                Numeric

  PostAdmin.2

    Post Mode
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Telephone

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
M024003         PostAdmin.3. Number of calls
                Numeric

  PostAdmin.3

    Post number of calls
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1-25

==============================
M024004         PostAdmin.4. Result
                Numeric

  PostAdmin.4

    Post Result
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Because few cases were ever removed from callback status,
         most cases with final disposition "never available" may be
         considered as, in fact, refusals.

         01. Completion
         05. Refusal
         60. Phone Not in service or new number
         61. No contact - no answer/answering device/busy/barrier
         68. "Never Available"/refusals

==============================
M024005         PostAdmin.5. Language
                Numeric

  PostAdmin.5

    Post language
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. English

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
M024006         PostAdmin.6. Verification
                Numeric

  PostAdmin.6

    Post interview verification
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         There was no verification of interviews at the interviewing
         facility.

         5. No verification

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
M024007         PostAdmin.7. Evaluation
                Numeric

  PostAdmin.7

    Post interview evaluation
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         There was no evaluation of interviews at the interviewing
         facility.

         5. No evaluation

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
M024008         PostAdmin.8. Tape recorded
                Numeric

  PostAdmin.8

    Post interview tape-recorded
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Tape recorded
         5. Not tape recorded

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
M024009         PostAdmin.9. Interviewed in parts
                Numeric

  PostAdmin.9

    Post interview in parts
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Interviewed in parts (multiple sessions)
         5. Not interviewed in parts (1 session)

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
M024010         PostAdmin.10. Number of parts
                Numeric

  PostAdmin.10

  IF PRE INTERVIEW CONDUCTED IN PARTS:

    Post number of parts
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1-5

         INAP.
         Interview not conducted in parts; no Post interview

==============================
M024011         PostAdmin.11. Number of interviewers
                Numeric
  PostAdmin.11

    Post number of interviewers
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This is the number of interviewers used on the case (1-5).

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
M024012a        PostAdmin.12a. Beginning month
                Numeric

  PostAdmin.12a

    Post interview - beginning month
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         11. November
         12. December

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
M024012b        PostAdmin.12b. Beginning day
                Numeric

  PostAdmin.12b

    Post interview - beginning day
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1-30

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
M0242012c         PostAdmin.12c. Beginning month and day
                Character
  PostAdmin.12c

    Post interview - beginning month and day (MMDD)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This is a character variable

==============================
M024012d        PostAdmin.12d. Days after election
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  PostAdmin.12d

    Post Interview - Number of days after election
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Based on beginning date of interview

         00. NA

==============================
M024013a        PostAdmin.13a. Ending month
                Numeric

  PostAdmin.13a

    Post interview - ending month
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         11. November
         12. December

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
M024013b        PostAdmin.13b. Ending day
                Numeric

  PostAdmin.13b

    Post interview - ending day
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1-30

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
M024013c         PostAdmin.12c. Ending month and day
                Character
  PostAdmin.13c

    Post interview - ending month and day (MMDD)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This is a character variable

==============================
M024014         PostAdmin.14. Pre Address given
                Numeric

  PostAdmin.14

    Post payment address given?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
M024015         PostAdmin.15. Payment mode
                Numeric

  PostAdmin.15

  IF PRE PAYMENT ADDRESS GIVEN:

    Post payment mode
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Check

         INAP.
         5 in PostAdmin.14; no Post interview

==============================
M024016         PostAdmin.16. Payment amount
                Numeric

  PostAdmin.16

  IF PRE PAYMENT ADDRESS GIVEN:

    Post payment amount
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         20. Twenty dollars
         40. Forty dollars
         50. Fifty dollars

         INAP.
         5 in PostAdmin.14; no Post interview

==============================
M024017a        PostAdmin.17a. Month payment mailed
                Numeric

  PostAdmin.17a

  IF PRE PAYMENT ADDRESS GIVEN:

    Date Post payment mailed - month
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         11. November
         12. December

         INAP.
         5 in PostAdmin.14; no Post interview

==============================
M024017b        PostAdmin.17b. Day payment mailed
                Numeric

  PostAdmin.17b

  IF PRE PAYMENT ADDRESS GIVEN:

    Date Post payment mailed - day
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1-31

         INAP.
         5 in PostAdmin.14; no Post interview

==============================
M024018         PostAdmin.18. Pre Interview Length
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  PostAdmin.18

    Post Interview Length
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This is length in minutes.

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
M024019         PostAdmin.19. Pre Interviewer IW Number
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  PostAdmin.19

    Post Interviewer's Interview Number
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         The interviewer's interviews are numbered by beginning date.

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
M024020         PostAdmin.20. Post persuasion letter
                Numeric

  PostAdmin.20

    Post Persuasion letter
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         No persuasion letters were sent in the Post

         1. No persuasion letter sent in the Post

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
M024024         IWR.1. Post IWR of Record
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  PostIWR.1

    POST Interviewer of Record
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Interviewer ID number is coded and:

         000. NA

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
M024025         IWR.2. Post IWR Gender
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  PostIWR.2

    POST Interviewer Gender
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the Post interviewer of record.
         Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by
         interviewers.

         1. Male
         2. Female

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
M024026         IWR.3. Post IWR Education Level
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  PostIWR.3

    POST Interviewer Education Level (highest education)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the Post interviewer of record.
         Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by
         interviewers.

         1. 1-8 grades
         2. Some high school
         3. High school graduate
         4. Some college
         5. College degree
         6. Master's degree
         7. Ph.D

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
M024027         IWR.4. Post IWR Race
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  PostIWR.4

    POST Interviewer Race
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the Post interviewer of record.
         Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by
         interviewers.

         1. White
         2. Black
         3. Native American
         4. Asian
         5. Other

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
M024027a        IWR.4a. Post IWR Ethnicity
                Numeric
                Missing eq 9

  PostIWR.4a

    POST Interviewer Ethnicity
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the Post interviewer of record.
         Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by
         interviewers.

         0. No ethnicity mentioned
         1. Hispanic
         7. Other

         9. NA

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
M024028         IWR.5. Post IWR languages
                Numeric
                Missing eq 9

  PostIWR.5

    POST Interviewer Languages
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the Post interviewer of record.
         Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by
         interviewers.

         0. No languages spoken
         1. Spanish
         7. Other

         9. NA

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
M024029         IWR.6. Post IWR experience
                Numeric
                Missing eq 99

  PostIWR.6

    POST Interviewer Experience
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the Post interviewer of record.
         Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by
         interviewers.

         00. None
         01. 1 Year or less
         02. 13-23 Months
         03. 2 years
         04. 4 years
         05. 5 years
         06. 6 years
         07. 7 years
         08. 8 years
         09. 9 years

         99. NA

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
M024030         IWR.7. Post IWR Age
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  PostIWR.7

    POST Interviewer Age (age groups)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the Post interviewer of record.
         Interviewer characteristics were self-descriptions provided by
         interviewers.

         1. 18-34 years
         2. 35-40 years
         3. 41-45 years
         4. 46-50 years
         5. 51-55 years
         6. 56-60 years
         7. 61-64 years
         8. 65-79 years

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
M024201         PostSummary.1. Flag misassigned preload
                Numeric

  PostSummary.1

    FLAG - MISSASSIGNMENT IN PRELOAD
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable flags 1 case where the preload district
         assignment was incorrect, and 2 cases where the preload county
         was misidentified but for which district assignment was still
         correct.

         1. District preload incorrect (NY03 correct; NY04 preloaded)
         2. County preload incorrect (district correct)
         3. No preload misassignment

==============================
M024202         PostSummary.2.' Panel 'Flag - candidate same
                Numeric

  PostSummary.2

    Panel:
    2002 House candidate preload names same as 2000 preload names?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This determines whether the House candidate name (s) preloaded
         into the 2002 Post instrument were the same as the House
         candidate names that had been preloaded into the ANES 2000 Post.
         Note:  Due to redistricting, district number for nonmovers may
         not be the same in 2000-2002; names of candidates were compared
         to construct this summary.

         00. Neither 2002 Democratic candidate preload name nor 2002
             Republican candidate preload name was preloaded in 2000
         01. 2002 Democratic preload name same as in 2000
         02. 2002 Republican preload name same as in 2000
         03. Both Democratic and Republican candidates same 2000-2002
         04. 2002 Democratic Retiring Representative name was preloaded
             in 2000 as Democratic candidate name
         05. 2002 Republican Retiring Representative name was preloaded
             in 2000 as Democratic candidate name
         15. Democrat preload same and 2002 retiring Republican was
             preloaded in 2000
         24. Republican preload same and 2002 retiring Democrat was
             preloaded in 2000

         INAP.
         Fresh cross case

==============================
M024202a

  Summary.2a

   ' Panel '- 2000 district number
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Due to redistricting, district number for nonmovers may
         not be the same in 2002 as it was in 2000.
         9996=case with misidentified district number in 2000

         INAP.
         Fresh cross case

==============================
M024401         PostRand.C1. Rand C1a/C1b Voter Turnout
                Numeric

  PostRand.C1

    RANDOMIZED PREASSIGNMENT -  C1a/C1b VOTER TURNOUT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly preassigned to either C1a or C1b in
         the Pre (alternate versions of vote turnout question).

         1. C1a
         2. C1b

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024402         PostRand.Vote. Rand Order-Dem/Rep Cands
                Numeric

  PostRand.Vote

    RANDOMIZED ORDER - DEM/REPUB CANDIDATE NAMES IN VOTE SECTION
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the order to which the names of major
         party candidates were randomly preassigned for reading in the
         text of House and Senate vote-choice and nonvoter preference
         questions.  This preassigned order did not actually apply if
         only a single major party candidate ran (major party candidate
         name always read before any independent/third-party name, if
         any).

         1. Democratic name first, Republican name second
         2. Republican name first, Democratic name second

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024403         PostRand.D1. Rand of D1 Thermometers
                Numeric

  PostRand.D1

    RANDOMIZATION OF D1 THERMOMETERS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         thermometer).
         Note: This is a randomly pre-assigned order; not all
         thermometers apply to every respondent.

         1. D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k
         2. D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024404         PostRand.D2. Rand of D2 Thermometers
                Numeric

  PostRand.D2

    RANDOMIZATION OF D2 THERMOMETERS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Group thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders.

         1. D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z
         2. D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024405         PostRand.D3/D4. Rand Select D3/D4 Traits
                Numeric

  PostRand.D3/D4

    RANDOMIZED SELECTION D3/D4 TRAITS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush
         traits questions.

         1. R administered D3 traits
         2. R administered D4 traits

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024406         PostRand.D3. Rand Order D3 Bush Traits
                Numeric

  PostRand.D3

    RANDOMIZATION - ORDER OF D3 BUSH TRAITS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         George W. Bush traits questions in D3 were randomly assigned to
         1 of 2 possible sequential orders.

         1. D3a,b,c,d
         2. D3a,d,c,b

         INAP.
         R selected for D4 traits; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024407         PostRand.D4. Rand Order D4 Bush Traits
                Numeric

  PostRand.D4

    RANDOMIZATION - ORDER OF D4 BUSH TRAITS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         George W. Bush traits questions in D4 were randomly assigned to
         1 of 2 possible sequential orders.

         1. D4a,b,c,d
         2. D4a,d,c,b

         INAP.
         R selected for D3 traits; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024408         PostRand.G1a/b. Rand Order of G1a/b
                Numeric

  PostRand.G1a/b

    RANDOMIZATION ORDER OF G1a/b
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly preassigned to be administered
         major party liberal-conservative House candidate placements
         with either the Democrat or Republican first.

         1. G1a Democratic House cand 1st, G1b Republican House cand 2nd
         2. G1b Republican House cand 1st, G1a Democratic House cand 2nd

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024409         PostRand.K4/K5. Rand Selection of K4/K5
                Numeric

  PostRand.K4/K5

    RANDOMIZED SELECTION K4/K5
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either K4 or K5
         (trust in people).

         1. K4 selected (people take advantage)
         2. K5 selected (people try to be helpful)

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024410         PostRand.L1/L2. Rand Assign L1/L2 Fed Sp
                Numeric

  PostRand.L1/L2

    RANDOMIZED ASSIGNMENT L1/L2 FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - K1 series in Pre, L2 series in Post
         - K2 series in Pre, L1 series in Post
         This variable describes the Post assignment based on this
         randomized selection.
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.

         1. L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         2. L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024411         PostRand.L1. Rand Post L1 Series
                Numeric

  PostRand.L1

    RANDOMIZATION POST L1 SERIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the order of administration of Post
         L1 series Federal spending items.  Two orderings were possible.

         1. L1a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
         2. L1a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e

         INAP.
         R selected for Post L2 series; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024412         PostRand.L1e. Rand Post L1e Wording
                Numeric

  PostRand.L1e

    RANDOMIZATION POST L1e WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the random assignment of wording
         in Federal spending item L1e in the Pre.

         1. "Public schools"
         2. "Big city schools"

         INAP.
         R selected for Post L1 series; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024413         PostRand.L1h. Rand Post L1h Wording
                Numeric

  PostRand.L1h

    RANDOMIZATION POST L1h WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the random assignment of wording
         in Federal spending item L1h in the Pre.

         1. "Homeland security"
         2. "War on terrorism"

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024414         PostRand.L2. Rand Post L2 Series
                Numeric

  PostRand.L2

    RANDOMIZATION POST L2 SERIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the order of administration of Post
         L2 series Federal spending items.  Two orderings were possible.

         1. L2a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
         2. L2a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024415         PostRand.L2c. Rand Post L2c Wording
                Numeric

  PostRand.L2c

    RANDOMIZATION POST L2c WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the random assignment of wording
         in Federal spending item L2c in the Pre.

         1. "Poor people"
         2. "Working poor"

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024416         PostRand.L2j. Rand Post L2j Wording
                Numeric

  PostRand.L2j

    RANDOMIZATION POST L2j WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the random assignment of wording
         in Federal spending item L2j in the Pre.

         1. "Poor children"
         2. "Black children"

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024417         PostRand.M5/M6. Randomized Assign M5/M6
                Numeric

  PostRand.M5/M6

    RANDOMIZED ASSIGNMENT M5/M6
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - P1 income inequality by race in Pre; M5a,b,c,d affirmative
             action items in Post
         - P2 income inequality by gender in Pre; M6a,b,c,d equal pay
             for women in Post
         This variable describes the Post assignment based on this
         randomized selection.
         Note: this Pre/Post randomization description applies regardless
         of which alternative wording of P1/P2 was randomly selected
         in the Pre.

         1. M5a,b,c,d asked in Post (P1 in pre)
         2. M6a,b,c,d asked in Post (P2 in Pre)

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024418         PostRand.M5a/b. Random Order M5a/b
                Numeric

  PostRand.M5a/b

    RANDOMIZATION ORDER OF M5a/b
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were administered affirmative action items M5a
         (position of Democratic Party) and M5b (position of Republican
         Party) in random order.

         1. M5a Democratic Party first, M5b Republican Party second
         2. M5b Republican Party first, M5a Democratic Party second

         INAP.
         R selected for M6a,b,c,d; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024419         PostRand.M6a/b. Random Order M6a/b
                Numeric

  PostRand.M6a/b

    RANDOMIZATION ORDER OF M6a/b
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were administered equal pay for women items M6a
         (position of Democratic Party) and M6b (position of Republican
         Party) in random order.

         1. M6a Democratic Party first, M6b Republican Party second
         2. M6b Republican Party first, M6a Democratic Party second

         INAP.

         R selected for M5a,b,c,d; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024420         PostRand.M7. Random Post M7 Wording
                Numeric

  PostRand.M7

    RANDOMIZATION POST M7 WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings
         for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions).

         1. "Estate tax"
         2. "Death tax"

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024421         PostRand.M7c/e. Random Order M7c/e
                Numeric

  PostRand.M7c/e

    RANDOMIZATION ORDER OF M7c/e
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were administered estate tax items M7c (position
         of Democratic Party) and M7e (position of Republican Party) in
         random order.

         1. M7c Democratic Party first, M7e Republican party second
         2. M7e Republican Party first, M7c Democratic party second

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024422         PostRand.M9b/c. Random Order of M9b/c
                Numeric

  PostRand.M9b/c

    RANDOMIZATION ORDER OF M9b/c
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were administered M9b and M9c items on level of
         taxation in random order.

         1. M9b taxes paid by rich first, M9c taxes paid by poor second
         2. M9c taxes paid by poor first, M9b taxes paid by rich second

         INAP.

         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024423         PostRand.M11. Randomized Assignment M11
                Numeric

  PostRand.M11

    RANDOMIZED ASSIGNMENT M11
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better"), Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse"), Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better"), Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse"), Post M11b (open "worse")
         This variable describes the Post assignment based on this
         randomized selection.
         Note: Income inequality items in Pre L2 and Post M11 are
         identical (L2a/M11a, L2b/M11b, L2c/M11c, L2d/M11d).

         1. Post M11c administered (Pre L2a)
         2. Post M11d administered (Pre L2b)
         3. Post M11a administered (Pre L2c)
         4. Post M11b administered (Pre L2d)

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024424         PostRand.M11c. Rand Post M11c Series
                Numeric

  PostRand.M11c

    RANDOMIZATION POST M11c SERIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the order of administration of Post
         M11c closed-list income inequality items (reasons why some
         people have better jobs/income).  Two orderings were possible.

         1. M11c1,2,3,4,5,6,7
         2. M11c2,4,5,6,3,1,7

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024425         PostRand.M11d. Random Post M11d Series
                Numeric

  PostRand.M11d

    RANDOMIZATION POST M11d SERIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the order of administration of Post
         M11d closed-list income inequality series items (reasons why
         some people have worse jobs/income).  Two orderings were
         possible.

         1. M11d1,2,3,4,5,6,7
         2. M11d2,4,5,6,3,1,7

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024500a        Cand.0a. House Type Race
                Numeric
                Missing eq 97, ge 99

  Cand.0a

    House Type Race
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         In LA05 only, there were 2 significant Republican candidates
         facing a Democrat in an open race.

             INCUMBENT RUNNING
         12. Democratic incumbent running - Republican challenger
         13. Democratic incumbent running - other challenger
         14. Democratic incumbent running - unopposed
         19. Democratic incumbent running - Repub and other challengers
         21. Republican incumbent running - Democratic challenger
         23. Republican incumbent running - other challenger
         24. Republican incumbent running - unopposed
         29. Republican incumbent running - Dem and other challengers
         31. Other incumbent running - Democratic challenger
         32. Other incumbent running - Republican challenger
         34. Other incumbent running - unopposed
         35. Other incumbent running - Dem and Repub challengers
             SPECIAL TYPE RACE DUE TO REDISTRICTING
         40. Dem and Repub incumbents running - no other candidate
         41. 2 Democratic incumbents running - no other candidate
         42. 2 Republican incumbents running - no other candidate
         43. Dem and Repub incumbents running - other candidate(s)
         44. Dem non-incumbent only - no retiree/unclear who is retiree
         45. Repub non-incumbent only - no retiree/unclear who is retiree
         46. Dem and Rep candidates - no retiree/unclear who is retiree
         47. Dem and other candidates - no retiree/unclear who is retiree
         48. Rep and other candidates - no retiree/unclear who is retiree
         49. Dem, Rep and other cands - no retiree/unclear who is retiree
             NO INCUMBENT RUNNING
         51. Dem incumbent not running - Democratic cand unopposed
         52. Dem incumbent not running - Republican cand unopposed
         53. Dem incumbent not running - Other cand unopposed
         55. Dem incumbent not running - Democratic and Republican cands
         56. Dem incumbent not running - Republican and other candidates
         57. Dem incumbent not running - Democratic and other candidates
         59. Dem incumbent not running - Democr, Repub, other cands
         61. Rep incumbent not running - Democratic cand unopposed
         62. Rep incumbent not running - Republican cand unopposed
         63. Rep incumbent not running - Other cand unopposed
         65. Rep incumbent not running - Democratic and Republican cands
         66. Rep incumbent not running - Republican and other candidates
         67. Rep incumbent not running - Democratic and other candidates
         69. Rep incumbent not running - Democr, Repub, other cands
        LOUISIANA DISTRICT 05 ONLY
         80. Rep incumbent not running - Democr and 2 Repub candidates

         97. Washington DC
         99. Correct district not assigned (See Summary.1)

==============================
M024500b        Cand.0b. Senate Type Race
                Numeric
                Missing eq 97

  Cand.0b

    Senate Type Race
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         In Louisiana only, there were 2 significant Republican
         challengers to the incumbent Democratic Senate candidate.

             INCUMBENT RUNNING
         12. Democratic incumbent running - Republican challenger
         13. Democratic incumbent running - other challenger
         14. Democratic incumbent running - unopposed
         19. Democratic incumbent running - Repub and other challengers
         21. Republican incumbent running - Democratic challenger
         23. Republican incumbent running - other challenger
         24. Republican incumbent running - unopposed
         29. Republican incumbent running - Dem and other challengers
         31. Other incumbent running - Democratic challenger
         32. Other incumbent running - Republican challenger
         34. Other incumbent running - unopposed
         35. Other incumbent running - Dem and Repub challengers
             NO INCUMBENT RUNNING
         51. Dem incumbent not running - Democratic cand unopposed
         52. Dem incumbent not running - Republican cand unopposed
         53. Dem incumbent not running - Other cand unopposed
         55. Dem incumbent not running - Democratic and Republican cands
         56. Dem incumbent not running - Republican and other candidates
         57. Dem incumbent not running - Democratic and other candidates
         59. Dem incumbent not running - Democr, Repub, other cands
         61. Rep incumbent not running - Democratic cand unopposed
         62. Rep incumbent not running - Republican cand unopposed
         63. Rep incumbent not running - Other cand unopposed
         65. Rep incumbent not running - Democratic and Republican cands
         66. Rep incumbent not running - Republican and other candidates
         67. Rep incumbent not running - Democratic and other candidates
         69. Rep incumbent not running - Democr, Repub, other cands
             LOUISIANA ONLY
         80. Democratic incumbent running - 2 Republican challengers
             NO RACE IN STATE
         81. Democratic incumbents, no race in state
         82. Republican incumbents, no race in state
         83. Democratic and other incumbent, no race in state
         84. Republican and other incumbent, no race in state
         85. Democratic and Republican incumbents, no race in state
         86.  2 Other incumbents - no race

         97. Washington DC

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024501         Cand.1. House Democratic Candidate Name
                Character
  Cand.1

    Democratic House candidate name (alpha)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         INAP.
         No Democratic House candidate; correct district not assigned
         (See Summary.1); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024502         Cand.2. Cand Code-House Democratic cand
                Numeric

  Cand.2

    Candidate code - Democratic House candidate
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         31. Democratic candidate in open House race
         33. Democratic House incumbent
         35. Democratic House challenger

         INAP.
         No Democratic House candidate; correct district not assigned
         (See Summary.1); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024503         Cand.3. House Democratic Cand Gender
                Numeric

  Cand.3

    Democratic House candidate gender
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Male
         2. Female

         INAP.
         No Democratic House candidate; correct district not assigned
         (See Summary.1); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024504         Cand.4. House Republican Candidate Name
                Character
  Cand.4

    Republican House candidate name (alpha)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         INAP.
         No Republican House candidate; correct district not assigned
         (See Summary.1); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024505         Cand.5. Cand Code-House Republican cand
                Numeric

  Cand.5

    Candidate code - Republican House candidate
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         32. Republican candidate in open House race
         34. Republican House incumbent
         36. Republican House challenger

         INAP.
         No Republican House candidate; correct district not assigned
         (See Summary.1); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024506         Cand.6. House Republican Cand Gender
                Numeric

  Cand.6

    Republican House candidate gender
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Male
         2. Female

         INAP.
         No Republican House candidate; correct district not assigned
         (See Summary.1); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024507         Cand.7. House Ind/3rd Party Cand Name
                Character
  Cand.7

    Independent/3rd-Party House candidate name (alpha)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         In LA05 only, there were 2 significant Republican candidates
         facing a Democrat in an open race.  The 2nd Republican
         candidate is represented here.

         INAP.
         No independent/3rd-party House candidate; correct district not
         assigned (See Summary.1)no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024508         Cand.8. Cand Code-House Ind/3rd Pty cand
                Numeric

  Cand.8

    Candidate code -Independent/3rd-Party House candidate
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         In LA05 only, there were 2 significant Republican candidates
         facing a Democrat in an open race.  The 2nd Republican
         candidate is represented here.

         32. 2nd Republican candidate in open House race (LA05 ONLY)
         37. 3rd-Party or Independent House candidate - non incumbent
         39. 3rd-Party or Independent House candidate - incumbent (VT01)

         INAP.
         No independent/3rd-party House candidate; correct district not
         assigned (See Summary.1)no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024509         Cand.9. House Ind/3rd Pty Cand Gender
                Numeric

  Cand.9

    Independent/3rd-Party House candidate gender
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         In LA05 only, there were 2 significant Republican candidates
         facing a Democrat in an open race.  The 2nd Republican
         candidate is represented here.

         1. Male
         2. Female

         INAP.
         No independent/3rd-party House candidate; correct district not
         assigned (See Summary.1)no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024510         Cand.10. House Ind/3rd Party Cand Party
                Character
  Cand.10

    Independent/3rd-Party House candidate party (alpha)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         In LA05 only, there were 2 significant Republican candidates
         facing a Democrat in an open race.  The 2nd Republican
         candidate is represented here.

         INAP.
         No independent/3rd-party House candidate; correct district not
         assigned (See Summary.1)no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024511         Cand.11. House Retiring Rep Name
                Character
  Cand.11

    Retiring House representative name (alpha)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         INAP.
         No retiring House representative; correct district not assigned
         (See Summary.1)no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024512         Cand.12. Cand Code-House Retiring Rep
                Numeric

  Cand.12

    Candidate code - Retiring House representative
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         41. Democratic Representative retiring (district with open race)
         42. Republican Representative retiring (district with open race)

         INAP.
         No retiring House representative; correct district not assigned
         (See Summary.1)no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024512a        Cand.2a. Ret Hse Rep running for Senate
                Numeric

  Cand.12a

    Is Retiring House representative also Senate candidate
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note:  for cases coded 1-2, thermometer was asked only once
         (for House retiree).

         1. House retiree is running as Democratic Senate cand in 2002
         2. House retiree is running as Republican Senate cand in 2002
         3. House retiree is not running as Senate cand in 2002

         INAP.
         No retiring House representative; correct district not assigned
         (See Summary.1); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024513         Cand.13. House Retiring Rep Gender
                Numeric

  Cand.13

    Retiring House representative gender
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Male
         2. Female

         INAP.
         No retiring House representative; correct district not assigned
         (See Summary.1)no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024514         Cand.14. Senate Democratic Cand Name
                Character
  Cand.14

    Democratic Senate candidate name (alpha)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         INAP.
         No Democratic Senate candidate; no race in state; no 2002 Post
         interview

==============================
M024515         Cand.15. Cand Code-Senate Dem Candidate
                Numeric

  Cand.15

    Candidate code - Democratic Senate candidate
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         01. Democratic candidate in open Senate race
         03. Democratic Senate incumbent
         05. Democratic Senate challenger

         INAP.
         No Democratic Senate candidate; no race in state; no 2002 Post
         interview

==============================
M024516         Cand.16. Senate Democratic Cand Gender
                Numeric

  Cand.16

    Democratic Senate candidate gender
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Male
         2. Female

         INAP.
         No Democratic Senate candidate; no race in state; no 2002 Post
         interview

==============================
M024517         Cand.17. Senate Republican Cand Name
                Character
  Cand.17

    Republican Senate candidate name (alpha)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         INAP.
         No Republican Senate candidate; no race in state; no 2002 Post
         interview

==============================
M024518         Cand.18. Cand Code-Senate Repub Cand
                Numeric

  Cand.18

    Candidate code - Republican Senate candidate
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         02. Republican candidate in open Senate race
         04. Republican Senate incumbent
         06. Republican Senate challenger

         INAP.
         No Republican Senate candidate; no race in state; no 2002 Post
         interview

==============================
M024519         Cand.19. Senate Republican Cand Gender
                Numeric

  Cand.19

    Republican Senate candidate gender
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Male
         2. Female

         INAP.
         No Republican Senate candidate; no race in state; no 2002 Post
         interview

==============================
M024520         Cand.20. Senate Ind/3rd Party Cand Name
                Character
  Cand.20

    Independent/3rd-Party Senate candidate name (alpha)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         In Louisiana only, there were 2 significant Republican
         challengers to the incumbent Democratic Senate candidate.
         The 2nd Republican Senate challenger is represented here.

         INAP.
         No independent/3rd=party Senate candidate; no race in state;
         2002 Post interview

==============================
M024521         Cand.21. Cand Code-Senate Ind/3rd Pty
                Numeric

  Cand.21

    Candidate code - Independent/3rd-Party Senate candidate
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         In Louisiana only, there were 2 significant Republican
         challengers to the incumbent Democratic Senate candidate.
         The 2nd Republican Senate challenger is represented here.

         06. Republican Senate challenger (LA only)
         07. 3rd-Party or Independent Senate candidate - non incumbent

         INAP.
         No independent/3rd=party Senate candidate; no race in state;
         2002 Post interview

==============================
M024522         Cand.22. Senate Ind/3rd Pty Cand Gender
                Numeric

  Cand.22

    Independent/3rd-Party Senate candidate gender
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         In Louisiana only, there were 2 significant Republican
         challengers to the incumbent Democratic Senate candidate.
         The 2nd Republican Senate challenger is represented here.

         1. Male
         2. Female

         INAP.
         No independent/3rd=party Senate candidate; no race in state;
         2002 Post interview

==============================
M024523         Cand.23. Party Senate Ind/3rd Pty Cand
                Character
  Cand.23

    Independent/3rd-Party Senate candidate party (alpha)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         In Louisiana only, there were 2 significant Republican
         challengers to the incumbent Democratic Senate candidate.
         The 2nd Republican Senate challenger is represented here.

         INAP.
         No independent/3rd=party Senate candidate; no race in state;
         2002 Post interview

==============================
M024524         Cand.24. Cand Code-2002 House Winner
                Numeric

  Cand.24

    2002 House Election Winner - candidate code
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         31. Democratic candidate in open House race
         32. Republican candidate in open House race
         33. Democratic House incumbent
         34. Republican House incumbent
         35. Democratic House challenger
         36. Republican House challenger
         39. 3rd-Party or Independent House candidate - incumbent (VT01)

         INAP.
         Washington DC; correct district not assigned (See Summary.1)

==============================
M024524a        Cand.24a. 2002 House Winner-Party
                Numeric

  Cand.24a

    2002 House Election Winner - Party
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Source: CNN.com

         1. Democrat
         5. Republican
         7. Other

         INAP.
         Washington DC; correct district not assigned (See Summary.1)

==============================
M024524b        Cand.24b. 2002 Dem House Cand Percen
                Numeric

  Cand.24b

    Vote % Dem House candidate
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Source: CNN.com

         INAP.
         No Democratic House candidate (incl. Washington DC); correct
         district not assigned (See Summary.1)

==============================
M024524c        Cand.24c. 2002 Rep House Cand Percent
                Numeric

  Cand.24c

    Vote % Rep House candidate
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Source: CNN.com

         INAP.
         No Democratic House candidate (incl. Washington DC); correct
         district not assigned (See Summary.1)

==============================
M024524d        Cand.24d. 2002 Ind/3rd Hse Cand Percent
                Numeric

  Cand.24d

    Vote % Ind/3rd Party House candidate
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Source: CNN.com.
         This includes the vote percentage of the independent/third
         party candidate with the greatest number of votes over 5% of
         returns (if any).
         Note that the Post instrument preload included, for several
         districts, 1 independent/3rd party candidate name; that
         candidate is represented here even if he/she did not finally
         receive more than 5% of the vote.
         Note: in a few districts, more than 1 independent/3rd-party
         candidate received more than 5% of the vote; besides an
         independent/3rd-party candidate described in Cand24.d-Cand.24f:
         LA02 - Additional Republican candidate 11% (Sullivan)
         LA05 - Additional Republican candidate 24% (Fletcher)
         SC02 - United Citizens Party candidate  6% (Legg)
         SC05 - Constitution Party candidate     6% (FaFemine)

         INAP.
         No Ind/3rd Party House candidate with more than 5% of vote and
         no preload of independent/3rd party name; Washington DC;
         correct district not assigned (See Summary.1)

==============================
M024524e        Cand.24e. 2002 Ind/3rd Hse Cand Name
                Character
  Cand.24e

    Ind/3rd Party House candidate name
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Source: CNN.com.
         This includes the independent/third party candidate with the
         greatest number of votes over 5% of returns (if any). Note that
         the Post instrument preload included, for several districts 1
         independent/3rd party candidate name; that candidate is
         represented here even if he/she did not finally receive more
         than 5% of the vote.

         INAP.
         No Ind/3rd Party House candidate with more than 5% of vote and
         no preload of independent/3rd party name; Washington DC;
         correct district not assigned (See Summary.1)

==============================
M024524f        Cand.24f. 2002 Hse Ind/3rd Party
                Character
  Cand.24f

    Ind/3rd Party House candidate party
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Source: CNN.com.
         This includes the independent/third party candidate with the
         greatest number of votes over 5% of returns (if any). Note that
         the Post instrument preload included, for several districts 1
         independent/3rd party candidate name; that candidate is
         represented here even if he/she did not finally receive more
         than 5% of the vote.

         INAP.
         No Ind/3rd Party House candidate with more than 5% of vote and
         no preload of independent/3rd party name; Washington DC;
         correct district not assigned (See Summary.1)

==============================
M024525         Cand.25. Cand Code-2002 Senate winner
                Numeric

  Cand.25

    2002 Senate Election Winner - candidate code
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         01. Democratic candidate in open Senate race
         02. Republican candidate in open Senate race
         03. Democratic Senate incumbent
         04. Republican Senate incumbent
         05. Democratic Senate challenger
         06. Republican Senate challenger

         INAP.
         No Senate race in state or Washington DC; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024525a        Cand.25a. 2002 Senate Winner-Party
                Numeric

  Cand.25a

    2002 Senate Election Winner - Party
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Source: CNN.com

         1. Democrat
         5. Republican
         7. Other

         INAP.
         No Senate race in state or Washington DC; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M024525b        Cand.25b. 2002 Dem Senate Cand Percent
                Numeric

  Cand.25b

    Vote % Dem Senate candidate
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Source: CNN.com

         INAP.
         No Democratic Senate candidate; no race in state; Washington DC

==============================
M024525c        Cand.25c. 2002 Rep Senate Cand Percent
                Numeric

  Cand.25c

    Vote % Rep Senate candidate
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Source: CNN.com

         INAP.
         No Republican Senate candidate; no race in state; Washington DC

==============================
M024525d        Cand.25d. 2002 Ind Senate Cand Percent
                Numeric

  Cand.25d

    Vote % Ind/3rd party Senate candidate
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Source: CNN.com.
         This includes the vote percentage of the independent/third
         party candidate with the greatest number of votes over 5% of
         returns (if any).
         Note that the Post instrument preload included 2 states for each
         of which an independent/third party candidate name was included
         in the preload; both of these preloaded independent/3rd party
         candidate names are represented here, including the MN
         candidate who did not finally receive more than 5% of the vote.
           KS: Libertarian candidate [Rosile]
           LA: 2nd Republican candidate [Terrell]
           MN: Reform party [Moore]
           MS: Reform candidate [O'Hara]
           OK: Independent candidate [Germalic]
           VA: Independent candidate [Spannaus]
         LA Note:
         Louisiana had multiple Republican challengers to the Senate
         running Democratic incumbent in the 2002 election; the
         Republican candidate who seemed to be the leading challenger
         was preloaded as 'the' Republican candidate in the instrument,
         and 1 additional Republican candidate was included in the
         preload fields otherwise reserved for independent/3rd party
         candidate. Also, in addition to the 2nd Republican candidate
         whose vote percentage is represented in Cand.25d, Louisiana had
         a 4th candidate with over 5% of the vote (a 3rd Republican
         candidate, [Perkins] who received 10% of the vote).
         VA Note:
         In Virginia, an additional Independent candidate [Hornberger]
         received 7% of the vote.

         INAP.
         No independent/3rd party Senate candidate with more than 5% of
         vote; no race in state; Washington DC

==============================
M024526         Cand.26. Junior Senator Status
                Numeric

  Cand.26

    Junior Senator Status 2002
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the Junior Senator prior to the 2002 election
         (107th Congress).

         0. Junior Senator not running or retiring in 2002
         1. Junior Senator running in 2002
         2. Junior Senator retiring in 2002

         INAP.
         Washington DC; no Post IW

==============================
M024526a        Cand.26. Junior Senator Party
                Numeric

  Cand.26a

    Junior Senator Party 2002
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the Junior Senator prior to the 2002 election
         (107th Congress).

         1. Democratic
         5. Republican
         7. Other

         INAP.
         Washington DC; no Post IW

==============================
M024527         Cand.27. Senior Senator Status in 2002
                Numeric

  Cand.27

    Senior Senator Status 2002
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the Senior Senator prior to the 2002 election
         (107th Congress).

         0. Senior Senator not running or retiring in 2002
         1. Senior Senator running in 2002
         2. Senior Senator retiring in 2002

         INAP.
         Washington DC; no Post IW

==============================
M024527a        Cand.27a. Senior Senator Party
                Numeric

  Cand.27a

    Senior Senator Party 2002
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This describes the Senior Senator prior to the 2002 election
         (107th Congress).

         1. Democratic
         5. Republican
         7. Other

         INAP.
         Washington DC; no Post IW

==============================
M024528         Cand.28. Junior Senator Name
                Character
  Cand.28

    Junior Senator name (alpha)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         INAP.
         Washington DC; no Post IW

==============================
M024529         Cand.29. Junior Senator Code
                Numeric

  Cand.29

    Junior Senator code
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         RACE IN STATE
         03.  Democratic Senate Running Incumbent
         04.  Republican Senate Running Incumbent
         JUNIOR SENATOR WITH TERM NOT UP (NOT RUNNING FOR RETIRING)
         11.  Democratic Junior Senator
         12.  Republican Junior Senator
         13.  Independent/3rd-Party Junior Senator
         JUNIOR SENATOR RETIRING
         21.  Retiring Democratic Junior Senator in state with open race
         22.  Retiring Republican Junior Senator in state with open race
         23.  Retiring Ind/3rd Party Junior Senator in state w/ open race

         INAP.
         Washington DC; no Post IW

==============================
M024530         Cand.30. Junior Senator Gender
                Numeric

  Cand.30

    Junior Senator gender
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Male
         2. Female

         INAP.
         Washington DC; no Post IW

==============================
M024531         Cand.31. Senior Senator Name
                Character
  Cand.31

    Senior Senator Name
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         INAP.
         Washington DC; no Post IW

==============================
M024532         Cand.32. Senior Senator Code
                Numeric

  Cand.32

    Senior Senator Code
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         RACE IN STATE
         03.  Democratic Senate Running Incumbent
         04.  Republican Senate Running Incumbent
         SENIOR SENATOR RETIRING
         27.  Retiring Democratic Senior Senator in state with open race
         28.  Retiring Republican Senior Senator in state with open race
         29.  Retiring Ind/3rd Party Senior Senator in state w/ open race
         SENIOR SENATOR WITH TERM NOT UP (NOT RUNNING FOR RETIRING)
         17.  Democratic Senior Senator
         18.  Republican Senior Senator
         19.  Independent/3rd Party Senior Senator

         INAP.
         Washington DC; no Post IW

==============================
M024533         Cand.33. Senior Senator Gender
                Numeric

  Cand.33

    Senior Senator gender
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Male
         2. Female

         INAP.
         Washington DC; no Post IW

==============================
M024534         Cand.34. Retiring Senator Name
                Character
  Cand.34

    Retiring Senator Name
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         INAP.
         No race in state; Washington DC; no Post IW

==============================
M024535         Cand.35. Retiring Senator Code
                Numeric

  Cand.35

    Retiring Senator Code
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         21.  Retiring Democratic Junior Senator in state with open race
         22.  Retiring Republican Junior Senator in state with open race
         23.  Retiring Ind/3rd Party Junior Senator in state w/ open race
         27.  Retiring Democratic Senior Senator in state with open race
         28.  Retiring Republican Senior Senator in state with open race
         29.  Retiring Ind/3rd Party Senior Senator in state w/ open race

         INAP.
         No race in state; Washington DC; no Post IW

==============================
M024536         Cand.36. Retiring Senator Gender
                Numeric

  Cand.36

    Retiring Senator gender
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Male
         2. Female

         INAP.
         No race in state; Washington DC; no Post IW

==============================
M025001         A1. How Much Attn to Campaigns
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  A1.

    Some people don't pay much attention to political campaigns.
    How about you? Would you say that you have been VERY MUCH
    INTERESTED, SOMEWHAT INTERESTED or NOT MUCH INTERESTED in the
    political campaigns so far this year?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Very much interested
         3. Somewhat interested
         5. Not much interested

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025002         A2. Watch Campaign TV Programs
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  A2.

    Did you watch any programs about the campaign on television?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025003         A3. R Discuss Politics w/ Family/Friends
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  A3.

    Do you ever discuss politics with your family or friends?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025004         A3a. How Often Discuss Politics
                Numeric
                Missing eq 8, ge 9

  A3a.

  IF R DISCUSSED POLITICS WITH FAMILY OR FRIENDS IN PAST WEEK:

    How many days IN THE PAST WEEK did you talk about politics
    with family or friends?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         00. None
         01. One Day
         02. Two Days
         03. Three Days
         04. Four Days
         05. Five Days
         06. Six Days
         07. Every Day

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         99. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in A3; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025005         B1. Parties Talk to R About Campaign
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  B1.

    As you know, the political parties try to talk to as many
    people as they can to get them to vote for their candidate.
    Did anyone from one of the POLITICAL PARTIES call you up or
    come around and talk to you about the campaign this year?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025006         B1a. Which Party Talked to R About Campa
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  B1a.

  IF POLITICAL PARTY SPOKE TO R ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN:

    Which party was that?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Democrats
         5. Republicans
         6. Both
         7. Other {SPECIFY}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in B1; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025007         B2. R Try to Influence Vote of Others
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  B2.

