Version 01 Codebook ------------------- CODEBOOK INTRODUCTION FILE 1984 PRE-POST STUDY (1984.TV) AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES 1984 PRE-POST ELECTION STUDY PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS WARREN E. MILLER AND THE NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN PRE-POST SURVEY SEPT-OCT, NOV-DEC ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER 8298 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ASSISTANCE ALL MANUSCRIPTS UTILIZING DATA MADE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE CONSORTIUM SHOULD ACKNOWLEDGE THAT FACT AS WELL AS IDENTIFY THE ORIGINAL COLLECTOR OF THE DATA. THE ICPSR COUNCIL URGES ALL USERS OF THE ICPSR DATA FACILITIES TO FOLLOW SOME ADAPTATION OF THIS STATEMENT WITH THE PARENTHESES INDICATING ITEMS TO BE FILLED IN APPROPRIATELY OR DELETED BY THE INDIVIDUAL USER. THE DATA (AND TABULATIONS) UTILIZED IN THIS (PUBLICATION) WERE MADE AVAILABLE (IN PART) BY THE INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL AND SOCIAL RESEARCH. THE DATA FOR THE AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY, 1984, WERE ORIGINALLY COLLECTED BY THE CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES OF THE INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH, THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, FOR THE NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES, UNDER THE OVERALL DIRECTION OF WARREN E. MILLER; SANTA TRAUGOTT WAS DIRECTOR OF STUDIES IN 1984. THE DATA WERE COLLECTED UNDER A GRANT FROM THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION. NEITHER THE COLLECTOR OF THE ORIGINAL DATA NOR THE CONSORTIUM BEARS ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ANALYSES OR INTERPRETATIONS PRESENTED HERE. IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FUNDING AGENCIES WITH ESSENTIAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE USE OF ARCHIVAL RESOURCES AND TO FACILITATE THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION ABOUT ICPSR PARTICIPANTS' RESEARCH ACTIVITIES, EACH USER OF THE ICPSR DATA FACILITIES IS EXPECTED TO SEND TWO COPIES OF EACH COMPLETED MANUSCRIPT OR THESIS ABSTRACT TO THE CONSORTIUM. PLEASE INDICATE IN THE COVER LETTER WHICH DATA WERE USED. TABLE OF CONTENTS Note: >>sections in the codebook introduction and codebook appendix can be navigated in the machine-readable files by searching ">>". INTRODUCTORY MATERIAL (file int1984.cbk) --------------------- >> 1984 STUDY DESCRIPTION >> 1984 SURVEY CONTENT AND ADMINISTRATION >> 1984 SAMPLING INFORMATION >> 1984 NOTE ON CANDIDATE NAME LIST >> 1984 INDIVIDUAL VOTER RECORD VALIDATION SECTION >> 1984 NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES WORKING PAPERS SERIES >> 1984 LIST OF REPORTS FROM ANES PILOT STUDY, SPRING, 1983 >> 1984 CODEBOOK INFORMATION >> 1984 ICPSR PROCESSING INFORMATION >> 1984 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST CODEBOOK -------- 1984 variables APPENDICES (file app1984.cbk) ---------- >> 1984 FIPS STATE AND COUNTY NOTE >> 1980 CENSUS DEFINITIONS >> 1984 PARTY/CANDIDATE NOTE >> 1984 NEWSPAPER CODE >> 1984 ECONOMIC CONDITIONS CODE >> 1984 COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY NOTE >> 1984 RECODING IN THE EDUCATION AND OCCUPATION SECTIONS >> OCCUPATION CODES, NES 1984 STUDY >> 1980 CENSUS INDUSTRY CODES >> 1984 NATIONALITY NOTE >> 1984 STATE AND COUNTRY NOTE >> 1984 CITIES NOTE >> 1984 CANDIDATE MASTER CODE >> 1984 PARTY DIFFERENCE NOTE >> 1984 IMPORTANT PROBLEMS NOTE >> 1984 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE DIMENSIONS >> 1984 STUDY DESCRIPTION THE NES/CPS AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY, 1984, WAS CONDUCTED BY THE CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES OF THE INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH, UNDER THE GENERAL DIRECTION OF WARREN E. MILLER. SANTA TRAUGOTT IS THE DIRECTOR OF STUDIES. THIS IS THE EIGHTEENTH IN A SERIES OF STUDIES OF AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTIONS PRODUCED BY THE POLITICAL BEHAVIOR PROGRAM OF THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER AND THE CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES, AND IS THE FOURTH STUDY TO BE CONDUCTED UNDER THE AUSPICES OF NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION GRANTS (NOS. SOC77-08885 AND SES-8341310) PROVIDING LONG-TERM SUPPORT FOR THE NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES. SINCE 1978, THE NES ELECTION STUDIES HAVE BEEN DESIGNED BY A NATIONAL BOARD OF OVERSEERS, THE MEMBERS OF WHICH MEET SEVERAL TIMES A YEAR TO PLAN CONTENT AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE MAJOR STUDY COMPONENTS. BOARD MEMBERS DURING THE 1984 PLANNING PHASE INCLUDED: RAY WOLFINGER, CHAIR, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY; RICHARD A. BRODY, STANFORD UNIVERSITY; HEINZ EULAU, STANFORD UNIVERSITY; MORRIS P. FIORINA, HARVARD UNIVERSITY; STANLEY KELLEY, JR., PRINCETON UNIVERSITY; DONALD R. KINDER, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN; DAVID R. MAYHEW, YALE UNIVERSITY; WARREN E. MILLER, ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, EX OFFICIO; DAVID O. SEARS, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES; AND J. MERRILL SHANKS, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY. AS PART OF THE PLANNING PROCESS, WORKSHOPS MAY BE HELD, A SPECIAL PLANNING COMMITTEE APPOINTED, A PILOT STUDY CONDUCTED, AND STIMULUS LETTERS SENT TO THE MEMBERS OF THE SCHOLARLY COMMUNITY, SOLICITING THEIR INPUT ON STUDY PLANS. THE 1984 STUDY PLANNING COMMITTEE INCLUDED SEVERAL BOARD MEMBERS (KINDER, CHAIR; BRODY, KELLEY, MILLER, EX OFFICIO; SEARS, AND WOLFINGER) AND THREE OTHER SCHOLARS, STANLEY FELDMAN, UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY; ETHEL KLEIN, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY; AND STEVEN J. ROSENSTONE, YALE UNIVERSITY. THE PLANNING COMMITTEE BEGAN MEETING IN FEBRUARY OF 1983. A PILOT STUDY WAS CARRIED OUT IN THE SUMMER OF 1983 FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEVELOPING NEW INSTRUMENTATION FOR THE 1984 ELECTION STUDY. NEW ITEMS WERE TESTED ON ECONOMIC WELL-BEING, GROUP IDENTIFICATION, VALUES, POLITICAL PARTICIPATION AND CANDIDATE AFFECT. DATA FROM THE PILOT STUDY ARE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL AND SOCIAL RESEARCH (ICPSR 8178). RESULTS FROM THE PILOT STUDY WERE USED BY THE PLANNING COMMITTEE IN FORMULATING RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE BOARD ABOUT STUDY CONTENT FOR THE 1984 ELECTION STUDY. (SEE THE LIST OF PILOT STUDY REPORTS.) THE 1984 NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY HAD TWO MAJOR COMPONENTS. THIS DOCUMENT DESCRIBES THE NOW TRADITIONAL PRE- AND POST-PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION SURVEY PANEL. THE OTHER MAJOR COMPONENT IS A CONTINUOUS MONITORING EFFORT, WHICH CONSISTS OF 3496 INTERVIEWS TAKEN IN 46 INDEPENDENT, CONSECUTIVE SAMPLES. INTERVIEW ADMINISTRATION WAS TELEPHONE; THE SAMPLE SELECTION WAS BY A RANDOM DIGIT DIALING PROCEDURE. THIS DATASET IS ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM, WITH DOCUMENTATION AND DESCRIPTION EQUIVALENT TO THIS. >> 1984 SURVEY CONTENT AND ADMINISTRATION THE BOARD OF OVERSEERS BALANCED A NUMBER OF CONSIDERATIONS IN SELECTING CONTENT FOR THE PRE- AND POST-PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION SURVEY PANEL. THERE WAS, AS ALWAYS, THE NECESSITY OF MAINTAINING CONTINUITY WITH PAST SURVEYS, SO THAT MEASURES WHICH HAVE REACHED THE STATUS OF TIME SERIES OR "CORE" COULD BE MAINTAINED. ALL SO-CALLED "CORE" ITEMS WERE EVALUATED BY THE BOARD AND INPUT SOLICITED FROM THE USER COMMUNITY ABOUT WHETHER EACH SHOULD BE RETAINED. ROOM HAD TO BE MADE FOR THE ADDITION OF NEW CONTENT, MOST OF WHICH HAD BEEN "PILOTED" IN 1983. EXAMPLES OF NEW CONTENT ARE THE ECONOMIC INDIVIDUALISM AND EGALITARIAN ITEMS (QS F1 AND J1) AND THE GROUP IDENTIFICATION ITEMS. IT WAS DESIRED ALSO TO TAKE SOMEWHAT MORE ADVANTAGE OF THE PANEL DESIGN AND ALLOCATE SEVERAL MINUTES IN THE POST TO QUESTIONS ASKED IN THE PRE AND DEEMED TO BE "CAMPAIGN-REACTIVE." SEVERAL ISSUE QUESTIONS, TRAITS, AFFECTS, POLITICAL EFFICACY ITEMS, PARTY IDENTIFICATION AND LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE SELF-PLACEMENT WERE REPEATED FOR THIS REASON. ANOTHER CONCERN WAS TO MAINTAIN SIMILARITY OF CONTENT WITH CONTINUOUS MONITORING, WHICH WAS IN THE FIELD SIMULTANEOUSLY, KEEPING IN MIND THE POSSIBILITY THAT SOME SCHOLARS MAY WISH TO "POOL" THE TWO DATASETS. THE BOARD SET TWO BASIC DESIGN PARAMETERS RELATING TO SURVEY ADMINISTRATION. IN THE PRE-ELECTION WAVE, THE SURVEY WAS TO BE ADMINISTERED IN TWO-WEEK "QUARTERS." IN THE POST-ELECTION, HALF OF THE RESPONDENTS WERE TO BE INTERVIEWED IN PERSON, THE OTHER HALF BY TELEPHONE. INTERVIEW TARGET PERIODS. IF ONE THINKS THAT THERE IS SOME AMOUNT OF RELATIVELY LATE VOTE DECISION-MAKING, THEN ONE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A MEASURE OF VOTE DECISION BY TIME OF INTERVIEW WHICH IS NOT CONTAMINATED BY THE DIFFICULTY OF OBTAINING AN INTERVIEW. THAT IS, IF THE ENTIRE SAMPLE IS RELEASED IMMEDIATELY, AND IF THE MOST RELUCTANT AND HARD-TO-REACH RESPONDENTS ARE SYSTEMATICALLY INTERVIEWED LATER IN THE INTERVIEW PERIOD THAN ARE MORE AMENABLE RESPONDENTS, AND IF THE HARDER-TO-REACH RESPONDENTS ALSO DECIDE LATER (AND/OR DIFFERENTLY) THAN OTHER RESPONDENTS, THEN THE VOTE DECISION BY TIME OF INTERVIEW RELATIONSHIP IS CONFOUNDED. THIS LOGIC LED THE BOARD TO DECIDE THAT THE SAMPLE SHOULD BE ADMINISTERED IN FOUR TWO-WEEK QUARTERS. THE FIELD PERIOD WAS TO BEGIN ON WEDNESDAY, SEPT. 5. (IN ACTUAL PRACTICE, A FEW INTERVIEWERS "JUMPED THE GUN" AND SEVERAL EARLY INTERVIEWS WERE TAKEN ON TUESDAY, THE TRADITIONAL NES STARTING DAY.) THE FIRST QUARTER ENDED TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18TH. THE SECOND QUARTER WAS SEPT.19TH - OCT.2ND; THE 3RD QUARTER WAS OCT. 3RD THROUGH OCT. 16TH; AND THE LAST QUARTER WAS OCT. 17TH - OCT. 31. THAT LEFT THE NOV. 1 - NOV. 5 PERIOD FOR "CATCH-UP" INTERVIEWS. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT INTERVIEWS WITH SELECTED RESPONDENTS WHICH COULD NOT BE TAKEN IN THE ASSIGNED SAMPLE QUARTER WERE NONETHELESS TAKEN AS THE RESPONDENTS WERE AVAILABLE. NINETY-THREE PERCENT OF ALL INTERVIEWS WERE TAKEN WITHIN THE TARGET PERIOD. VARIABLE 840027 RECORDS INFORMATION ABOUT TARGET PERIOD ASSIGNMENT AND SUCCESS. ONE QUARTER OF EACH SEGMENT (SEE 1984 SAMPLE DESIGN) WAS ASSIGNED TO EACH TWO-WEEK TARGET PERIOD (RATHER THAN ONE QUARTER OF THE SET OF SEGMENTS AT EACH PERIOD). TELEPHONE VS. IN-PERSON ASSIGNMENT. TELEPHONE INTERVIEWING HAS ADVANTAGES OVER IN-PERSON INTERVIEWING IN TERMS OF COST AND THE SPEED WITH WHICH INTERVIEWING CAN BE COMPLETED. ON THE OTHER HAND, IN-PERSON INTERVIEWS SEEM TO HAVE BETTER RESPONSE RATES AND CAN BE LONGER THAN TELEPHONE INTERVIEWS, FOR WHICH 50 MINUTES IS USUALLY REGARDED AS PRESSING (OR EXCEEDING) TOLERABLE LIMITS. A SAMPLE DERIVED BY A RANDOM DIGIT DIAL METHOD HAS THE DISADVANTAGE THAT IDENTIFICATION OF CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT IS NOT AT ALL STRAIGHTFORWARD. MANY RESPONDENTS CANNOT IDENTIFY THEIR CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT OR CONGRESSPERSON. TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, WHICH IS THE ONLY GEOGRAPHIC DESIGNATION READILY AVAILABLE, IS NOT AN ACCURATE INDICATION OF CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT. THEREFORE, THE PRE-ELECTION WAVE WAS TAKEN ENTIRELY IN-PERSON. FOR THE POST-ELECTION SURVEY, HOWEVER, WITH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT DETERMINED (AREA SEGMENTS, THE SECOND STAGE SAMPLE SELECTIONS, CAN BE ACCURATELY LINKED TO CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS), IT WAS DECIDED TO UTILIZE A MIXED-MODE DESIGN, WHERE PART OF THE MOTIVATION WAS TO ACHIEVE THE ALREADY KNOWN BENEFITS OF TELEPHONE INTERVIEWING, PARTICULARLY COST REDUCTION, AND TO LEARN AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE ABOUT THE EFFECT OF MODE ON QUESTION ANSWERS AND RESPONSE RATE. IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MIXED MODE DESIGN, HALF OF THE PRE-ELECTION RESPONDENTS WERE RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO THE IN-PERSON MODE. THE OTHER HALF WERE TO BE INTERVIEWED BY TELEPHONE. THE TELEPHONE RESPONDENTS RECEIVED A SHORTENED VERSION OF THE PERSONAL INSTRUMENT. (THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS ON THE TELEPHONE QUESTIONNAIRE WHICH ARE NOT ALSO ON THE PERSONAL QUESTIONNAIRE.) RESPONDENTS WHO DID NOT HAVE A TELEPHONE, OR FOR WHOM THE PRE-ELECTION INTERVIEWER INDICATED (IN RESPONSE TO A QUESTION ON THE COVER SHEET) THAT AN INTERVIEW SHOULD NOT BE ATTEMPTED OVER THE TELEPHONE (R IS DEAF, SPEAKS ENGLISH WITH DIFFICULTY, OR OTHER REASON) WERE RE-ASSIGNED TO THE FIELD, TO BE INTERVIEWED IN-PERSON BUT USING A TELEPHONE INTERVIEW. THE FEW RESPONDENTS WHO WERE ASSIGNED THE IN-PERSON MODE WHO HAD TO BE INTERVIEWED OVER THE TELEPHONE RECEIVED A SHORTENED PERSONAL INTERVIEW, WITH THOSE QUESTIONS DELETED WHICH WERE NOT ASKED ON THE TELEPHONE. (THEIR RESPONSES TO THESE QUESTIONS WERE MARKED NOT ASCERTAINED). VARIABLE 840063 COMBINES INFORMATION ABOUT THESE SEVERAL CONTINGENCIES: TO WHICH RANDOM HALF A PRE-ELECTION R WAS ORIGINALLY ASSIGNED, AND WHICH QUESTIONNAIRE AND MODE HE/SHE ULTIMATELY ENDED UP WITH. >> 1984 SAMPLING INFORMATION THE 1980 SAMPLING FRAME WAS DESIGNED, SELECTED AND LISTED JOINTLY BY NORC AND SRC. THE SAMPLE UNIVERSE INCLUDES ALL U.S. HOUSEHOLDS IN THE 48 COTERMINOUS STATES, ALASKA AND HAWAII. CIVILIAN HOUSEHOLDS RESIDING ON MILITARY BASES ARE INCLUDED IN THE SAMPLE UNIVERSE. THE 1980 NORC/SRC NATIONAL SAMPLE IS A MULTI-STAGE AREA PROBABILITY DESIGN. THAT IS, IN A SERIES OF HIERARCHICAL STEPS, GEOGRAPHICALLY DEFINED SAMPLING UNITS OF DECREASING SIZE ARE SELECTED WITH PROBABILITY PROPORTIONATE TO THEIR TOTAL OCCUPIED HOUSING UNIT COUNT. THE OVERALL SAMPLING FRACTION IS 1:25,389. THE NATIONAL SAMPLE INCLUDES A FIRST STAGE SELECTION OF SMSAS, COUNTIES AND COUNTY GROUPS (PRIMARY AREAS), A SECOND STAGE SELECTION OF AREA SEGMENTS (HOUSING UNIT CLUSTERS DEFINED BY CENSUS BLOCKS OR SUBSAMPLED PARTS OF SELECTED