Version 01 Codebook ------------------- CODEBOOK INTRODUCTION FILE 1982 POST-ELECTION STUDY (1982.T) AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES 1982 POST ELECTION STUDY PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS WARREN E. MILLER AND THE NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER 9042 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ASSISTANCE ALL MANUSCRIPTS USING DATA MADE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE CONSORTIUM SHOULD ACKNOWLEDGE THAT FACT AS WELL AS IDENTIFY THE ORIGINAL COLLECTOR OF THE DATA. THE ICPSR COUNCIL URGES ALL USERS OF THE ICPSR DATA FACILITIES TO FOLLOW SOME ADAPTATION OF THIS STATEMENT WITH THE PARENTHESES INDICATING ITEMS TO BE FILLED IN APPROPRIATELY OR DELETED BY THE INDIVIDUAL USER. THE DATA (AND TABULATIONS) UTILIZED IN THIS (PUBLICATION) WERE MADE AVAILABLE (IN PART) BY THE INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL AND SOCIAL RESEARCH. THE DATA FOR THE AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY, 1982, WERE ORIGINALLY COLLECTED BY THE CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES OF THE INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH, THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, FOR THE NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES, UNDER THE OVERALL DIRECTION OF WARREN E. MILLER; MARIA ELENA SANCHEZ WAS DIRECTOR OF STUDIES IN 1982. THE DATA WERE COLLECTED UNDER A GRANT FROM THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION. NEITHER THE ORIGINAL COLLECTORS OF THE DATA NOR THE CONSORTIUM BEAR ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ANALYSES OR INTER- PRETATIONS PRESENTED HERE. IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FUNDING AGENCIES WITH ESSENTIAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE USE OF ARCHIVAL RESOURCES, AND TO FACILITATE THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION ABOUT ICPSR PAR- TICIPANTS' RESEARCH ACTIVITIES, EACH USER OF THE ICPSR DATA FACILITIES IS EXPECTED TO SEND TWO COPIES OF EACH COMPLETED MANUSCRIPT OR THESIS ABSTRACT TO THE CONSORTIUM. PLEASE INDICATE IN THE COVER LETTER WHICH DATA WERE USED. TABLE OF CONTENTS Note: >>sections in the codebook introduction and codebook appendix can be navigated in the machine-readable files by searching ">>". INTRODUCTORY MATERIAL (file int1982.cbk) --------------------- >> 1982 STUDY DESCRIPTION >> 1982 - DESIGN OF THE NES/CPS AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY >> 1982 SAMPLING INFORMATION -IN-PERSON POST-ELECTION SURVEY >> 1982 CONTENTS >> 1982 NOTES ON ADMINISTRATION >> 1982 PROCESSING INFORMATION AND FILE STRUCTURE >> 1982 CODEBOOK INFORMATION >> 1982 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST CODEBOOK -------- 1982 variables APPENDICES (file app1982.cbk) ---------- >> 1982 ICPSR STATE AND COUNTY NOTE >> FIPS STATE AND COUNTY NOTE >> 1980 CENSUS DEFINITIONS >> 1982 CANDIDATE MASTER CODE >> 1982 IMPORTANT PROBLEMS NOTE >> 1982 OCCUPATION NOTES >> 1970 CENSUS INDUSTRY NOTE >> 1982 NATIONALITY NOTE >> 1982 CITIES NOTE >> 1982 PARTY/CANDIDATE NOTE >> 1982 RECODING IN THE OCCUPATION AND EDUCATION SECTIONS >> 1982 STATE AND COUNTRY NOTE >> 1982 STUDY DESCRIPTION THE NES/CPS AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY, 1982, WAS CONDUCTED BY THE CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES OF THE INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH, THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, UNDER THE OVERALL DIRECTION OF WARREN E. MILLER. MARIA ELENA SANCHEZ WAS DIRECTOR OF STUDIES IN 1982. SHE WAS ASSISTED BY JEANNE CASTRO AND ALICE HAYES WHO HAD PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONDUCT OF FIELD AND CODING OPERATIONS, RESPECTIVELY. THIS IS THE SEVENTEENTH IN A SERIES OF STUDIES OF AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTIONS PRODUCED BY THE POLITICAL BEHAVIOR PROGRAM OF THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER (SRC) AND THE CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES (CPS), AND THE THIRD STUDY TO BE CONDUCTED UNDER THE AUSPICES OF THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION WITH FUNDING FROM A GRANT (NO. SES-8207580) WHICH CONTINUES LONG-TERM SUPPORT FOR THE NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES. A BOARD OF OVERSEERS DRAWN FROM THE NATIONAL COMMUNITY OF SOCIAL SCIENTISTS EXISTS TO SUPERVISE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GRANT, SET PRIORITIES FOR FUTURE STUDIES, AND LINK MEMBERS OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCE COMMUNITY TO THE NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES. AS IN 1978 AND 1980, THE BOARD PLAYED AN ACTIVE ROLE IN PLANNING THE DESIGN AND CONTENT OF THE 1982 STUDY. THE COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD DURING THE PLANNING AND EXECUTION PHASES OF THE 1982 STUDY WAS AS FOLLOWS: PROFESSORS RAYMOND E. WOLFINGER, CHAIR, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY; RICHARD A. BRODY, STANFORD UNIVERSITY; HEINZ EULAU, STANFORD UNIVERSITY; STANLEY KELLY, JR., PRINCETON UNIVERSITY; DONALD R. KINDER, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN; DAVID R. MAYHEW, YALE UNIVERSITY; WARREN E. MILLER, ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, EX OFFICIO; MILDRED A. SCHWARTZ, UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, CHICAGO CIRCLE; DAVID O. SEARS, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES; AND J. MERRILL SHANKS, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY. PLANNING FOR THE 1982 STUDY WAS GREATLY DELAYED DUE TO BUDGETARY UNCERTAINTY AT THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION WITH RESPECT TO THE LEVEL OF SUPPORT TO BE RECEIVED BY NES FROM THIS ORGANIZATION. AS A RESULT, THE 1982 STUDY DESIGN WAS LARGELY THE RESULT OF DELIBERATIONS BETWEEN THE BOARD OF OVERSEERS AND THE PROJECT STAFF, WITH LESS INVOLVEMENT THAN USUAL FROM THE COMMUNITY OF OUTSIDE SCHOLARS. AN AD HOC 1982 STUDY PLANNING COMMITTEE WAS APPOINTED BY THE BOARD IN FEBRUARY 1982 TO FORMULATE RECOMMENDATIONS ON SURVEY INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTEXTUAL DATA COLLECTIONS. THE COMMITTEE MET ONCE IN LATE MARCH TO DEFINE THE BASIC CONTENTS OF THE PRESENT STUDY. THE COMMITTEE WAS CHAIRED BY PROFESSOR RAYMOND WOLFINGER AND CONSISTED OF: TWO ADDITIONAL BOARD MEMBERS, PROFESSORS DAVID SEARS AND MERRILL SHANKS; CONGRESSIONAL SCHOLARS, PROFESSORS DAVID W. BRADY, JOHN FEREJOHN, MORRIS P. FIORINA, AND GARY C. JACOBSON; AND PROFESSOR WARREN MILLER, EX OFFICIO. THE NES BOARD WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEFINITION OF CORE QUESTIONNAIRE ITEMS TO SUPPORT THE NATIONAL ELECTIONS TIME SERIES. FINAL CORE ITEM SELECTIONS WERE PARTLY BASED ON PREFERENCES VOICED BY THE USER COMMUNITY IN RESPONSE TO A MEMORANDUM SENT IN 1979 TO THE APPROXIMATELY 900 PERSONS ON THE NES MAILING LIST. THE BOARD WAS ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR REVIEWING THE INSTRUMENTATION OF THE CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS TIMES SERIES STARTED IN 1978. FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE PLANNING COMMITTEE, THE BOARD APPROVED THE REPETITION IN THE TRADITIONAL POST-ELECTION SURVEY OF A SUBSTANTIAL NUMBER OF CONGRESSIONAL ITEMS USED IN THE 1978 AND 1980 NES/CPS ELECTION STUDIES. >> 1982 - DESIGN OF THE NES/CPS AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY THE 1982 ELECTION STUDY HAS TWO COMPONENTS: (1) A TRADITIONAL POST-ELECTION SURVEY USING IN-PERSON INTERVIEWS WITH A NATIONAL SAMPLE OF 1418 RESPONDENTS LOCATED IN THE 74 PRIMARY AREAS OF THE COUNTY-BASED SRC SAMPLING FRAME, AND (2) AN EXPERIMENTAL POST-ELECTION SURVEY USING COMPUTER-ASSISTED TELEPHONE INTERVIEWING (CATI) WITH A NATIONAL SAMPLE OF 1000 RESPONDENTS SELECTED BY A RANDOM-DIGIT DIALING PROCEDURE. INTERVIEWING FOR THE IN-PERSON AND TELEPHONE SURVEYS STARTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER ELECTION DAY AND EXTENDED THROUGH JANUARY 1983. TELEPHONE RESPONDENTS WERE ADMINISTERED A SOMEWHAT ABBREVIATED VERSION OF THE IN-PERSON INTERVIEW SCHEDULE, ADAPTED FOR USE OVER THE TELEPHONE WHERE APPROPRIATE. SRC FIELD INTERVIEWERS CONDUCTED THE IN-PERSON SURVEY, AS IN PAST ELECTION STUDIES. THE TELEPHONE STUDY INVOLVED THE USE OF MATCHED HALF-SAMPLES, AND THE COLLABORATION OF TWO SURVEY ORGANIZATIONS: MICHIGAN'S SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER AND BERKELEY'S COMPUTER-ASSISTED SURVEY METHODS GROUP. EACH OF THE SURVEY ORGANIZATIONS ADMINISTERED A COMPARABLE QUESTIONNAIRE VERSION UNDER THEIR DIFFERENT CATI SYSTEMS, INTERVIEWING A RANDOM HALF OF THE RESPONDENTS FROM EACH OF THE SAMPLED TELEPHONE CLUSTERS. THE IN-PERSON/TELEPHONE METHODOLOGICAL EXPERIMENT OF THE 1982 STUDY WAS DESIGNED TO ADDRESS A VARIETY OF SUBSTANTIVE, MEASUREMENT AND PROCEDURAL ISSUES SUCH AS: THE VIABILITY OF A METHOD DEVELOPED TO IDENTIFY THE CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT OF TELEPHONE RESPONDENTS; DIFFERENCES IN SAMPLE COVERAGE AND RESPONSE RATE BETWEEN INTERVIEWING MODES; QUALITATIVE MODE DIFFERENCES RESULTING FROM THE ADAPTATION TO TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION OF TRADITIONALNES00000 QUESTIONS RELYING ON "SHOW CARDS" AND OTHER VISUAL AIDS, AND THE FEASIBILITY OF ADMINISTERING LONG (50-55 MINUTES) POLITICAL INTERVIEWS OVER THE TELEPHONE. SUMMARIZED INFORMATION ABOUT THE FIELD ADMINISTRATION FOR THE IN-PERSON SURVEY IS PRESENTED BELOW: TRADITIONAL POST-ELECTION SURVEY FIELD PERIOD NOV 3, 1982 - JAN 31, 1983 MODE OF INTERVIEW IN-PERSON (AVG. LENGTH, MINUTES) (72.1) N % COMPLETED INTERVIEWS 1418 72.4 REFUSALS 422 21.5 OTHER NON-INTERVIEW 120 6.1 TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE 1960 100.0 >> 1982 SAMPLING INFORMATION - IN-PERSON POST-ELECTION SURVEY DATA FOR THE 1982 NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY WERE OBTAINED BY INTERVIEWING, IN-PERSON, INDIVIDUALS LIVING IN HOUSEHOLDS IN THE COTERMINOUS UNITED STATES, EXCLUSIVE OF HOUSEHOLDS ON MILITARY RESERVATONS. THE ELIGIBLE POPULATION CONSISTED OF UNITED STATES CITIZENS WHO WERE 18 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER BY ELECTION DAY, 1982. IN 1978 AND 1980, THE NES SAMPLING FRAME CONSISTED OF 108 CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS. IN 1982, BECAUSE OF REDISTRICTING, IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN THE REQUIRED STATISTICAL INFORMATION IN TIME TO DRAW A SAMPLE OF NEW CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS. THEREFORE, THE TRADITIONAL POST-ELECTION SURVEY