    We would like to find out about some of the things people do to
    help a party or a candidate win an election. During the
    campaign, did you talk to any people and try to show them why
    they should vote for or against one of the parties or
    candidates?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025008         B3. R Display Campaign Button/Sticker
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  B3.

    Did you wear a campaign button, put a campaign sticker on your
    car, or place a sign in your window or in front of your house?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025009         B4. R Attend Candidate Meetings/Rallies
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  B4.

    Did you go to any political meetings, rallies, speeches,
    dinners, or things like that in support of a particular
    candidate?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025010         B5. R Do Other Work for Party or Cand
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  B5.

    Did you do any (other) work for one of the parties or
    candidates?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025011         B6. Did R Give Money to Candidate
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  B6.

    During an election year people are often asked to make a
    contribution to support campaigns. Did you give money to AN
    INDIVIDUAL CANDIDATE running for public office?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025012         B7. Did R Give Money to Party
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  B7.

    Did you give money to A POLITICAL PARTY during this election
    year?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025013         B8. R Give Money to Any Other Group
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  B8.

    Did you give any money to ANY OTHER GROUP that supported or
    opposed candidates?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025014         B9. Anyone Talk to R About Reg/Vote
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  B9.

    During the campaign this year, did anyone talk to you about
    REGISTERING TO VOTE or GETTNG OUT TO VOTE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes, someone did
         5. No, no one did

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025015a        C1a. R Turnout Traditional
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  C1a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 1 OF VOTE TURNOUT QUESTION:

    In talking to people about elections, we often find that a lot
    of people were not able to vote because they weren't
    registered, they were sick, or they just didn't have time.  How
    about you--did you vote in the elections this November?

    R 2002 ELECTION TURNOUT - VERSION 1
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either C1a or C1b in the
         Pre (alternate version for R turnout).
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Yes, voted
         5. No, didn't vote
         6. R refused to say whether voted

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for version 2 of R turnout (C1b); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025015b        C1b. R Turnout Experimental
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  C1b.

  IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 2 OF VOTE TURNOUT QUESTION:

    In talking to people about elections, we often find that a lot
    of people were not able to vote because they weren't
    registered, they were sick, or they just didn't have time.
    Which of the following statements best describes you:
       One, I did not vote  (in the election this November);
       Two, I thought about voting  this time - but didn't;
       Three, I usually vote, but didn't this time; or
       Four, I am sure I voted?

    R 2002 ELECTION TURNOUT - VERSION 2
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either C1a or C1b in the
         Pre (alternate version for R turnout).
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. I did not vote (in the election this November)
         2. I thought about voting this time but didn't
         3. I usually vote but didn't this time
         4. I am sure I voted

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for version 1 of R turnout (C1a); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025016         C1x. Summary:R 2002 Election Turnout
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  C1x.

    VERSION 1:
    In talking to people about elections, we often find that a lot
    of people were not able to vote because they weren't
    registered, they were sick, or they just didn't have time.  How
    about you--did you vote in the elections this November?
    VERSION 2:
    In talking to people about elections, we often find that a lot
    of people were not able to vote because they weren't
    registered, they were sick, or they just didn't have time.
    Which of the following statements best describes you:
       One, I did not vote  (in the election this November);
       Two, I thought about voting  this time - but didn't;
       Three, I usually vote, but didn't this time; or
       Four, I am sure I voted?

    SUMMARY:  R 2002 ELECTION TURNOUT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from C1a and C1b.

         1. R reported voting in 2002 election
         5. R reported not voting in 2002 election

         8. R did not know whether voted in 2002 election
         9. R refused to say whether voted in 2002 election
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025017         C2. Was R Registered to Vote
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  C2.

  IF R DID NOT VOTE OR NA/REFUSED IF VOTED:

    Were you registered to vote in this election?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No
         6. VOL: Not required to register in R's state

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         1,9,0 in C1x; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025018         C2a. R Registered in County
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 7

  C2a.

  IF R VOTED:/
  IF R IS REGISTERED NONVOTER:

    {IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C AND NOT LOUISIANA:}
    Your residence is located in <PRELOAD COUNTY NAME> county.
    Are you registered to vote in <PRELOAD COUNTY NAME> county?
    {IF LOUISIANA:}
    Your residence is located in <PRELOAD PARISH NAME> parish?
    Are you registered to vote in <PRELOAD PARISH NAME> parish?
    {IF WASHINGTON D.C.:}
    Your residence is located in Washington D.C.
    Are you registered to vote in Washington D.C.?

    R REGISTERED IN COUNTY OF INTERVIEW
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         PRELOADED: NAME OF COUNTY OR WASHINGTON DC
         (ALASKA: OTHER UNITS; IN METROPOLITANA AREAS SOMETIMES
         IDENTIFIED READS:  "<PRELOAD CITY NAME> city")

         1. Yes, registered in <COUNTY/WASH D.C.>
         5. No, registered elsewhere

         7. Not registered elsewhere but District misassignment (see
               Summary.1)
         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C2; 9,0 in C1x; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025018a        C2aa. Preloaded FIPS county
                Numeric

  C2aa.

    PRELOADED COUNTY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         The first 2 digits are FIPS state code; last 3 digits are
         FIPS county code.  This variable has been blanked to preserve
         respondent confidentiality. 11000=Washington DC

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025019         C2a1. County Registered if Not Residence
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  C2a1.

  IF R VOTED OR IS REGISTERED NONVOTER:
  IF R REGISTERED OUTSIDE OF COUNTY OF RESIDENCE:

    In what county and state are you registered?

    STATE OF REGISTRATION - R REGISTERED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         FIPS state code.

         00. NA

         INAP.
         9,0 in C1x; 5,6,8,9,0 in C2; 1,8,9,0 in C2a; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025019a        C2a2. District of outside registration
                Numeric
                Missing eq 99

  C2a2.

  IF R VOTED OR IS REGISTERED NONVOTER:
  IF R REGISTERED OUTSIDE OF COUNTY OF RESIDENCE:

    In what county and state are you registered?

    DISTRICT OF REGISTRATION-R REGISTERED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         99. NA

         INAP.
         6,8,9,0 in C2; 1,8,9,0 in C2a; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025020         C2ax. Summary:R Vote/Registration Status
                Numeric

  C2ax.

    VERSION 1:
    In talking to people about elections, we often find that a lot
    of people were not able to vote because they weren't
    registered, they were sick, or they just didn't have time.  How
    about you--did you vote in the elections this November? /
    VERSION 2:
    In talking to people about elections, we often find that a lot
    of people were not able to vote because they weren't
    registered, they were sick, or they just didn't have time.
    Which of the following statements best describes you:
       One, I did not vote  (in the election this November);
       Two, I thought about voting  this time - but didn't;
       Three, I usually vote, but didn't this time; or
       Four, I am sure I voted?
    Were you registered to vote in this election?
    {IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C AND NOT LOUISIANA:}
    Your residence is located in <PRELOAD COUNTY NAME> county.
    Are you registered to vote in <PRELOAD COUNTY NAME> county?
    {IF LOUISIANA:}
    Your residence is located in <PRELOAD PARISH NAME> parish?
    Are you registered to vote in <PRELOAD PARISH NAME> parish?
    {IF WASHINGTON D.C.:}
    Your residence is located in Washington D.C.
    Are you registered to vote in Washington D.C.?

    SUMMARY: R VOTE/REGISTRATION STATUS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from C1x, C2, C2a.

         1. R voted, registered in county (includes 7 in C2a)
         2. R voted, registered outside county /DK/RF/NA where registered
         3. R did not vote or DK/RF/NA if voted
         4. Washington DC: R voted, registered in Washington DC
         5. Washington DC: R voted, registered outside or DK/RF/NA where
         6. Washington DC: R did not vote or DK/RF/NA if voted

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025021         C4. Did R Vote on Election Day
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  C4.

  IF R VOTED:

    Did you vote ON ELECTION DAY -- that is, November 5, 2002, or
    did you vote at SOME TIME BEFORE this?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. On election day
         5. Some time before this

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C1x; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025022         C4a1. R Voted How Long Before Election
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 88

  C4a1.

  IF R VOTED:
  IF R VOTED BEFORE ELECTION DAY:

    How long before November 5th did you vote?
    {PROBE: A FEW DAYS, A WEEK, LONGER THAN THAT?}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         01. Less than one week, 1-6 days
         02. One week; 7 days
         03. 1-2 weeks; 8-14 days
         04. 2-3 weeks; 15-21 days
         05. 3-4 weeks; 22-28 days
         06. One month; 29-31 days
         07. More than one month; 32-60 days
         11. A few days; a couple of days; several days -- NFS
         12. A few weeks; a couple of weeks; several weeks -- NFS
         87. Other

         88. Don't know
         89. Refused
         00. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C1x; 1,8,9,0 in C4a; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025023         C4a2. R Vote Absentee Ballot or in Perso
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  C4a2.

  IF R VOTED:
  IF R VOTED BEFORE ELECTION DAY:

    Did you vote IN PERSON or by ABSENTEE BALLOT?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. In person
         5. Absentee ballot
         7. R VOLUNTEERS: by mail {OREGON ONLY}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C1x; 1,8,9,0 in C4a; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025024         C11a. Did R Vote for House
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  C11a.

  IF R VOTED AND NOT WASHINGTON D.C.

    How about the election for the HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES in
    Washington. Did you vote for a candidate for the U.S. House of
    Representatives?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes, voted for House of Representatives
         5. No, didn't vote for House of Representatives

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         3,4,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025025         C11a1. In County R Vote House of Represe
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  C11a1.

  IF R VOTED:
  IF NOT WASHINGTON DC AND VOTED IN COUNTY:
  IF R VOTED FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:

    Who did you vote for?
    Did you vote for (the [Democrat/Republican], [<DEM CAND
    NAME>/<REP CAND NAME>]) (or) (the [Republican/Democrat],
    [<REP CAND NAME>/<DEM CAND NAME>]) (or the <OTHER PARTY>
    candidate, <OTHER CAND NAME>) (or someone else?)?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: The case with misassigned district preloaded (see
         Summary.1) was coded for R's candidate vote from R's actual
         district.
         In LA05 there were 2 Republican candidates, the 2nd of
         which was preloaded into House independent/3rd-party candidate
         preload fields.  Independent/3rd-party candidate names were
         read after any major party names.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered this
         questions with the name of the Democratic candidate read first
         or the name of the Republican candidate read first.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. <PRELOAD DEM CAND NAME>
         5. <PRELOAD REP CAND NAME>
         3. <PRELOAD IND/3RD PARTY CAND NAME>
         7. Other {SPECIFY}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         2,3,4,5,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; 5,8,9,0 in C11a; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025025x        C11ax. Cand Code-House Vote In County
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 88

  C11ax.

  IF R VOTED:
  IF NOT WASHINGTON DC AND VOTED IN COUNTY:
  IF R VOTED FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:

    Who did you vote for?
    Did you vote for (the [Democrat/Republican], [<DEM CAND
    NAME>/<REP CAND NAME>]) (or) (the [Republican/Democrat],
    [<REP CAND NAME>/<DEM CAND NAME>]) (or the <OTHER PARTY>
    candidate, <OTHER CAND NAME>) (or someone else?)?

    CANDIDATE CODE HOUSE VOTE - IN COUNTY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: The case with misassigned district preloaded (see
         Summary.1) was coded for R's candidate vote from R's actual
         district.
         In LA05 there were 2 Republican candidates, the 2nd of
         which was preloaded into House independent/3rd-party candidate
         preload fields.  Independent/3rd-party candidate names were
         read after any major party names.Respondents were randomly
         assigned to be administered this questions with the name of the
         Democratic candidate read first or the name of the Republican
         candidate read first. Post randomization variables (e.g.
         PostRand.C1), which precede Post survey variables, provide case
         level identification of randomization assigned.

         31. Democratic House candidate in open race
         32. Republican House candidate in open race
         33. Democratic House incumbent
         34. Republican House incumbent
         35. Democratic House challenger
         36. Republican House challenger
         37. Third party or independent House cand - non incumbent
         38. Third party or independent House cand - 2nd non incumbent
         39. Third party or independent House cand - incumbent
         85. Name not on candidate list

         88. Don't know
         89. Refused
         00. NA

         INAP.
         2,3,4,5,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; 5,8,9,0 in C11a; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025026         C11a2. Outside Cand R Vote House of Repr
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 88

  C11a2.

  IF R VOTED:
  IF VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY:
  IF R VOTED FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:

    Who did you vote for?

    HOUSE VOTE CANDIDATE CODE - R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF IW
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: in 1 case, R's 'outside' candidate was in the same
         congressional district as district of residence (1 case coded
         33).

             DISTRICT WITH NO RUNNING INCUMBENT:
         71. Democratic candidate
         72. Republican candidate
             DISTRICT WITH RUNNING INCUMBENT:
         73. Democratic incumbent
         74. Republican incumbent
         75. Democratic challenger
         76. Republican challenger
             ALL DISTRICTS:
         80. Third party or independent candidate
         81. Democrat--no name given
         82. Republican--no name given
         85. Name not on candidate list

         88. Don't know
         89. Refused
         00. NA

         INAP.
         1,3,4,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; 5,8,9,0 in C11a; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025027         C11a2a. Outside Party R Vote House of Re
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  C11a2a.

  IF R VOTED:
  IF VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY:
  IF R VOTED FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:

    Which party was that?

    PARTY OF HOUSE VOTE - OUTSIDE COUNTY OF IW
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This is the respondent's identification of 'outside' candidate's
         party.

         1. DEMOCRAT
         2. REPUBLICAN
         3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate)
         7. Name not on candidate list

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         1,3,4,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; 5,8,9,0 in C11a; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025028a        C11x1. Cand Code-House Vote Summary
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 88

  C11x1.

  IF R VOTED IN COUNTY AND NOT WASHINGTON DC /
  IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY:
  IF R VOTED FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:

    Who did you vote for?
    Did you vote for (the [Democrat/Republican], [<DEM CAND
    NAME>/<REP CAND NAME>]) (or) (the [Republican/Democrat],
    [<REP CAND NAME>/<DEM CAND NAME>]) (or the <OTHER PARTY>
    candidate, <OTHER CAND NAME>) (or someone else?)? /
    Who did you vote for? Which party was that?

    CANDIDATE CODE HOUSE VOTE SUMMARY - ALL VOTERS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from C11ax, C11a2.

         31. Democratic House candidate in open race
         32. Republican House candidate in open race
         33. Democratic House incumbent
         34. Republican House incumbent
         35. Democratic House challenger
         36. Republican House challenger
         37. Third party or independent House cand - non incumbent
         38. Third party or independent House cand - 2nd non incumbent
         39. Third party or independent House cand - incumbent
             OUTSIDE DISTRICT
         71. Democratic candidate
         72. Republican candidate
         73. Democratic incumbent
         74. Republican incumbent
         75. Democratic challenger
         76. Republican challenger
         80. Third party or independent candidate
         81. Democrat--no name given
         82. Republican--no name given
         85. Name not on candidate list

         88. Don't know
         89. Refused
         00. NA

         INAP.

         3,4,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; 5,8,9,0 in C11a; no 2002 Post interview


==============================
M025028b        C11x2. Cand Pty House Vote Summary
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  C11x2.

  IF R VOTED IN COUNTY AND NOT WASHINGTON DC /
  IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY:
  IF R VOTED FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:

    Who did you vote for?
    Did you vote for (the [Democrat/Republican], [<DEM CAND
    NAME>/<REP CAND NAME>]) (or) (the [Republican/Democrat],
    [<REP CAND NAME>/<DEM CAND NAME>]) (or the <OTHER PARTY>
    candidate, <OTHER CAND NAME>) (or someone else?)? /
    Who did you vote for? Which party was that?

    CANDIDATE PARTY HOUSE VOTE SUMMARY - ALL VOTERS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from C11ax, C11a2.

         1. DEMOCRAT
         2. REPUBLICAN
         3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate)
         7. Name not on candidate list for this race

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         3,4,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; 5,8,9,0 in C11a; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025029         C15. Summary-Senate Race Status
                Numeric

  C15.

  IF R VOTED:

    SUMMARY: SENATE RACE STATUS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Registered in county and race in state
         2. Registered in county and no race in state
         3. Registered outside county or DK/RF/NA where registered
               (incl. Washington DC)
         4. Washington DC and registered in Washington DC

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C1x; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025030         C15a. Did R Vote Senate
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  C15a.

  IF R VOTED:
  IF R VOTED IN COUNTY OF IW IN STATE WITH SENATE RACE:/
  IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF INTERVIEW:

    How about the election for the UNITED STATES SENATE?
    Did you vote for a candidate for the U.S. Senate?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes, voted for Senate
         5. No, didn't vote for Senate
         7. R VOLUNTEERS: no race in state of vote
            (R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE)

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C1x; 2,4 in C15; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025031         C15a1. In County Cand R Senate Vote
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  C15a1.

  IF R VOTED:
  IF R VOTED IN COUNTY OF IW IN STATE WITH SENATE RACE:
  IF R VOTED FOR SENATE:

    Who did you vote for?
    Did you vote for (the [Democrat/Republican], [<DEM CAND
    NAME>/<REP CAND NAME>]) (or) (the [Republican/Democrat],
    [<REP CAND NAME>/<DEM CAND NAME>]) (or the <OTHER PARTY>
    candidate, <OTHER CAND NAME>) (or someone else?)?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered this
         questions with the name of the Democratic candidate read first
         or the name of the Republican candidate read first.
         Note: in LA there were 2 Republican candidates, the 2nd of
         which was preloaded into Senate independent/3rd-party candidate
         preload fields.  Independent/3rd-party candidate names were
         read after any major party names.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. <PRELOAD DEM CAND NAME>
         5. <PRELOAD REP CAND NAME>
         3. <PRELOAD IND/3RD PARTY CAND NAME>
         7. Other {SPECIFY}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C1x; 2,3,4 in C15; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025031a        C15ax. Cand - in-county senate vote
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 88

  C15ax.

  IF R VOTED:
  IF R VOTED IN COUNTY OF IW IN STATE WITH SENATE RACE:
  IF R VOTED FOR SENATE:

    CANDIDATE CODE SENATE VOTE - IN COUNTY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         01. Democratic candidate in open Senate race
         02. Republican candidate in open Senate race
         03. Democratic Senate incumbent
         04. Republican Senate incumbent
         05. Democratic Senate challenger
         06. Republican Senate challenger
         07. Third party or independent Senate cand - non incumbent
         08. Third party or independent Senate cand - 2nd non incumbent
         09. Third party or independent Senate cand - incumbent
             VOTED IN COUNTY OF IW BUT R GAVE NAME OUTSIDE DISTRICT OF IW
         71. Democratic candidate
         72. Republican candidate
         73. Democratic incumbent
         74. Republican incumbent
         75. Democratic challenger
         76. Republican challenger
             NAME NOT ON CANDIDATE LIST
         85. Name not on candidate list

         88. Don't know
         89. Refused
         00. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C1x; 2,3,4 in C15; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025032         C15a2. Outside Cand R Senate Vote
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 88

  C15a2.

  IF R VOTED:
  IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF IW:
  IF R VOTED FOR SENATE:

    Who did you vote for?

    SENATE VOTE CANDIDATE CODE - R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF IW
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         If R voted outside county of interview but within the same
         state, the regular candidate code is used here (as found in
         C15ax, codes 1-9).

         71. Democratic candidate
         72. Republican candidate
         73. Democratic incumbent
         74. Republican incumbent
         75. Democratic challenger
         76. Republican challenger
         80. Third party or independent candidate
         81. Democrat--no name given
         82. Republican--no name given
         85. Name not on candidate list

         88. Don't know
         89. Refused
         00. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C1x; 1,2,4 in C15; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025033         C15a2a. Outside Party R Vote Senate
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  C15a2a.

  IF R VOTED:
  IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF IW:
  IF R VOTED FOR SENATE:

    Which party was that?

    PARTY OF SENATE VOTE - OUTSIDE COUNTY OF IW
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This is the respondent's identification of 'outside' candidate's
         party.

         1. Democratic
         5. Republican
         7. Other {SPECIFY}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C1x; 1,2,4 in C15; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025034         C15ax1. Summary - Senate Vote
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 88

  C15ax1.

  IF R VOTED:
  IF R VOTED IN STATE OF IW AND RACE IN STATE /
  IF R VOTED OUTSIDE STATE OF IW:
     ED FOR SENATE:

    CANDIDATE CODE SENATE VOTE SUMMARY - ALL VOTERS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from C15ax, C15a2.

         01. Democratic candidate in open Senate race
         02. Republican candidate in open Senate race
         03. Democratic Senate incumbent
         04. Republican Senate incumbent
         05. Democratic Senate challenger
         06. Republican Senate challenger
         07. Third party or independent Senate cand - non incumbent
         08. Third party or independent Senate cand - 2nd non incumbent
         09. Third party or independent Senate cand - incumbent
             VOTED IN COUNTY OF IW BUT R GAVE NAME OUTSIDE DISTRICT OF IW
         71. Democratic candidate
         72. Republican candidate
         73. Democratic incumbent
         74. Republican incumbent
         75. Democratic challenger
         76. Republican challenger
               VOTED OUTSIDE STATE OF IW:
                   STATE WITH NO RUNNING INCUMBENT: (VOTE VAR ONLY)
         71. Democratic candidate
         72. Republican candidate
                   STATE WITH RUNNING INCUMBENT:
         73. Democratic incumbent
         74. Republican incumbent
         75. Democratic challenger
         76. Republican challenger
                   ALL STATES:
         80. Third party or independent candidate
         81. Democrat--no name given
         82. Republican--no name given
         85. Name not on candidate list

         88. Don't know
         89. Refused
         00. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C1x; 2,4 in C15; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025034x        C15ax2. Cand party - all Senate vote
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  C15ax2.

  IF R VOTED:
  IF R VOTED IN STATE OF IW AND RACE IN STATE /
  IF R VOTED OUTSIDE STATE OF IW:
     ED FOR SENATE:

    CANDIDATE PARTY SENATE VOTE SUMMARY - ALL VOTERS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from C15ax, C15a2.

         1. DEMOCRAT
         2. REPUBLICAN
         3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate)
         7. Name not on candidate list for this race

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C1x; 2,4 in C15; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025035         C18a. Nonvoter Prefer House Cand
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  C18a.

  IF R DID NOT VOTE OR DK/NA IF VOTED:
  IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:

    How about the election for the HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES in
    Washington?  Did you PREFER one of the candidates for the U.S.
    House of Representatives?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         1,2,4,5,6 in C2ax; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025036         C18a1. House Cand Nonvoter Prefers
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  C18a1.

  IF R DID NOT VOTE OR DK/NA IF VOTED:
  IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
  IF R PREFERRED ONE OF THE U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATES:

    Who did you prefer?
    Did you prefer (the [Democrat/Republican], [<DEM CAND NAME>/
    <REP CAND NAME>]) (or) (the [Republican/Democrat], [<REP
    CAND NAME>/<DEM CAND NAME>]) (or the <OTHER PARTY>
    candidate, <OTHER CAND NAME>) (or someone else?)?

    NONVOTER HOUSE CANDIDATE PREFERENCE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered this
         questions with the name of the Democratic candidate read first
         or the name of the Republican candidate read first.
         Note: in LA05 there were 2 Republican candidates, the 2nd of
         which was preloaded into House independent/3rd-party candidate
         preload fields.  Independent/3rd-party candidate names were
         read after any major party names.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. <PRELOAD DEM CAND NAME>
         5. <PRELOAD REP CAND NAME>
         3. <PRELOAD IND/3RD PARTY CAND NAME>
         7. Other {SPECIFY}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C18a; 1,2,4,5,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025037         C18ax1. Nonvoter Hse pref cand code
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 88

  C18ax1.

  IF R DID NOT VOTE OR DK/NA IF VOTED:
  IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
  IF R PREFERRED ONE OF THE U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATES:

    NONVOTER HOUSE CANDIDATE PREFERENCE - CANDIDATE CODE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         31. Democratic House candidate in open race
         32. Republican House candidate in open race
         33. Democratic House incumbent
         34. Republican House incumbent
         35. Democratic House challenger
         36. Republican House challenger
         37. Third party or independent House cand - non incumbent
         38. Third party or independent House cand - 2nd non incumbent
         39. Third party or independent House cand - incumbent
         85. Name not on candidate list

         88. Don't know
         89. Refused
         00. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C18a; 1,2,4,5,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025038         C18ax2. Sen race in state of IW?
                Numeric

  C19.

  IF R DID NOT VOTE OR DK/NA IF VOTED:

    RACE IN STATE OF IW?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. State with race
         2. State with no race (including Washington DC)

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C1x; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025039         C19a. Nonvoter Prefer Senate Candidate
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  C19a.

  IF R DID NOT VOTE OR DK/NA IF VOTED:
  IF STATE WITH SENATE RACE:

    How about the election for the UNITED STATES SENATE?
    Did you PREFER one of the candidates for the U.S. Senate?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         2 in C19; 5,8,9,0 in C1x; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025040         C19a1. Senate Cand Nonvoter Prefers
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  C19a1.

  IF R DID NOT VOTE OR DK/NA IF VOTED:
  IF STATE WITH SENATE RACE:
  R PREFERRED ONE OF THE U.S. SENATE CANDIDATES:

    Who did you prefer?
    Did you prefer (the [Democrat/Republican], [<DEM CAND NAME>/
    <REP CAND NAME>]) (or) (the [Republican/Democrat], [<REP
    CAND NAME>/<DEM CAND NAME>]) (or the <OTHER PARTY>
    candidate, <OTHER CAND NAME>) (or someone else?)?

    NONVOTER SENATE CANDIDATE PREFERENCE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered this
         questions with the name of the Democratic candidate read first
         or the name of the Republican candidate read first.
         Note: in LA there were 2 Republican candidates, the 2nd of
         which was preloaded into Senate independent/3rd-party candidate
         preload fields.  Independent/3rd-party candidate names were
         read after any major party names.

         1. <PRELOAD DEM CAND NAME>
         5. <PRELOAD REP CAND NAME>
         3. <PRELOAD IND/3RD PARTY CAND NAME>
         7. Other {SPECIFY}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C19a; 2 in C19; 5,8,9,0 in C1x; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025041         C19ax. Nonvoter Sen pref cand code
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 88

  C19ax.

  IF R DID NOT VOTE OR DK/NA IF VOTED:
  IF STATE WITH SENATE RACE:
  R PREFERRED ONE OF THE U.S. SENATE CANDIDATES:

    NONVOTER SENATE CANDIDATE PREFERENCE - CANDIDATE CODE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Code 6 includes the 2nd Republican Senate candidate in
         Louisiana (included in code 3 in C19a).

         01. Democratic candidate in open Senate race
         02. Republican candidate in open Senate race
         03. Democratic Senate incumbent
         04. Republican Senate incumbent
         05. Democratic Senate challenger
         06. Republican Senate challenger
         07. Third party or independent Senate cand - non incumbent
         08. Third party or independent Senate cand - 2nd non incumbent
         09. Third party or independent Senate cand - incumbent
         85. Name not on candidate list

         88. Don't know
         89. Refused
         00. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C19a; 2 in C19; 5,8,9,0 in C1x; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025042         C20. Congr Elections Conducted Fairly
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  C20.

    In some countries, people believe their elections are conducted
    fairly.  In other countries, people believe that their
    elections are conducted unfairly.  Thinking of the
    Congressional elections we've just had, do you believe they
    were VERY FAIR, SOMEWHAT FAIR, NEITHER FAIR NOR UNFAIR,
    SOMEWHAT UNFAIR, or VERY UNFAIR?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Very fair
         2. Somewhat fair
         3. Neither fair nor unfair
         4. Somewhat unfair
         5. Very unfair

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================

  D1.

    I'd like to get your feelings toward some people in the news
    these days. I'll read the name of a person and I'll ask you to
    rate that person on a thermometer that runs from 0 to 100
    degrees. Rating above 50 means that you feel favorable and warm
    toward the person. Rating below 50 means that you feel
    unfavorable and cool toward the person.  Rating right at the 50
    degree mark means you don't feel particularly warm or cold.
    You may use any number from 0 to 100 to tell me how favorable
    or unfavorable your feelings are. If we come to a person whose
    name you don't recognize, just tell me and we'll move on to the
    next one.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
M025043         D1a. George W. Bush Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D1a.

    The first person is:
    George W. Bush
    Where on that thermometer would you rate George W. Bush?

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: GEORGE W. BUSH
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         thermometer):
           D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k
           D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025044         D1g. Dem House Cand Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D1g.

  IF R'S COUNTY OF RESIDENCE HAS A DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE:

    (The next person is:)
    <PRELOAD DEM HOUSE CAND NAME>
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate [him/her]?)

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: PRELOADED DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         thermometer):
           D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k
           D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No Democratic House candidate; error in district assignment
         preload (1 case); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025045         D1h. Rep House Cand Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D1h.

  IF R'S COUNTY OF RESIDENCE HAS A REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE:

    (The next person is:)
    <PRELOAD REP HOUSE CAND NAME>
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate [him/her]?)

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: PRELOADED REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE NAME
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         thermometer):
           D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k
           D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No Republican House candidate; error in district assignment
         preload (1 case); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025046         D1j. Retiring House Representative Therm
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D1j.

  IF R'S COUNTY OF RESIDENCE HAS A RETIRING HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE:

    (The next person is:)
    <PRELOAD RETIRING HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE NAME>
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate [him/her]?)

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: PRELOADED RETIRING HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         thermometer):
           D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k
           D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No retiring House representative; error in district assignment
         preload (1 case); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025047         D1k. Dem Senate Cand Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D1k.

  IF R LIVES IN A STATE WITH A DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE:
  IF DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE IS NOT HOUSE RETIREE:

    (The next person is:)
    <PRELOAD DEM SENATE CAND NAME>
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate [him/her]?)

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: PRELOADED DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         If Democratic Senate candidate was also House retiree, then
         only the House retiree thermometer was asked (D1j).
         Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         thermometer):
           D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k
           D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No Democratic Senate candidate; Democratic Senate candidate is
         also House retiree (1 in Cand.12a); no race in state or
         Washington DC; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025048         D1m. Repub Senate Cand Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D1m.

  IF R LIVES IN A STATE WITH A REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE:
  IF REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE IS NOT HOUSE RETIREE:

    (The next person is:)
    <PRELOAD REP SENATE CAND NAME>
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate [him/her]?)

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: PRELOADED REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         If Republican Senate candidate was also House retiree, then
         only the House retiree thermometer was asked (D1j).
         Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         thermometer):
           D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k
           D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No Republican Senate candidate; Republican Senate candidate is
         also House retiree (1 in Cand.12a); no race in state or
         Washington DC; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025049         D1m1. LA05 ONLY: 2nd Repub Senate Cand T
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D1m1.

  IF R LIVES IN LOUISIANA:

    (The next person is:)
    <LA ONLY: 2ND REP SENATE CAND NAME>
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate [him/her]?)

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: PRELOADED LA 2ND REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         In Louisiana only, there were 2 significant Republican
         challengers to the incumbent Democratic Senate candidate.
         Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         thermometer):
           D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k
           D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         Not Louisiana (no 2nd Republican Senate candidate); no 2002 Post
         interview

==============================
M025050         D1n. Ind/3rd Party House Cand Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D1n.

  IF INDEPENDENT/3RD PARTY HOUSE CAND.:/
  IF LA05:

    (The next person is:)
    <PRELOAD IND/3RD PARTY HOUSE CAND NAME>
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate [him/her]?)

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: PRELOADED INDEPEN./3RD PARTY HOUSE CANDIDATE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         In LA05 only, there were 2 significant Republican candidates
         facing a Democrat in an open race; for LA05, this variable
         represents the 2nd Republican candidate.
         Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         thermometer):
           D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k
           D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No independent/3rd-party House candidate and not LA05; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================

  D2.

    Still using the thermometer, how would you rate:
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
M025051         D2a. Supreme Court Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D2a.

    (How would you rate:)
    the Supreme Court?

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: THE SUPREME COURT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025052         D2b. Congress Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D2b.

    (How would you rate:)
    Congress?

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: CONGRESS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025053         D2c. Military Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D2c.

    (How would you rate:)
    the Military?

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: THE MILITARY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025054         D2d. Federal Govt Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D2d.

    (How would you rate:)
    the federal government in Washington?

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN WASHINGTON
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025055         D2e. Blacks Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D2e.

    (How would you rate:)
    blacks?

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: BLACKS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025056         D2f. Whites Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D2f.

    (How would you rate:)
    whites?

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: WHITES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025057         D2g. Conservatives Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D2g.

    (How would you rate:)
    conservatives?

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: CONSERVATIVES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025058         D2h. Liberals Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D2h.

    (How would you rate:)
    liberals?

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: LIBERALS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025059         D2j. Labor Unions Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D2j.

    (How would you rate:)
    labor unions?

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: LABOR UNIONS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025060         D2k. Big Business Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D2k.

    (How would you rate:)
    big business?

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: BIG BUSINESS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025061         D2m. Poor People Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D2m.

    (How would you rate:)
    poor people?

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: POOR PEOPLE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025062         D2n. People on Welfare Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D2n.

    (How would you rate:)
    people on welfare?

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: PEOPLE ON WELFARE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025063         D2p. Hispanics Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D2p.

    (How would you rate:)
    Hispanics (Hispanic-Americans)?

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: HISPANICS (HISPANIC-AMERICANS)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025064         D2q. Christian Fundamentalists Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D2q.

    (How would you rate:)
    Christian fundamentalists?

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: CHRISTIAN FUNDAMENTALISTS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025065         D2r. Elderly Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D2r.

    (How would you rate:)
    older people (the elderly)?

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: OLDER PEOPLE (THE ELDERLY)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025066         D2s. Environmentalists Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D2s.

    (How would you rate:)
    environmentalists?

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: ENVIRONMENTALISTS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025067         D2t. Gay Men and Lesbians Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D2t.

    (How would you rate:)
    gay men and lesbians, that is, homosexuals?

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: GAY MEN AND LESBIANS (HOMOSEXUALS)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025068         D2u. Catholics Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D2u.

    (How would you rate:)
    Catholics?

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: CATHOLICS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025069         D2v. Jews Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D2v.

    (How would you rate:)
    Jews?

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: JEWS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025070         D2w. Protestants Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D2w.

    (How would you rate:)
    Protestants?

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: PROTESTANTS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025071         D2y. Feminists Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D2y.

    (How would you rate:)
    feminists?

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: FEMINISTS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025072         D2z. Asian-Americans Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D2z.

    (How would you rate:)
    Asian-Americans?

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: ASIAN-AMERICANS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025073         D2za. News Media Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D2za.

    (How would you rate:)
    the news media?

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: THE NEWS MEDIA
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025074         D2zb. Catholic Church Thermometer
                Numeric
                Missing eq 887, ge 888

  D2zb.

    (How would you rate:)
    the Catholic Church?

    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================

  D3.

    I am going to read a list of words and phrases people may use
    to describe George W. Bush.  For each, please tell me whether
    the word or phrase describes him.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
M025075         D3a. Bush Trait -Leadership
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  D3a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR D3 GEORGE W. BUSH TRAITS:

    In your opinion, does the phrase 'he PROVIDES STRONG
    LEADERSHIP' describe George W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL, QUITE WELL,
    NOT TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL?

    GEORGE W. BUSH TRAIT: PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush
         traits questions.
         George W. Bush traits questions in D3 were randomly assigned to
         1 of 2 possible sequential orders:
           D3a,b,c,d
           D3a,d,c,b
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Extremely Well
         2. Quite Well
         3. Not Too Well
         4. Not Well at All

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for D4 traits; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025076         D3b. Bush Trait - Moral
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  D3b.

  IF R SELECTED FOR D3 GEORGE W. BUSH TRAITS:

    What about 'he is MORAL'?
    (Does this phrase describe George W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL,
    QUITE WELL, NOT TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL?)

    GEORGE W. BUSH TRAIT: MORAL
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush
         traits questions.
         George W. Bush traits questions in D3 were randomly assigned to
         1 of 2 possible sequential orders:
           D3a,b,c,d
           D3a,d,c,b
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Extremely Well
         2. Quite Well
         3. Not Too Well
         4. Not Well at All

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for D4 traits; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025077         D3c. Bush Trait - Out of Touch
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  D3c.

  IF R SELECTED FOR D3 GEORGE W. BUSH TRAITS:

    What about 'he is OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE'?
    (Does this phrase describe George W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL,
    QUITE WELL, NOT TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL?)

    GEORGE W. BUSH TRAIT: OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush
         traits questions.
         George W. Bush traits questions in D3 were randomly assigned to
         1 of 2 possible sequential orders:
           D3a,b,c,d
           D3a,d,c,b
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Extremely Well
         2. Quite Well
         3. Not Too Well
         4. Not Well at All

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for D4 traits; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025078         D3d. Bush Trait - Knowledgeable
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  D3d.

  IF R SELECTED FOR D3 GEORGE W. BUSH TRAITS:

    What about 'he is KNOWLEDGEABLE'?
    (Does this phrase describe George W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL,
    QUITE WELL, NOT TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL?)

    GEORGE W. BUSH TRAIT: KNOWLEDGEABLE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush
         traits questions.
         George W. Bush traits questions in D3 were randomly assigned to
         1 of 2 possible sequential orders:
           D3a,b,c,d
           D3a,d,c,b
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Extremely Well
         2. Quite Well
         3. Not Too Well
         4. Not Well at All

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for D4 traits; no 2002 Post interview

==============================

  D4.

    I am going to read a list of words and phrases people may use
    to describe George W. Bush.  For each, please tell me whether
    the word or phrase describes him.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
M025079         D4a. Bush Trait - Leader
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  D4a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR D4 GEORGE W. BUSH TRAITS:

    In your opinion, does the phrase 'he PROVIDES STRONG
    LEADERSHIP' describe George W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL, QUITE WELL,
    NOT TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL?

    GEORGE W. BUSH TRAIT: PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush
         traits questions.
         George W. Bush traits questions in D4 were randomly assigned to
         1 of 2 possible sequential orders:
           D4a,b,c,d
           D4a,d,c,b
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Extremely Well
         2. Quite Well
         3. Not Too Well
         4. Not Well at All

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for D3 traits; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025080         D4b. Bush Trait -Cares Abt People
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  D4b.

  IF R SELECTED FOR D4 GEORGE W. BUSH TRAITS:

    What about 'he REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU'?
    (Does this phrase describe George W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL,
    QUITE WELLl, NOT TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL?)

    GEORGE W. BUSH TRAIT: REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush
         traits questions.
         George W. Bush traits questions in D4 were randomly assigned to
         1 of 2 possible sequential orders:
           D4a,b,c,d
           D4a,d,c,b
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Extremely Well
         2. Quite Well
         3. Not Too Well
         4. Not Well at All

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025081         D4c. Bush Trait - Dishonest
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  D4c.

  IF R SELECTED FOR D4 GEORGE W. BUSH TRAITS:

    What about 'he is DISHONEST'?
    (Does this phrase describe George W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL,
    QUITE WELL, NOT TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL?)

    GEORGE W. BUSH TRAIT: DISHONEST
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush
         traits questions.
         George W. Bush traits questions in D4 were randomly assigned to
         1 of 2 possible sequential orders:
           D4a,b,c,d
           D4a,d,c,b
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Extremely Well
         2. Quite Well
         3. Not Too Well
         4. Not Well at All

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025082         D4d. Bush Trait - Intelligent
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  D4d.

  IF R SELECTED FOR D4 GEORGE W. BUSH TRAITS:

    What about 'he is INTELLIGENT'?
    (Does this phrase describe George W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL,
    QUITE WELL, NOT TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL?)

    GEORGE W. BUSH TRAIT: INTELLIGENT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush
         traits questions.
         George W. Bush traits questions in D4 were randomly assigned to
         1 of 2 possible sequential orders:
           D4a,b,c,d
           D4a,d,c,b
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Extremely Well
         2. Quite Well
         3. Not Too Well
         4. Not Well at All

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025083         E1. Before Election Party w/House Most
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  E1.

    Do you happen to know which party had the most members in the
    House of Representatives in Washington BEFORE the election
    [this/last] month?
    {IF NECESSARY: WHICH ONE?}
    {DON'T PROBE DK}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. The Democrats
         5. The Republicans
         7. About equal; above even; about the same [VOL]

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025084         F5. R Follow Politics and Public Affairs
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  F5.

    Some people seem to follow what's going on in government and
    public affairs most of the time, whether there's an election
    going on or not. Others aren't that interested.  Would you say
    you follow what's going on in government and public affairs
    MOST OF THE TIME, SOME OF THE TIME, ONLY NOW AND THEN, or
    HARDLY AT ALL?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Most of the time
         2. Some of the time
         3. Only now and then
         4. Hardly at all

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================

  G1.

    We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and
    conservatives.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
M025085         G1a. Dem Hse Cand Liberal-Conservative
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  G1a.

  IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE OR VT01:
  IF R RECOGNIZED DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE IN THERMOMETER:

    When it comes to politics, do you think of [<DEM HOUSE CAND
    NAME/<REP HOUSE CAND NAME/VT01 INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT] as a
    LIBERAL, a CONSERVATIVE, or a MODERATE?

    DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CAND/VT01 INDEP INCUMBENT: LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: if R indicated nonrecognition of the Democratic House
         candidate's name in the D1h thermometer, then this question
         was not asked.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered
         G1a/G1b (liberal-conservative placement of Democratic House
         candidate/Republican House candidate) with wording Democratic
         House candidate name first and Republican House candidate name
         second or vice versa.  (Data in G1a are data for Democratic
         House candidate regardless of order; data in G1b are data
         for Republican House candidate regardless of order).
         Placement for VT01 independent incumbent (only) is also included
         in this variable, with data for VT01 Republican challenger
         in G1b.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Liberal
         2. Conservative
         3. Moderate

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Democratic House candidate and not VT01; wrong district
         identification preloaded (1 case, 1 in Summary.1); R did not
         recognize Democratic House candidate in thermometer (887 in
         D1g); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025086         G1a1. Dem Hse Cand Liberal-How Strong
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  G1a1.

  IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE OR VT01:
  IF R RECOGNIZED DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE IN THERMOMETER:
  IF R CONSIDERS DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE LIBERAL:

    Would you call [him/her] a STRONG liberal or a NOT VERY STRONG
    liberal?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See notes G1a

         1. Strong liberal
         5. Not very strong liberal

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         2,3,8,9,0 in G1a; no Democratic House candidate and not VT01;
         wrong district identification preloaded (1 case, 1 in
         Summary.1); R did not recognize Democratic House candidate in
         thermometer (887 in D1g); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025087         G1a2. Dem Hse Cand Conservative-How Stro
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  G1a2.

  IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE OR VT01:
  IF R RECOGNIZED DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE IN THERMOMETER:
  IF R CONSIDERS DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE CONSERVATIVE:

    Would you call [him/her] a STRONG conservative or a NOT VERY
    STRONG conservative?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See notes G1a

         1. Strong conservative
         5. Not very strong conservative

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         1,3,8,9,0 in G1a; no Democratic House candidate and not VT01;
         wrong district identification preloaded (1 case, 1 in
         Summary.1); R did not recognize Democratic House candidate in
         thermometer (887 in D1g); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025088         G1a3. Dem Hse Cand Mod/DK -More Lib or C
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  G1a3.

  IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE / VT01:
  IF R RECOGNIZED DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE IN THERMOMETER:
  IF R CONSIDERS DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE MODERATE/DK:

    Do you think [he/she] is more like a LIBERAL or more like a
    CONSERVATIVE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See notes G1a

         1. Liberal
         2. Conservative
         3. Moderate {VOL}
         7. Can't choose; neither {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         1,2,9,0 in G1a; no Democratic House candidate and not VT01;
         wrong district identification preloaded (1 case, 1 in
         Summary.1); R did not recognize Democratic House candidate in
         thermometer (887 in D1g); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025089         G1ax. Summary Lib-Con Hse Dem/VT01
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  G1ax.

  IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE / VT01:
  IF R RECOGNIZED DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE IN THERMOMETER:

    When it comes to politics, do you think of [<DEM HOUSE CAND
    NAME/<REP HOUSE CAND NAME/VT01 INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT] as a
    LIBERAL, a CONSERVATIVE, or a MODERATE?
    Would you call [him/her] a STRONG liberal or a NOT VERY STRONG
    liberal? /
    Would you call [him/her] a STRONG conservative or a NOT VERY
    STRONG conservative? /
    Do you think [he/she] is more like a LIBERAL or more like a
    CONSERVATIVE?

    SUMMARY: DEM HOUSE CAND/VT01 INDEP INCUMBENT LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered
         G1a/G1b (liberal-conservative placement of Democratic House
         candidate/Republican House candidate) with wording Democratic
         House candidate name first and Republican House candidate name
         second or vice versa.  (Data in G1a are data for Democratic
         House candidate regardless of order; data in G1b are data
         for Republican House candidate regardless of order).
         Placement for VT01 independent incumbent (only) is also included
         in this variable, with data for VT01 Republican challenger
         in G1b.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Strong liberal
         2. Not strong liberal
         3. Leaning liberal
         4. Moderate
         5. Leaning conservative
         6. Not strong conservative
         7. Strong conservative

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Democratic House candidate and not VT01; wrong district
         identification preloaded (1 case, 1 in Summary.1); R did not
         recognize Democratic House candidate in thermometer (887 in
         D1g); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025090         G1b. Rep Hse Cand Liberal-Conservative
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  G1b.

  IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE:
  IF R RECOGNIZED REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE IN THERMOMETER:

    What about [<DEM HOUSE CAND NAME/<REP HOUSE CAND NAME>]?  Do
    you think [he/she] is a LIBERAL, a CONSERVATIVE, or a MODERATE?

    REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE: LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: if R indicated nonrecognition of the Republican House
         candidate's name in the D1h thermometer, then this question
         was not asked.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered
         G1a/G1b (liberal-conservative placement of Democratic House
         candidate/Republican House candidate) with wording Democratic
         House candidate name first and Republican House candidate name
         second or vice versa.  (Data in G1b are data for Republican
         House candidate regardless of order; data in G1a are data
         for Democratic House candidate regardless of order).
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Liberal
         2. Conservative
         3. Moderate

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Republican House candidate; wrong district identification
         preloaded (1 case, 1 in Summary.1); R did not recognize
         Republican House candidate in thermometer (887 in D1h); no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
M025091         G1b1. Rep Hse Cand Liberal-How Strong
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  G1b1.

  IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE:
  IF R RECOGNIZED REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE IN THERMOMETER:
  IF R CONSIDERS REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE LIBERAL:

    Would you call [him/her] a STRONG liberal or a NOT VERY STRONG
    liberal?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See notes G1b.

         1. Strong liberal
         5. Not very strong liberal

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         2,3,8,9,0 in G1b; no Republican House candidate; wrong district
         identification preloaded (1 case, 1 in Summary.1); R did not
         recognize Republican House candidate in thermometer (887 in
         D1h); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025092         G1b2. Rep Hse Cand Conservative-How Stro
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  G1b2.

  IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE:
  IF R RECOGNIZED REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE IN THERMOMETER:
  IF R CONSIDERS REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE CONSERVATIVE:

    Would you call [him/her] a STRONG conservative or a NOT VERY
    STRONG conservative?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See notes G1b.

         1. Strong conservative
         5. Not very strong conservative

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         1,3,8,9,0 in G1b; no Republican House candidate; wrong district
         identification preloaded (1 case, 1 in Summary.1); R did not
         recognize Republican House candidate in thermometer (887 in
         D1h); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025093         G1b3. Rep Hse Cand Mod/DK -More Lib or C
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  G1b3.

  IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE:
  IF R RECOGNIZED REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE IN THERMOMETER:
  IF R CONSIDERS REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE MODERATE/DK:

    Do you think [he/she] is more like a LIBERAL or more like a
    CONSERVATIVE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See notes G1b.

         1. Liberal
         2. Conservative
         3. Moderate {VOL}
         7. Can't choose; neither {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         1,2,9,0 in G1b; no Republican House candidate; wrong district
         identification preloaded (1 case, 1 in Summary.1); R did not
         recognize Republican House candidate in thermometer (887 in
         D1h); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025094         G1bx. Summary - Rep Hse cand Lib-Con
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  G1bx.

  IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE:
  IF R RECOGNIZED REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE IN THERMOMETER:

    When it comes to politics, do you think of [<DEM HOUSE CAND
    NAME/<REP HOUSE CAND NAME/VT01 INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT] as a
    LIBERAL, a CONSERVATIVE, or a MODERATE?
    Would you call [him/her] a STRONG liberal or a NOT VERY STRONG
    liberal? /
    Would you call [him/her] a STRONG conservative or a NOT VERY
    STRONG conservative? /
    Do you think [he/she] is more like a LIBERAL or more like a
    CONSERVATIVE?

    SUMMARY: REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered
         G1a/G1b (liberal-conservative placement of Democratic House
         candidate/Republican House candidate) with wording Democratic
         House candidate name first and Republican House candidate name
         second or vice versa.  (Data in G1a are data for Democratic
         House candidate regardless of order; data in G1b are data
         for Republican House candidate regardless of order).
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Strong liberal
         2. Not strong liberal
         3. Leaning liberal
         4. Moderate
         5. Leaning conservative
         6. Not strong conservative
         7. Strong conservative

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Republican House candidate; wrong district identification
         preloaded (1 case, 1 in Summary.1); R did not recognize
         Republican House candidate in thermometer (887 in D1h); no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
M025095         G1c. LA05 2nd Rep Cand Liberal-Conservat
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  G1c.

  IF LA05:

    What about [<LA05 2ND HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE]?
    Do you think [he/she] is a LIBERAL, a CONSERVATIVE, or a
    MODERATE?

    LA05 2nd REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE: LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This question applies to LA05 only, which had 2 major Republican
         House candidates.

         1. Liberal
         2. Conservative
         3. Moderate

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Not LA05; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025096         G1c1. LA05 2nd Rep Hse Cand Liberal-How
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  G1c1.

  IF LA05:
  IF R CONSIDERS 2ND HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE LIBERAL:

    Would you call [him/her] a STRONG liberal or a NOT VERY STRONG
    liberal?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Strong liberal
         5. Not very strong liberal

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         2,3,8,9,0 in G1c; not LA05; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025097         G1c2. LA05 2nd Rep Hse Cand Conserv-How
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  G1c2.

  IF LA05:
  IF R CONSIDERS 2ND HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE CONSERVATIVE:

    Would you call [him/her] a STRONG conservative or a NOT VERY
    STRONG conservative?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Strong conservative
         5. Not very strong conservative

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         1,3,8,9,0 in G1c; not LA05; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025098         G1c3. LA05 2d Rep Hse Cand Mod/DK-More L
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  G1c3.

  IF LA05:
  IF R CONSIDERS 2ND HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE MODERATE/DK:

    Do you think [he/she] is more like a LIBERAL or more like a
    CONSERVATIVE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Liberal
         2. Conservative
         3. Moderate {VOL}
         7. Can't choose; neither {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         1,3,9,0 in G1c; not LA05; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025099         G1cx. Summary - Lib-Con 2nd Rep LA05
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  G1cx.

  IF LA05:
  IF R CONSIDERS 2ND HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE MODERATE/DK:

    What about [<LA05 2ND HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE]?
    Do you think [he/she] is a LIBERAL, a CONSERVATIVE, or a
    MODERATE? /
    Would you call [him/her] a STRONG liberal or a NOT VERY STRONG
    liberal? /
    Would you call [him/her] a STRONG conservative or a NOT VERY
    STRONG conservative? /
    Do you think [he/she] is more like a LIBERAL or more like a
    CONSERVATIVE?

    SUMMARY: 2ND REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This question applies to LA05 only, which had 2 major Republican
         House candidates.

         1. Strong liberal
         2. Not strong liberal
         3. Leaning liberal
         4. Moderate
         5. Leaning conservative
         6. Not strong conservative
         7. Strong conservative

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Not LA05; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025100         K2. R Do Volunteer Work in Last Year
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  K2.

    Many people say they have less time these days to do volunteer
    work. What about you, were you able to devote any time to
    volunteer work IN THE LAST 12 MONTHS or did you not do so?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025101         K3. Can People be Trusted
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  K3.

    Generally speaking, would you say that MOST PEOPLE CAN BE
    TRUSTED or that you CAN'T BE TOO CAREFUL in dealing with people?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Most people can be trusted
         5. Can't be too careful

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025102         K4. People Take Advantage
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  K4.

  IF R SELECTED FOR K4 ADMINISTRATION:

    Do you think most people would try to TAKE ADVANTAGE of you if
    they got the chance or would they TRY TO BE FAIR?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either K4 or K5.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Take advantage
         5. Try to be fair

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for K5 administration; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025103         K5. People Take Advantage
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  K5.

  IF R SELECTED FOR K5 ADMINISTRATION:

    Would you say that most of the time people TRY TO BE HELPFUL,
    or that they are JUST LOOKING OUT FOR THEMSELVES?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either K4 or K5.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Try to be helpful
         5. Just looking out for themselves

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for K4 administration; no 2002 Post interview

==============================

  L1.

    Next I am going to read you a list of federal programs.  For
    each one, I would like you to tell me whether you would like to
    see spending INCREASED or DECREASED.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
M025104         L1a. Highways - Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L1a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L1 SERIES IN POST (K2 IN PRE):

    The first program is:
    building and repairing highways.
    If you had a say in making up the federal budget this year,
    should federal spending on building and repairing highways be
    INCREASED, DECREASED or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?

    FEDERAL SPENDING: BUILDING AND REPAIRING HIGHWAYS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two possible
         orderings of L1 spending items:
           1. L1a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
           2. L1a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L2 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025104x        L1ax. Pre-Po Summary: Highways spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L1ax.

    If you had a say in making up the federal budget this year,
    should federal spending on building and repairing highways be
    INCREASED, DECREASED or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: BUILDING/REPAIRING HIGHWAYS - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre K2a and Post L1a.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025105         L1b. Defense - Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L1b.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L1 SERIES IN POST (K2 IN PRE):

    (What about)
    defense?

    (Should federal spending on defense be INCREASED, DECREASED,
    or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: DEFENSE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: This item was not included the in the Pre K2 series;
         it is also included in the Post L2 series, followed by a
         Post L1/L2 summary.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two possible
         orderings of L1 spending items:
           1. L1a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
           2. L1a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L2 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025106         L1c. AIDS Research - Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L1c.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L1 SERIES IN POST (K2 IN PRE):

    (What about)
    spending on AIDS research?

    (Should federal spending on AIDS research be INCREASED,
    DECREASED or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: AIDS RESEARCH
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two possible
         orderings of L1 spending items:
           1. L1a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
           2. L1a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L2 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025106x        L1cx. PrePo Summary: AIDS spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L1cx.

    (What about)
    spending on AIDS research?

    (Should federal spending on AIDS research be INCREASED,
    DECREASED or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: AIDS RESEARCH - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre K2b and Post L1c.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025107         L1d. Welfare - Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L1d.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L1 SERIES IN POST (K2 IN PRE):

    (What about)
    welfare programs?

    (Should federal spending on welfare programs be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: WELFARE PROGRAMS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two possible
         orderings of L1 spending items:
           1. L1a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
           2. L1a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L2 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025107x        L1dx. PrePo Summary - Welfare spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L1dx.

    (What about)
    welfare programs?

    (Should federal spending on welfare programs be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: WELFARE PROGRAMS - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre K2c and Post L1d.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025108a        L1e1. Public Schools - Fed Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L1e1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L1 SERIES IN POST (K2 IN PRE):
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'PUBLIC SCHOOLS' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [public schools/big-city schools]?

    (Should federal spending on [public schools/big-city schools]
    be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either "public schools"
         or "big-city schools" wording for L1e.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two possible
         orderings of L1 spending items:
           1. L1a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
           2. L1a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; R selected for L2 series in
         the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025108b        L1e2. Big City Schools - Fed Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L1e2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L1 SERIES IN POST (K2 IN PRE):
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'BIG-CITY SCHOOLS' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [public schools/big-city schools]?

    (Should federal spending on [public schools/big-city schools]
    be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: BIG-CITY SCHOOLS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either "public schools"
         or "big-city schools" wording for L1e.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two possible
         orderings of L1 spending items:
           1. L1a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
           2. L1a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; R selected for L2 series in
         the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025108x        L1e1x. PrePo Summary-Public Sch spend
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L1e1x.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'PUBLIC SCHOOLS' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [public schools/big-city schools]?

    (Should federal spending on [public schools/big-city schools]
    be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: PUBLIC SCHOOLS - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This combines data from Pre K2d1 and Post L1e1.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025108y        L1e2x. PrePo Summary-Big City Sch spend
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L1e2x.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'BIG-CITY SCHOOLS' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [public schools/big-city schools]?

    (Should federal spending on [public schools/big-city schools]
    be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: BIG-CITY SCHOOLS - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This combines data from Pre K2d2 and Post L1e2.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025109         L1f. Crime - Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L1f.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L1 SERIES IN POST (K2 IN PRE):

    (What about)
    dealing with crime?

    (Should federal spending on dealing with crime be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: DEALING WITH CRIME
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two possible
         orderings of L1 spending items:
           1. L1a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
           2. L1a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L2 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025109x        L1fx. PrePo Summary - Crime spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L1fx.

    (What about)
    dealing with crime?

    (Should federal spending on dealing with crime be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: DEALING WITH CRIME - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre K2e and Post L1f.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025110         L1g. Child Care - Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L1g.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L1 SERIES IN POST (K2 IN PRE):

    (What about)
    child care?

    (Should federal spending on child care be INCREASED,
    DESCREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: CHILD CARE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two possible
         orderings of L1 spending items:
           1. L1a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
           2. L1a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L2 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025110x        L1gx. PrePo Summary - Child care spend
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L1gx.

    (What about)
    child care?

    (Should federal spending on child care be INCREASED,
    DESCREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: CHILD CARE - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre K2f and Post L1g.
         R

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview


==============================
M025111a        L1h1. Homeland Securty - Federal Spend
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L1h1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L1 SERIES IN POST (K2 IN PRE):
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'HOMELAND SECURITY' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [homeland security/the war on terrorism]?

    (Should federal spending on homeland security be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: HOMELAND SECURITY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either "homeland security"
         or "war on terrorism" wording for L1h.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two possible
         orderings of L1 spending items:
           1. L1a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
           2. L1a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; R selected for L2 series in
         the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025111b        L1h2. War on Terrorism - Fed spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L1h2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L1 SERIES IN POST (K2 IN PRE):
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WAR ON TERRORISM' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [homeland security/the war on terrorism]?

    (Should federal spending on homeland security be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: WAR ON TERRORISM
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either "homeland security"
         or "war on terrorism" wording for L1h.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two possible
         orderings of L1 spending items:
           1. L1a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
           2. L1a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; R selected for L2 series in
         the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025111x        L1h1x. PrePo Summary -Homeland Sec Spend
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L1h1x.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'HOMELAND SECURITY' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [homeland security/the war on terrorism]?

    (Should federal spending on homeland security be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: HOMELAND SECURITY - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This combines data from Pre K2g1 and Post L1h1.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025111y        L1h2x. PrePo Summary -War on Terr Spend
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L1h2x.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WAR ON TERRORISM' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [homeland security/the war on terrorism]?

    (Should federal spending on homeland security be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: WAR ON TERRORISM - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This combines data from Pre K2g2 and Post L1h2.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025112         L1j. Unemp Insurance - Federal Spendin
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L1j.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L1 SERIES IN POST (K2 IN PRE):

    (What about)
    unemployment insurance?

    (Should federal spending on unemployment insurance be
    INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two possible
         orderings of L1 spending items:
           1. L1a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
           2. L1a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L2 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025112x        L1jx. PrePo Summary - Unemp Insur Spend
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L1jx.

    (What about)
    unemployment insurance?

    (Should federal spending on unemployment insurance be
    INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre K2h and Post L1j.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================

  L2.

    Next I am going to read you a list of federal programs.  For
    each one, I would like you to tell me whether you would like to
    see spending INCREASED or DECREASED.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
M025113         L2a. Environmental Protect - Fed Spend
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2 SERIES IN POST (K1 IN PRE):

    The first program is:
    environmental protection

    If you had a say in making up the federal budget this year,
    should federal spending on environmental protection be
    INCREASED, DECREASED or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?

    FEDERAL SPENDING: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two possible
         orderings of L2 spending items:
           1. L2a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
           2. L2a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L1 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025113x        L2ax. PrePo Summary - Env Protect Spend
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2ax.

    The first program is:
    environmental protection

    If you had a say in making up the federal budget this year,
    should federal spending on environmental protection be
    INCREASED, DECREASED or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from L1a in the Pre and L2a in the Post

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025114         L2b. Defense - Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2b.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2 SERIES IN POST (K1 IN PRE):

    (What about)
    defense?

    (Should federal spending on defense be INCREASED, DECREASED,
    or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: DEFENSE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: This item was not included the in the Pre K1 series;
         it is also included in the Post L1 series (see L2bx).
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two possible
         orderings of L2 spending items:
           1. L2a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
           2. L2a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L1 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025114x        L2bx. Post L1/L2 Summary Defense Budget
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2bx.

    (What about)
    defense?

    (Should federal spending on defense be INCREASED, DECREASED,
    or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    POST L1/L2 SUMMARY: DEFENSE - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from Post variables L1a and L2b.
         Note: This item was not included the in the Pre K1 series;
         it is also included in the Post L1 series.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025115a        L2c1. Aid Poor - Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2c1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2 SERIES IN POST (K1 IN PRE):
  IF R SELECTED TO 'POOR PEOPLE' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [aid to poor people/aid to the working poor]?

    (Should federal spending on [aid to poor people /aid to the
    working poor] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: AID TO POOR PEOPLE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either "poor people" or
         "working poor" wording for L2c.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two possible
         orderings of L2 spending items:
           1. L2a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
           2. L2a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; R selected for L1 series in
         the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025115b        L2c2. Aid Working Poor - Federal Spend
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2c2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2 SERIES IN POST (K1 IN PRE):
  IF R SELECTED TO 'WORKING POOR' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [aid to poor people/aid to the working poor]?

    (Should federal spending on [aid to poor people /aid to the
    working poor] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: THE WORKING POOR
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either "poor people" or
         "working poor" wording for L2c.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two possible
         orderings of L2 spending items:
           1. L2a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
           2. L2a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; R selected for L1 series in
         the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025115x        L2c1x. PrePo Summary - Aid to Poor spend
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2c1x.

  IF R SELECTED TO 'POOR PEOPLE' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [aid to poor people/aid to the working poor]?

    (Should federal spending on [aid to poor people /aid to the
    working poor] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: AID TO POOR PEOPLE - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre L1b1 and Post L2c1.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025115y        L2c2x. PrePo Summary - Aid Wk Poor spend
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2c2x.

  IF R SELECTED TO 'WORKING POOR' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [aid to poor people/aid to the working poor]?

    (Should federal spending on [aid to poor people /aid to the
    working poor] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: AID TO WORKING POOR - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre L1b2 and Post L2c2.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025116         L2d. Foreign Aid - Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2d.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2 SERIES IN POST (K1 IN PRE):

    (What about)
    foreign aid?

    (Should federal spending on foreign aid be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: FOREIGN AID
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two possible
         orderings of L2 spending items:
           1. L2a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
           2. L2a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L1 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025116x        L2dx. PrePo Summary - Foreign Aid spend
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2dx.

    (What about)
    foreign aid?

    (Should federal spending on foreign aid be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: FOREIGN AID - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre L1c and Post L2d.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025117         L2e. Social Security - Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2e.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2 SERIES IN POST (K1 IN PRE):

    (What about)
    Social Security?

    (Should federal spending on Social Security be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: SOCIAL SECURITY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two possible
         orderings of L2 spending items:
           1. L2a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
           2. L2a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L1 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025117x        L2ex. PrePo Summary - Soc Sec spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2ex.

    (What about)
    Social Security?

    (Should federal spending on Social Security be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: SOCIAL SECURITY - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre L1d and Post L2e.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025118         L2f. Border Security - Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2f.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2 SERIES IN POST (K1 IN PRE):

    (What about)
    tightening border security to prevent illegal immigration?

    (Should federal spending on tightening border security to
    prevent illegal immigration be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT
    ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: TIGHTENING BORDER SECURITY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two possible
         orderings of L2 spending items:
           1. L2a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
           2. L2a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L1 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025118x        L2fx. PrePo Summary - Border Sec spend
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2fx.

    (What about)
    tightening border security to prevent illegal immigration?

    (Should federal spending on tightening border security to
    prevent illegal immigration be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT
    ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: BORDER SECURITY - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre L1e and Post L2f.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025119         L2g. Aid to Blacks - Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2g.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2 SERIES IN POST (K1 IN PRE):

    (What about)
    aid to blacks?

    (Should federal spending on aid to blacks be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: AID TO BLACKS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two possible
         orderings of L2 spending items:
           1. L2a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
           2. L2a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L1 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025119x        L2gx. PrePo Summary - Aid Blacks spend
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2gx.

    (What about)
    aid to blacks?

    (Should federal spending on aid to blacks be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: AID TO BLACKS - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre L1f and Post L2g.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025120         L2h. Infant Mortality - Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2h.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2 SERIES IN POST (K1 IN PRE):

    (What about)
    preventing infant mortality?

    (Should federal spending on preventing infant mortality be
    INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: PREVENTING INFANT MORTALITY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two possible
         orderings of L2 spending items:
           1. L2a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
           2. L2a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L1 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025120x        L2hx. PrePo Summary - Infant Mort spend
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2hx.

    (What about)
    preventing infant mortality?

    (Should federal spending on preventing infant mortality be
    INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: PREVENTING INFANT MORTALITY - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre L1g and Post L2h.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025121a        L2j1. Poor Children - Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2j1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2 SERIES IN POST (K1 IN PRE):
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'POOR CHILDREN' WORDING

    (What about)
    [pre-school and early education for poor children/
    pre-school and early education for black children]?

    (Should federal spending on [pre-school and early education
    for poor children/ pre-school and early education for black
    children] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: POOR CHILDREN PRE-SCHOOL
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either "poor children"
         or "black children" wording for L2j.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two possible
         orderings of L2 spending items:
           1. L2a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
           2. L2a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; R selected for L1 series in
         the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025121b        L2j2. Black Children - Federal Spending
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2j2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2 SERIES IN POST (K1 IN PRE):
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACK CHILDREN' WORDING

    (What about)
    [pre-school and early education for poor children/
    pre-school and early education for black children]?

    (Should federal spending on [pre-school and early education
    for poor children/ pre-school and early education for black
    children] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: BLACK CHILDREN PRE-SCHOOL
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either "poor children"
         or "black children" wording for L2j.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two possible
         orderings of L2 spending items:
           1. L2a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
           2. L2a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; R selected for L1 series in
         the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025121x        L2j1x. PrePo Summary - Poor Child spend
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2j1x.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'POOR CHILDREN' WORDING

    (What about)
    [pre-school and early education for poor children/
    pre-school and early education for black children]?

    (Should federal spending on [pre-school and early education
    for poor children/ pre-school and early education for black
    children] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: POOR CHILDREN PRE-SCHOOL - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre L1h1 and Post L2j1.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025121y        L2j2x. PrePo Summary - Black Child spend
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  L2j2x.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACK CHILDREN' WORDING

    (What about)
    [pre-school and early education for poor children/
    pre-school and early education for black children]?

    (Should federal spending on [pre-school and early education
    for poor children/ pre-school and early education for black
    children] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: BLACK CHILDREN PRE-SCHOOL - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre L1h2 and Post L2j2.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025122         M4. R Favor Guaranteed Jobs/Std of Livin
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M4.

    Some people feel the government in Washington should see to it
    that every person has A JOB AND A GOOD STANDARD OF LIVING.
    Others think the government should just LET EACH PERSON GET
    AHEAD ON THEIR OWN.  Which is closer to the way you feel or
    haven't you thought much about this?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         01. Government should see to jobs and standard of living
         05. Government should let each person get ahead on own
         07. Other, it depends, neither {SPECIFY} {VOL}

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         90. Haven't thought much about this
         00. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025123         M4c. How Important is Guar Jobs/Std Livi
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M4c.

    How important is this issue to you personally - VERY
    important, SOMEWHWAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025124         M4d. Has Guar Jobs Issue Made R Angry
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M4d.

    Has this issue ever made you angry?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025125         M5. Companies Have Affirm Action
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M5.

    Some people think that if a company has a history of
    discriminating against blacks when making hiring decisions,
    then they should be required to have an affirmative action
    program that gives blacks preference in hiring.  What do you
    think? Should companies that have discriminated against blacks
    have to have an affirmative action program?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes, they should have to have affirmative action
         5. No, they should not have to have affirmative action
         7. Other (specify) {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025126         M5a. Dem Party on Affirm Action
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M5a.

  IF R ASKED EITHER VERSION OF PRE P1 (INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE):

    Which would you say is CLOSER to the Democratic Party's
    position -- that companies that have discriminated against
    blacks should have an affirmative action program, or not?
    {DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - P1 income inequality by race in Pre (either version) and
             M5a,b,c,d affirmative action items in Post
         - P2 income inequality by gender in Pre (either version) and
             M6a,b,c,d equal pay for women in Post
         Respondents were administered affirmative action items M5a
         (position of Democratic Party) and M5b (position of Republican
         Party) in random order.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Yes, they should have to have affirmative action
         5. No, they should not have to have affirmative action
         7. Other (specify) {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R administered P2 in Pre; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025127         M5b. Rep Party on Affirm Action
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M5b.

  IF R ASKED EITHER VERSION OF PRE P1 (INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE):

    Which would you say is CLOSER to the Republican Party's
    position -- that companies that have discriminated against
    blacks should have an affirmative action program, or not?
    {DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - P1 income inequality by race in Pre (either version) and
             M5a,b,c,d affirmative action items in Post
         - P2 income inequality by gender in Pre (either version) and
             M6a,b,c,d equal pay for women in Post
         Respondents were administered affirmative action items M5a
         (position of Democratic Party) and M5b (position of Republican
         Party) in random order.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Yes, they should have to have affirmative action
         5. No, they should not have to have affirmative action
         7. Other (specify) {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R administered P2 in Pre; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025128         M5c. How Important Affirmative Action to
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M5c.

  IF R ASKED EITHER VERSION OF PRE P1 (INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE):

    How important is this issue to you personally - VERY
    important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - P1 income inequality by race in Pre (either version) and
             M5a,b,c,d affirmative action items in Post
         - P2 income inequality by gender in Pre (either version) and
             M6a,b,c,d equal pay for women in Post
         randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.

         R administered P2 in Pre; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025129         M5d. Has Affirm Action Made R Angry
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M5d.

  IF R ASKED EITHER VERSION OF PRE P1 (INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE):

    Has this issue ever made you angry?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - P1 income inequality by race in Pre (either version) and
             M5a,b,c,d affirmative action items in Post
         - P2 income inequality by gender in Pre (either version) and
             M6a,b,c,d equal pay for women in Post
         randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R administered P2 in Pre; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025130         M6. Govt Ensure Equal Pay for Women
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M6.

    How much do you think the federal government should be doing to
    make sure that women get equal pay for equal work - A LOT,
    SOME, or NOT MUCH AT ALL?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. A lot
         3. Some
         5. Not much at all

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025131         M6a. Democratic Party on Equal Pay for W
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M6a.

  IF R ASKED EITHER VERSION OF PRE P2 (INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER):

    Which would you say is CLOSER to the Democratic Party's
    position -- that the federal government should be doing - A
    LOT, SOME, or NOT MUCH AT ALL to make sure that women get equal
    pay for equal work?
    {DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - P1 income inequality by race in Pre (either version) and
             M5a,b,c,d affirmative action items in Post
         - P2 income inequality by gender in Pre (either version) and
             M6a,b,c,d equal pay for women in Post
         Respondents were administered equal pay by gender items M6a
         (position of Democratic Party) and M6b (position of Republican
         Party) in random order.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. A lot
         3. Some
         5. Not much at all

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R administered P1 in Pre; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025132         M6b. Republican Party on Equal Pay for W
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M6b.

  IF R ASKED EITHER VERSION OF PRE P2 (INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER):

    Which would you say is CLOSER to the Republican Party's
    position -- that the federal government should be doing - A
    LOT, SOME, or NOT MUCH AT ALL to make sure that women get equal
    pay for equal work?
    {DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - P1 income inequality by race in Pre (either version) and
             M5a,b,c,d affirmative action items in Post
         - P2 income inequality by gender in Pre (either version) and
             M6a,b,c,d equal pay for women in Post
         Respondents were administered equal pay by gender items M6a
         (position of Democratic Party) and M6b (position of Republican
         Party) in random order.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. A lot
         3. Some
         5. Not much at all

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R administered P1 in Pre; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025133         M6c. Women Equal Pay Important to R
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M6c.

  IF R ASKED EITHER VERSION OF PRE P2 (INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER):

    How important is this issue to you personally - VERY
    important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - P1 income inequality by race in Pre (either version) and
             M5a,b,c,d affirmative action items in Post
         - P2 income inequality by gender in Pre (either version) and
             M6a,b,c,d equal pay for women in Post
         randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R administered P1 in Pre; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025134         M6d. Has Women Equal Pay Made R Angry
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M6d.

  IF R ASKED EITHER VERSION OF PRE P2 (INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER):

    Has this issue ever made you angry?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - P1 income inequality by race in Pre (either version) and
             M5a,b,c,d affirmative action items in Post
         - P2 income inequality by gender in Pre (either version) and
             M6a,b,c,d equal pay for women in Post
         randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R administered P1 in Pre; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025135         M7b1. Favor estate/death tax - combined
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M7b1.

    There has been a lot of talk recently about doing away with the
    tax on large inheritances, the so-called "[estate/death] tax".
    Do you FAVOR or OPPOSE doing away with the [estate/death tax]?

    FAVOR ELIMINATING ESTATE/DEATH TAX - COMBINED WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings
         for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions).
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Favor
         5. Oppose
         7. Other; depends {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025135a        M7b1a. R favor/oppose elim. Estate tax
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M7b1a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'ESTATE TAX' WORDING:

    There has been a lot of talk recently about doing away with the
    tax on large inheritances, the so-called "[estate/death] tax".
    Do you FAVOR or OPPOSE doing away with the [estate/death tax]?

    FAVOR ELIMINATING ESTATE/DEATH TAX - ESTATE TAX WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings
         for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions).
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Favor
         5. Oppose
         7. Other; depends {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025135b        M7b1b. R favor/oppose elim. Estate tax
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M7b1b.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'DEATH TAX' WORDING:

    There has been a lot of talk recently about doing away with the
    tax on large inheritances, the so-called "[estate/death] tax".
    Do you FAVOR or OPPOSE doing away with the [estate/death tax]?

    FAVOR ELIMINATING ESTATE/DEATH TAX - DEATH TAX WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings
         for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions).
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Favor
         5. Oppose
         7. Other; depends {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025136         M7b2. How Strong Fav/Opp Elim Estate Tax
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 7

  M7b2.

  IF R FAVORS DOING AWAY WITH THE ESTATE/DEATH TAX:
  IF R OPPOSES DOING AWAY WITH THE ESTATE/DEATH TAX:

    Do you [favor/oppose] doing away with the [estate/death] tax
    STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

    STRENGTH FAVOR ELIMINATING ESTATE/DEATH TAX - COMBINED WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings
         for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions).
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Favor strongly
         2. Favor not strongly
         4. Oppose not strongly
         5. Oppose strongly

         7. Other; depends in M7b [VOL]
         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         8,9,0 in M7b; No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025136a        M7b2a. Strength fav/opp elim estate tax
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 7

  M7b2a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'ESTATE TAX' WORDING:
  IF R FAVORS DOING AWAY WITH THE ESTATE TAX /
  IF R OPPOSES DOING AWAY WITH THE ESTATE TAX:

    Do you [favor/oppose] doing away with the [estate/death] tax
    STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

    STRENGTH FAVOR ELIMINATING ESTATE/DEATH TAX - ESTATE TAX WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings
         for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions).
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Favor strongly
         2. Favor not strongly
         4. Oppose not strongly
         5. Oppose strongly

         7. Other; depends in M7b [VOL]
         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025136b        M7b2b. Strength fav/opp elim estate tax
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 7

  M7b2b.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'DEATH TAX' WORDING:
  IF R FAVORS DOING AWAY WITH THE ESTATE TAX /
  IF R OPPOSES DOING AWAY WITH THE ESTATE TAX:

    Do you [favor/oppose] doing away with the [estate/death] tax
    STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

    STRENGTH FAVOR ELIMINATING ESTATE/DEATH TAX - DEATH TAX WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings
         for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions).
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Favor strongly
         2. Favor not strongly
         4. Oppose not strongly
         5. Oppose strongly

         7. Other; depends in M7b [VOL]
         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025137         M7c. Democrats favor/oppose elim. death
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M7c.

    Which would you say is closer to the Democratic Party's
    position -- that they FAVOR or OPPOSE doing away with the
    [estate/death] tax?
    {DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}

    DEMOCRATIC PARTY ON ESTATE/DEATH TAX - COMBINED WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings
         for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions).
         Respondents were administered estate/death tax items M7c
         (position of Democratic Party) and M7e (position of Republican
         Party) in random order.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Favor
         5. Oppose
         7. Other; depends {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025137a        M7c1. Dem Pty Favor/Opp Estate Tax Elim
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M7c1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'ESTATE TAX' WORDING:

    Which would you say is closer to the Democratic Party's
    position -- that they FAVOR or OPPOSE doing away with the
    [estate] tax?
    {DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}

    DEMOCRATIC PARTY ON ESTATE/DEATH TAX - ESTATE TAX WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings
         for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions).
         Respondents were administered estate/death tax items M7c
         (position of Democratic Party) and M7e (position of Republican
         Party) in random order.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Favor
         5. Oppose
         7. Other; depends {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025137b        M7c2. Dem Pty Favor/Opp Death Tax Elim
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M7c2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'DEATH TAX' WORDING:

    Which would you say is closer to the Democratic Party's
    position -- that they FAVOR or OPPOSE doing away with the
    [death] tax?
    {DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}

    DEMOCRATIC PARTY ON ESTATE/DEATH TAX - DEATH TAX WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings
         for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions).
         Respondents were administered estate/death tax items M7c
         (position of Democratic Party) and M7e (position of Republican
         Party) in random order.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Favor
         5. Oppose
         7. Other; depends {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025138         M7e. Rep Pty Fav/Opp Death/Est Tax Elim
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M7e.

    Which would you say is closer to the Republican Party's
    position -- that they FAVOR or OPPOSE doing away with of the
    [estate/death] tax?
    {DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}

    DEMOCRATIC PARTY ON ESTATE/DEATH TAX - COMBINED WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings
         for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions).
         Respondents were administered estate/death tax items M7c
         (position of Democratic Party) and M7e (position of Republican
         Party) in random order.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Favor
         5. Oppose
         7. Other; depends {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025138a        M7e1. Rep Pty Favor/Opp Estate Tax Elim
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M7e1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'ESTATE TAX' WORDING:

    Which would you say is closer to the Republican Party's
    position -- that they FAVOR or OPPOSE doing away with of the
    [estate/death] tax?
    {DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}

    REPUBLICAN PARTY ON ESTATE/DEATH TAX - ESTATE TAX WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings
         for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions).
         Respondents were administered estate/death tax items M7c
         (position of Democratic Party) and M7e (position of Republican
         Party) in random order.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Favor
         5. Oppose
         7. Other; depends {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025138b        M7e2. Rep Pty Favor/Opp Death Tax Elim
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M7e2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'DEATH TAX' WORDING:

    Which would you say is closer to the Republican Party's
    position -- that they FAVOR or OPPOSE doing away with of the
    [estate/death] tax?
    {DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}

    REPUBLICAN PARTY ON ESTATE/DEATH TAX - DEATH TAX WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings
         for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions).
         Respondents were administered estate/death tax items M7c
         (position of Democratic Party) and M7e (position of Republican
         Party) in random order.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Favor
         5. Oppose
         7. Other; depends {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025139         M7h. How Imp Estate Tax Issue to R
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M7h.

    How important is this issue to you personally - VERY important,
    SOMEWHAT important or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL?

    IMPORTANCE OF ESTATE/DEATH TAX ISSUE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See notes M7b1

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025140         M7j. Has Estate Tax Issue Made R Angry
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M7j.

    Has this issue ever made you feel angry?

    ESTATE/DEATH TAX ISSUE EVER MADE R ANGRY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See notes M7b1

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================

  M9.

    Next are a few miscellaneous questions.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
M025141         M9a. R Pay Right Amount in Taxes
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M9a.

    Do you feel you are asked to pay MORE THAN YOU SHOULD in
    federal income taxes, about the RIGHT AMOUNT, or LESS THAN YOU
    SHOULD?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. More than should pay
         3. About right
         5. Less than should pay
         7. Don't pay at all {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025142         M9b. Rich Pay Right Amount in Taxes
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M9b.

    What about rich people? Do you feel rich people are asked to
    pay MORE THAN THEY SHOULD in federal income taxes, about the
    RIGHT AMOUNT, or LESS THAN THEY SHOULD?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were administered M9b and M9c taxation level items
         in random order.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. More than should pay
         3. About right
         5. Less than should pay
         7. Don't pay at all {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025143         M9c. Poor Pay Right Amount in Taxes
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M9c.

    What about poor people? Do you feel poor people are asked to
    pay MORE THAN THEY SHOULD in federal income taxes, about the
    RIGHT AMOUNT, or LESS THAN THEY SHOULD?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were administered M9b and M9c taxation level items
         in random order.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. More than should pay
         3. About right
         5. Less than should pay
         7. Don't pay at all {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025144         M10a. Worried about Nuclear War
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M10a.

    How worried are you about our country getting into a nuclear
    war at this time? Are you VERY worried, SOMEWHAT worried, or
    NOT WORRIED AT ALL?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Very worried
         3. Somewhat worried
         5. Not worried at all

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025145         M10b. Worried about Conventional War
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M10b.

    How worried are you about our country getting into a
    conventional war at this time, one in which nuclear weapons are
    not used? Are you VERY WORRIED, SOMEWHAT worried, or NOT
    WORRIED AT ALL?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Very worried
         3. Somewhat worried
         5. Not worried at all

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025146         M10d. Extent of Campaign Finance Reform
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M10d.

    Recently, there has been a lot of talk about campaign finance
    reform.
    In general, which of the following statements best represents
    what you feel about the way political campaigns are financed in
    this country:
      it needs to be completely overhauled,
      it needs major changes,
      it needs minor changes, or
      it is basically fine the way it is?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Completely overhauled
         3. Major changes
         5. Minor changes
         7. Fine the way it is

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025147         M11a. Openend - Why Some Have Better Job
                Numeric

  M11a.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2c CLOSED SERIES (BETTER JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    In America today, some people have BETTER JOBS and HIGHER
    INCOMES than  others do. WHY do you think that is -- why do
    some Americans have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do?

    REASON BETTER JOBS: OPEN-END RESPONSE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         This variable describes the Post assignment based on this
         randomized selection.
         Note: Income inequality items in Pre L2 and Post M11 are
         identical (L2a/M11a, L2b/M11b, L2c/M11c, L2d/M11d).
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precede Post survey variables, provide case level
         identification of randomization assigned.

         1. Text present
         5. No text present

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2c closed series in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview


==============================
M025148         M11b. Openend - Why Some Have Worse Jobs
                Numeric

  M11b.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2d CLOSED SERIES (WORSE JOBS/LOWER INCOMES):

    In America today, some people have WORSE JOBS and LOWER INCOMES
    than others do.  WHY do you think that is -- why do some
    Americans have worse jobs and lower incomes than others do?

    REASON WORSE JOBS: OPEN-END RESPONSE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         This variable describes the Post assignment based on this
         randomized selection.
         Note: Income inequality items in Pre L2 and Post M11 are
         identical (L2a/M11a, L2b/M11b, L2c/M11c, L2d/M11d).
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precede Post survey variables, provide case level
         identification of randomization assigned.