CENSUS ENUMERATION DISTRICTS), A THIRD STAGE SAMPLING OF (LISTED) HOUSING UNITS FROM THE SELECTED AREA SEGMENTS, AND, FOR THE NES SAMPLE, A FINAL STAGE OF RANDOMLY SELECTING A RESPONDENT FROM THE ELIGIBLE MEMBERS OF THE SAMPLE HOUSEHOLDS. IN THIS SAMPLE, PRIMARY AREAS CONSIST OF COUNTIES, SMSAS, INDEPENDENT CITIES, AND IN NEW ENGLAND, PARTS OF COUNTIES. EIGHTY-FOUR PRIMARY AREAS WERE SELECTED AT THE FIRST STAGE. PRIOR TO SELECTION, PRIMARY AREAS WERE GROUPED INTO 84 STRATA. THE STRATA WERE FORMED BY GROUPING METROPOLITAN AND NON-METROPOLITAN PAS WITHIN EACH OF THE FOUR CENSUS REGIONS. WITHIN EACH REGION, ADDITIONAL VARIABLES WERE USED TO DEFINE STRATA. THE STRATIFYING VARIABLES INCLUDED WITHIN-REGION GEOGRAPHY AND SIZE; SIZE WAS MEASURED BY THE 1980 CENSUS COUNT OF OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS. ONE PSU (PRIMARY SELECTION UNIT) WAS SELECTED FROM EACH STRATUM USING A CONTROLLED SELECTION PROCEDURE. SIXTEEN OF THE SELECTIONS ARE "SELF-REPRESENTING." THAT IS, THERE IS ONE AND ONLY ONE SELECTION FROM THAT STRATA BECAUSE THE ENTIRE STRATA IS COMPRISED OF AN SMSA. FOR EXAMPLE, NEW YORK AND CHICAGO SMSAS ARE SELF-REPRESENTING. TECHNICALLY, THESE ARE NOT PSUS SINCE THERE IS NO SELECTION AS SUCH INVOLVED. FOR THIS REASON THE 84 UNITS IN THE FIRST STAGE OF THE SAMPLE SELECTIONS ARE REFERRED TO IN SUBSEQUENT DESCRIPTIONS AS PRIMARY AREAS, RATHER THAN PSUS. FOR THE 1980 DESIGN, THE DESIGNATED SECOND STAGE SAMPLING UNITS (SSUS OR SEGMENTS) ARE COMPRISED OF CENSUS BLOCKS IN METROPOLITAN PRIMARY AREAS (OR ENUMERATION DISTRICTS IN SOME RURAL AREAS). THIS REPRESENTS A CHANGE FOR SRC WHICH IN 1970 USED AN INTERMEDIATE STEP OF SELECTING A STRATIFIED SAMPLE OF MINOR CIVIL DIVISIONS OR "PLACES" BEFORE SELECTING THE SMALLER BLOCK OR ED UNITS. SAMPLING OF SECOND STAGE UNITS WAS PERFORMED WITH PROBABILITIES PROPORTIONATE TO MEASURES OF SIZE (MOS) -- THE TOTAL OCCUPIED HOUSING COUNT FOR THE AREA. BEFORE SECOND STAGE SELECTION TOOK PLACE, SSUS WERE ORDERED OR IMPLICITLY STRATIFIED USING A THREE-STEP PROCEDURE. FIRST, IN MULTI-COUNTY PRIMARY AREAS, THE SSUS WERE ORDERED BY COUNTY ACCORDING TO GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION AND POPULATION SIZE OF THE COUNTY. THIRTY-SIX OF THE EIGHTY-FOUR PRIMARY AREAS FELL IN STATES WHERE DATA WERE AVAILABLE FOR THE MEDIAN PER CAPITA INCOME FOR EACH MCD. IN THESE AREAS, EACH MCD WAS CLASSIFIED INTO ONE OF THREE POPULATION SIZE, AND ONE OF THREE INCOME SIZE, CATEGORIES. IN ALL PRIMARY AREAS, THE FINAL STRATIFICATION STEP WAS TO ORDER INDIVIDUAL CENSUS BLOCKS AND ENUMERATION DISTRICTS ACCORDING TO GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION. THE SECONDARY SELECTIONS (SEGMENTS) WERE MADE USING A SYSTEMATIC SELECTION PROCEDURE. WITHIN THE 6 LARGEST PRIMARY AREAS, A VARYING NUMBER OF SEGMENTS CAN BE SELECTED, FROM 6 TO ABOUT 25. IN ALL OTHER PRIMARY AREAS, SIX SECONDARY SELECTIONS WERE MADE. THE MINIMUM SIZE OF A SEGMENT IS 50 OCCUPIED HOUSEHOLDS, BUT THE AVERAGE NUMBER OF HOUSING UNIT LISTINGS IN A SEGMENT IS ABOUT 92. IN ORDER TO MAKE MANAGEABLE THE SUBSEQUENT STEP OF LISTING THE HOUSING UNITS FROM WHICH SAMPLE SELECTIONS ARE TO BE MADE, THE SRC SAMPLE DESIGN FURTHER DIVIDES THE SEGMENTS INTO SEGMENT PARTS, WHICH ARE IDENTIFIABLE UNITS WITHIN THE SEGMENT WITH A MEASURE OF SIZE OF APPROXIMATELY 16 TO 20 HUS -- FOR EXAMPLE, A CITY BLOCK. EACH HU IN AN ACTIVE SEGMENT PART IS THEN LISTED AS A SAMPLE "LINE," AND FINAL HOUSEHOLD SELECTIONS ARE MADE WITH A RANDOM START AND A SYSTEMATIC SAMPLING PROCEDURE. ONCE A HOUSEHOLD IS SELECTED, ALL PERSONS RESIDING THERE ARE LISTED BY AN INTERVIEWER, AND A RESPONDENT IS CHOSEN, USING A SELECTION TABLE, FROM THE POLITICALLY ELIGIBLE ADULTS IN THE HOUSEHOLD. (SEE VARIABLES 840037 AND 840070.) EVERY HOUSEHOLD IN THE UNITED STATES HAS AN EQUAL PROBABILITY OF FALLING INTO THE SAMPLE. HOWEVER, ALL RESPONDENTS ARE NOT SELECTED WITH EQUAL PROBABILITY. FOR EXAMPLE, ONCE A HOUSEHOLD IS SELECTED, AN ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUAL IN A HOUSEHOLD WITH THREE ELIGIBLE PERSONS HAS ONLY ONE-THIRD THE PROBABILITY OF SELECTION AS THE PERSON WHO IS THE ONLY ELIGIBLE PERSON IN HIS/HER HOUSEHOLD. TECHNICALLY, RESPONDENTS OUGHT TO BE WEIGHTED IN ALL ANALYSES BY THE INVERSE OF THEIR SELECTION PROBABILITY. NES STAFF HAS TRADITIONALLY COMPARED FREQUENCIES RUN WEIGHTED AND UNWEIGHTED ON VARIABLES OF INTEREST AND CONCLUDED THAT THE DIFFERENCES IN DISTRIBUTIONS (TYPICALLY VERY MINOR) DO NOT JUSTIFY THE ADDED COMPLEXITIES OF WEIGHTING. THIS IS THE CASE FOR 1984 AS WELL. (SEE WORKING PAPER 6: WEIGHTING FOR THE 1984 PRE- AND POST-ELECTION SURVEYS.) FINALLY, THE FULL 1980 NATIONAL SAMPLE HAS 84 PRIMARY SELECTIONS, ONE FROM EACH STRATA. IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FOR FLEXIBILITY IN SAMPLE DESIGN AND FOR EFFICIENCY IN STAFFING PRIMARY AREAS, THE SAMPLE DESIGN ALLOWS FOR USE OF 1/2, 2/3, 5/6 OR ALL OF THE NON-SELF-REPRESENTING PRIMARY AREAS. THIS FEATURE ALLOWS A SMALLER NUMBER OF PRIMARY AREAS TO BE USED FOR SMALLER SAMPLE SIZES, ENABLING MORE OPTIMAL COST/STATISTICAL EFFICIENCY THAN WOULD RESULT IF THE SAMPLE WERE SPREAD ACROSS THE FULL 84 PRIMARY AREAS. IN PREVIOUS SRC SAMPLES, DESIRED INCREASES IN SAMPLE SIZE WERE HANDLED BY GENERATING ADDITIONAL LINES WITHIN A STANDARD SET OF SEGMENTS. IN THE CURRENT SAMPLING FRAME, ADDITIONAL PRIMARY AREAS AND/OR SEGMENTS WITHIN THE LARGEST PRIMARY AREAS ARE SELECTED TO INCREASE SAMPLE SIZE. THE NES USED THE 1/2 SAMPLE OPTION, WHICH MEANS THAT 11 OF THE 16 SELF-REPRESENTING PRIMARY AREAS AND 34 (1/2 OF 68) OF THE NON-SELF-REPRESENTING PRIMARY AREAS WERE USED, FOR A TOTAL OF 45 PRIMARY AREAS. IN ADDITION TO FLEXIBILITY IN THE NUMBER OF PRIMARY AREAS WHICH MAY BE USED IN A SAMPLE, THE SRC SAMPLE DESIGN ALSO ALLOWS FOR FLEXIBILITY IN THE NUMBER OF SEGMENTS USED WITHIN EACH OF THE 6 LARGEST SELF-REPRESENTING PRIMARY AREAS. EACH OF THESE AREAS IS DIVIDED INTO 4 SETS OF SEGMENTS, AVERAGING 6.25 SEGMENTS EACH. ONE TO FOUR "SETS" OF SEGMENTS CAN BE USED AS NECESSARY. THE NUMBER OF SEGMENTS FROM THE REMAINING 39 PRIMARY AREAS (5 SR, 34 NON-SR) IS EXACTLY SIX EACH. THERE ARE 306 SEGMENTS IN THE SAMPLE; 72 FROM THE 6 LARGEST PRIMARY AREAS AND 234 FROM THE REMAINING ONES. WITH 2257 INTERVIEWS, THERE ARE 6.1 INTERVIEWS ON AVERAGE PER SEGMENT. THE SAMPLE IS MORE FULLY DESCRIBED IN HEERINGA, STEVEN G. AND JUDITH H. CONNOR, 1980 SRC/NORC NATIONAL SAMPLE, ANN ARBOR: INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH, MAY 1985. >> 1984 NOTE ON CANDIDATE NAME LIST THE _________________ EXPRESSIONS IN THE 1984 QUESTIONNAIRE (NAME # X, Y, OR Z) THE 1984 ELECTION STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE MADE PROVISIONS TO HAVE INTERVIEWERS FILL IN DISTRICT/STATE CANDIDATE NAMES IN BLANK SLOTS LIKE THE ONE DEPICTED ABOVE. A COMPREHENSIVE LIST OF HOUSE AND SENATE CANDIDATE AND INCUMBENT NAMES WAS PREPARED FOR EACH OF THE 134 DISTRICTS IN THE SAMPLE AND THE INTERVIEWERS USED THE LISTS TO PRE-EDIT NAMES WHERE APPROPRIATE, DEPENDING ON THE DISTRICT OF INTERVIEW. THESE CANDIDATE LISTS ARE REPRODUCED IN NOTE 13 IN THE NOTES SECTION. THE (NAME #) EXPRESSION WILL GENERALLY LIST MORE THAN ONE CANDIDATE NUMBER. FOR ANY GIVEN DISTRICT, HOWEVER, ONE OF TWO POSSIBILITIES WILL HOLD: 1) THERE WILL BE ONE AND ONLY ONE NAME IN THE DISTRICT CANDIDATE LIST QUALIFYING FOR INCLUSION ON THE BASIS OF THE NUMBERS LISTED IN THE EXPRESSION; OR 2) THERE WILL BE NO NUMBER IN THE DISTRICT CANDIDATE LIST MATCHING ANY OF THE NUMBERS IN THE EXPRESSION. AN INSTANCE OF NO MATCHING NUMBERS ARISES FOR A QUESTION ABOUT THE CANDIDATE CHALLENGING A DISTRICT INCUMBENT WHEN, IN FACT, THE INCUMBENT IS RUNNING UNOPPOSED. INTERVIEWERS WERE INSTRUCTED TO MARK "NO INFO" THOSE QUESTIONS INVOLVING UNMATCHED CANDIDATE NUMBERS IN THE (NAME #) EXPRESSION. IN THE CANDIDATE LIST, EACH CANDIDATE OR INCUMBENT IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER OR CODE. NUMBERS BEGINNING WITH 1 (11-19) ARE FOR THE SENATE AND NUMBERS BEGINNING WITH 3 (31-39) ARE FOR THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. IN ADDITION, THE CODE OR NUMBER ASSIGNED TO A NAME HAS AN INTRINSIC MEANING--IT DENOTES THE FUNCTIONAL ROLE OF THAT PERSON IN THE CONTEXT OF THE 1984 GENERAL ELECTIONS. FOR EXAMPLE, CANDIDATE NUMBER 33 IS USED FOR A DEMOCRATIC HOUSE INCUMBENT SEEKING RE-ELECTION AND PLAYING, THEREFORE, THE DUAL ROLE OF HOUSE INCUMBENT AND DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE FOR THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES IN THE 1984 ELECTIONS. THE PRECISE MEANING OF EACH CANDIDATE NUMBER USED IN THE STUDY IS GIVEN IN NOTE 13 IN THE NOTES SECTION. NEEDLESS TO SAY, YOU WILL NEED TO UNDERSTAND THE SCHEME THAT WAS USED IN ORDER TO WORK EFFECTIVELY WITH QUESTIONS INVOLVING (NAME #) EXPRESSIONS. >> 1984 INDIVIDUAL VOTER RECORD VALIDATION SECTION AS IN 1978 AND 1980, THE NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES UNDERTOOK TO VALIDATE THE REPORTED VOTE OF RESPONDENTS. USERS SHOULD AT LEAST NOTE THE EXISTENCE OF VOTE VALIDATION DATA VARIABLES V841119 TO V841134 AS WELL AS THE REPORTED VOTE VARIABLES. BASICALLY, ALL PRE-ELECTION R'S WERE VALIDATED WITH THE EXCEPTIONS OF 1) R'S WHO TOLD US IN THE POST THAT THEY DID NOT VOTE AND WERE NOT REGISTERED AND 2) R'S WHO DID NOT GIVE US THEIR NAMES. DOCUMENTATION FOR THESE VARIABLES WILL BE MORE FULLY FLESHED OUT IN THE SECOND CONSORTIUM RELEASE. ALSO, NES STAFF WILL PREPARE A WORKING PAPER ON VOTE VALIDATION OVER THE SUMMER. MEANWHILE, CONSULTATION ON DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF THESE VARIABLES IS AVAILABLE FROM NES STAFF AT (313) 764-5494. >> 1984 NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES WORKING PAPERS SERIES COPIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THE CENTER FOR POLITICAL STUDIES, BOX 1248, ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48106. PAPERS WILL BE DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT CHARGE UNTIL THE INITIAL RUN OF COPIES HAS BEEN EXHAUSTED. AFTER THAT, THERE WILL BE A CHARGE FOR COST OF REPRODUCTION, WHICH IS 10 CENTS AT PRESENT (MARCH 1984). GIOVANNA MORCHIO AND MARIA SANCHEZ. "CREATION OF A FILTER VARIABLE TO BE USED WHEN ANALYZING QUESTIONS ABOUT CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES IN THE 1982 INTEGRATED PERSONAL/ISR CATI/BERKELEY, CATI DATASET: A REPORT TO THE BOARD OF OVERSEERS, NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES." WORKING PAPER NO. 1. ANN ARBOR: CPS, FEBRUARY 28, 1984. 40 PAGES. GIOVANNA MORCHIO AND MARIA SANCHEZ. "COMPARISON OF THE MICHIGAN METHOD OF DISTRICT ASSIGNMENT ON THE TELEPHONE WITH THE PERSONAL INTERVIEW SIMULATED DATA: A REPORT TO THE BOARD OF OVERSEERS, NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES." WORKING PAPER NO. 2. ANN ARBOR: CPS, MARCH 2, 1984. 10 PAGES. NES STAFF. "QUESTIONS AND VERSIONS IN NES CONTINUOUS MONITORING, 1984: A REPORT TO THE BOARD OF OVERSEERS, NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES." WORKING PAPER NO. 3. ANN ARBOR: CPS, AUGUST, 1984. 10 PAGES. NES STAFF. "WEEKLY FIELD REPORT FOR THE NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES CONTINUOUS MONITORING, JAN. 11 - AUG. 3, 1984: A REPORT TO THE BOARD OF OVERSEERS, NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES." WORKING PAPER NO. 4. ANN ARBOR: CPS, AUGUST, 1984. 4 PAGES. SANTA TRAUGOTT. "SAMPLE WEIGHTING IN NES CONTINUOUS MONITORING, 1984: A REPORT TO THE BOARD OF OVERSEERS, NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES." WORKING PAPER NO. 5. ANN ARBOR: CPS, APRIL, 1985. 6 PAGES. SANTA TRAUGOTT. "SAMPLE WEIGHTING IN NES PRE-POST PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION SURVEY." WORKING PAPER NO. 6. ANN ARBOR: CPS, APRIL, 1985. >> 1984 LIST OF REPORTS FROM THE ANES PILOT STUDY, SPRING, 1983 SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD OF OVERSEERS, NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY AND THE 1984 NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PLANNING COMMITTEE 1. "MEASURING PERSONAL ECONOMIC WELL-BEING" FROM STEVEN J. ROSENSTONE AND JOHN MARK HANSEN, DATED OCTOBER, 1983. 2. "GROUP ECONOMIC WELL-BEING AND POLITICAL CHOICE" FROM DONALD R. KINDER, STEVEN J. ROSENSTONE AND JOHN MARK HANSEN, DATED OCTOBER, 1983. 3. MEMO TO NES BOARD OF OVERSEERS FROM STANLEY FELDMAN RE: REPORT ON VALUES IN THE 1983 PILOT STUDY, DATED OCTOBER 19, 1983. 4. MEMO TO NES PLANNING COMMITTEE AND BOARD FROM DAVID O. SEARS, LEONIE HUDDY, LYNITTA SCHAFFER RE: NES PILOT STUDY OF VALUES, DATED OCTOBER, 1983. 5. "PRESIDENTIAL TRAITS" FROM DONALD R. KINDER, DATED DATED OCTOBER, 1983. 6. MEMO TO NES BOARD OF OVERSEERS AND 1984 PLANNING COMMITTEE FROM PAMELA JOHNSTON CONOVER AND STANLEY FELDMAN RE: THE INCLUSION OF ITEMS MEASURING EMOTIONAL REACTIONS TO THE ECONOMY IN THE 1984 NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY, DATED OCTOBER 22, 1983. 7. MEMO TO BOARD OF OVERSEERS AND 1984 NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PLANNING COMMITTEE FROM JOHN MARK HANSEN AND STEVEN J. ROSENSTONE RE: PARTICIPATION OUTSIDE ELECTIONS, DATED OCTOBER 24, 1983. 8. "GROUP CONSCIOUSNESS IN THE 1983 NES PILOT STUDY" FROM DAVID O. SEARS, TOM JESSOR AND MARTIN GAHART, DATED OCTOBER 24, 1983. 9. "MONITORING GROUP INTEREST" FROM ETHEL KLEIN, DATED OCTOBER, 1983. 10. MEMO TO NES PLANNING COMMITTEE AND BOARD FROM JON KROSNICK RE: NES PILOT STUDY OF ISSUE POSITION CENTRALITY MEASURES, DATED OCTOBER 21, 1983. 11. MEMO TO BOARD OF OVERSEERS AND 1984 NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PLANNING COMMITTEE FROM STEVEN ROSENSTONE AND STANLEY FELDMAN RE: DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, AND ANALYSIS OF THE ROLLING CROSS-SECTION AND EVENT MONITORING COMPONENTS OF THE 1984 NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY, DATED OCTOBER 19, 1983. 12. MEMO TO BOARD OF OVERSEERS AND 1984 NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PLANNING COMMITTEE FROM STEVEN ROSENSTONE RE: STUDYING POLITICAL ACTIVATION ON THE ROLLING CROSS-SECTION, DATED OCTOBER 18, 1983. 13. MEMO TO 1984 NES PLANNING COMMITTEE AND NES BOARD FROM DONALD R. KINDER RE: MEASURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF CANDIDATE IMPRESSIONS, DATED OCTOBER 26, 1983. 