

==============================
A020001

  ID.1

    Pre Case ID
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Cases 0001-1513 (2 gaps in numbering)

==============================
A020002

  ID.2

    Panel 2000 ID
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         INAP.
         2002 Fresh cross-section respondent

==============================
A021001

  STUDY.1

    Panel/Fresh Cross
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Panel case
         2. Fresh cross-section case

==============================
A021002

  STUDY.2

    Pre-only or Pre-and-Post
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Pre interview only
         2. Pre interview and Post interview

==============================
A021201

  Sample.1

    FIPS State Code
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         01. Alabama             02. Alaska
         04. Arizona             05. Arkansas
         06. California          08. Colorado
         09. Connecticut         10. Delaware
         11. Washington DC       12. Florida
         13. Georgia             15. Hawaii
         16. Idaho               17. Illinois
         18. Indiana             19. Iowa
         20. Kansas              21. Kentucky
         22. Louisiana           23. Maine
         24. Maryland            25. Massachusetts
         26. Michigan            27. Minnesota
         28. Mississippi         29. Missouri
         30. Montana             31. Nebraska
         32. Nevada              33. New Hampshire
         34. New Jersey          35. New Mexico
         36. New York            37. North Carolina
         38. North Dakota        39. Ohio
         40. Oklahoma            41. Oregon
         42. Pennsylvania        44. Rhode Island
         45. South Carolina      46. South Dakota
         47. Tennessee           48. Texas
         49. Utah                50. Vermont
         51. Virginia            53. Washington
         54. West Virginia       55. Wisconsin
         56. Wyoming

         INAP.
         No Post-election Interview

==============================
A021201a

  Sample.1a

    ICPSR State Code
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         01. Connecticut       02. Maine
         03. Massachusetts     04. New Hampshire
         05. Rhode Island      06. Vermont
         11. Delaware          12. New Jersey
         13. New York          14. Pennsylvania
         21. Illinois          22. Indiana
         23. Michigan          24. Ohio
         25. Wisconsin         31. Iowa
         32. Kansas            33. Minnesota
         34. Missouri          35. Nebraska
         36. North Dakota      37. South Dakota
         40. Virginia          41. Alabama
         42. Arkansas          43. Florida
         44. Georgia           45. Louisiana
         46. Mississippi       47. North Carolina
         48. South Carolina    49. Texas
         51. Kentucky          52. Maryland
         53. Oklahoma          54. Tennessee
         55. Washington DC     56. West Virginia
         61. Arizona           62. Colorado
         63. Idaho             64. Montana
         65. Nevada            66. New Mexico
         67. Utah              68. Wyoming
         71. California        72. Oregon
         73. Washington        81. Alaska
         82. Hawaii
      
         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A021201b

  Sample.1b

    State abbreviation (alpha)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A021202

  Sample.2

    Congressional District Number
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Codes 1-52 and:
         77. Washington DC

         99. Correct district not assigned (see Summary.1)

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A021202a

  Sample.2a

    FIPS State code and Congressional District Number
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         The first 2 digits are FIPS state code; last 2 digits are
         Congressional district number. 1100=Washington DC

         9999. Correct district not assigned (see Summary.1)

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A021202b

  Sample.2b

    ICPSR State code and Congressional District Number
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         The first 2 digits are ICPSR state code; last 2 digits are
         Congressional district number. 5500=Washington DC

         9999. Correct district not assigned (see Summary.1)

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A021202c

  Sample.2c

    State Abbreviation and Congressional District Number (alpha)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         "DC00"=Washington DC. "9999" corresponds to 1 in Summary.1

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A022001

  PreAdmin.1

    Pre Release number
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. 1st third
         2. 2nd third
         3. remainder

==============================
A022002

  PreAdmin.2

    Pre Mode
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Telephone

==============================
A022003

  PreAdmin.3

    Pre number of calls
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1-25

==============================
A022004

  PreAdmin.4

    Pre Result
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         There were no partials in the 2002 Pre.

         1. Completed interview

==============================
A022005

  PreAdmin.5

    Pre language
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. English

==============================
A022006

  PreAdmin.6

    Pre interview verification
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         There was no verification of interviews at the interviewing
         facility.

         5. No verification

==============================
A022007

  PreAdmin.7

    Pre interview evaluation
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         There was no evaluation of interviews at the interviewing
         facility.

         5. No evaluation

==============================
A022008

  PreAdmin.8

    Pre interview tape-recorded
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Tape recorded
         5. Not tape recorded

==============================
A022009

  PreAdmin.9

    Pre interview in parts
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Interviewed in parts (multiple sessions)
         5. Not interviewed in parts (1 session)

==============================
A022010

  PreAdmin.10

  IF PRE INTERVIEW CONDUCTED IN PARTS:

    Pre number of parts
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1-5

         INAP.
         5 in PreAdmin.9

==============================
A022011

  PreAdmin.11

    Pre number of interviewers
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This is the number of interviewers used on the case (1-5).

==============================
A022012a

  PreAdmin.12a

    Pre interview - beginning month
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         09. September
         10. October
         11. November

==============================
A022012b

  PreAdmin.12b

    Pre interview - beginning day
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1-31

==============================
A022013a

  PreAdmin.13a

    Pre interview - ending month
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         09. September
         10. October
         11. November

==============================
A022013b

  PreAdmin.13b

    Pre interview - ending day
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1-31

==============================
A022014

  PreAdmin.14

    Pre payment address given?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

==============================
A022015

  PreAdmin.15

  IF PRE PAYMENT ADDRESS GIVEN:

    Pre payment mode
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Check

         INAP.
         5 in PreAdmin.14

==============================
A022016

  PreAdmin.16

  IF PRE PAYMENT ADDRESS GIVEN:

    Pre payment amount
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         20. Twenty dollars
         40. Forty dollars
         50. Fifty dollars

         INAP.
         5 in PreAdmin.14

==============================
A022017a

  PreAdmin.17a

  IF PRE PAYMENT ADDRESS GIVEN:

    Date Pre payment mailed - month
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         09. September
         10. October
         11. November

         INAP.
         5 in PreAdmin.14

==============================
A022017b

  PreAdmin.17b

  IF PRE PAYMENT ADDRESS GIVEN:

    Date Pre payment mailed - day
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1-31

         INAP.
         5 in PreAdmin.14

==============================
A022401

  PreRand.C1

    RANDOMIZATION C1 PRE THERMOMETER SERIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the order of administration of Pre
         interview thermometer questions (C1 series).  Two orderings
         were possible.

         1. Order  C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r
         2. Order  C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j

==============================
A022402

  PreRand.H5J5

    RANDOMIZATION PRE H5/J5
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either H4 or J5 in the
         Pre (alternate placements for President Bush performance on the
         economy).

         1. H5 administered in the Pre interview
         2. J5 administered in the Pre interview

==============================
A022403

  PreRand.H7

    ORDER OF TEXT - PRE H7
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered Pre
         question H7 (party that would perform better on the economy)
         with either "Democrats" or "Republicans" read first.

         1. Democrats first, Republicans second
         2. Republicans firsst, Democrats second

==============================
A022404

  PreRand.J4R1

    RANDOMIZATION PRE J4/R1
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered either
         J4a and J4d or else R1a and R1d in the Pre (alternate
         placements for patriotism items).

         1. J4 administered in the Pre interview
         2. R1 administered in the Pre interview

==============================
A022405

  PreRand.K1K2

    RANDOMIZATION PRE K1/K2
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered either
         the K1 Federal spending items or the K2 Federal spending items.
         (If R was administered K1 in the Pre, then questions
         corresponding to K2 were asked in the Post; if R was
         administered K2 in the Pre, then questions corresponding to
         K1 were asked in the Post.)

         1. R administered K1 in the Pre
         2. R administered K2 in the Pre

==============================
A022406

  PreRand.K1

    RANDOMIZATION PRE K1 SERIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the order of administration of Pre
         K1 series Federal spending items.  Two orderings were possible.

         1. K1a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h
         2. K1a,g,e,b,c,f,h,d

         INAP.
         Not administered K1 in the Pre

==============================
A022407

  PreRand.K1d

    RANDOMIZATION PRE K1d WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the random assignment of wording
         in Federal spending item K1d in the Pre.

         1. "Public schools"
         2. "Big city schools"

         INAP.
         Not administered K1 in the Pre

==============================
A022408

  PreRand.K1g

    RANDOMIZATION PRE K1g WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the random assignment of wording
         in Federal spending item K1g in the Pre.

         1. "Homeland security"
         2. "War on terrorism"

         INAP.
         Not administered K1 in the Pre

==============================
A022409

  PreRand.K2

    RANDOMIZATION PRE K2 SERIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the order of administration of Pre
         K2 series Federal spending items.  Two orderings were possible.

         1. K1a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h
         2. K1a,g,c,d,e,f,h,b

         INAP.
         Not administered K2 in the Pre

==============================
A022410

  PreRand.K2b

    RANDOMIZATION PRE K2b WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the random assignment of wording
         in Federal spending item K2b in the Pre.

         1. "Poor people"
         2. "Working poor"

         INAP.
         Not administered K2 in the Pre

==============================
A022411

  PreRand.K2h

    RANDOMIZATION PRE K2h WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the random assignment of wording
         in Federal spending item K2h in the Pre

         1. "Poor children"
         2. "Black children"

         INAP.
         Not administered K2 in the Pre

==============================
A022412

  PreRand.L2

    L2 RANDOM SELECTION
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the closed list for L2d consists of questions L2d1,d2,d3,
         d4,d5,d6,d7.

         1. L2a open-end ("better")
         2. L2b open-end ("worse")
         3. L2c closed series ("better")
         4. L2d closed series ("worse")

==============================
A022413

  PreRand.L2c

    RANDOMIZATION PRE L2c SERIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the order of administration of Pre
         L2c closed-list income inequality series items (reasons why
         some people have better jobs/income).  Two orderings were
         possible.

         1. L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7
         2. L2c2,c4,c5,c6,c3,c1,c7

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2c series

==============================
A022414

  PreRand.L2d

    RANDOMIZATION PRE L2d SERIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the order of administration of Pre
         L2d closed-list income inequality series items (reasons why
         some people have worse jobs/income).  Two orderings were
         possible.

         1. L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7
         2. L2c2,c4,c5,c6,c3,c1,c7

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2d series

==============================
A022415

  PreRand.L9a/b

    RANDOMIZATION PRE L9a/b WORDING ORDER
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered
         L9a/L9b (party better for the rich/poor) with wording "poor"
         first and "rich" second or vice versa.  (Data in L9a are data
         for "poor" wording regardless of order; data in L9b are data
         for "rich" wording regardless of order).

         1. "Poor" first, "rich" second
         2. "Rich" first, "poor" second

==============================
A022416

  PreRand.L11a/b

    RANDOMIZATION PRE L11a/b ORDER
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered
         L11b first and L11c second, or L11c first and L11b second
         in the Pre (appropriateness of amount paid by rich/poor).

         1. L11b ("rich") first, L11c ("poor") second
         2. L11c ("poor") first, L11b ("rich") second

==============================
A022417

  PreRand.M1d

    ORDER OF TEXT - PRE M1d
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered Pre
         question M1d (party performance on corporate scandals) with
         either "Democrats" or "Republicans" read first.

         1. Democrats first, Republicans second
         2. Republicans firsst, Democrats second

==============================
A022418

  PreRand.M2

    RANDOMIZATION - M2 SERIES WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to alternate wording
         in the M2 tax cut series (all questions in the series wee
         randomly assigned to the same wording).

         1. "Congress passed"
         2. "Bush signed"

==============================
A022419

  PreRand.P1P2

    P1/P2 RANDOM SELECTION
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 and P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 and P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 and P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 and P2j,k,m

         1. Series 1: P1 series "whites better jobs/income" wording
         2. Series 2: P1 series "blacks worse jobs/income" wording
         3. Series 3: P2 series "women worse jobs/income" wording
         4. Series 4: P2 series "men better jobs/income" wording

==============================
A022420

  PreRand.P1

    RANDOMIZATION PRE P1 SERIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were administered a P1 (race) income inequality
         series in 1 of 2 possible orders, randomly assigned.  This order
         was used regardless of which P1 series was administered
         ("whites better/higher" or "blacks worse/lower").

         1. P1a,c,d,e,f,g
         2. P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g

         INAP.
         Not assigned to a P1 series

==============================
A022421

  PreRand.P1k/m

    RANDOMIZATION PRE P1k/m WORDING ORDER
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered
         P1k/P1m (party better for whites/blacks) with wording "whites"
         first and "blacks" second or vice versa.  (Data in P1k are data
         for "whites" wording regardless of order; data in P1m are data
         for "blacks" wording regardless of order).

         1. "Whites" first, "blacks" second
         2. "Blacks" first, "whites" second

         INAP.
         Not assigned to a P1 series

==============================
A022422

  PreRand.P2

    RANDOMIZATION PRE P2 SERIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were administered a P2 (gender) income inequality
         series in 1 of 2 possible orders, randomly assigned.  This order
         was used regardless of which P2 series was administered
         ("women worse/lower" or "men better/higher").

         1. P2a,c,d,e,f,g
         2. P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g

         INAP.
         Not assigned to a P2 series

==============================
A022423

  PreRand.P2k/m

    RANDOMIZATION PRE P2k/m WORDING ORDER
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered
         P2k/P2m (party better for women/men) with wording "women"
         first and "men" second or vice versa.  (Data in P2k are data
         for "women" wording regardless of order; data in P2m are data
         for "men" wording regardless of order).

         1. "Women" first, "men" second
         2. "Men" first, "women" second

         INAP.
         Not assigned to a P2 series

==============================
A022424

  PreRand.Q1Q4

    RANDOMIZED ORDER Q1-Q2/Q3-Q4
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Pre panel cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.

         1. Q2-Q4 first, Q1-Q2 second
         2. Q1-Q2 first, Q3-Q4 second

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
A022425

  PreRand.Q3d

    RANDOMIZED ORDER PRE Q3d SERIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         For Pre panel respondents, the Q3d series of questions (reasons
         for 9/11 attack) were asked in 1 of 2 possible orders, randomly
         assigned.

         1. Q3d1,d2,d5,d6
         2. Q3d5,d6,d1,d2

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
A022426

  PreRand.Q3g

    RANDOMIZED PRE Q3g WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible
         wordings for Q3g (President Bush performance) in the Pre.

         1. "Handling war on terrorism"
         2. "Responded to attack of September 11"

==============================
A022427

  PreRand.Q4a4

    RANDOMIZED ORDER Q4a4/Q4a5
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Panel respondents were randomly assigned to be administered
         Q4a4 (whether war against the Taliban worth the cost) either
         before or after Q4a5 (is Bin Laden still alive) in the Pre.

         1. Q4a4 first, Q4a5 second
         2. Q4a5 first, Q4a4 second

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
A023001

  A1.

    Some people don't pay much attention to political campaigns.
    How about you? Would you say that you have been VERY MUCH
    INTERESTED, SOMEWHAT INTERESTED or NOT MUCH INTERESTED in the
    political campaigns so far this year?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Very much interested
         3. Somewhat interested
         5. Not much interested

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023002

  A6.

    How many days in the PAST WEEK did you watch the NATIONAL
    network news on TV?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         00. None
         01. One Day
         02. Two Days
         03. Three Days
         04. Four Days
         05. Five Days
         06. Six Days
         07. Every Day

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         99. NA

==============================
A023003

  A7.

    How many days IN THE PAST WEEK did you watch the local TV news
    shows, either in the late afternoon or in the early-evening?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         00. None
         01. One Day
         02. Two Days
         03. Three Days
         04. Four Days
         05. Five Days
         06. Six Days
         07. Every Day

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         99. NA

==============================
A023004

  A10.

    How many days IN THE PAST WEEK did you read a daily newspaper?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         00. None
         01. One Day
         02. Two Days
         03. Three Days
         04. Four Days
         05. Five Days
         06. Six Days
         07. Every Day

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         99. NA

==============================
A023005

  A12.

    Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush is
    HANDLING HIS JOB AS PRESIDENT?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Approve
         5. Disapprove

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023006

  A12a.

  IF R APPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING JOB AS PRESIDENT:/
  IF R DISAPPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING JOB AS PRESIDENT:

    (Do you [approve/disapprove])
    STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Strongly
         5. Not Strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         8,9,0 in A12

==============================
A023006x

  A12x.

    Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush is
    HANDLING HIS JOB AS PRESIDENT?
    (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

    APPROVAL - GEORGE W. BUSH JOB AS PRESIDENT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from A12 and A12a.

         1. Approve strongly
         2. Approve not strongly
         4. Disapprove not strongly
         5. Disapprove strongly

         8. Don't know (A12 or A12a)
         9. Refused (A12 or A12a)
         0. NA (A12 or A12a)

==============================
A023007

  B1.

    As you know, representatives to Congress in Washington are being
    chosen in this election from congressional districts all around
    the country.  How much would you say that you personally care
    about the way the election to the U.S. House of Representatives
    comes out: do you care VERY MUCH, PRETTY MUCH, NOT VERY MUCH or
    NOT AT ALL?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Very much
         2. Pretty much
         3. Not very much
         4. Not at all

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023008

  B2.

    Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way the U.S. Congress
    has been handling its job?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Approve
         5. Disapprove

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023009

  B2a.

  IF R APPROVES U.S. CONGRESS HANDLING ITS JOB:/
  IF R DISAPPROVES U.S. CONGRESS HANDLING ITS JOB:

    (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Strongly
         5. Not Strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         8,9,0 in B2

==============================
A023009x

  B2x.

    Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way the U.S. Congress
    has been handling its job?
    (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

    SUMMARY: APPROVAL OF CONGRESS HANDLING ITS JOB
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from B2 and B2a.

         1. Approve strongly
         2. Approve not strongly
         4. Disapprove not strongly
         5. Disapprove strongly

         8. Don't know (B2 or B2a)
         9. Refused (B2 or B2a)
         0. NA (B2 or B2a)

==============================

  C1.

    I'd like to get your feelings toward some people in the news
    these days. I'll read the name of a person and I'll ask you to
    rate that person on a thermometer that runs from 0 to 100
    degrees. Rating above 50 means that you feel favorable and warm
    toward the person. Rating below 50 means that you feel
    unfavorable and cool toward the person.  Rating right at the 50
    degree mark means you don't feel particularly warm or cold.
    You may use any number from 0 to 100 to tell me how favorable
    or unfavorable your feelings are. If we come to a person whose
    name you don't recognize, just tell me and we'll move on to the
    next one.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
A023010

  C1a.

    The first person is:
    George W. Bush
    Where on that thermometer would you rate George W. Bush?
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: GEORGE W. BUSH
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

==============================
A023011

  C1b.

    (The next person is:)
    Dick Cheney
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate him?)
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: DICK CHENEY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         theromometer):
           C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r
           C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

==============================
A023012

  C1c.

    (The next person is:)
    Al Gore
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate him?)
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: AL GORE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         theromometer):
           C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r
           C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

==============================
A023013

  C1d.

    (The next person is:)
    Joseph Lieberman
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate him?)
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: JOSEPH LIEBERMAN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         theromometer):
           C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r
           C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

==============================
A023014

  C1e.

    (The next person is:)
    Ralph Nader
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate him?)
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: RALPH NADER
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         theromometer):
           C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r
           C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

==============================
A023015

  C1f.

    (The next person is:)
    Bill Clinton
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate him?)
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: BILL CLINTON
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         theromometer):
           C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r
           C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

==============================
A023016

  C1h.

    (The next person is:)
    Colin Powell
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate him?)
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: COLIN POWELL
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         theromometer):
           C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r
           C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

==============================
A023017

  C1j.

    (The next person is:)
    John Ashcroft
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate him?)
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: JOHN ASHCROFT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         theromometer):
           C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r
           C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

==============================
A023018

  C1m.

    (The next person is:)
    Jesse Jackson
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate him?)
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: JESSE JACKSON
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         theromometer):
           C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r
           C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

==============================
A023019

  C1p.

    (The next person is:)
    Laura Bush
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate her?)
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: LAURA BUSH
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         theromometer):
           C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r
           C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

==============================
A023020

  C1r.

    (The next person is:)
    Hillary Clinton
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate her?)
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: HILLARY CLINTON
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (C1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         theromometer):
           C1a,Clb,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1j,C1h,C1m,C1p,C1r
           C1a,C1b,C1c,C1d,C1e,C1f,C1r,C1p,C1m,C1h,C1j
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

==============================
A023021

  D2.

    Do you think it is better when ONE PARTY CONTROLS both the
    presidency and Congress, better when CONTROL IS SPLIT between
    the Democrats and Republicans, or DOESN'T MATTER?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Better When One Party Controls Both
         3. Better When Control Is Split
         5. It Doesn't Matter

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023022

  F1.

    We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and
    conservatives. When it comes to politics, do you usually think
    of yourself as EXTREMELY LIBERAL, LIBERAL, SLIGHTLY LIBERAL,
    MODERATE OR MIDDLE OF THE ROAD, SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE,
    CONSERVATIVE, EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE, or haven't you thought
    much about this?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         01. Extremely Liberal
         02. Liberal
         03. Slightly Liberal
         04. Moderate; Middle of the Road
         05. Slightly Conservative
         06. Conservative
         07. Extremely Conservative

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         90. Haven't thought much [Do Not Probe]
         00. NA

==============================
A023023

  F1a.

  IF R LIB-CON SCALE SELF-PLACEMENT IS MODERATE/HAVEN'T THOUGHT/DK:

    If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a LIBERAL or
    a CONSERVATIVE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Liberal
         3. Conservative
         5. Moderate {VOL}
         7. R Refuses to Choose

         8. Don't know
         0. NA

         INAP.
         1-3,5-7,9,0 in F1

==============================
A023024

  F1x.

    We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and
    conservatives. When it comes to politics, do you usually think
    of yourself as EXTREMELY LIBERAL, LIBERAL, SLIGHTLY LIBERAL,
    MODERATE OR MIDDLE OF THE ROAD, SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIVE,
    CONSERVATIVE, EXTREMELY CONSERVATIVE, or haven't you thought
    much about this?
    If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a LIBERAL or
    a CONSERVATIVE?

    SUMMARY - LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE SELF-PLACEMENT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from F1 and F1a

         1. Liberal  (01/02/03;. or 90/04/08;1)
         3. Moderate  (90/04/08;5 or 04;7/8/0)
         5. Conservative  (05/06/07;. or 90/04/08;3)
         7. Refused to choose (90/08;7 or 09;.)

         8. DK  (90/08;8)
         0. NA to F1; 08,90 in F1 and 0 in F1a

==============================
A023025

  G1.

    We are interested in how people are getting along financially
    these days. Would you say that you (and your family) are
    BETTER OFF, WORSE OFF, or just about the same financially as
    you were a year ago?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Better
         3. Worse
         5. Same

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023026

  G1a.

  IF R IS BETTER OFF FINANCIALLY THAN A YEAR AGO:/
  IF R IS WORSE OFF FINANCIALLY THAN A YEAR AGO:

    (Is that) MUCH [better/worse] off or SOMEWHAT [better/worse]
    off?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Much Better
         2. Somewhat Better
         3. Same (5 in G1)
         4. Somewhat Worse
         5. Much Worse

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         8,9,0 in G1

==============================
A023027

  H1.

    Now thinking about the economy in the country as a whole, would
    you say that over the past year the nation's economy has gotten
    BETTER, STAYED ABOUT THE SAME, or gotten WORSE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Better
         3. Same
         5. Worse

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023028

  H1a.

  IF R SAYS ECONOMY HAS GOTTEN BETTER:/
  IF R SAYS ECONOMY HAS GOTTEN WORSE:

    (Would you say) MUCH [better/worse] or SOMEWHAT [better/
    worse]?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Much Better
         2. Somewhat Better
         3. Same (3 in H1)
         4. Somewhat Worse
         5. Much Worse

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         8,9,0 in H1

==============================
A023029

  H5.

  IF R SELECTED FOR H5 ADMINISTRATION:

    Do you APROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush is
    HANDLING THE ECONOMY?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Approval of the President's performance on the economy
         was randomly assigned to administration at H5 or J5 in
         the Pre.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Approve
         5. Disapprove

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for J5 administration

==============================
A023030

  H5a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR H5 ADMINISTRATION:
  IF R APPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING THE ECONOMY:/
  IF R DISAPPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING THE ECONOMY:

    (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Strongly
         5. Not Strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         8,9,0 in H5; R selected for J5 administration

==============================
A023031

  H7.

    Which party do you think would do a better job of HANDLING THE
    NATION'S ECONOMY... the [Democrats/Republicans], the
    [Republicans/Democrats], or wouldn't there be much difference
    between them?
    {IF 'DK' OR 'NEITHER PARTY' IS VOLUNTEERED, DO NOT PROBE}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order of "Democrats" and "Republicans" in question text is
         randomized.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Democrats
         3. Republicans
         5. Wouldn't Be Much Difference/no Difference
         7. Neither Party {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023032

  H9.

    Turning to some other issues facing the country.  During
    the past year, would you say that the United States' position in
    the world has grown WEAKER, STAYED ABOUT THE SAME, or has it
    grown STRONGER?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Weaker
         3. Stayed about the Same
         5. Stronger

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023033

  H12.

    Do you AGREE or DISAGREE with this statement: 'This country
    would be better off if we just stayed home and did not concern
    ourselves with problems in other parts of the world.'
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Agree
         5. Disagree

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023034

  H13.

    Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush is
    HANDLING OUR RELATIONS WITH FOREIGN COUNTRIES?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Approve
         5. Disapprove

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023035

  H13a.

  IF R APPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING FOREIGN RELATIONS:/
  IF R DISAPPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING FOREIGN RELATIONS:

    (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Strongly
         5. Not Strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         8,9,0 in H13

==============================
A023035x

  H13x.

    Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush is
    HANDLING OUR RELATIONS WITH FOREIGN COUNTRIES?
    (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

    SUMMARY - APPROVE GEORGE W. BUSH ON FOREIGN RELATIONS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from H13 and H13a.

         1. Approve strongly
         2. Approve not strongly
         4. Disapprove not strongly
         5. Disapprove strongly

         8. Don't know (H13 or H13a)
         9. Refused (H13 or H13a)
         0. NA (H13 or H13a)

==============================
A023036

  J1.

    Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as a
    REPUBLICAN, a DEMOCRAT, an INDEPENDENT, or what?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Democrat
         2. Republican
         3. Independent
         4. Other Party {VOL} {SPECIFY}
         5. No Preference {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023037

  J1a.

