Version 01 Codebook ------------------- CODEBOOK INTRODUCTION FILE 1964 PRE-POST STUDY (1964.TV) AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES 1964 PRE-POST ELECTION STUDY CONDUCTED BY THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER (S473) PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS POLITICAL BEHAVIOR PROGRAM UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN PRE-ELECTION STUDY: SEPTEMBER 7, 1964 - NOVEMBER 2, 1964 POST-ELECTION STUDY: NOVEMBER 6, 1964 - FEBRUARY 1965 ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER 7235 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ASSISTANCE ALL MANUSCRIPTS UTILIZING DATA MADE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE CONSORTIUM SHOULD ACKNOWLEDGE THAT FACT AS WELL AS IDENTIFY THE ORIGINAL COLLECTOR OF THE DATA. THE ICPSR COUNCIL URGES ALL USERS OF ICPSR DATA FACILITIES TO FOLLOW SOME ADAPTATION OF THIS STATEMENT WITH THE PARENTHESES INDICATING ITEMS TO BE FILLED IN APPROPRIATELY OR DELETED BY THE INDIVIDUAL USER. THE DATA (AND TABULATIONS) UTILIZED IN THIS (PUBLICATION) WERE MADE AVAILABLE (IN PART) BY THE INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL RESEARCH. THE DATA WERE ORIGINALLY COLLECTED BY THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER POLITICAL BEHAVIOR PROGRAM. NEITHER THE ORIGINAL COLLECTORS OF THE DATA NOR THE CONSORTIUM BEAR ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ANALYSES OR INTERPRETATIONS PRESENTED HERE. IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FUNDING AGENCIES WITH ESSENTIAL INFOR- MATION ABOUT THE USE OF ARCHIVAL RESOURCES, AND TO FACILITATE THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION ABOUT ICPSR PARTICIPANTS' RESEARCH ACTIVITIES, EACH USER OF THE ICPSR DATA FACILITIES IS EXPECTED TO SEND TWO COPIES OF EACH COMPLETED MANUSCRIPT TO THE CONSORTIUM. PLEASE INDICATE IN THE COVER LETTER WHICH DATA WERE USED. TABLE OF CONTENTS Note: >>sections in the codebook introduction and codebook appendix can be navigated in the machine-readable files by searching ">>". INTRODUCTORY MATERIAL (file int1964.cbk) --------------------- >> 1964 STUDY DESCRIPTION >> 1964 SAMPLING INFORMATION >> 1964 WEIGHTING INFORMATION >> 1964 PROCESSING INFORMATION >> 1964 CODEBOOK INFORMATION >> 1964 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST CODEBOOK -------- 1964 variables APPENDICES (file app1964.cbk) ---------- >> 1964 PARTY MASTER CODE >> 1964 CANDIDATE MASTER CODE >> 1964 OCCUPATION CODE >> 1964 INDUSTRY CODE >> 1964 CONGRESSIONAL PRIMARY AND GENERAL ELECTION CANDIDATES, 1964 >> REF. NOS. 21-28 AND 32-35 NOTE, 1964 >> 1964 STANDARD PSU CODE >> 1964 SAMPLING COUNTY CODE >> 1964 FINANCIAL SITUATION FRAME OF REFERENCE CODE >> VAR 640136 NOTE >> VAR 640138 NOTE >> VAR 640150 NOTE >> VAR 640152 NOTE >> LEVEL OF EDUCATION NOTE, 1964 >> VAR 640235 NOTE >> 1964 UNION CODE >> 1964 THE STATE AND COUNTRY CODE >> REF.NO.21-28 AND 32-35 NOTE, 1964 >> REF. NO. 90 NOTE, 1964 >> MAJORITY OF TIME NOTE, 1964 >> REF. NO 74/75 NOTE, 1964 >> Q.T1 NOTE, 1964 >> Q.T1-T19 NOTE, 1964 >> 1964 THE NEWSPAPER CODE >> RELIGION CODE NOTE, 1964 >> REF. NO. 100 AND 101 NOTE, 1964 >> VARS 640298, 640299, 640303, 640304 NOTE >> 1964 SENATORIAL CANDIDATES >> 1964 GUBERNATORIAL CANDIDATES >> VAR 640164 NOTE >> R VOTING NOTE, 1964 >> REF. NO. 91 NOTE, 1964 >> 1964 MAJOR PROBLEMS CODE >> DEGREE OF IMPORTANCE NOTE, 1964 >> LAND MEASUREMENT NOTE, 1964 >> DEGREE OF RESPONSE NOTE, 1964 >> REF. NO. 356 NOTE, 1964 >> REF. NO. 92 NOTE, 1964 >> REF. NO. 93 NOTE, 1964 >> REF. NOS. 459 TO 465 NOTE, 1964 >> 1964 ICPSR COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY CODE >> REF. NO. 94 NOTE, 1964 >> REF. NO. 95 NOTE, 1964 >> REF. NOS. 111 AND 112 NOTE, 1964 >> REF. NO. 96 NOTE, 1964 >> REF. NO. 143 NOTE, 1964 >> REF. NO. 144 NOTE, 1964 >> REF. NO. 145 NOTE, 1964 >> REF. NO. 178 NOTE, 1964 >> REF. NO. 179 NOTE, 1964 >> REF. NO. 180 NOTE, 1964 >> REF. NO. 181 NOTE, 1964 >> REF. NO. 216 NOTE, 1964 >> REF. NO. 300 NOTE, 1964 >> REF. NO. 301 NOTE, 1964 >> REF. NO. 382 NOTE, 1964 >> REF. NO. 383 NOTE, 1964 >> REF. NO. 422 NOTE, 1964 >> 1964 STUDY DESCRIPTION THE 1964 NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY (SRC 473) IS THE EIGHTH IN A SERIES OF STUDIES OF NATIONAL ELECTIONS CONDUCTED BY THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER POLITICAL BEHAVIOR PROGRAM SINCE 1948. THE STUDY EMPHASIZES POLITICAL ATTITUDES IN GENERAL, AND ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOR PERTINENT TO THE 1964 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION. THE INTERVIEW SCHEDULE CONTAINED BOTH CLOSED AND OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONS ASCERTAINING A WIDE RANGE OF INFORMATION. MOST RESPONDENTS WERE INTERVIEWED BOTH BEFORE (SEPTEMBER 7, 1964, TO NOVEMBER 2, 1964) AND AFTER (NOVEMBER 6, 1964 THROUGH FEBRUARY, 1965) THE DATE OF THE ELECTION. THE PRE-ELECTION SURVEY TAPPED ATTITUDES TOWARD POLITICAL PARTIES, CANDIDATES, AND SPECIFIC ISSUES, (E.G., PERCEIVED MAJOR NATIONAL PROBLEMS, DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN POLICY ISSUES), AND OBTAINED SOME PERSONAL AND POLITICAL BACKGROUND DATA AS WELL. THE POST-ELECTION INTERVIEW CONCENTRATED