14. MEMO TO DONALD KINDER, CHAIR, NES 1984 DESIGN COMMITTEE FROM RICHARD A. BRODY RE: PRESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE RATINGS IN THE CONTINUOUS MONITORING DATA COLLECTION, DATED SEPTEMBER 12, 1983. 15A. MEMO TO DON KINDER, CHAIR, 1984 NES PLANNING COMMITTEE FROM MERRILL SHANKS RE: PERCEPTIONS OF STRENGTH FOR INDIVIDUAL CANDIDACIES: MEASUREMENT OBJECTIVES FOR ANALYSES OF "MOMENTUM" AND "STRATEGIC VOTING", DATED OCTOBER 26, 1983. 15B. VARIABLES ON PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES 16. MEMO TO NES BOARD OF OVERSEERS AND 1984 PLANNING COMMITTEE FROM STANLEY FELDMAN RE: VALUES AND THE ROLLING CROSS-SECTION, DATED OCTOBER 19, 1983. 17. MEMO TO 1984 NES PLANNING COMMITTEE AND BOARD FROM DONALD KINDER RE: MEASURING THE PUBLIC'S VIEW OF THE NATION'S CONDITION IN THE 1984 ROLLING CROSS-SECTION, DATED OCTOBER 25, 1983. >> 1984 CODEBOOK INFORMATION The following example from the 1948 NES study provides the standard format for codebook variable documentation. Note that NES studies which are not part of the Time-Series usually omit marginals and the descriptive content in lines 2-5 (except for variable name). Line 1 ============================== 2 VAR 480026 NAME-R NOT VT-WAS R REG TO VT 3 COLUMNS 61 - 61 4 NUMERIC 5 MD=0 OR GE 8 6 7 Q. 17. (IF R DID NOT VOTE) WERE YOU REGISTERED (ELIGIBLE) 8 TO VOTE. 9 ........................................................... 10 11 82 1. YES 12 149 2. NO 13 14 0 8. DK 15 9 9. NA 16 422 0. INAP., R VOTED Line 2 - VARIABLE NAME. Note that in the codebook the variable name (usually a 'number') does not include the "V" prefix which is used in the release SAS and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files) for all variables including those which do not have 'number' names. For example the variable "VERSION" in the codebook is "VVERSION" in the data definition files. Line 2 - "NAME". This is the variable label used in the SAS and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files). Some codebooks exclude this. Line 3 - COLUMNS. Columns in the ASCII data file (.dat file). Line 4 - CHARACTER OR NUMERIC. If numeric and the variable is a decimal rather than integer variable, the numer of decimal places is also indicated (e.g. "NUMERIC DEC 4") Line 5 - Values which are assigned to missing by default in the Study's SAS and and SPSS data definition files (.sas and .sps files). Line 7 - Actual question text for survey variables or a description of non-survey variables (for example, congressional district). Survey items usually include the question number (for example "B1a.") from the Study questionnaire; beginning in 1996 non-survey items also have unique item numbers (for example "CSheet.1"). Line 9 - A dashed or dotted line usually separates question text from any other documentation which follows. Line 10- When present, annotation provided by Study staff is presented below the question text/description and preceding code values. Lines 11-16 Code values are listed with descriptive labels. Valid codes (those not having 'missing' status in line 5) are presented first, followed by the values described in line 5. For continuous variables, one line may appear providing the range of possible values. A blank line usually separates the 'valid' and 'missing' values. Lines 11-16 Marginals are usually provided for discrete variables. The counts may be unweighted or weighted; check the Study codebook introductory text to determine weight usage. >> 1984 ICPSR PROCESSING INFORMATION THE DATA COLLECTION WAS PROCESSED ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD ICPSR PROCESSING PROCEDURES. THE DATA WERE CHECKED FOR ILLEGAL OR INCONSISTENT CODE VALUES WHICH, WHEN FOUND, WERE RECODED TO OSIRIS MISSING DATA VALUES. SOME CONSISTENCY CHECKS WERE PERFORMED. STATEMENTS BRACKETED IN "<" AND ">" SIGNS IN THE BODY OF THE CODEBOOK WERE ADDED BY THE PROCESSORS FOR EXPLANATORY PURPOSES. >> 1984 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST VARIABLE VARIABLE LABEL -------- -------------- VERSION NES VERSION NUMBER DSETNO NES DATASET NUMBER 840001 ICPSR ARCHIVE NUMBER ...... ...there are no variables 840002,840003 840004 CASE ID OF RESPONDENT SAMPLING INFORMATION 840005 PRIMARY AREA CODE 840006 SEGMENT ID 840007 PRIMARY AREA NAMES 840008 STATE ALPHABETIC CODE 840009 CENSUS REGION 840010 ICPSR STATE CODE 840011 FIPS STATE CODE 840012 FIPS STATE AND COUNTY CODE 840013 ICPSR STATE/82 DISTRICT CODE 840014 ICPSR STATE/78 DISTRICT CODE 840015 FIPS 80 SMSA CENSUS CODE 840016 FIPS 80 SMSA CENSUS CODE 840017 POPULATION SIZE: PLACE OF INTERVIEW LOCATION 840018 ACTUAL POPULATION OF INTERVIEW LOCATION 840019 BELT CODE 840020 1980 CENSUS TRACT 840021 CENSUS ENUMERATION, 1980 840022 MINOR CIVIL DIVISION 840023 CENSUS PLACE CODE 840024 SAMPLING ERROR CODE PRE-ELECTION INFORMATION 840025 INTERVIEWER NUMBER 840026 CONTROL ID 840027 TARGET INTERVIEW PERIOD 840028 INTERVIEWER'S INTERVIEW # 840029 DATE OF INTERVIEW 840030 DATE COMPLETED-MONTH 840031 DATE COMPLETED-DAY 840032 DAYS PRIOR TO ELECTION THAT INTERVIEW HELD 840033 LENGTH OF INTERVIEW 840034 LENGTH OF POST-EDITING 840035 BEGINNING TIME-LOCAL 840036 BEGINNING TIME-ANN ARBOR 840037 SELECTION TABLE 840038 REFUSAL CONVERSION INDICATOR 840039 FINAL CALL NUMBER 840040 FINAL RESULT CODE 840041 PHONE NUMBER OBTAINED 840042 REASON SHOULD NOT CONDUCT POST INTERVIEW BY PHONE POST-ELECTION INFORMATION 840043 RESPONDENT NUMBER 840044 INTERVIEWER NUMBER 840045 CONTROL ID 840046 IS R STILL LIVING AT ORIGINAL ADDRESS? 840047 INTERVIEWER'S INTERVIEW # 840048 DATE COMPLETED-MONTH 840049 DATE COMPLETED-DAY 840050 DAYS BETWEEN ELECTION AND POST-INTERVIEW 840051 LENGTH OF INTERVIEW 840052 LENGTH OF PRE-EDITING 840053 LENGTH OF POST-EDITING 840054 BEGINNING TIME-LOCAL 840055 BEGINNING TIME-ANN ARBOR 840056 REFUSAL CONVERSION INDICATOR 840057 FINAL CALL NUMBER 840058 FINAL RESULT CODE 840059 TYPE OF CONGRESSIONAL RACE 840060 TYPE OF SENATORIAL RACE 840061 WHETHER R TOOK PART IN BOTH PRE AND POST SURVEYS SAMPLING INFORMATION-POST 840062 SAMPLE TO WHICH R ASSIGNED 840063 TYPE OF SAMPLE AND ADMINISTRATION 840064 INSTRUMENT ACTUALLY USED 840065 STATE OF INTERVIEW 840066 STATE AND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT CODE 840067 STATE AND CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT CODE FOR THOSE WHO VOTED OUTSIDE PRE-ELECTION DISTRICT HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION 840068 NUMBER OF PERSONS IN HOUSEHOLD 840069 HOUSEHOLD COMPOSITION 840070 NUMBER OF ELIGIBLE ADULTS 840071 NUMBER OF CHILDREN UNDER SIX YEARS OLD 840072 NUMBER OF CHILDREN SIX TO NINE YEARS OLD 840073 NUMBER OF CHILDREN TEN TO THIRTEEN YEARS OLD 840074 NUMBER OF CHILDREN FOURTEEN TO SEVENTEEN YEARS OLD R'S INFORMATION ABOUT AND INTEREST IN CAMPAIGN 840075 R'S INTEREST IN THE CAMPAIGN 840076 R'S PREDICTION OF WINNER IN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 840077 DOES R THINK PRESIDENTIAL RACE WILL BE CLOSE 840078 WHICH PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE DOES R THINK WILL CARRY R'S STATE 840079 DOES R THINK PRESIDENTIAL RACE WILL BE CLOSE IN R'S STATE 840080 DOES R CARE WHICH PARTY WINS THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION REAGAN AS CANDIDATE 840081 WHETHER SOMETHING ABOUT REAGAN WOULD MAKE R VOTE FOR HIM 840082 REASONS R MIGHT VOTE FOR REAGAN-FIRST MENTION 840083 REASONS R MIGHT VOTE FOR REAGAN-SECOND MENTION 840084 REASONS R MIGHT VOTE FOR REAGAN-THIRD MENTION 840085 REASONS R MIGHT VOTE FOR REAGAN-FOURTH MENTION 840086 REASONS R MIGHT VOTE FOR REAGAN-FIFTH MENTION 840087 WHETHER SOMETHING ABOUT REAGAN WOULD MAKE R VOTE AGAINST HIM 840088 REASONS R MIGHT VOTE AGAINST REAGAN-FIRST MENTION 840089 REASONS R MIGHT VOTE AGAINST REAGAN-SECOND MENTION 840090 REASONS R MIGHT VOTE AGAINST REAGAN-THIRD MENTION 840091 REASONS R MIGHT VOTE AGAINST REAGAN-FOURTH MENTION 840092 REASONS R MIGHT VOTE AGAINST REAGAN-FIFTH MENTION MONDALE AS CANDIDATE 840093 WHETHER SOMETHING ABOUT MONDALE MIGHT MAKE R VOTE FOR HIM 840094 REASONS R MIGHT VOTE FOR MONDALE-FIRST MENTION 840095 REASONS R MIGHT VOTE FOR MONDALE-SECOND MENTION 840096 REASONS R MIGHT VOTE FOR MONDALE-THIRD MENTION 840097 REASONS R MIGHT VOTE FOR MONDALE-FOURTH MENTION 840098 REASONS R MIGHT VOTE FOR MONDALE-FIFTH MENTION 840099 WHETHER SOMETHING ABOUT MONDALE MIGHT MAKE R VOTE AGAINST HIM 840100 REASONS R MIGHT VOTE AGAINST MONDALE-FIRST MENTION 840101 REASONS R MIGHT VOTE AGAINST MONDALE-SECOND MENTION 840102 REASONS R MIGHT VOTE AGAINST MONDALE-THIRD MENTION 840103 REASONS R MIGHT VOTE AGAINST MONDALE-FOURTH MENTION 840104 REASONS R MIGHT VOTE AGAINST MONDALE-FIFTH MENTION DOES R DISCUSS POLITICS 840105 DOES R DISCUSS POLITICS WITH FAMILY OR FRIENDS 840106 HOW OFTEN DOES R DISCUSS POLITICS PER WEEK 840107 HOW OFTEN DID R DISCUSS POLITICS IN PAST WEEK THE MEDIA AS AN INFORMATION SOURCE 840108 HOW OFTEN DOES R WATCH NATIONAL NETWORK NEWS 840109 HOW MUCH ATTENTION DOES R GIVE TO GOVERNMENT AND POLITICAL NEWS ON TV 840110 HOW OFTEN DID R WATCH NATIONAL NEWS IN PAST WEEK 840111 HOW MUCH ATTENTION DID R GIVE TO THE PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN NEWS ON TV 840112 HOW OFTEN DID R READ A DAILY NEWSPAPER IN PAST WEEK 840113 WHICH PAPER DID R READ-FIRST MENTION 840114 WHICH PAPER DID R READ-SECOND MENTION 840115 WHICH PAPER DID R READ-THIRD MENTION 840116 HOW MUCH ATTENTION DID R GIVE TO THE PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN NEWS IN THE NEWSPAPER 840117 DID R READ A WEEKLY NEWS MAGAZINE IN PAST WEEK 840118 HOW MUCH ATTENTION DID R GIVE TO THE PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN NEWS IN MAGAZINES POSITIONS ON LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE 840119 DOES R CONSIDER SELF LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE/MODERATE 840120 HOW STRONGLY LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE DOES R CONSIDER SELF 840121 DOES R CONSIDER SELF MORE LIKE LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE 840122 SUMMARY: R'S LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE PLACEMENT 840123 DOES R CONSIDER REAGAN LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE/MODERATE 840124 HOW STRONGLY LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE DOES R CONSIDER REAGAN 840125 DOES R CONSIDER REAGAN MORE LIKE LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE 840126 R'S LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE PLACEMENT-REAGAN 840127 DOES R CONSIDER MONDALE LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE/MODERATE 840128 HOW STRONGLY LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE DOES R CONSIDER MONDALE 840129 DOES R CONSIDER MONDALE MORE LIKE LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE 840130 R'S LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE PLACEMENT-MONDALE 840131 DOES R CONSIDER DEMOCRATIC PARTY LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE/ MODERATE 840132 HOW STRONGLY LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE DOES R CONSIDER THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY 840133 DOES R CONSIDER DEMOCRATIC PARTY MORE LIBERAL/ CONSERVATIVE 840134 R'S LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE PLACEMENT-DEMOCRATIC PARTY 840135 DOES R CONSIDER REPUBLICAN PARTY LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE/ MODERATE 840136 HOW STRONGLY LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE DOES R CONSIDER THE REPUBLICAN PARTY 840137 DOES R CONSIDER REPUBLICAN PARTY MORE LIBERAL/ CONSERVATIVE 840138 R'S LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE PLACEMENT-REPUBLICAN PARTY R'S PERSONAL FINANCIAL SITUATION 840139 DOES R FEEL BETTER/WORSE FINANCIALLY THAN A YEAR AGO 840140 HOW MUCH BETTER/WORSE OFF DOES R FEEL 840141 WHY DID CONDITION CHANGE/NOT CHANGE-FIRST MENTION 840142 HOW DID CONDITION CHANGE/NOT CHANGE-FIRST MENTION 840143 WHO INFLUENCED CHANGE/LACK OF CHANGE-FIRST MENTION 840144 WHY DID CONDITION CHANGE/NOT CHANGE-SECOND MENTION 840145 HOW DID CONDITION CHANGE/NOT CHANGE-SECOND MENTION 840146 WHO INFLUENCED CHANGE/LACK OF CHANGE-SECOND MENTION 840147 WHY DID CONDITION CHANGE/NOT CHANGE-THIRD MENTION 840148 HOW DID CONDITION CHANGE/NOT CHANGE-THIRD MENTION 840149 WHO INFLUENCED CHANGE/LACK OF CHANGE-THIRD MENTION 840150 CAUSAL RELATION OF MENTIONS FOR CHANGE/NO CHANGE 840151 WILL R BE BETTER/WORSE OFF FINANCIALLY A YEAR FROM NOW 840152 HAS R WATCHED BUDGET MORE CLOSELY THIS YEAR 840153 HOW MUCH MORE CLOSELY HAS R WATCHED BUDGET 840154 HAS R'S INCOME STAYED AT/ABOVE/BELOW THE COST OF LIVING 840155 HOW MUCH HAS R'S INCOME RISEN ABOVE/FALLEN BEHIND THE COST OF LIVING 840156 HAS R BEEN ABLE TO BUY THINGS NEEDED OR PLANNED 840157 HAS R HAD TO PUT OFF MEDICAL OR DENTAL TREATMENT DUE TO MONEY PROBLEMS 840158 DID R BORROW MONEY IN PAST YEAR 840159 DID R BORROW MORE/LESS/THE SAME AMOUNT AS YR. BEFORE 840160 DID R BORROW MONEY THE YEAR BEFORE LAST 840161 DID R USE SAVINGS IN PAST YEAR 840162 DID R USE MORE/LESS/THE SAME AMOUNT OF SAVINGS AS THE YEAR BEFORE 840163 DID R SAVE ANY MONEY OVER PAST YEAR 840164 DID R SAVE MORE/LESS/THE SAME AMOUNT AS THE YEAR BEFORE 840165 DID R FALL BEHIND IN RENT OR HOUSE PAYMENTS LAST YEAR 840166 DID R WORK MORE HOURS OR LOOK FOR A NEW JOB TO MAKE ENDS MEET IN PAST YEAR 840167 HAS FEDERAL ECONOMIC POLICY MADE A DIFFERENCE ON R'S FINANCIAL POSITION 840168 HOW MUCH BETTER/WORSE HAS IT MADE R R'S POSITION ON CLOSEST ECONOMIC GROUP 840169 DID R ASK FOR DEFINITION OF "GROUPS" 840170 WHEN IT COMES TO ECONOMIC MATTERS, WHAT GROUP(S) DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO-FIRST MENTION 840171 WHEN IT COMES TO ECONOMIC MATTERS, WHAT GROUP(S) DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO-SECOND MENTION 840172 WHEN IT COMES TO ECONOMIC MATTERS, WHAT GROUP(S) DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO-THIRD MENTION 840173 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: DID R NAME MORE THAN ONE GROUP 840174 WHEN IT COMES TO ECONOMIC MATTERS, WHAT SORTS OF PEOPLE DOES R FEEL CLOSEST TO 840175 DOES R THINK THAT THE ECONOMIC CONDITION OF GROUP HAS GOTTEN