  IF R IDENTIFIES SELF AS A DEMOCRAT:/
  IF R IDENTIFIES SELF AS A REPUBLICAN:

    Would you call yourself a STRONG [democrat/republican] or a
    NOT VERY STRONG [democrat/republican]?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Strong
         5. Not Very Strong

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         3-5,8,9,0 in J1

==============================
A023038

  J1b.

  IF R IDENTIFIES AS INDEPENDENT/OTHER PARTY/NO PREFERENCE/DK:

    Do you think of yourself as CLOSER to the Republican Party or
    to the Democratic party?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Closer to Republican
         3. Neither {VOL}
         5. Closer to Democratic

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         1,2,9,0 in J1

==============================
A023038x

  J1x.

    Generally speaking, do you usually think of yourself as a
    REPUBLICAN, a DEMOCRAT, an INDEPENDENT, or what?
    Would you call yourself a STRONG [democrat/republican] or a
    NOT VERY STRONG [democrat/republican]? /
    Do you think of yourself as CLOSER to the Republican Party or
    to the Democratic party?

    SUMMARY - PARTY IDENTIFICATION
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from J1, J1a, J1b.
         Code 8 (apolitical) was used only if the respondent had a
         code of 5 or 8 in J1 and a code of 3,8,9,0 in J1b AND also
         showed little or no interest in politics in response to the
         following survey questions:  PRE question A1.(interest in
         campaigns), PRE question B1 (care about Congressional race
         outcome), POST question C1x (voted), POST question F5 (follow
         public affairs); respondents who showed an interest in politics
         were coded 3.

         0. Strong Democrat
         1. Weak Democrat
         2. Independent-Democrat
         3. Independent-Independent
         4. Independent-Republican
         5. Weak Republican
         6. Strong Republican

         7. Other; minor party; refuses to say
         8. Apolitical
         9. NA 0 in J1

==============================
A023039

  J4a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR J4 ADMINISTRATION:

    In the PAST TWELVE MONTHS, have you flown an American flag or
    displayed the flag in some other way, such as in a window, or
    on your car, or on a T-shirt or other piece of clothing?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Patriotism items were randomly assigned to placement
         at J4a,d or R1a,d.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for R1 administration

==============================
A023040

  J4d.

  IF R SELECTED FOR J4 ADMINISTRATION:

    Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with this
    statement:  'There are some things about America today that
    make me feel ashamed of America.' Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE
    NOR DISAGREE, or DISAGREE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Patriotism items were randomly assigned to placement
         at J4a,d or R1a,d.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Agree
         3. Neither agree nor disagree
         5. Disagree

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for R1 administration

==============================
A023041

  J5.

  IF R SELECTED FOR J5 ADMINISTRATION:

    Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush is
    HANDLING THE ECONOMY?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Approval of the President's performance on the economy
         was randomly assigned to administration at H5 or J5 in
         the Pre.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Approve
         5. Disapprove

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for H5 administration

==============================
A023042

  J5a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR J5 ADMINISTRATION:
  IF R APPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING THE ECONOMY:/
  IF R DISAPPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH HANDLING THE ECONOMY:

    (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Strongly
         5. Not Strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for H5 administration; 8,9,0 in J5

==============================
A023042x

  J5x.

    Do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the way George W. Bush is
    HANDLING THE ECONOMY?
    (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

    SUMMARY - APPROVE GEORGE W. BUSH ON ECONOMY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This summarizes data from H5 and J5 placements.

         1. Approve strongly
         2. Approve not strongly
         4. Disapprove not strongly
         5. Disapprove strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================

  J6.

    Now I am going to read a statement and ask you whether you
    agree or disagree.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
A023043

  J6a.

    'In the U.S. today, a poor person has the same chance of
    getting a fair trial as a wealthy person does'.  Do you AGREE,
    NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE, or DISAGREE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Agree
         3. Neither agree nor disagree
         5. Disagree

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================

  K1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES:

    Next I am going to read you a list of federal programs.  For
    each one, I would like you to tell me whether you would like to
    see spending INCREASED or DECREASED.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
A023044

  K1a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES:

    The first program is :
    Building and repairing highways.
    If you had a say in making up the federal budget this year,
    should federal spending on building and repairing highways be
    INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: BUILDING AND REPAIRING HIGHWAYS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h
           K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K2 series

==============================
A023045

  K1b.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES:

    (What about)
    spending on AIDS research?
    (Should federal spending on AIDS research be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: AIDS RESEARCH
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h
           K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K2 series

==============================
A023046

  K1c.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES:

    (What about)
    welfare programs?
    (Should federal spending on welfare programs be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: WELFARE PROGRAMS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h
           K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K2 series

==============================
A023047a

  K1d1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'PUBLIC SCHOOLS' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [public schools/big-city schools]?
    (Should federal spending on [public schools/big-city schools]
    be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1/2 of K1d respondents (1/4 sample each) were administered each
         wording.
         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h
           K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K2 series; R selected for alternate wording

==============================
A023047b

  K1d2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'BIG CITY SCHOOLS' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [public schools/big-city schools]?
    (Should federal spending on [public schools/big-city schools]
    be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: BIG CITY SCHOOLS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1/2 of K1d respondents (1/4 sample each) were administered each
         wording.
         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h
           K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K2 series; R selected for alternate wording

==============================
A023048

  K1e.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES:

    (What about)
    dealing with crime?
    (Should federal spending on dealing with crime be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: DEALING WITH CRIME
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h
           K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K2 series

==============================
A023049

  K1f.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES:

    (What about)
    child care?
    (Should federal spending on child care be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: CHILD CARE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h
           K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K2 series

==============================
A023050a

  K1g1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'HOMELAND SECURITY' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [Homeland security/the war on terrorism]?
    (Should federal spending on Homeland security be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: HOMELAND SECURITY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1/2 of K1g respondents (1/4 sample each) were administered each
         wording.
         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h
           K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
        of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K2 series; R selected for alternate wording

==============================
A023050b

  K1g2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WAR ON TERRORISM' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [Homeland security/the war on terrorism]?
    (Should federal spending on Homeland security be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: THE WAR ON TERRORISM
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1/2 of K1g respondents (1/4 sample each) were administered each
         wording.
         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h
           K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
       of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K2 series; R selected for alternate wording

==============================
A023051

  K1h.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K1 SERIES:

    (What about)
    unemployment insurance?
    (Should federal spending on unemployment insurance be
    INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K1a,K1b,K1c,K1d,K1e,K1f,K1g,K1h
           K1a,K1g,K1e,K1b,K1c,K1f,K1h,K1d
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K2 series

==============================

  K2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES:

    Next I am going to read you a list of federal programs.  For
    each one, I would like you to tell me whether you would like to
    see spending INCREASED or DECREASED.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
A023052

  K2a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES:

    The first program is :
    environmental protection
    If you had a say in making up the federal budget this year,
    should federal spending on environmental protection be
    INCREASED, DESCREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h
           K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K1 series

==============================
A023053a

  K2b1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'POOR PEOPLE' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [aid to poor people/aid to the working poor]?
    (Should federal spending on [aid to poor people /aid to the
    working poor] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: AID TO POOR PEOPLE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1/2 of K2b respondents (1/4 sample each) were administered each
         wording.
         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h
           K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K1 series; R selected for alternate wording

==============================
A023053b

  K2b2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WORKING POOR' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [aid to poor people/aid to the working poor]?
    (Should federal spending on [aid to poor people /aid to the
    working poor] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: AID TO THE WORKING POOR
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1/2 of K2b respondents (1/4 sample each) were administered each
         wording.
         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h
           K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K1 series; R selected for alternate wording

==============================
A023054

  K2c.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES:

    (What about)
    foreign aid?
    (Should federal spending on foreign aid be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: FOREIGN AID
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h
           K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K1 series

==============================
A023055

  K2d.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES:

    (What about)
    Social Security?
    (Should federal spending on Social Security be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: SOCIAL SECURITY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h
           K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K1 series

==============================
A023056

  K2e.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES:

    (What about)
    tightening border security to prevent illegal immigration?
    (Should federal spending on tightening border security to
    prevent illegal immigration be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT
    ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: TIGHTENING BORDER SECURITY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h
           K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K1 series

==============================
A023057

  K2f.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES:

    (What about)
    aid to blacks?
    (Should federal spending on aid to blacks be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: AID TO BLACKS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h
           K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K1 series

==============================
A023058

  K2g.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES:

    (What about)
    preventing infant mortality?
    (Should federal spending on preventing infant mortality be
    INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: PREVENTING INFANT MORTALITY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h
           K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K1 series

==============================
A023059a

  K2h1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'POOR CHILDREN' WORDING

    (What about)
    [pre-school and early education for poor children/
    pre-school and early education for black children]?
    (Should federal spending on [pre-school and early education
    for poor children/ pre-school and early education for black
    children] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: EARLY EDUCATION FOR POOR CHILDREN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1/2 of K2h respondents (1/4 sample each) were administered each
         wording.
         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h
           K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K1 series; R selected for alternate wording

==============================
A023059b

  K2h2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR PRE K2 SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACK CHILDREN' WORDING

    (What about)
    [pre-school and early education for poor children/
    pre-school and early education for black children]?
    (Should federal spending on [pre-school and early education
    for poor children/ pre-school and early education for black
    children] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: EARLY EDUCATION FOR BLACK CHILDREN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1/2 of K2h respondents (1/4 sample each) were administered each
         wording.
         Administration of K1 Federal spending series or K2 Federal
         spending series was randomly assigned.
         Individual K1 spending items were administered in one of two
         possible orders following K1a (highways fixed as 1st):
           K2a,K2b,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2g,K2h
           K2a,K2g,K2c,K2d,K2e,K2f,K2h,K2b
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for Pre K1 series; R selected for alternate wording

==============================
A023060

  L1a.

    Now on a different topic.
    Do you think the difference in incomes between rich people and
    poor people in the United States today is LARGER, SMALLER, or
    ABOUT THE SAME as it was 20 years ago?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Larger
         3. Smaller
         5. About the same

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023061

  L1a1.

  IF R SAYS GAP BETWEEN RICH AND POOR LARGER THAN 20 YEARS AGO:/
  IF R SAYS GAP BETWEEN RICH AND POOR SMALLER THAN 20 YEARS AGO:

    (Would you say the difference in incomes is) MUCH
    [larger/smaller] or SOMEWHAT [larger/smaller]?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Much larger
         2. Somewhat larger
         3. About the same (3 in L1a)
         4. Somewhat smaller
         5. Much smaller

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         8,9,0 in L1a

==============================
A023062

  L1a2.

  IF R SAYS GAP BETWEEN RICH AND POOR LARGER THAN 20 YEARS AGO:/
  IF R SAYS GAP BETWEEN RICH AND POOR SMALLER THAN 20 YEARS AGO:

    Do you think this is A GOOD THING, A BAD THING, or haven't you
    thought about it?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Good thing
         3. Bad thing

         7. Haven't thought
         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in L1a

==============================

  L2c.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2c ADMINISTRATION:

    Next, we'd like to know WHY you think it is, that in America
    today, some people have BETTER JOBS and HIGHER INCOMES than
    others do.  I'm going to read you some possible explanations,
    and I want you to tell me how IMPORTANT you think each is.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
A023065a

  L2c1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2c ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people have more in-born ability to learn.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR BETTER JOBS/INCOME: IN-BORN ABILITY TO LEARN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Two orderings L2c series items were possible:
             L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7 OR L2c2,c4,c5,c6,c3,c1,c7
         2. Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the L2d closed list consists of L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2c administration

==============================
A023065b

  L2c2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2c ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because discrimination holds some people back.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR BETTER JOBS/INCOME: DISCRIMINATION HOLDS BACK
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Two orderings L2c series items were possible:
             L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7 OR L2c2,c4,c5,c6,c3,c1,c7
         2. Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the L2d closed list consists of L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2c administration

==============================
A023065c

  L2c3.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2c ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people just don't work as hard.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR BETTER JOBS/INCOME: SOME PEOPLE DON'T WORK AS HARD
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Two orderings L2c series items were possible:
             L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7 OR L2c2,c4,c5,c6,c3,c1,c7
         2. Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the L2d closed list consists of L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2c administration

==============================
A023065d

  L2c4.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2c ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people don't get a chance to get a good
    education.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR BETTER JOBS/INCOME: SOME HAVE NO CHANCE AT EDUCATION
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Two orderings L2c series items were possible:
             L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7 OR L2c2,c4,c5,c6,c3,c1,c7
         2. Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the L2d closed list consists of L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2c administration

==============================
A023065e

  L2c5.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2c ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people just choose low-paying jobs.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR BETTER JOBS/INCOME: SOME PEOPLE CHOOSE LOW-PAY JOBS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Two orderings L2c series items were possible:
             L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7 OR L2c2,c4,c5,c6,c3,c1,c7
         2. Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the L2d closed list consists of L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2c administration

==============================
A023065f

  L2c6.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2c ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because government policies have helped high-income workers
    more.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR BETTER JOBS/INCOME: GOV'T POLICIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Two orderings L2c series items were possible:
             L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7 OR L2c2,c4,c5,c6,c3,c1,c7
         2. Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the L2d closed list consists of L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2c administration

==============================
A023065g

  L2c7.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2c ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because God made people different from one another.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR BETTER JOBS/INCOME: GOD MADE PEOPLE DIFFERENT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Two orderings L2c series items were possible:
             L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7 OR L2c2,c4,c5,c6,c3,c1,c7
         2. Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2c consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the L2d closed list consists of L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2c administration

==============================

  L2d.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2d ADMINISTRATION:

    Next, we'd like to know WHY you think it is, that in America
    today, some people have WORSE JOBS and LOWER INCOMES than
    others  do.  I'm going to read you some possible explanations,
    and I want you to tell me how IMPORTANT you think each is.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
A023066a

  L2d1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2d ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people have more in-born ability to learn.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR WORSE JOBS/INCOME: IN-BORN ABILITY TO LEARN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Two orderings L2d series items were possible:
           L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7
           L2d2,d4,d5,d6,d3,d1,d7
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2d consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the closed list for L2d consists of questions L2d1,d2,d3,
         d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2d administration

==============================
A023066b

  L2d2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2d ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because discrimination holds some people back.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR WORSE JOBS/INCOME: DISCRIMINATION HOLDS BACK
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Two orderings L2d series items were possible:
           L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7
           L2d2,d4,d5,d6,d3,d1,d7
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2d consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the closed list for L2d consists of questions L2d1,d2,d3,
         d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2d administration

==============================
A023066c

  L2d3.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2d ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people just don't work as hard.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR WORSE JOBS/INCOME: SOME PEOPLE DON'T WORK AS HARD
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Two orderings L2d series items were possible:
           L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7
           L2d2,d4,d5,d6,d3,d1,d7
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2d consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the closed list for L2d consists of questions L2d1,d2,d3,
         d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2d administration

==============================
A023066d

  L2d4.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2d ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people don't get a chance to get a good
    education.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR WORSE JOBS/INCOME: SOME HAVE NO CHANCE AT EDUCATION
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Two orderings L2d series items were possible:
           L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7
           L2d2,d4,d5,d6,d3,d1,d7
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2d consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the closed list for L2d consists of questions L2d1,d2,d3,
         d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2d administration

==============================
A023066e

  L2d5.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2d ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people just choose low-paying jobs.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR WORSE JOBS/INCOME: SOME PEOPLE CHOOSE LOW-PAY JOBS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Two orderings L2d series items were possible:
           L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7
           L2d2,d4,d5,d6,d3,d1,d7
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2d consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the closed list for L2d consists of questions L2d1,d2,d3,
         d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2d administration

==============================
A023066f

  L2d6.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2d ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because government policies have helped high-income workers
    more.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR WORSE JOBS/INCOME: GOV'T POLICIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Two orderings L2d series items were possible:
           L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7
           L2d2,d4,d5,d6,d3,d1,d7
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2d consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the closed list for L2d consists of questions L2d1,d2,d3,
         d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2d administration

==============================
A023066g

  L2d7.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2d ADMINISTRATION:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because God made people different from one another.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR WORSE JOBS/INCOME: GOD MADE PEOPLE DIFFERENT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Two orderings L2d series items were possible:
           L2d1,d2,d3,d4,d5,d6,d7
           L2d2,d4,d5,d6,d3,d1,d7
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
           L2a - open-end reason some people have better jobs/income
           L2b - open-end reason some people have worse jobs/income
           L2c - closed list reasons some people have better jobs/income
           L2d - closed list reasons some people have worse jobs/income
         The closed list for L2d consists of questions L2c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,
         c6,c7; the closed list for L2d consists of questions L2d1,d2,d3,
         d4,d5,d6,d7.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R not selected for L2d administration

==============================
A023067

  L9a.

    Which political party do you think is generally better for
    [poor/rich] people - the DEMOCRATS, the REPUBLICANS, or is
    there NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE between them?

    PARTY R THINKS IS BETTER FOR POOR PEOPLE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         L9a-L9b are randomly assigned to have a 1/2 sample administered
         with "poor" first and "rich" second. The other 1/2 sample
         administered reverse wording order ("rich" first and "poor"
         second).
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Democrats
         3. Republicans
         5. Not much difference

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023068

  L9b.

    And which party do you think is generally better for
    [rich/poor] people - the DEMOCRATS, the REPUBLICANS, or is
    there NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE between them?

    PARTY R THINKS IS BETTER FOR RICH PEOPLE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         L9a-L9b are randomly assigned to have a 1/2 sample administered
         with "poor" first and "rich" second. The other 1/2 sample
         administered reverse wording order ("rich" first and "poor"
         second).
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Democrats
         3. Republicans
         5. Not much difference

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================

  L11.

    Next are a few questions about federal income taxes.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
A023069

  L11a.

    Do you feel you are asked to pay MORE THAN YOU SHOULD in
    federal income taxes, about the RIGHT AMOUNT, or LESS THAN YOU
    SHOULD?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. More than should pay
         3. About right
         5. Less than should pay
         7. Don't pay at all {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023070

  L11b.

    What about rich people? Do you feel rich people are asked to
    pay MORE THAN THEY SHOULD in federal income taxes, about the
    RIGHT AMOUNT, or LESS THAN THEY SHOULD?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1st 1/2 SAMPLE L11b ("rich") FIRST AND L11c ("poor") SECOND;
         2nd 1/2 SAMPLE L11c ("poor") FIRST AND L11b ("rich") SECOND
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. More than should pay
         3. About right
         5. Less than should pay
         7. Don't pay at all {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023071

  L11c.

    What about poor people? Do you feel poor people are asked to
    pay MORE THAN THEY SHOULD in federal income taxes, about the
    RIGHT AMOUNT, or LESS THAN THEY SHOULD?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1st 1/2 SAMPLE L11b ("rich") FIRST AND L11c ("poor") SECOND;
         2nd 1/2 SAMPLE L11c ("poor") FIRST AND L11b ("rich") SECOND
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. More than should pay
         3. About right
         5. Less than should pay
         7. Don't pay at all {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023072

  M1a.

    Over the last year, investigations into a number of large
    corporations such as Enron have found top executives to have
    exaggerated profits through shady accounting procedures.  The
    executives received huge bonuses, but their companies went
    bankrupt and workers lost their jobs and retirement savings.
    How much attention would you say you've paid to those stories
    -- QUITE A LOT, SOME, JUST A LITTLE, or NONE AT ALL?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Quite a lot
         2. Some
         3. Just a little
         4. None

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023073

  M1a2.

  IF R PAID ATTENTION TO CORPORATE SCANDALS:

    Have these stories ever made you angry?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         4,8,9,0 in M1a

==============================
A023074

  M1a3.

  IF R PAID ATTENTION TO CORPORATE SCANDALS:

    How common do you think this problem is today:  would you say
    it affects NEARLY ALL large U.S. companies, MANY, SOME, or
    JUST A FEW?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Nearly all
         2. Many
         3. Some
         4. Just a few

         7. Haven't thought about {VOL}
         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         4,8,9,0 in M1a

==============================
A023075

  M1d.

    Which party do you think would do a better job making sure that
    these problems do not continue to happen, the [DEMOCRATS/
    REPUBLICANS], the [REPUBLICANS/DEMOCRATS], or WOULDN'T THERE BE
    MUCH DIFFERENCE between them?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered Pre
         question M1d (party performance on corporate scandals) with
         either "Democrats" or "Republicans" read first.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Democrats
         3. Republicans
         5. Wouldn't be much difference
         7. Neither {VOL}

         8  Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023076

  M2a.

    As you may recall, [Congress passed/President Bush signed] a
    big tax cut last year.  Did you FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut, or
    is this something you haven't thought about?

    FAVOR/OPPOSE TAX CUT: COMBINED WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This combines data from M2a1 and M2a2.

         01. Favor
         05. Oppose
         07. Other/depends/neither {VOL} {SPECIFY}

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         00. NA
         90. Haven't thought about

==============================
A023076a

  M2a1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'CONGRESS' WORDING:

    As you may recall, [Congress passed/President Bush signed] a
    big tax cut last year.  Did you FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut, or
    is this something you haven't thought about?

    FAVOR/OPPOSE TAX CUT: CONGRESS WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to alternate wording
         in the M2 tax cut series (all questions in the series wee
         randomly assigned to the same wording).
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         01. Favor
         05. Oppose
         07. Other/depends/neither {VOL} {SPECIFY}

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         00. NA
         90. Haven't thought about

         INAP.
         R not selected for this wording

==============================
A023076b

  M2a2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'PRESIDENT BUSH' WORDING:

    As you may recall, [Congress passed/President Bush signed] a
    big tax cut last year.  Did you FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut, or
    is this something you haven't thought about?

    FAVOR/OPPOSE TAX CUT: PRESIDENT BUSH WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to alternate wording
         in the M2 tax cut series (all questions in the series wee
         randomly assigned to the same wording).
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         01. Favor
         05. Oppose
         07. Other/depends/neither {VOL} {SPECIFY}

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         00. NA
         90. Haven't thought about

         INAP.
         R not selected for this wording

==============================
A023077

  M2b.

  IF R FAVORED TAX CUT LAST YEAR:/
  IF R OPPOSED TAX CUT LAST YEAR:

    Did you [favor/oppose] the tax cut STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Strongly
         5. Not strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         7,8,9,90,0 in M2a

==============================
A023077x

  M2bx.

    As you may recall, [Congress passed/President Bush signed] a
    big tax cut last year.  Did you FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut, or
    is this something you haven't thought about?
    Did you [favor/oppose] the tax cut STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

    SUMMARY - APPROVE LAST YEAR'S TAX CUT (COMBINED WORDING)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from M2a and M2b

         1. Approve strongly
         2. Approve not strongly
         4. Disapprove not strongly
         5. Disapprove strongly

         6. Other; depends; neither (7 in M2a)
         7. Haven't thought about it (90 in M2a)
         8. Don't know in M2a or M2b
         9. Refused in M2a or M2b
         0. NA in M2a or M2b

==============================
A023078

  M2c.

    Do you happen to remember - did the Democratic Party FAVOR or
    OPPOSE the tax cut that [Congress passed/President Bush
    signed] last year?

    DEMOCRATIC PARTY FAVOR TAX CUT: COMBINED WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This combines data from M2c1 and M2c2.

         01. Favor
         05. Oppose
         07. Other  {VOL} {SPECIFY}

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         00. NA
         80. Don't remember {VOL}

==============================
A023078a

  M2c1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'CONGRESS' WORDING:

    Do you happen to remember - did the Democratic Party FAVOR or
    OPPOSE the tax cut that [Congress passed/President Bush
    signed] last year?

    DEMOCRATIC PARTY FAVOR TAX CUT - CONGRESS WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to alternate wording
         in the M2 tax cut series (all questions in the series wee
         randomly assigned to the same wording).
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         01. Favor
         05. Oppose
         07. Other  {VOL} {SPECIFY}

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         00. NA
         80. Don't remember {VOL}

         INAP.
         R not selected for this wording

==============================
A023078b

  M2c2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'PRESIDENT BUSH' WORDING:

    Do you happen to remember - did the Democratic Party FAVOR or
    OPPOSE the tax cut that [Congress passed/President Bush
    signed] last year?

    DEMOCRATIC PARTY FAVOR TAX CUT - BUSH WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to alternate wording
         in the M2 tax cut series (all questions in the series wee
         randomly assigned to the same wording).
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         01. Favor
         05. Oppose
         07. Other  {VOL} {SPECIFY}

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         00. NA
         80. Don't remember {VOL}

         INAP.
         R not selected for this wording

==============================
A023079

  M2e.

    What about the Republican Party - did the Republican Party
    FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut that [Congress passed/President
    Bush signed] last year?

    REPUBLICAN PARTY FAVOR TAX CUT: COMBINED WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This combines data from M2e1 and M2e2.

         01. Favor
         05. Oppose
         07. Other  {VOL} {SPECIFY}

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         00. NA
         80. Don't remember {VOL}

==============================
A023079a

  M2e1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'CONGRESS' WORDING:

    What about the Republican Party - did the Republican Party
    FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut that [Congress passed/President
    Bush signed] last year?

    REPUBLICAN PARTY FAVOR TAX CUT - CONGRESS WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to alternate wording
         in the M2 tax cut series (all questions in the series wee
         randomly assigned to the same wording).
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         01. Favor
         05. Oppose
         07. Other  {VOL} {SPECIFY}

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         00. NA
         80. Don't remember {VOL}

         INAP.
         R not selected for this wording

==============================
A023079b

  M2e2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'PRESIDENT BUSH' WORDING:

    What about the Republican Party - did the Republican Party
    FAVOR or OPPOSE the tax cut that [Congress passed/President
    Bush signed] last year?

    REPUBLICAN PARTY FAVOR TAX CUT - BUSH WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to alternate wording
         in the M2 tax cut series (all questions in the series wee
         randomly assigned to the same wording).
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         01. Favor
         05. Oppose
         07. Other  {VOL} {SPECIFY}

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         00. NA
         80. Don't remember {VOL}

         INAP.
         R not selected for this wording

==============================
A023080

  M2n.

    How important is this issue to you personally - VERY
    important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL?

    IMPORTANCE OF TAX CUT TO R
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023081

  M2p.

    Has this issue ever made you angry?

    TAX CUT EVER MADE R ANGRY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023082

  N1.

    Now, on another topic. . .
    Do you consider religion to be an IMPORTANT part of your life,
    or NOT?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Important
         5. Not important

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023083

  N1a.

  IF R CONSIDERS RELIGION IMPORTANT:

    Would you say your religion provides SOME guidance in your day-
    to-day living, QUITE A BIT of guidance, or A GREAT DEAL of
    guidance in your day-to-day life?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Some
         3. Quite a bit
         5. A great deal

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         0,5,8,9 in N1

==============================
A023084

  N3.