ON THE ACTUAL VOTE AND VOTING-RELATED BEHAVIOR, AND OBTAINED FURTHER PERSONAL DATA. IN ADDITION IT ELICITED OPINIONS ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT, TESTED POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, AND TAPPED FURTHER INFORMATION CONCERNING RACIAL ISSUES. THE MAJOR STAFF REPORT ON THE STUDY IS PHILIP E. CONVERSE, AAGE R. CLAUSEN, AND WARREN E. MILLER, "ELECTORAL MYTH AND REALITY: THE 1964 ELECTION", THE AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, VOL. 59, NO. 2, (JUNE, 1965), PP. 321-336. THE RESPONDENTS ARE DIVIDED INTO TWO SAMPLES -- A CROSS SECTION SAMPLE, CONSISTING OF 1571 RESPONDENTS, AND A NEGRO SUPPLEMENT SAMPLE OF 263 RESPONDENTS. THESE LATTER WERE INTERVIEWED TO BROADEN THE BASE OF NEGRO RESPONDENTS AVAILABLE TO RESEARCHERS INTERESTED IN THE RACIAL ISSUES INVESTIGATED IN THIS STUDY; WHEN COMBINED WITH THE NEGROES IN THE CROSS SECTION SAMPLE, THIS MAKES AVAILABLE AN N OF 422 NEGRO RESPONDENTS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THE CONSTRUC- TION AND USE OF THE CROSS SECTION, THE SUPPLEMENT, THE ALL NEGRO, OR THE COMBINED CROSS SECTION AND SUPPLEMENT SAMPLES, SEE THE SECTIONS OF THIS INTRODUCTION ENTITLED "SAMPLING INFORMATION" AND "WEIGHTING INFORMATION". FOLLOWING THE POST-ELECTION INTERVIEW, A VOTER VALIDATION STUDY WAS UNDERTAKEN, WHEREIN THE VOTING RECORDS OF 1264 OF THE CROSS SECTION RESPONDENTS WERE CHECKED, IN AN ATTEMPT TO ACCOUNT FOR ONE POSSIBLE SOURCE OF THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER'S CONSISTENT OVER-ESTIMATION OF THE VOTER TURNOUT: FALSE REPORTING BY THE RESPONDENT. FOR A DISCUSSION OF THE FINDINGS FROM THE VOTER VALIDATION STUDY, SEE AAGE R. CLAUSEN, "RESPONSE VALIDITY: VOTE REPORT"; YOUR ICPSR OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVE HAS A COPY OF THIS ARTICLE. >> 1964 SAMPLING INFORMATION INDIVIDUALS INTERVIEWED IN THE 1964 ELECTION STUDY WERE A REPRESENTATIVE CROSS SECTION OF PERSONS OF VOTING AGE LIVING IN PRIVATE HOUSEHOLDS IN THE CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES. THE TWELVE LARGEST METROPOLITAN AREAS OF THE UNITED STATES WERE DRAWN WITH CERTAINTY. THE REST OF THE COUNTRY WAS FORMED INTO 62 STRATA (CONTAINING TWO OR MORE PRIMARY SAMPLING UNITS), FROM EACH OF WHICH A PRIMARY SAMPLING UNIT (CONSISTING OF A COUNTY OR GROUP OF COUNTIES) WAS DRAWN WITH PROBABILITY PROPORTIONAL TO ITS 1960 POPULATION. ULTIMATELY, THE SELECTION PROCEDURE WITHIN THESE 74 PSU'S YIELDED A SAMPLE OF PRIVATE HOUSEHOLDS. RESPONDENTS WERE SELECTED FROM THESE HOUSEHOLDS BY AN OBJECTIVE PROCEDURE OF SELECTION WHICH ALLOWED NO SUBSTITUTIONS. THIS SAMPLE IS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE FOUR MAJOR REGIONS (NORTHEAST, NORTH CENTRAL, SOUTH AND WEST) OF THE UNITED STATES AS WELL AS THE ENTIRE UNITED STATES. DETAILED DESCRIPTIONS OF THE SAMPLING PROCEDURE CAN BE FOUND IN LESLIE KISH AND IRENE HESS, THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER'S NATIONAL SAMPLE OF DWELLINGS (ANN ARBOR: UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN), ISR PUBLICATION NUMBER 2315, AND LESLIE KISH, SURVEY SAMPLING (NEW YORK: JOHN WILEY AND SONS, 1964). THE INTERVIEWS WERE CODED BY THE SRC CODING SECTION UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF POLITICAL BEHAVIOR PROGRAM STAFF MEMBERS, AND THE USUAL PRACTICE OF CHECK-CODING ONE OUT OF EVERY TEN INTERVIEWS WAS FOLLOWED. THIS RESULTED IN THE CALCULATION OF AN AVERAGE CODING ERROR OF 3.28 ERRORS PER INTERVIEW IN THE PRE-ELECTION INTERVIEWS, AND 1.74 ERRORS PER INTERVIEW IN THE POST-ELECTION INTERVIEWS. IN ORDER TO PROVIDE A MORE REPRESENTATIVE SUBSAMPLE OF NEGROES, AN ADDITIONAL SET OF NEGROES WAS SAMPLED AND ASKED ALL OF THE APPLICABLE QUESTIONS FOUND IN THE PRE- AND POST- ELECTION INTERVIEW SCHEDULES. THE NEGROES IN THIS SAMPLE, 263, WHEN ADDED TO THE NEGROES OBTAINED IN THE CROSS SECTION SAMPLE, 159, GIVE A MORE RELIABLE DATA BASE. THE SUPPLEMEN- TARY NEGROES WERE SAMPLED BY DIRECTING THE INTERVIEWER TO SEGMENTS (SMALL AREAS OF 3 - 6 DWELLINGS) IN WHICH ONE OR MORE NEGRO HOUSEHOLDS HAD BEEN LOCATED IN TWO PREVIOUS STUDIES. IN GENERAL, THE PROCEDURE WAS TO SELECT ONE RESPONDENT FROM EACH NEGRO HOUSEHOLD FOUND IN THE SEGMENT. A PRECISE DESCRIPTION OF THE SAMPLING PROCEDURE CAN BE FOUND IN THE PRE-ELECTION INSTRUCTION BOOK. VARIABLES 640423 THROUGH 640458 COME FROM THE VOTE REPORT VALIDATION STUDY CONDUCTED BY THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER AS PART OF THE 1964 ELECTION STUDY. THE IMMEDIATE PURPOSE OF THIS SUPPLEMENTARY STUDY WAS TO INVESTIGATE ONE POSSIBLE SOURCE OF THE CENTER'S CONSISTENT OVER-ESTIMATION OF THE VOTER TURNOUT: FALSE REPORTING BY THE RESPONDENT. IN ADDITION, THE EFFECTS OF OTHER DEMONSTRABLE AND HYPOTHESIZED SOURCES OF THE OVER-REPORT WOULD BE CLARIFIED IN VARYING DEGREES GIVEN THIS ESTIMATE OF THE RESPONSE ERROR. THE PROCEDURE OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS CHECK INVOLVED OBTAINING THE NAMES OF THE POST-ELECTION RESPONDENTS, GAINING ACCESS TO LOCAL RECORDS, AND THE CHECKING OF THOSE RECORDS BY SRC INTERVIEWERS ABOUT SIX MONTHS AFTER THE ELECTION. THE PRECISION OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS CHECK IS DEPENDENT UPON THE