BETTER/WORSE/STAYED THE SAME IN THE PAST YEAR 840176 HOW MUCH WORSE/BETTER DOES R THINK THE CONDITION IS 840177 WHY DID THE CONDITION CHANGE/NOT CHANGE-FIRST MENTION 840178 HOW DID THE CONDITION CHANGE/NOT CHANGE-FIRST MENTION 840179 WHO INFLUENCED CHANGE/LACK OF CHANGE-FIRST MENTION 840180 WHY DID CONDITION CHANGE/NOT CHANGE-SECOND MENTION 840181 HOW DID CONDITION CHANGE/NOT CHANGE-SECOND MENTION 840182 WHO INFLUENCED CHANGE/LACK OF CHANGE-SECOND MENTION 840183 WHY DID CONDITION CHANGE/NOT CHANGE-THIRD MENTION 840184 HOW DID CONDITION CHANGE/NOT CHANGE-THIRD MENTION 840185 WHO INFLUENCED CHANGE/LACK OF CHANGE-THIRD MENTION 840186 CAUSAL RELATION OF MENTIONS FOR CHANGE 840187 DOES R THINK THE INCOMES FROM HAVE RISEN ABOVE OR FALLEN BEHIND THE COST OF LIVING 840188 HOW MUCH HAS 'S INCOME GONE UP/FALLEN BEHIND 840189 DOES R THINK THAT FEDERAL ECONOMIC POLICY HAS MADE ECONOMIC SITUATION BETTER/WORSE FOR 840190 HOW MUCH BETTER/WORSE OFF DOES R THINK IS 840191 DOES R THINK THAT HAVE HAD A HARDER/EASIER TIME FINDING WORK IN THE PAST YEAR 840192 HOW MUCH HARDER/EASIER DOES R THINK FINDING WORK WAS 840193 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: DID R USE CHECK BOXES FOR GROUP 840194 DID R MENTION WOMEN 840195 DID R MENTION BLACKS 840196 DID R MENTION THE ELDERLY (SENIOR CITIZENS) 840197 DID R MENTION THE POOR 840198 DID R MENTION THE MIDDLE CLASS R'S OPINIONS ON ECONOMIC POSITION OF GROUPS 840199 IS ECONOMIC CONDITION OF WOMEN BETTER/WORSE 840200 IS ECONOMIC CONDITION OF BLACKS BETTER/WORSE 840201 IS ECONOMIC CONDITION OF ELDERLY BETTER/WORSE 840202 IS ECONOMIC CONDITION OF POOR BETTER/WORSE 840203 IS ECONOMIC CONDITION OF MIDDLE CLASS BETTER/WORSE R'S OPINIONS ON EQUAL OPPORTUNITY 840204 SOCIETY SHOULD ASSURE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY 840205 PEOPLE SHOULD BLAME SELVES NOT SYSTEM FOR ECONOMIC POSITION 840206 EQUAL RIGHTS HAVE BEEN PUSHED TOO FAR IN THIS COUNTRY 840207 HARD WORK DOESN'T GUARANTEE SUCCESS 840208 A PROBLEM IN THIS COUNTRY IS THAT WE DON'T GIVE EVERYONE AN EQUAL CHANCE 840209 PEOPLE CAN GET WHAT THEY WANT IF THEY WORK HARD 840210 MEN ARE BETTER SUITED FOR IMPORTANT POSITIONS IN SOCIETY R'S POSITION ON DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY 840211 WHO DID R WANT TO WIN THE DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY R'S FEELINGS ABOUT CANDIDATE: REAGAN 840212 WHETHER REAGAN MAKES R ANGRY 840213 WHETHER REAGAN MAKES R HOPEFUL 840214 WHETHER REAGAN MAKES R AFRAID OF HIM 840215 WHETHER REAGAN MAKES R PROUD 840216 WHETHER REAGAN MAKES R DISGUSTED 840217 WHETHER REAGAN MAKES R SYMPATHETIC TOWARDS HIM 840218 WHETHER REAGAN MAKES R UNEASY R'S FEELINGS ABOUT CANDIDATE: MONDALE 840219 WHETHER MONDALE MAKES R ANGRY 840220 WHETHER MONDALE MAKES R HOPEFUL 840221 WHETHER MONDALE MAKES R AFRAID OF HIM 840222 WHETHER MONDALE MAKES R PROUD 840223 WHETHER MONDALE MAKES R DISGUSTED 840224 WHETHER MONDALE MAKES R SYMPATHETIC TOWARD HIM 840225 WHETHER MONDALE MAKES R UNEASY R'S OPINIONS ON ECONOMIC CONDITION OF COUNTRY 840226 HOW DOES R FEEL THE COUNTRY IS DOING 840227 DOES R THINK THE NATION'S ECONOMY HAS GOTTEN BETTER/ WORSE/STAYED THE SAME IN THE PAST YEAR 840228 HOW MUCH BETTER/WORSE IS ECONOMY 840229 WHY DID THE CONDITION CHANGE/NOT CHANGE-FIRST MENTION 840230 HOW DID THE CONDITION CHANGE/NOT CHANGE-FIRST MENTION 840231 WHO INFLUENCED CHANGE/LACK OF CHANGE-FIRST MENTION 840232 WHY DID CONDITION CHANGE/NOT CHANGE-SECOND MENTION 840233 HOW DID CONDITION CHANGE/NOT CHANGE-SECOND MENTION 840234 WHO INFLUENCED CHANGE/LACK OF CHANGE-SECOND MENTION 840235 WHY DID CONDITION CHANGE/NOT CHANGE-THIRD MENTION 840236 HOW DID CONDITION CHANGE/NOT CHANGE-THIRD MENTION 840237 WHO INFLUENCED CHANGE/LACK OF CHANGE-THIRD MENTION 840238 CAUSAL RELATION OF MENTIONS FOR CHANGE 840239 DOES R THINK THAT IN GENERAL PEOPLE HAVE HAD A HARDER/EASIER TIME FINDING WORK IN THE PAST YEAR 840240 DOES R THINK IT IS MUCH HARDER/EASIER FINDING WORK 840241 DOES R THINK THE COST OF THINGS HAS GONE UP/DOWN/ STAYED THE SAME IN THE PAST YEAR 840242 HOW MUCH HAVE THEY GONE UP/DOWN 840243 DOES R SEE THE ECONOMY GETTING BETTER/WORSE IN THE NEXT TWELVE MONTHS 840244 DOES R THINK THE FEDERAL ECONOMIC POLICY HAS MADE THE ECONOMY BETTER/WORSE/UNCHANGED 840245 HOW MUCH BETTER/WORSE DOES R THINK ECONOMY HAS BECOME R'S POSITIONS ON FOREIGN RELATIONS 840246 DOES R THINK THE UNITED STATES' POSITION HAS GROWN STRONGER/WEAKER/STAYED THE SAME IN THE PAST YEAR 840247 HOW WORRIED IS R ABOUT THE U.S. GETTING INTO A CONVENTIONAL WAR 840248 HOW WORRIED IS R ABOUT THE U.S. GETTING INTO A NUCLEAR WAR 840249 DOES R THINK THAT REPUBLICANS/DEMOCRATS COULD BETTER KEEP THE U.S. OUT OF WAR IN THE NEXT FOUR YEARS R'S POSITION ON WOMEN'S EQUALITY 840250 WOMEN'S ROLE SCALE: SHOULD WOMEN BE EQUAL TO MEN OR STAY IN THE HOME R'S POSITION ON EQUAL OPPORTUNITY 840251 WE SHOULD WORRY LESS ABOUT EQUALITY 840252 PEOPLE WHO DO NOT DO WELL WORK AS HARD AS THOSE WHO DO 840253 THE COUNTRY WOULD HAVE FEWER PROBLEMS IF PEOPLE TREATED EQUALLY 840254 IF A PERSON WORKS HE/SHE WILL SUCCEED 840255 IT IS NOT A PROBLEM IF PEOPLE HAVE UNEQUAL CHANCES 840256 EVEN IF THEY WORK HARD PEOPLE OFTEN CANNOT REACH GOAL 840257 MEN ARE BETTER SUITED EMOTIONALLY FOR POLITICS EVALUATION OF REAGAN'S PERFORMANCE 840258 R APPROVES/DISAPPROVES OF REAGAN'S HANDLING OF HIS JOB AS PRESIDENT 840259 HOW STRONGLY DOES R APPROVE/DISAPPROVE OF REAGAN'S HANDLING OF HIS JOB 840260 R APPROVES/DISAPPROVES OF REAGAN'S HANDLING OF ECONOMY 840261 HOW STRONGLY DOES R APPROVE/DISAPPROVE OF REAGAN'S HANDLING OF ECONOMY 840262 R APPROVES/DISAPPROVES OF REAGAN'S HANDLING OF BALANCING THE BUDGET 840263 HOW STRONGLY DOES R APPROVE/DISAPPROVE OF REAGAN'S HANDLING OF BALANCING THE BUDGET 840264 R APPROVES/DISAPPROVES OF REAGAN'S HANDLING OF FOREIGN RELATIONS 840265 HOW STRONGLY DOES R APPROVE/DISAPPROVE OF REAGAN'S HANDLING OF FOREIGN RELATIONS WHAT R LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC PARTY 840266 WHETHER R LIKES ANYTHING ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY 840267 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-FIRST MENTION 840268 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-SECOND MENTION 840269 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-THIRD MENTION 840270 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-FOURTH MENTION 840271 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-FIFTH MENTION 840272 WHETHER R DISLIKES ANYTHING ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY 840273 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-FIRST MENTION 840274 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-SECOND MENTION 840275 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-THIRD MENTION 840276 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-FOURTH MENTION 840277 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY-FIFTH MENTION WHAT R LIKES/DISLIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN PARTY 840278 WHETHER R LIKES ANYTHING ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY 840279 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-FIRST MENTION 840280 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-SECOND MENTION 840281 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-THIRD MENTION 840282 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-FOURTH MENTION 840283 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-FIFTH MENTION 840284 WHETHER R DISLIKES ANYTHING ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY 840285 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-FIRST MENTION 840286 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-SECOND MENTION 840287 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-THIRD MENTION 840288 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-FOURTH MENTION 840289 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY-FIFTH MENTION FEELING THERMOMETER - POLITICAL FIGURES 840290 FEELING THERMOMETER-RONALD REAGAN 840291 FEELING THERMOMETER-HOWARD BAKER 840292 FEELING THERMOMETER-GEORGE BUSH 840293 FEELING THERMOMETER-JIMMY CARTER 840294 FEELING THERMOMETER-ROBERT DOLE 840295 FEELING THERMOMETER-GERALD FORD 840296 FEELING THERMOMETER-JOHN GLENN 840297 FEELING THERMOMETER-GARY HART 840298 FEELING THERMOMETER-JESSE JACKSON 840299 FEELING THERMOMETER-TED KENNEDY 840300 FEELING THERMOMETER-GEORGE MCGOVERN 840301 FEELING THERMOMETER-WALTER MONDALE 840302 FEELING THERMOMETER-RICHARD NIXON 840303 FEELING THERMOMETER-TIP O'NEILL 840304 FEELING THERMOMETER-GERALDINE FERRARO 840305 FEELING THERMOMETER-DEMOCRATIC PARTY 840306 FEELING THERMOMETER-REPUBLICAN PARTY 840307 FEELING THERMOMETER-POLITICAL INDEPENDENTS 840308 FEELING THERMOMETER-POLITICAL PARTIES R'S ATTITUDES TOWARDS POLITICAL PROCESS 840309 HOW MUCH DOES HAVING ELECTIONS FORCE THE GOVERNMENT TO PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT THE PEOPLE THINK 840310 HOW MUCH DOES THE GOVERNMENT PAY ATTENTION TO THE PEOPLE WHEN MAKING DECISIONS R'S ATTITUDES ON POLITICAL PROCESS (AGREE/DISAGREE) 840311 A PERSON SHOULD NOT VOTE IF HE/SHE DOESN'T CARE ABOUT OUTCOME OF ELECTION 840312 PEOPLE LIKE ME HAVE NO SAY IN GOVERNMENT 840313 PUBLIC OFFICIALS DON'T CARE ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE ME 840314 POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT ARE TOO COMPLICATED FOR ME TO UNDERSTAND R'S PARTY IDENTIFICATION 840315 R'S PARTY IDENTIFICATION 840316 STRENGTH OF R'S PARTY IDENTIFICATION 840317 R CLOSER TO REPUBLICAN/DEMOCRATIC PARTY 840318 SUMMARY: R'S PARTY IDENTIFICATION QUALITIES DESCRIBING CANDIDATE - REAGAN 840319 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "HARD-WORKING" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840320 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "DECENT" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840321 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "COMPASSIONATE" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840322 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "COMMANDS RESPECT" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840323 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "INTELLIGENT" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840324 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "MORAL" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840325 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "KIND" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840326 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "INSPIRING" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840327 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "KNOWLEDGEABLE" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840328 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "SETS A GOOD EXAMPLE" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840329 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840330 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840331 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "UNDERSTANDS PEOPLE LIKE YOU" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840332 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "FAIR" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840333 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "IN TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840334 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "RELIGIOUS" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN QUALITIES DESCRIBING CANDIDATE - MONDALE 840335 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "HARD-WORKING" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840336 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "DECENT" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840337 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "COMPASSIONATE" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840338 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "COMMANDS RESPECT" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840339 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "INTELLIGENT" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840340 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "MORAL" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840341 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "KIND" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840342 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "INSPIRING" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840343 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "KNOWLEDGEABLE" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840344 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "SETS A GOOD EXAMPLE" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840345 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840346 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840347 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "UNDERSTANDS PEOPLE LIKE YOU" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840348 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "FAIR" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840349 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "IN TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840350 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "RELIGIOUS" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE QUALITIES DESCRIBING CANDIDATE - BUSH 840351 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "HARD-WORKING" DESCRIBES GEORGE BUSH 840352 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "COMPASSIONATE" DESCRIBES GEORGE BUSH 840353 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "MORAL" DESCRIBES GEORGE BUSH 840354 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "INSPIRING" DESCRIBES GEORGE BUSH 840355 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "KNOWLEDGEABLE" DESCRIBES GEORGE BUSH 840356 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "SETS A GOOD EXAMPLE" DESCRIBES GEORGE BUSH 840357 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU" DESCRIBES GEORGE BUSH 840358 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP" DESCRIBES GEORGE BUSH 840359 