    Lots of things come up that keep people from attending
    religious services even if they want to. Thinking about your
    life these days, do you ever attend religious services, apart
    from occasional weddings, baptisms, or funerals?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023085

  N3a.

  IF R EVER ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES:

    Do you go to religious services EVERY WEEK, ALMOST EVERY WEEK,
    ONCE OR TWICE A MONTH, A FEW TIMES A YEAR, or NEVER?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Every week
         2. Almost every week
         3. Once or twice a month
         4. A few times a year
         5. Never

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in N3

==============================
A023086

  N3a1.

  IF R EVER ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES:
  IF R ATTENDS RELIGIOUS SERVICES EVERY WEEK:

    Would you say you go to religious services ONCE A WEEK or MORE
    OFTEN THAN ONCE A WEEK?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Once a week
         2. More often than once a week

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in N3; 2-5,8,9,0 in N3a

==============================
A023087

  N4.

    Aside from attending services, in the PAST SIX MONTHS have you
    been an active member at your place of worship - I mean, have
    you done things like serve on committees, give time for special
    projects, or help organize meetings?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023088

  N4a.

  IF R REPORTS BEING AN ACTIVE MEMBER AT R'S PLACE OF WORSHIP:

    As part of these activities, have you planned or chaired a
    meeting (in the last six months)?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in N4

==============================
A023089

  N4b.

  IF R REPORTS BEING AN ACTIVE MEMBER AT R'S PLACE OF WORSHIP:

    (As part of these activities,) have you given a presentation
    or speech (in the last six months)?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in N4

==============================

  P1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:

    Now for some other questions.
    Next, we'd like to know WHY you think it is, that in America
    today, [blacks/whites] tend to have [WORSE/BETTER] JOBS and
    [LOWER/HIGHER] INCOMES than [whites/blacks] do.  I'm going to
    read you some possible explanations, and I want you to tell me
    how IMPORTANT you think each is.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
A023090

  P1a1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WHITES BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because whites have more in-born ability to learn'.
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    WHITES BETTER JOBS: MORE IN-BORN ABILITY TO LEARN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
A023090a

  P1a2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACKS WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because whites have more in-born ability to learn'.
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    BLACKS WORSE JOBS: MORE IN-BORN ABILITY TO LEARN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
A023091

  P1b1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WHITES BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because discrimination holds blacks back'.
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    WHITES BETTER JOBS: DISCRIMINATION HOLDS BLACKS BACK
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
A023091a

  P1b2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACKS WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because discrimination holds blacks back'.
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    BLACKS WORSE JOBS: DISCRIMINATION HOLDS BLACKS BACK
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
A023092

  P1c1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WHITES BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because blacks just don't work as hard'.
    (Would you say that this is VERY  important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    WHITES BETTER JOBS: BLACKS JUST DON'T WORK AS HARD
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
A023092a

  P1c2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACKS WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because blacks just don't work as hard'.
    (Would you say that this is VERY  important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    BLACKS WORSE JOBS: BLACKS JUST DON'T WORK AS HARD
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
A023093

  P1d1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WHITES BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because blacks don't get a chance to get a good education'.
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    WHITES BETTER JOBS: BLACKS DON'T GET CHANCE AT GOOD EDUC.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
A023093a

  P1d2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACKS WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because blacks don't get a chance to get a good education'.
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    BLACKS WORSE JOBS: BLACKS DON'T GET CHANCE AT GOOD EDUC.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
A023094

  P1e1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WHITES BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because blacks just choose low-paying jobs'.
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    WHITES BETTER JOBS: BLACKS JUST CHOOSE LOW-PAYING JOBS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
A023094a

  P1e2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACKS WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because blacks just choose low-paying jobs'.
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    BLACKS WORSE JOBS: BLACKS JUST CHOOSE LOW-PAYING JOBS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
A023095

  P1f1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WHITES BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because government policies have helped whites more'.
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    WHITES BETTER JOBS: GOV'T POLICIES HELP WHITES MORE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
A023095a

  P1f2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACKS WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because government policies have helped whites more'.
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    BLACKS WORSE JOBS: GOV'T POLICIES HELP WHITES MORE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
A023096

  P1g1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WHITES BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because God made people different from one another'.
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    WHITES BETTER JOBS: GOD MADE PEOPLE DIFFERENT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
A023096a

  P1g2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACKS WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because God made people different from one another'.
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [blacks/ whites] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [whites/blacks] do ?)

    BLACKS WORSE JOBS: GOD MADE PEOPLE DIFFERENT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P1 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P1a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P1b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by gender series P2; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by race

==============================
A023097

  P1j.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:

    Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with the following:
    'In the U.S. today, a black person has the same chance of
    getting a fair trial as a white person does.'  Do you AGREE,
    NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE, or DISAGREE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This question was asked of respondents assigned to either
         series for income inequality by race (P1)
         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Agree
         3. Neither agree nor disagree
         5. Disagree

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for gender inequality series P2

==============================
A023098

  P1k.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:

    Which political party do you think is generally better for
    [white/black] people - the DEMOCRATS, the REPUBLICANS, or is
    there NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM?

    PARTY BETTER FOR WHITES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         P1k-P1m are randomly assigned to have a 1/2 sample administered
         with "white" first (in P1k) and "black" second (in P1m). The
         other 1/2 sample administered reverse wording order ("black" in
         P1k and "white" in P1m)
         This question was asked of respondents assigned to either
         series for income inequality by race (P1)
         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Democrats
         3. Republicans
         5. Not much difference between them

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for gender inequality series P2

==============================
A023099

  P1m.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE SERIES:

    And which party do you think is generally better for
    [black/white] people - the DEMOCRATS, the REPUBLICANS, or is
    there NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM?

    PARTY BETTER FOR BLACKS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         P1k-P1m are randomly assigned to have a 1/2 sample administered
         with "white" first (in P1k) and "black" second (in P1m). The
         other 1/2 sample administered reverse wording order ("black" in
         P1k and "white" in P1m)
         This question was asked of respondents assigned to either
         series for income inequality by race (P1)
         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Democrats
         3. Republicans
         5. Not much difference between them

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for gender inequality series P2

==============================

  P2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:

    Now for some other questions.
    Next, we'd like to know WHY you think it is, that in America
    today, [women/men] tend to have [WORSE/BETTER] JOBS and
    [LOWER/HIGHER] INCOMES than [men/women] do.  I'm going to
    read you some possible explanations, and I want you to tell me
    how IMPORTANT you think each is.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
A023100

  P2a1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WOMEN WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because men have more in-born ability to learn'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON WOMEN WORSE JOBS: MEN HAVE MORE IN-BORN ABILITY TO LEARN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
A023100a

  P2a2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'MEN BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because men have more in-born ability to learn'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON MEN BETTER JOBS: MEN HAVE MORE IN-BORN ABILITY TO LEARN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
A023101

  P2b1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WOMEN WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because discrimination holds women back'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON WOMEN WORSE JOBS: DISCRIMINATION HOLDS WOMEN BACK
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
A023101a

  P2b2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'MEN BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because discrimination holds women back'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON MEN BETTER JOBS: DISCRIMINATION HOLDS WOMEN BACK
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
A023102

  P2c1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WOMEN WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because women just don't work as hard'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON WOMEN WORSE JOBS: WOMEN JUST DON'T WORK AS HARD
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
A023102a

  P2c2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'MEN BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because women just don't work as hard'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON MEN BETTER JOBS: WOMEN JUST DON'T WORK AS HARD
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
A023103

  P2d1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WOMEN WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because women don't get a chance to get a good education'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON WOMEN WORSE JOBS: WOMEN DON'T GET CHANCE AT GOOD EDUCATION
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
A023103a

  P2d2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'MEN BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because women don't get a chance to get a good education'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON MEN BETTER JOBS: WOMEN DON'T GET CHANCE AT GOOD EDUC.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
A023104

  P2e1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WOMEN WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because women just choose low-paying jobs'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON WOMEN WORSE JOBS: WOMEN JUST CHOOSE LOW-PAYING JOBS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
A023104a

  P2e2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'MEN BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because women just choose low-paying jobs'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON MEN BETTER JOBS: WOMEN JUST CHOOSE LOW-PAYING JOBS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
A023105

  P2f1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WOMEN WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because government policies have helped men more'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON WOMEN WORSE JOBS: GOV'T POLICIES HELP MEN MORE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
A023105a

  P2f2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'MEN BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because government policies have helped men more'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON MEN BETTER JOBS: GOV'T POLICIES HELP MEN MORE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
A023106

  P2g1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WOMEN WORSE JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because God made people different from one another'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON WOMEN WORSE JOBS: GOD MADE PEOPLE DIFFERENT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 race/gender income
         inequality series.
           Series 1: P1a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1 ('whites better'), P1j,k,m
           Series 2: P1a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('blacks worse'), P1j,k,m
           Series 3: P2a1,b1,c1,d1,e1,f1,g1. ('women worse'), P2j,k,m
           Series 4: P2a2,b2,c2,d2,e2,f2,g2 ('men better'), P2j,k,m
         Reasons for inequality by race (either P2 series) were
         administered in one of two possible orders:
           P2a,b,c,d,e,f,g  OR  P2b,d,e,f,c,a,g
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
A023106a

  P2g2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'MEN BETTER JOBS-INCOME' WORDING:

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because God made people different from one another'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    [women/ men] tend to have [worse/better] jobs and
    [lower/higher] incomes than [men/women] do ?)

    REASON MEN BETTER JOBS: GOD MADE PEOPLE DIFFERENT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         '

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1; R
         selected for alternate wording for income inequality by gender

==============================
A023107

  P2j.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:

    Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with the following:
    'In the U.S. today, a woman has the same chance of a getting a
    fair trial as a man does.'  Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE NOR
    DISAGREE, or DISAGREE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         '

         1. Agree
         3. Neither agree nor disagree
         5. Disagree

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1

==============================
A023108

  P2k.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:

    Which political party do you think is generally better for
    [women/men] - the DEMOCRATS, the REPUBLICANS, or is there
    NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM?

    PARTY BETTER FOR WOMEN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         '

         1. Democrats
         3. Republicans
         5. Not much difference between them

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1

==============================
A023109

  P2m.

  IF R SELECTED FOR INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER SERIES:

    And which party do you think is generally better for
    [men/women] - the DEMOCRATS, the REPUBLICANS, or is there
    NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM?

    PARTY BETTER FOR MEN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         '

         1. Democrats
         3. Republicans
         5. Not much difference between them

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for income inequality by race series P1

==============================
A023110

  Q1.

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT:

    Now I'd like to ask you a few questions about the 2000
    Presidential election.
    In 2000 George W. Bush ran on the Republican ticket against
    Al Gore for the Democrats, and Ralph Nader as a third party
    candidate. Do you remember for sure whether or not you voted in
    that election?
    {DO NOT PROBE 'DK' RESPONSE}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Pre panel cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Yes, voted
         5. No, didn't vote

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
A023111

  Q1a.

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT:
  IF R VOTED IN THE 2000 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION:

    Which one did you vote for?
    {DO NOT PROBE DK RESPONSE}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Pre panel cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Al Gore
         3. George W. Bush
         5. Ralph Nader
         7. Other {SPECIFY}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent; 5,8,9 in Q1

==============================
A023111a

  Q1b.

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT:
  IF R VOTED IN THE 2000 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION:

    STUDY STAFF ONLY

    Q1a. SPECIFY TEXT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent; 5,8,9 in Q1

==============================
A023112

  Q2a.

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT:

    Whether or not you voted, you might remember that the 2000
    presidential election ended in a big controversy.  What do you
    remember most about that?

    2000 ELECTION: CODED OPENEND RESPONSE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Pre panel cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
A023113

  Q2c.

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT:

    All things considered, would you say that the 2000 presidential
    election was decided in a way that was FAIR or UNFAIR?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Pre panel cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Fair
         5. Unfair

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
A023114

  Q2c1.

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT:
  IF R FELT 2000 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OUTCOME WAS FAIR /
  IF R FELT 2000 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OUTCOME WAS UNFAIR:

    Do you feel STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY that it was [fair/unfair]?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Pre panel cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Strongly
         5. Not strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent; 8,9,0 in Q2c

==============================
A023114x

  Q2cx.

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT:

    All things considered, would you say that the 2000 presidential
    election was decided in a way that was FAIR or UNFAIR?
    Do you feel STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY that it was [fair/unfair]?

    SUMMARY: FAIRNESS OF 2000 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from Q2c and Q2c1.
         Pre panel cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Approve strongly
         2. Approve not strongly
         4. Disapprove not strongly
         5. Disapprove strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================

  Q3.

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT:

    Now for another topic.
    As you know, on September 11th 2001, a group of terrorists took
    control of several U.S. commercial airplanes and crashed them
    into the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in
    Washington.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
A023115

  Q3b.

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT:

    Did you happen to see the collapse of the World Trade Center
    towers on live television AS IT WAS ACTUALLY HAPPENING?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Pre panel cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Yes
         5. No
         7. R witnessed in person

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
A023116

  Q3c.

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT:

    What do you think the terrorists were trying to accomplish by
    their actions?

    CODED OPEN-END RESPONSE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================

  Q3d.

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT:

    Now I'm going to read you a short list of explanations people
    have suggested for September 11.  I would like you to tell me
    how IMPORTANT you think each is in explaining the September
    11th attack.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
A023117a

  Q3d1.

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT:

    [The first is:/(What about:)]
    'The United States' support of Israel.'
    (Would you say that U.S. support of Israel is VERY important,
    SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation
    for the terrorist attack on September 11?)

    REASON FOR 9/11: US SUPPORT OF ISRAEL
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         For Pre panel respondents, the Q3d series of questions (reasons
         for 9/11 attack) were asked in 1 of 2 possible orders, randomly
         assigned:
            Q3d1,d2,d5,d6
            Q3d5,d6,d1,d2
         Pre panel cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
A023117b

  Q3d2.

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT:

    [The first is:/(What about:)]
    'Desert Storm, the U.S. war against Iraq and Saddam Hussein in
    1991'
    (Would you say that Desert Storm is VERY important,
    SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an
    explanation for the terrorist attack on September 11?)

    REASON FOR 9/11: DESERT STORM, US WAR AGAINST IRAQ IN 1991
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         For Pre panel respondents, the Q3d series of questions (reasons
         for 9/11 attack) were asked in 1 of 2 possible orders, randomly
         assigned:
            Q3d1,d2,d5,d6
            Q3d5,d6,d1,d2
         Pre panel cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
A023117c

  Q3d5.

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT:

    [The first is:/(What about:)]
    'To carry out a religious war'
    (Would you say that a religious war is VERY important,
    SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an
    explanation for the terrorist attack on September 11?)

    REASON FOR 9/11: TO CARRY OUT A RELIGIOUS WAR
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         For Pre panel respondents, the Q3d series of questions (reasons
         for 9/11 attack) were asked in 1 of 2 possible orders, randomly
         assigned:
            Q3d1,d2,d5,d6
            Q3d5,d6,d1,d2
         Pre panel cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
A023117d

  Q3d6.

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT:

    [The first is:/(What about:)]
    'Because the terrorists believe that America is immoral'
    (Would you say that this belief about America is VERY
    important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an
    explanation for the terrorist attack on September 11?)

    REASON FOR 9/11: TERRORISTS BELIEVE AMERICA IS IMMORAL
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         For Pre panel respondents, the Q3d series of questions (reasons
         for 9/11 attack) were asked in 1 of 2 possible orders, randomly
         assigned:
            Q3d1,d2,d5,d6
            Q3d5,d6,d1,d2
         Pre panel cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
A023118

  Q3e.

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT:

    How likely do you think it is that the U.S. will suffer an
    attack as serious as the one in New York and Washington some
    time in the next 12 months? Would you say VERY LIKELY, SOMEWHAT
    LIKELY, SOMEWHAT UNLIKELY, or VERY UNLIKELY?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Pre panel cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very Likely
         2. Somewhat Likely
         3. Somewhat Unlikely
         4. Very Unlikely

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
A023119

  Q3g.

    All things considered, do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the
    way George W. Bush [is handling the war on terrorism/has
    responded to the terrorist attack of September 11]?

    GEORGE W. BUSH APPROVAL COMBINED WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This combines data from Q3g1 and Q3g2.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible
         wordings for Q3g (President Bush performance) in the Pre.
         Pre panel cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre cases from the fresh
         cross-section were asked only Q3g questions.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Approve
         5. Disapprove

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023119a

  Q3g1a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WAR ON TERRORISM' WORDING:

    All things considered, do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the
    way George W. Bush [is handling the war on terrorism/has
    responded to the terrorist attack of September 11]?

    GEORGE W. BUSH APPROVAL - HANDLING WAR ON TERRORISM
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible
         wordings for Q3g (President Bush performance) in the Pre.
         Pre panel cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre cases from the fresh
         cross-section were asked only Q3g questions.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Approve
         5. Disapprove

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording

==============================
A023119b

  Q3g1b.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'RESPONDED TO 9/11' WORDING:

    All things considered, do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the
    way George W. Bush [is handling the war on terrorism/has
    responded to the terrorist attack of September 11]?

    GEORGE W. BUSH APPROVAL - RESPONSE TO TERRORIST ATTACKS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible
         wordings for Q3g (President Bush performance) in the Pre.
         Pre panel cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre cases from the fresh
         cross-section were asked only Q3g questions.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Approve
         5. Disapprove

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording

==============================
A023119c

  Q3g2.

  IF R APPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH ON 9-11/WAR ON TERRORISM: /
  IF R DISAPPROVES GEORGE W. BUSH ON 9-11/WAR ON TERRORISM:

    (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Strongly
         5. Not Strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         8,9,0 in Q3g

==============================
A023119x

  Q3gx.

    All things considered, do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the
    way George W. Bush [is handling the war on terrorism/has
    responded to the terrorist attack of September 11]?
    (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

    SUMMARY: APPROVE BUSH ON TERRORISM/SEPT 11 RESPONSE (COMBINED)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from Q3g1 and Q3g2.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible
         wordings for Q3g (President Bush performance) in the Pre.
         Pre panel cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre cases from the fresh
         cross-section were asked only Q3g questions.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Approve strongly
         2. Approve not strongly
         4. Disapprove not strongly
         5. Disapprove strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023119y

  Q3gx1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WAR ON TERRORISM' WORDING:

    All things considered, do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the
    way George W. Bush is handling the war on terrorism?
    (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

    SUMMARY: APPROVE BUSH ON 'WAR ON TERRORISM'
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from Q3g1 and Q3g2.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible
         wordings for Q3g (President Bush performance) in the Pre.
         Pre panel cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre cases from the fresh
         cross-section were asked only Q3g questions.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Approve strongly
         2. Approve not strongly
         4. Disapprove not strongly
         5. Disapprove strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording

==============================
A023119z

  Q3gx2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'RESPONDED TO 9/11' WORDING:

    All things considered, do you APPROVE or DISAPPROVE of the
    way George W. Bush has  responded to the terrorist attack of
    September 11]?
    (Do you [approve/disapprove]) STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

    SUMMARY: APPROVE BUSH ON 'RESPONSE TO 9/11'
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from Q3g1 and Q3g2.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible
         wordings for Q3g (President Bush performance) in the Pre.
         Pre panel cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11. Pre cases from the fresh
         cross-section were asked only Q3g questions.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Approve strongly
         2. Approve not strongly
         4. Disapprove not strongly
         5. Disapprove strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording

==============================

  Q4a.

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT:

    After the September 11 terrorist attacks, President Bush
    declared a war on terrorism.  A first step was to launch
    air strikes against the Taliban government of Afghanistan that
    was providing aid and protection to Osama bin Laden and the
    Al-Quaeda terrorists responsible for the September 11 attacks.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
A023120

  Q4a4.

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT:

    Taking everything into account, do you think the U.S. war
    against the Taliban government in Afghanistan was WORTH THE
    COST or NOT?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Panel respondents were randomly assigned to be administered
         Q4a4 (whether war against the Taliban worth the cost) either
         before or after Q4a5 (is Bin Laden still alive) in the Pre.
         Pre panel cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Worth it
         5. Not worth it

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
A023121

  Q4a5.

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT:

    Do you think Osama bin Laden is still alive?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Panel respondents were randomly assigned to be administered
         Q4a4 (whether war against the Taliban worth the cost) either
         before or after Q4a5 (is Bin Laden still alive) in the Pre.
         Pre panel cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
A023122

  Q4a6.

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT:

    As you may know, President Bush and his top advisers are
    discussing the possibility of taking military action against
    Iraq to remove Saddam Hussein from power. Do you FAVOR or
    OPPOSE military action against Iraq -- or is this something
    you haven't thought about?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Pre panel cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         01. Favor
         05. Oppose
         07. Other; depends {VOL} {SPECIFY}

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         90. Haven't thought about it
         00. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
A023123

  Q4a7a.

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT:
  IF R FAVORS OR OPPOSES MILITARY ACTION AGAINST IRAQ:

    Do you [favor/oppose] this policy STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Pre panel cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Strongly
         5. Not strongly

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent; 7,8,9,0,90 in Q4a6

==============================
A023123x

  Q4a7x.

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT:

    As you may know, President Bush and his top advisers are
    discussing the possibility of taking military action against
    Iraq to remove Saddam Hussein from power. Do you FAVOR or
    OPPOSE military action against Iraq -- or is this something
    you haven't thought about?
    Do you [favor/oppose] this policy STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

    SUMMARY: FAVOR/OPPOSE MILITARY ACTION AGAINST IRAQ
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from Q4a6 and Q4a7a.
         Pre panel cases were randomly assigned to be administered the
         Q1-Q2 questions on the 2000 election either before or after the
         Q3-Q4 questions on September 11.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Approve strongly
         2. Approve not strongly
         4. Disapprove not strongly
         5. Disapprove strongly

         6. Other; depends; neither (7 in M2a)
         7. Haven't thought about it (90 in M2a)
         8. Don't know in M2a or M2b
         9. Refused in M2a or M2b
         0. NA in M2a or M2b

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
A023124

  R1a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR R1 ADMINISTRATION:

    In the PAST TWELVE MONTHS, have you flown an American flag or
    displayed the flag in some other way, such as in a window, or
    on your car, or on a T-shirt or other piece of clothing?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1/2 SAMPLE PRE J4 (REMAINING 1/2 SAMPLE PRE R1)
         Patriotism items were randomly assigned to placement
         at J4a,d or R1a,d.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for J4 administration

==============================
A023124x

  R1ax.

    In the PAST TWELVE MONTHS, have you flown an American flag or
    displayed the flag in some other way, such as in a window, or
    on your car, or on a T-shirt or other piece of clothing?

    COMBINED J4a/R1a: PATRIOTIC DISPLAY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This summarized data from Pre placements, J4a and R1a

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023125

  R1d.

  IF R SELECTED FOR R1 ADMINISTRATION:

    Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with this
    statement:  'There are some things about America today that
    make me feel  ashamed of America.'  Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE
    NOR DISAGREE, or DISAGREE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1/2 SAMPLE PRE J4 (REMAINING 1/2 SAMPLE PRE R1)
         Patriotism items were randomly assigned to placement
         at J4a,d or R1a,d.
         Pre randomization variables (e.g. PreRand.C1), which precede
         Pre survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Agree
         3. Neither agree nor disagree
         5. Disagree

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for J4 administration

==============================
A023125x

  R1dx.

    Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with this
    statement:  'There are some things about America today that
    make me feel  ashamed of America.'  Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE
    NOR DISAGREE, or DISAGREE?

    COMBINED J4a/R1a: ASHAMED OF AMERICA
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This summarizes data from both Pre placements, J4d and R1d

         1. Agree
         3. Neither agree nor disagree
         5. Disagree

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023126a

  Y1a.

  IF FRESH CROSS:

    Now, on a different topic.
    What is the month, day and year of your birth?

    MONTH OF BIRTH
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         01. JANUARY
         02. FEBRUARY
         03. MARCH
         04. APRIL
         05. MAY
         06. JUNE
         07. JULY
         08. AUGUST
         09. SEPTEMBER
         10. OCTOBER
         11. NOVEMBER
         12. DECEMBER

         89. Refused
         00. NA

         INAP.
         Panel Respondent

==============================
A023126c

  Y1c.

  IF FRESH CROSS:

    Now, on a different topic.
    What is the month, day and year of your birth?

    YEAR OF BIRTH
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1912-1984

         INAP.
         Panel Respondent

==============================
A023126x

  Y1x.

    Now, on a different topic.
    What is the month, day and year of your birth?

    SUMMARY: RESPONDENT AGE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Full release.
         Age of Panel respondent included by adding 2 years to
         age recorded for 2000 Study.

==============================
A023127

  Y2.

  IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT:

    Are you MARRIED NOW and living with your spouse -
    or are you WIDOWED, DIVORCED, SEPARATED, or have you NEVER
    MARRIED?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Married
         2. Widowed
         3. Divorced
         4. Separated
         5. Never married
     . Partnered, not married {VOL}
         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Panel Respondent

==============================
A023127a

  Y2a.

    Are you MARRIED NOW and living with your spouse -
    or are you WIDOWED, DIVORCED, SEPARATED, or have you NEVER
    MARRIED?

    PANEL RESPONDENTS: MARITAL STATUS IN 2000
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This provides data for marital status from the 2000 Study
         for Panel Respondents.

         1. Married
         2. Widowed
         3. Divorced
         4. Separated
         5. Never married
         6. Partnered, not married {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross Respondent

==============================
A023128

  Y3.

  IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT:

    What is the highest grade of school or year of college you
    completed?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         00-12  years
         13-16  years
         17.    17+ years

         88. Don't know
         89. Refused
         99. NA

         INAP.
         Panel Respondent

==============================
A023129

  Y3a.

  IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT:
  IF R HAS 0-12 YRS OF ED. OR IF HIGHEST ED. LEVEL IS DK/RF/NA:

    Did you get a high school diploma or pass a high school
    equivalency test?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         13-17 in Y3; Panel Respondent

==============================
A023130

  Y3b.

  IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDNET:
  IF R HAS MORE THAN 12 YEARS OF EDUCATION:

    What is the highest degree that you have earned?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         00. None (no degree)
         01. BACHELOR'S DEGREE
         02. MASTER'S DEGREE
         03. PhD, LIT, SCD, DFA, DLIT, DPH, DPHIL, JSC, SJD
         04. LLB, JD
         05. MD, DDS, DVM, MVSA, DSC, DO
         06. JDC, STD, THD
         07. ASSOCIATE DEGREE (AA)

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         99. NA

         INAP.
         00-12 in Y3; Panel Respondent

==============================
A023131

  Y3x.

  IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDNET:

    What is the highest grade of school or year of college you
    completed?
    Did you get a high school diploma or pass a high school
    equivalency test?
    What is the highest degree that you have earned?

    SUMMARY - R EDUCATION
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Education summary data from the 2000 study will be added
         for Panel respondents.

         1. 8 grades or less and no diploma or equivalency
                   [0-8 in Y3, 5 in Y3a]
         2. 9-11 grades, no further schooling (incl. 12 years
                   without diploma or equivalency) [9-12 in Y3, 5 in Y3a]
         3. High school diploma or equivalency test [0-12 in Y3,
                   1 in Y3a]
         4. More than 12 years of schooling, no higher degree
                   (13-17 in Y3, 96 in Y3b)
         5. Junior or community college level degrees (AA degrees)
                   (07 in Y3b)
         6. BA level degrees; 17+ years, no advanced degree (01 in Y3b)
         7. Advanced degree, including LLB [13-17 in Y3, 2-6 in Y3b]

         9. Refused
         0. NA in Y3, Y3a or Y3b

==============================
A023132

  Y4.

  IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT:

    We'd like to know if you are working now, or are you
    unemployed, retired, (a homemaker), (a student), or what?
    {MULTIPLE RESPONSES}

    FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         The maximum number of mentions was 3 (1 case).

         001. working now
         002. temporarily laid off
         003. unemployed
         004. retired
         005. permanently disabled
         006. homemaker
         007. Student
         014. working now and retired
         016. working now and homemaker
         046. retired and homemaker
         046. working now retired and homemaker

         99. Refused
         00. NA

         INAP.
         Panel Respondent

==============================
A023132a

  Y4a.

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT

    PANEL RESPONDENTS:  2000 STUDY EMPLOYMENT STATUS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Full release

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section Respondent

==============================
A023133

  Y6.

  IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT:

    Does anyone in this household belong to a labor union?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Panel Respondent

==============================
A023133a

  Y6(1).

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT

    PANEL RESPONDENTS:  2000 STUDY HOUSEHOLD UNION STATUS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Full release

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section Respondent

==============================
A023134

  Y6a.

  IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT:
  IF SOMEONE IN R'S HOUSEHOLD BELONGS TO A LABOR UNION:

    Who is it that belongs?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         The maximum number of mentions was 2.

         01. Respondent
         02. Respondent's spouse
         03. Other family member {SPECIFY}
         04. Someone else {SPECIFY}
         12. Respondent and spouse
         14. Respondent and other family membeer

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         00. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in Y6; Panel Respondent

==============================
A023134a

  Y6a(1).

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT:

    PANEL RESPONDENTS:  2000 STUDY HH MEMBER WITH UNION STATUS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Full release

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section Respondent

==============================
A023135

  Y7.

  IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT:

    Is your religious preference PROTESTANT, ROMAN CATHOLIC,
    JEWISH, or something else?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         00. None/Atheist/Agnostic
         01. Protestant
         02. Roman Catholic
         03. Jewish
         07. Other {SPECIFY}

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         99. NA

         INAP.
         Panel Respondent

==============================
A023136

  Y7a.

  IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT:
  IF R'S RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE IS PROTESTANT OR "OTHER":

    What church or denomination is that?
    {CODE MENTION.  IF UNSURE CODE "OTHER" AND SPECIFY R'S RESPONSE}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         00.  Non-denominational Christian
         01.  Baptist
         02.  Episcopalian/anglican/church of England
         03.  Lutheran
         04.  Methodist
         05.  Just Protestant
         06.  Presbyterian
         07.  Reformed
         08.  Brethren
         09.  Evangelical United Brethren
         10.  Christian or Just Christian
         11.  Christian Scientist
         12.  Church (Or Churches) of Christ
         13.  United Church of Christ
         14.  Disciples of Christ
         15.  Church of God
         16.  Assembly of God
         17.  Congregationalist
         18.  Holiness
         19.  Pentacostal
         20.  Friends, Quaker
         21.  Orthodox, E.g. Greek, Russian {SPECIFY}
         22.  Non-denominational - Protestant
         23.  Mormons
         24.  Jehovah's Witnesses
         25.  Latter Day Saints
         26.  Unitarian/universalist
         27.  Seventh day adventist
         30.  Christian NA denomination
         35.  Buddhist
         45.  Hindu
         55.  Muslim/islam

         88. Don't know
         89. Refused
         99. NA

         INAP.
         00,02,03,08,09,99 in Y7; Panel Respondent

==============================
A023137

  Y7a1.

  IF FRESH CROSS:
  IF R'S RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE IS PROTESTANT OR "OTHER":
  IF R IDENTIFIES AS BAPTIST:

    Is that SOUTHERN BAPTIST or SOMETHING ELSE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Southern Baptist
         7. Something else

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         00,02,03,08,09,99 in Y7; 00,02-87,88,89,99 in Y7a;Panel
         Respondent

==============================
A023138

  Y7x.

    Is your religious preference PROTESTANT, ROMAN CATHOLIC,
    JEWISH, or something else?
    What church or denomination is that?
    {CODE MENTION.  IF UNSURE CODE "OTHER" AND SPECIFY R'S RESPONSE}
    Is that SOUTHERN BAPTIST or SOMETHING ELSE?

    RELIGION SUMMARY - PANEL (2000) AND CROSS (2002)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Full release

==============================
A023139

  Z1.

  IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT:

    How long have you lived in your present community?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Years are rounded to the next highest year if months
         are more than 6.

         000. Less than 1 year
         001. 18 months or less
         002. 19-24 months; 2 years
         003-097 years
         098. All my life

         888. Don't know
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         Panel Respondent

==============================
A023139a

  Z1a.

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT:

    PANEL RESPONDENTS:  2000 STUDY NUMBER OF YEARS IN COMMUNITY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Full release

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section respondent

==============================
A023140

  Z2.

  IF FRESH CROSS RESPONDENT:

    How long have you lived in your current home?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Years are rounded to the next highest year if months
         are more than 6.
         Note: case ID 386 has indicated a number of years greater
         in R's home than in R's community.

         000. Less than 1 year
         001. 18 months or less
         002. 19-24 months; 2 years
         003-097 years
         098. All my life

         888. Don't know
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         Panel Respondent

==============================
A023140a

  Z2a.

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT:

    PANEL RESPONDENTS:  2000 STUDY NUMBER OF YEARS IN HOUSE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Full release

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-Section Respondent

==============================
A023141

  Z3.

    {IF PANEL: Now on a different topic.}
    (Do you/Does your family) own your home, pay rent, or what?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Own house
         5. Pay rent
         7. Other {SPECIFY}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023142

  Z4.

    Do you personally (or jointly with a spouse), have any MONEY
    INVESTED IN THE STOCK MARKET RIGHT NOW -- either in an
    individual stock or in a mutual fund?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023143

  Z5b.

    Do you (or any family member living with you) CURRENTLY
    receive payments from: Medicare?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023144

  Z5c.

    Do you (or any family member living with you) CURRENTLY
    receive payments from: Medicaid?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023145

  Z5g.

    Do you (or any family member living with you) CURRENTLY have
    retirement savings either in a pension plan or a retirement
    account, like an IRA?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================

  Z6.

    We are interested in how people are getting along financially
    these days.  The next questions are about the total income of
    all members of your family living in your house in 2001, before
    taxes and other deductions.  The figure should include
    salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other
    income.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
A023146

  Z6a.

    Is your total household income less than $50,000 or more than
    $50,000?
    {PROBE IF NEEDED: What would be your best guess?}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Less than $50,000
         3. More than $50,000
         7. Income was (about) $50,000 {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A023147

  Z6b.

  IF R'S TOTAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME IS MORE THAN $50,000:

    Which category best describes your total household income:
    $50,000-$64,999, $65,000-$84,999, or more than $84,999?
    {PROBE IF NEEDED: What would be your best guess?}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. $50,000-$64,999
         3. $65,000-$84,999
         5. More than $84,999

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         1,7,8,9,0 in Z6a

==============================
A023148

  Z6c.

  IF R'S TOTAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME IS LESS THAN $50,000:

    Which category best describes your total household income:
    $0-$14,999, $15,000-$34,999, or $35,000-$49,999?
    {PROBE IF NEEDED: What would be your best guess?}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. $0-$14,999
         3. $15,000-$34,999
         5. $35,000-$49,999

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         3,7,8,9,0 in Z6a

==============================
A023149

  Z6x.

    We are interested in how people are getting along financially
    these days.  The next questions are about the total income of
    all members of your family living in your house in 2001, before
    taxes and other deductions.  The figure should include
    salaries, wages, pensions, dividends, interest, and all other
    income.
    Is your total household income less than $50,000 or more than
    $50,000? {PROBE IF NEEDED: What would be your best guess?}
    Which category best describes your total household income:
    $50,000-$64,999, $65,000-$84,999, or more than $84,999?
    {PROBE IF NEEDED: What would be your best guess?}
    Which category best describes your total household income:
    $0-$14,999, $15,000-$34,999, or $35,000-$49,999?

    SUMMARY - HOUSEHOLD INCOME
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from Z6a, Z6b and Z6c.

         01. $0     -$14,999
         02. $15,000-$34,999
         03. $35,000-$49,999
         04. Just about $50,000 [VOL]
         05. $50,000-$64,999
         06. $65,000-$84,999
         07. More than $84,999
         08. Less than $50,000 - DK/NA/RF additional subcategorizaton
         09. More than $50,000 - DK/NA/RF additonal subcategorization

         88. Don't know household income (8 in Z6a)
         89. Refused household income (9 in Z6a)
         00. NA (0 in Z6a)

==============================
A023150a

  Z7a.

  IF FRESH CROSS:

    What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you?
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    MENTION BLACK
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.
         For Panel respondents, inclusion of 2000 Study mention will be
         added.

         1. Mentioned
         5. Not mentioned

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused to answer question
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Panel Respondent

==============================
A023150b

  Z7b.

  IF FRESH CROSS:

    What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you?
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    MENTION ASIAN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.
         For Panel respondents, inclusion of 2000 Study mention will be
         added.

         1. Mentioned
         5. Not mentioned

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused to answer question
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Panel Respondent

==============================
A023150c

  Z7c.

  IF FRESH CROSS:

    What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you?
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    MENTION NATIVE AMERICAN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.
         For Panel respondents, inclusion of 2000 Study mention will be
         added.

         1. Mentioned
         5. Not mentioned

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused to answer question
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Panel Respondent

==============================
A023150d

  Z7d.

  IF FRESH CROSS:

    What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you?
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    MENTION HISPANIC
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.
         For Panel respondents, inclusion of 2000 Study mention will be
         added.

         1. Mentioned
         5. Not mentioned

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused to answer question
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Panel Respondent

==============================
A023150e

  Z7e.

  IF FRESH CROSS:

    What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you?
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    MENTION WHITE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.
         For Panel respondents, inclusion of 2000 Study mention will be
         added.

         1. Mentioned
         5. Not mentioned

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused to answer question
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Panel Respondent

==============================
A023150f

  Z7f.

  IF FRESH CROSS:

    What racial or ethnic group or groups best describes you?
    {MULTIPLE MENTIONS}

    MENTION OTHER
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Order in which mentions were made is not available.
         For Panel respondents, inclusion of 2000 Study mention will be
         added.

         1. Mentioned
         5. Not mentioned

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused to answer question
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Panel Respondent

==============================
A023151

  Z9.

  IF FRESH CROSS:

    {IF HISPANIC OR LATINO MENTIONED FOR RACE, CODE AND DO NOT ASK,
    OTHERWISE ASK:}
    Are you of Spanish or Hispanic origin or descent?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Panel identification from the 2000 Study will be added.

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Panel Respondent

==============================
A023152

  Z9a.

  IF FRESH CROSS:
  IF R IDENTIFIES AS BEING OF SPANISH OR HISPANIC ORIGIN OR DESCENT:

    Would you describe your Hispanic origin as MEXICAN,
    PUERTO RICAN, CUBAN, LATIN AMERICA, CENTRAL AMERICAN,
    or SPANISH?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Panel identification from the 2000 Study will be added.

         1. Mexican
         2. Puerto Rican
         3. Cuban
         4. Latin American
         5. Central American
         6. Spanish
         7. Other {VOL} {SPECIFY}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in Z9; Panel Respondent

==============================
A023153

  Z10.

    {ASK ONLY IF UNSURE, OTHERWISE CODE WITHOUT ASKING:}
    Finally, are you MALE or FEMALE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Male
         2. Female

         9. Refused
         0. NA

==============================
A024001

  PostAdmin.1

    Post Release number
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. There was a single release in the Post

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
A024002

  PostAdmin.2

    Post Mode
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Telephone

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
A024003

  PostAdmin.3

    Post number of calls
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1-25

==============================
A024004

  PostAdmin.4

    Post Result
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable will be available in the full 2002 release.

==============================
A024005

  PostAdmin.5

    Post language
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. English

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
A024006

  PostAdmin.6

    Post interview verification
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         There was no verification of interviews at the interviewing
         facility.

         5. No verification

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
A024007

  PostAdmin.7

    Post interview evaluation
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         There was no evaluation of interviews at the interviewing
         facility.

         5. No evaluation

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
A024008

  PostAdmin.8

    Post interview tape-recorded
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Tape recorded
         5. Not tape recorded

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
A024009

  PostAdmin.9

    Post interview in parts
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Interviewed in parts (multiple sessions)
         5. Not interviewed in parts (1 session)

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
A024010

  PostAdmin.10

  IF PRE INTERVIEW CONDUCTED IN PARTS:

    Post number of parts
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1-5

         INAP.
         Interview not conducted in parts; no Post interview

==============================
A024011

  PostAdmin.11

    Post number of interviewers
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This is the number of interviewers used on the case (1-5).

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
A024012a

  PostAdmin.12a

    Post interview - beginning month
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         11. November
         12. December

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
A024012b

  PostAdmin.12b

    Post interview - beginning day
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1-30

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
A024013a

  PostAdmin.13a

    Post interview - ending month
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         11. November
         12. December

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
A024013b

  PostAdmin.13b

    Post interview - ending day
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1-30

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
A024014

  PostAdmin.14

    Post payment address given?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         INAP.
         No Post interview

==============================
A024015

  PostAdmin.15

  IF PRE PAYMENT ADDRESS GIVEN:

    Post payment mode
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Check

         INAP.
         5 in PostAdmin.14; no Post interview

==============================
A024016

  PostAdmin.16

  IF PRE PAYMENT ADDRESS GIVEN:

    Post payment amount
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         20. Twenty dollars
         40. Forty dollars
         50. Fifty dollars

         INAP.
         5 in PostAdmin.14; no Post interview

==============================
A024017a

  PostAdmin.17a

  IF PRE PAYMENT ADDRESS GIVEN:

    Date Post payment mailed - month
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         09. September
         10. October
         11. November

         INAP.
         5 in PostAdmin.14; no Post interview

==============================
A024017b

  PostAdmin.17b

  IF PRE PAYMENT ADDRESS GIVEN:

    Date Post payment mailed - day
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1-31

         INAP.
         5 in PostAdmin.14; no Post interview

==============================
A024201

  Summary.1

    FLAG - MISSASSIGNMENT IN PRELOAD
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable flags 1 case where the preload district
         assignment was incorrect, and 2 cases where the preload county
         was misidentified but for which district assignment was still
         correct.

         1. District preload incorrect (NY03 correct; NY04 preloaded)
         2. County preload incorrect (district correct)
         3. No preload misassignment

==============================
A024401

  PostRand.C1

    RANDOMIZED PREASSIGNMENT -  C1a/C1b VOTER TURNOUT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly preassigned to either C1a or C1b in
         the Pre (alternate versions of vote turnout question).

         1. C1a
         2. C1b

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024402

  PostRand.Vote

    RANDOMIZED ORDER - DEM/REPUB CANDIDATE NAMES IN VOTE SECTION
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the order to which the names of major
         party candidates were randomly preassigned for reading in the
         text of House and Senate vote-choice and nonvoter preference
         questions.  This preassigned order did not actually apply if
         only a single major party candidate ran (major party candidate
         name always read before any independent/third-party name, if
         any).

         1. Democratic name first, Republican name second
         2. Republican name first, Democratic name second

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024403

  PostRand.D1

    RANDOMIZATION OF D1 THERMOMETERS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         theromometer).
         Note: This is a randomly pre-assigned order; not all
         thermometers apply to every respondent.

         1. D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k
         2. D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024404

  PostRand.D2

    RANDOMIZATION OF D2 THERMOMETERS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Group thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders.

         1. D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z
         2. D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024405

  PostRand.D3/D4

    RANDOMIZED SELECTION D3/D4 TRAITS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush
         traits questions.

         1. R administered D3 traits
         2. R administered D4 traits

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024406

  PostRand.D3

    RANDOMIZATION - ORDER OF D3 BUSH TRAITS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         George W. Bush traits questions in D3 were randomly assigned to
         1 of 2 possible sequential orders.

         1. D3a,b,c,d
         2. D3a,d,c,b

         INAP.
         R selected for D4 traits; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024407

  PostRand.D4

    RANDOMIZATION - ORDER OF D4 BUSH TRAITS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         George W. Bush traits questions in D4 were randomly assigned to
         1 of 2 possible sequential orders.

         1. D4a,b,c,d
         2. D4a,d,c,b

         INAP.
         R selected for D3 traits; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024408

  PostRand.G1a/b

    RANDOMIZATION ORDER OF G1a/b
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly preassigned to be administered
         major party liberal-conservative House candidate placements
         with either the Democrat or Republican first.

         1. G1a Democratic House cand 1st, G1b Republican House cand 2nd
         2. G1b Republican House cand 1st, G1a Democratic House cand 2nd

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024409

  PostRand.K4/K5

    RANDOMIZED SELECTION K4/K5
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either K4 or K5
         (trust in people).

         1. K4 selected (people take advantage)
         2. K5 selected (people try to be helpful)

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024410

  PostRand.L1/L2

    RANDOMIZED ASSIGNMENT L1/L2 FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - K1 series in Pre, L2 series in Post
         - K2 series in Pre, L1 series in Post
         This variable describes the Post assignment based on this
         randomized selection.
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.

         1. L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         2. L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024411

  PostRand.L1

    RANDOMIZATION POST L1 SERIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the order of administration of Post
         L1 series Federal spending items.  Two orderings were possible.

         1. L1a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
         2. L1a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e

         INAP.
         R selected for Post L2 series; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024412

  PostRand.L1e

    RANDOMIZATION POST L1e WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the random assignment of wording
         in Federal spending item L1e in the Pre.

         1. "Public schools"
         2. "Big city schools"

         INAP.
         R selected for Post L1 series; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024413

  PostRand.L1h

    RANDOMIZATION POST L1h WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the random assignment of wording
         in Federal spending item L1h in the Pre.

         1. "Homeland security"
         2. "War on terrorism"

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024414

  PostRand.L2

    RANDOMIZATION POST L2 SERIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the order of administration of Post
         L2 series Federal spending items.  Two orderings were possible.

         1. L2a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j
         2. L2a,b,h,f,c,d,g,j,e

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024415

  PostRand.L2c

    RANDOMIZATION POST L2c WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the random assignment of wording
         in Federal spending item L2c in the Pre.

         1. "Poor people"
         2. "Working poor"

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024416

  PostRand.L2j

    RANDOMIZATION POST L2j WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the random assignment of wording
         in Federal spending item L2j in the Pre.

         1. "Poor children"
         2. "Black children"

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024417

  PostRand.M5/M6

    RANDOMIZED ASSIGNMENT M5/M6
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - P1 income inequality by race in Pre; M5a,b,c,d affirmative
             action items in Post
         - P2 income inequality by gender in Pre; M6a,b,c,d equal pay
             for women in Post
         This variable describes the Post assignment based on this
         randomized selection.
         Note: this Pre/Post randomization description applies regardless
         of which alternative wording of P1/P2 was randomly selected
         in the Pre.

         1. M5a,b,c,d asked in Post (P1 in pre)
         2. M6a,b,c,d asked in Post (P2 in Pre)

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024418

  PostRand.M5a/b

    RANDOMIZATION ORDER OF M5a/b
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were administered affirmative action items M5a
         (position of Democratic Party) and M5b (position of Republican
         Party) in random order.

         1. M5a Democratic Party first, M5b Republican Party second
         2. M5b Republican Party first, M5a Democratic Party second

         INAP.
         R selected for M6a,b,c,d; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024419

  PostRand.M6a/b

    RANDOMIZATION ORDER OF M6a/b
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were administered equal pay for women items M6a
         (position of Democratic Party) and M6b (position of Republican
         Party) in random order.

         1. M6a Democratic Party first, M6b Republican Party second
         2. M6b Republican Party first, M6a Democratic Party second

         INAP.
         R selected for M5a,b,c,d; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024420

  PostRand.M7

    RANDOMIZATION POST M7 WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings
         for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions).

         1. "Estate tax"
         2. "Death tax"

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024421

  PostRand.M7c/e

    RANDOMIZATION ORDER OF M7c/e
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were administered estate tax items M7c (position
         of Democratic Party) and M7e (position of Republican Party) in
         random order.

         1. M7c Democratic Party first, M7e Republican party second
         2. M7e Republican Party first, M7c Democratic party second

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024422

  PostRand.M9b/c

    RANDOMIZATION ORDER OF M9b/c
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were administered M9b and M9c items on level of
         taxation in random order.

         1. M9b taxes paid by rich first, M7c taxes paid by poor second
         2. M9c taxes paid by poor first, M9b taxes paid by rich second

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024423

  PostRand.M11

    RANDOMIZED ASSIGNMENT M11
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better"), Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse"), Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better"), Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse"), Post M11b (open "worse")
         This variable describes the Post assignment based on this
         randomized selection.
         Note: Income inequality items in Pre L2 and Post M11 are
         identical (L2a/M11a, L2b/M11b, L2c/M11c, L2d/M11d).

         1. Post M11c administered (Pre L2a)
         2. Post M11d administered (Pre L2b)
         3. Post M11a administered (Pre L2c)
         4. Post M11b administered (Pre L2d)

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024424

  PostRand.M11c

    RANDOMIZATION POST M11c SERIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the order of administration of Post
         M11c closed-list income inequality items (reasons why some
         people have better jobs/income).  Two orderings were possible.

         1. M11c1,2,3,4,5,6,7
         2. M11c2,4,5,6,3,1,7

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024425

  PostRand.M11d

    RANDOMIZATION POST M11d SERIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This variable describes the order of administration of Post
         M11d closed-list income inequality series items (reasons why
         some people have worse jobs/income).  Two orderings were
         possible.

         1. M11d1,2,3,4,5,6,7
         2. M11d2,4,5,6,3,1,7

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024500a

  Cand.0a

    House Type Race
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         In LA05 only, there were 2 significant Republican candidates
         facing a Democrat in an open race.

             INCUMBENT RUNNING
         12. Democratic incumbent running - Republican challenger
         13. Democratic incumbent running - other challenger
         14. Democratic incumbent running - unopposed
         19. Democratic incumbent running - Repub and other challengers
         21. Republican incumbent running - Democratic challenger
         23. Republican incumbent running - other challenger
         24. Republican incumbent running - unopposed
         29. Republican incumbent running - Dem and other challengers
         31. Other incumbent running - Democratic challenger
         32. Other incumbent running - Republican challenger
         34. Other incumbent running - unopposed
         35. Other incumbent running - Dem and Repub challengers
             SPECIAL TYPE RACE DUE TO REDISTRICTING
         40. Dem and Repub incumbents running - no other candidate
         41. 2 Democratic incumbents running - no other candidate
         42. 2 Republican incumbents running - no other candidate
         43. Dem and Repub incumbents running - other candidate(s)
         44. Dem non-incumbent only - no retiree/unclear who is retiree
         45. Repub non-incumbent only - no retiree/unclear who is retiree
         46. Dem and Rep candidates - no retiree/unclear who is retiree
         47. Dem and other candidates - no retiree/unclear who is retiree
         48. Rep and other candidates - no retiree/unclear who is retiree
         49. Dem, Rep and other cands - no retiree/unclear who is retiree
             NO INCUMBENT RUNNING
         51. Dem incumbent not running - Democratic cand unopposed
         52. Dem incumbent not running - Republican cand unopposed
         53. Dem incumbent not running - Other cand unopposed
         55. Dem incumbent not running - Democratic and Republican cands
         56. Dem incumbent not running - Republican and other candidates
         57. Dem incumbent not running - Democratic and other candidates
         59. Dem incumbent not running - Democr, Repub, other cands
         61. Rep incumbent not running - Democratic cand unopposed
         62. Rep incumbent not running - Republican cand unopposed
         63. Rep incumbent not running - Other cand unopposed
         65. Rep incumbent not running - Democratic and Republican cands
         66. Rep incumbent not running - Republican and other candidates
         67. Rep incumbent not running - Democratic and other candidates
         69. Rep incumbent not running - Democr, Repub, other cands
             LOUISIANA DISTRICT 05 ONLY
         80. Rep incumbent not running - Democr and 2 Repub candidates

         97. Washington DC
         99. Correct district not assigned (See Summary.1)

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024500b

  Cand.0b

    Senate Type Race
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         In Louisiana only, there were 2 significant Republican
         challengers to the incumbent Democratic Senate candidate.