SAMPLE WAS DRAWN FROM THE COUNTY-BASED SRC SAMPLING FRAME, WITH THE 1982 CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT NUMBERS SUBSEQUENTLY IDENTIFIED FOR EACH SAMPLED SEGMENT FROM INSPECTION OF REDISTRICTED CONGRESSIONAL MAPS. TIMELY IDENTIFICATION OF THE DISTRICT NUMBER CORRESPONDING TO EACH SAMPLE SEGMENT WAS NECESSARY FOR THE CONGRESSIONAL TIME SERIES, INASMUCH AS THE ADMINISTRATION OF THIS BATTERY OF QUESTIONS REQUIRES THAT INTERVIEWERS PRE-EDIT IN THE QUESTIONNAIRES THE NAMES OF THE CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES THAT RAN IN THE RESPONDENT'S DISTRICT. THERE ARE 173 CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS IN THE GEOGRAPHIC AREAS REPRESENTED IN THE 1982 SAMPLE. THE 1982 STUDY EMPLOYS THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER'S NATIONAL SAMPLE OF COUNTIES AND SMSA'S. THE 74 PRIMARY AREAS OF THE SRC NATIONAL SAMPLE INCLUDE 12 MAJOR METROPOLITAN AREAS, 32 OTHER STANDARD METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREAS (SMSA'S) AND 30 COUNTIES OR COUNTY-GROUPS REPRESENTING THE NONMETROPOLITAN OR RURAL PORTIONS OF THE COUNTRY. IN THE MULTISTAGE AREA PROBABILITY SAMPLING, FIRST-STAGE STRATIFICATION OF SMSA'S AND COUNTIES IS CARRIED OUT INDEPENDENTLY WITHIN EACH OF THE FOUR MAJOR GEOGRAPHICAL REGIONS, NORTHEAST, NORTH CENTRAL, SOUTH, AND WEST, EACH OF WHICH RECEIVES REPRESENTATION IN PROPORTION TO ITS POPULATION. OVER ALL REGIONS, THE SMSA'S AND COUNTIES ARE ASSIGNED TO 74 RELATIVELY HOMOGENEOUS GROUPS OR STRATA. TWELVE OF THESE STRATA CONTAIN ONLY ONE PRIMARY AREA EACH; THESE ARE THE TWO STANDARD CONSOLIDATED AREAS AND THE 10 LARGEST SMSA'S, OUTSIDE THE CONSOLIDATED AREAS, WHICH ARE INCLUDED WITH CERTAINTY. THE REMAINING 62 STRATA AVERAGE A LITTLE OVER TWO MILLION POPULATION AND MAY CONTAIN FROM 2 TO 200 OR MORE PRIMARY AREAS (SMSA'S OR COUNTY GROUPS). FROM EACH STRATUM ONE PRIMARY AREA IS SELECTED WITH PROBABILITY PROPORTIONATE TO POPULATION. THIS SAMPLING PROCESS LEADS TO APPROXIMATELY EQUAL SAMPLE SIZES FROM THESE 62 PRIMARY SAMPLE AREAS. INSTEAD OF INDEPENDENT SELECTIONS WITHIN EACH OF THE 62 STRATA, CONTROLLED PROBABILITY SELECTION IS INTRODUCED FOR A MORE EFFICIENT SAMPLE. WITHIN EACH OF THE FOUR GEOGRAPHIC REGIONS THE SELECTIONS OF PRIMARY AREAS ARE LINKED BY A PROCEDURE THAT CONTROLS THE DISTRIBUTION OF SAMPLE AREAS BY STATES AND DEGREE OF URBANIZATION BEYOND THE CONTROLS EFFECTED THROUGH THE FORMATION OF THE 62 STRATA. THIS CONTROLLED SELECTION YIELDS A MORE BALANCED SAMPLE AND INCREASES THE PRECISION OF SAMPLE ESTIMATES. AS THE MULTISTAGE AREA SAMPLING CONTINUES WITHIN THE 74 PRIMARY UNITS, THE AREA IS DIVIDED AND SUBDIVIDED, IN TWO TO FIVE STAGES, INTO SUCCESSIVELY SMALLER SAMPLING UNITS. BY DEFINITION AND PROCEDURE, EACH DWELLING BELONGS UNIQUELY TO ONE SAMPLING UNIT AT EACH STAGE. WITHIN THE PRIMARY AREAS, CITIES, TOWNS, AND RURAL AREAS ARE THE SECONDARY SELECTIONS. BLOCKS OR CLUSTERS OF ADDRESSES IN CITIES AND TOWNS, AND CHUNKS OF RURAL AREAS ARE THE THIRD-STAGE UNITS. IN A FOURTH-STAGE THERE IS A SELECTION OF SMALL SEGMENTS OR CLUSTERS OF DWELLINGS WHERE INTERVIEWS ARE TAKEN FOR A STUDY. IN A LAST STAGE OF SAMPLING, ONE RESPONDENT IS SELECTED FROM AMONG ELIGIBLE HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS. PROBABILITY SELECTION IS ENFORCED AT ALL STAGES OF THE SAMPLE SELECTION; THE INTERVIEWER HAS NO FREEDOM OF CHOICE AMONG DWELLINGS OR AMONG HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS WITHIN A SAMPLE DWELLING. AT THE OVERALL RATE OF 1:35,360 A SAMPLE OF 2,278 HOUSING UNITS WAS DRAWN. THESE ARE THE DWELLINGS WHERE INTERVIEWERS CALLED IN 1982 TO ATTEMPT INTERVIEWS WITH ONE OBJECTIVELY SELECTED ELIGIBLE PERSON. THE SELECTIONS WERE THINLY SPREAD, AVERAGING ONLY ONE OR TWO FROM A SAMPLE BLOCK. IN HOUSEHOLDS WITH ELIGIBLE PERSONS, AN INTERVIEW WAS COMPLETED WITH THE HOUSEHOLD MEMBER DESIGNATED AS THE RESPONDENT THROUGH AN OBJECTIVE SELECTION PROCEDURE ALLOWING FOR NO SUBSTITUTIONS. >> 1982 CONTENTS THE FOCUS OF THE SURVEY WAS THE JUST-HELD CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS. RESPONDENTS WERE ASKED ABOUT THEIR INVOLVEMENT AND INTEREST IN THE CAMPAIGN, WHETHER AND HOW THEY VOTED, THE NATURE AND EXTENT OF CONTACT WITH THEIR U.S. REPRESENTATIVE, AND ABOUT THEIR KNOWLEDGE OF ISSUE POSITIONS HELD BY CANDIDATES FOR CONGRESS. A NUMBER OF QUESTIONS DEALT WITH PRESIDENT REAGAN'S PERFORMANCE IN OFFICE. IN ADDITION, THE RESPONDENTS WERE ASKED TO EVALUATE REAGAN'S PERSONAL QUALITIES, AND THEIR OWN FEELINGS TOWARD HIM. OTHER VARIABLES INCLUDE FEELING THERMOMETERS, PARTY IDENTIFICATION, MAJOR NATIONAL PROBLEMS, ATTITUDES ON A NUMBER OF SOCIAL AND POLITICAL ISSUES, AND PERSONAL DATA: EMPLOYMENT, INCOME, RELIGION, AGE, EDUCATION, MARITAL STATUS, AND SOCIAL CLASS. THE PRESENT RELEASE OF THE DATA INCLUDES FIELD ADMINISTRATION AND SAMPLING VARIABLES, AS WELL AS SEVERAL KINDS OF DERIVED MEASURES: OCCUPATIONAL PRESTIGE SCORES (DUNCAN, NORC) FOR RESPONDENT, HEAD, AND WIFE OF HEAD AND SEPARATE EDUCATIONAL AND OCCUPATIONAL SERIES PRESENTING DATA FOR HEAD AND WIFE OF HEAD SEPARATE FROM RESPONDENT. >> 1982 NOTES ON ADMINISTRATION SPECIAL INFORMATION: ABOUT THE ------------------- (NAME # X, Y, OR Z) EXPRESSIONS IN THE 1982 QUESTIONNAIRE THE 1982 ELECTION STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE MADE PROVISIONS TO HAVE INTERVIEWERS FILL IN DISTRICT/STATE CANDIDATE NAMES IN BLANK SLOTS LIKE THE ONE DEPICTED ABOVE. A COMPREHENSIVE LIST OF HOUSE, SENATE AND GOVERNOR CANDIDATE AND INCUMBENT NAMES WAS PREPARED FOR EACH OF THE 173 DISTRICTS IN THE SAMPLE AND THE INTERVIEWERS USED THE LISTS TO PRE-EDIT NAMES WHERE APPROPRIATE, DEPENDING ON THE DISTRICT OF INTERVIEW. THESE CANDIDATE LISTS ARE REPRODUCED IN NOTE 4 IN THE NOTES SECTION. THE (NAME #) EXPRESSION WILL GENERALLY LIST MORE THAN ONE CANDIDATE NUMBER. FOR ANY GIVEN DISTRICT, HOWEVER, ONE OF TWO POSSIBILITIES WILL HOLD: 1) THERE WILL BE ONE AND ONLY ONE NAME IN THE DISTRICT CANDIDATE LIST QUALIFYING FOR INCLUSION ON THE BASIS OF THE NUMBERS LISTED IN THE EXPRESSION; OR 2) THERE WILL BE NO NUMBER IN THE DISTRICT CANDIDATE LIST MATCHING ANY OF THE NUMBERS IN THE EXPRESSION. AN INSTANCE OF NO MATCHING NUMBERS ARISES FOR A QUESTION ABOUT THE CANDIDATE CHALLENGING A DISTRICT INCUMBENT WHEN, IN FACT, THE INCUMBENT IS RUNNING UNOPPOSED. INTERVIEWERS WERE INSTRUCTED TO MARK "NO INFO" THOSE QUESTIONS INVOLVING UNMATCHED CANDIDATE NUMBERS IN THE (NAME #) EXPRESSION. IN THE CANDIDATE LIST, EACH CANDIDATE OR INCUMBENT IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER OR CODE. NUMBERS BEGINNING WITH 1 (11-19) ARE FOR THE SENATE, NUMBERS BEGINNING WITH 3 (31-39) ARE FOR THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, AND NUMBERS BEGINNING WITH 5 (51-58) ARE FOR GOVERNORS. IN ADDITION, THE CODE OR NUMBER ASSIGNED TO A NAME HAS AN INTRINSIC MEANING--IT DENOTES THE FUNCTIONAL ROLE OF THAT PERSON IN THE CONTEXT OF THE 1982 GENERAL ELECTIONS. FOR EXAMPLE, CANDIDATE NUMBER 33 IS USED FOR A DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT SEEKING RE-ELECTION AND PLAYING, THEREFORE, THE DUAL ROLE OF HOUSE INCUMBENT AND DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE FOR THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES IN THE 1982 ELECTIONS. THE PRECISE MEANING OF EACH CANDIDATE NUMBER USED IN THE STUDY IS GIVEN IN NOTE 4 OF THE NOTES SECTION. NEEDLESS TO SAY, YOU WILL NEED TO UNDERSTAND THE SCHEME THAT WAS USED IN ORDER TO WORK EFFECTIVELY WITH THE QUESTIONS INVOLVING (NAME #) EXPRESSIONS. VIRTUALLY ALL STATES REDEFINED CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT BOUNDARIES (REDISTRICTED) DURING 1981 OR 1982 IN ACCORDANCE WITH NEW 1980 CENSUS POPULATION ESTIMATES. IN THE CANDIDATE LIST, THE TERM 'INCUMBENT' DENOTES A HOUSE CANDIDATE WHO WAS A MEMBER OF CONGRESS PRIOR TO THE 1982 GENERAL ELECTIONS. UNLIKE 1978 AND 1980, THE INCUMBENT'S DISTRICT IN 1982 MAY CONSIST OF A FAIRLY DIFFERENT GEOGRAPHIC AREA FROM THE AREA COVERED BY THE DISTRICT PRIOR TO THE BOUNDARY CHANGES; THEREFORE, ALTHOUGH THE 'INCUMBENT' HOUSE CANDIDATE SERVED IN CONGRESS AS OF THE 1982 ELECTIONS, DEPENDING ON CHANGES IN DISTRICT BOUNDARIES, HE OR SHE MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE BEEN THE SURVEY RESPONDENT'S DISTRICT INCUMBENT BEFORE 1982. BOTH THE 1982 AND THE 1978 CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT NUMBERS CORRESPONDING TO THE LOCATION OF INTERVIEW ARE REPORTED IN REF. NO. XXX AND REF. NO. XXX TO ENABLE RESEARCHERS TO INVESTIGATE WHETHER THE RESPONDENT'S INCUMBENT WAS CHANGED BY REDISTRICTING. SPECIAL INFORMATION: FEELING THERMOMETER (C5) EDWARD KENNEDY'S NAME IS REFERENCED TWICE IN THE FEELING THERMOMETER FOR RESPONDENTS IN MASSACHUSETTS. RESPONDENTS IN THIS STATE WERE ASKED TO RATE KENNEDY ONLY ONCE, AT THE FIRST LOCATION (C5C). THE RESPONSE WAS THEN POST-EDITED INTO THE SECOND REFERENCE (C5E). SPECIAL INFORMATION: LIBERAL, CONSERVATIVE, AND INDEPENDENT CANDIDATES THE CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS LISTED BELOW HAD AN INDEPENDENT OR MINOR PARTY CANDIDATE RUNNING IN 1982, IN ADDITION TO A DEMOCRATIC AND/OR REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE. THESE THIRD PARTY CANDIDATES WERE INCLUDED IN THE DESCRIPTION OF THE CONGRESSIONAL RACES. THE TYPE OF HOUSE RACE (V10) WAS CODED 13, 19, 23, 29, 49, 56, 57 OR 59, AS APPROPRIATE. NY 08 CA 43 NY 10 NY 16 GA 05 NY 11 NY 18 NY 03 NY 12 NY 20 NY 28 NY 04 NY 14 NY 25 PA 02 NY 06 NY 15 NY 27 UT 03 THE MINOR PARTY CANDIDATES WERE REFERENCED IN THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS ONLY: C5P J4G J7G J1M J5G L4 J3G J6G SPECIAL INFORMATION: NEW YORK CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS LIBERAL AND CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATES RUNNING IN NEW YORK HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN ALL NEW YORK DISTRICTS. IN CASES WHERE THE DEMOCRATIC AND REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES ALSO HAD THE SUPPORT OF THE LIBERAL AND CONSERVATIVE PARTIES RESPECTIVELY, THEY ARE ASSIGNED THE CANDIDATE NUMBER APPROPRIATE FOR DEMOCRATIC OR REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES, AND TREATED THROUGHOUT THE QUESTIONNAIRE ONLY AS DEMOCRATIC OR REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES. SPECIAL INFORMATION: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INTERVIEWS SINCE THERE WERE NO RACES FOR THE U.S. SENATE OR THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CERTAIN QUESTIONS IN THE INTERVIEW SCHEDULE WERE INAPPROPRIATE FOR RESPONDENTS LIVING IN THAT