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "IN TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE" DESCRIBES GEORGE BUSH QUALITIES DESCRIBING CANDIDATE - FERRARO 840360 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "HARD-WORKING" DESCRIBES GERALDINE FERRARO 840361 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "COMPASSIONATE" DESCRIBES GERALDINE FERRARO 840362 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "MORAL" DESCRIBES GERALDINE FERRARO 840363 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "INSPIRING" DESCRIBES GERALDINE FERRARO 840364 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "KNOWLEDGEABLE" DESCRIBES GERALDINE FERRARO 840365 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "SETS A GOOD EXAMPLE" DESCRIBES GERALDINE FERRARO 840366 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "REALLY CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU" DESCRIBES GERALDINE FERRARO 840367 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP" DESCRIBES GERALDINE FERRARO 840368 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "IN TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE" DESCRIBES GERALDINE FERRARO POSITIONS ON LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE 840369 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE-R 840370 IF R HAD TO CHOOSE, WOULD R CONSIDER SELF A LIBERAL/ CONSERVATIVE 840371 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE-REAGAN 840372 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE-MONDALE 840373 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE-DEMOCRATIC PARTY 840374 LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE SCALE-REPUBLICAN PARTY POSITIONS ON LESS/MORE GOVT SERVICES/SPENDING SCALE 840375 GOVERNMENT SERVICES/SPENDING SCALE - R 840376 GOVERNMENT SERVICES/SPENDING SCALE - REAGAN 840377 GOVERNMENT SERVICES/SPENDING SCALE - MONDALE 840378 GOVERNMENT SERVICES/SPENDING SCALE - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 840379 GOVERNMENT SERVICES/SPENDING SCALE - REPUBLICAN PARTY 840380 GOVERNMENT SERVICES/SPENDING SCALE - FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 840381 HOW IMPORTANT IS GOVERNMENT POSITION TO R: FEDERAL SPENDING/SERVICES POSITIONS ON MINORITY AID/NO AID SCALE 840382 MINORITY AID/NO AID SCALE-R 840383 MINORITY AID/NO AID SCALE-REAGAN 840384 MINORITY AID/NO AID SCALE-MONDALE 840385 MINORITY AID/NO AID SCALE-DEMOCRATIC PARTY 840386 MINORITY AID/NO AID SCALE-REPUBLICAN PARTY 840387 MINORITY AID/NO AID SCALE-FEDERAL GOVERNMENT POSITIONS ON INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE 840388 INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE-R 840389 INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE-REAGAN 840390 INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE-MONDALE 840391 INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE-DEMOCRATIC PARTY 840392 INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE-REPUBLICAN PARTY 840393 INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE-FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 840394 HOW IMPORTANT IS GOVERNMENT POSITION TO R: INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA POSITIONS ON MORE/LESS DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE 840395 DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE-R 840396 DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE-REAGAN 840397 DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE-MONDALE 840398 DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE-DEMOCRATIC PARTY 840399 DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE-REPUBLICAN PARTY 840400 DEFENSE SPENDING SCALE-FEDERAL GOVERNMENT POSITION ON IMPROVING SOC/ECON STATUS OF WOMEN SCALE 840401 SOCIAL/ECONOMIC STATUS OF WOMEN SCALE-R 840402 SOCIAL/ECONOMIC STATUS OF WOMEN SCALE-REAGAN 840403 SOCIAL/ECONOMIC STATUS OF WOMEN SCALE-MONDALE 840404 SOCIAL/ECONOMIC STATUS OF WOMEN SCALE-DEMOCRATIC PARTY 840405 SOCIAL/ECONOMIC STATUS OF WOMEN SCALE-REPUBLICAN PARTY 840406 SOCIAL/ECONOMIC STATUS OF WOMEN SCALE-FEDERAL GOVT 840407 HOW IMPORTANT IS GOVERNMENT POSITION TO R: SOCIAL/ECONOMIC STATUS OF WOMEN POSITION ON COOPERATION WITH RUSSIA SCALE 840408 COOPERATION WITH RUSSIA SCALE-R 840409 COOPERATION WITH RUSSIA SCALE-REAGAN 840410 COOPERATION WITH RUSSIA SCALE-MONDALE 840411 COOPERATION WITH RUSSIA SCALE-DEMOCRATIC PARTY 840412 COOPERATION WITH RUSSIA SCALE-REPUBLICAN PARTY 840413 COOPERATION WITH RUSSIA SCALE-FEDERAL GOVERNMENT POSITION ON GOVT GUARANTEED LIVING/JOB SCALE 840414 GUARANTEED STDRD OF LIVING/JOB SCALE-R 840415 GUARANTEED STDRD OF LIVING/JOB SCALE-REAGAN 840416 GUARANTEED STDRD OF LIVING/JOB SCALE-MONDALE 840417 GUARANTEED STDRD OF LIVING/JOB SCALE-DEMOCRATIC PARTY 840418 GUARANTEED STDRD OF LIVING/JOB SCALE-REPUBLICAN PARTY 840419 GUARANTEED STDRD OF LIVING/JOB SCALE-FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 840420 HOW IMPORTANT IS GOVERNMENT POSITION TO R: GOVERNMENT GUARANTEED STANDARD OF LIVING/JOB R AS POLITICAL INDEPENDENT 840421 DOES R SEE SELF AS POLITICAL INDEPENDENT 840422 HOW STRONGLY INDEPENDENT DOES R SEE SELF R'S POSITION ON ABORTION 840423 R'S POSITION ON ABORTION R'S OPINION ON PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 840424 DOES R EXPECT TO VOTE IN NOVEMBER 840425 WHO WILL R VOTE FOR IN ELECTION FOR PRESIDENT 840426 HOW STRONG IS R'S PREFERENCE FOR PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT R 840427 R'S DATE OF BIRTH-MONTH 840428 R'S DATE OF BIRTH-YEAR 840429 R'S RECODED AGE 840430 R'S MARITAL STATUS R'S EDUCATION 840431 HIGHEST GRADE OF SCHOOL COMPLETED BY R 840432 R'S EDITED EDUCATION 840433 DOES R HAVE A HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA 840434 HAS R HAD OTHER SCHOOLING 840435 DOES R HAVE A COLLEGE DEGREE 840436 R'S HIGHEST COLLEGE DEGREE 840437 WHICH COLLEGE DID R ATTEND 840438 SUMMARY: R'S EDUCATION 840439 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT:R'S RELATION TO HEAD EDUCATION OF HEAD OF FAMILY 840440 HIGHEST GRADE OF SCHOOL COMPLETED BY HEAD OF FAMILY 840441 HEAD OF FAMILY'S EDITED EDUCATION 840442 DOES HEAD OF FAMILY HAVE HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA 840443 HAS HEAD OF FAMILY HAD OTHER SCHOOLING 840444 DOES HEAD OF FAMILY HAVE A COLLEGE DEGREE 840445 HEAD OF FAMILY'S HIGHEST COLLEGE DEGREE 840446 WHICH COLLEGE DID HEAD OF FAMILY ATTEND 840447 SUMMARY: HEAD OF FAMILY'S EDUCATION EDUCATION OF R'S SPOUSE 840448 HIGHEST GRADE OF SCHOOL COMPLETED BY SPOUSE 840449 SPOUSE'S EDITED EDUCATION 840450 DOES SPOUSE HAVE HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA 840451 HAS SPOUSE HAD OTHER SCHOOLING 840451 DOES SPOUSE HAVE A COLLEGE DEGREE 840453 SPOUSE'S HIGHEST COLLEGE DEGREE 840454 WHICH COLLEGE DID SPOUSE ATTEND 840455 SUMMARY: SPOUSE'S EDUCATION R'S OCCUPATION SECTION 840456 R'S PRESENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS 840457 SUMMARY: R'S WORKING STATUS 840458 HAS R EVER WORKED FOR PAY-R UNEMPLOYED 840459 HAS R EVER WORKED FOR PAY-R DISABLED 840460 IS R (HOUSEWIFE/STUDENT) WORKING NOW 840461 HAS R (HOUSEWIFE/STUDENT) WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MOS OCCUPATION - R WORKING/TEMPORARILY LAID OFF 840462 R'S PRESENT OCCUPATION - CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 840463 R'S PRESENT OCCUPATION - COLLAPSED 1980 OCCUPATION CODE 840464 R'S PRESENT OCCUPATION - COLLAPSED 1970 OCCUPATION COD 840465 R'S PRESENT OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 840466 IS R SELF-EMPLOYED 840467 DOES R SUPERVISE WORKERS/EMPLOYEES 840468 R EMPLOYED BY GOVT, BUS, OR NON-PROFIT AGENCY 840469 IS R'S EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH THE GOVERNMENT 840470 IS R'S EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL OR STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 840471 NUMBER OF HOURS PER WEEK R WORKS 840472 IS R SATISFIED WITH NUMBER OF HOURS WORKED 840473 HOW WORRIED ABOUT JOB SECURITY IS R 840474 WAS R OUT OF WORK WITHIN THE LAST SIX MONTHS 840475 HAS R HAD TO TAKE A PAY CUT/REDUCE HOURS WITHIN THE LAST SIX MONTHS OCCUPATION - R UNEMPLOYED 840476 R'S LAST OCCUPATION - CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 840477 R'S LAST OCCUPATION - COLLAPSED 1980 OCCUPATION CODE 840478 R'S LAST OCCUPATION - COLLAPSED 1970 OCCUPATION CODE 840479 R'S LAST OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 840480 ON R'S LAST REGULAR JOB, WAS R SELF-EMPLOYED 840481 DID R SUPERVISE WORKERS/EMPLOYEES AS A PART OF LAST JOB 840482 R EMPLOYED BY GOVT,BUS,OR NON-PROFIT AGENCY 840483 WAS R'S EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH THE GOVERNMENT 840484 WAS R'S EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL OR STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 840485 DID R WORK WITHIN THE LAST SIX MONTHS 840486 NUMBER OF HOURS PER WEEK R WORKED 840487 IS R LOOKING FOR WORK AT THE PRESENT TIME 840488 HOW WORRIED IS R ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND A JOB OCCUPATION - R RETIRED OR DISABLED 840489 WHEN DID R RETIRE 840490 R'S LAST OCCUPATION - CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 840491 R'S LAST OCCUPATION - COLLAPSED 1980 OCCUPATION CODE 840492 R'S LAST OCCUPATION - COLLAPSED 1970 OCCUPATION CODE 840493 R'S LAST OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 840494 WAS R SELF-EMPLOYED LAST JOB 840495 DID R SUPERVISE ANY WORKERS/EMPLOYEES AT LAST JOB 840496 R EMPLOYED BY GOVT, BUS, OR NON-PROFIT AGENCY 840497 WAS R'S EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH THE GOVERNMENT 840498 WAS R'S EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL OR STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 840499 DID R DO ANY WORK FOR PAY WITHIN THE PAST SIX MONTHS 840500 NUMBER OF HOURS PER WEEK R WORKED WHEN R WAS WORKING 840501 IS R LOOKING FOR WORK AT PRESENT TIME 840502 HOW WORRIED IS R ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND A JOB OCCUPATION - R HOUSEWIFE OR STUDENT 840503 R'S LAST OCCUPATION - CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 840504 R'S LAST OCCUPATION - COLLAPSED 1980 OCCUPATION CODE 840505 R'S LAST OCCUPATION - COLLAPSED 1970 OCCUPATION CODE 840506 R'S LAST OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 840507 WAS R SELF-EMPLOYED LAST JOB 840508 DID R SUPERVISE ANY WORKERS/EMPLOYEES AT LAST JOB 840509 R EMPLOYED BY GOVT, BUS, OR NON-PROFIT AGENCY 840510 WAS R'S EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH THE GOVERNMENT 840511 WAS R'S EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL OR STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 840512 NUMBER OF HOURS PER WEEK R WORKED WHEN R WAS WORKING 840513 IS R LOOKING FOR WORK AT PRESENT TIME 840514 HOW WORRIED IS R ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND A JOB R'S OCCUPATIONAL DATA--STACKED 840515 R'S PRESENT/LAST OCCUPATION - CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 840516 R'S PRESENT/LAST OCCUPATION - COLLAPSED 1980 CODE 840517 R'S PRESENT/LAST OCCUPATION - COLLAPSED 1970 CODE 840518 R'S PRESENT/LAST OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 840519 R SELF-EMPLOYED 840520 DOES R SUPERVISE WORKERS 840521 EMPLOYED BY GOVT/BUSINESS/NON-PROFIT AGENCY 840522 EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH GOVERNMENT 840523 BUSINESS WITH FED/STATE/LOCAL GOVT 840524 NUMBER OF HOURS WORKED PER WEEK 840525 WORRIES ABOUT JOB SECURITY 840526 HAS R HAD A JOB IN THE PAST SIX MONTHS 840527 (IF UNEMPLOYED) IS R PRESENTLY LOOKING FOR WORK 840528 (IF NOT WORKING NOW) HAS R EVER WORKED FOR PAY 840529 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT - DOES R HAVE SPOUSE HEAD OF FAMILY'S OCCUPATION SECTION 840530 HEAD OF FAMILY: EMPLOYMENT STATUS 840531 SUMMARY: HEAD OF FAMILY'S WORKING STATUS 840532 HAS HEAD OF FAMILY EVER WORKED FOR PAY-HEAD UNEMPLOYED 840533 HAS HEAD OF FAMILY EVER WORKED FOR PAY-HEAD DISABLED 840534 IS HEAD (HOUSEWIFE/STUDENT) WORKING FOR PAY 840535 HAS HEAD (HSWF/STD) WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MONTHS OCCUPATION-HEAD OF FAMILY WORKING/TEMPORARILY LAID OFF 840536 HEAD:PRESENT OCCUPATION-CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 840537 HEAD:PRESENT OCCUPATION-COLLAPSED 1980 OCCUPATION CODE 840538 HEAD:PRESENT OCCUPATION-COLLAPSED 1970 OCCUPATION CODE 840539 HEAD:PRESENT OCCUPATION-CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 840540 IS HEAD OF FAMILY SELF-EMPLOYED 840541 DOES HEAD OF FAMILY SUPERVISE WORKERS/EMPLOYEES 840542 HEAD EMPLOYED BY GOVT, BUS, OR NON-PROFIT AGENCY 840543 IS HEAD'S EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH THE GOVERNMENT 840544 IS HEAD'S EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL OR STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 840545 NUMBER OF HOURS PER WEEK HEAD OF FAMILY WORKS 840546 IS HEAD SATISFIED WITH NUMBER OF HOURS WORKED 840547 HOW WORRIED ABOUT JOB SECURITY IS HEAD OF FAMILY 840548 WAS HEAD OUT OF WORK WITHIN THE LAST SIX MONTHS 840549 HAS HEAD HAD TO TAKE A PAY CUT/REDUCE HOURS WITHIN THE LAST SIX MONTHS OCCUPATION - HEAD OF FAMILY UNEMPLOYED 840550 HEAD:LAST OCCUPATION-CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 840551 HEAD:LAST OCCUPATION-COLLAPSED 1980 OCCUPATION CODE 840552 HEAD:LAST OCCUPATION-COLLAPSED 1970 OCCUPATION CODE 840553 HEAD:LAST OCCUPATION-CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 840554 ON LAST REGULAR JOB WAS HEAD OF FAMILY SELF-EMPLOYED 840555 DID HEAD OF FAMILY SUPERVISE WORKERS/EMPLOYEES 840556 WAS HEAD EMPLOYED BY GOVT, BUS, OR NON-PROFIT AGENCY 840557 WAS HEAD'S EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH THE GOVERNMENT 840558 WAS HEAD'S EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL OR STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 840559 WAS HEAD OF FAMILY EMPLOYED IN LAST SIX MONTHS 840560 NUMBER OF HOURS PER WEEK HEAD OF FAMILY WORKED 840561 IS HEAD OF FAMILY LOOKING FOR WORK AT PRESENT TIME 840562 HOW WORRIED IS HEAD ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND A JOB OCCUPATION - HEAD OF FAMILY RETIRED OR DISABLED 840563 WHEN DID HEAD OF FAMILY RETIRE 840564 HEAD:LAST OCCUPATION-CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 840565 HEAD:LAST OCCUPATION-COLLAPSED 1980 OCCUPATION CODE 840566 HEAD:LAST OCCUPATION-COLLAPSED 1970 OCCUPATION CODE 840567 HEAD:LAST OCCUPATION-CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 840568 ON LAST REGULAR JOB WAS HEAD OF FAMILY SELF-EMPLOYED 840569 DID HEAD OF FAMILY SUPERVISE WORKERS/EMPLOYEES 840570 WAS HEAD EMPLOYED BY GOVT, BUS, OR NON-PROFIT AGENCY 840571 WAS HEAD'S EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH THE GOVERNMENT 840572 WAS HEAD'S EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL OR STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 840573 WAS HEAD OF FAMILY EMPLOYED IN LAST SIX MONTHS 840574 NUMBER OF HOURS PER WEEK HEAD OF FAMILY WORKED 840575 IS HEAD OF FAMILY LOOKING FOR WORK AT PRESENT TIME 840576 HOW WORRIED IS HEAD ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND A JOB OCCUPATION - HEAD OF FAMILY HOUSEWIFE OR STUDENT 840577 HEAD:LAST OCCUPATION-CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 840578 HEAD:LAST OCCUPATION-COLLAPSED 1980 OCCUPATION CODE 840579 HEAD:LAST OCCUPATION-COLLAPSED 1970 OCCUPATION CODE 840580 HEAD:LAST OCCUPATION-CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 840581 ON LAST REGULAR JOB WAS HEAD OF FAMILY SELF-EMPLOYED 840582 DID HEAD OF FAMILY SUPERVISE WORKERS/EMPLOYEES 840583 WAS HEAD EMPLOYED BY GOVT, BUS, OR NON-PROFIT AGENCY 840584 WAS HEAD'S EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH THE GOVERNMENT 840585 WAS HEAD'S EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL OR STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 840586 NUMBER OF HOURS PER WEEK HEAD OF FAMILY WORKED 840587 IS HEAD OF FAMILY LOOKING FOR WORK AT PRESENT TIME 840588 HOW WORRIED IS HEAD ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND A JOB HEAD'S OCCUPATIONAL DATA--STACKED 840589 HEAD'S PRESENT/LAST OCCUPATION-CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 840590 HEAD'S PRESENT/LAST OCCUPATION - COLLAPSED 1980 CODE 840591 HEAD'S PRESENT/LAST OCCUPATION - COLLAPSED 1970 CODE 840592 HEAD'S PRESENT/LAST OCCUPATION -CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 840593 HEAD-IS/WAS SELF-EMPLOYED 840594 HEAD-DOES/DID HE/SHE SUPERVISE WORKERS/EMPLOYEES 840595 HEAD-EMPLOYED BY GOVT/BUSINESS/NON-PROFIT AGENCY 840596 HEAD-EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH GOVERNMENT 840597 HEAD/EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH FED/STATE-LOCAL GOVT 840598 HEAD-NUMBER OF HOURS WORKED PER WEEK 840599 HEAD-WORRIES ABOUT JOB SECURITY 840600 HEAD-HAS HE/SHE HAD A JOB IN PAST SIX MONTHS 840601 HEAD-IS HE/SHE PRESENTLY LOOKING FOR WORK 840602 (IF NOT WORKING NOW) HAS HE/SHE EVER WORKED FOR PAY SPOUSE'S OCCUPATION SECTION 840603 SPOUSE: EMPLOYMENT STATUS 840604 SUMMARY: SPOUSE'S WORKING STATUS 840605 HAS SPOUSE EVER WORKED FOR PAY-SPOUSE UNEMPLOYED 840606 HAS SPOUSE EVER WORKED FOR PAY-SPOUSE DISABLED 840607 IS SPOUSE (HOUSEWIFE/STUDENT) WORKING FOR PAY 840608 HAS SPOUSE (HSWF/STD) WORKED FOR PAY IN LAST 6 MONTHS OCCUPATION - SPOUSE WORKING/TEMPORARILY LAID OFF 840609 SPOUSE:PRESENT OCCUPATION - CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 840610 SPOUSE:PRESENT OCCUPATION - COLLAPSED 1980 OCCUPATION CODE 840611 SPOUSE:PRESENT OCCUPATION - COLLAPSED 1970 OCCUPATION CODE 840612 SPOUSE:PRESENT OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 840613 IS SPOUSE SELF-EMPLOYED 840614 DOES SPOUSE SUPERVISE WORKERS/EMPLOYEES 840615 SPOUSE EMPLOYED BY GOVT, BUS, OR NON-PROFIT AGENCY 840616 IS SPOUSE'S EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH THE GOVERNMENT 840617 IS SPOUSE'S EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL OR STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 840618 NUMBER OF HOURS PER WEEK SPOUSE WORKS 840619 IS SPOUSE SATISFIED WITH NUMBER OF HOURS WORKED 840620 HOW WORRIED ABOUT JOB SECURITY IS SPOUSE 840621 WAS SPOUSE OUT OF WORK WITHIN THE LAST SIX MONTHS 840622 HAS SPOUSE HAD TO TAKE A PAY CUT/REDUCE HOURS WITHIN THE LAST SIX MONTHS OCCUPATION - SPOUSE UNEMPLOYED 840623 SPOUSE:LAST OCCUPATION-CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 840624 SPOUSE:LAST OCCUPATION-COLLAPSED 1980 OCCUPATION CODE 840625 SPOUSE:LAST OCCUPATION-COLLAPSED 1970 OCCUPATION CODE 840626 SPOUSE:LAST OCCUPATION-CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 840627 ON LAST REGULAR JOB WAS SPOUSE SELF-EMPLOYED 840628 DID SPOUSE SUPERVISE WORKERS/EMPLOYEES 840629 WAS SPOUSE EMPLOYED BY GOVT, BUS, OR NON-PROFIT AGENCY 840630 WAS SPOUSE'S EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH THE GOVERNMENT 840631 WAS SPOUSE'S EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL OR STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 840632 WAS SPOUSE EMPLOYED IN LAST SIX MONTHS 840633 NUMBER OF HOURS PER WEEK SPOUSE WORKED 840634 IS SPOUSE LOOKING FOR WORK AT PRESENT TIME 840635 HOW WORRIED IS SPOUSE ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND JOB OCCUPATION - SPOUSE RETIRED OR DISABLED 840636 WHEN DID SPOUSE RETIRE 840637 SPOUSE:LAST OCCUPATION-CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 840638 SPOUSE:LAST OCCUPATION-COLLAPSED 1980 OCCUPATION CODE 840639 SPOUSE:LAST OCCUPATION-COLLAPSED 1970 OCCUPATION CODE 840640 SPOUSE:LAST OCCUPATION-CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 840641 ON LAST REGULAR JOB WAS SPOUSE SELF-EMPLOYED 840642 DID SPOUSE SUPERVISE WORKERS/EMPLOYEES 840643 WAS SPOUSE EMPLOYED BY GOVT, BUS, OR NON-PROFIT AGENCY 840644 WAS SPOUSE'S EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH THE GOVERNMENT 840645 WAS SPOUSE'S EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL OR STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 840646 WAS SPOUSE EMPLOYED IN LAST SIX MONTHS 840647 NUMBER OF HOURS PER WEEK SPOUSE WORKED 840648 IS SPOUSE LOOKING FOR WORK AT PRESENT TIME 840649 HOW WORRIED IS SPOUSE ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND JOB OCCUPATION - SPOUSE HOUSEWIFE OR STUDENT 840650 SPOUSE:LAST OCCUPATION - CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 840651 SPOUSE:LAST OCCUPATION - COLLAPSED 1980 OCCUPATION CODE 840652 SPOUSE:LAST OCCUPATION - COLLAPSED 1970 OCCUPATION CODE 840653 SPOUSE:LAST OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 840654 ON LAST REGULAR JOB WAS SPOUSE SELF-EMPLOYED 840655 DID SPOUSE SUPERVISE WORKERS/EMPLOYEES 840656 WAS SPOUSE EMPLOYED BY GOVT, BUS, OR NON-PROFIT AGENCY 840657 WAS SPOUSE'S EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH THE GOVERNMENT 840658 WAS SPOUSE'S EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL OR STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 840659 NUMBER OF HOURS PER WEEK SPOUSE WORKED 840660 IS SPOUSE LOOKING FOR WORK AT PRESENT TIME 840661 HOW WORRIED IS SPOUSE ABOUT NOT BEING ABLE TO FIND JOB SPOUSE OF R OCCUPATIONAL DATA--STACKED 840662 SPOUSE OF R -PRESENT/LAST OCCUPATION - CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 840663 SPOUSE OF R -PRESENT/LAST OCCUPATION - COLLAPSED 1980 CODE 840664 SPOUSE OF R -PRESENT/LAST OCCUPATION - COLLAPSED 1970 CODE 840665 SPOUSE OF R -PRESENT/LAST OCCUPATION - CENSUS INDUSTRY CODE 840666 IS/WAS SPOUSE OF R SELF-EMPLOYED 840667 DOES SPOUSE OF R SUPERVISE WORKERS 840668 SPOUSE OF R-EMPLOYED BY GOVT/BUSINESS/NON-PROFIT AGENCY 840669 SPOUSE OF R-EMPLOYER'S BUSINESS WITH GOVERNMENT 840670 SPOUSE OF R-BUSINESS WITH FED/STATE-LOCAL GOVT 840671 SPOUSE OF R-NUMBER OF HOURS WORKED PER WEEK 840672 SPOUSE OF R-WORRIED ABOUT JOB SECURITY 840673 DID SPOUSE OF R WORK FOR PAY DURING PAST SIX MONTHS 840674 IS SPOUSE OF R LOOKING FOR WORK AT THE PRESENT TIME 840675 (IF UNEMPLOYED) HAS SPOUSE OF R EVER WORKED FOR PAY LABOR UNION POSITION 840676 DOES ANYONE IN R'S HOUSEHOLD BELONG TO A LABOR UNION 840677 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT:IS R HEAD OF FAMILY 840678 WHO BELONGS TO LABOR UNION 840679 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT:IS R ONLY FAM MEM 14 OR OLDR? R'S FAMILY INCOME AND SOCIAL CLASS 840680 FAMILY HOUSEHOLD INCOME BEFORE TAXES 840681 R'S INCOME 840682 DOES R THINK OF SELF AS BELONGING TO A SOCIAL CLASS 840683 DOES R THINK OF SELF AS MIDDLE OR WORKING CLASS 840684 DOES R THINK OF SELF AS AVERAGE OR UPPER MIDDLE/ WORKING CLASS 840685 SUMMARY: R'S SOCIAL CLASS 840686 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO MIDDLE/WORKING CLASS R'S RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE 840687 R'S RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE AND DENOMINATION 840688 HOW OFTEN DOES R ATTEND CHURCH/SYNAGOGUE R'S ETHNIC IDENTITY 840689 WHAT DOES R CONSIDER HIS MAIN ETHNIC GROUP (OTHER THAN AMERICAN)-FIRST MENTION 840690 WHAT DOES R CONSIDER HIS MAIN ETHNIC GROUP (OTHER THAN AMERICAN)-SECOND MENTION 840691 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: NUMBER OF GROUPS R MENTIONED 840692 WHICH GROUP DOES R MOST CLOSELY IDENTIFY WITH (OF THOSE MENTIONED) PERSONAL INFORMATION: R'S PARENTS 840693 WERE R'S PARENTS BORN IN THIS COUNTRY 840694 R'S FATHER'S MAIN OCCUPATION-CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 840695 DID R'S MOTHER HAVE A JOB 840696 R'S MOTHER'S MAIN OCCUPATION-CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 840697 R'S BIRTHPLACE PERSONAL INFORMATION: R'S COMMUNITY 840698 WHERE DID R GROW UP 840699 WHICH COMMUNITY TYPE DID R GROW UP IN 840700 WHERE DID R LIVE WHEN 14 YEARS OLD-WITHIN THE U.S.A. 840701 WHERE DID R LIVE WHEN 14 YEARS OLD-FOREIGN COUNTRY 840702 HOW LONG HAS R LIVED IN THIS CITY/TOWN, STATE 840703 WHERE DID R LIVE BEFORE THIS CITY/TOWN, STATE-WITHIN THE U.S.A. 840704 WHERE DID R LIVE BEFORE THIS CITY/TOWN, STATE-FOREIGN COUNTRY 840705 HOW LONG HAS R LIVED IN THIS HOUSE/APARTMENT 840706 DOES R/R'S FAMILY OWN OR RENT R'S HOME PERSONAL INFORMATION: SUMMARY 840707 R'S SEX 840708 R'S RACE 840709 IS R OF HISPANIC ORIGIN 840710 R'S RELATION TO HEAD OF FAMILY CONDITIONS OF INTERVIEW 840711 OTHERS PRESENT AT INTERVIEW 840712 R'S COOPERATION 840713 R'S LEVEL OF INFORMATION ABOUT POLITICS/PUBLIC AFFAIRS 840714 R'S INTELLIGENCE 840715 WAS R SUSPICIOUS BEFORE INTERVIEW 840716 R'S INTEREST IN INTERVIEW 840717 R'S SINCERITY 840718 DID R REPORT INCOME CORRECTLY 840719 ESTIMATE OF R'S INCOME 840720 WAS INTERVIEW CONDUCTED IN ENGLISH 840721 LANGUAGE IN WHICH INTERVIEW WAS CONDUCTED - POST-ELECTION SURVEY VARIABLES 1984 ELECTION AND THE MASS MEDIA 840722 HAS R BEEN INTERESTED IN POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS SO FAR 840723 DID R LISTEN TO CAMPAIGN RADIO PROGRAMS 840724 HOW MANY CAMPAIGN RADIO PROGRAMS DID R LISTEN TO 840725 DID R READ ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN IN ANY MAGAZINES 840726 HOW MANY MAGAZINE ARTICLES DID R READ ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN 840727 DID R READ ABOUT CAMPAIGN IN ANY NEWSPAPER 840728 HOW MANY NEWSPAPER ARTICLES ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN DID R READ 840729 DID R WATCH ANY CAMPAIGN TELEVISION PROGRAMS 840730 HOW MANY TV PROGRAMS ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN DID R WATCH 840731 DID R WATCH OCT. 7 REAGAN-MONDALE DEBATE 840732 DID R WATCH/LISTEN TO ENTIRE OCT. 7 DEBATE 840733 DID R WATCH OCT. 21 REAGAN-MONDALE DEBATE 840734 DID R WATCH/LISTEN TO ENTIRE OCT. 21 DEBATE 840735 DID R WATCH BUSH-FERRARO DEBATE 840736 DID R WATCH/LISTEN TO ENTIRE BUSH-FERRARO DEBATE CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN 840737 DOES R REMEMBER THE CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATES 840738 NUMBER OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE - CANDIDATE 1 840739 FROM WHICH PARTY WAS THE CANDIDATE - CANDIDATE 1 840740 COLLAPSED CODE FOR CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE 1 840741 R'S KNOWLEDGE OF CANDIDATE'S NAME AND PARTY - CANDIDATE 1 840742 NUMBER OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE - CANDIDATE 2 840743 FROM WHICH PARTY WAS THE CANDIDATE - CANDIDATE 2 840744 COLLAPSED CODE FOR CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE 2 840745 R'S KNOWLEDGE OF CANDIDATE'S NAME AND PARTY - CANDIDATE 2 840746 NUMBER OF CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE - CANDIDATE 3 840747 FROM WHICH PARTY WAS THE CANDIDATE - CANDIDATE 3 840748 COLLAPSED CODE FOR CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE 3 840749 R'S KNOWLEDGE OF CANDIDATE'S NAME AND PARTY - CANDIDATE 3 FEELING THERMOMETER: POLITICAL/MEDIA FIGURES 840750 FEELING THERMOMETER - RONALD REAGAN 840751 FEELING THERMOMETER - WALTER MONDALE 840752 FEELING THERMOMETER - JESSE JACKSON 840753 FEELING THERMOMETER - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 840754 FEELING THERMOMETER - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 840755 FEELING THERMOMETER - INDEPENDENT/THIRD PARTY HOUSE CANDIDATE 840756 FEELING THERMOMETER - GEORGE BUSH 840757 FEELING THERMOMETER - GERALDINE FERRARO 840758 FEELING THERMOMETER - DEMOCRATIC PARTY 840759 FEELING THERMOMETER - REPUBLICAN PARTY 840760 FEELING THERMOMETER - INDEPENDENTS 840761 FEELING THERMOMETER - POLITICAL PARTIES 840762 FEELING THERMOMETER - WOMEN 840763 FEELING THERMOMETER - BLACKS 840764 FEELING THERMOMETER - CONSERVATIVES 840765 FEELING THERMOMETER - HISPANICS 840766 FEELING THERMOMETER - MIDDLE CLASS PEOPLE 840767 FEELING THERMOMETER - LABOR UNIONS 840768 FEELING THERMOMETER - POOR PEOPLE 840769 FEELING THERMOMETER - WHITES 840770 FEELING THERMOMETER - LIBERALS 840771 FEELING THERMOMETER - OLDER PEOPLE 840772 FEELING THERMOMETER - EVANGELICAL/MORAL MAJORITY 840773 FEELING THERMOMETER - BIG BUSINESS 840774 FEELING THERMOMETER - CATHOLICS 840775 FEELING THERMOMETER - BLACK MILITANTS 840776 FEELING THERMOMETER - THE U.S. SUPREME COURT 840777 FEELING THERMOMETER - PEOPLE ON WELFARE 840778 FEELING THERMOMETER - GAYS/LESBIANS 840779 FEELING THERMOMETER - CIVIL RIGHTS LEADERS 840780 FEELING THERMOMETER - ANTI-ABORTIONISTS 840781 FEELING THERMOMETER - THE MILITARY 840782 FEELING THERMOMETER - WOMEN'S LIBERATION MOVEMENT VOTING SECTION: VOTERS 840783 DID R VOTE IN 1984 ELECTION 840784 IS R REGISTERED DEMOCRAT/REPUBLICAN/OTHER 840785 IS R REGISTERED TO VOTE AT CURRENT ADDRESS 840786 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: IS R REGISTERED TO VOTE IN STATE 840787 DID R VOTE FOR PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE IN 1984 ELECTION 840788 WHO DID R VOTE FOR IN 1984 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 840789 WAS R'S PREFERENCE STRONG FOR THIS PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE 840790 WHEN DID R REACH VOTE DECISION 840791 DID R VOTE FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CANDIDATE 840792 FOR WHICH HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CANDIDATE DID R VOTE 840793 R'S VOTE FOR H.R. CANDIDATE - PARTY 840794 WAS R'S PREFERENCE STRONG FOR H.R. CANDIDATE 840795 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT - WAS THERE A SENATE RACE IN R'S STATE 840796 DID R VOTE FOR A SENATE CANDIDATE 840797 FOR WHOM DID R VOTE FOR SENATE 840798 R'S VOTE FOR SENATE CANDIDATE - PARTY 840799 DID R VOTE A STRAIGHT PARTY TICKET FOR STATE OFFICES 840800 IF R VOTED A STRAIGHT TICKET, WHICH PARTY DID R VOTE 840801 (IF SPLIT TICKET) PARTY FAVORED IN STATE/LOCAL RACES VOTING SECTION: NON-VOTERS 840802 WAS R REGISTERED TO VOTE IN THIS ELECTION 840803 WAS R REGISTERED AS REPUBLICAN/DEMOCRAT/INDEPENDENT 840804 IS R REGISTERED TO VOTE AT CURRENT ADDRESS 840805 DID R PREFER ONE CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT 840806 WHOM DID R PREFER FOR PRESIDENT 840807 HOW STRONG WAS R'S PREFERENCE FOR PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE 840808 DID R PREFER A CANDIDATE FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 840809 WHICH HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CANDIDATE DID R PREFER 840810 PARTY OF HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CANDIDATE PREFERRED BY R 840811 WAS R'S PREFERENCE STRONG FOR H.R. CANDIDATE PARTY CONTACTS WITH R DURING THE CAMPAIGN 840812 DID A POLITICAL PARTY WORKER CONTACT R DURING CAMPAIGN 840813 WHICH PARTY(S) CONTACTED R DURING CAMPAIGN 840814 DID ANYONE ELSE CONTACT R DURING CAMPAIGN 840815 WAS THIS CONTACT FROM CANDIDATE'S ORGANIZATION/SOMEONE ELSE 840816 WHICH CANDIDATE DID THE CONTACT SUPPORT - 1ST MENTION 840817 WHICH CANDIDATE DID THE CONTACT SUPPORT - 2ND MENTION R'S POLITICAL ACTIVITIES 840818 DID R TRY TO INFLUENCE OTHERS' VOTE CHOICES 840819 DID R WEAR A BUTTON OR PUT A STICKER ON THE CAR 840820 DID ANYONE ELSE TRY INFLUENCING R TO WORK FOR CANDIDATE 840821 DID R ATTEND ANY POLITICAL MEETINGS OR RALLIES 840822 DID R GIVE MONEY TO CANDIDATE AFTER POLITICAL MEETING 840823 DID R WORK FOR PARTY OR CANDIDATE 840824 DID R USE $1 POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION OPTION ON FEDERAL INCOME TAX RETURN R'S CONTRIBUTION TO POLITICAL PARTIES 840825 DID R CONTRIBUTE MONEY TO A POLITICAL PARTY/ISSUE/CANDIDATE 840826 DID R GIVE MONEY TO SPECIFIC POLITICAL PARTY 840827 WHICH PARTY DID R GIVE MONEY TO 840828 DID R GIVE MONEY TO SPECIFIC CANDIDATE 840829 R GAVE MONEY TO CANDIDATE FROM WHICH PARTY 840830 DID R GIVE MONEY FOR LOCAL OR STATE BALLOT ISSUE 840831 DID R GIVE MONEY TO POLITICAL ACTION/ISSUE GROUPS 840832 DID R RECEIVE REQUESTS THROUGH MAIL FOR POLITICAL CONTRIBUTION 840833 HOW MANY MAIL REQUESTS DID R GET 840834 DID R CONTRIBUTE MONEY BECAUSE OF MAIL REQUESTS 840835 DID R RECEIVE PHONE REQUEST FOR POL CONTRIBUTIONS 840836 HOW MANY PHONE REQUESTS DID R RECEIVE 840837 DID R GIVE MONEY BECAUSE OF PHONE REQUESTS 840838 DID R RECEIVE PERSONAL REQUEST FOR POL CONTRIBUTION 840839 HOW MANY PERSONAL REQUESTS DID R RECEIVE 840840 DID R GIVE MONEY BECAUSE OF PERSONAL REQUESTS 840841 WAS R CONTACTED ABOUT REGISTERING OR VOTING 840842 IN LAST 6 MONTHS DID R JOIN ORGANIZATION TO SOLVE NATIONAL PROBLEM R'S EVALUATION OF CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENT 840843 DOES R APPROVE OF HOW CONGRESS IS HANDLING ITS JOB 840844 HOW STRONGLY DOES R APPROVE/DISAPPROVE OF HOW CONGRESS IS HANDLING ITS JOB 840845 DOES R APPROVE OF HOW REAGAN IS HANDLING HIS JOB 840846 HOW STRONGLY DOES R APPROVE/DISAPPROVE OF HOW REAGAN IS HANDLING HIS JOB 840847 DOES R APPROVE OF REAGAN'S HANDLING OF BALANCED BUDGET 840848 HOW STRONGLY DOES R APPROVE/DISAPPROVE OF REAGAN'S HANDLING OF BALANCED BUDGET R'S FEELINGS ABOUT CANDIDATES 840849 DOES REAGAN MAKE R FEEL ANGRY 840850 DOES REAGAN MAKE R FEEL HOPEFUL 840851 DOES REAGAN MAKE R FEEL AFRAID 840852 DOES REAGAN MAKE R FEEL PROUD 840853 DOES REAGAN MAKE R FEEL DISGUSTED 840854 DOES REAGAN MAKE R FEEL SYMPATHETIC TOWARD HIM 840855 DOES REAGAN MAKE R FEEL UNEASY 840856 DOES MONDALE MAKE R FEEL ANGRY 840857 DOES MONDALE MAKE R FEEL HOPEFUL 840858 DOES MONDALE MAKE R FEEL AFRAID 840859 DOES MONDALE MAKE R FEEL PROUD 840860 DOES MONDALE MAKE R FEEL DISGUSTED 840861 DOES MONDALE MAKE R FEEL SYMPATHETIC TOWARD HIM 840862 DOES MONDALE MAKE R FEEL UNEASY R'S PARTY IDENTIFICATION 840863 IS R REPUBLICAN, DEMOCRAT OR INDEPENDENT 840864 IS R A STRONG REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT 840865 R THINK OF SELF AS CLOSER REPUBLICAN/DEMOCRATIC PARTY 840866 SUMMARY - R'S PARTY IDENTIFICATION PARTY DIFFERENCES 840867 DOES R SEE IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE PARTIES 840868 IMPORTANT PARTY DIFFERENCES: PARTY REFERENCE - FIRST MENTION 840869 PARTY DIFFERENCE CONTENT - FIRST MENTION 840870 IMPORTANT PARTY DIFFERENCES: PARTY REFERENCE - SECOND MENTION 840871 PARTY DIFFERENCE CONTENT - SECOND MENTION 840872 IMPORTANT PARTY DIFFERENCES: PARTY REFERENCE - THIRD MENTION 840873 PARTY DIFFERENCE CONTENT - THIRD MENTION 840874 DOES R THINK ONE PARTY MORE CONSERVATIVE AT NATIONAL LEVEL 840875 WHICH PARTY IS MORE CONSERVATIVE QUALITIES DESCRIBING CANDIDATE - REAGAN 840876 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "HARD-WORKING" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840877 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "DECENT" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840878 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "COMPASSIONATE" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840879 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "COMMANDS RESPECT" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840880 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "INTELLIGENT" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840881 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "MORAL" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840882 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "KIND" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840883 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "INSPIRING" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840884 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "KNOWLEDGEABLE" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840885 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "SETS A GOOD EXAMPLE" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840886 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840887 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "PROVIDES STRONG LEADERSHIP" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840888 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "UNDERSTANDS PEOPLE LIKE YOU" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840889 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "FAIR" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840890 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "IN TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN 840891 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "RELIGIOUS" DESCRIBES RONALD REAGAN QUALITIES DESCRIBING CANDIDATE - MONDALE 840892 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "HARD-WORKING" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840893 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "DECENT" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840894 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "COMPASSIONATE" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840895 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "COMMANDS RESPECT" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840896 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "INTELLIGENT" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840897 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "MORAL" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840898 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "KIND" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840899 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "INSPIRING" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840900 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "KNOWLEDGEABLE" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840901 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "SETS A GOOD EXAMPLE" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840902 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "CARES ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840903 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "STRONG LEADERSHIP" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840904 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "UNDERSTANDS PEOPLE LIKE YOU" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840905 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "FAIR" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840906 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE PHRASE "IN TOUCH WITH ORDINARY PEOPLE" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE 840907 HOW WELL DOES R FEEL THE WORD "RELIGIOUS" DESCRIBES WALTER MONDALE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CAMPAIGN 840908 IS THERE ANYTHING R LIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 840909 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE - FIRST MENTION 840910 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE - SECOND MENTION 840911 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE - THIRD MENTION 840912 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE - FOURTH MENTION 840913 IS THERE ANYTHING R DISLIKES ABOUT DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 840914 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE - FIRST MENTION 840915 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE - SECOND MENTION 840916 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE - THIRD MENTION 840917 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE - FOURTH MENTION 840918 IS THERE ANYTHING R LIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 840919 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE - FIRST MENTION 840920 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE - SECOND MENTION 840921 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE - THIRD MENTION 840922 WHAT R LIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE - FOURTH MENTION 840923 IS THERE ANYTHING R DISLIKES ABOUT REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE FOR HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 840924 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE - FIRST MENTION 840925 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE - SECOND MENTION 840926 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE - THIRD MENTION 840927 WHAT R DISLIKES ABOUT U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE - FOURTH MENTION 840928 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: TYPE OF RACE 840929 ONE HOUSE CANDIDATE RUNNING: WAS CANDIDATE ALREADY IN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 840930 ONE HOUSE CANDIDATE RUNNING: CANDIDATE NUMBER CODE 840931 ONE HOUSE CANDIDATE RUNNING: PARTY OF HOUSE CANDIDATE 840932 TWO HOUSE CANDIDATES RUNNING: WAS EITHER CANDIDATE ALREADY IN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 840933 TWO HOUSE CANDIDATES RUNNING: WHICH CANDIDATE WAS ALREADY IN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 840934 TWO HOUSE CANDIDATES RUNNING: PARTY OF CANDIDATE ALREADY IN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 840935 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: TYPE OF RACE CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT 840936 DID R HAVE ANY CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT 840937 DID R MEET HOUSE INCUMBENT PERSONALLY 840938 DID R ATTEND MEETING/GATHERING WHERE U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT SPOKE 840939 DID R TALK WITH U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT'S STAFF/OFFICE 840940 DID R RECEIVE SOMETHING IN MAIL FROM U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT 840941 DID R READ ABOUT U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT IN NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE 840942 DID R HEAR U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT ON RADIO 840943 DID R SEE U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT ON TELEVISION 840944 R HAD CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT IN OTHER WAYS 840945 DOES R KNOW ANYONE ELSE WHO HAD CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE - DISTRICTS WITH RUNNING INCUMBENT 840946 DID R HAVE ANY CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE 840947 DID R MEET U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE PERSONALLY 840948 DID R ATTEND MEETING/GATHERING WHERE U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE SPOKE 840949 DID R TALK WITH U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE STAFF/OFFICE 840950 DID R RECEIVE SOMETHING IN MAIL FROM U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE 840951 DID R READ ABOUT U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE IN NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE 840952 DID R HEAR U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE ON RADIO 840953 DID R SEE U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE ON TELEVISION 840954 R HAD CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE IN OTHER WAYS 840955 DOES R KNOW ANYONE ELSE WHO HAD CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATE NON-CAMPAIGN CONTACTS WITH U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT 840956 DID R OR FAMILY MEMBER EVER CONTACT U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT/OFFICE 840957 REASON FOR