PROPORTION OF THE RESPONDENTS WHO WERE WILLING TO GIVE THEIR NAMES (ABOUT 9/10), ACCESSIBILITY OF THE VOTING RECORDS (ABOUT 9/10), THE CONGRUENCE BETWEEN THE RESPONDENT'S INTERVIEW ADDRESS AND HIS OFFICIAL VOTING RESIDENCE (NUMBER OF R'S WITH DIFFERENT VOTING RESIDENCE IS UNKNOWN), AND THE AMOUNT OF ERROR IN THE OFFICIAL RECORD AND IN THE CHECKING OF THE RECORD (UNKNOWN). >> 1964 WEIGHTING INFORMATION THE DATA DESCRIBED BY THIS CODEBOOK MAY BE ACCESSED IN THREE DIFFERENT WAYS, YIELDING IN EFFECT THREE SEPARATE SAMPLES, EACH WITH A DIFFERENT NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS: A. THE CROSS SECTION AND NEGRO SUPPLEMENT COMBINED SAMPLE USES ALL THE DATA CASES AVAILABLE (RAW N OF 1834), AND REQUIRES THE USE OF THE WEIGHT VARIABLE (REF. NO. 466) TO MAKE A VALID SAMPLE. IN IT, THE NON-NEGRO RESPONDENTS ARE GIVEN A WEIGHT OF THREE, WHILE NEGRO RESPONDENTS ARE WEIGHTED ONE, YIELDING A WEIGHTED N OF 4658. NOTE: OF THE THREE VALID SAMPLES RESULTING FROM THIS DATASET, THIS IS THE ONLY ONE WHICH NEEDS TO BE WEIGHTED. B. THE ALL-NEGRO SAMPLE USES THE 159 NEGRO RESPONDENTS FROM THE CROSS SECTION AND THE 263 NEGRO RESPONDENTS OF THE SUPPLEMENT TO YIELD AN N OF 422. THIS SAMPLE, WHICH IS SELF-WEIGHTING, MAY BE OBTAINED EITHER BY FILTERING ON THE WEIGHT VARIABLE SO AS TO USE ONLY THOSE CASES CODED 1 AND EXCLUDING ALL THOSE CODED 3 IN REF. NO. 466, OR BY FILTERING ON THE RACE VARIABLE, SELECTING ONLY THOSE CASES CODED 2 AND EXCLUDING ALL CASES CODED 1 OR 7 IN REF. NO. 183. C. THE CROSS SECTION SAMPLE ALONE USES ONLY THE 1571 RESPONDENTS INTERVIEWED FOR THE NATIONAL CROSS SECTION, AND EXCLUDES THE SUPPLEMENT. THIS SAMPLE IS ALWAYS UNWEIGHTED, AND MAY BE OBTAINED EITHER BY FILTERING ON THE TYPE OF INTERVIEW VARIABLE SO AS TO SELECT ONLY THOSE CASES CODED 1 OR 2 AND EXCLUDE CASES CODED 3 OR 4 IN REF. NO. 3, OR BY FILTERING ON THE INTERVIEW NUMBER SO AS TO USE ONLY THOSE CASES CODED 0001-1999 AND EXCLUDE THOSE CODED 2000-3999 IN REF. NO. 2. NOTE THAT NO OTHER SUBSET OF THESE RESPONDENTS YIELDS A VALID SAMPLE (E.G., THE NEGRO SUPPLEMENT ALONE IS NOT A VALID SAMPLE, AND SHOULD NOT BE USED AS SUCH). >> 1964 PROCESSING INFORMATION THE STUDY WAS PROCESSED ACCORDING TO ICPSR STANDARD PROCESSING PROCEDURES; THE CODE CATEGORIES WERE RECODED TO ELIMINATE AMPS AND DASHES AND TO CONFORM TO ICPSR STANDARDIZED CODES WHERE APPLICABLE, AND THE DATA WERE CHECKED FOR INCONSISTENT AND ILLEGAL CODES. THESE WERE CORRECTED BY REFERRING TO THE ORIGINAL INTERVIEW SCHEDULES. IN USING THIS CODEBOOK, SEVERAL FEATURES SHOULD BE NOTED. THE FIRST IS THAT THE TENS AND HUNDREDS DIGITS OF MOST TWO AND THREE DIGIT CODES MAY BE MEANINGFULLY USED ALONE. (THE GAPS THAT APPEAR IN SOME OF THE TWO AND THREE DIGIT STANDARDIZED CODES REPRESENT VALUES NOT USED IN THIS STUDY.) ANOTHER IS THAT IN MANY CASES, BOTH IN THE BODY OF THE CODEBOOK AND IN THE FOOTNOTES, TEXT IS BRACKETED IN < AND > SIGNS. ALL TEXT SO BRACKETED WAS NOT CONTAINED IN THE ORIGINAL CODEBOOK BUT WAS ADDED BY THE PROCESSOR, EITHER FOR EXPLANATORY PURPOSES OR IN ORDER TO MAKE VARIABLES INDEPENDENT OF ONE ANOTHER BY MAKING IT UNNECESSARY TO REFER TO ONE IN ORDER TO UNDERSTAND THE TEXT OF ANOTHER. VARIABLE NAMES IN THE TABLE OF CONTENTS FOLLOWED BY AN ASTERISK HAVE SPECIAL ICPSR STANDARDIZED CODES. THOSE PRECEDED BY AN X DESIGNATE A VARIABLE DEPENDENT ON SOME OTHER VARIABLE, DUE TO THE STRUCTURE OF THE INTERVIEW SCHEDULE. >> 1964 CODEBOOK INFORMATION The following example from the 1948 NES study provides the standard format for codebook variable documentation. Note that NES studies which are not part of the Time-Series usually omit marginals and the descriptive content in lines 2-5 (except for variable name). Line 1 ============================== 2 VAR 480026 NAME-R NOT VT-WAS R REG TO VT 3 COLUMNS 61 - 61 4 NUMERIC 5 MD=0 OR GE 8 6 7 Q. 17. (IF R DID NOT VOTE) WERE YOU REGISTERED (ELIGIBLE) 8 TO VOTE. 9 ........................................................... 10 11 82 1. YES 12 149 2. NO 13 14 0 8. DK 15 9 9. NA 16 422 0. INAP., R VOTED Line 2 - VARIABLE NAME. Note that in the codebook the variable name (usually a 'number') does not include the "V" prefix which is used in the release SAS and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files) for all variables including those which do not have 'number' names. For example the variable "VERSION" in the codebook is "VVERSION" in the data definition files. Line 2 - "NAME". This is the variable label used in the SAS and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files). Some codebooks exclude this. Line 3 - COLUMNS. Columns in the ASCII data file (.dat file). Line 4 - CHARACTER OR NUMERIC. If numeric and the variable is a decimal rather than integer variable, the numer of decimal places is also indicated (e.g. "NUMERIC DEC 4") Line 5 - Values which are assigned to missing by default in the Study's SAS and and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files). Line 7 - Actual question text for survey variables or a description of non-survey variables (for example, congressional district). Survey items usually include the question number (for example "B1a.") from the Study questionnaire; beginning in 1996 non-survey items also have unique