AREA. INTERVIEWERS IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WERE INSTRUCTED TO OMIT QUESTIONS ABOUT THE HOUSE, SENATE AND GUBERNATORIAL RACES. THE LIST OF QUESTIONS OMITTED FOR DC RESPONDENTS INCLUDES: C2,C2A,C2B J5E-J5G C4,C4A.C4B J6E-J6G C5E-C5P J7E-J7G E1-E44 K2,K2A,K10A F8,F8A L4,L4A J1C-J1M L6,L6A J3E-J3G L8,L8A J4E-J4G SEVERAL CHECKPOINT QUESTIONS WERE ALSO INAPPROPRIATE FOR DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INTERVIEWS AND WERE CODED AS FOLLOWS: C3, E5, E8, F7, L5, L7 = 9 K10 = 2 SPECIAL INFORMATION: VOTE QUESTIONS (SECTION L) ACCORDING TO LOUISIANA ELECTION LAWS ANY CANDIDATE RECEIVING OVER FIFTY PER CENT OF THE PRIMARY VOTE IS ELECTED TO OFFICE AND DOES NOT APPEAR ON THE BALLOT IN THE NOVEMBER GENERAL ELECTION. IN BOTH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS, 05 AND 07, THE CANDIDATES WERE SO ELECTED. THESE RACES WERE CODED 14, IDENTIFYING THEM AS DISTRICTS WITH INCUMBENTS RUNNING UNOPPOSED (SEE Q.AA5). THE CANDIDATE NUMBER ASSIGNED WAS 33 - DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT (SEE SPECIAL INFORMATION ON (NAME #) EXPRESSIONS IN INTRODUCTION) THE VOTE SECTION, Q.L4-L8, WAS OMITTED FOR THESE DISTRICTS. RESPONDENTS WERE ASKED L1-L3 AND L9 SINCE THEY DID HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO VOTE ON OTHER STATE MATTERS IN NOVEMBER. ALTERATIONS WERE ALSO MADE TO THE QUESTION WORDING IN C2 AND E1 (SEE SPECIFIC QUESTIONS FOR CHANGES). SPECIAL INFORMATION: GEORGIA 04 AND 05 CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 04 AND 05 IN GEORGIA WERE LATE IN FINALIZING A REDISTRICTING PLAN AND, AS A RESULT, THEIR CONGRESSIONAL PRIMARY WAS HELD NOVEMBER 2, FOLLOWED BY A SPECIAL HOUSE ELECTION HELD NOVEMBER 30. INTERVIEWING IN GEORGIA 04 AND 05 WAS DELAYED UNTIL DECEMBER 1, AFTER THE SPECIAL HOUSE ELECTION. RESIDENTS OF THESE TWO GEORGIA DISTRICTS DID GO TO THE POLLS NOVEMBER 2 TO VOTE FOR ALL OTHER OFFICES AND ISSUES ON GEORGIA'S 1982 BALLOT. TO ASCERTAIN THE VOTING BEHAVIOR OF RESPONDENTS IN GA04 AND 05, Q.L1 WAS ADMINISTERED, AND IF THE RESPONDENT REPORTED NOT VOTING NOVEMBER 2, HE/SHE WAS ASKED AN ADDITIONAL QUESTION ABOUT WHETHER THEY VOTED IN THE SPECIAL NOVEMBER 30TH ELECTION. (SEE L1 FOR QUESTION TEXT.) THIS ADDITIONAL QUESTION WAS NOT CODED SEPARATELY, BUT RESPONDENTS WHO REPORTED VOTING IN THE SPECIAL HOUSE ELECTION WERE RECODED TO A "1. YES, DID VOTE" ANSWER IN L1. THUS, L1 CAPTURES RESPONDENT TURNOUT IN EITHER THE NOVEMBER 2 OR THE NOVEMBER 30 ELECTION FOR GA04 AND GA05 RESPONDENTS. SPECIAL INFORMATION: UNOPPOSED RACES IN THE CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS LISTED BELOW, ONLY ONE MAJOR PARTY CANDIDATE RAN. (SOME OF THESE DISTRICTS MAY HAVE HAD MINOR PARTY OPPOSITION). AL03 MA03 NY18 CA25 MI01 OH03 FL10 MI14 PA02 FL17 MS03 TX17 GA02 NC10 TX22 IL01 NE03 UT03 KY01 NY06 WI09 MA01 NY08 NY16 *LA05, LA07 (SEE "SPECIAL INFORMATION: VOTE QUESTIONS" IN INTRODUCTION) SPECIAL INFORMATION: NJ13, IL01 AND NY08 NJ13 AND IL01 WERE INCORRECTLY TREATED AS DISTRICTS IN WHICH THE INCUMBENT RAN UNOPPOSED BY A MAJOR PARTY CANDIDATE. THREE INTERVIEWS WERE CONDUCTED IN EACH. SINCE THE TYPE OF HOUSE RACE WAS INCORRECTLY CODED AT THE TIME OF THE INTERVIEW, NO INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED ABOUT THE CONGRESSIONAL CHALLENGER. THE OMITTED QUESTIONS WERE CODED AS MISSING DATA AND THE TYPE OF HOUSE RACE WAS CORRECTED. INFORMATION PUBLISHED BEFORE THE ELECTION INDICATED THAT FOR NY08 THE DEMOCRATIC INCUMBENT'S OPPONENT WAS RUNNING AS AS A REPUBLICAN AND CONSERVATIVE. THE TWO INTERVIEWS IN THIS DISTRICT WERE CONDUCTED ACCORDINGLY, AND RESPONDENTS WERE ASKED THE QUESTIONS PERTAINING TO THE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE. IN FACT, THE CHALLENGER RAN AS A CONSERVATIVE ONLY. THE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE OR ABOUT THE INCUMBENT'S MAJOR PARTY OPPONENT, WHICH SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ASKED, HAVE BEEN CODED INAP., AND THE INFORMATION GATHERED ABOUT THIS CANDIDATE IN THE FEELING THERMOMETER SECTION, THE LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE SCALE SECTION, AND THE ISSUE PLACEMENT SECTION HAS BEEN RECORDED IN THE VARIABLES PERTAINING TO THE INDEPENDENT/THIRD PARTY HOUSE CANDIDATE. THE TYPE OF RACE VARIABLE HAS BEEN CORRECTED. >> 1982 PROCESSING INFORMATION AND FILE STRUCTURE THIS STUDY WAS PROCESSED ACCORDING TO STANDARD ICPSR PROCEDURES FOR CLASS I STUDIES. THE DATA WERE CHECKED FOR ILLEGAL AND INCONSISTENT CODES WHICH, WHENEVER FOUND, WERE CORRECTED BY REFERRING TO THE ORIGINAL INTERVIEW SCHEDULES. ALL FREQUENCIES APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE CODEBOOK. NOTE NUMBERING IN THE APPENDIX IS NOT CONTIGUOUS, BUT ALL NOTES THAT ARE REFERENCED IN THE CODEBOOK ARE PRESENT IN THE NOTES SECTION. >> 1982 CODEBOOK INFORMATION The following example from the 1948 NES study provides the standard format for codebook variable documentation. Note that NES studies which are not part of the Time-Series usually omit marginals and the descriptive content in lines 2-5 (except for variable name). Line 1 ============================== 2 VAR 480026 NAME-R NOT VT-WAS R REG TO VT 3 COLUMNS 61 - 61 4 NUMERIC 5 MD=0 OR GE 8 6 7 Q. 17. (IF R DID NOT VOTE) WERE YOU REGISTERED (ELIGIBLE) 8 TO VOTE. 9 ........................................................... 10 11 82 1. YES 12 149 2. NO 13 14 0 8. DK 15 9 9. NA 16 422 0. INAP., R VOTED Line 2 - VARIABLE NAME. Note that in the codebook the variable name (usually a 'number') does not include the "V" prefix which is used in the release SAS and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files) for all variables including those which do not have 'number' names. For example the variable "VERSION" in the codebook is "VVERSION" in the data definition files. Line 2 - "NAME". This is the variable label used in the SAS and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files). Some codebooks exclude this. Line 3 - COLUMNS. Columns in the ASCII data file (.dat file). Line 4 - CHARACTER OR NUMERIC. If numeric and the variable is a decimal rather than integer variable, the numer of decimal places is also indicated (e.g. "NUMERIC DEC 4") Line 5 - Values which are assigned to missing by default in the Study's SAS and and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files). Line 7 - Actual question text for survey variables or a description of non-survey variables (for example, congressional district). Survey items usually include the question number (for example "B1a.") from the Study questionnaire; beginning in 1996 non-survey items also have unique item numbers (for example "CSheet.1"). Line 9 - A dashed or dotted line usually separates question text from any other documentation which follows. Line 10- When present, annotation provided by Study staff is presented below the question text/description and preceding code values. Lines 11-16 Code values are listed with descriptive labels. Valid codes (those not having 'missing' status in line 5) are presented first, followed by the values described in line 5. For continuous variables, one line may appear providing the range of possible values. A blank line usually separates the 'valid' and 'missing' values. Lines 11-16 Marginals are usually provided for discrete variables. The counts may be unweighted or weighted; check the Study codebook introductory text to determine weight usage. >> 1982 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST VARIABLE VARIABLE LABEL -------- -------------- VERSION NES VERSION NUMBER DSETNO NES DATASET NUMBER 820001 ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER ...... ...there are no variables 820002, 820003 820004 CASE ID 820005 TYPE OF INTERVIEW TYPE OF POLITICAL RACE 820006 TYPE OF RACE - HOUSE 820007 TYPE OF RACE - SENATE 820008 PARTY OF INCUMBENT SENATOR NOT FACING ELECTION 820009 TYPE OF RACE - GOVERNOR SAMPLING INFORMATION 820010 PRIMARY AREA CODE 820011 SEGMENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 820012 PRIMARY AREA NAMES 820013 STATE ALPHABETIC CODE 820014 CENSUS REGION CODE 820015 ICPSR STATE CODE 820016 FIPS STATE CODE 820017 ICPSR STATE AND COUNTY CODE 820018 FIPS STATE AND COUNTY CODE 820019 ICPSR STATE CODE AND 1982 CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT OF LOCATION OF INTERVIEW 820020 ICPSR STATE CODE AND 1978 CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT OF LOCATION OF INTERVIEW 820021 FIPS STANDARD METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREA (SMSA) CODE 820022 FIPS 1980 STANDARD CONSOLIDATED STATISTICAL AREA (SCSA) CODE 820023 1980 POPULATION SIZE CODE FOR LOCATION OF INTERVIEW 820024 ACTUAL POPULATION OF LOCATION OF INTERVIEW 820025 BELT CODE (1980 POPULATION) 820026 DISTANCE FROM LOCATION OF INTERVIEW TO CENTER OF CENTRAL CITY OF SMSA 820027 DISTANCE FROM LOCATION OF INTERVIEW TO CENTER OF CENTRAL CITY OF SCSA OR SMSA WITH CITY OF 350,000 OR MORE 820028 CENSUS TRACT NUMBER, 1970 820029 CENSUS ENUMERATION DISTRICT, 1970 820030 MINOR CIVIL DIVISION CODE 820031 1980 CENSUS PLACE CODE FOR LOCATION OF INTERVIEW 820032 SAMPLING ERROR CODE 820033 QUARTER SAMPLE CODE STUDY PROCEDURE INFORMATION 820034 CONTROL ID 820035 CODER ID 820036 INTERVIEWER ID # 820037 REFUSAL CONVERSION INDICATOR 820038 PERSUASION LETTER SENT 820039 DATE OF INTERVIEW 820040 LENGTH OF INTERVIEW 820041 LENGTH OF INTERVIEWER'S PRE-EDIT 820042 LENGTH OF INTERVIEWER'S POST-EDIT 820043 FINAL CALL NUMBER 820044 WAS R'S NAME OBTAINED IN RECONTACT SECTION 820045 USABLE MAILING ADDRESS OBTAINED IN RECONTACT SECTION 820046 WAS R'S PHONE NUMBER OBTAINED IN RECONTACT SECTION 820047 IS R'S PHONE NUMBER LISTED IN TELEPHONE DIRECTORY 820048 IS TELEPHONE LISTED UNDER R'S NAME 820049 DOES R HAVE OTHER RESIDENCE 820050 WAS CONTACT PERSON INFORMATION OBTAINED HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION 820051 NUMBER OF PERSONS IN HOUSEHOLD 820052 HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION 820053 NUMBER OF POLITICALLY ELIGIBLE ADULTS IN HOUSEHOLD 820054 NUMBER OF CHILDREN IN HOUSEHOLD UNDER AGE SIX 820055 NUMBER OF CHILDREN 6-9 YEARS OLD IN HOUSEHOLD 820056 NUMBER OF CHILDREN 10-13 YEARS OLD IN HOUSEHOLD 820057 NUMBER OF CHILDREN 14-17 YEARS OLD IN HOUSEHOLD R'S INTEREST IN CAMPAIGN 820058 HAS R BEEN INTERESTED IN POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS THIS YEAR 820059 DID R LISTEN TO CAMPAIGN RADIO PROGRAMS 820060 DID R READ ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN IN ANY MAGAZINES 820061 DID R WATCH ANY CAMPAIGN TELEVISION PROGRAMS 820062 DID R READ ABOUT CAMPAIGN IN ANY NEWSPAPER R'S ASSESSMENT OF CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENT 820063 DOES R APPROVE OF CONGRESS' HANDLING ITS JOB 820064 HOW STRONGLY DOES R APPROVE/DISAPPROVE OF CONGRESS' PERFORMANCE 820065 DOES R APPROVE/DISAPPROVE OF RONALD REAGAN'S PERFORMANCE 820066 HOW STRONGLY DOES R APPROVE OR DISAPPROVE OF RONALD REAGAN'S PERFORMANCE 820067 R'S OPINION OF REAGAN'S HANDLING OF RELATIONS WITH SOVIET UNION R'S PARTY SUPPORT 820068 DOES R THINK OF HIMSELF/HERSELF AS A PARTY SUPPORTER 820069 WHICH POLITICAL PARTY DOES R SUPPORT 820070 IS R CLOSER TO ONE OF THE TWO MAJOR PARTIES 820071 WHICH PARTY DOES R FEEL CLOSER TO 820072 DOES R CONSIDER SELF A POLITICAL INDEPENDENT R LIKES/DISLIKES THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY 820073 WHETHER R LIKES ANYTHING ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY 820074 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-FIRST MENTION 820075 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-SECOND MENTION 820076 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-THIRD MENTION 820077 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-FOURTH MENTION 820078 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-FIFTH MENTION 820079 WHETHER R DISLIKES ANYTHING ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY 820080 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-FIRST MENTION 820081 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-SECOND MENTION 820082 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-THIRD MENTION 820083 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-FOURTH MENTION 820084 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-FIFTH MENTION R LIKES/DISLIKES THE REPUBLICAN PARTY 820085 WHETHER R LIKES ANYTHING ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY 820086 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-FIRST MENTION 820087 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-SECOND MENTION 820088 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-THIRD MENTION 820089 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-FOURTH MENTION 820090 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-FIFTH MENTION 820091 WHETHER R DISLIKES ANYTHING ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY 820092 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-FIRST MENTION 820093 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-SECOND MENTION 820094 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-THIRD MENTION 820095 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-FOURTH MENTION 820096 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-FIFTH MENTION R'S CONCERN ABOUT ELECTION RESULTS 820097 DID R CARE HOW CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS CAME OUT R'S KNOWLEDGE OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES 820098 DOES R REMEMBER THE CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES 820099 PARTY OF HOUSE CANDIDATE NAMED--FIRST CANDIDATE 820100 WHO WERE THE CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES--FIRST CANDIDATE 820101 FROM WHICH PARTY WERE THE CANDIDATES--FIRST CANDIDATE 820102 R'S KNOWLEDGE OF HOUSE DISTRICT CANDIDATES/PARTIES--FIRST CANDIDATE 820103 PARTY OF HOUSE CANDIDATE NAMED--SECOND CANDIDATE 820104 WHO WERE THE CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES--SECOND CANDIDATE 820105 FROM WHICH PARTY WERE THE CANDIDATES--SECOND CANDIDATE 820106 R'S KNOWLEDGE OF HOUSE DISTRICT CANDIDATES/PARTIES--SECOND CANDIDATE 820107 PARTY OF CANDIDATE NAMED--THIRD CANDIDATE 820108 WHO WERE THE CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES--THIRD CANDIDATE 820109 FROM WHICH PARTY WERE THE CANDIDATES--THIRD CANDIDATE 820110 R'S KNOWLEDGE OF HOUSE DISTRICT CANDIDATES/PARTIES--THIRD CANDIDATE R'S KNOWLEDGE OF SENATE CANDIDATES 820111 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: SENATE RACE IN STATE 820112 DOES R REMEMBER THE SENATORIAL CANDIDATES 820113 WHO WERE THE SENATORIAL CANDIDATES--FIRST CANDIDATE 820114 FROM WHICH PARTY WERE THE CANDIDATES--FIRST CANDIDATE 820115 R'S KNOWLEDGE OF SENATE CANDIDATES/PARTIES--FIRST CANDIDATE 820116 WHO WERE THE SENATORIAL CANDIDATES--SECOND CANDIDATE 820117 FROM WHICH PARTY WERE THE CANDIDATES--SECOND CANDIDATE 820118 R'S KNOWLEDGE OF SENATE CANDIDATES/PARTIES--SECOND CANDIDATE 820119 WHO WERE THE SENATORIAL CANDIDATES--THIRD CANDIDATE 820120 FROM WHICH PARTY WERE THE CANDIDATES--THIRD CANDIDATE 820121 R'S KNOWLEDGE OF SENATE CANDIDATES/PARTIES--THIRD CANDIDATE FEELING THERMOMETER--POLITICAL FIGURES, GROUPS 820122 FEELING THERMOMETER--JIMMY CARTER 820123 FEELING THERMOMETER--RONALD REAGAN 820124 FEELING THERMOMETER--TED KENNEDY 820125 FEELING THERMOMETER--JOHN ANDERSON 820126 FEELING THERMOMETER--DEMOCRATIC U.S. SENATE CANDIDATE 820127 FEELING THERMOMETER--REPUBLICAN U.S. SENATE CANDIDATE 820128 FEELING THERMOMETER--INDEPENDENT/THIRD PARTY U.S. SENATE CANDIDATE 820129 FEELING THERMOMETER--INCUMBENT U.S. SENATOR #1, NO SENATE RACE IN STATE 820130 FEELING THERMOMETER--INCUMBENT U.S. SENATOR #2, NO SENATE RACE IN STATE 820131 FEELING THERMOMETER--INCUMBENT U.S. SENATOR, TERM NOT UP, SENATE RACE IN STATE 820132 FEELING THERMOMETER--DEMOCRATIC U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE 820133 FEELING THERMOMETER--REPUBLICAN U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE 820134 FEELING THERMOMETER--INDEPENDENT/THIRD PARTY U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE 820135 FEELING THERMOMETER--GEORGE BUSH 820136 FEELING THERMOMETER--WALTER MONDALE 820137 FEELING THERMOMETER--RICHARD NIXON 820138 FEELING THERMOMETER--DEMOCRATIC PARTY 820139 FEELING THERMOMETER--REPUBLICAN PARTY 820140 FEELING THERMOMETER--POLITICAL INDEPENDENTS 820141 FEELING THERMOMETER--POLITICAL PARTIES 820142 FEELING THERMOMETER--LIBERALS 820143 FEELING THERMOMETER--CONSERVATIVES 820144 FEELING THERMOMETER--WHITES 820145 FEELING THERMOMETER--BLACKS 820146 FEELING THERMOMETER--DEMOCRATS 820147 FEELING THERMOMETER--REPUBLICANS R LIKES/DISLIKES DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES 820148 IS THERE ANYTHING R LIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE FOR U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 820149 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE-- FIRST MENTION 820150 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE-- SECOND MENTION 820151 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE-- THIRD MENTION 820152 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE-- FOURTH MENTION 820153 IS THERE ANYTHING R DISLIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE FOR U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 820154 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE --FIRST MENTION 820155 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE --SECOND MENTION 820156 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE --THIRD MENTION 820157 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE --FOURTH MENTION R LIKES/DISLIKES REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE 820158 IS THERE ANYTHING R LIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE FOR U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 820159 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE-- FIRST MENTION 820160 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE-- SECOND MENTION 820161 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE-- THIRD MENTION 820162 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE-- FOURTH MENTION 820163 IS THERE ANYTHING R DISLIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE FOR U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 820164 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE --FIRST MENTION 820165 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE --SECOND MENTION 820166 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE --THIRD MENTION 820167 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE --FOURTH MENTION KNOWLEDGE OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES' PRE-ELECTION STATUS 820168 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: NUMBER MAJOR PARTY HOUSE CANDIDATES RUNNING 820169 WAS CANDIDATE IN U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES BEFORE THE ELECTION 820170 PARTY OF CANDIDATE ALREADY IN HOUSE 820171 CANDIDATE NUMBER CODE - CANDIDATE ALREADY IN HOUSE 820172 WAS EITHER CANDIDATE ALREADY IN HOUSE 820173 PARTY OF CANDIDATE ALREADY IN HOUSE 820174 WHICH CANDIDATE WAS ALREADY IN HOUSE 820175 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: NUMBER OF HOUSE INCUMBENTS RUNNING U.S. HOUSE DISTRICT WITH ONE INCUMBENT RUNNING R'S CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT 820176 DID HOUSE INCUMBENT HAVE CONTACT WITH R IN ANY WAY 820177 R MET HOUSE INCUMBENT PERSONALLY 820178 R ATTENDED MEETING WHERE HOUSE INCUMBENT SPOKE 820179 R TALKED WITH HOUSE INCUMBENT STAFF/OFFICE 820180 R RECEIVED MAIL FROM HOUSE INCUMBENT 820181 R READ ABOUT HOUSE INCUMBENT IN NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE 820182 R HEARD HOUSE INCUMBENT ON RADIO 820183 R SAW HOUSE INCUMBENT ON TELEVISION 820184 R HAD CONTACT WITH HOUSE INCUMBENT IN OTHER WAYS 820185 OTHERS WHO HAD CONTACT WITH HOUSE INCUMBENT R'S CONTACT WITH CANDIDATE OPPOSING U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT 820186 DID HOUSE CANDIDATE HAVE ANY CONTACT WITH R 820187 R MET HOUSE CANDIDATE PERSONALLY 820188 R ATTENDED MEETING WHERE HOUSE CANDIDATE SPOKE 820189 R TALKED WITH HOUSE CANDIDATE'S STAFF/OFFICE 820190 R RECEIVED MAIL FROM HOUSE CANDIDATE 820191 R READ ABOUT HOUSE CANDIDATE IN NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE 820192 R HEARD HOUSE CANDIDATE ON RADIO 820193 R SAW HOUSE CANDIDATE ON TELEVISION 820194 R HAD CONTACT WITH HOUSE CANDIDATE IN OTHER WAYS 820195 OTHERS WHO HAD CONTACT WITH HOUSE CANDIDATE R'S EXPERIENCE WITH U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT 820196 DID R/R'S FAMILY EVER CONTACT HOUSE INCUMBENT 820197 EXPERIENCE WITH HOUSE INCUMBENT--EXPRESSED OPINION 820198 EXPERIENCE WITH HOUSE INCUMBENT--SOUGHT INFORMATION 820199 EXPERIENCE WITH HOUSE INCUMBENT--SOUGHT HELP WITH PROBLEM 820200 DID HOUSE INCUMBENT RESPOND TO R 820201 HOW SATISFIED WAS R WITH RESPONSE FROM HOUSE INCUMBENT 820202 OTHERS WHO CONTACTED HOUSE INCUMBENT 820203 DID OTHERS GET RESPONSE FROM HOUSE INCUMBENT 820204 HOW SATISFIED WERE OTHERS WITH RESPONSE FROM HOUSE INCUMBENT 820205 DOES R SEE HOUSE INCUMBENT AS HELPFUL WITH OTHER PROBLEMS 820206 ANYTHING SPECIAL HOUSE