             INCUMBENT RUNNING
         12. Democratic incumbent running - Republican challenger
         13. Democratic incumbent running - other challenger
         14. Democratic incumbent running - unopposed
         19. Democratic incumbent running - Repub and other challengers
         21. Republican incumbent running - Democratic challenger
         23. Republican incumbent running - other challenger
         24. Republican incumbent running - unopposed
         29. Republican incumbent running - Dem and other challengers
         31. Other incumbent running - Democratic challenger
         32. Other incumbent running - Republican challenger
         34. Other incumbent running - unopposed
         35. Other incumbent running - Dem and Repub challengers
             NO INCUMBENT RUNNING
         51. Dem incumbent not running - Democratic cand unopposed
         52. Dem incumbent not running - Republican cand unopposed
         53. Dem incumbent not running - Other cand unopposed
         55. Dem incumbent not running - Democratic and Republican cands
         56. Dem incumbent not running - Republican and other candidates
         57. Dem incumbent not running - Democratic and other candidates
         59. Dem incumbent not running - Democr, Repub, other cands
         61. Rep incumbent not running - Democratic cand unopposed
         62. Rep incumbent not running - Republican cand unopposed
         63. Rep incumbent not running - Other cand unopposed
         65. Rep incumbent not running - Democratic and Republican cands
         66. Rep incumbent not running - Republican and other candidates
         67. Rep incumbent not running - Democratic and other candidates
         69. Rep incumbent not running - Democr, Repub, other cands
             LOUISIANA ONLY
         80. Democratic incumbent running - 2 Republican challengers
             NO RACE IN STATE
         81. Democratic incumbents, no race in state
         82. Republican incumbents, no race in state
         83. Democratic and other incumbent, no race in state
         84. Republican and other incumbent, no race in state
         85. Democratic and Republican incumbents, no race in state

         97. Washington DC

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024501

  Cand.1

    Democratic House candidate name (alpha)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         INAP.
         No Democratic House candidate; correct district not assigned
         (See Summary.1); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024502

  Cand.2

    Candidate code - Democratic House candidate
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         31. Democratic candidate in open House race
         33. Democratic House incumbent
         35. Democratic House challenger

         INAP.
         No Democratic House candidate; correct district not assigned
         (See Summary.1); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024503

  Cand.3

    Democratic House candidate gender
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Male
         2. Female

         INAP.
         No Democratic House candidate; correct district not assigned
         (See Summary.1); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024504

  Cand.4

    Republican House candidate name (alpha)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         INAP.
         No Republican House candidate; correct district not assigned
         (See Summary.1); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024505

  Cand.5

    Candidate code - Republican House candidate
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         32. Republican candidate in open House race
         34. Republican House incumbent
         36. Republican House challenger

         INAP.
         No Republican House candidate; correct district not assigned
         (See Summary.1); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024506

  Cand.6

    Republican House candidate gender
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Male
         2. Female

         INAP.
         No Republican House candidate; correct district not assigned
         (See Summary.1); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024507

  Cand.7

    Independent/3rd-Party House candidate name (alpha)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         INAP.
         No independent/3rd-party House candidate; correct district not
         assigned (See Summary.1)no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024508

  Cand.8

    Candidate code -Independent/3rd-Party House candidate
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         In LA05 only, there were 2 significant Republican candidates
         facing a Democrat in an open race.  The 2nd Republican
         candidate is represented here.

         32. 2nd Republican candidate in open House race (LA05 ONLY)
         37. 3rd-Party or Independent House candidate - nonincumbent
         39. 3rd-Party or Independent House candidate - incumbent (VT01)

         INAP.
         No independent/3rd-party House candidate; correct district not
         assigned (See Summary.1)no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024509

  Cand.9

    Independent/3rd-Party House candidate gender
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Male
         2. Female

         INAP.
         No independent/3rd-party House candidate; correct district not
         assigned (See Summary.1)no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024510

  Cand.10

    Independent/3rd-Party House candidate party (alpha)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         INAP.
         No independent/3rd-party House candidate; correct district not
         assigned (See Summary.1)no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024511

  Cand.11

    Retiring House representative name (alpha)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         INAP.
         No retiring House representative; correct district not assigned
         (See Summary.1)no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024512

  Cand.12

    Candidate code - Retiring House representative
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         41. Democratic Representative retiring (district with open race)
         42. Republican Representative retiring (district with open race)

         INAP.
         No retiring House representative; correct district not assigned
         (See Summary.1)no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024512a

  Cand.12a

    Retiring House representative also Senate candidate
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note:  for these cases, thermometer was asked only once
         (for House retiree).

         1. House retiree is running as Democratic Senate cand in 2002
         2. House retiree is running as Republican Senate cand in 2002
         3. House retiree is not running as Senate cand in 2002

         INAP.
         No retiring House representative; correct district not assigned
         (See Summary.1); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024513

  Cand.13

    Retiring House representative gender
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Male
         2. Female

         INAP.
         No retiring House representative; correct district not assigned
         (See Summary.1)no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024514

  Cand.14

    Democratic Senate candidate name (alpha)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         INAP.
         No Democratic Senate candidate; no race in state; no 2002 Post
         interview

==============================
A024515

  Cand.15

    Candidate code - Democratic Senate candidate
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         01. Democratic candidate in open Senate race
         03. Democratic Senate incumbent
         05. Democratic Senate challenger

         INAP.
         No Democratic Senate candidate; no race in state; no 2002 Post
         interview

==============================
A024516

  Cand.16

    Democratic Senate candidate gender
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Male
         2. Female

         INAP.
         No Democratic Senate candidate; no race in state; no 2002 Post
         interview

==============================
A024517

  Cand.17

    Republican Senate candidate name (alpha)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         INAP.
         No Republican Senate candidate; no race in state; no 2002 Post
         interview

==============================
A024518

  Cand.18

    Candidate code - Republican Senate candidate
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         02. Republican candidate in open Senate race
         04. Republican Senate incumbent
         06. Republican Senate challenger

         INAP.
         No Republican Senate candidate; no race in state; no 2002 Post
         interview

==============================
A024519

  Cand.19

    Republican Senate candidate gender
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Male
         2. Female

         INAP.
         No Republican Senate candidate; no race in state; no 2002 Post
         interview

==============================
A024520

  Cand.20

    Independent/3rd-Party Senate candidate name (alpha)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         INAP.
         No independent/3rd=party Senate candidate; no race in state;
         2002 Post interview

==============================
A024521

  Cand.21

    Candidate code - Independent/3rd-Party Senate candidate
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         In Louisiana only, there were 2 significant Republican
         challengers to the incumbent Democratic Senate candidate.
         The 2nd Republican Senate challenger is represented here.

         06. Republican Senate challenger
         07. 3rd-Party or Independent Senate candidate - nonincumbent

         INAP.
         No independent/3rd=party Senate candidate; no race in state;
         2002 Post interview

==============================
A024522

  Cand.22

    Independent/3rd-Party Senate candidate gender
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Male
         2. Female

         INAP.
         No independent/3rd=party Senate candidate; no race in state;
         2002 Post interview

==============================
A024523

  Cand.23

    Independent/3rd-Party Senate candidate party (alpha)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         INAP.
         No independent/3rd=party Senate candidate; no race in state;
         2002 Post interview

==============================
A024524

  Cand.24

    2002 House Election Winner - candidate code
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         31. Democratic candidate in open House race
         32. Republican candidate in open House race
         33. Democratic House incumbent
         34. Republican House incumbent
         35. Democratic House challenger
         36. Republican House challenger
         39. 3rd-Party or Independent House candidate - incumbent (VT01)

         INAP.
         Washington DC; correct district not assigned (See Summary.1)

==============================
A024524a

  Cand.24a

    2002 House Election Winner - Party
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Democrat
         5. Republican
         7. Other

         INAP.
         Washington DC; correct district not assigned (See Summary.1)

==============================
A024525

  Cand.25

    2002 Senate Election Winner - candidate code
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         01. Democratic candidate in open Senate race
         02. Republican candidate in open Senate race
         03. Democratic Senate incumbent
         04. Republican Senate incumbent
         05. Democratic Senate challenger
         06. Republican Senate challenger

         INAP.
         No Senate race in state or Washington DC; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A024525a

  Cand.25a

    2002 Senate Election Winner - Party
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Democrat
         5. Republican
         7. Other

         INAP.
         No Senate race in state or Washington DC; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025001

  A1.

    Some people don't pay much attention to political campaigns.
    How about you? Would you say that you have been VERY MUCH
    INTERESTED, SOMEWHAT INTERESTED or NOT MUCH INTERESTED in the
    political campaigns so far this year?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Very much interested
         3. Somewhat interested
         5. Not much interested

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025002

  A2.

    Did you watch any programs about the campaign on television?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025003

  A3.

    Do you ever discuss politics with your family or friends?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025004

  A3a.

  IF R DISCUSSED POLITICS WITH FAMILY OR FRIENDS IN PAST WEEK:

    How many days IN THE PAST WEEK did you talk about politics
    with family or friends?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         00. None
         01. One Day
         02. Two Days
         03. Three Days
         04. Four Days
         05. Five Days
         06. Six Days
         07. Every Day

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         99. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in A3; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025005

  B1.

    As you know, the political parties try to talk to as many
    people as they can to get them to vote for their candidate.
    Did anyone from one of the POLITICAL PARTIES call you up or
    come around and talk to you about the campaign this year?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025006

  B1a.

  IF POLITICAL PARTY SPOKE TO R ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN:

    Which party was that?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Democrats
         5. Republicans
         6. Both
         7. Other {SPECIFY}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in B1; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025007

  B2.

    We would like to find out about some of the things people do to
    help a party or a candidate win an election. During the
    campaign, did you talk to any people and try to show them why
    they should vote for or against one of the parties or
    candidates?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025008

  B3.

    Did you wear a campaign button, put a campaign sticker on your
    car, or place a sign in your window or in front of your house?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025009

  B4.

    Did you go to any political meetings, rallies, speeches,
    dinners, or things like that in support of a particular
    candidate?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025010

  B5.

    Did you do any (other) work for one of the parties or
    candidates?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025011

  B6.

    During an election year people are often asked to make a
    contribution to support campaigns. Did you give money to AN
    INDIVIDUAL CANDIDATE running for public office?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025012

  B7.

    Did you give money to A POLITICAL PARTY during this election
    year?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025013

  B8.

    Did you give any money to ANY OTHER GROUP that supported or
    opposed candidates?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025014

  B9.

    During the campaign this year, did anyone talk to you about
    REGISTERING TO VOTE or GETTNG OUT TO VOTE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes, someone did
         5. No, no one did

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025015a

  C1a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 1 OF VOTE TURNOUT QUESTION:

    In talking to people about elections, we often find that a lot
    of people were not able to vote because they weren't
    registered, they were sick, or they just didn't have time.  How
    about you--did you vote in the elections this November?

    R 2002 ELECTION TURNOUT - VERSION 1
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either C1a or C1b in the
         Pre (alternate version for R turnout).
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Yes, voted
         5. No, didn't vote
         6. R refused to say whether voted

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for version 2 of R turnout (C1b); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025015b

  C1b.

  IF R SELECTED FOR VERSION 2 OF VOTE TURNOUT QUESTION:

    In talking to people about elections, we often find that a lot
    of people were not able to vote because they weren't
    registered, they were sick, or they just didn't have time.
    Which of the following statements best describes you:
       One, I did not vote  (in the election this November);
       Two, I thought about voting  this time - but didn't;
       Three, I usually vote, but didn't this time; or
       Four, I am sure I voted?

    R 2002 ELECTION TURNOUT - VERSION 2
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either C1a or C1b in the
         Pre (alternate version for R turnout).
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. I did not vote (in the election this November)
         2. I thought about voting this time but didn't
         3. I usually vote but didn't this time
         4. I am sure I voted

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for version 1 of R turnout (C1a); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025016

  C1x.

    VERSION 1:
    In talking to people about elections, we often find that a lot
    of people were not able to vote because they weren't
    registered, they were sick, or they just didn't have time.  How
    about you--did you vote in the elections this November?
    VERSION 2:
    In talking to people about elections, we often find that a lot
    of people were not able to vote because they weren't
    registered, they were sick, or they just didn't have time.
    Which of the following statements best describes you:
       One, I did not vote  (in the election this November);
       Two, I thought about voting  this time - but didn't;
       Three, I usually vote, but didn't this time; or

    SUMMARY:  R 2002 ELECTION TURNOUT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. R reported voting in 2002 election
         5. R reported not voting in 2002 election

         8. R did not know whether voted in 2002 election
         9. R refused to say whether voted in 2002 election
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025017

  C2.

  IF R DID NOT VOTE OR NA/REFUSED IF VOTED:

    Were you registered to vote in this election?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No
         6. VOL: Not required to register in R's state

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         1,9,0 in C1x; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025018

  C2a.

  IF R VOTED:/
  IF R IS REGISTERED NONVOTER:

    {IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C AND NOT LOUISIANA:}
    Your residence is located in <PRELOAD COUNTY NAME> county.
    Are you registered to vote in <PRELOAD COUNTY NAME> county?
    {IF LOUISIANA:}
    Your residence is located in <PRELOAD PARISH NAME> parish?
    Are you registered to vote in <PRELOAD PARISH NAME> parish?
    {IF WASHINGTON D.C.:}
    Your residence is located in Washington D.C.
    Are you registered to vote in Washington D.C.?

    R REGISTERED IN COUNTY OF INTERVIEW
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         PRELOADED: NAME OF COUNTY OR WASHINGTON DC
         (ALASKA: OTHER UNITS; IN METROPOLITANA AREAS SOMETIMES
         IDENTIFIED READS:  "<PRELOAD CITY NAME> city")

         1. Yes, registered in <COUNTY/WASH D.C.>
         5. No, registered elsewhere

         7. Not registered elsewhere but District misassignment (see
               Summary.1)
         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C2; 9,0 in C1x; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025019

  C2a1.

  IF R VOTED OR IS REGISTERED NONVOTER:
  IF R REGISTERED OUTSIDE OF COUNTY OF RESIDENCE:

    In what county and state are you registered?

    STATE OF REGISTRATION - R REGISTERED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         FIPS state code.

         00. NA

         INAP.
         9,0 in C1x; 5,6,8,9,0 in C2; 1,8,9,0 in C2a; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025019a

  C2a2.

  IF R VOTED OR IS REGISTERED NONVOTER:
  IF R REGISTERED OUTSIDE OF COUNTY OF RESIDENCE:

    In what county and state are you registered?

    DISTRICT OF REGISTRATION-R REGISTERED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         99. NA

         INAP.
         6,8,9,0 in C2; 1,8,9,0 in C2a; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025020

  C2ax.

    VERSION 1:
    In talking to people about elections, we often find that a lot
    of people were not able to vote because they weren't
    registered, they were sick, or they just didn't have time.  How
    about you--did you vote in the elections this November? /
    VERSION 2:
    In talking to people about elections, we often find that a lot
    of people were not able to vote because they weren't
    registered, they were sick, or they just didn't have time.
    Which of the following statements best describes you:
       One, I did not vote  (in the election this November);
       Two, I thought about voting  this time - but didn't;
       Three, I usually vote, but didn't this time; or
       Four, I am sure I voted?
    Were you registered to vote in this election?
    {IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C AND NOT LOUISIANA:}
    Your residence is located in <PRELOAD COUNTY NAME> county.
    Are you registered to vote in <PRELOAD COUNTY NAME> county?
    {IF LOUISIANA:}
    Your residence is located in <PRELOAD PARISH NAME> parish?
    Are you registered to vote in <PRELOAD PARISH NAME> parish?
    {IF WASHINGTON D.C.:}
    Your residence is located in Washington D.C.

    SUMMARY: R VOTE/REGISTRATION STATUS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from C1x, C2, C2a.

         1. R voted, registered in county (includes 7 in C2a)
         2. R voted, registered outside county /DK/RF/NA where registered
         3. R did not vote or DK/RF/NA if voted
         4. Washington DC: R voted, registered in Washington DC
         5. Washington DC: R voted, registered outside or DK/RF/NA where
         6. Washington DC: R did not vote or DK/RF/NA if voted

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025021

  C4.

  IF R VOTED:

    Did you vote ON ELECTION DAY -- that is, November 5, 2002, or
    did you vote at SOME TIME BEFORE this?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. On election day
         5. Some time before this

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C1x; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025022

  C4a1.

  IF R VOTED:
  IF R VOTED BEFORE ELECTION DAY:

    How long before November 5th did you vote?
    {PROBE: A FEW DAYS, A WEEK, LONGER THAN THAT?}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         01. Less than one week, 1-6 days
         02. One week; 7 days
         03. 1-2 weeks; 8-14 days
         04. 2-3 weeks; 15-21 days
         05. 3-4 weeks; 22-28 days
         06. One month; 29-31 days
         07. More than one month; 32-60 days
         11. A few days; a couple of days; several days -- NFS
         12. A few weeks; a couple of weeks; several weeks -- NFS
     7. Other
         88. Don't know
         89. Refused
         00. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C1x; 1,8,9,0 in C4a; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025023

  C4a2.

  IF R VOTED:
  IF R VOTED BEFORE ELECTION DAY:

    Did you vote IN PERSON or by ABSENTEE BALLOT?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. In person
         5. Absentee ballot
         7. R VOLUNTEERS: by mail {OREGON ONLY}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C1x; 1,8,9,0 in C4a; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025024

  C11a.

  IF R VOTED AND NOT WASHINGTON D.C.

    How about the election for the HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES in
    Washington. Did you vote for a candidate for the U.S. House of
    Representatives?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes, voted for House of Representatives
         5. No, didn't vote for House of Representatives

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         3,4,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025025

  C11a1.

  IF R VOTED:
  IF NOT WASHINGTON DC AND VOTED IN COUNTY:
  IF R VOTED FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:

    Who did you vote for?
    Did you vote for (the [Democrat/Republican], [<DEM CAND
    NAME>/<REP CAND NAME>]) (or) (the [Republican/Democrat],
    [<REP CAND NAME>/<DEM CAND NAME>]) (or the <OTHER PARTY>
    candidate, <OTHER CAND NAME>) (or someone else?)?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: The case with misassigned district preloaded (see
         Summary.1) was coded for R's candidate vote from R's actual
         district.
         In LA05 there were 2 Republican candidates, the 2nd of
         which was preloaded into House independent/3rd-party candidate
         preload fields.  Independent/3rd-party candidate names were
         read after any major party names.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered this
         questions with the name of the Democratic candidate read first
         or the name of the Republican candidate read first.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. <PRELOAD DEM CAND NAME>
         5. <PRELOAD REP CAND NAME>
         3. <PRELOAD IND/3RD PARTY CAND NAME>
         7. Other {SPECIFY}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         2,3,4,5,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; 5,8,9,0 in C11a; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025025x

  C11ax.

  IF R VOTED:
  IF NOT WASHINGTON DC AND VOTED IN COUNTY:
  IF R VOTED FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:

    Who did you vote for?
    Did you vote for (the [Democrat/Republican], [<DEM CAND
    NAME>/<REP CAND NAME>]) (or) (the [Republican/Democrat],
    [<REP CAND NAME>/<DEM CAND NAME>]) (or the <OTHER PARTY>
    candidate, <OTHER CAND NAME>) (or someone else?)?

    CANDIDATE CODE HOUSE VOTE - IN COUNTY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: The case with misassigned district preloaded (see
         Summary.1) was coded for R's candidate vote from R's actual
         district.
         In LA05 there were 2 Republican candidates, the 2nd of
         which was preloaded into House independent/3rd-party candidate
         preload fields.  Independent/3rd-party candidate names were
         read after any major party names.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered this
         questions with the name of the Democratic candidate read first
         or the name of the Republican candidate read first.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         34. Republican House incumbent
         35. Democratic House challenger
         36. Republican House challenger
         37. Third party or independent House cand - nonincumbent
         38. Third party or independent House cand - 2nd nonincumbent
         39. Third party or independent House cand - incumbent
         85. Name not on candidate list

         88. Don't know
         89. Refused
         00. NA

         INAP.
         2,3,4,5,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; 5,8,9,0 in C11a; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025026

  C11a2.

  IF R VOTED:
  IF VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY:
  IF R VOTED FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:

    Who did you vote for?

    HOUSE VOTE CANDIDATE CODE - R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF IW
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: in 1 case, R's 'outside' candidate was in the same
         congressional district as district of residence (1 case coded
         33).

             DISTRICT WITH NO RUNNING INCUMBENT:
         71. Democratic candidate
         72. Republican candidate
             DISTRICT WITH RUNNING INCUMBENT:
         73. Democratic incumbent
         74. Republican incumbent
         75. Democratic challenger
         76. Republican challenger
             ALL DISTRICTS:
         80. Third party or independent candidate
         81. Democrat--no name given
         82. Republican--no name given
         85. Name not on candidate list

         88. Don't know
         89. Refused
         00. NA

         INAP.
         1,3,4,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; 5,8,9,0 in C11a; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025027

  C11a2a.

  IF R VOTED:
  IF VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY:
  IF R VOTED FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:

    Which party was that?

    PARTY OF HOUSE VOTE - OUTSIDE COUNTY OF IW
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This is the respondent's identification of 'outside' candidate's
         party.

         1. DEMOCRAT
         2. REPUBLICAN
         3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate)
         7. Name not on candidate list

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         1,3,4,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; 5,8,9,0 in C11a; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025028a

  C11x1.

  IF R VOTED IN COUNTY AND NOT WASHINGTON DC /
  IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY:
  IF R VOTED FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:

    Who did you vote for?
    Did you vote for (the [Democrat/Republican], [<DEM CAND
    NAME>/<REP CAND NAME>]) (or) (the [Republican/Democrat],
    [<REP CAND NAME>/<DEM CAND NAME>]) (or the <OTHER PARTY>
    candidate, <OTHER CAND NAME>) (or someone else?)? /
    Who did you vote for? Which party was that?

    CANDIDATE CODE HOUSE VOTE SUMMARY - ALL VOTERS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from C11ax, C11a2.

         34. Republican House incumbent
         35. Democratic House challenger
         36. Republican House challenger
         37. Third party or independent House cand - nonincumbent
         38. Third party or independent House cand - 2nd nonincumbent
         39. Third party or independent House cand - incumbent
             OUTSIDE DISTRICT
         71. Democratic candidate
         72. Republican candidate
         73. Democratic incumbent
         74. Republican incumbent
         75. Democratic challenger
         76. Republican challenger
         80. Third party or independent candidate
         81. Democrat--no name given
         82. Republican--no name given
         85. Name not on candidate list

         88. Don't know
         89. Refused
         00. NA

         INAP.
         3,4,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; 5,8,9,0 in C11a; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025028b

  C11x2.

  IF R VOTED IN COUNTY AND NOT WASHINGTON DC /
  IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY:
  IF R VOTED FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:

    Who did you vote for?
    Did you vote for (the [Democrat/Republican], [<DEM CAND
    NAME>/<REP CAND NAME>]) (or) (the [Republican/Democrat],
    [<REP CAND NAME>/<DEM CAND NAME>]) (or the <OTHER PARTY>
    candidate, <OTHER CAND NAME>) (or someone else?)? /
    Who did you vote for? Which party was that?

    CANDIDATE PARTY HOUSE VOTE SUMMARY - ALL VOTERS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from C11ax, C11a2.

         1. DEMOCRAT
         2. REPUBLICAN
         3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate)
         7. Name not on candidate list for this race

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         3,4,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; 5,8,9,0 in C11a; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025029

  C15.

  IF R VOTED:

    SUMMARY: SENATE RACE STATUS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Registered in county and race in state
         2. Registered in county and no race in state
         3. Registered outside county or DK/RF/NA where registered
               (incl. Washington DC)
         4. Washington DC and registered in Washington DC

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C1x; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025030

  C15a.

  IF R VOTED:
  IF R VOTED IN COUNTY OF IW IN STATE WITH SENATE RACE:/
  IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF INTERVIEW:

    How about the election for the UNITED STATES SENATE?
    Did you vote for a candidate for the U.S. Senate?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes, voted for Senate
         5. No, didn't vote for Senate
         7. R VOLUNTEERS: no race in state of vote
            (R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF RESIDENCE)

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C1x; 2,4 in C15; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025031

  C15a1.

  IF R VOTED:
  IF R VOTED IN COUNTY OF IW IN STATE WITH SENATE RACE:
  IF R VOTED FOR SENATE:

    Who did you vote for?
    Did you vote for (the [Democrat/Republican], [<DEM CAND
    NAME>/<REP CAND NAME>]) (or) (the [Republican/Democrat],
    [<REP CAND NAME>/<DEM CAND NAME>]) (or the <OTHER PARTY>
    candidate, <OTHER CAND NAME>) (or someone else?)?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered this
         questions with the name of the Democratic candidate read first
         or the name of the Republican candidate read first.
         Note: in LA there were 2 Republican candidates, the 2nd of
         which was preloaded into Senate independent/3rd-party candidate
         preload fields.  Independent/3rd-party candidate names were
         read after any major party names.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. <PRELOAD DEM CAND NAME>
         5. <PRELOAD REP CAND NAME>
         3. <PRELOAD IND/3RD PARTY CAND NAME>
         7. Other {SPECIFY}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C1x; 2,3,4 in C15; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025031a

  C15ax.

  IF R VOTED:
  IF R VOTED IN COUNTY OF IW IN STATE WITH SENATE RACE:
  IF R VOTED FOR SENATE:

    CANDIDATE CODE SENATE VOTE - IN COUNTY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         01. Democratic candidate in open Senate race
         02. Republican candidate in open Senate race
         03. Democratic Senate incumbent
         04. Republican Senate incumbent
         05. Democratic Senate challenger
         06. Republican Senate challenger
         07. Third party or independent Senate cand - nonincumbent
         08. Third party or independent Senate cand - 2nd nonincumbent
         09. Third party or independent Senate cand - incumbent
             VOTED IN COUNTY OF IW BUT R GAVE NAME OUTSIDE DISTRICT OF IW
         71. Democratic candidate
         72. Republican candidate
         73. Democratic incumbent
         74. Republican incumbent
         75. Democratic challenger
         76. Republican challenger
             NAME NOT ON CANDIDATE LIST

         88. Don't know
         89. Refused
         00. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C1x; 2,3,4 in C15; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025032

  C15a2.

  IF R VOTED:
  IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF IW:
  IF R VOTED FOR SENATE:

    Who did you vote for?

    SENATE VOTE CANDIDATE CODE - R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF IW
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         If R voted outside county of interview but within the same
         state, the regular candidate code is used here (as found in
         C15ax).

               VOTED OUTSIDE STATE OF IW:
         71. Democratic candidate
         72. Republican candidate
         73. Democratic incumbent
         74. Republican incumbent
         75. Democratic challenger
         76. Republican challenger
         80. Third party or independent candidate
         81. Democrat--no name given
         82. Republican--no name given
         85. Name not on candidate list

         88. Don't know
         89. Refused
         00. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C1x; 1,2,4 in C15; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025033

  C15a2a.

  IF R VOTED:
  IF R VOTED OUTSIDE COUNTY OF IW:
  IF R VOTED FOR SENATE:

    Which party was that?

    PARTY OF SENATE VOTE - OUTSIDE COUNTY OF IW
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This is the respondent's identification of 'outside' candidate's
         party.

         1. Democratic
         5. Republican
         7. Other {SPECIFY}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C1x; 1,2,4 in C15; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025034

  C15ax1.

  IF R VOTED:
  IF R VOTED IN STATE OF IW AND RACE IN STATE /
  IF R VOTED OUTSIDE STATE OF IW:
     ED FOR SENATE:

    CANDIDATE CODE SENATE VOTE SUMMARY - ALL VOTERS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from C15ax, C15a2.