         1. Text present
         5. No text present

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2d closed series in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================

  M11c.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2a OPEN-END (BETTER JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    Next, we'd like to know WHY you think it is, that in America
    today, some people have BETTER JOBS and HIGHER INCOMES than
    others do.  I'm going to read you some possible explanations,
    and I want you to tell me how IMPORTANT you think each is.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
M025149         M11c1. #1 Reason Some Have Better Jobs
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M11c1.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2a OPEN-END (BETTER JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people have more in-born ability to learn.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON BETTER JOBS: CLOSED LIST - IN-BORN ABILITY TO LEARN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11c1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11c2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2a open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
M025150         M11c2. #2 Reason Some Have Better Jobs
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M11c2.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2a OPEN-END (BETTER JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because discrimination holds some people back.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON BETTER JOBS: CLOSED LIST - DISCRIMINATION HOLDS BACK
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11c1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11c2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2a open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
M025151         M11c3. #3 Reason Some Have Better Jobs
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M11c3.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2a OPEN-END (BETTER JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people just don't work as hard.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON BETTER JOBS: CLOSED LIST - SOME DON'T WORK HARD
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11c1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11c2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2a open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
M025152         M11c4. #4 Reason Some Have Better Jobs
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M11c4.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2a OPEN-END (BETTER JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people don't get a chance to get a good
    education.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON BETTER JOBS: CLOSED LIST - SOME DON'T WORK HARD
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11c1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11c2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2a open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
M025153         M11c5. #5 Reason Some Have Better Jobs
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M11c5.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2a OPEN-END (BETTER JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people just choose low-paying jobs.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON BETTER JOBS: CLOSED LIST - SOME CHOOSE LOW-PAYING JOBS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11c1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11c2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2a open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
M025154         M11c6. #6 Reason Some Have Better Jobs
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M11c6.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2a OPEN-END (BETTER JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because government policies have helped high-income workers
    more.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important,  SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON BETTER JOBS: CLOSED LIST - GOVERNMENT POLICIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11c1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11c2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2a open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
M025155         M11c7. #7 Reason Some Have Better Jobs
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M11c7.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2a OPEN-END (BETTER JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because God made people different from one another.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR BETTER JOBS: CLOSED LIST - GOD MADE PEOPLE DIFFERENT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11c1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11c2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2a open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================

  M11d.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2b OPEN-END (WORSE JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    Next, we'd like to know WHY you think it is, that in America
    today, some people have WORSE JOBS and LOWER INCOMES than
    others  do.  I'm going to read you some possible explanations,
    and I want you to tell me how IMPORTANT you think each is.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
M025156         M11d1. #1 Reason Some Have Worse Jobs
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M11d1.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2b OPEN-END (WORSE JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people have more in-born ability to learn.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON WORSE JOBS: CLOSED LIST - IN-BORN ABILITY TO LEARN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11d1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11d2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2b open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
M025157         M11d2. #2 Reason Some Have Worse Jobs
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M11d2.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2b OPEN-END (WORSE JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because discrimination holds some people back.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON WORSE JOBS: CLOSED LIST - DISCRIMINATION HOLDS BACK
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11d1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11d2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2b open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
M025158         M11d3. #3 Reason Some Have Worse Jobs
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M11d3.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2b OPEN-END (WORSE JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people just don't work as hard.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON WORSE JOBS: CLOSED LIST - SOME DON'T WORK HARD
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11d1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11d2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2b open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
M025159         M11d4. #4 Reason Some Have Worse Jobs
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M11d4.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2b OPEN-END (WORSE JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people don't get a chance to get a good
    education.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON WORSE JOBS: CLOSED LIST - SOME DON'T WORK HARD
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11d1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11d2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2b open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
M025160         M11d5. #5 Reason Some Have Worse Jobs
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M11d5.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2b OPEN-END (WORSE JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people just choose low-paying jobs.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON WORSE JOBS: CLOSED LIST - SOME CHOOSE LOW-PAYING JOBS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11d1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11d2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2b open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
M025161         M11d6. #6 Reason Some Have Worse Jobs
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M11d6.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2b OPEN-END (WORSE JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because government policies have helped high-income workers
    more.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON WORSE JOBS: CLOSED LIST - GOVERNMENT POLICIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11d1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11d2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2b open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
M025162         M11d7. #7 Reason Some Have Worse Jobs
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M11d7.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2b OPEN-END (WORSE JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because God made people different from one another.'

    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR WORSE JOBS: CLOSED LIST - GOD MADE PEOPLE DIFFERENT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11d1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11d2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2b open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
M025163         M12a. R Worked w/Others on Commun Issue
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

   M12a.

    DURING THE PAST 12 MONTHS, have you worked with other people
    to deal with some issue facing your community?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025164         M12b. R Views to Govt Official in Last Y
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M12b.

    DURING THE PAST TWELVE MONTHS, have you telephoned, written a
    letter to, or visited a government official to express your
    views on a public issue?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025165         M12c. Attend School/Commun Issue Meetg L
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M12c.

    DURING THE PAST TWELVE MONTHS, did you attend a meeting about
    an issue facing your community or schools?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025166         M12d. R a Member or any Organizatio
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M12d.

    Here is a list of some organizations people can belong to.
    There are labor unions, associations of people who do the same
    kinds of work, fraternal groups such as Lions or Kiwanis,
    hobby clubs or sports teams, groups working on political
    issues, community groups, and school groups.  Of course, there
    are lots of other types of organizations, too. Not counting
    membership in a local church or synagogue, are you a member of
    any of these kinds of organizations?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025167         M12e. R Contribute to Charity Last 12 Mo
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M12e.

    Many people are finding it more difficult to make contributions
    to church or charity as much as they used to. How about you --
    were you able to contribute any money to church or charity in
    the LAST 12 MONTHS?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025168         M12f. R Taken part in protest
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  M12f.

    Aside from a strike against your employer, in the PAST TWELVE
    MONTHS, have you taken part in a protest, march, or
    demonstration on some national or local issue?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================

  N2.

    Now I'd like to read you a few statements about public life.
    I'll read them one at a time. Please tell me whether you
    agree or disagree with each of them.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
M025169         N2b. R Well-Qualified for Political Part
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  N2b.

    ' I consider myself well-qualified to participate in politics. '
    Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE, or DISAGREE with this
    statement?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Agree
         3. Neither agree nor disagree
         5. Disagree

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025170         N2c. R Better Informed Than Most
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  N2c.

    ' I think that I am better informed about politics and
    government than most people. ' (Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE
    NOR DISAGREE, or DISAGREE with this statement)?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Agree
         3. Neither agree nor disagree
         5. Disagree

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025171         N3. Doesn't Matter if R Votes or Not
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  N3.

    'So many other people vote in the national election that it
    doesn't matter much to me whether I vote or not.'  (Do you
    AGREE, NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE, or DISAGREE with this
    statement)?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Agree
         3. Neither agree nor disagree
         5. Disagree

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================

  Q1.

    Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with these
    statements about the government. The first is:
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
M025172         Q1a. Public Officials Don't Care
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q1a.

    ' Public officials don't care much what people like me think. '
    Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE, or DISAGREE with this
    statement?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Agree
         3. Neither agree nor disagree
         5. Disagree

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025173         Q1b. People Like R Have no Say about Gov
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q1b.

    ' People like me don't have any say about what the government
    does. '  (Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE, or
    DISAGREE with this statement)?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Agree
         3. Neither agree nor disagree
         5. Disagree

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================

  Q2.

    We're nearly at the end of the interview now, and have just a
    few more questions on a couple of topics.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================

  Q3.

    People have different ideas about the government in Washington.
    These ideas don't refer to Democrats or Republicans in
    particular, but just to the government in general. We want to
    see how you feel about these  ideas.  For example:
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
M025174         Q3a. How Often Trust Govt in Washington
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q3a.

    How much of the time do you think you can trust the
    government in Washington to do what is right -- JUST ABOUT
    ALWAYS, MOST OF THE TIME, or only SOME OF THE TIME?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Just about always
         2. Most of the time
         3. Only some of the time
         4. Never {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025175         Q4. Govt Wastes Tax Money
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q4.

    Do you think that people in government waste A LOT of
    the money we pay in taxes, waste SOME of it, or DON'T WASTE
    VERY MUCH of it?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Waste a lot
         3. Waste some
         5. Don't waste very much

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025176         Q5. Govt Run by Few Big Interests
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q5.

    Would you say the government is pretty much run by A FEW BIG
    INTERESTS looking out for themselves or that it is run for THE
    BENEFIT OF ALL THE PEOPLE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Government run by a few big interests
         5. Government run for the benefit of all

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.

         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025177         Q6. How Many in Govt are Crooked
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q6.

    Do you think that QUITE A FEW of the people running the
    government are crooked, NOT VERY MANY are, or do you think
    HARDLY ANY of them are crooked?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Quite a few are crooked
         3. Not very many are crooked
         5. Hardly any are crooked

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025178         Q7. How Much Elections Make Govt Attenti
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Q7.

    How much do you feel that having elections makes the
    government pay attention to what the people think
    -- a GOOD DEAL, SOME, or NOT MUCH?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. A good deal
         3. Some
         5. Not much

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025179         T6. Satisfied How US Democracy Works
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  T6.

    On the whole, are you SATISFIED, FAIRLY SATISFIED, NOT VERY
    SATISFIED, or NOT AT ALL SATISFIED with the way democracy works
    in the United States?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Satisfied
         2. Fairly satisfied
         3. Not very satisfied
         4. Not at all satisfied

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025180         T7a. How Good does U.S. Flag Make R Feel
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  T7a.

    When you see the American flag flying does it make you feel
    EXTREMELY GOOD, VERY GOOD, SOMEWHAT GOOD, or NOT VERY GOOD?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Extremely good
         2. Very good
         3. Somewhat good
         4. Not very good
         7. Don't feel anything [VOL]

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025181         T7b. How Strong is Rs Love for Country
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  T7b.

    How strong is your love for your country... EXTREMELY STRONG,
    VERY STRONG, SOMEWHAT STRONG, or NOT VERY STRONG?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1.  Extremely Strong
         2.  Very Strong
         4.  Somewhat Strong
         5.  Not Very Strong

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025182         Y4. R Employment Status
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  Y4.

  IF 'PANEL' RESPONDENT:

    We'd like to know if you are working now, or are you
    unemployed, retired, a homemaker, (a student), or what?
    {MULTIPLE RESPONSES}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         The maximum number of mentions was 3.  For 2-digit and 3-digit
         codes, each digit represents an employment category.

         001. Working now
         002. Temporarily laid off
         003. Unemployed
         004. Retired
         005. Permanently disabled
         006. Homemaker
         007. Student
         014. Working now and retired
         016. Working now and homemaker
         017. Working now and student
         026. Temporarily laid off and homemaker
         034. Unemployed and retired
         035. Unemployed and permanently disabled
         036. Unemployed and homemaker
         045. Retired and permanently disabled
         046. Retired and homemaker
         047. Retired and student
         067. Homemaker and student
         167. Working now, homemaker, and student
         467. Retired, homemaker, and student

         000. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-section case; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025183         Y4x. Pre/Post Employment Status Summary
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  Y4x.

    We'd like to know if you are working now, or are you
    unemployed, retired, a homemaker, (a student), or what?
    {MULTIPLE RESPONSES}

    PRE AND POST EMPLOYMENT STATUS SUMMARY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from Pre Y4 and Post Y4

         001. Working now
         002. Temporarily laid off
         003. Unemployed
         004. Retired
         005. Permanently disabled
         006. Homemaker
         007. Student
         014. Working now and retired
         016. Working now and homemaker
         017. Working now and student
         026. Temporarily laid off and homemaker
         034. Unemployed and retired
         035. Unemployed and permanently disabled
         036. Unemployed and homemaker
         045. Retired and permanently disabled
         046. Retired and homemaker
         047. Retired and student
         067. Homemaker and student
         146. Working now, retired, and homemaker
         167. Working now, homemaker, and student
         467. Retired, homemaker, and student

         000. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================

  Y8.

  IF 'PANEL' AND REPORTED WORKING NOW IN POST Y4 :/
  IF FRESH CROSS AND REPORTED WORKING NOW IN PRE Y4 :

    Here are a couple of things people sometimes do as part of
    their job. After I read each, please tell me whether or not you
    have done this, DURING THE LAST SIX MONTHS, as part of your
    job.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
M025184         Y8a. Chaired Meeting for Job Last 6 Mos.
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Y8a.

  IF 'PANEL' AND REPORTED WORKING NOW IN POST Y4 :/
  IF FRESH CROSS AND REPORTED WORKING NOW IN PRE Y4 :

    Have you planned or chaired a meeting (in the last 6 months?)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         0,2,3,4,5,6,7,26,34,35,36,45,46,47,67,467 (R not working) in
         Y4x; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025185         Y8b. R Gave Presentation for Job Last 6
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Y8b.

  IF 'PANEL' AND REPORTED WORKING NOW IN POST Y4 :/
  IF FRESH CROSS AND REPORTED WORKING NOW IN PRE Y4 :

    Have you given a presentation or speech (in the last 6
    months?)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         0,2,3,4,5,6,7,26,34,35,36,45,46,47,67,467 (R not working) in
         Y4x; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025186         Z1. R Worked with Neighbors on Issue/Pro
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Z1.

    Finally, I'd like to ask you a few questions about life in
    your neighborhood.  During the PAST TWELVE MONTHS, have you
    worked with others from your neighborhood to deal with a common
    issue or problem?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No
         7. No neighbors [VOL]

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025187         Z2. R Neighbors Just Out for Selves
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Z2.

    Next some questions about the people you regularly see in your
    neighborhood.
    In general, with these people in mind, would you say that they
    are just looking out for themselves ALL OF THE TIME, MOST OF
    THE TIME, SOME OF THE TIME, HARDLY EVER, or NEVER?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: several respondents volunteered in one or more of set of
         neighborhood-trust questions (Z2,Z3a,Z3b,Z3c) that they had no
         neighbors, yet still provided valid responses to other
         questions from the set.

         1.  All of the time
         2.  Most of the time
         3.  Some of the time
         4.  Hardly ever
         5.  Never
         7.  No neighbors [VOL]

         8. Don't know {DO NOT PROBE}
         9. Refused    {DO NOT PROBE}
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025188         Z3a. R Neighbors Take Advantage
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Z3a.

    Would you say those people you see regularly in your
    neighborhood try to take advantage of others ALL OF THE TIME,
    MOST OF THE TIME, SOME OF THE TIME, HARDLY EVER, or NEVER?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: several respondents volunteered in one or more of set of
         neighborhood-trust questions (Z2,Z3a,Z3b,Z3c) that they had no
         neighbors, yet still provided valid responses to other
         questions from the set.

         1.  All of the time
         2.  Most of the time
         3.  Some of the time
         4.  Hardly ever
         5.  Never
         7.  No neighbors [VOL]

         8. Don't know {DO NOT PROBE}
         9. Refused    {DO NOT PROBE}
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025189         Z3b. R Neighbors Respect Others
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Z3b.

    (Again, thinking about those people you see in your
    neighborhood,) Would you say they treat others with respect
    ALL OF THE TIME, MOST OF THE TIME, SOME OF THE TIME, HARDLY
    EVER, or NEVER?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: several respondents volunteered in one or more of set of
         neighborhood-trust questions (Z2,Z3a,Z3b,Z3c) that they had no
         neighbors, yet still provided valid responses to other
         questions from the set.

         1.  All of the time
         2.  Most of the time
         3.  Some of the time
         4.  Hardly ever
         5.  Never
         7.  No neighbors [VOL]

         8. Don't know {DO NOT PROBE}
         9. Refused    {DO NOT PROBE}
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025190         Z3c. Honest Describe R Neighbors
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 8

  Z3c.

    Would you say that HONEST describes the people in your
    neighborhood EXTREMELY WELL, QUITE WELL, NOT TOO WELL, or NOT
    WELL AT ALL?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: several respondents volunteered in one or more of set of
         neighborhood-trust questions (Z2,Z3a,Z3b,Z3c) that they had no
         neighbors, yet still provided valid responses to other
         questions from the set.

         1.  All of the time
         2.  Most of the time
         3.  Some of the time
         4.  Hardly ever
         5.  Never
         7.  No neighbors [VOL]

         8. Don't know {DO NOT PROBE}
         9. Refused    {DO NOT PROBE}
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025191         ZZ4. R Cooperation
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ4.

    R's cooperation was:
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Very good
         2. Good
         3. Fair
         4. Poor
         5. Very poor

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025192         ZZ5. R Level of Information
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ5.

    R's general level of information about politics and public
    affairs seemed:
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Very high
         2. Fairly high
         3. Average
         4. Fairly low
         5. Very low

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025193         ZZ6. R Intelligence
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ6.

    R's apparent intelligence:
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Very high
         2. Fairly high
         3. Average
         4. Fairly low
         5. Very low

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025194         ZZ7. How Suspicious Was R
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ7.

    How suspicious did R seem to be about the study before the
    interview?:
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Not at all suspicious
         3. Somewhat suspicious
         5. Very suspicious

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025195         ZZ8. R Interest in Interview
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ8.

    Overall, how great was R's interest in the interview?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Very high
         2. Fairly high
         3. Average
         4. Fairly low
         5. Very low

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025196         ZZ9. How Sincere Was R
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ9.

    How sincere did R seem to be in his/her answers?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Completely sincere
         3. Usually sincere
         5. Often seemed to be insincere

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025197         ZZ9a. Parts where doubt R's sincerity
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ9a.

  IF IWR REPORTED R WAS USUALLY SINCERE:/
  IF IWR REPORTED R OFTEN SEEMED TO BE INSINCERE:

    Were there any particular parts of the interview for which you
    doubted R's sincerity?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         0. NA

         INAP.
         1,0 in ZZ9; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
M025198a        ZZ12a. IWR:IW Rxns- Negative General
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12a.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    NEGATIVE - GENERAL
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.  "Negative - general"
         5.  Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Post Interview

==============================
M025198b        ZZ12b. IWR:IW Rxns-Too Long
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12b.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    NEGATIVE - TOO LONG
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.  "Negative - too long"
         5.  Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Post Interview

==============================
M025198c        ZZ12c. IWR:IW Rxns-Too Complicated
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12c.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    NEGATIVE - TOO COMPLICATED
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.  "Negative - too complicated"
         5.  Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Post Interview

==============================
M025198d        ZZ12d. IWR:IW Rxns-Boring/Tedious
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12d.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    NEGATIVE - BORING/TEDIOUS/REPETITIOUS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.  "Negative - boring/tedious/repetitious"
         5.  Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Post Interview


==============================
M025198e        ZZ12e. IWR:IW Rxns-Wanted to Stop
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12e.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    R WANTED TO STOP BEFORE INTERVIEW COMPLETED
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.   "R wanted to stop before interview completed.  After
              starting the interview R made comments indicating
              he/she regretted having agreed to be interviewed"
         5.   Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Post Interview

==============================
M025198f        ZZ12f. IWR:IW Rxns- Ill/Deaf/Tired
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12f.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    R ILL/DEAF/TIRED ETC.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.   "R complained and/or interviewer observed that R was
              ill/deaf/tired/had bad eyesight etc.; interview was
              obviously hard for R"
         5.   Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Post Interview

==============================
M025198g        ZZ12g. IWR:IW Rxns-Confused
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12g.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    R CONFUSED BY QUESTIONS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.   "R complained and/or interviewer observed that R was
              confused by questions "couldn't understand the
              scales"; interview was obviously hard for R"
         5.   Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Post Interview

==============================
M025198h        ZZ12h. IWR:IW Rxns-Lack of Knowledge
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12h.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    R SELF-CONSCIOUS - LACK OF KNOWLEDGE/SUITABILITY FOR INTERVIEWING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.   "R expressed (especially repeatedly) doubts/apologies/
              embarrassment over lack of knowledge or own
              suitability for interview"
         5.   Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Post Interview

==============================
M025198j        ZZ12j. IWR:IW Rxns-Lack Political Knwldg
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12j.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    R SELF-CONSCIOUS - LACK OF POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.   "R expressed (especially repeatedly) doubts/apologies/
              embarrassment over lack of POLITICAL knowledge"
         5.   Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Post Interview

==============================
M025198k        ZZ12k. IWR:IW Rxns-Agitated by Process
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12k.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    R AGITATED BY INTERVIEW PROCESS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.  "R was agitated or stressed by interview PROCESS"
         5.  Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Post Interview

==============================
M025198m        ZZ12m. IWR:IW Rxns-Angry at Content
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12m.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    R ANGRY ABOUT INTERVIEW CONTENT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.  "R became angry at interview CONTENT"
         5.  Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Post Interview

==============================
M025198n        ZZ12n. IWR:IW Rxns-Sampling Concerns
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12n.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    R CONCERNED ABOUT SAMPLING PURPOSE/BIAS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.   "R became concerned about sampling purpose or bias:
              'why do you come to the old folks home?' 'why THIS
              neighborhood?' 'why/why not blacks/Hispanics?' 'why
              me?' etc."
         5.   Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Post Interview

==============================
M025198p        ZZ12p. IWR:IW Rxns- Positive
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12p.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    POSITIVE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.   "R appeared to enjoy the interview (R was "cooperative"
              /"interested"/"pleasant" etc.)"
         5.   Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

         INAP.

         No Post Interview

==============================
M025198q        ZZ12q. IWR:IW Rxns- Neutral/None
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0

  ZZ12q.

    R's reaction to interview
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    NEUTRAL OR NO FEEDBACK
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.

         1.  "Neutral or no feedback (1st mention only)"
         5.  Not checked by interviewer

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Post Interview

==============================
M025201         PROB1. R Physical Problem with Phone In
                Numeric
                Missing eq 0, ge 9

  PROB1.

    Is there any difficulty administering an interview by phone
    to this R?
    {EXAMPLES: hard of hearing, illness that makes it difficult for
    R to stay on the phone very long, etc.}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1 Yes {SPECIFY}
         5 No

         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================





========================================================================
M041201     Sampling.1. 2004 State Name
========================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
State name.

NOTES:
------
This is the full name of the state corresponding to the
respondent's 2004 Panel Study address.

TYPE:
-----
Character

========================================================================
M041201a    Sampling.1a. 2004 Postal Abbreviation Of State
========================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
State postal abbreviation.

VALID CODES:
------------
AL. Alabama
AK. Alaska
AZ. Arizona
AR. Arkansas
CA. California
CO. Colorado
CT. Connecticut
DE. Delaware
DC. Washington DC
FL. Florida
GA. Georgia
HI. Hawaii
ID. Idaho
IL. Illinois
IN. Indiana
IA. Iowa
KS. Kansas
KY. Kentucky
LA. Louisiana
ME. Maine
MD. Maryland
MA. Massachusetts
MI. Michigan
MN. Minnesota
MS. Mississippi
MO. Missouri
MT. Montana
NE. Nebraska
NV. Nevada
NH. New Hampshire
NJ. New Jersey
NM. New Mexico
NY. New York
NC. North Carolina
ND. North Dakota
OH. Ohio
OK. Oklahoma
OR. Oregon
PA. Pennsylvania
RI. Rhode Island
SC. South Carolina
SD. South Dakota
TN. Tennessee
TX. Texas
UT. Utah
VT. Vermont
VA. Virginia
WA. Washington
WV. West Virginia
WI. Wisconsin
WY. Wyoming

NOTES:
------
This is the 2-character postal abbreviation of the state
corresponding to the respondent's 2004 Panel Study address.

TYPE:
-----
Character

========================================================================
M041202     Sampling.2. 2004 FIPS State Code
========================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
FIPS state code.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Alabama
02. Alaska
04. Arizona
05. Arkansas
06. California
08. Colorado
09. Connecticut
10. Delaware
11. Washington DC
12. Florida
13. Georgia
15. Hawaii
16. Idaho
17. Illinois
18. Indiana
19. Iowa
20. Kansas
21. Kentucky
22. Louisiana
23. Maine
24. Maryland
25. Massachusetts
26. Michigan
27. Minnesota
28. Mississippi
29. Missouri
30. Montana
31. Nebraska
32. Nevada
33. New Hampshire
34. New Jersey
35. New Mexico
36. New York
37. North Carolina
38. North Dakota
39. Ohio
40. Oklahoma
41. Oregon
42. Pennsylvania
44. Rhode Island
45. South Carolina
46. South Dakota
47. Tennessee
48. Texas
49. Utah
50. Vermont
51. Virginia
53. Washington
54. West Virginia
55. Wisconsin
56. Wyoming

NOTES:
------
This is the FIPS code of the state corresponding
to the respondent's 2004 Panel Study address.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M041203     Sampling.3. 2004 ICPSR State Code
========================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
ICPSR state code.

VALID CODES:
------------
NEW ENGLAND
01. Connecticut
02. Maine
03. Massachusetts
04. New Hampshire
05. Rhode Island
06. Vermont
MIDDLE ATLANTIC
11. Delaware
12. New Jersey
13. New York
14. Pennsylvania
EAST NORTH CENTRAL
21. Illinois
22. Indiana
23. Michigan
24. Ohio
25. Wisconsin
WEST NORTH CENTRAL
31. Iowa
32. Kansas
33. Minnesota
34. Missouri
35. Nebraska
36. North Dakota
37. South Dakota
SOLID SOUTH
40. Virginia
41. Alabama
42. Arkansas
43. Florida
44. Georgia
45. Louisiana
46. Mississippi
47. North Carolina
48. South Carolina
49. Texas
BORDER STATES
51. Kentucky
52. Maryland
53. Oklahoma
54. Tennessee
55. Washington DC
56. West Virginia
MOUNTAIN STATES
61. Arizona
62. Colorado
63. Idaho
64. Montana
65. Nevada
66. New Mexico
67. Utah
68. Wyoming
PACIFIC STATES
71. California
72. Oregon
73. Washington
EXTERNAL STATES
81. Alaska
82. Hawaii

NOTES:
------
This is the ICPSR code of the state corresponding
to the respondent's 2004 Panel Study address.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M041204     Sampling.4. 2004 Congressional District Number
========================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Congressional district number.

VALID CODES:
------------
01-53

MISSING CODES:
--------------
00. Washington D.C.

NOTES:
------
This is the Congressional District of the respondent's
2004 Panel Study address.  At-large districts are coded 1.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M041204a    Sampling.4a. 2004 State Postal Abbrev And Congr District Num
========================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
State Postal abbreviation and Congressional district number.

NOTES:
------
This is the state postal abbreviation (1st two characters)
and Congressional District (2nd two characters) of the
respondent's 2004 Panel Study address.  At-large districts
are represented as district 01.

TYPE:
-----
Character

========================================================================
M041204b    Sampling.4b. 2004 State FIPS Code And Congr District Number
========================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
State FIPS code and Congressional district number.

NOTES:
------
This is the state FIPS code (1st 1-2 digits) and
Congressional District (last 2 digits) of the
respondent's 2004 Panel Study address.  At-large
districts are represented as district 01.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M041204c    Sampling.4c. 2004 State ICPSR Code And Congr District Number
========================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
State ICPSR code and Congressional district number.

NOTES:
------
This is the state ICPSR code (1st 1-2 digits) and
Congressional District (last 2 digits) of the
respondent's 2004 Panel Study address.  At-large
districts are represented as district 01.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M041205     Sampling.5. 2004 Census Region
========================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Census region.

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Northeast (CT,ME,MA,NH,NJ,NY,PA,RI,VT)
2. North Central (IL,IN,IA,KS,MI,MN,MO,NE,ND,OH,SD,WI)
3. South (AL,AR,DE,DC,FL,GA,KY,LA,MD,MS,NC,OK,SC,TN,TX,VA,WV)
4. West (AK,AZ,CA,CO,HI,ID,MT,NM,NV,OR,UT,WA,WY)

NOTES:
------
This is the Census region of the respondent's 2004 Panel Study
address.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M041206     Sampling.6. 2000 ANES Primary Area (PSU) Number
========================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Primary area (PSU).

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. 2000 RDD case

NOTES:
------
This is the primary area (PSU) number of the respondent's
original 2000 sampling address (for 2000 ANES face-to-face
respondents).
To protect the confidentiality of the respondent, this
variable has been recoded in the public release: the 44 PSU
codes listed (110 through 482) have been recoded to values
1-44 in random order.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M041207     Sampling.7. 2000 ANES Segment Number
========================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Segment number.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. 2000 RDD case

NOTES:
------
This is the segment in which the respondent's original 2000
sampling address was selected as a household (for 2000 ANES
face-to-face respondents).
To protect the confidentiality of the respondent, this
variable has been recoded to 999 in the public release.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M041208     Sampling.8. 2004 FIPS State-County Code
========================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
FIPS state and county code.

NOTES:
------
This represents the state (1st 1 or 2 digits) and county
(last 3 digits) of the respondent's 2004 Panel Study
address.  Washington D.C. is 11001.
To protect the confidentiality of the respondent, this
variable has been coded to 99999 in the public release.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M041208a    Sampling.8a. 2004 FIPS County Name
========================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
FIPS County name.

NOTES:
------
This represents the FIPS version of the county name that
corresponds to the respondent's 2004 Panel Study address.
To protect the confidentiality of the respondent, this
variable has been blanked in the public release.

TYPE:
-----
Character

========================================================================
M041209     Sampling.9. 2004 Address - 2000 Census Tract Number
========================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
2000 Census tract number.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
0000.00 NA

NOTES:
------
This represents the 2000 Census tract number corresponding
to the respondent's 2004 Panel Study address.
To protect the confidentiality of the respondent, this
variable has been recoded to 9999.99 in the public release.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 2

========================================================================
M041210     Sampling.10. 2004 Address - 2000 Census Place Code
========================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
2000 Census Place (CDP) code.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
00000. Not a Census Place

NOTES:
------
This represents the 2000 Census Place code corresponding
to the respondent's 2004 Panel Study address.
To protect the confidentiality of the respondent, this
variable has been recoded to 99999 in the public release.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M041211     Sampling.11. 2004 Address - 2000 Census MCD code
========================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
2000 Census Minor Civil Division (MCD) code.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
00000. NA

NOTES:
------
This represents the 2000 Census Minor Civil Division
corresponding to the respondent's 2004 Panel Study
address.
To protect the confidentiality of the respondent, this
variable has been recoded to 99999 in the public release.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M041212     Sampling.12. 2004 Address - 1990 Census MSA
========================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) 1990.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
0000. Not in a 1990 MSA

NOTES:
------
This represents the 1990 Census MSA corresponding to the
respondent's 2004 Panel Study address.
To protect the confidentiality of the respondent, this
variable has been recoded to 9999 in the public release.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M041213     Sampling.13. 2004 Address - 2000 Census Urban/Rural
========================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
2000 Census Urban/Rural classification.

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Rural
5. Urban

MISSING CODES:
--------------
0. NA

NOTES:
------
This represents the 2000 Census urban/rural classification
corresponding to the respondent's 2004 Panel Study address.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M041214     Sampling.14. 2004 Address - 2000 Census CSA
========================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
2000 Census Combined Statistical Area (CSA).

MISSING CODES:
--------------
000. Not in a CSA

NOTES:
------
This represents the 2000 Census Combined Statistical Area
(CSA) corresponding to the respondent's 2004 Panel Study
address.
To protect the confidentiality of the respondent, this
variable has been recoded to 999 in the public release.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M041214a    Sampling.14a. 2004 Address - 2000 Census CBSA
========================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
2000 Census Component Core-Based Statistical Area (CBSA).

MISSING CODES:
--------------
00000. Not in a CBSA

NOTES:
------
This represents the 2000 Census Component Core-Based
Statistical Area (CBSA) corresponding to the respondent's
2004 Panel Study address.
To protect the confidentiality of the respondent, this
variable has been recoded to 99999 in the public release.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M041215     Sampling.15. 2002 FIPS State And Congressional District
========================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
2002 State FIPS code and Congressional district number.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
9999. District not correctly assigned in 2002

NOTES:
------
This is the state FIPS code (1st 1-2 digits) and
Congressional District (last 2 digits) of the
respondent's 2002 ANES address.  At-large
districts are represented as district 01. Washington DC
is 1100.
Note that some redistricting was effected prior to
the 2002 election.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M041216     Sampling.16. 2000 FIPS State And Congressional District
========================================================================

STUDY DESCRIPTIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
2000 State FIPS code and Congressional district number.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
9996. District not correctly assigned in 2004

NOTES:
------
This is the state FIPS code (1st 1-2 digits) and
Congressional District (last 2 digits) of the
respondent's 2000 ANES address.  At-large
districts are represented as district 01. Washington DC
is 1100.
Note that some redistricting was effected prior to
the 2002 election; prior to the 2004 election,
redistricting was effected in Texas only.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044001     PostAdmin.1. Form Of Post Interview
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Assigned form of interview.

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Affirm action (Q188-94); soc trust fair (Q217);
   traits 1 (Q137-40)
2. Affirm action (Q188-94); soc trust fair (Q217);
   traits 2 (Q137,Q141-43)
3. Affirm action (Q188-94); soc trust helpful (Q218);
   traits 1 (Q137-40)
4. Affirm action (Q188-94); soc trust helpful (Q218);
   traits 2 (Q137,Q141-43)
5. Equal pay (Q195-198);    soc trust fair (Q217);
   traits 1 (Q137-40)
6. Equal pay (Q195-198);    soc trust fair (Q217);
   traits 2 (Q137,Q141-43)
7. Equal pay (Q195-198);    soc trust helpful (Q218);
   traits 1 (Q137-40)
8. Equal pay (Q195-198);    soc trust helpful (Q218);
   traits 2 (Q137,Q141-43)

NOTES:
------
In the 2004 Panel, respondents were assigned to the same
items that had been randomly assigned in 2002 for three
question sets: alternative sets of 4 Bush traits; a
question set either on race (affirmative action for
Blacks) or gender (equal pay for women); and a social
trust question either describing people as fair/taking
advantage or as helpful/looking out for themselves.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044002     PostAdmin.2. Release
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Pre-election sample release.

VALID CODES:
------------
1. All sample lines released at start of interviewing period

NOTES:
------
All sample lines were issued in a single release at the start
of the field period.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044003     PostAdmin.3. Mode Of Interview
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Mode of post-election interview.

VALID CODES:
------------
1. All interviews conducted by telephone

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044004     PostAdmin.4. Number Of Calls
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE

QUESTION:
---------
Total number of calls made.

VALID CODES:
------------
1-58

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044005     PostAdmin.5. Result
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Post-election result code.

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Completed interview

NOTES:
------
No post-election interviews were partials.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044006     PostAdmin.6. Language Of Interview
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Language of post-election interview.

VALID CODES:
------------
1. All interviews were conducted in English

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044007     PostAdmin.7. Interview Verification
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Verification of post-election interview.

VALID CODES:
------------
5. No verification

NOTES:
------
There was no verification of interviews at the
interviewing facility.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044008     PostAdmin.8. Interviewer Evaluation
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Interviewer evaluation conducted for post-election interview.

VALID CODES:
------------
5. No interviewer evaluation

NOTES:
------
There was no interviewer evaluation at the
interviewing  facility.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044009     PostAdmin.9. Interview Tape-Recorded
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Interview tape-recorded.

VALID CODES:
------------
5. Interview not tape-recorded

NOTE:
-----
There were no tape-recorded interviews at the
interviewing facility.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044010     PostAdmin.10. Interviewed In Parts
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Interview conducted in more than one part/session.

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Interviewed in parts (multiple sessions)
5. Not interviewed in parts (1 session)

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044011     PostAdmin.11. Number Of Parts
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Total number of interviewing sessions for each interview.

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Interview conducted in one session
2. Interview conducted in two sessions
3. Interview conducted in three sessions

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044012     PostAdmin.12. Number Of Interviewers For Each Interview
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Total number of interviewers for each interview.

VALID CODES:
------------
1. One interviewer conducted the entire interview
2. Two interviewers conducted the entire interview
3. Three interviewers conducted the entire interview

NOTES:
------
This is the total number of interviewers administering
1 or more sessions of the interview.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044013a    PostAdmin.13a. Interview Session 1 Interviewer ID
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Interviewer ID of interviewer who conducted session 1 of interview.

VALID CODES:
------------
1002-1056

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044013b    PostAdmin.13b. Interview Session 1 Date (MMDD)
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Interview session 1 date (MMDD).

NOTES:
------
This is the interview date of interviews conducted in
a single session and the date of the 1st interview session
for interviews which were broken into more than 1 session
of interviewing.
The first 2 characters provide the month of the session
date; the last 2 characters provide the day.

TYPE:
-----
Character

========================================================================
M044013c    PostAdmin.13c. Interview Session 1 Breakoff
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:
IF INTERVIEW CONDUCTED IN MORE THAN 1 SESSION:

QUESTION:
---------
Breakoff session 1.

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Between Q1 and Q57
2. Between Q57 and Q144
3. Between Q144 and Q207

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. 1 in Post.Admin.11

NOTES:
------
This describes the section of interview where the interview
was  broken off between session 1 and session 2.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 2

========================================================================
M044014a    PostAdmin.14a. Interview Session 2 Interviewer ID
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:
IF INTERVIEW CONDUCTED IN MORE THAN 1 SESSION:

QUESTION:
---------
Interviewer ID of interviewer who conducted session 2 of interview.

VALID CODES:
------------
1002-1056

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. 1 in Post.Admin.1

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044014b    PostAdmin.14b. Interview Session 2 Date (MMDD)
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:
IF INTERVIEW CONDUCTED IN MORE THAN 1 SESSION:

QUESTION:
---------
Interview session 2 date (MMDD).

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. 1 in Post.Admin.1

NOTES:
------
This is the interview date of session 2.  If an interview
was conducted in a single session, this variable is INAP.
The first 2 characters provide the month of the session
date; the last 2 characters provide the day.

TYPE:
-----
Character

========================================================================
M044014c    PostAdmin.14c. Interview Session 2 Breakoff
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:
IF INTERVIEW CONDUCTED IN 3 SESSIONS:

QUESTION:
---------
Breakoff session 2.

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Between Q1 and Q57
2. Between Q57 and Q144
3. Between Q144 and Q207

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. 1,2 in Post.Admin.11

NOTES:
------
This describes the section of interview where the
interview was  broken off between session 2 and
session 3.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 2

========================================================================
M044015a    PostAdmin.15a. Interview Session 3 Interviewer ID
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:
IF INTERVIEW CONDUCTED IN 3 SESSIONS:

QUESTION:
---------
Interviewer ID of interviewer who conducted part 3 of interview.

VALID CODES:
------------
1002-1056

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. 1,2 in Post.Admin.11

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044015b    PostAdmin.15b. Interview Session 3 Date (MMDD)
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:
IF INTERVIEW CONDUCTED IN 3 SESSIONS:

QUESTION:
---------
Interview session 3 date (MMDD).

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. 1,2 in Post.Admin.11

NOTES:
------
This is the interview date of session 3.  If an
interview was conducted in one or two sessions, this
variable is INAP.
The first 2 characters provide the month of the session
date; the last 2 characters provide the day.

TYPE:
-----
Character

========================================================================
M044016     PostAdmin.16. Total Length of Interview
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Total length of interview.
MISSING CODES:
--------------
00.0 NA

NOTES:
------
The mean interview length for the post-election interview
was 45.0 minutes.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 1

========================================================================
M044017     PostAdmin.17. Timezone Of Interview
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Timezone of interview.

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Eastern
2. Central
3. Mountain
4. Pacific
5. Alaska
6. Hawaii

MISSING CODES:
--------------
0. NA

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044018     PostAdmin.18. Date Interview Completed (MMDD)
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Date interview completed (MMDD).

NOTES:
------
This is the date the interview was completed.  The first
2 characters provide the month of the completion date; the
last 2 characters provide the day.

TYPE:
-----
Character

========================================================================
M044019     PostAdmin.19. Number of Days After Election IW Completed
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Number of days after the election interview was completed.

VALID CODES:
------------
1-49

NOTES:
-----
This is the number of days by which the November 2,
2004 general election preceded the ending date of the
interview . (Note: no interviewing was conducted on the
day of the general election).

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044020     PostAdmin.20. Interviewer Interview Number (Nth IW)
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Interviewer interview number.

VALID CODES:
------------
1-41

NOTES:
------
This identifies the interview as the Nth interview
conducted by the interviewer.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044021     PostAdmin.21. Payment 1 Amount
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Payment 1 amount paid to respondent for interview.

VALID CODES:
------------
00. Respondent refused payment
20. $20
40. $40
50. $50


NOTES:
-----
The amount of this payment (unless refused) represents
the initial amount offered to the respondent and is
the equivalent of the highest amount previously paid
to the respondent.  For some respondents not yet
interviewed  and initially offered $20, an additional
payment was offered (see PostAdmin.24) later in the
field period.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044022     PostAdmin.22. Payment 1 Mode
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:
IF RESPONDENT DID NOT REFUSE PAYMENT:

QUESTION:
---------
Payment 1 mode.

VALID CODES:
------------
1. All respondents paid by check

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. Respondent refused payment (00 in PostAdmin.20)

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044023     PostAdmin.23. Payment 1 Date (MMDD)
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:
IF RESPONDENT DID NOT REFUSE PAYMENT:

QUESTION:
---------
Date of payment 1 to respondent for IW (MMDD).

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. Respondent refused payment (00 in PostAdmin.20)

NOTES:
------
This is the date that the payment 1 check was issued.

TYPE:
-----
Character

========================================================================
M044024     PostAdmin.24. Payment 2 Amount
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:
IF RESPONDENT WAS OFFERED/PAID AN ADDITIONAL PAYMENT:

QUESTION:
---------
Payment 2 amount paid to respondent for interview.

VALID CODES:
------------
30. $30

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. R did not receive a second payment amount

NOTES:
------
Late in the interviewing period, to increase response
rate, an additional payment amount of $30.00 was
offered to some respondents who had already been offered
a $20.00 payment; respondents who accepted the additional
$30 were paid a total of $50 in 2 payments.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044025     PostAdmin.25. Payment 2 Mode
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:
IF RESPONDENT WAS OFFERED/PAID AN ADDITIONAL PAYMENT:

QUESTION:
---------
Payment 2 mode.