INCUMBENT DID FOR DISTRICT R'S OPINION OF U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT'S VOTING RECORD 820207 R'S OPINION OF THE HOUSE INCUMBENT'S VOTING RECORD 820208 DID HOUSE INCUMBENT SUPPORT REAGAN'S ECONOMIC PROGRAM 820209 DOES HOUSE INCUMBENT STILL SUPPORT/OPPOSE REAGAN'S ECONOMIC PROGRAM 820210 DOES R RECALL HOW HOUSE INCUMBENT VOTED ON ANOTHER BILL 820211 DID R AGREE WITH HOUSE INCUMBENT'S VOTE ON BILL 820212 R APPROVE/DISAPPROVE OF HOUSE INCUMBENT'S JOB PERFORMANCE U.S. HOUSE DISTRICT WITH TWO INCUMBENTS RUNNING R'S CONTACT WITH DEMOCRATIC U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT 820213 DID DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT HAVE ANY CONTACT WITH R 820214 R MET DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE PERSONALLY 820215 R ATTENDED MEETING WHERE DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT SPOKE 820216 R TALKED WITH DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT STAFF/OFFICE 820217 R RECEIVED MAIL FROM DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT 820218 R READ ABOUT DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT IN NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE 820219 R HEARD DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT ON RADIO 820220 R SAW DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT ON TELEVISION 820221 R HAD CONTACT WITH DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT IN OTHER WAYS 820222 OTHERS WHO HAD CONTACT WITH DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT R'S CONTACT WITH REPUBLICAN U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT 820223 DID REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT HAVE ANY CONTACT WITH R 820224 R MET REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT PERSONALLY 820225 R ATTENDED MEETING WHERE REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT SPOKE 820226 R TALKED WITH REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT'S STAFF/OFFICE 820227 R RECEIVED MAIL FROM REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT 820228 R READ ABOUT REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT IN NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE 820229 R HEARD REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT ON RADIO 820230 R SAW REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT ON TELEVISION 820231 R HAD CONTACT WITH REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT IN OTHER WAYS 820232 OTHERS WHO HAD CONTACT WITH REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT R'S EXPERIENCE WITH DEMOCRATIC U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT 820233 DID R/R'S FAMILY EVER CONTACT DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT 820234 EXPERIENCE WITH DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT-- EXPRESSED OPINION 820235 EXPERIENCE WITH DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT--SOUGHT INFORMATION 820236 EXPERIENCE WITH DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT--SOUGHT HELP WITH PROBLEM 820237 DID DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT RESPOND TO R 820238 HOW SATISFIED WAS R WITH RESPONSE FROM DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT 820239 OTHERS WHO HAD CONTACT WITH DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT 820240 DID OTHERS GET RESPONSE FROM DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT 820241 HOW SATISFIED WERE OTHERS WITH RESPONSE FROM DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT 820242 DOES R SEE DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT AS HELPFUL WITH OTHER PROBLEMS 820243 ANYTHING SPECIAL DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT DID FOR DISTRICT R'S OPINION OF DEMOCRATIC U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT'S VOTING RECORD 820244 R'S OPINION OF THE DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT'S VOTING RECORD 820245 DID DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT SUPPORT REAGAN'S ECONOMIC PROGRAM LAST YEAR 820246 DOES DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT STILL SUPPORT/OPPOSE REAGAN'S ECONOMIC PROGRAM 820247 DOES R RECALL HOW DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT VOTED ON ANOTHER BILL 820248 DID R AGREE WITH DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT'S VOTE ON BILL 820249 R APPROVE/DISAPPROVE OF DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT'S JOB PERFORMANCE R'S EXPERIENCE WITH REPUBLICAN U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT 820250 DID R/R'S FAMILY EVER CONTACT REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT 820251 EXPERIENCE WITH REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT-- EXPRESSED OPINION 820252 EXPERIENCE WITH REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT--SOUGHT INFORMATION 820253 EXPERIENCE WITH REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT--SOUGHT HELP WITH A PROBLEM 820254 DID REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT RESPOND TO R 820255 HOW SATISFIED WAS R WITH RESPONSE FROM REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT 820256 OTHERS' CONTACT WITH REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT 820257 DID OTHERS GET A RESPONSE FROM REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT 820258 HOW SATISFIED WERE OTHERS WITH REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT'S RESPONSE 820259 DOES R SEE REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT AS HELPFUL WITH OTHER PROBLEMS 820260 ANYTHING SPECIAL REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT DID FOR DIST R'S OPINION OF REPUBLICAN U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT'S VOTING RECORD 820261 R'S OPINION OF REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT'S VOTING RECORD 820262 DID REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT SUPPORT REAGAN'S ECONOMIC PROGRAM LAST YEAR 820263 DOES REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT STILL SUPPORT/OPPOSE REAGAN'S ECONOMIC PROGRAM 820264 DOES R RECALL HOW REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT VOTED ON ANOTHER BILL 820265 DID R AGREE REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT'S VOTE ON ANOTHER BILL 820266 R APPROVE/DISAPPROVE REPUBLICAN HOUSE INCUMBENT'S JOB PERFORMANCE U.S. HOUSE DISTRICTS WITH NO INCUMBENTS RUNNING R'S CONTACT WITH DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 820267 DID DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE HAVE ANY CONTACT WITH R 820268 R MET DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE PERSONALLY 820269 R ATTENDED MEETING WHERE DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE SPOKE 820270 R TALKED WITH DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE'S STAFF/OFFICE 820271 R RECEIVED MAIL FROM DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 820272 R READ ABOUT DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE IN NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE 820273 R HEARD DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE ON RADIO 820274 R SAW DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE ON TELEVISION 820275 R HAD CONTACT WITH DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE IN OTHER WAYS 820276 OTHERS' CONTACT WITH DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE R'S CONTACT WITH REPUBLICAN U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE 820277 DID R/R'S FAMILY EVER CONTACT REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 820278 R MET REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE PERSONALLY 820279 R ATTENDED MEETING WHERE REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE SPOKE 820280 R TALKED WITH REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE'S STAFF/OFFICE 820281 R RECEIVED MAIL FROM REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 820282 R READ ABOUT REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE IN NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE 820283 R HEARD REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE ON RADIO 820284 R SAW THE REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE ON TELEVISION 820285 R HAD CONTACT WITH REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE IN OTHER WAYS 820286 OTHERS' CONTACT WITH REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE R'S PARTY IDENTIFICATION 820287 DOES R CONSIDER SELF A REPUBLICAN/DEMOCRAT/OTHER 820288 STRENGTH OF DEMOCRAT/REPUBLICAN IDENTIFICATION 820289 MAJOR PARTY R FEELS CLOSEST TO 820290 STRENGTH OF R'S IDENTIFICATION WITH MAJOR PARTY 820291 SUMMARY: R'S PARTY ID R'S VOTING BEHAVIOR--1980 820292 DID R VOTE IN 1980 ELECTION 820293 WHICH PRESIDENTAL CANDIDATE DID R VOTE FOR 820294 DOES R FOLLOW GOVERNMENT/PUBLIC AFFAIRS IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEMS 820295 IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM--FIRST RESPONSE 820296 IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM--SECOND RESPONSE 820297 IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM--THIRD RESPONSE 820298 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: DID R MENTION PROBLEMS FACING WASHINGTON 820299 WHAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM 820300 WHICH PARTY WOULD GET GOVERNMENT TO DEAL WITH PROBLEM 820301 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: NUMBER OF MAJOR HOUSE CANDIDATES IN DISTRICT ELECTION 820302 IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IN HOW HOUSE CANDIDATES WOULD HANDLE THIS PROBLEM 820303 PARTY OF HOUSE CANDIDATE WHO WOULD DO A BETTER JOB 820304 WHICH HOUSE CANDIDATE WOULD DO A BETTER JOB R'S OPINIONS ON DEFENSE ISSUES 820305 DOES R THINK US SHOULD FREEZE NUCLEAR ARMS PRODUCTION 820306 DOES R THINK US AND SOVIETS WILL REACH NUCLEAR ARMS AGREEMENT 820307 IS R WORRIED ABOUT US GETTING INTO CONVENTIONAL WAR 820308 WILL REPUBLICANS OR DEMOCRATS BE BETTER AT KEEPING US OUT OF WAR R'S OPINIONS ON FEDERAL SPENDING PROGRAMS 820309 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE SPACE PROGRAM 820310 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON THE ENVIRONMENT 820311 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON HEALTH 820312 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON BIG CITIES 820313 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON CRIME 820314 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON DRUGS 820315 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON IMPROVING EDUCATION 820316 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON IMPROVING CONDITIONS