item numbers (for example "CSheet.1"). Line 9 - A dashed or dotted line usually separates question text from any other documentation which follows. Line 10- When present, annotation provided by Study staff is presented below the question text/description and preceding code values. Lines 11-16 Code values are listed with descriptive labels. Valid codes (those not having 'missing' status in line 5) are presented first, followed by the values described in line 5. For continuous variables, one line may appear providing the range of possible values. A blank line usually separates the 'valid' and 'missing' values. Lines 11-16 Marginals are usually provided for discrete variables. The counts may be unweighted or weighted; check the Study codebook introductory text to determine weight usage. >> 1964 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST VARIABLE VARIABLE LABEL -------- -------------- VERSION NES VERSION NUMBER DSETNO NES DATASET NUMBER 640001 ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER 640002 INTERVIEW NUMBER STUDY PROCEDURE AND SAMPLING 640003 TYPE OF INTERVIEW 640004 PRIMARY SAMPLING UNIT 640005 PLACE IDENTIFICATION CODE 640006 BELT CODE 640007 SIZE CODE-CONSUMER FINANCES 640008 SIZE CODE-INTERIM SURVEYS 640009 FORM OF INTEGRATION QUESTIONS 640010 SAMPLING COUNTY CODE 640011 POLITICAL BEHAVIOR COUNTY CODE 640012 STATE CODE * 640013 CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT NUMBER 640014 PRE-ELECTION INTERVIEW DATE 640015 LENGTH OF INTERVIEW 640016 INTERVIEWER 640017 CODER ELECTION PREDICTIONS BY R 640018 R'S PRESIDENTIAL PREDICTION 640019 XWILL THE PRESIDENTIAL RACE BE CLOSE 640020 DOES R CARE MUCH WHICH PARTY WINS THE PARTIES AND THE CANDIDATES 640021 WHAT IS GOOD ABOUT THE DEMOCRATS * 640022 WHAT IS BAD ABOUT THE DEMOCRATS * 640023 WHAT IS GOOD ABOUT THE REPUBLICANS * 640024 WHAT IS BAD ABOUT THE REPUBLICANS * 640025 WHAT IS GOOD ABOUT JOHNSON * 640026 WHAT IS BAD ABOUT JOHNSON * 640027 WHAT IS GOOD ABOUT GOLDWATER * 640028 WHAT IS BAD ABOUT GOLDWATER * 640029 WHO WAS THE BEST REPUBLICAN UP FOR NOMINATION 640030 XIS GOLDWATER AS GOOD AS R'S PREFERRED NOMINEE 640031 XIS R HAPPY THAT GOLDWATER WAS NOMINATED 640032 PRO-HUMPHREY OPINIONS * 640033 ANTI-HUMPHREY OPINIONS * 640034 PRO-MILLER OPINIONS * 640035 ANTI-MILLER OPINIONS * MAJOR PROBLEMS 640036 WHAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM THAT THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD SOLVE * 640037 XTO WHAT DEGREE IS R CONCERNED ABOUT THIS PROBLEM 640038 XHOW OFTEN DOES R THINK ABOUT THIS PROBLEM 640039 XDOES R PAY ATTENTION TO NEWS ABOUT THIS PROBLEM 640040 XWHICH PARTY BEST REPRESENTS R'S VIEW ON THIS PROBLEM 640041 WHAT IS THE SECOND MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM THAT THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD SOLVE * 640042 XTO WHAT DEGREE IS R CONCERNED ABOUT THIS PROBLEM 640043 XHOW OFTEN DOES R THINK ABOUT THIS PROBLEM 640044 XDOES R PAY ATTENTION TO NEWS ABOUT THIS PROBLEM 640045 XWHICH PARTY BEST REPRESENTS R'S VIEW ON THIS PROBLEM 640046 WHAT IS THE THIRD MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM THAT THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD SOLVE * 640047 XTO WHAT DEGREE IS R CONCERNED ABOUT THIS PROBLEM 640048 XHOW OFTEN DOES R THINK ABOUT THIS PROBLEM 640049 XDOES R PAY ATTENTION TO NEWS ABOUT THIS PROBLEM 640050 XWHICH PARTY BEST REPRESENTS R'S VIEW ON THIS PROBLEM 640051 WHAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM THAT THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD STAY OUT OF * 640052 XTO WHAT DEGREE IS R CONCERNED ABOUT THIS PROBLEM 640053 XHOW OFTEN DOES R THINK ABOUT THIS PROBLEM 640054 XDOES R PAY ATTENTION TO NEWS ABOUT THIS PROBLEM 640055 XWHAT PARTY BEST REPRESENTS R'S VIEW ON THIS PROBLEM 640056 WHAT IS THE SECOND MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM THAT THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD STAY OUT OF * 640057 XTO WHAT DEGREE IS R CONCERNED ABOUT THIS PROBLEM 640058 XHOW OFTEN DOES R THINK ABOUT THIS PROBLEM 640059 XDOES R PAY ATTENTION TO NEWS ABOUT THIS PROBLEM 640060 XWHICH PARTY BEST REPRESENTS R'S VIEW ON THIS PROBLEM 640061 WHAT IS THE THIRD MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM THAT THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD STAY OUT OF * 640062 XTO WHAT DEGREE IS R CONCERNED ABOUT THIS PROBLEM 640063 XHOW OFTEN DOES R THINK ABOUT THIS PROBLEM 640064 XDOES R PAY ATTENTION TO NEWS ABOUT THIS PROBLEM 640065 XWHICH PARTY BEST REPRESENTS R'S VIEW ON THIS PROBLEM DOMESTIC ISSUES AND FOREIGN POLICY 640066 OPINION ON GOVERNMENT AID TO EDUCATION 640067 XHAS R MADE UP HIS MIND ON AID TO EDUCATION 640068 XWHICH PARTY REPRESENTS R'S VIEW ON AID TO EDUCATION 640069 OPINION ON GOVERNMENT AID TO PRIVATE SCHOOLS 640070 XREASONS FOR R'S OPINION ON AID TO PRIVATE SCHOOLS 640071 OPINION ON WHETHER THE GOVERNMENT IS TOO POWERFUL 640072 XHAS R MADE UP HIS MIND ON GOVERNMENTAL POWER 640073 XWHICH PARTY REPRESENTS R'S VIEW ON GOVERNMENTAL POWER 640074 OPINION ON GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIZATION OF MEDICARE 640075 XPOSITION ON GOVERNMENT SUBSIDIZATION OF MEDICARE 640076 XHAS R MADE UP HIS MIND ON