Version 01 Codebook ------------------- CODEBOOK INTRODUCTION FILE 1968 PRE-POST STUDY (1968.T) AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES 1968 PRE-POST ELECTION STUDY CONDUCTED BY THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER (45523) PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS POLITICAL BEHAVIOR PROGRAM UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SEPT. 6, 1968 - NOV. 4, 1968 NOV. 6, 1968 - FEB. 24, 1969 ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER 7281 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ASSISTANCE ALL MANUSCRIPTS UTILIZING DATA MADE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE CONSORTIUM SHOULD ACKNOWLEDGE THAT FACT AS WELL AS IDENTIFY THE ORIGINAL COLLECTOR OF THE DATA. THE ICPSR COUNCIL URGES ALL USERS OF ICPSR DATA FACILITIES TO FOLLOW SOME ADAPTATION OF THIS STATEMENT WITH THE PARENTHESES INDICATING ITEMS TO BE FILLED IN APPROPRIATELY OR DELETED BY THE INDIVIDUAL USER. THE DATA (AND TABULATIONS) UTILIZED IN THIS (PUBLICATION) WERE MADE AVAILABLE (IN PART) BY THE INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL RESEARCH. THE DATA FOR THE SRC 1968 AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY WERE ORIGINALLY COLLECTED BY THE POLITICAL BEHAVIOR PROGRAM OF THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER, INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH, THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN. NEITHER THE ORIGINAL COLLECTORS OF THE DATA NOR THE CONSORTIUM BEAR ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ANALYSES OR INTERPRETATIONS PRESENTED HERE. IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FUNDING AGENCIES WITH ESSENTIAL INFOR- MATION ABOUT THE USE OF ARCHIVAL RESOURCES, AND TO FACILITATE THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION ABOUT ICPSR PARTICIPANTS' RESEARCH ACTIVITIES, EACH USER OF THE ICPSR DATA FACILITIES IS EXPECTED TO SEND TWO COPIES OF EACH COMPLETED MANUSCRIPT TO THE CONSORTIUM. PLEASE INDICATE IN THE COVER LETTER WHICH DATA WERE USED. CONTENTS Note: >>sections in the codebook introduction and codebook appendix can be navigated in the machine-readable files by searching ">>". INTRODUCTORY MATERIAL (file int1968.cbk) --------------------- >> 1968 STUDY DESCRIPTION >> 1968 SAMPLING INFORMATION >> 1968 CODEBOOK INFORMATION >> 1968 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST CODEBOOK -------- 1968 variables APPENDICES (file app1968.cbk) ---------- >> REF. NO. 2 NOTE, 1968 >> REF. NO. 3 NOTE, 1968 >> REF. NO. 5 NOTE, 1968 >> 1968 STANDARD PRIMARY SAMPLING UNIT CODE >> 1968 THE STATE AND COUNTRY CODE >> 1968 PSU AND COUNTY CODES ALPHABETICALLY BY STATES >> REF. NO. 20 NOTE, 1968 >> REF. NOS. 28-37 NOTE, 1968 >> 1968 PARTY AND CANDIDATE MASTER CODES >> REF. NOS 48, 52, 56 NOTE, 1968 >> REF. NO. 68 NOTE, 1968 >> REF. NOS. 70-72 NOTE, 1968 >> 1968 ICPSR COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY CODE >> 1968 OCCUPATION CODES >> 1968 CENSUS INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION >> 1968 UNION CODE >> REF. NOS. 224-242 NOTE, 1968 >> 1968 THE NEWSPAPER CODE >> 1968 SENATORIAL, GUBERNATORIAL AND CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE LIST >> REF. NOS. 346, 350, 354, 358, 363, 365, 367, 371, 373, 375, 377 >> 1968 PARTY DIFFERENCES CODE >> 1968 PRECIPITATING EVENTS CODE >> 1968 PROBLEMS FACING EDUCATION IN R'S SCHOOL DISTRICT >> 1968 HOW TO HANDLE SCHOOL DISTRICT PROBLEM >> Q. 68A , Q. 69A , AND Q. 70A , 1968 >> INTRODUCTION MATERIAL TO THE "CANDIDATE THERMOMETER QUESTIONS" (REF. NOS. 478-489), 1968 >> 1968 STUDY DESCRIPTION THE 1968 AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY (SRC 45523) WAS CONDUCTED BY THE POLITICAL BEHAVIOR PROGRAM OF THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER, INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH, THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN. THE STUDY WAS SUPPORTED BY A GRANT FROM THE FORD FOUNDATION. IT IS THE TENTH IN A SERIES OF STUDIES OF NATIONAL ELECTIONS BEGINNING WITH THE 1948 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION. INTERVIEWING WAS CONDUCTED IN TWO WAVES. FOR THE FIRST OR PRE-ELECTION WAVE, THE INTERVIEWING STARTED IN THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER AND CONTINUED THROUGH THE FIRST FOUR DAYS IN NOVEMBER. THE POST-ELECTION INTERVIEWING BEGAN IMMEDI- ATELY AFTER ELECTION DAY AND ENDED IN THE LATTER DAYS OF FEBRUARY, 1969. THE OVERALL RESPONSE RATE FOR THE PRE- ELECTION SURVEY WAS 77%; THE OVERALL REINTERVIEW RATE OF THE 1673 PRE-ELECTION RESPONDENTS WAS 86.3%. TO COMPENSATE FOR A POST-ELECTION RESPONSE RATE UNEXPECTEDLY LOW, A TWO- PAGE MAIL QUESTIONNAIRE, INQUIRING ABOUT THE 1968 VOTING BE- HAVIOR, WAS SENT OUT TO 182 POST-ELECTION NON-INTERVIEWEES FOR WHOM A MAILING ADDRESS WAS AVAILABLE. THIS MAILING, AND A SUBSEQUENT ONE, BROUGHT RESPONSES FROM 36 OF THE ORIGINAL NON-INTERVIEWEES, THEREBY INCREASING THE OVERALL POST ELECTION RESPONSE RATE TO 88.5%. THE PRE-ELECTION SURVEY INQUIRED ABOUT THE RESPON- DENT'S ATTITUDES ON RACIAL ISSUES AND HIS RACIAL ENVIRONMENT, SUCH AS RACIAL MIX OF AREA SCHOOLS AND CO-WORKERS, AND OBTAINED INFORMATION ABOUT THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT IN A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT AREAS (HEALTH CARE, EDUCATION, STANDARD OF LIVING, JOB EQUALITY, INTEGRATION OF SCHOOLS AND PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS). OPINIONS ABOUT VIETNAM, FOREIGN AID AND TRADE, AND FOREIGN POLICY IN GENERAL WERE ALSO SOUGHT. OTHER MORE NARROWLY-DEFINED POLITICAL ITEMS GATHERED INFORMATION ON THE RESPON- DENT'S LIKES AND DISLIKES ABOUT THE PARTIES AND THE 1968 CANDIDATES, THE REACTIONS TO PARTY NOMINATIONS, INTEREST IN THE CAMPAIGN AND THE PRIMARY, PRESIDENTIAL VOTE INTENTION, AND PAST VOTING BEHAVIOR AS WELL AS PARTY AFFIL- IATION OF THE RESPONDENT AND HIS PARENTS. AS IN THE PAST, THE QUESTIONNAIRE INCLUDED AN INQUIRY INTO THE MAJOR PROB- LEMS FACING THE COUNTRY AND WAYS TO HANDLE THEM, AND "FEELING THERMOMETER" ITEMS ABOUT VARIOUS GROUPS IN THE NATION. THE PRE-ELECTION SURVEY ALSO OBTAINED PERSONAL DATA SUCH AS THE RESPONDENT'S FAMILY COMPOSITION, EDU- CATION AND UNION MEMBERSHIP OF THE RESPONDENT AND THE HEAD OF THE HOUSEHOLD, INFORMATION ON THE MAIN AND THE SECONDARY OCCUPATION OF BOTH THE HEAD AND THE RESPONDENT, THE RESPONDENT'S RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE, CLASS IDENTIFICATION, ETHNIC BACKGROUND AND IDENTIFICATION, INCOME, SEX, AND RACE. THE POST-ELECTION SURVEY CONCENTRATED ON THE ACTUAL VOTING BEHAVIOR IN THE VARIOUS RACES OF THE 1968 ELECTION. IT ALSO SOUGHT TO MEASURE THE NATURE AND THE EXTENT OF PO- LITICAL ACTIVITIES THAT THE RESPONDENT WAS INVOLVED IN DUR- ING THE CAMPAIGN, FOR EXAMPLE, CONTRIBUTIONS AND ATTEMPTS TO INFLUENCE OTHERS. A NUMBER OF ITEMS IN THIS PART OF THE STUDY INVESTIGATE THE DIFFERENCES THE RESPONDENT PERCEIVES BETWEEN THE DEMOCRATIC AND THE REPUBLICAN PARTIES, AND BETWEEN WALLACE AND THE TWO MAJOR PARTIES. IN ADDITION, QUESTIONS ABOUT A VARIETY OF EDUCATIONAL PROBLEMS, AND PRO- TEST AND CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE ARE INCLUDED, AS WELL AS TWO SCALES MEASURING THE RESPONDENT'S POSITION AND THE POSITION OF CERTAIN POLITICAL LEADERS WITH REGARD TO URBAN UNREST AND ACTION IN VIETNAM. "FEELING THERMOMETER" ITEMS ABOUT POS- SIBLE CANDIDATES IN 1972 ARE PRESENT IN THE POST-ELECTION SURVEY ALONG WITH QUESTIONS THAT INQUIRE ABOUT THE RESPON- DENT'S PERSONAL FINANCIAL SITUATION AND HIS OUTLOOK ON THE ECONOMIC FUTURE OF THE NATION AS A WHOLE. THE STUDY CON- CLUDES WITH A SERIES OF QUESTIONS DESIGNED TO MEASURE THE RESPONDENT'S POLITICAL TRUST AND CYNICISM, PERSONAL TRUST AND EFFECTIVENESS, TRUST IN GOVERNMENT, AND POLITICAL EFFICACY. AS IN THE 1964 ELECTION STUDY, THE RESPONDENTS IN THIS STUDY ARE DIVIDED INTO TWO SAMPLES--A CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE, CONSISTING OF 1557 RESPONDENTS, AND A BLACK SUPPLE- MENT SAMPLE OF 116 RESPONDENTS. THE LATTER GROUP WAS IN- TERVIEWED TO BROADEN THE BASE OF BLACK RESPONDENTS AVAILABLE TO RESEARCHERS INTERESTED IN THE RACIAL ISSUES INVESTIGATED IN THE STUDY. WHEN THE BLACK SUPPLEMENT IS COMBINED WITH THE BLACKS FROM THE CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE, A RAW N OF 265 BLACK RESPONDENTS IS AVAILABLE. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON THE CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF THE CROSS-SECTION AND THE ALL- BLACK SAMPLE, OR THE COMBINED CROSS-SECTION AND SUPPLEMENT SAMPLE, SEE THE SECTION OF THIS INTRODUCTION ENTITLED "TYPES OF SAMPLES". >> 1968 SAMPLING INFORMATION INDIVIDUALS INTERVIEWED IN THE 1968 ELECTION STUDY FORM A REPRESENTATIVE CROSS-SECTION OF VOTING AGE CITIZENS LIVING IN PRIVATE HOUSEHOLDS IN THE CONTIGUOUS UNITED STATES. THE TWELVE LARGEST METROPOLITAN AREAS OF THE UNITED STATES WERE DRAWN WITH CERTAINTY. THE REST OF THE COUNTRY WAS FORMED INTO 62 STRATA (CONTAINING TWO OR MORE PRIMARY SAMPLING UNITS), FROM EACH OF WHICH A PRIMARY SAMPLING UNIT (CONSISTING OF A COUNTY OR GROUP OF COUNTIES) WAS DRAWN WITH PROBABILITY PROPORTIONAL TO ITS 1960 POPULATION. ULTIMATE- LY, THE SELECTION PROCEDURE WITHIN THESE 74 PSU'S YIELDED A SAMPLE OF PRIVATE HOUSEHOLDS. RESPONDENTS WERE SELECTED FROM THESE HOUSEHOLDS BY AN OBJECTIVE PROCEDURE OF SELEC- TION WHICH ALLOWED NO SUBSTITUTIONS. THIS SAMPLE IS REPRE- SENTATIVE OF THE FOUR MAJOR REGIONS (NORTHEAST, NORTH CEN- TRAL, SOUTH, AND WEST) OF THE UNITED STATES AS WELL AS THE ENTIRE UNITED STATES. DETAILED DESCRIPTIONS OF THE SAMPLING PROCEDURE CAN BE FOUND IN LESLIE KISH AND IRENE HESS, THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER'S NATIONAL SAMPLE OF DWELLINGS (ANN ARBOR: THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN) AND LESLIE KISH, SURVEY SAMPLING (NEW YORK: JOHN WILEY AND SONS, 1964). THE PRE-ELECTION SAMPLE WAS DIVIDED INTO TWO RANDOM HALF- SAMPLES EACH OF WHICH COMPOSES A NATIONAL CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE OF CITIZENS OF VOTING AGE. CHANGES IN VOTING INTENTIONS AND SHIFTS IN ATTITUDE TOWARD MAJOR ISSUES DURING THE INTER- VIEWING PERIOD CAN BE ANALYZED BY COMPARING THE HALF- SAMPLES. THE FIRST HALF-SAMPLE INTERVIEWS WERE OBTAINED BEFORE OCTOBER 9, 1968 AND THE SECOND HALF-SAMPLE INTERVIEWS BETWEEN OCTOBER 10, 1968 AND NOVEMBER 4, 1968. IN ORDER TO PROVIDE A MORE RELIABLE SAMPLE OF BLACKS, AN ADDITIONAL SET OF BLACKS WAS SAMPLED AND ASKED ALL OF THE APPLICABLE QUESTIONS FOUND IN THE INTERVIEW SCHEDULE. THE 116 BLACKS IN THIS SAMPLE, WHEN ADDED TO THE 149 BLACK RE- SPONDENTS IN THE CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE, GIVE A MORE RELI- ABLE DATA BASE. THE SUPPLEMENTARY BLACKS WERE SAMPLED BY DIRECTING THE INTERVIEWER TO SEGMENTS (SMALL AREAS OF 3-6 DWELLINGS) IN WHICH ONE OR MORE BLACK HOUSEHOLDS HAD BEEN LOCATED IN PREVIOUS SRC STUDIES. IN GENERAL, THE PROCEDURE WAS TO SELECT ONE RESPONDENT FROM EACH BLACK HOUSEHOLD FOUND IN THE SEGMENT. A PRECISE DESCRIPTION OF THE SAMPLING PRO- CEDURE CAN BE FOUND IN THE INTERVIEWERS' "INSTRUCTION BOOK". THE INTERVIEWS WERE CODED BY THE SRC CODING SECTION UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF ARTHUR C. WOLFE AND JERROLD RUSK WHO ALSO ASSISTED WITH THE OTHER MAJOR PHASES OF THE STUDY. THE USUAL PRACTICE OF CHECK-CODING ONE OUT OF EVERY TEN IN- TERVIEWS WAS FOLLOWED. THIS RESULTED IN THE CALCULATION OF AN AVERAGE CODING ERROR OF 3.07 ERRORS PER INTERVIEW FOR THE PRE-ELECTION SURVEY, AND 3.36 FOR THE POST-ELECTION. TYPES OF SAMPLES THE DATA DESCRIBED BY THIS CODEBOOK MAY BE ACCESSED IN THREE DIFFERENT WAYS, YIELDING IN EFFECT THREE SEPARATE SAM- PLES, EACH WITH A DIFFERENT NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS: A. THE COMBINED SAMPLE (CROSS-SECTION PLUS BLACK SUPPLEMENT RESPONDENTS) USES ALL THE DATA CASES AVAILABLE IN THE ICPSR DATASET (RAW N OF 1673), AND REQUIRES THE USE OF A WEIGHT VARIABLE (V680003) TO MAKE THE SAMPLE VALID. THE USE OF THE COMBINED SAMPLE IS RECOMMENDED FOR CROSS-SECTION ANALYSIS WITH THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTION. BECAUSE THE BLACK SUPPLEMENT SLIGHTLY UNDER- REPRESENTS BLACKS IN MIXED NEIGHBORHOODS, THE USE OF THE COMBINED SAMPLE IS NOT RECOMMENDED FOR ANALYSIS ON QUESTIONS IN WHICH THE RACIAL ENVIRONMENT MIGHT HAVE AN INFLUENCE ON THE RESPONDENT'S ANSWER. WHERE THIS IS ANTICIPATED TO BE A PROBLEM, THE USER SHOULD WORK WITH THE CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE WHICH EXCLUDES THE BLACK SUPPLEMENT RESPONDENTS. PRE-ELECTION WAVE POST-ELECTION WAVE ----------------- ------------------ A) FILTER STATEMENT: A) FILTER STATEMENT: NONE EXCLUDE V680005 = 4-5 THIS FILTER EXCLUDES "NO POST-ELECTION" TYPE OF RESPONDENTS FROM THE COMBINED SAMPLE. B) PRE-ELECTION WAVE N B) POST-ELECTION WAVE N UNWEIGHTED = 1673 UNWEIGHTED = 1481 WEIGHTED = 3100 WEIGHTED = 2748 B. THE ALL-BLACK SAMPLE USES THE 149 BLACK RESPONDENTS FROM THE CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE AND THE 116 BLACK RESPONDENTS OF THE BLACK SUPPLEMENT TO YIELD A RAW N OF 265. THIS SAMPLE REQUIRES THE USE OF A WEIGHT VARIABLE (V680003). IT CAN BE OBTAINED BY USING A FILTER ON THE ICPSR DATASET TO INCLUDE ONLY THOSE RESPONDENTS CODED '2' IN REF. NO. 264 (R'S RACE). THE COMPARABLE WHITE SAMPLE FOR RACIAL ANALYSIS IS OBTAINED FROM THE CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE BY FILTERING OUT ALL BLACK RESPONDENTS FROM THAT SAMPLE. THIS ALL- WHITE SAMPLE FOLLOWS THE SAME RULES OUTLINED BELOW FOR THE CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE. PRE-ELECTION WAVE POST-ELECTION WAVE ----------------- ------------------ A) FILTER STATEMENT: A) FILTER STATEMENT: INCLUDE V680264 = 2 INCLUDE V680264=2 AND V680005=1-3 THIS FILTER INCLUDES THIS FILTER INCLUDES ONLY RESPONDENTS WHO ONLY BLACKS WITH POST- ARE BLACK. ELECTION INTERVIEWS. B) PRE-ELECTION WAVE N B) POST-ELECTION WAVE N UNWEIGHTED = 265 UNWEIGHTED = 225 WEIGHTED = 284 WEIGHTED = 241 C. THE CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE ALONE USES ONLY THE 1557 RE- SPONDENTS INTERVIEWED FOR THE NATIONAL CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE, AND EXCLUDES THE BLACK SUPPLEMENT. THIS SAMPLE DOES NOT REQUIRE THE USE OF A WEIGHT VARIABLE, BUT IT NECESSITATES USE OF A FILTER VARIABLE (V4) WHICH EXCLUDES THE BLACK SUPPLEMENT RESPONDENTS FROM THE ICPSR DATASET. PRE-ELECTION WAVE POST-ELECTION WAVE ----------------- ------------------ A) FILTER STATEMENT: A) FILTER STATEMENT: EXCLUDE V680004 = 5-6 EXCLUDE V680004=5-6 OR V680005=4-5 THIS FILTER EXCLUDES THIS FILTER EXCLUDES BLACK SUPPLEMENT RESPON- BLACK SUPPLEMENT RE- DENTS FROM THE ICPSR DA- SPONDENTS, AND "NO SET. POST-ELECTION" TYPE OF RESPONDENTS FROM THE CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE. B) PRE-ELECTION WAVE B) POST-ELECTION WAVE N = 1557 N = 1384 NOTE THAT NO OTHER SUBSET OF THESE RESPONDENTS YIELDS A VALID SAMPLE (E.G., THE BLACK SUPPLEMENT ALONE IS NOT A VALID SAMPLE, AND SHOULD NOT BE USED AS SUCH). FREQUENCIES CROSS-SECTION ONLY FREQUENCIES HAVE BEEN INSERTED FOR VARIABLES IN THE BODY OF THIS CODEBOOK. THE BLACK SUPPLE- MENT RESPONDENTS HAVE BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE VALUES RE- PORTED. >> 1968 CODEBOOK INFORMATION The following example from the 1948 NES study provides the standard format for codebook variable documentation. Note that NES studies which are not part of the Time-Series usually omit marginals and the descriptive content in lines 2-5 (except for variable name). Line 1 ============================== 2 VAR 480026 NAME-R NOT VT-WAS R REG TO VT 3 COLUMNS 61 - 61 4 NUMERIC 5 MD=0 OR GE 8 6 7 Q. 17. (IF R DID NOT VOTE) WERE YOU REGISTERED (ELIGIBLE) 8 TO VOTE. 9 ........................................................... 10 11 82 1. YES 12 149 2. NO 13 14 0 8. DK 15 9 9. NA 16 422 0. INAP., R VOTED Line 2 - VARIABLE NAME. Note that in the codebook the variable name (usually a 'number') does not include the "V" prefix which is used in the release SAS and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files) for all variables including those which do not have 'number' names. For example the variable "VERSION" in the codebook is "VVERSION" in the data definition files. Line 2 - "NAME". This is the variable label used in the SAS and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files). Some codebooks exclude this. Line 3 - COLUMNS. Columns in the ASCII data file (.dat file). Line 4 - CHARACTER OR NUMERIC. If numeric and the variable is a decimal rather than integer variable, the numer of decimal places is also indicated (e.g. "NUMERIC DEC 4") Line 5 - Values which are assigned to missing by default in the Study's SAS and and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files). Line 7 - Actual question text for survey variables or a description of non-survey variables (for example, congressional district). Survey items usually include the question number (for example "B1a.") from the Study questionnaire; beginning in 1996 non-survey items also have unique item numbers (for example "CSheet.1"). Line 9 - A dashed or dotted line usually separates question text from any other documentation which follows. Line 10- When present, annotation provided by Study staff is presented below the question text/description and preceding code values. Lines 11-16 Code values are listed with descriptive labels. Valid codes (those not having 'missing' status in line 5) are presented first, followed by the values described in line 5. For continuous variables, one line may appear providing the range of possible values. A blank line usually separates the 'valid' and 'missing' values. Lines 11-16 Marginals are usually provided for discrete variables. The counts may be unweighted or weighted; check the Study codebook introductory text to determine weight usage. >> 1968 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST VARIABLE VARIABLE LABEL -------- -------------- VERSION NES VERSION NUMBER DSETNO NES DATASET NUMBER 680001 ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER 680002 INTERVIEW NUMBER STUDY PROCEDURE, SAMPLING & WEIGHT VARIABLE 680003 WEIGHT VARIABLE 680004 TYPE OF PRE-ELECTION INTERVIEW 680005 TYPE OF POST-ELECTION INFORMATION OBTAINED 680006 PRIMARY SAMPLING UNIT 680007 PRIMARY SAMPLING UNIT AND PLACE IDENTIFICATION 680008 BELT CODE 680009 STANDARD SIZE CODE FOR CONSUMER FINANCE SURVEY 680010 STANDARD SIZE CODE FOR INTERIM SURVEYS 680011 DISTANCE TO CENTER OF CENTRAL CITY OF NEAREST SMSA 680012 DISTANCE TO CENTER OF CENTRAL CITY OF NEAREST SMSA OF AT LEAST 350,000 POPULATION 680013 REGION OF INTERVIEW 680014 STATE OF INTERVIEW 680015 STATE AND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT OF INTERVIEW 680016 ICPSR COUNTY CODE 680017 SAMPLING COUNTY CODE 680018 ADULT COMPOSITION OF PRIMARY FAMILY UNIT 680019 ADULT COMPOSITION OF SECONDARY FAMILY UNITS IN HOUSE 680020 NUMBER OF POLITICALLY ELIGIBLE ADULTS IN HOUSE 680021 INTERVIEWER'S NUMBER PRE-ELECTION WAVE 680022 DATE OF PRE-ELECTION INTERVIEW 680023 LENGTH OF PRE-ELECTION INTERVIEW 680024 CODER OF PRE-ELECTION INTERVIEW PREDICTION & CARE ABOUT 1968 RACE 680025 WHOM DOES R THINK WILL BE ELECTED PRESIDENT 680026 WILL IT BE A CLOSE RACE 680027 DOES R CARE MUCH WHO WINS THE PRESIDENCY LIKES & DISLIKES ABOUT PARTIES AND CANDIDATES 680028 WHAT DOES R LIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY 680029 WHAT DOES R DISLIKE ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY 680030 WHAT DOES R LIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY 680031 WHAT DOES R DISLIKE ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY 680032 WHAT DOES R LIKE ABOUT HUMPHREY 680033 WHAT DOES R DISLIKE ABOUT HUMPHREY 680034 WHAT DOES R LIKE ABOUT NIXON 680035 WHAT DOES R DISLIKE ABOUT NIXON 680036 WHAT DOES R LIKE ABOUT WALLACE 680037 WHAT DOES R DISLIKE ABOUT WALLACE PARTY NOMINATIONS & R'S REACTIONS TO THEM 680038 WHO DID R WANT TO WIN THE REPUBLICAN NOMINATION 680039 WAS R PARTICULARLY HAPPY NIXON WON THE NOMINATION 680040 WAS R PARTICULARLY UNHAPPY NIXON WON THE NOMINATION 680041 WHO WAS R'S 2ND REPUBLICAN CHOICE 680042 WHO DID R WANT TO WIN THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION 680043 WAS R PARTICULARLY HAPPY HUMPHREY WON THE NOMINATION 680044 WAS R PARTICULARLY UNHAPPY HUMPHREY WAS NOMINATED 680045 WHAT WAS R'S 2ND DEMOCRATIC CHOICE EVALUATION OF JOHNSON'S PERFORMANCE 680046 WOULD R HAVE FAVORED JOHNSON AS A CANDIDATE 680047 HOW WELL HAS PRESIDENT JOHNSON DONE HIS JOB MOST IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEMS 680048 WHAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM FOR WASHINGTON 680049 WHAT SHOULD BE DONE ABOUT (1ST PROBLEM) 680050 HOW STRONGLY DOES R FEEL ABOUT (1ST PROBLEM) 680051 WHICH PARTY WOULD DO WHAT R WANTS ON (1ST PROBLEM) 680052 WHAT IS THE 2ND MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM FOR WASHINGTON 680053 WHAT SHOULD BE DONE ABOUT (2ND PROBLEM) 680054 HOW STRONGLY DOES R FEEL ABOUT (2ND PROBLEM) 680055 WHICH PARTY WOULD DO WHAT R WANTS ON (2ND PROBLEM) 680056 WHAT IS THE 3RD MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM FOR WASHINGTON 680057 WHAT SHOULD BE DONE ABOUT (3RD PROBLEM 680058 HOW STRONGLY DOES R FEEL ABOUT (3RD PROBLEM) 680059 WHICH PARTY WOULD DO WHAT R WANTS ON (3RD PROBLEM) GOVERNMENT'S ROLE IN AID TO EDUCATION 680060 SHOULD FEDERAL GOVT AID EDUCATION 680061 WHICH PARTY MORE SUPPORTS FEDERAL AID TO EDUCATION POWER OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 680062 IS THE FEDERAL GOVT TOO POWERFUL 680063 WHICH PARTY SUPPORTS A STRONGER FEDERAL GOVT GOVERNMENT'S ROLE IN HEALTH CARE 680064 SHOULD FEDERAL GOVT SUPPORT COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CARE 680065 WHICH PARTY MORE SUPPORTS A STRONG HEALTH PLAN GOVERNMENT'S ROLE IN ENSURING STANDARD OF LIVING 680066 SHOULD FEDERAL GOVT ENSURE A GOOD STANDARD OF LIVING 680067 WHICH PARTY MORE SUPPORTS GOVT ROLE IN INCOMES EFFECT OF ELECTION ON R'S FINANCIAL SITUATION 680068 WILL THE ELECTION MAKE A DIFFERENCE TO R FINANCIALLY 680069 FRAME OF REFERENCE FOR ASSESSING FINANCIAL EFFECT AMOUNT OF TAX DOLLAR SPENT 680070 CENTS PER TAX DOLLAR SPENT FOR DEFENSE 680071 CENTS PER TAX DOLLAR SPENT FOR SOCIAL WELFARE 680072 CENTS PER TAX DOLLAR SPENT FOR FOREIGN AID GOVERNMENT'S ROLE IN JOB EQUALITY 680073 SHOULD FEDERAL GOVT ENSURE JOB OPPORTUNITY EQUALITY 680074 WHICH PARTY WILL MORE LIKELY OPPOSE DISCRIMINATION GOVERNMENT'S ROLE IN SCHOOL INTEGRATION 680075 SHOULD FEDERAL GOVT ENSURE SCHOOL INTEGRATION 680076 COMMENTS ON SCHOOL INTEGRATION 680077 WHICH PARTY WILL MORE LIKELY SUPPORT INTEGRATION GOVERNMENT'S ROLE IN ACCOMMODATIONS INTEGRATION 680078 SHOULD FEDERAL GOVT ENSURE ACCOMMODATIONS RIGHTS 680079 WHICH PARTY WILL LIKELY SUPPORT ACCOMMODATIONS RIGHTS CIVIL RIGHTS 680080 HOW MUCH HAS THE NEGRO'S POSITION CHANGED RECENTLY 680081 ARE CIVIL RIGHTS PEOPLE PUSHING TOO FAST 680082 HAVE MOST NEGRO CIVIL RIGHTS ACTIONS BEEN PEACEFUL 680083 HAVE NEGRO CIVIL RIGHTS ACTIONS HELPED THEIR CAUSE NEIGHBORHOOD SEGREGATION 680084 DO NEGROES HAVE A RIGHT TO LIVE WHEREVER THEY WANT 680085 DOES R FEEL STRONGLY ON THE HOUSING INTEGRATION ISSUE RACIAL STAND OF R & THOSE IN HIS AREA 680086 HOW MANY NEGROES IN R'S AREA FAVOR DESEGREGATION 680087 HOW MANY WHITES IN R'S AREA FAVOR SEGREGATION 680088 DOES R FAVOR DESEGREGATION RACIAL MIX OF R'S ENVIRONMENT 680089 WHAT IS THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF R'S NEIGHBORHOOD 680090 WHAT IS THE RACIAL MIX OF THE NEAREST GRADE SCHOOL 680091 WHAT IS THE RACIAL MIX OF THE NEAREST JUNIOR HIGH 680092 WHAT IS THE RACIAL MIX OF THE NEAREST HIGH SCHOOL 680093 WHAT IS THE RACIAL MIX AT R'S JOB 680094 WHAT IS THE RACIAL MIX OF THOSE WHO SHOP WHERE R DOES 680095 WAT IS THE RACIAL MIX OF R'S FRIENDS FOREIGN AID, DIPLOMACY & FOREIGN TRADE 680096 WHAT IS R'S POSITION ON FOREIGN AID 680097 WHICH PARTY MORE LIKELY SUPPORTS FOREIGN AID 680098 SHOULD OUR LEADERS SIT DOWN AND TALK WITH COMMUNISTS 680099 WHICH PARTY MORE LIKELY SUPPORTS SUMMIT CONFERENCES 680100 SHOULD THE U.S. TRADE WITH COMMUNIST NATIONS 680101 WHICH PARTY MORE LIKELY SUPPORTS COMMUNIST TRADE VIETNAM WAR 680102 HOW MUCH ATTENTION HAS R BEEN PAYING TO VIETNAM 680103 WERE WE RIGHT IN GETTING INTO VIETNAM 680104 WHAT SHOULD WE DO NOW IN VIETNAM 680105 VIETNAM COMMENTS 680106 WHICH PARTY TAKES A STRONGER STAND ON VIETNAM CHINA & CUBA 680107 IS THE CHINESE GOVT COMMUNIST AND U.N. MEMBER 680108 SHOULD CHINA BE ADMITTED TO THE U.N. 680109 IS CUBA'S GOVT COMMUNIST AND HOW SHOULD WE HANDLE IT 680110 WHICH OF VIETNAM, CHINA, AND CUBA CONCERNS R MOST 680111 WHICH OF VIETNAM, CHINA, AND CUBA CONCERNS R LEAST U.S. FOREIGN POLICY: EVALUATION OF PAST YEAR 680112 HOW HAVE U.S. FOREIGN RELATIONS BEEN IN THE PAST YEAR 680113 R'S FRAME OF REFERENCE FOR JUDGMENT ON U.S. DIPLOMACY 680114 HAS OUR WORLD POSITION GROWN STRONGER IN A YEAR OR SO 680115 R'S FRAME OF REFERENCE FOR JUDGMENT ON U.S. STRENGTH BIGGER WAR 680116 ARE WE LIKELY TO GET INTO A BIGGER WAR 680117 WHICH PARTY WOULD BETTER KEEP US OUT OF A BIGGER WAR 680118 WHY WOULD (CHOSEN PARTY) BETTER KEEP US OUT OF WAR R'S PARTY AFFILIATION: PRESENT, PAST 680119 WHICH PARTY DOES R CONSIDER SELF AS 680120 HOW STRONGLY (PARTY OR INDEPENDENT) DOES R FEEL 680121 DID R EVER THINK OF SELF AS ANOTHER PARTY 680122 WHEN DID R CHANGE TO PRESENT PARTY R'S PARENTS: PARTY AFFILIATION & POLITICAL INTEREST 680123 WAS R'S FATHER VERY MUCH INTERESTED IN POLITICS 680124 WHAT PARTY DID R'S FATHER THINK OF SELF AS 680125 WAS R'S MOTHER VERY MUCH INTERESTED IN POLITICS 680126 WHAT PARTY DID R'S MOTHER THINK OF SELF AS PAST PRESIDENTIAL VOTING BEHAVIOR 680127 HAS R VOTED IN MOST PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS 680128 HAS R ALWAYS VOTED FOR THE SAME PARTY 680129 WHOM DID R VOTE FOR FOR PRESIDENT IN 1964 1968 CAMPAIGN: INTEREST, VOTE INTENTION 680130 HAS R BEEN VERY INTERESTED IN THIS YEAR'S CAMPAIGN 680131 IS R REGISTERED FOR THIS ELECTION 680132 DOES R EXPECT TO VOTE IN THIS ELECTION 680133 WHO WILL R VOTE FOR FOR PRESIDENT 680134 WHO WOULD R VOTE FOR FOR PRESIDENT 680135 WHAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT REASON FOR R'S CHOICE ELECTORAL MAJORITY ISSUE 680136 IS IT LIKELY THAT NO ONE WILL GET A MAJORITY 680137 WHY IS IT LIKELY THAT NO ONE WILL GET A MAJORITY 680138 HAS THE PROBLEM OF NO MAJORITY AFFECTED YOUR CHOICE 1968 PRIMARY 680139 DID R VOTE IN A PRIMARY THIS YEAR 680140 WAS THERE A PARTICULAR PRIMARY R WAS INTERESTED IN POLITICAL EFFICACY 680141 DO PUBLIC OFFICIALS CARE WHAT PEOPLE LIKE R THINK 680142 IS VOTING THE ONLY WAY PEOPLE LIKE R CAN HAVE A SAY 680143 IS GOVT TOO COMPLEX FOR PEOPLE LIKE R TO UNDERSTAND 680144 DO PEOPLE LIKE R HAVE LOT OF SAY IN GOVERNMENT PERSONAL DATA 680145 R'S DATE OF BIRTH 680146 R'S MARITAL STATUS FAMILY COMPOSITION 680147 NUMBER OF CHILDREN IN R'S FAMILY UNDER 18 680148 AGE OF THE OLDEST CHILD 680149 AGE OF THE YOUNGEST CHILD 680150 NUMBER OF CHILDREN 4 YEARS OLD OR LESS 680151 NUMBER OF CHILDREN 5 THROUGH 11 YEARS OLD 680152 NUMBER OF CHILDREN 12 THROUGH 14 YEARS OLD 680153 NUMBER OF CHILDREN 15 THROUGH 18 YEARS OLD 680154 HOW MANY OF THE CHILDREN GO TO SCHOOL IN R'S AREA 680155 DO THE CHILDREN GO TO PUBLIC SCHOOLS R'S & HEAD'S EDUCATION AND COLLEGES 680156 R'S EDUCATIONAL LEVEL 680157 HEAD'S EDUCATIONAL LEVEL 680158 R'S COLLEGES 680159 HEAD'S COLLEGES R'S MAIN OCCUPATION SECTION 680160 R'S EMPLOYMENT STATUS 680161 R'S MAIN OCCUPATION - WHAT KIND OF WORK IS IT 680162 R'S MAIN OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 680163 R'S MAIN OCCUPATION - DUNCAN SES 680164 R'S MAIN OCCUPATION - DUNCAN DECILE 680165 R'S MAIN OCCUPATION - CENSUS SES 680166 R'S MAIN OCCUPATION - IS R SELF-EMPLOYED 680167 R'S MAIN OCCUPATION - DOES R WORK FULL-TIME HEAD'S MAIN OCCUPATION SECTION 680168 HEAD'S EMPLOYMENT STATUS 680169 HEAD'S MAIN OCCUPATION - WHAT KIND OF WORK IS IT 680170 HEAD'S MAIN OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 680171 HEAD'S MAIN OCCUPATION - DUNCAN SES 680172 HEAD'S MAIN OCCUPATION - DUNCAN DECILE 680173 HEAD'S MAIN OCCUPATION - CENSUS SES 680174 HEAD'S MAIN OCCUPATION - IS HEAD SELF-EMPLOYED 680175 HEAD'S MAIN OCCUPATION - DOES HEAD WORK FULL TIME R'S SECOND OCCUPATION SECTION 680176 R'S 2ND OCCUPATION - WHAT KIND OF WORK IS IT 680177 R'S 2ND OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 680178 R'S 2ND OCCUPATION - DUNCAN SES 680179 R'S 2ND OCCUPATION - DUNCAN DECILE 680180 R'S 2ND OCCUPATION - CENSUS SES 680181 R'S 2ND OCCUPATION - IS R SELF-EMPLOYED 680182 R'S 2ND OCCUPATION - DOES R WORK FULL-TIME HEAD'S SECOND OCCUPATION SECTION 680183 HEAD'S 2ND OCCUPATION - WHAT KIND OF WORK IS IT 680184 HEAD'S 2ND OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 680185 HEAD'S 2ND OCCUPATION - DUNCAN SES 680186 HEAD'S 2ND OCCUPATION - DUNCAN DECILE 680187 HEAD'S 2ND OCCUPATION - CENSUS SES 680188 HEAD'S 2ND OCCUPATION - IS HEAD SELF-EMPLOYED 680189 HEAD'S 2ND OCCUPATION - DOES HEAD WORK FULL-TIME R'S & HEAD'S UNEMPLOYMENT: LENGTH, RECENCY 680190 R'S LENGTH OF UNEMPLOYMENT 680191 R'S RECENCY OF UNEMPLOYMENT 680192 HEAD'S LENGTH OF UNEMPLOYMENT 680193 HEAD'S RECENCY OF UNEMPLOYMENT FARMERS' QUESTIONS 680194 DOES R OWN, RENT, OR MANAGE R'S FARM 680195 HOW MUCH LAND DOES R FARM 680196 WHAT KIND OF FARMING DOES R DO MOSTLY 680197 HAVE PRICES FOR R'S PRODUCE RISEN IN THE LAST 4 YEARS 680198 HOW MUCH EFFECT HAS GOVT HAD ON CROP PRICES 680199 SHOULD GOVT SUBSIDIZE AGRICULTURE 680200 DOES R FEEL STRONGLY ABOUT SUBSIDIZED AGRICULTURE UNION MEMBERSHIP: R, HEAD, OTHER HOUSEHOLD MEMBER 680201 DOES ANYONE IN R'S HOUSEHOLD BELONG TO A UNION 680202 WHAT UNION DOES R BELONG TO 680203 HOW LONG HAS R BELONGED TO THAT UNION 680204 WHAT UNION DOES HEAD BELONG TO 680205 HOW LONG HAS HEAD BELONGED TO THAT UNION 680206 WHAT UNION DOES OTHER HOUSEHOLD MEMBER BELONG TO 680207 HOW LONG HAS OTHER MEMBER BELONGED TO THAT UNION R'S CLASS IDENTIFICATION 680208 DOES R THINK OF SELF AS MIDDLE OR WORKING CLASS 680209 WHICH CLASS DOES R THINK OF SELF AS 680210 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO (CHOSEN CLASS) PEOPLE 680211 IN WHAT SOCIAL CLASS WOULD OTHERS PLACE R 680212 WHAT CLASS WAS R'S FAMILY WHEN R WAS GROWING UP R'S RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE 680213 R'S RELIGION 680214 HOW OFTEN DOES R GO TO CHURCH 680215 WHAT IS R'S OPINION ON THE BIBLE MILITARY SERVICE & VIETNAM TROOP BUILDUP 680216 HAS R SERVED IN THE ARMED FORCES IN THE PAST 6 YEARS 680217 DID R SERVE ANY TIME IN VIETNAM 680218 HAVE ANY FAMILY MEMBERS SERVED IN THE PAST 6 YEARS 680219 DID THE MEMBER SERVE DUE TO THE VIETNAM TROOP-BUILDUP 680220 DID THE MEMBER SERVE ANY TIME IN VIETNAM 680221 HAVE ANY OTHER RELATIVES OR FRIENDS SERVED RECENTLY 680222 DID THE PERSON SERVE DUE TO THE VIETNAM TROOP-BUILDUP 680223 DID THE PERSON SERVE ANY TIME IN VIETNAM "FEELING THERMOMETER" - GROUPS IN SOCIETY 680224 FEELING THERMOMETER - BIG BUSINESS 680225 FEELING THERMOMETER - LIBERALS 680226 FEELING THERMOMETER - SOUTHERNERS 680227 FEELING THERMOMETER - CATHOLICS 680228 FEELING THERMOMETER - POLICEMAN 680229 FEELING THERMOMETER - COLLEGE STUDENTS 680230 FEELING THERMOMETER - DEMOCRATS 680231 FEELING THERMOMETER - THE MILITARY 680232 FEELING THERMOMETER - JEWS 680233 FEELING THERMOMETER - WHITES 680234 FEELING THERMOMETER - VIETNAM WAR PROTESTERS 680235 FEELING THERMOMETER - LABOR UNIONS 680236 FEELING THERMOMETER - LAWYERS 680237 FEELING THERMOMETER - REPUBLICANS 680238 FEELING THERMOMETER - SCHOOL TEACHERS 680239 FEELING THERMOMETER - PROTESTANTS 680240 FEELING THERMOMETER - NEGROES 680241 FEELING THERMOMETER - CONSERVATIVES 680242 FEELING THERMOMETER - CITY AND COUNTY OFFICIALS R'S ETHNIC BACKGROUND & IDENTIFICATION 680243 R'S BIRTHPLACE 680244 WERE BOTH R'S PARENTS BORN IN THE US 680245 WHICH COUNTRY WAS R'S FATHER BORN IN 680246 WHICH COUNTRY WAS R'S MOTHER BORN IN 680247 WHICH COUNTRY WAS R'S FAMILY FROM - FATHER'S SIDE 680248 WHICH COUNTRY WAS R'S FAMILY FROM - MOTHER'S SIDE 680249 WHAT NATIONALITY DOES R CONSIDER R'S FAMILY 680250 R'S MAIN NATIONALITY 680251 FEELING THERMOMETER - R'S MAIN NATIONALITY R'S FATHER'S OCCUPATION 680252 WHAT KIND OF WORK DID R'S FATHER DO 680253 R'S FATHER'S OCCUPATION - DUNCAN SES 680254 R'S FATHER'S OCCUPATION - DUNCAN DECILE 680255 R'S FATHER'S OCCUPATION - CENSUS SES 680256 WAS R'S FAMILY WELL OFF ON THE FARM WHEN R WAS YOUNG WHERE WAS R BROUGHT UP 680257 WHAT STATE(S) DID R GROW UP IN 680258 AT WHAT AGE DID R COME TO (PRESENT STATE) 680259 WHAT SIZE COMMUNITY WAS R BROUGHT UP IN 680260 HOW LONG HAS R LIVED IN (PRESENT COMMUNITY) R'S INCOME 680261 WHAT WILL R AND FAMILY'S TOTAL INCOME BE THIS YEAR 680262 DOES R OWN OR RENT R'S HOME SEX, RACE, RELATIONSHIP TO HEAD 680263 R'S SEX 680264 R'S RACE 680265 RELATIONSHIP OF R TO HEAD CONDITIONS OF THE PRE-ELECTION INTERVIEW 680266 WHAT OTHER PERSONS WERE PRESENT AT THE INTERVIEW 680267 EXTENT OF R'S COOPERATION 680268 LEVEL OF R'S INTEREST IN POLITICS 680269 LEVEL OF R'S INFORMATION ABOUT POLITICS POST-ELECTION WAVE 680270 POST-ELECTION SEQUENCE NUMBER 680271 INTERVIEWER NUMBER 680272 DATE OF POST-ELECTION INTERVIEW 680273 LENGTH OF POST-ELECTION INTERVIEW 680274 POST-ELECTION CODER NUMBER R'S PERSONAL FINANCIAL SITUATION: PRESENT, FUTURE 680275 IS R BETTER OFF FINANCIALLY THAN A YEAR AGO 680276 FACTORS AFFECTING FINANCIAL STATUS OF R AND FAMILY 680277 IS R AND FAMILY MAKING AS MUCH MONEY AS A YEAR AGO 680278 WILL R BE BETTER OFF A YEAR FROM NOW 680279 WILL THE RECENT TAX INCREASE AFFECT HOW R WILL SPEND 680280 WILL THE RECENT TAX INCREASE AFFECT HOW R WILL SAVE INFLATION, RECESSION, BUSINESS CONDITIONS 680281 DOES R THINK PRICES WILL GO UP IN THE NEXT YEAR 680282 HOW LARGE A PRICE INCREASE DOES R EXPECT 680283 WILL NATIONAL BUSINESS CONDITIONS BE GOOD NEXT YEAR 680284 WHY DOES R THINK BUSINESS CONDITIONS WILL BE GOOD/BAD 680285 IS DEPRESSION OR GOOD TIMES MORE LIKELY NEXT 5 YEARS 680286 ARE BUSINESS CONDITIONS BETTER THAN A YEAR AGO 680287 HAS R HEARD OF ANY CHANGES IN CONDITIONS RECENTLY 680288 WILL BUSINESS CONDITIONS BE BETTER A YEAR FROM NOW 680289 WILL A RECESSION LIKE 1958 OR 1960-61 HAPPEN AGAIN 680290 WHY IS SUCH A RECESSION LIKELY 680291 WHEN WILL A RECESSION OCCUR THE 1968 ELECTION & THE MASS MEDIA 680292 DID R FOLLOW THE ELECTION REGULARLY IN NEWSPAPERS 680293 WHAT PAPER DID R READ MOST FOR POLITICAL NEWS 680294 DID THE NEWSPAPER TAKE SIDES IN THE CAMPAIGN 680295 WHO WAS THE NEWSPAPER FOR/AGAINST 680296 DID R LISTEN TO MANY CAMPAIGN RADIO PROGRAMS 680297 DID THE RADIO REPORTING TAKE SIDES IN THE CAMPAIGN 680298 WHO WAS THE RADIO REPORTING FOR/AGAINST 680299 DID R READ MANY MAGAZINE ARTICLES ON THE CAMPAIGN 680300 WHICH MAGAZINES DID R READ POLITICAL ARTICLES IN 680301 DID (MAGAZINE MOST READ) TAKE SIDES IN THE CAMPAIGN 680302 WHO WAS THE MAGAZINE FOR/AGAINST 680303 DID R WATCH ANY PROGRAMS ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN ON TV 680304 DID THE TELEVISION REPORTING TAKE SIDES 680305 WHO WAS THE TELEVISION REPORTING FOR/AGAINST 680306 DID LOCAL OR NATIONAL TELEVISION TAKE SIDES 680307 FROM WHICH MEDIUM DID R GET THE MOST INFORMATION CHICAGO POLICE & DEMOCRATIC CONVENTION 680308 DID THE CHICAGO POLICE USE TOO MUCH FORCE 680309 CHICAGO POLICE COMMENTS R'S 1968 ELECTION VOTING BEHAVIOR 680310 DID R VOTE IN THIS ELECTION 680311 DID R VOTE IN R'S PRESENT AREA 680312 STATE R VOTED IN IF R VOTED OUTSIDE PRESENT AREA 680313 DISTRICT VOTED IN IF R VOTED OUTSIDE OF PRESENT AREA 680314 DID R VOTE IN PERSON 680315 DID R VOTE BY VOTING MACHINE PRESIDENTIAL VOTE 680316 WHOM DID R VOTE FOR FOR PRESIDENT 680317 WHY DID R VOTE FOR (CHOSEN CANDIDATE) 680318 HOW LONG BEFORE THE ELECTION DID R DECIDE R'S VOTE SENATORIAL VOTE 680319 DID R VOTE FOR U.S. SENATOR 680320 WHOM DID R VOTE FOR FOR SENATOR 680321 SENATORIAL PARTY CANDIDACY PATTERN CONGRESSIONAL VOTE 680322 DID R VOTE FOR CONGRESSMAN 680323 WHOM DID R VOTE FOR FOR CONGRESSMAN 680324 CONGRESSIONAL PARTY CANDIDACY PATTERN GUBERNATORIAL VOTE 680325 DID R VOTE FOR GOVERNOR 680326 WHOM DID R VOTE FOR FOR GOVERNOR 680327 GUBERNATORIAL PARTY CANDIDACY PATTERN OTHER STATE & LOCAL OFFICES 680328 DID R VOTE A STRAIGHT TICKET FOR OTHER OFFICES PROPOSITIONS ON BALLOT 680329 WERE THERE ANY PROPOSITIONS R WAS INTERESTED IN 680330 PRESENCE OF PROPOSITIONS ON R'S BALLOT 680331 R'S KNOWLEDGE OF PROPOSITIONS ON BALLOT 680332 TYPE OF PROPOSITION R WAS INTERESTED IN 680333 DID R VOTE IN FAVOR OF (MENTIONED PROSITION) 680334 WAS (MENTIONED PROPOSITION) A STATE OR LOCAL ISSUE 680335 WHAT WAS THE MAIN REASON R DID NOT VOTE NATIONAL AND LOCAL CLOSENESS OF 1968 RACE 680336 WHOM DID R THINK WOULD WIN THE PRESIDENCY 680337 HOW CLOSE DID R THINK THE ELECTION WOULD BE NATIONALLY 680338 HOW CLOSE DID R THINK WALLACE WOULD COME NATIONALLY 680339 WHOM DID R THINK WOULD CARRY R'S STATE 680340 HOW CLOSE DID R THINK IT WOULD BE IN R'S STATE 680341 HOW CLOSE DID R THINK WALLACE WOULD COME IN R'S STATE PAST VOTING BEHAVIOR IN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS 680342 YEAR OF R'S BIRTH 680343 HOW MANY PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS HAS R VOTED IN 680344 HOW MANY TIMES DID R VOTE FOR THE DEMOCRAT REPUBLICAN-DEMOCRATIC PARTY DIFFERENCES 680345 WHAT DIFFERENCES ARE THERE BETWEEN THE TWO PARTIES 680346 CONTENT OF 1ST DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE PARTIES 680347 WHEN DID R FIRST NOTICE THE 1ST DIFFERENCE 680348 WHAT MADE R AWARE OF THE 1ST DIFFERENCE 680349 ARE THERE ANY MORE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE PARTIES 680350 CONTENT OF 2ND DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE PARTIES 680351 WHEN DID R FIRST NOTICE THE 2ND DIFFERENCE 680352 WHAT MADE R AWARE OF THE 2ND DIFFERENCE 680353 ARE THERE ANY MORE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE PARTIES 680354 CONTENT OF 3RD DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE PARTIES 680355 WHEN DID R FIRST NOTICE THE 3RD DIFFERENCE 680356 WHAT MADE R AWARE OF THE 3RD DIFFERENCE 680357 ARE THERE ANY MORE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE PARTIES 680358 CONTENT OF 4TH DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE PARTIES 680359 WHEN DID R FIRST NOTICE THE 4TH DIFFERENCE 680360 WHAT MADE R AWARE OF THE 4TH DIFFERENCE CONSERVATIVE-LIBERAL PARTY DIFFERENCES 680361 IS ONE PARTY MORE CONSERVATIVE THAN THE OTHER 680362 1ST CONSERVATIVE-LIBERAL DIFFERENCE - REFERENCE CODE 680363 CONTENT OF 1ST CONSERVATIVE-LIBERAL PARTY DIFFERENCE 680364 2ND CONSERVATIVE-LIBERAL DIFFERENCE - REFERENCE CODE 680365 CONTENT OF 2ND CONSERVATIVE-LIBERAL PARTY DIFFERENCE 680366 3RD CONSERVATIVE-LIBERAL DIFFERENCE - REFERENCE CODE 680367 CONTENT OF 3RD CONSERVATIVE-LIBERAL PARTY DIFFERENCE WALLACE COMPARED TO DEMOCRATS/REPUBLICANS 680368 DOES R CONSIDER WALLACE AND LEMAY PARTY LEADERS 680369 WHY ARE WALLACE AND LEMAY (NOT) PARTY LEADERS 680370 ARE THERE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WALLACE AND REPUBLICANS 680371 CONTENT OF 1ST WALLACE-REPUBLICAN DIFFERENCE 680372 ANY OTHER DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WALLACE AND REPUBLICANS 680373 CONTENT OF 2ND WALLACE-REPUBLICAN DIFFERENCE 680374 ARE THERE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WALLACE AND DEMOCRATS 680375 CONTENT OF 1ST WALLACE-DEMOCRATIC DIFFERENCE 680376 ANY OTHER DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WALLACE AND DEMOCRATS 680377 CONTENT OF 2ND WALLACE-DEMOCRATIC DIFFERENCE R'S KNOWLEDGE OF DISTRICT'S CONGRESSIONAL RACE 680378 DOES R REMEMBER THE CANDIDATES FOR U.S. CONGRESS 680379 R'S KNOWLEDGE OF REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE 680380 R'S KNOWLEDGE OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES-NAME & PARTY 680381 DID BOTH PARTIES RUN CANDIDATES FOR CONGRESS 680382 CORRECTNESS OF R'S PERCEPTION OF CANDIDACY PATTERNS 680383 IS (EITHER OF THE CANDIDATES) ALREADY IN CONGRESS 680384 ACTUAL INCUMBENCY STATUS OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES 680385 CORRECTNESS OF R'S PERCEPTION OF INCUMBENCY STATUS 680386 WHICH PARTY HAD MORE CONGRESSMEN BEFORE THE ELECTION 680387 WHICH PARTY JUST ELECTED THE MOST CONGRESSMEN POLITICAL ACTIVITIES DURING THE CAMPAIGN R'S ATTEMPTS TO INFLUENCE OTHERS' VOTE 680388 DID R TRY TO CONVINCE SOMEONE HOW TO VOTE 680389 DID R TALK TO SPOUSE ABOUT VOTING 680390 DID R TALK TO A RELATIVE ABOUT VOTING 680391 DID R TALK TO A FRIEND ABOUT VOTING 680392 DID R TALK TO A CO-WORKER ABOUT VOTING 680393 DID R TALK TO ANYONE ELSE ABOUT VOTING 680394 WHO IS THE "ANYONE ELSE" R TALKED TO ABOUT VOTING 680395 IDENTITY OF MULTIPLE RESPONSES FOR REF. NOS. 389-393 680396 WHOM DID R TELL THEM TO VOTE FOR MEETINGS, BUTTONS, CANVASSING 680397 DID R ATTEND ANY POLITICAL MEETINGS OR RALLIES 680398 DID R WORK FOR A PARTY OR CANDIDATE 680399 DID R WEAR A BUTTON OR PUT A STICKER ON THE CAR 680400 DOES R BELONG TO A POLITICAL GROUP OTHERS' ATTEMPTS TO INFLUENCE R'S VOTE 680401 DID A POLITICAL WORKER TALK TO R 680402 HOW MANY TIMES DID POLITICAL WORKERS TALK TO R 680403 HOW MANY TIMES DID REPUBLICANS TALK TO R 680404 HOW MANY TIMES DID DEMOCRATS TALK TO R 680405 HOW MANY TIMES DID ANOTHER PARTY TALK TO R 680406 WHAT OTHER PARTY TALKED TO R 680407 WHAT SPECIFICALLY DID THESE PEOPLE DISCUSS WITH R 680408 DID ANYONE CLOSE TO R TRY TO TELL R HOW TO VOTE 680409 DID R'S SPOUSE TELL R WHO TO VOTE FOR 680410 WHOM DID SPOUSE TELL R TO VOTE FOR 680411 DID A RELATIVE TELL R WHO TO VOTE FOR 680412 WHOM DID THE RELATIVE TELL R TO VOTE FOR 680413 DID A FRIEND TELL R WHO TO VOTE FOR 680414 WHOM DID THE FRIEND TELL R TO VOTE FOR 680415 DID A CO-WORKER TELL R WHO TO VOTE FOR 680416 WHOM DID THE CO-WORKER TELL R TO VOTE FOR 680417 DID ANYONE ELSE TELL R WHO TO VOTE FOR 680418 WHOM DID "ANYONE ELSE" TELL R TO VOTE FOR 680419 WHO WAS THE OTHER PERSON WHO TOLD R HOW TO VOTE 680420 IDENTITY OF MULTIPLE RESPONSES FOR REF. NOS. 409-419 CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS 680421 WAS R OR FAMILY ASKED TO CONTRIBUTE TO A CAMPAIGN 680422 WHICH PARTY ASKED FOR CONTRIBUTIONS 680423 DID R OR FAMILY CONTRIBUTE TO A CAMPAIGN 680424 TO WHICH PARTY WAS THE CONTRIBUTION MADE LETTERS TO PUBLIC OFFICIALS, CONGRESSMAN, EDITOR 680425 HAS R EVER WRITTEN AN OPINION TO ANY PUBLIC OFFICIAL 680426 HOW MANY TIMES HAS R WRITTEN IN THE LAST 4 YEARS 680427 HOW MANY TIMES DID R WRITE R'S US CONGRESSMAN 680428 HAS R EVER WRITTEN A POLITICAL LETTER TO THE EDITOR 680429 HOW MANY LETTERS TO THE EDITOR IN THE LAST 4 YEARS ATTENTION PAID TO INTERNATIONAL/STATE/LOCAL AFFAIRS 680430 DOES R FOLLOW GOVT AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS A LOT 680431 DOES R PAY MUCH ATTENTION TO INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS 680432 DOES R PAY MUCH ATTENTION TO NATIONAL AFFAIRS 680433 DOES R PAY MUCH ATTENTION TO STATE AFFAIRS 680434 DOES R PAY MUCH ATTENTION TO LOCAL AFFAIRS 680435 