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Payment by check

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. R did not receive a second payment amount

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044026     PostAdmin.26. Payment 2 Date (MMDD)
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:
IF RESPONDENT WAS OFFERED/PAID AN ADDITIONAL PAYMENT:

QUESTION:
---------
Date of payment 2 to respondent for IW (MMDD).

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. R did not receive a second payment amount

NOTES:
------
This is the date that the payment 2 check was issued.

TYPE:
-----
Character

========================================================================
M044027     PostAdmin.27. Respondent Incentive
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Type of incentive mailed to respondent in advance of interview.

VALID CODES:
------------
1. University of Michigan notepad

NOTES:
------
This identifies that a respondent incentive, a refillable
University of Michigan padded notepad, was sent with the
advance letter and ANES study brochure to the respondent
prior to the start of the interviewing period.
This does not identify whether the advance letter, ANES Study
brochure, and incentive gift (notepad) were actually
received by the respondent due to mail or address
difficulties.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044028     PostAdmin.28. Final Persuasion Letter 12/03/2004
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Final persuasion letter sent 12/03/2004.

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Sent
5. Not sent

NOTES:
------
In a final effort to convert non-interview cases, a final
general persuasion letter was mailed 12/03/2004 to a subset
of outstanding cases; some had already, previously, been
mailed a refusal conversion letter (PostAdmin.29).

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044029     PostAdmin.29. Refusal Conversion Letter Sent
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Refusal conversion letter sent

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Sent
5. Not sent

NOTES:
------
Case 409 was sent a second refusal conversion letter. The
type of refusal conversion letter was "interview incomplete".
It was sent by two-day mail on December 3, 2004.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044029a    PostAdmin.29a. Refusal Conversion Letter Type
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:
IF REFUSAL CONVERSION LETTER SENT TO RESPONDENT:

QUESTION:
---------
Refusal conversion letter type.

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Interview incomplete
2. Not interested
3. General reluctance
4. Too busy
5. Too old

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. 5 in PostAdmin.29

NOTES:
------
Case 409 was sent a second refusal conversion letter. The
type of refusal conversion letter was "interview incomplete".
It was sent by two-day mail on December 3, 2004.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044029b    PostAdmin.29b. Refusal Conversion Letter Mail Priority
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:
IF REFUSAL CONVERSION LETTER SENT TO RESPONDENT:

QUESTION:
---------
Refusal conversion letter mail priority.

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Two-day mail
2. Standard mail

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. 5 in PostAdmin.29

NOTES:
------
Case 409 was sent a second refusal conversion letter. The
type of refusal conversion letter was "interview incomplete".
It was sent by two-day mail on December 3, 2004.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044029c    PostAdmin.29c. Refusal Conversion Letter Mail Date
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:
IF REFUSAL CONVERSION LETTER SENT TO RESPONDENT:

QUESTION:
---------
Refusal conversion letter date sent (MMDD).

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. 5 in PostAdmin.29

NOTES:
------
Case 409 was sent a second refusal conversion letter. The
type of refusal conversion letter was "interview incomplete".
It was sent by two-day mail on December 3, 2004.

TYPE:
-----
Character

========================================================================
M044101     PostIwr.1. Interviewer Of Record (IWR ID)
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Interviewer of record - interviewer ID.

VALID CODES:
------------
0401 - 0450

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044102     PostIwr.2. Interviewer Gender
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Interviewer gender.

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Male
2. Female

MISSING CODES:
--------------
9. NA

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044103     PostIwr.3. Interviewer Education Level
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Interviewer education level.

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Grades 1 - 8
2. Some high school
3. High school graduate
4. Some college
5. College degree
6. Master's degree
7. Ph.D.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
9. NA

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044104     PostIwr.4. Interviewer Race
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Interviewer race.

VALID CODES:
------------
1. White
2. Black
3. Native American
4. Asian
7. Other (includes Hispanic)

MISSING CODES:
--------------
9. NA

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044105     PostIwr.5. Interviewer Ethnicity
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Interviewer ethnicity.

VALID CODES:
------------
0. No ethnic identity coded
1. Hispanic
7. Other

MISSING CODES:
--------------
9. NA

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044106     PostIwr.6. Interviewer Languages
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Languages spoken by interviewer other than English.

VALID CODES:
------------
0. No other languages
1. Spanish
7. Other

MISSING CODES:
--------------
9. NA

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044107     PostIwr.7. Interviewer Yrs Experience
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Interviewer years of experience.

VALID CODES:
------------
00. Less than one year
01. One year of experience
  .
  .
  .
21. Twenty one years of experience

MISSING CODES:
--------------
99. NA

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044108     PostIwr.8. Interviewer Age (Bracketed)
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Interviewer age (bracketed).

VALID CODES:
------------
1. 18-34 years
2. 35-40 years
3. 41-45 years
4. 46-50 years
5. 51-55 years
6. 56-60 years
7. 51-64 years
8. 65-79 years

MISSING CODES:
--------------
9. NA

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044201     PostErr.1. Error Flag For Diplomacy/Military Force Items
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Error flag for the diplomacy/military force scales.

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Before probe correction
2. After probe correction

NOTE:
-----
During the field period, for the diplomacy /military force
scales Q144-Q147 an error was discovered in the probe ,
text, which had appeared as follows prior to the discovery:
   (As a reminder, 1 means the U.S. should solve with

   diplomacy and international pressure, 7 means the U.S.
   must be ready to use international force, and of
   course you can choose points 2,3,4,5, or 6 in between.)
instead of [correct version]:
   (As a reminder, 1 means the U.S. should solve with
   diplomacy and international pressure, 7 means the U.S.
   must be ready to use military force, and of course
   you can choose points 2,3,4,5, or 6 in between.)
This error was corrected immediately upon discovery but
only after approximately half of the interviews were
already completed. Since the probe as it appeared onscreen
was specifically flagged as optional text, it is unknown
precisely when the incorrect version was actually read
aloud prior to the error discovery.  However, PostErr.1
identifies cases that were administered prior to the date
when the instrument was revised.
Cases are coded 1 if the respondent was asked the
diplomacy/force interventionism series before the probe fix
was implemented, indicating that the question may have
been administered with the incorrect probe text read to
the respondent.  Cases coded 2 were administered with
the correct probe text appearing onscreen.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044401     PostRand.1a. Pos Kerry - Polit Figs Thermometers
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of John Kerry in thermometers for political figures.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Kerry administered 1st
02. Kerry administered 2nd
03. Kerry administered 3rd
04. Kerry administered 4th
05. Kerry administered 5th
06. Kerry administered 6th
07. Kerry administered 7th
08. Kerry administered 8th
09. Kerry administered 9th
10. Kerry administered 10th
11. Kerry administered 11th

NOTES:
------
The Q16-Q27 series of political figure thermometers
was administered in random order after George W. Bush
(fixed as the first thermometer).  This variable
identifies the thermometer for Kerry (Q17) as
administered as the nth thermometer in the randomized
portion of the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044402     PostRand.1b. Pos Cheney - Polit Figs Thermometers
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of Dick Cheney in thermometers for political figures.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Cheney administered 1st
02. Cheney administered 2nd
03. Cheney administered 3rd
04. Cheney administered 4th
05. Cheney administered 5th
06. Cheney administered 6th
07. Cheney administered 7th
08. Cheney administered 8th
09. Cheney administered 9th
10. Cheney administered 10th
11. Cheney administered 11th

NOTES:
------
The Q16-Q27 series of political figure thermometers
was administered in random order after George W. Bush
(fixed as the first thermometer).  This variable
identifies the thermometer for Cheney (Q18) as
administered as the nth thermometer in the randomized
portion of the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044403     PostRand.1c. Pos Gore - Polit Figs Thermometers
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of Al Gore in thermometers for political figures.

VALID CODES:

------------
01. Gore administered 1st
02. Gore administered 2nd
03. Gore administered 3rd
04. Gore administered 4th
05. Gore administered 5th
06. Gore administered 6th
07. Gore administered 7th
08. Gore administered 8th
09. Gore administered 9th
10. Gore administered 10th
11. Gore administered 11th

NOTES:
------
The Q16-Q27 series of political figure thermometers
was administered in random order after George W. Bush
(fixed as the first thermometer).  This variable
identifies the thermometer for Gore (Q19) as
administered as the nth thermometer in the randomized
portion of the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044404     PostRand.1d. Pos Edwards - Polit Figs Thermometers
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of John Edwards in thermometers for political figures.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Edwards administered 1st
02. Edwards administered 2nd
03. Edwards administered 3rd
04. Edwards administered 4th
05. Edwards administered 5th
06. Edwards administered 6th
07. Edwards administered 7th
08. Edwards administered 8th
09. Edwards administered 9th
10. Edwards administered 10th
11. Edwards administered 11th

NOTES:
------
The Q16-Q27 series of political figure thermometers
was administered in random order after George W. Bush
(fixed as the first thermometer).  This variable
identifies the thermometer for Edwards (Q20) as
administered as the nth thermometer in the randomized
portion of the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044405     PostRand.1e. Pos Nader - Polit Figs Thermometers
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of Ralph Nader in thermometers for political figures.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Nader administered 1st
02. Nader administered 2nd
03. Nader administered 3rd
04. Nader administered 4th
05. Nader administered 5th
06. Nader administered 6th
07. Nader administered 7th
08. Nader administered 8th
09. Nader administered 9th
10. Nader administered 10th
11. Nader administered 11th

NOTES:
------
The Q16-Q27 series of political figure thermometers
was administered in random order after George W. Bush
(fixed as the first thermometer).   This variable
identifies the thermometer for Nader (Q21) as
administered as the nth thermometer in the randomized
portion of the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044406     PostRand.1f. Pos Clinton - Polit Figs Thermometers
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of Bill Clinton in thermometers for political figures.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Clinton administered 1st
02. Clinton administered 2nd
03. Clinton administered 3rd
04. Clinton administered 4th
05. Clinton administered 5th
06. Clinton administered 6th
07. Clinton administered 7th
08. Clinton administered 8th
09. Clinton administered 9th
10. Clinton administered 10th
11. Clinton administered 11th

NOTES:
------
The Q16-Q27 series of political figure thermometers
was administered in random order after George W. Bush
(fixed as the first thermometer).  This variable
identifies the thermometer for Clinton (Q22) as
administered as the nth thermometer in the randomized
portion of the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044407     PostRand.1g. Pos Powell - Polit Figs Thermometers
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of Colin Powell in thermometers for political figures.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Powell administered 1st
02. Powell administered 2nd
03. Powell administered 3rd
04. Powell administered 4th
05. Powell administered 5th
06. Powell administered 6th
07. Powell administered 7th
08. Powell administered 8th
09. Powell administered 9th
10. Powell administered 10th
11. Powell administered 11th

NOTES:
------
The Q16-Q27 series of political figure thermometers
was administered in random order after George W. Bush
(fixed as the first thermometer).  This variable
identifies the thermometer for Powell(Q23) as
administered as the nth thermometer in the randomized
portion of the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044408     PostRand.1h. Pos Ashcroft - Polit Figs Thermometers
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of John Ashcroft in thermometers for political figures.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Ashcroft administered 1st
02. Ashcroft administered 2nd
03. Ashcroft administered 3rd
04. Ashcroft administered 4th
05. Ashcroft administered 5th
06. Ashcroft administered 6th
07. Ashcroft administered 7th
08. Ashcroft administered 8th
09. Ashcroft administered 9th
10. Ashcroft administered 10th
11. Ashcroft administered 11th

NOTES:
------
The Q16-Q27 series of political figure thermometers
was administered in random order after George W. Bush
(fixed as the first thermometer).   This variable
identifies the thermometer for Ashcroft (Q24) as
administered as the nth thermometer in the randomized
portion of the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044409     PostRand.1j. Pos Jackson - Polit Figs Thermometers
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of Jesse Jackson in thermometers for political figures.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Jackson administered 1st
02. Jackson administered 2nd
03. Jackson administered 3rd
04. Jackson administered 4th
05. Jackson administered 5th
06. Jackson administered 6th
07. Jackson administered 7th
08. Jackson administered 8th
09. Jackson administered 9th
10. Jackson administered 10th
11. Jackson administered 11th

NOTES:
------
The Q16-Q27 series of political figure thermometers
was administered in random order after George W. Bush
(fixed as the first thermometer).  This variable
identifies the thermometer for Jackson (Q25) as
administered as the nth thermometer in the randomized
portion of the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044410    PostRand.1k. Pos Laura Bush - Polit Figs Thermometers
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of Laura Bush in thermometers for political figures.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Laura Bush administered 1st
02. Laura Bush administered 2nd
03. Laura Bush administered 3rd
04. Laura Bush administered 4th
05. Laura Bush administered 5th
06. Laura Bush administered 6th
07. Laura Bush administered 7th
08. Laura Bush administered 8th
09. Laura Bush administered 9th
10. Laura Bush administered 10th
11. Laura Bush administered 11th

NOTES:
------
The Q16-Q27 series of political figure thermometers
was administered in random order after George W. Bush
(fixed as the first thermometer).  This variable
identifies the thermometer for Laura Bush (Q26) as
administered as the nth thermometer in the randomized
portion of the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044411    PostRand.1m. Pos Hillary Clinton - Polit Figs Thermometers
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of Hillary Clinton in thermometers for political figures.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Hillary Clinton administered 1st
02. Hillary Clinton administered 2nd
03. Hillary Clinton administered 3rd
04. Hillary Clinton administered 4th
05. Hillary Clinton administered 5th
06. Hillary Clinton administered 6th
07. Hillary Clinton administered 7th
08. Hillary Clinton administered 8th
09. Hillary Clinton administered 9th
10. Hillary Clinton administered 10th
11. Hillary Clinton administered 11th

NOTES:
------
The Q16-Q27 series of political figure thermometers
was administered in random order after George W. Bush
(fixed as the first thermometer).  This variable
identifies the thermometer for Hillary Clinton (Q27) as
administered as the nth thermometer in the randomized
portion of the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044412    PostRand.2a. Pos Supreme Crt - Group Therms
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of the Supreme Court in the group thermometers.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 26

NOTES:
------
The Q28-Q53 series of group thermometers was administered
in random order.  This variable identifies the thermometer
for the Supreme Court (Q28) as administered as the nth
thermometer in the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044413    PostRand.2b. Pos Congress - Group Therms
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of Congress in the group thermometers.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 26

NOTES:
------
The Q28-Q53 series of group thermometers was administered
in random order.  This variable identifies the thermometer
for Congress (Q29) as administered as the nth thermometer
in the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044414    PostRand.2c. Pos Military - Group Therms
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of the military in the group thermometers.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 26

NOTES:
------
The Q28-Q53 series of group thermometers was administered
in random order.  This variable identifies the thermometer
for the military (Q30) as administered as the nth
thermometer in the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044415    PostRand.2d. Pos Federal Govt - Group Therms
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of the federal government in the group thermometers.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 26

NOTES:
------
The Q28-Q53 series of group thermometers was administered
in random order.  This variable identifies the thermometer
for the federal government (Q31) as administered as the nth
thermometer in the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044416    PostRand.2e. Pos Blacks - Group Therms
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of Blacks in the group thermometers.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 26

NOTES:
------
The Q28-Q53 series of group thermometers was administered
in random order.  This variable identifies the thermometer
for blacks (Q32) as administered as the nth thermometer in
the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044417    PostRand.2f. Pos Whites - Group Therms
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of Whites in the group thermometers.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 26

NOTES:
------
The Q28-Q53 series of group thermometers was administered
in random order.  This variable identifies the thermometer
for whites (Q33) as administered as the nth thermometer in
the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044418    PostRand.2g. Pos Conservatives - Group Therms
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of conservatives in the group thermometers.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 26

NOTES:
------
The Q28-Q53 series of group thermometers was administered
in random order.  This variable identifies the thermometer
for conservatives (Q34) as administered as the nth
thermometer in the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044419    PostRand.2h. Pos Liberals - Group Therms
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of liberals in the group thermometers.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 26

NOTES:
------
The Q28-Q53 series of group thermometers was administered
in random order.  This variable identifies the thermometer
for liberals (Q35) as administered as the nth thermometer
in the series.
TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044420    PostRand.2j. Pos Unions - Group Therms
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of unions in the group thermometers.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 26

NOTES:
------
The Q28-Q53 series of group thermometers was administered
in random order.  This variable identifies the thermometer
for unions (Q36) as administered as the nth thermometer in
the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044421    PostRand.2k. Pos Big Business - Group Therms
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of big business in the group thermometers.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 26

NOTES:
------
The Q28-Q53 series of group thermometers was administered
in random order.  This variable identifies the thermometer
for big business (Q37) as administered as the nth
thermometer in the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044422    PostRand.2m. Pos Poor People - Group Therms
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of poor people in the group thermometers.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 26

NOTES:
------
The Q28-Q53 series of group thermometers was administered
in random order.  This variable identifies the thermometer
for poor people (Q38) as administered as the nth
thermometer in the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044423    PostRand.2n. Pos People On Welfare - Group Therms
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of people on welfare in the group thermometers.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 26

NOTES:
------
The Q28-Q53 series of group thermometers was administered
in random order.  This variable identifies the thermometer
for people on Welfare (Q39) as administered as the nth
thermometer in the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044424    PostRand.2p. Pos Hispanics - Group Therms
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of Hispanics in the group thermometers.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 26

NOTES:
------
The Q28-Q53 series of group thermometers was administered
in random order.  This variable identifies the thermometer
for Hispanics (Q40) as administered as the nth thermometer
in the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044425    PostRand.2q. Pos Christian Fundam - Group Therms
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of Christian fundamentalists in the group
thermometers.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 26

NOTES:
------
The Q28-Q53 series of group thermometers was administered
in random order.  This variable identifies the thermometer
for Christian fundamentalists (Q41) as administered as the
nth thermometer in the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044426    PostRand.2r. Pos Elderly - Group Therms
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of the elderly in the group thermometers.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 26

NOTES:
------
The Q28-Q53 series of group thermometers was administered
in random order.  This variable identifies the thermometer
for the elderly (Q42) as administered as the nth thermometer
in the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0
c  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044427    PostRand.2s. Pos Environmentalists - Group Therms
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of environmentalists in the group thermometers.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 26

NOTES:
------
The Q28-Q53 series of group thermometers was administered
in random order.  This variable identifies the thermometer
for environmentalists (Q43) as administered as the nth
thermometer in the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044428    PostRand.2t. Pos Homosexuals - Group Therms
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of homosexuals in the group thermometers.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 26

NOTES:
------
The Q28-Q53 series of group thermometers was administered
in random order.  This variable identifies the thermometer
for homosexuals (Q44) as administered as the nth
thermometer in the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044429    PostRand.2u. Pos Catholics - Group Therms
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of Catholics in the group thermometers.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 26

NOTES:
------
The Q28-Q53 series of group thermometers was administered
in random order.  This variable identifies the thermometer
for Catholics (Q45) as administered as the nth thermometer
in the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044430    PostRand.2v. Pos Jews - Group Therms
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of Jews in the group thermometers.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 26

NOTES:
------
The Q28-Q53 series of group thermometers was administered
in random order.  This variable identifies the thermometer
for Jews (Q46) as administered as the nth thermometer in
the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044431    PostRand.2w. Pos Protestants - Group Therms
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of Protestants in the group thermometers.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 26

NOTES:
------
The Q28-Q53 series of group thermometers was administered
in random order.  This variable identifies the thermometer
for Protestants (Q47) as administered as the nth
thermometer in the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044432    PostRand.2y. Pos Feminists - Group Therms
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of feminists in the group thermometers.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 26

NOTES:
------
The Q28-Q53 series of group thermometers was administered
in random order.  This variable identifies the thermometer
for  feminists (Q48) as administered as the nth thermometer
in the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044433    PostRand.2z. Pos Asian-Americans - Group Therms
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of Asian-Americans in the group thermometers.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 26

NOTES:
------
The Q28-Q53 series of group thermometers was administered
in random order.  This variable identifies the thermometer
for Asian-Americans (Q49) as administered as the nth
thermometer in the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================

M044434    PostRand.2za. Pos News Media - Group Therms
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of the news media in the group thermometers.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 26

NOTES:
------
The Q28-Q53 series of group thermometers was administered
in random order.  This variable identifies the thermometer
for the news media (Q50) as administered as the nth
thermometer in the series.

TYPE:
-----

Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044435    PostRand.2zb. Pos Catholic Church - Group Therms
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of the Catholic Church in the group thermometers.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 26

NOTES:
------
The Q28-Q53 series of group thermometers was administered
in random order.  This variable identifies the thermometer
for the Catholic Church (Q51) as administered as the nth
thermometer in the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044436    PostRand.2zc. Men - Group Therms
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of men in the group thermometers.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 26

NOTES:
------
The Q28-Q53 series of group thermometers was administered
in random order.  This variable identifies the thermometer
for men (Q52) as administered as the nth thermometer in
the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044437    PostRand.2zd. Women - Group Therms
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of women in the group thermometers.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 26

NOTES:
------
The Q28-Q53 series of group thermometers was administered
in random order.  This variable identifies the thermometer
for  women (Q53) as administered as the nth thermometer
in the series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044438    PostRand.3a. Pos AIDS Research - Fed Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of AIDS research in the federal spending series.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 13

NOTES:
------
The Q93-Q114 series of federal spending items was
administered in random order after environmental
protection (fixed as the first spending item.
This variable identifies AIDS research (Q81) as
administered as the nth item in the randomized
portion of the federal spending series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044439    PostRand.3b. Pos Welfare - Fed Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of welfare in the federal spending series.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 13

NOTES:
------
The Q93-Q114 series of federal spending items was
administered in random order after environmental
protection (fixed as the first spending item). This
variable identifies welfare (Q82) as administered
as the nth item in the randomized portion of the
federal spending series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044440     PostRand.3c. Pos Public/Big-City Schools - Fed Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of public schools/big-city schools in the federal
spending series.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 13

NOTES:
------
The Q93-Q114 series of federal spending items was
administered in random order after environmental
protection (fixed as the first spending item). This
variable identifies public schools/big-city schools
as administered as the nth item in the randomized
portion of the federal spending series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044441     PostRand.3d. Pos Crime - Fed Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of crime in the federal spending series.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 13

NOTES:
------
The Q93-Q114 series of federal spending items was
administered in random order after environmental
protection (fixed as the first spending item). This
variable identifies crime (Q99) as administered
as the nth item in the randomized portion of the
federal spending series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044442     PostRand.3e. Pos Child Care - Fed Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of child care in the federal spending series.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 13

NOTES:
------
The Q93-Q114 series of federal spending items was
administered in random order after environmental
protection (fixed as the first spending item). This
variable identifies child care (Q100) as
administered as the nth item in the randomized
portion of the federal spending series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044443     PostRand.3f. Pos Homeland Sec/War On Terror - Fed Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of homeland security/war on terrorism in the
federal spending series.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 13

NOTES:
------
The Q93-Q114 series of federal spending items was
administered in random order after environmental
protection (fixed as the first spending item). This
variable identifies homeland security/war on
terrorism as administered as the nth item in the
randomized portion of the federal spending series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044444     PostRand.3g. Pos Poor/Working Poor - Fed Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of poor people/working poor in the federal spending
series.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 13

NOTES:
------
The Q93-Q114 series of federal spending items was
administered in random order after environmental
protection (fixed as the first spending item). This
variable identifies poor/working poor as administered
as the nth item in the randomized portion of the
federal spending series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044445    PostRand.3h. Pos Foreign Aid - Fed Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of foreign aid in the federal spending series.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 13

NOTES:
------
The Q93-Q114 series of federal spending items was
administered in random order after environmental
protection (fixed as the first spending item). This
variable identifies foreign aid (Q107) as
administered as the nth item in the randomized
portion of the federal spending series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044446    PostRand.3j. Pos Social Security - Fed Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of Social Security in the federal spending series.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 13

NOTES:
------
The Q93-Q114 series of federal spending items was
administered in random order after environmental
protection (fixed as the first spending item). This
variable identifies Social Security (Q108) as
administered as the nth item in the randomized
portion of the federal spending series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044447    PostRand.3k. Pos Border Security - Fed Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of border security in the federal spending series.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 13

NOTES:
------
The Q93-Q114 series of federal spending items was
administered in random order after environmental
protection (fixed as the first spending item). This
variable identifies border security (Q109) as
administered as the nth item in the randomized
portion of the federal spending series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044448    PostRand.3m. Aid To Blacks - Fed Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of aid to Blacks in the federal spending series.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 13

NOTES:
------
The Q93-Q114 series of federal spending items was
administered in random order after environmental
protection (fixed as the first spending item). This
variable identifies aid to Blacks (Q110) as
administered as the nth item in the randomized
portion of the federal spending series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044449    PostRand.3n. Early Education - Fed Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of preschool and early education for poor children/
pre-school and early education for Black children in the
federal spending series.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 13

NOTES:
------
The Q93-Q114 series of federal spending items was
administered in random order after environmental
protection (fixed as the first spending item). This
variable identifies preschool and early education
for poor children/pre-school and early education
for Black children as administered as the nth item
in the randomized portion of the federal spending
series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044450    PostRand.3p. Defense - Fed Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of defense in the federal spending series.

VALID CODES:
------------
01 - 13

NOTES:
------
The Q93-Q114 series of federal spending items was
administered in random order after environmental
protection (fixed as the first spending item). This
variable identifies defense (Q114) as administered
as the nth item in the randomized portion of the
federal spending series.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044451     PostRand.4. Public/Big-City Schools Wording
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Random administration in federal spending series:
public schools or big-city schools.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Federal spending on public schools
02. Federal spending on big-city schools

NOTE:
-----
For the federal spending item on school spending,
respondents were randomly administered one of two
possible wordings: public schools or big-city schools
(Q96,Q97)

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044452     PostRand.5. Homeland Sec/War On Terrorism Wording
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Random administration in federal spending series:
homeland security or war on terrorism.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Federal spending on homeland security
02. Federal spending on the war on terrorism

NOTE:
-----
For the federal spending item related to national
security, respondents were randomly administered one
of two possible wordings: homeland security or war
on terrorism  (Q102,Q103)

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044453     PostRand.6. Poor People/Working Poor Wording
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Random administration in federal spending series:
poor people or working poor.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Federal spending on poor people
02. Federal spending on the working poor

NOTE:
-----
For the federal spending item on aid to the poor,
respondents were randomly administered one of two
possible wordings: poor people or the working poor
(Q104,Q105)

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044454     PostRand.7. Early Ed For Poor/Black Children Wording
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Random administration in federal spending series:
poor children or black children.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Federal spending on preschool and early education for poor children
02. Federal spending on preschool and early education for black children

NOTE:
-----
For the federal spending item on preschool and early
education, respondents were randomly administered
one of two possible wordings: poor children or black
children (Q111,Q112)

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044455     PostRand.8a. Pos Provides Strong Leadership Trait
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:
IF R ADMINISTERED 1ST SET OF GW BUSH TRAITS:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of "provides strong leadership" in 1st set of
GW Bush traits.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Provides strong leadership 1st in set 1 of GW Bush traits
02. Provides strong leadership 2nd in set 1 of GW Bush traits
03. Provides strong leadership 3rd in set 1 of GW Bush traits
04. Provides strong leadership 4th in set 1 of GW Bush traits

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. R selected for 2nd set of traits

NOTES:
-----
Respondents were assigned the same set of 4 traits
for George W. Bush as in 2002, with the order of
traits randomized.  This is the order of the
leadership trait (Q137a/Q137) in the 1st set of
traits.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044456     PostRand.8b. Pos Moral Trait
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:
IF R ADMINISTERED 1ST SET OF GW BUSH TRAITS:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of "moral" in 1st set of GW Bush traits.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Moral 1st in set 1 of GW Bush traits
02. Moral 2nd in set 1 of GW Bush traits
03. Moral 3rd GW set 1 of GW Bush traits
04. Moral 4th GW set 1 of GW Bush traits

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. R selected for 2nd set of traits

NOTES:
-----
Respondents were assigned the same set of 4 traits
for George W. Bush as in 2002, with the order of
traits randomized.  This is the order of the moral
trait (Q138) in the 1st set of traits.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044457     PostRand.8c. Pos Out Of Touch Trait
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:
IF R ADMINISTERED 1ST SET OF GW BUSH TRAITS:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of "out of touch" in 1st set of GW Bush traits.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Out of touch 1st in set 1 of GW Bush traits
02. Out of touch 2nd in set 1 of GW Bush traits
03. Out of touch 3rd in set 1 of GW Bush traits
04. Out of touch 4th in set 1 of GW Bush traits

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. R selected for 2nd set of traits

NOTES:
-----
Respondents were assigned the same set of 4 traits
for George W. Bush as in 2002, with the order of
traits randomized.  This is the order of the out of
touch trait (Q139) in the 1st set of traits.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044458     PostRand.8d. Pos Knowledgeable Trait
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:
IF R ADMINISTERED 1ST SET OF GW BUSH TRAITS:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of "knowledgeable" in 1st set of GW Bush traits.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Knowledgeable 1st in set 1 of GW Bush traits
02. Knowledgeable 2nd in set 1 of GW Bush traits
03. Knowledgeable 3rd in set 1 of GW Bush traits
04. Knowledgeable 4th in set 1 of GW Bush traits

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. R selected for 2nd set of traits


NOTES:
-----
Respondents were assigned the same set of 4 traits
for George W. Bush as in 2002, with the order of
traits randomized.  This is the order of the
knowledgeable trait (Q140) in the 1st set of traits.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044459     PostRand.9a. Pos Provides Strong Leadership Trait
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:
IF R ADMINISTERED 2ND SET OF GW BUSH TRAITS:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of "provides strong leadership" in 2nd set of
GW Bush traits.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Provides strong leadership 1st in set 2 of GW Bush traits
02. Provides strong leadership 2nd in set 2 of GW Bush traits
03. Provides strong leadership 3rd in set 2 of GW Bush traits
04. Provides strong leadership 4th in set 2 of GW Bush traits

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. R selected for 1st set of traits

NOTES:
-----
Respondents were assigned the same set of 4 traits
for George W. Bush as in 2002, with the order of
traits randomized.  This is the order of the
leadership trait (Q137b/Q137) in the 2nd set of
traits.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044460     PostRand.9b. Pos Really Cares Trait
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:
IF R ADMINISTERED 2ND SET OF GW BUSH TRAITS:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of "really cares" in 2nd set of GW Bush traits.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Really cares 1st in set 2 of GW Bush traits
02. Really cares 2nd in set 2 of GW Bush traits
03. Really cares 3rd in set 2 of GW Bush traits
04. Really cares 4th in set 2 of GW Bush traits

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. R selected for 1st set of traits

NOTES:
------
Respondents were assigned the same set of 4 traits
for George W. Bush as in 2002, with the order of
traits randomized.  This is the order of the
really cares trait (Q141) in the 2nd set of traits.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044461     PostRand.9c. Pos Dishonest Trait
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:
IF R ADMINISTERED 2ND SET OF GW BUSH TRAITS:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of "dishonest" in 2nd set of GW Bush traits.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Dishonest 1st in set 2 of GW Bush traits
02. Dishonest 2nd in set 2 of GW Bush traits
03. Dishonest 3rd in set 2 of GW Bush traits
04. Dishonest 4th in set 2 of GW Bush traits

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. R selected for 1st set of traits

NOTES:
-----
Respondents were assigned the same set of 4 traits
for George W. Bush as in 2002, with the order of
traits randomized.  This is the order of the
really cares trait (Q142) in the 2nd set of traits.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044462     PostRand.9d. Pos Intelligent Trait
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

IF R ADMINISTERED 2ND SET OF GW BUSH TRAITS:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of "intelligent" in 2nd set of GW Bush traits.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Intelligent 1st in set 2 of GW Bush traits
02. Intelligent 2nd in set 2 of GW Bush traits
03. Intelligent 3rd in set 2 of GW Bush traits
04. Intelligent 4th in set 2 of GW Bush traits

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. R selected for 1st set of traits

NOTES:
-----
Respondents were assigned the same set of 4 traits
for George W. Bush as in 2002, with the order of
traits randomized.  This is the order of the
intelligent trait (Q143) in the 2nd set of traits.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044463     PostRand.10. Order Party Plcmnt Diplomacy Scale
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of Democratic Party and Republican Party in
the diplomacy/military scale items.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Diplomacy scale placement -Democratic party 1st, Republican party 2nd
02. Diplomacy scale placement -Republican party 1st, Democratic party 2nd

NOTES:
------
Respondents were randomly assigned one of two
possible orders for placements of the Democratic
party and Republican party on the diplomacy/military
scale (Q146,Q147): Democratic party first and
Republican party second, or vice-versa.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044464     PostRand.11. Order Rich/Poor Pay Taxes
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of rich and poor in the pay taxes series.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Taxes paid by the rich 1st, taxes paid by the poor 2nd
02. Taxes paid by the poor 1st, taxes paid by the rich 2nd

NOTE:
-----
Respondents were randomly assigned one of two
possible orders for placement of questions on the
payment of taxes by the rich/poor (Q168,Q169):
rich first and poor second, or vice-versa.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044465     PostRand.12. Order Party Plcmnt Govt Services
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of Democratic Party and Republican Party in
the government services items.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Government services -Democratic party 1st, Republican party 2nd
02. Government services -Republican party 1st, Democratic party 2nd

NOTES:
------
Respondents were randomly assigned one of two
possible orders for placements of Democratic party and
Republican party positions on the government spending
scale (Q183,Q184):  Democratic party first and Republican
party second, or vice-versa.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044466     PostRand.13. Order Party Plcmnt Affirm Action
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:
IF R WAS ADMINISTERED THE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION SERIES:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of Democratic Party and Republican Party in the
affirmative action series.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Affirmative action -Democratic party 1st, Republican party 2nd
02. Affirmative action -Republican party 1st, Democratic party 2nd

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. R administered series on equal pay for women

NOTES:
------
Respondents were randomly assigned one of two
possible orders for placements of Democratic party
and Republican party positions on affirmative action
(Q190,Q192): Democratic party first and Republican
party second, or vice-versa.
[Respondents were assigned either to the affirmative
action series or the equal pay for women series
according to which series had been previously
administered to them, in 2002]

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044467     PostRand.14. Order Party Plcmnt Equal Pay Women
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:
IF R WAS ADMINISTERED THE EQUAL PAY FOR WOMEN SERIES:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of Democratic Party and Republican Party in
the equal pay for women series.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Equal pay for women-Democratic party 1st, Republican party 2nd
02. Equal pay for women-Republican party 1st, Democratic party 2nd

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. R administered series on Affirmative Action

NOTE:
-----
Respondents were randomly assigned one of two
possible orders for placements of Democratic party
and Republican party positions on equal pay for women
(Q197,Q198):  Democratic party first and Republican
party second, or vice-versa.
[Respondents were assigned either to the affirmative
action series or the equal pay for women series
according to which series had been previously
administered to them, in 2002]

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044468     PostRand.15. Order Working Women Items
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Order of three items in the working women series.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Order Q213, Q214, Q215
02. Order Q215, Q213, Q214

NOTE:
-----
Respondents were randomly administered to one of
two possible orders for questions in the working women
series:  either Q213,Q214,Q215 or else Q215,Q213,Q214.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044501     PostCand.1. 2004 House Type Race
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
2004 House Type Race.

VALID CODES:
------------
INCUMBENT RUNNING
12  Democratic incumbent running - Republican challenger
13  Democratic incumbent running - other challenger
14  Democratic incumbent running - unopposed
19  Democratic incumbent running - Repub and other challengers
21  Republican incumbent running - Democratic challenger
23  Republican incumbent running - other challenger
24  Republican incumbent running - unopposed
29  Republican incumbent running - Dem and other challengers
31  Other incumbent running - Democratic challenger
32  Other incumbent running - Republican challenger
34  Other incumbent running - unopposed
35  Other incumbent running - Democratic and Republican challengers
36  Other incumbent running -- Republican and other challengers
37  Other incumbent running -- Democratic and other challengers
39  Other incumbent running -- Democratic, Republican, other challengers
SPECIAL HOUSE TYPE RACE DUE TO REDISTRICTING
40  Democratic and Republican incumbents running - no other candidate
41  2 Democratic incumbents running - no other candidate
42  2 Republican incumbents running - no other candidate
43  Dem and Repub incumbents running - other candidate(s)
44  Democratic non-incumbent only - no retiree/unclear who is retiree
45  Republican non-incumbent only - no retiree/unclear who is retiree
46  Democratic and Republican cands - no retiree/unclear who is retiree
47  Democratic and other cands - no retiree/unclear who is retiree
48  Republican and other cands - no retiree/unclear who is retiree
49  Democratic, Republican, other cands - no retiree/unclear who is retiree
NO INCUMBENT RUNNING:
51  Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed
52  Dem incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed
53  Dem incumbent not running -- other candidate unopposed
55  Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands
56  Dem incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands
57  Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands
59  Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands
61  Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed
62  Rep incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed
63  Rep incumbent not running -- other candidate unopposed
65  Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands
66  Rep incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands
67  Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands
69  Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands
71  Other incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed
72  Other incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed
73  Other incumbent not running -- other candidate unopposed
75  Other incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands
76  Other incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands
77  Other incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands
79  Other incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands
HOUSE - LOUISIANA DISTRICTS ONLY
91  Rep incumbent not running - Democratic and 2 Republican candidates
92  Rep incumbent not running - Republican and 2 Democratic candidates
93  Dem incumbent not running - Democratic and 2 Republican candidates
94  Dem incumbent not running - Republican and 2 Democratic candidates

MISSING CODES:
--------------
00  Washington D.C. (no House or Senate race)

NOTE:
-----
House incumbents have been regarded as candidates (already)
in office and representing a district -- where district is
regarded as a geographic unit-- at the time of the 2004
election.  The extent of the Texas redistricting prior to
the 2004 election produced House races with incumbents
running in areas where he or she had provided little or no
prior representation, thus no Texas candidate has been
identified as a true incumbent for the new Texas districts
in effect for the 2004 election (House type race 44-49).
In Louisiana (House type race 91-94), the runoff system allows
multiple candidates from a single party to run in the November
general election.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044502     PostCand.2. 2004 Senate Type Race
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
2004 Senate Type Race.

VALID CODES:
------------
INCUMBENT RUNNING
12  Democratic incumbent running - Republican challenger
13  Democratic incumbent running - other challenger
14  Democratic incumbent running - unopposed
19  Democratic incumbent running - Repub and other challengers
21  Republican incumbent running - Democratic challenger
23  Republican incumbent running - other challenger
24  Republican incumbent running - unopposed
29  Republican incumbent running - Dem and other challengers
31  Other incumbent running - Democratic challenger
32  Other incumbent running - Republican challenger
34  Other incumbent running - unopposed
35  Other incumbent running - Democratic and Republican challengers
36  Other incumbent running -- Republican and other challengers
37  Other incumbent running -- Democratic and other challengers
39  Other incumbent running -- Democratic, Republican, other challengers
NO INCUMBENT RUNNING:
51  Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed
52  Dem incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed
53  Dem incumbent not running -- other candidate unopposed
55  Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands
56  Dem incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands
57  Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands
59  Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands
61  Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed
62  Rep incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed
63  Rep incumbent not running -- other candidate unopposed
65  Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands
66  Rep incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands
67  Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands
69  Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands
71  Other incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed
72  Other incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed
73  Other incumbent not running -- other candidate unopposed
75  Other incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands
76  Other incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands
77  Other incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands
79  Other incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands
NO RACE IN STATE
81  Democratic incumbents, no race in state
82  Republican incumbents, no race in state
85  Democratic and Republican incumbents, no race in state
87  Democratic and other incumbent, no race in state
88  Republican and other incumbent, no race in state

MISSING CODES:
--------------
00  Washington D.C. (no House or Senate race)

NOTE:
-----
The Louisiana runoff system allows multiple candidates
from a single party to run in the House November general
election.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044503a    PostCand.3a. 2000-2002 Move Status
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Panel respondent move status 2000-2002.

VALID CODES:
------------
0. Same address 2000 and 2002
1. Different address 2000 and 2002

MISSING CODES:
--------------
9. NA

NOTE:
-----
Based on address information.  2002 address was
address where respondent was located at the
beginning of the 2002 field period; in several cases,
this was a 2nd residence in another state.
Code 9 corresponds to cases where physical
address was insufficient (for example, post
office box within the same state in one or both
years).

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044503b    PostCand.3b. 2002-2004 Move Status
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Panel respondent move status 2002-2004.

VALID CODES:
------------
0. Same address 2002 and 2004
1. Different address 2002 and 2004

MISSING CODES:
--------------
9. NA

NOTE:
-----
Based on address information. 2002 address was
address where respondent was located at the
beginning of the 2002 field period; in several cases,
this was a 2nd residence in another state.
Code 9 corresponds to cases where physical
address was insufficient (for example, post
office box within the same state in one or both
years).

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044503c    PostCand.3c. 2000-2004 Move Status
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Panel respondent move status 2000-2004.

VALID CODES:
------------
0. Same address 2000 and 2004
1. Different address 2000 and 2004

MISSING CODES:
--------------
9. NA

NOTE:
-----
Based on address information.  Code 1 includes 3
cases where R clearly moved between 2000 and 2004
but year of move is unknown.
Code 9 corresponds to cases where physical
address was insufficient (for example, post
office box within the same state in one or both
years).

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044504a    PostCand.4a. 2000-2002 Change In District Number
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Panel respondent change in Congressional district number
2000-2002.

VALID CODES:
------------
0. Same state and district number in 2000 and 2002
1. Different state/district number in 2000 and 2002

MISSING CODES:
--------------
9. NA (error in district assignment in 2000 or 2002)

NOTE:
-----
Due to redistricting effected just prior to the 2002
general election, code 1 may include cases where
the change in district was not due to change in
address.  (For code 0, it is also possible --though
less likely-- that, due to redistricting, the respondent
moved to another district but redistricting renumbered
to the same number as in 2000.)

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044504b    PostCand.4b. 2002-2004 Change In District Number
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Panel respondent change in Congressional district number
2002-2004.