MEDICAL SUBSIDIZATION 640077 XWHICH PARTY REPRESENTS R'S VIEW ON MEDICAL SUBSIDIZATION 640078 OPINION ON GOVERNMENT GUARANTEE OF JOBS 640079 XHAS R MADE UP HIS MIND ON GOVERNMENTAL JOB GUARANTEE 640080 XWHICH PARTY REPRESENTS R'S VIEW ON GOVERNMENTAL JOB GUARANTEE 640081 OPINION ON SCHOOL PRAYERS 640082 XHAS R MADE UP HIS MIND ON SCHOOL PRAYERS 640083 XWHICH PARTY FAVORS SCHOOL PRAYERS 640084 OPINION ON FOREIGN AID 640085 XHAS R MADE UP HIS MIND ON FOREIGN AID 640086 XWHICH PARTY REPRESENTS R'S VIEW ON FOREIGN AID 640087 OPINION ON THE NECESSITY OF DISCUSSING DIFFERENCES WITH COMMUNISTS 640088 XHAS R MADE UP HIS MIND ON TALKS WITH COMMUNISTS 640089 XWHICH PARTY REPRESENTS R'S VIEW ON TALKS WITH COMMUNISTS 640090 FEDERAL AID TO EDUCATION INDEX 640091 FEDERAL POWER INDEX 640092 MEDICARE INDEX 640093 LIVING STANDARDS INDEX 640094 SCHOOL PRAYERS INDEX 640095 FOREIGN AID INDEX 640096 TALKS WITH COMMUNISTS INDEX RACE RELATIONS 640097 OPINION ON GOVERNMENT GUARANTEE OF FAIR EMPLOYMENT 640098 XHAS R MADE UP HIS MIND ON FAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES FOR NEGROES 640099 XWHICH PARTY REPRESENTS R'S VIEW ON FAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES FOR NEGROES 640100 OPINION ON GOVERNMENT GUARANTEE OF SCHOOL INTEGRATION 640101 XCOMMENTS ON SCHOOL INTEGRATION 640102 XHAS R MADE UP HIS MIND ON SCHOOL INTEGRATION 640103 XWHICH PARTY REPRESENTS R'S VIEW ON SCHOOL INTEGRATION 640104 IS THERE ANY CHANGE IN THE NEGROES' POSITION IN SOCIETY 640105 OPINION ON THE SPEED OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT 640106 IS NEGRO CIVIL RIGHTS ACTIVITY VIOLENT OR NOT 640107 DO NEGROES' ACTIONS HELP THEIR CAUSE 640108 XWOULD R KEEP A CHILD IN AN INTEGRATED SCHOOL 640109 XARE ANY LOCAL SCHOOLS INTEGRATED 640110 XMIGHT LOCAL SCHOOLS INTEGRATE 640111 XDOES R WANT HIS CHILD TO GO TO AN INTEGRATED SCHOOL 640112 XR'S COMMENTS ON INTEGRATED SCHOOLS 640113 HAS BUSSING OCCURRED 640114 XMIGHT BUSSING OCCUR 640115 WOULD R ACCEPT BUSSING 640116 OPINION ON HOUSING INTEGRATION 640117 XTO WHAT DEGREE IS R CONCERNED ABOUT HOUSING INTEGRATION 640118 WHAT IS THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD 640119 WHAT IS THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE GRADE SCHOOL 640120 WHAT IS THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 640121 WHAT IS THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE HIGH SCHOOL 640122 WHAT IS THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF R'S COWORKERS 640123 WHAT IS THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE PEOPLE WHERE R SHOPS 640124 WHAT IS THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF R'S FRIENDS 640125 XWHAT NUMBER OF LOCAL NEGROES FAVOR DESEGREGATION 640126 XWHAT NUMBER OF LOCAL WHITES FAVOR DESEGREGATION 640127 WHAT DEGREE OF DESEGREGATION DOES R FAVOR FINANCIAL SITUATION OF FAMILY UNIT 640128 IS R SATISFIED FINANCIALLY 640129 TREND OF R'S FINANCES 640130 XREASONS FOR FINANCIAL SITUATION 640131 R'S FUTURE FINANCIAL PROSPECTS 640132 XREASONS FOR FUTURE FINANCIAL PROSPECTS 640133 WHAT WILL BE THE FINANCIAL EFFECT OF THE ELECTION 640134 XREASONS FOR THE FINANCIAL EFFECT OF THE ELECTION THE U.S. AS A WORLD POWER 640135 OPINION ON U.S. FOREIGN RELATIONS 640136 REASONS FOR FOREIGN RELATIONS OPINION 640137 WHAT HAS BEEN THE STRENGTH OF THE U.S. POSITION IN THE PAST YEAR 640138 XREASONS FOR R'S OPINION ON U.S. STRENGTH THE PROBLEMS OF WAR 640139 R'S DEGREE OF WORRY ABOUT WAR 640140 HAS THE PROBLEM OF WAR LESSENED 640141 WHICH PARTY BEST AVOIDS WAR 640142 XREASON THE (DEMOCRATIC) (REPUBLICAN) PARTY AVOIDS WAR BETTER 640143 EQUAL JOB OPPORTUNITIES INDEX 640144 SCHOOL INTEGRATION INDEX 640145 RESIDENTIAL INTEGRATION INDEX PARTY IDENTIFICATION 640146 R'S PARTY IDENTIFICATION * 640147 DID R EVER CHANGE PARTIES * 640148 XWHEN DID R CHANGE PARTIES * 640149 XWHAT MADE R CHANGE PARTIES * 640150 WAS R'S FATHER INTERESTED IN POLITICS 640151 R'S FATHER'S PARTY IDENTIFICATION 640152 WAS R'S MOTHER INTERESTED IN POLITICS 640153 R'S MOTHER'S PARTY IDENTIFICATION VOTING BEHAVIOR 640154 DOES R ALWAYS VOTE IN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS 640155 XDOES R ALWAYS VOTE FOR THE SAME PARTY 640156 HOW DID R VOTE IN THE 1960 ELECTION 640157 DOES R PAY ANY ATTENTION TO THE POLITICAL CAMPAIGN 640158 IS R REGISTERED TO VOTE 640159 WILL R VOTE IN NOVEMBER 640160 XHOW WILL R VOTE FOR PRESIDENT 640161 XWHY R WILL VOTE FOR HIS PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE * 640162 XIS R VOTING FOR THE CANDIDATE OR AGAINST THE OPPONENT CANDIDATE 640163 IF R WOULD VOTE, HOW WOULD HE VOTE 640164 XMOST IMPORTANT REASON R WOULD HAVE VOTED * 640165 XWOULD R VOTE FOR THE CANDIDATE OR AGAINST THE OPPONENT CANDIDATE 640166 DID R EVER VOTE IN A PRIMARY 640167 XWHEN DID R VOTE IN A PRIMARY 640168 XDID R EVER VOTE IN THE OPPOSITE PARTY'S PRIMARY 640169 XWHY R VOTED IN THE 1964 PRIMARY 640170 XWERE THERE CONGRESSIONAL CONTESTS IN THE PRIMARY 640171 XHOW DID R VOTE IN THE CONGRESSIONAL PRIMARY 640172 XTHE REASON R VOTED FOR HIS CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE * 640173 XREASON FOR VOTING IN THE CONGRESSIONAL PRIMARY POLITICAL EFFICACY 640174 DO PEOPLE HAVE A SAY IN THE GOVERNMENT 640175 IS VOTING THE