Version 01 Codebook ------------------- CODEBOOK INTRODUCTION FILE 1976 PRE-POST STUDY (1976.T) AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES 1976 PRE-POST ELECTION STUDY PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS WARREN E. MILLER ARTHUR H. MILLER THE CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN PRE-ELECTION WAVE SEPTEMBER 17, 1976 -- NOVEMBER 1, 1976 POST-ELECTION WAVE NOVEMBER 3, 1976 -- JANUARY 15, 1977 ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER 7381 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ASSISTANCE ALL MANUSCRIPTS UTILIZING DATA MADE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE CONSORTIUM SHOULD ACKNOWLEDGE THAT FACT AS WELL AS IDENTIFY THE ORIGINAL COLLECTOR OF THE DATA. THE ICPSR COUNCIL URGES ALL USERS OF ICPSR DATA FACILITIES TO FOLLOW SOME ADAPTATION OF THIS STATEMENT WITH THE PARENTHESES IN- DICATING ITEMS TO BE FILLED IN APPROPRIATELY OR DELETED BY THE INDIVIDUAL USER. THE DATA (AND TABULATIONS) UTILIZED IN THIS (PUBLICATION) WERE MADE AVAILABLE (IN PART) BY THE INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL AND SOCIAL RESEARCH. THE DATA FOR THE CPS 1976 AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY WERE ORIGINALLY COLLECTED BY THE CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES OF THE INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH, THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN UNDER A GRANT FROM THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION. NEITHER THE ORIGINAL COLLECTORS OF THE DATA NOR THE CONSORTIUM BEAR ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ANALYSES OR INTERPRETATIONS PRESENTED HERE. IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FUNDING AGENCIES WITH ESSENTIAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE USE OF ARCHIVAL RESOURCES, AND TO FACILITATE THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION ABOUT ICPSR PAR- TICIPANTS' RESEARCH ACTIVITIES, EACH USER OF THE ICPSR DATA FACILITIES IS EXPECTED TO SEND TWO COPIES OF EACH COMPLETED MANUSCRIPT OR THESIS ABSTRACT TO THE CONSORTIUM. PLEASE INDICATE IN THE COVER LETTER WHICH DATA WERE USED. TABLE OF CONTENTS Note: >>sections in the codebook introduction and codebook appendix can be navigated in the machine-readable files by searching ">>". INTRODUCTORY MATERIAL (file int1976.cbk) --------------------- >> 1976 STUDY DESCRIPTION >> 1976 SAMPLING INFORMATION >> 1976 WEIGHTING INFORMATION >> 1976 FREQUENCIES INFORMATION >> 1976 CODEBOOK INFORMATION >> 1976 FILE STRUCTURE >> 1976 PROCESSING INFORMATION >> 1976 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST CODEBOOK -------- 1976 variables APPENDICES (file app1976.cbk) ---------- >> 1976 STANDARD PRIMARY SAMPLING UNIT CODE >> 1976 COUNTY CODES - COUNTY NAMES ALPHABETICALLY BY STATE >> 1976 PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARIES >> 1976 PARTY/CANDIDATE MASTER CODE >> 1976 PARTY DIFFERENCES CODE >> 1976 FEELING THERMOMETER NOTE >> 1976 CHANGES IN GOVERNMENT >> 1976 ICPSR COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY CODE >> 1976 OCCUPATIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM >> 1976 INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM >> 1976 UNION CODE >> 1976 THE STATE AND COUNTRY CODE >> 1976 CENSUS COUNTY CODES >> 1976 DEBATE MASTER CODE >> 1976 NEWSPAPER CODE >> 1976 CANDIDATES FOR U.S. SENATOR >> 1976 CANDIDATES FOR REPRESENTATIVE TO CONGRESS >> 1976 CANDIDATES FOR GOVERNOR >> 1976 IMPORTANT PROBLEMS CODE >> 1976 STUDY DESCRIPTION THE CPS 1976 AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY WAS CONDUCTED BY THE CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES OF THE INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH, THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN UNDER THE DIRECTION OF WARREN E. MILLER AND ARTHUR H. MILLER. IT WAS THE FOURTEENTH IN A SERIES OF STUDIES OF NA- TIONAL ELECTIONS PRODUCED BY THE POLITICAL BEHAVIOR PROGRAM OF THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER AND THE CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES. THE STUDY WAS SUPPORTED BY A GRANT FROM THE THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION (SOC 76-13562). RESPONDENTS WERE INTERVIEWED BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER THE 1976 ELECTION. THE PRE-ELECTION QUESTIONNAIRE WAS ADMINISTERED TO 2,248 RESPONDENTS AND THE POST-ELECTION QUESTIONNAIRE WAS ADMINISTERED TO 1,909 RESPONDENTS. THE DESIGN OF THE 1976 STUDY INCLUDES A SUBSET OF RESPONDENTS WHO HAD PREVIOUSLY BEEN INTERVIEWED IN BOTH THE 1972 POST-ELECTION SURVEY AND THE 1974 ELECTION STUDY. THIS SET OF PANEL RESPONDENTS WAS THEN AUGMENTED WITH A SET OF NEW INTERVIEWS SELECTED TO PROVIDE A REPRESENTATIVE CROSS-SECTION OF U.S. CITIZENS WHEN COMBINED WITH THE NON-MOVING PANEL RESPONDENTS. NEW RESPONDENTS WERE NOT, HOWEVER, SELECTED AT THE SAME SAMPLING RATE AS PANEL RESPONDENTS; THUS WEIGHTING WAS NECESSARY TO FORM A REPRESENTATIVE CROSS-SECTION FROM THE TWO TYPES OF RESPONDENTS. THE PRIMARY OBJECTIVE OF THIS STUDY WAS ANALYSIS OF CURRENT ATTITUDES AND VOTING PATTERNS OF A CROSS-SECTION OF AMERICAN CITIZENS, PARTICULARLY IN COMPARISON WITH ATTITUDES AND VOTING PATTERNS FOUND IN PREVIOUS CROSS-SECTION STUDIES. AS IN PAST ELECTION STUDIES, EMPHASIS WAS PLACED ON HOW THE CANDIDATES, PARTIES, AND ISSUES AFFECTED THE POLITICAL BEHAVIOR OF RESPONDENTS. IN ADDITION, THE IMPACT OF THE MASS MEDIA, PARTICULARLY THE 1976 PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES, AND THE GENERAL THEMES OF ALIENATION AND TRUST IN GOVERNMENT WERE INVESTIGATED. CONTENT OF INTERVIEWS THE CPS AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY EXPLORED POLITICAL ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOR IN THE CONTEXT OF THE 1976 CAMPAIGN AND ELECTION. ITEMS DEALING SPECIFICALLY WITH THE CAMPAIGN AND ELECTION ELICITED RESPONDENTS' INTEREST IN THE CAMPAIGN, CONCERN FOR THE OUTCOME OF THE ELECTION, AND EVALUATION OF THE CANDIDATES, AS WELL AS THEIR VOTING BEHAVIOR. THE PARTY IDENTIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENTS, THEIR VOTING HISTORY, INFORMATION ABOUT FACETS OF EARLY POLITICAL SOCIALIZATION, AND THE RESPONDENTS' EVALUATION OF THE POLITICAL PARTIES WERE ALSO OBTAINED. SIMILAR TO PAST STUDIES, THE QUESTIONNAIRE INCLUDED AN IDENTIFICATION OF THE MAJOR PROBLEMS THOUGHT TO BE FACING THE COUNTRY. A SERIES OF QUESTIONS DEALT WITH THE RESPONDENTS' SENSE OF POLITICAL EFFICACY AND CIVIC DUTY, THE DEGREE OF THEIR TRUST IN GOVERNMENT, AND THEIR EVALUATIONS OF GOVERNMENT RESPONSIVENESS. RACE RELATIONS AND THE CONTROVERSIAL ISSUE OF BUSING WERE INVESTIGATED WITH BOTH OPEN-ENDED AND STRUCTURED QUESTIONS. RESPONDENTS WERE ALSO ASKED TO INDICATE THEIR FEELINGS TOWARD POTENTIAL CANDIDATES AND GROUP INFLUENCES IN AMERICAN LIFE AND POLITICS ON A "FEELING THERMOMETER." ANOTHER SERIES OF ISSUE SCALES MEASURED THE RESPONDENTS' POSITION AND THEIR PERCEPTIONS OF THE POSITIONS OF THE POLITICAL PARTIES, POSITIONS OF CERTAIN POLITICAL LEADERS AND VARIOUS SOCIAL GROUPS WITH REGARD TO POLITICAL ISSUES SUCH AS BUSING, WOMEN'S LIBERATION, MARIJUANA USE, NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE, THE RIGHTS OF ACCUSED PERSONS, AID TO MINORITIES, AND THE IMPORTANCE OF GOVERNMENT GUARANTEES OF LIVING STANDARDS. RESPONDENTS WERE FURTHER ASKED TO EVALUATE THEMSELVES, THE PARTIES, AND THE CANDIDATES ON A LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE SCALE. THE STUDY ALSO CONTAINED SPECIFIC INQUIRIES INTO THE IMPACT OF THE MASS MEDIA. A SERIES OF QUESTIONS EXAMINED MEDIA USAGE IN GENERAL, AS WELL AS HOW THE MEDIA WERE USED AS A SOURCE OF CAMPAIGN INFORMATION. IN ADDITION, A SERIES OF QUESTIONS WAS DESIGNED TO MEASURE THE IMPACT OF THE 1976 PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES ON POLITICAL LEARNING AND INFORMATION HOLDING. OTHER SERIES OF QUESTIONS DEALT WITH NON-POLITICAL ISSUES. RESPONDENTS WERE QUESTIONED ABOUT PERCEPTIONS OF THEIR OWN FINANCIAL CONDITION AS WELL AS BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS IN THE NATION AS A WHOLE. RESPONDENTS WERE QUESTIONED ABOUT PERCEPTIONS OF THEIR OWN LIFE IN A SERIES OF QUESTIONS DESIGNED TO MEASURE PERSONAL ESTEEM, TRUST AND QUALITY OF LIFE. THE PERSONAL DATA SECTION CONTAINED A WIDE VARIETY OF INFORMATION ABOUT THE RESPONDENTS AND THEIR FAMILIES. INFORMATION WAS SOUGHT ON EDUCATION, OCCUPATION, UNION MEMBERSHIP(S), AGE, SEX, MARITAL STATUS AND FAMILY COMPOSITION, SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS, ETHNIC BACKGROUND, INCOME LEVEL AND RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION. >> 1976 SAMPLING INFORMATION THE SAMPLE FOR THE CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES' 1976 AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY WAS A COMBINATION OF THREE OVERLAPPING SAMPLES, EACH ONE DERIVED FROM THE INITIAL CPS 1972 ELECTION STUDY SAMPLE FRAME. THE 1972 SAMPLE WAS SUPPLEMENTED TO ATTAIN REPRESENTATION OF ALL HOUSING UNITS (HU'S) AND CITIZENS ADDED TO THE STUDY UNIVERSE AFTER THE FALL OF 1972. THE SAMPLING OF HOUSEHOLD UNITS UTILIZED THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER'S MASTER FRAME OF COTERMINOUS UNITED STATES: HOUSING UNITS EXCLUSIVE OF INSTITUTIONAL POPULATIONS. A MORE DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THIS SAMPLING PROCEDURE CAN BE FOUND IN LESLIE KISH AND IRENE HESS, "THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER'S NATIONAL SAMPLE OF DWELLINGS," (ISR #2315, ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN: INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH, THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN). THE 1976 CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE DESIGN THE 1976 ELECTION STUDY WAS DESIGNED TO PRODUCE BOTH A REPRESENTATIVE CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE OF UNITED STATES ADULT CITIZENS AND TO COMPLETE A THREE WAVE (1972-1974-1976) PANEL STUDY. THIS "DUAL" DESIGN FEATURE OF THE STUDY WAS MOST EFFICIENTLY SERVED BY CONSTRUCTING A CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE STARTED WITH THE 1972 SAMPLE FRAME. IT THEN COMBINED ALL HOUSING UNITS (HU'S) WHERE A NON-MOVING 1972 RESPONDENT WAS IN RESIDENCE WITH A TWO-THIRDS SUBSAMPLE OF THE HU'S THAT 1972 RESPONDENTS HAD VACATED AND A TWO-THIRDS SUBSAMPLE OF HU'S THAT HAD ZERO CHANCE OF SELECTION IN 1972 FOR ONE OF THE FOLLOWING REASONS: (1) THEY WERE OVERLOOKED PREVIOUSLY; (2) THEY RESULTED FROM CONVERSIONS OF VACANCIES AFTER 1972; OR, (3) THEY RESULTED FROM NEW CONSTRUCTION AFTER 1972. TWO-THIRDS WAS USED AS A SUBSAMPLING FRACTION FOR HU'S ADDED TO THE PANEL HU'S SIMPLY BECAUSE THE BUDGET DID NOT ALLOW US TO TAKE INTERVIEWS IN ALL THESE HOUSEHOLDS. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE 1976 CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE WAS ACCOMPLISHED IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER: 1. TREATMENT OF PANEL HOUSEHOLDS: A. THE PANEL MEMBER STILL LIVED AT THE 1972 HU AND NO NEW MEMBERS HAD BEEN ADDED TO THE HOUSEHOLD: "NEW" MEMBERS MEANS ANYONE WHO HAD ZERO CHANCE OF SELECTION FOR THE 1972 STUDY. WHEN THE PANEL MEMBER WAS PRESENT AND THERE WERE NO NEW MEMBERS, THE PANEL MEMBER WAS ALSO THE CROSS-SECTION RESPONDENT. B. THE PANEL MEMBER WAS STILL LIVING AT THE SAMPLE HU, BUT ONE OR MORE NEW MEMBERS WERE PRESENT IN THE HOUSEHOLD: INTERVIEWERS WERE INSTRUCTED TO LIST ALL ELIGIBLE HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS AND TO CHOOSE ONE OBJECTIVELY. IF THE CHOSEN PERSON WAS NOT AN ELIGIBLE HOUSEHOLD MEMBER IN 1972, A CROSS-SECTION INTERVIEW WAS ATTEMPTED WITH THE OBJECTIVELY SELECTED CHOSEN PERSON; OTHERWISE THE PANEL MEMBER WAS DESIGNATED RESPONDENT FOR THE CROSS-SECTION STUDY AS WELL AS FOR THE PANEL. 2. TREATMENT OF NON-PANEL HOUSEHOLDS: TWO-THIRDS OF THE 1972 VACANT HU'S, AND HU'S PRODUCING NON- RESPONSES, OR PRE-ELECTION ONLY RESPONSES WERE CHOSEN FOR THE CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE. IN THIS CASE, ALL HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS EIGHTEEN YEARS AND OVER WERE LISTED AND AN INTERVIEW ATTEMPTED WITH ONE OBJECTIVELY SELECTED RESPONDENT (SEE LESLIE KISH, "A PROCEDURE FOR OBJECTIVE RESPONDENT SELECTION WITHIN THE HOUSEHOLD," JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 44 (SEPTEMBER, 1949), PP. 38-387. 3. TREATMENT OF 1976 HU'S NONEXISTENT IN 1974: INTER- VIEWERS WERE INSTRUCTED TO UPDATE THE HU LISTINGS FOR EACH SAMPLE SEGMENT. TWO-THIRDS OF THE NEWLY ADDED HU'S WERE INCLUDED IN THE CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE. AT EACH OF THESE HU'S, HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE AND OVER WERE LISTED AND AN INTERVIEW ATTEMPTED WITH AN OBJECTIVELY SELECTED RESPONDENT. 4. 1974 CROSS-SECTION ONLY AT 1972 ADDRESSES: THESE ARE RESPONDENTS WHO WERE 1974 CROSS-SECTION RESPONDENTS WHO CONTINUE TO RESIDE AT HU'S SELECTED FOR THE 1976 CROSS-SECTION. ALL OF THESE RESPONDENTS WERE INCLUDED IN THE 1976 CROSS- SECTION SAMPLE IF THEY SATISFIED EITHER OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, AS IN 1B, ABOVE: (A) NO NEW MEMBERS HAD BEEN ADDED TO THE HOUSEHOLD SINCE 1974; OR (B) NEW MEMBERS HAD BEEN ADDED TO THE HOUSEHOLD BUT THE RESPONDENT INTERVIEWED IN 1974 WAS OBJECTIVELY SELECTED FROM THE ELIGIBLE 1976 MEMBERS. IF THE SELECTION PROCEDURE CHOSE NEW MEMBERS, INTERVIEWS WERE TAKEN WITH A TWO-THIRDS SUBSAMPLE. THE SAMPLE DESIGN EMPLOYED FOR THE 1976 CROSS-SECTION PRODUCES A REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE OF UNITED STATES CITIZENS, EIGHTEEN YEARS OLD AND OLDER RESIDING WITHIN THE FORTY- EIGHT CONTIGUOUS STATES WHEN THE APPROPRIATE SAMPLE WEIGHTS (DESCRIBED BELOW) ARE APPLIED. THESE WEIGHTS ARE NECESSARY TO BRING ABOUT EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN THE TWO-THIRDS SUBSAMPLED HU'S AND THE HU'S WHERE NON-MOVING PANEL MEMBERS WERE FOUND TO RESIDE. >> 1976 WEIGHTING INFORMATION THE 1976 CPS AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY SAMPLE CONSISTED OF PANEL AND CROSS-SECTION COMPONENTS. THE RECONTACTED RESPONDENTS FORMING THE PANEL WERE FIRST INTERVIEWED IN THE PRE- AND POST-ELECTION PHASES OF THE 1972 CPS AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY, AND THEN AGAIN IN THE 1974 CPS AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY. OF THESE PANEL RESPONDENTS, 1,005 WERE PART OF THE 1976 CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE. THESE RESPONDENTS WERE GIVEN A SELF-WEIGHT OF 1. TO FORM A REPRESENTATIVE CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE OF ADULTS 18 YEARS OF AGE AND OVER, 1,243 NON-PANEL RESPONDENTS WERE SELECTED BY SUBSAMPLING THE 1972 SAMPLE OF HOUSING UNITS AT A TWO-THIRDS FRACTION. CONSEQUENTLY, THESE CROSS-SECTION (NON-PANEL) RESPONDENTS WERE GIVEN A WEIGHT OF 1.5. THE UNWEIGHTED N IS 2,248, BUT APPLICATION OF THE WEIGHTS YIELDS AN N OF 2,868.5. THE WEIGHT VARIABLE (V763003) MUST BE EMPLOYED WHENEVER THESE DATA ARE USED IN ORDER TO OBTAIN A REPRESENTATIVE CROSS-SECTION OF THE VOTING POPULATION OF THE UNITED STATES IN 1976. >> 1976 FREQUENCIES INFORMATION THE FREQUENCIES USED IN THE CODEBOOK WERE OBTAINED BY APPLYING THE WEIGHT VARIABLE (V763003). THE FMERG PROGRAM USED TO GENERATE FREQUENCIES FOR THIS CODEBOOK ROUNDS OFF EACH CODE VALUE TO THE NEAREST INTEGER. CONSEQUENTLY, THE TOTAL N FOR MOST VARIABLES WILL RANGE BETWEEN 2,870 AND 2,872. THERE ARE A FEW INSTANCES, HOWEVER, WHERE DUE TO THE LARGE NUMBER OF CODE CATEGORIES, EACH OF WHICH IS SUBJECT TO ROUNDING, THE TOTAL N IS INCREASED CONSIDERABLY. FOR EXAMPLE, V763923-V3925 (FOREIGN RELATIONS PROBLEMS--1ST - 3RD RESPONSES) HAVE TOTAL N'S OF 2,886, 2,884, AND 2,881, RESPECTIVELY. THE FREQUENCIES ADDENDUM, HOWEVER, REPORTS THE N WITH THE IMPLIED DECIMAL. DEPENDING ON THE CONVENTIONS OF THE PROGRAMS USED, FREQUENCIES FOR INDIVIDUAL CODE VALUES MAY VARY BY A COUNT OF 1. >> 1976 CODEBOOK INFORMATION The following example from the 1948 NES study provides the standard format for codebook variable documentation. Note that NES studies which are not part of the Time-Series usually omit marginals and the descriptive content in lines 2-5 (except for variable name). Line 1 ============================== 2 VAR 480026 NAME-R NOT VT-WAS R REG TO VT 3 COLUMNS 61 - 61 4 NUMERIC 5 MD=0 OR GE 8 6 7 Q. 17. (IF R DID NOT VOTE) WERE YOU REGISTERED (ELIGIBLE) 8 TO VOTE. 9 ........................................................... 10 11 82 1. YES 12 149 2. NO 13 14 0 8. DK 15 9 9. NA 16 422 0. INAP., R VOTED Line 2 - VARIABLE NAME. Note that in the codebook the variable name (usually a 'number') does not include the "V" prefix which is used in the release SAS and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files) for all variables including those which do not have 'number' names. For example the variable "VERSION" in the codebook is "VVERSION" in the data definition files. Line 2 - "NAME". This is the variable label used in the SAS and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files). Some codebooks exclude this. Line 3 - COLUMNS. Columns in the ASCII data file (.dat file). Line 4 - CHARACTER OR NUMERIC. If numeric and the variable is a decimal rather than integer variable, the numer of decimal places is also indicated (e.g. "NUMERIC DEC 4") Line 5 - Values which are assigned to missing by default in the Study's SAS and and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files). Line 7 - Actual question text for survey variables or a description of non-survey variables (for example, congressional district). Survey items usually include the question number (for example "B1a.") from the Study questionnaire; beginning in 1996 non-survey items also have unique item numbers (for example "CSheet.1"). Line 9 - A dashed or dotted line usually separates question text from any other documentation which follows. Line 10- When present, annotation provided by Study staff is presented below the question text/description and preceding code values. Lines 11-16 Code values are listed with descriptive labels. Valid codes (those not having 'missing' status in line 5) are presented first, followed by the values described in line 5. For continuous variables, one line may appear providing the range of possible values. A blank line usually separates the 'valid' and 'missing' values. Lines 11-16 Marginals are usually provided for discrete variables. The counts may be unweighted or weighted; check the Study codebook introductory text to determine weight usage. >> 1976 FILE STRUCTURE THE OSIRIS DATA FILE CAN BE ACCESSED DIRECTLY BY SOFT- WARE PACKAGES WHICH DO NOT USE THE OSIRIS DICTIONARY BY SPECIFYING THE TAPE LOCATIONS OF THE DESIRED VARIABLES. TAPE LOCATIONS ARE PROVIDED IN THIS CODEBOOK. THERE IS ONE WEIGHT VARIABLE IN THE CPS 1976 AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY. (SEE V763003; THIS SHOULD BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH DATA ANALYSIS PROGRAMS.) >> 1976 PROCESSING INFORMATION THIS STUDY WAS PROCESSED ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD ICPSR PROCEDURES. THE DATA WERE CHECKED FOR INCONSISTENT CODES, ILLEGAL CODES, AND BLANKS WHICH, WHENEVER FOUND, WERE CORRECTED BY REFERRING TO THE ORIGINAL INTERVIEW SCHEDULES, EXCEPT IN Q.E7-Q.E9 AND CHECKPOINT C1 WHERE INCONSISTENT DATA WERE NOT CORRECTED IN ORDER TO MAXIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF SUBSTANTIVE DATA. STATEMENTS BRACKETED IN "<" AND ">" SIGNS IN THE BODY OF THE CODEBOOK AND THE FOOTNOTES WERE ADDED BY THE PROCESSORS FOR EXPLANATORY PURPOSES. >> 1976 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST VARIABLE VARIABLE LABEL -------- -------------- VERSION NES VERSION NUMBER DSETNO NES DATASET NUMBER 763001 ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER 763002 PRE-ELECTION INTERVIEW NUMBER 763003 WEIGHT STUDY PROCEDURE & SAMPLING INFORMATION 763004 PRE AND/OR POST INTERVIEW OBTAINED 763005 STATE OF INTERVIEW 763006 REGION OF INTERVIEW 763007 STATE AND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT OF INTERVIEW 763008 ICPSR COUNTY CODE 763009 SAMPLING COUNTY CODE 763010 PRIMARY SAMPLING UNIT (PSU) OF INTERVIEW 763011 DEGREE OF URBANIZATION 763012 PRIMARY SAMPLING UNIT AND PLACE IDENTIFICATION 763013 ACTUAL POPULATION OF INTERVIEW PLACE 763014 DISTANCE FROM PLACE OF INTERVIEW TO CENTER OF CENTRAL CITY OF NEAREST SMSA 763015 DISTANCE FROM PLACE OF INTERVIEW TO CENTER OF CENTRAL CITY OF NEAREST SMSA OVER 349,999 PEOPLE 763016 1970 CENSUS TRACT NUMBER FOR PLACE OF INTERVIEW 763017 SIZE OF INTERVIEW PLACE -- MASTER CODE 763018 BELT CODE 763019 NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS IN HOUSEHOLD 763020 ADULT COMPOSITION OF PRIMARY FAMILY UNIT 763021 NUMBER OF POLITICALLY ELIGIBLE ADULTS IN DWELLING UNIT ***PRE-ELECTION WAVE*** 763022 INTERVIEWER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 763023 DATE OF PRE-ELECTION INTERVIEW 763024 LENGTH OF PRE-ELECTION INTERVIEW 763025 PRE-ELECTION CODER NUMBER EXPECTATIONS, CONCERN ABOUT PRESIDENTIAL RACE 763026 WHOM DOES R THINK WILL BE ELECTED PRESIDENT IN 1976 763027 DOES R BELIEVE PRESIDENTIAL RACE WILL BE CLOSE 763028 WHICH CANDIDATE WILL CARRY R'S STATE 763029 DOES R BELIEVE THAT STATE RACE WILL BE CLOSE 763030 DOES R CARE WHICH PARTY WINS PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 763031 HAS R BEEN INTERESTED IN POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS SO FAR 763032 IS R REGISTERED TO VOTE 763033 IS R REGISTERED DEMOCRAT/REPUBLICAN/OTHER R'S ACTIVITY - PRIMARY RACE 763034 WAS THERE PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY IN R'S STATE 763035 DID R VOTE IN STATE PRIMARY ELECTION 763036 IN WHICH PARTY PRIMARY DID R VOTE 763037 WHICH PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE DID R SUPPORT IN PRIMARY 763038 DID R WORK FOR ONE OF THE CANDIDATES IN PRIMARY 763039 DID R ATTEND ANY POLITICAL MEETINGS OR RALLIES 763040 DID R TALK TO PEOPLE ABOUT WHY THEY SHOULD HAVE VOTED FOR ONE OF THE CANDIDATES 763041 DID R MAKE ANY CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS DURING PRIMARY 763042 TO WHICH CANDIDATE'S CAMPAIGN DID R CONTRIBUTE 763043 DOES R EXPECT TO VOTE IN 1976 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 763044 WHOM WILL R VOTE FOR IN 1976 ELECTION 763045 WHOM WOULD R VOTE FOR IN 1976 ELECTION R'S NON-ELECTORAL POLITICAL ACTIVITIES (NATIONAL LEVEL) 763046 DID R WRITE A LETTER TO THE EDITOR ABOUT A NATIONAL PROBLEM 763047 DID R JOIN WITH OTHERS TO DEAL WITH A NATIONAL PROBLEM 763048 DID R COMMUNICATE WITH A NATIONAL LEADER 763049 DID R SIGN A PETITION REGARDING ACTION BY WASHINGTON 763050 DID R DEMONSTRATE/PROTEST ABOUT A NATIONAL PROBLEM 763051 INTERVIEWERS CHECKPOINT - R'S POLITICAL ACTIVITY (NATIONAL) EVALUATION OF R'S NON-ELECTORAL ACTIVITIES (NATIONAL LEVEL) 763052 WAS WRITING A LETTER TO THE EDITOR SUCCESSFUL 763053 WAS WRITING A LETTER TO THE EDITOR WORTH DOING 763054 WAS JOINING WITH OTHERS SUCCESSFUL (NATIONAL PROBLEM) 763055 WAS JOINING WITH OTHERS WORTH DOING (NATIONAL PROBLEM) 763056 WAS COMMUNICATION WITH A NATIONAL LEADER SUCCESSFUL 763057 WAS COMMUNICATING WITH A NATIONAL LEADER WORTH DOING 763058 WAS PETITIONING THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT SUCCESSFUL 763059 WAS PETITIONING THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT WORTH DOING 763060 WAS DEMONSTRATING ABOUT A NATIONAL PROBLEM SUCCESSFUL 763061 WAS DEMONSTRATING ABOUT A NATIONAL PROBLEM WORTH DOING 763062 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: DID R DEMONSTRATE (NATIONAL) 763063 HOW MANY TIMES HAS R DEMONSTRATED 763064 MOST RECENT DEMONSTRATION REASON R'S NON-ELECTORAL POLITICAL ACTIVITIES (LOCAL LEVEL) 763065 DID R ATTEND CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD MEETINGS 763066 DID R WRITE A LETTER TO THE EDITOR OF THE LOCAL PAPER 763067 DID R JOIN WITH OTHERS TO DEAL WITH A LOCAL PROBLEM 763068 DID R COMMUNICATE WITH A LOCAL OFFICIAL 763069 DID R SIGN PETITION REGARDING LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACTION 763070 DID R DEMONSTRATE ABOUT A LOCAL PROBLEM EVALUATION OF R'S NON-ELECTORAL ACTIVITIES (LOCAL LEVEL) 763071 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT - R'S POLITICAL ACTIVITY (LOCAL) 763072 WAS ATTENDING LOCAL MEETINGS SUCCESSFUL 763073 WAS ATTENDING LOCAL MEETINGS WORTH DOING 763074 WAS WRITING LETTER TO LOCAL PAPER SUCCESSFUL 763075 WAS WRITING LETTER TO LOCAL PAPER WORTH DOING 763076 WAS COOPERATING WITH OTHERS IN COMMUNITY SUCCESSFUL 763077 WAS COOPERATING WITH OTHERS IN COMMUNITY WORTH DOING 763078 WAS COMMUNICATION WITH A LOCAL OFFICIAL SUCCESSFUL 763079 WAS COMMUNICATING WITH A LOCAL OFFICIAL WORTH DOING 763080 WAS PETITIONING THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SUCCESSFUL 763081 WAS PETITIONING THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT WORTH DOING 763082 WAS DEMONSTRATING ABOUT A LOCAL PROBLEM SUCCESSFUL 763083 WAS DEMONSTRATING ABOUT A LOCAL PROBLEM WORTH DOING 763084 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: DID R DEMONSTRATE (LOCAL) 763085 HOW MANY TIMES HAS R DEMONSTRATED 763086 REASON FOR MOST RECENT DEMONSTRATION EVALUATION OF PARTIES 763087 IS THERE ANYTHING R LIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY 763088 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY - MENTION 1 763089 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY - MENTION 2 763090 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY - MENTION 3 763091 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY - MENTION 4 763092 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY - MENTION 5 763093 IS THERE ANYTHING R DISLIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY 763094 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY - MENTION 1 763095 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY - MENTION 2 763096 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY - MENTION 3 763097 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY - MENTION 4 763098 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY - MENTION 5 763099 IS THERE ANYTHING R LIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY 763100 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY - MENTION 1 763101 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY - MENTION 2 763102 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY - MENTION 3 763103 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY - MENTION 4 763104 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY - MENTION 5 763105 IS THERE ANYTHING R DISLIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY 763106 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY - MENTION 1 763107 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY - MENTION 2 763108 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY - MENTION 3 763109 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY - MENTION 4 763110 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY - MENTION 5 EVALUATION OF CANDIDATES 763111 IS THERE ANYTHING R LIKES ABOUT JIMMY CARTER 763112 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT JIMMY CARTER - MENTION 1 763113 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT JIMMY CARTER - MENTION 2 763114 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT JIMMY CARTER - MENTION 3 763115 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT JIMMY CARTER - MENTION 4 763116 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT JIMMY CARTER - MENTION 5 763117 IS THERE ANYTHING R DISLIKES ABOUT JIMMY CARTER 763118 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT JIMMY CARTER - MENTION 1 763119 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT JIMMY CARTER - MENTION 2 763120 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT JIMMY CARTER - MENTION 3 763121 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT JIMMY CARTER - MENTION 4 763122 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT JIMMY CARTER - MENTION 5 763123 IS THERE ANYTHING R LIKES ABOUT GERALD FORD 763124 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT GERALD FORD - MENTION 1 763125 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT GERALD FORD - MENTION 2 763126 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT GERALD FORD - MENTION 3 763127 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT GERALD FORD - MENTION 4 763128 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT GERALD FORD - MENTION 5 763129 IS THERE ANYTHING R DISLIKES ABOUT GERALD FORD 763130 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT GERALD FORD - MENTION 1 763131 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT GERALD FORD - MENTION 2 763132 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT GERALD FORD - MENTION 3 763133 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT GERALD FORD - MENTION 4 763134 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT GERALD FORD - MENTION 5 763135 DOES R APPROVE OF FORD'S HANDLING OF HIS JOB AS PRESIDENT 763136 SHOULD FORD HAVE PARDONED NIXON R'S PERSONAL FINANCIAL SITUATION 763137 DOES R FEEL BETTER OFF FINANCIALLY THAN A YEAR AGO 763138 WILL R BE BETTER OFF FINANCIALLY A YEAR FROM NOW BUSINESS CONDITIONS 763139 ARE BUSINESS CONDITIONS BETTER NOW THAN A YEAR AGO 763140 WILL BUSINESS CONDITIONS BE BETTER A YEAR FROM NOW UNEMPLOYMENT, INFLATION, & GOVERNMENT POLICY 763141 WILL UNEMPLOYMENT INCREASE IN THE NEXT 12 MONTHS 763142 HAS THE GOVERNMENT BEEN DOING A GOOD JOB WITH ITS INFLATION POLICY 763143 WHICH PARTY CAN BEST HANDLE INFLATION PROBLEMS 763144 HAS THE GOVERNMENT BEEN DOING A GOOD JOB WITH ITS UNEMPLOYMENT POLICY 763145 WHICH PARTY CAN BEST HANDLE UNEMPLOYMENT PROBLEMS EFFECTS OF RECESSION - R OR FAMILY MEMBER(S) 763146 WAS R OR FAMILY MEMBER(S) UNEMPLOYED 763147 WAS R OR FAMILY MEMBER(S) TEMPORARILY LAID OFF 763148 DID R OR FAMILY MEMBER(S) HAVE WORKING HOURS REDUCED 763149 DID R OR FAMILY MEMBER(S) HAVE TO CHANGE SHIFTS 763150 DID R OR FAMILY MEMBER(S) HAVE TO TAKE A PAY CUT 763151 DID R OR FAMILY MEMBER(S) HAVE TO TAKE A JOB BELOW QUALIFICATIONS 763152 DID R OR FAMILY MEMBER(S) RELY ON GOVERNMENTAL ASSISTANCE 763153 R OR FAMILY MEMBER(S) NOT AFFECTED BY RECESSION EFFECTS OF RECESSION - R ONLY 763154 WAS R UNEMPLOYED 763155 WAS R TEMPORARILY LAID OFF 763156 DID R HAVE WORKING HOURS REDUCED 763157 DID R HAVE TO CHANGE SHIFTS 763158 DID R HAVE TO TAKE A PAY CUT 763159 DID R HAVE TO TAKE A JOB BELOW QUALIFICATIONS 763160 DID R RELY ON GOVERNMENTAL ASSISTANCE 763161 R WAS NOT AFFECTED BY RECESSION CYNICISM AND TRUST IN GOVERNMENT 763162 DO PEOPLE IN GOVERNMENT WASTE A LOT OF TAX MONEY 763163 HOW MUCH CAN R TRUST GOVERNMENT TO DO RIGHT 763164 IS GOVERNMENT RUN FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL OR A FEW 763165 DO GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS USUALLY KNOW WHAT THEY'RE DOING 763166 ARE MANY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS CROOKED 763167 WHO IS TO BLAME FOR CORRUPTION IN WASHINGTON PARTY IDENTIFICATION 763168 DOES R CONSIDER SELF AS REPUBLICAN/DEMOCRAT/OTHER 763169 STRENGTH OF REPUBLICAN/DEMOCRAT IDENTIFICATION 763170 DID R EVER HAVE A DIFFERENT PARTY IDENTIFICATION 763171 R'S PREVIOUS PARTY IDENTIFICATION 763172 (IF REPUBLICAN/DEMOCRAT) WHEN DID R CHANGE PARTY IDENTIFICATION 763173 R THINK OF SELF AS CLOSER REPUBLICAN/DEMOCRATIC PARTY 763174 SUMMARY OF R'S PARTY IDENTIFICATION & STRENGTH 763175 (IF INDEPENDENT/OTHER) HOW MUCH CLOSER DOES R FEEL TO ONE PARTY 763176 (IF CLOSE TO NEITHER PARTY) DID R EVER CONSIDER SELF AS CLOSER TO DEMOCRATIC/REPUBLICAN PARTY 763177 (IF INDEPENDENT/OTHER) DID R EVER CONSIDER SELF AS CLOSER TO OTHER PARTY 763178 (IF INDEPENDENT/OTHER) WHEN DID R CHANGE TO PRESENT PARTY FEELINGS PAST PRESIDENTIAL VOTING BEHAVIOR 763179 HAS R VOTED IN ALL POSSIBLE PAST PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS 763180 HAS R ALWAYS VOTED FOR THE SAME PARTY FOR PRESIDENT 763181 PARTY R SUPPORTED IN PAST PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS 763182 DID R VOTE IN 1972 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 763183 WHICH CANDIDATE DID R VOTE FOR IN 1972 ELECTION DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE POLITICAL PARTIES 763184 DOES R SEE IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE PARTIES 763185 FAVORABLE/UNFAVORABLE REFERENCE - 1ST MENTION 763186 PARTY DIFFERENCE CONTENT - 1ST MENTION 763187 FAVORABLE/UNFAVORABLE REFERENCE - 2ND MENTION 763188 PARTY DIFFERENCE CONTENT - 2ND MENTION 763189 FAVORABLE/UNFAVORABLE REFERENCE - 3RD MENTION 763190 PARTY DIFFERENCE CONTENT - 3RD MENTION 763191 FAVORABLE/UNFAVORABLE REFERENCE - 4TH MENTION 763192 PARTY DIFFERENCE CONTENT - 4TH MENTION 763193 DOES R FEEL ONE PARTY IS MORE CONSERVATIVE THAN THE OTHER 763194 WHICH PARTY IS MORE CONSERVATIVE 763195 REPUBLICAN-DEMOCRAT MORE CONSERVATIVE FAVORABLE/ UNFAVORABLE REFERENCE - MENTION 1 763196 REPUBLICAN-DEMOCRAT MORE CONSERVATIVE DIFFERENCE MENTION 1 763197 REPUBLICAN-DEMOCRAT MORE CONSERVATIVE FAVORABLE/ UNFAVORABLE REFERENCE - MENTION 2 763198 REPUBLICAN-DEMOCRAT MORE CONSERVATIVE DIFFERENCE MENTION 2 763199 REPUBLICAN-DEMOCRAT MORE CONSERVATIVE FAVORABLE/ UNFAVORABLE REFERENCE - MENTION 3 763200 REPUBLICAN-DEMOCRAT MORE CONSERVATIVE DIFFERENCE MENTION 3 R'S PARENTS: POLITICAL INTEREST & PARTISANSHIP 763201 WAS R'S FATHER INTERESTED IN POLITICS 763202 WHAT WAS R'S FATHER'S PARTY AFFILIATION 763203 WAS R'S MOTHER INTERESTED IN POLITICS 763204 WHAT WAS R'S MOTHER'S PARTY AFFILIATION RACIAL ATTITUDES - BUSING 763205 WHAT DOES R THINK OF BUSING - MENTION 1 763206 WHAT DOES R THINK OF BUSING - MENTION 2 763207 WHAT DOES R THINK OF BUSING - MENTION 3 763208 HAS THERE BEEN BUSING IN R'S COMMUNITY 763209 HAS R HEARD TALK OF FUTURE BUSING IN R'S COMMUNITY 763210 R'S INTEREST IN FEDERAL ROLE IN SCHOOL INTEGRATION 763211 SHOULD FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ENSURE SCHOOL INTEGRATION RACIAL ATTITUDES - CIVIL RIGHTS 763212 HOW MUCH HAS THE BLACKS' POSITION CHANGED RECENTLY 763213 ARE CIVIL RIGHTS PEOPLE PUSHING TOO FAST 763214 DO BLACKS HAVE A RIGHT TO LIVE WHEREVER THEY WANT 763215 HOW MANY BLACKS IN R'S AREA FAVOR DESEGREGATION 763216 HOW MANY WHITES IN R'S AREA FAVOR SEGREGATION 763217 DOES R FAVOR (DE)SEGREGATION 763218 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: RACE OF RESPONDENT RACIAL MIX OF R'S ENVIRONMENT 763219 WHAT IS THE RACIAL MIX OF R'S NEIGHBORHOOD 763220 R'S PREFERRED RACIAL MIX FOR NEIGHBORHOOD 763221 WHAT IS THE RACIAL MIX OF THE NEAREST GRADE SCHOOL 763222 WHAT IS THE RACIAL MIX OF R'S FRIENDS 763223 IS R PROUD OF THE UNITED STATES' BICENTENNIAL POWER OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 763224 R'S INTEREST IN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT POWER ISSUE 763225 IS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GETTING TOO POWERFUL 763226 WHICH PARTY SUPPORTS A STRONGER FEDERAL GOVERNMENT EVALUATION OF FORD AS POTENTIAL PRESIDENT 763227 COULD FORD BE TRUSTED AS PRESIDENT 763228 DOES FORD HAVE A PRESIDENTIAL PERSONALITY 763229 WOULD FORD BRING MORAL AND RELIGIOUS STANDARDS TO GOVERNMENT 763230 WOULD FORD REDUCE UNEMPLOYMENT AS PRESIDENT 763231 WOULD FORD MAKE THE GOVERNMENT RUN BETTER 763232 WOULD FORD REDUCE THE POWER & SIZE OF GOVERNMENT 763233 WOULD FORD REDUCE INFLATION AS PRESIDENT EVALUATION OF CARTER AS POTENTIAL PRESIDENT 763234 COULD CARTER BE TRUSTED AS PRESIDENT 763235 DOES CARTER HAVE A PRESIDENTIAL PERSONALITY 763236 WOULD CARTER BRING MORAL AND RELIGIOUS STANDARDS TO GOVERNMENT 763237 WOULD CARTER REDUCE UNEMPLOYMENT AS PRESIDENT 763238 WOULD CARTER MAKE THE GOVERNMENT RUN BETTER 763239 WOULD CARTER REDUCE THE POWER AND SIZE OF GOVERNMENT 763240 WOULD CARTER REDUCE INFLATION AS PRESIDENT GOVERNMENT GUARANTEED JOB & LIVING STANDARD SCALE 763241 R'S POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE 763242 FORD'S POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE 763243 CARTER'S POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE 763244 DEMOCRATS' POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE 763245 REPUBLICANS' POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE 763246 LIBERALS' POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE 763247 CONSERVATIVES' POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED SCALE 763248 R'S POSITION ON RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED SCALE 763249 FORD'S POSITION ON RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED SCALE 763250 CARTER'S POSITION ON RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED SCALE 763251 DEMOCRATS' POSITION ON RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED SCALE 763252 REPUBLICANS' POSITION ON RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED SCALE 763253 BLACKS' POSITION ON RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED SCALE 763254 WHITES' POSITION ON RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED SCALE 763255 LIBERALS' POSITION ON RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED SCALE 763256 CONSERVATIVES' POSITION ON RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED SCALE SCHOOL BUSING TO ACHIEVE INTEGRATION SCALE 763257 R'S POSITION ON SCHOOL BUSING SCALE 763258 FORD'S POSITION ON SCHOOL BUSING SCALE 763259 CARTER'S POSITION ON SCHOOL BUSING SCALE 763260 DEMOCRATS' POSITION ON SCHOOL BUSING SCALE 763261 REPUBLICANS' POSITION ON SCHOOL BUSING SCALE 763262 BLACKS' POSITION ON SCHOOL BUSING SCALE 763263 WHITES' POSITION ON SCHOOL BUSING SCALE GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES SCALE 763264 R'S POSITION ON GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES SCALE 763265 FORD'S POSITION ON GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES SCALE 763266 CARTER'S POSITION ON GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES SCALE 763267 DEMOCRATS' POSITION ON GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES 763268 REPUBLICANS' POSITION ON GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES 763269 BUSINESSMEN'S POSITION ON GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES 763270 POOR PEOPLE'S POSITION ON GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES 763271 BLACKS' POSITION ON GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES 763272 WHITES' POSITION ON GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES GOVERNMENT MEDICAL INSURANCE PLAN SCALE 763273 R'S POSITION ON GOVERNMENT MEDICAL INSURANCE PLAN SCALE 763274 FORD'S POSITION ON GOVERNMENT MEDICAL INSURANCE PLAN SCALE 763275 CARTER'S POSITION ON GOVERNMENT MEDICAL INSURANCE PLAN SCALE 763276 DEMOCRATS' POSITION ON GOVERNMENT MEDICAL INSURANCE PLAN SCALE 763277 REPUBLICANS' POSITION ON GOVERNMENT MEDICAL INSURANCE PLAN SCALE 763278 BUSINESSMEN'S POSITION ON GOVERNMENT MEDICAL INSURANCE PLAN SCALE 763279 POOR PEOPLE'S POSITION ON GOVERNMENT MEDICAL INSURANCE PLAN SCALE 763280 BLACKS' POSITION ON GOVERNMENT MEDICAL INSURANCE PLAN SCALE 763281 WHITES' POSITION ON GOVERNMENT MEDICAL INSURANCE PLAN SCALE 763282 IS R COVERED BY ANY HEALTH INSURANCE PLAN 763283 ARE R'S HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS ABOUT RIGHT 763284 IS R'S HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE ADEQUATE 763285 WOULD EXTENDED ILLNESS REQUIRE R TO DIP INTO SAVINGS OR BORROW LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE 763286 R'S POSITION ON LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE 763287 FORD'S POSITION ON LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE 763288 CARTER'S POSITION ON LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE 763289 DEMOCRATS' POSITION--LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE 763290 REPUBLICANS' POSITION ON LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE 763291 HUMPHREY'S POSITION--LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE 763292 WALLACE'S POSITION ON LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE 763293 MCGOVERN'S POSITION--LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE 763294 REAGAN'S POSITION ON LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE 763295 MONDALE'S POSITION ON LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE 763296 DOLE'S POSITION ON LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE VIEWS SCALE "FEELING THERMOMETER" - POLITICAL FIGURES 763297 FEELING THERMOMETER - GEORGE WALLACE 763298 FEELING THERMOMETER - JIMMY CARTER 763299 FEELING THERMOMETER - GERALD FORD 763300 FEELING THERMOMETER - HUBERT HUMPHREY 763301 FEELING THERMOMETER - RONALD REAGAN 763302 FEELING THERMOMETER - EDWARD "TED" KENNEDY 763303 FEELING THERMOMETER - HENRY "SCOOP" JACKSON 763304 FEELING THERMOMETER - NELSON ROCKEFELLER 763305 FEELING THERMOMETER - MORRIS K. UDALL 763306 FEELING THERMOMETER - "JERRY" BROWN, JR. 763307 FEELING THERMOMETER - RICHARD NIXON 763308 FEELING THERMOMETER - WALTER "FRITZ" MONDALE 763309 FEELING THERMOMETER - GEORGE MCGOVERN 763310 FEELING THERMOMETER - HENRY KISSINGER 763311 FEELING THERMOMETER - EUGENE MCCARTHY 763312 FEELING THERMOMETER - ROBERT DOLE 763313 DO ANY