VALID CODES:
------------
0. Same state and district number in 2002 and 2004
1. Different state/district number in 2002 and 2004

MISSING CODES:
--------------
9. NA (error in district assignment in 2002)

NOTE:
-----
Due to Texas redistricting effected just prior to the
2004 general election, code 1 may include Texas cases
where the change in district was not due to change in
address.  (For code 0, it is also possible --though
less likely-- that, due to redistricting, the respondent
moved to another Texas district but redistricting
renumbered to the same number as in 2002.)

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044504c    PostCand.4c. 2000-2004 Change In District Number
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Panel respondent change in Congressional district number 2000-2004.

VALID CODES:
------------
0. Same state and district number in 2000 and 2004
1. Different state/district number in 2000 and 2004

MISSING CODES:
--------------
9. NA (error in district assignment in 2000)

NOTE:
-----
Due to redistricting effected just prior to the 2002
general election, and Texas redistricting effected just
prior to the  2004 general election, code 1 may include
cases where the change in district was not due to change in
address.  (For code 0, it is also possible --though
less likely-- that, due to redistricting, the respondent
moved to another district but redistricting renumbered
to the same number as in 2000.)

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044505a    PostCand.5a. 2000-2002 District Status
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Panel respondent change in Congressional district
2000-2002.

VALID CODES:
------------
SAME DISTRICT
0. Move not known; same district assignment
1. R did not move 2000-2002, no change in district
2. R moved 2000-2002 but same district
DIFFERENT DISTRICT
3. R moved 2000-2002 to different district
4. R did not move 2000-2002 but different district (redistricting)
5. Move not known; different district assignment in 2002

MISSING CODES:
--------------
9. NA (includes 9 in PostCand.4a)

NOTE:
-----
Based on move status and district assignment.
Codes 0 and 5 include cases where address detail
not sufficiently to identify as same or different
address, though district known.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044505b    PostCand.5b. 2002-2004 District Status
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Panel respondent change in Congressional district 2002-2004.

VALID CODES:
------------
SAME DISTRICT
0. Move not known; same district assignment
1. R did not move 2002-2004, no change in district
2. R moved 2002-2004 but same district
DIFFERENT DISTRICT
3. R moved 2002-2004 to different district
4. R did not move 2002-2004 but different district (redistricting)
5. Move not known; different district assignment in 2004

MISSING CODES:
--------------
9. NA (includes 9 in PostCand.4b)

NOTE:
-----
Based on move status and district assignment
Codes 0 and 5 include cases where address detail
not sufficiently to identify as same or different
address, though district known.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044505c    PostCand.5c. 2000-2004 District Status
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
Panel respondent change Congressional district 2000-2004.

VALID CODES:
------------
SAME DISTRICT
0. Move not known; same district assignment
1. R did not move 2000-2004, no change in district
2. R moved 2000-2004 but same district
DIFFERENT DISTRICT
3. R moved 2000-2004 to different district
4. R did not move 2000-2004 but different district (redistricting)
5. Move not known; different district assignment in 2004

MISSING CODES:
--------------
9. NA (includes 9 in PostCand.4c)

NOTE:
-----
Based on move status and district assignment
Codes 0 and 5 include cases where address detail
not sufficiently to identify as same or different
address, though district known.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044506     PostCand.6. 2000-2002 Same House Candidates
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
2000 and 2002 House candidate(s) same.

VALID CODES:
------------
00. Neither 2002 Democratic candidate preload name nor
    2002 Republican candidate preload name had been preloaded
    as candidates in respondent's 2000 IW
01. 2002 Democratic cand preload name same as preloaded for 2000
02. 2002 Republican cand preload name same as preloaded for 2000
03. Both Democratic and Republican candidate names same 2000-2002
04. 2002 Democratic Retiring Representative name had been
    preloaded in 2000 as Democratic candidate name
05. 2002 Republican Retiring Representative name had been
    preloaded in 2000 as Republican candidate name
15. 2000-2002 preload Democratic cand name same;
    2002 retiring Republican incumbent had been preloaded in
    2000 as Republican candidate
24. 2000-2002 preload Republican cand name same;
    2002 retiring Democratic incumbent had been preloaded in
    2000 as Democratic candidate

NOTE:
-----
This determines whether either of the House candidate
names preloaded into the 2002 Post instrument was the
same as the House candidate name that had been preloaded
into the ANES 2000 Post instrument.
Note:  Due to 2002 redistricting, district number for
2000-2002 nonmovers may not have been have been the same in
2000 and 2002; names of candidates were compared to construct
this summary.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044506a    PostCand.6a. 2002-2004 Same House Candidates
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
2002 and 2004 House candidate(s) same.

VALID CODES:
------------
01. No, R in different districts 2002-2004
02. No, R in same district 2002-2004 but neither candidate same
03. No, R TEXAS 2002-2004: neither candidate same
10. Yes, R in same district 2002-2004: same Democratic candidate
20. Yes, R in same district 2002-2004: same Republican candidate
30. Yes, R in same district 2002-2004: both major party candidates the same
70. TEXAS 2004: R's 2004 Democratic candidate same as 2002
80. TEXAS 2004: R's 2004 Republican candidate same as 2002
90. TEXAS 2004: both 2004 major party candidates same as 2002

MISSING CODES:
--------------
00. NA, error in district assignment in 2002

NOTE:
-----
This determines whether the Democratic or Republican House
candidate running in the district of the respondent's 2004
address was the same that ran in the district of respondent's
2002 address.
The extent of the Texas  redistricting prior to the 2004
election produced 2004 House races with incumbents running in
areas where he or she had provided little or no prior
representation.  Thus for 2004 Texas cases, 2002-2004 move
status or congressional district identification does not
necessarily have a relationship to sameness of candidates
from 2002 to 2004; only names of candidates were compared
to construct this summary for TX cases.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M044506b    PostCand.6b. 2004 House Retiree Status In 2002
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION ADMINISTRATIVE:

QUESTION:
---------
2004 House Retiree Status in 2002.

VALID CODES:
------------
0. No, R's 2004 House retiree was not R's 2002 Dem or Repub cand
1. Yes, R's 2004 House retiree was R's 2002 Democratic candidate
2. Yes, R's 2004 House retiree was R's 2002 Republican candidate

MISSING CODES:
--------------
9. Texas 2004

NOTE:
-----
Names were compared to construct this summary.
This determines whether the Democratic or Republican retiring
House incumbent for the district of R's 2004 address had been
preloaded as a running candidate in 2002 for the district
of R's 2002 address.
For 2004 Texas cases, extensive redistricting did not allow
clear identification of retiring incumbent.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045001     Q1.f2a2. Watch Campaign TV Programs
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Did you watch any programs about the campaign on television?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045002     Q2.f2a3. R Discuss Politics With Family/Friends
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Do you ever discuss politics with your family or friends?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: WE WANT TO KNOW IF THEY THINK THEY DISCUSS POLITICS,
WHETHER THEY HAVE IN MIND A LENGTHY DEBATE OVER CANDIDATE STANDS ON
POLICY, OR BRIEFLY MENTION THE SCANDALS OF POLITICIANS.)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045002a    Q3.f2a3a. How Often R Discuss Politics
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R DISCUSSES POLITICS WITH FAMILY OR FRIENDS:

QUESTION:
---------
How many days IN THE PAST WEEK did you talk about
politics with family or friends?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: THIS ASKS FOR NUMBER OF DAYS, NOT NUMBER OF TIMES)

 VALID CODES:
------------
0. None
1. One Day
2. Two Days
3. Three Days
4. Four Days
5. Five Days
6. Six Days
7. Every Day

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 5,8,9 in Q2

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045003     Q4.f1q1. Did R Vote In 2000 Presidential Election
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Now I'd like to ask you a few questions about the 2000
Presidential election.
In 2000 George W. Bush ran on the Republican ticket
against Al Gore for the Democrats, and Ralph Nader as a
third party candidate.  Do you remember for sure whether
or not you voted in that election?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{DO NOT PROBE 'DK' RESPONSE}

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes, voted
5. No, didn't vote

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045003a    Q5.f1q1a. R Vote Choice 2000 Presidential Election
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R VOTED IN 2000 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION:

QUESTION:
---------
Which one did you vote for?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{DO NOT PROBE 'DK' RESPONSE}

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Al Gore
3. George W. Bush
5. Ralph Nader
7. Other {SPECIFY}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 5,8,9 in Q4

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045004     Q7.f1q2c. 2000 Presidential Elect Fair/Unfair
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
All things considered, would you say that the 2000
presidential election was decided in a way that was
FAIR or UNFAIR?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Fair
5. Unfair

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045004a    Q8.f1q2c1. How Fair/Unfair 2000 Presidential Elect
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R SAYS 2000 PRESIDENTIAL ELECT DECIDED IN FAIR WAY/
IF R SAYS 2000 PRESIDENTIAL ELECT DECIDED IN UNFAIR WAY:

QUESTION:
---------
Do you feel STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY that it was
[fair/unfair]?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Strongly
5. Not strongly

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 8,9 in Q7

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045004x    Q9.f1q2cx. How Fair/Unfair 2000 Pres Elect-Summary
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
All things considered, would you say that the 2000
presidential election was decided in a way that was
FAIR or UNFAIR?
Do you feel STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY that it was
[fair/unfair]?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Feel strongly election was fair
2. Feel not so strongly election was fair
4. Feel not so strongly election was unfair
5. Feel strongly election was unfair

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know (in Q8)
9. Refused (in Q8)
INAP. 8,9 in Q7

NOTES:
------
Built from Q7 and Q8.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045005     Q10.f1a12. App/Disapp GW Bush Handling Job As Pres
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush
is HANDLING HIS JOB AS PRESIDENT?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: IF RESPONDENT ASKS WHETHER THEY CAN CHOOSE A MIDDLE
CATEGORY, ANSWER "WELL IN GENERAL, WHICH IS CLOSER TO THE WAY YOU
FEEL?" AND REPEAT QUESTION.  IF RESPONDENT ASKS ABOUT TIME PERIOD,
REPEAT THE QUESTION AND EMPHASIZE "IS HANDLING".)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Approve
5. Disapprove

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045005a    Q11.f1a12a. Strength App/Disapp GW Bush Job As Pres
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R APPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING JOB AS PRESIDENT/
IF R DISAPPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING JOB AS PRESIDENT:

QUESTION:
---------
(Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Strongly
5. Not Strongly

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 8,9 in Q10

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045005x    Q12.f1a12x. App/Disapp GW Bush Job As Pres-Summary
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush
is HANDLING HIS JOB AS PRESIDENT?
(Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Approve strongly
2. Approve not strongly
4. Disapprove not strongly
5. Disapprove strongly

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know (in Q11)
9. Refused (in Q11)
INAP. 8,9 in Q10

NOTES:
------
Built from Q10 and Q11

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045006     Q13.f1h5. Approve/Disapp Bush Handling Economy
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush
is HANDLING THE ECONOMY?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: IF RESPONDENT ASKS ABOUT TIME PERIOD, REPEAT THE
QUESTION AND EMPHASIZE "IS HANDLING".)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Approve
5. Disapprove

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045006a    Q14.f1h5a. Strength App/Disapp GW Bush On Economy
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R APPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING OF ECONOMY/
IF R DISAPPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING OF ECONOMY:

QUESTION:
---------
(Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Strongly
5. Not Strongly

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 8,9 in Q13

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045006x    Q15.f1h5x. App/Disapp GW Bush On Economy-Summary
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush
is HANDLING THE ECONOMY?
(Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Approve strongly
2. Approve not strongly
4. Disapprove not strongly
5. Disapprove strongly

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know (in Q14)
9. Refused (in Q14)
INAP. 8,9 in Q13

NOTES:
------
Built from Q13 and Q14

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
            F1C1. INTRODUCTION - INDIVIDUAL THERMOMETERS
========================================================================

I'd like to get your feelings toward some people in
the news these days. I'll read the name of a person and
I'll ask you to rate that person on a thermometer that
runs from 0 to 100 degrees. Rating above 50 means that

you feel favorable and warm toward the person. Rating
below 50 means that you feel unfavorable and cool toward
the person. Rating right at the 50 degree mark means you
don't feel particularly warm or cold. You may use any
number from 0 to 100 to tell me how favorable or
unfavorable your feelings are. If we come to a person
whose name you don't recognize, just tell me and we'll
move on to the next one.

========================================================================
M045007     Q16.f1c1a. George W. Bush Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
The first person is:
George W. Bush
Where on that thermometer would you rate George W. Bush?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU
DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Individual thermometers (Q16-Q27) were administered
in randomized order following George W. Bush (fixed
as first thermometer).Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045008     Q17.f1c1a1. John Kerry Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(The next person is:)
John Kerry
(Where on that thermometer would you rate him?)

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU
DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Individual thermometers (Q16-Q27) were administered
in randomized order following George W. Bush (fixed
as first thermometer).Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045009     Q18.f1c1b. Dick Cheney Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(The next person is:)
Dick Cheney
(Where on that thermometer would you rate him?)

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU
DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Individual thermometers (Q16-Q27) were administered
in randomized order following George W. Bush (fixed
as first thermometer).Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045010     Q19.f1c1c. Al Gore Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(The next person is:)
Al Gore
(Where on that thermometer would you rate him?)

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU
DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Individual thermometers (Q16-Q27) were administered
in randomized order following George W. Bush (fixed
as first thermometer).Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045011     Q20.f1c1d. John Edwards Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(The next person is:)
John Edwards
(Where on that thermometer would you rate him?)

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU
DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Individual thermometers (Q16-Q27) were administered
in randomized order following George W. Bush (fixed
as first thermometer).Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045012     Q21.f1c1e. Ralph Nader Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(The next person is:)
Ralph Nader
(Where on that thermometer would you rate him?)

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU
DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Individual thermometers (Q16-Q27) were administered
in randomized order following George W. Bush (fixed
as first thermometer).Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045013     Q22.f1c1f. Bill Clinton Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(The next person is:)
Bill Clinton
(Where on that thermometer would you rate him?)

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU
DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Individual thermometers (Q16-Q27) were administered
in randomized order following George W. Bush (fixed
as first thermometer).Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045014     Q23.f1c1h. Colin Powell Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(The next person is:)
Colin Powell
(Where on that thermometer would you rate him?)

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU
DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Individual thermometers (Q16-Q27) were administered
in randomized order following George W. Bush (fixed
as first thermometer).Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045015     Q24.f1c1j. John Ashcroft Thermometer
========================================================================


POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(The next person is:)
John Ashcroft
(Where on that thermometer would you rate him?)

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU
DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Individual thermometers (Q16-Q27) were administered
in randomized order following George W. Bush (fixed
as first thermometer).Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045016     Q25.f1c1m. Jesse Jackson Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(The next person is:)
Jesse Jackson
(Where on that thermometer would you rate him?)

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU
DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Individual thermometers (Q16-Q27) were administered
in randomized order following George W. Bush (fixed
as first thermometer).Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045017     Q26.f1c1p. Laura Bush Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(The next person is:)
Laura Bush
(Where on that thermometer would you rate her?)

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU
DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Individual thermometers (Q16-Q27) were administered
in randomized order following George W. Bush (fixed
as first thermometer).Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================

M045018     Q27.f1c1r. Hillary Clinton Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(The next person is:)
Hillary Clinton
(Where on that thermometer would you rate her?)

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT YOU
DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Individual thermometers (Q16-Q27) were administered
in randomized order following George W. Bush (fixed
as first thermometer).Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
            F2D2. INTRO - GROUP THERMOMETERS
========================================================================

Still using the thermometer, how would you rate:

========================================================================
M045019     Q28.f2d2a. Supreme Court Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION::
---------
(How would you rate:)
the Supreme Court?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Group thermometers (Q28-Q53) were administered in
randomized order. Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045020     Q29.f2d2b. Congress Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(How would you rate:)
Congress?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------

0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Group thermometers (Q28-Q53) were administered in
randomized order. Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045021     Q30.f2d2c Military Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(How would you rate:)
the Military?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Group thermometers (Q28-Q53) were administered in
randomized order. Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045022     Q31.f2d2d. Federal Government Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(How would you rate:)
the federal government in Washington?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Group thermometers (Q28-Q53) were administered in
randomized order. Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045023     Q32.f2d2e. Blacks Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(How would you rate:)
blacks?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Group thermometers (Q28-Q53) were administered in
randomized order. Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045024     Q33.f2d2f. Whites Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(How would you rate:)
whites?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Group thermometers (Q28-Q53) were administered in
randomized order. Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045025     Q34.f2d2g. Conservatives Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(How would you rate:)
conservatives?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Group thermometers (Q28-Q53) were administered in
randomized order. Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045026     Q35.f2d2h. Liberals Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(How would you rate:)
liberals?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:

------
Group thermometers (Q28-Q53) were administered in
randomized order. Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045027     Q36.f2d2j. Labor Unions Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(How would you rate:)
labor unions?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Group thermometers (Q28-Q53) were administered in
randomized order. Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045028     Q37.f2d2k. Big Business Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(How would you rate:)
big business?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Group thermometers (Q28-Q53) were administered in
randomized order. Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045029     Q38.f2d2m. Poor People Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(How would you rate:)
poor people?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Group thermometers (Q28-Q53) were administered in
randomized order.  Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045030     Q39.f2d2n. People On Welfare Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(How would you rate:)
people on welfare?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Group thermometers (Q28-Q53) were administered in
randomized order. Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045031     Q40.f2d2p. Hispanics Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(How would you rate:)
Hispanics/Hispanic-Americans?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize

888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Group thermometers (Q28-Q53) were administered in
randomized order. Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045032     Q41.f2d2q. Christian Fundamentalists Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(How would you rate:)
Christian fundamentalists?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Group thermometers (Q28-Q53) were administered in
randomized order. Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045033     Q42.f2d2r. Elderly Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(How would you rate:)
older people (the elderly)?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Group thermometers (Q28-Q53) were administered in
randomized order. Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045034     Q43.f2d2s. Environmentalists Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(How would you rate:)
environmentalists?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Group thermometers (Q28-Q53) were administered in
randomized order. Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045035     Q44.f2d2t. Gay Men And Lesbians Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(How would you rate:)
gay men and lesbians, that is, homosexuals?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Group thermometers (Q28-Q53) were administered in
randomized order. Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045036     Q45.f2d2u. Catholics Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(How would you rate:)
Catholics?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Group thermometers (Q28-Q53) were administered in
randomized order. Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045037     Q46.f2d2v. Jews Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(How would you rate:)
Jews?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Group thermometers (Q28-Q53) were administered in
randomized order. Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045038     Q47.f2d2w. Protestants Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(How would you rate:)
Protestants?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Group thermometers (Q28-Q53) were administered in
randomized order. Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045039     Q48.f2d2y. Feminists Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(How would you rate:)
feminists?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Group thermometers (Q28-Q53) were administered in
randomized order. Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045040     Q49.f2d2z. Asian-Americans Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(How would you rate:)
Asian-Americans?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Group thermometers (Q28-Q53) were administered in
randomized order. Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045041     Q50.f2d2za. News Media Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(How would you rate:)
the news media?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Group thermometers (Q28-Q53) were administered in
randomized order. Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045042     Q51.f2d2zb. Catholic Church Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(How would you rate:)
the Catholic Church?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Group thermometers (Q28-Q53) were administered in
randomized order. Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045043     Q52.f2d2zc. Men Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(How would you rate:)
men?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Group thermometers (Q28-Q53) were administered in
randomized order. Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045044     Q53.f2d2zd. Women Thermometer
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(How would you rate:)
women?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE:
WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO YOU MEAN THAT
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR
DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

VALID CODES:
------------
0-100.

MISSING CODES:
--------------
777. Don't recognize
888. Don't know where to rate
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
Group thermometers (Q28-Q53) were administered in
randomized order. Randomization variables, which
precede survey variables, provide case level
identification of randomization assignment.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045045a    Q54.f2c1a. R 2004 Voter Turnout-Traditional
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 1 OF VOTER TURNOUT QUESTION:

QUESTION:
---------
In talking to people about elections, we often
find that a lot of people were not able to vote
because they weren't registered, they were sick,
or they just didn't have time. How about you--
did you vote in the elections this November?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes, voted
5. No, didn't vote

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R selected for version 2 of R turnout (Q55)

NOTES:
------
Respondents were randomly assigned to either
Q54 or Q55.
Randomization variables, which precede survey
variables,  provide case level identification of
randomization assigned.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045045b    Q55.f2c1b. R 2004 Voter Turnout-Experimental
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 2 OF VOTER TURNOUT QUESTION:

QUESTION:
---------
In talking to people about elections, we often find
that a lot of people were not able to vote because they
weren't registered, they were sick, or they just didn't
have time. Which of the following statements best
describes you:
One, I did not vote  (in the election this November);
Two, I thought about voting this time - but didn't;
Three, I usually vote, but didn't this time; or
Four, I am sure I voted?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{INTERVIEWER: PLEASE READ ALL OPTIONS}

VALID CODES:
------------
1. I did not vote (in the election this November)
2. I thought about voting this time but didn't
3. I usually vote but didn't this time
4. I am sure I voted

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R selected for version 1 of R turnout (Q54)

NOTES:
------
Respondents were randomly assigned to either
Q54 or Q55.
Randomization variables, which precede survey
variables, provide case level identification
of randomization assigned.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045045x    Q56.f2c1x. R 2004 Voter Turnout-Summary
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
VERSION 1:
In talking to people about elections, we often
find that a lot of people were not able to vote
because they weren't registered, they were sick,
or they just didn't have time. How about you--
did you vote in the elections this November?
VERSION2:
In talking to people about elections, we often find
that a lot of people were not able to vote because
they weren't registered, they were sick, or they
just didn't have time. Which of the following
statements best describes you:
One, I did not vote  (in the election this November);
Two, I thought about voting this time - but didn't;
Three, I usually vote, but didn't this time; or
Four, I am sure I voted?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{INTERVIEWER: PLEASE READ ALL OPTIONS}

VALID CODES:
------------
1. R reported voting in 2004 election
5. R reported not voting in 2004 election

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. R did not know whether voted in 2004 election
9. R refused to say whether voted in 2004 election

NOTES:
------
Built from Q54 and Q55

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045046     Q57.f2c2. Was Non-Voter R Registered To Vote
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R DID NOT VOTE OR DK/REFUSED IF VOTED:

QUESTION:
---------
Were you registered to vote in this election?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No
6. VOL: Not required to register in R's state

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 1 in Q54 or 4 in Q55

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045047     Q58.f2c2a. Was Voter R Registered In Preload State
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R VOTED:

QUESTION:
---------
Were you registered to vote in [PRELOAD STATE]?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No
6. VOL: Not required to register in R's state

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know

9. Refused
INAP. 5,8,9 in Q54; 1-3,8,9 in Q55

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045047a     Q59.f2c2a1. State Voter R Registered
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R VOTED:
IF R WAS NOT REGISTERED IN [PRELOAD STATE]:

QUESTION:
---------
What state were you registered in?

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Alabama
02. Alaska
04. Arizona
05. Arkansas
06. California
08. Colorado
09. Connecticut
10. Delaware
11. Washington DC
12. Florida
13. Georgia
15. Hawaii
16. Idaho
17. Illinois
18. Indiana
19. Iowa
20. Kansas
21. Kentucky
22. Louisiana
23. Maine
24. Maryland
25. Massachusetts
26. Michigan
27. Minnesota
28. Mississippi
29. Missouri
30. Montana
31. Nebraska
32. Nevada
33. New Hampshire
34. New Jersey
35. New Mexico
36. New York
37. North Carolina
38. North Dakota
39. Ohio
40. Oklahoma
41. Oregon
42. Pennsylvania
44. Rhode Island
45. South Carolina
46. South Dakota
47. Tennessee
48. Texas
49. Utah
50. Vermont
51. Virginia
53. Washington
54. West Virginia
55. Wisconsin
56. Wyoming

MISSING CODES:
--------------
88. Don't know
89. Refused
INAP. 5 in Q56; 1,6,8,9 in Q58

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045048x    Q60.f2c2x. Vote/Registration Status-Summary
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Voter registered in-state
2. Voter registered out-of-state
3. Non-voter registered
4. Non-voter not registered
5. Non-voter not required to register in state
6. Voter not required to register in state

MISSING CODES:
--------------
9. Voter, DK/RF if registered in state
0. Non-voter, DK/RF if registered or DK/RF if
   registered in state

NOTES:
------
Built from Q57, Q58, and Q59.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045049     Q61.f2c3. Did R Vote For President
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R VOTED:

QUESTION:
---------
How about the election for President?
Did you vote for a candidate for PRESIDENT?

MISSING CODES:
--------------
1. Yes, voted for President
5. No, didn't vote for President

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 5,8,9 in Q54; 1-3,8,9 in Q55

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045049a    Q62.f2c3a. Presidential Vote Choice
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R VOTED FOR PRESIDENT:

QUESTION:
---------
Who did you vote for?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. John Kerry
3. George W. Bush
5. Ralph Nader
7. Other {SPECIFY}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 5,8,9 in Q61

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045050     Q64.f2c3a1. Strength Presidential Cand Pref
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R VOTED FOR PRESIDENT:
IF PRESIDENTIAL VOTE CAST IS NOT DK/RF:

QUESTION:
---------
Would you say that your preference for (NAME GIVEN
/this candidate) was STRONG or NOT STRONG?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Strong
5. Not strong

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 5,8,9 in Q61; 8,9 in Q62

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045051     Q65.f2c3b. Timing Of Presidential Vote Decision
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R VOTED FOR PRESIDENT:
IF PRESIDENTIAL VOTE CAST IS NOT DK/RF:

QUESTION:
---------
How long before the election did you decide that
you were going to vote the way you did?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: THIS IS AN OPEN-ENDED QUESTION. REMEMBER TO RECORD
VERBATIM. USE "ANYTHING ELSE" PROBE UNTIL COMPLETION.  USE STANDARD
CLARIFICATION PROBES AS APPOPRIATE. IF MORE SPACE IS NEEDED, FINISH
ON PAPER.)
(INTERVIEWER: TRY TO ELICIT AN ANSWER THAT CAN BE TRANSLATED INTO A
TIME FRAME.  FOR EXAMPLE, "WHEN I ATTENDED A PTA MEETING" SHOULD BE
PROBED WITH "WHEN WAS THIS MEETING HELD?" ANSWERS REFERRING TO
RECOGNIZABLE EVENTS ARE ACCEPTABLE, SUCH AS "I DECIDED DURING THE
SECOND PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE.")

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Knew all along/from the first; always vote for
    the same party; before the convention/nomination
    (no mention of Kerry/Bush); before the primaries;
    9 months or more
02. Before the convention because of Kerry's/Bush's
    candidacy; as soon as Kerry/Bush/Nader said he
    would run; "months before"; "early on"; "long time/
    quite a bit before the election"; "in the summer"
03. During the Democratic convention when Kerry was
    nominated; just after the Republican convention;
    July; 4 months; 3-4 months; 4-5 months
04. At the time of the Republican convention/when Bush
    was nominated; just after the Republican convention;
    August; 3 months; a few months; 2-3 months
05. After the convention(s); during the campaign (NFS)*;
    when the campaign started; 2 months; "a couple of
    months"; September
06. 5-7 weeks before the election
07. 1 month; three weeks; October; after the Presidential
    debates; "a few weeks"; "several weeks"; "4-5 weeks";
    "weeks before"
08. About two weeks  before the election; "ten days";
    "longer than a week" - NFS; "a couple of weeks"
09. In the last days of the campaign; the last part of it;
    a week; less than a week
10. On election day
11. During/after the primaries (not codeable in 02);
    several months; 5-8 months; 6 months
87. Other

*NFS - not further specified

MISSING CODES:
--------------
88. Don't know
89. Refused
00. NA
INAP. 5,8,9 in Q61; 8,9 in Q62

NOTES:
------
This variable coded from open-ended responses.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045052     Q68.f2c11a. Did R Vote For US House Of Rep
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R VOTED:

IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:

QUESTION:
---------
How about the election for the HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
in Washington. Did you vote for a candidate for the
U.S. House of Representatives?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes, voted for House of Representatives
5. No, didn't vote for House of Representatives

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 5,8,9 in Q54 or 1-3,8,9 in Q55 or
(1 in Q54 or 4 in Q55) and 1,6,8,9 in Q58
and residence in Washington D.C. or
(1 in Q54or 4 in Q55) and 5 in Q58 and 11 in Q59

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045053     Q69.f2c11a1. US House of Rep R Vote Choice
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
IF R VOTED FOR U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:

QUESTION:
---------
Who did you vote for?
Did you vote for the Democratic candidate, the Republican
candidate, or someone else?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE
5. REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE
7. Other {SPECIFY}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 5,8,9 in Q54 or 1-3,8,9 in Q55

or (1 in Q54 or 4 in Q55) and 1,6,8,9
in Q58 and residence in Washington D.C.
or (1 in Q54 or 4 in Q55 ) and 5 in
Q58 and 11 in Q59; 5,8,9 in Q68

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045054x    Q71.f2c15ax. Checkpoint: Senate Race In State
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

VALID CODES:
------------
1. State with race: preload state, same as state of 2004 address
2. State with race: preload state, not same as state of 2004 address
3. State with race: state of 2004 address, not same as preload state
4. State without race: preload state, same as state of 2004 address
5. State without race: preload state, not same as state of 2004 address
6. State without race: state of 2004 address, not same as preload state

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. nonvoter; DK/RF/NA whether voted

NOTES:
------
Status of senate race here refers to state of registration.
Codes 2 and 5 apply to cases where R moved from preload
state but  is still registered in preload state; codes 3
and 6 correspond to cases where R moved from preload state
and is now registered in new state. Case 489 had
preload state incorrect (as past or present state).

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045054     Q72.f2c15a. Did R Vote For US Senate
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R VOTED:
IF R REGISTERED IN STATE WITH SENATORIAL ELECTION:

QUESTION:
---------
How about the election for the UNITED STATES SENATE?
Did you vote for a candidate for the U.S. Senate?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes, voted for Senate
5. No, didn't vote for Senate
7. R VOLUNTEERS: no race in state of vote

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 5 in Q56 or 1 in Q56 and 4,5,6 in Q71

NOTES:
------
For the 2 cases coded 7, the respondent was
incorrect when informing the interviewer that
no 2004 Senate election occurred in the state.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045055     Q73.f2c15a1. U.S. Senate R Vote Choice
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R REGISTERED IN STATE WITH SENATE ELECTION:
IF R VOTED FOR THE UNITED STATES SENATE:

QUESTION:
---------
Who did you vote for?
Did you vote for the Democratic candidate, the Republican
candidate, or someone else?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE
5. REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE
7. Other {SPECIFY}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 5 in Q56 or 1 in Q56 and 4,5,6, in Q71

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045056     Q75.f2c20. 2004 Elections Fair/Unfair
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Please continue thinking about the November election.
In some countries, people believe their elections are
conducted fairly.  In other countries, people believe
that their elections are conducted unfairly. Thinking
of the presidential election we've just had, do you
believe it was very fair, somewhat fair, neither fair
nor unfair, somewhat unfair, or very unfair?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Very fair
2. Somewhat fair
3. Neither fair nor unfair
4. Somewhat unfair
5. Very unfair

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045057     Q76.f2f5. R Follow Govt And Public Affairs
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Some people seem to follow what's going on in
government and public affairs most of the time,
whether there's an election going on or not.
Others aren't that interested. Would you say you
follow what's going on in government and public
affairs MOST OF THE TIME, SOME OF THE TIME,
ONLY NOW AND THEN, or HARDLY AT ALL?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Most of the time
2. Some of the time
3. Only now and then
4. Hardly at all

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045058     Q77.f1j1. R Consider Self Dem/Rep/Ind/Other
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Generally speaking, do you usually think of
yourself as a REPUBLICAN, a DEMOCRAT, an
INDEPENDENT, or what?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: THIS QUESTION IS INTENDED TO PIN DOWN THE RESPONDENT'S
*USUAL* PARTY, NOT HOW THEY VOTED THIS YEAR. IF THEY RESPOND
"AMERICAN" OR THE LIKE, PROBE "WELL, A LOT OF US WHO CONSIDER
OURSELVES AMERICAN ALSO THINK OF OURSELVES AS DEMOCRATS,
REPUBLICANS, AND SO FORTH." AND REPEAT QUESTION.)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Republican
2. Democrat
3. Independent
4. Other party {VOL} {SPECIFY}
5. No preference {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045058a     Q79.f1j1a. Strength R Considers Self Dem/Rep
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R IDENTIFIES AS A REPUBLICAN/
IF R IDENTIFIES AS A DEMOCRAT:

QUESTION:
---------
Would you call yourself a STRONG [Democrat/Republican]
or a NOT VERY STRONG [Democrat/Republican]?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Strong
5. Not very strong

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 3,4,5,8,9, in Q77

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045058b     Q80.f1j1b. Is R Closer To Dem/Rep Party
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R INDEPENDENT/OTHER/DK/NO PREFERENCE:

QUESTION:
---------
Do you think of yourself as CLOSER to the
Republican Party or to the Democratic party?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Closer to Republican
3. Neither {VOL}
5. Closer to Democratic

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 1,2,9 in Q77

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045058x    Q81.f1j1x. Summary-R Party Preference
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself
as a REPUBLICAN, a DEMOCRAT, an INDEPENDENT, or what?

Would you call yourself a STRONG [Democrat/Republican]
or a NOT VERY STRONG [Democrat/Republican]?
Do you think of yourself as CLOSER to the Republican
Party or to the Democratic party?

VALID CODES:
------------
0. Strong Democrat (2/1/.)
1. Weak Democrat (2/5-8-9/.;8/./5)
2. Independent-Democrat (3-4-5/./5)
3. Independent-Independent
   (3/./3-8-9 ; 5/./3-8-9 if not apolitical)
4. Independent-Republican (3-4-5/./1)
5. Weak Republican (1/5-8-9/.; 8/./1)
6. Strong Republican (1/1/.)
7. Other; minor party; refuses to say (9/./. ; 4/./3-8-9)

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Apolitical (5/./3-8-9 if apolitical)
9. DK (8/./.; 8/./8)

NOTES:
------
Code combinations in parentheses represent
corresponding values in Q77/Q79/Q80.
Code 8 (apolitical) was used if R was coded 'No
preference' in Q77 and also showed little or no
interest in politics in response to the following
survey questions:
Q54/Q55: Voted
Q76: Follow public affairs
Respondents coded 'No preference' in Q77 who
showed interest in politics were coded 3.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045059     Q82.f2b1. Parties Talk To R About Campaign
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
As you know, the political parties try to talk to
as many people as they can to get them to vote for
their candidate. Did anyone from one of the POLITICAL
PARTIES call you up or come around and talk to you
about the campaign this year?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: THESE ARE ABOUT RESPONDENT'S PARTICIPATION IN THIS
YEAR'S CAMPAIGN, NOT IN THE PAST.  IF ASKED, REFERS TO PARTISAN
ELECTIONS WHERE CANDIDATES ARE RUNNING FROM SPECIFIC PARTIES - NOT
SCHOOL BOARD CANDIDATES, ETC.)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes

5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045059a    Q83.f2b1a. Which Party Spoke To R About Campaign
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF POLITICAL PARTY SPOKE TO R ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN:

QUESTION:
---------
Which party was that?

VALID CODES:
------------

1. Democrats
5. Republicans
6. Both
7. Other {SPECIFY}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 5,8,9 in Q82

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045060     Q85.f2b9. Anyone Talk To R About Reg/Vote
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
During the campaign this year, did anyone talk
to you about REGISTERING TO VOTE or GETTING OUT
TO VOTE?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: WE ARE INTERESTED IN HOW MANY OF OUR RESPONDENTS HAVE
BEEN CONTACTED BY REGISTRATION AND VOTING DRIVES. IF RESPONDENT SAYS
HE/SHE RECEIVED A CALL ON ELECTION DAY FROM THE LOCAL PARTY ASKING
IF RESPONDENT HAS VOTED AND OFFERING RIDES TO THE POLLS, ETC. --
THAT COUNTS -- THE ANSWER IS "YES".)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes, someone did
5. No, no one did

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045061     Q86.f2b2. R Try To Influence Vote Of Others
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
We would like to find out about some of the things
people do to help a party or a candidate win an
election.
During the campaign, did you talk to any people and
try to show them why they should vote for or against
one of the parties or candidates?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: IF RESPONDENT SAYS HE/SHE HAS TRIED TO CONVINCE OTHERS
SIMPLY TO VOTE, BUT NOT FOR OR AGAINST A CANDIDATE OR PARTY, THE
ANSWER TO THIS QUESTION IS "NO". THESE ARE ABOUT RESPONDENT'S
PARTICIPATION IN THIS YEAR'S CAMPAIGN, NOT IN THE PAST.  IF ASKED,
REFERS TO PARTISAN ELECTIONS WHERE CANDIDATES ARE RUNNING FROM
SPECIFIC PARTIES - NOT SCHOOL BOARD CANDIDATES, ETC.)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No


MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045062     Q87.f2b3. R Display Campaign Button/Sticker
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Did you wear a campaign button, put a campaign
sticker on your car, or place a sign in your window
or in front of your house?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: THESE ARE ABOUT RESPONDENT'S PARTICIPATION IN THIS
YEAR'S CAMPAIGN, NOT IN THE PAST.  IF ASKED, REFERS TO PARTISAN
ELECTIONS WHERE CANDIDATES ARE RUNNING FROM SPECIFIC PARTIES - NOT
SCHOOL BOARD CANDIDATES, ETC.)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045063     Q88.f2b4. R Attend Candidate Meetings/Rallies
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Did you go to any political meetings, rallies,
speeches, dinners, or things like that in support
of a particular candidate?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: THESE ARE ABOUT RESPONDENT'S PARTICIPATION IN THIS
YEAR'S CAMPAIGN, NOT IN THE PAST.  IF ASKED, REFERS TO PARTISAN
ELECTIONS WHERE CANDIDATES ARE RUNNING FROM SPECIFIC PARTIES - NOT
SCHOOL BOARD CANDIDATES, ETC.)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045064     Q89.f2b5. R Do Other Work For Party/Candidate
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Did you do any (other) work for one of the parties
or candidates?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045065     Q90.f2b6. Did R Give Money To Candidate
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
During an election year people are often asked to
make a contribution to support campaigns. Did you
give money to AN INDIVIDUAL CANDIDATE running for
public office?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: THESE ARE ABOUT RESPONDENT'S PARTICIPATION IN THIS
YEAR'S CAMPAIGN, NOT IN THE PAST.  IF ASKED, REFERS TO PARTISAN
ELECTIONS WHERE CANDIDATES ARE RUNNING FROM SPECIFIC PARTIES - NOT
SCHOOL BOARD CANDIDATES, ETC.)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045066     Q91.f2b7. Did R Give Money To Political Party
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Did you give money to A POLITICAL PARTY during
this election year?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: THESE ARE ABOUT RESPONDENT'S PARTICIPATION IN THIS
YEAR'S CAMPAIGN, NOT IN THE PAST.  IF ASKED, REFERS TO PARTISAN
ELECTIONS WHERE CANDIDATES ARE RUNNING FROM SPECIFIC PARTIES - NOT
SCHOOL BOARD CANDIDATES, ETC.)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045067      Q92.f2b8. Did R Give Money To Any Other Group
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Did you give any money to ANY OTHER GROUP that
supported or opposed candidates?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: THESE ARE ABOUT RESPONDENT'S PARTICIPATION IN THIS
YEAR'S CAMPAIGN, NOT IN THE PAST.  IF ASKED, REFERS TO PARTISAN
ELECTIONS WHERE CANDIDATES ARE RUNNING FROM SPECIFIC PARTIES - NOT
SCHOOL BOARD CANDIDATES, ETC.)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
            F1K1. INTRODUCTION - FEDERAL SPENDING ITEMS
========================================================================

Next I am going to read you a list of federal
programs. For each one, I would like you to tell me
whether you would like to see spending INCREASED or
DECREASED.