CONTACT WITH HOUSE INCUMBENT - TO EXPRESS OPINION 840958 REASON FOR CONTACT WITH HOUSE INCUMBENT - TO SEEK INFORMATION 840959 REASON FOR CONTACT WITH HOUSE INCUMBENT - TO SEEK HELP WITH PROBLEM 840960 DID R GET RESPONSE FROM HOUSE INCUMBENT/OFFICE 840961 HOW SATISFIED WAS R WITH RESPONSE FROM INCUMBENT 840962 DOES R KNOW ANYONE ELSE WHO HAD CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE INCUMBENT 840963 DID PERSON/GROUP GET RESPONSE FROM HOUSE INCUMBENT/ OFFICE 840964 HOW SATISFIED WAS PERSON/GROUP WITH RESPONSE FROM INCUMBENT 840965 HOW HELPFUL WOULD HOUSE INCUMBENT BE WITH ANOTHER PROBLEM 840966 ANYTHING SPECIAL DONE BY HOUSE INCUMBENT FOR DISTRICT/PEOPLE 840967 R APPROVE/DISAPPROVE OF INCUMBENT'S HANDLING OF JOB CONTACTS WITH U.S. HOUSE CANDIDATES - DISTRICTS WITH NO INCUMBENT REPRESENTATIVE 840968 DID R HAVE ANY CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE 840969 DID R MEET U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE PERSONALLY 840970 DID R ATTEND MEETING/GATHERING WHERE U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE SPOKE 840971 DID R TALK WITH U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE STAFF/OFFICE 840972 DID R RECEIVE SOMETHING IN MAIL FROM U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE 840973 DID R READ ABOUT U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE 840974 DID R HEAR U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE ON RADIO 840975 DID R SEE U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE ON TELEVISION 840976 R HAD CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE IN OTHER WAYS 840977 DOES R KNOW ANYONE ELSE WHO HAD CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE 840978 DID R HAVE ANY CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE 840979 DID R MEET U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE PERSONALLY 840980 DID R ATTEND MEETING/GATHERING WHERE U.S. REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE SPOKE 840981 DID R TALK WITH U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE STAFF/OFFICE 840982 DID R RECEIVE SOMETHING IN MAIL FROM U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE 840983 DID R READ ABOUT U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN NEWSPAPER/MAGAZINE 840984 DID R HEAR U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE ON RADIO 840985 DID R SEE U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE ON TELEVISION 840986 R HAD CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IN OTHER WAYS 840987 DOES R KNOW ANYONE ELSE WHO HAD CONTACT WITH U.S. HOUSE REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEMS 840988 HOW OFTEN DOES R FOLLOW GOVERNMENT/PUBLIC AFFAIRS 840989 WHAT IS MOST IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM - 1ST RESPONSE 840990 WHAT IS MOST IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM - 2ND RESPONSE 840991 WHAT IS MOST IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM - 3RD RESPONSE 840992 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT: HAS R MENTIONED ANY PROBLEMS 840993 WHAT IS THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT NATIONAL PROBLEM 840994 HOW GOOD A JOB IS GOVERNMENT DOING WITH THIS PROBLEM 840995 WHICH PARTY WOULD GET GOVERNMENT TO DEAL WITH PROBLEM POSITIONS ON FEDERAL SPENDING 840996 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING FOR IMPROVING AND PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT 840997 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON DEALING WITH CRIME 840998 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON PUBLIC SCHOOLS 840999 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON SOCIAL SECURITY 841000 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON FOOD STAMPS 841001 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON MEDICARE 841002 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON GOVERNMENT JOBS FOR THE UNEMPLOYED 841003 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 841004 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON DEFENSE 841005 R'S OPINION OF FEDERAL SPENDING ON ASSISTANCE TO BLACKS KNOWLEDGE OF CONGRESSIONAL PARTY MEMBERSHIP 841006 DOES R KNOW WHICH PARTY HAD MOST MEMBERS IN U.S. HOUSE BEFORE ELECTION 841007 DOES R KNOW, AS A RESULT OF THE ELECTION, WHICH PARTY WILL NOW HAVE THE MOST MEMBERS IN U.S. HOUSE 841008 DOES R KNOW WHAT PARTY HAD MOST MEMBERS IN SENATE BEFORE ELECTION 841009 DOES R KNOW, AS A RESULT OF THE ELECTION, WHICH PARTY WILL NOW HAVE THE MOST MEMBERS IN THE U.S. SENATE R'S VIEW OF SELF/OTHERS AS LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE 841010 DOES R CONSIDER SELF A LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE/MODERATE 841011 DOES R CONSIDER SELF A STRONG OR NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL OR CONSERVATIVE 841012 DOES R CONSIDER SELF MORE LIKE A LIBERAL OR MORE LIKE A CONSERVATIVE 841013 LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE SUMMARY: R 841014 DOES R THINK RONALD REAGAN IS A LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE/ MODERATE 841015 DOES R THINK RONALD REAGAN IS A STRONG OR NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL OR CONSERVATIVE 841016 DOES R THINK RONALD REAGAN IS MORE LIKE A LIBERAL OR MORE LIKE A CONSERVATIVE 841017 LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE SUMMARY: REAGAN 841018 DOES R THINK WALTER MONDALE IS A LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE/ MODERATE 841019 DOES R THINK WALTER MONDALE IS A STRONG OR NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL OR CONSERVATIVE 841020 DOES R THINK WALTER MONDALE IS MORE LIKE A LIBERAL OR MORE LIKE A CONSERVATIVE 841021 LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE SUMMARY: MONDALE 841022 WHAT R MEANS BY LIBERAL - FIRST MENTION 841023 WHAT R MEANS BY LIBERAL - SECOND MENTION 841024 WHAT R MEANS BY LIBERAL - THIRD MENTION 841025 WHAT R MEANS BY CONSERVATIVE - FIRST MENTION 841026 WHAT R MEANS BY CONSERVATIVE - SECOND MENTION 841027 WHAT R MEANS BY CONSERVATIVE - THIRD MENTION POSITIONS ON GOVT SERVICES/SPENDING SCALE 841028 GOVERNMENT SERVICES/SPENDING SCALE - R 841029 GOVERNMENT SERVICES/SPENDING SCALE - REAGAN 841030 GOVERNMENT SERVICES/SPENDING SCALE - MONDALE 841031 GOVERNMENT SERVICES/SPENDING SCALE - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 841032 GOVERNMENT SERVICES/SPENDING SCALE - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 841033 GOVERNMENT SERVICES/SPENDING SCALE - INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE 841034 GOVERNMENT SERVICES/SPENDING SCALE - LIBERALS 841035 GOVERNMENT SERVICES/SPENDING SCALE - CONSERVATIVES 841036 HOW IMPORTANT IS IT TO R FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO DO WHAT R THINKS IS BEST ON SPENDING AND SERVICES POSITION ON PRAYER IN SCHOOL 841037 DOES R HAVE OPINION ON PRAYER IN SCHOOL 841038 R'S OPINION ON PRAYER IN SCHOOL POSITIONS ON INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE 841039 U.S. INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE - R 841040 U.S. INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE - REAGAN 841041 U.S. INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE - MONDALE 841042 U.S. INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 841043 U.S. INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 841044 U.S. INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE-INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE 841045 U.S. INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE - LIBERALS 841046 U.S. INVOLVEMENT IN CENTRAL AMERICA SCALE - CONSERVATIVES 841047 HOW IMPORTANT IS IT TO R FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO DO WHAT R THINKS IS BEST IN CENTRAL AMERICA POSITIONS ON GOVT GUARANTEED LIVING/JOB SCALE 841048 GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE - R 841049 GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE - REAGAN 841050 GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE - MONDALE 841051 GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE - DEMOCRATIC HOUSE CANDIDATE 841052 GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE - REPUBLICAN HOUSE CANDIDATE 841053 GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE - INDEPENDENT HOUSE CANDIDATE 841054 GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE - LIBERALS 841055 GUARANTEED JOB AND LIVING STANDARD SCALE - CONSERVATIVES 841056 HOW IMPORTANT IS IT TO R FOR GOVERNMENT TO DO WHAT R THINKS IS BEST ON GUARANTEED JOB/LIVING STANDARD ISSUE POSITION ON ISOLATIONIST STANCE OF U.S. 841057 DOES R THINK U.S. SHOULD BE ISOLATIONIST GOVERNMENT FUNDED MEDICAL INSURANCE SCALE 841058 GOVERNMENT FUNDED MEDICAL INSURANCE SCALE - R POSITIONS ON POWER OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 841059 DOES R HAVE AN OPINION ON FEDERAL GOVERNMENT POWER 841060 DOES R THINK FEDERAL GOVERNMENT (IS/ISN'T) GETTING TOO POWERFUL 841061 DOES R THINK FEDERAL GOVERNMENT (SHOULD/SHOULDN'T) BECOME MORE POWERFUL 841062 PARTY R THINKS FAVORS POWERFUL GOVERNMENT 841063 DOES R THINK GOVERNMENT WASTES THE MONEY WE PAY IN TAXES 841064 HOW MUCH OF THE TIME DOES R FEEL HE/SHE CAN TRUST THE GOVERNMENT 841065 DOES R THINK GOVERNMENT IS RUN BY A FEW BIG INTERESTS OR FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL THE PEOPLE 841066 DOES R THINK PEOPLE IN GOVERNMENT ARE CROOKED 841067 DOES R THINK ELECTIONS MAKE GOVERNMENT RESPONSIVE 841068 DOES R THINK GOVERNMENT PAYS ATTENTION TO R 841069 DOES R THINK ONLY THOSE WHO CARE ABOUT THE OUTCOME SHOULD VOTE 841070 DO PEOPLE LIKE R HAVE ANY SAY IN WHAT GOVERNMENT DOES 841071 DO PUBLIC OFFICIALS CARE WHAT PEOPLE LIKE R THINK 841072 DOES R THINK POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT ARE TOO COMPLICATED FOR PEOPLE LIKE HIM/HER TO UNDERSTAND CIVIL RIGHTS POSITION 841073 DOES R THINK CIVIL RIGHTS IS BEING PUSHED TOO FAST 841074 BUSING SCALE - R 841075 R'S OPINION ON CHANGE IN POSITION OF BLACKS NATIONAL GOAL 841076 NATIONAL GOAL - FIRST CHOICE 841077 NATIONAL GOAL - SECOND CHOICE POSITION ON RELIGIOUS MATTERS 841078 IS RELIGION IMPORTANT TO R 841079 DOES RELIGION PROVIDE GUIDANCE TO R 841080 IS R BORN AGAIN 841081 R'S OPINION ON THE BIBLE R'S IDENTIFICATION WITH GROUPS IN SOCIETY 841082 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO POOR PEOPLE 841083 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO LIBERALS 841084 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO SOUTHERNERS 841085 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO HISPANICS 841086 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO THE ELDERLY 841087 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO BLACKS 841088 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO LABOR UNIONS 841089 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO FEMINISTS 841090 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO MEN 841091 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO ENVIRONMENTALISTS 841092 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO BUSINESSMEN/BUSINESSWOMEN 841093 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO YOUNG PEOPLE 841094 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO CONSERVATIVES 841095 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO WOMEN 841096 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO WORKINGMEN/WORKINGWOMEN 841097 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO FARMERS 841098 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO WHITES 841099 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO EVANGELICAL GROUPS 841100 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO MIDDLE-CLASS PEOPLE 841101 INTERVIEWER CHECKPOINT - GROUPS D/NOT MENTIONE MENTIONED 841102 WHICH GROUP R FEELS CLOSEST TO 841103 DOES R BELONG TO ANY ORGANIZATIONS OF CLOSEST GROUP PERSONAL INFORMATION 841104 R'S RACE 841105 IS R OF HISPANIC ORIGIN 841106 R'S SEX 841107 R'S RACE 841108 IS R OF HISPANIC ORIGIN 841109 RELATIONSHIP OF R TO HEAD OF FAMILY CONDITIONS OF INTERVIEW 841110 WHO ELSE WAS PRESENT AT THE INTERVIEW 841111 DEGREE OF R'S COOPERATION WITH INTERVIEW 841112 R'S APPARENT LEVEL OF POLITICAL INFORMATION 841113 RATING OF R'S APPARENT INTELLIGENCE 841114 HOW SUSPICIOUS WAS R ABOUT THE STUDY BEFOREHAND 841115 HOW GREAT WAS R'S INTEREST IN THE INTERVIEW 841116 HOW SINCERE WAS R WITH ANSWERS 841117 WAS THE INTERVIEW CONDUCTED IN ENGLISH 841118 IN WHAT LANGUAGE WAS THE INTERVIEW CONDUCTED INDIVIDUAL VOTER RECORD VALIDATION SECTION 841119 R'S INDIVIDUAL VOTER RECORD VALIDATION ID 841120 OFFICE CODE FOR INDIVIDUAL VOTER RECORD VALIDATION 841121 SUMMARY: R IS REGISTERED OR NOT REGISTERED TO VOTE 841122 DOES R'S NAME MATCH EXACTLY THE NAME IN THE REGISTRATION RECORD 841123 DOES R'S ADDRESS MATCH EXACTLY THE ADDRESS IN THE REGISTRATION RECORD 841124 R'S CITY/TOWN/TOWNSHIP IN REGISTRATION RECORD 841125 IS REGISTRATION RECORD ADDRESS DIFFERENT FROM R'S ADDRESS ON THIS FORM 841126 ACCORDING TO REGISTRATION RECORD, MONTH OF R'S BIRTH 841127 ACCORDING TO REGISTRATION RECORD, YEAR OF R'S BIRTH 841128 REGISTRATION RECORD INDICATES R REGISTERED WITH WHICH POLITICAL PARTY 841129 WAS INTERVIEWER ABLE TO GAIN ACCESS TO RECORDS TO DETERMINE WHETHER R VOTED IN NOV ELECTION 841130 DID R VOTE IN NOV. 6, 1984 GENERAL ELECTION 841131 INFORMATION ABOUT OTHERS REGISTERED AT R'S ADDRESS 841132 VOTE VALIDATION SUMMARY 841133 VOTE TURNOUT FOR RESPONDENTS PARTICIPATING IN BOTH PRE- AND POST-ELECTION SURVEYS ONLY 841134 VOTE TURNOUT FOR ENTIRE SAMPLE 841135 IMPORTANCE OF ADDRESS IN LOCATING R'S RECORD 841136 TOTAL SOCIOECONOMIC INDEX (TSEI) SCORE OF R'S CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 841137 MALE SOCIOECONOMIC INDEX (MSEI) SCORE OF R'S CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 841138 TOTAL SOCIOECONOMIC INDEX (TSEI) SCORE OF HEAD'S CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 841139 MALE SOCIOECONOMIC INDEX (MSEI) SCORE OF HEAD'S CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 841140 TOTAL SOCIOECONOMIC INDEX (TSEI) SCORE OF SPOUSE'S CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE 841141 MALE SOCIOECONOMIC INDEX (MSEI) SCORE OF SPOUSE'S CENSUS OCCUPATION CODE