ONLY WAY TO INFLUENCE THE GOVERNMENT 640176 IS POLITICS TOO COMPLICATED TO UNDERSTAND 640177 ARE PEOPLE'S OPINIONS UNIMPORTANT TO THE GOVERNMENT BUILT MEASURES-INVOLVEMENT, EFFICACY 640178 INVOLVEMENT INDEX 640179 POLITICAL EFFICACY INDEX 640180 PRECONVENTION FAVORITE INDEX 640181 VOTER PREFERENCE INDEX PERSONAL DATA 640182 SEX OF THE RESPONDENT * 640183 RACE OF THE RESPONDENT * FAMILY COMPOSITION 640184 NUMBER OF ADULTS IN THE HOUSEHOLD 640185 RELATIONSHIP OF R TO THE HEAD OF THE HOUSEHOLD 640186 AGE OF THE HEAD OF THE HOUSEHOLD 640187 AGE OF THE RESPONDENT 640188 MARITAL STATUS * 640189 NUMBER OF CHILDREN UNDER 18 640190 XAGE OF THE YOUNGEST CHILD 640191 XNUMBER OF CHILDREN 4-1/2 AND UNDER 640192 XNUMBER OF CHILDREN 4-1/2 TO 10-1/2 640193 XNUMBER OF CHILDREN 10-1/2 TO 14-1/2 640194 XNUMBER OF CHILDREN OVER 14-1/2 640195 XNUMBER OF CHILDREN IN LOCAL SCHOOLS FAMILY EDUCATION 640196 EDUCATION OF THE RESPONDENT * 640197 EDUCATION OF THE HEAD OF THE HOUSEHOLD * 640198 EDUCATION OF WIFE * 640199 COLLEGE WHERE R EARNED HIS DEGREE * 640200 COLLEGE WHERE THE HEAD OF THE HOUSEHOLD EARNED HIS DEGREE * 640201 COLLEGE WHERE R'S WIFE EARNED HER DEGREE * OCCUPATION 640202 OCCUPATION OF THE RESPONDENT * 640203 XINDUSTRY CODE FOR THE RESPONDENT * 640204 XIS R SELF-EMPLOYED 640205 XWHAT WAS R'S OCCUPATION BEFORE RETIREMENT OR UNEMPLOYMENT * 640206 XIN WHAT INDUSTRY DID R WORK BEFORE RETIREMENT OR UNEMPLOYMENT * 640207 XLENGTH OF R'S UNEMPLOYMENT 640208 XHOW RECENT IS R'S UNEMPLOYMENT 640209 OCCUPATION OF THE HEAD OF THE HOUSEHOLD * 640210 XINDUSTRY CODE FOR THE HEAD OF THE HOUSEHOLD * 640211 XIS THE HEAD OF THE HOUSEHOLD SELF-EMPLOYED 640212 XWHAT WAS THE OCCUPATION OF THE HEAD OF THE HOUSEHOLD BEFORE RETIREMENT OR UNEMPLOYMENT * 640213 XIN WHAT INDUSTRY WAS THE HEAD OF THE HOUSEHOLD BEFORE RETIREMENT OR UNEMPLOYMENT * 640214 XWHAT IS THE LENGTH OF UNEMPLOYMENT OF THE HEAD OF THE HOUSEHOLD 640215 XHOW RECENT IS THE UNEMPLOYMENT OF THE HEAD OF THE HOUSEHOLD 640216 LIFE CYCLE STATUS OF THE RESPONDENT 640217 HEAD OF THE HOUSEHOLD'S OCCUPATION- 1952 BREAKDOWN 640218 XDOES R OR THE HEAD OF THE HOUSEHOLD DO WORK BESIDES FARMING 640219 XWHAT WORK IS DONE BESIDES FARMING 640220 XHOW MANY HOURS PER WEEK ARE SPENT ON A NON-FARMING OCCUPATION 640221 XHOW MANY WEEKS PER YEAR ARE SPENT ON A NON-FARMING OCCUPATION QUESTIONS FOR FARMERS 640222 XDOES R OWN A FARM, RENT, OR WHAT 640223 XWHAT AMOUNT OF LAND DOES R FARM 640224 XWHAT KIND OF FARMING DOES R DO * 640225 XWHAT HAS BEEN THE CROP PRICE MOVEMENT IN THE LAST 4 YEARS 640226 XWHAT HAS BEEN THE EFFECT ON PRICES OF GOVERNMENTAL FARM POLICY 640227 XOPINION ON GOVERNMENT FARM SUBSIDIES 640228 WHO IN THE HOUSEHOLD IS A UNION MEMBER 640229 XIN WHAT UNION IS THE MEMBERSHIP * 640230 XHOW LONG HAS R BEEN A UNION MEMBER 640231 SUBJECTIVE SOCIAL CLASS OF RESPONDENT * 640232 XDOES R FEEL CLOSEST TO MEMBERS OF HIS OWN CLASS 640233 XDOES R HAVE AN INTEREST IN THE WELFARE OF HIS OWN CLASS 640234 WHAT IS THE SOCIAL CLASS OF THE FAMILY 640235 WHAT IS R'S CHURCH PREFERENCE * 640236 XHOW OFTEN DOES R ATTEND CHURCH FEELINGS TOWARD GROUPS-FEELING THERMOMETER 640237 FEELING THERMOMETER-FARMERS 640238 FEELING THERMOMETER-LIBERALS 640239 FEELING THERMOMETER-SOUTHERNERS 640240 FEELING THERMOMETER-CATHOLICS 640241 FEELING THERMOMETER-BIG BUSINESS 640242 FEELING THERMOMETER-DEMOCRATS 640243 FEELING THERMOMETER-MILITARY 640244 FEELING THERMOMETER-JEWS 640245 FEELING THERMOMETER-WHITES 640246 FEELING THERMOMETER-LABOR UNIONS 640247 FEELING THERMOMETER-REPUBLICANS 640248 FEELING THERMOMETER-EASTERNERS 640249 FEELING THERMOMETER-PROTESTANTS 640250 FEELING THERMOMETER-NEGROES 640251 FEELING THERMOMETER-CONSERVATIVES FAMILY BACKGROUND 640252 WHAT IS R'S PLACE OF BIRTH * 640253 ARE BOTH R'S PARENTS NATIVE BORN 640254 WHAT WAS THE BIRTH PLACE OF R'S FATHER * 640255 WHAT WAS THE BIRTH PLACE OF R'S MOTHER * 640256 XWHAT ARE R'S GRANDPARENTS' NATIONAL ORIGIN 640257 WHAT IS THE MAIN NATIONALITY OF R'S FAMILY 640258 XWHAT IS R'S ATTITUDE TOWARD THE MAIN NATIONALITY OF HIS FAMILY 640259 WHAT WAS R'S FATHER'S WORK WHEN R WAS YOUNG 640260 XWHAT WAS THE FINANCIAL SITUATION OF THE FAMILY WHEN R WAS YOUNG 640261 WHERE DID R GROW UP * 640262 HOW OLD WAS R WHEN HE CAME TO THIS STATE 640263 WAS R RAISED IN THE CITY, ON A FARM, ETC. 640264 HOW LONG HAS R LIVED IN THIS HOUSE 640265 XWHERE WAS R'S PRIOR RESIDENCE 640266 XWHAT IS THIS NEIGHBORHOOD'S AGE RELATIVE TO R'S LAST NEIGHBORHOOD 640267 XIS THIS NEIGHBORHOOD MORE OR LESS EXPENSIVE THAN R'S LAST NEIGHBORHOOD 640268 XIS THIS NEIGHBORHOOD CLOSER TO THE CITY'S CENTER THAN R'S LAST NEIGHBORHOOD 640269 WHAT IS R'S ESTIMATED FAMILY INCOME THIS YEAR * 640270 WHAT PERCENT OF THE INCOME IS EARNED BY THE HEAD OF THE HOUSEHOLD * 640271 DOES R OWN, RENT, OR WHAT 640272 CONTROL VARIABLE-WIFE'S BIRTH DATE POST ELECTION 640273 POST ELECTION SEQUENCE NUMBER 640274 CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT NUMBER STUDY PROCEDURE 640275 DATE OF POST ELECTION INTERVIEW 640276 IS THIS THE SAME INTERVIEWER AS FOR THE PRE-ELECTION SURVEY 640277 POLITICAL STUDY TIME OF THE INTERVIEW 640278 TRAVEL STUDY TIME OF THE INTERVIEW MASS MEDIA USAGE 640279 HOW MUCH HAS R READ ABOUT THE ELECTION 640280 XWHICH NEWSPAPER