         01. Democratic candidate in open Senate race
         02. Republican candidate in open Senate race
         03. Democratic Senate incumbent
         04. Republican Senate incumbent
         05. Democratic Senate challenger
         06. Republican Senate challenger
         07. Third party or independent Senate cand - nonincumbent
         08. Third party or independent Senate cand - 2nd nonincumbent
         09. Third party or independent Senate cand - incumbent
             VOTED IN COUNTY OF IW BUT R GAVE NAME OUTSIDE DISTRICT OF IW
         71. Democratic candidate
         72. Republican candidate
         73. Democratic incumbent
         74. Republican incumbent
         75. Democratic challenger
         76. Republican challenger
               VOTED OUTSIDE STATE OF IW:
                   STATE WITH NO RUNNING INCUMBENT: (VOTE VAR ONLY)
         71. Democratic candidate
         72. Republican candidate
                   STATE WITH RUNNING INCUMBENT:
         73. Democratic incumbent
         74. Republican incumbent
         75. Democratic challenger
         76. Republican challenger
                   ALL STATES:
         80. Third party or independent candidate
         81. Democrat--no name given
         82. Republican--no name given
         85. Name not on candidate list

         88. Don't know
         89. Refused
         00. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C1x; 2,4 in C15; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025034x

  C15ax2.

  IF R VOTED:
  IF R VOTED IN STATE OF IW AND RACE IN STATE /
  IF R VOTED OUTSIDE STATE OF IW:
     ED FOR SENATE:

    CANDIDATE PARTY SENATE VOTE SUMMARY - ALL VOTERS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from C15ax, C15a2.

         1. DEMOCRAT
         2. REPUBLICAN
         3. OTHER (third party or independent candidate)
         7. Name not on candidate list for this race

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C1x; 2,4 in C15; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025035

  C18a.

  IF R DID NOT VOTE OR DK/NA IF VOTED:
  IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:

    How about the election for the HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES in
    Washington?  Did you PREFER one of the candidates for the U.S.
    House of Representatives?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         1,2,4,5,6 in C2ax; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025036

  C18a1.

  IF R DID NOT VOTE OR DK/NA IF VOTED:
  IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
  IF R PREFERRED ONE OF THE U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATES:

    Who did you prefer?
    Did you prefer (the [Democrat/Republican], [<DEM CAND NAME>/
    <REP CAND NAME>]) (or) (the [Republican/Democrat], [<REP
    CAND NAME>/<DEM CAND NAME>]) (or the <OTHER PARTY>
    candidate, <OTHER CAND NAME>) (or someone else?)?

    NONVOTER HOUSE CANDIDATE PREFERENCE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered this
         questions with the name of the Democratic candidate read first
         or the name of the Republican candidate read first.
         Note: in LA05 there were 2 Republican candidates, the 2nd of
         which was preloaded into House independent/3rd-party candidate
         preload fields.  Independent/3rd-party candidate names were
         read after any major party names.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. <PRELOAD DEM CAND NAME>
         5. <PRELOAD REP CAND NAME>
         3. <PRELOAD IND/3RD PARTY CAND NAME>
         7. Other {SPECIFY}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C18a; 1,2,4,5,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025037

  C18ax1.

  IF R DID NOT VOTE OR DK/NA IF VOTED:
  IF NOT WASHINGTON D.C.:
  IF R PREFERRED ONE OF THE U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATES:

    NONVOTER HOUSE CANDIDATE PREFERENCE - CANDIDATE CODE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         34. Republican House incumbent
         35. Democratic House challenger
         36. Republican House challenger
         37. Third party or independent House cand - nonincumbent
         38. Third party or independent House cand - 2nd nonincumbent
         39. Third party or independent House cand - incumbent
         85. Name not on candidate list

         88. Don't know
         89. Refused
         00. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C18a; 1,2,4,5,6,8,9,0 in C2ax; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025038

  C19.

  IF R DID NOT VOTE OR DK/NA IF VOTED:

    RACE IN STATE OF IW?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. State with race
         2. State with no race (including Washington DC)

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C1x; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025039

  C19a.

  IF R DID NOT VOTE OR DK/NA IF VOTED:
  IF STATE WITH SENATE RACE:

    How about the election for the UNITED STATES SENATE?
    Did you PREFER one of the candidates for the U.S. Senate?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         2 in C19; 5,8,9,0 in C1x; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025040

  C19a1.

  IF R DID NOT VOTE OR DK/NA IF VOTED:
  IF STATE WITH SENATE RACE:
  R PREFERRED ONE OF THE U.S. SENATE CANDIDATES:

    Who did you prefer?
    Did you prefer (the [Democrat/Republican], [<DEM CAND NAME>/
    <REP CAND NAME>]) (or) (the [Republican/Democrat], [<REP
    CAND NAME>/<DEM CAND NAME>]) (or the <OTHER PARTY>
    candidate, <OTHER CAND NAME>) (or someone else?)?

    NONVOTER SENATE CANDIDATE PREFERENCE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered this
         questions with the name of the Democratic candidate read first
         or the name of the Republican candidate read first.
         Note: in LA there were 2 Republican candidates, the 2nd of
         which was preloaded into Senate independent/3rd-party candidate
         preload fields.  Independent/3rd-party candidate names were
         read after any major party names.

         1. <PRELOAD DEM CAND NAME>
         5. <PRELOAD REP CAND NAME>
         3. <PRELOAD IND/3RD PARTY CAND NAME>
         7. Other {SPECIFY}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C19a; 2 in C19; 5,8,9,0 in C1x; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025041

  C19ax.

  IF R DID NOT VOTE OR DK/NA IF VOTED:
  IF STATE WITH SENATE RACE:
  R PREFERRED ONE OF THE U.S. SENATE CANDIDATES:

    NONVOTER SENATE CANDIDATE PREFERENCE - CANDIDATE CODE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         01. Democratic candidate in open Senate race
         02. Republican candidate in open Senate race
         03. Democratic Senate incumbent
         04. Republican Senate incumbent
         05. Democratic Senate challenger
         06. Republican Senate challenger
         07. Third party or independent Senate cand - nonincumbent
         08. Third party or independent Senate cand - 2nd nonincumbent
         09. Third party or independent Senate cand - incumbent
         85. Name not on candidate list

         88. Don't know
         89. Refused
         00. NA

         INAP.
         5,8,9,0 in C19a; 2 in C19; 5,8,9,0 in C1x; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025042

  C20.

    In some countries, people believe their elections are conducted
    fairly.  In other countries, people believe that their
    elections are conducted unfairly.  Thinking of the
    Congressional elections we've just had, do you believe they
    were VERY FAIR, SOMEWHAT FAIR, NEITHER FAIR NOR UNFAIR,
    SOMEWHAT UNFAIR, or VERY UNFAIR?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Very fair
         2. Somewhat fair
         3. Neither fair nor unfair
         4. Somewhat unfair
         5. Very unfair

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================

  D1.

    I'd like to get your feelings toward some people in the news
    these days. I'll read the name of a person and I'll ask you to
    rate that person on a thermometer that runs from 0 to 100
    degrees. Rating above 50 means that you feel favorable and warm
    toward the person. Rating below 50 means that you feel
    unfavorable and cool toward the person.  Rating right at the 50
    degree mark means you don't feel particularly warm or cold.
    You may use any number from 0 to 100 to tell me how favorable
    or unfavorable your feelings are. If we come to a person whose
    name you don't recognize, just tell me and we'll move on to the
    next one.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
A025043

  D1a.

    The first person is:
    George W. Bush
    Where on that thermometer would you rate George W. Bush?
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: GEORGE W. BUSH
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         theromometer):
           D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k
           D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025044

  D1g.

  IF R'S COUNTY OF RESIDENCE HAS A DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE:

    (The next person is:)
    <PRELOAD DEM HOUSE CAND NAME>
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate [him/her]?)
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: PRELOADED DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         theromometer):
           D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k
           D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No Democratic House candidate; error in distric assignment
         preload (1 case); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025045

  D1h.

  IF R'S COUNTY OF RESIDENCE HAS A REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE:

    (The next person is:)
    <PRELOAD REP HOUSE CAND NAME>
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate [him/her]?)
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: PRELOADED REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE NAME
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         theromometer):
           D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k
           D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No Republican House candidate; error in distric assignment
         preload (1 case); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025046

  D1j.

  IF R'S COUNTY OF RESIDENCE HAS A RETIRING HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE:

    (The next person is:)
    <PRELOAD RETIRING HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE NAME>
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate [him/her]?)
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: PRELOADED RETIRING HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         theromometer):
           D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k
           D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No retiring House representative; error in distric assignment
         preload (1 case); no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025047

  D1k.

  IF R LIVES IN A STATE WITH A DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE:
  IF DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE IS NOT HOUSE RETIREE:

    (The next person is:)
    <PRELOAD DEM SENATE CAND NAME>
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate [him/her]?)
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: PRELOADED DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         If Democratic Senate candidate was also House retiree, then
         only the House retiree thermometer was asked (D1j).
         Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         theromometer):
           D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k
           D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No Democratic Senate candidate; Democratic Senate candidate is
         also House retiree (1 in Cand.12a); no race in state or
         Washington DC; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025048

  D1m.

  IF R LIVES IN A STATE WITH A REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE:
  IF REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE IS NOT HOUSE RETIREE:

    (The next person is:)
    <PRELOAD REP SENATE CAND NAME>
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate [him/her]?)
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: PRELOADED REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         If Republican Senate candidate was also House retiree, then
         only the House retiree thermometer was asked (D1j).
         Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         theromometer):
           D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k
           D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No Republican Senate candidate; Republican Senate candidate is
         also House retiree (1 in Cand.12a); no race in state or
         Washington DC; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025049

  D1m1.

  IF R LIVES IN LOUISIANA:

    (The next person is:)
    <LA ONLY: 2ND REP SENATE CAND NAME>
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate [him/her]?)
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: PRELOADED LA 2ND REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         In Louisiana only, there were 2 significant Republican
         challengers to the incumbent Democratic Senate candidate.
         Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         theromometer):
           D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k
           D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         Not Lousiana (no 2nd Republican Senate candidate); no 2002 Post
         interview

==============================
A025050

  D1n.

  IF INDEPENDENT/3RD PARTY HOUSE CAND.:/
  IF LA05:

    (The next person is:)
    <PRELOAD IND/3RD PARTY HOUSE CAND NAME>
    (Where on that thermometer would you rate [him/her]?)
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THE PERSON IS OR DO YOU HAVE
    SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: PRELOADED INDEPEN./3RD PARTY HOUSE CANDIDATE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         In LA05 only, there were 2 significant Republican candidates
         facing a Democrat in an open race; for LA05, this variable
         represents the 2nd Republican candidate.
         Individual thermometers (D1) were administered in one of two
         possible orders following George W. Bush (fixed as 1st
         theromometer):
           D1a,D1g,D1h,D1j,D1m,D1m1,D1k
           D1a,D1h,D1g,D1j,D1k,D1m,D1m1
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No independent/3rd-party House candidate and not LA05; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================

  D2.

    Still using the thermometer, how would you rate:
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
A025051

  D2a.

    (How would you rate:)
    the Supreme Court?
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: THE SUPREME COURT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025052

  D2b.

    (How would you rate:)
    Congress?
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: CONGRESS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025053

  D2c.

    (How would you rate:)
    the Military?
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: THE MILITARY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025054

  D2d.

    (How would you rate:)
    the federal government in Washington?
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN WASHINGTON
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025055

  D2e.

    (How would you rate:)
    blacks?
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: BLACKS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025056

  D2f.

    (How would you rate:)
    whites?
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: WHITES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025057

  D2g.

    (How would you rate:)
    conservatives?
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: CONSERVATIVES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025058

  D2h.

    (How would you rate:)
    liberals?
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: LIBERALS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025059

  D2j.

    (How would you rate:)
    labor unions?
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: LABOR UNIONS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025060

  D2k.

    (How would you rate:)
    big business?
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: BIG BUSINESS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025061

  D2m.

    (How would you rate:)
    poor people?
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: POOR PEOPLE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025062

  D2n.

    (How would you rate:)
    people on welfare?
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: PEOPLE ON WELFARE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025063

  D2p.

    (How would you rate:)
    Hispanics (Hispanic-Americans)?
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: HISPANICS (HISPANIC-AMERICANS)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025064

  D2q.

    (How would you rate:)
    Christian fundamentalists?
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: CHRISTIAN FUNDAMENTALISTS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025065

  D2r.

    (How would you rate:)
    older people (the elderly)?
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: OLDER PEOPLE (THE ELDERLY)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025066

  D2s.

    (How would you rate:)
    environmentalists?
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: ENVIRONMENTALISTS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025067

  D2t.

    (How would you rate:)
    gay men and lesbians, that is, homosexuals?
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: GAY MEN AND LESBIANS (HOMOSEXUALS)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025068

  D2u.

    (How would you rate:)
    Catholics?
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: CATHOLICS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025069

  D2v.

    (How would you rate:)
    Jews?
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: JEWS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025070

  D2w.

    (How would you rate:)
    Protestants?
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: PROTESTANTS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025071

  D2y.

    (How would you rate:)
    feminists?
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: FEMINISTS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025072

  D2z.

    (How would you rate:)
    Asian-Americans?
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: ASIAN-AMERICANS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025073

  D2za.

    (How would you rate:)
    the news media?
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: THE NEWS MEDIA
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025074

  D2zb.

    (How would you rate:)
    the Catholic Church?
    {PROBE FOR DON'T KNOW RESPONSE: WHEN YOU SAY "DON'T KNOW" DO
    YOU MEAN THAT YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD THE TERM BEFORE OR DO YOU
    HAVE SOMETHING ELSE IN MIND?}

    THERMOMETER RATING: THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Individual thermometers (D2) were administered in one of two
         possible orders:
         D2za,a,b,c,d,zb,e,f,g,h,j,k,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,y,z /
         D2za,b,c,a,d,zb,h,g,k,j,f,e,m,n,p,q,r,s,t,w,v,u,y,z
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         0-100.

         887. Don't recognize
         888. Don't know where to rate
         889. Refused
         999. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================

  D3.

    I am going to read a list of words and phrases people may use
    to describe George W. Bush.  For each, please tell me whether
    the word or phrase describes him.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
A025075

  D3a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR D3 GEORGE W. BUSH TRAITS:

    In your opinion, does the phrase 'he PROVIDES STRONG
    LEADERSHIP' describe George W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL, QUITE WELL,
    NOT TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL?

    GEORGE W. BUSH TRAIT: PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush
         traits questions.
         George W. Bush traits questions in D3 were randomly assigned to
         1 of 2 possible sequential orders:
           D3a,b,c,d
           D3a,d,c,b
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Extremely Well
         2. Quite Well
         3. Not Too Well
         4. Not Well at All

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for D4 traits; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025076

  D3b.

  IF R SELECTED FOR D3 GEORGE W. BUSH TRAITS:

    What about 'he is MORAL'?
    (Does this phrase describe George W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL,
    QUITE WELL, NOT TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL?)

    GEORGE W. BUSH TRAIT: MORAL
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush
         traits questions.
         George W. Bush traits questions in D3 were randomly assigned to
         1 of 2 possible sequential orders:
           D3a,b,c,d
           D3a,d,c,b
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Extremely Well
         2. Quite Well
         3. Not Too Well
         4. Not Well at All

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for D4 traits; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025077

  D3c.

  IF R SELECTED FOR D3 GEORGE W. BUSH TRAITS:

    What about 'he is OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE'?
    (Does this phrase describe George W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL,
    QUITE WELL, NOT TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL?)

    GEORGE W. BUSH TRAIT: OUT OF TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush
         traits questions.
         George W. Bush traits questions in D3 were randomly assigned to
         1 of 2 possible sequential orders:
           D3a,b,c,d
           D3a,d,c,b
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Extremely Well
         2. Quite Well
         3. Not Too Well
         4. Not Well at All

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for D4 traits; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025078

  D3d.

  IF R SELECTED FOR D3 GEORGE W. BUSH TRAITS:

    What about 'he is KNOWLEDGEABLE'?
    (Does this phrase describe George W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL,
    QUITE WELL, NOT TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL?)

    GEORGE W. BUSH TRAIT: KNOWLEDGEABLE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush
         traits questions.
         George W. Bush traits questions in D3 were randomly assigned to
         1 of 2 possible sequential orders:
           D3a,b,c,d
           D3a,d,c,b
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Extremely Well
         2. Quite Well
         3. Not Too Well
         4. Not Well at All

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for D4 traits; no 2002 Post interview

==============================

  D4.

    I am going to read a list of words and phrases people may use
    to describe George W. Bush.  For each, please tell me whether
    the word or phrase describes him.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
A025079

  D4a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR D4 GEORGE W. BUSH TRAITS:

    In your opinion, does the phrase 'he PROVIDES STRONG
    LEADERSHIP' describe George W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL, QUITE WELL,
    NOT TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL?

    GEORGE W. BUSH TRAIT: PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush
         traits questions.
         George W. Bush traits questions in D4 were randomly assigned to
         1 of 2 possible sequential orders:
           D4a,b,c,d
           D4a,d,c,b
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Extremely Well
         2. Quite Well
         3. Not Too Well
         4. Not Well at All

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for D3 traits; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025080

  D4b.

  IF R SELECTED FOR D4 GEORGE W. BUSH TRAITS:

    What about 'he REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU'?
    (Does this phrase describe George W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL,
    QUITE WELLl, NOT TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL?)

    GEORGE W. BUSH TRAIT: REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush
         traits questions.
         George W. Bush traits questions in D4 were randomly assigned to
         1 of 2 possible sequential orders:
           D4a,b,c,d
           D4a,d,c,b
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Extremely Well
         2. Quite Well
         3. Not Too Well
         4. Not Well at All

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025081

  D4c.

  IF R SELECTED FOR D4 GEORGE W. BUSH TRAITS:

    What about 'he is DISHONEST'?
    (Does this phrase describe George W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL,
    QUITE WELL, NOT TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL?)

    GEORGE W. BUSH TRAIT: DISHONEST
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush
         traits questions.
         George W. Bush traits questions in D4 were randomly assigned to
         1 of 2 possible sequential orders:
           D4a,b,c,d
           D4a,d,c,b
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Extremely Well
         2. Quite Well
         3. Not Too Well
         4. Not Well at All

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025082

  D4d.

  IF R SELECTED FOR D4 GEORGE W. BUSH TRAITS:

    What about 'he is INTELLIGENT'?
    (Does this phrase describe George W. Bush EXTREMELY WELL,
    QUITE WELL, NOT TOO WELL, or NOT WELL AT ALL?)

    GEORGE W. BUSH TRAIT: INTELLIGENT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either D3 or D4 Bush
         traits questions.
         George W. Bush traits questions in D4 were randomly assigned to
         1 of 2 possible sequential orders:
           D4a,b,c,d
           D4a,d,c,b
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Extremely Well
         2. Quite Well
         3. Not Too Well
         4. Not Well at All

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025083

  E1.

    Do you happen to know which party had the most members in the
    House of Representatives in Washington BEFORE the election
    [this/last] month?
    {IF NECESSARY: WHICH ONE?}
    {DON'T PROBE DK}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. The Democrats
         5. The Republicans
         7. About equal; above even; about the same [VOL]

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025084

  F5.

    Some people seem to follow what's going on in government and
    public affairs most of the time, whether there's an election
    going on or not. Others aren't that interested.  Would you say
    you follow what's going on in government and public affairs
    MOST OF THE TIME, SOME OF THE TIME, ONLY NOW AND THEN, or
    HARDLY AT ALL?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Most of the time
         2. Some of the time
         3. Only now and then
         4. Hardly at all

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================

  G1.

    We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and
    conservatives.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
A025085

  G1a.

  IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE OR VT01:
  IF R RECOGNIZED DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE IN THERMOMETER:

    When it comes to politics, do you think of [<DEM HOUSE CAND
    NAME/<REP HOUSE CAND NAME/VT01 INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT] as a
    LIBERAL, a CONSERVATIVE, or a MODERATE?

    DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CAND/VT01 INDEP INCUMBENT: LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: if R indicated nonrecognition of the Democratic House
         candidate's name in the D1h thermometer, then this question
         was not asked.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered
         G1a/G1b (liberal-conservative placement of Democratic House
         candidate/Republican House candidate) with wording Democratic
         House candidate name first and Republican House candidate name
         second or vice versa.  (Data in G1a are data for Democratic
         House candidate regardless of order; data in G1b are data
         for Republican House candidate regardless of order).
         Placement for VT01 independent incumbent (only) is also included
         in this variable, with data for VT01 Republican challenger
         in G1b.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.       

         1. Liberal
         2. Conservative
         3. Moderate

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Democratic House candidate and not VT01; wrong district
         identification preloaded (1 case, 1 in Summary.1); R did not
         recognize Democratic House candidate in thermometer (887 in

==============================
A025086

  G1a1.

  IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE OR VT01:
  IF R RECOGNIZED DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE IN THERMOMETER:
  IF R CONSIDERS DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE LIBERAL:

    Would you call [him/her] a STRONG liberal or a NOT VERY STRONG
    liberal?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Strong liberal
         5. Not very strong liberal

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         2,3,8,9,0 in G1a; no Democratic House candidate and not VT01;
         wrong district identification preloaded (1 case, 1 in
         Summary.1); R did not recognize Democratic House candidate in

==============================
A025087

  G1a2.

  IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE OR VT01:
  IF R RECOGNIZED DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE IN THERMOMETER:
  IF R CONSIDERS DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE CONSERVATIVE:

    Would you call [him/her] a STRONG conservative or a NOT VERY
    STRONG conservative?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Strong conservative
         5. Not very strong conservative

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         1,3,8,9,0 in G1a; no Democratic House candidate and not VT01;
         wrong district identification preloaded (1 case, 1 in
         Summary.1); R did not recognize Democratic House candidate in

==============================
A025088

  G1a3.

  IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE / VT01:
  IF R RECOGNIZED DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE IN THERMOMETER:
  IF R CONSIDERS DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE MODERATE/DK:

    Do you think [he/she] is more like a LIBERAL or more like a
    CONSERVATIVE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Liberal
         2. Conservative
         3. Moderate {VOL}
         7. Can't choose; neither {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         1,2,9,0 in G1a; no Democratic House candidate and not VT01;
         wrong district identification preloaded (1 case, 1 in
         Summary.1); R did not recognize Democratic House candidate in

==============================
A025089

  G1ax.

  IF DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE / VT01:
  IF R RECOGNIZED DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE IN THERMOMETER:

    When it comes to politics, do you think of [<DEM HOUSE CAND
    NAME/<REP HOUSE CAND NAME/VT01 INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT] as a
    LIBERAL, a CONSERVATIVE, or a MODERATE?
    Would you call [him/her] a STRONG liberal or a NOT VERY STRONG
    liberal? /
    Would you call [him/her] a STRONG conservative or a NOT VERY
    STRONG conservative? /
    Do you think [he/she] is more like a LIBERAL or more like a
    CONSERVATIVE?

    SUMMARY: DEM HOUSE CAND/VT01 INDEP INCUMBENT LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered
         G1a/G1b (liberal-conservative placement of Democratic House
         candidate/Republican House candidate) with wording Democratic
         House candidate name first and Republican House candidate name
         second or vice versa.  (Data in G1a are data for Democratic
         House candidate regardless of order; data in G1b are data
         for Republican House candidate regardless of order).
         Placement for VT01 independent incumbent (only) is also included
         in this variable, with data for VT01 Republican challenger
         in G1b.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Strong liberal
         2. Not strong liberal
         3. Leaning liberal
         4. Moderate
         5. Leaning conservative
         6. Not strong conservative
         7. Strong conservative

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Democratic House candidate and not VT01; wrong district
         identification preloaded (1 case, 1 in Summary.1); R did not
         recognize Democratic House candidate in thermometer (887 in

==============================
A025090

  G1b.

  IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE:
  IF R RECOGNIZED REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE IN THERMOMETER:

    What about [<DEM HOUSE CAND NAME/<REP HOUSE CAND NAME>]?  Do
    you think [he/she] is a LIBERAL, a CONSERVATIVE, or a MODERATE?

    REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE: LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: if R indicated nonrecognition of the Republican House
         candidate's name in the D1h thermometer, then this question
         was not asked.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered
         G1a/G1b (liberal-conservative placement of Democratic House
         candidate/Republican House candidate) with wording Democratic
         House candidate name first and Republican House candidate name
         second or vice versa.  (Data in G1b are data for Republican
         House candidate regardless of order; data in G1a are data
         for Democratic House candidate regardless of order).
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Liberal
         2. Conservative
         3. Moderate

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Republican House candidate; wrong district identification
         preloaded (1 case, 1 in Summary.1); R did not recognize
         Republican House candidate in thermometer (887 in D1h); no 2002

==============================
A025091

  G1b1.

  IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE:
  IF R RECOGNIZED REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE IN THERMOMETER:
  IF R CONSIDERS REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE LIBERAL:

    Would you call [him/her] a STRONG liberal or a NOT VERY STRONG
    liberal?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Strong liberal
         5. Not very strong liberal

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         2,3,8,9,0 in G1b; no Republican House candidate; wrong district
         identification preloaded (1 case, 1 in Summary.1); R did not
         recognize Republican House candidate in thermometer (887 in

==============================
A025092

  G1b2.

  IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE:
  IF R RECOGNIZED REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE IN THERMOMETER:
  IF R CONSIDERS REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE CONSERVATIVE:

    Would you call [him/her] a STRONG conservative or a NOT VERY
    STRONG conservative?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Strong conservative
         5. Not very strong conservative

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         1,3,8,9,0 in G1b; no Republican House candidate; wrong district
         identification preloaded (1 case, 1 in Summary.1); R did not
         recognize Republican House candidate in thermometer (887 in

==============================
A025093

  G1b3.

  IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE:
  IF R RECOGNIZED REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE IN THERMOMETER:
  IF R CONSIDERS REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE MODERATE/DK:

    Do you think [he/she] is more like a LIBERAL or more like a
    CONSERVATIVE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Liberal
         2. Conservative
         3. Moderate {VOL}
         7. Can't choose; neither {VOL}

         8. Don't know                    
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         1,2,9,0 in G1b; no Republican House candidate; wrong district
         identification preloaded (1 case, 1 in Summary.1); R did not
         recognize Republican House candidate in thermometer (887 in

==============================
A025094

  G1bx.

  IF REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN HOUSE RACE:
  IF R RECOGNIZED REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE IN THERMOMETER:

    When it comes to politics, do you think of [<DEM HOUSE CAND
    NAME/<REP HOUSE CAND NAME/VT01 INDEPENDENT INCUMBENT] as a
    LIBERAL, a CONSERVATIVE, or a MODERATE?
    Would you call [him/her] a STRONG liberal or a NOT VERY STRONG
    liberal? /
    Would you call [him/her] a STRONG conservative or a NOT VERY
    STRONG conservative? /
    Do you think [he/she] is more like a LIBERAL or more like a
    CONSERVATIVE?

    SUMMARY: REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to be administered
         G1a/G1b (liberal-conservative placement of Democratic House
         candidate/Republican House candidate) with wording Democratic
         House candidate name first and Republican House candidate name
         second or vice versa.  (Data in G1a are data for Democratic
         House candidate regardless of order; data in G1b are data
         for Republican House candidate regardless of order).
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Strong liberal
         2. Not strong liberal
         3. Leaning liberal
         4. Moderate
         5. Leaning conservative
         6. Not strong conservative
         7. Strong conservative

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No Republican House candidate; wrong district identification
         preloaded (1 case, 1 in Summary.1); R did not recognize
         Republican House candidate in thermometer (887 in D1h); no 2002

==============================
A025095

  G1c.

  IF LA05:

    What about [<LA05 2ND HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE]?
    Do you think [he/she] is a LIBERAL, a CONSERVATIVE, or a
    MODERATE?

    LA05 2nd REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE: LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This question applies to LA05 only, which had 2 major Republican
         House candidates.

         1. Liberal
         2. Conservative
         3. Moderate

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Not LA05; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025096

  G1c1.

  IF LA05:
  IF R CONSIDERS 2ND HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE LIBERAL:

    Would you call [him/her] a STRONG liberal or a NOT VERY STRONG
    liberal?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Strong liberal
         5. Not very strong liberal

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         2,3,8,9,0 in G1c; not LA05; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025097

  G1c2.

  IF LA05:
  IF R CONSIDERS 2ND HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE CONSERVATIVE:

    Would you call [him/her] a STRONG conservative or a NOT VERY
    STRONG conservative?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Strong conservative
         5. Not very strong conservative

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         1,3,8,9,0 in G1c; not LA05; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025098

  G1c3.

  IF LA05:
  IF R CONSIDERS 2ND HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE MODERATE/DK:

    Do you think [he/she] is more like a LIBERAL or more like a
    CONSERVATIVE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Liberal
         2. Conservative
         3. Moderate {VOL}
         7. Can't choose; neither {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         1,3,9,0 in G1c; not LA05; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025099

  G1cx.

  IF LA05:
  IF R CONSIDERS 2ND HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE MODERATE/DK:

    What about [<LA05 2ND HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE]?
    Do you think [he/she] is a LIBERAL, a CONSERVATIVE, or a
    MODERATE? /
    Would you call [him/her] a STRONG liberal or a NOT VERY STRONG
    liberal? /
    Would you call [him/her] a STRONG conservative or a NOT VERY
    STRONG conservative? /
    Do you think [he/she] is more like a LIBERAL or more like a
    CONSERVATIVE?

    SUMMARY: 2ND REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This question applies to LA05 only, which had 2 major Republican
         House candidates.

         1. Strong liberal
         2. Not strong liberal
         3. Leaning liberal
         4. Moderate
         5. Leaning conservative
         6. Not strong conservative
         7. Strong conservative

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         Not LA05; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025100

  K2.

    Many people say they have less time these days to do volunteer
    work. What about you, were you able to devote any time to
    volunteer work IN THE LAST 12 MONTHS or did you not do so?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025101

  K3.

    Generally speaking, would you say that MOST PEOPLE CAN BE
    TRUSTED or that you CAN'T BE TOO CAREFUL in dealing with people?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Most people can be trusted
         5. Can't be too careful

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025102

  K4.

  IF R SELECTED FOR K4 ADMINISTRATION:

    Do you think most people would try to TAKE ADVANTAGE of you if
    they got the chance or would they TRY TO BE FAIR?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either K4 or K5.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Take advantage
         5. Try to be fair

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for K5 administration; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025103

  K5.

  IF R SELECTED FOR K5 ADMINISTRATION:

    Would you say that most of the time people TRY TO BE HELPFUL,
    or that they are JUST LOOKING OUT FOR THEMSELVES?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either K4 or K5.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Try to be helpful
         5. Just looking out for themselves

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for K4 administration; no 2002 Post interview

==============================

  L1.

    Next I am going to read you a list of federal programs.  For
    each one, I would like you to tell me whether you would like to
    see spending INCREASED or DECREASED.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
A025104

  L1a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L1 SERIES IN POST (K2 IN PRE):

    The first program is:
    building and repairing highways.
    If you had a say in making up the federal budget this year,
    should federal spending on building and repairing highways be
    INCREASED, DECREASED or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?

    FEDERAL SPENDING: BUILDING AND REPAIRING HIGHWAYS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L2 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025104x

  L1ax.

    If you had a say in making up the federal budget this year,
    should federal spending on building and repairing highways be
    INCREASED, DECREASED or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: BUILDING/REPAIRING HIGHWAYS - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre K2a and Post L1a.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025105

  L1b.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L1 SERIES IN POST (K2 IN PRE):

    (What about)
    defense?
    (Should federal spending on defense be INCREASED, DECREASED,
    or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: DEFENSE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: This item was not included the in the Pre K2 series;
         it is also included in the the Post L2 series, followed by a
         Post L1/L2 summary.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L2 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025106

  L1c.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L1 SERIES IN POST (K2 IN PRE):

    (What about)
    spending on AIDS research?
    (Should federal spending on AIDS research be INCREASED,
    DECREASED or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: AIDS RESEARCH
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L2 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025106x

  L1cx.

    (What about)
    spending on AIDS research?
    (Should federal spending on AIDS research be INCREASED,
    DECREASED or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: AIDS RESEARCH - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre K2b and Post L1c.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025107

  L1d.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L1 SERIES IN POST (K2 IN PRE):

    (What about)
    welfare programs?
    (Should federal spending on welfare programs be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: WELFARE PROGRAMS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L2 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025107x

  L1dx.

    (What about)
    welfare programs?
    (Should federal spending on welfare programs be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: WELFARE PROGRAMS - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre K2c and Post L1d.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025108a

  L1e1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L1 SERIES IN POST (K2 IN PRE):
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'PUBLIC SCHOOLS' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [public schools/big-city schools]?
    (Should federal spending on [public schools/big-city schools]
    be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either "public schools"
         or "big-city schools" wording for L1e.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; R selected for L2 series in
         the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025108b

  L1e2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L1 SERIES IN POST (K2 IN PRE):
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'BIG-CITY SCHOOLS' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [public schools/big-city schools]?
    (Should federal spending on [public schools/big-city schools]
    be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: BIG-CITY SCHOOLS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either "public schools"
         or "big-city schools" wording for L1e.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; R selected for L2 series in
         the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025108x

  L1e1x.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'PUBLIC SCHOOLS' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [public schools/big-city schools]?
    (Should federal spending on [public schools/big-city schools]
    be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: PUBLIC SCHOOLS - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This combines data from Pre K2d1 and Post L1e1.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to either "public schools"
         or "big-city schools" wording for Pre K1d and for Post L1e.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025108y

  L1e2x.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'BIG-CITY SCHOOLS' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [public schools/big-city schools]?
    (Should federal spending on [public schools/big-city schools]
    be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: BIG-CITY SCHOOLS - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This combines data from Pre K2d2 and Post L1e2.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to either "public schools"
         or "big-city schools" wording for Pre K1d and for Post L1e.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025109

  L1f.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L1 SERIES IN POST (K2 IN PRE):

    (What about)
    dealing with crime?
    (Should federal spending on dealing with crime be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: DEALING WITH CRIME
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L2 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025109x

  L1fx.

    (What about)
    dealing with crime?
    (Should federal spending on dealing with crime be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: DEALING WITH CRIME - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre K2e and Post L1f.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025110

  L1g.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L1 SERIES IN POST (K2 IN PRE):

    (What about)
    child care?
    (Should federal spending on child care be INCREASED,
    DESCREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: CHILD CARE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L2 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025110x

  L1gx.

    (What about)
    child care?
    (Should federal spending on child care be INCREASED,
    DESCREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: CHILD CARE - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre K2f and Post L1g.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025111a

  L1h1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L1 SERIES IN POST (K2 IN PRE):
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'HOMELAND SECURITY' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [homeland security/the war on terrorism]?
    (Should federal spending on homeland security be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: HOMELAND SECURITY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either "homeland security"
         or "war on terrorism" wording for L1h.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; R selected for L2 series in
         the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025111b

  L1h2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L1 SERIES IN POST (K2 IN PRE):
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WAR ON TERRORISM' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [homeland security/the war on terrorism]?
    (Should federal spending on homeland security be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING SERIES: WAR ON TERRORISM
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either "homeland security"
         or "war on terrorism" wording for L1h.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; R selected for L2 series in
         the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025111x

  L1h1x.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'HOMELAND SECURITY' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [homeland security/the war on terrorism]?
    (Should federal spending on homeland security be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: HOMELAND SECURITY - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This combines data from Pre K2g1 and Post L1h1.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to either "homeland security"
         or "war on terrorism" wording for L1h.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025111y

  L1h2x.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'WAR ON TERRORISM' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [homeland security/the war on terrorism]?
    (Should federal spending on homeland security be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: WAR ON TERRORISM - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This combines data from Pre K2g2 and Post L1h2.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to either "homeland security"
         or "war on terrorism" wording for L1h.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025112

  L1j.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L1 SERIES IN POST (K2 IN PRE):

    (What about)
    unemployment insurance?
    (Should federal spending on unemployment insurance be
    INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L2 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025112x

  L1jx.

    (What about)
    unemployment insurance?
    (Should federal spending on unemployment insurance be
    INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre K2h and Post L1j.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================

  L2.

    Next I am going to read you a list of federal programs.  For
    each one, I would like you to tell me whether you would like to
    see spending INCREASED or DECREASED.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
A025113

  L2a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2 SERIES IN POST (K1 IN PRE):

    The first program is:
    environmental protection
    If you had a say in making up the federal budget this year,
    should federal spending on environmental protection be
    INCREASED, DECREASED or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?

    FEDERAL SPENDING: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L1 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025113x

  L2ax.

    The first program is:
    environmental protection
    If you had a say in making up the federal budget this year,
    should federal spending on environmental protection be
    INCREASED, DECREASED or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from L1a in the Pre and L2a in the Post
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025114

  L2b.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2 SERIES IN POST (K1 IN PRE):

    (What about)
    defense?
    (Should federal spending on defense be INCREASED, DECREASED,
    or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: DEFENSE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: This item was not included the in the Pre K1 series;
         it is also included in the the Post L1 series (see L2bx).
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L1 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025114

  L2bx.

    (What about)
    defense?
    (Should federal spending on defense be INCREASED, DECREASED,
    or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: DEFENSE - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: This item was not included the in the Pre K1 series;
         it is also included in the the Post L1 series.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025115a

  L2c1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2 SERIES IN POST (K1 IN PRE):
  IF R SELECTED TO 'POOR PEOPLE' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [aid to poor people/aid to the working poor]?
    (Should federal spending on [aid to poor people /aid to the
    working poor] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: AID TO POOR PEOPLE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either "homeland security"
         or "war on terrorism" wording for L2c.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; R selected for L1 series in
         the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025115b

  L2c2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2 SERIES IN POST (K1 IN PRE):
  IF R SELECTED TO 'WORKING POOR' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [aid to poor people/aid to the working poor]?
    (Should federal spending on [aid to poor people /aid to the
    working poor] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: THE WORKING POOR
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either "homeland security"
         or "war on terrorism" wording for L2c.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; R selected for L1 series in
         the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025115x

  L2c1x.

  IF R SELECTED TO 'POOR PEOPLE' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [aid to poor people/aid to the working poor]?
    (Should federal spending on [aid to poor people /aid to the
    working poor] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: AID TO POOR PEOPLE - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre L1b1 and Post L2c1.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to either "homeland security"
         or "war on terrorism" wording for L2c.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025115y

  L2c2x.

  IF R SELECTED TO 'WORKING POOR' WORDING:

    (What about)
    [aid to poor people/aid to the working poor]?
    (Should federal spending on [aid to poor people /aid to the
    working poor] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: AID TO WORKING POOR - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre L1b2 and Post L2c2.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to either "homeland security"
         or "war on terrorism" wording for L2c.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025116

  L2d.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2 SERIES IN POST (K1 IN PRE):

    (What about)
    foreign aid?
    (Should federal spending on foreign aid be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: FOREIGN AID
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L1 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025116x

  L2dx.

    (What about)
    foreign aid?
    (Should federal spending on foreign aid be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: FOREIGN AID - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre L1c and Post L2d.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025117

  L2e.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2 SERIES IN POST (K1 IN PRE):

    (What about)
    Social Security?
    (Should federal spending on Social Security be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: SOCIAL SECURITY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L1 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025117x

  L2ex.

    (What about)
    Social Security?
    (Should federal spending on Social Security be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: SOCIAL SECURITY - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre L1d and Post L2e.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025118

  L2f.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2 SERIES IN POST (K1 IN PRE):

    (What about)
    tightening border security to prevent illegal immigration?
    (Should federal spending on tightening border security to
    prevent illegal immigration be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT
    ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: TIGHTENING BORDER SECURITY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L1 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025118x

  L2fx.

    (What about)
    tightening border security to prevent illegal immigration?
    (Should federal spending on tightening border security to
    prevent illegal immigration be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT
    ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: BORDER SECURITY - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre L1e and Post L2f.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025119

  L2g.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2 SERIES IN POST (K1 IN PRE):

    (What about)
    aid to blacks?
    (Should federal spending on aid to blacks be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: AID TO BLACKS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L1 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025119x

  L2gx.

    (What about)
    aid to blacks?
    (Should federal spending on aid to blacks be INCREASED,
    DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: AID TO BLACKS - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre L1f and Post L2g.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025120

  L2h.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2 SERIES IN POST (K1 IN PRE):

    (What about)
    preventing infant mortality?
    (Should federal spending on preventing infant mortality be
    INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: PREVENTING INFANT MORTALITY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for L1 series in the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025120x

  L2hx.

    (What about)
    preventing infant mortality?
    (Should federal spending on preventing infant mortality be
    INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: PREVENTING INFANT MORTALITY - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre L1g and Post L2h.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025121a

  L2j1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2 SERIES IN POST (K1 IN PRE):
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'POOR CHILDREN' WORDING

    (What about)
    [pre-school and early education for poor children/
    pre-school and early education for black children]?
    (Should federal spending on [pre-school and early education
    for poor children/ pre-school and early education for black
    children] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: POOR CHILDREN PRE-SCHOOL
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either "homeland security"
         or "war on terrorism" wording for L2j.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; R selected for L1 series in
         the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025121b

  L2j2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR L2 SERIES IN POST (K1 IN PRE):
  IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACK CHILDREN' WORDING

    (What about)
    [pre-school and early education for poor children/
    pre-school and early education for black children]?
    (Should federal spending on [pre-school and early education
    for poor children/ pre-school and early education for black
    children] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    FEDERAL SPENDING: BLACK CHILDREN PRE-SCHOOL
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to either "homeland security"
         or "war on terrorism" wording for L2j.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; R selected for L1 series in
         the Post; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025121x

  L2j1x.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'POOR CHILDREN' WORDING

    (What about)
    [pre-school and early education for poor children/
    pre-school and early education for black children]?
    (Should federal spending on [pre-school and early education
    for poor children/ pre-school and early education for black
    children] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: POOR CHILDREN PRE-SCHOOL - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre L1h1 and Post L2j1.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to either "homeland security"
         or "war on terrorism" wording for L2j.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025121y

  L2j2x.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'BLACK CHILDREN' WORDING

    (What about)
    [pre-school and early education for poor children/
    pre-school and early education for black children]?
    (Should federal spending on [pre-school and early education
    for poor children/ pre-school and early education for black
    children] be INCREASED, DECREASED, or KEPT ABOUT THE SAME?)

    PRE-POST SUMMARY: BLACK CHILDREN PRE-SCHOOL - FEDERAL SPENDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Combined from Pre L1h2 and Post L2j2.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to either "homeland security"
         or "war on terrorism" wording for L2j.
         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - L1 series in Post (K2 series in Pre)
         - L2 series in Post (K1 series in Pre)
         Note: With the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L1 includes the same questions as Pre series
         K1; with the exception of the addition for defense spending,
         Post series L2 includes the same questions as Pre series K2.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification

         1. Increased
         2. Decreased
         3. Kept about the same
         4. Cut out entirely {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025122

  M4.

    Some people feel the government in Washington should see to it
    that every person has A JOB AND A GOOD STANDARD OF LIVING.
    Others think the government should just LET EACH PERSON GET
    AHEAD ON THEIR OWN.  Which is closer to the way you feel or
    haven't you thought much about this?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         01. Government should see to jobs and standard of living
         05. Government should let each person get ahead on own
         07. Other, it depends, neither {SPECIFY} {VOL}

         08. Don't know
         09. Refused
         90. Haven't thought much about this
         00. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025123

  M4c.

    How important is this issue to you personally - VERY
    important, SOMEWHWAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025124

  M4d.

    Has this issue ever made you angry?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025125

  M5.

    Some people think that if a company has a history of
    discriminating against blacks when making hiring decisions,
    then they should be required to have an affirmative action
    program that gives blacks preference in hiring.  What do you
    think? Should companies that have discriminated against blacks
    have to have an affirmative action program?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes, they should have to have affirmative action
         5. No, they should not have to have affirmative action
         7. Other (specify) {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025126

  M5a.

  IF R ASKED EITHER VERSION OF PRE P1 (INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE):

    Which would you say is CLOSER to the Democratic Party's
    position -- that companies that have discriminated against
    blacks should have an affirmative action program, or not?
    {DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - P1 income inequality by race in Pre (either version) and
             M5a,b,c,d affirmative action items in Post
         - P2 income inequality by gender in Pre (either version) and
             M6a,b,c,d equal pay for women in Post
         Respondents were administered affirmative action items M5a
         (position of Democratic Party) and M5b (position of Republican
         Party) in random order.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Yes, they should have to have affirmative action
         5. No, they should not have to have affirmative action
         7. Other (specify) {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R administered P2 in Pre; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025127

  M5b.

  IF R ASKED EITHER VERSION OF PRE P1 (INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE):

    Which would you say is CLOSER to the Republican Party's
    position -- that companies that have discriminated against
    blacks should have an affirmative action program, or not?
    {DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - P1 income inequality by race in Pre (either version) and
             M5a,b,c,d affirmative action items in Post
         - P2 income inequality by gender in Pre (either version) and
             M6a,b,c,d equal pay for women in Post
         Respondents were administered affirmative action items M5a
         (position of Democratic Party) and M5b (position of Republican
         Party) in random order.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Yes, they should have to have affirmative action
         5. No, they should not have to have affirmative action
         7. Other (specify) {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R administered P2 in Pre; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025128

  M5c.

  IF R ASKED EITHER VERSION OF PRE P1 (INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE):

    How important is this issue to you personally - VERY
    important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - P1 income inequality by race in Pre (either version) and
             M5a,b,c,d affirmative action items in Post
         - P2 income inequality by gender in Pre (either version) and
             M6a,b,c,d equal pay for women in Post
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R administered P2 in Pre; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025129

  M5d.

  IF R ASKED EITHER VERSION OF PRE P1 (INCOME INEQUALITY BY RACE):

    Has this issue ever made you angry?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - P1 income inequality by race in Pre (either version) and
             M5a,b,c,d affirmative action items in Post
         - P2 income inequality by gender in Pre (either version) and
             M6a,b,c,d equal pay for women in Post
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R administered P2 in Pre; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025130

  M6.

    How much do you think the federal government should be doing to
    make sure that women get equal pay for equal work - A LOT,
    SOME, or NOT MUCH AT ALL?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. A lot
         3. Some
         5. Not much at all

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025131

  M6a.

  IF R ASKED EITHER VERSION OF PRE P2 (INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER):

    Which would you say is CLOSER to the Democratic Party's
    position -- that the federal government should be doing - A
    LOT, SOME, or NOT MUCH AT ALL to make sure that women get equal
    pay for equal work?
    {DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - P1 income inequality by race in Pre (either version) and
             M5a,b,c,d affirmative action items in Post
         - P2 income inequality by gender in Pre (either version) and
             M6a,b,c,d equal pay for women in Post
         Respondents were administered equal pay by gender items M6a
         (position of Democratic Party) and M6b (position of Republican
         Party) in random order.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. A lot
         3. Some
         5. Not much at all

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R administered P1 in Pre; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025132

  M6b.

  IF R ASKED EITHER VERSION OF PRE P2 (INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER):

    Which would you say is CLOSER to the Republican Party's
    position -- that the federal government should be doing - A
    LOT, SOME, or NOT MUCH AT ALL to make sure that women get equal
    pay for equal work?
    {DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - P1 income inequality by race in Pre (either version) and
             M5a,b,c,d affirmative action items in Post
         - P2 income inequality by gender in Pre (either version) and
             M6a,b,c,d equal pay for women in Post
         Respondents were administered equal pay by gender items M6a
         (position of Democratic Party) and M6b (position of Republican
         Party) in random order.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. A lot
         3. Some
         5. Not much at all

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R administered P1 in Pre; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025133

  M6c.

  IF R ASKED EITHER VERSION OF PRE P2 (INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER):

    How important is this issue to you personally - VERY
    important, SOMEWHAT important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - P1 income inequality by race in Pre (either version) and
             M5a,b,c,d affirmative action items in Post
         - P2 income inequality by gender in Pre (either version) and
             M6a,b,c,d equal pay for women in Post
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R administered P1 in Pre; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025134

  M6d.

  IF R ASKED EITHER VERSION OF PRE P2 (INCOME INEQUALITY BY GENDER):

    Has this issue ever made you angry?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following:
         - P1 income inequality by race in Pre (either version) and
             M5a,b,c,d affirmative action items in Post
         - P2 income inequality by gender in Pre (either version) and
             M6a,b,c,d equal pay for women in Post
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R administered P1 in Pre; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025135

  M7b1.

    There has been a lot of talk recently about doing away with the
    tax on large inheritances, the so-called "[estate/death] tax".
    Do you FAVOR or OPPOSE doing away with the [estate/death tax]?

    FAVOR ELIMINATING ESTATE/DEATH TAX - COMBINED WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings
         for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions).
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Favor
         5. Oppose
         7. Other; depends {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025135a

  M7b1a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'ESTATE TAX' WORDING:

    There has been a lot of talk recently about doing away with the
    tax on large inheritances, the so-called "[estate/death] tax".
    Do you FAVOR or OPPOSE doing away with the [estate/death tax]?

    FAVOR ELIMINATING ESTATE/DEATH TAX - ESTATE TAX WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings
         for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions).
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Favor
         5. Oppose
         7. Other; depends {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025135b

  M7b1b.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'DEATH TAX' WORDING:

    There has been a lot of talk recently about doing away with the
    tax on large inheritances, the so-called "[estate/death] tax".
    Do you FAVOR or OPPOSE doing away with the [estate/death tax]?

    FAVOR ELIMINATING ESTATE/DEATH TAX - DEATH TAX WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings
         for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions).
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Favor
         5. Oppose
         7. Other; depends {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025136

  M7b2.

  IF R FAVORS DOING AWAY WITH THE ESTATE/DEATH TAX:
  IF R OPPOSES DOING AWAY WITH THE ESTATE/DEATH TAX:

    Do you [favor/oppose] doing away with the [estate/death] tax
    STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

    STRENGTH FAVOR ELIMINATING ESTATE/DEATH TAX - COMBINED WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings
         for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions).
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Favor strongly
         2. Favor not strongly
         4. Oppose not strongly
         5. Oppose strongly

         7. Other; depends in M7b [VOL]
         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         8,9,0 in M7b; No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025136a

  M7b2a.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'ESTATE TAX' WORDING:
  IF R FAVORS DOING AWAY WITH THE ESTATE TAX /
  IF R OPPOSES DOING AWAY WITH THE ESTATE TAX:

    Do you [favor/oppose] doing away with the [estate/death] tax
    STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

    STRENGTH FAVOR ELIMINATING ESTATE/DEATH TAX - ESTATE TAX WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings
         for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions).
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Favor strongly
         2. Favor not strongly
         4. Oppose not strongly
         5. Oppose strongly

         7. Other; depends in M7b [VOL]
         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025136b

  M7b2b.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'DEATH TAX' WORDING:
  IF R FAVORS DOING AWAY WITH THE ESTATE TAX /
  IF R OPPOSES DOING AWAY WITH THE ESTATE TAX:

    Do you [favor/oppose] doing away with the [estate/death] tax
    STRONGLY or NOT STRONGLY?

    STRENGTH FAVOR ELIMINATING ESTATE/DEATH TAX - DEATH TAX WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings
         for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions).
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Favor strongly
         2. Favor not strongly
         4. Oppose not strongly
         5. Oppose strongly

         7. Other; depends in M7b [VOL]
         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025137

  M7c.

    Which would you say is closer to the Democratic Party's
    position -- that they FAVOR or OPPOSE doing away with the
    [estate/death] tax?
    {DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}

    DEMOCRATIC PARTY ON ESTATE/DEATH TAX - COMBINED WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings
         for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions).
         Respondents were administered estate/death tax items M7c
         (position of Democratic Party) and M7e (position of Republican
         Party) in random order.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Favor
         5. Oppose
         7. Other; depends {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025137a

  M7c1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'ESTATE TAX' WORDING:

    Which would you say is closer to the Democratic Party's
    position -- that they FAVOR or OPPOSE doing away with the
    [estate/death] tax?
    {DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}

    DEMOCRATIC PARTY ON ESTATE/DEATH TAX - ESTATE TAX WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings
         for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions).
         Respondents were administered estate/death tax items M7c
         (position of Democratic Party) and M7e (position of Republican
         Party) in random order.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Favor
         5. Oppose
         7. Other; depends {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025137b

  M7c2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'DEATH TAX' WORDING:

    Which would you say is closer to the Democratic Party's
    position -- that they FAVOR or OPPOSE doing away with the
    [estate/death] tax?
    {DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}

    DEMOCRATIC PARTY ON ESTATE/DEATH TAX - DEATH TAX WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings
         for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions).
         Respondents were administered estate/death tax items M7c
         (position of Democratic Party) and M7e (position of Republican
         Party) in random order.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Favor
         5. Oppose
         7. Other; depends {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025138

  M7e.