========================================================================
M045068     Q93.f1k2a. Environmental Protection-Federal Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
The first program is:
environmental protection
If you had a say in making up the federal budget
this year, should federal spending on environmental
protection be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT
THE SAME?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Increased
2. Decreased
3. Kept about the same
4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
------
Federal spending items were administered in
randomized order, following environmental
protection (fixed as first federal spending item).
Randomization variables, which precede survey
variables, provide case level identification of
randomization assigned.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045069     Q94.f1k1b. AIDS Research-Federal Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(What about)
spending on AIDS research?
(Should federal spending on AIDS research be
INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Increased
2. Decreased
3. Kept about the same
4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
------
Federal spending items were administered in
randomized order, following environmental
protection (fixed as first federal spending item).
Randomization variables, which precede survey
variables, provide case level identification of
randomization assigned.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045070     Q95.f1k1c. Welfare-Federal Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(What about)
welfare programs?
(Should federal spending on welfare programs
be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE
SAME?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Increased
2. Decreased
3. Kept about the same
4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
------
Federal spending items were administered in
randomized order, following environmental
protection (fixed as first federal spending item).
Randomization variables, which precede survey
variables, provide case level identification of
randomization assigned.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045071a     Q96.f1k1d1a. Public Schools Federal Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF RESPONDENT SELECTED FOR "PUBLIC SCHOOLS" WORDING:

QUESTION:
---------
(What about)
public schools?
(Should federal spending on public schools be
INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Increased
2. Decreased
3. Kept about the same
4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R selected for alternate wording

NOTES:
------
Respondents were randomly assigned to one of
two possible wordings: public schools OR
big-city schools.
Federal spending items were administered in
randomized order, following environmental
protection (fixed as first federal spending item).
Randomization variables, which precede survey
variables, provide case level identification of
randomization assigned.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045071b     Q97.f1k1d1b. Big-City Schools-Federal Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF RESPONDENT SELECTED FOR "BIG-CITY SCHOOLS" WORDING:

QUESTION:
---------
(What about)
big-city schools?
(Should federal spending on big-city schools be
INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Increased
2. Decreased
3. Kept about the same
4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R selected for alternate wording

NOTES:
------
Respondents were randomly assigned to one of
two possible wordings: public schools OR
big-city schools.
Federal spending items were administered in
randomized order, following environmental
protection (fixed as first federal spending item).
Randomization variables, which precede survey
variables, provide case level identification of
randomization assigned.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045071x     Q98.f1k1d1. Public/Big-City Schools-Summary
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(What about)
[public schools/big-city schools]?
(Should federal spending on [public schools/
big-city schools] be INCREASED, DECREASED,
or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Increased
2. Decreased
3. Kept about the same
4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
------
Respondents were randomly assigned to one of
two possible wordings: public schools OR
big-city schools.
Federal spending items were administered in
randomized order, following environmental
protection (fixed as first federal spending item).
Randomization variables, which precede survey
variables, provide case level identification of
randomization assigned.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045072     Q99.f1k1e. Crime-Federal Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(What about)
dealing with crime?
(Should federal spending on dealing with crime
be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Increased
2. Decreased
3. Kept about the same
4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
------
Federal spending items were administered in
randomized order, following environmental
protection (fixed as first federal spending item).
Randomization variables, which precede survey
variables, provide case level identification of
randomization assigned.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045073     Q100.f1k1f. Child Care-Federal Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(What about)
child care?
(Should federal spending on child care be
INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

VALID CODES:

------------
1. Increased
2. Decreased
3. Kept about the same
4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
------
Federal spending items were administered in
randomized order, following environmental
protection (fixed as first federal spending item).
Randomization variables, which precede survey
variables, provide case level identification of
randomization assigned.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045074a    Q101.f1k1g1a. Homeland Security-Federal Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF RESPONDENT SELECTED FOR "HOMELAND SECURITY" WORDING:

QUESTION:
---------
(What about)
Homeland security?
(Should federal spending on Homeland security
be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Increased
2. Decreased
3. Kept about the same
4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R selected for alternate wording

NOTES:
------
Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two
possible wordings: homeland security OR the war
on terrorism.
Federal spending items were administered in
randomized order, following environmental
protection (fixed as first federal spending item).
Randomization variables, which precede survey
variables, provide case level identification of
randomization assigned.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045074b    Q102.f1k1g1b. War On Terrorism-Federal Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF RESPONDENT SELECTED FOR "WAR ON TERRORISM" WORDING:

QUESTION:
---------
(What about)
the war on terrorism?
(Should federal spending on the war on
terrorism be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT
ABOUT THE SAME?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Increased
2. Decreased
3. Kept about the same
4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R Selected for alternate wording

NOTES:
------
Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two
possible wordings: homeland security OR the war
on terrorism.
Federal spending items were administered in
randomized order, following environmental
protection (fixed as first federal spending item).
Randomization variables, which precede survey
variables, provide case level identification of
randomization assigned.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045074x    Q103.f1k1g1x. Homeland Sec/War On Terrorism-Summary
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(What about)
[Homeland security/the war on terrorism]?
(Should federal spending on [Homeland
security/the war on terrorism] be INCREASED,
DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Increased
2. Decreased
3. Kept about the same
4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
------
Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two
possible wordings: homeland security OR the war
on terrorism.
Federal spending items were administered in
randomized order, following environmental
protection (fixed as first federal spending item).
Randomization variables, which precede survey
variables, provide case level identification of
randomization assigned.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045075a    Q104.f1k2b1a. Aid To Poor People-Federal Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF RESPONDENT SELECTED FOR "AID  TO POOR PEOPLE" WORDING:

QUESTION:
---------
(What about)
aid to poor people?
(Should federal spending on aid to poor people
be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Increased
2. Decreased
3. Kept about the same
4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R selected for alternate wording

NOTES:
------
Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two
possible wordings: aid to poor people OR aid to
the working poor
Federal spending items were administered in
randomized order, following environmental
protection (fixed as first federal spending item).
Randomization variables, which precede survey
variables, provide case level identification of
randomization assigned.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045075b    Q105.f1k2b1b. Aid To Working Poor-Federal Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF RESPONDENT SELECTED FOR "AID TO THE WORKING POOR" WORDING:

QUESTION:
---------
(What about)
aid to the working poor?
(Should federal spending on aid to the working
poor be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE
SAME?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Increased
2. Decreased
3. Kept about the same
4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R selected for alternate wording

NOTES:
------
Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two
possible wordings: aid to poor people OR aid to
the working poor
Federal spending items were administered in
randomized order, following environmental
protection (fixed as first federal spending item).
Randomization variables, which precede survey
variables, provide case level identification of
randomization assigned.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045075x    Q106.f1k2b1x. Aid To Poor/Working Poor-Summary
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(What about)
[aid to poor people/aid to the working poor]?
(Should federal spending on [aid to poor
people/aid to the working poor] be INCREASED,
DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Increased
2. Decreased
3. Kept about the same
4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
------
Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two
possible wordings: aid to poor people OR aid to
the working poor
Federal spending items were administered in
randomized order, following environmental
protection (fixed as first federal spending item).
Randomization variables, which precede survey
variables, provide case level identification of
randomization assigned.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045076     Q107.f1k2c. Foreign Aid-Federal Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(What about)
foreign aid?
(Should federal spending on foreign aid be
INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Increased
2. Decreased
3. Kept about the same
4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
------
Federal spending items were administered in
randomized order, following environmental
protection (fixed as first federal spending item).
Randomization variables, which precede survey
variables, provide case level identification of
randomization assigned.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045077     Q108.f1k2d. Social Security-Federal Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(What about)
Social Security?
(Should federal spending on Social Security
be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE
SAME?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Increased
2. Decreased
3. Kept about the same
4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
------
Federal spending items were administered in
randomized order, following environmental
protection (fixed as first federal spending item).
Randomization variables, which precede survey
variables, provide case level identification of
randomization assigned.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045078     Q109.f1k2e. Border Security-Federal Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(What about)
tightening border security to prevent illegal
immigration?
(Should federal spending on tightening border
security to prevent illegal immigration be
INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Increased
2. Decreased
3. Kept about the same
4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
------
Federal spending items were administered in
randomized order, following environmental
protection (fixed as first federal spending item).
Randomization variables, which precede survey
variables, provide case level identification of
randomization assigned.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045079     Q110.f1k2f. Aid To Blacks-Federal Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(What about)
aid to blacks?
(Should federal spending on aid to blacks
be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE
SAME?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Increased
2. Decreased
3. Kept about the same
4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
------
Federal spending items were administered in
randomized order, following environmental
protection (fixed as first federal spending item).
Randomization variables, which precede survey
variables, provide case level identification of
randomization assigned.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045080a    Q111.f1k2h1a. Early Ed For Poor Children-Federal Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R SELECTED FOR "EARLY EDUCATION FOR POOR CHILDREN" WORDING:

QUESTION:
---------
(What about)
pre-school and early education for poor children?
(Should federal spending on pre-school and early
education for poor children be INCREASED, DECREASED,
or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Increased
2. Decreased
3. Kept about the same
4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R selected for alternate wording

NOTES:
------
Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two
possible wordings: pre-school and early education
for poor children or pre-school and early education
for black children.
Federal spending items were administered in
randomized order, following environmental
protection (fixed as first federal spending item).
Randomization variables, which precede survey
variables, provide case level identification of
randomization assigned.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045080b    Q112.f1k2h1b. Early Ed For Black Children-Federal Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R SELECTED FOR "EARLY EDUCATION FOR BLACK CHILDREN" WORDING:

QUESTION:
---------
(What about)
pre-school and early education for black children?
(Should federal spending on pre-school and early
education for black children] be INCREASED,
DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Increased
2. Decreased
3. Kept about the same
4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R selected for alternative wording

NOTES:
------
Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two
possible wordings: pre-school and early education
for poor children or pre-school and early education
for black children.
Federal spending items were administered in
randomized order, following environmental
protection (fixed as first federal spending item).
Randomization variables, which precede survey
variables, provide case level identification of
randomization assigned.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045080x   Q113.f1k2h1x. Early Ed For Poor/Black Children-Summary
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(What about)
[pre-school and early education for poor children/
pre-school and early education for black children]?
(Should federal spending on [pre-school and early
education for poor children/pre-school and early
education for black children] be INCREASED,
DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Increased
2. Decreased
3. Kept about the same
4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
------
Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two
possible wordings: pre-school and early education
for poor children or pre-school and early education
for black children.
Federal spending items were administered in
randomized order, following environmental
protection (fixed as first federal spending item).
Randomization variables, which precede survey
variables, provide case level identification of
randomization assigned.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045081     Q114.f2l1b. Defense Federal Spending
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(What about)
defense?
(Should federal spending on defense be INCREASED,
DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Increased
2. Decreased
3. Kept about the same
4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
------
Federal spending items were administered in
randomized order, following environmental
protection (fixed as first federal spending item).
Randomization variables, which precede survey
variables, provide case level identification of
randomization assigned.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
            F1Q3. INTRODUCTION - WAR ON TERRORISM/9-11 QUESTIONS
========================================================================

Now for another topic.
As you know, on September 11th 2001, a group of
terrorists took control of several U.S. commercial
airplanes and crashed them into the World Trade
Center in New York and the Pentagon in Washington.

========================================================================
M045082     Q115.f1q3c. What Terrorists Wanted To Accomplish
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
What do you think the terrorists were trying to
accomplish by their actions?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: THIS IS AN OPEN-ENDED QUESTION. REMEMBER TO RECORD
VERBATIM. USE "ANYTHING ELSE" PROBE UNTIL COMPLETION.  USE STANDARD
CLARIFICATION PROBES AS APPOPRIATE. IF MORE SPACE IS NEEDED, FINISH
ON PAPER.)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Text present
5. No text present

NOTES:
------
This variable coded from an open-ended response

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045083     Q118.f1q3e. How Likely Another Terrorist Attack
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
How likely do you think it is that the U.S.
will suffer an attack as serious as the one in
New York and Washington some time in the
next 12 months?  Would you say VERY LIKELY,
SOMEWHAT LIKELY, SOMEWHAT UNLIKELY, or VERY
UNLIKELY?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Very Likely
2. Somewhat Likely
3. Somewhat Unlikely
4. Very Unlikely

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045084x    Q119.f1q3gx. Checkpoint: F1Q3g Wording
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
CHECKPOINT FOR F1Q3G WORDING:

VALID CODES:
------------
1. "War on terrorism" wording
2. "Terrorist attack of September 11" wording

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045084a    Q120.f1q3ga. App/Disapp Bush War On Terrorism/9-11
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
All things considered, do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE
of the way George W. Bush [is handling the war on
terrorism/has responded to the terrorist attack of
September 11]?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: IF RESPONDENT ASKS ABOUT TIME PERIOD, REPEAT THE
QUESTION AND EMPHASIZE "IS HANDLING".)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Approve
5. Disapprove

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTE:
-----
Respondents were randomly selected for one of the
following wordings: war on terrorism OR terrorist
attack of September 11.
Randomization variables, which precede survey
variables, provide case level identification of
randomization assigned.
Q119 is a checkpoint variable, coded by wording.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045085a    Q121.f1q3g2a. Strength App/Disapp Bush War On Terrorism
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R SELECTED FOR "WAR ON TERRORISM' WORDING:
IF R APPROVES G.W. BUSH RESPONSE TO WAR ON TERRORISM/
IF R DISAPPROVES G.W. BUSH RESPONSE TO WAR ON TERRORISM:

QUESTION:
---------
All things considered, do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE
of the way George W. Bush is handling the war on
terrorism?
(Do you [approve/disapprove])
STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Strongly
5. Not Strongly

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R selected for alternate wording; 8,9 in
Q120

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045085b    Q122.f1q3g2b. Strength App/Disapp Bush 9-11
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R SELECTED FOR "TERRORIST ATTACK OF SEPTEMBER 11' WORDING:
IF R APPROVES G.W. BUSH RESPONSE TO TERRORIST ATTACK OF SEPTEMBER 11/
IF R DISAPPROVES G.W. BUSH RESPONSE TO TERRORIST ATTACK OF SEPTEMBER 11:

QUESTION:
---------
All things considered, do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE
of the way George W. Bush has responded to the
terrorist attack of September 11]?
(Do you [approve/disapprove])
STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Strongly
5. Not Strongly

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know (in
9. Refused
IINAP. R selected for alternate wording; 8,9
in  Q120

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045085x    Q123.f1q3g2x. Strength App/Disapp Bush Resp-Summary
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R APPROVES G.W. BUSH HANDLING WAR ON TERRORISM/ RESPONSE TO 9/11 /
IF R DISAPPROVES G.W. BUSH HANDLING WAR ON TERRORISM/ RESPONSE TO 9/11:

QUESTION:
---------
All things considered, do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE
of the way George W. Bush [is handling the war on
terrorism/has responded to the terrorist attack of
September 11]?
(Do you [approve/disapprove])
STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Approve strongly
2. Approve not strongly
4. Disapprove not strongly
5. Disapprove strongly

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know (in Q122)
9. Refused (in Q122)
INAP. 8,9 in Q120; 8,9 in Q121

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045086     Q124.f1q4a4. War In Afghanistan Worth Cost
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Taking everything into account, do you think
the U.S. war against the Taliban government
in Afghanistan was WORTH THE COST or NOT?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Worth it
5. Not worth it

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045087     Q125.f1q4a4a. War In Iraq Worth Cost
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Taking everything into account, do you think the
war in Iraq has been WORTH THE COST or NOT?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Worth it
5. Not worth it

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045088     Q126.f1g1. R Better/Worse Off In Last Year
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
We are interested in how people are getting
along financially these days. Would you say
that you (and your family) are BETTER OFF,
WORSE OFF, or just about the same financially
as you were a year ago?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: IF RESPONDENT SAYS THEY ARE "BETTER OFF" IN SOME
RESPECTS AND "WORSE OFF" IN OTHERS, PROBE BY ASKING "OVERALL, WOULD
YOU SAY...")

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Better
3. Worse
5. Same

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045089     Q127.f1g1a. R How Much Better/Worse Off In Last Yr
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R BETTER OFF FINANCIALLY THAN A YEAR AGO:/
IF R WORSE OFF FINANCIALLY THAN A YEAR AGO:

QUESTION:
---------
(Is that) MUCH [better/worse] off or SOMEWHAT
[better/worse] off?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: IF RESPONDENT SAYS THEY ARE "BETTER OFF" IN SOME
RESPECTS AND "WORSE OFF" IN OTHERS, PROBE BY ASKING "OVERALL, WOULD
YOU SAY...")

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Much
5. Somewhat

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 5,8,9 in Q126.F1G1

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045089x    Q128.f1g1ax. R How Much Better/Worse Off-Summary
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
We are interested in how people are getting
along financially these days. Would you say
that you (and your family) are BETTER OFF,
WORSE OFF, or just about the same financially
as you were a year ago?
(Is that) MUCH [better/worse] off or SOMEWHAT
[better/worse] off?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Much better
2. Somewhat better
3. The same (5 in Q126)
4. Somewhat worse
5. Much worse

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know (in Q127)
9. Refused (in Q127)
INAP. 8,9 in Q126

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045090     Q129.f1h1. US Economy Better/Worse In Last Yr
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Now thinking about the economy in the country
as a whole, would you say that over the past year
the nation's economy has gotten BETTER, gotten WORSE
or STAYED ABOUT THE SAME?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: WE ARE INTERESTED IN RESPONDENT'S "PERCEPTIONS" OR
"FEELINGS" AS OPPOSED TO KNOWLEDGE ON DIFFERENT ECONOMIC TOPICS.)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Better
3. Worse
5. Same

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
------
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045091     Q130.f1h1a. Extent US Econ Better/Worse In Last Yr
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R SAYS US ECONOMY HAS GOTTEN BETTER:/
IF R SAYS US ECONOMY HAS GOTTEN WORSE:

QUESTION:
---------
(Would you say)
MUCH [better/worse] or SOMEWHAT [better/worse]?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: WE ARE INTERESTED IN RESPONDENT'S "PERCEPTIONS" OR
"FEELINGS" AS OPPOSED TO KNOWLEDGE ON DIFFERENT ECONOMIC TOPICS.)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Much
5. Somewhat

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 8,9 in Q129

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045091x    Q131.f1h1ax. Extent US Econ Better/Worse - Summary
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Now thinking about the economy in the country
as a whole, would you say that over the past year
the nation's economy has gotten BETTER, gotten WORSE
or STAYED ABOUT THE SAME?
(Is that) MUCH [better/worse] off or SOMEWHAT
[better/worse] off?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Much better
2. Somewhat better
3. The same (5 in Q129)
4. Somewhat worse
5. Much worse

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know (in Q130)
9. Refused (in Q130)
INAP. 8,9 in Q129

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045092     Q132.f2m10d. Extent Of Campaign Finance Reform
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Recently, there has been a lot of talk about
campaign finance reform.
In general, which of the following statements
best represents what you feel about the way
political campaigns are financed in this country:
 It needs to be completely overhauled,
 It needs major changes,
 It needs minor changes, or
 It is basically fine the way it is?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Completely overhauled
3. Major changes
5. Minor changes
7. Fine the way it is

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045093     Q133.f1r1a. Has R Shown Flag In Past 12 Months
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
In the PAST TWELVE MONTHS, have you flown an
American flag or displayed the flag in some other
way, such as in a window, or on your car, or on a
T-shirt or other piece of clothing?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045094     Q134.f1j4d. Things About US Make R Ashamed
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Please tell me whether you agree or disagree
with this statement:
'There are some things about America today that
make me feel ashamed of America.'
Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE, or DISAGREE?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Agree
3. Neither agree nor disagree
5. Disagree

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045095     Q135.f2t7a. How Good Does US Flag Make R Feel
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
When you see the American flag flying does it
make you feel EXTREMELY GOOD, VERY GOOD, SOMEWHAT
GOOD, or NOT VERY GOOD?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Extremely good
2. Very good
3. Somewhat good
4. Not very good
7. Don't feel anything [VOL]

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045096     Q136.f2t7b. How Strong Is Rs Love For Country
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
How strong is your love for your country...
EXTREMELY STRONG, VERY STRONG, SOMEWHAT STRONG,
or NOT VERY STRONG?

VALID CODES:
------------
1.  Extremely strong
2.  Very strong
4.  Somewhat strong
5.  Not very strong

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
            F2D3. INTRODUCTION - GW BUSH TRAITS
========================================================================

I am going to read a list of words and phrases
people may use to describe George W. Bush.  For
each, please tell me whether the word or phrase
describes him.

========================================================================
M045097     Q137.f2d3a. Bush Trait-Leadership
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
In your opinion, does the phrase 'he
PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP' describe
George W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL, QUITE WELL,
NOT TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: IF RESPONDENTS SAY THEY DON'T KNOW OR CAN'T DECIDE,
PAUSE AND LET THEM THINK ABOUT IT.  IF THEY DON'T CHANGE THEIR
RESPONSE, ACCEPT THE DON'T KNOW OR CAN'T DECIDE AND MOVE ON.)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Extremely well
2. Quite well
3. Not too well
4. Not well at all

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
-----
Respondents were administered the same set of 4
traits as in 2002: either Q137-Q140 or Q137,
Q141-Q143. Each set of traits was administered
in random order.  This variable combines data
from Q137 and Q137.  The leadership trait (Q137)
was the only trait asked in both sets.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045097a    Q137a.f2d3a1. Bush Trait-Leadership, 1st Traits Set
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF SELECTED FOR 1st SET OF GEORGE W. BUSH TRAITS:

QUESTION:
---------
In your opinion, does the phrase 'he
PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP' describe George
W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL, QUITE WELL, NOT
TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: IF RESPONDENTS SAY THEY DON'T KNOW OR CAN'T DECIDE,
PAUSE AND LET THEM THINK ABOUT IT.  IF THEY DON'T CHANGE THEIR
RESPONSE, ACCEPT THE DON'T KNOW OR CAN'T DECIDE AND MOVE ON.)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Extremely well
2. Quite well
3. Not too well
4. Not well at all

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. Administered 2nd set of G.W. Bush traits

NOTES:
-----
Respondents were administered the same set of 4
traits as in 2002: either Q137-Q140 or Q137,
Q141-Q143. Each set of traits was administered
in random order.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045097b    Q137b.f2d3a2. Bush Trait-Leadership, 2nd Traits Set
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF SELECTED FOR 2nd SET OF GEORGE W. BUSH TRAITS:

QUESTION:
---------
In your opinion, does the phrase 'he
PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP' describe George
W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL, QUITE WELL, NOT
TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: IF RESPONDENTS SAY THEY DON'T KNOW OR CAN'T DECIDE,
PAUSE AND LET THEM THINK ABOUT IT.  IF THEY DON'T CHANGE THEIR
RESPONSE, ACCEPT THE DON'T KNOW OR CAN'T DECIDE AND MOVE ON.)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Extremely well
2. Quite well
3. Not too well
4. Not well at all

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. Administered 1st set of G.W. Bush traits

NOTES:
-----
Respondents were administered the same set of 4
traits as in 2002: either Q137-Q140 or Q137,
Q141-Q143. Each set of traits was administered
in random order.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045098     Q138.f2d3b. Bush Trait-Moral
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R ADMINISTERED 1st SET OF GW BUSH TRAITS IN 2002:

QUESTION:
---------
What about 'he is MORAL'?
(Does this phrase describe George W. Bush
EXTREMELY WELL, QUITE WELL, NOT TOO WELL,
or NOT WELL AT ALL?)

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: IF RESPONDENTS SAY THEY DON'T KNOW OR CAN'T DECIDE,
PAUSE AND LET THEM THINK ABOUT IT.  IF THEY DON'T CHANGE THEIR
RESPONSE, ACCEPT THE DON'T KNOW OR CAN'T DECIDE AND MOVE ON.)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Extremely well
2. Quite well
3. Not too well
4. Not well at all

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R administered 2nd set of GW Bush traits in 2002

NOTES:
-----
Respondents were administered the same set of 4
traits as in 2002: either Q137-Q140 or Q137,
Q141-Q143. Each set of traits was administered
in random order.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045099     Q139.f2d3c. Bush Trait-Out Of Touch
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R ADMINISTERED 1st SET OF GW BUSH TRAITS IN 2002:

QUESTION:
---------
What about 'he is OUT OF TOUCH WITH
ORDINARY PEOPLE'?
(Does this phrase describe George W. Bush
EXTREMELY WELL, QUITE WELL, NOT TOO WELL,
or NOT WELL AT ALL?)

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: IF RESPONDENTS SAY THEY DON'T KNOW OR CAN'T DECIDE,
PAUSE AND LET THEM THINK ABOUT IT.  IF THEY DON'T CHANGE THEIR
RESPONSE, ACCEPT THE DON'T KNOW OR CAN'T DECIDE AND MOVE ON.)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Extremely well
2. Quite well
3. Not too well
4. Not well at all

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R administered 2nd set of GW Bush traits in 2002

NOTES:
-----
Respondents were administered the same set of 4
traits as in 2002: either Q137-Q140 or Q137,
Q141-Q143. Each set of traits was administered
in random order.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045100     Q140.f2d3d. Bush Trait-Knowledgeable
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R ADMINISTERED 1st SET OF GW BUSH TRAITS IN 2002:

QUESTION:
---------
What about 'he is KNOWLEDGEABLE'?
(Does this phrase describe George W. Bush
EXTREMELY WELL, QUITE WELL, NOT TOO WELL,
or NOT WELL AT ALL?)

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: IF RESPONDENTS SAY THEY DON'T KNOW OR CAN'T DECIDE,
PAUSE AND LET THEM THINK ABOUT IT.  IF THEY DON'T CHANGE THEIR
RESPONSE, ACCEPT THE DON'T KNOW OR CAN'T DECIDE AND MOVE ON.)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Extremely well
2. Quite well
3. Not too well
4. Not well at all

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R administered 2nd set of GW Bush traits in 2002

NOTES:
-----
Respondents were administered the same set of 4
traits as in 2002: either Q137-Q140 or Q137,
Q141-Q143. Each set of traits was administered
in random order.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045101     Q141.f2d4b. Bush Trait-Cares About People
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R ADMINISTERED 2nd SET OF GW BUSH TRAITS IN 2002:

QUESTION:
---------
What about 'he REALLY CARES ABOUT
PEOPLE LIKE YOU'?
(Does this phrase describe George W. Bush
EXTREMELY WELL, QUITE WELL, NOT TOO WELL,
or NOT WELL AT ALL?)

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: IF RESPONDENTS SAY THEY DON'T KNOW OR CAN'T DECIDE,
PAUSE AND LET THEM THINK ABOUT IT.  IF THEY DON'T CHANGE THEIR
RESPONSE, ACCEPT THE DON'T KNOW OR CAN'T DECIDE AND MOVE ON.)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Extremely well
2. Quite well
3. Not too well
4. Not well at all

MISSING DATA:
-------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R administered 1st set of GW Bush traits in 2002

NOTES:
-----
Respondents were administered the same set of 4
traits as in 2002: either Q137-Q140 or Q137,
Q141-Q143. Each set of traits was administered
in random order.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045102     Q142.f2d4c. Bush Trait-Dishonest
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R ADMINISTERED 2nd SET OF GW BUSH TRAITS IN 2002:

QUESTION:
---------
What about 'he is DISHONEST'?
(Does this phrase describe George W. Bush
EXTREMELY WELL, QUITE WELL, NOT TOO WELL,
or NOT WELL AT ALL?)

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: IF RESPONDENTS SAY THEY DON'T KNOW OR CAN'T DECIDE,
PAUSE AND LET THEM THINK ABOUT IT.  IF THEY DON'T CHANGE THEIR
RESPONSE, ACCEPT THE DON'T KNOW OR CAN'T DECIDE AND MOVE ON.)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Extremely well
2. Quite well
3. Not too well
4. Not well at all

MISSING DATA:
-------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R administered 1st set of GW Bush traits in 2002

NOTES:
-----
Respondents were administered the same set of 4
traits as in 2002: either Q137-Q140 or Q137,
Q141-Q143. Each set of traits was administered
in random order.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045103     Q143.f2d4d. Bush Trait-Intelligent
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R ADMINISTERED 2nd SET OF GW BUSH TRAITS IN 2002:

QUESTION TEXT:
--------------
What about 'he is INTELLIGENT'?
(Does this phrase describe George W. Bush
EXTREMELY WELL, QUITE WELL, NOT TOO WELL,
or NOT WELL AT ALL?)

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: IF RESPONDENTS SAY THEY DON'T KNOW OR CAN'T DECIDE,
PAUSE AND LET THEM THINK ABOUT IT.  IF THEY DON'T CHANGE THEIR
RESPONSE, ACCEPT THE DON'T KNOW OR CAN'T DECIDE AND MOVE ON.)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Extremely well
2. Quite well
3. Not too well
4. Not well at all

MISSING DATA:
-------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R administered 1st set of GW Bush traits in 2002

NOTES:
-----
Respondents were administered the same set of 4
traits as in 2002: either Q137-Q140 or Q137,
Q141-Q143. Each set of traits was administered
in random order.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
            F1H6. INTRODUCTION - DIPLOMACY OR MILITARY FORCE SCALE
========================================================================

Some people believe the United States should
solve international problems by using diplomacy
and other forms of international pressure and use
military force only if absolutely necessary.
Suppose we put such people on a scale that goes
from 1 to 7, placing them at the end of the scale
numbered "1".
Other people believe that diplomacy and pressure
often fail and the US must be ready to use military
force. Suppose these people are at the other end of
the scale, at point number "7". And of course other
people fall into positions in-between, at points
2, 3, 4, 5, and 6.

========================================================================
M045104     Q144.f1h6a. Diplomacy/Military Force Scale
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Where would you place YOURSELF on this scale, or
haven't you thought much about this?
(As a reminder, 1 means the U.S. should solve with
diplomacy and international pressure, 7 means the
U.S. must be ready to use military force, and of
course you can choose points 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6
in between.)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. U.S. should solve with diplomacy and international pressure
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. U.S. must be ready to use military force

MISSING CODES:
--------------
0. Haven't thought much about this
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
-----
See PostErr.1.
During the field period, an error was discovered
in the probe, which had appeared as follows prior to the
discovery:
   (As a reminder, 1 means the U.S. should solve with
   diplomacy and international pressure, 7 means the U.S.
   must be ready to use international force, and of
   course you can choose points 2,3,4,5, or 6 in between.)
This error was corrected during the field period but
only after approximately half of the interviews were
already completed. Since the probe as it appeared onscreen
was specifically flagged as optional text, it is unknown
precisely when the incorrect version was actually
used prior to the error discovery.  However, interviews
are identified in [Post-election administration item]
PostErr.1 if they were administered prior to the date
when the instrument was revised to display the correct
probe text.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045105     Q145.f1h6a2. Diplomacy/Military Scale-GW Bush
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Where would you place George W. Bush (on this
scale)?
(As a reminder, 1 means the U.S. should solve

with diplomacy and international pressure, 7
means the U.S. must be ready to use military
force, and of course you can choose points
2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 in between.)

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
DO NOT PROBE DK

VALID CODES:
------------
1. U.S. should solve with diplomacy and international pressure
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. U.S. must be ready to use military force

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
-----
See notes Q144.f1h6a.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045106     Q146.f1h6a3. Diplomacy/Military Scale-Democrats
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Where would you place the Democratic Party
(on this scale)?
(As a reminder, 1 means the U.S. should solve
with diplomacy and international pressure, 7
means the U.S. must be ready to use military
force, and of course you can choose points
2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 in between.)

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
DO NOT PROBE DK

VALID CODES:
------------
1. U.S. should solve with diplomacy and international pressure
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. U.S. must be ready to use military force

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
-----
See notes Q144.f1h6a.
Order of Democratic and Republican party
placements randomized.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045107     Q147.f1h6a4. Diplomacy/Military Scale-Republicans
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Where would you place the Republican Party
(on this scale)?
(As a reminder, 1 means the U.S. should solve
with diplomacy and international pressure, 7
means the U.S. must be ready to use military
force, and of course you can choose points
2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 in between.)

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
DO NOT PROBE DK

VALID CODES:
------------
1. U.S. should solve with diplomacy and international pressure
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. U.S. must be ready to use military force

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
-----
See notes Q144.f1h6a.
Order of Democratic and Republican party
placements randomized.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045108     Q148.f1h6a1. Diplomacy/Military-Importance To R
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
How important is this issue to you personally -
VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT
IMPORTANT AT ALL?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Very important
3. Somewhat important
5. Not important at all

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045109     Q149.f1l5. Increase/Decrease Immigration
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Do you think the number of immigrants from
foreign countries who are permitted to come
to the United States to live should be
INCREASED A LOT, INCREASED A LITTLE, LEFT
THE SAME as it is now, DECREASED A LITTLE,
or DECREASED A LOT?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Increased a lot
2. Increased a little
3. Left the same as it is now
4. Decreased a little
5. Decreased a lot

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045110     Q150.f1l6. Abortion Issue - Self-Placement
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
There has been some discussion about abortion
during recent years.
I am going to read you a short list of opinions.
Please tell me which one of the opinions best
agrees with your view?  You can just tell me
the number of the opinion you choose:
1. By law, abortion should never be permitted.
2. The law should permit abortion only in case of
   rape, incest, or when the woman's life is in
   danger.
3. The law should permit abortion for reasons other
   than rape, incest, or danger to the woman's life,
   but only after the need for the abortion has been
   clearly established.
4. By law, a woman should always be able to obtain
   an abortion as a matter of personal choice.

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(READ LIST; INCLUDE ITEM NUMBER WHEN READING)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. By law, abortion should never be permitted.
2. The law should permit abortion only in case of
   rape, incest, or when the woman's life is in
   danger
3. The law should permit abortion for reasons other
   than rape, incest, or danger to the woman's life,
   but only after the need for the abortion has been
   clearly established.
4. By law, a woman should always be able to obtain
   an abortion as a matter of personal choice.
7. Other (SPECIFY) [VOL]

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045111     Q152.f1l7. Fav/Opp Laws Protect Homosexuals
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Do you favor or oppose laws to protect
homosexuals against job discrimination?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Favor
5. Oppose

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045112     Q153.f1l7a. Strngth Fav/Opp Laws Protect Homosexuals
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R FAVORS LAWS TO PROTECT HOMOSEXUALS/
IF R OPPOSES LAWS TO PROTECT HOMOSEXUALS:

QUESTION:
---------
Do you [favor/oppose] such laws strongly or not strongly?


VALID CODES:
------------
1. Strongly
5. Not strongly

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 8,9 in Q152

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045112x    Q154.f1l7ax. Fav/Opp Laws Protect Homosexuals-Summary
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R FAVORS LAWS TO PROTECT HOMOSEXUALS/
IF R OPPOSES LAWS TO PROTECT HOMOSEXUALS:

QUESTION:
---------
Do you [favor/oppose] such laws strongly or
not strongly?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Favor strongly
2. Favor not strongly
4. Oppose not strongly
5. Oppose strongly

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 8,9 in Q152

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
            F1H15. INTRO - EQUAL TREATMENT FOR WOMEN IN JOBS
========================================================================

Some people feel that if women are not getting
equal treatment in jobs, the  government in
Washington ought to see to it that they do.
Others feel that this is not the federal
government's business.

========================================================================
M045113     Q155.f1h15a Equal Treatment For Women In Jobs Issue
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Have you had enough interest in this question
to favor one side over the other?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes, have interest
5. No, don't have interest

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045113a     Q156.f1h15a1 Govt Ensure Equal Treatment For Women
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R HAS HAD INTEREST IN EQUAL TREATMENT FOR WOMEN ISSUE:

QUESTION:
---------
How do you feel?
Should the government in Washington see to it
that women get equal treatment in jobs OR
is this not the federal government's business?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Govt should see to it
5. Not the federal govt's business
7. Other (SPECIFY)

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 5,8,9 in Q155

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045114     Q158.f1h15a2. Strngth Govt Ensure Equal Treat Women
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R THINKS WOMEN EQUAL TREATMENT IN JOBS GOVT ISSUE/
IF R THINKS WOMEN EQUAL TREATMENT IN JOBS NOT GOVT ISSUE:

QUESTION:
Do you feel strongly or not strongly about that?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Strongly
5. Not strongly

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 5,8,9 in Q155; 7,8 in Q156

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045114x    Q159.f1h15a2x. Strngth Govt Equal Treat Women - Summary
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R THINKS WOMEN EQUAL TREATMENT IN JOBS GOVT ISSUE/
IF R THINKS WOMEN EQUAL TREATMENT IN JOBS NOT GOVT ISSUE:

QUESTION:
---------
Have you had enough interest in this question
to favor one side over the other?
How do you feel?
Should the government in Washington see to it
that women get equal treatment in jobs OR is this
not the federal government's business?
Do you feel strongly or not strongly about that?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Feel strongly govt should see to it
2. Feel not so strongly govt should see to it
4. Feel not so strongly it is not govt's business
5. Feel strongly it is not govt's business
7. Other

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know (in Q158)
9. Refused (in Q158)
0. No interest
INAP. 8,9 in Q155

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045115     Q160.f1h16. What Happens to Women Affect R
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R IS FEMALE:

QUESTION:
---------
Do you think that what happens to women in
this country will have something to do with
what happens in your life?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No
7. Unsure; depends

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R male

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045115a     Q161.f1h16a1. What Happens To Women Affect R How Much
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R IS FEMALE:
IF R THINKS WHAT HAPPENS TO WOMEN IN US WILL AFFECT HER LIFE:

QUESTION:
---------
How much will it affect you?
A LOT, SOME, or NOT VERY MUCH AT ALL?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. A lot
3. Some
5. Not very much at all

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 5,7-9 in Q160; male respondent

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045116     Q162.f1h16b Rs Sense Of Pride As A Woman
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R IS FEMALE:

QUESTION:
---------
How often do you find yourself feeling a sense
of pride as a woman in the accomplishments of women?
Is it A LOT, FAIRLY OFTEN, ONCE IN A WHILE, or
HARDLY EVER?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. A lot
2. Fairly often
3. Once in a while
4. Hardly ever

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R male

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045117     Q163.f1h16c. Is R Angry About Way Women Treated
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R IS FEMALE:

QUESTION:
---------
How often do you find yourself feeling angry about
the way women are treated in society?
Is it A LOT, FAIRLY OFTEN, ONCE IN A WHILE, or
HARDLY EVER?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. A lot
2. Fairly often
3. Once in a while
4. Hardly ever

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R male

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045118     Q164.f1l1a. Last 20 Yrs Change In Income Inequality
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Now on a different topic.
Do you think the difference in incomes between
rich people and poor people in the United States
today is LARGER, SMALLER, or ABOUT THE SAME as it
was 20 years ago?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Larger
3. Smaller
5. About the same

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045118a    Q165.f1l1a1. How Much Diff In Income Inequality
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R THINKS INCOME GAP IS LARGER/
IF R THINKS INCOME GAP IS SMALLER:

QUESTION:
---------
(Would you say the difference in incomes is)
MUCH [larger/smaller] or SOMEWHAT [larger/
smaller]?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Much
5. Somewhat

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 5,8,9 in Q164

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045118x    Q165x.f1l1a1x. Diff In Income Inequality-Summary
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Do you think the difference in incomes between
rich people and poor people in the United States
today is LARGER, SMALLER, or ABOUT THE SAME as it
was 20 years ago?
(Would you say the difference in incomes is)
MUCH [larger/smaller] or SOMEWHAT [larger/
smaller]?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Much larger
2. Somewhat larger
3. About the same
4. Somewhat smaller
5. Much smaller

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know (in Q165)
9. Refused (in Q165)
INAP. 8,9 in Q164

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045118b    Q166.f1l1a2. Income Inequality Good Or Bad
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R THINKS INCOME GAP IS LARGER:/
IF R THINKS INCOME GAP IS SMALLER:


QUESTION:
---------
Do you think this is A GOOD THING, A BAD THING,
or haven't you thought about it?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Good thing
3. Bad thing

MISSING CODES:
--------------
7. Haven't thought
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 5,8,9 in Q164

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
            F1L11. INTRODUCTION - FEDERAL INCOME TAXES
========================================================================

Next are a few questions about federal income taxes.

========================================================================
M045119     Q167.f1l11a. R Think Pay More/Less Taxes Than Shld
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Do you feel you are asked to pay MORE THAN YOU
SHOULD in federal income taxes, about the RIGHT
AMOUNT, or LESS THAN YOU SHOULD?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. More than should pay
3. About right
5. Less than should pay
7. Don't pay at all {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045120     Q168.f1l11b. Rich Pay More/Less Than Shld In Taxes
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
What about rich people?
Do you feel rich people are asked to pay MORE
THAN THEY SHOULD in federal income taxes, about
the RIGHT AMOUNT, or LESS THAN THEY SHOULD?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. More than should pay
3. About right
5. Less than should pay
7. Don't pay at all {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
------
The order in which Q168 and Q169 was
administered was randomized.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045121     Q169.f1l11c. Poor Pay More/Less Than Shld In Taxes
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
What about poor people?
Do you feel poor people are asked to pay MORE
THAN THEY SHOULD in federal income taxes, about
the RIGHT AMOUNT, or LESS THAN THEY SHOULD?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. More than should pay
3. About right
5. Less than should pay
7. Don't pay at all {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
------
The order in which Q168 and Q169 was
administered was randomized.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045122x    Q170.f1m2at. Checkpoint: F1M2 Wording
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: (choose one)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. "Congress passed" wording
2. "President Bush signed" wording

NOTES:
------
For the tax cut series of questions, respondents
were randomly assigned one of two possible
wordings, listed here.

========================================================================
M045122     Q171.f1m2a Did R Favor/Oppose Tax Cut
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
As you may recall, [Congress passed/President
Bush signed] a big tax cut a few years ago.
Did you FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut, or is this
something you haven't thought about?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Favor
5. Oppose
7. Other/depends/neither {VOL} {SPECIFY}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
0. Haven't thought about

NOTES:
------
Respondents were randomly assigned one of two
possible wordings: Congress passed OR
President Bush signed.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045123a    Q173.f1m2b1. Strength R Fav/Opp Tax Cut-Congress Wording
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R ASSIGNED "CONGRESS PASSED" WORDING:
IF R FAVORED TAX CUT/
IF R OPPOSED TAX CUT:

QUESTION:
---------
Did you [favor/oppose] the tax cut STRONGLY or
NOT STRONGLY?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Strongly
5. Not strongly

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 0,7,8,9 in Q171; alternate wording

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045123b    Q174.f1m2b2. Strength R Fav/Opp Tax Cut-GW Bush Wording
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R ASSIGNED "PRESIDENT BUSH SIGNED" WORDING:
IF R FAVORED TAX CUT/
IF R OPPOSED TAX CUT:

QUESTION:
---------
Did you [favor/oppose] the tax cut STRONGLY
or NOT STRONGLY?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Strongly
5. Not strongly

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 0,7,8,9 in Q171; alternate wording

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045123x    Q175.f1m2bx. Strength R Fav/Opp Tax Cut-Summary
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
As you may recall, [Congress passed/President
Bush signed] a big tax cut a few years ago.
Did you FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut, or is this
something you haven't thought about?
Did you [favor/oppose] the tax cut STRONGLY or
NOT STRONGLY?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Favored strongly
2. Favored not so strongly
4. Opposed not so strongly
5. Opposed strongly
7. Other

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know (in Q173 or Q174)
9. Refused (in Q173 or Q174)
0. Haven't thought about
INAP 8,9 in Q171

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045124     Q176.f1m2c. Dem Party Favor/Oppose Tax Cut
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Do you happen to remember - did the Democratic
Party FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut that [Congress
passed/President Bush signed] a few years ago?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Favor
5. Oppose
7. Other  {VOL} {SPECIFY}
0. Don't remember {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
------
Order in which Q176 and Q178 was
administered was randomized

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045125     Q178.f1m2e. Rep Party Fav/Opp Tax Cut
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
What about the Republican Party - did the
Republican Party FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut
that [Congress passed/President Bush signed]
a few years ago?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Favor
5. Oppose
7. Other  {VOL} {SPECIFY}
0. Don't remember {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
------
Order in which Q176 and Q178 was
administered was randomized

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045126     Q180.f1m2n. Importance Of Tax Cut Issue To R
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
How important is this issue to you personally
- VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT
IMPORTANT AT ALL?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Very important
3. Somewhat important
5. Not important at all

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
            F2K7. INTRODUCTION - GOVERNMENT SERVICES SCALE
========================================================================

Some people think the government should provide
fewer services even in areas such as health and
education in order to reduce spending.
Suppose we put such people on a scale that goes
from 1 to 7, placing them at the end of the scale
numbered "1". Other people feel it is important
for the government to provide many more services
even if it means an increase in spending. Suppose
these people are at the other end of the scale,
at point number "7". And, of course other people
have opinions somewhere in between, at points
2, 3, 4, 5 or 6.