DOES R READ MOST FOR POLITICAL OPINIONS * 640281 DID R HEAR ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN ON THE RADIO 640282 DID R READ ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN IN MAGAZINES 640283 XWHAT MAGAZINES DOES R READ REGULARLY * 640284 HOW MUCH CAMPAIGN TELEVISION DID R WATCH 640285 XWHICH FORM OF MEDIA DID R FIND MOST INFORMATIVE * (SEE REF. NO. 300) VOTING PREFERENCES 640286 HOW DID R VOTE FOR PRESIDENT 640287 XWHAT WERE THE REASONS FOR R'S PRESIDENTIAL VOTE * 640288 XWHEN DID R MAKE HIS VOTING DECISION 640289 HOW DID R VOTE FOR UNITED STATES SENATOR 640290 HOW DID R VOTE FOR U.S. CONGRESSMAN 640291 HOW DID R VOTE FOR GOVERNOR 640292 DID R VOTE SPLIT ON LOCAL ELECTIONS (SEE REF. NO. 301) 640293 XWHAT WAS THE MAIN REASON R DID NOT VOTE KNOWLEDGE OF CANDIDATES 640294 WHERE IS GOLDWATER FROM 640295 WHAT IS GOLDWATER'S RELIGION 640296 WHERE IS JOHNSON FROM 640297 WHAT IS JOHNSON'S RELIGION PARTY DIFFERENCES 640298 WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE PARTIES- DEMOCRATIC MENTION 640299 WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE PARTIES- REPUBLICAN MENTION 640300 MASS MEDIA USAGE INDEX 640301 SPLIT TICKET PATTERNS 640302 WHICH PARTY IS MOST CONSERVATIVE 640303 XWHAT REASONS FOR DEMOCRATIC PARTY CONSERVATISM DOES R MENTION 640304 XWHAT REASONS FOR REPUBLICAN PARTY CONSERVATISM DOES R MENTION KNOWLEDGE OF CONGRESSIONAL COMPOSITION AND CANDIDATES 640305 WHICH PARTY HAD THE PRE-ELECTION CONGRESSIONAL MAJORITY 640306 WHICH PARTY ELECTED MOST CONGRESSMEN 640307 WHAT WERE THE NAMES OF THE DISTRICT CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES 640308 XDID BOTH PARTIES RUN CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES 640309 XNUMBER OF CORRECT REFERENCES TO THE CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES 640310 XDID R HEAR ANYTHING ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE 640311 XDID R HEAR ANYTHING ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE 640312 XIS EITHER CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE AN INCUMBENT POLITICAL ACTIVITY 640313 DID R EVER TRY INFLUENCING OTHERS' VOTES 640314 DID R EVER GO TO POLITICAL MEETINGS 640315 DID R EVER WORK FOR A PARTY OR CANDIDATE 640316 DID R EVER BELONG TO A POLITICAL CLUB OR ORGANIZATION 640317 DID R DISPLAY CAMPAIGN LITERATURE 640318 DID R EVER WRITE AN OPINION TO AN OFFICIAL 640319 XWHAT WAS THE NUMBER OF LETTERS WRITTEN TO OFFICIALS IN THE LAST 4 YEARS 640320 XWHAT WAS THE NUMBER OF LETTERS WRITTEN TO CONGRESSMEN 640321 DID R EVER WRITE TO AN EDITOR 640322 XWHAT WAS THE NUMBER OF LETTERS WRITTEN TO EDITORS 640323 R'S DEGREE OF INTEREST IN THE CAMPAIGN 640324 DOES R FOLLOW GOVERNMENT ACTIVITY CONTACTED BY PARTIES 640325 HOW MANY TIMES WAS R CONTACTED BY THE PARTIES 640326 XHOW MANY TIMES WAS R CONTACTED BY REPUBLICANS 640327 XHOW MANY TIMES WAS R CONTACTED BY DEMOCRATS 640328 XWHAT DID THE PARTY CONTACT TALK ABOUT CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS 640329 DID R HEAR OF THE POLITICAL FUND DRIVE 640330 DID R ASK PEOPLE FOR CAMPAIGN MONEY 640331 WAS R ASKED FOR CAMPAIGN MONEY 640332 XWHICH PARTY ASKED R FOR MONEY 640333 XHOW WAS R ASKED TO GIVE MONEY 640334 XDID R KNOW THE PERSON WHO ASKED FOR MONEY 640335 DID R MAKE A CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION THIS YEAR 640336 XWHICH PARTY DID R GIVE MONEY TO 640337 XDID R GIVE MONEY TO ANOTHER REQUESTING PARTY 640338 XWHOULD R GIVE IF HE WERE ASKED 640339 WHAT IS R'S POSITION ON TAX DEDUCTIBLE CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS 640340 XREASONS FOR POSITION ON TAX DEDUCTIBLE CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS 640341 SHOULD THE GOVERNMENT GIVE AID TO PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGNS 640342 XREASONS FOR POSITION ON GOVERNMENT AID TO CAMPAIGNS 640343 DOES R PREFER TO CONTRIBUTE TIME OR MONEY DOMESTIC ISSUES AND FOREIGN POLICY 640344 OPINIONS ON GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP OF PUBLIC UTILITIES 640345 XHAS R MADE UP HIS MIND ON GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP OF PUBLIC UTILITIES (SEE REF. NO. 382) 640346 XWHICH PARTY FAVORS GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP OF PUBLIC UTILITIES 640347 OPINION ON TRADE WITH COMMUNISTS 640348 XIS R'S OPINION FIRM ON TRADE WITH COMMUNISTS (SEE REF. NO. 383) 640349 XWHICH PARTY FAVORS TRADE WITH COMMUNISTS 640350 OPINION ON U.S. INVOLVEMENT IN VIETNAM 640351 XWHAT SHOULD WE DO IN VIETNAM 640352 WHAT KIND OF GOVERNMENT DOES CHINA HAVE. IS IT A MEMBER OF THE UNITED NATIONS 640353 XWHAT SHOULD OUR GOVERNMENT DO IF CHINA IS ADMITTED TO THE UNITED NATIONS 640354 WHAT FORM OF GOVERNMENT DOES CUBA HAVE 640355 XWHAT SHOULD THE U.S. DO WITH CUBA 640356 WHICH IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE-VIETNAM, CUBA, OR CHINA SUPREME COURT 640357 WHICH ACTIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT DOES R FAVOR 640358 WHICH ACTIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT IS R AGAINST 640359 XWHICH SUPREME COURT JUSTICES DOES R MENTION PERSONAL COMPETENCE 640360 DOES R FEEL HIS LIFE WORKS AS HE HAS PLANNED IT 640361 DOES R HAVE GOOD LUCK OR NOT 640362 DO R'S PLANS WORK AS EXPECTED STRONG