OF BLACKS 820317 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON DEFENSE 820318 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON FOREIGN AID 820319 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON WELFARE 820320 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON SOCIAL SECURITY 820321 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON FOOD STAMPS 820322 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON GUARANTEED STUDENT LOANS 820323 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 820324 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON AID FOR HANDICAPPED R'S OPINIONS ON ECONOMIC ISSUES 820325 DOES R FEEL BETTER OFF FINANCIALLY TODAY THAN HE/SHE FELT A YEAR AGO 820326 HOW R FEELS HE/SHE WILL BE FINANCIALLY ONE YEAR FROM NOW 820327 DOES R FEEL THAT THE NATION'S ECONOMY HAS IMPROVED/WORSENED/STAYED SAME OVER THE PAST YEAR 820328 HOW MUCH BETTER OR WORSE DOES R THINK ECONOMY HAS GOTTEN 820329 HOW R EXPECTS THE ECONOMY TO BE IN THE NEXT 12 MONTHS 820330 R'S FIRST PRIORITY IN GOVERNMENT APPROACH TO ECONOMIC SITUATION 820331 R'S SECOND PRIORITY IN GOVERNMENT APPROACH TO ECONOMIC SITUATION 820332 R'S THIRD PRIORITY IN GOVERNMENT APPROACH TO ECONOMIC SITUATION 820333 REAGAN'S FIRST PRIORITY IN GOVERNMENT APPROACH TO ECONOMIC SITUATION 820334 REAGAN'S SECOND PRIORITY IN GOVERNMENT APPROACH TO ECONOMIC SITUATION 820335 REAGAN'S THIRD PRIORITY IN GOVERNMENT APPROACH TO ECONOMIC SITUATION 820336 WHETHER R APPROVES/DISAPPROVES OF HOW RONALD REAGAN IS HANDLING INFLATION 820337 WHICH PARTY DOES R FEEL WOULD BETTER HANDLE INFLATION 820338 WHETHER R APPROVES/DISAPPROVES OF REAGAN'S HANDLING OF UNEMPLOYMENT 820339 WHICH PARTY DOES R FEEL WOULD BETTER HANDLE UNEMPLOYMENT 820340 IS CONGRESS OR THE PRESIDENT MORE INFLUENTIAL IN ECONOMY 820341 HAS REAGAN'S ECONOMIC PROGRAM HELPED OR HURT R 820342 HAS REAGAN'S ECONOMIC PROGRAM HELPED OR HURT US ECONOMY 820343 HOW WILL REAGAN'S ECONOMIC PROGRAM AFFECT US ECONOMY LONG-TERM DOES R'S FAMILY RECEIVE GOVERNMENT BENEFITS 820344 DOES ANY MEMBER OF R'S FAMILY RECEIVE SOCIAL SECURITY PAYMENTS 820345 DOES A MEMBER OF R'S FAMILY RECEIVE FOOD STAMPS 820346 DOES A MEMBER OF R'S FAMILY RECEIVE MEDICAID OR MEDICARE 820347 DOES MEMBER OF R'S FAMILY RECEIVE UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 820348 DOES A MEMBER OF R'S FAMILY RECEIVE AFDC 820349 DOES A MEMBER OF R'S FAMILY RECEIVE GOVERNMENT STUDENT LOANS 820350 DOES A MEMBER OF R'S FAMILY RECEIVE AID TO THE HANDICAPPED 820351 DOES A MEMBER OF R'S FAMILY RECEIVE VETERANS BENEFITS 820352 DOES A MEMBER OF R'S FAMILY RECEIVE GOVERNMENT RETIREMENT PENSION BENEFITS R'S FAMILY LOST GOVERNMENT BENEFITS 820353 DID A MEMBER OF R'S FAMILY LOSE BENEFITS IN LAST YEAR 820354 DID A MEMBER OF R'S FAMILY LOSE SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS WITHIN LAST YEAR 820355 DID A MEMBER OF R'S FAMILY LOSE FOOD STAMPS BENEFITS WITHIN LAST YEAR 820356 DID A MEMBER OF R'S FAMILY LOSE MEDICAID OR MEDICARE BENEFITS WITHIN LAST YEAR 820357 DID A MEMBER OF R'S FAMILY LOSE UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS WITHIN LAST YEAR 820358 DID A MEMBER OF R'S FAMILY LOSE AID TO FAMILIES WITH DEPENDENT CHILDREN WITHIN LAST YEAR 820359 DID A MEMBER OF R'S FAMILY LOSE STUDENT LOAN BENEFITS WITHIN LAST YEAR 820360 DID A MEMBER OF R'S FAMILY LOSE AID TO HANDICAPPED BENEFITS WITHIN LAST YEAR 820361 DID A MEMBER OF R'S FAMILY LOSE VETERANS' BENEFITS WITHIN LAST YEAR 820362 DID A MEMBER OF R'S FAMILY LOSE GOVERNMENT RETIREMENT PENSION BENEFITS WITHIN LAST YEAR DOES R EXPECT TO LOSE GOVERNMENT BENEFITS 820363 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: DOES A MEMBER OF R'S FAMILY RECEIVE BENEFITS 820364 DOES R EXPECT TO LOSE CURRENT GOVERNMENT BENEFITS 820365 DOES R EXPECT LOSS/REDUCTIONS IN SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS 820366 DOES R EXPECT LOSS/REDUCTIONS IN FOOD STAMP BENEFITS 820367 DOES R EXPECT LOSS/REDUCTION IN MEDICAID/MEDICARE BENEFITS 820368 DOES R EXPECT LOSS/REDUCTIONS IN UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 820369 DOES R EXPECT LOSS/REDUCTIONS IN AID TO FAMILIES WITH DEPENDENT CHILDREN 820370 DOES R EXPECT LOSS/REDUCTIONS IN STUDENT LOAN BENEFITS 820371 DOES R EXPECT LOSS/REDUCTIONS IN AID TO HANDICAPPED BENEFITS 820372 DOES R EXPECT LOSS/REDUCTIONS IN VETERANS' BENEFITS 820373 DOES R EXPECT LOSS/REDUCTIONS IN GOVERNMENT RETIREMENT PENSION BENEFITS R'S ASSESSMENT OF REAGAN'S PERFORMANCE 820374 DOES R APPROVE OF REAGAN'S TAX MEASURES 820375 DOES R APPROVE OF REAGAN'S MEASURES FOR HIGH INTEREST RATES 820376 DOES R APPROVE OF REAGAN'S HANDLING OF NATIONAL DEFENSE QUALITIES DESCRIBING REAGAN 820377 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "MORAL" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 820378 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "DISHONEST" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 820379 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "WEAK" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 820380 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "KNOWLEDGEABLE" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 820381 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "POWER-HUNGRY" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 820382 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "INSPIRING" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 820383 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "RECKLESS" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 820384 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "HE PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 820385 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "HE WOULD DEVELOP GOOD RELATIONS WITH OTHER COUNTRIES" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 820386 DOES RONALD REAGAN EVER MAKE R FEEL ANGRY 820387 DOES RONALD REAGAN EVER MAKE R FEEL HOPEFUL 820388 DOES RONALD REAGAN EVER MAKE R FEEL AFRAID OF HIM 820389 DOES RONALD REAGAN EVER MAKE R FEEL PROUD 820390 DOES RONALD REAGAN EVER MAKE R FEEL DISGUSTED 820391 DOES RONALD REAGAN EVER MAKE R FEEL SYMPATHETIC TOWARD HIM 820392 DOES RONALD REAGAN EVER MAKE R FEEL UNEASY POSITIONS ON LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE 820393 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE--R 820394 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE--REAGAN 820395 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE--DEMOCRATIC SENATE CANDIDATE 820396 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE--REPUBLICAN SENATE CANDIDATE 820397 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE--INDEPENDENT/THIRD PARTY SENATE CANDIDATE 820398 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE--INCUMBENT U.S. SENATOR #1 820399 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE--INCUMBENT U.S. SENATOR #2 820400 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE--INCUMBENT U.S. SENATOR, TERM NOT UP 820401 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE--DEMOCRATIC U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE 820402 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE--REPUBLICAN U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE 820403 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE--INDEPENDENT/THIRD PARTY HOUSE CANDIDATE 820404 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE--REPUBLICAN PARTY 820405 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE--DEMOCRATIC PARTY 820406 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE--R POSITIONS ON DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE 820407 DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE--R 820408 DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE--REAGAN 820409 DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE--DEMOCRATIC PARTY 820410 DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE--REPUBLICAN PARTY 820411 DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE--DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 820412 DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE--REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 820413 DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE--INDEPENDENT/THIRD PARTY HOUSE CANDIDATE 820414 DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE--FEDERAL GOVERNMENT POSITIONS ON AID TO MINORITIES SCALE 820415 GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES SCALE--R 820416 GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES SCALE--REAGAN 820417 GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES SCALE--DEMOCRATIC PARTY 820418 GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES SCALE--REPUBLICAN PARTY 820419 GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES SCALE--DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 820420 GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES SCALE--REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 820421 GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES SCALE--INDEPENDENT/ THIRD PARTY HOUSE CANDIDATE 820422 GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES SCALE--MOST LIBERALS 820423 GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES SCALE--MOST CONSERVATIVES 820424 GOVERNMENT AID TO MINORITIES SCALE--FEDERAL GOVERNMENT POSITIONS ON GUARANTEED JOB SCALE 820425 GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE--R 820426 GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE--REAGAN 820427 GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE--DEMOCRATIC PARTY 820428 GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE--REPUBLICAN PARTY 820429 GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE--DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 820430 GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE--REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 820431 GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE-- INDEPENDENT/THIRD PARTY HOUSE CANDIDATE 820432 GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE--MOST LIBERALS 820433 GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE--MOST CONSERVATIVES 820434 GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE--FEDERAL GOVERNMENT POSITIONS ON WOMEN'S RIGHTS SCALE 820435 EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN SCALE--R 820436 EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN SCALE--REAGAN 820437 EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN SCALE--DEMOCRATIC PARTY 820438 EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN SCALE--REPUBLICAN PARTY 820439 EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN SCALE--DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 820440 EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN SCALE--REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 820441 EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN SCALE--INDEPENDENT/THIRD PARTY HOUSE CANDIDATE 820442 EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WOMEN SCALE--FEDERAL GOVERNMENT POSITIONS ON GOVERNMENT SERVICES SCALE 820443 GOVERNMENT SERVICES SCALE--R 820444 GOVERNMENT SERVICES SCALE--REAGAN 820445 GOVERNMENT SERVICES SCALE--DEMOCRATIC PARTY 820446 GOVERNMENT SERVICES SCALE--REPUBLICAN PARTY 820447 GOVERNMENT SERVICES SCALE--DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 820448 GOVERNMENT SERVICES SCALE--REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 820449 GOVERNMENT SERVICES SCALE--INDEPENDENT/THIRD PARTY HOUSE CANDIDATE 820450 GOVERNMENT SERVICES SCALE--CONGRESS 820451 GOVERNMENT SERVICES SCALE--FEDERAL GOVERNMENT EFFECT OF TAX CUTS 820452 EFFECT OF TAX CUTS ON R'S DISPOSABLE INCOME R'S FEELINGS ABOUT ERA DEFEAT 820453 HOW DID R FEEL ABOUT ERA'S FAILURE TO PASS 820454 HOW STRONG ARE R'S FEELINGS REGARDING ERA DEFEAT R'S ASSESSMENT OF REAGAN'S PERFORMANCE 820455 DOES R APPROVE OF REAGAN'S HANDLING OF NUCLEAR ARMS CONTROL 820456 DOES R APPROVE OF REAGAN'S HANDLING OF THE ENVIRONMENT 820457 DOES R APPROVE OF REAGAN'S HANDLING OF BALANCING THE BUDGET R'S OPINION ON BIG GOVERNMENT 820458 SHOULD THE FEDERAL OR STATE & LOCAL GOVERNMENTS HANDLE SOCIAL/ECONOMIC PROBLEMS 820459 DOES R FEEL GOVERNMENT REGULATES BUSINESS TOO MUCH 820460 DOES R THINK FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS INVOLVED IN ISSUES IT SHOULDN'T BE 820461 DOES R FEEL THE GOVERNMENT HAS GOTTEN OVER-INVOLVED IN MANY ISSUES R'S OPINION ON TRADE WITH SOVIETS 820462 DOES R THINK WESTERN NATIONS SHOULD INCREASE TRADE WITH SOVIETS R'S OPINION ON ABORTION 820463 DOES R FEEL ABORTION SHOULD BE PERMITTED-IN WHAT CASES CAMPAIGN CONTACTS 820464 DID A POLITICAL PARTY WORKER CONTACT R DURING CAMPAIGN 820465 WHICH PARTY(S) CONTACTED R DURING CAMPAIGN 820466 DID ANYONE ELSE CONTACT R ABOUT HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CAMPAIGN 820467 PARTY OF CANDIDATE REPRESENTED BY SUPPORTER WHO CONTACTED R--FIRST MENTION 820468 PARTY OF CANDIDATE REPRESENTED BY SUPPORTER WHO CONTACTED R--SECOND MENTION 820469 NAME OF CANDIDATE REPRESENTED BY SUPPORTER WHO CONTACTED R--FIRST MENTION 820470 NAME OF CANDIDATE REPRESENTED BY SUPPORTER WHO CONTACTED R--SECOND MENTION CAMPAIGN ACTIVITIES 820471 DID R RECEIVE MAIL ASKING FOR CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS 820472 DID R CONTRIBUTE IN RESPONSE TO CAMPAIGN MAIL 820473 DID R TRY TO INFLUENCE OTHER'S VOTE CHOICES 820474 DID R ATTEND ANY POLITICAL MEETINGS OR RALLIES 820475 DID R WORK FOR PARTY OR CANDIDATE 820476 DID R WEAR A BUTTON OR PUT A STICKER ON THE CAR 820477 R'S MEMBERSHIP IN POLITICAL CLUBS AND ORGANIZATIONS R'S CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS 820478 DID R USE $1 POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION OPTION ON FEDERAL INCOME TAX RETURN 820479 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: DOES STATE TAX RETURN HAVE POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION OPTION 820480 DID R GIVE CONTRIBUTION THROUGH STATE INCOME TAX RETURN 820481 DID R GIVE ANY MONEY TO A CANDIDATE FOR OFFICE 820482 R GAVE MONEY TO CANDIDATE FOR WHICH OFFICE--FIRST MENTION 820483 R GAVE MONEY TO CANDIDATE FROM WHICH PARTY--FIRST MENTION 820484 R GAVE MONEY TO CANDIDATE FOR WHICH OFFICE--SECOND MENTION 820485 R GAVE MONEY TO CANDIDATE FROM WHICH PARTY--SECOND MENTION 820486 R GAVE MONEY TO CANDIDATE FOR WHICH OFFICE--THIRD MENTION 820487 R GAVE MONEY TO CANDIDATE FROM WHICH PARTY--THIRD MENTION 820488 R GAVE MONEY TO CANDIDATE FOR WHICH OFFICE--FOURTH MENTION 820489 R GAVE MONEY TO CANDIDATE FROM WHICH PARTY--FOURTH MENTION 820490 DID R GIVE MONEY TO A POLITICAL PARTY 820491 PARTY R CONTRIBUTED TO--FIRST MENTION 820492 CONTRIBUTION TO LOCAL/STATE/NATIONAL CHAPTER-- FIRST MENTION 820493 PARTY R CONTRIBUTED TO--SECOND MENTION 820494 CONTRIBUTION TO LOCAL/STATE/NATIONAL CHAPTER-- SECOND MENTION 820495 PARTY R CONTRIBUTED TO--THIRD MENTION 820496 CONTRIBUTION TO LOCAL/STATE/NATIONAL CHAPTER-- THIRD MENTION 820497 DID R GIVE MONEY TO POLITICAL ACTION/ISSUE GROUPS 820498 NAME OF POLITICAL ACTION/ISSUE GROUP--FIRST MENTION 820499 NAME OF POLITICAL ACTION/ISSUE GROUP--SECOND MENTION 820500 NAME OF POLITICAL ACTION/ISSUE GROUP--THIRD MENTION R'S VOTING BEHAVIOR--1982 820501 DID R VOTE IN 1982 ELECTION 820502 IS R REGISTERED DEMOCRAT/REPUBLICAN/OTHER 820503 IS R REGISTERED TO VOTE IN STATE OF INTERVIEW 820504 IS R REGISTERED TO VOTE AT CURRENT ADDRESS 820505 DID R VOTE FOR CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE 820506 PARTY OF CANDIDATE R VOTED FOR 820507 NAME OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE R VOTED FOR 820508 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: WAS THERE A SENATE RACE IN R'S STATE 820509 DID R VOTE FOR A SENATE CANDIDATE 820510 PARTY OF SENATE CANDIDATE R VOTED FOR 820511 NAME OF SENATE CANDIDATE R VOTED FOR 820512 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: WAS THERE A GUBERNATORIAL RACE IN R'S STATE 820513 DID R VOTE FOR A GUBERNATORIAL CANDIDATE 820514 PARTY OF GUBERNATORIAL CANDIDATE R VOTED FOR 820515 NAME OF GUBERNATORIAL CANDIDATE R VOTED FOR 820516 DID R VOTE A STRAIGHT PARTY TICKET FOR OTHER OFFICES 820517 IF R VOTED A STRAIGHT TICKET, FOR WHICH PARTY DID R VOTE 820518 WHICH PARTY GOT MORE OF R'S VOTES NON-VOTERS 820519 WAS R REGISTERED TO VOTE IN THIS ELECTION 820520 WAS R REGISTERED AS REPUBLICAN/DEMOCRAT/INDEPENDENT 820521 WAS R REGISTERED TO VOTE IN STATE OF INTERVIEW 820522 IS R REGISTERED TO VOTE AT CURRENT ADDRESS R'S KNOWLEDGE OF CONGRESS 820523 DOES R KNOW WHICH PARTY HAD MOST MEMBERS IN U.S. HOUSE 820524 WHICH PARTY ELECTED MOST NEW MEMBERS TO HOUSE 820525 DOES R KNOW WHAT PARTY HAD MOST MEMBERS IN SENATE BEFORE ELECTION 820526 DOES R KNOW WHICH PARTY ELECTED MOST NEW MEMBERS TO SENATE CYNICISM AND TRUST IN GOVERNMENT 820527 HOW RESPONSIVE DOES R FEEL THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS TO THE PEOPLE 820528 DOES R THINK THE GOVERNMENT WASTES THE MONEY WE PAY IN TAXES 820529 HOW MUCH OF THE TIME DOES R FEEL HE/SHE CAN TRUST THE GOVERNMENT 820530 DOES R FEEL THE GOVERNMENT IS RUN FOR A FEW BIG INTERESTS OR FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL THE PEOPLE 820531 DO PEOPLE LIKE R HAVE ANY SAY IN WHAT GOVERNMENT DOES 820532 DO PUBLIC OFFICIALS CARE WHAT PEOPLE LIKE R THINK R'S PERSONAL DATA 820533 WHAT IS THE MONTH OF R'S BIRTH 820534 YEAR OF R'S BIRTH 820535 R'S AGE 820536 R'S MARITAL STATUS R'S EDUCATION 820537 HIGHEST GRADE/YEAR OF COLLEGE COMPLETED BY R 820538 DID R GET A HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA OR PASS A HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY TEST 820539 HAS R HAD ANY OTHER SCHOOLING 820540 DOES R HAVE A COLLEGE DEGREE 820541 WHAT IS THE HIGHEST DEGREE R HAS EARNED 820542 SUMMARY: R'S EDUCATION HEAD OF FAMILY'S EDUCATION 820543 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: R'S FAMILY STATUS 820544 HIGHEST GRADE/YEAR OF COLLEGE COMPLETED BY FAMILY HEAD 820545 DID FAMILY HEAD GET A HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA OR PASS A HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY TEST 820546 HAS THE FAMILY HEAD HAD ANY OTHER SCHOOLING 820547 DOES FAMILY HEAD HAVE A COLLEGE DEGREE 820548 WHAT IS THE HIGHEST DEGREE THAT THE FAMILY HEAD HAS EARNED 820549 SUMMARY: HEAD'S EDUCATION WIFE OF HEAD'S EDUCATION 820550 HIGHEST GRADE/YEAR OF COLLEGE COMPLETED BY WIFE OF HEAD 820551 DID WIFE OF HEAD GET A HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA OR PASS A HIGH SCHOOL EQUIVALENCY TEST 820552 HAS THE WIFE OF HEAD HAD ANY OTHER SCHOOLING 820553 DOES WIFE OF HEAD HAVE A COLLEGE DEGREE 820554 WHAT IS THE HIGHEST DEGREE THAT THE WIFE OF HEAD HAS EARNED 820555 SUMMARY: WIFE OF HEAD'S EDUCATION R'S OCCUPATION SECTION 820556 IS R WORKING NOW, UNEMPLOYED, RETIRED, A HOUSEWIFE, STUDENT, OR WHAT R'S WORKING OR TEMPORARILY LAID OFF 820557 WHAT IS R'S MAIN OCCUPATION 820558 R EMPLOYED OR TEMPORARILY LAID OFF--DUNCAN SEI 820559 R EMPLOYED OR TEMPORARILY LAID OFF--NORC PRESTIGE 820560 IN WHAT TYPE OF BUSINESS/INDUSTRY DOES R WORK 820561 IS R SELF-EMPLOYED 820562 DOES R WORK IN INDUSTRY OR GOVERNMENT 820563 DOES R'S COMPANY DO BUSINESS WITH FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 820564 HAS BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INCREASED IN THE LAST YEAR 820565 NUMBER OF HOURS R WORKS PER WEEK 820566 DOES R LIKE THE NUMBER OF HOURS R WORKS/WEEK 820567 HOW WORRIED IS R ABOUT LOSING HIS/HER JOB IN THE NEAR FUTURE 820568 WAS R OUT OF WORK OR LAID OFF WITHIN THE LAST TWELVE MONTHS 820569 HAS R HAD TO TAKE A PAY CUT/REDUCE HOURS WITHIN THE LAST TWELVE MONTHS R IS UNEMPLOYED 820570 HAS R EVER WORKED FOR PAY 820571 HAS R HAD A JOB IN THE PAST TWELVE MONTHS? 