POLITICAL FIGURES HAVE HIGHER MORAL/RELIGIOUS STANDARDS THAN THE OTHERS 763314 WHICH POLITICAL FIGURE HAS HIGHER MORAL/RELIGIOUS STANDARDS - 1ST MENTION 763315 WHICH POLITICAL FIGURE HAS HIGHER MORAL/RELIGIOUS STANDARDS - 2ND MENTION GROUPS IN SOCIETY AND CARTER 763316 WOULD BUSINESSMEN BE BETTER OFF WITH CARTER AS PRESIDENT 763317 WOULD LIBERALS BE BETTER OFF WITH CARTER AS PRESIDENT 763318 WOULD SOUTHERNERS BE BETTER OFF WITH CARTER AS PRESIDENT 763319 WOULD POOR PEOPLE BE BETTER OFF WITH CARTER AS PRESIDENT 763320 WOULD CATHOLICS BE BETTER OFF WITH CARTER AS PRESIDENT 763321 WOULD PROTESTANTS BE BETTER OFF WITH CARTER AS PRESIDENT 763322 WOULD JEWS BE BETTER OFF WITH CARTER AS PRESIDENT 763323 WOULD YOUNG PEOPLE BE BETTER OFF WITH CARTER AS PRESIDENT 763324 WOULD WHITES BE BETTER OFF WITH CARTER AS PRESIDENT 763325 WOULD BLACKS BE BETTER OFF WITH CARTER AS PRESIDENT 763326 WOULD CONSERVATIVES BE BETTER OFF WITH CARTER AS PRESIDENT 763327 WOULD WOMEN BE BETTER OFF WITH CARTER AS PRESIDENT 763328 WOULD MIDDLE CLASS PEOPLE BE BETTER OFF WITH CARTER AS PRESIDENT 763329 WOULD WORKINGMEN BE BETTER OFF WITH CARTER AS PRESIDENT 763330 WOULD FARMERS BE BETTER OFF WITH CARTER AS PRESIDENT 763331 WOULD OLDER PEOPLE BE BETTER OFF WITH CARTER AS PRESIDENT GROUPS IN SOCIETY AND FORD 763332 WOULD BUSINESSMEN BE BETTER OFF WITH FORD AS PRESIDENT 763333 WOULD LIBERALS BE BETTER OFF WITH FORD AS PRESIDENT 763334 WOULD SOUTHERNERS BE BETTER OFF WITH FORD AS PRESIDENT 763335 WOULD POOR PEOPLE BE BETTER OFF WITH FORD AS PRESIDENT 763336 WOULD CATHOLICS BE BETTER OFF WITH FORD AS PRESIDENT 763337 WOULD PROTESTANTS BE BETTER OFF WITH FORD AS PRESIDENT 763338 WOULD JEWS BE BETTER OFF WITH FORD AS PRESIDENT 763339 WOULD YOUNG PEOPLE BE BETTER OFF WITH FORD AS PRESIDENT 763340 WOULD WHITES BE BETTER OFF WITH FORD AS PRESIDENT 763341 WOULD BLACKS BE BETTER OFF WITH FORD AS PRESIDENT 763342 WOULD CONSERVATIVES BE BETTER OFF WITH FORD AS PRESIDENT 763343 WOULD WOMEN BE BETTER OFF WITH FORD AS PRESIDENT 763344 WOULD MIDDLE CLASS PEOPLE BE BETTER OFF WITH FORD AS PRESIDENT 763345 WOULD WORKINGMEN BE BETTER OFF WITH FORD AS PRESIDENT 763346 WOULD FARMERS BE BETTER OFF WITH FORD AS PRESIDENT 763347 WOULD OLDER PEOPLE BE BETTER OFF WITH FORD AS PRESIDENT ATTITUDES TOWARD VOTING PROCESS: "CITIZEN DUTY" 763348 IS IT IMPORTANT TO VOTE IF YOUR PARTY CAN'T WIN 763349 WITH MANY OTHER PEOPLE VOTING, DOES IT MATTER IF R VOTES 763350 IF A PERSON DOESN'T CARE ABOUT OUTCOME, SHOULD HE VOTE 763351 ARE LOCAL ELECTIONS UNIMPORTANT 763352 HAS UNITED STATES GIVEN MORE THAN RECEIVED FROM USSR 763353 SHOULD THE GOVERNMENT SPEND LESS AT THE RISK OF CUTTING BACK ON HEALTH AND EDUCATION BELIEF IN POLITICAL IDEALS 763354 ARE R AND FRIENDS WELL-REPRESENTED IN THE POLITICAL SYSTEM 763355 DO THE COURTS GUARANTEE ALL A FAIR TRIAL 763356 DO THE LEADING POLITICIANS HAVE GOOD INTENTIONS MILITARY SPENDING 763357 DOES R FEEL THAT MILITARY SPENDING SHOULD BE CUT 763358 MILITARY SPENDING CUT IN RELATION TO RELATIVE MILITARY STRENGTH 763359 WHICH PARTY IS MORE IN FAVOR OF CUTTING MILITARY SPENDING 763360 WHAT IS R'S POLITICAL ATTITUDE ON "LEFT-RIGHT" BASIS EVALUATION OF THE COUNTRY & THE GOVERNMENT 763361 IS A CHANGE IN OUR FORM OF GOVERNMENT NEEDED 763362 WHAT KIND OF CHANGE IN GOVERNMENT IS NEEDED - 1ST MENTION 763363 WHAT KIND OF CHANGE IN GOVERNMENT IS NEEDED - 2ND MENTION 763364 WHAT KIND OF CHANGE IN GOVERNMENT IS NEEDED - 3RD MENTION 763365 IS R PROUD OF PRESENT FORM OF GOVERNMENT 763366 WHO/WHAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LACK OF FAITH IN GOVERNMENT ** PERSONAL DATA ** AGE AND MARITAL STATUS 763367 R'S DATE OF BIRTH - MONTH 763368 R'S DATE OF BIRTH - YEAR 763369 R'S AGE 763370 R'S MARITAL STATUS CHILDREN IN HOUSEHOLD 763371 DOES R HAVE ANY CHILDREN 763372 HOW MANY CHILDREN DOES R HAVE 763373 WHAT ARE CHILDREN'S AGES - FIRST CHILD 763374 WHAT ARE CHILDREN'S AGES - SECOND CHILD 763375 WHAT ARE CHILDREN'S AGES - THIRD CHILD 763376 WHAT ARE CHILDREN'S AGES - FOURTH CHILD 763377 WHAT ARE CHILDREN'S AGES - FIFTH CHILD 763378 WHAT ARE CHILDREN'S AGES - SIXTH CHILD 763379 WHAT ARE CHILDREN'S AGES - SEVENTH CHILD 763380 WHAT ARE CHILDREN'S AGES - EIGHTH CHILD 763381 DO ANY OF R'S CHILDREN ATTEND PUBLIC SCHOOL 763382 DO ANY OF R'S CHILDREN RIDE A BUS TO SCHOOL 763383 ARE R'S CHILDREN BUSED TO SCHOOL FOR THE PURPOSE OF RACIAL INTEGRATION R'S EDUCATION 763384 WHAT IS THE HIGHEST GRADE COMPLETED BY R 763385 DOES R HAVE A HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA 763386 HAS R HAD ANY OTHER SCHOOLING 763387 DOES R HAVE A COLLEGE DEGREE 763388 WHAT COLLEGE DEGREE DOES R HAVE 763389 SUMMARY OF R'S EDUCATION 763390 COLLEGE ATTENDED BY R - 1ST MENTION 763391 COLLEGE ATTENDED BY R - 2ND MENTION 763392 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT - FAMILY STATUS OF R EDUCATION OF FAMILY HEAD 763393 WHAT IS THE HIGHEST GRADE COMPLETED BY FAMILY HEAD 763394 DOES FAMILY HEAD HAVE HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA 763395 DOES FAMILY HEAD HAVE ANY OTHER SCHOOLING 763396 DOES FAMILY HEAD HAVE A COLLEGE DEGREE 763397 WHAT COLLEGE DEGREE DOES FAMILY HEAD HAVE 763398 SUMMARY OF EDUCATION OF FAMILY HEAD 763399 COLLEGE ATTENDED BY FAMILY HEAD - 1ST MENTION 763400 COLLEGE ATTENDED BY FAMILY HEAD - 2ND MENTION EDUCATION OF WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD 763401 WHAT IS HIGHEST GRADE COMPLETED BY WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD 763402 DOES WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD HAVE A HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA 763403 DOES WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD HAVE ANY OTHER SCHOOLING 763404 DOES WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD HAVE A COLLEGE DEGREE 763405 WHAT COLLEGE DEGREE DOES WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD HAVE 763406 SUMMARY OF EDUCATION OF WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD 763407 COLLEGE ATTENDED BY WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD - MENTION 1 763408 COLLEGE ATTENDED BY WIFE OF FAMILY HEAD - MENTION 2 R'S OCCUPATION SECTION 763409 R'S PRESENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS 763410 (IF RETIRED) WHEN DID R RETIRE 763411 (IF UNEMPLOYED) HAS R EVER WORKED FOR PAY 763412 KIND OF WORK R DOES/DID (CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE) 763413 R'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION - DUNCAN SEI 763414 R'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION - NORC PRESTIGE 763415 R'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY 763416 IS/WAS R SELF-EMPLOYED 763417 (IF UNEMPLOYED) DID R WORK FOR PAY DURING THE PAST YEAR 763418 (IF RETIRED OR DISABLED) IS R PRESENTLY WORKING 763419 HOW MANY HOURS A WEEK DOES/DID R WORK 763420 IS R TIRED AFTER WORK 763421 (IF EMPLOYED) WAS R UNEMPLOYED DURING THE PAST YEAR (IF HOUSEWIFE OR STUDENT) 763422 DID R WORK FOR PAY DURING THE PAST YEAR 763423 IS R PRESENTLY EMPLOYED 763424 WHAT KIND OF WORK DID R DO (CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE) 763425 R'S FORMER OCCUPATION - DUNCAN SEI 763426 R'S FORMER OCCUPATION - NORC PRESTIGE 763427 R'S FORMER OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY 763428 HOW MANY HOURS A WEEK DID R WORK 763429 WAS R SELF-EMPLOYED 763430 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT - FAMILY STATUS OF R FAMILY HEAD'S OCCUPATION SECTION 763431 FAMILY HEAD'S PRESENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS 763432 (IF RETIRED) WHEN DID THE FAMILY HEAD RETIRE 763433 (IF UNEMPLOYED) HAS THE FAMILY HEAD EVER WORKED FOR PAY 763434 WHAT KIND OF WORK DOES/DID THE FAMILY HEAD DO (CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE) 763435 FAMILY HEAD'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION - DUNCAN SEI 763436 FAMILY HEAD'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION - NORC PRESTIGE 763437 FAMILY HEAD'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY 763438 IS/WAS THE FAMILY HEAD SELF-EMPLOYED 763439 (IF UNEMPLOYED) DID THE FAMILY HEAD WORK FOR PAY DURING THE PAST YEAR 763440 (IF RETIRED OR DISABLED) IS THE FAMILY HEAD PRESENTLY WORKING 763441 HOW MANY HOURS A WEEK DOES/DID THE FAMILY HEAD WORK 763442 (IF EMPLOYED) WAS FAMILY HEAD UNEMPLOYED IN PAST YEAR (IF HOUSEWIFE OR STUDENT) 763443 DID THE FAMILY HEAD WORK FOR PAY DURING THE PAST YEAR 763444 IS THE FAMILY HEAD PRESENTLY EMPLOYED 763445 WHAT KIND OF WORK DID THE FAMILY HEAD DO (CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE) 763446 FAMILY HEAD'S FORMER OCCUPATION - DUNCAN SEI 763447 FAMILY HEAD'S FORMER OCCUPATION - NORC PRESTIGE 763448 FAMILY HEAD'S FORMER OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY 763449 WAS THE FAMILY HEAD SELF-EMPLOYED 763450 HOW MANY HOURS A WEEK DID THE FAMILY HEAD WORK WIFE OF HEAD'S OCCUPATION SECTION 763451 WIFE OF HEAD'S PRESENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS 763452 (IF RETIRED) WHEN DID WIFE OF HEAD RETIRE 763453 (IF UNEMPLOYED) HAS WIFE OF HEAD EVER WORKED FOR PAY 763454 WHAT KIND OF WORK DOES/DID WIFE OF HEAD DO (CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE) 763455 WIFE OF HEAD'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION--DUNCAN SEI 763456 WIFE OF HEAD'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION--NORC PRESTIGE 763457 WIFE OF HEAD'S PRESENT/FORMER OCCUPATION--CENSUS INDUSTRY 763458 IS/WAS WIFE OF HEAD SELF-EMPLOYED 763459 (IF UNEMPLOYED) DID THE WIFE OF HEAD WORK FOR PAY DURING THE PAST YEAR 763460 (IF RETIRED OR DISABLED) IS THE WIFE OF HEAD PRESENTLY WORKING 763461 HOW MANY HOURS A WEEK DOES/DID THE WIFE OF HEAD WORK 763462 (IF EMPLOYED) WAS THE WIFE OF HEAD UNEMPLOYED DURING THE PAST YEAR (IF HOUSEWIFE OR STUDENT) 763463 DID WIFE OF HEAD WORK FOR PAY DURING THE PAST YEAR 763464 IS WIFE OF HEAD PRESENTLY EMPLOYED 763465 WHAT KIND OF WORK DID WIFE OF HEAD DO (CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE) 763466 WIFE OF HEAD'S FORMER OCCUPATION - DUNCAN SEI 763467 WIFE OF HEAD'S FORMER OCCUPATION - NORC PRESTIGE 763468 WIFE OF HEAD'S FORMER OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY 763469 WAS WIFE OF HEAD SELF-EMPLOYED 763470 HOW MANY HOURS A WEEK DID WIFE OF HEAD WORK FARMERS' QUESTIONS 763471 DOES THE FAMILY HEAD DO OTHER WORK BESIDES FARMING 763472 FARMER/RANCHER'S OTHER OCCUPATION 763473 HOW MUCH TIME DOES FAMILY HEAD PUT IN ON NON-FARMING JOB - HOURS/WEEK 763474 HOW MUCH TIME DOES FAMILY HEAD PUT IN ON NON-FARMING JOB - WEEKS/YEAR 763475 DOES FAMILY HEAD OWN/RENT/MANAGE FARM HOUSEHOLD UNION MEMBERSHIP 763476 IS ANYONE IN HOUSEHOLD A UNION MEMBER 763477 WHO IN THE HOUSEHOLD IS A UNION MEMBER 763478 UNION MEMBERSHIP - FIRST UNION MENTIONED 763479 UNION MEMBERSHIP - SECOND UNION MENTIONED 763480 UNION MEMBERSHIP - THIRD UNION MENTIONED R'S INCOME LEVEL 763481 IS R COMPENSATED FAIRLY FOR WORK WITH RESPECT TO OTHERS WITH THE SAME OCCUPATION 763482 IS R COMPENSATED FAIRLY FOR WORK WITH RESPECT TO OTHERS WITH DIFFERENT OCCUPATIONS R'S CLASS IDENTIFICATION 763483 DOES R THINK OF SELF AS BELONGING TO A SOCIAL CLASS 763484 WHICH SOCIAL CLASS DOES R THINK OF SELF AS BELONGING TO 763485 R'S RELATIVE PLACEMENT IN SOCIAL CLASS CHOSEN 763486 R'S SUBJECTIVE SOCIAL CLASS SUMMARY 763487 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO PEOPLE IN R'S SOCIAL CLASS 763488 WHAT SOCIAL CLASS WAS R'S FAMILY WHEN R WAS YOUNG R'S ETHNIC BACKGROUND AND IDENTIFICATION 763489 WHAT DOES R CONSIDER R'S MAIN ETHNIC GROUP 763490 WERE BOTH OF R'S PARENTS BORN IN THIS COUNTRY 763491 (IF ONE OR BOTH PARENTS FOREIGN-BORN) WHAT COUNTRY WAS R'S FATHER BORN IN 763492 (IF ONE OR BOTH PARENTS FOREIGN BORN) WHAT COUNTRY WAS R'S MOTHER BORN IN 763493 (IF BOTH PARENTS NATIVE-BORN) WHICH COUNTRY DID R'S FAMILY COME FROM - FATHER'S SIDE 763494 (IF BOTH PARENTS NATIVE BORN) WHICH COUNTRY DID R'S FAMILY COME FROM - MOTHER'S SIDE OCCUPATION OF R'S PARENTS 763495 KIND OF WORK R'S FATHER DID WHEN R WAS YOUNG 763496 WAS R'S MOTHER EMPLOYED WHEN R WAS YOUNG 763497 KIND OF WORK R'S MOTHER DID WHEN R WAS YOUNG WHERE WAS R BROUGHT UP 763498 WHERE WAS R BORN 763499 WHERE DID R GROW UP 763500 WHAT KIND OF COMMUNITY WAS R BROUGHT UP IN 763501 WHERE DID R LIVE AT AGE 14 763502 HOW LONG HAS R LIVED IN PRESENT COMMUNITY R'S HOUSING 763503 HOW LONG HAS R LIVED IN PRESENT HOUSING 763504 IS R'S PRESENT NEIGHBORHOOD NEWER THAN PRIOR ONE 763505 IS R'S PRESENT NEIGHBORHOOD MORE EXPENSIVE THAN PRIOR ONE 763506 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: DOES R LIVE WITH OTHER FAMILY MEMBERS AGE 14 OR OLDER PERSONAL DATA 763507 R'S ESTIMATED FAMILY INCOME FOR 1975 763508 R'S OWN INCOME FOR 1975 763509 DOES R OWN/RENT PRESENT HOME 763510 R'S RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE 763511 HOW OFTEN DOES R GO TO CHURCH 763512 WHAT IS R'S SEX 763513 WHAT IS R'S RACE 763514 WHAT IS THE RELATIONSHIP OF R TO HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD CONDITIONS OF THE INTERVIEW 763515 WHO ELSE WAS PRESENT AT THE INTERVIEW 763516 DEGREE OF R'S COOPERATION WITH INTERVIEW 763517 R'S APPARENT LEVEL OF POLITICAL INFORMATION 763518 RATING OF R'S APPARENT INTELLIGENCE 763519 HOW SUSPICIOUS WAS R ABOUT THE STUDY BEFOREHAND 763520 HOW GREAT WAS R'S INTEREST IN THE INTERVIEW 763521 HOW SINCERE WAS R WITH ANSWERS 763522 TYPE OF STRUCTURE IN WHICH R LIVES 763523 NUMBER OF STORIES IN STRUCTURE IN WHICH R LIVES ***POST ELECTION WAVE*** 763524 POST ELECTION INTERVIEW NUMBER 763525 DATE OF INTERVIEW 763526 LENGTH OF INTERVIEW 763527 INTERVIEWER NUMBER 763528 CODER NUMBER R'S POLITICAL ACTIVITY 763529 DID R TRY TO INFLUENCE OTHER'S VOTE CHOICES 763530 DID ANYONE TRY TO INFLUENCE R'S VOTE CHOICES 763531 WHO DID OTHERS TELL R TO VOTE FOR 763532 DID R ATTEND ANY POLITICAL MEETINGS OR RALLIES 763533 DID R WORK FOR PARTY OR CANDIDATE 763534 DID R WEAR A BUTTON OR PUT A STICKER ON THE CAR 763535 DID R GIVE ANY MONEY TO A POLITICAL PARTY 763536 WHICH PARTY DID R GIVE MONEY TO 763537 HAS R EVER WRITTEN AN OPINION TO A PUBLIC OFFICIAL 763538 HAS R EVER WRITTEN A POLITICAL LETTER TO THE EDITOR PARTY CONTACTS WITH R DURING CAMPAIGN 763539 DID A POLITICAL PARTY WORKER CONTACT R DURING CAMPAIGN 763540 WHICH PARTY(S) CONTACTED R DURING CAMPAIGN R'S ELECTION RESULTS CONVERSATIONS 763541 DID R TALK ABOUT ELECTION RESULTS WITH ANYONE 763542 DID R TALK TO HUSBAND/WIFE ABOUT ELECTION RESULTS 763543 DID R TALK TO OTHER RELATIVES ABOUT ELECTION RESULTS 763544 DID R TALK TO PEOPLE AT WORK ABOUT ELECTION RESULTS 763545 DID R TALK TO OTHER FRIENDS & NEIGHBORS ABOUT ELECTION RESULTS 763546 DID R TALK TO OTHERS ABOUT ELECTION RESULTS 763547 DID PEOPLE R TALKED WITH ABOUT ELECTION RESULTS VOTE INSTITUTIONAL PERFORMANCE 763548 HOW GOOD A JOB IS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DOING 763549 HOW GOOD A JOB ARE STATE GOVERNMENTS DOING 763550 HOW GOOD A JOB ARE LOCAL GOVERNMENTS DOING 763551 HOW GOOD A JOB IS THE PRESIDENCY DOING 763552 HOW GOOD A JOB IS THE CONGRESS DOING 763553 HOW GOOD A JOB IS THE SUPREME COURT DOING INSTITUTIONAL INFLUENCE 763554 HOW MUCH INFLUENCE SHOULD THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAVE 763555 HOW MUCH INFLUENCE SHOULD STATE GOVERNMENTS HAVE 763556 HOW MUCH INFLUENCE SHOULD LOCAL GOVERNMENTS HAVE 763557 HOW MUCH INFLUENCE SHOULD THE PRESIDENCY HAVE 763558 HOW MUCH INFLUENCE SHOULD CONGRESS HAVE 763559 HOW MUCH INFLUENCE SHOULD THE SUPREME COURT HAVE GOVERNMENTAL POWERS 763560 SHOULD GOVERNMENT BE ABLE TO LIMIT GAS USED DURING AN ENERGY CRISIS 763561 SHOULD GOVERNMENT BE ABLE TO REQUIRE NATIONAL ID CARDS 763562 SHOULD GOVERNMENT BE ABLE TO REGULATE LOCAL BUSINESSES TO MEET JOB SAFETY STANDARDS 763563 SHOULD GOVERNMENT BE ABLE TO CHECK YOUR BACKGROUND 763564 SHOULD GOVERNMENT BE ABLE TO REQUIRE POLLUTION EQUIPMENT ON NEW CARS 763565 SHOULD GOVERNMENT BE ABLE TO USE WIRETAP FOR SECURITY INFLUENCE OF SOCIAL GROUPS SCALE 763566 R'S OPINION OF LABOR UNIONS' INFLUENCE 763567 R'S OPINION OF POOR PEOPLE'S INFLUENCE 763568 R'S OPINION OF JEWS' INFLUENCE 763569 R'S OPINION OF SOUTHERNERS' INFLUENCE 763570 R'S OPINION OF BLACKS' INFLUENCE 763571 R'S OPINION OF WORKINGMEN'S INFLUENCE 763572 R'S OPINION OF CATHOLICS' INFLUENCE 763573 R'S OPINION OF BIG BUSINESS' INFLUENCE 763574 R'S OPINION OF WOMEN'S LIBERATION MOVEMENT'S INFLUENCE 763575 R'S OPINION OF LIBERALS' INFLUENCE 763576 R'S OPINION OF CHICANOS, MEXICAN-AMERICANS' INFLUENCE 763577 R'S OPINION OF WHITES' INFLUENCE 763578 R'S OPINION OF YOUNG PEOPLE'S INFLUENCE 763579 R'S OPINION OF WOMEN'S INFLUENCE 763580 R'S OPINION OF PROTESTANTS' INFLUENCE 763581 R'S OPINION OF REPUBLICANS' INFLUENCE 763582 R'S OPINION OF PEOPLE ON WELFARE'S INFLUENCE 763583 R'S OPINION OF MEN'S INFLUENCE 763584 R'S OPINION OF OLDER PEOPLE'S INFLUENCE 763585 R'S OPINION OF DEMOCRATS' INFLUENCE 763586 R'S OPINION OF MIDDLE CLASS PEOPLE'S INFLUENCE 763587 R'S OPINION OF CONSERVATIVES' INFLUENCE 763588 R'S OPINION OF BLACK MILITANTS' INFLUENCE 763589 R'S OPINION OF BUSINESSMEN'S INFLUENCE EVALUATION OF GOVERNMENTAL INSTITUTIONS 763590 WHICH PART OF GOVERNMENT CAN BE MOST OFTEN TRUSTED 763591 WHICH PART OF GOVERNMENT CAN BE NEXT MOST OFTEN TRUSTED 763592 WHICH PART OF GOVERNMENT CAN BE LEAST OFTEN TRUSTED CONFIDENCE IN NATIONAL/STATE/LOCAL GOVERNMENT 763593 LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT R HAS MOST CONFIDENCE IN 763594 WHY R HAS CONFIDENCE IN LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT - MENTION 1 763595 WHY R HAS CONFIDENCE IN LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT - MENTION 2 763596 LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT R HAS LEAST CONFIDENCE IN 763597 WHY R LACKS CONFIDENCE IN LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT-MENTION 1 763598 WHY R LACKS CONFIDENCE IN LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT-MENTION 2 THE 1976 ELECTION AND THE MASS MEDIA 763599 DOES R FOLLOW POLITICS 763600 DID R LISTEN TO CAMPAIGN RADIO PROGRAMS 763601 HOW MANY CAMPAIGN RADIO PROGRAMS DID R LISTEN TO 763602 DID R READ ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN IN ANY MAGAZINES 763603 HOW MANY MAGAZINE ARTICLES ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN DID R READ 763604 DID R WATCH ANY CAMPAIGN TELEVISION PROGRAMS 763605 HOW MANY TV PROGRAMS ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN DID R WATCH PRESIDENTIAL/VICE-PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES 763606 DID R WATCH PRESIDENTIAL OR VICE-PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES 763607 HOW MANY DEBATES DID R WATCH 763608 HOW INTERESTED WAS R IN DEBATES R WATCHED 763609 DID R LEARN ABOUT ISSUE OR CANDIDATE FROM DEBATES 763610 WHAT DID R LEARN FROM DEBATES - REFERENCE MENTION 1 763611 WHAT DID R LEARN FROM DEBATES - CONTENT MENTION 1 763612 WHAT DID R LEARN FROM DEBATES - REFERENCE MENTION 2 763613 WHAT DID R LEARN FROM DEBATES - CONTENT MENTION 2 763614 WHAT DID R LEARN FROM DEBATES - REFERENCE MENTION 3 763615 WHAT DID R LEARN FROM DEBATES - CONTENT MENTION 3 IMPRESSIONS AND INFORMATION FROM DEBATES 763616 WHAT FAVORABLY/UNFAVORABLY IMPRESSED R ABOUT ANY CANDIDATES IN THE DEBATES - REFERENCE MENTION 1 763617 WHAT FAVORABLY/UNFAVORABLY IMPRESSED R ABOUT ANY CANDIDATES IN THE DEBATES - CONTENT MENTION 1 763618 WHAT FAVORABLY/UNFAVORABLY IMPRESSED R ABOUT ANY CANDIDATES IN THE DEBATES - REFERENCE MENTION 2 763619 WHAT FAVORABLY/UNFAVORABLY IMPRESSED R ABOUT ANY CANDIDATES IN THE DEBATES - CONTENT MENTION 2 763620 WHAT FAVORABLY/UNFAVORABLY IMPRESSED R ABOUT ANY CANDIDATES IN THE DEBATES - REFERENCE MENTION 3 763621 WHAT FAVORABLY/UNFAVORABLY IMPRESSED R ABOUT ANY CANDIDATES IN THE DEBATES - CONTENT MENTION 3 763622 ANYTHING FROM DEBATES R REMEMBERS ABOUT FORD-MENTION 1 763623 ANYTHING R REMEMBERS ABOUT FORD-CONTENT MENTION 1 763624 ANYTHING FROM DEBATES R REMEMBERS ABOUT FORD-MENTION 2 763625 ANYTHING R REMEMBERS ABOUT FORD-CONTENT MENTION 2 763626 ANYTHING FROM DEBATES R REMEMBERS ABOUT FORD-MENTION 3 763627 ANYTHING R REMEMBERS ABOUT FORD-CONTENT MENTION 3 763628 ANYTHING FROM DEBATES R REMEMBERS ABOUT CARTER-MENTION 1 763629 ANYTHING R REMEMBERS ABOUT CARTER-CONTENT MENTION 1 763630 ANYTHING FROM DEBATES R REMEMBERS ABOUT CARTER-MENTION 2 763631 ANYTHING R REMEMBERS ABOUT CARTER-CONTENT MENTION 2 763632 ANYTHING FROM DEBATES R REMEMBERS ABOUT CARTER-MENTION 3 763633 ANYTHING R REMEMBERS ABOUT CARTER-CONTENT MENTION 3 763634 DEBATE INDEX TELEVISION AS AN INFORMATION SOURCE 763635 HOW OFTEN DOES R WATCH DAYTIME TV ENTERTAINMENT 763636 HOW OFTEN DOES R WATCH EARLY EVENING NATIONAL NEWS 763637 HOW OFTEN DOES R WATCH POLICE AND CRIME SHOWS 763638 HOW OFTEN DOES R WATCH LATE EVENING LOCAL NEWS NEWSPAPER AS AN INFORMATION SOURCE 763639 DOES R READ A DAILY NEWSPAPER 763640 WHICH PAPER DOES R READ - MENTION 1 763641 WHICH PAPER DOES R READ - MENTION 2 763642 LOCAL PAPER R READS FOR POLITICAL AND CURRENT EVENTS 763643 DID PAPER READ BY R ENDORSE A PARTY OR CANDIDATE 763644 WHO DID PAPER READ BY R ENDORSE 763645 DID R READ ABOUT CAMPAIGN IN ANY NEWSPAPER 763646 HOW OFTEN DID R READ ABOUT ELECTION 763647 HOW OFTEN DOES R READ ABOUT SPORTS 763648 HOW OFTEN DOES R READ ABOUT NATIONAL POLITICS 763649 HOW OFTEN DOES R READ ABOUT STATE AND LOCAL POLITICS 763650 HOW OFTEN DOES R READ ABOUT COMMUNITY EVENTS 763651 HOW OFTEN DOES R READ ABOUT INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS 763652 HOW OFTEN DOES R READ ABOUT HOME, GARDENING AND HOBBIES 763653 HOW OFTEN DOES R READ ABOUT CRIME AND ACCIDENTS 763654 R RELY ON TV/NEWSPAPERS CURRENT EVENTS INFORMATION R'S 1976 ELECTION VOTING BEHAVIOR 763655 DID R VOTE IN 1976 ELECTION 763656 R DID NOT VOTE - HAD TROUBLE GETTING TO POLLS 763657 R DID NOT VOTE - HAD TROUBLE GETTING OFF WORK TO VOTE 763658 R DID NOT VOTE - LINES AT POLLS TOO LONG/TOOK TOO LONG 763659 R DID NOT VOTE - WEATHER WAS BAD 763660 R DID NOT VOTE - R WAS OUT OF TOWN 763661 R DID NOT VOTE - HAD FAMILY EMERGENCY/ILLNESS 763662 R DID NOT VOTE - WASN'T INTERESTED IN ELECTION 763663 R DID NOT VOTE - R DIDN'T THINK VOTE WOULD MATTER 763664 R DID NOT VOTE - R DIDN'T LIKE ANY CANDIDATES 763665 WHO DID R VOTE FOR IN 1976 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 763666 WHEN DID R REACH VOTE DECISION 763667 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: ELECTION FOR SENATOR IN STATE 763668 DID R VOTE FOR U.S. SENATOR IN 1976 763669 FOR WHOM DID R VOTE FOR SENATOR - CANDIDATE 763670 FOR WHOM DID R VOTE FOR SENATOR - PARTY NAMED BY R 763671 DID R VOTE FOR CONGRESSMAN IN 1976 763672 FOR WHOM DID R VOTE FOR CONGRESSMAN - CANDIDATE 763673 FOR WHOM DID R VOTE FOR CONGRESSMAN - PARTY NAMED BY R 763674 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: ELECTION FOR GOVERNOR IN STATE 763675 DID R VOTE FOR GOVERNOR IN 1976 763676 FOR WHOM DID R VOTE FOR GOVERNOR - CANDIDATE 763677 FOR WHOM DID R VOTE FOR GOVERNOR - PARTY NAMED BY R 763678 R VOTED BUT HAD TROUBLE GETTING TO POLLS 763679 R VOTED BUT HAD TROUBLE GETTING OFF WORK TO VOTE 763680 R VOTED BUT LINES AT POLLS WERE TOO LONG/TOOK TOO LONG 763681 R VOTED BUT WEATHER WAS BAD 763682 R VOTED BUT WAS OUT OF TOWN - USED ABSENTEE BALLOT POLITICAL FACTUAL ITEMS 763683 WHICH PARTY HAD THE MOST MEMBERS IN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES BEFORE THE ELECTIONS 763684 WHICH PARTY HAD THE MOST MEMBERS IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AFTER THE ELECTIONS MOST IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEMS 763685 IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM - MENTION 1 763686 IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM - MENTION 2 763687 IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM - MENTION 3 763688 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: HAS R MENTIONED ANY PROBLEMS 763689 WHAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM 763690 DOES MOST IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM AFFECT R 763691 HOW GOOD A JOB IS GOVERNMENT DOING IN DEALING WITH THIS PROBLEM 763692 WHICH PARTY WOULD GET GOVERNMENT TO DEAL WITH PROBLEM 763693 HOW MUCH RESPONSIBILITY DOES GOVERNMENT HAVE TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM 763694 HAS R TALKED TO OTHER ABOUT THIS PROBLEM 763695 WHO DID R TALK TO ABOUT PROBLEM - HUSBAND/WIFE 763696 DOES HUSBAND/WIFE PAY MORE ATTENTION TO PUBLIC AFFAIRS 763697 WHO DID R TALK TO ABOUT PROBLEM - OTHER RELATIVE 763698 DOES OTHER RELATIVE PAY MORE ATTENTION TO PUBLIC AFFAIRS 763699 WHO DID R TALK TO ABOUT PROBLEM - SOMEONE AT WORK 763700 DOES SOMEONE AT WORK PAY MORE ATTENTION TO PUBLIC AFFAIRS 763701 WHO DID R TALK TO ABOUT PROBLEM - FRIEND OR NEIGHBOR 763702 DOES FRIEND OR NEIGHBOR PAY MORE ATTENTION TO PUBLIC AFFAIRS 763703 WHO DID R TALK TO ABOUT PROBLEM - ANYONE ELSE 763704 DOES ANYONE ELSE PAY MORE ATTENTION TO PUBLIC AFFAIRS ISSUES WHICH ARE IMPORTANT TO R 763705 R MENTIONS HONESTY IN GOVERNMENT AS IMPORTANT ISSUE 763706 R MENTIONS HIGH TAXES AS IMPORTANT ISSUE 763707 R MENTIONS INFLATION AS IMPORTANT ISSUE 763708 R MENTIONS ENERGY SHORTAGES AS IMPORTANT ISSUE 763709 R MENTIONS UNEMPLOYMENT AS IMPORTANT ISSUE 763710 R MENTIONS FOREIGN RELATIONS AS IMPORTANT ISSUE 763711 R MENTIONS RACIAL ISSUES AS IMPORTANT ISSUE 763712 R MENTIONS COMBATING CRIME/DRUGS AS IMPORTANT ISSUE 763713 R MENTIONS CONSUMER PROTECTION AS IMPORTANT ISSUE 763714 R MENTIONS POLLUTION AS IMPORTANT ISSUE 763715 SUMMARY OF IMPORTANT ISSUES RESPONSES GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO SOLVE PROBLEMS 763716 RESPONSIBILITY OF GOVERNMENT TO SOLVE HONESTY IN GOVERNMENT 763717 RESPONSIBILITY OF GOVERNMENT TO SOLVE HIGH TAXES 763718 RESPONSIBILITY OF GOVERNMENT TO SOLVE INFLATION 763719 RESPONSIBILITY OF GOVERNMENT TO SOLVE ENERGY SHORTAGES 763720 RESPONSIBILITY OF GOVERNMENT TO SOLVE UNEMPLOYMENT 763721 RESPONSIBILITY OF GOVERNMENT TO SOLVE FOREIGN RELATIONS 763722 RESPONSIBILITY OF GOVERNMENT TO SOLVE RACIAL ISSUES 763723 RESPONSIBILITY OF GOVERNMENT TO SOLVE CRIME/DRUG ISSUE 763724 RESPONSIBILITY OF GOVERNMENT TO SOLVE CONSUMER PROTECTION 763725 RESPONSIBILITY OF GOVERNMENT TO SOLVE POLLUTION 763726 HOW WOULD R RANK THE IMPORTANCE OF HONESTY IN GOVERNMENT 763727 HOW WOULD R RANK THE IMPORTANCE OF HIGH TAXES 763728 HOW WOULD R RANK THE IMPORTANCE OF INFLATION 763729 HOW WOULD R RANK THE IMPORTANCE OF ENERGY SHORTAGES 763730 HOW WOULD R RANK THE IMPORTANCE OF UNEMPLOYMENT 763731 HOW WOULD R RANK THE IMPORTANCE OF FOREIGN RELATIONS 763732 HOW WOULD R RANK THE IMPORTANCE OF RACIAL ISSUES 763733 HOW WOULD R RANK THE IMPORTANCE OF CRIME/DRUG ISSUE 763734 HOW WOULD R RANK THE IMPORTANCE OF CONSUMER PROTECTION 763735 HOW WOULD R RANK THE IMPORTANCE OF POLLUTION CONTROL AND DIRECTION OF LIFE: "PERSONAL COMPETENCE" 763736 IS IT BETTER TO PLAN ONE'S LIFE A GOOD WAY AHEAD 763737 WHEN R PLANS AHEAD, DO R'S PLANS WORK AS EXPECTED 763738 HAS R FELT LIFE WOULD WORK OUT AS DESIRED 763739 DOES R FEEL R CAN RUN LIFE AS WANTED 763740 HOW SATISFYING IS R'S LIFE THESE DAYS GOVERNMENT ATTENTION TO PEOPLE: "RESPONSIVENESS" 763741 HOW MUCH DOES GOVERNMENT LISTEN TO PEOPLE 763742 HOW MUCH DO PARTIES MAKE GOVERNMENT LISTEN 763743 HOW MUCH DO ELECTIONS MAKE GOVERNMENT LISTEN 763744 ARE CONGRESSMEN ATTENTIVE TO THEIR CONSTITUENCIES TRUST IN PEOPLE 763745 GENERALLY SPEAKING, CAN MOST PEOPLE BE TRUSTED 763746 DO PEOPLE TRY TO BE HELPFUL MOST OF THE TIME 763747 WOULD PEOPLE TAKE ADVANTAGE OF R IF GIVEN CHANCE GOVERNMENT ECONOMIC POLICY 763748 IS GOVERNMENT DOING A GOOD JOB WITH ECONOMIC POLICY 763749 WHICH PARTY CAN BEST HANDLE INFLATION/UNEMPLOYMENT 763750 WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR RECENT ECONOMIC PROBLEMS LOCUS OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE STATUS OF THE POOR 763751 DO THE WEALTHY AND POWERFUL KEEP THE POOR POOR 763752 ARE PEOPLE POOR BECAUSE THERE AREN'T ENOUGH JOBS 763753 DO POOR PEOPLE HAVE A CHANCE FOR A GOOD EDUCATION 763754 DOES THE SENIORITY SYSTEM IN COMPANIES WORK AGAINST THE POOR 763755 CAN POOR PEOPLE GET INTO UNIONS FOR SKILLED JOBS 763756 WERE MOST POOR BROUGHT UP WITHOUT DRIVE AND AMBITION 763757 DOES OUR WAY OF LIFE GIVE POOR PEOPLE AN EQUAL CHANCE GOVERNMENT GUARANTEED JOB & LIVING STANDARD SCALE 763758 R'S POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB & LIVING STANDARD SCALE 763759 FORD'S POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB & LIVING STANDARD SCALE 763760 CARTER'S POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB & LIVING STANDARD SCALE 763761 DEMOCRATS' POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB & LIVING STANDARD SCALE 763762 REPUBLICANS' POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB & LIVING STANDARD SCALE 763763 MOST POOR PEOPLES' POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB & LIVING STANDARD SCALE 763764 MOST BUSINESSMEN'S POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB & LIVING STANDARD SCALE 763765 MOST BLACKS' POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB & LIVING STANDARD SCALE 763766 MOST WHITES' POSITION ON GUARANTEED JOB & LIVING STANDARD SCALE URBAN UNREST SCALE 763767 R'S POSITION ON HANDLING URBAN UNREST SCALE 763768 FORD'S POSITION ON HANDLING URBAN UNREST SCALE 763769 CARTER'S POSITION ON HANDLING URBAN UNREST SCALE 763770 DEMOCRATS' POSITION ON HANDLING URBAN UNREST SCALE 763771 REPUBLICANS' POSITION ON HANDLING URBAN UNREST SCALE LEGALIZATION OF MARIJUANA SCALE 763772 R'S POSITION ON LEGALIZATION OF MARIJUANA SCALE 763773 FORD'S POSITION ON LEGALIZATION OF MARIJUANA SCALE 763774 CARTER'S POSITION ON LEGALIZATION OF MARIJUANA SCALE 763775 DEMOCRATS' POSITION ON LEGALIZATION OF MARIJUANA SCALE 763776 REPUBLICANS' POSITION ON LEGALIZATION OF MARIJUANA SCALE 763777 MOST YOUNG PEOPLE'S POSITION ON LEGALIZATION OF MARIJUANA SCALE 763778 MOST OLDER PEOPLE'S POSITION ON LEGALIZATION OF MARIJUANA SCALE CHANGE IN TAX RATE SCALE 763779 R'S POSITION ON THE TAX RATE CHANGE SCALE 763780 FORD'S POSITION ON THE TAX RATE CHANGE SCALE 763781 CARTER'S POSITION ON THE TAX RATE CHANGE SCALE 763782 DEMOCRATS' POSITION ON THE TAX RATE CHANGE SCALE 763783 REPUBLICANS' POSITION ON THE TAX RATE CHANGE SCALE 763784 MOST WORKINGMEN'S POSITION ON THE TAX RATE CHANGE SCALE 763785 MOST POOR PEOPLE'S POSITION ON THE TAX RATE CHANGE SCALE 763786 MOST BUSINESSMEN'S POSITION ON THE TAX RATE CHANGE SCALE EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN SCALE 763787 R'S POSITION ON EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN SCALE 763788 FORD'S POSITION ON EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN SCALE 763789 CARTER'S POSITION ON EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN SCALE 763790 DEMOCRATS' POSITION ON EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN SCALE 763791 REPUBLICANS' POSITION ON EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN SCALE 763792 MOST WOMEN'S POSITION ON EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN SCALE 763793 MOST MEN'S POSITION ON EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN SCALE 763794 MOST YOUNG PEOPLE'S POSITION ON EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN SCALE 763795 MOST OLDER PEOPLE'S POSITION ON EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN SCALE ABORTION AND SEX DISCRIMINATION 763796 WHEN SHOULD ABORTION BE ALLOWED 763797 WHICH PARTY WOULD SUPPORT AMENDMENT TO MAKE ABORTION ILLEGAL 763798 SHOULD WOMEN WITH WORKING HUSBANDS BE LAID OFF FIRST 763799 DOES R APPROVE/DISAPPROVE OF EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT 763800 DID R'S STATE CONSIDER EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT 763801 DID R'S STATE PASS/REJECT EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT LOCUS OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR STATUS OF WOMEN AND BLACKS 763802 R'S OPINION: SEX DISCRIMINATION IN JOBS 763803 R'S OPINION: BLACKS SHOULD WORK AS GROUP/INDIVIDUAL TO ATTAIN RIGHTS 763804 R'S OPINION: WOMEN SHOULD WORK AS GROUP/INDIVIDUAL TO ATTAIN RIGHTS 763805 R'S OPINION: RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN JOBS 763806 R'S OPINION: WHITES/BLACKS - USE OF OPPORTUNITIES 763807 R'S OPINION: BEST WAY FOR BLACKS TO OVERCOME DISCRIMINATION 763808 R'S OPINION: SEX DISCRIMINATION AND TOP LEVEL JOBS 763809 R'S OPINION: BEST WAY FOR WOMEN TO OVERCOME DISCRIMINATION 763810 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT - WHO READ GREEN SHEET 763811 R'S OPINION: BY NATURE WOMEN ARE HAPPIEST AT HOME 763812 R'S OPINION: BLACKS GET AHEAD BY DOING THE PROPER THING 763813 R'S OPINION: MEN HAVE TOP JOBS BECAUSE THEY HAVE HIGHER DRIVE THAN WOMEN 763814 R'S OPINION: BLACKS/MINORITIES FAVORED FOR JOBS AND TRAINING PROGRAMS POLITICAL EFFICACY 763815 DO PEOPLE LIKE R HAVE ANY SAY IN WHAT GOVERNMENT DOES 763816 IS VOTING THE ONLY WAY PEOPLE LIKE R HAVE A SAY 763817 IS POLITICS TOO COMPLICATED FOR R TO UNDERSTAND 763818 DO OFFICIALS CARE WHAT PEOPLE LIKE R THINK 763819 DO CONGRESSMEN LOOSE TOUCH WITH PEOPLE QUICKLY 763820 ARE PARTIES INTERESTED IN PEOPLES VOTES, NOT OPINION "FEELING THERMOMETER" - GROUPS IN SOCIETY 763821 FEELING THERMOMETER - BIG BUSINESS 763822 FEELING THERMOMETER - POOR PEOPLE 763823 FEELING THERMOMETER - LIBERALS 763824 FEELING THERMOMETER - SOUTHERNERS 763825 FEELING THERMOMETER - CHICANOS, MEXICAN-AMERICANS 763826 FEELING THERMOMETER - CATHOLICS 763827 FEELING THERMOMETER - RADICAL STUDENTS 763828 FEELING THERMOMETER - POLICEMEN 763829 FEELING THERMOMETER - OLDER PEOPLE 763830 FEELING THERMOMETER - WOMEN 763831 FEELING THERMOMETER - THE MILITARY 763832 FEELING THERMOMETER - BLACKS 763833 FEELING THERMOMETER - DEMOCRATS 763834 FEELING THERMOMETER - PEOPLE ON WELFARE 763835 FEELING THERMOMETER - REPUBLICANS 763836 FEELING THERMOMETER - LABOR UNIONS 763837 FEELING THERMOMETER - YOUNG PEOPLE 763838 FEELING THERMOMETER - CONSERVATIVES 763839 FEELING THERMOMETER - WOMEN'S LIBERATION MOVEMENT 763840 FEELING THERMOMETER - PEOPLE WHO USE MARIJUANA 763841 FEELING THERMOMETER - BLACK MILITANTS 763842 FEELING THERMOMETER - JEWS 763843 FEELING THERMOMETER - CIVIL RIGHTS LEADERS 763844 FEELING THERMOMETER - PROTESTANTS 763845 FEELING THERMOMETER - WORKINGMEN 763846 FEELING THERMOMETER - WHITES 763847 FEELING THERMOMETER - MEN 763848 FEELING THERMOMETER - MIDDLE CLASS PEOPLE 763849 FEELING THERMOMETER - BUSINESSMEN R'S CLOSENESS TO VARIOUS SOCIAL GROUPS 763850 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO BUSINESSMEN 763851 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO LIBERALS 763852 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO SOUTHERNERS 763853 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO POOR PEOPLE 763854 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO CATHOLICS 763855 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO PROTESTANTS 763856 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO JEWS 763857 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO YOUNG PEOPLE 763858 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO WHITES 763859 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO BLACKS 763860 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO CONSERVATIVES 763861 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO WOMEN 763862 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO MIDDLE CLASS PEOPLE 763863 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO WORKINGMEN 763864 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO FARMERS 763865 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO OLDER PEOPLE 763866 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: GROUPS MENTIONED/NOT MENTIONED GROUP IDENTIFICATION AND INFLUENCE 763867 WHICH SOCIAL GROUP DOES R FEEL CLOSEST TO 763868 DOES R BELONG TO ANY ORGANIZATIONS OF CLOSEST GROUP 763869 ACTIVITIES OF CLOSEST GROUP R BELONGS TO 763870 DOES R READ ANY PUBLICATION REPRESENTING CLOSEST GROUP 763871 HOW MUCH INFLUENCE DOES CLOSEST GROUP HAVE IN AMERICAN LIFE 763872 ARE THERE THINGS CLOSEST GROUP CAN DO TO INCREASE ITS INFLUENCE 763873 HOW CAN CLOSEST GROUP INCREASE INFLUENCE - MENTION 1 763874 HOW CAN CLOSEST GROUP INCREASE INFLUENCE - MENTION 2 763875 HOW CAN CLOSEST GROUP INCREASE INFLUENCE - MENTION 3 763876 WHY CLOSEST GROUP CANNOT INCREASE INFLUENCE-MENTION 1 763877 WHY CLOSEST GROUP CANNOT INCREASE INFLUENCE-MENTION 2 763878 WHY CLOSEST GROUP CANNOT INCREASE INFLUENCE-MENTION 3 763879 HAS INFLUENCE OF CLOSEST GROUP INCREASED/DECREASED 763880 DOES R THINK CLOSEST GROUP SHOULD WORK TOGETHER OR INDIVIDUALLY TO INCREASE INFLUENCE 763881 DOES R THINK CLOSEST GROUP SHOULD WORK TOGETHER OR INDIVIDUALLY TO INCREASE ECONOMIC POSITION 763882 HAS R GOTTEN CLOSEST GROUP MEMBERS TO VOTE AS A BLOC 763883 HAS R REGISTERED MEMBERS OF CLOSEST GROUP TO VOTE 763884 HAS R WORKED FOR/AGAINST POLICY AFFECTING CLOSEST GROUP 763885 HAS R GOTTEN CLOSEST GROUP TO WORK WITH OTHER GROUP 763886 HAS R MOVED TO COMMUNITY THAT BETTER REFLECTS R'S CLOSEST GROUPS' INTERESTS 763887 HAS R WORKED TO HELP CLOSEST GROUP EXPRESS VALUES 763888 R'S OPINION: GROUP MEMBERS VOTING AS A BLOC 763889 R'S OPINION: REGISTER OTHER GROUP MEMBERS TO VOTE 763890 R'S OPINION: WORK FOR/AGAINST POLICY AFFECTING GROUP 763891 R'S OPINION: CLOSEST GROUP WORKING WITH OTHER GROUPS 763892 R'S OPINION: MOVING TO COMMUNITY THAT BETTER REFLECTS GROUPS' INTERESTS 763893 R'S OPINION: WORKING IN GROUP TO HELP GROUP EXPRESS ITS OWN VALUES R'S ETHNIC BACKGROUND AND IDENTIFICATION 763894 WHAT DOES R CONSIDER R'S MAIN ETHNIC GROUP 763895 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO ETHNIC GROUP 763896 DOES R BELONG TO ANY ETHNIC ORGANIZATIONS 763897 WHAT ETHNIC ORGANIZATIONS DOES R BELONG TO 763898 DOES R READ ETHNIC NEWSPAPER OR MAGAZINES 763899 HOW MUCH INFLUENCE DOES R'S ETHNIC GROUP HAVE 763900 CAN R'S ETHNIC GROUP INCREASE INFLUENCE 763901 DOES R'S ETHNIC GROUP HAVE MORE OR LESS INFLUENCE NOW 763902 ANY OTHER GROUP R FEELS CLOSE TO 763903 WHAT OTHER GROUP DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO LOCAL EFFICACY 763904 DO PEOPLE LIKE R HAVE ANY SAY IN WHAT LOCAL GOVERNMENT DOES 763905 IS LOCAL POLITICS TOO COMPLICATED FOR R TO UNDERSTAND 763906 DO LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIALS LOSE TOUCH WITH PEOPLE QUICKLY CYNICISM AND TRUST IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT 763907 HOW OFTEN CAN R TRUST LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO DO RIGHT 763908 IS LOCAL GOVERNMENT RUN FOR THE BENIFIT OF ALL OR FEW 763909 WOULD R APPROVE OF SIT-INS, DEMONSTRATIONS CRIME AND SAFETY 763910 IS IT SAFE TO WALK AROUND HERE ALONE AT NIGHT 763911 DOES R FAVOR STRICTER HAND GUN CONTROL 763912 WOULD R FAVOR REQUIRING PERMIT TO PURCHASE A HAND GUN 763913 DO COURTS TREAT CRIMINALS TOO HARSHLY 763914 HAS R BOUGHT A DOG FOR PROTECTION 763915 HAS R PUT NEW LOCKS ON DOORS OR WINDOWS 763916 HAS R INSTALLED ALARM IN CAR OR HOME 763917 HAS R KEPT A GUN FOR PROTECTION 763918 HAS R STAYED AWAY FROM CERTAIN AREAS OF CITY OR TOWN 763919 IN LAST YEAR HAS R WITNESSED A CRIME 763920 IN LAST YEAR HAS R HAD HOME OR APARTMENT BROKEN INTO 763921 IN LAST YEAR HAS R HAD CAR BROKEN INTO OR STOLEN 763922 IN LAST YEAR HAS R BEEN ATTACKED OR HAD SOMETHING TAKEN BY FORCE FOREIGN INVOLVEMENT AND AID 763923 WHAT IS MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM IN RELATIONS WITH OTHER COUNTRIES - MENTION 1 763924 WHAT IS MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM IN RELATIONS WITH OTHER COUNTRIES - MENTION 2 763925 WHAT IS MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM IN RELATIONS WITH OTHER COUNTRIES - MENTION 3 763926 SHOULD THE U.S. NOT CONCERN ITSELF WITH WORLD PROBLEMS 763927 SHOULD THE U.S. GIVE FOREIGN AID TO COUNTRIES DIFFERING FROM U.S. 763928 SHOULD WE LIMIT AMOUNT OF ENERGY PEOPLE CAN USE PERSONAL PROBLEMS 763929 WHAT PROBLEMS DOES R FACE - MENTION 1 763930 WHAT PROBLEMS DOES R FACE - MENTION 2 ROKEACH INSTRUMENTAL VALUES 763931 IS IT IMPORTANT TO R TO BE AMBITIOUS AND HARD WORKING 763932 IS IT IMPORTANT TO R TO BE WELL-LIKED AND FRIENDLY 763933 IS IT IMPORTANT TO R TO BE INDEPENDENT, SELF-RELIANT 763934 IS IT IMPORTANT TO R TO BE HELPFUL, ORK FOR OTHERS 763935 IS IT IMPORTANT TO R TO BE RESPONSIBLE AND DEPENDABLE 763936 IS IT MOST IMPORTANT TO BE AMBITIOUS AND HARD WORKING 763937 IS IT MOST IMPORTANT TO BE WELL-LIKED AND FRIENDLY 763938 IS IT MOST IMPORTANT TO BE INDEPENDENT, SELF-RELIANT 763939 IS IT MOST IMPORTANT TO BE HELPFUL, WORK FOR OTHERS 763940 IS IT MOST IMPORTANT TO BE RESPONSIBLE AND DEPENDABLE- ROKEACH TERMINAL VALUES 763941 IS AN IMPORTANT GOAL FOR R TO HAVE A PROSPEROUS LIFE 763942 IS AN IMPORTANT GOAL FOR R TO HAVE AN IMPORTANT LIFE 763943 IS AN IMPORTANT GOAL FOR R TO HAVE A SECURE LIFE 763944 IS AN IMPORTANT GOAL FOR R TO HAVE AN EXCITING LIFE 763945 IS IT MOST IMPORTANT TO R TO HAVE A PROSPEROUS LIFE 763946 IS IT MOST IMPORTANT TO R TO HAVE AN IMPORTANT LIFE 763947 IS IT MOST IMPORTANT TO R TO HAVE A SECURE LIFE 763948 IS IT MOST IMPORTANT TO R TO HAVE AN EXCITING LIFE NATIONAL GOALS 763949 WHAT IS MOST DESIRABLE NATIONAL GOAL 763950 WHAT IS SECOND MOST DESIRABLE NATIONAL GOAL PERSONAL DATA 763951 RESPONDENT'S SEX 763952 RESPONDENT'S RACE