Version 01 Codebook ------------------- CODEBOOK INTRODUCTION FILE 1966 POST-ELECTION STUDY (1966.T) AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES 1966 POST ELECTION STUDY CONDUCTED BY THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER (504) PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS POLITICAL BEHAVIOR PROGRAM, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN WALTER MURPHY, PRINCETON UNIVERSITY JOSEPH TANENHAUS, UNIVERSITY OF IOWA NOV. 9, 1966 - JAN. 31, 1967 ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER 7259 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ASSISTANCE ALL MANUSCRIPTS UTILIZING DATA MADE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE CONSORTIUM SHOULD ACKNOWLEDGE THAT FACT AS WELL AS IDENTIFY THE ORIGINAL COLLECTOR OF THE DATA. THE ICPSR COUNCIL URGES ALL USERS OF ICPSR DATA FACILITIES TO FOLLOW SOME ADAPTATION OF THIS STATEMENT WITH THE PARENTHESES INDICATING ITEMS TO BE FILLED IN APPROPRIATELY OR DELETED BY THE INDIVIDUAL USER. THE DATA (AND TABULATIONS) UTILIZED IN THIS (PUBLICATION) WERE MADE AVAILABLE (IN PART) BY THE INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL RESEARCH. THE DATA WERE ORIGINALLY COLLECTED BY THE POLITICAL BEHAVIOR PROGRAM (UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN), WALTER MURPHY (PRINCETON UNIVERSITY), AND JOSEPH TANENHAUS (UNIVERSITY OF IOWA). NEITHER THE ORIGINAL COLLECTORS OF THE DATA NOR THE CONSORTIUM BEAR ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ANALYSES OR INTERPRETATIONS PRESENTED HERE. IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FUNDING AGENCIES WITH ESSENTIAL INFOR- MATION ABOUT THE USE OF ARCHIVAL RESOURCES, AND TO FACILITATE THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION ABOUT ICPSR PARTICIPANTS' RESEARCH ACTIVITIES, EACH USER OF THE ICPSR DATA FACILITIES IS EXPECTED TO SEND TWO COPIES OF EACH COMPLETED MANUSCRIPT TO THE CONSORTIUM. PLEASE INDICATE IN THE COVER LETTER WHICH DATA WERE USED. CONTENTS Note: >>sections in the codebook introduction and codebook appendix can be navigated in the machine-readable files by searching ">>". INTRODUCTORY MATERIAL (file int1966.cbk) --------------------- >> 1966 STUDY DESCRIPTION >> 1966 SAMPLING, INTERVIEW, AND CODING INFORMATION >> 1966 PROCESSING INFORMATION >> 1966 CODEBOOK INFORMATION >> 1966 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST CODEBOOK -------- 1966 variables APPENDICES (file app1966.cbk) ---------- >> 1966 STANDARD PSU CODE >> 1966 SAMPLING COUNTY CODE >> 1966 ICPSR COUNTY CODE >> 1966 ICPSR STATE AND COUNTRY CODE >> REF. NO. 19 NOTE, 1966 >> THREE MENTIONS NOTE, 1966 >> PRIORITY CODE NOTE, 1966 >> 1966 CANDIDATE LISTS >> GROUP THERMOMETER NOTE, 1966 >> REF. NOS. 140-143 NOTE, 1966 >> VAR 660140, 660141, 660142 NOTE >> STRENGTH OF FEELING NOTE, 1966 >> VAR 66144 NOTE >> VAR 66172 NOTE >> VAR 660174 NOTE >> LEVEL OF EDUCATION NOTE, 1966 >> 1966 COLLEGE LIST >> 1966 POLITICAL BEHAVIOR CODE >> OCCUPATION OF HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD NOTE, 1966 >> 1966 CENSUS INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION >> CENSUS BUREAU OCCUPATION CODES, 1966 >> REF. NOS. 205-214 NOTE, 1966 >> UNION CODE NOTE, 1966 >> 1966 UNION CODE >> MAJOR PROBLEMS CODE, 1966 >> 1966 STUDY DESCRIPTION THE 1966 NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY (SRC 504) IS THE NINTH IN A SERIES OF STUDIES OF NATIONAL ELECTIONS CONDUCTED BY THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER POLITICAL BEHAVIOR PROGRAM SINCE 1948. IT CONSISTS OF 1291 POST-ELECTION INTERVIEWS OBTAINED BETWEEN NOV. 9, 1966, AND JAN. 31, 1967, FROM A RANDOM PROBABILITY SAMPLE OF CITIZENS OF VOTING AGE IN THE CONTI- NENTAL UNITED STATES (EXCLUDING ALASKA AND THE INHABITANTS OF INSTITUTIONS, HOTELS, ROOMING HOUSES, ETC.). THE STUDY WAS CONDUCTED IN COOPERATION WITH THE SRC ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR PROGRAM WHICH WAS GATHERING DATA FOR ITS REGULAR QUARTERLY SURVEY ON THE CONSUMER OUTLOOK. THE QUESTIONNAIRE WAS DIVIDED INTO FOUR PARTS: SECTION A (QUESTIONS OF A POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC NATURE ANSWERED BY ALL OF THE RESPONDENTS), SECTION B (ECONOMIC QUESTIONS), SECTION C (POLITICAL QUESTIONS), AND SECTION D (PERSONAL DATA QUESTIONS). THIS CODEBOOK IS A SUB-SET OF THE ORIGINAL QUESTIONNAIRE. SECTION B QUESTIONS, SPONSORED BY THE SRC ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR PROGRAM, HAVE BEEN OMITTED FROM THE CODEBOOK. INCLUDED, HOWEVER, ARE ALL THE QUESTIONS IN SECTIONS A, C, AND D WHICH WERE DESIGNED TO INVESTIGATE POLITICAL ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIORS, ESPECIALLY THOSE RELATING TO THE 1966 CONGRESSIONAL ELECTION. THE INTERVIEW SCHEDULE FOR SECTIONS A, C, AND D COM- PRISED BOTH CLOSED AND OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONS. THE STUDY IN- CLUDES OPINIONS ON THE VIETNAM WAR, THE SCHOOL PRAYER ISSUE, THE CHANGE IN THE NEGROES' POSITION, THE POWER OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, AND THE GOVERNMENT'S ROLE IN SCHOOL INTEGRATION. IN ADDITION TO EVALUATING THE FINANCIAL SITUATION OF HIS FAMILY UNIT, THE RESPONDENT WAS ASKED HIS THOUGHTS ON SUCH NATIONAL ECONOMIC FACTORS AS FUTURE PRICE CHANGES, BUSINESS CONDITIONS AND UNEMPLOYMENT. QUESTIONS MEASURING THE RESPON- DENT'S POLITICAL EFFICACY, TRUST IN GOVERNMENT, AND LOCAL AND NATIONAL COMPETENCE ARE INCLUDED AS WELL AS "FEELING THER- MOMETER" VARIABLES ABOUT RELIGIOUS, ECONOMIC AND RACIAL GROUPS IN THE SOCIETY. THE RESPONDENT'S POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE WAS TAPPED BY VARI- ABLES SUCH AS KNOWLEDGE OF NAME, PARTY, INCUMBENCY STATUS OF THE CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES AND KNOWLEDGE OF THE 1966 PARTY CANDIDACY PATTERN FOR THE CONGRESSIONAL, SENATORIAL AND GUBERNATORIAL ELECTORAL CONTESTS. THE RESPONDENT'S GENERAL INVOLVEMENT IN THE ELECTION WAS EXPLORED BY ASKING HIM WHETHER HE CONTRIBUTED TO A CAMPAIGN, WHETHER HE WAS CONTACTED BY THE POLITICAL PARTIES, WHETHER HE VOTED AND IF HE VOTED, WHEN, WHERE AND HOW HE VOTED (STRAIGHT OR SPLIT TICKET; AND MACHINE, PAPER BALLOT OR ABSENTEE). THE STUDY ALSO INCLUDED VARIABLES DEALING WITH INDICATORS OF PERSONAL POLITICAL COMPETENCE AND ATTITUDES TOWARD THE SUPREME COURT. THEY WERE SPONSORED BY PROFESSORS WALTER MURPHY OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY AND JOSEPH TANENHAUS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA UNDER A GRANT FROM THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION. IN ADDITION TO THE QUESTIONS WHICH WERE FORMULATED TO TAP THE RESPONDENT'S KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT, THERE ARE THOSE WHICH SOUGHT TO EXPLORE THE RESPONDENT'S ATTITUDE TOWARD THE COURT, ITS ROLE IN GOVERNMENT AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO VARIOUS GROUPS AND ISSUES. THE PERSONAL DATA SECTION OBTAINED INFORMATION ON THE RELIGION, CHURCH ATTENDANCE, SOCIAL CLASS, INCOME, EDUCATION, AND MATRILINEAL AND PATRILINEAL ORIGINS OF THE RESPONDENT. THIS SECTION ALSO INQUIRED ABOUT THE EMPLOYMENT STATUS AND OCCU- PATION OF THE HEAD OF THE HOUSEHOLD AS WELL AS UNION AFFIL- IATION AND LENGTH OF UNION MEMBERSHIP OF HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS. >> 1966 SAMPLING, INTERVIEW, AND CODING INFORMATION THE SAMPLE FOR THE STUDY WAS SO DRAWN THAT REPRESENTA- TIVE SUBSAMPLES WERE OBTAINED FROM EACH OF THE FOUR MAJOR REGIONS OF THE UNITED STATES. THE SAMPLE MAY ALSO BE CONSIDERED REPRESENTATIVE OF CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS IN THE UNITED STATES. THE SAMPLING PROCEDURE INVOLVED A CONTROLLED PROBABILITY SELECTION OF HOUSEHOLDS (DEFINED AS RELATED MEMBERS LIVING TOGETHER) IN 74 PRIMARY SAMPLING AREAS AND THEN, AFTER THE INTERVIEWER OBTAINED A LISTING OF THE CITIZENS OF VOTING AGE IN THE HOUSEHOLD, A FURTHER CONTROLLED PROBABILITY SELECTION OF ONE AS THE ELECTION STUDY RESPONDENT TOOK PLACE. OBJECTIONS TO THIS PROCEDURE OF OBTAINING ONE INTERVIEW PER HOUSEHOLD COULD BE RAISED ON THE GROUNDS THAT IT OVER-REPRESENTS SINGLE PERSONS. HOWEVER, WHEN THE UNWEIGHTED FREQUENCIES FOR CERTAIN VARIABLES (SEX, RACE, AGE, ETC.) ARE COMPARED WITH THE SAME FREQUENCIES WEIGHTED BY HOUSEHOLD SIZE AND WITH THE NATIONAL STATISTI- CAL PARAMETERS FOR THESE VARIABLES, NO EVIDENCE OF ANY SIGNIFICANT BIAS APPEARS IN THE SAMPLE. THUS, THE COLLEC-| TION OF INTERVIEWS CAN BE LEGITIMATELY ANALYZED AS THOUGH EACH RESPONDENT HAD AN EQUAL CHANCE OF SELECTION (NO WEIGHTS NECESSARY). NOTES ON THE ESTIMATION OF SAMPLING ERROR FOR A SAMPLE OF THIS SIZE MAY BE FOUND AT THE BEGINNING OF THE ICPSR ANALYSIS BOOK FOR THE 1952-1960 STUDIES. INTERVIEWS WERE OBTAINED FROM 77% OF THE ELIGIBLE ELECTION STUDY RESPONDENTS, A SLIGHTLY LOWER RATE THAN IS USUAL FOR SRC SURVEYS. INCLUDED IN THE NON-RESPONSE CATEGORY ARE NOT ONLY REFUSALS (14%), BUT ALSO NO ONE AT HOME AFTER REPEATED CALLS (4.3%), AND MISCELLANEOUS REASONS FOR NO INTERVIEW (4.7%), SUCH AS ILLNESS, SENILITY, LANGUAGE DIFFICULTY, ETC. THREE PERCENT OF THE ELECTION STUDY RESPONDENTS WERE NOT ASKED THE ECONOMIC SECTION SINCE THE ECONOMIC INTERVIEWS WERE ONLY ADMINISTERED TO THE HEAD OF THE HOUSEHOLD OR HIS WIFE. THE AVERAGE LENGTH OF THE COMBINED POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC INTERVIEWS WAS 93 MINUTES. THE INTERVIEWS WERE CODED BY THE SRC CODING SECTION UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF POLITICAL BEHAVIOR PROGRAM STAFF MEMBERS, AND THE USUAL PRACTICE OF CHECK-CODING ONE OUT OF EVERY TEN INTERVIEWS WAS FOLLOWED. THIS RESULTED IN THE CALCULATION OF AN AVERAGE CODING ERROR OF 3.5 ERRORS PER INTERVIEW, MOSTLY IN THE MORE DIFFICULT CODES SUCH AS MAJOR PROBLEMS AND PARTY DIFFERENCES QUESTIONS. >> 1966 PROCESSING INFORMATION THE STUDY WAS PROCESSED ACCORDING TO ICPSR STANDARD PRO- CESSING PROCEDURES. WHERE APPLICABLE, THE CODE CATEGORIES WERE RECODED TO CONFORM TO ICPSR STANDARDIZED CODES. THE DATA WERE CHECKED FOR INCONSISTENT AND ILLEGAL CODES, AND, WHENEVER FOUND, THE LATTER MISTAKES WERE CORRECTED BY REFER- RING TO THE ORIGINAL INTERVIEW SCHEDULES. IN THE CONTENTS SECTION, AN ASTERISK APPEARS AFTER EACH VARIABLE HAVING A SPECIAL ICPSR STANDARDIZED CODE. THOSE VARIABLE NAMES PRECEDED BY AN X DESIGNATE A VARIABLE DEPEN- DENT ON SOME OTHER VARIABLE DUE TO THE STRUCTURE OF THE INTERVIEW SCHEDULE. FREQUENCIES FOR MULTIPLE RESPONSE VARIABLES ARE CUMU- LATIVE. INFORMATION SET IN SLASHES (//) WILL BE FOUND THROUGHOUT THE CODEBOOK. FOR EXAMPLE: /SCHOOL INTEGRATION. SEE REF. NO. 25 FOR COMPLETE TEXT./ THIS REPRESENTS AT ALL TIMES INFORMATION ADDED BY THE STUDY PROCESSOR IN THE COURSE OF PREPARING THE CODEBOOK. >> 1966 CODEBOOK INFORMATION The following example from the 1948 NES study provides the standard format for codebook variable documentation. Note that NES studies which are not part of the Time-Series usually omit marginals and the descriptive content in lines 2-5 (except for variable name). Line 1 ============================== 2 VAR 480026 NAME-R NOT VT-WAS R REG TO VT 3 COLUMNS 61 - 61 4 NUMERIC 5 MD=0 OR GE 8 6 7 Q. 17. (IF R DID NOT VOTE) WERE YOU REGISTERED (ELIGIBLE) 8 TO VOTE. 9 ........................................................... 10 11 82 1. YES 12 149 2. NO 13 14 0 8. DK 15 9 9. NA 16 422 0. INAP., R VOTED Line 2 - VARIABLE NAME. Note that in the codebook the variable name (usually a 'number') does not include the "V" prefix which is used in the release SAS and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files) for all variables including those which do not have 'number' names. For example the variable "VERSION" in the codebook is "VVERSION" in the data definition files. Line 2 - "NAME". This is the variable label used in the SAS and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files). Some codebooks exclude this. Line 3 - COLUMNS. Columns in the ASCII data file (.dat file). Line 4 - CHARACTER OR NUMERIC. If numeric and the variable is a decimal rather than integer variable, the numer of decimal places is also indicated (e.g. "NUMERIC DEC 4") Line 5 - Values which are assigned to missing by default in the Study's SAS and and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files). Line 7 - Actual question text for survey variables or a description of non-survey variables (for example, congressional district). Survey items usually include the question number (for example "B1a.") from the Study questionnaire; beginning in 1996 non-survey items also have unique item numbers (for example "CSheet.1"). Line 9 - A dashed or dotted line usually separates question text from any other documentation which follows. Line 10- When present, annotation provided by Study staff is presented below the question text/description and preceding code values. Lines 11-16 Code values are listed with descriptive labels. Valid codes (those not having 'missing' status in line 5) are presented first, followed by the values described in line 5. For continuous variables, one line may appear providing the range of possible values. A blank line usually separates the 'valid' and 'missing' values. Lines 11-16 Marginals are usually provided for discrete variables. The counts may be unweighted or weighted; check the Study codebook introductory text to determine weight usage. >> 1966 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST VARIABLE VARIABLE LABEL -------- -------------- VERSION NES VERSION NUMBER DSETNO NES DATASET NUMBER 660001 ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER 660002 INTERVIEW NUMBER STUDY PROCEDURE AND SAMPLING 660003 PRIMARY SAMPLING UNIT AND PLACE IDENTIFICATION 660004 SAMPLING COUNTY CODE 660005 ICPSR COUNTY CODE * 660006 BELT CODE 660007 SIZE CODE FOR SURVEY OF CONSUMER FINANCES 660008 SIZE CODE FOR INTERIM SURVEYS 660009 DISTANCE TO CENTRAL CITY OF NEAREST SMSA 660010 STATE OF INTERVIEW * 660011 CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT OF INTERVIEW 660012 DWELLING UNIT NUMBER 660013 INTERVIEWER NUMBER 660014 ADULT COMPOSITION OF PRIMARY FAMILY UNIT (PFU) 660015 ADULT COMPOSITION OF SECONDARY FAMILY UNIT (SFU) 660016 POLITICALLY ELIGIBLE ADULTS IN PFU 660017 DATE OF INTERVIEW 660018 CODER MAJOR PROBLEMS 660019 R'S LIST OF MAJOR PROBLEMS * 660020 TYPE OF GOVERNMENT ACTION R WANTS POWER OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 660021 R'S OPINION ON POWER OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 660022 R CERTAIN GOVERNMENT IS (NOT) TOO POWERFUL 660023 R'S POSITION ON POWER OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 660024 FEDERAL POWER-REP OR DEM WOULD HANDLE BEST SCHOOL INTEGRATION 660025 SCHOOL INTEGRATION IS GOVERNMENT'S BUSINESS? 660026 SCHOOL INTEGRATION-R'S COMMENTS 660027 R CERTAIN SCHOOL INTEGRATION IS (NOT) GOVERN- MENT'S BUSINESS 660028 R'S POSITION ON ISSUE OF SCHOOL INTEGRATION 660029 SCHOOL INTEGRATION-REP OR DEM WOULD HANDLE BEST SCHOOL PRAYER 660030 R'S OPINION ON SCHOOL PRAYER ISSUE 660031 SCHOOL PRAYER-R'S COMMENTS 660032 R CERTAIN SCHOOL PRAYER SHOULD (NOT) BE ALLOWED 660033 R'S POSITION ON SCHOOL PRAYER ISSUE 660034 SCHOOL PRAYER-REP OR DEM WOULD HANDLE BEST VIETNAM 660035 VIETNAM INTERVENTION-RIGHT OR WRONG 660036 VIETNAM-WHAT SHOULD U.S. DO? 660037 VIETNAM-R'S COMMENTS 660038 VIETNAM-REP OR DEM WOULD HANDLE BEST BIGGER WAR 660039 BIGGER WAR-PRESENT CHANCES 660040 BIGGER WAR-REP OR DEM WOULD HANDLE BEST 660041 BIGGER WAR-WHY REP OR DEM WOULD HANDLE BEST RACE RELATIONS 660042 R'S ESTIMATE OF CHANGE IN THE NEGROES' POSITION 660043 R'S VIEW OF THE PUSH OF CIVIL RIGHTS LEADERS FINANCIAL SITUATION OF FAMILY UNIT 660044 BETTER OR WORSE FINANCIALLY THAN THE YEAR BEFORE 660045 MORE OR LESS MONEY THAN THE YEAR BEFORE 660046 WHY IS FAMILY UNIT'S FINANCIAL STATUS DIFFERENT 660047 BETTER OR WORSE FINANCIALLY NEXT YEAR NATIONAL ECONOMIC SITUATION 660048 WILL PRICES GO UP OR DOWN? 660049 FUTURE PRICE CHANGES-GOOD OR BAD 660050 GOOD OR BAD NATIONAL FINANCIAL FUTURE 660051 WHY GOOD OR BAD NATIONAL FINANCIAL FUTURE 660052 PRESENT BUSINESS CONDITIONS BETTER OR WORSE 660053 READ OR HEARD ABOUT RECENT CHANGES IN BUSINESS CONDITIONS 660054 FUTURE BUSINESS CONDITIONS BETTER OR WORSE 660055 MORE OR LESS UNEMPLOYMENT NEXT YEAR 660056 WHY MORE OR LESS UNEMPLOYMENT IN THE FUTURE 660057 GOOD OR BAD ECONOMIC TIMES DURING NEXT 5 YEARS 660058 WILL RECESSION HAPPEN AGAIN 660059 WHY RECESSION AGAIN 660060 WHEN WILL RECESSION HAPPEN AGAIN 660061 IS WORLD SITUATION AFFECTING BUSINESS CONDITIONS AT HOME 660062 WHY IS WORLD SITUATION AFFECTING BUSINESS CONDITIONS AT HOME PUBLIC INTEREST 660063 CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS-R'S CONCERN 660064 PUBLIC AFFAIRS-R'S INTEREST 660065 PUBLIC AFFAIRS-WHICH MOST FOLLOWED BY R 660066 PUBLIC AFFAIRS-WHICH SECOND MOST FOLLOWED BY R 660067 PUBLIC AFFAIRS-WHICH LEAST FOLLOWED BY R ELECTIONS - PARTY ACTIVITY, R'S VOTING BEHAVIOR, AND OTHER 660068 ELECTIONS-R'S MEDIA OF INFORMATION * 660069 ELECTIONS-WHO ASKED FOR R'S VIEWS 660070 ELECTIONS-WHOM R TRIED TO INFLUENCE 660071 WAS R CONTACTED BY POLITICAL PARTIES 660072 HOW MANY TIMES WAS R CONTACTED BY PARTIES 660073 TIMES CONTACTED BY REPUBLICANS 660074 TIMES CONTACTED BY DEMOCRATS 660075 CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION-WAS R ASKED 660076 CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION-WHICH PARTY ASKED 660077 CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION-DID R GIVE 660078 CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION-TO WHICH PARTY DID R GIVE 660079 CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION-WOULD R HAVE GIVEN IF CONTACTED 660080 PARTY DIFFERENCES-WHICH PARTY MENTIONED BY R 660081 PARTY DIFFERENCES-CONTENT OF R'S RESPONSE 660082 R'S PARTY IDENTIFICATION * 660083 R IS REGULAR VOTER IN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS 660084 R ALWAYS VOTES FOR SAME PARTY 660085 R'S VOTE IN 1964 ELECTION 660086 DID R VOTE IN PRIMARY 660087 R'S INTEREST IN THE CAMPAIGNS CONGRESSIONAL, SENATORIAL AND GUBERNATORIAL RACES 660088 KNOWLEDGE OF DEM CANDIDATE FOR CONGRESS 660089 KNOWLEDGE OF REP CANDIDATE FOR CONGRESS 660090 KNOWLEDGE OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES-NUMBER OF CORRECT NAMES AND PARTIES 660091 DEM AND/OR REP CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES IN DISTRICT 660092 R'S KNOWLEDGE OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDACY PATTERNS IN DISTRICT 660093 WHICH CANDIDATE INCUMBENT CONGRESSMAN 660094 R'S KNOWLEDGE OF INCUMBENT CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE 660095 INCUMBENCY STATUS OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE 660096 REPUBLICAN % OF CONGRESSIONAL VOTE 660097 CONGRESSIONAL 1966 PARTY CANDIDACY PATTERN 660098 GUBERNATORIAL 1966 PARTY CANDIDACY PATTERN 660099 SENATORIAL 1966 PARTY CANDIDACY PATTERN 660100 WHICH PARTY HAD MORE CONGRESSMEN BEFORE ELECTION 660101 WHICH PARTY HAD MORE CONGRESSMEN AFTER ELECTION VOTING: WHERE, HOW, FOR WHOM 660102 DID R VOTE IN 1966 ELECTION 660103 R VOTED IN WHICH DISTRICT 660104 STATE OF ABSENTEE VOTE * 660105 CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT OF ABSENTEE VOTE 660106 VOTE BY VOTING MACHINE OR BY PAPER(BALLOT) 660107 DID R VOTE FOR IN THE ELECTION FOR GOVERNOR 660108 WHICH GUBERNATORIAL CANDIDATE DID R VOTE FOR 660109 DID R VOTE IN THE ELECTION FOR U.S. SENATOR 660110 WHICH SENATORIAL CANDIDATE DID R VOTE FOR 660111 DID R VOTE IN THE ELECTION FOR U.S. CONGRESSMAN 660112 WHICH CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE DID R VOTE FOR 660113 DID R VOTE STRAIGHT OR SPLIT TICKET FOR OTHER STATE AND LOCAL OFFICES 660114 SPLIT TICKET PATTERNS POLITICAL EFFICACY 660115 PEOPLE LIKE ME HAVE NO POLITICAL POWER 660116 VOTING EFFECTIVE POLITICAL WEAPON 660117 POLITICS COMPLICATED FOR PEOPLE 660118 PUBLIC OFFICIALS DON'T CARE FEELINGS TOWARDS GROUPS - 'FEELING THERMOMETER' 660119 R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS BIG BUSINESS 660120 R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS LIBERALS 660121 R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS CATHOLICS 660122 R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS LAWYERS 660123 R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS PROTESTANTS 660124 R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS DEMOCRATS 660125 R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS POLICEMEN 660126 R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS JEWS 660127 R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS LABOR UNIONS 660128 R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS WHITES 660129 R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS REPUBLICANS 660130 R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS NEGROES 660131 R'S FEELINGS TOWARDS CONSERVATIVES 660132 POLICEMEN-ARE ANY R'S FRIENDS OR RELATIVES 660133 LAWYERS-ARE ANY R'S FRIENDS OR RELATIVES 660134 R EVER TAKEN PART IN TRIAL 660135 WHICH OCCUPATIONS R ADMIRES MOST TRUST IN PEOPLE (ROSENBERG) 660136 PEOPLE CAN (NOT) BE TRUSTED-R'S OPINION 660137 PEOPLE SELFISH OR HELPFUL-R'S OPINION 660138 R'S ESTIMATE OF POLITICAL POWER OF PEOPLE LIKE HIMSELF SUPREME COURT QUESTIONS 660139 COVER SHEET 660140 SUPREME COURT-ANYTHING R DISLIKES 660141 SUPREME COURT-STRENGTH OF R'S DISLIKES 660142 SUPREME COURT-ANYTHING R LIKES 660143 SUPREME COURT-STRENGTH OF R'S LIKES 660144 SUPREME COURT-ROLE IN THE GOVERNMENT 660145 SUPREME COURT-HOW GOOD DOES ITS JOB 660146 SUPREME COURT-TOO MIXED UP IN POLITICS 660147 SUPREME COURT-R (NOT) SURE IT'S TOO MIXED UP IN POLITICS 660148 WHICH R TRUSTS MORE: SUPREME COURT OR CONGRESS 660149 TRUST MORE SUPREME COURT OR CONGRESS-R IS HOW SURE 660150 SUPREME COURT FAVORS SOME GROUPS 660151 SUPREME COURT FAVORS WHICH GROUPS 660152 OPEN HOUSING-R AGREES OR DISAGREES 660153 OPEN HOUSING-STRENGTH OF R'S OPINION 660154 OPEN HOUSING-DEPENDS ON WHAT 660155 SUPREME COURT AGAINST OPEN HOUSING-R'S FEELINGS 660156 SUPREME COURT AGAINST OPEN HOUSING-R'S VIEW OF COURT 660157 SUPREME COURT FAVORS OPEN HOUSING-R'S FEELINGS 660158 SUPREME COURT FAVORS OPEN HOUSING-R'S VIEW OF COURT 660159 FREEDOM TO SELL INDECENT MAGAZINES-R'S OPINION 660160 FREEDOM TO SELL INDECENT MAGAZINES-STRENGTH OF R'S OPINION 660161 INDECENT MAGAZINES-SALE DEPENDS ON WHAT 660162 SUPREME COURT AGAINST INDECENT MAGAZINES-R'S FEELINGS 660163 SUPREME COURT AGAINST INDECENT MAGAZINES-R'S VIEW OF COURT 660164 SUPREME COURT FAVORS INDECENT MAGAZINES-R'S FEELINGS 660165 SUPREME COURT FAVORS INDECENT MAGAZINES-R'S VIEW OF COURT 660166 NAMES OF SUPREME COURT JUSTICES 660167 CORRECT NAMES (GIVEN) OF SUPREME COURT JUSTICES 660168 HAS R HEARD OR READ ABOUT SUPREME COURT JUSTICES 660169 FAVORABLE MENTIONS ABOUT JUSTICES 660170 UNFAVORABLE MENTIONS ABOUT JUSTICES 660171 R HAS READ OR HEARD ABOUT CHANGES IN SUPREME COURT MEMBERSHIP 660172 R AGREES OR DISAGREES WITH CHANGES IN SUPREME COURT MEMBERSHIP 660173 CAN WE TRUST FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 660174 IMPACT OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ON PEOPLE 660175 POLITICAL POWER OF PEOPLE LIKE R 660176 GOVERNMENT RUN BY BIG INTERESTS 660177 ELECTIONS MAKE GOVERNMENT CARE 660178 (NOT) PUNISH PERSON WHO BREAKS LAW AGAINST HIS RELIGION 660179 BREAKING LAW AGAINST RELIGION-R'S COMMENTS 660180 POLICE TREATMENT 660181 POLICE TREATMENT IF R WENT TO ELECTED OFFICIAL 660182 BUREAUCRATIC TREATMENT 660183 BUREAUCRATIC TREATMENT IF R WENT TO ELECTED OFFICIAL LOCAL COMPETENCE 660184 LOCAL UNJUST LAW-R'S ACTION 660185 LOCAL UNJUST LAW-EFFECT OF R'S ACTION 660186 LOCAL UNJUST LAW-WOULD R ACT 660187 HOW HAS R TRIED TO INFLUENCE LOCAL DECISION NATIONAL COMPETENCE 660188 FEDERAL UNJUST LAW-R'S ACTION 660189 FEDERAL UNJUST LAW-EFFECT OF R'S ACTION 660190 FEDERAL UNJUST LAW-WOULD R ACT 660191 HOW HAS R TRIED TO INFLUENCE ACT OF CONGRESS PERSONAL DATA 660192 R'S DATE OF BIRTH 660193 R'S MARITAL STATUS 660194 CHILDREN UNDER 18 YRS. IN FAMILY 660195 AGE OF YOUNGEST CHILD 660196 R'S LIFE CYCLE 660197 R'S EDUCATION * 660198 COLLEGE R ATTENDED * 660199 HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD'S CURRENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS 660200 HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD WORKS FOR SELF OR OTHER 660201 HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD'S OCCUPATION-POLITICAL BEHAVIOR OCCUPATION CODE * 660202 HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD'S OCCUPATION-POLITICAL BEHAVIOR INDUSTRY CODE * 660203 HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD'S OCCUPATION-CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 660204 HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD'S OCCUPATION-DUNCAN SOCIO- ECONOMIC STATUS SCALE (QUESTIONS FOR FARMERS) 660205 R'S FULL-TIME OR PART-TIME FARMER 660206 FARMER'S PART-TIME JOB 660207 HOURS PER WEEK SPENT ON PART-TIME JOB 660208 WEEKS PER YEAR SPENT ON PART-TIME JOB 660209 OWN, MANAGE OR RENT FARM 660210 AMOUNT OF LAND FARMED 660211 TYPE OF FARMING DONE * 660212 FARM PRICE MOVEMENT IN PAST FOUR YEARS 660213 EFFECT OF GOVERNMENT POLICY ON CROP PRICES 660214 FARM SUBSIDIZATION-DOES R AGREE OR DISAGREE PERSONAL DATA (CONT.) 660215 WHO IN HOUSEHOLD A UNION MEMBER 660216 UNION AFFILIATION OF HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS * 660217 LENGTH OF UNION MEMBERSHIP 660218 R'S SOCIAL CLASS IDENTIFICATION-MIDDLE CLASS OR WORKING CLASS 660219 R'S SOCIAL CLASS-OWN RANKING 660220 R'S SOCIAL CLASS-BACKGROUND 660221 R'S CHURCH PREFERENCE * 660222 CHURCH ATTENDANCE 660223 WHERE WAS R BORN * 660224 GENERATIONS IN UNITED STATES 660225 PATRILINEAL ORIGIN * 660226 MATRILINEAL ORIGIN * 660227 NATIONALITY OF GRANDFATHER * 660228 FATHER'S OCCUPATION WHILE R WAS GROWING UP 660229 FARM FINANCIAL SITUATION-R IS A FARMER'S SON 660230 AREA WHERE R GREW UP * 660231 R'S AGE WHEN HE MOVED HERE 660232 SIZE OF PLACE WHERE R GREW UP 660233 LENGTH OF CURRENT RESIDENCE 660234 AREA OF PREVIOUS RESIDENCE 660235 EXPECTED 1966 INCOME * 660236 R'S SEX 660237 R'S RACE 660238 R'S RELATIONSHIP TO HEAD * 660239 OTHER PERSONS PRESENT DURING INTERVIEW 660240 R'S COOPERATION 660241 R'S INTEREST IN POLITICS 660242 R'S LEVEL OF POLITICAL INFORMATION