820572 WHAT WAS R'S OCCUPATION ON LAST REGULAR JOB 820573 R UNEMPLOYED--DUNCAN SEI 820574 R UNEMPLOYED--NORC PRESTIGE 820575 IN WHAT TYPE OF BUSINESS/INDUSTRY DID R WORK ON LAST JOB 820576 HOW MANY HOURS PER WEEK DID R WORK 820577 WAS R SELF-EMPLOYED WHEN HE/SHE WORKED 820578 DID R WORK IN INDUSTRY OR GOVERNMENT 820579 DID R'S COMPANY DO BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 820580 HAD BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INCREASED FOR R'S FORMER EMPLOYER 820581 IS R LOOKING FOR WORK AT THE PRESENT TIME 820582 IS R WORRIED ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND A JOB R IS RETIRED OR DISABLED 820583 (IF RETIRED) WHEN DID R RETIRE 820584 (IF PERMANENTLY DISABLED) HAS R DONE ANY WORK FOR PAY 820585 WHAT WAS R'S MAIN OCCUPATION WHEN HE/SHE WORKED 820586 R RETIRED/DISABLED--DUNCAN SEI 820587 R RETIRED/DISABLED--NORC PRESTIGE 820588 IN WHAT TYPE OF BUSINESS/INDUSTRY DID R WORK WHEN HE/SHE WORKED 820589 WHEN R WORKED WAS HE/SHE SELF-EMPLOYED 820590 DID R WORK IN INDUSTRY OR GOVERNMENT WHEN HE/SHE WORKED 820591 DID R'S COMPANY DO BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 820592 DID R DO ANY WORK FOR PAY WITHIN THE PAST 12 MONTHS 820593 NUMBER OF HOURS WORKED PER WEEK WHEN R WAS WORKING R IS HOUSEWIFE OR STUDENT 820594 IS R WORKING NOW 820595 DID R WORK IN PAST YEAR 820596 IS R WORRIED ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND A JOB 820597 IS R WORKING FOR PAY NOW 820598 DID R DO ANY WORK FOR PAY IN THE LAST TWELVE MONTHS 820599 WHAT WAS R'S OCCUPATION 820600 R HOUSEWIFE/STUDENT-DUNCAN SEI 820601 R HOUSEWIFE/STUDENT-NORC PRESTIGE 820602 IN WHAT TYPE OF BUSINESS/INDUSTRY DID R WORK 820603 WAS R SELF-EMPLOYED WHEN HE/SHE WORKED 820604 DID R WORK IN INDUSTRY OR GOVERNMENT 820605 DID R'S COMPANY DO BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 820606 HAD BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INCREASED FOR R'S FORMER COMPANY 820607 NUMBER OF HOURS WORKED PER WEEK WHEN R WAS WORKING 820608 IS R LOOKING FOR WORK AT THE PRESENT TIME 820609 IS R WORRIED ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND A JOB SUMMARY: R'S WORKING STATUS 820610 SUMMARY-R'S WORKING STATUS R'S FAMILY STATUS 820611 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: R'S FAMILY STATUS HEAD'S OCCUPATION SECTION 820612 IS HEAD WORKING NOW, UNEMPLOYED, RETIRED, A HOUSEWIFE, STUDENT, OR WHAT HEAD WORKING OR TEMPORARILY LAID OFF 820613 WHAT IS HEAD'S MAIN OCCUPATION 820614 HEAD EMPLOYED OR TEMPORARILY LAID OFF-DUNCAN SEI 820615 HEAD EMPLOYED OR TEMPORARILY LAID OFF-NORC PRESTIGE 820616 IN WHAT TYPE OF BUSINESS/INDUSTRY DOES HEAD WORK 820617 IS HEAD SELF-EMPLOYED 820618 DID HEAD WORK IN INDUSTRY OR GOVERNMENT 820619 DOES HEAD'S COMPANY DO BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 820620 HAS BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INCREASED FOR HEAD'S COMPANY 820621 NUMBER OF HOURS HEAD WORKS PER WEEK 820622 DOES HEAD LIKE NUMBER OF HOURS WORKED 820623 HOW WORRIED IS HEAD ABOUT LOSING JOB 820624 WAS HEAD OUT OF WORK IN THE LAST 12 MONTHS 820625 HAS HEAD TAKEN A PAY CUT OR REDUCTION IN HOURS IN LAST 12 MONTHS HEAD UNEMPLOYED 820626 HAS HEAD EVER WORKED FOR PAY 820627 HAS HEAD WORKED IN LAST TWELVE MONTHS 820628 WHAT WAS HEAD'S OCCUPATION ON LAST REGULAR JOB 820629 HEAD UNEMPLOYED-DUNCAN SEI 820630 HEAD UNEMPLOYED-NORC PRESTIGE 820631 IN WHAT TYPE OF BUSINESS/INDUSTRY DID HEAD WORK ON LAST JOB 820632 HOW MANY HOURS DID HEAD WORK ON LAST JOB 820633 WAS HEAD/SPOUSE SELF-EMPLOYED 820634 DID HEAD WORK FOR GOVERNMENT OR INDUSTRY 820635 DID HEAD'S COMPANY DO BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 820636 HAD BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INCREASED FOR FORMER EMPLOYER 820637 IS HEAD LOOKING FOR WORK NOW 820638 HOW WORRIED IS HEAD ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND A JOB HEAD RETIRED/DISABLED 820639 (IF RETIRED) WHEN DID HEAD RETIRE 820640 (IF PERMANENTLY DISABLED) HAS HEAD EVER WORKED FOR PAY 820641 WHAT WAS HEAD'S MAIN OCCUPATION WHEN HE/SHE WORKED 820642 HEAD RETIRED/DISABLED-DUNCAN SEI 820643 HEAD RETIRED/DISABLED-NORC PRESTIGE 820644 IN WHAT TYPE OF BUSINESS/INDUSTRY DID HEAD WORK WHEN HE/SHE WORKED 820645 WAS HEAD SELF-EMPLOYED WHEN WORKING 820646 DID HEAD WORK IN INDUSTRY OR GOVERNMENT 820647 DID HEAD'S FORMER EMPLOYER DO BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 820648 DID HEAD WORK WITHIN LAST 12 MONTHS 820649 NUMBER OF HOURS HEAD WORKED WHEN WORKING 820650 IS HEAD WORKING NOW 820651 IS HEAD LOOKING FOR WORK NOW 820652 HOW WORRIED IS HEAD ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND A JOB HEAD HOUSEWIFE/STUDENT 820653 IS HEAD WORKING NOW 820654 DID HEAD WORK IN PAST YEAR 820655 WHAT WAS HEAD'S MAIN OCCUPATION WHEN WORKING 820656 HEAD HOUSEWIFE/STUDENT-DUNCAN SEI 820657 HEAD HOUSEWIFE/STUDENT-NORC PRESTIGE 820658 IN WHAT TYPE OF BUSINESS/INDUSTRY DID HEAD WORK 820659 WAS HEAD SELF-EMPLOYED WHEN WORKING 820660 DID HEAD WORK IN GOVERNMENT OR INDUSTRY 820661 DID HEAD'S EMPLOYER DO BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 820662 HAD BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INCREASED FOR WIFE OF HEAD'S EMPLOYER 820663 HOW MANY HOURS DID HEAD WORK WHEN WORKING 820664 IS HEAD LOOKING FOR WORK AT THE PRESENT TIME 820665 HOW WORRIED IS HEAD ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND A JOB SUMMARY: HEAD'S OCCUPATION 820666 SUMMARY: HEAD'S WORKING STATUS WIFE OF HEAD'S OCCUPATION SECTION 820667 IS WIFE OF HEAD WORKING NOW, UNEMPLOYED, RETIRED, A HOUSEWIFE, STUDENT OR WHAT WIFE OF HEAD WORKING OR TEMPORARILY LAID OFF 820668 WHAT IS WIFE OF HEAD'S MAIN OCCUPATION 820669 WIFE EMPLOYED OR TEMPORARILY LAID OFF-DUNCAN SEI 820670 WIFE OF HEAD EMPLOYED OR TEMPORARILY LAID OFF-NORC PRESTIGE 820671 IN WHAT TYPE OF BUSINESS/INDUSTRY DOES WIFE OF HEAD WORK 820672 IS WIFE OF HEAD SELF-EMPLOYED 820673 DID WIFE OF HEAD WORK IN INDUSTRY OR GOVERNMENT 820674 DOES WIFE OF HEAD'S COMPANY DO BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 820675 HAS BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INCREASED FOR WIFE OF HEAD'S COMPANY 820676 NUMBER OF HOURS WIFE OF HEAD WORKS PER WEEK 820677 DOES WIFE OF HEAD LIKE NUMBER OF HOURS WORKED 820678 HOW WORRIED IS WIFE OF HEAD ABOUT LOSING JOB 820679 WAS WIFE OF HEAD OUT OF WORK IN THE LAST 12 MONTHS 820680 HAS WIFE OF HEAD TAKEN A PAY CUT OR REDUCTION IN HOURS IN LAST 12 MONTHS WIFE IS UNEMPLOYED 820681 HAS WIFE OF HEAD EVER WORKED FOR PAY 820682 HAS WIFE OF HEAD WORKED IN LAST TWELVE MONTHS 820683 WHAT WAS WIFE OF HEAD'S OCCUPATION ON LAST REGULAR JOB 820684 WIFE OF HEAD UNEMPLOYED-DUNCAN SEI 820685 WIFE OF HEAD UNEMPLOYED-NORC PRESTIGE 820686 IN WHAT TYPE OF BUSINESS/INDUSTRY DID WIFE OF HEAD WORK ON LAST JOB 820687 HOW MANY HOURS DID WIFE OF HEAD WORK ON LAST JOB 820688 WAS WIFE OF HEAD SELF-EMPLOYED 820689 DID WIFE OF HEAD WORK FOR GOVERNMUNT OR INDUSTRY 820690 DID WIFE OF HEAD'S COMPANY DO BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 820691 HAD BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INCREASED FOR FORMER EMPLOYER 820692 IS WIFE OF HEAD LOOKING FOR WORK NOW 820693 HOW WORRIED IS WIFE OF HEAD ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND A JOB WIFE IS RETIRED OR DISABLED 820694 (IF RETIRED) WHEN DID WIFE OF HEAD RETIRE 820695 (IF PERMANENTLY DISABLED) HAS WIFE OF HEAD EVER WORKED FOR PAY 820696 WHAT WAS WIFE OF HEAD'S MAIN OCCUPATION WHEN SHE WORKED 820697 WIFE OF HEAD RETIRED/DISABLED-DUNCAN SEI 820698 WIFE OF HEAD RETIRED/DISABLED-NORC PRESTIGE 820699 IN WHAT TYPE OF BUSINESS DID WIFE OF HEAD WORK PREVIOUSLY 820700 WAS WIFE OF HEAD SELF-EMPLOYED WHEN WORKING 820701 DID WIFE OF HEAD WORK IN INDUSTRY OR GOVERNMENT 820702 DID WIFE OF HEAD'S FORMER EMPLOYER DO BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 820703 DID WIFE OF HEAD WORK WITHIN LAST 12 MONTHS 820704 NUMBER OF HOURS WIFE OF HEAD WORKED WHEN WORKING 820705 IS WIFE OF HEAD WORKING NOW 820706 IS WIFE OF HEAD LOOKING FOR WORK NOW 820707 HOW WORRIED IS WIFE OF HEAD ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND A JOB WIFE IS HOUSEWIFE/STUDENT 820708 IS WIFE OF HEAD WORKING NOW 820709 DID WIFE OF HEAD WORK IN PAST YEAR 820710 WHAT WAS WIFE OF HEAD'S MAIN OCCUPATION WHEN WORKING 820711 WIFE OF HEAD HOUSEWIFE/STUDENT-DUNCAN SEI 820712 WIFE OF HEAD STUDENT/HOUSEWIFE-NORC PRESTIGE 820713 IN WHAT KIND OF BUSINESS/INDUSTRY DID WIFE OF HEAD WORK 820714 WAS WIFE OF HEAD SELF-EMPLOYED WHEN WORKING 820715 DID WIFE OF HEAD WORK IN GOVERNMENT OR INDUSTRY 820716 DID WIFE OF HEAD'S EMPLOYER DO BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 820717 HAD BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INCREASED FOR WIFE OF HEAD'S EMPLOYER 820718 HOW MANY HOURS DID WIFE OF HEAD WORK WHEN WORKING 820719 IS WIFE OF HEAD LOOKING FOR WORK AT THE PRESENT TIME 820720 HOW WORRIED IS WIFE OF HEAD ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND A JOB SUMMARY: WIFE OF HEAD'S OCCUPATION 820721 SUMMARY: WIFE OF HEAD'S WORKING STATUS UNION MEMBERSHIP 820722 DOES ANYONE IN THE HOUSEHOLD BELONG TO A LABOR UNION 820723 WHO BELONGS TO A LABOR UNION IN HOUSEHOLD AGE COMPOSITION OF FAMILY 820724 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: AGE COMPOSITION OF R'S HOUSEHOLD FAMILY INCOME 820725 FAMILY'S 1981 INCOME BEFORE TAXES 820726 SUMMARY OF FAMILY INCOME 820727 R'S 1981 INCOME BEFORE TAXES 820728 SUMMARY OF R'S INCOME R'S CLASS IDENTIFICATION 820729 DOES R THINK OF HIMSELF/HERSELF AS BELONGING TO THE MIDDLE OR WORKING CLASS 820730 WOULD R CALL HIMSELF/HERSELF MIDDLE CLASS OR WORKING CLASS 820731 WOULD R SAY HE/SHE IS IN THE AVERAGE/UPPER MIDDLE/WORKING CLASS 820732 SUMMARY OF R'S SOCIAL CLASS 820733 DOES R FEEL CLOSER TO HIS VS. OTHER CLASSES OTHER PERSONAL DATA 820734 RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE 820735 HOW OFTEN DOES R ATTEND CHURCH OR SYNAGOGUE 820736 ETHNIC/NATIONALITY GROUP--FIRST MENTION 820737 ETHNIC/NATIONALITY GROUP--SECOND MENTION 820738 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: NUMBER OF ETHNIC GROUPS TO WHICH R BELONGS 820739 WHICH ETHNIC OR NATIONALITY GROUP DOES R MOST CLOSELY IDENTIFY WITH 820740 STRENGTH OF ETHNIC IDENTIFICATION 820741 WERE BOTH R'S PARENTS BORN IN THIS COUNTRY 820742 COUNTRY OF R'S FATHER'S BIRTH 820743 COUNTRY OF R'S MOTHER'S BIRTH 820744 COUNTRY OF ORIGIN: R'S PATERNAL SIDE 820745 COUNTRY OF ORIGIN: R'S MATERNAL SIDE 820746 R'S PRIMARY ETHNIC IDENTIFICATION 820747 WHAT WAS R'S FATHER'S OCCUPATION 820748 DID R'S MOTHER HAVE A JOB, OTHER THAN BEING A HOUSEWIFE 820749 WHAT WAS R'S MOTHER'S OCCUPATION 820750 WHERE WAS R BORN 820751 WHERE DID R GROW UP 820752 WHAT TYPE OF COMMUNITY DID R GROW UP IN 820753 WHERE DID R LIVE WHEN R WAS FOURTEEN YEARS OLD 820754 R'S RESIDENCE AT 14: ALPHABETIC CITY/FOREIGN CODE 820755 R'S RESIDENCE AT 14: ALPHABETIC STATE CODE 820756 HOW LONG HAS R LIVED IN LOCATION OF INTERVIEW 820757 WHERE R LIVED BEFORE PRESENT RESIDENCE 820758 R'S PREVIOUS RESIDENCE: ALPHABETIC CITY/FOREIGN CODE 820759 R'S PREVIOUS RESIDENCE: ALPHABETIC STATE CODE 820760 HOW LONG HAS R LIVED IN THIS APT/HOUSE 820761 DOES R/R'S FAMILY OWN OR RENT HOME 820762 R'S SEX 820763 R'S RACE 820764 IS R OF HISPANIC ORIGIN 820765 RELATIONSHIP OF R TO HEAD CONDITIONS OF INTERVIEW 820766 OTHER PERSONS PRESENT AT INTERVIEW 820767 HOW GOOD WAS RESPONDENT'S COOPERATION 820768 R'S INFORMATION LEVEL RE: POLITICS & PUBLIC AFFAIRS 820769 R'S INTELLIGENCE 820770 HOW SUSPICIOUS DID R SEEM TO BE ABOUT THE STUDY, BEFORE THE INTERVIEW? 820771 R'S INTEREST IN THE INTERVIEW 820772 SINCERITY OF R'S ANSWERS 820773 DOES INTERVIEWER FEEL R REPORTED INCOME HONESTLY 820774 INTERVIEWER ESTIMATE OF R'S FAMILY INCOME 820775 WAS INTERVIEW CONDUCTED IN ENGLISH 820776 LANGUAGE IN WHICH INTERVIEW CONDUCTED 820777 TYPE OF STRUCTURE R LIVES IN 820778 HOW MANY UNITS ARE IN R'S RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE 820779 HOW MANY FLOORS ARE IN R'S RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE