Version 01 Codebook ------------------- CODEBOOK INTRODUCTION FILE 1974 POST-ELECTION STUDY (1974.T) AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES 1974 POST-ELECTION STUDY PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS WARREN E. MILLER ARTHUR H. MILLER F. GERALD KLINE THE CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN NOV.-DEC., 1974; JAN., 1975 ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER 7355 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ASSISTANCE ALL MANUSCRIPTS UTILIZING DATA MADE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE CONSORTIUM SHOULD ACKNOWLEDGE THAT FACT AS WELL AS IDENTIFY THE ORIGINAL COLLECTOR OF THE DATA. THE ICPSR COUNCIL URGES ALL USERS OF ICPSR DATA FACILITIES TO FOLLOW SOME ADAPTATION OF THIS STATEMENT WITH THE PARENTHESES IN- DICATING ITEMS TO BE FILLED IN APPROPRIATELY OR DELETED BY THE INDIVIDUAL USER. THE DATA (AND TABULATIONS) UTILIZED IN THIS (PUBLICATION) WERE MADE AVAILABLE (IN PART) BY THE INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL RESEARCH. THE DATA FOR THE CPS 1974 AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY WERE ORIGINALLY COLLECTED BY THE CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES OF THE INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH, THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN UNDER GRANTS FROM THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, THE JOHN AND MARY R. MARKLE FOUNDATION AND THE CARNEGIE CORPORATION. NEITHER THE ORIGINAL COLLECTORS OF THE DATA NOR THE CONSORTIUM BEAR ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ANALYSES OR INTERPRETATIONS PRESENTED HERE. IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FUNDING AGENCIES WITH ESSENTIAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE USE OF ARCHIVAL RESOURCES, AND TO FACILITATE THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION ABOUT ICPSR PAR- TICIPANTS' RESEARCH ACTIVITIES, EACH USER OF THE ICPSR DATA FACILITIES IS EXPECTED TO SEND TWO COPIES OF EACH COMPLETED MANUSCRIPT OR THESIS ABSTRACT TO THE CONSORTIUM. PLEASE INDICATE IN THE COVER LETTER WHICH DATA WERE USED. TABLE OF CONTENTS Note: >>sections in the codebook introduction and codebook appendix can be navigated in the machine-readable files by searching ">>". INTRODUCTORY MATERIAL (file int1974.cbk) --------------------- >> 1974 STUDY DESCRIPTION >> 1974 PUBLICATIONS, 1974 >> 1974 SAMPLING INFORMATION >> 1974 WEIGHTING INFORMATION >> 1974 FILE STRUCTURE >> 1974 CODEBOOK INFORMATION >> 1974 PROCESSING INFORMATION >> 1974 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST CODEBOOK -------- 1974 variables APPENDICES (file app1974.cbk) ---------- >> 1974 STANDARD PRIMARY SAMPLING UNIT CODE >> 1974 COUNTY CODES >> 1974 STATION CALL LETTER CODE >> 1974 NEWSPAPER CODE >> 1974 PERSONAL PROBLEMS CODE >> 1974 NATIONAL PROBLEMS CODE >> 1974 PERSON/ACTOR CODE >> 1974 CANDIDATES FOR REPRESENTATIVE TO CONGRESS >> 1974 CANDIDATES FOR U.S. SENATOR >> 1974 CANDIDATES FOR GOVERNOR >> 1974 PARTY/CANDIDATE MASTER CODE >> 1974 FEELING THERMOMETER NOTE >> 1974 ICPSR COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY CODE >> 1974 CENSUS INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION >> 1974 UNION CODE >> 1974 THE STATE AND COUNTRY CODE >> 1974 CENSUS COUNTY CODES >> 1974 STUDY DESCRIPTION THE CPS 1974 AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY (CPS # 495441) WAS CONDUCTED BY THE CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES OF THE INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH, THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHI- GAN UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WARREN MILLER, ARTHUR MILLER AND GERALD KLINE. IT WAS THE THIRTEENTH IN A SERIES OF STUDIES OF NATIONAL ELECTIONS PRODUCED BY THE POLITICAL BEHAVIOR PROGRAM OF THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER AND THE CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES. THE STUDY WAS SUPPORTED BY GRANTS FROM THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION (SOC 75-02704), THE JOHN AND MARY R. MARKLE FOUNDATION AND THE CARNEGIE CORPORATION. THE BASIC DESIGN OF THE 1974 STUDY INCLUDES A SUBSET OF THE RESPONDENTS WHO HAD PREVIOUSLY BEEN INTERVIEWED IN THE 1972 POST-ELECTION SURVEY. THIS SET OF PANEL RESPONDENTS WAS THEN AUGMENTED WITH A SET OF NEW INTERVIEWS SELECTED SO AS TO PROVIDE A REPRESENTATIVE CROSS-SECTION OF U.S. CIT- IZENS WHEN COMBINED WITH THE NON-MOVING PANEL RESPONDENTS. NEW RESPONDENTS WERE NOT, HOWEVER, SELECTED AT THE SAME SAMPLING RATE AS 1972 RESPONDENTS; THUS WEIGHTING IS NECES- SARY TO FORM A REPRESENTATIVE CROSS-SECTION FROM THE TWO TYPES OF RESPONDENT. THE 1974 AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY INCLUDES ONLY THE CROSS-SECTION SAMPLES, THAT IS, NON-MOVING PANEL RESPONDENTS AND THE RESPONDENTS WHO WERE ADDED IN 1974. THE STUDY INCLUDES 1575 RESPONDENTS. RESPONDENTS WERE INTERVIEWED FROM NOVEMBER 5, 1974 THROUGH JANUARY 31, 1975, FOLLOWING THE CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS. THE CPS AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY EXPLORED POLIT- ICAL ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOR IN THE CONTEXT OF THE WATERGATE EVENTS AND THE 1974 CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS. THE PARTY IDENTIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENTS, THEIR VOTING HISTORY, AND INFORMATION ABOUT FACETS OF EARLY POLITICAL SOCIALIZATION WERE OBTAINED. THE RESPONDENTS' SENSE OF POLITICAL EFFICACY AND CIVIC DUTY, THE DEGREE OF THEIR TRUST IN GOVERNMENT, AND THEIR EVALUATIONS OF GOVERNMENTAL RESPONSIVENESS WERE THE SUBJECTS OF QUESTIONS DESIGNED TO MEASURE DIMENSIONS OF THE RESPONDENTS' PERCEPTIONS OF THE RELAIONSHIP OF THE GOVERN- MENT TO ITS CITIZENS. CONSIDERABLE ATTENTION WAS ALSO FOCUSED ON WATERGATE EVENTS. FEELING THERMOMETERS WERE USED TO TAP REACTIONS TO THE PRINCIPAL FIGURES IN THESE EVENTS. ANOTHER SERIES OF QUESTIONS TAPPED ATTITUDES TOWARDS THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE'S IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS AND THE DECISION TO IMPEACH, NIXON'S RESIGNATION, AND FORD'S PARDON OF NIXON. RESPONDENTS WERE ALSO ASKED TO EVALUATE MEDIA OBJECTIVITY IN COVERAGE OF THE INVOLVEMENT OF THE NIXON ADMINISTRATION IN THE WATERGATE AFFAIR. THE STUDY CONTAINED EXTENSIVE INQUIRIES INTO THE RESPON- DENTS' MEDIA-RELATED ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOR. AN INITIAL SERIES OF QUESTIONS DEALT WITH THE GENERAL EXTENT OF MASS MEDIA USAGE, AND ALSO MEDIA USAGE SPECIFICALLY AS A NEWS SOURCE. FURTHER QUESTIONS PROBED MORE DEEPLY INTO TELE- VISION AND NEWSPAPERS AS A SOURCE OF CAMPAIGN INFORMATION. ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS CONCERNED THE RESPONDENT'S MOTIVATIONS FOR FOLLOWING THE CAMPAIGN IN THE MASS MEDIA. OTHER ITEMS DEALT MORE SPECIFICALLY WITH THE 1974 CAMPAIGN AND ELECTION. THE RESPONDENTS' INTEREST IN THE CAMPAIGN AND CONCERN FOR THE OUTCOME OF THE ELECTION WERE ASCERTAINED, AND THEIR REPORTS OF THEIR 1974 VOTING BEHAVIOR WERE RECORDED. IN ADDITION, RESPONDENTS WERE ASKED TO REPORT THEIR FEELINGS ABOUT POTENTIAL PRESIDENTIAL CANDI- DATES ON A FEELING THERMOMETER, AND TO GIVE THEIR SPECIFIC LIKES AND DISLIKES ABOUT THE SENATORIAL CANDIDATES. AS IN THE PAST, THE QUESTIONNAIRE INCLUDED AN INQUIRY INTO THE MAJOR PROBLEMS FACING THE COUNTRY. A FEELING THERMOMETER SERIES WAS USED TO MEASURE RESPONDENT PERCEP- TIONS OF GROUP INFLUENCES IN AMERICAN LIFE AND POLITICS. ANOTHER SERIES OF SCALES MEASURED THE RESPONDENTS' POSITION AND THE POSITION OF THE POLITICAL PARTIES AND CERTAIN POLIT- ICAL LEADERS WITH REGARD TO POLITICAL ISSUES SUCH AS BUSING, WOMEN'S LIBERATION, URBAN UNREST, RIGHTS OF ACCUSED PERSONS, AID TO MINORITIES AND THE IMPORTANCE OF GOVERNMENT GUARAN- TEES OF LIVING STANDARDS. FURTHER, RESPONDENTS WERE ASKED TO EVALUATE THEMSELVES AND POLITICAL LEADERS AND PARTIES ON A LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE SCALE. SEVERAL SERIES OF QUESTIONS DEALT WITH NON-POLITICAL ISSUES. RESPONDENTS WERE QUESTIONED ABOUT THEIR PERCEPTION OF THEIR FINANCIAL CONDITION, AND ABOUT BUSINESS AND ECONOM- IC CONDITIONS IN THE NATION AS A WHOLE. RESPONDENTS WERE ASKED TO EVALUATE THE QUALITY OF THEIR OWN LIFE IN A SERIES OF QUESTIONS DESIGNED TO MEASURE PERSONAL ESTEEM, TRUST AND QUALITY OF LIFE. THE PERSONAL DATA SECTION CONTAINED A WIDE VARIETY OF INFORMATION ABOUT THE RESPONDENTS AND THEIR FAMILIES. INFORMATION WAS SOUGHT ON EDUCATION, OCCUPATION, UNION MEMBERSHIP(S), AGE, SEX, MARITAL STATUS AND FAMILY COMPOSI- TION, SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS, ETHNIC BACKGROUND, INCOME LEVEL AND RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION. >> 1974 PUBLICATIONS MILLER, ARTHUR H., JEFFREY BRUDNEY AND PETER JOFTIS, "PRESIDENTIAL CRISES AND POLITICAL SUPPORT: THE IMPACT OF WATERGATE ON ATTITUDES TOWARD INSTITUTIONS," PAPER PRESENTED AT THE MIDWEST POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION CONVENTION, CHICAGO, MAY 1-3, 1975. >> 1974 SAMPLING INFORMATION THE SAMPLE FOR THE 1974 CPS AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY WAS A COMBINATION OF TWO SAMPLES, EACH DERIVED FROM THE 1972 CPS AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY SAMPLE. THE 1972 SAMPLE WAS SUPPLEMENTED TO INCLUDE REPRESENTATIONS OF HOUSING UNITS AND CITIZENS ADDED TO THE STUDY UNIVERSE AFTER THE FALL OF 1972. THE SAMPLING OF HOUSING UNITS UTILIZED THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER'S MASTER FRAME OF COTERMINOUS UNITED STATES HOUSING UNITS EXCLUSIVE OF THOSE ON MILITARY BASES. THE 1972 SAMPLE OF HOUSING UNITS, SELECTED AT THE OVERALL RATE OF ABOUT 1/17,000, WAS DESIGNED TO YIELD APPROXIMATELY 2,600 INTERVIEWS, ONE PER HOUSING UNIT, WITH UNITED STATES CITIZENS 18 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER ON OR BEFORE NOVEMBER 7, 1972. ALTHOUGH HOUSING UNITS HAD EQUAL SELECTION PROBABIL- ITIES, RESPONDENTS HAD DISPROPORTIONATE SELECTION RATES BECAUSE THE NUMBER OF ELIGIBLE PERSONS VARIES AMONG HOUSING UNITS. THOSE PERSONS INTERVIEWED PRIOR TO THE 1972 ELECTION WERE CONTACTED AFTER NOVEMBER 7 FOR A POST-ELECTION INTER- VIEW. THOSE PERSONS GRANTING TWO INTERVIEWS IN 1972 (PRE- AND POST-ELECTION) COMPRISE THE PANEL FOR THE 1974 STUDY. THE 1974 PANEL STUDY THE PANEL STUDY IS SIMPLE IN CONCEPT. AFTER THE 1974 ELECTION, ATTEMPTS TO CONTACT THE 2191 RESPONDENTS WHO GRANTED BOTH A PRE- AND POST-ELECTION INTERVIEW IN 1972 WERE MADE. IF A PANEL MAMBER HAD MOVED FROM HIS OR HER 1972 RESIDENCE, EVERY REASONABLE EFFORT WAS MADE TO LOCATE THAT PERSON AND INTERVIEW HER OR HIM AT THE 1974 RESIDENCE. THUS, APPROXIMATELY 1625 INTERVIEWS WERE OBTAINED WITH PANEL MEMBERS. THE 1974 CROSS-SECTION STUDY THE SAMPLE OF HOUSING UNITS INSTEAD OF SELECTING A NEW SAMPLE OF HOUSING UNITS (HU'S), A CURRENT CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE OF HU'S WAS CON- STRUCTED AT THE OVER-ALL RATE OF APPROXIMATELY 1/51,000 BY SUB-SAMPLING THE 1972 SAMPLE HU'S AT THE RATE OF 1/3 AND THEN ADDING TO THE 1972 SAMPLE A 1/51,000 SAMPLE OF HU'S THAT HAD ZERO CHANCE OF SELECTION IN 1972 FOR ONE OF THREE REASONS: (1) THEY WERE OVERLOOKED IN 1972 WHEN THE LISTS WERE PREPARED; (2) THEY RESULTED FROM CONVERSIONS AFTER 1972; (3) THEY WERE NEWLY CONSTRUCTED AFTER 1972. THE SUBSAMPLING OF 1972 SAMPLE HU'S WAS ACCOMPLISHED IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER: 1. ONE-THIRD OF THE PANEL HU'S WERE DESIGNATED FOR THE CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE, THE SAMPLE SELECTION CUTTING ACROSS ALL REGIONS, ALL PRIMARY AREAS, ALL PLACES AND ALL SEGMENTS THAT HAD ONE OR MORE PANEL HU'S. IF MORE THAN ONE HU WAS FOUND TO EXIST AT A DESIG- NATED PANEL ADDRESS, THOSE ADDITIONAL HU'S WERE ADDED TO THE 1974 SAMPLE. 2. ONE-THIRD OF THE 1972 VACANT HU'S, NON-RE- SPONSES AND PRE-ELECTION ONLY RESPONSES WERE CHOSEN FOR THE CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE IN A MANNER SIMILAR TO THE SUBSAMPLING OF PANEL HU'S. IF MORE THAN ONE HU WAS FOUND AT A 1972 ADDRESS, THOSE ADDITIONAL HU'S WERE ADDED TO THE 1974 SAMPLE. 3. INTERVIEWERS WERE INSTRUCTED TO UPDATE THE HU LISTINGS FOR EACH SAMPLE SEGMENT; THEN INSTRUCTIONS IN THE FORM OF LISTING SHEET LINE NUMBERS WERE PROVIDED, SO ONE-THIRD OF THE HU'S IN PREVIOUSLY UNLISTED RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS WERE ADDED TO THE SAMPLE. THE SAMPLE OF ELIGIBLE PERSONS FOR THE 1974 CPS AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY, HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS WHO WERE UNITED STATES CITIZENS 16 YEARS OF AGE OR OVER WERE ELIGIBLE TO BE CHOSEN AS RESPONDENTS. SINCE ANY ELIGIBLE PERSON WHO WAS UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE ON NOVEMBER 7, 1972 HAD ZERO CHANCE OF SELECTION IN 1972, A PROCEDURE TO GIVE SUCH PERSONS A NON-ZERO CHANCE OF SELEC- TION IN 1974 WAS DEVISED. THE SELECTION OF RESPONDENTS PRO- CEEDED AS FOLLOWS: 1. ONE-THIRD SELECTION OF 1972 NONPANEL HU'S: THESE ARE THE 1972 HU'S THAT WERE VACANT, PRODUCED NONRESPONSES OR ONLY A PRE-ELEC- TION RESPONSE. AT EACH OF THESE HU'S, HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS 16 YEARS OF AGE AND OVER WERE LISTED AND AN INTERVIEW ATTEMPTED WITH AN OBJECTIVELY SELECTED RESPONDENT. 2. 1974 SAMPLE HU'S NON-EXISTENT IN 1972: AT EACH OF THESE HU'S HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS 16 YEARS OF AGE AND OVER WERE LISTED AND AN INTERVIEW ATTEMPTED WITH AN OBJECTIVE- LY SELECTED RESPONDENT. 3. ONE-THIRD SAMPLE OF 1972 PANEL HU'S: THERE WERE THREE SITUATIONS: A) THE PANEL MEMBER NO LONGER LIVED AT THE HU. IN THIS CASE, ALL HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS 16 YEARS AND OVER WERE LISTED AND AN INTERVIEW ATTEMPTED WITH ONE OBJECTIVELY SELECTED RESPONDENT. B) THE PANEL MEMBER STILL LIVED AT THE 1972 HU AND NO NEW MEMBERS HAD BEEN ADDED TO THE HOUSEHOLD. BY "NEW" MEMBERS WE MEAN ANYONE WHO HAD ZERO CHANCE OF SELECTION FOR THE 1972 STUDY. WHEN THE PANEL MEMBER WAS PRESENT AND THERE WERE NO NEW MEM- BERS, THE PANEL MEMBER WAS ALSO THE CROSS-SECTION RESPONDENT. C) THE PANEL MEMBER WAS STILL LIVING AT THE SAMPLE HU, BUT ONE OR MORE NEW MEMBERS WERE PRESENT IN THE HOUSE- HOLD. INTERVIEWERS WERE INSTRUCTED TO LIST ALL ELIGIBLE HOUSEHOLD MEM- BERS AND TO CHOOSE ONE OBJECTIVELY. IF THE CHOSEN PERSON WAS AN ELIGIBLE HOUSEHOLD MEMBER IN 1972, THE PANEL MEMBER WAS THE DESIGNATED RESPONDENT FOR THE CROSS-SECTION STUDY AS WELL AS FOR THE PANEL. IF THE CHOSEN PERSON WAS NOT AN ELIGIBLE HOUSEHOLD MEMBER IN 1972, A CROSS-SECTION INTERVIEW WAS ATTEMPTED WITH THE OBJECTIVELY CHOSEN PERSON. >> 1974 WEIGHTING INFORMATION THE CPS 1974 AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY SAMPLE CONSISTED OF PANEL AND CROSS-SECTION COMPONENTS. THE RE- CONTACTED RESPONDENTS FORMING THE PANEL WERE FIRST INTER- VIEWED IN THE PRE- AND POST-ELECTION PHASES OF THE 1972 CPS AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY. OF THESE PANEL RESPON- DENTS 1101 WERE FOUND TO REMAIN AT THEIR 1972 ADDRESSES AND WERE INCORPORATED INTO THE 1974 CROSS SECTION SAMPLE. THESE RESPONDENTS WERE GIVEN A WEIGHT OF 1. TO FORM A REPRESENTATIVE CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE OF ADULTS 16 YEARS AND OVER, 474 NON-PANEL RESPONDENTS WERE SELECTED BY SUB- SAMPLING THE 1972 SAMPLE OF HOUSING UNITS. SINCE THE CROSS- SECTION (NON-PANEL) RESPONDENTS WERE SELECTED WITH A ONE- THIRD FRACTION OUT OF THE AVAILABLE ADDRESSES, THEY WERE GIVEN A WEIGHT OF 3. NOTE: FOR PURPOSES OF THIS DATASET, PERSONS UNDER THE AGE OF 18 ON NOVEMBER 5, 1974 WERE DROPPED FROM THE SAMPLE. V742003, WEIGHTING VARIABLE, SHOULD BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH ANY ANALYSIS OF THIS DATA. THE WEIGHTED N IS 2523. >> 1974 FILE STRUCTURE THERE IS ONE WEIGHT VARIABLE IN THE CPS 1974 AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY. (SEE V742003; THIS SHOULD BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH DATA ANALYSIS PROGRAMS.) >> 1974 CODEBOOK INFORMATION The following example from the 1948 NES study provides the standard format for codebook variable documentation. Note that NES studies which are not part of the Time-Series usually omit marginals and the descriptive content in lines 2-5 (except for variable name). Line 1 ============================== 2 VAR 480026 NAME-R NOT VT-WAS R REG TO VT 3 COLUMNS 61 - 61 4 NUMERIC 5 MD=0 OR GE 8 6 7 Q. 17. (IF R DID NOT VOTE) WERE YOU REGISTERED (ELIGIBLE) 8 TO VOTE. 9 ........................................................... 10 11 82 1. YES 12 149 2. NO 13 14 0 8. DK 15 9 9. NA 16 422 0. INAP., R VOTED Line 2 - VARIABLE NAME. Note that in the codebook the variable name (usually a 'number') does not include the "V" prefix which is used in the release SAS and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files) for all variables including those which do not have 'number' names. For example the variable "VERSION" in the codebook is "VVERSION" in the data definition files. Line 2 - "NAME". This is the variable label used in the SAS and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files). Some codebooks exclude this. Line 3 - COLUMNS. Columns in the ASCII data file (.dat file). Line 4 - CHARACTER OR NUMERIC. If numeric and the variable is a decimal rather than integer variable, the numer of decimal places is also indicated (e.g. "NUMERIC DEC 4") Line 5 - Values which are assigned to missing by default in the Study's SAS and and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files). Line 7 - Actual question text for survey variables or a description of non-survey variables (for example, congressional district). Survey items usually include the question number (for example "B1a.") from the Study questionnaire; beginning in 1996 non-survey items also have unique item numbers (for example "CSheet.1"). Line 9 - A dashed or dotted line usually separates question text from any other documentation which follows. Line 10- When present, annotation provided by Study staff is presented below the question text/description and preceding code values. Lines 11-16 Code values are listed with descriptive labels. Valid codes (those not having 'missing' status in line 5) are presented first, followed by the values described in line 5. For continuous variables, one line may appear providing the range of possible values. A blank line usually separates the 'valid' and 'missing' values. Lines 11-16 Marginals are usually provided for discrete variables. The counts may be unweighted or weighted; check the Study codebook introductory text to determine weight usage. >> 1974 PROCESSING INFORMATION THIS STUDY WAS PROCESSED ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD ICPSR PROCEDURES. THE DATA WERE CHECKED FOR INCONSISTENT CODES, ILLEGAL CODES, AND BLANKS WHICH, WHENEVER FOUND, WERE CORRECTED BY REFERRING TO THE ORIGINAL INTERVIEW SCHEDULES. STATEMENTS BRACKETED IN "<" AND ">" SIGNS IN THE BODY OF THE CODEBOOK AND THE FOOTNOTES WERE ADDED BY THE PROCESSORS FOR EXPLANATORY PURPOSES. THE PROCESSING OF THE STUDY WAS PLANNED AND EXECUTED PRIMARILY BY MICHAEL NOLTE WITH THE COLLABORATION OF PETER JOFTIS AND MITCHELL COHEN. >> 1974 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST VAR. NO. VERSION NES VERSION NUMBER DSETNO NES DATASET NUMBER 742001 ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER - 7355 742002 INTERVIEW NUMBER 742003 WEIGHT VARIABLE 742004 FUTURE PANEL R IDENTIFICATION NUMBER STUDY PROCEDURE AND SAMPLING INFORMATION 742005 STATE OF INTERVIEW 742006 REGION OF INTERVIEW 742007 STATE AND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT OF INTERVIEW 742008 ICPSR COUNTY CODE 742009 SAMPLING COUNTY CODE 742010 PRIMARY SAMPLING UNIT (PSU) OF INTERVIEW 742011 PRIMARY SAMPLING UNIT AND PLACE IDENTIFICATION 742012 ACTUAL POPULATION OF INTERVIEW PLACE 742013 DISTANCE FROM PLACE OF INTERVIEW TO CENTER OF CENTRAL CITY OF NEAREST SMSA 742014 DISTANCE FROM PLACE OF INTERVIEW TO CENTER OF CENTRAL CITY OF NEAREST SMSA OVER 349,999 PEOPLE 742015 1970 CENSUS TRACT NUMBER FOR PLACE OF INTERVIEW 742016 SIZE OF INTERVIEW PLACE-MASTER CODE 742017 BELT CODE 742018 NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS IN HOUSEHOLD 742019 ADULT COMPOSITION OF PRIMARY FAMILY UNIT 742020 NUMBER OF POLITICALLY ELIGIBLE ADULTS IN DWELLING UNIT 742021 SEGMENT CODE 742022 INTERVIEWER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 742023 DATE OF INTERVIEW 742024 LENGTH OF INTERVIEW 742025 CODER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER CONCERN ABOUT ELECTION 742026 DOES R CARE HOW CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS COME OUT 742027 DOES R FOLLOW POLITICS TELEVISION AS A NEWS SOURCE 742028 HOW OFTEN DOES R WATCH MORNING NATIONAL NEWS 742029 HOW OFTEN DOES R WATCH DAYTIME TV ENTERTAINMENT 742030 HOW OFTEN DOES R WATCH EARLY EVENING LOCAL NEWS 742031 HOW OFTEN DOES R WATCH NATIONAL NEWS 742032 HOW OFTEN DOES R WATCH EVENING TV ENTERTAINMENT 742033 HOW OFTEN DOES R WATCH LATE EVENING LOCAL NEWS 742034 WHICH NATIONAL EVENING NEWS DOES R WATCH MOST 742035 WHICH STATION DOES R WATCH MOST FOR LOCAL NEWS TELEVISION AS A SOURCE OF POLITICAL INFORMATION 742036 DID R WATCH ANY PROGRAMS ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN 742037 HOW MANY CAMPAIGN PROGRAMS DID R WATCH 742038 DOES R WATCH TV TO LEARN THE CANDIDATES' STANDS 742039 DOES R WATCH TV TO DECIDE HOW TO VOTE 742040 DOES R WATCH TV TO ENJOY EXCITEMENT OF ELECTION 742041 DOES R WATCH TV TO JUDGE THE CANDIDATES 742042 DOES R WATCH TV TO REENFORCE CANDIDATE PREFERENCE 742043 DOES R WATCH TV TO OBTAIN INFORMATION 742044 DID R SEE ANY SENATE RACE ADVERTISEMENTS ON TV 742045 DID R PAY ATTENTION TO SENATE RACE ADVERTISEMENTS NEWSPAPERS AS AN INFORMATION SOURCE 742046 DOES R READ A DAILY NEWSPAPER 742047 WHICH NEWSPAPERS DOES R READ 742048 WHAT LOCAL PAPER DOES R READ MOST FOR CURRENT EVENTS 742049 HOW OFTEN DOES R READ PERSONAL INTEREST STORIES 742050 HOW OFTEN DOES R READ NATIONAL POLITICAL NEWS 742051 HOW OFTEN DOES R READ STATE AND LOCAL POLITICAL NEWS 742052 HOW OFTEN DOES R READ COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 742053 HOW OFTEN DOES R READ INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS 742054 HOW OFTEN DOES R READ HOME AND GARDENING STORIES 742055 HOW OFTEN DOES R READ STORIES ABOUT CRIME 742056 HOW OFTEN DOES R READ EDITORIALS AND OPINION COLUMNS NEWSPAPERS AS A SOURCE OF POLITICAL INFORMATION 742057 DOES R READ PAPERS TO LEARN THE CANDIDATES' STANDS 742058 DOES R READ PAPERS TO DECIDE HOW TO VOTE 742059 DOES R READ PAPERS TO ENJOY EXCITEMENT OF ELECTION 742060 DOES R READ PAPERS TO JUDGE THE CANDIDATES 742061 DOES R READ PAPERS TO REENFORCE CANDIDATE PREFERENCE 742062 DOES R READ PAPERS TO OBTAIN INFORMATION 742063 DID R READ ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN IN ANY NEWSPAPER 742064 HOW OFTEN DID R READ ABOUT U.S. SENATE CAMPAIGN 742065 HOW OFTEN DID R READ ABOUT U.S. HOUSE CAMPAIGN 742066 R RELY ON TV/NEWSPAPERS FOR POLITICAL INFORMATION R'S PERSONAL PROBLEMS 742067 WHAT PERSONAL PROBLEMS DOES R FACE - FIRST MENTION 742068 WHAT PERSONAL PROBLEMS DOES R FACE - SECOND MENTION 742069 WHAT PERSONAL PROBLEMS DOES R FACE - THIRD MENTION 742070 DOES R MENTION ANY PERSONAL PROBLEM 742071 WHAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT PERSONAL PROBLEM R FACES 742072 DOES R WORK OUT PERSONAL PROBLEM ALONE 742073 WHO SHOULD HELP R WITH PERSONAL PROBLEMS 742074 HOW HELPFUL IS GOVERNMENT WITH R'S PROBLEMS MOST IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEMS 742075 IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM - FIRST MENTION 742076 IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM - SECOND MENTION 742077 IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM - THIRD MENTION 742078 DOES R MENTION ANY IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM 742079 WHAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM NEWSPAPER COVERAGE -- NATIONAL PROBLEMS 742080 DID R READ ABOUT IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEMS IN PAPER 742081 FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM R READ ABOUT 742082 LEVEL OF FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM 742083 PERSON/ACTOR DIMENSION 1 - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM 742084 PERSON/ACTOR DIMENSION 2 - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM 742085 CRITICISM/PRAISE DIMENSION 1 - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM 742086 OBJECT OF CRITICISM/PRAISE 1 - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM 742087 CRITICISM/PRAISE DIMENSION 2 - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM 742088 OBJECT OF CRITICISM/PRAISE 2 - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM 742089 PROPOSAL FOR ACTION DIMENSION - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM 742090 KEYWORD DIMENSION (MENTION 1) - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM 742091 KEYWORD DIMENSION (MENTION 2) - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM 742092 SECOND NATIONAL PROBLEM R READ ABOUT 742093 LEVEL OF SECOND NATIONAL PROBLEM TELEVISION COVERAGE - NATIONAL PROBLEMS 742094 DID R SEE ANYTHING ABOUT IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEMS ON TELEVISION 742095 FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM R SAW ON TELEVISION 742096 LEVEL OF FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM 742097 PERSON/ACTOR DIMENSION 1 - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM 742098 PERSON/ACTOR DIMENSION 2 - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM 742099 CRITICISM/PRAISE DIMENSION 1 - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM 742100 OBJECT OF CRITICISM/PRAISE 1 - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM 742101 CRITICISM/PRAISE DIMENSION 2 - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM 742102 OBJECT OF CRITICISM/PRAISE 2 - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM 742103 PROPOSAL FOR ACTION DIMENSION - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM 742104 KEYWORD DIMENSION (MENTION 1) - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM 742105 KEYWORD DIMENSION (MENTION 2) - FIRST NATIONAL PROBLEM 742106 SECOND NATIONAL PROBLEM R SAW ON TELEVISION 742107 LEVEL OF SECOND NATIONAL PROBLEM 742108 HOW HELPFUL IS GOVERNMENT ON MOST IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEMS - ELECTION CAMPAIGN 742109 WHAT WAS THE FIRST IMPORTANT THING THAT R READ ABOUT DURING THE CAMPAIGN 742110 LEVEL OF PROBLEM - FIRST CAMPAIGN EVENT 742111 PERSON/ACTOR DIMENSION 1 - FIRST CAMPAIGN EVENT 742112 PERSON/ACTOR DIMENSION 2 - FIRST CAMPAIGN EVENT 742113 CRITICISM/PRAISE DIMENSION 1 - FIRST CAMPAIGN EVENT 742114 OBJECT OF CRITICISM/PRAISE 1 - FIRST CAMPAIGN EVENT 742115 CRITICISM/PRAISE DIMENSION 2 - FIRST CAMPAIGN EVENT 742116 OBJECT OF CRITICISM/PRAISE 2 - FIRST CAMPAIGN EVENT 742117 PROPOSAL FOR ACTION DIMENSION - FIRST CAMPAIGN EVENT 742118 KEYWORD DIMENSION (MENTION 1) - FIRST CAMPAIGN EVENT 742119 KEYWORD DIMENSION (MENTION 2) - FIRST CAMPAIGN EVENT 742120 WHAT WAS THE SECOND IMPORTANT THING THAT R READ ABOUT DURING THE CAMPAIGN 742121 LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT - SECOND CAMPAIGN EVENT NEWSPAPER COVERAGE OF IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM 742122 HOW MUCH DID R READ ABOUT NATIONAL PROBLEM IN PAPERS 742123 WAS NEWSPAPER COVERAGE OF NATIONAL PROBLEM FAIR DISCUSSION OF MOST IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM 742124 DID R DISCUSS NATIONAL PROBLEM WITH ANYONE 742125 WHOM DID R DISCUSS NATIONAL PROBLEM WITH - MENTION 1 742126 WHOM DID R DISCUSS NATIONAL PROBLEM WITH - MENTION 2 SALIENT ISSUES IN SENATE CAMPAIGN 742127 R MENTIONS HONESTY IN GOVERNMENT--SENATE CAMPAIGN ISSUE 742128 R MENTIONS TAXES AS SENATE CAMPAIGN ISSUE 742129 R MENTIONS INFLATION AS SENATE CAMPAIGN ISSUE 742130 R MENTIONS ENERGY SHORTAGES AS SENATE CAMPAIGN ISSUE 742131 R MENTIONS UNEMPLOYMENT AS SENATE CAMPAIGN ISSUE 742132 R MENTIONS FOREIGN RELATIONS AS SENATE CAMPAIGN ISSUE 742133 R MENTIONS RACIAL TOPICS AS SENATE CAMPAIGN ISSUE 742134 R MENTIONS CRIME/DRUGS AS SENATE CAMPAIGN ISSUE 742135 R MENTIONS CONSUMER PROTECTION AS SENATE CAMPAIGN ISSUE 742136 R MENTIONS POLLUTION AS SENATE CAMPAIGN ISSUE ISSUES WHICH ARE IMPORTANT TO R 742137 R MENTIONS HONESTY IN GOVERNMENT AS IMPORTANT ISSUE 742138 R MENTIONS TAXES AS IMPORTANT ISSUE 742139 R MENTIONS INFLATION AS IMPORTANT ISSUE 742140 R MENTIONS ENERGY SHORTAGES AS IMPORTANT ISSUE 742141 R MENTIONS UNEMPLOYMENT AS IMPORTANT ISSUE 742142 R MENTIONS FOREIGN RELATIONS AS IMPORTANT ISSUE 742143 R MENTIONS RACIAL TOPICS AS IMPORTANT ISSUE 742144 R MENTIONS CRIME/DRUGS AS IMPORTANT ISSUE 742145 R MENTIONS CONSUMER PROTECTION AS IMPORTANT ISSUE 742146 R MENTIONS POLLUTION AS IMPORTANT ISSUE R'S RANKING OF IMPORTANT ISSUES 742147 ISSUE RANKED BY R: HONESTY IN GOVERNMENT 742148 ISSUE RANKED BY R: TAXES 742149 ISSUE RANKED BY R: INFLATION 742150 ISSUE RANKED BY R: ENERGY SHORTAGES 742151 ISSUE RANKED BY R: UNEMPLOYMENT 742152 ISSUE RANKED BY R: FOREIGN RELATIONS 742153 ISSUE RANKED BY R: RACIAL ISSUES 742154 ISSUE RANKED BY R: CRIME/DRUGS 742155 ISSUE RANKED BY R: CONSUMER PROTECTION 742156 ISSUE RANKED BY R: POLLUTION 742157 DOES R APPROVE OF THE WAY FORD IS HANDLING HIS JOB NIXON'S RESIGNATION 742158 WAS R (DIS)PLEASED BY NIXON'S RESIGNATION 742159 WHY WAS R (DIS)PLEASED BY NIXON RESIGNATION - MENTION 1 742160 WHY WAS R (DIS)PLEASED BY NIXON RESIGNATION - MENTION 2 742161 WERE THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE HEARINGS FAIR 742162 DID R (DIS)APPROVE OF THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE'S IMPEACHMENT DECISION 742163 WHY DID R (DIS)APPROVE OF THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE'S IMPEACHMENT DECISION - FIRST MENTION 742164 WHY DID R (DIS)APPROVE OF THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE'S IMPEACHMENT DECISION - SECOND MENTION 742165 HOW FAIR WAS MEDIA COVERAGE OF THE WATERGATE AFFAIR FORD'S PARDON OF NIXON 742166 SHOULD FORD HAVE PARDONED NIXON 742167 SHOULD FORD HAVE PARDONED NIXON AFTER TRIAL/NOT AT ALL 742168 WHY SHOULD FORD (NOT) HAVE PARDONED NIXON - MENTION 1 742169 WHY SHOULD FORD (NOT) HAVE PARDONED NIXON - MENTION 2 742170 SHOULD FORD HAVE WAITED UNTIL AFTER TRIAL BEFORE PARDON R'S EVALUATION OF NIXON'S RESIGNATION 742171 WAS NIXON'S RESIGNATION GOOD/BAD FOR COUNTRY 742172 WHY NIXON'S RESIGNATION GOOD/BAD FOR COUNTRY--MENTION 1 742173 WHY NIXON'S RESIGNATION GOOD/BAD FOR COUNTRY--MENTION 2 SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN 742174 DOES R REMEMBER THE SENATORIAL CANDIDATES 742175 WHO WERE THE SENATORIAL CANDIDATES - MENTION 1 742176 WHO WERE THE SENATORIAL CANDIDATES - MENTION 2 742177 WAS THERE ANYTHING R LIKED ABOUT THE DEMOCRAT 742178 WHAT DID R LIKE ABOUT DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE - MENTION 1 742179 WHAT DID R LIKE ABOUT DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE - MENTION 2 742180 WHAT DID R LIKE ABOUT DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE - MENTION 3 742181 WAS THERE ANYTHING R DISLIKED ABOUT THE DEMOCRAT 742182 WHAT R DISLIKED ABOUT DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE - MENTION 1 742183 WHAT R DISLIKED ABOUT DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE - MENTION 2 742184 WHAT R DISLIKED ABOUT DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE - MENTION 3 742185 WAS THERE ANYTHING R LIKED ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN 742186 WHAT DID R LIKE ABOUT REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE - MENTION 1 742187 WHAT DID R LIKE ABOUT REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE - MENTION 2 742188 WHAT DID R LIKE ABOUT REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE - MENTION 3 742189 WAS THERE ANYTHING R DISLIKED ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN 742190 WHAT R DISLIKED ABOUT REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE - MENTION 1 742191 WHAT R DISLIKED ABOUT REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE - MENTION 2 742192 WHAT R DISLIKED ABOUT REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE - MENTION 3 PARTY CONTACTS WITH R DURING CAMPAIGN 742193 DID A POLITICAL PARTY WORKER CONTACT R DURING CAMPAIGN 742194 WHICH PARTY(S) CONTACTED R DURING CAMPAIGN R'S POLITICAL ACTIVITY 742195 DID R TRY TO INFLUENCE OTHERS' VOTE CHOICES 742196 DID R ATTEND ANY POLITICAL MEETINGS OR RALLIES 742197 DID R WORK FOR A PARTY OR CANDIDATE 742198 DID R WEAR A BUTTON OR PUT A STICKER ON THE CAR 742199 DID R GIVE ANY MONEY TO A POLITICAL PARTY 742200 WHICH PARTY DID R GIVE MONEY TO PARTY IDENTIFICATION 742201 DOES R CONSIDER SELF AS REPUBLICAN/DEMOCRAT/OTHER 742202 STRENGTH OF DEMOCRAT/REPUBLICAN IDENTIFICATION 742203 R THINK OF SELF AS CLOSER REPUBLICAN/DEMOCRATIC PARTY 742204 R'S PARTY IDENTIFICATION 742205 DID R EVER HAVE A DIFFERENT PARTY IDENTIFICATION 742206 WHAT WAS R'S PREVIOUS PARTY IDENTIFICATION 742207 (IF REPUBLICAN/DEMOCRAT) WHEN DID R CHANGE PARTY IDENTIFICATION NON-IDENTIFIERS -- INDEPENDENTS 742208 (IF CLOSER TO ONE PARTY) DID R EVER CONSIDER SELF AS CLOSER TO OTHER PARTY 742209 (IF CLOSE TO NEITHER PARTY) DID R EVER CONSIDER SELF AS CLOSER TO REPUBLICAN/DEMOCRATIC PARTY 742210 (IF INDEPENDENT/OTHER) WHEN DID R CHANGE PARTY IDENTIFICATION PAST PRESIDENTIAL VOTING BEHAVIOR 742211 HAS R VOTED IN ALL POSSIBLE PAST PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS 742212 HAS R ALWAYS VOTED FOR THE SAME PARTY FOR PRESIDENT 742213 PARTY R SUPPORTED IN PAST-PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN 742214 DOES R REMEMBER THE CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES 742215 WHO WERE THE CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES - FIRST MENTION 742216 WHO WERE THE CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES - SECOND MENTION 742217 WHO WERE THE CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES - THIRD MENTION 742218 FROM WHICH PARTY WERE THE CANDIDATES - 1ST CANDIDATE 742219 FROM WHICH PARTY WERE THE CANDIDATES - 2ND CANDIDATE 742220 FROM WHICH PARTY WERE THE CANDIDATES - 3RD CANDIDATE 742221 DID BOTH MAJOR PARTIES RUN CANDIDATES IN R'S DISTRICT POLITICAL EFFICACY 742222 DO PEOPLE LIKE R HAVE ANY SAY IN WHAT GOVERNMENT DOES 742223 IS VOTING THE ONLY WAY PEOPLE LIKE R HAVE A SAY 742224 IS POLITICS TOO COMPLICATED FOR R TO UNDERSTAND 742225 DO OFFICIALS CARE WHAT PEOPLE LIKE R THINK 742226 DO CONGRESSMEN LOSE TOUCH WITH PEOPLE QUICKLY 742227 ARE PARTIES INTERESTED IN PEOPLE'S VOTES, NOT OPINION 742228 IS EVERYONE TREATED EQUALLY BY LAWS CYNICISM AND TRUST IN GOVERNMENT 742229 DO PEOPLE IN GOVERNMENT WASTE A LOT OF TAX MONEY 742230 HOW MUCH CAN R TRUST FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO DO RIGHT 742231 IS GOVERNMENT RUN FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL OR A FEW 742232 DO GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS USUALLY KNOW WHAT THEY'RE DOING 742233 ARE MANY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS A LITTLE CROOKED GOVERNMENT ATTENTION TO PEOPLE 742234 HOW MUCH DOES GOVERNMENT LISTEN TO PEOPLE 742235 HOW MUCH DO PARTIES MAKE GOVERNMENT LISTEN 742236 HOW MUCH DO ELECTIONS MAKE GOVERNMENT LISTEN 742237 ARE CONGRESSMEN ATTENTIVE TO THEIR CONSTITUENCIES R'S ATTITUDE: PROTEST, CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE 742238 WOULD R APPROVE OF TAKING PART IN LEGAL PROTESTS 742239 WOULD R APPROVE OF DISOBEYING UNJUST LAW 742240 WOULD R APPROVE OF EFFORTS TO STOP GOVERNMENT OPERATION EVALUATION OF GOVERNMENTAL INSTITUTIONS 742241 WHICH PART OF GOVERNMENT CAN BE MOST OFTEN TRUSTED 742242 WHICH PART OF GOVERNMENT CAN BE NEXT MOST OFTEN TRUSTED 742243 WHICH PART OF GOVERNMENT CAN BE LEAST OFTEN TRUSTED CONFIDENCE IN NATIONAL/STATE/LOCAL GOVERNMENT 742244 LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT R HAS MOST CONFIDENCE IN 742245 WHY R HAS CONFIDENCE IN LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT - MENTION 1 742246 WHY R HAS CONFIDENCE IN LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT - MENTION 2 742247 LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT R HAS LEAST CONFIDENCE IN 742248 WHY R LACKS CONFIDENCE IN LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT-MENTION 1 742249 WHY R LACKS CONFIDENCE IN LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT-MENTION 2 INSTITUTIONAL PERFORMANCE 742250 HOW GOOD A JOB IS DONE BY NATIONAL TELEVISION NEWS 742251 HOW GOOD A JOB IS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DOING 742252 HOW GOOD A JOB ARE STATE GOVERNMENTS DOING 742253 HOW GOOD A JOB ARE LOCAL GOVERNMENTS DOING 742254 HOW GOOD A JOB IS THE PRESIDENCY DOING 742255 HOW GOOD A JOB IS THE CONGRESS DOING 742256 HOW GOOD A JOB IS THE SUPREME COURT DOING INSTITUTIONAL INFLUENCE 742257 HOW MUCH INFLUENCE SHOULD NATIONAL TELEVISION NEWS HAVE 742258 HOW MUCH INFLUENCE SHOULD THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAVE 742259 HOW MUCH INFLUENCE SHOULD STATE GOVERNMENTS HAVE 742260 HOW MUCH INFLUENCE SHOULD LOCAL GOVERNMENTS HAVE 742261 HOW MUCH INFLUENCE SHOULD THE PRESIDENCY HAVE 742262 HOW MUCH INFLUENCE SHOULD CONGRESS HAVE 742263 HOW MUCH INFLUENCE SHOULD THE SUPREME COURT HAVE 742264 ARE CIVIL RIGHTS PEOPLE PUSHING TOO FAST GOVERNMENT GUARANTEED JOB & LIVING STANDARD SCALE 742265 R'S POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE 742266 FORD'S POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE 742267 WALLACE'S POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE 742268 NIXON'S POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE 742269 DEMOCRATS' POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE 742270 REPUBLICANS' POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE 742271 DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE'S POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE 742272 REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE'S POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE HANDLING URBAN UNREST SCALE 742273 R'S POSITION ON HANDLING URBAN UNREST SCALE 742274 FORD'S POSITION ON HANDLING URBAN UNREST SCALE 742275 WALLACE'S POSITION ON HANDLING URBAN UNREST SCALE 742276 NIXON'S POSITION ON HANDLING URBAN UNREST SCALE 742277 DEMOCRATS' POSITION ON HANDLING URBAN UNREST SCALE 742278 REPUBLICANS' POSITION ON HANDLING URBAN UNREST SCALE 742279 DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE'S POSITION ON HANDLING URBAN UNREST SCALE 742280 REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE'S POSITION ON HANDLING URBAN UNREST SCALE RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED SCALE 742281 R'S POSITION ON RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED SCALE 742282 FORD'S POSITION ON RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED SCALE 742283 WALLACE'S POSITION ON RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED SCALE 742284 DEMOCRATS' POSITION ON RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED SCALE 742285 REPUBLICANS' POSITION ON RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED SCALE 742286 DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE'S POSITION ON RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED SCALE 742287 REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE'S POSITION ON RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED SCALE SCHOOL BUSING TO ACHIEVE INTEGRATION SCALE 742288 R'S POSITION ON SCHOOL BUSING SCALE 742289 FORD'S POSITION ON SCHOOL BUSING SCALE 742290 WALLACE'S POSITION ON SCHOOL BUSING SCALE 742291 NIXON'S POSITION ON SCHOOL BUSING SCALE 742292 DEMOCRATS' POSITION ON SCHOOL BUSING SCALE 742293 REPUBLICANS' POSITION ON SCHOOL BUSING SCALE 742294 DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE'S POSITION ON SCHOOL BUSING SCALE 742295 REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE'S POSITION ON SCHOOL BUSING SCALE GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES SCALE 742296 R'S POSITION ON GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES SCALE 742297 FORD'S POSITION ON GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES SCALE 742298 WALLACE'S POSITION--GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES SCALE 742299 NIXON'S POSITION ON GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES SCALE 742300 DEMOCRATS' POSITION ON GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES SCALE 742301 REPUBLICANS' POSITION ON GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES SCALE EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN SCALE 742302 R'S POSITION ON EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN SCALE 742303 DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE'S POSITION ON EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN SCALE 742304 REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE'S POSITION ON EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN SCALE LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE 742305 R'S POSITION ON LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE 742306 FORD'S POSITION ON LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE 742307 WALLACE'S POSITION ON LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE 742308 NIXON'S POSITION ON LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE 742309 DEMOCRATS' POSITION ON LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE 742310 REPUBLICANS' POSITION ON LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE 742311 DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE'S POSITION ON LIBERAL/ CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE 742312 REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE'S POSITION ON LIBERAL/ CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE R'S PERSONAL FINANCIAL SITUATION 742313 DOES R FEEL BETTER OFF FINANCIALLY THAN A YEAR AGO 742314 WILL R BE BETTER OFF FINANCIALLY THAN A YEAR AGO BUSINESS CONDITIONS 742315 WILL BUSINESS CONDITIONS BE GOOD DURING NEXT YEAR 742316 WHY DOES R THINK BUSINESS CONDITIONS WILL BE GOOD/BAD GOVERNMENT ECONOMIC POLICY 742317 IS THE GOVERNMENT DOING A GOOD JOB WITH ECONOMIC POLICY 742318 WHICH PARTY CAN BEST HANDLE INFLATION PROBLEMS R'S 1974 ELECTION VOTING BEHAVIOR 742319 DID R VOTE IN THE 1974 ELECTION 742320 DID R VOTE FOR CONGRESSMAN IN 1974 742321 WHOM DID R VOTE FOR CONGRESSMAN - CANDIDATE 742322 WHOM DID R VOTE FOR CONGRESSMAN - PARTY NAMED BY R 742323 DID R VOTE FOR U.S. SENATOR IN 1974 742324 WHOM DID R VOTE FOR SENATOR - CANDIDATE 742325 WHOM DID R VOTE FOR SENATOR - PARTY NAMED BY R 742326 DID R VOTE FOR GOVERNOR IN 1974 742327 WHOM DID R VOTE FOR GOVERNOR - CANDIDATE 742328 WHOM DID R VOTE FOR GOVERNOR - PARTY NAMED BY R OTHER STATE AND LOCAL OFFICES 742329 DID R VOTE A STRAIGHT TICKET FOR OTHER OFFICES IN 1974 742330 (STRAIGHT TICKET) PARTY SUPPORTED IN STATE/LOCAL RACES 742331 (IF SPLIT TICKET) PARTY SUPPORTED IN STATE/LOCAL RACES 742332 RECODE: TICKET TYPE AND PARTY SUPPORTED IN STATE/ LOCAL RACES PROPOSITIONS ON BALLOT 742333 WERE THERE ANY PROPOSITIONS ON THE 1974 BALLOT 742334 HOW MANY PROPOSITIONS DID R VOTE ON 742335 SHOULD MORE ISSUES BE DECIDED AT THE POLLS 742336 ISSUES R FEELS SHOULD BE DECIDED AT POLLS - 1ST MENTION 742337 ISSUES R FEELS SHOULD BE DECIDED AT POLLS - 2ND MENTION "FEELING THERMOMETER" - POLITICAL/MEDIA FIGURES 742338 FEELING THERMOMETER - GEORGE WALLACE 742339 FEELING THERMOMETER - GERALD FORD 742340 FEELING THERMOMETER - LEON JAWORSKI 742341 FEELING THERMOMETER - JOHN MITCHELL 742342 FEELING THERMOMETER - NELSON ROCKEFELLER 742343 FEELING THERMOMETER - JOHN ERLICHMAN 742344 FEELING THERMOMETER - WALTER CRONKITE 742345 FEELING THERMOMETER - JOHN CHANCELLOR 742346 FEELING THERMOMETER - PETER RODINO 742347 FEELING THERMOMETER - EDWARD "TED" KENNEDY 742348 FEELING THERMOMETER - HENRY "SCOOP" JACKSON 742349 FEELING THERMOMETER - JUDGE JOHN SIRICA 742350 FEELING THERMOMETER - HOWARD K. SMITH 742351 FEELING THERMOMETER - JOHN DEAN 742352 FEELING THERMOMETER - HUBERT HUMPHREY 742353 FEELING THERMOMETER - WALTER MONDALE 742354 FEELING THERMOMETER - RICHARD NIXON 742355 FEELING THERMOMETER - LLOYD BENTSEN "FEELING THERMOMETER" - GROUPS IN SOCIETY 742356 FEELING THERMOMETER - BIG BUSINESS 742357 FEELING THERMOMETER - POOR PEOPLE 742358 FEELING THERMOMETER - LIBERALS 742359 FEELING THERMOMETER - RADICAL STUDENTS 742360 FEELING THERMOMETER - POLICEMEN 742361 FEELING THERMOMETER - OLDER PEOPLE 742362 FEELING THERMOMETER - THE MILITARY 742563 FEELING THERMOMETER - WHITES 742364 FEELING THERMOMETER - DEMOCRATS 742365 FEELING THERMOMETER - BLACKS 742366 FEELING THERMOMETER - REPUBLICANS 742367 FEELING THERMOMETER - LABOR UNIONS 742368 FEELING THERMOMETER - YOUNG PEOPLE 742369 FEELING THERMOMETER - CONSERVATIVES 742370 FEELING THERMOMETER - WOMEN'S LIBERATION MOVEMENT 742371 FEELING THERMOMETER - MARIJUANA USERS 742372 FEELING THERMOMETER - BLACK MILITANTS 742373 FEELING THERMOMETER - CIVIL RIGHTS LEADERS 742374 FEELING THERMOMETER - POLITICIANS 742375 FEELING THERMOMETER - FARMERS 742376 FEELING THERMOMETER - MIDDLE-CLASS PEOPLE 742377 FEELING THERMOMETER - TV COMMENTATORS 742378 FEELING THERMOMETER - NEWSPAPER EDITORS INFLUENCE OF SOCIAL GROUPS SCALE 742379 R'S OPINION OF LABOR UNIONS' INFLUENCE 742380 R'S OPINION OF POOR PEOPLE'S INFLUENCE 742381 R'S OPINION OF POLICEMEN'S INFLUENCE 742382 R'S OPINION OF POLITICIANS' INFLUENCE 742383 R'S OPINION OF BIG BUSINESS' INFLUENCE 742384 R'S OPINION OF BLACKS' INFLUENCE 742385 R'S OPINION OF LIBERALS' INFLUENCE 742386 R'S OPINION OF THE MILITARY'S INFLUENCE 742387 R'S OPINION OF NEWSPAPER EDITORS' INFLUENCE 742388 R'S OPINION OF YOUNG PEOPLE'S INFLUENCE 742389 R'S OPINION OF WOMEN'S INFLUENCE 742390 R'S OPINION OF REPUBLICANS' INFLUENCE 742391 R'S OPINION OF INFLUENCE OF PEOPLE ON WELFARE 742392 R'S OPINION OF FARMERS' INFLUENCE 742393 R'S OPINION OF OLD PEOPLE'S INFLUENCE 742394 R'S OPINION OF DEMOCRATS' INFLUENCE 742395 R'S OPINION OF AVERAGE CITIZEN'S INFLUENCE CONTROL AND DIRECTION OF OWN LIFE 742396 IS IT BETTER TO PLAN ONE'S LIFE A GOOD WAY AHEAD 742397 WHEN R PLANS AHEAD, DO R'S PLANS WORK AS EXPECTED 742398 HAS R FELT LIFE WOULD WORK OUT AS DESIRED 742399 DOES R FEEL R CAN RUN LIFE AS WANTED PERSONAL TRUST 742400 GENERALLY SPEAKING, CAN MOST PEOPLE BE TRUSTED 742401 DO PEOPLE TRY TO BE HELPFUL MOST OF THE TIME 742402 IF GIVEN THE CHANCE, WOULD PEOPLE TAKE ADVANTAGE OF R SATISFACTION WITH STANDARD OF LIVING 742403 HOW SATISFIED IS R WITH R'S INCOME 742404 HOW SATISFIED IS R WITH R'S STANDARD OF LIVING ** PERSONAL DATA ** AGE AND MARITAL STATUS 742405 R'S DATE OF BIRTH 742406 RECODE: R'S AGE AT TIME OF INTERVIEW 742407 R'S MARITAL STATUS CHILDREN IN HOUSEHOLD 742408 DOES R HAVE ANY CHILDREN 742409 HOW MANY CHILDREN DOES R HAVE 742410 WHAT ARE CHILDREN'S AGES - FIRST CHILD 742411 WHAT ARE CHILDREN'S AGES - SECOND CHILD 742412 WHAT ARE CHILDREN'S AGES - THIRD CHILD 742413 WHAT ARE CHILDREN'S AGES - FOURTH CHILD 742414 WHAT ARE CHILDREN'S AGES - FIFTH CHILD 742415 WHAT ARE CHILDREN'S AGES - SIXTH CHILD 742416 WHAT ARE CHILDREN'S AGES - SEVENTH CHILD 742417 WHAT ARE CHILDREN'S AGES - EIGHTH CHILD R'S EDUCATION 742418 WHAT IS THE HIGHEST GRADE COMPLETED BY R 742419 DOES R HAVE A HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA 742420 HAS R HAD ANY OTHER SCHOOLING 742421 DOES R HAVE A COLLEGE DEGREE 742422 WHAT COLLEGE DEGREE DOES R HAVE 742423 RECODE: EDUCATION OF RESPONDENT 742424 FIRST COLLEGE ATTENDED BY R 742425 LAST COLLEGE ATTENDED BY R 742426 FAMILY STATUS OF RESPONDENT EDUCATION OF FAMILY HEAD 742427 WHAT IS THE HIGHEST GRADE COMPLETED BY FAMILY HEAD 742428 DOES FAMILY HEAD HAVE A HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA 742429 DOES FAMILY HEAD HAVE ANY OTHER SCHOOLING 742430 DOES FAMILY HEAD HAVE A COLLEGE DEGREE 742431 WHAT COLLEGE DEGREE DOES FAMILY HEAD HAVE 742432 RECODE: EDUCATION OF FAMILY HEAD 742433 FIRST COLLEGE ATTENDED BY FAMILY HEAD 742434 LAST COLLEGE ATTENDED BY FAMILY HEAD EDUCATION OF WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD 742435 WHAT IS HIGHEST GRADE COMPLETED BY WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD 742436 DOES WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD HAVE A HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA 742437 DOES WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD HAVE ANY OTHER SCHOOLING 742438 DOES WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD HAVE A COLLEGE DEGREE 742439 WHAT COLLEGE DEGREE DOES WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD HAVE 742440 RECODE: EDUCATION OF WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD 742441 FIRST COLLEGE ATTENDED BY WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD 742442 LAST COLLEGE ATTENDED BY WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD R'S OCCUPATION SECTION 742443 R'S PRESENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS 742444 (IF RETIRED) WHEN DID R RETIRE 742445 (IF UNEMPLOYED) HAS R EVER WORKED FOR PAY 742446 KIND OF WORK R DOES/DID (PB OCCUPATION CODE) 742447 R'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION - DUNCAN SES 742448 R'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION - DUNCAN DECILE 742449 R'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION - CENSUS SES 742450 R'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY 742451 IS/WAS R SELF-EMPLOYED 742452 (IF UNEMPLOYED) DID R WORK FOR PAY DURING THE PAST YEAR 742453 (IF RETIRED OR DISABLED) IS R PRESENTLY WORKING 742454 HOW MANY HOURS A WEEK DOES/DID R WORK 742455 (IF EMPLOYED) WAS R UNEMPLOYED DURING THE PAST YEAR (IF HOUSEWIFE OR STUDENT) 742456 DID R WORK FOR PAY DURING THE PAST YEAR 742457 IS R PRESENTLY EMPLOYED 742458 WHAT KIND OF WORK DID R DO (PB OCCUPATION CODE) 742459 R'S FORMER OCCUPATION - DUNCAN SES 742460 R'S FORMER OCCUPATION - DUNCAN DECILE 742461 R'S FORMER OCCUPATION - CENSUS SES 742462 R'S FORMER OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY 742463 WAS R SELF-EMPLOYED 742464 HOW MANY HOURS A WEEK DID R WORK 742465 FAMILY STATUS OF RESPONDENT FAMILY HEAD'S OCCUPATION SECTION 742466 FAMILY HEAD'S PRESENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS 742467 (IF RETIRED) WHEN DID THE FAMILY HEAD RETIRE 742468 (IF UNEMPLOYED) HAS THE FAMILY HEAD EVER WORKED FOR PAY 742469 WHAT KIND OF WORK DOES/DID THE FAMILY HEAD DO (PB OCCUPATION CODE) 742470 FAMILY HEAD'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION - DUNCAN SES 742471 FAMILY HEAD'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION - DUNCAN DECILE 742472 FAMILY HEAD'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION - CENSUS SES 742473 FAMILY HEAD'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY 742474 IS/WAS THE FAMILY HEAD SELF-EMPLOYED 742475 (IF UNEMPLOYED) DID THE FAMILY HEAD WORK FOR PAY DURING THE PAST YEAR 742476 (IF RETIRED OR DISABLED) IS THE FAMILY HEAD PRESENTLY WORKING 742477 HOW MANY HOURS A WEEK DOES/DID THE FAMILY HEAD WORK 742478 (IF EMPLOYED) WAS FAMILY HEAD UNEMPLOYED IN PAST YEAR (IF HOUSEWIFE OR STUDENT) 742479 DID THE FAMILY HEAD WORK FOR PAY DURING THE PAST YEAR 742480 IS THE FAMILY HEAD PRESENTLY EMPLOYED 742481 WHAT KIND OF WORK DID THE FAMILY HEAD DO (PB OCCUPATION CODE) 742482 FAMILY HEAD'S FORMER OCCUPATION - DUNCAN SES 742483 FAMILY HEAD'S FORMER OCCUPATION - DUNCAN DECILE 742484 FAMILY HEAD'S FORMER OCCUPATION - CENSUS SES 742485 FAMILY HEAD'S FORMER OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY 742486 WAS THE FAMILY HEAD SELF-EMPLOYED 742487 HOW MANY HOURS A WEEK DID THE FAMILY HEAD WORK WIFE OF HEAD'S OCCUPATION SECTION 742488 WIFE OF HEAD'S PRESENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS 742489 (IF RETIRED) WHEN DID WIFE OF HEAD RETIRE 742490 (IF UNEMPLOYED) HAS WIFE OF HEAD EVER WORKED FOR PAY 742491 WHAT KIND OF WORK DOES/DID WIFE OF HEAD DO (PB OCCUPATION CODE) 742492 WIFE OF HEAD'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION--DUNCAN SES 742493 WIFE OF HEAD'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION--DUNCAN DECILE 742494 WIFE OF HEAD'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION--CENSUS SES 742495 WIFE OF HEAD'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION--CENSUS INDUSTRY 742496 IS/WAS WIFE OF HEAD SELF-EMPLOYED 742497 (IF UNEMPLOYED) DID THE WIFE OF HEAD WORK FOR PAY DURING THE PAST YEAR 742498 (IF RETIRED OR DISABLED) IS THE WIFE OF HEAD PRESENTLY WORKING 742499 HOW MANY HOURS A WEEK DOES/DID THE WIFE OF HEAD WORK 742500 (IF EMPLOYED) WAS THE WIFE OF HEAD UNEMPLOYED DURING THE PAST YEAR (IF HOUSEWIFE OR STUDENT) 742501 DID WIFE OF HEAD WORK FOR PAY DURING THE PAST YEAR 742502 IS WIFE OF HEAD PRESENTLY EMPLOYED 742503 WHAT KIND OF WORK DID WIFE OF HEAD DO (PB OCCUPATION CODE) 742504 WIFE OF HEAD'S FORMER OCCUPATION - DUNCAN SES 742505 WIFE OF HEAD'S FORMER OCCUPATION - DUNCAN DECILE 742506 WIFE OF HEAD'S FORMER OCCUPATION - CENSUS SES 742507 WIFE OF HEAD'S FORMER OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY 742508 WAS WIFE OF HEAD SELF-EMPLOYED 742509 HOW MANY HOURS A WEEK DID WIFE OF HEAD WORK FARMERS' QUESTIONS 742510 DOES THE FAMILY HEAD DO OTHER WORK BESIDES FARMING 742511 FARMER/RANCHER'S OTHER OCCUPATION 742512 HOW MUCH TIME DOES FAMILY HEAD PUT IN ON NON-FARMING JOB - HOURS/WEEK 742513 HOW MUCH TIME DOES FAMILY HEAD PUT IN ON NON-FARMING JOB - WEEKS/YEAR 742514 DOES FAMILY HEAD OWN/RENT/MANAGE FARM HOUSEHOLD UNION MEMBERSHIP 742515 IS ANYONE IN THE HOUSEHOLD A UNION MEMBER 742516 WHO IS THE HOUSEHOLD IS A UNION MEMBER 742517 UNION MEMBERSHIP - FIRST UNION MENTIONED 742518 UNION MEMBERSHIP - SECOND UNION MENTIONED 742519 UNION MEMBERSHIP - THIRD UNION MENTIONED R'S INCOME LEVEL 742520 DOES R MAKE AS MUCH AS OTHERS WITH SAME OCCUPATION 742521 DOES R MAKE AS MUCH AS OTHERS WITH OTHER OCCUPATIONS R'S CLASS IDENTIFICATION 742522 DOES R THINK OF SELF AS BELONGING TO A SOCIAL CLASS 742523 WHICH SOCIAL CLASS DOES R THINK OF SELF AS BELONGING TO 742524 R'S RELATIVE PLACEMENT IN SOCIAL CLASS CHOSEN 742525 RECODE: R'S SUBJECTIVE SOCIAL CLASS SUMMARY 742526 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO PEOPLE IN R'S SOCIAL CLASS 742527 WHAT SOCIAL CLASS WAS R'S FAMILY WHEN R WAS YOUNG R'S ETHNIC BACKGROUND AND IDENTIFICATION 742528 WHAT DOES R CONSIDER R'S MAIN ETHNIC GROUP 742529 WERE BOTH OF R'S PARENTS BORN IN THIS COUNTRY 742530 (IF ONE OR BOTH PARENTS FOREIGN-BORN) WHAT COUNTRY WAS R'S FATHER BORN IN 742531 (IF ONE OR BOTH PARENTS FOREIGN-BORN) WHAT COUNTRY WAS R'S MOTHER BORN IN 742532 (IF BOTH PARENTS NATIVE-BORN) WHICH COUNTRY DID R'S FAMILY COME FROM - FATHER'S SIDE 742533 (IF BOTH PARENTS NATIVE-BORN) WHICH COUNTRY DID R'S FAMILY COME FROM - MOTHER'S SIDE OCCUPATION OF R'S PARENTS 742534 KIND OF WORK R'S FATHER DID WHEN R WAS YOUNG 742535 WAS R'S MOTHER EMPLOYED WHEN R WAS YOUNG 742536 KIND OF WORK R'S MOTHER DID WHEN R WAS YOUNG WHERE WAS R BROUGHT UP 742537 WHERE WAS R BORN 742538 WHERE DID R GROW UP 742539 R'S AGE WHEN R CAME TO STATE OF CURRENT RESIDENCE 742540 WHAT TYPE OF COMMUNITY WAS R BROUGHT UP IN 742541 WHICH CITY DID R LIVE IN AT AGE 14 742542 WHICH STATE DID R LIVE IN AT AGE 14 742543 HOW LONG HAS R LIVED IN PRESENT COMMUNITY 742544 RESPONDENT'S CITY BEFORE MOVING TO PRESENT COMMUNITY 742545 STATE IN WHICH R LIVED BEFORE MOVING TO PRESENT STATE R'S HOUSING 742546 HOW LONG HAS R LIVED IN PRESENT HOUSING 742547 IS R'S PRESENT NEIGHBORHOOD NEWER THAN PRIOR ONE 742548 IS R'S PRESENT NEIGHBORHOOD MORE EXPENSIVE THAN PRIOR ONE PERSONAL DATA 742549 R'S ESTIMATED FAMILY INCOME FOR 1973 742550 DOES R OWN/RENT PRESENT HOME 742551 R'S RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE 742552 HOW OFTEN DOES R GO TO CHURCH 742553 WHAT IS R'S SEX 742554 WHAT IS R'S RACE 742555 WHAT IS THE RELATIONSHIP OF R TO HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD CONDITIONS OF THE INTERVIEW 742556 WHO ELSE WAS PRESENT AT THE INTERVIEW 742557 DEGREE OF R'S COOPERATION WITH INTERVIEW 742558 R'S APPARENT LEVEL OF POLITICAL INFORMATION 742559 RATING OF R'S APPARENT INTELLIGENCE 742560 HOW SUSPICIOUS WAS R ABOUT THE STUDY BEFOREHAND 742561 HOW GREAT WAS R'S INTEREST IN THE INTERVIEW 742562 HOW SINCERE WAS R WITH ANSWERS 742563 TYPE OF STRUCTURE IN WHICH R LIVES 742564 NUMBER OF STORIES IN STRUCTURE IN WHICH R LIVES