    Which would you say is closer to the Republican Party's
    position -- that they FAVOR or OPPOSE doing away with of the
    [estate/death] tax?
    {DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}

    DEMOCRATIC PARTY ON ESTATE/DEATH TAX - COMBINED WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings
         for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions).
         Respondents were administered estate/death tax items M7c
         (position of Democratic Party) and M7e (position of Republican
         Party) in random order.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Favor
         5. Oppose
         7. Other; depends {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025138a

  M7e1.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'ESTATE TAX' WORDING:

    Which would you say is closer to the Republican Party's
    position -- that they FAVOR or OPPOSE doing away with of the
    [estate/death] tax?
    {DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}

    REPUBLICAN PARTY ON ESTATE/DEATH TAX - ESTATE TAX WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings
         for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions).
         Respondents were administered estate/death tax items M7c
         (position of Democratic Party) and M7e (position of Republican
         Party) in random order.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Favor
         5. Oppose
         7. Other; depends {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025138b

  M7e2.

  IF R SELECTED FOR 'DEATH TAX' WORDING:

    Which would you say is closer to the Republican Party's
    position -- that they FAVOR or OPPOSE doing away with of the
    [estate/death] tax?
    {DO NOT PROBE DON'T KNOW}

    REPUBLICAN PARTY ON ESTATE/DEATH TAX - DEATH TAX WORDING
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 possible wordings
         for M7 questions (same wording used in all M7 questions).
         Respondents were administered estate/death tax items M7c
         (position of Democratic Party) and M7e (position of Republican
         Party) in random order.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Favor
         5. Oppose
         7. Other; depends {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R selected for alternate wording; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025139

  M7h.

    How important is this issue to you personally - VERY important,
    SOMEWHAT important or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL?

    IMPORTANCE OF ESTATE/DEATH TAX ISSUE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025140

  M7j.

    Has this issue ever made you feel angry?

    ESTATE/DEATH TAX ISSUE EVER MADE R ANGRY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================

  M9.

    Next are a few miscellaneous questions.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
A025141

  M9a.

    Do you feel you are asked to pay MORE THAN YOU SHOULD in
    federal income taxes, about the RIGHT AMOUNT, or LESS THAN YOU
    SHOULD?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. More than should pay
         3. About right
         5. Less than should pay
         7. Don't pay at all {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025142

  M9b.

    What about rich people? Do you feel rich people are asked to
    pay MORE THAN THEY SHOULD in federal income taxes, about the
    RIGHT AMOUNT, or LESS THAN THEY SHOULD?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were administered M9b and M9c taxation level items
         in random order.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. More than should pay
         3. About right
         5. Less than should pay
         7. Don't pay at all {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025143

  M9c.

    What about poor people? Do you feel poor people are asked to
    pay MORE THAN THEY SHOULD in federal income taxes, about the
    RIGHT AMOUNT, or LESS THAN THEY SHOULD?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were administered M9b and M9c taxation level items
         in random order.
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precedePost survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. More than should pay
         3. About right
         5. Less than should pay
         7. Don't pay at all {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025144

  M10a.

    How worried are you about our country getting into a nuclear
    war at this time? Are you VERY worried, SOMEWHAT worried, or
    NOT WORRIED AT ALL?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Very worried
         3. Somewhat worried
         5. Not worried at all

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025145

  M10b.

    How worried are you about our country getting into a
    conventional war at this time, one in which nuclear weapons are
    not used? Are you VERY WORRIED, SOMEWHAT worried, or NOT
    WORRIED AT ALL?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Very worried
         3. Somewhat worried
         5. Not worried at all

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025146

  M10d.

    Recently, there has been a lot of talk about campaign finance
    reform.
    In general, which of the following statements best represents
    what you feel about the way political campaigns are financed in
    this country:
      it needs to be completely overhauled,
      it needs major changes,
      it needs minor changes, or
      it is basically fine the way it is?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Completely overhauled
         3. Major changes
         5. Minor changes
         7. Fine the way it is

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025147

  M11a.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2c CLOSED SERIES (BETTER JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    In America today, some people have BETTER JOBS and HIGHER
    INCOMES than  others do. WHY do you think that is -- why do
    some Americans have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do?

    REASON BETTER JOBS: CODED OPEN-END RESPONSE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         This variable describes the Post assignment based on this
         randomized selection.
         Note: Income inequality items in Pre L2 and Post M11 are
         identical (L2a/M11a, L2b/M11b, L2c/M11c, L2d/M11d).
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precede Post survey variables, provide case level

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2c closed series in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
A025148

  M11b.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2d CLOSED SERIES (BETTER JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    In America today, some people have WORSE JOBS and LOWER INCOMES
    than others do.  WHY do you think that is -- why do some
    Americans have worse jobs and lower incomes than others do?

    REASON WORSE JOBS: CODED OPEN-END RESPONSE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         This variable describes the Post assignment based on this
         randomized selection.
         Note: Income inequality items in Pre L2 and Post M11 are
         identical (L2a/M11a, L2b/M11b, L2c/M11c, L2d/M11d).
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which
         precede Post survey variables, provide case level

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2d closed series in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================

  M11c.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2a OPEN-END (BETTER JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    Next, we'd like to know WHY you think it is, that in America
    today, some people have BETTER JOBS and HIGHER INCOMES than
    others do.  I'm going to read you some possible explanations,
    and I want you to tell me how IMPORTANT you think each is.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
A025149

  M11c1.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2a OPEN-END (BETTER JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people have more in-born ability to learn.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON BETTER JOBS: CLOSED LIST - IN-BORN ABILITY TO LEARN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11c1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11c2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2a open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
A025150

  M11c2.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2a OPEN-END (BETTER JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because discrimination holds some people back.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON BETTER JOBS: CLOSED LIST - DISCRIMINATION HOLDS BACK
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11c1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11c2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2a open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
A025151

  M11c3.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2a OPEN-END (BETTER JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people just don't work as hard.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON BETTER JOBS: CLOSED LIST - SOME DON'T WORK HARD
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11c1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11c2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2a open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
A025152

  M11c4.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2a OPEN-END (BETTER JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people don't get a chance to get a good
    education.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON BETTER JOBS: CLOSED LIST - SOME DON'T WORK HARD
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11c1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11c2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2a open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
A025153

  M11c5.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2a OPEN-END (BETTER JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people just choose low-paying jobs.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON BETTER JOBS: CLOSED LIST - SOME CHOOSE LOW-PAYING JOBS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11c1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11c2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2a open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
A025154

  M11c6.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2a OPEN-END (BETTER JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because government policies have helped high-income workers
    more.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important,  SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON BETTER JOBS: CLOSED LIST - GOVERNMENT POLICIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11c1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11c2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2a open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
A025155

  M11c7.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2a OPEN-END (BETTER JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because God made people different from one another.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have better jobs and higher incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR BETTER JOBS: CLOSED LIST - GOD MADE PEOPLE DIFFERENT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11c1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11c2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2a open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================

  M11d.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2b OPEN-END (WORSE JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    Next, we'd like to know WHY you think it is, that in America
    today, some people have WORSE JOBS and LOWER INCOMES than
    others  do.  I'm going to read you some possible explanations,
    and I want you to tell me how IMPORTANT you think each is.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
A025156

  M11d1.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2b OPEN-END (WORSE JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people have more in-born ability to learn.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON WORSE JOBS: CLOSED LIST - IN-BORN ABILITY TO LEARN
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11d1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11d2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2b open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
A025157

  M11d2.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2b OPEN-END (WORSE JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because discrimination holds some people back.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON WORSE JOBS: CLOSED LIST - DISCRIMINATION HOLDS BACK
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11d1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11d2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2b open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
A025158

  M11d3.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2b OPEN-END (WORSE JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people just don't work as hard.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON WORSE JOBS: CLOSED LIST - SOME DON'T WORK HARD
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11d1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11d2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2b open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
A025159

  M11d4.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2b OPEN-END (WORSE JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people don't get a chance to get a good
    education.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON WORSE JOBS: CLOSED LIST - SOME DON'T WORK HARD
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11d1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11d2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2b open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
A025160

  M11d5.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2b OPEN-END (WORSE JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because some people just choose low-paying jobs.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON WORSE JOBS: CLOSED LIST - SOME CHOOSE LOW-PAYING JOBS
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11d1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11d2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2b open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
A025161

  M11d6.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2b OPEN-END (WORSE JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because government policies have helped high-income workers
    more.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON WORSE JOBS: CLOSED LIST - GOVERNMENT POLICIES
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11d1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11d2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         3. Somewhat important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2b open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
A025162

  M11d7.

  IF R WAS ASKED PRE L2b OPEN-END (WORSE JOBS/HIGHER INCOMES):

    [The first is:/(Next:)]
    'Because God made people different from one another.'
    (Would you say that this is VERY important, SOMEWHAT
    important, or NOT IMPORTANT AT ALL as an explanation for why
    some people have worse jobs and lower incomes than others
    do ?)

    REASON FOR WORSE JOBS: CLOSED LIST - GOD MADE PEOPLE DIFFERENT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the following
         combinations of general income inequality questions:
         - Pre L2a (open "better") and Post M11c (closed list "better")
         - Pre L2b (open "worse") and Post M11d (closed list "worse")
         - Pre L2c (closed list "better") and Post M11a (open "better")
         - Pre L2d (closed list "worse") and Post M11b (open "worse")
         Two randomly assigned orderings were possible:
           M11d1,2,3,4,5,6,7
           M11d2,4,5,6,3,1,7
         Post randomization variables (e.g. PostRand.C1), which precede
         Post survey variables, provide case level identification
         of randomization assigned.

         1. Very important
         5. Not important at all
         7. Statement isn't true {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         R was not selected for L2b open-end in the Pre; no 2002
         Post interview

==============================
A025163

  M12a.

    DURING THE PAST 12 MONTHS, have you worked with other people
    to deal with some issue facing your community?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025164

  M12b.

    DURING THE PAST TWELVE MONTHS, have you telephoned, written a
    letter to, or visited a government official to express your
    views on a public issue?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025165

  M12c.

    DURING THE PAST TWELVE MONTHS, did you attend a meeting about
    an issue facing your community or schools?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025166

  M12d.

    Here is a list of some organizations people can belong to.
    There are labor unions, associations of people who do the same
    kinds of work, fraternal groups such as Lions or Kiwanis,
    hobby clubs or sports teams, groups working on political
    issues, community groups, and school groups.  Of course, there
    are lots of other types of organizations, too. Not counting
    membership in a local church or synagogue, are you a member of
    any of these kinds of organizations?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025167

  M12e.

    Many people are finding it more difficult to make contributions
    to church or charity as much as they used to. How about you --
    were you able to contribute any money to church or charity in
    the LAST 12 MONTHS?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025168

  M12f.

    Aside from a strike against your employer, in the PAST TWELVE
    MONTHS, have you taken part in a protest, march, or
    demonstration on some national or local issue?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================

  N2.

    Now I'd like to read you a few statements about public life.
    I'll read them one at a time. Please tell me whether you
    agree or disagree with each of them.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
A025169

  N2b.

    ' I consider myself well-qualified to participate in politics. '
    Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE, or DISAGREE with this
    statement?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Agree
         3. Neither agree nor disagree
         5. Disagree

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025170

  N2c.

    ' I think that I am better informed about politics and
    government than most people. ' (Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE
    NOR DISAGREE, or DISAGREE with this statement)?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Agree
         3. Neither agree nor disagree
         5. Disagree

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025171

  N3.

    'So many other people vote in the national election that it
    doesn't matter much to me whether I vote or not.'  (Do you
    AGREE, NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE, or DISAGREE with this
    statement)?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Agree
         3. Neither agree nor disagree
         5. Disagree

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================

  Q1.

    Please tell me whether you agree or disagree with these
    statements about the government. The first is:
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
A025172

  Q1a.

    ' Public officials don't care much what people like me think. '
    Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE, or DISAGREE with this
    statement?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Agree
         3. Neither agree nor disagree
         5. Disagree

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025173

  Q1b.

    ' People like me don't have any say about what the government
    does. '  (Do you AGREE, NEITHER AGREE NOR DISAGREE, or
    DISAGREE with this statement)?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Agree
         3. Neither agree nor disagree
         5. Disagree

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================

  Q2.

    We're nearly at the end of the interview now, and have just a
    few more questions on a couple of topics.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================

  Q3.

    People have different ideas about the government in Washington.
    These ideas don't refer to Democrats or Republicans in
    particular, but just to the government in general. We want to
    see how you feel about these  ideas.  For example:
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
A025174

  Q3a.

    How much of the time do you think you can trust the
    government in Washington to do what is right -- JUST ABOUT
    ALWAYS, MOST OF THE TIME, or only SOME OF THE TIME?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Just about always
         2. Most of the time
         3. Only some of the time
         4. Never {VOL}

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025175

  Q4.

    Do you think that people in government waste A LOT of
    the money we pay in taxes, waste SOME of it, or DON'T WASTE
    VERY MUCH of it?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Waste a lot
         3. Waste some
         5. Don't waste very much

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025176

  Q5.

    Would you say the government is pretty much run by A FEW BIG
    INTERESTS looking out for themselves or that it is run for THE
    BENEFIT OF ALL THE PEOPLE?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Government run by a few big interests
         5. Government run for the benefit of all

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025177

  Q6.

    Do you think that QUITE A FEW of the people running the
    government are crooked, NOT VERY MANY are, or do you think
    HARDLY ANY of them are crooked?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Quite a few are crooked
         3. Not very many are crooked
         5. Hardly any are crooked

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025178

  Q7.

    How much do you feel that having elections makes the
    government pay attention to what the people think
    -- a GOOD DEAL, SOME, or NOT MUCH?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. A good deal
         3. Some
         5. Not much

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025179

  T6.

    On the whole, are you SATISFIED, FAIRLY SATISFIED, NOT VERY
    SATISFIED, or NOT AT ALL SATISFIED with the way democracy works
    in the United States?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Satisfied
         2. Fairly satisfied
         3. Not very satisfied
         4. Not at all satisfied

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025180

  T7a.

    When you see the American flag flying does it make you feel
    EXTREMELY GOOD, VERY GOOD, SOMEWHAT GOOD, or NOT VERY GOOD?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Extremely good
         2. Very good
         3. Somewhat good
         4. Not very good
         7. Don't feel anything [VOL]

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025181

  T7b.

    How strong is your love for your country... EXTREMELY STRONG,
    VERY STRONG, SOMEWHAT STRONG, or NOT VERY STRONG?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1.  Extremely Strong
         2.  Very Strong
         4.  Somewhat Strong
         5.  Not Very Strong

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025182

  Y4.

  IF PANEL RESPONDENT:

    We'd like to know if you are working now, or are you
    unemployed, retired, a homemaker, (a student), or what?
    {MULTIPLE RESPONSES}
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         The maximum number of mentions was 3.  For 2-digit and 3-digit
         codes, each digit represents an employment category.

         001. Working now
         002. Temporarily laid off
         003. Unemployed
         004. Retired
         005. Permanently disabled
         006. Homemaker
         007. Student
         014. Working now and retired
         016. Working now and homemaker
         017. Working now and student
         026. Temporarily laid off and homemaker
         034. Unemployed and retired
         035. Unemployed and permanently disabled
         036. Unemployed and homemaker
         045. Retired and permanently disabled
         046. Retired and homemaker
         047. Retired and student
         067. Homemaker and student
         167. Working now, homemaker, and student

         000. NA

         INAP.
         Fresh Cross-section case; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025183

  Y4x.

    We'd like to know if you are working now, or are you
    unemployed, retired, a homemaker, (a student), or what?
    {MULTIPLE RESPONSES}

    PRE AND POST EMPLOYMENT STATUS SUMMARY
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Built from Pre Y4 and Post Y4

         001. Working now
         002. Temporarily laid off
         003. Unemployed
         004. Retired
         005. Permanently disabled
         006. Homemaker
         007. Student
         014. Working now and retired
         016. Working now and homemaker
         017. Working now and student
         026. Temporarily laid off and homemaker
         034. Unemployed and retired
         035. Unemployed and permanently disabled
         036. Unemployed and homemaker
         045. Retired and permanently disabled
         046. Retired and homemaker
         047. Retired and student
         067. Homemaker and student
         146. Working now, retired, and homemaker
         167. Working now, homemaker, and student

         000. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================

  Y8.

  IF PANEL AND REPORTED WORKING NOW IN POST Y4 :/
  IF FRESH CROSS AND REPORTED WORKING NOW IN PRE Y4 :

    Here are a couple of things people sometimes do as part of
    their job. After I read each, please tell me whether or not you
    have done this, DURING THE LAST SIX MONTHS, as part of your
    job.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

==============================
A025184

  Y8a.

  IF PANEL AND REPORTED WORKING NOW IN POST Y4 :/
  IF FRESH CROSS AND REPORTED WORKING NOW IN PRE Y4 :

    Have you planned or chaired a meeting (in the last 6 months?)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         0,2,3,4,5,6,7,26,34,35,36,45,46,47,67,467 (R not working) in
         Y4x; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025185

  Y8b.

  IF PANEL AND REPORTED WORKING NOW IN POST Y4 :/
  IF FRESH CROSS AND REPORTED WORKING NOW IN PRE Y4 :

    Have you given a presentation or speech (in the last 6
    months?)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         0,2,3,4,5,6,7,26,34,35,36,45,46,47,67,467 (R not working) in
         Y4x; no 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025186

  Z1.

    Finally, I'd like to ask you a few questions about life in
    your neighborhood.  During the PAST TWELVE MONTHS, have you
    worked with others from your neighborhood to deal with a common
    issue or problem?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         1. Yes
         5. No
         7. No neighbors [VOL]

         8. Don't know
         9. Refused
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025187

  Z2.

    Next some questions about the people you regularly see in your
    neighborhood.
    In general, with these people in mind, would you say that they
    are just looking out for themselves ALL OF THE TIME, MOST OF
    THE TIME, SOME OF THE TIME, HARDLY EVER, or NEVER?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: several respondents volunteered in one or more of set of
         neighborhood-trust questions (Z2,Z3a,Z3b,Z3c) that they had no
         neighbors, yet still provided valid responses to other
         questions from the set.

         1.  All of the time
         2.  Most of the time
         3.  Some of the time
         4.  Hardly ever
         5.  Never
         7. No neighbors [VOL]

         8. Don't know {DO NOT PROBE}
         9. Refused    {DO NOT PROBE}
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025188

  Z3a.

    Would you say those people you see regularly in your
    neighborhood try to take advantage of others ALL OF THE TIME,
    MOST OF THE TIME, SOME OF THE TIME, HARDLY EVER, or NEVER?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: several respondents volunteered in one or more of set of
         neighborhood-trust questions (Z2,Z3a,Z3b,Z3c) that they had no
         neighbors, yet still provided valid responses to other
         questions from the set.

         1.  All of the time
         2.  Most of the time
         3.  Some of the time
         4.  Hardly ever
         5.  Never
     . No neighbors [VOL]
         8. Don't know {DO NOT PROBE}
         9. Refused    {DO NOT PROBE}
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025189

  Z3b.

    (Again, thinking about those people you see in your
    neighborhood,) Would you say they treat others with respect
    ALL OF THE TIME, MOST OF THE TIME, SOME OF THE TIME, HARDLY
    EVER, or NEVER?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: several respondents volunteered in one or more of set of
         neighborhood-trust questions (Z2,Z3a,Z3b,Z3c) that they had no
         neighbors, yet still provided valid responses to other
         questions from the set.

         1.  All of the time
         2.  Most of the time
         3.  Some of the time
         4.  Hardly ever
         5.  Never
         7. No neighbors [VOL]

         8. Don't know {DO NOT PROBE}
         9. Refused    {DO NOT PROBE}
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A025190

  Z3c.

    Would you say that HONEST describes the people in your
    neighborhood EXTREMELY WELL, QUITE WELL, NOT TOO WELL, or NOT
    WELL AT ALL?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: several respondents volunteered in one or more of set of
         neighborhood-trust questions (Z2,Z3a,Z3b,Z3c) that they had no
         neighbors, yet still provided valid responses to other
         questions from the set.

         1.  All of the time
         2.  Most of the time
         3.  Some of the time
         4.  Hardly ever
         5.  Never
     . No neighbors [VOL]
         8. Don't know {DO NOT PROBE}
         9. Refused    {DO NOT PROBE}
         0. NA

         INAP.
         No 2002 Post interview

==============================
A026200

  CONTEXT.200

    Incumbent candidate code

    INCUMBENT CODE
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This is the code of the retiring or running incumbent for
         whom Committee membership for the 107th Congress is provided
         (note: 'incumbents' from districts with type race 40-49 are not
         inluded).
         Further documentation in full release

==============================
A026201

  CONTEXT.201

    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    1st Committee/Subcommittee - 107th Congress
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See appendix.
         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

==============================
A026201a

  CONTEXT.201a

    Special Office
    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    1st Committee/Subcommittee - Special Office of Incumbent
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

         1. Chairman
         2. Vice-chairman
         3. Ranking member

==============================
A026202

  CONTEXT.202

    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    2nd Committee/Subcommittee- 107th Congress
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See appendix.
         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

==============================
A026202a

  CONTEXT.202a

    Special Office
    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    2nd Committee/Subcommittee - Special Office of Incumbent
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

         1. Chairman
         2. Vice-chairman
         3. Ranking member

==============================
A026203

  CONTEXT.203

    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    3rd Committee/Subcommittee- 107th Congress
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See appendix.
         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

==============================
A026203a

  CONTEXT.203a

    Special Office
    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    3rd Committee/Subcommittee - Special Office of Incumbent
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

         1. Chairman
         2. Vice-chairman
         3. Ranking member

==============================
A026204

  CONTEXT.204

    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    4th Committee/Subcommittee- 107th Congress
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See appendix.
         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

==============================
A026204a

  CONTEXT.204a

    Special Office
    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    4th Committee/Subcommittee - Special Office of Incumbent
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

         1. Chairman
         2. Vice-chairman
         3. Ranking member

==============================
A026205

  CONTEXT.205

    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    5th Committee/Subcommittee- 107th Congress
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See appendix.
         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

==============================
A026205a

  CONTEXT.205a

    Special Office
    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    5th Committee/Subcommittee - Special Office of Incumbent
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

         1. Chairman
         2. Vice-chairman
         3. Ranking member

==============================
A026206

  CONTEXT.206

    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    6th Committee/Subcommittee- 107th Congress
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See appendix.
         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

==============================
A026206a

  CONTEXT.206a

    Special Office
    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    6th Committee/Subcommittee - Special Office of Incumbent
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

         1. Chairman
         2. Vice-chairman
         3. Ranking member

==============================
A026207

  CONTEXT.207

    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    7th Committee/Subcommittee- 107th Congress
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See appendix.
         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

==============================
A026207a

  CONTEXT.207a

    Special Office
    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    7th Committee/Subcommittee - Special Office of Incumbent
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

         1. Chairman
         2. Vice-chairman
         3. Ranking member

==============================
A026208

  CONTEXT.208

    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    8th Committee/Subcommittee- 107th Congress
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See appendix.
         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

==============================
A026208a

  CONTEXT.208a

    Special Office
    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    8th Committee/Subcommittee - Special Office of Incumbent
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

         1. Chairman
         2. Vice-chairman
         3. Ranking member

==============================
A026209

  CONTEXT.209

    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    9th Committee/Subcommittee- 107th Congress
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See appendix.
         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

==============================
A026209a

  CONTEXT.209a

    Special Office
    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    9th Committee/Subcommittee - Special Office of Incumbent
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

         1. Chairman
         2. Vice-chairman
         3. Ranking member

==============================
A026210

  CONTEXT.210

    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    10th Committee/Subcommittee- 107th Congress
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See appendix.
         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

==============================
A026210a

  CONTEXT.210a

    Special Office
    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    10th Committee/Subcommittee - Special Office of Incumbent
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

         1. Chairman
         2. Vice-chairman
         3. Ranking member

==============================
A026211

  CONTEXT.211

    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    11th Committee/Subcommittee- 107th Congress
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See appendix.
         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

==============================
A026211a

  CONTEXT.211a

    Special Office
    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    11th Committee/Subcommittee - Special Office of Incumbent
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

         1. Chairman
         2. Vice-chairman
         3. Ranking member

==============================
A026212

  CONTEXT.212

    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    12th Committee/Subcommittee- 107th Congress
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See appendix.
         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

==============================
A026212a

  CONTEXT.212a

    Special Office
    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    12th Committee/Subcommittee - Special Office of Incumbent
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

         1. Chairman
         2. Vice-chairman
         3. Ranking member

==============================
A026213

  CONTEXT.213

    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    13th Committee/Subcommittee- 107th Congress
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See appendix.
         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

==============================
A026213a

  CONTEXT.213a

    Special Office
    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    13th Committee/Subcommittee - Special Office of Incumbent
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

         1. Chairman
         2. Vice-chairman
         3. Ranking member

==============================
A026214

  CONTEXT.214

    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    14th Committee/Subcommittee- 107th Congress
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See appendix.
         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

==============================
A026214a

  CONTEXT.214a

    Special Office
    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    14th Committee/Subcommittee - Special Office of Incumbent
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

         1. Chairman
         2. Vice-chairman
         3. Ranking member

==============================
A026215

  CONTEXT.215

    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    15th Committee/Subcommittee- 107th Congress
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See appendix.
         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

==============================
A026215a

  CONTEXT.215a

    Special Office
    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    15th Committee/Subcommittee - Special Office of Incumbent
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

         1. Chairman
         2. Vice-chairman
         3. Ranking member

==============================
A026216

  CONTEXT.216

    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    16th Committee/Subcommittee- 107th Congress
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See appendix.
         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

==============================
A026216a

  CONTEXT.216a

    Special Office
    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    16th Committee/Subcommittee - Special Office of Incumbent
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

         1. Chairman
         2. Vice-chairman
         3. Ranking member

==============================
A026217

  CONTEXT.217

    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    17th Committee/Subcommittee- 107th Congress
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See appendix.
         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

==============================
A026217a

  CONTEXT.217a

    Special Office
    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    17th Committee/Subcommittee - Special Office of Incumbent
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

         1. Chairman
         2. Vice-chairman
         3. Ranking member

==============================
A026218

  CONTEXT.218

    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    18th Committee/Subcommittee- 107th Congress
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         See appendix.
         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

==============================
A026218a

  CONTEXT.218a

    Special Office
    House Incumbent Legislative Committe/Subcommittee Membership

    18th Committee/Subcommittee - Special Office of Incumbent
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Note: incumbents from districts with type race 40-49 are not
included.

         1. Chairman
         2. Vice-chairman
         3. Ranking member