========================================================================
M045127     Q181.f2k7a. Fewer/More Govt Services-Rs Placement
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Where would you place YOURSELF on this scale,
or haven't you thought much about this?
(As a reminder, 1 means the government should provide many fewer
services, 7 means the government should provide many more services,
and of course you can choose points 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 in between.)

VALID CODES:
------------
01. Govt should provide many fewer services
02.
03.
04.
05.
06.
07. Govt should provide many more services

MISSING CODES:
--------------
80. Haven't thought much about this
88. Don't know
89. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045128     Q182.f2k7b. Fewer/More Govt Services-GW Bush
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Where would you place GEORGE W. BUSH
(on this scale)?
(As a reminder, 1 means the government should provide many fewer
services, 7 means the government should provide many more services,
and of course you can choose points 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 in between.)

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
DO NOT PROBE DK

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Govt should provide many fewer services
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. Govt should provide many more services

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045129     Q183.f2k7c. Fewer/More Govt Services-Dem Party
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Where would you place the DEMOCRATIC PARTY
(on this scale)?
(As a reminder, 1 means the government should provide many fewer
services, 7 means the government should provide many more services,

and of course you can choose points 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 in between.)

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
DO NOT PROBE DK

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Govt should provide many fewer services
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. Govt should provide many more services

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
------
Order of Democratic and Republican party
placements randomized.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045130     Q184.f2k7d. Fewer/More Govt Service-Rep Party
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Where would you place the REPUBLICAN PARTY
(on this scale)?
(As a reminder, 1 means the government should provide many fewer
services, 7 means the government should provide many more services,
and of course you can choose points 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 in between.)

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
DO NOT PROBE DK

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Govt should provide many fewer services
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. Govt should provide many more services

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045131     Q185.f2k7a1. Fewer/More Govt Service-Import to R
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
How important is this issue to you
personally - VERY important, SOMEWHAT
important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Very important
3. Somewhat important
5. Not important at all

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
            F2M5. INTRODUCTION: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
========================================================================

Some people think that if a company has a
history of discriminating against blacks when
making hiring decisions, then they should be
required to have an affirmative action program
that gives blacks preference in hiring.

========================================================================
M045132     Q186.f2m5aa. Affirmative Action-Rs Position
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R ADMINISTERED AFFIRMATIVE ACTION SERIES IN 2002:

QUESTION:
---------
What do you think? Should companies that have
discriminated against blacks have to have an
affirmative action program?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes, they should have to have affirmative action
5. No, they should not have to have affirmative action
7. Other (specify) {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R administered equal pay for women series

NOTES:
------
Respondents were administered the same set
of questions as in 2002.  They were asked either
affirmative action items Q186-Q194 or equal
treatment for women items Q195-Q199.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045133     Q188.f2m5a. Affirmative Action-GW Bush Position
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R ADMINISTERED AFFIRMATIVE ACTION SERIES IN 2002:

QUESTION:
---------
Which would you say is CLOSER to George
Bush's position -- that companies that have
discriminated against blacks should have an
affirmative action program, or not?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes, they should have to have affirmative action
5. No, they should not have to have affirmative action
7. Other (specify) {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R administered equal pay for women series

NOTES:
------
Respondents were administered the same set
of questions as in 2002.  They were asked
either affirmative action items Q186-Q194 or
equal treatment for women items Q195-Q199.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045134     Q190.f2m5b. Affirmative Action-Dem Party Position
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R ADMINISTERED AFFIRMATIVE ACTION SERIES IN 2002:

QUESTION:
---------
Which would you say is CLOSER to the
Democratic Party's position -- that companies
that have discriminated against blacks should
have an affirmative action program, or not?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes, they should have to have affirmative action
5. No, they should not have to have affirmative action
7. Other (specify) {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R administered equal pay for women series

NOTES:
------
Respondents were administered the same set
of questions as in 2002.  They were asked
either affirmative action items Q186-Q194 or
equal treatment for women items Q195-Q199.
Order of Q190.F2M5b (position of Democratic
Party) and  Q192.F2M5c (position of Republican
Party) was randomized.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045135     Q192.f2m5c. Affirmative Action-Rep Party Position
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R ADMINISTERED AFFIRMATIVE ACTION SERIES IN 2002:

QUESTION:
---------
Which would you say is CLOSER to the
Republican Party's position -- that companies
that have discriminated against blacks should
have an affirmative action program, or not?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes, they should have to have affirmative action
5. No, they should not have to have affirmative action
7. Other (specify) {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R administered equal pay for women series

NOTES:
------
Respondents were administered the same set
of questions as in 2002.  They were asked
either affirmative action items Q186-Q194 or
equal treatment for women items Q195-Q199.
Order of Q190.F2M5b (position of Democratic
Party) and  Q192.F2M5c (position of Republican
Party) was randomized.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045136     Q194.f2m5d. Affirmative Action-Importance To R
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R ADMINISTERED AFFIRMATIVE ACTION SERIES IN 2002:

QUESTION:
---------
How important is this issue to you personally
- VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT
IMPORTANT AT ALL?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Very important
3. Somewhat important
5. Not important at all

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R administered equal pay for women series

NOTES:
------
Respondents were administered the same set
of questions as in 2002.  They were asked
either affirmative action items Q186-Q194 or
equal treatment for women items Q195-Q199.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045137     Q195.f2m6. Govt Ensure Equal Pay For Women
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R ADMINISTERED EQUAL PAY FOR WOMEN SERIES IN 2002:

QUESTION:
---------
How much do you think the federal government
should be doing to make sure that women get
equal pay for equal work - A LOT, SOME, or
NOT MUCH AT ALL?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. A lot
3. Some
5. Not much at all

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R administered Affirmative Action series

NOTES:
------
Respondents were administered the same set
of questions as in 2002.  They were asked
either affirmative action items Q186-Q194 or
equal treatment for women items Q195-Q199.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045138     Q196.f2m6a. GW Bush On Equal Pay For Women
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R ADMINISTERED EQUAL PAY FOR WOMEN SERIES IN 2002:

QUESTION:
---------
Which would you say is CLOSER to George
Bush's position -- that the federal government
should be doing - A LOT, SOME, or NOT MUCH AT
ALL to make sure that women get equal pay
for equal work?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}


VALID CODES:
------------
1. A lot
3. Some
5. Not much at all

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R administered Affirmative Action series

NOTES:
------
Respondents were administered the same set
of questions as in 2002.  They were asked
either affirmative action items Q186-Q194 or
equal treatment for women items Q195-Q199.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045139     Q197.f2m6a1. Dem Party On Equal Pay For Women
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R ADMINISTERED EQUAL PAY FOR WOMEN SERIES IN 2002:

QUESTION:
---------
Which would you say is CLOSER to the
Democratic Party's position -- that the
federal government should be doing -
A LOT, SOME, or NOT MUCH AT ALL to make
sure that women get equal pay for equal work?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}

VALID CODES:
------------
1. A lot
3. Some
5. Not much at all

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R administered Affirmative Action series

NOTES:
------
Respondents were administered the same set
of questions as in 2002.  They were asked
either affirmative action items Q186-Q194 or
equal treatment for women items Q195-Q199.
Order of Q197 (position of Democratic
Party) and  Q198 (position of Republican
Party) was randomized.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045140     Q198.f2m6b. Rep Party On Equal Pay For Women
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R ADMINISTERED EQUAL PAY FOR WOMEN SERIES IN 2002:

QUESTION:
---------
Which would you say is CLOSER to the
Republican Party's position -- that the
federal government should be doing - A LOT,
SOME, or NOT MUCH AT ALL to make sure that
women get equal pay for equal work?

INTERVIWER INSTRUCTION:
-----------------------
{DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}

VALID CODES:
------------
1. A lot
3. Some
5. Not much at all

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R administered Affirmative Action series

NOTES:
------
Respondents were administered the same set
of questions as in 2002.  They were asked
either affirmative action items Q186-Q194 or
equal treatment for women items Q195-Q199.
Order of Q197 (position of Democratic
Party) and  Q198 (position of Republican
Party) was randomized.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045141     Q199.f2m6c. Equal Pay For Women - Importance To R
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R ADMINISTERED EQUAL PAY FOR WOMEN SERIES IN 2002:

QUESTION:
---------
How important is this issue to you personally
- VERY important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT
IMPORTANT AT ALL?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Very important
3. Somewhat important
5. Not important at all

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R administered Affirmative Action series

NOTES:
------
Respondents were administered the same set
of questions as in 2002.  They were asked
either affirmative action items Q186-Q194 or
equal treatment for women items Q195-Q199.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045142     Q200.f1h9. US Position In World-Weaker/Stronger
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Turning to some other issues facing the country.
During the past year, would you say that the
United  States' position in the world has grown
WEAKER, STAYED  ABOUT THE SAME, or has it grown
STRONGER?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Weaker
3. Stayed about the same
5. Stronger

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045143     Q201.f1h12. Agree/Disagree US Should Stay Home
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Do you AGREE or DISAGREE with this statement:
'This country would be better off if we just
stayed home and did not concern ourselves with
problems in other parts of the world.'

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Agree
5. Disagree

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
            F2N2. INTRODUCTION: PUBLIC LIFE
========================================================================


Now I'd like to read you a few statements about
public life.
I'll read them one at a time. Please tell me
whether you agree or disagree with each of them.

========================================================================
M045144     Q202.f2n2b. R Well-Qualified For Political Partic
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
' I consider myself well-qualified to participate
in politics. '
Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE, or
DISAGREE with this statement?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Agree
3. Neither agree nor disagree
5. Disagree

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045145     Q203.f2n2c. R Better Informed Than Most People
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
' I think that I am better informed about
politics and government than most people. '
(Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE,
or DISAGREE with this statement?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Agree
3. Neither agree nor disagree
5. Disagree

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045146     Q204.f2n3. Doesn't Matter Whether Vote Or Not
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
'So many other people vote in the
national election that It doesn't matter
much to me whether I vote or not.'
(Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE,
or DISAGREE with this statement?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Agree
3. Neither agree nor disagree
5. Disagree

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
            F2Q1. INTRO - EFFICACY AND GOVERNMENT RESPONSIVENESS
========================================================================

Please tell me whether you agree or disagree
with these statements about the government.
The first is:

========================================================================
M045147     Q205.f2q1a. Public Officials Don't Care
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
' Public officials don't care much what
people like me think. '
Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE,
or DISAGREE with this statement?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Agree
3. Neither agree nor disagree
5. Disagree

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045148     Q206.f2q1b. People Like Me Have No Say
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
' People like me don't have any say
about what the government does. '
(Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE,
or DISAGREE with this statement?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Agree
3. Neither agree nor disagree
5. Disagree

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Missing

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
            F2Q3. INTRODUCTION - TRUST IN GOVERNMENT
========================================================================

People have different ideas about the
government in Washington.
These ideas don't refer to Democrats or
Republicans in particular, but just to the
government in general. We want to see how you feel
about these ideas. For example:

========================================================================

M045149     Q207.f2q3a. Trust Govt To Do What Is Right
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
How much of the time do you think you can trust
the government in Washington to do what is right
-- JUST ABOUT ALWAYS, MOST OF THE TIME, or only
SOME OF THE TIME?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Just about always
2. Most of the time
3. Only some of the time
4. Never {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045150     Q208.f2q4. Govt Wastes Tax Money

========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Do you think that people in government waste
A LOT of the money we pay in taxes, waste SOME
of it, or DON'T WASTE VERY MUCH of it?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Waste a lot
3. Waste some
5. Don't waste very much

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045151     Q209.f2q5. Govt Run By Big Interests/Benefit Of All
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Would you say the government is pretty much
run by A FEW BIG INTERESTS looking out for
themselves or that it is run for THE BENEFIT
OF ALL THE PEOPLE?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Government run by a few big interests
5. Government run for the benefit of all

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045152     Q210.f2q6. How Many In Govt Crooked
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Do you think that QUITE A FEW of the people
running the government are crooked, NOT VERY MANY
are, or do you think HARDLY ANY of them are
crooked?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Quite a few are crooked
3. Not very many are crooked
5. Hardly any are crooked

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045153     Q211.f2q7. How Much Elections Make Govt Pay Attn
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
How much do you feel that having elections
makes the government pay attention to what the
people think -- a GOOD DEAL, SOME, or NOT MUCH?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. A good deal

3. Some
5. Not much

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045154     Q212.f2t6. Satisfaction With How US Democracy Works
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
On the whole, are you SATISFIED, FAIRLY
SATISFIED, NOT VERY SATISFIED, or NOT AT ALL
SATISFIED with the way democracy works in the
United States?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Satisfied
2. Fairly satisfied
3. Not very satisfied
4. Not at all satisfied

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
            F2T8. INTRODUCTION - WORKING MOTHERS
========================================================================

Now for some other questions.
Please tell me whether you AGREE or DISAGREE
with the next few statements.

========================================================================
M045155     Q213.f2t8a. Working Mother Vs Non-Working Mother
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
'A working mother can establish just as warm
and secure a relationship with her children as
a mother who does not work.'
(Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE, or
DISAGREE with this statement?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Agree
3. Neither agree nor disagree
5. Disagree

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
-------------
1/2 sample administered, in order, Q213,Q214,Q215;
1/2 sample administered, in order, Q215,Q213,Q214

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045156     Q214.f2t8b. Better If Man Is Achiever Outside Home
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
'It is much better for everyone involved if
the man is the achiever outside the home and
the woman takes care of the home and family.'
(Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE, or
DISAGREE with this statement?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Agree
3. Neither agree nor disagree
5. Disagree

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
-------------
1/2 sample administered, in order, Q213,Q214,Q215;
1/2 sample administered, in order, Q215,Q213,Q214

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045157     Q215.f2t8c. Women Want Equality/Special Favors
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
'When women demand equality these days, they are
actually seeking special favors.'
(Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE, or
DISAGREE with this statement?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Agree
3. Neither agree nor disagree
5. Disagree

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
-------------
1/2 sample administered, in order, Q213,Q214,Q215;
1/2 sample administered, in order, Q215,Q213,Q214

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045158     Q216.f2k3. Can People Be Trusted
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Turning to another topic.
Generally speaking, would you say that MOST
PEOPLE CAN BE TRUSTED or that you CAN'T BE TOO
CAREFUL in dealing with people?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Most people can be trusted
5. Can't be too careful

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045159     Q217.f2k4. People Take Advantage/Be Fair
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R ADMINISTERED "PEOPLE TAKE ADVANTAGE OF" ITEM IN 2002:

QUESTION:
---------
Do you think most people would try to TAKE
ADVANTAGE of you if they got the chance or
would they TRY TO BE FAIR?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Take advantage
5. Try to be fair

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R administered Q218

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045160     Q218.f2k5. People Helpful/Looking Out For Themselves
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R ADMINISTERED "PEOPLE TRY TO BE HELPFUL" ITEM IN 2002:

QUESTION:
---------
Would you say that most of the time people
TRY TO BE HELPFUL, or that they are JUST
LOOKING OUT FOR THEMSELVES?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Try to be helpful
5. Just looking out for themselves

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. R administered Q217

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045161     Q219.f2k2. R Able To Do Volunteer Work Past Year
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Many people say they have less time these days
to do volunteer work.
What about you, were you able to devote any
time to volunteer work IN THE LAST 12 MONTHS
or did you not do so?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: VOLUNTEER WORK IS UNPAID WORK ON BEHALF OF SOMEONE
OTHER THAN THE RESPONDENT OR HIS/HER FAMILY.  IF RESPONDENT ASKS, WE
CAN SAY "WORK THAT YOU DO FOR OTHER PEOPLE OR GROUPS THAT YOU DO NOT
EXPECT TO BE PAID FOR".)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045162     Q220.f2m12a. R Worked With Others On Community Issue
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
DURING THE PAST 12 MONTHS, have you worked
with other people to deal with some issue
facing your community?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045163     Q221.f2m12b. R Views To Govt In Past Year
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
DURING THE PAST TWELVE MONTHS, have you
telephoned, written a letter to, or visited
a government official to express your views
on a public issue?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045164     Q222.f2m12c. Attend Mtg For School/Comm In Past Yr
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
DURING THE PAST TWELVE MONTHS, did you attend a meeting about
an issue facing your community or schools?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045165     Q223.f2m12d. R Member Of Any Organization
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Here is a list of some organizations people can
belong to. There are labor unions, associations of
people who do the same kinds of work, fraternal
groups such as Lions or Kiwanis, hobby clubs or
sports teams, groups working on political issues,
community groups, and school groups. Of course,
there are lots of other types of organizations, too.
Not counting membership in a local church or synagogue,
are you a member of any of these kinds of organizations?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045166     Q224.f2m12e. R Give To Church/Charity In Past Year
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Many people are finding it more difficult to
make contributions to church or charity as much
as they used to.  How about you -- were you able
to contribute any money to church or charity in

the LAST 12 MONTHS?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045167     Q225.f2m12f. R In Protest/March/Demonstration
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Aside from a strike against your employer,
in the PAST TWELVE MONTHS, have you taken part
in a protest, march, or demonstration on some
national or local issue?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045168     Q226.f2z1. R Worked With Neighbors On Issue/Problem
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Next, I'd like to ask you a few questions about
life in your
neighborhood.
During the PAST TWELVE MONTHS, have you worked
with others from your neighborhood to deal with a
common issue or problem?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No
7. No neighbors [VOL]

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045169     Q227.f2z2. Rs Neighbors Out For Themselves
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Next some questions about the people you regularly
see in your neighborhood.
In general, with these people in mind, would you
say that they are just looking out for themselves
ALL OF THE TIME, MOST OF THE TIME, SOME OF THE TIME,
HARDLY EVER, or NEVER?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. All of the time
2. Most of the time
3. Some of the time
4. Hardly ever
5. Never
7. No neighbors [VOL]

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045170     Q228.f2z3a. Rs Neighbors Try To Take Advantage
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Would you say those people you see regularly
in your neighborhood try to take advantage of
others ALL OF THE TIME, MOST OF THE TIME, SOME
OF THE TIME, HARDLY EVER, or NEVER?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. All of the time
2. Most of the time
3. Some of the time
4. Hardly ever
5. Never
7. No neighbors [VOL]

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045171     Q229.f2z3b. Rs Neighbors Treat Others With Respect
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(Again, thinking about those people you see in
your neighborhood,)
Would you say they treat others with respect ALL
OF THE TIME, MOST OF THE TIME, SOME OF THE TIME,
HARDLY EVER, or NEVER?

INTERVIWER INSTRUCTION:
-----------------------
(DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. All of the time
2. Most of the time
3. Some of the time
4. Hardly ever
5. Never
7. No neighbors [VOL]

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045172     Q230.f2z3c. Honest Describes Rs Neighbors
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Would you say that HONEST describes the people
in your neighborhood EXTREMELY WELL, QUITE WELL,
NOT TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Extremely well
2. Quite well
3. Not too well
4. Not well at all
7. No neighbors [VOL]

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045173     Q231.f1n1. Religion Important Part of Rs Life
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
On another subject now.
Do you consider religion to be an IMPORTANT
 part of your life, or NOT?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Important
5. Not important

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045173a    Q232.f1n1a. How Important Religion In Rs Life
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF RELIGION IS IMPORTANT PART OF R'S LIFE:

QUESTION:
---------
Would you say your religion provides SOME
guidance in your day-to-day living, QUITE A BIT
of guidance, or A GREAT DEAL of guidance in your
day-to-day life?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Some
3. Quite a bit
5. A great deal

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 5,8,9 in Q231

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045174     Q233.f1n3. Does R Attend Religious Services
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Lots of things come up that keep people from
attending religious services even if they want to.
Thinking about your life these days, do you ever
attend religious services, apart from occasional
weddings, baptisms, or funerals?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045174a    Q234.f1n3a. How Often R Attends Religious Services
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES:

QUESTION:
---------
Do you go to religious services EVERY WEEK,
ALMOST EVERY WEEK, ONCE OR TWICE A MONTH,
A FEW TIMES A YEAR, or NEVER?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Every week
2. Almost every week
3. Once or twice a month
4. A few times a year
5. Never

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 5,8,9 in Q233.F1N3.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045174b     Q235.f1n3a1. Attends Once A Week/More Than Weekly
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES EVERY WEEK:

QUESTION:
---------
Would you say you go to religious services
ONCE A WEEK or MORE OFTEN THAN ONCE A WEEK?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Once a week
2. More often than once a week

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 2-5,8,9 in Q234

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045175     Q236.f1n4. R Active Member At Place Of Worship
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Aside from attending services, in the PAST SIX
MONTHS have you been an active member at your
place of worship - I mean, have you done
things like serve on committees, give time
for special projects, or help organize meetings?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045175a    Q237.f1n4a. R Planned Mtg At Place Of Worship
=======================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R HAS BEEN ACTIVE MEMBER AT PLACE OF WORSHIP:

QUESTION:
---------
As part of these activities, have you planned
or chaired a meeting (in the last six months)?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 5,8,9 in Q236.F1N4

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045175b    Q238.f1n4b. R Given Speech At Place Of Worship
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R HAS BEEN ACTIVE MEMBER AT PLACE OF WORSHIP:

QUESTION:
---------
(As part of these activities,) have you given
a presentation or speech (in the last six months)?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 5,8,9 in Q236.F1N4

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
            F2Q2. INTRODUCTION TO LAST SET OF QUESTIONS
========================================================================

We're nearly at the end of the interview now, and have
just this last set of questions.

========================================================================
M045176     Q239.f3y2. Rs Marital Status
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Are you MARRIED NOW and living with your spouse
- or are you WIDOWED, DIVORCED, SEPARATED, or
have you NEVER MARRIED?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: PEOPLE THAT YOU INCLUDE UNDER CATEGORY 6 SHOULD BE
LIVING AS MARRIED.)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Married
2. Widowed
3. Divorced
4. Separated
5. Never married
6. Partnered, not married {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045177     Q240.f3y3. R Attend Undergrad College/University
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Did you ever attend an undergraduate college or
university?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: IF "YES" ASK: What school was that?)
(INTERVIEWER: The word "attend" includes both those who did not
finish their degree, and those who did.)
(INTERVIEWER: THIS IS AN OPEN-ENDED QUESTION. REMEMBER TO RECORD
VERBATIM. USE "ANYTHING ELSE" PROBE UNTIL COMPLETION.  USE STANDARD
CLARIFICATION PROBES AS APPOPRIATE. IF MORE SPACE IS NEEDED, FINISH
ON PAPER.)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
2. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

NOTES:
------
This variable coded from an open-end response

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045178x    Q246.f3y4x. Rs Employment Status-Summary
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
We'd like to know if you are working now, or
are you unemployed, retired, a homemaker,
(a student), or what?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{MULTIPLE RESPONSES}

VALID CODES:
------------
001. Working now
002. Temporarily laid off
003. Unemployed
004. Retired
005. Permanently disabled
006. Homemaker
007. Student
014. Working now and retired
016. Working now and homemaker
017. Working now and student
026. Temporarily laid off and homemaker
034. Unemployed and retired
035. Unemployed and permanently disabled
036. Unemployed and homemaker
045. Retired and permanently disabled
046. Retired and homemaker
047. Retired and student
067. Homemaker and student
146. Working now, retired, and homemaker
167. Working now, homemaker, and student
467. Retired, homemaker, and student

MISSING CODES:
--------------
888. Don't know
889. Refused

NOTES:
------
This is a final summary which codes respondent
occupation status from R's response to the
questions in the employment section (items
Q243, Q244, and Q245)

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
            F3Y8. INTRODUCTION - QUESTIONS FOR RS WORKING NOW
========================================================================

Here are a couple of things people sometimes do
as part of their job.
After I read each, please tell me whether or not
you have done this, DURING THE LAST SIX MONTHS,
as part of your job.

========================================================================
M045179a     Q247.f3y8a. R Planned/Chaired Mtg At Work
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R IS WORKING NOW:

QUESTION:
---------
Have you planned or chaired a meeting (in the
last 6 months?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 3-7,34-67,888 in Q246

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045179b     Q248.f3y8b. R Given Presentation/Speech At Work
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R IS WORKING NOW:

QUESTION:
---------
Have you given a presentation or speech (in the
last 6 months?)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 3-7,34-67,888 in Q246

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
            F3Z6. INTRODUCTION - R'S FAMILY INCOME
========================================================================

We are interested in how people are getting along
financially these days. The next questions are about
the total income of all members of your family living
in your house in 2003, before taxes and other
deductions. The figure should include salaries,
wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other
income.

========================================================================
M045180a     Q249.f3z6a. Is Rs Family Income More/Less Than 50K
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Is your total household income less than $50,000
or more than $50,000?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE IF NEEDED: What would be your best guess?}

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Less than $50,000
3. More than $50,000
7. Income was (about) $50,000 {VOL}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045180b     Q250.f3z6b. Category Family Income If More Than 50K
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R's TOTAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME MORE THAN $50,000:

QUESTION:
---------
Which category best describes your total household
income: $50,000-$64,999, $65,000-$84,999, or more
than $84,999?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{PROBE IF NEEDED: What would be your best guess?}

VALID CODES:
------------
1. $50,000-$64,999
3. $65,000-$84,999
5. More than $84,999

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 1,7-9 in Q249

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045180c     Q251.f3z6c. Category Family Income If Less Than 50K
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R's TOTAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME LESS THAN $50,000:

QUESTION:
---------
Which category best describes your total household
income: $0-$14,999, $15,000-$34,999, or
$35,000-$49,999?
{PROBE IF NEEDED: What would be your best guess?}

VALID CODES:
------------
1. $0-$14,999
3. $15,000-$34,999
5. $35,000-$49,999

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 3,7-9 IN Q249

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045180x     Q252.f3z6x. R's Family Income-Summary
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Is your total household income less than $50,000
or more than $50,000?
Which category best describes your total household
income: $50,000-$64,999, $65,000-$84,999, or more
than $84,999?
Which category best describes your total household
income: $0-$14,999, $15,000-$34,999, or
$35,000-$49,999?
{PROBE IF NEEDED: What would be your best guess?}

VALID CODES:
------------
01. $0     -$14,999
02. $15,000-$34,999
03. $35,000-$49,999
04. Just about $50,000 [VOL]
05. $50,000-$64,999
06. $65,000-$84,999
07. More than $84,999
08. Less than $50,000 - DK/NA/RF additional subcategorization
09. More than $50,000 - DK/NA/RF additional subcategorization

MISSING CODES:
--------------
88. Don't know household income (8 in Q249)
89. Refused household income (9 in Q249)

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045181     Q253.f3z4. R Have Money In Stock Market
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Do you personally (or jointly with a spouse), have
any MONEY INVESTED IN THE STOCK MARKET RIGHT NOW
-- either in an individual stock or in a mutual fund?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
(INTERVIEWER: "MONEY INVESTED" INCLUDES RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS, LIKE
IRAS INVESTED IN MUTUAL FUNDS.)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045182     Q254.f3z5b. Family Medicare Benefits
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Do you (or any family member living with you)
CURRENTLY receive payments from: Medicare?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045183     Q255.f3z5c. Family Medicaid Benefits
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Do you (or any family member living with you)
CURRENTLY receive payments from: Medicaid?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045184     Q256.f3z5g. Family Retirement Account/Pension
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Do you (or any family member living with you)
CURRENTLY have retirement savings either in a
pension plan or a retirement account, like an IRA?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045185a    Q257.f3z7e1. Rs Race/Ethnicity-Mention 1
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
What racial or ethnic group or groups best
describes you?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{MULTIPLE MENTIONS}
(INTERVIEWER: THIS IS AN OPEN-ENDED QUESTION. REMEMBER TO RECORD
VERBATIM. USE "ANYTHING ELSE" PROBE UNTIL COMPLETION.  USE STANDARD
CLARIFICATION PROBES AS APPOPRIATE. IF MORE SPACE IS NEEDED, FINISH
ON PAPER.)

VALID CODES:
------------
10. Black
20. Asian
30. Native American
40. Hispanic
50. White
70. Other

MISSING CODES:
--------------
80. None
88. Don't know
89. Refused
00. NA

NOTES:
------
The summary variable for Q257-Q259 follows
at Q260.
This variable coded from an open-end response.
Mentions coded in order, as mentioned by R.
Hawaiian/Pacific Islander coded "20. Asian".

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045185b    Q258.f3z7e2. Rs Race/Ethnicity-Mention 2
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
What racial or ethnic group or groups best
describes you?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{MULTIPLE MENTIONS}
(INTERVIEWER: THIS IS AN OPEN-ENDED QUESTION. REMEMBER TO RECORD
VERBATIM. USE "ANYTHING ELSE" PROBE UNTIL COMPLETION.  USE STANDARD
CLARIFICATION PROBES AS APPOPRIATE. IF MORE SPACE IS NEEDED, FINISH
ON PAPER.)

VALID CODES:
------------
10. Black
20. Asian
30. Native American
40. Hispanic
50. White
70. Other

MISSING CODES:
--------------
80. None
88. Don't know
89. Refused
00. NA

NOTES:
------
The summary variable for Q257-Q259 follows at
Q260.
This variable coded from an open-end response.
Mentions coded in order, as mentioned by R.
Hawaiian/Pacific Islander coded "20. Asian".

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045185c    Q259.f3z7e3. Rs Race/Ethnicity-Mention 3
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
What racial or ethnic group or groups best
describes you?
(INTERVIEWER: THIS IS AN OPEN-ENDED QUESTION. REMEMBER TO RECORD
VERBATIM. USE "ANYTHING ELSE" PROBE UNTIL COMPLETION.  USE STANDARD
CLARIFICATION PROBES AS APPOPRIATE. IF MORE SPACE IS NEEDED, FINISH
ON PAPER.)

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

VALID CODES:
------------
10. Black
20. Asian
30. Native American
40. Hispanic
50. White
70. Other

MISSING CODES:
--------------
80. None
88. Don't know
89. Refused
00. NA

NOTES:
------
The summary variable for Q257-Q259 follows at
Q260.
This variable coded from an open-end response.
Mentions coded in order, as mentioned by R.
Hawaiian/Pacific Islander coded "20. Asian".

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045185x    Q260.f3z7ex. Summary: Rs Race/Ethnicity
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
What racial or ethnic group or groups best
describes you?

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{MULTIPLE MENTIONS}
(INTERVIEWER: THIS IS AN OPEN-ENDED QUESTION. REMEMBER TO RECORD
VERBATIM. USE "ANYTHING ELSE" PROBE UNTIL COMPLETION.  USE STANDARD
CLARIFICATION PROBES AS APPOPRIATE. IF MORE SPACE IS NEEDED, FINISH
ON PAPER.)

VALID CODES:
------------
10. Black
12. Black and Asian
13. Black and Native American
14. Black and Hispanic
15. Black and White
20. Asian
23. Asian and Native American
24. Asian and Hispanic
25. Asian and White
30. Native American
34. Native American and Hispanic
35. Native American and White
40. Hispanic
45. Hispanic and White
50. White (no mention of other race)
70. Other

MISSING CODES:
--------------
80. None
88. Don't know
89. Refused
00. NA

NOTES:
------
Hawaiian/Pacific Islander coded "20. Asian".
Note: case 652 has been coded 15 (Black and
White) but included 3 mentions (Black, White

and American Indian)

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045186x    Q263.f3z8x. Checkpoint: Hispanic Mention In Q257-Q259
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Checkpoint: Hispanic mention

VALID CODES:
------------
0. No Hispanic mention in Q257-Q259
1. Hispanic mention in Q257-Q259
6. Hispanic mention in Q257-Q259 but IWR mistakenly
   coded Q263 for no Hispanic mention
7. No Hispanic mention in Q257-Q259 but IWR coded
   Q263 for Hispanic mention
8. Hispanic mention in Q257-Q259 but IWR mistakenly
   coded Q263 as don't know

NOTE:
-----
Respondents whom the interviewer did not
code for Hispanic mention in Q263 were
asked Q264 (if Q263 correctly coded).
See Q265 for final Hispanic status summary.
Code 7 did not appear onscreen for the
interviewer to code but flags cases where
respondent mentions in Q257-Q259 did not
specifically indicate Hispanic race but
interviewer independently identified
respondent as Hispanic and coded Q263
accordingly [note: for all cases coded 7
the respondent was Hispanic].
Codes 6,8 did not appear onscreen for the
interviewer to code but have been added to
identify cases for which IWR miscoded
respondent status according to race/ethnicity
mentions in Q257-Q259.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045187     Q264.f3z9. Is R Spanish/Of Hispanic Origin
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF HISPANIC OR LATINO NOT MENTIONED FOR RACE/ETHNICITY IN
Q257-Q262:

QUESTION:
---------
Are you of Spanish or Hispanic origin or descent?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused
INAP. 1,6,7,8 in Q263

NOTE:
-----
See Q265.F3Z9ax for Hispanic status summary.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045188x    Q265.f3z9ax. Summary: Is R Spanish/Of Hispanic Origin
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT:
IS SPANISH OR HISPANIC GROUP MENTIONED IN Q257-Q262/
DID R IDENTIFY AS SPANISH/OF HISPANIC ORIGIN IN Q264:

VALID CODES:
------------
0. No Hispanic mention in either Q257-Q262 or Q264
   (0 in Q263 and 5,DK,RF in Q264)
1. Hispanic mention in Q257-Q262(1 in Q263)
2. Hispanic mention in Q264 (0 in Q263 and 1 in Q264)
3. Hispanic mention in both Q257-Q262 and Q264
   (6 in Q263 and 1 in Q264)

7. Hispanic - no Hispanic mention in Q257-Q259 but IWR
   correctly coded Q263 as Hispanic [Q264 not asked]

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045188     Q266.f3z9a. If R Hispanic - Type
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:
IF R HISPANIC:

QUESTION:
---------
Would you describe your Hispanic origin as MEXICAN,
PUERTO RICAN, CUBAN, LATIN AMERICA, CENTRAL AMERICAN,
or SPANISH?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Mexican
2. Puerto Rican
3. Cuban
4. Latin American
5. Central American
6. Spanish
7. Other {VOL} {SPECIFY}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know

9. Refused
INAP. 0,7 in Q265

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045189x    Q271.f3z1x. Summary: How Long In Present Community

========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
How long have you lived in your present community?

VALID CODES:
------------
00. Less than 1 year
01. 12-18 months; 1 year
02. 19-24 months; 2 years
03. 3 years
.
.
76. 76 years or more

MISSING CODES:
--------------
88. Don't know
89. Refused
99. NA

NOTES:
------
If R answered 'all my life' then R's age in years has
been coded 18-76.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045190x    Q275.f3z2x. Summary: How Long In Present Home
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
How long have you lived in your current home?

VALID CODES:
------------
00. Less than 1 year
01. 12-18 months; 1 year
02. 19-24 months; 2 years
03. 3 years
.
.
76. 76 years or more

MISSING CODES:
--------------
88. Don't know
89. Refused
99. NA

NOTES:
------
If R answered 'all my life' then R's age in years has
been coded 18-76.

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045191     Q276.f3z3. Does R/Rs Family Own Home/Pay Rent
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
(Do you/Does your family) own your home, pay
rent, or what?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Own house
5. Pay rent
7. Other {SPECIFY}

MISSING CODES:
--------------
8. Don't know
9. Refused

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045192     Q277a. Respondent Gender (Preload)
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Respondent gender (from preload)

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Male
5. Female

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045193     Q277b. Respondent Age (Preload)
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Respondent age (from preload)

VALID CODES:
------------
22-104

MISSING CODES:
--------------
000. NA

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045201     Q278.f4z4. IWR - Rs Cooperation
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
R's cooperation was:

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Very good
2. Good
3. Fair
4. Poor
5. Very poor

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045202     Q279.f4z5. IWR - Rs Level of Political Info
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
R's general level of information about politics
and public affairs seemed:

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Very high
2. Fairly high
3. Average
4. Fairly low
5. Very low

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045203     Q280.f4z6. IWR - R's Apparent Intelligence
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
R's apparent intelligence:

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Very high
2. Fairly high
3. Average
4. Fairly low
5. Very low

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045204     Q281.f4z7. IWR - How Suspicious R Before Study
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
How suspicious did R seem to be about the study
before the interview?:

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Not at all suspicious
3. Somewhat suspicious
5. Very suspicious

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045205     Q282.f4z8. IWR - Rs Interest In Interview
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Overall, how great was R's interest in the interview?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Very high
2. Fairly high
3. Average
4. Fairly low
5. Very low

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045206     Q283.f4z9. IWR - Rs Sincerity
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
How sincere did R seem to be in his/her answers?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Completely sincere
3. Usually sincere
5. Often seemed to be insincere

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045206a     Q284.f4z9a. IWR - Doubted Rs Sincerity
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Were there any particular parts of the interview for
which you doubted R's sincerity?

VALID CODES:
------------
1. Yes
5. No

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045207a    Q286.f4z12_1. IWR - Rs Reaction To IW - Mention 1
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
R's reaction to interview

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

VALID CODES:
------------
10. Negative - general
11. Negative - too long
12. Negative - too complicated
13. Negative - boring/tedious/repetitious
15. R wanted to stop before iw completed.  After
    starting IW, R made comments indicating regrets
    having agreed to do IW
20. R complained and/or iwr observed R was ill/deaf
    /tired/had bad eyesight etc.  IW was hard for R
22. R complained and/or iwr observed r was confused
    by Qs, R was slow reader.  IW was hard for R
30. R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over
    lack of knowledge or own suitability for IW
31. R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over
    lack of political knowledge, candidate names,
    election issues, or own lack of political
    participation
40. R was agitated or stressed by interview process
41. R became angry at interview content
45. R became concerned about sampling purposes or bias
70. R appeared to enjoy the IW (R was cooperative/
    interested/pleasant)
80. Neutral or no feedback (1st mention only)

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045207b    Q287.f4z12_2. IWR - Rs Reaction To IW - Mention 2
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
R's reaction to interview


INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

VALID CODES:
------------
10. Negative - general
11. Negative - too long
12. Negative - too complicated
13. Negative - boring/tedious/repetitious
15. R wanted to stop before iw completed.  After
    starting IW, R made comments indicating regrets
    having agreed to do IW
20. R complained and/or iwr observed R was ill/deaf
    /tired/had bad eyesight etc.  IW was hard for R
22. R complained and/or iwr observed r was confused
    by Qs, R was slow reader.  IW was hard for R
30. R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over
    lack of knowledge or own suitability for IW
31. R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over
    lack of political knowledge, candidate names,
    election issues, or own lack of political
    participation
40. R was agitated or stressed by interview process
41. R became angry at interview content
45. R became concerned about sampling purposes or bias
70. R appeared to enjoy the IW (R was cooperative/
    interested/pleasant)

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. No further mention

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045207c    Q288.f4z12_3. IWR - Rs Reaction To IW - Mention 3
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
R's reaction to interview

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

VALID CODES:
------------
10. Negative - general
11. Negative - too long
12. Negative - too complicated
13. Negative - boring/tedious/repetitious
15. R wanted to stop before iw completed.  After
    starting IW, R made comments indicating regrets
    having agreed to do IW
20. R complained and/or iwr observed R was ill/deaf
    /tired/had bad eyesight etc.  IW was hard for R
22. R complained and/or iwr observed r was confused
    by Qs, R was slow reader.  IW was hard for R
30. R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over
    lack of knowledge or own suitability for IW
31. R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over
    lack of political knowledge, candidate names,
    election issues, or own lack of political
    participation
40. R was agitated or stressed by interview process
41. R became angry at interview content
45. R became concerned about sampling purposes or bias
70. R appeared to enjoy the IW (R was cooperative/
    interested/pleasant)

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. No further mention

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045207d    Q289.f4z12_4. IWR - Rs Reaction To IW - Mention 4
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
R's reaction to interview

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

VALID CODES:
------------
10. Negative - general
11. Negative - too long
12. Negative - too complicated
13. Negative - boring/tedious/repetitious
15. R wanted to stop before iw completed.  After
    starting IW, R made comments indicating regrets
    having agreed to do IW
20. R complained and/or iwr observed R was ill/deaf
    /tired/had bad eyesight etc.  IW was hard for R
22. R complained and/or iwr observed r was confused
    by Qs, R was slow reader.  IW was hard for R
30. R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over
    lack of knowledge or own suitability for IW
31. R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over
    lack of political knowledge, candidate names,
    election issues, or own lack of political
    participation
40. R was agitated or stressed by interview process
41. R became angry at interview content
45. R became concerned about sampling purposes or bias
70. R appeared to enjoy the IW (R was cooperative/
    interested/pleasant)

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. No further mention

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045207e    Q290.f4z12_5. IWR - Rs Reaction To IW - Mention 5
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
R's reaction to interview

INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTION:
------------------------
{MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

VALID CODES:
------------
10. Negative - general
11. Negative - too long
12. Negative - too complicated
13. Negative - boring/tedious/repetitious
15. R wanted to stop before iw completed.  After
    starting IW, R made comments indicating regrets
    having agreed to do IW
20. R complained and/or iwr observed R was ill/deaf
    /tired/had bad eyesight etc.  IW was hard for R
22. R complained and/or iwr observed r was confused
    by Qs, R was slow reader.  IW was hard for R
30. R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over
    lack of knowledge or own suitability for IW
31. R expressed doubts/apologies/embarrassments over
    lack of political knowledge, candidate names,
    election issues, or own lack of political
    participation
40. R was agitated or stressed by interview process
41. R became angry at interview content
45. R became concerned about sampling purposes or bias
70. R appeared to enjoy the IW (R was cooperative/
    interested/pleasant)

MISSING CODES:
--------------
INAP. No further mention

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

========================================================================
M045209     Q295.f4prob1. IWR - Difficulty Admin IW By Phone
========================================================================

POST-ELECTION SURVEY:

QUESTION:
---------
Is there any difficulty administering an interview
by phone to this R?
{EXAMPLES: hard of hearing, illness that makes it
difficult for R to stay on the phone very long, etc.}

VALID CODES:
------------
1 Yes {SPECIFY}
5 No

TYPE:
-----
Numeric  Dec 0