MINDEDNESS 640363 DOES R USUALLY WIN ARGUMENTS 640364 DOES R HAVE STRONG OPINIONS OR NOT 640365 IS IT HARD TO CHANGE R'S MIND AWARENESS OF, AND FEELINGS TOWARD, VARIOUS ORGANIZATIONS 640366 HAS R HEARD ABOUT THE NAACP 640367 XFEELING THERMOMETER-NAACP 640368 HAS R EVER HEARD ABOUT THE ADA 640369 XFEELING THERMOMETER-ADA 640370 HAS R HEARD ABOUT THE CAC 640371 XFEELING THERMOMETER-CAC 640372 HAS R HEARD ABOUT THE KU KLUX KLAN 640373 XFEELING THERMOMETER-KU KLUX KLAN 640374 HAS R EVER HEARD OF CORE 640375 XFEELING THERMOMETER-CORE 640376 HAS R HEARD OF BLACK MUSLIMS 640377 XFEELING THERMOMETER-BLACK MUSLIMS 640378 HAS R HEARD OF THE JOHN BIRCH SOCIETY 640379 XFEELING THERMOMETER-JOHN BIRCH SOCIETY 640380 HAS R HEARD OF THE U.S. COMMUNIST PARTY 640381 XFEELING THERMOMETER-UNITED STATES COMMUNIST PARTY 640382 GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP OF PUBLIC UTILITIES INDEX 640383 TRADE WITH COMMUNISTS INDEX POLITICAL GROUP MEMBERSHIP 640384 DOES R BELONG TO VARIOUS POLITICAL GROUPS 640385 XTO WHICH GROUPS DOES R BELONG 640386 XDID R EVER BELONG TO POLITICAL GROUPS 640387 XTO WHICH GROUPS DID R BELONG 640388 XWHEN DID R BELONG TO POLITICAL GROUPS 640389 XFOR HOW LONG DID R BELONG TO POLITICAL GROUPS GOVERNMENT RESPONSIVENESS 640390 WHAT EFFECT ON POLICY DO PEOPLE'S WANTS HAVE 640391 DOES PARTY POLICY HAVE AN EFFECT ON GOVERN- MENT POLICY 640392 DO ELECTIONS FOCUS ATTENTION ON THE PEOPLE'S WANTS 640393 DO CONGRESSMEN PAY ATTENTION TO THEIR CONSTITUENTS 640394 IS FREQUENT CHANGE OF GOVERNMENT CONTROL GOOD NOSTALGIA 640395 WAS LIFE BEST IN THE U.S. 50 YEARS AGO 640396 ARE PEOPLE MORE SATISFIED TODAY 640397 IS BEING MORAL HARDER TODAY TRUST PEOPLE (ROSENBERG) 640398 CAN MOST PEOPLE BE TRUSTED 640399 ARE MOST PEOPLE HELPFUL OR SELFISH 640400 ARE PEOPLE GENERALLY ALTRUISTIC POLITICAL CYNICISM 640401 WHAT DEGREE OF DISHONESTY IS IN THE GOVERNMENT 640402 DOES THE GOVERNMENT WASTE TAXES 640403 TO WHAT DEGREE DOES R TRUST THE GOVERNMENT TO DO RIGHT 640404 DO GOVERNMENT PEOPLE KNOW THEIR JOBS 640405 IS THE GOVERNMENT RUN TO THE BENEFIT OF ALL KNOWLEDGE OF CIVIL RIGHTS BILL AND OPINION ON ACCOMMODATIONS SECTION 640406 DID THE PRESIDENT, CONGRESS ACT IN CIVIL RIGHTS 640407 XDID GOLDWATER VOTE FOR THE CIVIL RIGHTS BILL 640408 DID THE GOVERNMENT SUPPORT NEGRO PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS RIGHTS 640409 OPINION ON NEGRO PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS RIGHTS IS HIS OPINION FIRM (SEE REF. NO. 422) 640410 XWHICH PARTY FAVORS NEGRO PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS RIGHTS RELIGION AND POLITICS 640411 IS R'S MINISTER IN FAVOR OF SEGREGATION 640412 XDOES R'S CHURCH DISCUSS ELECTION CAMPAIGNS 640413 XDOES R'S CHURCH FAVOR A PARTICULAR CANDIDATE 640414 WHAT IS R'S VIEW OF THE BIBLE ELECTION DAY PREDICTIONS BY NETWORKS 640415 DID R PREDICT THE ELECTION RESULT 640416 DID R HEAR RADIO, TELEVISION, ELECTION AFTERNOON AND EVENING 640417 XDID R HEAR PREDICTIONS ELECTION NIGHT 640418 XON WHICH NETWORK DID R HEAR PREDICTIONS 640419 XDID RADIO OR TELEVISION INFLUENCE R'S PREDICTION 640420 XDID R HEAR PREDICTIONS BEFORE OR AFTER VOTING 640421 XAT WHAT TIME DID R VOTE 640422 NEGRO PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS RIGHTS INDEX VOTER VALIDATION STUDY 640423 RESPONDENT TYPE 640424 R'S REGISTRATION ON NOVEMBER 3, 1964 640425 DID R VOTE ON NOVEMBER 3, 1964 640426 R'S REGISTRATION ON NOVEMBER 6, 1962 640427 DID R VOTE ON NOVEMBER 6, 1962 640428 R'S REGISTRATION ON NOVEMBER 8, 1960 640429 DID R VOTE ON NOVEMBER 8, 1960 640430 MONTH OF THE EARLIEST RECORD 640431 YEAR OF THE EARLIEST RECORD 640432 DID R VOTE IN THE 1964 STATE PRIMARY 640433 WHAT OTHER ELECTIONS DID R VOTE IN AFTER 1960 640434 MONTH OF THE MOST RECENT OTHER VOTE 640435 YEAR OF THE MOST RECENT OTHER VOTE 640436 MONTH OF THE SECOND MOST RECENT OTHER VOTE 640437 YEAR OF THE SECOND MOST RECENT OTHER VOTE 640438 MONTH OF THE THIRD MOST RECENT OTHER VOTE 640439 YEAR OF THE THIRD MOST RECENT OTHER VOTE 640440 MONTH OF THE FOURTH MOST RECENT OTHER VOTE 640441 YEAR OF THE FOURTH MOST RECENT OTHER VOTE 640442 MONTH OF THE FIFTH MOST RECENT OTHER VOTE 640443 YEAR OF THE FIFTH MOST RECENT OTHER VOTE 640444 MONTH OF THE SIXTH MOST RECENT OTHER VOTE 640445 YEAR OF THE SIXTH MOST RECENT OTHER VOTE 640446 MONTH OF THE SEVENTH MOST RECENT OTHER VOTE 640447 YEAR OF THE SEVENTH MOST RECENT OTHER VOTE 640448 MONTH OF THE EIGHTH MOST RECENT OTHER VOTE 640449 YEAR OF THE EIGHTH MOST RECENT OTHER VOTE 640450 MONTH OF THE NINTH MOST RECENT OTHER VOTE 640451 YEAR OF THE NINTH MOST RECENT OTHER VOTE 640452 MONTH OF THE TENTH MOST RECENT OTHER VOTE 640453 YEAR OF THE TENTH MOST RECENT OTHER VOTE 640454 MONTH OF THE ELEVENTH MOST RECENT OTHER VOTE 640455 YEAR OF THE ELEVENTH MOST RECENT OTHER VOTE 640456 OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND VOTE INDEX, 1964 640457 DEFINITE OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND VOTE 640458 RACE OF THE INTERVIEWER PARTISANSHIP INDICES 640459 PARTISANSHIP INDEX 640460 JOHNSON REFERENCES 640461 GOLDWATER REFERENCES 640462 REFERENCES TO GROUP 640463 REFERENCES TO DOMESTIC ISSUES 640464 REFERENCES TO FOREIGN ISSUES 640465 REFERENCES TO PARTIES AS MANAGERS