WHICH LEVEL DOES R FOLLOW MOST-INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS 680436 WHICH LEVEL DOES R FOLLOW MOST-NATIONAL AFFAIRS 680437 WHICH LEVEL DOES R FOLLOW MOST-STATE AFFAIRS 680438 WHICH LEVEL DOES R FOLLOW MOST-LOCAL AFFAIRS LOCAL SCHOOL BOARD 680439 HOW INTERESTED IS R IN THE LOCAL SCHOOL BOARD 680440 HOW OFTEN DOES R DISAGREE WITH THE SCHOOL BOARD 680441 SHOULD A SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER USE HIS OWN JUDGEMENT 680442 WHY SHOULD A BOARD MEMBER (NOT) USE HIS OWN JUDGEMENT LOCAL EDUCATION: PROBLEMS, R'S ACTIVITIES 680443 WHAT ARE THE BIGGEST EDUCATIONAL PROBLEMS-1ST PROBLEM 680444 WHAT ARE THE BIGGEST EDUCATIONAL PROBLEMS-2ND PROBLEM 680445 HOW SHOULD THE 1ST EDUCATIONAL PROBLEM BE HANDLED 680446 HOW SHOULD THE 2ND EDUCATIONAL PROBLEM BE HANDLED 680447 HAS R EVER VOTED IN AN ELECTION PERTAINING TO SCHOOLS 680448 WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME R EVER VOTED ON SCHOOL MATTERS 680449 DOES R RECALL WHAT THE ELECTION (LAST VOTED IN) WAS 680450 HAS R TAKEN PART IN A SCHOOL MATTER THE PAST 2 YEARS 680451 WHAT SCHOOL ACTIVITIES HAS R ENGAGED IN TEACHERS' VOICE & STRIKE RIGHTS 680452 SHOULD TEACHERS HAVE A GREATER VOICE IN SCHOOL POLICY 680453 HOW SHOULD TEACHERS HAVE A GREATER VOICE IN POLICY 680454 SHOULD TEACHERS GO ON STRIKE FOR GREATER BENEFITS 680455 IS R'S MIND MADE UP ON THE ISSUE OF TEACHERS STRIKING GOVERNMENT CONTROL OF EDUCATION 680456 DOES THE FEDERAL GOVT CONTROL EDUCATION TOO MUCH 680457 DOES THE STATE GOVT CONTROL LOCAL EDUCATION TOO MUCH SCHOOL PRAYER 680458 SHOULD PRAYER BE ALLOWED IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS 680459 COMMENTS ON PRAYERS IN SCHOOLS URBAN UNREST SCALE 680460 R'S RATING ON URBAN UNREST SCALE OF LYNDON JOHNSON 680461 R'S RATING ON URBAN UNREST SCALE OF HUBERT HUMPHREY 680462 R'S RATING ON URBAN UNREST SCALE OF RICHARD NIXON 680463 R'S RATING ON URBAN UNREST SCALE OF GEORGE WALLACE 680464 R'S RATING ON URBAN UNREST SCALE OF HIMSELF 680465 WAS THE URBAN UNREST ISSUE IMPORTANT FOR R'S VOTE VIETNAM ACTION SCALE 680466 R'S RATING ON VIETNAM ACTION SCALE OF LYNDON JOHNSON 680467 R'S RATING ON VIETNAM ACTION SCALE OF HUBERT HUMPHREY 680468 R'S RATING ON VIETNAM ACTION SCALE OF RICHARD NIXON 680469 R'S RATING ON VIETNAM ACTION SCALE OF GEORGE WALLACE 680470 R'S RATING ON VIETNAM ACTION SCALE OF HIMSELF 680471 WAS THE VIETNAM ISSUE IMPORTANT FOR R'S VOTE R'S ATTITUDE: PROTEST, CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE 680472 DOES R APPROVE OF LEGAL PROTEST MEETINGS OR MARCHES 680473 WHY DOES R (NOT) APPROVE OF LEGAL DEMONSTRATIONS 680474 DOES R APPROVE OF BREAKING A LAW ONE FEELS IS UNJUST 680475 WHY DOES R (NOT) APPROVE OF LEGAL DEMONSTRATIONS 680476 DOES R APPROVE OF ATTEMPTING TO STOP GOVT ACTIVITIES 680477 WHY DOES R (NOT) APPROVE OF STOPPING GOVT ACTIVITIES "FEELING THERMOMETER" - POSSIBLE CANDIDATES 680478 FEELING THERMOMETER - GEORGE WALLACE 680479 FEELING THERMOMETER - HUBERT HUMPHREY 680480 FEELING THERMOMETER - RICHARD NIXON 680481 FEELING THERMOMETER - EUGENE MCCARTHY 680482 FEELING THERMOMETER - RONALD REAGAN 680483 FEELING THERMOMETER - NELSON ROCKEFELLER 680484 FEELING THERMOMETER - LYNDON JOHNSON 680485 FEELING THERMOMETER - GEORGE ROMNEY 680486 FEELING THERMOMETER - ROBERT KENNEDY 680487 FEELING THERMOMETER - ED MUSKIE 680488 FEELING THERMOMETER - SPIRO AGNEW 680489 FEELING THERMOMETER - CURTIS LEMAY POLITICAL TRUST & CYNICISM 680490 HOW MUCH ATTENTION DOES GOVT PAY TO WHAT PEOPLE THINK 680491 HOW MUCH DO PARTIES HELP GOVT PAY ATTENTION TO PEOPLE 680492 HOW MUCH DO ELECTIONS MAKE GOVT RESPONSIVE TO PEOPLE 680493 HOW MUCH ATTENTION DO CONGRESSMEN PAY TO PEOPLE 680494 DO PARTIES USUALLY KEEP THEIR ELECTION PROMISES PERSONAL EFFECTIVENESS & TRUST 680495 IS IT BETTER TO PLAN ONE'S LIFE A GOOD WAY AHEAD 680496 WHEN R PLANS AHEAD, DO THINGS USUALLY GO AS PLANNED 680497 HAS R FELT SURE THAT LIFE WOULD GO AS R WANTS IT 680498 DOES R FEEL R CAN RUN R'S LIFE PRETTY MUCH AS R LIKES 680499 HOW SATISFYING IS R'S LIFE THESE DAYS 680500 GENERALLY SPEAKING, CAN MOST PEOPLE BE TRUSTED 680501 DO PEOPLE TRY AND BE HELPFUL MOST OF THE TIME 680502 IF GIVEN THE CHANCE, WOULD PEOPLE TAKE ADVANTAGE OF R TRUST IN GOVERNMENT 680503 DO PEOPLE IN GOVT WASTE A LOT OF TAX MONEY 680504 HOW OFTEN CAN THE FEDERAL GOVT BE TRUSTED TO DO RIGHT 680505 IS GOVT RUN PRETTY MUCH BY A FEW BIG INTERESTS 680506 DO PEOPLE IN GOVT USUALLY KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING 680507 ARE QUITE A FEW PEOPLE IN GOVT A LITTLE CROOKED FAITH IN LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT 680508 WHAT LEVEL OF GOVT DOES R HAVE THE MOST FAITH IN 680509 WHY DOES R HAVE THE MOST FAITH IN (CHOSEN LEVEL) 680510 WHAT LEVEL OF GOVT DOES R HAVE THE LEAST FAITH IN 680511 WHY DOES R HAVE THE LEAST FAITH IN (CHOSEN LEVEL) 680512 LEVEL OF GOVT R RANKS SECOND IN TERMS OF FAITH POLITICAL EFFICACY 680513 WHAT WOULD R DO TO STOP A BAD LOCAL LAW FROM PASSING 680514 WHAT CHANCE WOULD R HAVE OF CHANGING THE LOCAL LAW 680515 WHAT WOULD R DO ABOUT A BAD NATIONAL LAW 680516 WHAT CHANCE WOULD R HAVE OF CHANGING THE NATIONAL LAW 680517 DO PEOPLE LIKE R HAVE A SAY IN GOVT 680518 IS VOTING THE ONLY WAY PEOPLE LIKE R CAN HAVE A SAY 680519 IS POLITICS AND GOVT TOO COMPLEX FOR R TO UNDERSTAND 680520 DO PUBLIC OFFICIALS CARE WHAT PEOPLE LIKE R THINK 680521 DO US CONGRESSMEN QUICKLY LOSE TOUCH WITH THE PEOPLE 680522 SHOULD WE WORRY ABOUT PROBLEMS ELSEWHERE IN THE WORLD 680523 PARTIES ARE ONLY INTERESTED IN PEOPLE'S VOTES 680524 SCHOOL DISTRICT IN WHICH R LIVES SEX, RACE, RELATIONSHIP TO HEAD 680525 R'S SEX 680526 R'S RACE 680527 RELATIONSHIP OF R TO HEAD CONDITIONS OF THE POST-ELECTION INTERVIEW 680528 OTHER PERSONS PRESENT AT THE INTERVIEW 680529 NATURE OF R'S COOPERATION 680530 LEVEL OF R'S INTEREST IN POLITICS AND GOVT 680531 LEVEL OF R'S INFORMATION ABOUT POLITICS AND GOVT 680532 DID THE SAME INTERVIEWER DO THE PRE-ELECTION STUDY DERIVED VARIABLES 680533 R'S AGE 680534 STATE AND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT WHERE R VOTED 680535 POLITICAL EFFICACY INDEX 680536 POLITICAL INVOLVEMENT INDEX